HARROW, INC.

Current report

Sales of our products depend on the availability and extent of coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors, including government healthcare programs and private insurance plans. Payors continue to implement measures to manage utilization and contain costs, including step edits, prior authorization, formulary restrictions, increased patient cost sharing, and reimbursement rate reductions. These actions may reduce the number of patients for whom our products are reimbursed, delay or restrict patient access, and limit our ability to increase prices or maintain pricing levels, any of which could adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

Current report

In the United States, legislative and regulatory actions continue to focus on reducing drug costs, including measures affecting Medicare reimbursement and manufacturer financial obligations. In addition, policymakers and CMS have advanced proposals that would reference prices in other economically comparable countries in determining Medicare beneficiary cost-sharing and/or additional manufacturer rebate obligations, sometimes described as “most-favored-nation” or international reference pricing policies. CMS has proposed mandatory demonstration models, including GLOBE for Medicare Part B and GUARD for Medicare Part D, that would assess additional manufacturer rebates based on international benchmarks for certain therapeutic categories that include ophthalmology or ophthalmic agents. Because certain of our ophthalmic products are reimbursed under Medicare Part B, and we may develop or acquire additional products reimbursed by government programs, these and similar initiatives could be particularly relevant to our business. Moreover, because we do not own global rights to many of the products we market in the United States and generally do not control commercialization or pricing outside the United States for those products, we may have limited or no ability to affect non-U.S. pricing that could be used as a benchmark under most-favored-nation or international reference pricing initiatives, which could increase our exposure to such policies.

Current report

Our reported revenues also depend on significant estimates of variable consideration, including estimates for government rebates, commercial rebates, chargebacks, wholesaler fees, distribution service fees, returns, administrative fees, patient assistance programs, and other gross-to-net revenue deductions. These estimates require judgment and are based on available information regarding contractual terms, channel inventory, product utilization, payor mix, wholesaler and distributor data, government program requirements, and historical and expected claims activity. Actual deductions may differ from our estimates, and we may be required to adjust revenues in future periods as new information becomes available or as claims are submitted, reconciled, disputed, validated, settled, or otherwise resolved.

Current report

From time to time, we may receive rebate claims, chargebacks, fee-for-service deductions, invoices, or other claims from government agencies, wholesalers, distributors, customers, former product owners, or other third parties that we believe are unsupported, overstated, duplicative, attributable to another party or product, or otherwise inconsistent with applicable contracts, statutes, regulations, or program requirements. The resolution of these matters may require significant management judgment, data reconciliation, legal analysis, and interaction with third parties, and may involve uncertainty regarding matters such as product attribution, labeler codes, utilization data, 340B exclusions, Medicaid and Medicare program rules, wholesaler deduction timing, and other assumptions. If our estimates are inaccurate, if disputed amounts are ultimately resolved adversely to us, or if we are unable to obtain credits, offsets, refunds, recoupments, or other recoveries for amounts we believe were improperly claimed or deducted, our revenues, gross margins, cash flows, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Current report

We cannot predict the scope, timing, or ultimate impact of these or other policy, payor, reimbursement, pricing, or gross-to-net developments. If such developments decrease coverage or reimbursement, increase rebates or other price concessions, limit utilization, or result in revenue adjustments that differ materially from our estimates, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

Current report

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Current report

None.

Current report

During the three months ended March 31, 2026, we did not repurchase any shares of common stock as part of a publicly announced repurchase program or otherwise.

Current report

Dividends

Current report

We have not paid any dividends on our common stock since our inception and do not expect to pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Previous report

Disruptions at the FDA, CMS, the SEC, and other government agencies resulting from the U.S. government shutdown and reported staffing reductions could adversely affect our operations, regulatory interactions, and access to capital.

Previous report

A prolonged or repeated shutdown of the U.S. federal government, or other significant disruptions to the operations of federal agencies, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The U.S. government shutdown that began on October 1, 2025 has caused many federal agencies to scale back operations and furlough portions of their workforce. Certain agencies that are important to our business, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) and its operating divisions such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) and the FDA, and the SEC, may experience resource constraints or temporary delays in certain activities as a result of the shutdown or related funding limitations. Any such disruptions could delay the FDA’s review and processing of submissions, the CMS’s issuance of reimbursement guidance, or the SEC’s review of our filings, which could in turn affect our ability to develop, market, and sell our products or raise capital in a timely manner.

Previous report

In addition, reports of staffing and budget reductions at HHS and its agencies earlier in 2025 have created further uncertainty regarding the federal government’s capacity to carry out regulatory and policy functions. In March 2025, the Secretary of HHS announced a departmental reorganization and reduction-in-force initiative that included workforce adjustments at the FDA and other HHS components. Although the precise scope and timing of these changes remain uncertain, further reductions in agency staffing or funding could limit the government’s ability to provide timely guidance, review regulatory submissions, or issue reimbursement decisions. Similarly, proposed future budget constraints for HHS could affect CMS’s ability to update coverage and payment policies, which may influence healthcare providers’ adoption of our products.

Previous report

Significant changes to the operations, priorities, or funding of these agencies—whether resulting from shutdowns, staffing reductions, or shifting policy directives—could cause additional delays or disruptions. If the FDA, CMS, or other agencies are unable to maintain adequate staffing or operational continuity, it could result in increased regulatory uncertainty, slower review and approval timelines, or reimbursement decisions that negatively affect utilization of our products by healthcare providers.

Previous report

In addition, continued or future government shutdowns or funding freezes could negatively affect broader economic conditions, including volatility in the capital markets and reduced liquidity, which could make it more difficult for us to access capital or maintain adequate financing for our operations. If these disruptions persist or worsen, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and ability to execute our strategic plans could be materially and adversely affected.

Previous report

We sell our proprietary formulations primarily through pharmaceutical compounding facilities we own, and our results of operations may be negatively impacted if such facilities do not comply with regulatory requirements or lose their licenses.

Previous report

We currently have two Imprimis compounding facilities in New Jersey. We have developed “ImprimisRx” as a uniform brand for our compounding pharmaceutical business. As we have in the past purchased and operated certain pharmaceutical compounding businesses and pharmacies and subsequently divested or sold those associated assets, we may pursue similar strategies in the future. Those things considered, we may experience difficulties implementing and/or executing on our compounding pharmacy strategy, including difficulties that arise as a result of our lack of experience, and we may be unsuccessful and our plans may change materially. For instance:

Previous report

Our ImprimisRx subsidiary completed an in-person meeting with the FDA in October 2025 regarding its efforts to remediate certain deficiencies at its New Jersey site. At the FDA meeting, ImprimisRx presented, among other data, its safety record, which includes an adverse event (ADE) rate of approximately 2 per million units, which is meaningfully better than known ADE rates for FDA-approved products. FDA ultimately decided to allow ImprimisRx to continue with its remediation efforts on a voluntary basis. Additionally, Imprimis is currently subject to an administrative accusation by the California State Board of Pharmacy relating to certain alleged regulatory compliance matters. ImprimisRx is actively engaged in discussions with the California Board of Pharmacy regarding a resolution to the administrative action and the potential denial of ImprimisRx’s 503B out-of-state outsourcing facility renewal application. Although the loss of the California nonresident outsourcing facility pharmacy license would restrict sales and dispensing of our compounded products in that state and would reduce revenues from the affected state, we believe that, based on our current concentration of sales and geographic diversification, such loss would not be material to our consolidated statement of operations. Nevertheless, if additional states were to take similar actions, or if broader or longer-term restrictions were imposed, the cumulative effect could be material***.***

Previous report

Moreover, all our efforts to expand pharmacy operations will involve significant costs and other resources, which we may not be able to afford and may disrupt our other operations and distract management and employees from the other aspects of our business. As a result, our business could materially suffer if we are unable to further develop a group of unified compounding facilities and, even if we are successful, we may be unable to generate sufficient revenue to recover our costs.

Previous report

The federal government could pursue enforcement actions against us to the extent we are unable to demonstrate compliance with cGMPs and other required regulations, the effects of which could be costly to us and could result in adverse consequences to our business.

Previous report

In August 2017, the FDA issued a MedWatch notification regarding a curcumin emulsion and two adverse events that had been associated with the use of these emulsions by prescribing physicians. We issued a press release on August 7, 2017, clarifying certain facts regarding the notice which outlined our belief that the adverse events associated with the two patients occurred due to an allergic reaction caused by the products being inappropriately administered and obtained by the prescribing physician, and our use of curcumin and excipients in our curcumin emulsion formulation met regulatory standards required for dispensing of the curcumin emulsion. In September 2017, the FDA released a letter confirming that the alleged misuse of certain ingredients in our curcumin emulsions was due to mislabeling by the underlying supplier and not of our own misdoing. We no longer compound curcumin emulsion products. Separately, in December 2017, we were issued a warning letter from the FDA alleging that, in its interpretation of our public communications, we had made false or misleading claims and omitted risk and side effect information regarding certain of our ophthalmology-focused compounded medications. We immediately performed a full review of our public communications referenced in the warning letter and responded to the FDA in January 2018; notwithstanding our continued belief that our public communications were not, in fact, false and misleading, we remained in communication with the FDA and took steps to address the items outlined in the FDA letter. The Company received another warning letter from the FDA in June 2022 related to our alleged marketing activities. We immediately responded to the warning letter and the FDA sent the Company notice in January 2023 that our corrective actions appear adequate. In June 2019, our New Jersey-based outsourcing facility (“NJOF”) was issued a warning letter related to an April 2017 inspection and our use of certain active pharmaceutical ingredients in our compounded medications. During September 2020 through January 2021, our New Jersey based outsourcing facility was inspected by the FDA (the “2020 Inspection”) and certain observations were made by the FDA in a Form 483. Five observations made during the 2020 Inspection were considered repeat observations from a 2017 FDA inspection. In addition, during the 2020 inspection, the FDA noted that we were compounding drugs for which there is no change that produces a clinical difference for an individual patient, as determined by a prescribing practitioner between a compounded drug and the comparable approved drug. We have responded to the FDA regarding all of their observations from the 2020 Inspection, including providing documentation from prescribing clinicians that indicate a clinical difference between our compounded drugs and the comparable approved drugs, while also committing to amend our order process to collect “medical necessity/clinical difference” information…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous report

Sales of our products depend on the availability and extent of coverage and reimbursement from third-party payers, including government healthcare programs and private insurance plans. Governments and private payers continue to pursue initiatives to manage drug utilization and contain costs. Further, pressures on healthcare budgets from the economic downturn and inflation continue and are likely to increase, across the markets we serve. Payers are increasingly focused on costs, which has resulted, and is expected to continue to result, in lower reimbursement rates for our products and/or narrower patient populations for which payers will reimburse. Continued intense public scrutiny of the price of drugs and other healthcare costs, together with payer dynamics, have limited, and are likely to continue to limit, our ability to set or adjust the price of our products based on their value, which can have a material adverse effect on our business. In the United States, particularly over the past few years, a number of legislative and regulatory proposals have been introduced and/or signed into law to lower drug prices. These include provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act that enable the U.S. government to set prices for certain drugs in Medicare, redesign Medicare Part D benefits to shift a greater proportion of the costs to manufacturers and health plans and enable the U.S. government to impose penalties if drug prices are increased at a rate faster than inflation. Additional proposals focused on drug pricing continue to be debated, and additional executive orders or regulatory initiatives focused on drug pricing and competition are likely to be adopted and implemented in some form. It is unclear what policies will advance with respect to other drug pricing proposals, including international reference pricing or changes to healthcare regulations affecting pharmaceuticals. Further, state government activity has been dynamic, including certain states enacting new laws limiting drug reimbursement under state run Medicaid programs and prohibiting restrictions on 340B Program use. Such state laws could also eventually be adopted at the federal level

Previous report

We are unable to predict which or how many policy, regulatory, administrative or legislative changes may ultimately be, or effectively estimate the consequences to our business if, enacted and implemented. However, to the extent that payer actions further decrease or modify the coverage or reimbursement available for our products, require that we pay increased rebates or shift other costs to us, limit or affect our decisions regarding the pricing of or otherwise reduce the use of our products, such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Previous report

Global economic conditions may negatively affect us and may magnify certain risks that affect our business.

Previous report

Our operations and performance have been, and may continue to be, affected by global economic conditions. The economic downturn resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic precipitated a global recession, which was followed by high rates of inflation and actions taken by financial regulators to raise interest rates. Instability in the financial system, tighter lending standards and higher interest rates have added stress that may create additional vulnerabilities in the global economy, the effects of which may be of an extended duration. Additionally, with higher interest rates, deficits (including those associated with the pandemic), and other fiscal pressures, governments may be unable to sustain their previously high levels of fiscal spending. As a result of global economic conditions, some third-party payers may delay or be unable to satisfy their reimbursement obligations. Job losses or other economic hardships (including inflation) may also affect patients’ ability to afford healthcare as a result of increased co-pay or deductible obligations, greater cost sensitivity to existing co-pay or deductible obligations, lost healthcare insurance coverage or for other reasons. We believe such conditions could lead to reduced demand for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our product sales, business and results of operations. The cumulative effects of inflationary pressures, an uncertain trade environment with escalating and rapidly-changing tariffs, and the effects from the armed conflict in Ukraine (including the effects of the sanctions that were implemented in response to the conflict and the resulting impacts on the commodity market and supply chains) and the Middle East may also increase our operating expenses. Some of our operational costs, including the cost of energy, cost of goods, other materials, labor, distribution and our other operational costs are subject to market conditions and have been adversely affected by inflationary pressures. Although we monitor our distributors’, customers’ and suppliers’ financial condition and their liquidity to mitigate our business risks, some of our distributors, customers and suppliers may become insolvent, which could have a material adverse effect on our product sales, business and results of operations.

Previous report

Changes in U.S. trade policy—including the possible imposition of significant tariffs on pharmaceuticals and raw materials—could materially increase our costs, disrupt our supply chain, and impair our competitive position.

Previous report

Recent public statements by U.S. policymakers contemplate phased tariff rates of up to 150% (or more) on imported finished drugs, active pharmaceutical ingredients (“APIs”), and key excipients. Although we manufacture a significant amount of our finished ophthalmic products in the United States, we rely on third-party suppliers, many of which source APIs, sterile bottles, dropper tips, and other critical components from non-U.S. jurisdictions. If one or more rounds of tariffs are enacted, we could experience:

Previous report

While we are evaluating mitigation strategies—including dual-sourcing, qualifying U.S. or free-trade-area suppliers, and tariff-engineering options—there can be no assurance that these actions will be successful or fully offset potential cost increases. Material tariff-related cost inflation or supply disruptions could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous report

During the three months ended September 30, 2025, the Company withheld shares of common stock to satisfy employee minimum statutory tax withholding obligations payable upon the vesting of restricted stock, as follows:

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

The following risk factor amends and restates in its entirety the risk factor titled “Our sales depend on coverage and reimbursement from government and commercial third-party payors, and pricing and reimbursement pressures have affected, and are likely to continue to affect, our profitability” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.