AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co
For the period ended Jun 30, 2025. Filed Sep 18, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Sep 18, 2025
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
American Battery Technology Company:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American Battery Technology Company and subsidiaries (the Company) as of June 30, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended June 30, 2025, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended June 30, 2025, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, is generating negative cash flows from operating activities, and has an accumulated deficit that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Valuation of Held for Sale Assets
As discussed in Note 7 to the financial statements, as of June 30, 2025, the Company had a single parcel of land and building at the Fernley, Nevada location (Fernley Disposal Group) with a carrying value of $6.0 million classified as held for sale. The Company assesses the fair value of a disposal group less any costs to sell, each reporting period it remains classified as held for sale and reports any subsequent changes as an adjustment to the carrying value of the disposal group, as long as the new carrying value does not exceed the initial carrying value of the disposal group. The fair value of the assets held-for-sale is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and was determined based on indicative market listing prices of the assets. As of June 30, 2025, there were no additional impairments on the Fernley Disposal Group.
We identified the evaluation of the fair value of the Fernley Disposal Group as a critical audit matter. Subjective auditor judgment was required to evaluate the valuation methodology and certain key assumptions used to develop the fair value less cost to sell as the methodology and key assumptions used may have a significant effect on the Company’s fair value measurement. Key assumptions included the improved building value per square foot and excess land per square foot. Additionally, the evaluation of the valuation methodology and key assumptions required specialized knowledge.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We compared management’s estimate of fair value for the Fernley Disposal Group to a broker’s opinion of value obtained from the Company’s broker. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in evaluating the methodology and key assumptions used in the determination of the fair value less cost to sell of the Fernley Disposal Group, by:
| ● | evaluating whether the valuation methodology used was appropriate in the context of the Company’s financial reporting framework and business environment in which they operate |
| ● | assessing the reasonableness of the assumptions for improved building value per square foot and excess land value per square foot by comparing them with market comparable building and land transactions with similar attributes. |
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2024.
Portland, Oregon
September 18, 2025
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.