Skip to main content

SI-BONE, Inc.

For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 24, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Feb 24, 2026

SIBN$25.60+5.6%Stored close · as of Nov 9, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-K

Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-25.

0001459839-25-000036

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Current report: 10-K

Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-02-24.

0001459839-26-000036

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 376 previous paragraphs and 385 current paragraphs.

305 unchanged; 65 reworded; 11 added; 5 removed; 1 previous and 4 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (11)

Current report

The AMA develops and maintains CPT codes that are used by third-party payers to determine the amount of reimbursement that a healthcare provider and facility will receive for a particular service. The AMA CPT Editorial Panel introduced a new permanent Category 1 CPT Code, 27278, to describe minimally invasive sacroiliac fixation or fusion achieved with placement of an intra-articular implant without piercing the cortices of both the ilium and sacrum bones on either side of it. Effective January 1, 2026, the CPT Editorial Panel revised the description of CPT Code 27279, to describe both transarticular and intra-articular implants placed across or within the SI joint, which provide fixation by piercing the cortices of both the ilium and sacrum bones. While we offer products that can be used in procedures described by both CPT Codes 27278 and 27279, our newer implant types and procedures may require ongoing code interpretation by the AMA and its CPT Advisors. If more physicians elect to offer, or more patients elect to undergo, procedures described by codes that are the subject of ongoing interpretation, or if we are unable to demonstrate to physicians the comparative benefits of our products that are intended for use in those procedures, sales of our implants could decline or fail to grow, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Current report

Minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion procedures are primarily separated into two main types: procedures where devices placed either via transarticular or intra-articular approach fixate within the joint by means of “piercing” the dense outer cortical walls of the ilium and sacrum bones, and those procedures where devices or allograft implants use only an intra-articular approach and do not pierce cortical walls of both the ilium and sacrum bones. The cortical piercing transarticular and intra-articular procedures are described by CPT Code 27279, which was updated by the AMA CPT Editorial Panel effective for procedures as of January 1, 2026. The non-piercing intra-articular procedures are described by CPT Code 27278, which was adopted by the AMA CPT Editorial Panel effective for procedures as of January 1, 2024.

Current report

The current administration is pursuing policies to reduce regulations and expenditures across government agencies including at HHS, the FDA, CMS and related agencies. These actions, presently directed by executive orders or memoranda from the Office of Management and Budget, may propose policy changes that create additional uncertainty for our business. Recent actions, for example, include directing agencies to reduce agency workforce and cut programs. Additionally, the current administration recently called on Congress to enact “The Great Healthcare Plan,” to lower government subsidies to private insurance companies and increase healthcare price transparency, among other things. In June 2024, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the U.S. Supreme Court greatly reduced judicial deference to regulatory agencies, which could increase successful legal challenges to federal regulations affecting our operations. We expect that additional state, federal, and foreign healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Current report

In the EEA, some countries may, after a medical device is CE marked, require the completion of additional studies that compare the cost-effectiveness of a particular medical device candidate to currently available therapies. This Health Technology Assessment (HTA), process is the procedure according to which the assessment of the public health impact, therapeutic impact and the economic and societal impact of use of a given medical device in the national healthcare systems of the individual country is conducted. The outcome of HTA regarding specific medical devices will often influence the pricing and reimbursement status granted to these products by the competent authorities of individual EEA countries. On January 12, 2025, Regulation No 2021/2282 on Health Technology Assessment (HTA Regulation), entered into application through a phased implementation. Select high-risk medical devices came into scope in 2026. The HTA Regulation is intended to boost cooperation among EEA countries in assessing health technologies, including new medical devices. The Regulation establishes a framework for EU‑level joint clinical assessments and increased cooperation among Member States on clinical aspects of health technology evaluation. Individual EEA countries will continue to be responsible for assessing non-clinical (e.g., economic, social, ethical) aspects of health technologies, and making decisions on pricing and reimbursement. If the conclusions of these assessments are negative, or compare our products unfavorably with competing products, this may impact our pricing and reimbursement status.

Current report

As a medical device manufacturer, we collect clinical information in two settings: post market surveillance and clinical studies. We have sponsored, and may continue to sponsor, clinical studies to answer questions about safety and effectiveness of our products. Our studies have included those targeting 1) chronic SI joint dysfunction, 2) sacral fractures (i.e., fragility fractures of the pelvis), 3) SI joint pain in the setting of multilevel spine fusion, and 4) pelvic fixation during multilevel spine fusion. If surgeons’ clinical experience with our implants in standard commercial cases or clinical studies is not positive, or if our clinical studies do not show meaningful benefits to the patients undergoing the procedures using our implants for these indications, sale of our implants could be adversely impacted, which could negatively affect our operations and financial condition.

Current report

We may expend significant resources or modify our business activities (including our clinical trial activities) to try to protect against security incidents. Certain data privacy and security obligations have required us to implement and maintain specific security measures or industry-standard or reasonable security measures to protect our information technology systems and sensitive information. In addition, future or past business transactions (such as acquisitions or integrations) could expose us to additional cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities, as our systems could be negatively affected by vulnerabilities present in acquired or integrated entities’ systems and technologies. Furthermore, we may discover security issues that were not found during due diligence of such acquired or integrated entities, and it may be difficult to integrate companies into our information technology environment and security program.

Current report

• pre-market clearance and approval;

Current report

Certain states have also enacted consumer health data privacy laws or medical information privacy laws, or amended existing consumer protection laws, to further regulate the collection, use, and sharing of consumer health data and medical information. These laws further complicate compliance, and many provide a private right of action through which individuals can seek statutory damages for actual or perceived violations. We may be subject to laws governing the privacy of consumer health data, including reproductive, sexual orientation, and gender identity privacy rights. For example, Washington’s My Health My Data Act (“MHMD”) broadly defines consumer health data, places restrictions on processing consumer health data (including imposing stringent requirements for consents), provides consumers certain rights with respect to their health data, and creates a private right of action to allow individuals to sue for violations of the law. Other states have passed, are considering, and may adopt similar laws.

Current report

Outside the United States, an increasing number of laws, regulations, and industry standards govern data privacy and security. For example, the GDPR impose strict requirements for processing personal data. The GDPR imposes onerous accountability obligations requiring data controllers and processors to maintain a record of their data processing and policies. It requires data controllers to, among others, be transparent and to disclose to data subjects (in a concise, intelligible and easily accessible form) how their personal data is to be used, imposes limitations on retention of information, increases requirements pertaining to pseudonymized (i.e., key-coded) data, introduces mandatory data breach notification requirements and sets higher standards for data controllers to demonstrate that they have obtained valid consent for certain data processing activities. Under the GDPR, companies may face temporary or definitive bans on data processing and other corrective actions; fines of up to 20 million Euros under the EU GDPR, 17.5 million pounds sterling under the UK GDPR or, in each case, 4% of annual global revenue, whichever is greater; or private litigation related to processing of personal data brought by classes of data subjects or consumer protection organizations authorized at law to represent their interests

Current report

groups. Some European regulators have ordered certain companies to suspend or permanently cease certain transfers out of Europe for allegedly violating the GDPR’s cross-border data transfer limitations.

Current report

Additionally, as of December 31, 2025, we are licensed or have permits for tissue banking in California and Maryland, and to the extent that we conduct any tissue banking activities, we may be subject to ongoing compliance requirements in connection with such approvals. If we (to the extent that we conduct any tissue banking activities) or the tissue bank from which we obtain these products fail to comply with such state licensure requirements, or any others that may apply to us, we could be subject to significant penalties, including the revocation or suspension of the licenses or subject us to plans of correction, monitoring, or other restrictions that may curtail our business.
Removed paragraphs (5)

Previous report

Minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion procedures are primarily separated into two main types: procedures where the devices transfix the joint, and newer procedures using intra-articular (in-line) devices that do not transfix the joint. The transfixing procedures are described by CPT Code 27279. The non-transfixing procedures are described by CPT Code 27278, which was adopted by the AMA CPT Editorial Panel on January 1, 2024.

Previous report

In November 2018, we introduced our iFuse Bedrock technique, in which spine surgeons place iFuse triangular implants across the sacroiliac joint using a different surgical approach to treat sacroiliac joint dysfunction at the same time they are fusing multiple levels of the spine above and affixing those spinal fusion devices to the pelvis. In April 2019, the FDA cleared promotion of iFuse Bedrock for a broader and more general purpose, to provide additional stability and immobilization of the sacroiliac joint in connection with a thoracolumbar fusion procedure. In June 2022, we also obtained a similar marketing clearance for iFuse TORQ, which can be used in the same Bedrock approach, In May 2022, we introduced iFuse Bedrock Granite, an implant which fuses the sacroiliac joint and attaches to the rods placed in a multi-segment spinal fusion construct, and which is used in substantially similar procedures as the iFuse Bedrock technique. To date, clinical experience with the iFuse Bedrock technique and with iFuse Bedrock Granite is limited and we have yet to publish results from our SILVIA trial of the iFuse Bedrock technique or complete a clinical trial to evaluate the iFuse Bedrock Granite implant. Surgeons do not know if the addition of sacroiliac fusion devices to the implants used to fuse multiple levels of the lumbar spine will result in patient benefit. If surgeons' clinical experience with our implants in these procedures is not positive, or if our clinical trials do not show meaningful benefits to the patients undergoing this procedure, sale of our iFuse implants for this indication could be adversely impacted, which could negatively affect our operations and financial condition.

Previous report

In February 2021, we launched iFuse TORQ, a line of 3D-printed threaded implants designed for applications in pelvic trauma and sacroliliac fusion. In June 2022, the FDA provided clearance for an expanded indication for iFuse TORQ to include acute, non-acute and non-traumatic fractures as well as for placement across the sacroiliac joint using our Bedrock technique. In August 2024, we received FDA clearance for the iFuse TORQ TNT with indication for fracture fixation of the pelvis and sacroiliac joint fusion. Clinical experience with iFuse TORQ is limited and we have yet to publish results from SAFFRON, our clinical trial to evaluate the use of iFuse TORQ in patients with sacral fragility or insufficiency fractures. Physicians do not yet know if pelvic fracture fixation and sacroiliac joint fusion using iFuse TORQ is superior to nonsurgical management in this class of patients. If physicians' clinical experience with our implants in these procedures is not positive, or if our clinical trials do not show meaningful benefits to the patients undergoing this procedure, sale of our iFuse implants for this indication could be adversely impacted, which could negatively affect our operations and financial condition.

Previous report

• premarket clearance and approval;

Previous report

It requires data controllers to, among others, be transparent and to disclose to data subjects (in a concise, intelligible and easily accessible form) how their personal information is to be used, imposes limitations on retention of information, increases requirements pertaining to pseudonymized (i.e., key-coded) data, introduces mandatory data breach notification requirements and sets higher standards for data controllers to demonstrate that they have obtained valid consent for certain data processing activities. Fines for non-compliance with the EU GDPR will be significant — the greater of € 20 million or 4% of global turnover. The EU GDPR provides that EU Member States may introduce further conditions, including limitations, to the processing of genetic, biometric, or health data, which could limit our ability to collect, use and share personal data, or could cause our compliance costs to increase, ultimately having an adverse impact on our business. Each EU Member State may also adopt additional related legislation and guidance in its own national data privacy regime and therefore the laws may differ by jurisdiction, sometimes significantly. We need to ensure compliance with the rules in each jurisdiction where we are established or are otherwise subject to local privacy laws.
Reworded paragraphs (65)

Previous wording

Our currently marketed products are, and any future products we commercialize will likely be, subject to intense competition. Our field is subject to rapid change and is highly sensitive to the introduction of new products or other market activities of industry participants. Our ability to compete successfully will depend on our ability to develop proprietary products that reach the market in a timely manner, receive adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors, and are viewed as safer, less invasive, and more effective than alternatives available for similar purposes as demonstrated in peer-reviewed clinical publications. Because of the size of the potential market, other companies have dedicated, and likely will continue to dedicate, significant resources to developing competing products.

Current wording

Our currently marketed products are, and any future products we commercialize will likely be, subject to intense competition. Our field is subject to rapid change and is highly sensitive to the introduction of new products or other market activities of industry participants. Our ability to compete successfully will depend on our ability to develop proprietary products that reach the market in a timely manner, receive adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors, and are viewed as safer, less invasive, and more effective than alternatives available for similar purposes as demonstrated in peer-reviewed clinical publications. Because of the size of the potential market, other companies have dedicated, and likely will continue to dedicate, significant resources to develop competing products.

Previous wording

We believe that our primary competitors marketing implantable devices currently are Globus Medical, Inc. and Medtronic plc. At any time, these or other industry participants may develop alternative treatments, products or procedures for the treatment of the sacroiliac joint that compete directly or indirectly with our products. They may also develop and patent processes or products earlier than we can, or obtain domestic and international regulatory clearances or approvals and CE Certificates of Conformity for competing products in the EEA, more rapidly than we can, which could impair our ability to develop and commercialize similar processes or products. If alternative treatments are, or are perceived to be, superior to our products, sales of our products and our results of operations could be negatively affected.

Current wording

We believe that our primary competitors marketing implantable devices currently are Alphatec Holding Inc., Aurora Spine Corporation, Globus Medical, Inc., Medtronic plc., and Tenon Medical, Inc. At any time, these or other industry participants may develop alternative treatments, products or procedures for the treatment of the sacroiliac joint that compete directly or indirectly with our products. They may also develop and patent processes or products earlier than we can, or obtain domestic and international regulatory clearances or approvals and CE Certificates of Conformity for competing products in the European Economic Area ("EEA"), more rapidly than we can, which could impair our ability to develop and commercialize similar processes or products. If alternative treatments are, or are perceived to be, superior to our products, sales of our products and our results of operations could be negatively affected.

Previous wording

We have incurred net losses since our inception in 2008. For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022 we had net losses of $30.9 million, $43.3 million, and $61.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of $431.4 million. We have financed our operations primarily through the net proceeds of our public offerings of our common stock, private placements of equity securities, certain debt-related financing arrangements, and from sales of our products. We have devoted substantially all of our resources to research and development of our products, sales and marketing activities, investments in training and educating surgeons and other healthcare providers, and clinical and regulatory matters for our products. There can be no assurances that we will be able to generate sufficient revenue from our existing products or from any of our product candidates in development, and to transition to profitability and generate consistent positive cash flows. We expect that our operating expenses will continue to increase as we continue to develop, enhance, and commercialize our existing and new products and grow our commercial infrastructure. As a result, we may continue to incur operating losses for some time and may never achieve profitability. Furthermore, even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on an ongoing basis. If we do not achieve profitability, it will be more difficult for us to finance our business and accomplish our strategic objectives.

Current wording

We have incurred net losses since our inception in 2008. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 we had net losses of $18.9 million, $30.9 million, and $43.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $450.3 million. We have financed our operations primarily through the net proceeds of our public offerings of our common stock, private placements of equity securities, certain debt-related financing arrangements, and from sales of our products. We have devoted substantially all of our resources to research and development of our products, sales and marketing activities, investments in training and educating physicians and other healthcare providers, and clinical and regulatory matters for our products. There can be no assurances that we will be able to generate sufficient revenue from our existing products or from any of our product candidates in development, and to transition to profitability and generate consistent positive cash flows. We expect that our operating expenses will continue to increase as we continue to develop, enhance, and commercialize our existing and new products and grow our commercial infrastructure. As a result, we may continue to incur operating losses for some time and may never achieve profitability. Furthermore, even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on an ongoing basis. If we do not achieve profitability, it will be more difficult for us to finance our business and accomplish our strategic objectives.

Previous wording

Our expected future capital requirements depend on many factors including expanding our physician base, the expansion of our sales force including through hybrid sales agencies, investment in implants and instruments, the timing and extent of spending on the development of our technology to increase our product offerings, and potential investment in additional product and service offerings through the acquisition of other businesses. We may need additional funding for our operations, but additional funds may not be available to us on acceptable terms on a timely basis, if at all. We may seek funds through borrowings or through additional rounds of financing, including private or public equity or debt offerings. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience dilution. Any future debt financing into which we enter may impose upon us additional covenants that restrict our operations, including limitations on our ability to incur liens or additional debt, pay dividends, repurchase our common stock, make certain investments, and engage in certain merger, consolidation or asset sale transactions. Any future debt financing or additional equity that we raise may contain terms that are not favorable to us or our stockholders. Furthermore, we cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. The capital markets have deteriorated substantially since the beginning of 2022, especially with respect to securities issued by small- and mid-cap companies in the medical device sector. Equity and debt capital have become substantially more expensive and difficult to raise on attractive terms. If we are unable to raise additional capital or generate sufficient cash from operations to adequately fund our operations, we will need to curtail planned activities to reduce costs, which will likely harm our ability to execute on our business plan and continue operations.

Current wording

Our expected future capital requirements depend on many factors including expanding our physician base, the expansion of our sales force including through hybrid sales agencies, investment in implants and instruments, the timing and extent of spending on the development of our technology to increase our product offerings, and potential investment in additional product and service offerings through the acquisition of other businesses. We may need additional funding for our operations, but additional funds may not be available to us on acceptable terms on a timely basis, if at all. We may seek funds through borrowings or through additional rounds of financing, including private or public equity or debt offerings. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience dilution. Any future debt financing into which we enter may impose upon us additional covenants that restrict our operations, including limitations on our ability to incur liens or additional debt, pay dividends, repurchase our common stock, make certain investments, and engage in certain merger, consolidation or asset sale transactions. Any future debt financing or additional equity that we raise may contain terms that are not favorable to us or our stockholders. Furthermore, we cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. Equity and debt capital have become substantially more expensive, unpredictable, and difficult to raise on attractive terms. If we are unable to raise additional capital or generate sufficient cash from operations to adequately fund our operations, we will need to curtail planned activities to reduce costs, which will likely harm our ability to execute on our business plan and continue operations.

Previous wording

Maintaining and growing sales of our products depends on the availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors, including government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, private insurance plans, and managed care programs. Hospitals, physicians, and other healthcare providers that purchase or use medical devices generally rely on third-party payors to pay for all or part of the costs and fees associated with the procedures performed with these devices. When a procedure using our implants is performed, the reimbursement process depends on the site of service. For procedures performed in a hospital or ambulatory surgical center, both the physicians and the healthcare facility submit claims for reimbursement to the healthcare payor. When the procedure is performed in an office-based lab, a single claim covers both physician services and facility costs.

Current wording

Maintaining and growing sales of our products depends on the availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payers, including government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, Veterans Administration benefits, private insurance plans, and managed care programs. Hospitals, physicians, and other healthcare providers that purchase or use medical devices generally rely on third-party payers to pay for all or part of the costs and fees associated with the procedures performed with these devices. When a procedure using our implants is performed, the reimbursement process depends on the site of service. For procedures performed in a hospital or ambulatory surgical center, both the physicians and the healthcare facility submit claims for reimbursement to the healthcare payer. When the procedure is performed in an office-based lab, a single claim covers both physician services and overhead costs including supplies and implants.

Previous wording

The AMA develops and maintains CPT codes that are used by third-party payors to determine the amount of reimbursement that a healthcare provider and facility will receive for a particular service. As of January 1, 2025, the Medicare physician fee reimbursement for minimally invasive fusion with our laterally placed transfixing iFuse implants, described as CPT Code 27279, is $790. As of January 1, 2025, Medicare physician fee for procedures using intra-articular, non-transfixing implants, including our iFuse INTRA bone allograft products, is $465 when performed in the facility setting, and $11,805 when performed in the physician office

Current wording

As of January 1, 2026, the Medicare physician fee reimbursement for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fixation or fusion with our laterally placed transarticular iFuse implants, described as CPT Code 27279, is $762. As of January 1, 2026, Medicare physician fee for procedures using intra-articular, non-piercing implants, including our iFuse INTRA X bone allograft products, is $441 when performed in the facility setting, and $13,834 when performed in the physician office (e.g., office-based lab) setting. Minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fixation or fusion performed with a transarticular or intra-articular piercing device is currently not eligible for payment in the office-based lab site of service and there is therefore no corresponding value for office-based reimbursement for CPT Code 27279.

Previous wording

Even to the extent our products and procedures using our products are currently covered and reimbursed by third-party private and public payors, adverse changes in coverage and reimbursement policies that affect our products, discounts, and number of implants used may also drive our prices and revenue down and harm our ability to market and sell our products.

Current wording

Even to the extent our products and procedures using our products are currently covered and reimbursed by third-party private and public payers, adverse changes in coding, coverage and reimbursement policies that affect our products, discounts, and number of implants used may also drive our prices and revenue down and harm our ability to market and sell our products.

Previous wording

While all Medicare Administrative Contractors are regularly reimbursing for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing laterally placed transfixing devices under CPT Code 27279, a small number of private payors still have policies that treat the procedure as experimental or investigational and do not regularly reimburse for the procedure.

Current wording

While all Medicare Administrative Contractors ("MAC") and a predominant number of private payers are regularly reimbursing for minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fixation or fusion reported under CPT Code 27279, a small number of private payers still have policies that treat the procedure as experimental or investigational and do not regularly reimburse for the procedure. We expect at least some of these payers to also cover newer sacroiliac joint procedures utilizing intra-articular devices that pierce cortical walls of the ilium and sacrum bones, and are reported under CPT Code 27279.

Previous wording

In contrast, the reimbursement environment for the procedure described by CPT Code 27278 (placement of intra-articular implant without the placement of a transfixing device) is less consistent. In 2024, three Medicare Administrative Contractors finalized Local Coverage Determinations precluding coverage for CPT Code 27278. The coverage decisions of the remaining Medicare Administrative Contractors remain uncertain. We believe this reimbursement environment has impacted demand for our iFuse INTRA products.

Current wording

In contrast, the reimbursement environment for the procedure described by CPT Code 27278 (placement of intra-articular, non-piercing device or allograft implant) is less consistent. In 2024, three Medicare Administrative Contractors finalized Local Coverage Determinations precluding coverage for CPT Code 27278. The coverage decisions of the remaining Medicare Administrative Contractors remain uncertain. We believe this reimbursement environment has impacted demand for our iFuse INTRA X products.

Previous wording

Commercial payors generally set their physician fee reimbursement with reference to Medicare reimbursement rates. Many have yet to set coverage decisions for CPT Code 27278, and may decide not to cover these procedures until more evidence is developed. There is a small number of commercial payers with positive coverage policies for CPT Code 27278 procedures, and many may allow coverage on a case-by-case basis.

Current wording

Commercial payers generally set their physician fee reimbursement with reference to Medicare reimbursement rates. Many have yet to set coverage decisions for CPT Code 27278, and may decide not to cover these procedures until more evidence is developed. There is a small number of commercial payers with positive coverage policies for CPT Code 27278 procedures, and many may allow coverage on a case-by-case basis.

Previous wording

We may be unable to sell our products on a profitable basis if third-party payors deny coverage, or if reimbursement levels are insufficient to support use of our products by healthcare facilities or to compensate physicians for their time spent diagnosing patients and performing procedures using our products. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for procedures using our implants, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.

Current wording

We may be unable to sell our products on a profitable basis if third-party payers deny coverage, or if reimbursement levels are insufficient to support use of our products by healthcare facilities or to compensate physicians for their time spent diagnosing patients and performing procedures using our products. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for procedures using our implants, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.

Previous wording

Future action by the Centers for CMS or third-party payors may reduce the availability of payments to physicians, outpatient surgery centers, and/or hospitals for procedures using our products. Volatility in the payment rates that physicians and hospitals receive from CMS may have a material impact on their willingness to perform procedures including our products, as well as place additional pressure on pricing of our implants.

Current wording

Future action by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS"), its MACs, or commercial third-party payers may reduce the availability of payments to physicians, outpatient surgery centers, and/or hospitals for procedures using our products. Volatility in the payment rates that physicians and hospitals receive from CMS may have a material impact on their willingness to perform procedures including our products, as well as place additional pressure on pricing of our implants. CMS policies on incremental or differentiated reimbursement for eligible products and procedures may also change. Our request that CMS consider MS-DRG reassignment for FY 2027 of certain inpatient hospital-based procedures involving the iFuse Bedrock Granite are paid adequately may affect hospitals’ future willingness to continue adopting high-cost implants in favor of less expensive alternatives. In addition, our reliance on incremental reimbursement eligibility-based programs for high-cost, innovative technologies, such as NTAP and TPT, may come under added scrutiny during review, or may be subject to future changes in policy as between the FDA and CMS.

Previous wording

We believe that the favorable coverage and reimbursement profile of CPT Code 27279 as compared to CPT Code 27278 is a result of third-party payers’ review and assessment of peer-reviewed clinical literature supporting its use. Most procedures available to U.S. patients have a clear coding interpretation, reported as either CPT Code 27279 or 27278. Ambiguity exists, however, over the proper categorization of some sacroiliac joint devices which use an intra-articular (in-line) approach, but also have integrated fixation design features which “pierce” ilium and sacrum bones on either side of the implant. The AMA is currently receiving proposals to change some code definitions, including for CPT code 27278 and CPT code 27279, to allow for newer sacroiliac joint procedures via the CPT Editorial process, which would impact the reporting of procedures effective January 1, 2026. These changes could impact the code definitions of either or both of these codes.

Current wording

We believe that the favorable coverage and reimbursement profile of CPT Code 27279 as compared to CPT Code 27278 is a result of third-party payers’ review and assessment of peer-reviewed clinical literature supporting its use. Most procedures available to U.S. patients have a clear coding interpretation, reported as either CPT Code 27279 or 27278. Additionally, recent clarity by the AMA CPT Editorial Panel regarding the proper categorization of some sacroiliac joint devices which use an intra-articular (in-line) approach, but also have integrated fixation design features which “pierce” ilium and sacrum bones on either side of the implant will support payers' review and consideration of sacroiliac joint procedures.

Previous wording

If procedures requiring lower work effort supported by lower-quality clinical evidence, and/or having less favorable patient outcomes are reported via CPT Code 27279 instead of CPT Code 27278 as a result of future changes to the code definitions, it may contribute to a loss of value for CPT Code 27279. This dynamic could also prompt reevaluations of third-party payers’ coverage policies, which could ultimately decrease demand for our products and negatively impact our business and prospects. Additionally, if physicians and facilities are confused about the proper coding for our products or our competitors’ products, physicians may choose competitors’ products or choose not to perform sacroiliac joint procedures altogether, which would adversely affect demand for our products.

Current wording

If procedures supported by lower-quality clinical evidence, and/or having less favorable patient outcomes, are reported via CPT Code 27279 with greater frequency as a result of changes to the code definitions, it may contribute to a loss of value for CPT Code 27279. This dynamic could also prompt reevaluations of third-party payers’ coverage policies, which could ultimately decrease demand for our products and negatively impact our business and prospects. Additionally, if physicians and facilities are confused about the proper coding for our products or our competitors’ products, physicians may choose competitors’ products or choose not to perform sacroiliac joint procedures altogether, which would adversely affect demand for our products.

Previous wording

Recent political, economic, and regulatory influences are subjecting the healthcare industry to fundamental changes that can impact coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors. We expect that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2011, as currently enacted or as it may be amended in the future, and other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our industry generally and on our ability to maintain or increase sales of our existing products. In addition, on August 16, 2022, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) into law, which among other things, extends enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in ACA marketplaces through plan year 2025. The IRA also eliminates the “donut hole” under the Medicare Part D program beginning in 2025 by significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost and creating a new manufacturer discount program. Further, CMS budget neutrality requirements may impose cuts to the Medicare physician fee schedule, which may be mitigated by acts of Congress or other changes to regulations. Other federal laws, known as budget sequestration, further reduce Medicare’s payments to providers by 2%, which, due to subsequent legislative amendments, will stay in effect through 2032. These reductions may reduce reimbursement for procedures performed using our products, which could potentially negatively impact our revenue, and may reduce providers’ revenues or profits, which could affect their ability to purchase new technologies. Both the federal and state governments in the United States and foreign governments continue to propose and pass new legislation and regulations designed to contain or reduce the cost of healthcare. Such legislation and regulations may result in decreased reimbursement for medical devices, which may further exacerbate industry-wide pressure to reduce the prices charged for medical devices. This could harm our ability to market our products and generate sales, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

Recent political, economic, and regulatory influences are subjecting the healthcare industry to fundamental changes that can impact coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors. We expect that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2011 (collectively the "ACA"), as currently enacted or as it may be amended in the future, and other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our industry generally and on our ability to maintain or increase sales of our existing products. Since its enactment, there have been amendments and judicial, Congressional and executive branch challenges to certain aspects of the ACA. For example, on July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the “OBBBA”), was signed into law, which narrowed access to ACA marketplace exchange enrollment and declined to extend the ACA enhanced advanced premium tax credits that expired at the end of 2025, which, among other provisions in the law, are anticipated to reduce the number of Americans with health insurance. The OBBBA also is expected to reduce Medicaid spending and enrollment by implementing work requirements for some beneficiaries, capping state-directed payments, reducing federal funding, and limiting provider taxes used to fund the program. Congress is considering proposed legislation intended to further reduce healthcare costs with alternatives to replace the expired ACA subsidies. We expect that additional U.S. federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that the U.S. federal government will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand for our products or additional pricing pressures. Other federal laws, known as budget sequestration, further reduce Medicare’s payments to providers by 2%, which, due to subsequent legislative amendments, will stay in effect through 2032. These reductions may reduce reimbursement for procedures performed using our products, which could potentially negatively impact our revenue, and may reduce providers’ revenues or profits, which could affect their ability to purchase new technologies. Both the federal and state governments in the United States and foreign governments continue to propose and pass new legislation and regulations designed to contain or reduce the cost of healthcare. Such legislation and regulations may result in decreased reimbursement for medical devices or procedures in which medical devices are used. This could harm our ability to market our products and generate sales, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

We anticipate that more outpatient eligible procedures will be performed in ASCs and OBLs to control costs and expand patient access to medical procedures. This shift accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we expect it to continue because ASCs and OBLs are generally a more economically favorable site of service, and physicians performing the procedures and their practices sometimes have ownership interests in the ASC and generally own the OBL. Because reimbursement for procedures in an ASC or OBL is typically less than the reimbursement in an in-patient setting and due to physicians’ economic interest in ASCs and OBLs, we typically experience more pressure on the pricing of our products by ASCs and OBLs than by hospitals, and the average price for which we sell our products to ASCs and OBLs can be less than the average prices we charge to hospitals. In addition, some physicians may choose to use fewer implants due to their interest in the profitability of the ASC or OBL. An accelerated shift of procedures using our products to ASCs and OBLs could adversely impact the average selling prices of our products and our revenues could suffer as a result.

Current wording

We anticipate that more outpatient eligible procedures will be performed in ASCs and OBLs to control costs and expand patient access to medical procedures. This shift accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we expect it to continue because ASCs and OBLs are generally a more economically favorable site of service, and physicians performing the procedures and their practices sometimes have ownership interests in the ASC and generally own the OBL outright. Because reimbursement for procedures in an ASC or OBL is typically less than the reimbursement in an in-patient setting and due to physicians’ economic interest in ASCs and OBLs, we typically experience more pressure on the pricing of our products by ASCs and OBLs than by hospitals, and the average price for which we sell our products to ASCs and OBLs can be less than the average prices we charge to hospitals. In addition, some physicians may choose to use fewer implants per case due to their interest in the profitability of the ASC or OBL. An accelerated shift of procedures using our products to ASCs and OBLs could adversely impact the average selling prices of our products and/or the number of implants we are able to sell, and our revenues could suffer as a result.

Previous wording

In 2024, CMS announced a TPT payment status for the use of the iFuse Bedrock Granite implant system in hospital outpatient and ASC settings of care, for procedures effective January 1, 2025. TPT allows the hospital outpatient departments and ASCs supporting the case to “pass through” the costs of the iFuse Bedrock Granite technology to the Medicare program, to encourage innovation and early access of new technologies for Medicare beneficiaries. We anticipate this may reduce pricing pressure on our Granite family of implants in the outpatient sites of care, particularly where the Medicare population is heavier. However, we have less experience with our Granite implants being used in outpatient procedures and it remains to be seen whether surgeons will perform more of these procedures in the outpatient setting in the future.

Current wording

In 2024, CMS announced a TPT payment status for the use of the iFuse Bedrock Granite implant in hospital outpatient and ASC settings of care, for procedures effective January 1, 2025. TPT allows the hospital outpatient departments and ASCs supporting the case to “pass through” the costs of the iFuse Bedrock Granite technology to the Medicare program, to encourage innovation and early access of new technologies for Medicare beneficiaries. We anticipate this may reduce pricing pressure on our Granite family of implants in the outpatient sites of care, particularly where the Medicare population is heavier. However, we have less experience with our Granite implants being used in outpatient procedures and it remains to be seen whether surgeons will perform more of these procedures in the outpatient setting in the future.

Previous wording

We have historically been highly dependent on revenue from the sale of a single family of products focused on procedures, the goal of which is to stabilize and fuse the sacroiliac joint. Continued reliance on a single family of products and single family of procedures could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

We have historically been highly dependent on revenue from the sales of similar products focused on procedures, the goal of which is to stabilize and fuse the sacroiliac joint. Continued reliance on sales of similar products could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

The majority of our revenue comes from the sale of iFuse, iFuse-3D, iFuse TORQ, and iFuse Bedrock Granite implants, and related tools and instruments. Therefore, we are dependent on widespread market adoption of the iFuse family of products, and we will continue to be dependent on the success of this single product family for the foreseeable future. There can be no assurance that our solutions will maintain a substantial degree of market acceptance among physicians, patients or healthcare providers. Our failure to successfully grow the market for our solutions and increase our share within that market or any other event impeding our ability to sell iFuse, could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and continuing operations.

Current wording

The majority of our revenue comes from the sale of iFuse, iFuse 3D, iFuse TORQ, and iFuse Bedrock Granite implants, and related tools and instruments. Therefore, we are dependent on widespread market adoption of our products, and we will continue to be dependent on the success of this single product family for the foreseeable future. There can be no assurance that our solutions will maintain a substantial degree of market acceptance among physicians, patients or healthcare providers. Our failure to successfully grow the market for our solutions and increase our share within that market or any other event impeding our ability to sell iFuse, could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and continuing operations.

Previous wording

A majority of our products are manufactured and sold inside of the United States, which increases our exposure to domestic inflation and fuel price increases. Inflationary pressures may result in increased fuel, raw materials and other costs which, if they continue for a prolonged period, may adversely affect our results of operations. We continue to actively monitor the impact of various macroeconomic trends, such as tariffs, changes to international trade agreements, labor costs, interest rates, inflation rates, and geopolitical instability within the United States and abroad. The implementation of more restrictive trade policies, including the imposition of further tariffs in connection with the new presidential administration in the United States and retaliatory tariffs in response thereto, or the renegotiation of existing trade agreements with the United States or countries where we source supplies, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For example, much of the titanium used in our implants is sourced from Canada and any disruption to trade with Canada caused by tariffs could increase the cost or disrupt the supply of our implants, which could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operation. Our efforts to mitigate supply chain weaknesses may not be successful or may have unfavorable effects. For example, efforts to purchase raw materials in advance for product manufacturing may result in increased storage costs or excess supply. If our costs rise due to significant inflationary pressures, tariffs, or supply chain disruptions, we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through price increases. In addition, delays in obtaining materials, components or instruments from our suppliers could delay product launches or result in lost opportunities to sell our products due to their availability. Increased costs and decreased product availability due to supply chain issues could adversely impact our revenue and/or gross margin, and could thereby harm our business, financial condition, and results of operation.

Current wording

A majority of our products are manufactured and sold inside of the United States, which increases our exposure to domestic inflation and fuel price increases. Inflationary pressures may result in increased fuel, raw materials and other costs which, if they continue for a prolonged period, may adversely affect our results of operations. We continue to actively monitor the impact of various macroeconomic trends, such as tariffs, changes to international trade agreements, labor costs, interest rates, inflation rates, and geopolitical instability within the United States and abroad. The implementation of more restrictive trade policies, including the imposition of further tariffs and retaliatory tariffs in response thereto, or the renegotiation of existing trade agreements with the United States or countries where we source supplies, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For example, much of the titanium used in our implants is sourced from Canada and any disruption to trade with Canada caused by tariffs could increase the cost or disrupt the supply of our implants, which could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operation. Our efforts to mitigate supply chain weaknesses may not be successful or may have unfavorable effects. For example, efforts to purchase raw materials in advance for product manufacturing may result in increased storage costs or excess supply. If our costs rise due to significant inflationary pressures, tariffs, or supply chain disruptions, we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through price increases. In addition, delays in obtaining materials, components or instruments from our suppliers could delay product launches or result in lost opportunities to sell our products due to their availability. Increased costs and decreased product availability due to supply chain issues could adversely impact our revenue and/or gross margin, and could thereby harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Previous wording

Our suppliers purchase many of the materials and components used in the manufacture of our products from third-party suppliers. Certain of these materials and components can only be obtained from a single source or a limited number of sources due to quality considerations, expertise, costs or constraints resulting from regulatory requirements. In certain cases, our suppliers may not be able to establish additional or replacement suppliers for such materials or components or outsourced activities in a timely or cost-effective manner. A reduction or interruption in the supply of materials or components used in manufacturing our products, such as due to one or more suppliers experiencing reductions in operations and/or worker absences due to health epidemics, an inability to timely develop and validate alternative sources if required, or a significant increase in the price of such materials or components, such as that caused by inflation and rising interest rates, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, certain of our products require titanium, which is sourced from third-party suppliers. While the titanium required for such products is not directly sourced from Russia, the current geopolitical events involving Russia and Ukraine are negatively impacting the wider titanium supply chain. These geopolitical events and related factors and results, including related sanctions, may negatively impact the ability of our suppliers’ third-party supply sources to timely supply titanium to our suppliers and may increase or result in additional costs to us.

Current wording

Our suppliers purchase many of the materials and components used in the manufacture of our products from third-party suppliers. Certain of these materials and components can only be obtained from a single source or a limited number of sources due to quality considerations, expertise, costs or constraints resulting from regulatory requirements. In certain cases, our suppliers may not be able to establish additional or replacement suppliers for such materials or components or outsourced activities in a timely or cost-effective manner. A reduction or interruption in the supply of materials or components used in manufacturing our products, such as due to one or more suppliers experiencing reductions in operations and/or worker absences due to health epidemics, an inability to timely develop and validate alternative sources if required, or a significant increase in the price of such materials or components, such as that caused by tariffs and retaliatory countermeasures, inflation or interest rates fluctuations, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, certain of our products require titanium, which is sourced from third-party suppliers. While the titanium required for such products is not directly sourced from Russia, the current geopolitical events involving Russia and Ukraine are negatively impacting the wider titanium supply chain. These geopolitical events and related factors and results, including related sanctions, may negatively impact the ability of our suppliers’ third-party supply sources to timely supply titanium to our suppliers and may increase or result in additional costs to us. The imposition of tariffs on titanium sourced from Canada or elsewhere could further exacerbate these challenges and increase the cost of our implants.

Previous wording

The products we currently market in the United States have either received premarket clearance under Section 510(k) of the United States FDCA, or are exempt from premarket review. Those marketed in the EEA have been the subject of a CE Certificate of Conformity. The 510(k) clearance process of the FDA requires us to document that our product is “substantially equivalent” to another 510(k)-cleared product. The 510(k) process is shorter and typically requires the submission of less supporting documentation than other FDA approval processes, such as a PMA, and does not usually require pre-clinical or clinical studies. As a result, each of our products has been launched prior to gathering substantial prospective clinical trial evidence, and our post-market clinical studies may lack the size and scope of randomized controlled clinical trials required to support approval of a PMA. For these reasons, physicians may be slow to adopt our more recent products including iFuse TORQ, iFUse Bedrock Granite and iFuse INTRA, each of which are supported by smaller bodies of clinical evidence than iFuse and iFuse-3D, third-party payors may be slow to provide coverage for novel procedures and techniques using these products, and we may be subject to greater regulatory and product liability risks. Further, future patient studies or clinical experience may indicate that treatment with any of our products does not improve patient outcomes. Such results would slow the adoption of our products by physicians, significantly reduce our ability to achieve expected sales, and could prevent us from achieving profitability.

Current wording

The products we currently market in the United States have either received premarket clearance under Section 510(k) of the United States FDCA, or are exempt from premarket review. Those marketed in the EEA have been the subject of a CE Certificate of Conformity, where applicable, and have been CE marked. The 510(k) clearance process of the FDA requires us to document that our product is “substantially equivalent” to another 510(k)-cleared product. The 510(k) process is shorter and typically requires the submission of less supporting documentation than other FDA approval processes, such as a PMA, and does not usually require pre-clinical or clinical studies. As a result, each of our products has been launched prior to gathering substantial prospective clinical trial evidence, and our post-market clinical studies may lack the size and scope of randomized controlled clinical trials required to support approval of a PMA. For these reasons, physicians may be slow to adopt our more recent products including iFuse TORQ, iFuse Bedrock Granite, iFuse TORQ TNT, and iFuse INTRA/INTRA X, each of which are supported by smaller bodies of clinical evidence than iFuse and iFuse 3D, third-party payors may be slow to provide coverage for novel procedures and techniques using these products, and we may be subject to greater regulatory and product liability risks. Further, future patient studies or clinical experience may indicate that treatment with any of our products does not improve patient outcomes. Such results would slow the adoption of our products by physicians, significantly reduce our ability to achieve expected sales, and could prevent us from achieving profitability.

Previous wording

We may not be able to convince physicians that our products are attractive alternatives to our competitors’ products and that our procedures are attractive alternatives to existing surgical and non-surgical treatments for their respective indications.

Current wording

We may not be able to demonstrate to physicians that our products are attractive alternatives to our competitors’ products and that our procedures are attractive alternatives to existing surgical and non-surgical treatments for their respective indications.

Previous wording

Physicians, in consultation with their patients, play the primary role in determining the course of treatment and, ultimately, any product that will be used in treatment. For us to sell our products successfully, we must demonstrate to physicians through education and training that treatment with one or more of our iFuse family of implants is beneficial, safe, and cost-effective for patients as compared to our competitors’ products. If we are not successful in demonstrating the merits of our products to physicians, their use of our products may decline, adversely affecting our revenues and profitability.

Current wording

Physicians, in consultation with their patients, play the primary role in determining the course of treatment and, ultimately, any product that will be used in treatment. For us to sell our products successfully, we must demonstrate to physicians through education and training that treatment with one or more of our implants is beneficial, safe, and cost-effective for patients as compared to our competitors’ products. If we are not successful in demonstrating the merits of our products to physicians, their use of our products may decline, adversely affecting our revenues and profitability.

Previous wording

Historically, many physicians did not include an evaluation of the sacroiliac joint in their diagnostic work-up because they did not have an adequate surgical procedure to perform for patients diagnosed with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. We believe that educating physicians and other healthcare professionals about the clinical merits and patient benefits of our iFuse family of implants is an important element of building our business. If we fail to effectively educate physicians and other medical professionals, they may not include a sacroiliac joint evaluation as part of their diagnosis and, as a result, those patients may continue to receive unnecessary surgical procedures or only non-surgical treatment.

Current wording

Historically, many physicians did not include an evaluation of the sacroiliac joint in their diagnostic work-up because they did not have an adequate surgical procedure to perform for patients diagnosed with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. We believe that educating physicians and other healthcare professionals about the clinical merits and patient benefits of our products is an important element of building our business. If we fail to effectively educate physicians and other medical professionals, they may not include a sacroiliac joint evaluation as part of their diagnosis and, as a result, those patients may continue to receive unnecessary surgical procedures or only non-surgical treatment.

Previous wording

Patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction are cared for by a variety of health care providers, including spine surgeons and pain physicians and other interventionalist spine physicians, who are generally trained as anesthesiologists, interventional radiologists, or physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists. These interventionalists often offer a variety of non-surgical and surgical interventions to sacroiliac joint dysfunction patients, including, but not limited to, steroid injections, radiofrequency ablation of the nerves serving the sacroiliac joint, and implantation of neurostimulation devices, stabilization and fusion implants and other products intended to treat the sacroiliac joint or the pain it can cause. Our professional education program seeks to teach these physicians, and other health care providers, about the benefits of our iFuse products, with the intent of either having them adopt and perform our procedures or refer their patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction to physicians who have been trained to perform our procedures. Providers who have not been educated on or adopted our procedures may prefer to continue to treat these patients with other interventions they offer because of physician preference or their view that these interventions are superior.

Current wording

Patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction are cared for by a variety of health care providers, including spine surgeons, pain physicians and other interventionalist spine physicians, who are generally trained as anesthesiologists, interventional radiologists, or physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists. These interventionalists often offer a variety of non-surgical and surgical interventions to sacroiliac joint dysfunction patients, including, but not limited to, steroid injections, radiofrequency ablation of the nerves serving the sacroiliac joint, and implantation of neurostimulation devices, stabilization and fusion implants and other products intended to treat the sacroiliac joint or the pain caused by its dysfunction. Our professional education program seeks to teach these physicians, and other health care providers, about the benefits of our iFuse products. Health care providers who have not been educated on or adopted our procedures may prefer to continue to treat these patients with other interventions they offer because of physician preference or their view that these interventions are superior.

Previous wording

If clinical experience with our iFuse Bedrock technique or our iFuse Bedrock Granite, iFuse TORQ, or iFuse INTRA products do not result in positive outcomes for patients, or if clinical trials involving the use of iFuse Bedrock, iFuse Bedrock Granite, iFuse INTRA and/or iFuse TORQ fail to show meaningful patient benefit, sales of our iFuse, iFuse-3D, iFuse TORQ and/or iFuse Bedrock Granite implants could be adversely impacted.

Current wording

If clinical experience with our implants or instruments does not result in positive outcomes for patients, or if clinical studies involving our implant systems fail to show meaningful patient benefit, sales of our products could be adversely impacted.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, our U.S. sales force consisted of 87 territory sales managers and 71 clinical support specialists directly employed by us and 252 third-party sales agents. As of December 31, 2024, our international sales force consisted of 9 sales representatives directly employed by us and a total of 31 third-party sales agents and resellers, which together have had sales in 38 countries through December 31, 2024. Our operating results are directly dependent upon the sales and marketing efforts of both our direct sales force and of our third-party sales agents and resellers.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, our U.S. sales force consisted of 89 territory sales managers and 83 clinical support specialists directly employed by us and 320 third-party sales agents. As of December 31, 2025, our international sales force consisted of 11 sales representatives directly employed by us and a total of 28 third-party sales agents and resellers, which together have had sales in 38 countries through December 31, 2025. Our operating results are directly dependent upon the sales and marketing efforts of both our direct sales force and of our third-party sales agents and resellers.

Previous wording

As we launch new products, expand physician call points, and increase our marketing efforts with respect to existing products, we will need to expand the reach of our marketing and sales networks. Our future success will depend largely on our ability to continue to hire, train, retain and motivate skilled direct sales representatives and third-party sales agents and resellers with significant technical knowledge in various areas, such as spine and pelvic health and treatment. New sales representatives and agents require training and take time to achieve full productivity. If we fail to train new sales representatives and agents adequately, or if we experience high turnover in our sales force in the future, we cannot be certain that new sales representatives and agents will become as productive as may be necessary to maintain or increase our sales. If a direct sales representative or third-party sales agent or reseller departs and is retained by one of our competitors, we may be unable to prevent them from helping competitors solicit business from our existing customers, which could further adversely affect our sales. The launch of new products or entrance into new markets could distract our sales representatives from existing customers and markets and redirect resources from existing to novel markets. Furthermore, any such change affects our ability to hire, contract with and retain members of our direct sales force and third-party sales agents and resellers. Because of the intense competition for their services, we may be unable to recruit or retain additional qualified third-party sales agents and resellers or to hire additional direct sales representatives to work with us. Furthermore, we may not be able to enter into agreements with them on favorable or commercially reasonable terms, if at all. Failure to hire or retain qualified direct sales representatives or third-party sales agents and resellers would prevent us from expanding our business and generating sales. If our direct sales representatives or third-party sales agents fail to adequately promote, market and sell our products or decide to leave or cease to do business with us, our sales could significantly decrease.

Current wording

As we launch new products, expand physician call points, and increase our marketing efforts with respect to existing products, we will need to expand the reach of our marketing and sales networks. Our future success will depend largely on our ability to continue to hire, train, retain and motivate skilled direct sales representatives and third-party sales agents and resellers with significant technical knowledge in various areas, such as spine and pelvic health and treatment. New sales representatives and agents require training and take time to achieve full productivity. If we fail to train new sales representatives and third-party sales agents adequately, or if we experience high turnover in our sales force in the future, we cannot be certain that new sales representatives and third-party sales agents will become as productive as may be necessary to maintain or increase our sales. If a direct sales representative or third-party sales agent or reseller departs and is retained by one of our competitors, we may be unable to prevent them from helping competitors solicit business from our existing customers, which could further adversely affect our sales. The launch of new products or entrance into new markets could distract our sales representatives from existing customers and markets and redirect resources from existing to novel markets. Furthermore, any such change affects our ability to hire, contract with and retain members of our direct sales force and third-party sales agents and resellers. Because of the intense competition for their services, we may be unable to recruit or retain additional qualified third-party sales agents and resellers or to hire additional direct sales representatives to work with us. Furthermore, we may not be able to enter into agreements with them on favorable or commercially reasonable terms, if at all. Failure to hire or retain qualified direct sales representatives or third-party sales agents and resellers would prevent us from expanding our business and generating sales. If our direct sales representatives or third-party sales agents fail to adequately promote, market and sell our products or decide to leave or cease to do business with us, our sales could significantly decrease.

Previous wording

Our business is highly reliant on a base of skilled employees, including those serving in engineering, information technology, operational, strategic marketing and sales functions. Many of these employees have developed specialized skills which are valuable within the medical device and life sciences industry, and, in some cases, in a broader variety of industries. Competition for skilled employees remains significant. If we experience turnover among our employees at a higher rate than expected, managing our labor force could become difficult and more costly, adversely impacting our results of operation. Sustained pressure in these labor markets could also cause prevailing wages to rise, which could adversely impact our business, results of operation and financial condition.

Current wording

Our business is highly reliant on a base of skilled employees, including those serving in engineering, information technology, operational, strategic marketing and sales functions. Many of these employees have developed specialized skills which are valuable within the medical device and life sciences industry, and, in some cases, in a broader variety of industries. Competition for skilled employees remains significant. If we experience turnover among our employees at a higher rate than expected, managing our labor force could become difficult and more costly, adversely impacting our results of operations. Sustained pressure in these labor markets could also cause prevailing wages to rise, which could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

• supply chain disruptions, including those caused by material and labor supply shortages and prolonged inflation;

Current wording

• supply chain disruptions, including those caused by material and labor supply shortages, tariffs and retaliatory countermeasures, and prolonged inflation;

Previous wording

Unfavorable media reports or other negative publicity concerning both alleged improper methods of tissue recovery from donors and disease transmission from donated tissue could limit widespread acceptance of some of our products.

Current wording

Unfavorable media reports or other negative publicity concerning both alleged improper methods of tissue recovery from donors and disease transmission from donated tissue could limit widespread acceptance of some of the products we market.

Previous wording

iFuse INTRA family of implants are implantable bone products manufactured from sterilized recovered cadaveric bone tissue. Unfavorable reports of improper or illegal tissue recovery practices, both in the United States and internationally, as well as incidents of improperly processed tissue leading to the transmission of disease, may affect the rate of future tissue donation and market acceptance of technologies incorporating human tissue. In addition, negative publicity could cause the families of potential donors to become reluctant to donate tissue to for-profit tissue processors. These reports could have a negative effect on sales of iFuse INTRA.

Current wording

iFuse INTRA/INTRA X family of implants are implantable bone products manufactured from sterilized recovered cadaveric bone tissue. Unfavorable reports of improper or illegal tissue recovery practices, both in the United States and internationally, as well as incidents of improperly processed tissue leading to the transmission of disease, may affect the rate of future tissue donation and market acceptance of technologies incorporating human tissue. In addition, negative publicity could cause the families of potential donors to become reluctant to donate tissue to for-profit tissue processors. These reports could have a negative effect on sales of iFuse INTRA/INTRA X.

Previous wording

As a result of the need to maintain adequate levels of inventory, we are subject to the risk of inventory obsolescence. Many of our products come in sets, which feature components and implants in a variety of sizes so that the implant or device may be chosen for size based on the patient’s needs. In order to market our products effectively, we often maintain and provide physicians and hospitals with back-up products and products of different sizes. For each surgery, fewer than all of the components of the set are used, and therefore certain portions of the set may become obsolete before they can be used. In addition, as we introduce new implants and instruments with the same intended uses as existing products, the older products may fall out of favor with our customers, causing them to become obsolete. In addition, market demand for our new products may be less than expected, resulting in excess inventory from the supply purchased for launch. For example, in the quarter ending December 31, 2023 we took a $1.7 million in reserves for excess inventory related to the "lag" configuration of our iFuse TORQ product, reflecting its below-expected market demand. In the event that a substantial portion of our inventory becomes obsolete, it could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and cash flows due to the resulting costs associated with the inventory impairment charges and costs that may be required to replace such inventory.

Current wording

As a result of the need to maintain adequate levels of inventory, we are subject to the risk of inventory obsolescence. Many of our products come in sets, which feature components and implants in a variety of sizes so that the implant or device may be chosen for size based on the patient’s needs. In order to market our products effectively, we often maintain and provide physicians and hospitals with back-up products and products of different sizes. For each surgery, fewer than all of the components of the set are used, and therefore certain portions of the set may become obsolete before they can be used. In addition, as we introduce new implants and instruments with the same intended uses as existing products, the older products may fall out of favor with our customers, causing them to become obsolete. In addition, market demand for our new products may be less than expected, resulting in excess inventory from the supply purchased for launch. In the event that a substantial portion of our inventory becomes obsolete, it could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and cash flows due to the resulting costs associated with the inventory impairment charges and costs that may be required to replace such inventory.

Previous wording

The sale of our products in select international markets is an element of our business strategy and involves risk. The sale and shipment of our products across international borders subject us to extensive U.S. and foreign governmental trade and export and customs regulations and laws. Compliance with these regulations and laws is costly and exposes us to penalties for non-compliance. Other laws and regulations that can significantly affect us include various anti-bribery laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), and the United Kingdom Bribery Act (“UKBA”), anti-boycott laws, anti-money laundering laws, and regulations relating to economic sanctions imposed by the United States, including the Office of Foreign Asset Control of the U.S. Treasury. Any failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations in the United States or abroad could adversely affect us in a variety of ways that include, but are not limited to, significant criminal, civil and administrative penalties, including imprisonment of individuals, fines and penalties, denial of export privileges, seizure of shipments and restrictions on certain business activities. Also, the failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations could result in the disruption of our distribution and sales activities.

Current wording

The sale of our products in select international markets is an element of our business strategy and involves risk. The sale and shipment of our products across international borders subject us to extensive U.S. and foreign governmental trade and export and customs regulations and laws. Compliance with these regulations and laws is costly and exposes us to penalties for non-compliance. Other laws and regulations that can significantly affect us include various anti-bribery laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), and the United Kingdom Bribery Act (“UKBA”), anti-boycott laws, anti-money laundering laws, and regulations relating to economic sanctions imposed by the United States, including the Office of Foreign Asset Control of the U.S.

Previous wording

If our data management systems, or those of the third parties with whom we work, fail to collect, store, process, or report relevant business data due to issues like malfunctions, human error, natural disasters, or cyberattacks, our ability to operate, plan, and comply with laws could be significantly impaired. Any such impairment could negatively impact our financial condition, operations, and cash flow. Maintaining and enhancing our information technology systems requires significant resources to address evolving technologies, new threats, legal standards, and the need for data security. Despite our efforts to upgrade, secure, and develop these systems, we cannot guarantee success or prevent future disruptions or issues.

Current wording

If our data management systems, or those of the third parties with whom we work, fail to collect, store, process, or report relevant business data due to issues like malfunctions, human error, natural disasters, or cyberattacks, our ability to operate, plan, and comply with laws could be significantly impaired. Any such impairment could negatively impact our financial condition, operations, and cash flow. Maintaining and enhancing our information technology systems requires significant resources to address evolving technologies, new threats, legal standards, and the need for data security. Despite our efforts to upgrade, secure, and develop these systems, we cannot guarantee success or prevent future disruptions or issues. Threat actors may also gain access to other networks and systems after a compromise of our networks and systems. For example, threat actors may use an initial compromise of one part of our environment to gain access to other parts of our environment, or leverage a compromise of our networks or systems to gain access to the networks or systems of third parties with whom we work, such as through phishing or supply chain attacks.

Previous wording

Furthermore, our employees, third-party service providers, strategic partners, or other contractors or consultants may input sensitive information (including competitive, proprietary, personal or confidential information, or other business data) of ours, into a system (in particular, a system that is managed, owned, or controlled by a third party), which may disrupt and otherwise compromise our business operations, divert the attention of management and key information technology resources, potentially lead to security breaches or incidents or other unauthorized access to, or other use or processing of, personal information, our confidential information or other business data. Third-party service providers store and otherwise process certain personal data and other confidential or proprietary information of ourselves and third parties on our behalf, and these service providers face similar risks.

Current wording

Furthermore, our employees, third-party service providers, strategic partners, contractors or consultants, or other third parties with whom we work may input sensitive information (including competitive, proprietary, personal or confidential information, or other business data) of ours, into a system (in particular, a system that is managed, owned, or controlled by a third party), which may disrupt and otherwise compromise our business operations, divert the attention of management and key information technology resources, potentially lead to security breaches or incidents or other unauthorized access to, or other use or processing of, personal information, our confidential information or other business data. Third-party service providers store and otherwise process certain personal data and other confidential or proprietary information of ourselves and third parties on our behalf, and these service providers face similar risks.

Previous wording

The scope and breadth of cyberattacks are expanding. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, or to sabotage systems, are becoming more sophisticated, frequent and adaptive, and therefore we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. For example, AI technologies may be used for certain cyberattacks or to increase the frequency or intensity of certain cyberattacks, which may increase our risks presented by cyberattack activity.

Current wording

We and the third parties with whom we work are subject to a variety of evolving threats, including but not limited to social-engineering attacks (including through deep fakes, which may be increasingly more difficult to identify as fake, and phishing attacks), malicious code (such as viruses and worms), malware (including as a result of advanced persistent threat intrusions), denial-of-service attacks, credential stuffing attacks, credential harvesting, personnel misconduct or error, ransomware attacks, supply-chain attacks, software bugs, server malfunctions, software or hardware failures, loss of data or other information technology assets, adware, telecommunications failures, earthquakes, fires, floods, attacks enhanced or facilitated by artificial intelligence (“AI”), and other similar threats. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, or to sabotage systems, are becoming more sophisticated, frequent and adaptive, and therefore we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures.

Previous wording

We cannot guarantee that our liability limitations in contracts will be enforceable or adequate to protect us from damages related to security breaches. While we have cyber insurance, it may be insufficient or not cover all liabilities. We cannot ensure that our coverage will be adequate, available at reasonable terms, or that an insurer won't deny future claims. Large claims exceeding our coverage or changes in insurance terms could significantly impact our business, financial condition, and reputation. In addition to experiencing a security incident, third parties may gather, collect, or infer sensitive information about us from public sources, data brokers, or other means that reveals competitively sensitive details about our organization and could be used to undermine our competitive advantage or market position.

Current wording

We cannot guarantee that our liability limitations in contracts will be enforceable or adequate to protect us from damages related to security breaches. While we have cyber insurance, it may be insufficient or not cover all liabilities. We cannot ensure that our coverage will be adequate, available at reasonable terms, or that an insurer will not deny future claims. Large claims exceeding our coverage or changes in insurance terms could significantly impact our business, financial condition, and reputation. In addition to experiencing a security incident, third parties may gather, collect, or infer sensitive information about us from public sources, data brokers, or other means that reveals competitively sensitive details about our organization and could be used to undermine our competitive advantage or market position.

Previous wording

We have integrated artificial intelligence ("AI"), including generative AI, and machine learning ("ML") technologies in our operations (collectively, “AI” technologies) in certain of our internal operations. Further, certain of our third-party vendors utilize AI and machine learning technologies in furnishing services to us. As with many technological innovations, AI presents risks and challenges that could affect its adoption, and therefore our business. AI tools may be incorrectly designed or provide inaccurate data, and business decisions could be made on the basis of AI-generated misinformation. Employees using publicly-available AI tools could leak our sensitive data. Risks can include, but are not limited to, the potential for errors or inaccuracies in the algorithms or models used by AI, the potential for bias or inaccuracies in the data used to train the AI, the potential for improper processing of personal information, and the potential for cybersecurity breaches that could compromise patient data or product functionality. Moreover, AI models may create flawed, incomplete, or inaccurate outputs, some of which may appear correct. This may happen if the inputs that the model relied on were inaccurate, incomplete or flawed (including if a bad actor “poisons” the AI with bad inputs or logic), or if the logic of the AI is flawed (a so-called “hallucination”). Though we have taken steps to be thoughtful in our implementation of AI, and training on appropriate uses of AI, such risks could negatively affect the performance of our products, services, and business, and we could incur liability through the violation of laws or contracts to which we are a party or civil claims.

Current wording

We have integrated artificial intelligence ("AI"), including generative AI, and machine learning ("ML") technologies (collectively, “AI” technologies) in certain of our internal operations. Further, certain of third-parties with whom we work with utilize AI and machine learning technologies in furnishing services to us. As with many technological innovations, AI presents risks and challenges that could affect its adoption, and therefore our business. AI tools may be incorrectly designed or provide inaccurate data, and business decisions could be made on the basis of AI-generated misinformation. Employees using publicly-available AI tools could leak our sensitive data. Risks can include, but are not limited to, the potential for errors or inaccuracies in the algorithms or models used by AI, the potential for bias or inaccuracies in the data used to train the AI, the potential for improper processing of personal information, and the potential for cybersecurity breaches that could compromise patient data or product functionality.

Showing the first 40 of 65 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.

Rearranged current paragraphs (4)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Treasury. Any failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations in the United States or abroad could adversely affect us in a variety of ways that include, but are not limited to, significant criminal, civil and administrative penalties, including imprisonment of individuals, fines and penalties, denial of export privileges, seizure of shipments and restrictions on certain business activities. Also, the failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations could result in the disruption of our distribution and sales activities.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Any sensitive information (including confidential, competitive, proprietary, or personal information) that we input into a third-party generative AI technology could be leaked or disclosed to others, including if sensitive information is used to train the third parties’ AI technologies. Additionally, where an AI technology ingests personal information and makes connections using such data, those technologies may reveal other personal or sensitive information generated by the model. Moreover, AI models may create flawed, incomplete, or inaccurate outputs, some of which may appear correct. This may happen if the inputs that the model relied on were inaccurate, incomplete or flawed (including if a bad actor “poisons” the AI with bad inputs or logic), or if the logic of the AI is flawed (a so-called “hallucination”). Though we have taken steps to be thoughtful in our implementation of AI, and training on appropriate uses of AI, such risks could negatively affect the performance of our products, services, and business, and we could incur liability through the violation of laws or contracts to which we are a party or civil claims.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

CCPA, also exempt some data processed in the context of clinical trials, these developments further complicate compliance efforts, and increase legal risk and compliance costs for us, the third parties with whom we work, and our customers.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

We rely primarily on patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements and other methods, to protect our proprietary technologies and know-how.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

(e.g., office-based lab) setting. Minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion performed with a transfixing device is not eligible for payment in the office-based lab site-of-service and there is therefore no corresponding value for office-based reimbursement for CPT Code 27279.