Arbutus Biopharma Corp
For the period ended Sep 30, 2024. Filed Nov 6, 2024.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Sep 30, 2024 · Filed Nov 6, 2024
What changed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2024-06-30; filed 2024-08-08.
0001447028-24-000072
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONSCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2024-09-30; filed 2024-11-06.
0001447028-24-000087
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONSThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 160 previous paragraphs and 166 current paragraphs.
116 unchanged; 42 reworded; 4 added; 1 removed; 1 previous and 4 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 7 previous and 7 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (4)
Current report
We intend to present additional follow-up data as a late-breaker poster presentation at the upcoming AASLD - The Liver Meeting in November 2024.
Current report
Part 2 of this clinical trial has enrolled to date two sequential cohorts of ten healthy subjects each receiving 10 mg or 25 mg of AB-101 (8 active: 2 placebo) daily for seven days. AB-101 was generally well-tolerated after repeat dosing with evidence of dose-dependent receptor occupancy. In the 25mg cohort, all subjects showed evidence of receptor occupancy, with seven of the eight subjects demonstrating receptor occupancy greater than 70% during the seven-day dosing period.
Current report
General and administrative expenses decreased $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024, as compared to the same period in 2023, due primarily to decreased employee compensation-related expenses associated with a reduction in headcount in connection with the prioritization of our HBV pipeline in September 2023. Total general and administrative expenses remained substantially similar for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the same period in 2023, with higher litigation-related legal fees offset by a reduction in employee compensation-related expenses and insurance premiums.
Removed paragraphs (1)
Previous report
General and administrative expenses increased $1.6 million and $1.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2023, due primarily to higher litigation costs, partially offset by a decrease in compensation-related expenses.
Reworded paragraphs (42)
Previous wording
You should read the following discussion and analysis by our management of our financial position and results of operations in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 and our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and are presented in U.S. dollars.
Current wording
You should read the following discussion and analysis by our management of our financial position and results of operations in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 and our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and are presented in U.S. dollars.
Previous wording
Additionally, the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q represent our views only as of the date of this Form 10-Q (or any earlier date indicated in such statement). While we may update certain forward-looking statements from time to time, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, even if new information becomes available in the future. However, you are advised to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in the periodic and current reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Current wording
Additionally, the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q represent our views only as of the date of this Form 10-Q (or any earlier date indicated in such statement). While we may update certain forward-looking statements from time to time, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, even if new information becomes available in the future. However, you are advised to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in the periodic and current reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Previous wording
We continue to protect and defend our intellectual property, which is the subject of our ongoing lawsuits against Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech for their use of our patented lipid nanoparticle (LNP) technology in their COVID-19 vaccines. With respect to the Moderna lawsuit, the claim construction hearing occurred on February 8, 2024. On April 3, 2024, the court provided its claim construction ruling in which it construed the disputed claim terms and agreed with our position on most of the disputed claim terms. On August 5, 2024, we and Genevant Sciences Ltd. (Genevant), along with Moderna, filed a Stipulation to Extend Time (the Stipulation) with the court requesting an amended case schedule to accommodate certain outstanding discovery from Moderna and third parties, as specified in the Stipulation, which would move the start of the trial from April 21, 2025 to September 24, 2025, subject to the court’s availability. The Stipulation, and the new deadlines set forth therein, are subject to the approval of the court. A conference to discuss the Stipulation has been scheduled by the court for August 15, 2024. The lawsuit against Pfizer/BioNTech is ongoing and a date for a claim construction hearing has not been set.
Current wording
We continue to protect and defend our intellectual property, which is the subject of our ongoing lawsuits against Moderna Therapeutics, Inc. (Moderna) and Pfizer Inc. and BioNTech SE (collectively, Pfizer/BioNTech) for their use of our patented lipid nanoparticle (LNP) technology in their COVID-19 vaccines. With respect to the Moderna lawsuit, the claim construction hearing occurred on February 8, 2024. On April 3, 2024, the court provided its claim construction ruling in which it construed the disputed claim terms and agreed with our position on most of the disputed claim terms. On August 5, 2024, we and Genevant Sciences Ltd. (Genevant), along with Moderna, filed a Stipulation to Extend Time (the Stipulation) with the court that requested an amended case schedule to accommodate certain outstanding discovery from Moderna and third parties. The court approved the amended case schedule and the start of the trial was moved from April 21, 2025 to September 24, 2025, subject to the court’s availability. The lawsuit against Pfizer/BioNTech is ongoing and a date for a claim construction hearing has been scheduled for December 18, 2024.
Previous wording
The two core elements of our strategy are: 1) developing a portfolio of compounds that target HBV; and 2) combining therapeutic product candidates with complementary mechanisms of action to develop a functional cure for people with cHBV infection.
Current wording
Our strategy is to advance our therapeutic product candidates with complementary mechanisms of action into late-stage clinical trials with the goal of developing a functional cure for people with cHBV infection.
Previous wording
We believe that a combination of compounds that can suppress HBV DNA replication and HBsAg expression as well as boost patients’ HBV-specific immune response could address the most important elements to achieving a functional cure. Functional cure is defined as undetectable HBV DNA and HBsAg levels six months after discontinuation of all treatment. We are developing imdusiran as a cornerstone in a combination therapy that also includes antivirals and immunologics. We believe that a combination therapy delivered over a finite treatment period that results in a significant increase in the functional cure rate (i.e., a cure rate of at least 20%) would be a meaningful advancement for patients with cHBV infection.
Current wording
We believe that a combination of compounds that can suppress HBV DNA replication and HBsAg expression as well as boost patients’ HBV-specific immune response could address the most important elements to achieving a functional cure. Functional cure is defined as sustained HBsAg loss and HBV DNA less than the lower limit of quantification (<LLOQ) 24 weeks off treatment, with or without anti-HBsAg antibodies. We are developing imdusiran as a cornerstone in a combination therapy that also includes antivirals and immunologics. We believe that a combination therapy delivered over a finite treatment period that results in a significant increase in the functional cure rate (i.e., a cure rate of at least 20%) would be a meaningful advancement for patients with cHBV infection.
Previous wording
•Imdusiran is our proprietary, conjugated GalNAc, subcutaneously-delivered RNAi therapeutic product candidate that suppresses all HBV antigens, including HBsAg expression, which is thought to be a key prerequisite to enable reawakening of a patient’s immune system to respond to HBV. Over 170 patients with cHBV infection have been dosed with imdusiran in our Phase 1 and ongoing Phase 2a clinical trials. Clinical data generated thus far has shown imdusiran to be generally safe and well-tolerated, while also providing meaningful reductions in HBsAg and HBV DNA.
Current wording
•Imdusiran is our proprietary, conjugated GalNAc, subcutaneously-delivered RNAi therapeutic product candidate that suppresses all HBV antigens, including HBsAg expression, which is thought to be a key prerequisite to enable reawakening of a patient’s immune system to respond to HBV. Over 250 patients with cHBV infection have been dosed with imdusiran in our Phase 1 and ongoing Phase 2a clinical trials. Clinical data generated thus far has shown imdusiran to be generally safe and well-tolerated, while also providing meaningful reductions in HBsAg and HBV DNA.
Previous wording
•AB-101 is our proprietary oral PD-L1 inhibitor that has the potential to reawaken patients’ HBV-specific immune response by inhibiting PD-L1. AB-101 is currently in a Phase 1a/1b clinical trial (AB-101-001) evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of single- and multiple-ascending oral doses in healthy subjects and patients with cHBV infection. Part 1 of this clinical trial enrolled four sequential cohorts of eight healthy subjects each (6 active: 2 placebo) receiving a single dose of AB-101 at increasing dose levels up to 25 mg. The data showed that AB-101 was well-tolerated with evidence of dose-dependent receptor occupancy. In the 25mg cohort, all five evaluable subjects showed evidence of receptor occupancy between 50-100%. We have moved into Part 2 of this clinical trial which evaluates multiple-ascending doses of AB-101 in healthy subjects and we expect to report this preliminary data in the second half of 2024.
Current wording
•AB-101 is our proprietary oral PD-L1 inhibitor that has the potential to reawaken patients’ HBV-specific immune response by inhibiting PD-L1. AB-101 is currently in a Phase 1a/1b clinical trial (AB-101-001) evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of single- and multiple-ascending oral doses in healthy subjects and patients with cHBV infection. Parts 1 and 2 of this clinical trial enrolled sequential cohorts of healthy subjects receiving single and multiple doses, respectively, of AB-101 at increasing dose levels. The data showed that AB-101 was generally well-tolerated with evidence of dose-dependent receptor occupancy. We have moved into Part 3 of this clinical trial which evaluates repeat dosing of AB-101 in patients with cHBV, and we expect to report preliminary data in the first half of 2025.
Previous wording
Our strategy is to position imdusiran as a potential cornerstone therapeutic in combination with AB-101 or other agents with potentially complementary mechanisms of action. We are currently conducting two Phase 2a clinical trials combining imdusiran with other agents. Upon successful completion of our AB-101-001 clinical trial, we may initiate a Phase 2 clinical trial combining imdusiran, AB-101 and nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy in patients with cHBV infection. The intent of these trials is to initially lower HBsAg levels with imdusiran and then administer a complementary agent, in this case an immune modulator or a therapeutic vaccine, to further lower HBsAg levels and promote anti-HBV immunity. We believe that if we can lower HBsAg and promote immunity, we may achieve and sustain undetectable HBV DNA and HBsAg levels, potentially leading to a functional cure.
Current wording
Our strategy is to position imdusiran as a potential cornerstone therapeutic in combination with AB-101 or other agents with potentially complementary mechanisms of action. We are currently conducting two Phase 2a clinical trials combining imdusiran with other agents. The intent of these trials is to initially lower HBsAg levels with imdusiran and then administer a complementary agent, in this case an immune modulator or a therapeutic vaccine, to further lower HBsAg levels and promote anti-HBV immunity. We believe that if we can lower HBsAg and promote immunity, we may achieve sustained HBsAg loss and HBV DNA <LLOQ, potentially leading to a functional cure.
Previous wording
•Imdusiran in combination with Peg-IFNα-2a and ongoing standard-of-care NA therapy in patients with cHBV infection (IM-PROVE I). Preliminary data reported from this IM-PROVE I trial suggest that the addition of Peg-IFNα-2a to imdusiran treatment was generally safe, well-tolerated and, in some patients, resulted in undetectable HBsAg at end-of-treatment and sustained HBsAg loss 24 weeks after completing imdusiran and Peg-IFNα-2a treatment.
Current wording
•Imdusiran in combination with Peg-IFNα-2a and ongoing standard-of-care NA therapy in patients with cHBV infection (IM-PROVE I). Preliminary data reported from this IM-PROVE I trial suggest that the addition of a short course of Peg-IFNα-2a to imdusiran treatment was generally safe, well-tolerated and, in some patients, resulted in HBsAg loss at end-of-treatment and sustained HBsAg loss 24 weeks after completing imdusiran and Peg-IFNα-2a treatment. We intend to present additional follow-up data as a late-breaker poster presentation at the upcoming AASLD - The Liver Meeting in November 2024.
Previous wording
•Imdusiran in combination with VTP-300, Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc’s (Barinthus and formerly Vaccitech plc), HBV antigen specific immunotherapy, and ongoing standard-of-care NA therapy in patients with cHBV infection (IM-PROVE II). Preliminary data reported from this IM-PROVE II clinical trial showed that dosing with imdusiran and then VTP-300 achieved statistical significance in lowering HBsAg levels after the end of the treatment period. We are also dosing patients in an additional cohort of this clinical trial that, in addition to imdusiran and VTP-300, includes up to two low doses of nivolumab (Opdivo®), an approved PD-1 monoclonal antibody inhibitor. Preliminary end-of-treatment data from this additional cohort are expected in the second half of 2024.
Current wording
•Imdusiran in combination with VTP-300, Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc’s (Barinthus and formerly Vaccitech plc), HBV antigen specific immunotherapy, and ongoing standard-of-care NA therapy in patients with cHBV infection (IM-PROVE II). Preliminary data reported from this IM-PROVE II clinical trial showed that dosing with imdusiran and then VTP-300 achieved statistical significance in lowering HBsAg levels after the end of the treatment period. We are also dosing patients in an additional cohort of this clinical trial that, in addition to imdusiran and VTP-300, includes up to two low doses of nivolumab (Opdivo®), an approved PD-1 monoclonal antibody inhibitor. We intend to present preliminary end-of-treatment data from this additional cohort as a poster presentation at the upcoming AASLD - The Liver Meeting in November 2024.
Previous wording
On July 29, 2024, our Board of Directors took action, effective August 1, 2024, to streamline the organization to focus our efforts on advancing the clinical development of imdusiran and AB-101, and therefore ceased all discovery efforts and discontinued our IM-PROVE III clinical trial. In taking these steps to streamline the organization, we are implementing a 40% reduction in our workforce, primarily affecting the discovery and general and administrative functions. As a result, we will incur a one-time restructuring charge in the third quarter of 2024 of approximately $3.0 million to $4.0 million, which includes approximately $2.9 million of cash severance and continued benefits payments, a non-cash impairment charge for laboratory equipment of approximately $0.5 million and approximately $0.2 million to $0.4 million of cash payments to vendors for close-out activities in connection with the cessation of discovery efforts and the discontinuation of our IM-PROVE III clinical trial. With these organizational changes and our ongoing cost management efforts, we now expect our current cash, cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities will be sufficient to fund our operations into the fourth quarter of 2026.
Current wording
On July 29, 2024, our Board of Directors approved a plan, effective August 1, 2024, to streamline the organization to focus our efforts on advancing the clinical development of imdusiran and AB-101, and therefore ceased all discovery efforts and discontinued our IM-PROVE III clinical trial. In taking these steps to streamline the organization, we implemented a 40% reduction in our workforce, primarily affecting the discovery and general and administrative functions. As a result, we incurred a one-time restructuring charge in the third quarter of 2024 of approximately $3.6 million, which includes approximately $2.9 million of cash severance and continued benefits payments, a non-cash impairment charge for laboratory equipment of approximately $0.2 million and approximately $0.5 million of cash payments to vendors for close-out activities in connection with the cessation of discovery efforts and the discontinuation of our IM-PROVE III clinical trial. With these organizational changes and our ongoing cost management efforts, we expect our current cash, cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities will be sufficient to fund our operations into the fourth quarter of 2026.
Previous wording
RNAi therapeutics represent a significant advancement in drug development. RNAi therapeutics utilize a natural pathway within cells to silence genes by eliminating the disease-causing proteins that they code for. We are developing RNAi therapeutics that are designed to reduce HBsAg expression and other HBV antigens in people with cHBV infection. Reducing HBsAg is widely believed to be a key prerequisite to enable a patient’s immune system to reawaken and respond against the virus.
Current wording
RNAi therapeutics represent a significant advancement in drug development. RNAi therapeutics utilize a natural pathway within cells to silence genes by eliminating the disease-causing proteins that they code for. We are developing an RNAi therapeutic that is designed to reduce HBsAg expression and other HBV antigens in people with cHBV infection. Reducing HBsAg is widely believed to be a key prerequisite to enable a patient’s immune system to reawaken and respond against the virus.
Previous wording
IM-PROVE I Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial to evaluate imdusiran in combination with Peg-IFNα-2a
Current wording
IM-PROVE I Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial evaluating imdusiran in combination with Peg-IFNα-2a
Previous wording
We have completed enrollment in a randomized, open label, multicenter Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial investigating the safety and antiviral activity of imdusiran in combination with short courses of Peg-IFNα-2a and ongoing NA therapy in 43 stably NA-suppressed, HBeAg negative, non-cirrhotic patients with cHBV infection. The primary objective of this trial is to initially lower HBsAg levels with imdusiran and then administer Peg-IFNα-2a as an immunomodulator to promote anti-HBV immune reawakening. We believe that if we can lower HBsAg and promote immune reawakening, we may achieve and sustain undetectable HBV DNA and HBsAg levels, potentially leading to a functional cure. After 24-weeks of dosing with imdusiran (60mg every 8 weeks), patients were randomized into one of four arms to receive ongoing Peg-IFNα-2a plus NA therapy for either 12 or 24 weeks, with or without additional doses of imdusiran. After completion of the assigned Peg-IFNα-2a treatment period, all patients remain on NA therapy for the initial 24-week follow-up period, and then discontinue NA treatment, provided they meet protocol-defined stopping criteria. Patients who stop NA therapy enter an intensive follow-up period for 48 weeks.
Current wording
We have completed enrollment in a randomized, open label, multicenter Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial investigating the safety and antiviral activity of imdusiran in combination with a short course of Peg-IFNα-2a and ongoing NA therapy in 43 stably NA-suppressed, HBeAg negative, non-cirrhotic patients with cHBV infection. The primary objective of this trial is to initially lower HBsAg levels with imdusiran and then administer Peg-IFNα-2a as an immunomodulator to promote anti-HBV immune reawakening. We believe that if we can lower HBsAg and promote immune reawakening, we may achieve sustained HBsAg loss and HBV DNA <LLOQ, potentially leading to a functional cure. After 24-weeks of dosing with imdusiran (60mg every 8 weeks, 4 doses), patients were randomized into one of four arms to receive a short course of Peg-IFNα-2a plus ongoing NA therapy for either 12 or 24 weeks, with or without an additional two doses of imdusiran. After completion of the assigned Peg-IFNα-2a treatment period, all patients remained on NA therapy for the initial 24-week follow-up period, and then discontinued NA treatment, provided they met protocol-defined stopping criteria. Patients who stopped NA therapy entered an intensive follow-up period for 48 weeks.
Previous wording
At the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Congress in June 2024, we presented data from this clinical trial that suggests that the addition of Peg-IFNα-2a to imdusiran treatment was generally safe, well-tolerated and, in some patients, resulted in undetectable HBsAg at end-of-treatment and sustained HBsAg loss 24 weeks after completing imdusiran and Peg-IFNα-2a treatment.
Current wording
At the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Congress in June 2024, we presented data from this clinical trial that suggests that the addition of Peg-IFNα-2a to imdusiran treatment was generally safe, well-tolerated and, in some patients, resulted in HBsAg loss at end-of-treatment and sustained HBsAg loss 24 weeks after completing imdusiran and Peg-IFNα-2a treatment.
Previous wording
Select key data from this Phase 2a clinical trial include:
Current wording
Select key data from this Phase 2a clinical trial that was presented at EASL 2024 include:
Previous wording
•33% of patients in Cohort A1 who received 48 weeks of imdusiran combined with a short course of Peg-IFNα-2a (24 weeks) with their ongoing NA therapy achieved undetectable HBsAg at the end-of-treatment (EOT) that was maintained in 100% of these patients 24 weeks after completing imdusiran and Peg-IFNα-2a treatment.
Current wording
•33% of patients in Cohort A1 who received 48 weeks of imdusiran (60mg every 8 weeks, 6 doses) combined with 24 weeks of Peg-IFNα-2a and their ongoing NA therapy achieved HBsAg loss at the end-of-treatment (EOT) that was maintained in 100% of these patients 24 weeks after completing imdusiran and Peg-IFNα-2a treatment.
Previous wording
•Undetectable HBsAg was achieved in 67% of patients with HBsAg less than 1,000 IU/mL at baseline in Cohort A1.
Current wording
•HBsAg loss was achieved and maintained in 67% of patients with HBsAg less than 1,000 IU/mL at baseline in Cohort A1.
Previous wording
•A total of six patients who received 24 weeks of Peg-IFNα-2a (n=4 Cohort A1; n=2 Cohort A2) seroconverted, with HBsAg loss accompanied by high titers of anti-HBsAg antibodies. All six of these patients have stopped NA therapy, with two of those patients reaching 12 weeks off all therapy with sustained undetectable levels of HBsAg and HBV DNA. The remaining four patients are at various timepoints less than 12 weeks off therapy with undetectable levels of HBsAg and HBV DNA.
Current wording
•A total of six patients who received 24 weeks of Peg-IFNα-2a (n=4 Cohort A1; n=2 Cohort A2) seroconverted with HBsAg loss. At the time the data was reported, all six of these patients had stopped NA therapy, with two of those patients reaching 12 weeks off all therapy with sustained undetectable HBV DNA levels and HBsAg loss. The remaining four patients were at various timepoints less than 12 weeks off therapy with undetectable HBV DNA levels and HBsAg loss.
Previous wording
IM-PROVE II Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial to evaluate imdusiran in combination with Barinthus’ VTP-300
Current wording
IM-PROVE II Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial evaluating imdusiran in combination with Barinthus’ VTP-300
Previous wording
Through a clinical collaboration agreement with Barinthus that we entered into in July 2021, we have completed enrollment in IM-PROVE II, a Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial evaluating the safety, antiviral activity and immunogenicity of Barinthus’ VTP-300, an HBV antigen specific immunotherapy, administered after imdusiran in patients with cHBV infection. The initial trial design enrolled 40 NA-suppressed, HBeAg negative or positive, non-cirrhotic cHBV infected patients. The primary objective of this trial is to initially lower HBsAg levels with imdusiran and then administer VTP-300 as an immunomodulator to promote anti-HBV immune reawakening. We believe that if we can lower HBsAg and promote immune reawakening, we may achieve and sustain undetectable HBV DNA and HBsAg levels, potentially leading to a functional cure. All patients received imdusiran (60mg every 8 weeks, 4 doses) plus NA therapy for 24 weeks. After week 24, treatment with imdusiran was stopped. Patients continued only on NA therapy and were randomized to receive VTP-300 or placebo at week 26 and week 30. At week 48, all patients were evaluated for eligibility to discontinue NA therapy and will be followed for an additional 24 to 48 weeks.
Current wording
Through a clinical collaboration agreement with Barinthus that we entered into in July 2021, we have completed enrollment in IM-PROVE II, a Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial evaluating the safety, antiviral activity and immunogenicity of Barinthus’ VTP-300, an HBV antigen specific immunotherapy, administered after imdusiran in patients with cHBV infection. The initial trial design enrolled 40 NA-suppressed, HBeAg negative or positive, non-cirrhotic cHBV infected patients. The primary objective of this trial was to initially lower HBsAg levels with imdusiran and then administer VTP-300 as an immunomodulator to promote anti-HBV immune reawakening. We believe that if we can lower HBsAg and promote immune reawakening, we may achieve sustained HBsAg loss and HBV DNA <LLOQ, potentially leading to a functional cure. All patients received imdusiran (60mg every 8 weeks, 4 doses) plus NA therapy for 24 weeks. After week 24, treatment with imdusiran was stopped. Patients continued only on NA therapy and were randomized to receive VTP-300 or placebo at week 26 and week 30. At week 48, all patients were evaluated for eligibility to discontinue NA therapy and are followed for an additional 24 to 48 weeks.
Previous wording
Preliminary data were presented at the EASL Congress in June 2024 from 38 of 40 patients in the IM-PROVE II clinical trial that were on stable NA therapy throughout the treatment period, received imdusiran (60mg every 8 weeks) for 24 weeks and were then randomized to receive either VTP-300 (treatment arm) or placebo at Weeks 26 and 30. The data showed that at 24-weeks post treatment with imdusiran and VTP-300, statistical significance (p<0.05) was achieved in HBsAg levels between the treatment arm (n=5) and placebo (n=6). In addition, more patients maintained HBsAg thresholds of <100 IU/mL and <10 IU/mL when administered VTP-300 versus placebo. Treatment with imdusiran and VTP-300 was generally safe and well-tolerated. There were no serious adverse events, Grade 3 or 4 adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events.
Current wording
Preliminary data were presented at the EASL Congress in June 2024 from 38 of 40 patients in the IM-PROVE II clinical trial that were on stable NA therapy throughout the treatment period, received imdusiran (60mg every 8 weeks, 4 doses) over 24 weeks and were then randomized to receive either VTP-300 (treatment arm) or placebo at Weeks 26 and 30. The data showed that at 24-weeks post-treatment with imdusiran and VTP-300, statistical significance (p<0.05) was achieved in HBsAg levels between the treatment arm (n=5) and placebo (n=6). In addition, more patients maintained HBsAg thresholds of <100 IU/mL and <10 IU/mL when administered VTP-300 versus placebo. Treatment with imdusiran and VTP-300 was generally safe and well-tolerated. There were no serious adverse events, Grade 3 or 4 adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events.
Previous wording
Additionally, we amended the IM-PROVE II clinical trial protocol to include another cohort that will receive imdusiran, VTP-300 and low dose nivolumab (Opdivo®), an approved PD-1 inhibitor. In this additional cohort, patients will receive imdusiran (60mg every 8 weeks, 4 doses) plus NA therapy for 24 weeks, followed by administration of VTP-300 plus up to two low doses of nivolumab while remaining on NA therapy. At week 48, all patients will be evaluated for eligibility to discontinue NA therapy, and will be followed for an additional 24 to 48 weeks. Preliminary end-of-treatment data from this additional cohort are expected in the second half of 2024.
Current wording
Additionally, we amended the IM-PROVE II clinical trial protocol to include another cohort that received imdusiran, VTP-300 and low dose nivolumab (Opdivo®), an approved PD-1 inhibitor. In this additional cohort, patients received imdusiran (60mg every 8 weeks, 4 doses) plus NA therapy for 24 weeks, followed by administration of VTP-300 plus up to two low doses of nivolumab while remaining on NA therapy. At week 48, all patients will be evaluated for eligibility to discontinue NA therapy, and will be followed for an additional 24 to 48 weeks. We intend to present preliminary end-of-treatment data from this additional cohort as a poster presentation at the upcoming AASLD - The Liver Meeting in November 2024.
Previous wording
We are currently dosing healthy subjects in our Phase 1a/1b clinical trial for AB-101 (AB-101-001). The AB-101-001 clinical trial is designed to investigate the safety, tolerability and PK/PD of single and multiple-ascending oral doses of AB-101 for up to 28 days in healthy subjects and patients with cHBV infection. The trial will be conducted in three parts starting with single ascending doses in healthy subjects, followed by multiple ascending doses in healthy subjects and culminating with multiple doses in patients with cHBV infection. Safety and PK/PD assessments will be performed prior to dose escalation in all parts of the clinical trial. Part 1 of this clinical trial enrolled four sequential cohorts of eight healthy subjects each (6 active: 2 placebo) receiving a single dose of AB-101 at increasing dose levels up to 25 mg. The data showed that AB-101 was well-tolerated with evidence of dose-dependent receptor occupancy. In the 25mg cohort, all five evaluable subjects showed evidence of receptor occupancy between 50-100%. We have moved into Part 2 of this clinical trial which evaluates multiple-ascending doses of AB-101 in healthy subjects and we expect to report this preliminary data in the second half of 2024.
Current wording
We are currently dosing study subject in our Phase 1a/1b clinical trial for AB-101 (AB-101-001). The AB-101-001 clinical trial is designed to investigate the safety, tolerability and PK/PD of single and multiple-ascending oral doses of AB-101 for up to 28 days in healthy subjects and patients with cHBV infection. The trial consists of three parts starting with single ascending doses in healthy subjects, followed by multiple ascending doses in healthy subjects and culminating with multiple doses in patients with cHBV infection. Safety and PK/PD assessments are performed prior to dose escalation in all parts of the clinical trial.
Previous wording
In 2012, we entered into a license agreement with Alnylam that entitles Alnylam to develop and commercialize products with our LNP delivery technology. Alnylam’s ONPATTRO, which represents the first approved application of our LNP technology, was approved by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) during the third quarter of 2018 and was launched by Alnylam immediately upon approval in the United States. Under the terms of this license agreement, we are entitled to tiered royalty payments on global net sales of ONPATTRO ranging from 1.00% - 2.33% after offsets, with the highest tier applicable to annual net sales above $500 million. This royalty interest was sold to the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS), effective as of January 1, 2019, for $20 million in gross proceeds before advisory fees. OMERS will retain this entitlement until it has received $30 million in royalties, at which point 100% of this royalty entitlement on future global net sales of ONPATTRO will revert to us. OMERS has assumed the risk of collecting up to $30 million of future royalty payments from Alnylam and we are not obligated to reimburse OMERS if they fail to collect any such future royalties. If this royalty entitlement reverts to us, it has the potential to provide an active royalty stream or to be otherwise monetized again in full or in part. From the inception of the royalty sale through June 30, 2024, an aggregate of $23.8 million of royalties have been earned by OMERS.
Current wording
In 2012, we entered into a license agreement with Alnylam that entitles Alnylam to develop and commercialize products with our LNP delivery technology. Alnylam’s ONPATTRO, which represents the first approved application of our LNP technology, was approved by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) during the third quarter of 2018 and was launched by Alnylam immediately upon approval in the United States. Under the terms of this license agreement, we are entitled to tiered royalty payments on global net sales of ONPATTRO ranging from 1.00% - 2.33% after offsets, with the highest tier applicable to annual net sales above $500 million. This royalty interest was sold to the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS), effective as of January 1, 2019, for $20 million in gross proceeds before advisory fees. OMERS will retain this entitlement until it has received $30 million in royalties, at which point 100% of this royalty entitlement on future global net sales of ONPATTRO will revert to us. OMERS has assumed the risk of collecting up to $30 million of future royalty payments from Alnylam and we are not obligated to reimburse OMERS if they fail to collect any such future royalties. If this royalty entitlement reverts to us, it has the potential to provide an active royalty stream or to be otherwise monetized again in full or in part. From the inception of the royalty sale through September 30, 2024, an aggregate of $24.4 million of royalties have been earned by OMERS.
Previous wording
Additionally, if Genevant receives proceeds from an action for infringement by any third parties of our intellectual property licensed to Genevant, we would be entitled to receive, after deduction of litigation costs, 20% of the proceeds received by Genevant or, if less, tiered low single-digit royalties on net sales of the infringing product (inclusive of the proceeds from litigation or settlement, which would be treated as net sales).
Current wording
Additionally, if Genevant receives proceeds from an action for infringement by any third parties of our intellectual property licensed to Genevant, we would be entitled to receive, after deduction of litigation costs, 20% of the proceeds received by
Previous wording
On April 5, 2018, Moderna and Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation (Merck) filed Notices of Opposition to Arbutus’ European patent EP 2279254 (the ’254 Patent) with the European Patent Office (EPO), requesting that the ‘254 Patent be revoked in its entirety for all contracting states. We filed a response to Moderna and Merck’s oppositions on September 3, 2018. A hearing was conducted before the Opposition Division of the EPO on October 10, 2019. At the conclusion of the hearing, the EPO upheld an auxiliary request adopting the amendment, as put forth by us, of certain claims of the ‘254 Patent. In February 2020 Moderna and Merck filed Notices of Appeal challenging the EPO’s grant of the auxiliary request. Merck filed its notice of appeal on February 24, 2020 and Moderna on February 27, 2020. Both Merck and Moderna perfected their appeals by filing Grounds of Appeal on April 30, 2020. We filed our responses to the appeals on September 18, 2020. On March 22, 2022, Moderna filed further written submissions to which we and Genevant responded in August 2022. On April 18, 2023, we and Genevant withdrew our auxiliary request, however, the original (main) request remains in the action. We and Moderna informed the Board of Appeals that we would not object to a remittance of the matter without a hearing to the Opposition Division of the EPO. The hearing in this matter before the Board of Appeals was subsequently cancelled and resubmitted to the Opposition Division (i.e., lower board) of the EPO. On October 31, 2023, the Opposition Division issued a summons for oral proceedings and provided its preliminary and non-binding opinion on the subject matter to be discussed at the hearing. On November 3, 2023, we responded to the summons and on January 15, 2024, Moderna and Merck filed their reply to the written opinion of the Opposition Division, as well as to our written submission of November 3, 2023. We responded to Moderna and Merck’s reply on April 5, 2024. Oral proceedings were held on June 6, 2024, and the Opposition Division upheld the ‘254 Patent but declined our and Genevant’s request to broaden certain claims in the ‘254 Patent. We have not received any indication from Moderna and Merck if they plan to appeal the decision, and Genevant and we are currently evaluating whether to appeal the Opposition Division’s decision not to allow Genevant and us to broaden our claims under the ‘254 Patent.
Current wording
On April 5, 2018, Moderna and Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation (Merck) filed Notices of Opposition to Arbutus’ European patent EP 2279254 (the ’254 Patent) with the European Patent Office (EPO), requesting that the ‘254 Patent be revoked in its entirety for all contracting states. We filed a response to Moderna and Merck’s oppositions on September 3, 2018. A hearing was conducted before the Opposition Division of the EPO on October 10, 2019. At the conclusion of the hearing, the EPO upheld an auxiliary request adopting the amendment, as put forth by us, of certain claims of the ‘254 Patent. In February 2020 Moderna and Merck filed Notices of Appeal challenging the EPO’s grant of the auxiliary request. Merck filed its notice of appeal on February 24, 2020 and Moderna on February 27, 2020. Both Merck and Moderna perfected their appeals by filing Grounds of Appeal on April 30, 2020. We filed our responses to the appeals on September 18, 2020. On March 22, 2022, Moderna filed further written submissions to which we and Genevant responded in August 2022. On April 18, 2023, we and Genevant withdrew our auxiliary request, however, the original (main) request remains in the action. We and Moderna informed the Board of Appeals that we would not object to a remittance of the matter without a hearing to the Opposition Division of the EPO. The hearing in this matter before the Board of Appeals was subsequently cancelled and resubmitted to the Opposition Division (i.e., lower board) of the EPO. On October 31, 2023, the Opposition Division issued a summons for oral proceedings and provided its preliminary and non-binding opinion on the subject matter to be discussed at the hearing. On November 3, 2023, we responded to the summons and on January 15, 2024, Moderna and Merck filed their reply to the written opinion of the Opposition Division, as well as to our written submission of November 3, 2023. We responded to Moderna and Merck’s reply on April 5, 2024. Oral proceedings were held on June 6, 2024, and the Opposition Division upheld the ‘254 Patent but declined our and Genevant’s request to broaden certain claims in the ‘254 Patent. Both parties have given notice of their intent to appeal the Opposition Division’s decision, and the deadline for filing for their respective grounds for appeal is November 25, 2024.
Previous wording
On February 28, 2022, we and Genevant filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against Moderna, Inc. and a Moderna affiliate (collectively, Moderna) seeking damages for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,058,069, 8,492,359, 8,822,668, 9,364,435, 9,504,651, and 11,141,378 in the manufacture and sale of MRNA-1273, Moderna’s vaccine for COVID-19. The patents relate to nucleic acid-lipid particles and lipid vesicles, as well as compositions and methods for their use. The lawsuit does not seek an injunction or otherwise seek to impede the sale, manufacture or distribution of MRNA-1273. However, we seek fair compensation for Moderna’s use of our patented technology that was developed with great effort and at great expense, without which Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine would not have been successful. On May 6, 2022, Moderna filed a partial motion to dismiss the claims “relating to Moderna’s sale and provision of COVID-19 vaccine doses to the U.S. Government.” On November 2, 2022, the court issued an Order denying Moderna’s motion. On November 30, 2022, Moderna filed its Answer to the Complaint and Counterclaims. We and Genevant filed our Answer to Moderna’s Counterclaims on December 21, 2022. On February 14, 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest in the action. On February 16, 2023, the court held an Initial Pretrial Conference after which it issued an Order, dated February 16, 2023, ordering that within 14 days of the issuance of the Order, the parties and the U.S. Government were to submit letters regarding the impact of the Governments’ Statement of Interest on the scheduling of the matter. On March 10, 2023, the court reaffirmed its denial of Moderna’s motion to dismiss. On March 16, 2023, the court held a Rule 16 scheduling conference, and on March 21, 2023, the court issued a scheduling order in the matter without setting a trial date. On June 9, 2023, the court granted the parties’ request to extend the time for claim construction briefing. The claim construction hearing was held on February 8, 2024. On April 3, 2024, the court issued its opinion regarding the claims construction. The court agreed with both of our positions regarding the Composition of Total Lipid (‘069) Patent that: (i) the claimed molar percentage (mol. %) ranges can be met by any particle and is not limited to “finished” particles that are not subjected to further process steps; and (ii) that the claimed mol. % ranges include standard variation based on the number of significant figures recited in the claim. The court also agreed with our position regarding the Cationic Lipid with Protonatable Tertiary Amine (‘378) Patent that there is no limitation as to the mol. % of the claimed cationic lipid. Regarding the Encapsulation of mRNA (‘651) Patent, the court held that “wherein at least 70% / at least 80% / about 90% of the mRNA in the formulation is fully encapsulated in the lipid vesicles” means “wherein at least 70% / at le…
Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.
Current wording
On February 28, 2022, we and Genevant filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against Moderna, Inc. and a Moderna affiliate (collectively, Moderna) seeking damages for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,058,069, 8,492,359, 8,822,668, 9,364,435, 9,504,651, and 11,141,378 in the manufacture and sale of MRNA-1273, Moderna’s vaccine for COVID-19. The patents relate to nucleic acid-lipid particles and lipid vesicles, as well as compositions and methods for their use. The lawsuit does not seek an injunction or otherwise seek to impede the sale, manufacture or distribution of MRNA-1273. However, we seek fair compensation for Moderna’s use of our patented technology that was developed with great effort and at great expense, without which Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine would not have been successful. On May 6, 2022, Moderna filed a partial motion to dismiss the claims “relating to Moderna’s sale and provision of COVID-19 vaccine doses to the U.S. Government.” On November 2, 2022, the court issued an Order denying Moderna’s motion. On November 30, 2022, Moderna filed its Answer to the Complaint and Counterclaims. We and Genevant filed our Answer to Moderna’s Counterclaims on December 21, 2022. On February 14, 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest in the action. On February 16, 2023, the court held an Initial Pretrial Conference after which it issued an Order, dated February 16, 2023, ordering that within 14 days of the issuance of the Order, the parties and the U.S. Government were to submit letters regarding the impact of the Governments’ Statement of Interest on the scheduling of the matter. On March 10, 2023, the court reaffirmed its denial of Moderna’s motion to dismiss. On March 16, 2023, the court held a Rule 16 scheduling conference, and on March 21, 2023, the court issued a scheduling order in the matter without setting a trial date. On June 9, 2023, the court granted the parties’ request to extend the time for claim construction briefing. The claim construction hearing was held on February 8, 2024. On April 3, 2024, the court issued its opinion regarding the claims construction. The court agreed with both of our positions regarding the Composition of Total Lipid (‘069) Patent that: (i) the claimed molar percentage (mol. %) ranges can be met by any particle and is not limited to “finished” particles that are not subjected to further process steps; and (ii) that the claimed mol. % ranges include standard variation based on the number of significant figures recited in the claim. The court also agreed with our position regarding the Cationic Lipid with Protonatable Tertiary Amine (‘378) Patent that there is no limitation as to the mol. % of the claimed cationic lipid. Regarding the Encapsulation of mRNA (‘651) Patent, the court held that “wherein at least 70% / at least 80% / about 90% of the mRNA in the formulation is fully encapsulated in the lipid vesicles” means “wherein at least 70% / at le…
Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.
Previous wording
On April 4, 2023, we and Genevant filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against Pfizer Inc. (Pfizer) and BioNTech SE (BioNTech) seeking damages for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,504,651; 8,492,359; 11,141,378; 11,298,320; and 11,318,098 in the manufacture and sale of any COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccines. The patents relate to nucleic acid-lipid particles and their composition, manufacture, delivery and methods of use. The lawsuit does not seek an injunction or otherwise seek to impede the sale, manufacture or distribution of any COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccines. However, we seek fair compensation for Pfizer’s and BioNTech’s use of our patented technology that was developed with great effort and at great expense, without which their COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccines would not have been successful. On July 10, 2023, Pfizer and BioNTech filed their answer to the complaint, affirmative defenses and counterclaims. We and Genevant filed our answer to these counterclaims on August 14, 2023. A scheduling conference was held on August 28, 2023 and the court issued a Letter Order on September 7, 2023 setting dates up to but not including the date for a claim construction hearing. Scheduling of the claim construction hearing and subsequent case dates, including the date for trial, will be set at a later time that is yet to be determined. Document and written discovery in the action is ongoing.
Current wording
On April 4, 2023, we and Genevant filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against Pfizer Inc. (Pfizer) and BioNTech SE (BioNTech) seeking damages for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,504,651; 8,492,359; 11,141,378; 11,298,320; and 11,318,098 in the manufacture and sale of any COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccines. The patents relate to nucleic acid-lipid particles and their composition, manufacture, delivery and methods of use. The lawsuit does not seek an injunction or otherwise seek to impede the sale, manufacture or distribution of any COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccines. However, we seek fair compensation for Pfizer’s and BioNTech’s use of our patented technology that was developed with great effort and at great expense, without which their COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccines would not have been successful. On July 10, 2023, Pfizer and BioNTech filed their answer to the complaint, affirmative defenses and counterclaims. We and Genevant filed our answer to these counterclaims on August 14, 2023. A scheduling conference was held on August 28, 2023 and the court issued a Letter Order on September 7, 2023 setting certain court dates. Subsequently, the claim construction hearing was scheduled for December 18, 2024. Scheduling of subsequent case dates, including the date for trial, will be set at a later time that is yet to be determined. Document and written discovery in the action is ongoing.
Previous wording
(iii) that if Acuitas did not file an amended complaint, we and Genevant must file our motion to dismiss by a certain date. Acuitas filed its amended complaint on September 6, 2022. On October 4, 2022, we and Genevant filed our motion to dismiss the Acuitas action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on the lack of a case or controversy. Acuitas filed its opposition to the motion to dismiss on November 1, 2022, and we and Genevant filed our reply brief on November 16, 2022 at which point the motion was fully briefed. A status conference for the action was set for August 9, 2023, however on August 4, 2023, Acuitas voluntarily dismissed its complaint in the Southern District of New York and refiled a virtually identical complaint in the District Court of New Jersey (D. N.J.) where the Pfizer/BioNTech matter is currently pending, except that the 9,404,127 patent is not at issue in the New Jersey action, and Acuitas also added two additional patents to its New Jersey declaratory judgment action (U.S. Patent Nos. 11,298,320 and 11,318,098) that were not at issue in its New York action. On September 15, 2023, we and Genevant filed a letter with the court seeking a premotion conference for a motion to dismiss and subsequently filed our and Genevant’s motion to dismiss on October 13, 2023. Acuitas filed its opposition on November 1, 2023 and we and Genevant filed our reply on November 16, 2023. Acuitas filed a request to commence discovery on November 18, 2023, to which we and Genevant responded on November 20, 2023. On May 20, 2024, the court granted our and Genevant’s motion to dismiss, so we believe this matter is now concluded.
Current wording
On March 18, 2022, Acuitas filed a lawsuit against us and Genevant in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, asking the court to enter declaratory judgment that Arbutus patent Nos. 8,058,069, 8,492,359, 8,822,668, 9,006,417, 9,364,435, 9,404,127, 9,504,651, 9,518,272, and 11,141,378 do not infringe Pfizer and BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine, COMIRNATY, which uses an mRNA lipid provided, under license, by Acuitas. Acuitas also seeks a declaration that each of the listed patents is invalid. On June 24, 2022, we and Genevant sought a pre-motion conference concerning our anticipated motion to dismiss all of Acuitas’ claims due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The request for a pre-motion conference was granted, but the case was subsequently re-assigned to a new judge who entered an order directing: (i) Acuitas to inform the court whether it intended to file an amended complaint; (ii) that Acuitas must file any amended complaint by a certain date; and (iii) that if Acuitas did not file an amended complaint, we and Genevant must file our motion to dismiss by a certain date. Acuitas filed its amended complaint on September 6, 2022. On October 4, 2022, we and Genevant filed our motion to dismiss the Acuitas action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on the lack of a case or controversy. Acuitas filed its opposition to the motion to dismiss on November 1, 2022, and we and Genevant filed our reply brief on November 16, 2022 at which point the motion was fully briefed. A status conference for the action was set for August 9, 2023, however on August 4, 2023, Acuitas voluntarily dismissed its complaint in the Southern District of New York and refiled a virtually identical complaint in the District Court of New Jersey (D. N.J.) where the Pfizer/BioNTech matter is currently pending, except that the 9,404,127 patent is not at issue in the New Jersey action, and Acuitas also added two additional patents to its New Jersey declaratory judgment action (U.S. Patent Nos. 11,298,320 and 11,318,098) that were not at issue in its New York action. On September 15, 2023, we and Genevant filed a letter with the court seeking a premotion conference for a motion to dismiss and subsequently filed our and Genevant’s motion to dismiss on October 13, 2023. Acuitas filed its opposition on November 1, 2023 and we and Genevant filed our reply on November 16, 2023. Acuitas filed a request to commence discovery on November 18, 2023, to which we and Genevant responded on November 20, 2023. On May 20, 2024, the court granted our and Genevant’s motion to dismiss, so we believe this matter is now concluded.
Previous wording
Please refer to Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in “Part I, Item 1-Financial Statements (Unaudited)” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a description of recent accounting pronouncements applicable to our business.
Current wording
Please refer to Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in “Part I, Item 1-Financial Statements (Unaudited)” of this Form 10-Q for a description of recent accounting pronouncements applicable to our business.
Previous wording
Total revenue decreased $2.9 million and $8.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2023, due primarily to: i) a decrease in license revenue recognized related to our progress towards the satisfaction of our performance obligations with respect to the technology transfer and licensing agreement with Qilu; and ii) a decrease in license royalty revenue from Alnylam and Acuitas due to lower sales of ONPATTRO in 2024 compared to 2023.
Current wording
Total revenue decreased $3.3 million and $11.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2023, due primarily to: i) a decrease in license revenue recognized related to our progress towards the satisfaction of our performance obligations with respect to the technology transfer and licensing agreement with Qilu; and ii) a decrease in license royalty revenue from Alnylam and Acuitas due to lower sales of ONPATTRO in 2024 compared to 2023.
Previous wording
Research and development expenses decreased $2.1 million and $5.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2023. The decreases were due primarily to the discontinuation of our coronavirus and AB-161 programs in September 2023 as part of our efforts to focus our pipeline on our lead HBV product candidates, partially offset by an increase in clinical expenses for our AB-101 Phase 1a/1b clinical trial and our multiple imdusiran Phase 2a clinical trials. In connection with our cessation of all discovery efforts in August 2024, we expect our research expenses to be reduced in future periods.
Current wording
Research and development expenses decreased $5.9 million and $10.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2023. The decreases were due primarily to the discontinuation of our coronavirus and AB-161 programs in September 2023, along with related headcount reductions, as part of our efforts to focus our pipeline on our lead HBV product candidates. In connection with our cessation of all discovery efforts in August 2024, we expect our research expenses to continue to be reduced in future periods.
Previous wording
The increase in interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024 compared to the same periods in 2023 was due primarily to higher interest earned on our cash and investment balances due to a general increase in market interest rates.
Current wording
The increase in interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the same periods in 2023 was due primarily to higher interest earned on our cash and investment balances due to a general increase in market interest rates. We anticipate a decrease in interest income in immediate future periods due to lower interest earned on our cash and investment balances due to a general decrease in market interest rates.
Previous wording
Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024 and 2023 consisted primarily of non-cash amortization of discount and issuance costs related to the sale of a portion of our ONPATTRO royalty interest to OMERS in July 2019. The decrease is related to the declining balance of the unamortized discount and issuance costs.
Current wording
Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023 consisted primarily of non-cash amortization of discount and issuance costs related to the sale of a portion of our ONPATTRO royalty interest to OMERS in July 2019. The decrease is related to the declining balance of the unamortized discount and issuance costs.
Previous wording
For the six months ended June 30, 2024, $33.8 million of cash was used in operating activities compared to $46.9 million used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2023, a change of $13.1 million. The change was due primarily to a decrease in research and development expenses and the timing of payments to vendors.
Current wording
For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, $54.5 million of cash was used in operating activities compared to $68.6 million used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2023, a change of $14.1 million. The change was due primarily to a decrease in research and development expenses related to our HBV pipeline prioritization in September 2023 and the timing of payments to vendors.
Previous wording
For the six months ended June 30, 2024, net cash provided by investing activities was $21.5 million, resulting primarily from maturities of investments in marketable securities of $79.6 million, partially offset by additional investments in marketable securities of $58.0 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2023, net cash provided by investing activities was $18.1 million, which resulted primarily from maturities of investments in marketable securities of $68.5 million, partially offset by additional investments in marketable securities of $49.4 million.
Current wording
For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, net cash provided by investing activities was $9.5 million, resulting primarily from maturities of investments in marketable securities of $108.0 million, partially offset by additional investments in marketable securities of $98.3 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2023, net cash provided by investing activities was $28.5 million, which resulted primarily from maturities of investments in marketable securities of $86.0 million, partially offset by additional investments in marketable securities of $56.5 million.
Previous wording
For the six months ended June 30, 2024, net cash provided by financing activities was $48.8 million, which was primarily related to $44.1 million in proceeds from sales of common shares under the Sale Agreement. For the six months ended June 30, 2023, net cash provided by financing activities was $25.2 million, which included $24.6 million in proceeds from sales of common shares under the Sale Agreement.
Current wording
For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, net cash provided by financing activities was $50.6 million, which was primarily related to $44.1 million in proceeds from sales of common shares under the Sale Agreement and $6.1 million in proceeds from the issuance of common shares pursuant to the exercise of stock options. For the nine months ended September 30, 2023, net cash provided by financing activities was $26.8 million, which included $26.0 million in proceeds from sales of common shares under the Sale Agreement.
Previous wording
As of June 30, 2024, we had cash, cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities of $148.5 million. We had no outstanding debt as of June 30, 2024.
Current wording
As of September 30, 2024, we had cash, cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities of $130.8 million. We had no outstanding debt as of September 30, 2024.
Previous wording
During the six months ended June 30, 2024, we issued 16,499,999 common shares pursuant to the Sale Agreement resulting in net proceeds of approximately $44.1 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2023, we issued 9,214,168 common shares pursuant to the Sale Agreement, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $24.6 million. As of June 30, 2024, there was approximately $25.4 million available under the March 2022 Prospectus Supplement.
Current wording
During the nine months ended September 30, 2024, we issued 16,499,999 common shares pursuant to the Sale Agreement resulting in net proceeds of approximately $44.1 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2023, we issued 9,848,090 common shares pursuant to the Sale Agreement, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $26.0 million. As of September 30, 2024, there was approximately $25.4 million available under the March 2022 Prospectus Supplement.
Showing the first 40 of 42 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (4)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Part 1 of this clinical trial enrolled four sequential cohorts of eight healthy subjects each (6 active: 2 placebo) receiving a single dose of AB-101 at increasing dose levels. The data showed that AB-101 was well-tolerated with evidence of dose-dependent receptor occupancy. In the 25mg cohort, all five evaluable subjects showed evidence of receptor occupancy between 50-100%.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
We have moved into Part 3 of this clinical trial which evaluates repeat dosing of AB-101 for 28 days in patients with cHBV and we expect to report preliminary data in the first half of 2025.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Genevant or, if less, tiered low single-digit royalties on net sales of the infringing product (inclusive of the proceeds from litigation or settlement, which would be treated as net sales).
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
During the three months ended September 30, 2024, we ceased all discovery efforts and discontinued our IM-PROVE III clinical trial to streamline the organization to focus our efforts on advancing the clinical development of imdusiran and AB-101. In taking these steps, we implemented a 40% reduction in our workforce, primarily affecting the discovery and general and administrative functions. As a result, we incurred a one-time restructuring charge in the third quarter of 2024 of approximately $3.6 million, which includes approximately $2.9 million of cash severance and continued benefits payments, a non-cash impairment charge for laboratory equipment of approximately $0.2 million and approximately $0.5 million of cash payments to vendors for close-out activities in connection with the cessation of discovery efforts and the discontinuation of our IM-PROVE III clinical trial.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
On March 18, 2022, Acuitas filed a lawsuit against us and Genevant in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, asking the court to enter declaratory judgment that Arbutus patent Nos. 8,058,069, 8,492,359, 8,822,668, 9,006,417, 9,364,435, 9,404,127, 9,504,651, 9,518,272, and 11,141,378 do not infringe Pfizer and BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine, COMIRNATY, which uses an mRNA lipid provided, under license, by Acuitas. Acuitas also seeks a declaration that each of the listed patents is invalid. On June 24, 2022, we and Genevant sought a pre-motion conference concerning our anticipated motion to dismiss all of Acuitas’ claims due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The request for a pre-motion conference was granted, but the case was subsequently re-assigned to a new judge who entered an order directing: (i) Acuitas to inform the court whether it intended to file an amended complaint; (ii) that Acuitas must file any amended complaint by a certain date; and