Skip to main content

ACCURAY INC

For the period ended Sep 30, 2026. Filed Nov 6, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Sep 30, 2026 · Filed Nov 6, 2026

ARAY$0.11-11.2%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 221 previous paragraphs and 231 current paragraphs.

150 unchanged; 66 reworded; 14 added; 5 removed; 0 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 128 previous and 132 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (14)

Current report

Risks Related to Our Financing Transaction

Current report

In fiscal year 2026, we announced a comprehensive strategic, operational, and organizational transformation plan (the “Transformation Plan”). The organizational realignment element of the plan focuses on four major areas: streamlining our commercial structure, centralizing and globalizing core functions, elevating the global heads of service and product development to report directly to the CEO, and optimizing our workforce and footprint. In parallel, we are also outsourcing selected non-core activities, rationalizing facilities, implementing programs to improve direct and indirect spend efficiency, and reallocating engineering resources to focus on high ROI programs and integration of third-party solutions. If we do not successfully implement the Transformation Plan, we may not achieve the goals for the Transformation Plan, which are to increase operating margins, enhance organizational responsiveness and agility, and position us for sustainable, profitable growth.

Current report

Further declines in our stock price and market capitalization, or other adverse developments, could result in an additional goodwill impairment charge that would adversely affect our results of operations.

Current report

As of September 30, 2026, we had goodwill of $22.5 million, representing approximately 6% of our total assets, following a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $35.4 million recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2026. A further sustained decline in our stock price or market capitalization, or a further increase in the carrying amount of our reporting unit, could result in additional impairment charges. This could occur even if the decline is driven by factors unrelated to our operating performance, such as general market volatility or investor sentiment toward the medical technology sector. An impairment could also result from a failure to achieve our projected revenue, margins or cash flows, an increase in discount rates, or adverse developments affecting our business. Any impairment charge would be non-cash, but it could be material to our results of operations in the period recognized. For more information, see Note 3, Supplemental Financial Information to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report and Note 1, The Company and its Significant Accounting Policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2026.

Current report

Risks Related to Our Financing Transaction

Current report

There can be no assurance that the Financing Transaction will be successfully consummated or achieve the anticipated results.

Current report

On July 29, 2026, we entered into the Third Amendment to the Financing Agreement and the Securities Purchase Agreement with certain existing investors (collectively, the “Financing Transaction”). Among other matters, the Financing Transaction provides for, subject to certain closing conditions, the issuance of $55.0 million of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, paid in the form of (i) $15.0 million in cash, which amount was paid on the date the parties entered into the Securities Purchase Agreement, and (ii) the conversion of $40.0 million of existing indebtedness held by existing investors under the Financing Agreement, with such existing indebtedness to be cancelled and extinguished in exchange for shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock issued at the closing of the Securities Purchase Agreement. In addition, the Third Amendment to the Financing Agreement, among other things, modified certain financial covenants, including minimum liquidity requirements, provided a covenant holiday through December 31, 2027 with respect to certain financial covenants, and converted the revolving credit facility to an asset-based lending structure. In addition, the Company issued 15.3 million warrants to purchase common stock (the “July 2026 Penny Warrants”). See Note 8,Debt, for additional information regarding these transactions. The Financing Transaction remains subject to certain closing conditions, including the implementation of a reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock, at a ratio ranging from any whole number between 1-for-15 and 1-for-40 (the “Reverse Stock Split”). Our stockholders approved the matters required to consummate the Financing Transaction on October 6, 2026. There can be no assurance that these conditions will be satisfied or waived, or that the Financing Transaction will be consummated on the terms currently contemplated, within the anticipated timeframe, or at all.

Current report

If the closing of the Financing Transaction is not completed or the Reverse Stock Split is not completed, the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock will not be issued, and the Securities Purchase Agreement may be terminated. If the Securities Purchase Agreement is terminated, (i) the $15.0 million cash investment will automatically be deemed to be an Obligation (as defined in the Financing Agreement) under the Financing Agreement, and (ii) we will be required to pay a fee in an amount equal to $15.0 million to TCW Asset Management Company LLC (“TCW”), as administrative agent under the Financing Agreement, to be allocated among the investors party to the Securities Purchase Agreement in accordance with the amounts funded by such investors. Such amount shall be fully earned, non-refundable, and due on such date of termination, and payable in full in cash on the earliest to occur of (A) the final maturity date under the Financing Agreement; (B) the date on which all Obligations (as defined in the Financing Agreement) that are then due and payable are indefeasibly paid in full, in cash; (C) the date on which all or any portion of the Obligations is accelerated; or (D) the date on which any of the Obligations is satisfied, released, paid, restructured, reorganized, replaced, reinstated, defeased or compromised, including through foreclosure (whether by judicial proceeding or otherwise), a deed in lieu of foreclosure, or a distribution of any kind made to TCW or the lenders in full or partial satisfaction of the Obligations.

Current report

In addition, the $40.0 million debt exchange contemplated by the Securities Purchase Agreement would not occur, and such indebtedness would remain outstanding under the Financing Agreement. The warrants proposed to be cancelled in connection with the Financing Transaction would also remain outstanding, resulting in additional potential dilution to our stockholders. Together with the $15.0 million termination fee described above, these consequences would undermine many of the anticipated benefits of the Financing Transaction. Even if the Financing Transaction is consummated, there can be no assurance that we will realize the anticipated benefits of the Financing Transaction, whether within the expected timeframe or at all, and any failure to realize such benefits could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Current report

If the Financing Transaction is consummated, our stockholders will experience substantial dilution as a result of** **any conversion of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock or the exercise of the July 2026 Penny Warrants.

Current report

As of October 31, 2026, we had 123.3 million and 120.2 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively, and 76.6 million shares of common stock reserved for future issuance, including 15.3 million shares reserved for issuance upon exercise of all of the July 2026 Penny Warrants. In addition, the Securities Purchase Agreement obligates us to reserve and keep available at least 100% of the maximum number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of all the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock then outstanding, which is currently 110,000,000 shares (which will be adjusted if the reverse stock split is effected). Consummation of the Financing Transaction and exercise of some or all of the July 2026 Penny Warrants will result in significant dilution of stockholders’ ownership and voting interests in the Company.

Current report

TCW Asset Management Company LLC and its affiliates will have significant influence over us following the conversion of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and the exercise of the July 2026 Penny Warrants, if any, and their interests may conflict with those of our other stockholders in the future.

Current report

TCW and its affiliates currently have the largest ownership position in the Company, which position will increase upon any conversion of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and any exercise of the July 2026 Penny Warrants. So long as they hold a significant amount of our voting power, TCW and its affiliates will have significant influence over the outcome of all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election and removal of our directors, and thereby over our corporate and management policies. In addition, TCW and its affiliates may vote their shares in a manner that, in their judgment, could enhance their investment, but which may conflict with our interests or those of our other stockholders. This concentration of ownership may also delay or deter possible changes in control of the Company or deprive our other stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares of common stock as part of a sale of the Company, which may ultimately affect the market price of our common stock. Further, under the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement, TCW has the right to designate up to two preferred directors (the “Preferred Directors”) as members of the board of directors. TCW has initially designated Chan W. Galbato and Steven F. Mayer, both of whom are currently serving as members of the board of directors, to serve as the Preferred Directors. As a result, TCW may exercise significant influence over the composition of our board of directors and may have the ability to influence the outcome of certain matters affecting our business, governance and capitalization. We cannot predict how TCW and its affiliates will exercise their influence over the Company, and their interests may differ from, or conflict with, the interests of our other stockholders. This concentration of ownership and control may also have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control of the Company or other transaction that might otherwise be beneficial to our other stockholders, and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Current report

None, other than as previously reported in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2026.
Removed paragraphs (5)

Previous report

In order to implement our business strategy, we expect continued growth in our infrastructure requirements, particularly as we expand into new and growing markets as well as expand our manufacturing capacities and sales and marketing capabilities. To manage our growth, we must expand our facilities, augment our management, operational and financial systems, hire and train additional qualified personnel, scale‑up our manufacturing capacity and expand our marketing and distribution capabilities. Our manufacturing, assembly and installation process is complex and occurs over many months and we must effectively scale this entire process to satisfy customer expectations and changes in demand. Further, to accommodate our growth and compete effectively, we will be required to make improvements to our business operations. We cannot be certain that our personnel, systems, procedures and internal controls will be adequate to support our future operations and any expansion of our systems and infrastructure may require us to commit significant additional financial, operational and management resources. If we cannot manage our growth effectively, our business will suffer.

Previous report

The conditional conversion features of the 2026 Notes, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

Previous report

In the event the conditional conversion features of the 2026 Notes are triggered, holders of the 2026 Notes, as applicable, will be entitled to convert such notes at any time during specified periods at their option. If one or more holders elect to convert such notes, unless we elect to satisfy our conversion obligation by delivering solely shares of our common stock (other than paying solely cash in lieu of any fractional share), including if we have irrevocably elected full physical settlement upon conversion, we would be required to make cash payments to satisfy all or a portion of our conversion obligation based on the applicable conversion rate, which could adversely affect our liquidity.

Previous report

Furthermore, if a “fundamental change” (as such term is defined in the applicable indenture of the 2026 Notes) occurs, holders of the 2026 Notes will have the right, at their option, to require us to repurchase all or a portion of their convertible notes. A “fundamental change” generally occurs when there is a change in control of Accuray (acquisition of 50% or more of our voting stock, liquidation or sale of Accuray not for stock in another publicly traded company) or trading of our stock is terminated. In the event of a “make‑whole fundamental change” (as such term is defined in the applicable indenture of the 2026 Notes), we may also be required to increase the conversion rate applicable to the 2026 Notes surrendered for conversion in connection with such make‑whole fundamental change. A “make‑whole fundamental change” is generally a sale of Accuray not for stock in another publicly traded company. In addition, the applicable indentures for the Notes prohibits us from engaging in certain mergers or acquisitions unless, among other things, the surviving entity assumes our obligations under the 2026 Notes.
Reworded paragraphs (66)

Previous wording

Our business and results of operations are materially affected by conditions in the global markets and the economy generally. We expect that the business of our customers and our own business will continue to be adversely impacted, directly or indirectly, by macroeconomic and geopolitical issues. Concerns over economic and political stability; inflation levels and related efforts to mitigate inflation; a potential recession; the level of U.S. national debt, the U.S. debt credit rating and U.S. budgetary concerns, including concerns over a U.S. government shutdown; currency fluctuations and volatility; the rate of growth of Japan, China and other Asian economies, including the impact of the China anti-corruption campaign and timing of China stimulus program on those economies; unemployment; the availability and cost of credit; trade relations, including the imposition of various sanctions, export controls, and tariffs by the United States and other countries; energy costs; instability in the banking and financial services sector; the recent escalation in conflict in Iran, the Middle East and Southwest Asia, including the impact on global supply chains and oil prices, as well as other geopolitical uncertainty and conflict, including with respect to the Russia-Ukraine conflict and increasing tension between China and the U.S.; changes in government administration policy positions and imposition of tariffs on global imports that could result in additional tariffs on specific industries, and uncertainties regarding impact, retaliations and further escalation, have contributed to increased volatility and diminished expectations for the economy and the markets in general. In turn, periods of economic slowdown or recession could lead to a reduction in demand for our products and services, which in turn would reduce our revenues and adversely affect our results of operations and our financial position. The results of these macroeconomic conditions, and the actions taken by governments, central banks, companies, and consumers in response, have and may continue to result in higher inflation in the U.S. and globally, which has led to an increase in costs and caused changes in fiscal and monetary policy, including increased interest rates. Other adverse impacts of recent macroeconomic conditions that have impacted us and may continue to impact us are foreign exchange rate fluctuations, supply chain constraints, logistics challenges, and fluctuations in labor availability. Thus, if general macroeconomic conditions deteriorate, our business and financial results could be materially and adversely affected.

Current wording

Our business and results of operations are materially affected by conditions in the global markets and the economy generally. We expect that the business of our customers and our own business will continue to be adversely impacted, directly or indirectly, by macroeconomic and geopolitical issues. Concerns over economic and political stability; inflation levels and related efforts to mitigate inflation; a potential recession; the level of U.S. national debt, the U.S. debt credit rating and U.S. budgetary concerns, including concerns over a U.S. government shutdown; currency fluctuations and volatility; the rate of growth of Japan, China and other Asian economies, including the impact of the China anti-corruption campaign and timing of China stimulus program on those economies; unemployment; the availability and cost of credit; trade relations, including the imposition of various sanctions, export controls, and tariffs by the United States and other countries; energy costs; instability in the banking and financial services sector; the conflicts in Russia-Ukraine, Iran, the Middle East and Southwest Asia, including the impact on global supply chains and oil prices, as well as other geopolitical uncertainty and conflict, and increasing tension between China and the U.S.; changes in government administration policy positions and imposition of tariffs on global imports that could result in additional tariffs on specific industries, and uncertainties regarding impact, retaliations and further escalation, have contributed to increased volatility and diminished expectations for the economy and the markets in general. In turn, periods of economic slowdown or recession could lead to a reduction in demand for our products and services, which in turn would reduce our revenues and adversely affect our results of operations and our financial position. The results of these macroeconomic conditions, and the actions taken by governments, central banks, companies, and consumers in response, have and may continue to result in higher inflation in the U.S. and globally, which has led to an increase in costs and caused changes in fiscal and monetary policy, including increased interest rates. For example, we had product shipments planned in the second half of fiscal year 2026 to certain customers in the Middle East, North Africa and Pakistan that have been delayed indefinitely due to geopolitical disruption in the Middle East, which is also impacting our service revenue in those regions. We also continue to experience pressure in China. Other adverse impacts of recent macroeconomic conditions that have impacted us and may continue to impact us are foreign exchange rate fluctuations, supply chain constraints, logistics challenges, and fluctuations in labor availability. Thus, if general macroeconomic conditions deteriorate, our business and financial results could be materially and adversely affected.

Previous wording

In an inflationary environment, we may be unable to raise the prices of our products and services sufficiently to keep up with the rate of inflation. Impacts from inflationary pressures could be more pronounced and materially adversely impact aspects of our business where revenue streams and cost commitments are linked to contractual agreements that extend many years into the future, as we may not be able to quickly or easily adjust pricing, reduce costs, or implement counter measures. A higher inflationary environment can also negatively impact raw material, component, and logistics costs that, in turn, has increased the costs of producing and distributing our products. For example, inflationary pressures as well as ongoing supply chain challenges beginning in fiscal year 2023 have resulted in rising costs for certain materials, including increased logistics and duties costs, that have materially affected our gross margins and net income (loss), which have had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We expect that gross margins and net income (loss) will continue to be adversely affected by increased material costs and freight and logistics expenses through at least fiscal year 2026. In addition, we expect inflation and the ongoing supply chain challenges and logistics costs to impact our cash from operations through at least fiscal year 2026, as we are unable to pass all of these increased costs to our customers.

Current wording

In an inflationary environment, we may be unable to raise the prices of our products and services sufficiently to keep up with the rate of inflation. Impacts from inflationary pressures could be more pronounced and materially adversely impact aspects of our business where revenue streams and cost commitments are linked to contractual agreements that extend many years into the future, as we may not be able to quickly or easily adjust pricing, reduce costs, or implement counter measures. A higher inflationary environment can also negatively impact raw material, component, and logistics costs that, in turn, have increased the costs of producing and distributing our products. For example, inflationary pressures as well as ongoing supply chain challenges beginning in fiscal year 2023 have resulted in rising costs for certain materials, including increased logistics and duties costs, that have materially affected our gross margins and net income (loss), which continue to have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We expect that gross margins and net income (loss) will continue to be adversely affected by increased material costs and freight and logistics expenses through at least fiscal year 2027. In addition, we expect inflation and the ongoing supply chain challenges and logistics costs to impact our cash from operations through at least fiscal year 2027, as we are unable to pass all of these increased costs to our customers.

Previous wording

The uncertain macroeconomic environment, including volatile credit markets and concerns regarding the availability and cost of credit, increased interest rates, inflation, reduced economic growth or a recession, instability in the banking and financial services sector, and changes in government administration policy positions, in any of the geographic areas where we do business, could impact consumer and customer demand for our products and services, as well as our ability to manage normal commercial relationships with our customers, suppliers and creditors, including financial institutions, and the ability of our customers to meet their obligations to us. For example, in the United States, at least one customer declared bankruptcy in fiscal 2023 causing us to increase our bad debt reserve due to the expectation that they will be unable to pay us. Further, some of our customers have been delayed in obtaining, or have not been able to obtain, necessary financing for their purchases of the CyberKnife or TomoTherapy platforms. In addition, some of our customers have been delayed in obtaining, or have not been able to obtain, necessary financing for the construction or renovation of facilities to house the CyberKnife or TomoTherapy platforms, the cost of which can be substantial. These delays have, in some instances, led to our customers postponing the shipment and installation of previously ordered systems or cancelling their system orders and may cause other customers to postpone their system installation or to cancel their agreements with us. Reduced budgets and lower capital deployment priority for radiotherapy equipment, along with longer customer installation timelines, in the United States have also negatively impacted our net revenue since fiscal year 2024, and we expect this will continue to have an impact through fiscal year 2026. A continuation or further deterioration of the adverse economic environment would further increase delays and order cancellations, or affect our ability to collect from our customers, any of which would continue to adversely affect revenues, and therefore, harm our business and results of operations.

Current wording

The uncertain macroeconomic environment, including volatile credit markets and concerns regarding the availability and cost of credit, increased interest rates, inflation, reduced economic growth or a recession, instability in the banking and financial services sector, and changes in government administration policy positions, in any of the geographic areas where we do business, could impact consumer and customer demand for our products and services, as well as our ability to manage normal commercial relationships with our customers, suppliers and creditors, including financial institutions, and the ability of our customers to meet their obligations to us. Further, some of our customers have been delayed in obtaining, or have not been able to obtain, necessary financing for their purchases of the CyberKnife or TomoTherapy platforms. In addition, some of our customers have been delayed in obtaining, or have not been able to obtain, necessary financing for the construction or renovation of facilities to house the CyberKnife or TomoTherapy platforms, the cost of which can be substantial. These delays have, in some instances, led to our customers postponing the shipment and installation of previously ordered systems or cancelling their system orders and may cause other customers to postpone their system installation or to cancel their agreements with us. Reduced budgets and lower capital deployment priority for radiotherapy equipment, along with longer customer installation timelines, in the United States have also negatively impacted our net revenue since fiscal year 2024 and we expect this will continue to affect us. A continuation or further deterioration of the adverse economic environment would further increase delays and order cancellations, or affect our ability to collect from our customers, any of which would continue to adversely affect revenues, and therefore, harm our business and results of operations.

Previous wording

We often need to educate physicians about the use of stereotactic radiosurgery, image guided radiation therapy (“IGRT”) and adaptive radiation therapy, convince healthcare payors that the benefits of the CyberKnife and TomoTherapy platforms and their related treatment processes outweigh their costs, and help train qualified physicians in the skilled use of these systems. In addition, we also must educate prospective customers regarding the entire functionality of our radiation therapy systems and their relative benefits compared to alternative products and treatment methods. We must also increase awareness among potential patients, who are increasingly educated about treatment options and therefore, impact adoption of new technologies by clinicians. We have expended and will continue to expend significant resources on marketing and educational efforts to create awareness of stereotactic radiosurgery and robotic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (“IMRT”) as well as adaptive radiation therapy and IGRT generally and to encourage the acceptance and adoption of our products for these technologies. We cannot be sure that our products will gain significant market acceptance among physicians, patients and healthcare payors, even if we spend significant time and expense on their education.

Current wording

We often need to educate physicians about the use of stereotactic radiosurgery, image guided radiation therapy (“IGRT”) and adaptive radiation therapy, convince healthcare payors that the benefits of the CyberKnife and TomoTherapy platforms and their related treatment processes outweigh their costs, and help train qualified physicians in the skilled use of these systems. In addition, we also must educate prospective customers regarding the entire functionality of our radiation therapy systems and their relative benefits compared to alternative products and treatment methods. We must also increase awareness among potential patients, who are increasingly educated about treatment options and therefore, impact adoption of new technologies by clinicians. We have expended and will continue to expend significant resources on marketing and educational efforts to create awareness of stereotactic radiosurgery and robotic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (“IMRT”), Synchrony technology and VOLO Optimizer on the CyberKnife System, as well as adaptive radiation therapy and IGRT generally and to encourage the acceptance and adoption of our products for these technologies. The long-term success of the CyberKnife platform is also dependent on a change in medical practice leading to utilization of stereotactic body radiation therapy more regularly as an alternative to surgery or other treatments. We cannot be sure that our products will gain significant market acceptance among physicians, patients and healthcare payors, even if we spend significant time and expense on their education.

Previous wording

As of March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $566.5 million. We have incurred net losses, and expect to incur net losses in the future, particularly as selling and marketing activities increase ahead of any expected revenue. Our ability to achieve and sustain long‑term profitability is largely dependent on our ability to successfully market and sell the CyberKnife and TomoTherapy platforms, control our costs, and effectively manage our growth. We cannot assure you that we will be able to achieve profitability and even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. In the event we fail to achieve profitability, our stock price could decline.

Current wording

As of September 30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $558.3 million. We have incurred net losses, and expect to incur net losses in the future, particularly as selling and marketing activities increase ahead of any expected revenue. Our ability to achieve and sustain long‑term profitability is largely dependent on our ability to successfully market and sell the CyberKnife and TomoTherapy platforms, control our costs, and effectively manage our growth. We cannot assure you that we will be able to achieve profitability and even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. In the event we fail to achieve profitability, our stock price could decline.

Previous wording

We have substantial indebtedness in the form of a credit facility and convertible senior notes and may incur other debt in the future, which may adversely affect our financial condition and future financial results. In the past, we have not been in compliance with certain financial covenants relating to our indebtedness and have been required to obtain waivers to avoid defaulting under such indebtedness.

Current wording

We have substantial indebtedness in the form of a credit facility and may incur other debt in the future, which may adversely affect our financial condition and future financial results. In the past, we have not been in compliance with certain financial covenants relating to our indebtedness and have been required to obtain waivers and amendments to avoid defaulting under such indebtedness.

Previous wording

As of March 31, 2026, we had outstanding borrowings of$156.5 million, which includes$7.7 million in accumulated paid-in-kind interest, under our five-year term loan (the “Term Loan Facility”) with additional borrowings available of $15 million under our revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and $18.25 million under our delayed draw term loan (the “Delayed Draw Facility” and together with the Term Loan Facility and Revolving Credit Facility, the “Credit Facilities”), each of which will mature on June 6, 2030, and $18.0 million in principal amount outstanding of our 3.75% Convertible Senior 2026 Notes due June 1, 2026 (the “2026 Notes”). Substantially all of our assets secure the Credit Facilities. In the event of a default, the lenders would have the right to foreclose on those assets, which could severely impair or eliminate our ability to continue operating. Our existing and future levels of indebtedness could have important consequences to stockholders and note holders and may adversely affect our financial conditions and future financial results by, among other things:

Current wording

As of September 30, 2026, we had net carrying values of $13.6 million under our five-year term loan A (the “Term Loan Facility”), $59.0 million under our five-year convertible term loan B (the "Convertible Term Loan B Facility"), $20.5 million under our asset-based revolving credit facility (the “Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility”) and $8.6 million under our convertible delayed draw term loan (the “Convertible Delayed Draw Facility” and, together with the Term Loan Facility A, Convertible Term Loan B Facility, and the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility, the “Credit Facilities”), each of which will mature on June 6, 2030. Outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facilities include $13.1 million in accumulated paid-in-kind interest. Substantially all of our assets secure the Credit Facilities. In the event of a default, the lenders would have the right to foreclose on those assets, which could severely impair or eliminate our ability to continue operating. Our existing and future levels of indebtedness could have important consequences to our stockholders and may adversely affect our financial condition and future financial results by, among other things:

Previous wording

In June 2025, in connection with our entry into the credit agreement governing the Credit Facilities (the “Financing Agreement”), we issued to our lenders (i) an aggregate of 17,180,710 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants (the “June 2025 Premium Warrants”), which are exercisable starting on December 7, 2025 and until June 6, 2032 and have an exercise price of $1.68 per share, and (ii) an aggregate of 6,247,531 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants (the “June 2025 Penny Warrants”), which are exercisable until June 6, 2032 and have an exercise price of $0.01 per share. In December 2025, in connection with our entry into an amendment to the Financing Agreement, we also issued, (i) 3,062,726 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants, with an exercise price of $1.50 per share, exercisable on and after June 16, 2026 and expiring on December 15, 2032 (the “December 2025 Super Premium Warrants”), (ii) 2,187,661 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants, with an exercise price of $1.25 per share, exercisable on and after June 16, 2026 and expiring on December 15, 2032 (the “December 2025 Premium Warrants” and, together with the June 2025 Premium Warrants, the “Premium Warrants”) , and (iii) 1,750,129 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants, with an exercise price of $0.01 per share, which are exercisable immediately and expire on December 15, 2032 (the “December 2025 Penny Warrants” and together with the June 2025 Penny Warrants, the “Penny Warrants” and together with the Premium Warrants and December 2025 Super Premium Warrants, the “Warrants”). If we access the Delayed Draw Facility, we will issue up to 7.0 million in additional warrants to the same warrant holders.

Current wording

In June 2025, in connection with our entry into the credit agreement governing the Credit Facilities (the “Financing Agreement”), we issued to our lenders (i) an aggregate of 17,180,710 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants (the “June 2025 Premium Warrants”), which are exercisable starting on December 7, 2025 and until June 6, 2032 and have an exercise price of $1.68 per share, and (ii) an aggregate of 6,247,531 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants (the “June 2025 Penny Warrants”), which are exercisable until June 6, 2032 and have an exercise price of $0.01 per share. In December 2025, in connection with our entry into an amendment to the Financing Agreement, we also issued, (i) 3,062,726 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants, with an exercise price of $1.50 per share, exercisable on and after June 16, 2026 and expiring on December 15, 2032 (the “December 2025 Super Premium Warrants”), (ii) 2,187,661 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants, with an exercise price of $1.25 per share, exercisable on and after June 16, 2026 and expiring on December 15, 2032 (the “December 2025 Premium Warrants”), and (iii) 1,750,129 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants, with an exercise price of $0.01 per share, which are exercisable immediately and expire on December 15, 2032 (the “December 2025 Penny Warrants”). In May 2026, in connection with accessing the Delayed Draw Facility, we issued (i) an aggregate of 2,990,010 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants, with an exercise price of $1.50 per share, exercisable on and after November 19, 2026 and expiring on May 18, 2033 (the “May 2026 Super Premium Warrants” and, together with the December 2025 Super Premium Warrants, the “Super Premium Warrants”), (ii) an aggregate of 2,135,721 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants, with an exercise price of $1.25 per share, exercisable on and after November 19, 2026 and expiring on May 18, 2033 (the “May 2026 Premium Warrants” and, together with the June 2025 Premium Warrants and the December 2025 Premium Warrants, the "Premium Warrants"), and (iii) an aggregate of 1,708,577 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants, with an exercise price of $0.01 per share, which are exercisable immediately and expire on May 18, 2033 (the “May 2026 Penny Warrants”). On July 29, 2026, we entered into the Third Amendment to the Financing Agreement and the Securities Purchase Agreement with certain existing investors. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement and the Third Amendment, we issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 15,253,473 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, which are exercisable immediately and expire on July 29, 2033 (the “July 2026 Penny Warrants”, and together with the June 2025 Penny Warrants, December 2025 Pen…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

The Amended Financing Agreement also includes certain restrictive covenants that limit, among other things, our ability and our subsidiaries’ ability to (i) incur indebtedness, (ii) incur liens on their property, (iii) pay dividends or make other distributions, (iv) sell our assets, (v) make certain loans or investments, (vi) merge or consolidate, (vii) voluntarily repay or prepay certain indebtedness and (viii) enter into transactions with affiliates, in each case, subject to certain exceptions. In addition, such agreements require us to meet certain financial covenants, including a fixed charge coverage ratio, total leverage ratio and liquidity level, as defined in the Amended Financing Agreement. These restrictions could adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs, withstand a future downturn in our business or the economy in general, engage in business activities, including future opportunities that may be in our interest, and plan for or react to market conditions or otherwise execute our business strategies. Our ability to comply with the covenants and other terms governing the Credit Facilities will depend in part on our future operating performance. If we fail to comply with such covenants and terms, we may be in default and the maturity of the related debt could be accelerated and become immediately due and payable. In addition, because substantially all of our assets are pledged as a security under the Credit Facilities, if we are not able to cure any default or repay outstanding borrowings, such assets are subject to the risk of foreclosure by our lenders. From time to time, we have not been in compliance with certain similar covenants or other terms governing the prior credit facilities and we have been required to obtain waivers or amendments to the previous credit agreement from our lenders in order to maintain compliance. There can, however, be no certainty that any such waiver or amendment will be available to us in the future, which may lead to a default under the terms of the Amended Financing Agreement governing the Credit Facilities, or what the cost of such waiver or amendment, if obtained, would be. If we are unable to obtain necessary waivers or relevant amendments as required and the debt under such credit facility is accelerated, we would be required to obtain replacement financing at prevailing market rates, which may not be available to us on favorable terms or at all. Failure to obtain replacement financing could result in certain of our long-term indebtedness being reclassified current, which could in turn impact our ability to continue as a going concern. Additionally, a default on indebtedness would likely result in a default under the terms of the indenture governing the 2026 Notes. We may not be able to satisfy our obligations if any of our indebtedness is accelerated.

Current wording

The Financing Agreement, as amended (the "Amended Financing Agreement") includes certain restrictive covenants that limit, among other things, our ability and our subsidiaries’ ability to (i) incur indebtedness, (ii) incur liens on their property, (iii) pay dividends or make other distributions, (iv) sell our assets, (v) make certain loans or investments, (vi) merge or consolidate, (vii) voluntarily repay or prepay certain indebtedness and (viii) enter into transactions with affiliates, in each case, subject to certain exceptions. In addition, such agreements require us to meet certain financial covenants, including a fixed charge coverage ratio, total leverage ratio and liquidity level, as defined in the Amended Financing Agreement. Although the Third Amendment provides a covenant holiday with respect to the total leverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio financial covenants through December 31, 2027, we remain subject to the minimum liquidity requirement, as modified by the Third Amendment, and to the borrowing conditions and covenants applicable to the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility, and we will again be required to comply with the total leverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio financial covenants beginning with the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2028. We may not be able to comply with these covenants when testing resumes. These restrictions could adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs, withstand a future downturn in our business or the economy in general, engage in business activities, including future opportunities that may be in our interest, and plan for or react to market conditions or otherwise execute our business strategies. Our ability to comply with the covenants and other terms governing the Credit Facilities will depend in part on our future operating performance. If we fail to comply with such covenants and terms, we may be in default and the maturity of the related debt could be accelerated and become immediately due and payable. In addition, because substantially all of our assets are pledged as a security under the Credit Facilities, if we are not able to cure any default or repay outstanding borrowings, such assets are subject to the risk of foreclosure by our lenders. From time to time, we have not been in compliance with certain similar covenants or other terms governing the prior credit facilities and we have been required to obtain waivers or amendments to the previous credit agreement from our lenders in order to maintain compliance. In addition, as of June 30, 2026, we were not in compliance with the minimum liquidity covenant under the Amended Financing Agreement, which default the lenders waived in the Third Amendment. There can, however, be no certainty that any such waiver or amendment will be available to us in the future, which may lead to a default under the terms of the Amended Financing Agreement governing the Credit Facilities, or what the cost of such …

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

In addition, the Credit Facilities expose us to interest rate risk. If the amount outstanding under the Credit Facilities remained at the level outstanding as of March 31, 2026 for the next 12 months and interest rates increased or decreased by 50 basis point change, our annual interest expense would increase or decrease, respectively, approximately $0.8 million.

Current wording

In addition, the Credit Facilities expose us to interest rate risk. If the amount outstanding under the Credit Facilities remained at the level outstanding as of September 30, 2026 for the next 12 months and interest rates increased or decreased by 50 basis points, our annual interest expense would increase or decrease, respectively, approximately $0.8 million.

Previous wording

Our global business has been and could continue to be negatively affected by uncertainty or volatility in trade policy as well as trade barriers and other governmental protectionist measures, any of which can be imposed or modified suddenly and unpredictably. There is currently significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the U.S. and various other countries, most significantly China, with respect to trade policies, treaties, government regulations and tariffs and such uncertainty could continue with the changes in government administration policy positions and reactions to such policies. In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the President does not have authority under the IEEPA to impose broad tariffs without explicit congressional authorization, striking down major tariffs previously in place. As a result of that ruling, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) outlined plans to establish a system for tariff refunds following an order by the Court of International Trade for CBP to progress with a tariff refund process. The first phase of the refund process and portal went live on April 20, 2026.

Current wording

Our global business has been and could continue to be negatively affected by uncertainty or volatility in trade policy as well as trade barriers and other governmental protectionist measures, any of which can be imposed or modified suddenly and unpredictably. There is currently significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the U.S. and various other countries, most significantly China, with respect to trade policies, treaties, government regulations and tariffs and such uncertainty could continue with the changes in government administration policy positions and reactions to such policies. In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the President does not have authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ("IEEPA") to impose broad tariffs without explicit congressional authorization, striking down major tariffs previously in place. As a result of that ruling, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) outlined plans to establish a system for tariff refunds following an order by the Court of International Trade for CBP to progress with a tariff refund process. The first phase of the refund process and portal went live on April 20, 2026.

Previous wording

In addition, the U.S. presidential administration has indicated its intent to modify U.S. trade policy and in some cases to renegotiate, or potentially terminate, certain existing bilateral or multi-lateral trade agreements. It has also imposed or announced enhanced international tariffs ranging from tariffs on certain imports, pursuant to Section 301 of Trade Act of 1974 (“Section 301”) and section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1964 (“Section 232”) as well as a baseline tariff on virtually all imports pursuant to Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 (“Section 122”). Following the ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court, on the legality of the IEEPA tariffs, the U.S. presidential administration announced it would utilize authority under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to implement tariffs of up to 15% for a limited period of time without U.S. Congressional approval and may ultimately replace such tariffs with longer-lasting authority under Section 301 or Section 232. The Section 301 tariffs affect component parts including the linear accelerator for our CyberKnife platforms, which we manufacture in China and import into the U.S., as well as other components that we import into the U.S. from other suppliers, which could significantly impact the cost of these parts. Currently, the Section 122 tariff rate is set at 10% and has not yet been raised to 15%. The Section 122 tariffs will expire on July 23, 2026. Any retaliatory tariffs could also impact our ability to export and sell our products into those countries.

Current wording

In addition, the U.S. presidential administration has indicated its intent to modify U.S. trade policy and in some cases to renegotiate, or potentially terminate, certain existing bilateral or multi-lateral trade agreements. It has also imposed or announced enhanced international tariffs ranging from tariffs on certain imports, pursuant to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (“Section 301”) and Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (“Section 232”) as well as a baseline tariff on virtually all imports pursuant to Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 (“Section 122”). Following the ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court on the legality of the IEEPA tariffs, the U.S. presidential administration announced it would utilize authority under Section 122 to implement tariffs of up to 15% for a limited period of time without U.S. Congressional approval and may ultimately replace such tariffs with longer-lasting authority under Section 301 or Section 232. The Section 301 tariffs affect component parts including the linear accelerator for our CyberKnife platforms, which we manufacture in China and import into the U.S., as well as other components that we import into the U.S. from other suppliers, which could significantly impact the cost of these parts. The Section 122 tariffs, which were imposed at a rate of 10%, expired on July 24, 2026. Any retaliatory tariffs could also impact our ability to export and sell our products into those countries.

Previous wording

With respect to tariff refund claims, there can be no assurance that we will receive any tariff refunds on a timely basis or at all, or that any such refunds, if received, will fully offset amounts previously paid or accrued. For example, in April 2026, the Company submitted approximately $9.0 million of tariff refund claims through CBP’s Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries portal, of which $8.9 million were reported as having an accepted submission status of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Refund claims may be delayed, denied or subject to dispute, and any delays or adverse determinations could negatively impact our cash flows, results of operations and financial position. Increased tariffs and evolving trade regimes may also heighten regulatory and customs compliance risks, including increased scrutiny by CBP and foreign customs authorities, disputes regarding tariff classification, valuation or country‑of‑origin determinations, and the potential for retroactive assessments, penalties, interest or delays in the clearance of our products. Prolonged uncertainty or volatility in trade policy and economic conditions, including uncertainty regarding future trade policy, potential tariff refund claims and shifting trade relationships could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations, especially if additional tariffs are placed on certain of our components or products or if any related counter-measures are taken by other countries. Our ability to mitigate the impact of tariff‑related cost increases may be limited by competitive pressures, long sales cycles, fixed‑price or long‑term customer contracts, and reimbursement or budgetary constraints faced by healthcare providers, particularly in China and other international markets. As a result, we may not be able to fully pass through increased costs to customers without adversely affecting demand.

Current wording

With respect to tariff refund claims, there can be no assurance that we will receive any tariff refunds on a timely basis or at all, or that any such refunds, if received, will fully offset amounts previously paid or accrued. For example, in April 2026, we submitted approximately $8.9 million of tariff refund claims, which were reported by CBP as having an accepted submission status. As of June 30, 2026, an additional $0.4 million of interest was reported by the CBP, resulting in a total refund claim balance of approximately $9.3 million. During the three months ended September 30, 2026, the remaining refund claims were collected and remitted to the third-party purchaser of our refund rights. Refund claims may be delayed, denied or subject to dispute, and any delays or adverse determinations could negatively impact our cash flows, results of operations and financial position. Increased tariffs and evolving trade regimes may also heighten regulatory and customs compliance risks, including increased scrutiny by CBP and foreign customs authorities, disputes regarding tariff classification, valuation or country of origin determinations, and the potential for retroactive assessments, penalties, interest or delays in the clearance of our products. Prolonged uncertainty or volatility in trade policy and economic conditions, including uncertainty regarding future trade policy, potential tariff refund claims and shifting trade relationships could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations, especially if additional tariffs are placed on certain of our components or products or if any related counter-measures are taken by other countries. Our ability to mitigate the impact of tariff related cost increases may be limited by competitive pressures, long sales cycles, fixed price or long term customer contracts, and reimbursement or budgetary constraints faced by healthcare providers, particularly in China and other international markets. As a result, we may not be able to fully pass through increased costs to customers without adversely affecting demand.

Previous wording

Tariffs increase the cost of our products and the components and raw materials that go into making them. An increase in our costs adversely impacts the gross margin that we earn on our products and we have been unable to fully pass tariff-related cost increases to our customers, particularly because healthcare providers face reimbursement constraints and competitive pressures limit or pricing flexibility. We may not be able to forecast such impacts accurately. Although we continue to work with our vendors and customers to mitigate our exposure to current or potential tariffs, there can be no assurance that we will be able to offset any increased costs. The ultimate impact of any tariffs will depend on various factors, including if any tariffs are ultimately implemented, the timing of implementation, and the amount, scope, and nature of the tariffs. If we are not successful in offsetting the impact of any such tariffs, our revenue, gross margins and operating results may be adversely affected. If existing tariffs associated with U.S.-China trade increase, we would expect minimal shipments to China despite customer demand.

Current wording

Tariffs increase the cost of our products and the components and raw materials that go into making them. An increase in our costs adversely impacts the gross margin that we earn on our products and we have been unable to fully pass tariff-related cost increases to our customers, particularly because healthcare providers face reimbursement constraints and competitive pressures limit our pricing flexibility. We may not be able to forecast such impacts accurately. Although we continue to work with our vendors and customers to mitigate our exposure to current or potential tariffs, there can be no assurance that we will be able to offset any increased costs. The ultimate impact of any tariffs will depend on various factors, including if any tariffs are ultimately implemented, the timing of implementation, and the amount, scope, and nature of the tariffs. If we are not successful in offsetting the impact of any such tariffs, our revenue, gross margins and operating results may be adversely affected. If existing tariffs associated with U.S.-China trade increase, we would expect minimal shipments to China despite customer demand.

Previous wording

These tariffs are subject to a number of uncertainties as they are implemented, including future adjustments and changes. We continue to monitor trade policy developments on a real-time basis. To date, tariff impacts have materially reduced our China product revenues and adversely affect our gross margins. If tariffs escalate or persist, we expect further reductions in China revenues and ongoing gross margin pressure, with limited ability to offset costs through pricing adjustments given our customers’ reimbursement constraints.

Current wording

These tariffs are subject to a number of uncertainties as they are implemented, including future adjustments and changes. We continue to monitor trade policy developments on a real-time basis. To date, tariff impacts have materially reduced our China product revenues and adversely affected our gross margins. If tariffs escalate or persist, we expect further reductions in China revenues and ongoing gross margin pressure, with limited ability to offset costs through pricing adjustments given our customers’ reimbursement constraints.

Previous wording

Once orders are received and booked into backlog, there is a risk that we may not recognize revenue in the near term or at all. The pace at which backlog converts to revenue has been adversely impacted in recent years, primarily due to delays in the timing of deliveries and installations in fiscal 2020 through 2022 caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting effects on the global economic environment. These delays in deliveries and installations could occur again in the future, which could have a negative impact on our revenue. Factors that may affect whether these orders become revenue (or are cancelled or deemed aged‑out and reflected as a reduction in net orders) and the timing of revenue include:

Current wording

Once orders are received and booked into backlog, there is a risk that we may not recognize revenue in the near term or at all. The pace at which backlog converts to revenue has been adversely impacted in recent years, primarily due to delays in the timing of deliveries and installations resulting from challenges associated with the global economic environment, including supply chain disruptions, financing constraints, customer budget pressures and project timing considerations. These delays in deliveries and installations could occur again in the future, which could have a negative impact on our revenue. Factors that may affect whether these orders become revenue (or are cancelled or deemed aged‑out and reflected as a reduction in net orders) and the timing of revenue include:

Previous wording

We consider the competition for the CyberKnife and TomoTherapy platforms to be existing radiation therapy systems, primarily using C‑arm linacs, which are sold by large, well‑capitalized companies with significantly greater market share and resources than we have. Several of these competitors are also able to leverage their fixed sales, service and other costs over multiple products or product lines. In particular, we compete with a number of existing radiation therapy equipment companies, including Varian Medical Systems, Inc., a Siemens Healthineers company (“Varian”), Elekta AB (“Elekta”), RefleXion Medical Inc. and Zap Surgical Systems. Varian has been the leader in the external beam radiation therapy market for many years and has the majority market share for radiation therapy systems worldwide. In general, because of aging demographics and attractive market factors in oncology, we believe that new competitors will enter the radiosurgery and radiation therapy markets in the years ahead. In addition, some manufacturers of conventional linac based radiation therapy systems, including Varian and Elekta, have products that can be used in combination with body and/or head frames and image guidance systems to perform both radiosurgical and radiotherapy procedures.

Current wording

We consider the competition for the CyberKnife and TomoTherapy platforms to be existing radiation therapy systems, primarily using C‑arm linacs, which are sold by large, well‑capitalized companies with significantly greater market share and resources than we have. Several of these competitors are also able to leverage their fixed sales, service and other costs over multiple products or product lines. In particular, we compete with a number of existing radiation therapy equipment companies, including Varian Medical Systems, Inc., a Siemens Healthineers company (“Varian”), Elekta AB (“Elekta”), RefleXion Medical Inc., Zap Surgical Systems and United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. Varian has been the leader in the external beam radiation therapy market for many years and has the majority market share for radiation therapy systems worldwide. In general, because of aging demographics and attractive market factors in oncology, we believe that new competitors will enter the radiosurgery and radiation therapy markets in the years ahead. In addition, some manufacturers of conventional linac based radiation therapy systems, including Varian and Elekta, have products that can be used in combination with body and/or head frames and image guidance systems to perform both radiosurgical and radiotherapy procedures.

Previous wording

We derive most of our revenue from our international operations, and we plan to continue expanding our business in international markets in the future. In addition, we have employees engaged in R&D, manufacturing, administration, support and sales and marketing activities.

Current wording

We derive most of our revenue from our international operations, and we plan to continue expanding our business in international markets in the future. In addition, we have employees engaged in R&D, manufacturing, administration, support and sales and marketing activities outside the United States.

Previous wording

Our inability to overcome these obstacles could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. Even if we are successful in managing these obstacles, our partners internationally are subject to these same risks and may not be able to manage these obstacles effectively.

Current wording

Our inability to overcome these obstacles could harm our business, financial condition and operating results, and may harm our ability to expand our business. Even if we are successful in managing these obstacles, our partners internationally are subject to these same risks and may not be able to manage these obstacles effectively.

Previous wording

Our operating results are subject to volatility due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Currently, the majority of our international sales are denominated in U.S. Dollars. As a result, an increase in the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to foreign currencies could require us to reduce our sales price or make our products less competitive in international markets. Foreign exchange has previously been and could in the future be a significant headwind if the U.S. Dollar strengthens, which could affect our results of operations and could cause potential delays in orders and we may see our sales and margins outside of the U.S. decline as we may not be able to raise local prices to fully offset any strengthening of the U.S. Dollar. Also, if our international sales continue to increase, we may enter into a greater number of transactions denominated in non-U.S. Dollars, which would expose us to foreign currency risks, including changes in currency exchange rates. If we are unable to address these risks and challenges effectively, our international operations may not be successful and our business would be materially harmed.

Current wording

Our operating results are subject to volatility due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Currently, a portion of our sales are denominated in U.S. Dollars. As a result, an increase in the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to foreign currencies could require us to reduce our sales price or make our products less competitive in international markets. Foreign exchange has previously been and could in the future be a significant headwind if the U.S. Dollar strengthens, which could affect our results of operations and could cause potential delays in orders and we may see our sales and margins outside of the U.S. decline as we may not be able to raise local prices to fully offset any strengthening of the U.S. Dollar. Also, if our international sales continue to increase, we may enter into a greater number of transactions denominated in non-U.S. Dollars, which would expose us to foreign currency risks, including changes in currency exchange rates. If we are unable to address these risks and challenges effectively, our international operations may not be successful and our business would be materially harmed.

Previous wording

Our manufacturing processes and the manufacturing processes of our third‑party suppliers are required to comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulations (“QSR”) for any products imported into, or sold within, the U.S. The QSR is a complex regulatory scheme that covers the methods and documentation of the design, testing, production process and controls, manufacturing, labeling, quality assurance, packaging, storage and shipping of our products. Furthermore, we are required to verify that our suppliers maintain facilities, procedures and operations that comply with our quality requirements. We are also subject to state licensing and other requirements and licenses applicable to manufacturers of medical devices, and we are required to comply with International Organization for Standardization (“ISO”), quality system standards in order to produce products for sale in Europe and Canada, as well as various other foreign laws and regulations. Because our manufacturing processes include the production of diagnostic and therapeutic X‑ray equipment and laser equipment, we are subject to the electronic product radiation control provisions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, which requires that we file reports with the FDA, applicable states and our customers regarding the distribution, manufacturing and installation of these types of equipment. The FDA enforces the QSR and the electronic product radiation control provisions through periodic inspections, some of which may be unannounced. We have been and anticipate in the future being subject to such inspections. FDA inspections usually occur every two to three years. During such inspections, the FDA may issue Inspectional Observations on Form FDA 483, listing instances where the manufacturer has failed to comply with applicable regulations and procedures, or warning letters.

Current wording

Our manufacturing processes and the manufacturing processes of our third‑party suppliers are required to comply with the FDA’s Quality Management System Regulations (“QMSR”) for any products imported into, or sold within, the U.S. The QMSR is a complex regulatory scheme that covers the methods and documentation of the design, testing, production process and controls, manufacturing, labeling, quality assurance, packaging, storage and shipping of our products. Furthermore, we are required to verify that our suppliers maintain facilities, procedures and operations that comply with our quality requirements. We are also subject to state licensing and other requirements and licenses applicable to manufacturers of medical devices, and we are required to comply with International Organization for Standardization (“ISO”), quality system standards in order to produce products for sale in Europe and Canada, as well as various other foreign laws and regulations. Because our manufacturing processes include the production of diagnostic and therapeutic X‑ray equipment and laser equipment, we are subject to the electronic product radiation control provisions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, which requires that we file reports with the FDA, applicable states and our customers regarding the distribution, manufacturing and installation of these types of equipment. The FDA enforces the QMSR and the electronic product radiation control provisions through periodic inspections, some of which may be unannounced. We have been and anticipate in the future being subject to such inspections. FDA inspections usually occur every two to three years. During such inspections, the FDA may issue Inspectional Observations on Form FDA 483, listing instances where the manufacturer has failed to comply with applicable regulations and procedures, or warning letters.

Previous wording

If a manufacturer does not adequately address the observations, the FDA may take enforcement action against the manufacturer, including the imposition of fines, restriction of the ability to export product, total shutdown of production facilities and criminal prosecution. If we or a third‑party supplier receive a Form FDA 483 with material or major observations that are not promptly corrected, fail to pass a QSR inspection, or fail to comply with these, ISO and other applicable regulatory requirements, our operations could be disrupted and our ability to generate sales could be delayed. Our failure to take prompt and satisfactory corrective action in response to an adverse inspection or our failure to comply with applicable standards could result in enforcement actions, including a public warning letter, a shutdown of our manufacturing operations, a recall of our products, civil or criminal penalties, or other sanctions, which would cause our sales and business to suffer. In addition, because some foreign regulatory approvals are based on approvals or clearances from the FDA, any failure to comply with FDA requirements may also disrupt our sales of products in other countries. We cannot assure you that the FDA or other governmental authorities would agree with our interpretation of applicable regulatory requirements or that we or our third‑party suppliers have in all instances fully complied with all applicable requirements. If any of these events occur, our reputation could be harmed, we could lose customers and there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

If a manufacturer does not adequately address the observations, the FDA may take enforcement action against the manufacturer, including the imposition of fines, restriction of the ability to export product, total shutdown of production facilities and criminal prosecution. If we or a third‑party supplier receive a Form FDA 483 with material or major observations that are not promptly corrected, fail to pass a QMSR inspection, or fail to comply with these, ISO and other applicable regulatory requirements, our operations could be disrupted and our ability to generate sales could be delayed. Our failure to take prompt and satisfactory corrective action in response to an adverse inspection or our failure to comply with applicable standards could result in enforcement actions, including a public warning letter, a shutdown of our manufacturing operations, a recall of our products, civil or criminal penalties, or other sanctions, which would cause our sales and business to suffer. In addition, because some foreign regulatory approvals are based on approvals or clearances from the FDA, any failure to comply with FDA requirements may also disrupt our sales of products in other countries. We cannot assure you that the FDA or other governmental authorities would agree with our interpretation of applicable regulatory requirements or that we or our third‑party suppliers have in all instances fully complied with all applicable requirements. If any of these events occur, our reputation could be harmed, we could lose customers and there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

If we cannot achieve the required level and quality of production, we may need to outsource production or rely on licensing and other arrangements with third parties who possess sufficient manufacturing facilities and capabilities in compliance with regulatory requirements. Even if we could outsource needed production or enter into licensing or other third‑party arrangements, this could reduce our gross margin and expose us to the risks inherent in relying on others. We also cannot assure you that our suppliers will deliver an adequate supply of required components on a timely basis or that they will adequately comply with the QSR. Failure to obtain these components on a timely basis would disrupt our manufacturing processes and increase our costs, which would harm our operating results.

Current wording

If we cannot achieve the required level and quality of production, we may need to outsource production or rely on licensing and other arrangements with third parties who possess sufficient manufacturing facilities and capabilities in compliance with regulatory requirements. Even if we could outsource needed production or enter into licensing or other third‑party arrangements, this could reduce our gross margin and expose us to the risks inherent in relying on others. We also cannot assure you that our suppliers will deliver an adequate supply of required components on a timely basis or that they will adequately comply with the QMSR. Failure to obtain these components on a timely basis would disrupt our manufacturing processes and increase our costs, which would harm our operating results.

Previous wording

In addition, we depend on one of our customers for a substantial portion of our revenue, and the loss of, or a significant reduction in orders from our major customer could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and operating results. The JV represented approximately 17% and 21% of our total net revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and represented approximately 16% and 27% of our total net revenue during the nine months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. In the future, our major customer may decide not to purchase our products at all, may purchase fewer products than they did in the past, or may defer or cancel purchases or otherwise alter their purchasing patterns.

Current wording

In addition, we depend on one of our customers for a substantial portion of our revenue, and the loss of, or a significant reduction in orders from our major customer could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and operating results. The JV represented approximately 16% and 15% of our total net revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. In the future, our major customer may decide not to purchase our products at all, may purchase fewer products than they did in the past, or may defer or cancel purchases or otherwise alter their purchasing patterns.

Previous wording

We cannot be sure that we will be able to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval or clearance for, manufacture or introduce new products, treatment systems or enhancements, the roll‑out of which involves compliance with complex quality assurance processes, including QSR. Failure to obtain regulatory approval or clearance for our products or to complete these processes in a timely and efficient manner could result in delays that could affect our ability to attract and retain customers, or could cause customers to delay or cancel orders, causing our backlog, revenues and operating results to suffer.

Current wording

We cannot be sure that we will be able to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval or clearance for, manufacture or introduce new products, treatment systems or enhancements, the roll‑out of which involves compliance with complex quality assurance processes, including QMSR. Failure to obtain regulatory approval or clearance for our products or to complete these processes in a timely and efficient manner could result in delays that could affect our ability to attract and retain customers, or could cause customers to delay or cancel orders, causing our backlog, revenues and operating results to suffer.

Previous wording

If we do not effectively manage our growth, our business may be significantly harmed.

Current wording

If we do not successfully implement our Transformation Plan, our business may be significantly harmed.

Previous wording

In addition, if a product we designed or manufactured is defective, whether because of design or manufacturing, supplied parts, or labeling defects, improper use of the product or other reasons, we may be required to notify regulatory authorities and/or to recall the product, possibly at our expense. We have voluntarily initiated recalls and other product corrections in the past, which have been reported to the FDA. We are committed to the safety and precision of our products and while no serious adverse health consequences have been reported in connection with these recalls and the costs associated with each such recall were not material, we cannot ensure that the FDA will not require that we take additional actions to address problems that resulted in previous recalls or that similar or more significant product recalls will not occur in the future. A required notification of a correction or removal to a regulatory authority or recall could result in an investigation by regulatory authorities of our products, which could in turn result in required recalls, restrictions on the sale of the products or other civil or criminal penalties. The adverse publicity resulting from any of these actions could cause customers to review and potentially terminate their relationships with us. These investigations, corrections or recalls, especially if accompanied by unfavorable publicity, patient injury or termination of customer contracts, could result in incurring substantial costs, losing revenues and damaging our reputation, each of which would harm our business.

Current wording

In addition, if a product we designed or manufactured is defective, whether because of design or manufacturing, supplied parts, or labeling defects, improper use of the product or other reasons, we may be required to notify regulatory authorities and/or to recall the product, possibly at our expense. We have voluntarily initiated recalls and other product corrections in the past, which have been reported to the FDA. For example, we initiated a voluntary recall on CyberKnife in May 2026 related to collimator retention during exchange. We will continue to monitor and voluntarily correct product issues in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements. We are committed to the safety and precision of our products and while no serious adverse health consequences have been reported in connection with these recalls and the costs associated with each such recall were not material, we cannot ensure that the FDA will not require that we take additional actions to address problems that resulted in previous recalls or that similar or more significant product recalls will not occur in the future. A required notification of a correction or removal to a regulatory authority or recall could result in an investigation by regulatory authorities of our products, which could in turn result in required recalls, restrictions on the sale of the products or other civil or criminal penalties. The adverse publicity resulting from any of these actions could cause customers to review and potentially terminate their relationships with us. These investigations, corrections or recalls, especially if accompanied by unfavorable publicity, patient injury or termination of customer contracts, could result in incurring substantial costs, losing revenues and damaging our reputation, each of which would harm our business.

Previous wording

Disruptions caused by ongoing or future global conflicts, including those resulting from conflicts affecting or in close proximity to countries and regions in the Middle East, may result in extended lead times, delays in supplier deliveries, and increasing freight costs. The risk of supply disruptions caused by these factors may further result in delays in the delivery of our products. Furthermore, as a result of the effects of the macroeconomic conditions, including inflation, and supply chain challenges, some of our suppliers have limited or reduced the sale of such components to us or increased the cost of such components to us. If these conditions worsen, or if these suppliers were to experience financial difficulties, additional supply chain or other problems that prevents them from supplying us with the necessary components, we could fail to meet product demand, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. These sole source and other suppliers could also be subject to quality and performance issues, materials shortages, excess demand, reduction in capacity and other factors that may disrupt the flow of goods to us; thereby adversely affecting our business and customer relationships. If any single‑source supplier was to cease delivering components to us or fail to provide the components to our specifications and on a timely basis, we might be required to find alternative sources for these components. The disruption or termination of the supply of components, including as a result of global shortages in important components, have resulted in, and will continue to cause, inflationary pressure on our supply chain and a significant increase in the costs of these components, which have materially affected and could continue to adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, we expect inflation and the ongoing supply chain challenges and logistics costs to impact our cash from operations through at least fiscal year 2026. In some cases, alternative suppliers may be located in the same geographic area as existing suppliers, and are thus subject to the same economic, political and geographic factors that may affect existing suppliers to meet our demand. We may have difficulty or be unable to find alternative sources for these components. Difficulties in obtaining a sufficient supply of component materials could increase as well as the costs associated with such components, and we expect such difficulties to persist through at least fiscal year 2026. As a result, we may be unable to meet the demand for the CyberKnife or TomoTherapy platforms, which could harm our ability to generate revenue and damage our reputation. Even if we do find alternate suppliers, we will be required to qualify any such alternate suppliers and we would likely experience a lengthy delay in our manufacturing processes or a cessation in production, which would result in delays of shipment to end users. We ca…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Current wording

Disruptions caused by ongoing or future global conflicts, including those resulting from conflicts affecting or in close proximity to countries and regions in the Middle East, may result in extended lead times, delays in supplier deliveries, and increasing freight costs. The risk of supply disruptions caused by these factors may further result in delays in the delivery of our products. Furthermore, as a result of the effects of the macroeconomic conditions, including inflation, and supply chain challenges, some of our suppliers have limited or reduced the sale of such components to us or increased the cost of such components to us. If these conditions worsen, or if these suppliers were to experience financial difficulties, additional supply chain or other problems that prevent them from supplying us with the necessary components, we could fail to meet product demand, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. These sole source and other suppliers could also be subject to quality and performance issues, materials shortages, excess demand, reduction in capacity and other factors that may disrupt the flow of goods to us; thereby adversely affecting our business and customer relationships. If any single‑source supplier was to cease delivering components to us or fail to provide the components to our specifications and on a timely basis, we might be required to find alternative sources for these components. The disruption or termination of the supply of components, including as a result of global shortages in important components, have resulted in, and will continue to cause, inflationary pressure on our supply chain and a significant increase in the costs of these components, which have materially affected and could continue to adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, we expect inflation and the ongoing supply chain challenges and logistics costs to impact our cash from operations through at least fiscal year 2027. In some cases, alternative suppliers may be located in the same geographic area as existing suppliers, and are thus subject to the same economic, political and geographic factors that may affect existing suppliers to meet our demand. We may have difficulty or be unable to find alternative sources for these components. Difficulties in obtaining a sufficient supply of component materials could increase as well as the costs associated with such components, and we expect such difficulties to persist through at least fiscal year 2027. As a result, we may be unable to meet the demand for the CyberKnife or TomoTherapy platforms, which could harm our ability to generate revenue and damage our reputation. Even if we do find alternate suppliers, we will be required to qualify any such alternate suppliers and we would likely experience a lengthy delay in our manufacturing processes or a cessation in production, which would result in delays of shipment to end users. We can…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

Failures of components also affect the reliability and performance of our products, can reduce customer confidence in our products, increase service parts consumption, and may adversely affect our financial performance. From time to time, we may receive components that do not perform according to their specifications, which could result in the inability of such customer utilize our systems in their practices until such components are replaced. Any future difficulty in obtaining reliable component parts could result in increased customer dissatisfaction and adversely affect our reputation, our ability to protect and retain our installed base of customers and results of operations.

Current wording

Failures of components also affect the reliability and performance of our products, can reduce customer confidence in our products, increase service parts consumption, and may adversely affect our financial performance. From time to time, we may receive components that do not perform according to their specifications, which could result in the inability of such customer to utilize our systems in their practices until such components are replaced. Any future difficulty in obtaining reliable component parts could result in increased customer dissatisfaction and adversely affect our reputation, our ability to protect and retain our installed base of customers and results of operations.

Previous wording

We are highly dependent on the members of our senior management, sales, marketing, operations and research and development staff. Our future success will depend in part on our ability to retain our key employees and to identify, hire and retain additional personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in the medical device industry is intense and finding and retaining qualified personnel with experience in our industry is very difficult. We believe there are only a limited number of individuals with the requisite skills to serve in many of our key positions and we face significant competition for key personnel and other employees, from other medical equipment and software manufacturers, technology companies, universities and research institutions. Fluctuations in labor availability globally, including labor shortages and staff burnout and attrition, may also impact our ability to hire and retain personnel critical to our manufacturing, logistics, and commercial operations. In addition, no payments were made under the company bonus plan in fiscal year 2025. As a result, we may not be able to retain our existing employees or hire new employees quickly enough to meet our needs. Moreover, we have from time to time conducted reductions in force in order to optimize our organizational structure and reduce costs, some of which were substantial, and certain senior personnel have also departed for various reasons. At the same time, we may face high turnover among employees that are critical to our ongoing operations, requiring us to expend time and resources, including financial resources, to source, train and integrate new employees. The challenging markets in which we compete for talent may also require us to invest significant amounts of cash and equity to attract and retain employees. In addition, a significant portion of our compensation to our key employees is in the form of stock related grants. A prolonged depression in our stock price could make it difficult for us to retain our key and other employees and recruit additional qualified personnel and we may have to pay additional compensation to employees to incentivize them to join or stay with us. We do not maintain, and do not currently intend to obtain, key employee life insurance on any of our personnel. If we fail to hire and retain key personnel and other employees, we may be unable to continue to grow our business successfully.

Current wording

We are highly dependent on the members of our senior management, sales, marketing, operations and research and development staff. Changes to management or other key personnel, including recent turnover in our leadership and senior management team, could have an adverse effect on our business. Our future success is substantially dependent upon the performance, contributions and expertise of our executive leadership, senior management team, and other key personnel as well as our ability to retain such employees and to identify, hire and retain additional personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in the medical device industry is intense and finding and retaining qualified personnel with experience in our industry is very difficult. We believe there are only a limited number of individuals with the requisite skills to serve in many of our key positions, and we face significant competition for key personnel and other employees, from other medical equipment and software manufacturers, technology companies, universities and research institutions. Fluctuations in labor availability globally, including labor shortages and staff burnout and attrition, may also impact our ability to hire and retain personnel critical to our manufacturing, logistics, and commercial operations. In addition, no payments were made under the company bonus plan in fiscal year 2026. As a result, we may not be able to retain our existing employees or hire new employees quickly enough to meet our needs. We have experienced, and may continue to experience, turnover in our senior executives and other key personnel. If we are unable to continue to successfully navigate this transition, we may be unable to achieve our strategic priorities. Moreover, we have from time to time conducted reductions in force in order to optimize our organizational structure and reduce costs, some of which were substantial, and certain senior personnel have also departed for various reasons. At the same time, we may face high turnover among employees that are critical to our ongoing operations, requiring us to expend time and resources, including financial resources, to source, train and integrate new employees. The challenging markets in which we compete for talent may also require us to invest significant amounts of cash and equity to attract and retain employees. In addition, a significant portion of our compensation to our key employees is in the form of stock related grants. A prolonged depression in our stock price could make it difficult for us to retain our key and other employees and recruit additional qualified personnel and we may have to pay additional compensation to employees to incentivize them to join or stay with us. We do not maintain, and do not currently intend to obtain, key employee life insurance on any of our personnel. If we fail to hire and retain key personnel and other employees, we may be unable to continue to grow our business successfully.

Previous wording

Information technology helps us operate more efficiently, interface with customers, maintain financial accuracy and efficiency and accurately produce our financial statements. If we do not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build, sustain and secure the proper technology infrastructure, we could be subject to transaction errors, processing inefficiencies, the loss of customers, business disruptions or the loss, unavailability of or damage to data and intellectual property through a cyberattack (including ransomware and other attacks) or other security breaches or incidents. While management is committed to identifying cybersecurity risks and working to address them through oversight of data security by our Chief Information Security Officer and implementation of various technical safeguards, procedural requirements and policies, regardless of the resources we allocate and the effectiveness with which we manage them, we face a risk of cyberattacks and other security breaches and incidents. Any cyberattacks or other security breaches or incidents we suffer could expose us to a risk of lost, unavailable, or corrupted information, unauthorized disclosure or other processing of information, claims, litigation and possible liability to employees, customers and others, and investigations and proceedings by regulatory authorities. Cyberattacks and other means of creating security breaches and incidents or disruptions continue to increase in frequency, sophistication, and intensity and are becoming increasingly difficult to detect on a timely basis or otherwise, especially as they relate to attacks on third-party providers or their vendors. Such attacks are often carried out by motivated and highly skilled actors, who are increasingly well-resourced. Techniques used to compromise or sabotage systems, including the use of advanced technologies, such as machine learning or artificial intelligence ("AI") change frequently, may originate from less regulated and remote areas of the world, may be difficult to detect, and generally are not recognized until after they are launched against a target. As a result, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures. Additionally, cyberattack activity may be heightened in connection with geopolitical events such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict and recent escalation of conflict in Iran, Middle East and Southwest Asia. In addition to potential exposure to cyberattacks, security incidents, or other actions that may compromise the security of or interfere with the function of our products, defects or vulnerabilities in the software or systems of our third-party vendors may expose failures in our internal controls and risk management processes, which may adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows and may also harm our reputation, brand, and customer relationships.

Current wording

Information technology helps us operate more efficiently, interface with customers, maintain financial accuracy and efficiency and accurately produce our financial statements. If we do not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build, sustain and secure the proper technology infrastructure, we could be subject to transaction errors, processing inefficiencies, the loss of customers, business disruptions or the loss, unavailability of or damage to data and intellectual property through a cyberattack (including ransomware and other attacks) or other security breaches or incidents. While management is committed to identifying cybersecurity risks and working to address them through oversight of data security by our Chief Information Security Officer and implementation of various technical safeguards, procedural requirements and policies, regardless of the resources we allocate and the effectiveness with which we manage them, we face a risk of cyberattacks and other security breaches and incidents. Any cyberattacks or other security breaches or incidents we suffer could expose us to a risk of lost, unavailable, or corrupted information, unauthorized disclosure or other processing of information, claims, litigation and possible liability to employees, customers and others, and investigations and proceedings by regulatory authorities. Cyberattacks and other means of creating security breaches and incidents or disruptions continue to increase in frequency, sophistication, and intensity and are becoming increasingly difficult to detect on a timely basis or otherwise, especially as they relate to attacks on third-party providers or their vendors. Such attacks are often carried out by motivated and highly skilled actors, who are increasingly well-resourced. Techniques used to compromise or sabotage systems, including the use of advanced technologies, such as machine learning or artificial intelligence (“AI”) change frequently, may originate from less regulated and remote areas of the world, may be difficult to detect, and generally are not recognized until after they are launched against a target. As a result, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures. Additionally, cyberattack activity may be heightened in connection with international conflicts and geopolitical tensions. Further, advanced technologies such as AI technologies that efficiently identify and exploit security vulnerabilities are being leveraged in manners that may increase the likelihood of security incidents and the impacts of security incidents that occur. In addition to potential exposure to cyberattacks, security incidents, or other actions that may compromise the security of or interfere with the function of our products, defects or vulnerabilities in the software or systems of our third-party vendors may expose failures in our internal controls and risk management processes, which may adversely impact our business, fina…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

To date, we have not experienced any cyberattack or security breach or incident that has had a material impact on our operations or financial results; however, we cannot provide any assurance that this will remain the case. There can be no assurance that any efforts we make to prevent against such privacy or security breaches or incidents have been or will be able to prevent breakdowns or breaches or incidents in our systems or those of our third-party service providers that could adversely affect our business. In addition, privacy and security breaches and incidents arising from errors, malfeasance or misconduct by employees, contractors or others with permitted access to our systems may pose a risk that sensitive data, including individually identifiable data, may be exposed to unauthorized persons or to the public and may compromise our security systems. Third parties may also attempt to fraudulently induce employees or customers into disclosing usernames, passwords or other sensitive information, which may in turn be used to access our information technology systems. For example, our employees have received in the past and likely will continue to receive “phishing” e-mails attempting to induce them to divulge sensitive information. We may also face increased cybersecurity risks due to our reliance on internet technology and many of our employees working remotely at least part of the time, which may create additional opportunities for cybercriminals to exploit vulnerabilities. In addition, adversaries might attempt to gain unauthorized access to our products or systems to obtain personal data relating to patients or employees, our confidential or proprietary information or confidential information we hold on behalf of third parties, which, if successful, could pose a risk of loss, unavailability, or corruption of, or unauthorized access to or acquisition of, data, risk to patient safety and risk of product recall. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to our systems change frequently and may be difficult to detect, and we may not be able to anticipate and prevent these intrusions or mitigate them when they occur. Third-party service providers store and otherwise process certain personal data and other confidential or proprietary information of ourselves and third parties on our behalf, and these service providers face similar risks. In addition, our employees, third-party service providers, strategic partners, or other contractors or consultants may input personal or confidential information, or other business data of ours, into an AI system (in particular, a system that is managed, owned, or controlled by a third party), which may disrupt and otherwise compromise our business operations, divert the attention of management and key information technology resources, potentially lead to security breaches or incidents or other unauthorized access to, or other use or processing of, personal information, our confidential information or o…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Current wording

There can be no assurance that any efforts we make to prevent privacy or security breaches or incidents have been or will be able to prevent breakdowns or breaches or incidents in our systems or those of our third-party service providers that could adversely affect our business. In addition, privacy and security breaches and incidents arising from errors, malfeasance or misconduct by employees, contractors or others with permitted access to our systems may pose a risk that sensitive data, including individually identifiable data, may be exposed to unauthorized persons or to the public and may compromise our security systems. Third parties may also attempt to fraudulently induce employees or customers into disclosing usernames, passwords or other sensitive information, which may in turn be used to access our information technology systems. For example, our employees have received in the past and likely will continue to receive “phishing” e-mails attempting to induce them to divulge sensitive information. We may also face increased cybersecurity risks due to our reliance on internet technology and many of our employees working remotely at least part of the time, which may create additional opportunities for cybercriminals to exploit vulnerabilities. In addition, adversaries might attempt to gain unauthorized access to our products or systems to obtain personal data relating to patients or employees, our confidential or proprietary information or confidential information we hold on behalf of third parties, which, if successful, could pose a risk of loss, unavailability, or corruption of, or unauthorized access to or acquisition of, data, risk to patient safety and risk of product recall. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to our systems change frequently and may be difficult to detect, and we may not be able to anticipate and prevent these intrusions or mitigate them when they occur. Third-party service providers store and otherwise process certain personal data and other confidential or proprietary information of ourselves and third parties on our behalf, and these service providers face similar risks. In addition, our employees, third-party service providers, strategic partners, or other contractors or consultants may input personal or confidential information, or other business data of ours, into an AI system (in particular, a system that is managed, owned, or controlled by a third-party), which may disrupt and otherwise compromise our business operations, divert the attention of management and key information technology resources, potentially lead to security breaches or incidents or other unauthorized access to, or other use or processing of, personal information, our confidential information or other business data. Moreover, we manufacture and sell hardware and software products that allow our customers to store confidential information about their patients. Both types of products are often connected to and reside within our cus…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

Due to frequently changing attack techniques, along with the increased volume and sophistication of the attacks, including the increasing use of tools and techniques that are designed to circumvent controls, avoid detection, and remove or obfuscate forensic evidence, all of which hinders our ability to identify, investigate, and recover from incidents, we could be adversely impacted by cybersecurity attacks or other security breaches or incidents. This impact could result in reputational, competitive, operational, or other business harm as well as financial costs and claims, demands, litigation and regulatory action.

Current wording

Frequently changing attack techniques, together with the increasing volume and sophistication of attacks, could adversely affect our ability to identify, investigate, contain and recover from cybersecurity incidents. Attackers increasingly use tools and techniques designed to circumvent controls, identify and exploit vulnerabilities, avoid detection, and remove or obscure forensic evidence, including through evolving AI technologies. These developments may increase both the likelihood and potential impact of successful attacks and could result in reputational, competitive, operational or other business harm, as well as financial costs, claims, litigation and regulatory action.

Previous wording

Data transfer and localization requirements also appear to be increasing and becoming more complex. With regard to transfers to the U.S. of personal data from our employees and European customers and users, both the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield and standard contractual clauses issued by the European Commission (the “EU SCCs”) have been subject to legal challenge. In July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) released a decision in the Schrems II case (Data Protection Commissioner v. Facebook Ireland, Schrems) (the “CJEU Decision”), declaring the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield invalid and imposing additional obligations in connection with the use of the EU SCCs, another mechanism for cross-border personal data transfers from the European Economic Area (“EEA”). Although the EU SCCs remain a valid means to transfer personal data from the EEA, the CJEU imposed additional obligations in connection with their use and, on June 4, 2021, the European Commission issued revised EU SCCs that address certain concerns of the CJEU. The United Kingdom also has issued new standard contractual clauses (the “UK SCCs”) that became effective March 21, 2022, and which are required to be implemented. In March 2022, the EU and U.S. reached an agreement in principle on a new EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (“DPF”). In October 2022, the U.S. issued an executive order in furtherance of the DPF, on which basis the European Commission adopted an adequacy decision with respect to the DPF in July 2023, allowing its implementation and availability for companies to use to legitimize transfers of personal data from the E.U. to the U.S. It remains unclear, however, whether this framework will be appropriate for us to rely upon. The DPF has faced a legal challenge and it may be subject to additional challenges. Additionally, the European Commission’s adequacy decision regarding the DPF provides that the DPF will be subject to future reviews and may be subject to suspension, amendment, repeal, or limitations to its scope by the European Commission. Additionally, the U.S. Department of Justice issued final Data Security Program rules that took effect in April 2025 and places limitations, and in some cases prohibitions, on certain transfers of sensitive personal data to business partners located in China or with other specified links to China, Russia and other designated countries (the “DOJ DSP Rules”). These and other developments relating to cross-border data transfer may require us to implement additional contractual and technical safeguards for any personal data transferred out of various jurisdictions, which may increase compliance costs, lead to increased regulatory scrutiny or liability, may require additional contractual negotiations, and may adversely impact our business, financial condition and operating results.

Current wording

Data transfer and localization requirements also appear to be increasing and becoming more complex. With regard to transfers to the U.S. of personal data from our employees and European customers and users, both the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield and standard contractual clauses issued by the European Commission (the “EU SCCs”) have been subject to legal challenge. In July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) released a decision in the Schrems II case (Data Protection Commissioner v. Facebook Ireland, Schrems) (the “CJEU Decision”), declaring the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield invalid and imposing additional obligations in connection with the use of the EU SCCs, another mechanism for cross-border personal data transfers from the European Economic Area (“EEA”). Although the EU SCCs remain a valid means to transfer personal data from the EEA, the CJEU imposed additional obligations in connection with their use and, on June 4, 2021, the European Commission issued revised EU SCCs that address certain concerns of the CJEU. The United Kingdom also has issued new standard contractual clauses (the “UK SCCs”) that became effective March 21, 2022, and which are required to be implemented. In March 2022, the EU and U.S. reached an agreement in principle on a new EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (“DPF”). In October 2022, the U.S. issued an executive order in furtherance of the DPF, on which basis the European Commission adopted an adequacy decision with respect to the DPF in July 2023, allowing its implementation and availability for companies to use to legitimize transfers of personal data from the E.U. to the U.S. It remains unclear, however, whether this framework will be appropriate for us to rely upon. The DPF has faced a legal challenge and it may be subject to additional challenges. Additionally, the European Commission’s adequacy decision regarding the DPF provides that the DPF will be subject to future reviews and may be subject to suspension, amendment, repeal, or limitations to its scope by the European Commission. These and other developments relating to cross-border data transfer may require us to implement additional contractual and technical safeguards for any personal data transferred out of various jurisdictions, which may increase compliance costs, lead to increased regulatory scrutiny or liability, may require additional contractual negotiations, and may adversely impact our business, financial condition and operating results.

Previous wording

Further, the U.S. government has undertaken an evaluation of national security concerns and other risks relating to the transfer of personally identifiable information from the United States to countries of concern, including China and Russia. In 2019, an executive order citing national security risks in the telecommunications sector served to block U.S. companies from buying certain information and communications technology or services sourced from foreign adversary countries such as China or Russia when the Commerce Department deems such products or services as posing undue or unacceptable risks to U.S. national security. On June 9, 2021, U.S. President Biden signed an executive order instituting a framework for determining national security risks of transactions that involve applications connected to governments or militaries of certain foreign adversaries or that collect sensitive personal data from U.S. consumers. On February 28, 2024, U.S. President Biden issued an executive order to build upon those previous orders by restricting access to bulk sensitive personal data and U.S. government-related data by countries of concern. The Department of Justice (DOJ) used authority under those executive orders to issue the Data Security Program rules (the “DSP rules”), which took effect in April 2025 and which prohibit or restrict the sharing of bulk U.S. sensitive personal data with recipients who are located in or affiliated with countries of concern, which are defined to include China and Russia. If our operations, including those involving the processing of U.S.-collected data such as medical imagery, through the JV in China, causes us to become subject to executive orders, sanctions, or other measures that bans or otherwise restricts transfer of data to the JV in China, it may increase costs as we seek operational and data processing alternatives.

Current wording

Further, the U.S. government has undertaken an evaluation of national security concerns and other risks relating to the transfer of personally identifiable information from the United States to countries of concern, including China and Russia. In 2019, an executive order citing national security risks in the telecommunications sector served to block U.S. companies from buying certain information and communications technology or services sourced from foreign adversary countries such as China or Russia when the Commerce Department deems such products or services as posing undue or unacceptable risks to U.S. national security. On June 9, 2021, U.S. President Biden signed an executive order instituting a framework for determining national security risks of transactions that involve applications connected to governments or militaries of certain foreign adversaries or that collect sensitive personal data from U.S. consumers. On February 28, 2024, U.S. President Biden issued an executive order to build upon those previous orders by restricting access to bulk sensitive personal data and U.S. government-related data by countries of concern. The Department of Justice (DOJ) used authority under those executive orders to issue Data Security Program rules that took effect in April 2025 and prohibit or restrict the sharing of bulk U.S. sensitive personal data with recipients who are located in or affiliated with countries of concern, which are defined to include China and Russia. If our operations, including those involving the processing of U.S.-collected data such as medical imagery, through the JV in China, cause us to become subject to executive orders, sanctions, or other measures that ban or otherwise restrict transfer of data to the JV in China, it may increase costs as we seek operational and data processing alternatives.

Previous wording

The California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), approved by California voters in November 2020, became effective on January 1, 2023. The CPRA, significantly modified the CCPA, has resulted in further uncertainty and may require us to incur additional costs and expenses in an effort to comply. We will continue to monitor developments related to the CPRA and anticipate additional costs and expenses associated with CPRA compliance. The enactment of the CCPA, as modified by the CPRA, is prompting a wave of similar legislative developments in other states in the U.S., which could potentially create a patchwork of overlapping but different state laws. For example, Virginia, Colorado, Utah, and Connecticut all have enacted state laws that became effective in 2023; Texas, Montana, Oregon, and Florida have adopted laws that became effective in 2024, Delaware, Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey and Tennessee have adopted laws that have become or will become effective in 2025; and Indiana, Kentucky, and Rhode Island have adopted laws that will become effective in 2026. These new state laws share similarities with the CCPA, CPRA, and legislation proposed in other states. Other states have enacted other types of privacy legislation, such as Washington’s My Health, My Data Act, which includes a private right of action. Additionally, the U.S. federal government is contemplating privacy legislation. We cannot fully predict the impact of the CCPA, CPRA, or other new or proposed legislation on our business or operations, but the restrictions imposed by these laws and regulations may require us to modify our data handling practices and impose additional costs and burdens, including risks of regulatory fines, litigation and associated reputational harm. In addition, U.S. and international laws that have been applied to protect consumer privacy (including laws regarding unfair and deceptive practices in the U.S. and GDPR in the EU) may be subject to evolving interpretations or applications in light of privacy developments. As a result, we may be subject to significant consequences, including penalties and fines, for any failure to comply with such laws, regulations and directives.

Current wording

The California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), approved by California voters in November 2020, became effective on January 1, 2023. The CPRA, which significantly modified the CCPA, has resulted in further uncertainty and may require us to incur additional costs and expenses in an effort to comply. We will continue to monitor developments related to the CPRA and anticipate additional costs and expenses associated with CPRA compliance. The enactment of the CCPA, as modified by the CPRA, is prompting a wave of similar legislative developments in other states in the U.S., which could potentially create a patchwork of overlapping but different state laws. For example, Virginia, Colorado, Utah, and Connecticut all have enacted state laws that became effective in 2023; Texas, Montana, Oregon, and Florida have adopted laws that became effective in 2024, Delaware, Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey and Tennessee have adopted laws that became effective in 2025; Indiana, Kentucky, and Rhode Island have adopted laws that became effective in 2026; Alabama, Louisiana, and Oklahoma have adopted laws that will become effective in 2027; and Vermont has adopted a law that will become effective in 2028. These new state laws share similarities with the CCPA, CPRA, and legislation proposed in other states. Other states have enacted other types of privacy legislation, such as Washington’s My Health, My Data Act, which includes a private right of action. Additionally, the U.S. federal government is contemplating privacy legislation. We cannot fully predict the impact of the CCPA, CPRA, or other new or proposed legislation on our business or operations, but the restrictions imposed by these laws and regulations may require us to modify our data handling practices and impose additional costs and burdens, including risks of regulatory fines, litigation and associated reputational harm. In addition, U.S. and international laws that have been applied to protect consumer privacy (including laws regarding unfair and deceptive practices in the U.S. and GDPR in the EU) may be subject to evolving interpretations or applications in light of privacy developments. As a result, we may be subject to significant consequences, including penalties and fines, for any failure to comply with such laws, regulations and directives.

Previous wording

We have integrated AI, including machine learning, in certain of our products, services and internal operations. Some of the uses in our internal operations include using AI to help detect and respond to abnormalities that could indicate a part is about to break, provide our service engineers support on information about parts, analyzing datasets, creating documents for internal purposes, and develop processes for internal departments to manage internal workflows. Further, certain of our third-party vendors utilize AI and machine learning technologies in furnishing services to us. As with many technological innovations, AI presents risks and challenges that could affect its adoption, and therefore our business. Our products utilize, and we plan to further examine, develop and introduce, machine learning algorithms, predictive analytics, and other AI technologies to offer new or upgraded solutions and enhance our capabilities. If these AI or machine learning models are incorrectly designed, the performance of our products, services, and business, as well as our reputation, could suffer or we could incur liability through the violation of laws or contracts to which we are a party.

Current wording

We have integrated AI, including machine learning, in certain of our products, services and internal operations. For example, we are developing AI-enabled tools intended to support predictive maintenance and faster diagnostics. Some of the uses in our internal operations include using AI to help detect and respond to abnormalities that could indicate a part is about to break, provide our service engineers support on information about parts, analyzing datasets, creating documents for internal purposes, and develop processes for internal departments to manage internal workflows. Further, certain of our third-party vendors utilize AI and machine learning technologies in furnishing services to us. As with many technological innovations, as we leverage AI and machine learning tools to increase productivity and innovation, we also face potential risks from the use of such AI and machine learning tools. Our, or our customers’ sensitive, proprietary, or confidential information could be leaked, disclosed, or revealed as a result of or in connection with employees’ or vendors’ use of generative AI technologies. In addition, we may use AI outputs to inform certain decisions, and AI models may create incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise flawed outputs, some of which may appear correct. Due to the potential flaws in the use of AI, we could make incorrect decisions, including decisions that could bias certain individuals or classes of individuals and adversely impact their rights. Additionally, our products utilize, and we plan to further examine, develop and introduce, machine learning algorithms, predictive analytics, and other AI technologies to offer new or upgraded solutions and enhance our capabilities. Developing, testing and deploying AI technologies may require additional investment and increase our costs. If these AI or machine learning models are incorrectly designed or ineffectively integrated, the performance of our products, services, and business, as well as our reputation, could suffer or we could incur liability through the violation of laws or contracts to which we are a party.

Previous wording

Although we believe that the CyberKnife and TomoTherapy platforms have advantages over competing products and technologies, we do not have sufficient clinical data demonstrating these advantages for all tumor indications. In addition, we have only limited five‑year patient survival rate data, which is a common long‑term measure of clinical effectiveness in cancer treatment. We also have limited clinical data directly comparing the effectiveness of the CyberKnife platform to other competing platforms. Future patient studies or clinical experience may indicate that treatment with the CyberKnife platform does not improve patient survival or outcomes relative to other platforms.

Current wording

Although we believe that the CyberKnife and TomoTherapy platforms have advantages over competing products and technologies, we do not have sufficient clinical data demonstrating these advantages for all tumor indications. In addition, we have limited five‑year patient survival rate data, which is a common long‑term measure of clinical effectiveness in cancer treatment. We also have limited clinical data directly comparing the effectiveness of the CyberKnife platform to other competing platforms. Future patient studies or clinical experience may indicate that treatment with the CyberKnife platform does not improve patient survival or outcomes relative to other platforms.

Previous wording

Likewise, because the TomoTherapy platform has only been on the market since 2003, we have limited complication or patient survival rate data with respect to treatment using the systems for all clinical indications. If future patient studies or clinical experience do not support our beliefs that the TomoTherapy platform offer a more advantageous treatment for a wide variety of cancer types, use of the systems could fail to increase or could decrease, and our business would therefore be adversely affected.

Current wording

Likewise, because the TomoTherapy platform has been on the market since 2003, we have limited complication or patient survival rate data with respect to treatment using the systems for all clinical indications. If future patient studies or clinical experience do not support our beliefs that the TomoTherapy platform offers a more advantageous treatment for a wide variety of cancer types, use of the systems could fail to increase or could decrease, and our business would therefore be adversely affected.

Previous wording

Our strategy to maintain or reduce our costs of operations includes the implementation of certain business process outsourcing initiatives for the provision and support of certain internal business functions. We may have limited control over these third parties, and we cannot guarantee that they will perform their obligations in an effective and timely manner. Our operations may be adversely affected if there is a failure, disruption, or malfunction (including cybersecurity breaches and other risks) in the provision of such outsourced services, or if the relationship with or services provided by such vendors are terminated in whole or in part. Further, we may not be able to find an alternative vendor in a timely manner, on acceptable terms, or that can provide adequate services or functionality. If any of these third-party vendors fail to implement proper controls to meet our industry’s regulatory requirements, violate laws, do not fulfill their contractual obligations, or act inappropriately in conducting their services on our behalf, our operations and reputation could be negatively impacted and result in regulatory fines and penalties.

Current wording

Our strategy to maintain or reduce our costs of operations includes the implementation of certain business process outsourcing initiatives for the provision and support of certain internal business functions. We may have limited control over these third parties, and we cannot guarantee that they will perform their obligations in an effective and timely manner. Our operations may be adversely affected if there is a failure, disruption, or malfunction (including cybersecurity breaches and other risks) in the provision of such outsourced services, or if the relationship with or services provided by such vendors are terminated in whole or in part. Further, we may not be able to find an alternative vendor in a timely manner, on acceptable terms, or that can provide adequate services or functionality. Our use of outsourced service providers may also create dependencies on these third-party vendors and may result in the loss of internal capabilities, expertise, and institutional knowledge over time. If we are required or elect to replace a provider, transition services to another provider, or perform such services internally, we may experience operational disruptions, increased costs, delays, and reduced effectiveness in performing those functions. Additionally, if any of these third-party vendors fail to implement proper controls to meet our industry’s regulatory requirements, violate laws, do not fulfill their contractual obligations, or act inappropriately in conducting their services on our behalf, our operations and reputation could be negatively impacted and result in regulatory fines and penalties.

Showing the first 40 of 66 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.

Rearranged current paragraphs (1)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Additionally, one of the provisions under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that became effective in tax years beginning after December 31, 2021, required the capitalization and amortization of domestic and foreign research and experimental expenditures. On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the “OBBB Act”) was enacted, which makes a number of changes to U.S. federal income tax law, including permanently suspending the requirement to capitalize and amortize domestic research and development expenditures and permitting such deductions on a current basis. The adoption of the OBBB Act did not have a material impact on our financial statements due to our current losses and full valuation allowance recorded against our U.S. deferred tax asset.