Orchid Island Capital, Inc.
For the period ended Mar 31, 2026. Filed Apr 24, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Mar 31, 2026 · Filed Apr 24, 2026
ORC$4.94-1.0%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026
What changed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-09-30; filed 2025-10-24.
0001437749-25-031728
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2026-03-31; filed 2026-04-24.
0001437749-26-013290
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 136 previous paragraphs and 131 current paragraphs.
72 unchanged; 44 reworded; 12 added; 19 removed; 1 previous and 3 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 55 previous and 51 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (12)
Current report
Net (Loss) Income Summary
Current report
As of March 31, 2026, the Company's portfolio had an effective duration of 3.005, indicating that an interest rate increase of 1.0% would be expected to cause a 3.005% decrease in the value of the RMBS in the Company’s investment portfolio. As of December 31, 2025, the Company's portfolio had an effective duration of 2.513, indicating that an interest rate increase of 1.0% would be expected to cause a 2.513% decrease in the value of the RMBS in the Company’s investment portfolio. These figures do not include the effect of the Company’s funding cost hedges. Effective duration quotes for individual investments are obtained from The Yield Book, Inc.
Current report
Economic developments during the first quarter of 2026 were to a large extent a continuation of 2025, with inflation stubbornly above the Fed’s target of 2%, the labor market stable, and growth and spending holding up. There was also considerable uncertainty surrounding the two primary focus points of the Fed – inflation and the labor market. The impact of tariffs implemented in 2025 had not materially impacted goods prices, and it was unclear whether they would, and to what extent. The Trump administration’s crack down on immigration has meaningfully slowed labor market growth, and economists suspect the current base line growth rate of the labor market is at or close to zero. Both of these factors make it difficult for economists and Fed officials to interpret economic data and ascertain the appropriate path, or level, of monetary policy. Consequently, the Fed has held monetary policy stable and guided that they will continue assessing incoming data over time to determine what changes, if any are needed.
Current report
Additional factors that could affect the economy emerged over the course of the quarter. The first was apparent strains in the private credit markets. These first emerged in 2025, but intensified materially during the first quarter of 2026 – predominantly as developments in artificial intelligence were viewed as a threat to software developers. Coincidentally, the market feared the tens of billions of dollars of spending on data centers throughout the country and world announced in recent months by the country’s largest technology companies could lead to overcapacity. The weakness in the private credit markets spilled over into the broader equity markets, and most major market indices were down for the year by mid-single percentage points through late February, with software related companies down multiples of that.
Current report
On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel attacked Iran and began the current war that has materially disrupted the supply and production of oil in the Persian Gulf region, among other important commodities needed for the global economy. Financial markets immediately reflected higher interest rates, equity markets declined and commodity prices rose, especially the price of oil, which jumped to over $100 per barrel. Markets initially expected the war to be brief and the disruptions to the supply of oil and market turmoil to end quickly. This has not proved to be the case. With respect to domestic markets in the United States, the immediate impact has been inflationary, and headline inflation readings are expected to be elevated while the war lasts. Market pricing of Fed monetary policy adjustment quickly shifted from possibly one or two more interest rate cuts in 2026 to a possible hike before year end. As the war has continued, the market now expects the effect of the war may become more growth oriented, and longer-term rates have declined back to levels seen at year-end 2025. The ultimate outcome of the war remains unclear at this point, but what is very clear is the uncertainty surrounding the Fed and its pursuit of its dual mandates has become even more challenging.
Current report
While interest rates across the U.S. Treasury curve had been remarkably stable for most of 2025, especially the latter half of the year, interest rate volatility increased during the first quarter of 2026 and into the second quarter. While the range of the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury and other maturities outside of the 2-year U.S. Treasury have expanded, yields have remained within the new range throughout the year. Implied interest rate volatility in the rate options market spiked at the onset of the Iranian war, but has since retraced most of the upward spike. Shorter maturity U.S. Treasuries, those most sensitive to monetary policy, have increased as the market no longer anticipates additional interest rate cuts by the Fed. Prior to the outbreak of the war, the market was anticipating at least two 25-basis point cuts in the Fed Funds rate by the end of 2026, with additional cuts priced in for 2027. By the end of the first quarter, market pricing was approximately one-quarter of one 25-basis point cut by the end of 2026.
Current report
The Fed ended its quantitative tightening program, which reduced its balance sheet via the maturation of its holdings, and began reinvesting them into additional U.S. Treasury holdings on December 1, 2025. Run-off from the Agency RMBS holdings is now directed towards purchasing U.S. Treasuries. The Fed also announced its intention, via Reserve Management Purchases (“RMPs”), to grow its balance sheet over time to maintain a stable relationship between the size of its balance sheet and the economy. These steps will result in increased purchases of U.S. Treasuries by the Fed going forward, and interest rate swap spreads have widened – or become less negative – as a result. When the RMP program was first introduced, U.S. Treasury purchases were $40 billion per month, which had the added benefit of taking pressure off of the overnight funding markets, as market participants such as money-market funds had fewer options to deploy their liquidity and therefore increased the pool of available funds for the overnight repurchase agreement (“repo”) funding markets. As a result, funding levels available to the Company in the repo markets during the quarter – typically expressed as a spread over SOFR, were lower than had been the case for 2025. As is typically the case, the U.S. Treasury cash balances are elevated around the April 15 th filing deadline for individual income taxes. The Fed has reduced its RMP purchases for the balance of the filing period – typically approximately 2 months – to $25 billion per month. The market anticipates the level of purchases will go back to $40 billion per month thereafter. The reduction in monthly RMP purchases during this period is not expected to materially impact the Company’s funding levels.
Current report
The Agency RMBS market had a strong start to the quarter as both absolute and relative performance versus comparable duration U.S. Treasuries and swaps. On January 8, 2026, President Trump announced plans for the Enterprises to purchase up to $200 billion of Agency RMBS in 2026 in an effort to drive mortgage rates down and improve housing affordability. The market reacted strongly to the news, and the current coupon spread tightened to approximately 74 basis points, the tightest level since early 2022 when the Fed was still buying Agency RMBS under its quantitative easing program. The anticipated increase in purchases by the Enterprises resulted in an immediate outperformance of the sector. Subsequently, the Iranian war commenced on February 28, 2026, and negatively impacted the performance of the Agency RMBS sector, as well all risk markets generally, for the month of March 2026. The Agency RMBS market had a -1.6% return for March and an excess return of -0.3% versus comparable duration swaps. For the first quarter of 2026, the Agency RMBS sector still managed to generate a positive return of 0.6%, but versus comparable durations swaps, the return was only 0.02%. The returns compare to absolute returns of -0.6% and -0.4%, respectively, for the high yield and investment grade corporate bond sectors for the first quarter of 2026, and 0.1% and 1.4%, respectively, of excess returns versus comparable duration swaps for the quarter.
Current report
Within Agency RMBS for the first quarter of 2026, conventional 30-year mortgages generated a total return of 0.6%, 15-year mortgages generated a total return of 0.3% and Ginnie Mae 30-year mortgages generated a total return of 0.9%. Versus comparable duration swaps, the returns were (0.11%), (0.08%) and 0.29% for 30-year conventional, 15-year conventional and Ginnie Mae 30-year mortgages, respectively. The Company invests predominantly in 30-year conventional mortgages. Returns with the 30-year stack varied greatly by coupon, with lower (3.0% and lower) and highest coupons (6.5% and higher) outperforming middle coupons. This was the case for both absolute and excess returns for the first quarter. As interest rates ended the quarter slightly higher than at the end of 2025 prepayment rates – and expectations for prepayment rates going forward – subsided. This led to outperformance for highest coupons – even higher than the lowest coupon securities. The Company has the greatest concentration of its holdings in the 5.5% and 6.0% coupons, which generated absolute returns of 0.4% and 0.6%, respectively. Excess returns for these coupons were both -0.2%.
Current report
On March 19, 2026, the OCC, FDIC and the Fed rescinded the 2023 Basel III Endgame proposal and concurrently issued three revised notices of proposed rulemaking. The three proposals include (i) a revised Basel III Endgame proposal that would apply an expanded risk-based approach to Category I and Category II banking organizations, thus narrowing the mandatory scope from the 2023 proposal, with all other banking organizations permitted to opt in; (ii) a revised standardized approach proposal that would reduce risk weights for traditional lending activities for banking organizations not subject to the expanded risk-based approach; and (iii) a revised GSIB capital surcharge proposal. The OCC, FDIC, and the Fed estimate that the revised proposals would decrease aggregate common equity tier 1 capital requirements by approximately 4.8 percent for Category I and Category II banking organizations, in contrast to the significant capital increases that would have resulted under the 2023 Basel III Endgame. Additionally, the revised proposal would eliminate the requirement to deduct mortgage servicing assets from common equity tier 1 capital, instead assigning a 250% risk weight, which is designed to promote mortgage origination and servicing by banking organizations. The Fed voted 6-to-1 to advance all three proposals and the FDIC board voted unanimously in favor of the revised Basel III Endgame and standardized approach proposals. The comment period for the revised proposals is scheduled to close on June 18, 2026.
Current report
The Company invests exclusively in Agency RMBS securities and applies leverage utilizing repurchase agreement funding. The primary drivers of the performance of our assets – both absolute performance and performance relative to our hedges, are interest rates, their impact on both our asset prices and the level of prepayments, interest rate volatility, particularly the level of implied volatility in interest rate swaptions and various interest rate derivatives, and finally our funding levels. Accordingly, we have significant exposure to interest rates and our performance is driven by our ability to select assets, manage our leverage, and our hedging strategy. Interest rates have been range bound for several months going back approximately 12 months, with the range briefly expanding slightly during the first quarter of 2026 as a result of the Iranian war. Interest rate volatility, both realized and implied in interest rate options, has remained subdued outside of a temporary spike at the onset of the war in Iran. It seems the economy and the markets generally are caught in a quandary where it is unclear if inflation, which has been running above the Fed’s 2% target level for several years, or growth prospects, now potentially negatively impacted by the war and increased commodity prices, will be the predominant driver of interest rates, monetary policy and the performance of risk assets of all types. The resulting uncertainty has resulted in relative stability in the level and volatility of interest rates, and therefore generally conducive conditions for levered Agency RMBS investors.
Current report
Looking forward, the war in Iran continues to be the dominant force driving the performance of all markets. At this point it is unclear what the ultimate outcome of the war will be or when it will end. As for the economy and monetary policy the outlook is equally uncertain, as the war will likely impact both inflation and growth in the U.S. and global economies. The Company has deployed modest levels of leverage for the past several quarters and is likely to continue to do so given the market uncertainty. Positioning of the portfolio, in terms of asset selection, is likely to remain defensive going forward as well.
Removed paragraphs (19)
Previous report
On March 7, 2023, we entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “March 2023 Equity Distribution Agreement”) with three sales agents pursuant to which we could offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $250,000,000 of gross proceeds from the sales of shares of our common stock in transactions that were deemed to be “at the market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. We issued a total of 24,675,497 shares under the March 2023 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $228.8 million and net proceeds of approximately $225.0 million, after commissions and fees, prior to its termination in June 2024.
Previous report
Net Income Summary
Previous report
On an economic basis, our interest expense on borrowings for thenine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 was $148.3 millionand $83.5 million, respectively, resulting in $133.5 million and $86.1 millionof economic net interest income, respectively.
Previous report
Average Asset Yield
Previous report
The table below presents the average portfolio size, income and yields of our respective sub-portfolios, consisting of structured RMBS and PT RMBS, for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, and for each quarter in 2025 to date and 2024.
Previous report
We had average outstanding borrowings of $6.5 billion and $4.2 billion and total interest expense of $212.0 million and $172.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Our average cost of funds was 4.33% for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, compared to 5.51% for the comparable period in 2024.
Previous report
Our economic interest expense was $148.3 million and $83.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. There was a 36 bps increase in the average economic cost of funds to 3.03% for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, from 2.67% for the nine months ended September 30, 2024.
Previous report
On March 7, 2023, we entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “March 2023 Equity Distribution Agreement”) with three sales agents pursuant to which we could offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $250,000,000 of gross proceeds from the sales of shares of our common stock in transactions that were deemed to be “at the market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. We issued a total of 24,675,497 shares under the March 2023 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $228.8 million and net proceeds of approximately $225.0 million, after commissions and fees, prior to its termination in June 2024.
Previous report
The third quarter may prove to be pivotal. Offsetting forces have driven economic activity and outlook since the new U.S. presidential administration took office in January. On the one hand the significant tariffs introduced have clouded the economic outlook and added upward pressure on prices – or at least such upward pressure is anticipated even if it hasn’t materialized to the extent expected to date. On the other hand, the administration has a decidedly pro-business agenda and has enacted the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the “OBBB”), which made permanent most of the tax legislation originally enacted in 2017 as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, with minor revisions. The OBBB is likely to be stimulative for the economy yet unlikely to reduce pressure on the fiscal deficit in the near term, itself a source of stimulus for the economy. The net effect of these two opposing forces appears, at least for now, to be leaning in the direction of economic weakness, especially for the labor market, which softened during the third quarter. The Chairman of the Fed, has stated the FOMC views the balance of risks as skewed towards economic and labor market weakness versus inflation, with the effects of tariffs causing only a one-time increase in prices versus a persistent source of inflation. In response to the deterioration in the labor market, the Fed lowered the Fed Funds rate by 25 basis points at their September meeting, and subsequent remarks by the Chairman imply they will do so again at upcoming meetings, consistent with market expectations.
Previous report
The impact of tariffs on inflation, particularly goods inflation, has yet to meet market expectations although there is evidence of such price pressures emerging. Further, it remains possible, to the extent tariff-induced price increases have been absorbed by other parties along the supply chain, that such pressure could increase in the future to the extent the price increases are not fully absorbed. There is also the possibility that the stimulative effects of the OBBB and numerous other efforts on the part of the administration to reduce regulations, stimulate growth and onshore of production back into the U.S. could prevail and cause economic growth to rebound, perhaps significantly. These considerations are behind the subset of Fed officials and market participants that feel economic and labor market weakness, and the need for the Fed to ease monetary policy, is misplaced or will only prove to be temporary.
Previous report
On October 1, 2025, the U.S. federal government shut down as Congress was unable to agree on a funding bill to keep the government running. The shutdown of the government prevented most economic data from being released, adding uncertainty to the economic outlook. To the extent the shutdown continues for too long the shutdown itself will become a source of economic weakness as most federal employees go unpaid and the government – the largest consumer in the economy – has limited capacity to spend.
Previous report
Interest rate movements during the third quarter were very minor – less than 10 basis points – for all points along the cash U.S. Treasury curve and the SOFR swap curve for maturities longer than 2 years. For shorter maturities rate movements were larger – and as much as 35 to 40 basis points lower – for maturities inside 2 years. The largest declines were around the 6-month maturity, reflecting market expectations of interest rate cuts by the Fed over the next two quarters. One-year maturities, in both cash U.S. Treasuries and SOFR swaps, declined by 30 and 22 basis points, respectively, again reflecting market expectations of Fed Funds rate cuts in the near term. Since the end of the third quarter, interest rates have declined slightly more – approximately 10 basis points in the case of longer maturities – as a result of uncertainty surrounding the government shutdown.
Previous report
As rates were relatively stable for longer maturity U.S. Treasuries and SOFR swaps and lower for shorter duration instruments, both the cash U.S. Treasury curve and SOFR swap curve remained upward sloping and the steepness of both curves increased modestly. The spread between the 2-year and 10-year U.S. Treasury securities has increased by approximately 5 basis points to approximately 55 basis points at quarter end, and remained in that area since.
Previous report
While interest rates were relatively unchanged during the quarter, implied volatility in interest rate swaptions declined materially during the quarter. The MOVE index, comprised of a basket of four interest rate swaptions and a widely referenced proxy for interest rate volatility, has been declining since May 2025, when the administration announced reciprocal tariffs. The index peaked in April at nearly 140 and has declined since, reaching a recent low of just under 70 on October 3, 2025. The index was at approximately 90 on June 30, 2025. Declining interest rate volatility is beneficial for Agency RMBS given the prepayment option held by the borrowers of the loans underlying the securities.
Previous report
The market conditions described above – low interest rate volatility and the prospects for reduced funding levels via Fed Funds rate cuts – were generally conducive to Agency RMBS performance. Spreads to comparable duration U.S. Treasuries and SOFR swaps declined, and most securities generated positive absolute and relative returns. However, as prevailing mortgage rates available to borrowers declined over the third quarter and into the fourth quarter prepayments have increased for securities with premium prices and expectations for continued high prepayment rates remain. The Mortgage Bankers Association index of 30-year contract rates declined from 6.79% for the week ended June 27, 2025, to 6.46% for the week ended September 26, 2025. The index has declined slightly more since the end of the third quarter. Secondly, the Trump administration has spoken of privatizing the Enterprises, although it does not appear as if this development is imminent. If it were to occur, an important consideration would be if the implicit government guarantee of the securities issued by the Enterprises would be retained. Comments made by the administration to date indicate that they would likely be maintained, but there can be no assurance that would be the case.
Previous report
The Agency RMBS index generated a return for the third quarter of 2.4% and a return of 1.2% versus comparable duration swaps, as compared to 2.7% and 1.5%, respectively for these measures, for the investment grade corporate index, and 2.4% and 1.3%, respectively for these measures, for high yield debt. Total returns for U.S. Treasury securities and most sectors of the fixed income markets generated positive total returns and excess returns versus comparable duration swaps for the third quarter.
Previous report
Within Agency RMBS for the third quarter of 2025, conventional 30-year mortgages generated a total return of 2.6%, 15-year mortgages generated a total return of 1.5% and Ginnie Mae 30-year mortgages generated a total return of 2.2%. Versus comparable duration swaps, the returns were 1.4%, 0.4% and 1.0% for 30-year conventional, 15-year conventional and Ginnie Mae 30-year mortgages, respectively. The Company invests predominantly in 30-year conventional mortgages. Because of the prospect of higher prepayment speeds and their negative effects on realized yields, higher coupon and premium dollar price Agency RMBS generated returns that lagged all lower coupons. Absolute returns within the 30-year stack of coupons ranged between 3.1% and 2.5% for par and lower dollar price Agency RMBS, and generally followed the durations of the Agency RMBS, with high duration/lower coupon Agency RMBS generating the highest returns. Agency RMBS with premium prices ranged from 2.3% to 0.7%, again with the longest duration/lowest coupons generating the highest returns. Versus comparable duration swaps, excess returns followed a similar pattern with the exception of the 4.0 and 4.5% coupons generating excess returns higher than surrounding coupon Agency RMBS – the result of market technical developments (a shortage of available bonds versus demand) that emerged during the third quarter. The range of excess returns across the coupon stack ranged from 1.9% for 2.0% coupons to 0.4% for 6.5% securities, and 7.0% securities had a negative excess return of -0.5%.
Previous report
The path of economic performance, the level of interest rates and the performance of Agency RMBS appear to be at a crossroads. During the third quarter, the path seemed to steer towards slower growth, lower rates and generally solid performance for Agency RMBS. The labor market in particular appears to have weakened significantly over the past two quarters, and the Fed intervened and lowered the Fed Funds rate by 25 basis points in September and appears likely to do so again at their October meeting at least, if not more times at subsequent meetings. The U.S. federal government shut down again on October 1, 2025, and this has only added to the fear the economy will remain weak. However, other measures of economic performance, when available, indicate the economy may not be so weak. Growth, as measured by GDP, remains well above 0%, retail sales and corporate earnings remain strong, developments with artificial intelligence have the potential to materially lift productivity and output, and the administration has a profoundly pro-growth agenda – all of which suggest the current softness may be temporary. The outcome will likely emerge over the next quarter or two.
Previous report
While it remains to be seen just which path the economy takes going forward, the third quarter was conducive to solid performance for the Agency RMBS market and the Company. The sector generated positive absolute and excess returns, and the Company generated a positive total return for the quarter as well. The Company continued grow its capital through the issuance of shares of common stock through its at the market program. While Agency RMBS generated positive returns for the third quarter of 2025, returns available in the sector remain above historical averages. To the extent such favorable market conditions persist, we expect that new capital can be deployed with the prospects for above average returns.
Reworded paragraphs (44)
Previous wording
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to those statements included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. Certain written statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Statements in this report addressing expectations, assumptions, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, future events, developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future, and future operating results, capital management, and dividend policy are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon management’s beliefs, assumptions, and expectations as of the date of this report regarding future events and operating performance, considering all information currently available to us, and are applicable only as of the date of this report. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “intend,” “should,” “could,” or similar expressions. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which are not historical facts and may be based on projections, assumptions, expectations, and anticipated events that do not materialize. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to, and do not intend to, update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may include, but are not limited to, statements about interest rates, inflation, liquidity, pledging of our structured RMBS, funding levels and spreads, prepayment speeds, portfolio composition, positioning and repositioning, hedging levels, leverage ratio, dividends, investment and return opportunities, the supply and demand for Agency RMBS and the performance of the Agency RMBS sector generally, the effect of actual or expected actions of the U.S. government, including the Fed, market expectations, capital raising, future opportunities and prospects of the Company, the stock repurchase program, geopolitical uncertainty and general economic conditions (including the effects of tariffs, trade wars, inflation, the U.S. deficit, and the strength of the U.S. dollar). As a result of many factors, such as those set forth under “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements.
Current wording
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to those statements included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. Certain written statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Statements in this report addressing expectations, assumptions, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, future events, developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future, and future operating results, capital management, and dividend policy are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon management’s beliefs, assumptions, and expectations as of the date of this report regarding future events and operating performance, considering all information currently available to us, and are applicable only as of the date of this report. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “intend,” “should,” “could,” or similar expressions. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which are not historical facts and may be based on projections, assumptions, expectations, and anticipated events that do not materialize. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to, and do not intend to, update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may include, but are not limited to, statements about interest rates, inflation, liquidity, pledging of our structured RMBS, funding levels and spreads, prepayment speeds, portfolio composition, positioning and repositioning, hedging levels, leverage ratio, dividends, investment and return opportunities, the supply and demand for Agency RMBS and the performance of the Agency RMBS sector generally, the effect of actual or expected actions of the U.S. government, including the Fed, market expectations, capital raising, future opportunities and prospects of the Company, the stock repurchase program, geopolitical uncertainty and general economic conditions (including the effects of artificial intelligence, wars, tariffs, trade wars, inflation, the U.S. deficit, and the strength of the U.S. dollar). As a result of many factors, such as those set forth under “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements.
Previous wording
We are a specialty finance company that invests in residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) which are issued and guaranteed by a federally chartered corporation or agency (“Agency RMBS”). Our investment strategy focuses on, and our portfolio consists of, two categories of Agency RMBS: (i) traditional pass-through Agency RMBS, such as mortgage pass-through certificates issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac" and together with Fannie Mae, the "Enterprises") or the Government National Mortgage Association ("Ginnie Mae" and, together with the Enterprises the “GSEs”) and collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) issued by the GSEs (“PT RMBS”) and (ii) structured Agency RMBS, such as interest-only securities (“IOs”), inverse interest-only securities (“IIOs”) and principal only securities (“POs”), among other types of structured Agency RMBS. We were formed by Bimini Capital Management, Inc. ("Bimini") in August 2010, commenced operations on November 24, 2010 and completed our initial public offering (“IPO”) on February 20, 2013. We are externally managed by Bimini Advisors, LLC ("Bimini Advisors," or our "Manager"), an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
Current wording
We are a specialty finance company that invests in residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) which are issued and guaranteed by a federally chartered corporation or agency (“Agency RMBS”). Our investment strategy focuses on, and our portfolio consists of, two categories of Agency RMBS: (i) traditional pass-through ("PT") Agency RMBS, such as mortgage PT certificates issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac" and together with Fannie Mae, the "Enterprises") or the Government National Mortgage Association ("Ginnie Mae" and, together with the Enterprises the “GSEs”) and collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) issued by the GSEs (“PT RMBS”) and (ii) structured Agency RMBS, such as interest-only securities (“IOs”), inverse interest-only securities (“IIOs”) and principal only securities (“POs”), among other types of structured Agency RMBS. We were formed by Bimini Capital Management, Inc. ("Bimini") in August 2010, commenced operations on November 24, 2010 and completed our initial public offering (“IPO”) on February 20, 2013. We are externally managed by Bimini Advisors, LLC ("Bimini Advisors," or our "Manager"), an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
Previous wording
Our business objective is to provide attractive risk-adjusted total returns over the long term through a combination of capital appreciation and the payment of regular monthly distributions. We intend to achieve this objective by investing in and strategically allocating capital between the two categories of Agency RMBS described above. We seek to generate income from (i) the net interest margin on our leveraged PT RMBS portfolio and the leveraged portion of our structured Agency RMBS portfolio, and (ii) the interest income we generate from the unleveraged portion of our structured Agency RMBS portfolio. We intend to fund our PT RMBS and certain of our structured Agency RMBS through short-term borrowings structured as repurchase agreements. PT RMBS and structured Agency RMBS typically exhibit materially different sensitivities to movements in interest rates. Declines in the value of one portfolio may be offset by appreciation in the other. The percentage of capital that we allocate to our two Agency RMBS asset categories will vary and will be actively managed in an effort to maintain the level of income generated by the combined portfolios, the stability of that income stream and the stability of the value of the combined portfolios. We believe that this strategy will enhance our liquidity, earnings, book value stability and asset selection opportunities in various interest rate environments.
Current wording
Our business objective is to provide attractive risk-adjusted total returns over the long term through a combination of capital appreciation and the payment of regular monthly distributions. We intend to achieve this objective by investing in the two categories of Agency RMBS described above. We seek to generate income from (i) the net interest margin on our leveraged PT RMBS portfolio and the leveraged portion of our structured Agency RMBS portfolio, and (ii) the interest income we generate from the unleveraged portion of our structured Agency RMBS portfolio. We intend to fund our PT RMBS and certain of our structured Agency RMBS through short-term borrowings structured as repurchase agreements.
Previous wording
On February 24, 2025, we entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement”) with four sales agents pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $350,000,000 of gross proceeds from the sales of shares of our common stock in transactions that are deemed to be “at the market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. On July 28, 2025, the February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement was amended to increase the aggregate amount of gross proceeds from the sales of shares that may be offered by $150,000,000 to a total of $500,000,000. Through September 30, 2025, we issued a total of 56,019,745 shares under the February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $420.2 million, and net proceeds of approximately $413.5 million, after commissions and fees. Subsequent to September 30, 2025, we issued a total of 3,472,759 shares under the February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $25.0 million, and net proceeds of approximately $24.6 million, after commissions and fees.
Current wording
On October 27, 2025, we entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “October 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement”) with four sales agents pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $500,000,000 of gross proceeds from the sales of shares of our common stock in transactions that are deemed to be “at the market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. From inception through March 31, 2026, we issued a total of 44,824,644 shares under the October 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $332.7 million, and net proceeds of approximately $327.5 million, after commissions and fees. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, we issued a total of 14,558,681 shares under the October 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $109.5 million, and net proceeds of approximately $107.8 million, after commissions and fees. Subsequent to March 31, 2026, we issued a total of 4,000,000 shares under the October 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $28.2 million, and net proceeds of approximately $27.8 million, after commissions and fees.
Previous wording
From the inception of the stock repurchase program through September 30, 2025, the Company repurchased a total of 6,257,826 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $84.8 million, including commissions and fees, for a weighted average price of $13.55 per share. During thenine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company repurchased a total of 1,113,224 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately 7.3 million, including commissions and fees, for a weighted average price of $6.52 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company repurchased a total of 396,241 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $3.3 million, including commissions and fees, for a weighted average price of $8.30 per share. The remaining authorization under the stock repurchase program as of October 23, 2025 was 2,719,137 shares.
Current wording
From the inception of the stock repurchase program through March 31, 2026, the Company repurchased a total of 6,257,826 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $84.8 million, including commissions and fees, for a weighted average price of $13.55 per share. The Company did not repurchase any shares during thethree months ended March 31, 2026. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company repurchased a total of 1,113,224 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $7.3 million, including commissions and fees, for a weighted average price of $6.52 per share. The remaining authorization under the stock repurchase program as of April 23, 2026 was 2,719,137 shares.
Previous wording
Described below are the Company’s results of operations for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2025, as compared to the Company’s results of operations for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2024.
Current wording
Described below are the Company’s results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026, as compared to the Company’s results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Previous wording
Net income for thenine months ended September 30, 2025 was $55.6 million, or $0.48 per share. Net income for thenine months ended September 30, 2024 was $32.1 million, or $0.53 per share. Net income for thethree months ended September 30, 2025 was $72.1 million, or $0.53 per share. Net income for thethree months ended September 30, 2024 was $17.3 million, or $0.24 per share. The components of net income for thenine and three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, along with the changes in those components are presented in the table below:
Current wording
Net loss for thethree months ended March 31, 2026 was $20.0 million, or $0.11 per share. Net income for thethree months ended March 31, 2025 was $17.1 million, or $0.18 per share. The components of net (loss) income for thethree months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, along with the changes in those components are presented in the table below:
Previous wording
We have elected to account for our Agency RMBS under the fair value option. Securities held under the fair value option are recorded at estimated fair value, with changes in the fair value recorded as unrealized gains or losses through the statements of comprehensive income.
Current wording
We have elected to account for our Agency RMBS under the fair value option. Securities held under the fair value option are recorded at estimated fair value, with changes in the fair value recorded as unrealized gains or losses through the statements of comprehensive income (loss).
Previous wording
In addition, we have not designated our derivative financial instruments used for hedging purposes as hedges for accounting purposes, but rather hold them for economic hedging purposes. Changes in fair value of these instruments are presented in a separate line item in the Company’s statements of comprehensive income and are not included in interest expense. As such, for financial reporting purposes, interest expense and cost of funds are not impacted by the fluctuation in value of the derivative instruments.
Current wording
In addition, we have not designated our derivative financial instruments used for hedging purposes as hedges for accounting purposes, but rather hold them for economic hedging purposes. Changes in fair value of these instruments are presented in a separate line item in the Company’s statements of comprehensive income (loss) and are not included in interest expense. As such, for financial reporting purposes, interest expense and cost of funds are not impacted by the fluctuation in value of the derivative instruments.
Previous wording
Described below are the Company’s results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, and for each quarter in 2025 to date and 2024.
Current wording
Described below are the Company’s results of operations for each quarter in 2026 to date and 2025.
Previous wording
We use derivative and other hedging instruments, specifically Fed Funds, SOFR and T-Note futures contracts, short positions in U.S. Treasury securities, dual digital options, interest rate floors and caps, and interest rate swaps and swaptions, to hedge a portion of the interest rate risk on repurchase agreements in a rising rate environment.
Current wording
We use derivative and other hedging instruments, specifically Fed Funds, SOFR, ERIS SOFR Swap, and T-Note futures contracts, short positions in U.S. Treasury securities, dual digital options, interest rate floors and caps, and interest rate swaps and swaptions, to hedge a portion of the interest rate risk on repurchase agreements in a rising rate environment.
Previous wording
For the purpose of computing economic net interest income and ratios relating to cost of funds measures, GAAP interest expense has been adjusted to reflect the realized and unrealized gains or losses on certain derivative instruments the Company uses, specifically Fed Funds, SOFR and U.S. Treasury futures, dual digital options, interest rate floors and caps, and interest rate swaps and swaptions, that pertain to each period presented. We believe that adjusting our interest expense for the periods presented by the gains or losses on these derivative instruments would not accurately reflect our economic interest expense for these periods. The reason is that these derivative instruments may cover periods that extend into the future, not just the current period. Any realized or unrealized gains or losses on the instruments reflect the change in market value of the instrument caused by changes in underlying interest rates applicable to the term covered by the instrument, not just the current period. For each period presented, we have combined the effects of the derivative financial instruments in place for the respective period with the actual interest expense incurred on borrowings to reflect total economic interest expense for the applicable period. Interest expense, including the effect of derivative instruments for the period, is referred to as economic interest expense. Net interest income, when calculated to include the effect of derivative instruments for the period, is referred to as economic net interest income. This presentation includes gains or losses on all contracts in effect during the reporting period, covering the current period as well as periods in the future.
Current wording
For the purpose of computing economic net interest income and ratios relating to cost of funds measures, GAAP interest expense has been adjusted to reflect the realized and unrealized gains or losses on certain derivative instruments the Company uses, specifically Fed Funds, SOFR, ERIS SOFR Swap, and U.S. Treasury futures, dual digital options, interest rate floors and caps, and interest rate swaps and swaptions, that pertain to each period presented. We believe that adjusting our interest expense for the periods presented by the gains or losses on these derivative instruments would not accurately reflect our economic interest expense for these periods. The reason is that these derivative instruments may cover periods that extend into the future, not just the current period. Any realized or unrealized gains or losses on the instruments reflect the change in market value of the instrument caused by changes in underlying interest rates applicable to the term covered by the instrument, not just the current period. For each period presented, we have combined the effects of the derivative financial instruments in place for the respective period with the actual interest expense incurred on borrowings to reflect total economic interest expense for the applicable period. Interest expense, including the effect of derivative instruments for the period, is referred to as economic interest expense. Net interest income, when calculated to include the effect of derivative instruments for the period, is referred to as economic net interest income. This presentation includes gains or losses on all contracts in effect during the reporting period, covering the current period as well as periods in the future.
Previous wording
We believe that economic interest expense and economic net interest income provide meaningful information to consider, in addition to the respective amounts prepared in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP measures help management to evaluate its financial position and performance without the effects of certain transactions and GAAP adjustments that are not necessarily indicative of our current investment portfolio or operations. The unrealized gains or losses on derivative instruments presented in our statements of comprehensive income are not necessarily representative of the total interest rate expense that we will ultimately realize. This is because as interest rates move up or down in the future, the gains or losses we ultimately realize, and which will affect our total interest rate expense in future periods, may differ from the unrealized gains or losses recognized as of the reporting date.
Current wording
We believe that economic interest expense and economic net interest income provide meaningful information to consider, in addition to the respective amounts prepared in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP measures help management to evaluate its financial position and performance without the effects of certain transactions and GAAP adjustments that are not necessarily indicative of our current investment portfolio or operations. The unrealized gains or losses on derivative instruments presented in our statements of comprehensive income (loss) are not necessarily representative of the total interest rate expense that we will ultimately realize. This is because as interest rates move up or down in the future, the gains or losses we ultimately realize, and which will affect our total interest rate expense in future periods, may differ from the unrealized gains or losses recognized as of the reporting date.
Previous wording
The tables below present a reconciliation of the adjustments to interest expense shown for each period relative to our derivative instruments, and the income statement line item, gains (losses) on derivative instruments, calculated in accordance with GAAP for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, and for each quarter in 2025 to date and 2024.
Current wording
The tables below present a reconciliation of the adjustments to interest expense shown for each period relative to our derivative instruments, and the income statement line item, gains (losses) on derivative instruments, calculated in accordance with GAAP for each quarter in 2026 to date and 2025.
Previous wording
During the three months ended September 30, 2025, we earned net interest income of$26.9 million consisting of$108.4 million of interest income from RMBS assets offset by$81.5 million of interest expense on borrowings. For the comparable period ended September 30, 2024, we incurred$0.3 million of net interest income, consisting of$67.6 million of interest income from RMBS assets offset by$67.3 million of interest expense on borrowings. The$40.8 million increase in interest income was due to a 22 bpsincrease in the yield on average RMBS, combined with a $2.7 billion increase in average RMBS. The$14.2 million increase in interest expense was due to a$2.5 billion increase in average outstanding borrowings, offset by a 117 bpsdecrease in the average cost of funds.
Current wording
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, we earned net interest income of$57.1 million consisting of$157.8 million of interest income from RMBS assets offset by$100.8 million of interest expense on borrowings. For the comparable period ended March 31, 2025, we earned$19.7 million of net interest income, consisting of$81.1 million of interest income from RMBS assets offset by$61.4 million of interest expense on borrowings. The$76.7 million increase in interest income was due to a 34 basis point ("bp")increase in the yield on average RMBS, combined with a $4,987.9 million increase in average RMBS. The$39.4 million increase in interest expense was due to a$4,768.0 million increase in average outstanding borrowings, offset by a 45 bpsdecrease in the average cost of funds.
Previous wording
On an economic basis, our interest expense on borrowings for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 was $59.6 millionand$35.4 million, respectively, resulting in$48.8 million and$32.3 million of economic net interest income, respectively.
Current wording
On an economic basis, our interest expense on borrowings for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 was $86.1 millionand$40.5 million, respectively, resulting in$71.7 million and$40.6 million of economic net interest income, respectively.
Previous wording
The tables below provide information on our portfolio average balances, interest income, yield on assets, average borrowings, interest expense, cost of funds, net interest income (expense) and net interest spread for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, and for each quarter in 2025 to date and 2024 on both a GAAP and economic basis.
Current wording
The tables below provide information on our portfolio average balances, interest income, yield on assets, average borrowings, interest expense, cost of funds, net interest income and net interest spread for each quarter in 2026 to date and 2025 on both a GAAP and economic basis.
Previous wording
We had average outstanding borrowings of $7.3 billion and $4.8 billion and total interest expense of $81.5 million and $67.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Our average cost of funds was 4.45% for the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to 5.62% for the comparable period in 2024.
Current wording
We had average outstanding borrowings of $10,490.1 million and $5,722.1 million and total interest expense of $100.8 million and $61.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Our average cost of funds was 3.84% for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to 4.29% for the comparable period in 2025.
Previous wording
Our economic interest expense was $59.6 million and $35.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. There was a 29 bps increase in the average economic cost of funds to 3.25% for the three months ended September 30, 2025, from 2.96% for the three months ended September 30, 2024.
Current wording
Our economic interest expense was $86.1 million and $40.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. There was a 45 bps increase in the average economic cost of funds to 3.28% for the three months ended March 31, 2026, from 2.83% for the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Previous wording
Since all of our repurchase agreements are short-term, changes in market rates directly affect our interest expense. Our average cost of funds calculated on a GAAP basis was 14 bps above the one-month average SOFR and 8 bps above the six-month average SOFR for the quarter ended September 30, 2025. Our average economic cost of funds was 106 bps below the average one-month SOFR and 112 bps below the average six-month SOFR for the quarter ended September 30, 2025. The average term to maturity of the outstanding repurchase agreements was 39 days at September 30, 2025 and 26 days at December 31, 2024.
Current wording
Since all of our repurchase agreements are short-term, changes in market rates directly affect our interest expense. Our average cost of funds calculated on a GAAP basis was 19 bps above the one-month average SOFR and 2 bps below the six-month average SOFR for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. Our average economic cost of funds was 37 bps below the average one-month SOFR and 58 bps below the average six-month SOFR for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. The average term to maturity of the outstanding repurchase agreements was 46 days at March 31, 2026 and 39 days at December 31, 2025.
Previous wording
The tables below present the average balance of borrowings outstanding, interest expense and average cost of funds, and average one-month and six-month SOFR rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, and for each quarter in 2025 to date and 2024, on both a GAAP and economic basis.
Current wording
The table below presents the one-month average and six-month average SOFR rates for each quarter in 2026 to date and 2025, on both a GAAP and economic basis.
Previous wording
The table below presents our gains or losses for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024.
Current wording
The table below presents our gains or losses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025.
Previous wording
We invest in RMBS with the intent to earn net income from the realized yield on those assets over their related funding and hedging costs, and not for the purpose of making short term gains from sales. However, we have sold, and may continue to sell, existing assets to acquire new assets, which our management believes might have higher risk-adjusted returns in light of current or anticipated interest rates, federal government programs or general economic conditions or to manage our balance sheet as part of our asset/liability management strategy. During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, we received proceeds of $733.9 million from sales of RMBS, resulting in losses of approximately $9.3 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2024, we received proceeds of $288.2 million from sales of RMBS, resulting in gains of approximately $0.5 million. Approximately $221.7 million of the 2024 proceeds consisted of pools that were consolidated into a larger pool and simultaneously acquired by us. No gain or loss was recorded on this resecuritization.
Current wording
We invest in RMBS with the intent to earn net income from the realized yield on those assets over their related funding and hedging costs, and not for the purpose of making short term gains from sales. However, we have sold, and may continue to sell, existing assets to acquire new assets, which our management believes might have higher risk-adjusted returns in light of current or anticipated interest rates, federal government programs or general economic conditions or to manage our balance sheet as part of our asset/liability management strategy. During the three months ended March 31, 2026, we received proceeds of $25.0 million from sales of RMBS, resulting in gains of approximately $39,000. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, we received proceeds of $168.6 million from sales of RMBS, resulting in losses of approximately $1.3 million.
Previous wording
Realized and unrealized gains and losses on RMBS are driven in part by changes in yields and interest rates, the spreads that Agency RMBS trade relative to comparable duration U.S. Treasuries or swaps, as well as varying levels of demand for RMBS, which affect the pricing of the securities in our portfolio. The unrealized gains and losses on RMBS may also include the premium lost as a result of prepayments on the underlying mortgages, decreasing unrealized gains or increasing unrealized losses as prepayment speeds or premiums increase. To the extent RMBS are carried at a discount to par, unrealized gains or losses on RMBS would also include discount accreted as a result of prepayments on the underlying mortgages, increasing unrealized gains or decreasing unrealized losses as speeds on discounts increase. Gains and losses on interest rate futures contracts are affected by changes in implied forward rates during the reporting period. The table below presents historical interest rate data for each quarter end during 2025 to date and 2024.
Current wording
Realized and unrealized gains and losses on RMBS are driven in part by changes in yields and interest rates, the spreads that Agency RMBS trade relative to comparable duration U.S. Treasuries or swaps, as well as varying levels of demand for RMBS, which affect the pricing of the securities in our portfolio. The unrealized gains and losses on RMBS may also include the premium lost as a result of prepayments on the underlying mortgages, decreasing unrealized gains or increasing unrealized losses as prepayment speeds or premiums increase. To the extent RMBS are carried at a discount to par, unrealized gains or losses on RMBS would also include discount accreted as a result of prepayments on the underlying mortgages, increasing unrealized gains or decreasing unrealized losses as speeds on discounts increase. Gains and losses on interest rate futures contracts are affected by changes in implied forward rates during the reporting period. The table below presents historical interest rate data for each quarter in 2026 to date and 2025.
Previous wording
For the purpose of recording income on the Company’s investments in PT RMBS, interest income is based on the stated interest rate of the security. Using the fair value accounting method, premiums or discounts to the face value of the PT RMBS present at the date of purchase are not amortized. Premium lost and discount accretion resulting from monthly principal repayments are reflected in unrealized gains (losses) on RMBS in the statements of comprehensive income. The following table adjusts the Company’s interest income as reported on the Company’s statements of comprehensive income for the periods indicated to show interest income adjusted for premium amortization and discount accretion on its mortgage-backed security investments. The purpose of presenting this non-GAAP measure of interest income is to provide management and investors with an alternative way of evaluating yield on RMBS that may be more comparable to some of the Company's peers who amortize premiums and discounts on their PT RMBS investments.
Current wording
For the purpose of recording income on the Company’s investments in PT RMBS, interest income is based on the stated interest rate of the security. Using the fair value accounting method, premiums or discounts to the face value of the PT RMBS present at the date of purchase are not amortized. Premium lost and discount accretion resulting from monthly principal repayments are reflected in unrealized gains (losses) on RMBS in the statements of comprehensive income (loss). The following table adjusts the Company’s interest income as reported on the Company’s statements of comprehensive income for the periods indicated to show interest income adjusted for premium amortization and discount accretion on its mortgage-backed security investments. The purpose of presenting this non-GAAP measure of interest income is to provide management and investors with an alternative way of evaluating yield on RMBS that may be more comparable to some of the Company's peers who amortize premiums and discounts on their PT RMBS investments.
Previous wording
For the nine and three months ended September 30, 2025, the Company’s total operating expenses were approximately $14.7 million, and $5.4 million, respectively, compared to approximately $12.4 million and $4.3 million for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2024. The table below presents a breakdown of operating expenses for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024.
Current wording
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company’s total operating expenses were approximately $7.4 million, compared to approximately $4.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The table below presents a breakdown of operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company had accrued a liability of $0.6 million for bonuses to be paid to the Manager's employees. During the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, the Company awarded shares of Company common stock with a fair value of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Accrued incentive compensation for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 includes a reversal of the over accrual of this liability.
Current wording
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had accrued a liability of $0.6 million for bonuses to be paid to the Manager's employees. During the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the Company awarded shares of Company common stock with a fair value of $1.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Accrued incentive compensation for the three months ended March 31, 2026 includes $1.1 million under accrual of this liability. Incentive compensation for the three months ended March 31, 2025 includes a reversal of the $0.4 million over accrual of this liability.
Previous wording
The following table summarizes the management fee and overhead allocation expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, and for each quarter in 2025 to date and 2024.
Current wording
The following table summarizes the management fee and overhead allocation expenses for each quarter in 2026 to date and 2025.
Previous wording
As of September 30, 2025, our RMBS portfolio consisted of $8.4 billion of Agency RMBS at fair value and had a weighted average coupon on assets of 5.49%. During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, we received principal repayments of $544.9 million, compared to $310.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. The average three month prepayment speeds for the quarters ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 were 10.1% and 8.8%, respectively.
Current wording
As of March 31, 2026, our RMBS portfolio consisted of $11.3 billion of Agency RMBS at fair value and had a weighted average coupon on assets of 5.58%. During the three months ended March 31, 2026, we received principal repayments of $404.7 million, compared to $133.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The average three month prepayment speeds for the quarters ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 were 14.7% and 7.8%, respectively.
Previous wording
The following table presents the 3-month constant prepayment rate (“CPR”) experienced on our structured and PT RMBS sub-portfolios, on an annualized basis, for the quarterly periods presented. CPR is a method of expressing the prepayment rate for a mortgage pool that assumes that a constant fraction of the remaining principal is prepaid each month or year. Specifically, the CPR in the chart below represents the three month prepayment rate of the securities in the respective asset category.
Current wording
The following table presents the 3-month constant prepayment rate (“CPR”) experienced on our RMBS portfolio, on an annualized basis, for the quarterly periods presented. CPR is a method of expressing the prepayment rate for a mortgage pool that assumes that a constant fraction of the remaining principal is prepaid each month or year. Specifically, the CPR in the chart below represents the three month prepayment rate of the securities in the respective asset category.
Previous wording
The following tables summarize certain characteristics of the Company’s PT RMBS and structured RMBS as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024:
Current wording
The following tables summarize certain characteristics of the Company’s RMBS portfolio as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025:
Previous wording
The following table presents a summary of portfolio assets acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, including securities purchased during the period that settled after the end of the period, if any.
Current wording
The following table presents a summary of portfolio assets acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, including securities purchased during the period that settled after the end of the period, if any.
Previous wording
As of September 30, 2025, we had established borrowing facilities in the repurchase agreement market with a number of commercial banks and other financial institutions and had borrowings in place with 26 of these counterparties. None of these lenders are affiliated with the Company. These borrowings are secured by the Company’s RMBS and cash, and bear interest at prevailing market rates. We believe our established repurchase agreement borrowing facilities provide borrowing capacity in excess of our needs.
Current wording
As of March 31, 2026, we had established borrowing facilities in the repurchase agreement market with a number of commercial banks and other financial institutions and had borrowings in place with 28 of these counterparties. None of these lenders are affiliated with the Company. These borrowings are secured by the Company’s RMBS and cash, and bear interest at prevailing market rates. We believe our established repurchase agreement borrowing facilities provide borrowing capacity in excess of our needs.
Previous wording
As of September 30, 2025, we had obligations outstanding under the repurchase agreements of approximately $8.0 billion with a net weighted average borrowing cost of 4.33%. The remaining maturity of our outstanding repurchase agreement obligations ranged from 8 to 356 days, with a weighted average remaining maturity of 39 days. Securing the repurchase agreement obligations as of September 30, 2025 are RMBS with an estimated fair value, including accrued interest, of approximately $8.4 billion, and cash pledged to counterparties of approximately $26.4 million. Through October 24, 2025, we have been able to maintain our repurchase facilities with comparable terms to those that existed at September 30, 2025, with maturities through September 21, 2026.
Current wording
As of March 31, 2026, we had obligations outstanding under the repurchase agreements of approximately $10.9 billion with a net weighted average borrowing cost of 3.79%. The remaining maturity of our outstanding repurchase agreement obligations ranged from 2 to 227 days, with a weighted average remaining maturity of 46 days. Securing the repurchase agreement obligations as of March 31, 2026 are RMBS with an estimated fair value, including accrued interest, of approximately $11.3 billion, and cash pledged to counterparties of approximately $82.6 million. Through April 24, 2026, we have been able to maintain our repurchase facilities with comparable terms to those that existed at March 31, 2026, with maturities through November 13, 2026.
Previous wording
We use two primary measures of leverage. Economic leverage is calculated by dividing the sum of total liabilities and our net notional TBA position, by stockholders' equity. We include our net TBA position in our calculation of economic leverage because a forward contract to purchase or sell an Agency RMBS in the TBA market carries similar risks to an Agency RMBS purchased or sold in the cash market and funded with repurchase agreement liabilities. Adjusted leverage is calculated by dividing our repurchase agreements by stockholders' equity. Our economic leverage as of September 30, 2025 was 7.4 to 1, compared to 7.3 to 1 as of December 31, 2024. Our adjusted leverage as of September 30, 2025 was 7.4 to 1, compared to 7.5 to 1 as of December 31, 2024. The following table presents information related to our historical leverage.
Current wording
We use two primary measures of leverage. Economic leverage is calculated by dividing total liabilities, adjusted for our net notional TBA position and securities borrowed, by stockholders' equity. We include our net TBA position in our calculation of economic leverage because a forward contract to purchase or sell an Agency RMBS in the TBA market carries similar risks to an Agency RMBS purchased or sold in the cash market and funded with repurchase agreement liabilities. Adjusted leverage is calculated by dividing our repurchase agreements by stockholders' equity. Our economic leverage as of March 31, 2026 was 7.9 to 1, compared to 7.4 to 1 as of December 31, 2025. Our adjusted leverage as of March 31, 2026 was 7.8 to 1, compared to 7.4 to 1 as of December 31, 2025. The following table presents information related to our historical leverage.
Previous wording
Under our repurchase agreement funding arrangements, we are required to post margin at the initiation of the borrowing. The margin posted represents the haircut, which is a percentage of the market value of the collateral pledged. To the extent the market value of the asset collateralizing the financing transaction declines, the market value of our posted margin will be insufficient, and we will be required to post additional collateral. Conversely, if the market value of the asset pledged increases in value, we would be over collateralized and we would be entitled to have excess margin returned to us by the counterparty. Our lenders typically value our pledged securities daily to ensure the adequacy of our margin and make margin calls as needed, as do we. Typically, but not always, the parties agree to a minimum threshold amount for margin calls so as to avoid the need for nuisance margin calls on a daily basis. Our master repurchase agreements do not specify the haircut; rather haircuts are determined on an individual repo transaction basis. Throughout the nine months ended September 30, 2025, haircuts on our pledged collateral remained stable and as of September 30, 2025, our weighted average haircut was approximately 4.1% of the value of our collateral.
Current wording
Under our repurchase agreement funding arrangements, we are required to post margin at the initiation of the borrowing. The margin posted represents the haircut, which is a percentage of the market value of the collateral pledged. To the extent the market value of the asset collateralizing the financing transaction declines, the market value of our posted margin will be insufficient, and we will be required to post additional collateral. Conversely, if the market value of the asset pledged increases in value, we would be over collateralized and we would be entitled to have excess margin returned to us by the counterparty. Our lenders typically value our pledged securities daily to ensure the adequacy of our margin and make margin calls as needed, as do we. Typically, but not always, the parties agree to a minimum threshold amount for margin calls so as to avoid the need for nuisance margin calls on a daily basis. Our master repurchase agreements do not specify the haircut; rather haircuts are determined on an individual repo transaction basis. Throughout the three months ended March 31, 2026, haircuts on our pledged collateral remained stable and as of March 31, 2026, our weighted average haircut was approximately 4.1% of the value of our collateral.
Previous wording
We invest a portion of our capital in structured Agency RMBS. We generally do not apply leverage to this portion of our portfolio. The leverage inherent in structured securities replaces the leverage obtained by acquiring PT securities and funding them in the repurchase market. This structured RMBS strategy has been a core element of the Company’s overall investment strategy since inception. However, we have and may continue to pledge a portion of our structured RMBS in order to raise our cash levels, but generally will not pledge these securities in order to acquire additional assets.
Current wording
We invest a portion of our capital in structured Agency RMBS. We generally do not apply leverage to this portion of our portfolio. The leverage inherent in structured securities replaces the leverage obtained by acquiring PT securities and funding them in the repurchase market. However, we have and may continue to pledge a portion of our structured RMBS in order to raise our cash levels, but generally will not pledge these securities in order to acquire additional assets.
Previous wording
In future periods, we expect to continue to finance our activities in a manner that is consistent with our current operations through repurchase agreements. As of September 30, 2025, we had cash and cash equivalents of $583.9 million. We generated cash flows of $793.9 million from principal and interest payments on our RMBS and had average repurchase agreements outstanding of $6.5 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2025.
Current wording
In future periods, we expect to continue to finance our activities in a manner that is consistent with our current operations through repurchase agreements. As of March 31, 2026, we had cash and cash equivalents of $674.0 million. We generated cash flows of $549.4 million from principal and interest payments on our RMBS and had average repurchase agreements outstanding of $10.4 billion during the three months ended March 31, 2026.
Previous wording
On February 24, 2025, we entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement”) with four sales agents pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $350,000,000 of gross proceeds from the sales of shares of our common stock in transactions that are deemed to be “at the market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. On July 28, 2025, the February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement was amended to increase the aggregate amount of gross proceeds from the sales of shares that may be offered by $150,000,000 to a total of $500,000,000. Through September 30, 2025, we issued a total of 56,019,745 shares under the February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $420.2 million, and net proceeds of approximately $413.5 million, after commissions and fees. Subsequent to September 30, 2025, we issued a total of 3,472,759 shares under the February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $25.0 million, and net proceeds of approximately $24.6 million, after commissions and fees.
Current wording
On October 27, 2025, we entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “October 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement”) with four sales agents pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $500,000,000 of gross proceeds from the sales of shares of our common stock in transactions that are deemed to be “at the market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. From inception through March 31, 2026, we issued a total of 44,824,644 shares under the October 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $332.7 million, and net proceeds of approximately $327.5 million, after commissions and fees. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, we issued a total of 14,558,681 shares under the October 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $109.5 million, and net proceeds of approximately $107.8 million, after commissions and fees. Subsequent to March 31, 2026, we issued a total of 4,000,000 shares under the October 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $28.2 million, and net proceeds of approximately $27.8 million, after commissions and fees.
Previous wording
In response to the deterioration in the markets for U.S. Treasuries, Agency RMBS and other mortgage and fixed income markets resulting from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fed implemented a program of quantitative easing. Through November of 2021, the Fed was committed to purchasing $80 billion of U.S. Treasuries and $40 billion of Agency RMBS each month. In November of 2021, it began tapering its net asset purchases each month, ended net asset purchases by early March of 2022, and ended asset purchases entirely in September of 2022. On May 4, 2022, the FOMC announced a plan for reducing the Fed’s balance sheet. In June of 2022, in accordance with this plan, the Fed began reducing its balance sheet by a maximum of $30 billion of U.S. Treasuries and $17.5 billion of Agency RMBS each month. On September 21, 2022, the FOMC announced the Fed’s decision to continue reducing its balance sheet by a maximum of $60 billion of U.S. Treasuries and $35 billion of Agency RMBS per month. On May 1, 2024, the FOMC announced the Fed’s decision to reduce its balance sheet by a maximum of $25 billion of U.S. Treasury securities and remove the cap on Agency RMBS reduction, with any amounts in excess of $35 billion per month being reinvested in U.S. Treasury securities. On March 19, 2025, the FOMC announced the Fed's decision to reduce its balance sheet by a maximum of $5 billion of U.S. Treasury securities beginning April 1, 2025. Relatively high interest rates and slow prepayment speeds have kept the balance sheet reduction for Agency RMBS below $20 billion per month throughout 2024 and the third quarter of 2025. As of September 30, 2025, the Fed had reduced its balance sheet for Agency RMBS by approximately $654 billion from the peak to $2.1 trillion, shedding approximately 49% of the Agency RMBS added during pandemic quantitative easing and representing the lowest level since February 2021. In remarks on October 14, 2025, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell signaled that the Fed may end its balance sheet runoff in the coming months.
Current wording
In response to the deterioration in the markets for U.S. Treasuries, Agency RMBS and other mortgage and fixed income markets resulting from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fed implemented a program of quantitative easing. Through November of 2021, the Fed was committed to purchasing $80 billion of U.S. Treasuries and $40 billion of Agency RMBS each month. In November of 2021, it began tapering its net asset purchases each month, ended net asset purchases by early March of 2022, and ended asset purchases entirely in September of 2022. On May 4, 2022, the FOMC announced a plan for reducing the Fed’s balance sheet. In June of 2022, in accordance with this plan, the Fed began reducing its balance sheet by a maximum of $30 billion of U.S. Treasuries and $17.5 billion of Agency RMBS each month. On September 21, 2022, the FOMC announced the Fed’s decision to continue reducing its balance sheet by a maximum of $60 billion of U.S. Treasuries and $35 billion of Agency RMBS per month. On May 1, 2024, the FOMC announced the Fed’s decision to reduce its balance sheet by a maximum of $25 billion of U.S. Treasury securities and remove the cap on Agency RMBS reduction, with any amounts in excess of $35 billion per month being reinvested in U.S. Treasury securities. On March 19, 2025, the FOMC announced the Fed’s decision to reduce its balance sheet by a maximum of $5 billion of U.S. Treasury securities beginning April 1, 2025. Relatively high interest rates and slow prepayment speeds kept the balance sheet reduction for Agency RMBS below $20 billion per month throughout 2024 and 2025. On December 1, 2025, the Fed ended quantitative tightening and began reinvesting all proceeds from maturing Agency RMBS up to a $35 billion per month cap in U.S. Treasuries and announced that it would begin buying an additional $40 billion per month of U.S. Treasuries via RMPs in order to maintain an ample level of reserves on an ongoing basis. As of March 31, 2026, the Fed had reduced its balance sheet for Agency RMBS by approximately $745 billion from the peak of approximately $2.7 trillion to approximately $2.0 trillion , shedding approximately 54% of the Agency RMBS added during pandemic quantitative easing and representing the lowest level since December 2020.
Showing the first 40 of 44 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (3)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
On February 24, 2025, we entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement”) with four sales agents pursuant to which we could offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $350,000,000 of gross proceeds from the sales of shares of our common stock in transactions that were deemed to be “at the market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. On July 28, 2025, the February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement was amended to increase the aggregate amount of gross proceeds from the sales of shares that may be offered by $150,000,000 to a total of $500,000,000. We issued a total of 59,492,504 shares under the February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $445.1 million and net proceeds of approximately $438.0 million, after commissions and fees, prior to its termination in October 2025.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
On February 24, 2025, we entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement”) with four sales agents pursuant to which we could offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $350,000,000 of gross proceeds from the sales of shares of our common stock in transactions that were deemed to be “at the market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. On July 28, 2025, the February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement was amended to increase the aggregate amount of gross proceeds from the sales of shares that may be offered by $150,000,000 to a total of $500,000,000. We issued a total of 59,492,504 shares under the February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $445.1 million and net proceeds of approximately $438.0 million, after commissions and fees, prior to its termination in October 2025.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
On November 25, 2025, the Fed, OCC and FDIC jointly adopted a final rule to revise the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio for globally systemically important bank holding companies (“GSIBs”). The rule, which became effective April 1, 2026 and may be adopted by banks subject to the rule as early as January 1, 2026, seeks to promote effective GSIB capital management and remove disincentives for banks to engage in low-risk activities, particularly in the U.S. Treasury market. This shift is expected to free up significant capital, allowing GSIBs greater discretion in asset allocation and potentially fostering increased lending and economic activity.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
During thenine months ended September 30, 2025, we earned net interest incomeof $69.8 million, consisting of $281.8 millionof interest income from RMBS assets, offset by $212.0 millionof interest expense on borrowings. For the comparable period ended September 30, 2024, we incurred $2.8 millionof net interest expense, consisting of $169.6 millionof interest income from RMBS assets offset by $172.4 millionof interest expense on borrowings. The $112.2 million increase in interest income was due to a 30 basis point ("bps") increasein the yield on average RMBS, combined with a $2.5 billion increasein average RMBS. The $39.6 million increase in interest expense was due to a $2.4 billion increase in average outstanding borrowings, offset by a 118 bps decreasein the average cost of funds.