AEMETIS, INC

Previous wording

We operate in an evolving industry that presents numerous risks beyond our control that are driven by factors that cannot be predicted. Should any of the risks described in this section or in the documents incorporated by reference in this report actually occur, our business, results of operations, financial condition, or stock price could be materially and adversely affected. Investors should carefully consider the risk factors discussed below, in addition to the other information in this report, before making any investment in our securities.

Current wording

We operate in an evolving industry that presents numerous risks, including risks beyond our control that are driven by factors that cannot be predicted. Should any of the risks described in this section or in the documents incorporated by reference in this report actually occur, our business, results of operations, financial condition, or stock price could be materially and adversely affected. Investors should carefully consider the risk factors discussed below, in addition to the other information in this report, before making any investment in our securities.

Previous wording

Historically, we have relied upon cash from debt and equity financing activities to fund substantially all of the cash requirements of our activities. As of December 31, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately$562.9 million. For our fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we reported a net loss of$87.5 million, and $46.4 million respectively. We may incur losses for an indeterminate period of time and may not achieve consistent profitability. We expect to rely on cash on hand; cash, if any, generated from our operations; borrowing availability, if any, under our lines of credit; and proceeds from future financing activities, if any, to fund the cash requirements of our business. In some market environments, we may have limited access to incremental financing, which could defer or cancel growth projects, reduce business activity or cause us to default on our existing debt agreements if we are unable to meet our payment schedules. An extended period of losses or negative cash flow may prevent us from successfully operating and expanding our business.

Current wording

We do not currently, and historically have not typically, generated profits or positive cash flow. As of December 31, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately$639.9 million. For our fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we reported a net loss of$77.0 million and $87.5 million respectively. We may continue to incur losses for an indeterminate period of time and may not achieve consistent profitability. We have historically relied upon cash from debt and equity financing activities to fund the cash we need that exceeds cash from operations. Going forward, we expect to rely on cash on hand, cash generated from our operations, borrowings, if available, and proceeds from other future financing activities, if any, to fund the cash requirements of our business. In some market environments, we may have limited access to incremental financing, which could defer or cancel growth projects, reduce business activity or cause us to default on our existing debt agreements if we are unable to meet our payment schedules. An extended period of losses or negative cash flow may prevent us from successfully operating and expanding our business.

Previous wording

For the year ended December 31, 2024, we recognized$40.2 million in interest rate expense and $12.7 million in accretion of Series A preferred units (excludes debt related fees and amortization expense). The terms of our indebtedness and the Series A preferred units impose certain restrictions on us that limit our cash flow and affect our ability to further invest in our business, including as follows:

Current wording

For the year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized$46.2 million in interest rate expense and $8.2 million in accretion of Series A preferred units (excludes debt related fees and amortization expense). The terms of our indebtedness and the Series A preferred units impose certain restrictions on us that limit our cash flow and affect our ability to further invest in our business, including as follows:

Previous wording

The adoption of new technologies at our ethanol and biodiesel plants, the development of bio-methane digesters at local dairies near our Keyes Plant, the construction of a SAF/RD production plant, the construction of our CCUS projects, and our working capital requirements are financed in part through debt or debt-like facilities. We may need to seek significant additional financing to continue or grow our operations and to develop our business. However, generally unfavorable credit market conditions may make it difficult to obtain necessary capital or additional debt financing on commercially viable terms or at all. If we are unable to pay our debt, we may be forced to delay or cancel capital expenditures, sell assets, restructure our indebtedness, seek additional financing, or file for bankruptcy protection. Debt levels or debt service requirements may limit our ability to borrow additional capital, make us vulnerable to increases in prevailing interest rates, subject our assets to liens, limit our ability to adjust to changing market conditions, or place us at a competitive disadvantage to our competitors. Should we be unable to generate enough cash from our operations or secure additional financing to fund our operations and debt service requirements, we may be required to postpone or cancel growth projects, reduce our operations, or may be unable to meet our debt repayment schedules. Any one of these events would likely have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial position.

Current wording

The adoption of new technologies at our ethanol and biodiesel plants, the development of bio-methane digesters at local dairies near our Keyes Plant, the construction of a SAF/RD production plant, the construction of our CCUS projects, and our working capital requirements are financed in part through debt or debt-like facilities. We may need to seek significant additional financing to continue or grow our operations and to develop our business. However, generally unfavorable credit market conditions may make it difficult to obtain necessary capital or additional debt financing on commercially viable terms or at all. If we are unable to pay our debt, we may be forced to delay or cancel capital expenditures, sell assets, restructure our indebtedness, seek additional financing, or file for bankruptcy protection. Debt levels or debt service requirements may limit our ability to borrow additional capital, make us vulnerable to increases in prevailing interest rates, subject our assets to liens, limit our ability to adjust to changing market conditions, or place us at a competitive disadvantage to our competitors. Should we be unable to generate enough cash from our operations or secure additional financing to fund our operations and debt service requirements, we may be required to postpone or cancel growth projects, reduce our operations, or be unable to meet our debt repayment schedules. Any one of these events would likely have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial position.

Previous wording

There can be no assurance that our existing cash flow from operations will be sufficient to sustain operations and to the extent that we are dependent on credit facilities to fund operations or service debt, there can be no assurances that we will be successful at securing funding from our senior lender or significant shareholders. Should we require additional financing, there can be no assurances that the additional financing will be available on terms satisfactory to us. Our ability to identify and enter into commercial arrangements with feedstock suppliers in India depends on maintaining our operations agreement with key vendors in India. If we are unable to maintain these strategic relationships, our business may be negatively affected. In addition, the ability of our key vendors to continue to provide us with working capital depends in part on the financial strength of them and their banking relationships. If our key vendors are unable or unwilling to continue to provide us with working capital, our business may be negatively affected. Our ability to enter into commercial arrangements with feedstock suppliers in California depends on maintaining our operations agreement with J.D. Heiskell, who is currently providing us with working capital for our Keyes Plant. If we are unable to maintain this strategic relationship, our business may be negatively affected. In addition, the ability of J.D. Heiskell to continue to provide us with working capital depends in part on the financial strength of J.D. Heiskell and its banking relationships. If J.D. Heiskell is unable or unwilling to continue to provide us with working capital, our business may be negatively affected. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the classification or carrying values of our assets or liabilities that might be necessary as a result of the outcome of this uncertainty.

Current wording

There can be no assurance that our existing cash flow from operations will be sufficient to sustain operations and to the extent that we are dependent on credit facilities to fund operations or service debt, there can be no assurances that we will be successful at securing funding from our senior lender or significant shareholders. Should we require additional financing, there can be no assurances that the additional financing will be available on terms satisfactory to us. Our ability to identify and enter into commercial arrangements with feedstock suppliers in India depends on maintaining our operations agreement with key vendors in India. If we are unable to maintain these strategic relationships, our business may be negatively affected. In addition, the ability of our key vendors to continue to provide us with working capital depends in part on the financial strength of such vendors and their banking relationships. If our key vendors are unable or unwilling to continue to provide us with working capital, our business may be negatively affected. Our ability to enter into commercial arrangements with feedstock suppliers in California depends on maintaining our operations agreement with J.D. Heiskell, who is currently providing us with working capital for our Keyes Plant. If we are unable to maintain this strategic relationship, our business may be negatively affected. In addition, the ability of J.D. Heiskell to continue to provide us with working capital depends in part on the financial strength of J.D. Heiskell and its banking relationships. If J.D. Heiskell is unable or unwilling to continue to provide us with working capital, our business may be negatively affected. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the classification or carrying values of our assets or liabilities that might be necessary as a result of the outcome of this uncertainty.

Previous wording

We may be unable to repay or refinance our Third Eye Capital Notes upon maturity.

Current wording

We may be unable to repay or refinance our Third Eye Capital Debt upon maturity.

Previous wording

Under our note facilities with Third Eye Capital, we owe approximately $218.1 million, excluding debt discounts, as of December 31, 2024. Our indebtedness and interest payments under these note facilities are currently substantial and may adversely affect our cash flow, cash position and stock price. The current maturity date on some of these notes was recently extended to April 2026. We have been able to extend our indebtedness in the past, but we may not be able to continue to extend the maturity of these notes in the future. We may not have sufficient cash available at the time of maturity to repay this indebtedness. We have default covenants that may accelerate the maturities of these notes. We may not have sufficient assets or cash flow available to support refinancing these notes at market rates or on terms that are satisfactory to us. If we are unable to extend the maturity of the notes or refinance on terms satisfactory to us, we may be forced to refinance on terms that are materially less favorable, seek funds through other means such as a sale of some of our assets, or otherwise significantly alter our operating plan, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

Under our note facilities with Third Eye Capital, we owe approximately$247.9 million, excluding debt discounts, as of December 31, 2025. Our indebtedness and interest payments under these note facilities are currently substantial and may adversely affect our cash flow, cash position and stock price. The debt is currently due on demand. We have been able to extend our indebtedness in the past, but we may not be able to continue to extend the maturity of these notes in the future. We may not have sufficient cash available at the time of maturity to repay this indebtedness. We have default covenants that may accelerate the demand for payment of these notes. We may not have sufficient assets or cash flow available to support refinancing these notes at market rates or on terms that are satisfactory to us. If we are unable to extend the maturity of the notes or refinance on terms satisfactory to us, we may be forced to refinance on terms that are materially less favorable, seek funds through other means such as a sale of some of our assets, or otherwise significantly alter our operating plan, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

The results of our ethanol production business in the U.S. are significantly affected by the spread between the cost of corn and natural gas that we purchase and the price of the ethanol, WDG and DCO that we sell. Similarly, in India our biodiesel business is primarily dependent on the price difference between the costs of the feedstock we purchase (principally stearin, tallow, and crude glycerin) and the products we sell (principally distilled biodiesel and refined glycerin). The markets for ethanol, biodiesel, WDG, DCO and refined glycerin are highly volatile and subject to significant fluctuations. Any decrease in the spread between prices of the commodities we buy and sell, whether as a result of an increase in feedstock prices or a reduction in ethanol or biodiesel prices, would adversely affect our financial performance and cash flow and may cause us to suspend production at either of our plants.

Current wording

The results of our ethanol production business in the U.S. are significantly affected by the spread between the cost of corn and natural gas that we purchase and the price of the ethanol, WDG, and DCO that we sell. Similarly, in India, our biodiesel business is primarily dependent on the price difference between the costs of the feedstock we purchase (principally stearin, tallow, and crude glycerin) and the products we sell (principally biodiesel and refined glycerin). The markets for ethanol, biodiesel, WDG, DCO and refined glycerin are highly volatile and subject to significant fluctuations. Any decrease in the spread between prices of the commodities we buy and sell, whether as a result of an increase in feedstock prices or a reduction in ethanol or biodiesel prices, would adversely affect our financial performance and cash flow and may cause us to suspend production at either of our plants.

Previous wording

The market price of ethanol is volatile and subject to large fluctuations. The market price of ethanol is dependent upon many factors, including the supply of ethanol and the demand for gasoline, which is in turn dependent upon the price of petroleum, which is also highly volatile and difficult to forecast. Fluctuations in the market price of ethanol may cause our profitability or losses to fluctuate significantly. In addition, domestic ethanol production capacity increased significantly in the last decade. Demand for ethanol may not increase commensurately with increases in supply, which could lead to lower ethanol prices. Demand for ethanol could be impaired due to a number of factors, including regulatory developments and reduced gasoline consumption. Reduced gasoline consumption has occurred in the past and could occur in the future as a result of increased gasoline or oil prices.

Current wording

The market price of ethanol is volatile and subject to large fluctuations. The market price of ethanol is dependent upon many factors, including the supply of ethanol and the demand for gasoline, which are in turn dependent upon the price of petroleum, which is also highly volatile and difficult to forecast. Fluctuations in the market price of ethanol may cause our profitability or losses to fluctuate significantly. In addition, domestic ethanol production capacity increased significantly in the last decade. Demand for ethanol may not increase commensurately with increases in supply, which could lead to lower ethanol prices. Demand for ethanol could be impaired due to a number of factors, including regulatory developments and reduced gasoline consumption. Reduced gasoline consumption has occurred in the past and could occur in the future as a result of increased gasoline or oil prices.

Previous wording

The value of our long-lived assets is based on our ability to execute our business plan and generate sufficient cash flow to justify the carrying value of our assets. Should we fall short of our cash flow projections in the future, we may be required to write down the value of these assets under accounting rules and further reduce the value of our assets. We can make no assurances that future cash flows will develop and provide us with sufficient cash to maintain the value of these assets, thus avoiding future impairment to our asset carrying values. As a result, we may need to write down the carrying value of our long-lived assets.

Current wording

The value of our long-lived assets is based on our ability to execute our business plan and generate sufficient cash flow to justify the carrying value of our assets. Should we fall short of our cash flow projections in the future, we may be required to write down the value of these assets under accounting rules and further reduce the value of our assets. We can make no assurances that future cash flows will develop and provide us with sufficient cash to maintain the value of these assets and avoid any future impairment to our asset carrying values. As a result, we may need to write down the carrying value of our long-lived assets.

Previous wording

In addition, we intend to modify or adapt third party technologies at the Keyes Plant and at the Kakinada Plant to accommodate alternative feedstocks and improve operations. After we design and engineer a specific integrated upgrade to either or both plants to allow us to produce products other than their existing products, we may not receive permission from the regulatory agencies to install the process at one or both plants. Additionally, even if we are able to install and begin operations of an integrated advanced fuels and/or bio-chemical plant, we cannot assure you that the technology will work and produce cost effective products because we have never designed, engineered nor built this technology into an existing bio-refinery. Similarly, our plans to develop the SAF/RD production plant, CCS, the integrated microgrid, the MVR system, or any other system at the Keyes Plant may not be successful as a result of financing or issues in design, construction, or operations. Any inability to execute our business plan may have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial position, ability to pay dividends, and ability to continue as a going concern.

Current wording

In addition, we intend to modify or adapt third party technologies at the Keyes Ethanol Plant and at the Kakinada Plant to accommodate alternative feedstocks and improve operations. After we design and engineer a specific integrated upgrade to either or both plants allowing us to produce products other than their existing products, we may not receive permission from regulatory agencies to install the process at either or both plants. Additionally, even if we are able to install and begin operations of an integrated advanced fuels and/or bio-chemical plant, we cannot provide assurance that the technology will work and produce cost-effective products. Similarly, our plans to develop the SAF/RD production plant, CCUS, MVR system, or any other system at the Keyes Plant may not be successful as a result of financing or issues in design, construction, or operations. Any inability to execute our business plan may have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial position, ability to pay dividends, and ability to continue as a going concern.

Previous wording

Our strategy calls for continued investment in capital improvements and additions. For example, we are currently developing a biofuels production plants designed to produce biofuels, including renewable aviation fuel and renewable diesel fuel, utilizing renewable hydrogen and non-edible renewable oils. We are also developing carbon sequestration wells to generate California low carbon fuel standard credits by injecting CO₂ into sequestration wells that are monitored for emissions to ensure the long-term sequestration of CO 2 underground. The construction of these capital improvements and additions involves numerous regulatory, environmental, political and legal uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control and may require the expenditure of significant amounts of capital, which may exceed our estimates and we may require significant debt or equity financing. These projects may not be completed at the planned cost, on schedule or at all due to unavailability of needed financing. The construction of new ethanol and other biofuel facilities is subject to construction cost overruns due to labor costs, costs of equipment and materials such as steel, labor shortages or weather or other delays, inflation or other factors, which could be material. In addition, the construction of these facilities is typically subject to the receipt of approvals and permits from various regulatory agencies. Those agencies may not approve the projects in a timely manner, if at all, or may impose restrictions or conditions on the projects that could potentially prevent a project from proceeding, lengthen its expected completion schedule and/or increase its anticipated cost. Moreover, our revenues and cash flows may not increase immediately upon the expenditure of funds on a particular project. For instance, if we expand an existing facility or construct a new facility, the construction may occur over an extended period of time, and we may not receive any material increases in revenues or cash flows until the project is completed. As a result, the new facilities may not be able to achieve our expected investment return, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Current wording

Our strategy calls for continued investment in capital improvements and additions. For example, we are currently developing plants designed to produce biofuels, including renewable aviation fuel and renewable diesel fuel, utilizing renewable hydrogen and non-edible renewable oils. We are also developing carbon sequestration wells to generate California low carbon fuel standard credits by injecting CO₂ into sequestration wells that are monitored for emissions to ensure the long-term sequestration of CO 2 underground. The construction of these capital improvements and additions involves numerous regulatory, environmental, political, and legal uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control and may require the expenditure of significant amounts of capital, which may exceed our estimates, and we may require significant debt or equity financing. These projects may not be completed at the planned cost, on schedule or at all due to unavailability of needed financing. The construction of new ethanol and other biofuel facilities is subject to construction cost overruns due to labor costs, costs of equipment, materials such as steel, labor shortages, weather or other delays, inflation, or other factors, which could be material. In addition, the construction of these facilities is typically subject to the receipt of approvals and permits from various regulatory agencies. Those agencies may not approve the projects in a timely manner, if at all, or may impose restrictions or conditions on the projects that could potentially prevent a project from proceeding, lengthen its expected completion schedule and/or increase its anticipated cost. Moreover, our revenues and cash flows may not increase immediately upon the expenditure of funds on a particular project. For instance, if we expand an existing facility or construct a new facility, the construction may occur over an extended period of time, and we may not receive any material increases in revenues or cash flows until the project is completed. As a result, the new facilities may not be able to achieve our expected investment return, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Previous wording

We are in the process of developing biogas digesters, CCUS, SAF/RD, expanded biodiesel production and other projects, and the success of such projects depends on many factors; as such, cash flows and revenue projections may not be achieved.

Current wording

We are in the process of developing biogas digesters, CCUS, SAF/RD, expanded biodiesel production and other projects, and the success of such projects depends on many factors including but not limited to, cash flows and revenue projections being achieved.

Previous wording

We are actively developing projects designed to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. These include (i) a biofuels production plant in Riverbank, California designed to produce SAF/RD using renewable fats and oils obtained from existing Aemetis biofuels plants and other sources, (ii) Carbon Capture and Underground Sequestration (“CCUS”) projects designed to compress and inject CO₂ into deep wells for long-term sequestration of carbon underground, (iii) additional dairy and other digesters at new locations, along with associated infrastructure for transporting and producing biogas and Renewable Natural Gas, (iv) expansion of biodiesel production in India. We also plan to develop additional projects beyond those listed here.

Current wording

We are developing projects designed to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. These include (i) a biofuels production plant in Riverbank, California designed to produce SAF/RD using renewable fats and oils obtained from existing Aemetis biofuels plants and other sources, (ii) Carbon Capture and Underground Sequestration (“CCUS”) projects designed to compress and inject CO₂ into deep wells for long-term sequestration of carbon underground, (iii) additional dairy digesters at new locations, along with associated infrastructure for transporting and producing biogas and Renewable Natural Gas, and (iv) expansion of biodiesel production in India. We also plan to develop additional projects beyond those listed here.

Previous wording

U.S. and India federal, state, and local governments provide regulations and incentives for operations and projects that are designed to promote renewable fuels and reduce carbon emissions. Each of our currently operating businesses and development projects are expected to generate revenue, cash, and credits from these government programs. In particular, we have used and plan to continue to use the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) and the Inflation Reduction Act (“IRA”) amendments to the IRC in 2022 that provide Investment Tax Credits, Production Tax Credits, and other credits, and that allow us to either use the credits or to monetize the credits by selling them to third parties. These include certain transferrable IRA tax credits generated from our qualified biogas facilities. We also currently generate and plan to continue to generate credits under the federal Renewable Fuel Standard (“RFS”) and the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (“LCFS”). Our India plant produces biofuel to help India meet the goals of its National Policy on Biofuels. The IRA, RFS, LCFS and other regulations, as well as our ability to qualify for and monetize the tax credits, carbon credits, grants and other financial incentives available thereunder, are subject to modifications, additional regulatory requirements or limits, varying interpretations, reduction, expiration, and other changes. Moreover, the new presidential administration may take action to revise, repeal or otherwise modify existing funding and tax credit arrangements currently in place. For example, on January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order (the “January Executive Order”) pausing certain funding disbursements under the IRA; the impact of this Executive Order on the use of and our ability to monetize certain federal credits and grants is uncertain at this time. Additionally, in its June 2024 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (the “Loper decision”), the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a longstanding Chevron doctrine, under which courts were required to give deference to regulatory agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambiguous federal statutes. The Loper decision could result in additional legal challenges to regulations and guidance issued by federal agencies applicable to our operations. Further, the Loper decision may result in increased regulatory uncertainty, inconsistent judicial interpretations and other impacts to the agency rulemaking process. The regulatory and/or financial changes can occur with or without advance notice, may affect our past business activities or future plans, and may occur for a variety of reasons resulting from legislation, new or changing regulations, regulatory interpretation, court cases, and other sources. These regulatory programs, credits, and incentives have been and will continue to be material to our business and to our projects under development. Changes to regulations and reductions in or expirations of governmenta…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Current wording

U.S. and India federal, state, and local governments provide regulations and incentives for operations and projects that are designed to promote renewable fuels and reduce carbon emissions. Each of our currently operating businesses and development projects are expected to generate revenue, cash, and credits from these government programs. In particular, we have used and plan to continue to use the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) and the Inflation Reduction Act (“IRA”) amendments to the IRC in 2022 that provide Investment Tax Credits, Production Tax Credits, and other credits, and that allow us to either use the credits or to monetize the credits by selling them to third parties. These include certain transferable IRA tax credits generated from our qualified biogas facilities. We also currently generate and plan to continue to generate credits under the federal Renewable Fuel Standard (“RFS”) and the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (“LCFS”). Our Kakinada Biodiesel plant produces biofuel to help India meet the goals of its National Policy on Biofuels. The IRA, RFS, LCFS and other regulations, as well as our ability to qualify for and monetize the tax credits, carbon credits, grants and other financial incentives available thereunder, are subject to modifications, additional regulatory requirements or limits, varying interpretations, reduction, expiration, and other changes. Moreover, changes in federal or state administrations may lead to actions to revise, repeal or otherwise modify existing funding and tax credit arrangements currently in place. For example, on January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order (the “January Executive Order”) pausing certain funding disbursements under the IRA; the impact of this Executive Order on the use of and our ability to monetize certain federal credits and grants is uncertain at this time. Additionally, in its June 2024 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (the “Loper decision”), the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a longstanding Chevron doctrine, under which courts were required to give deference to regulatory agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambiguous federal statutes. The Loper decision could result in additional legal challenges to regulations and guidance issued by federal agencies applicable to our operations. Further, the Loper decision may result in increased regulatory uncertainty, inconsistent judicial interpretations, and other impacts to agency rulemaking process. The regulatory and/or financial changes can occur with or without advance notice, may affect our past business activities or future plans, and may occur for a variety of reasons resulting from legislation, new or changing regulations, regulatory interpretation, court cases, and other sources. These regulatory programs, credits, and incentives have been and will continue to be material to our business and to our projects under development. Changes to regulations and reductions in or expir…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

We buy all of the feedstock for the Keyes Plant from one supplier, J.D. Heiskell. Under the Heiskell Supply Agreement, we are only permitted to purchase feedstock from other suppliers upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. In addition, we have contracted to sell all of the WDG, CDS, and corn oil we produce at the Keyes Plant to J.D. Heiskell. J.D. Heiskell, in turn, sells all WDG and syrup produced to A.L. Gilbert. We sell the majority of our fuel ethanol production to one customer, Murex. If J.D. Heiskell were to fail to deliver adequate feedstock to the Keyes Plant or fail to purchase all the contracted product we produce, if Murex were to fail to purchase the majority of the ethanol we produce, if A.L. Gilbert were to fail to purchase all of the WDG and syrup we produce, or if any of them were otherwise to default on our agreements with them or fail to perform as expected, we may be unable to find replacement suppliers or purchasers, or both, in a reasonable time or on favorable terms, any of which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

We buy all of the feedstock for the Keyes Plant from one supplier, J.D. Heiskell. Under the Heiskell Agreement, we are only permitted to purchase feedstock from other suppliers upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. In addition, we have contracted to sell all of the WDG, CDS, and corn oil we produce at the Keyes Plant to J.D. Heiskell. J.D. Heiskell, in turn, sells all WDG and syrup produced to A.L. Gilbert. We sell all of our fuel ethanol production to J.D. Heiskell, which sells it to one customer, Murex. If J.D. Heiskell were to fail to deliver adequate feedstock to the Keyes Plant or fail to purchase all the contracted product we produce, if Murex were to fail to purchase the ethanol we produce, if A.L. Gilbert were to fail to purchase all of the WDG and syrup we produce, or if any of them were to otherwise default on our agreements with them or fail to perform as expected, we may be unable to find replacement suppliers or purchasers, or both, in a reasonable time or on favorable terms, any of which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

On October 16, 2016, we launched our EB-5 Phase II program, allowing for the issuance of up to 100 subordinated convertible promissory notes, on substantially similar terms and conditions as those issued under our EB-5 Phase I program, for a total aggregate principal amount of up to $50.8 million. On November 21, 2019, the minimum investment was raised from $500,000 per investor to $900,000 per investor. As of December 31, 2024, $4.0 million has been raised through the EB-5 Phase II program and have been released from escrow and $4.4 million of principal and unpaid interest was outstanding on the EB-5 Notes under the EB-5 Phase II funding. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully raise additional funds under our EB-5 Phase II program or that such funds, if raised, will be approved by USCIS. If we are unable to raise, receive approval for, or receive any funds under our EB-5 Phase II program, our business may be negatively affected.

Current wording

On October 16, 2016, we launched our EB-5 Phase II program, allowing for the issuance of up to 100 subordinated convertible promissory notes, on substantially similar terms and conditions as those issued under our EB-5 Phase I program, for a total aggregate principal amount of up to $50.8 million. On November 21, 2019, the minimum investment was raised from $500,000 per investor to $900,000 per investor. As of December 31, 2025, $4.0 million has been raised through the EB-5 Phase II program and has been released from escrow and $4.5 million of principal and unpaid interest was outstanding on the EB-5 Notes under the EB-5 Phase II funding. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully raise additional funds under our EB-5 Phase II program or that such funds, if raised, will be approved by USCIS.

Previous wording

We face competition for our bio-chemical and transportation fuels products from providers of petroleum-based products and from other companies seeking to provide alternatives to these products, many of whom have greater resources and experience than we do, and if we cannot compete effectively against these companies, we may not be successful.

Current wording

We face competition for our transportation fuels products from providers of petroleum-based products and from other companies seeking to provide alternatives to these products, many of whom have greater resources and experience than we do, and if we cannot compete effectively against these companies, we may not be successful.

Previous wording

Our renewable products compete with both the traditional, largely petroleum-based bio-chemical and fuels products that are currently being used in our target markets and with the alternatives to these existing products that established enterprises and new companies are seeking to produce. The oil companies, large chemical companies and well-established agricultural products companies with whom we compete are much larger than we are, and have, in many cases, well developed distribution systems and networks for their products.

Current wording

Our renewable products compete with both the traditional, largely petroleum-based fuels products that are currently being used in our target markets and with the alternatives to these existing products that both established enterprises and new companies are seeking to produce. The oil companies, large chemical companies, and well-established agricultural products companies with whom we compete are much larger than we are, and have, in many cases, well developed distribution systems and networks for their products.

Previous wording

Our operations are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws, and regulations, including those relating to the discharge of materials into the air, water and ground, the generation, storage, handling, use, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials, access to and impacts on water supply, and the health and safety of our employees. In addition, our operations and sales in India subject us to risks associated with foreign laws, policies and regulations. Some of these laws and regulations require our facilities to operate under permits or licenses that are subject to renewal or modification. These laws, regulations and permits can require expensive emissions testing and pollution control equipment or operational changes to limit actual or potential impacts to the environment. Violations of these laws, regulations or permits, or license conditions can result in substantial fines, natural resource damages, criminal sanctions, permit revocations and facility shutdowns. We may not be at all times in compliance with these laws, regulations, permits or licenses or we may not have all permits or licenses required to operate our business. We may be subject to legal actions brought by environmental advocacy groups and other parties for actual or alleged violations of environmental laws, permits or licenses. As we enter into new markets such as USP alcohol and hand sanitizer, we may be subject to several regulations and health and safety laws by TTB and Food and Drug Administration (‘FDA”). Failure to comply with these health and safety laws, our license to sell these products may be revoked and we may be subject to certain penalties.** ** In addition, we may be required to make significant capital expenditures on an ongoing basis to comply with increasingly stringent environmental laws, regulations, and permit and license requirements.

Current wording

Our operations are subject to various federal, state and local environmental, health, safety, and product regulation laws and regulations, including those relating to the discharge of materials into the air, water and ground, the generation, storage, handling, use, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials, access to and impacts on water supply, and the health and safety of our employees. In addition, our operations and sales in India subject us to risks associated with foreign laws, policies and regulations. Some of these laws and regulations require our facilities to operate under permits or licenses that are subject to renewal or modification. These laws, regulations, and permits can require expensive emissions testing and pollution control equipment or operational changes to limit actual or potential impacts to the environment. Violations of these laws, regulations, permits, or license conditions can result in substantial fines, natural resource damages, criminal sanctions, permit revocations, and facility shutdowns. We may not be at all times in compliance with these laws, regulations, permits or licenses or we may not have all permits or licenses required to operate our business. We may be subject to legal actions brought by environmental advocacy groups and other parties for actual or alleged violations of environmental laws, permits, or licenses. Failure to comply with applicable laws could result in enforcement actions leading to penalties or revocation of permits or licenses.** **In addition, we may be required to make significant capital expenditures on an ongoing basis to comply with increasingly stringent laws, regulations, and permit and license requirements.

Previous wording

In the U.S., the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) promulgated federal GHG regulations under the Clean Air Act affecting certain sources. The EPA issued mandatory GHG reporting requirements, requirements to obtain GHG permits for certain industrial plants and GHG performance standards for some facilities. President Trump’s Day One 2025 executive orders reversed EPA’s priorities of environmental justice, regulatory enforcement, and addressing global climate change. Moreover, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in several cases that limit the EPA’s power to regulate the carbon emissions from existing power plants (West Virginia v. EPA) and discharges into wetlands (Sackett v. EPA). Therefore, it is uncertain whether EPA will continue to prioritize climate change. The recent changes to the EPA may result in additional regulations and legislation at the U.S. federal or state level, which could result in increased operating costs for compliance, or required acquisition or trading of emission allowances. Additionally, demand for the products we produce may be reduced for various reasons, including, but not limited to, lack of federal support. If new laws or regulations are passed relating to the production, disposal or emissions of carbon dioxide, we may be required to incur significant costs to comply with such new laws or regulations. Compliance with future legislation may require us to take action unknown to us at this time that could be costly, and require the use of working capital, which may or may not be available, preventing us from operating as planned, which may have a material adverse effect on our operations and cash flow.

Current wording

Climate change continues to attract considerable attention globally. The Keyes Plant is subject to California's "cap and trade" program that aims to reduce CO 2 emissions from fuel combustion activities. In addition, numerous proposals have been made and could continue to be made at the international, federal, state and local levels to monitor and limit existing emissions of GHG, including carbon dioxide, as well as to restrict or eliminate future emissions. At this stage, it is not possible to accurately estimate either a timetable for implementation of any future regulations or our future compliance costs relating to implementation. In the U.S., the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) promulgated federal GHG regulations under the Clean Air Act affecting certain sources. The EPA issued mandatory GHG reporting requirements, requirements to obtain GHG permits for certain industrial plants and GHG performance standards for some facilities. President Trump’s Day One 2025 executive orders reversed EPA’s priorities of environmental justice, regulatory enforcement, and addressing global climate change. Moreover, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in several cases that limit the EPA’s power to regulate the carbon emissions from existing power plants (West Virginia v. EPA) and discharges into wetlands (Sackett v. EPA). Therefore, it is uncertain whether the EPA will continue to prioritize climate change. The recent changes to the EPA may result in additional regulations and legislation at the U.S. federal or state level, which could result in increased operating costs for compliance, or required acquisition or trading of emission allowances. Additionally, demand for the products we produce may be reduced for various reasons, including, but not limited to, lack of federal support. If new laws or regulations are passed relating to the production, disposal or emissions of carbon dioxide, we may be required to incur significant costs to comply with such new laws or regulations. Compliance with future legislation may require us to take action unknown to us at this time that could be costly, and require the use of working capital, which may or may not be available, preventing us from operating as planned, which may have a material adverse effect on our operations and cash flow.

Previous wording

Waivers of the RFS minimum levels of renewable fuels included in gasoline or of the requirements by obligated parties to comply with the regulations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Under the Energy Policy Act, the U.S. Department of Energy, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Energy, may waive the renewable fuels mandate with respect to one or more states if the Administrator of the EPA determines that implementing the requirements would severely harm the economy or the environment of a state, a region or the nation, or that there is inadequate supply to meet the requirement. Additionally, the EPA has exercised the authority to waive the requirements of the RFS for certain small refiners. Any waiver of the RFS with respect to one or more states would reduce demand for ethanol and could cause our results of operations to decline and our financial condition to suffer. Further activity by the EPA to waive the requirements for small refiners could cause softening of pricing in the industry and cause our results of operations to similarly decline.

Current wording

Waivers of the RFS minimum levels of renewable fuels included in gasoline or of the requirements obligated by parties to comply with the regulations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Under the Energy Policy Act, the U.S. Department of Energy, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Energy, may waive the renewable fuels mandate with respect to one or more states if the Administrator of the EPA determines that implementing the requirements would severely harm the economy or the environment of a state, a region or the nation, or that there is inadequate supply to meet the requirement. Additionally, the EPA has exercised the authority to waive the requirements of the RFS for certain small refiners. Any waiver of the RFS with respect to one or more states would reduce demand for ethanol and could cause our results of operations to decline and our financial condition to suffer. Further activity by the EPA to waive the requirements for small refiners could cause softening of pricing in the industry and cause our results of operations to similarly decline.

Previous wording

A critical state program is California's LCFS, which is designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with transportation fuels used in California by ensuring that the fuel sold meets declining targets for such emissions. The regulation quantifies lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions by assigning a carbon intensity ("CI") score to each transportation fuel based on that fuel’s lifecycle assessment. Each petroleum fuel provider, generally the fuel’s producer or importer (the “Regulated Party”), is required to ensure that the overall CI score for its fuel pool meets the annual carbon intensity target for a given year. A Regulated Party’s fuel pool can include gasoline, diesel, and their blend stocks and substitutes. This obligation is tracked through credits and deficits. Fuels with a CI score lower than the annual standard earn a credit, and fuels that are higher than the standard result in a deficit. Credits can be traded. Any changes to California’s LCFS could cause our results of operations, particularly in ethanol and biogas, to decline and cause our financial condition to suffer.

Current wording

A critical state program is California's LCFS, which is designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with transportation fuels used in California by ensuring that the fuel sold meets declining targets for such emissions. The regulation quantifies lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions by calculating the carbon intensity ("CI") of each transportation fuel based on that fuel’s lifecycle assessment. Each petroleum fuel provider, generally the fuel’s producer or importer (the “Regulated Party”), is required to purchase LCFS credits if the CI for its fuel pool exceeds the annual carbon intensity target for a given year. Fuels such as ethanol or RNG that have CI score lower than the annual standard earn a credit that can be sold to Regulated Parties. Annual declines in the CI benchmark reduce the number of credits generated, and could cause the Keyes Plant to require credits rather than generate them. In addition, changes to California’s LCFS rule could reduce the credits generated by ethanol or RNG or constrain the value of the credits, which could adversely affect our financial condition.

Previous wording

Under the EISA, the EPA is required to produce a study every three years of the environmental impacts associated with current and future biofuel production and use, including effects on air and water quality, soil quality and conservation, water availability, energy recovery from secondary materials, ecosystem health and biodiversity, invasive species and international impacts. Should such EPA triennial studies, or other analyses find that biofuel production and use has resulted in, or could in the future result in, adverse environmental impacts, such findings could also negatively impact public perception and acceptance of biofuel as an alternative fuel, which also could result in the loss of political support. To the extent that state or federal laws are modified or public perception turns against biofuels, use requirements such as RFS and LCFS may not continue, which could materially harm our ability to operate profitably.

Current wording

Under the EISA, the EPA is required to produce a study every three years of the environmental impacts associated with current and future biofuel production and use, including effects on air and water quality, soil quality and conservation, water availability, energy recovery from secondary materials, ecosystem health and biodiversity, invasive species, and international impacts. Should such EPA triennial studies, or other analyses find that biofuel production and use has resulted in, or could in the future result in, adverse environmental impacts, such findings could also negatively impact public perception and acceptance of biofuel as an alternative fuel, which also could result in the loss of political support. To the extent that state or federal laws are modified or public perception turns against biofuels, use requirements such as the RFS and LCFS may not continue, which could materially harm our ability to operate profitably.

Previous wording

In order to improve the operations of the Keyes Plant and execute on our business plan, we intend to modify the Keyes Plant to accommodate alternative feedstocks and new chemical and/or mechanical production processes, including an integrated microgrid, an MVR distillation system, the Mitsubishi dehydration system and other technologies. We may not be able to successfully implement these modifications, and they may not function as we expect them to. These modifications may cost significantly more to complete than our estimates. The Keyes Plant may not operate at nameplate capacity once the changes are complete. If any of these risks materialize, they could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.

Current wording

In order to improve the operations of the Keyes Plant and execute on our business plan, we intend to modify the Keyes Plant to accommodate alternative feedstocks and new chemical and/or mechanical production processes, including a Mechanical Vapor Recompression ("MVR") system and other technologies. We may not be able to successfully implement these modifications, and they may not function as we expect them to. These modifications may cost significantly more to complete than our estimates. The Keyes Plant may not operate at nameplate capacity once the changes are complete. If any of these risks materialize, they could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.

Previous wording

Our operations in countries outside the United States, including our operations in India, are subject to anti-corruption laws and regulations, including restrictions imposed by the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”). The FCPA and similar anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. We operate in parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-corruption laws may conflict with local customs and practices.

Current wording

Our operations in countries outside the United States, including our operations in India, are subject to anti-corruption laws and regulations, including restrictions imposed by the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”). The FCPA and similar anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. We operate in parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-corruption laws may conflict with local customs and practices. Our employees and agents interact with government officials on our behalf, including interactions necessary to obtain licenses and other regulatory approvals necessary to operate our business. These interactions create a risk that actions may occur that could violate the FCPA or other similar laws.

Previous wording

Although we have policies and procedures designed to promote compliance with local laws and regulations as well as U.S. laws and regulations, including the FCPA, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, consultants, contractors and agents will abide by our policies. If we are found to be liable for violations of the FCPA or similar anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions, either due to our own acts or out of inadvertence, or due to the acts or inadvertence of others, we could suffer from criminal or civil penalties which could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Current wording

Although we have policies and procedures designed to promote compliance with local laws and regulations as well as U.S. laws and regulations, including the FCPA, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, consultants, contractors and agents will abide by our policies. If we are found to be liable for violations of the FCPA or similar anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions, either due to our own acts or out of inadvertence, or due to the acts or inadvertence of others, we could suffer from criminal or civil penalties which could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Due to the changing nature of the regulatory environment and uncertainty about the priorities and direction of changing presidential administrations, we cannot be certain if or how the U.S. governments enforcement of the FCPA will change or impact our business.

Previous wording

Certain of our principal operating subsidiaries are incorporated in India, and substantial portions of our assets are located in India. We intend to continue to develop and expand our facilities in India. The Indian government has exercised and continues to exercise significant influence over many aspects of the Indian economy. India’s government has traditionally maintained an artificially low price for certain commodities, including diesel fuel, through subsidies, but has recently begun to reduce such subsidies, which benefits us. We cannot assure you that liberalization policies will continue. Various factors, such as changes in the current federal government, could trigger significant changes in India’s economic liberalization and deregulation policies and disrupt business and economic conditions in India generally and our business in particular. In particular, the Indian government’s 2019 National Ethanol Blended Petrol Program Policy states a plan to increase ethanol Biodiesel blending to 20% by 2030. We cannot assure you that this policy will continue, nor can we assure you that we will continue to be able to procure biodiesel supply contracts with the Indian state-owned oil marketing companies through the public tender process. Our financial performance may be adversely affected by any such changes or other changes to the general economic conditions and economic and fiscal policy in India, including changes in exchange rates and controls, interest rates and taxation policies, as well as social stability and political, economic or diplomatic developments affecting India in the future.

Current wording

One of our principal operating subsidiaries is based in India, and substantial portions of our assets are located in India. We intend to continue to develop and expand our facilities in India. The India government has exercised and continues to exercise significant influence over many aspects of India's economy. India’s government has traditionally maintained an artificially low price for certain commodities, including diesel fuel, through subsidies, but has recently begun to reduce such subsidies, which benefits us. We cannot be sure that liberalization policies will continue. Various factors, such as changes in the current federal government, could trigger significant changes in India’s economic liberalization and deregulation policies and disrupt business and economic conditions in India generally and our business in particular. In particular, the India government’s 2019 National Ethanol Blended Petrol Program Policy states a plan to increase ethanol blending to 20% by 2030. We cannot be sure that this policy will continue, nor can we be sure that we will continue to be able to procure biodiesel supply contracts with Indian state-owned oil marketing companies through the public tender process. Our financial performance may be adversely affected by any such changes or other changes to the general economic conditions and economic and fiscal policy in India, including changes in exchange rates and controls, interest rates and taxation policies, as well as social stability and political, economic, or diplomatic developments affecting India in the future.

Previous wording

A substantial portion of our revenues is denominated in Indian rupees. We report our financial results in U.S. dollars. The exchange rates between the Indian rupee and the U.S. dollar have changed substantially in recent years and may fluctuate substantially in the future. We do not currently engage in any formal currency hedging of our foreign currency exposure, and our results of operations may be adversely affected if the Indian rupee fluctuates significantly against the U.S. dollar.

Current wording

A substantial portion of our revenues is received in Indian rupees. We report our financial results in U.S. dollars. The exchange rates between the Indian rupee and the U.S. dollar have changed substantially in recent years and may fluctuate substantially in the future. We do not currently engage in any formal currency hedging of our foreign currency exposure, and our results of operations may be adversely affected if the Indian rupee fluctuates significantly against the U.S. dollar.

Previous wording

We could be subject to strict restrictions on the movement of cash and the exchange of foreign currencies which could limit our access to cash held in our Indian subsidiary to fund our U.S. operations or otherwise make investments where needed.

Current wording

We could be subject to restrictions on the movement of cash and the exchange of foreign currencies that could limit our access to cash held in our India subsidiary to fund our U.S. operations or otherwise make investments where needed.

Previous wording

Our Indian operations could be subject to strict restrictions on the movement of cash and the exchange of foreign currencies, which would limit our ability to use this cash across our global operations. For instance, cash and cash equivalents were $0.9 million at December 31, 2024, of which $0.8 million was held in our North American entities and $0.1 thousand was held in our India subsidiary; at times this balance is much higher. Cash held in our Indian subsidiary may not otherwise be available for servicing debt obligations, potential investment or use for operations in the United States. Moreover, even if we were to repatriate this cash back to the United States for use in U.S. investments, this cash could be subject to additional withholding taxes. Due to various methods by which cash could be repatriated to the United States in the future, the amount of taxes attributable to the cash is dependent on circumstances existing if and when remittance occurs. Due to the various methods by which such earnings could be repatriated in the future, it is not practicable to determine the amount of applicable taxes that would result from such repatriation. In addition, Indian regulations may impose restrictions on the movement and exchange of foreign currencies which could further limit our ability to use such funds for repayment of debt, operations or capital or other strategic investments. Our inability to access our cash where and when needed could impede our ability to service our debt obligations, make investments and support our operations.

Current wording

Our India operations are subject to restrictions on the movement of cash and the exchange of foreign currencies, which could limit our ability to use this cash across our global operations. For instance, cash and cash equivalents were $4.9 million at December 31, 2025, of which $4.1 million was held in our North American entities and $0.8 million was held in our India subsidiary; at times this balance is much higher. Cash held in our India subsidiary may not be available for servicing debt obligations, potential investment, or use for operations in the United States. Moreover, even if we were to repatriate this cash back to the United States, it would be subject to additional withholding taxes. Due to the various methods by which such earnings could be repatriated in the future, it is not practicable to determine the amount of applicable taxes that would result from such repatriation.

Previous wording

We conduct substantially all of our operations through subsidiaries and are dependent on cash distributions, dividends or other intercompany transfers of funds from our subsidiaries to finance our operations. Our subsidiaries have not made significant distributions to us and may not have funds available for dividends or distributions in the future. The ability of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to us will be dependent upon their respective abilities to achieve sufficient cash flows after satisfying their respective cash requirements, including subsidiary-level debt service on their respective credit agreements. Our current credit agreement, the Third Eye Capital Note Purchase Agreement, as amended from time to time, as described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, requires us to obtain the prior consent of Third Eye Capital, as the Administrative Agent of the Note holders, to make cash distributions or any intercompany fund transfers. The ability of our Indian operating subsidiary to transfer funds to us is restricted by Indian laws and may be adversely affected by U.S. federal income tax laws. Under Indian laws, our capital contributions, or future capital contributions, to our Indian operation cannot be remitted back to the U.S. Remittance of funds by our Indian subsidiary to us may subject us to significant tax liabilities under U.S. federal income tax laws.

Current wording

We conduct substantially all of our operations through subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries have not made significant distributions to us and may not have funds available for dividends or distributions in the future. The ability of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to us will be dependent upon their respective abilities to achieve sufficient cash flows after satisfying their respective cash requirements, including subsidiary-level debt service on their respective credit agreements. Our credit agreements also contain certain restrictions and/or approval requirements that could limit cash distributions and intercompany transfers.

Previous wording

Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), a corporation is generally allowed a deduction in any taxable year for net operating losses (“NOLs”) arising in taxable years ending on or prior to December 31, 2017, that may be carried forward for a period of 20 taxable years, and NOLs arising in taxable years ending after December 31, 2017 may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such post-2017 NOLs in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020 is limited to 80% of the taxable income in the taxable year to which such NOLs are carried forward. Furthermore, state NOLs may also be subject to separate limitations at the state level. As of December 31, 2024, federal NOLs of $323.0 million and the state NOLs of $408.0 million expire on various dates between 2027 and 2042. Due to the 2017 U.S. Tax Reform, U.S. federal NOLs after 2017 in the amount of $135.0 million have no expiration date, but such NOLs are subject to the 80% taxable limitation described above.

Current wording

Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), a corporation is generally allowed a deduction in any taxable year for net operating losses (“NOLs”) arising in taxable years ending on or prior to December 31, 2017, that may be carried forward for a period of 20 taxable years, and NOLs arising in taxable years ending after December 31, 2017 may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such post-2017 NOLs in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020 is limited to 80% of the taxable income in the taxable year to which such NOLs are carried forward. Furthermore, state NOLs may also be subject to separate limitations at the state level. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had federal NOL carryforwards of $413.0 million and state NOL carryforwards of $538.0 million. Due to the 2017 U.S. Tax Reform, U.S. federal NOLs after 2017 in the amount of $225.0 million have no expiration date, but such NOLs are subject to the 80% taxable limitation described above.

Previous wording

Under Section 163(j) of the Code, a taxpayer’s deduction for business interest expense is generally limited to the sum of (i) the taxpayer’s business interest income, (ii) 30% of the taxpayer’s “adjusted taxable income” and (iii) the taxpayer’s floor plan financing interest. The amount of any excess business interest expense that is disallowed for a particular taxable year under Section 163(j) of the Code may be carried forward indefinitely. Due to the ongoing interest expense every year, our ability to utilize any excess business interest expense carryforwards may be limited.

Current wording

Under Section 163(j) of the IRC, a taxpayer’s deduction for business interest expense is generally limited to the sum of (i) the taxpayer’s business interest income, (ii) 30% of the taxpayer’s “adjusted taxable income” and (iii) the taxpayer’s floor plan financing interest. The amount of any excess business interest expense that is disallowed for a particular taxable year under Section 163(j) of the IRC may be carried forward indefinitely. Due to the ongoing interest expense every year, our ability to utilize any excess business interest expense carryforwards may be limited.

Previous wording

Our ability to deduct these NOL carryforwards, excess business interest expense carryforwards, and other tax attributes against future taxable income could be limited if we experience an “ownership change,” as defined in Section 382 of the Code. In general, an ownership change may result from one or more transactions increasing the aggregate ownership of certain persons (or groups of persons) in our stock by more than 50 percentage points over a testing period (generally three years). Past or future direct or indirect changes in the ownership of our stock, including sales or acquisitions of our stock by certain stockholders and purchases and issuances of our stock by us, some of which are not in our control and/or may occur or have already occurred in the public markets, could result in an ownership change. Any resulting limitation on the use of our NOL carryforwards, excess business interest expense carryforwards, and certain other tax attributes could result in the payment of taxes above the amounts currently estimated.

Current wording

Our ability to deduct these NOL carryforwards, excess business interest expense carryforwards, and other tax attributes against future taxable income could be limited if we experience or have experienced an “ownership change,” as defined in Section 382 of the IRC. In general, an ownership change may result from one or more transactions increasing the aggregate ownership of certain persons (or groups of persons) in our stock by more than 50 percent over a testing period (generally three years). Past or future direct or indirect changes in the ownership of our stock, some of which are not in our control and/or may occur or have already occurred in the public markets, could result in an ownership change that would limit NOL carryforwards. Any resulting limitation on the use of our NOL carryforwards, excess business interest expense carryforwards, and certain other tax attributes could result in the payment of taxes above the amounts currently estimated.

Previous wording

Our employees and facilities are subject to the hazards associated with producing ethanol and biodiesel. Operating hazards can cause personal injury and loss of life, damage to, or destruction of, property, plant and equipment and environmental damage. We maintain insurance coverage in amounts, against the risks that we believe are consistent with industry practice and maintain an active safety program. However, we could sustain losses for uninsurable or uninsured risks, or in amounts in excess of existing insurance coverage. Events that result in significant personal injury or damage to our property or to property owned by third parties or other losses that are not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.

Current wording

Our employees and facilities are subject to the hazards associated with producing ethanol, renewable natural gas, and biodiesel. Operating hazards can cause personal injury and loss of life, damage to or destruction of property, plant and equipment, and environmental damage. We maintain insurance coverage in amounts and against the risks that we believe are consistent with industry practice. However, we could sustain losses for uninsurable or uninsured risks, or in amounts in excess of existing insurance coverage. Events that result in significant personal injury or damage to our property or to property owned by third parties or other losses that are not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.

Previous wording

Insurance liabilities are difficult to assess and quantify due to unknown factors, including the severity of an injury, the determination of our liability in proportion to other parties, the number of incidents not reported and the effectiveness of our safety program. If we were to experience insurance claims or costs above our coverage limits or that are not covered by our insurance, we might be required to use working capital to satisfy these claims rather than to maintain or expand our operations. To the extent that we experience a material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents or workers’ compensation claims, or unfavorable developments on existing claims, our operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

Current wording

Insurance liabilities are difficult to assess and quantify due to unknown factors, including the severity of an injury, the determination of our liability in proportion to other parties, the number of incidents not reported, and the effectiveness of our safety programs. If we were to experience insurance claims or costs above our coverage limits or that are not covered by our insurance, we might be required to use working capital to satisfy these claims rather than to maintain or expand our operations. To the extent that we experience a material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents or workers’ compensation claims, or unfavorable developments on existing claims, our operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

Previous wording

Our business may be significantly disrupted upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event or cyberattack.

Current wording

Our business systems may be significantly disrupted upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event or cyberattack.

Previous wording

Our Keyes and Kakinada Plants are highly automated and they rely extensively on the availability of our network infrastructure and internal technology systems. The failure of our systems due to a catastrophic event, such as an earthquake, fire, flood, tsunami, weather event, telecommunications failure, power failure, cyberattack or war, could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. We have developed disaster recovery plans and maintain backup systems in order to reduce the potential impact of a catastrophic event. However, there can be no assurance that these plans and systems would enable us to return to normal business operations.

Current wording

The Keyes and Kakinada Plants are highly automated, and they rely extensively on the availability of our network infrastructure and internal technology systems. The failure of systems due to a catastrophic event, such as an earthquake, fire, flood, tsunami, weather event, telecommunications failure, power failure, cyberattack or war, could adversely impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition. We have developed disaster recovery plans and maintain backup systems in order to reduce the potential impact of a catastrophic event. However, there can be no assurance that these plans and systems would enable us to return to normal business operations.

Previous wording

Our network infrastructure and internal technology systems may also be subject to other risks such as computer viruses, physical or electronic vandalism or other similar disruptions that could cause system interruptions and loss of critical data. Cybersecurity threats and incidents can range from uncoordinated individual attempts to gain unauthorized access to our networks and systems to more sophisticated and targeted measures directed at us or our third-party service providers. Despite the implementation of cybersecurity measures including access controls, data encryption, vulnerability assessments, employee training, continuous monitoring, and maintenance of backup and protective systems, our network infrastructure and internal technology systems may still be vulnerable to cybersecurity threats and other electronic security breaches. While we have taken reasonable efforts to protect ourselves, and to date, we have not experienced any material breaches or material losses related to cyberattacks, we cannot assure that any of our security measures would be sufficient in the future.

Current wording

Our network infrastructure and internal technology systems may also be subject to other risks such as computer viruses, physical or electronic vandalism, or other similar disruptions that could cause system interruptions and loss of critical data. Cybersecurity threats and incidents can range from uncoordinated individual attempts to gain unauthorized access to our networks and systems to more sophisticated and targeted measures directed at us or our third-party service providers. Despite the implementation of cybersecurity measures including access controls, data encryption, vulnerability assessments, employee training, continuous monitoring, and maintenance of backup and protective systems, our network infrastructure and internal technology systems may still be vulnerable to cybersecurity threats and other electronic security breaches. While we believe we have taken reasonable efforts to protect ourselves, we cannot be certain that any of our security measures would be sufficient in the future.