FS Bancorp, Inc.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 13, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Mar 13, 2026
FSBW$43.55-0.5%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-03-17.
0001437749-25-008049
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-03-13.
0001437749-26-008243
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 100 previous paragraphs and 103 current paragraphs.
68 unchanged; 25 reworded; 10 added; 7 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 15 previous and 15 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (10)
Current report
Broader macroeconomic factors may also adversely affect our performance. Although inflation has moderated, higher input costs and persistent wage pressures continue to affect many borrowers, while the Federal Reserve's interest rate reductions in late 2025 have resulted in increased margin compression and reduced yields on adjustable- and variable-rate loans. Additionally, slowing economic activity, shifting consumer sentiment, and higher levels of household debt may negatively affect credit performance in our consumer and commercial portfolios. Trade disputes, tariffs, U.S. - China tensions, and shifting global supply chain patterns may continue to influence operating costs for our commercial borrowers, particularly those dependent on construction materials, manufacturing inputs, or exports.
Current report
Monetary policy, interest rate volatility, inflation, deflation, and other external economic factors could adversely impact our financial performance and operations.
Current report
Severe flooding in Western Washington and Oregon in November 2025, as well as the increasing frequency and severity of flood and wildfire events, could materially and adversely affect the credit quality of our loan portfolio and the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses.
Current report
The catastrophic flooding that occurred in November 2025 in Western Washington and Oregon has heightened the risks associated with our loan portfolio, particularly in flood-prone areas where we have significant credit exposure. Borrowers affected by the flooding may experience financial hardship, impairing their ability to meet their loan obligations and increasing the likelihood of delinquencies, nonperforming loans, and charge-offs. Damage to, or destruction of properties securing our loans may also reduce collateral values, which could increase potential losses.
Current report
Our ability to recover losses may be further limited if borrowers lack adequate insurance coverage or if insurance claims are delayed or denied. In addition, the flooding caused economic disruption in the impacted communities, including business closures and job losses, which continue to reduce borrowers' repayment capacity and require adjustments to our credit loss assumptions.
Current report
Moreover, climate-related events, including both flooding and wildfires, are occurring with greater frequency and severity. These trends may increase the long-term risks to our loan portfolio and may necessitate increases to our allowance for credit losses. While we regularly evaluate the adequacy of our allowance based on current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts, there can be no assurance that our allowance will be sufficient to cover actual losses, particularly if sever weather-related events persist or worsen.
Current report
Recent federal actions, including changes in federal DEI and ESG guidance, have shifted oversight of DEI and ESG practices. These developments alter the regulatory expectations and compliance requirements for companies with DEI and ESG initiatives. This shift increases compliance risk for companies with DEI and ESG initiatives, and new guidance may restrict voluntary programs and training, potentially requiring policy changes, reporting adjustments, and operational modifications.
Current report
At the same time, state-level requirements remain inconsistent. Some continue to mandate diversity or climate disclosures, while others limit DEI and ESG activities, creating additional operational complexity for multi-state businesses.
Current report
Failure to align DEI and ESG efforts with the current legal framework could result in reputational harm, legal challenges, financial penalties, and limitations on government contracting. Private third-party ESG and DEI evaluations may further influence investor decisions, access to capital, and stakeholder perception.
Current report
Although investors, customers, and other stakeholders continue to expect transparency and commitment to broader ESG goals, including workforce diversity, community engagement, and responsible governance, scaling back DEI or ESG efforts to comply with federal mandates may trigger criticism from investors, advocacy groups, and employees. Meanwhile, misalignment with state laws or rating agencies could affect market perception and access to capital.
Removed paragraphs (7)
Previous report
Our financial condition and results of operations are affected by credit policies of monetary authorities, particularly the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or the Federal Reserve. Actions by monetary and fiscal authorities, including the Federal Reserve, could lead to inflation, deflation, or other economic phenomena that could adversely affect our financial performance. Higher U.S. tariffs on imported goods could exacerbate inflationary pressures by increasing the cost of goods and materials for businesses and consumers. This may particularly affect small- to medium-sized businesses as they are less able to leverage economies of scale to mitigate cost pressures compared to larger businesses. Consequently, our business clients may experience increased financial strain, reducing their ability to repay loans and adversely impacting our results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, a prolonged period of inflation could cause wages and other costs to us to increase, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature, and as a result, interest rates tend to have a more significant impact on our performance than general levels of inflation or deflation. However, interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or magnitude as the prices of goods and services, creating additional uncertainty in the economic environment.
Previous report
The ongoing Los Angeles wildfires that began in January 2025 present heightened risks to our loan portfolio and the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses. Borrowers impacted by the fires may face financial hardship, leading to increased loan defaults and reduced repayment capacity. Damage to or destruction of properties securing loans may result in collateral value depreciation, further increasing potential losses. Additionally, inadequate insurance coverage or denied claims may limit recovery efforts and contribute to greater uncertainty in estimating credit losses. Local economic disruptions, such as business closures and job losses, may impair borrowers’ ability to meet financial obligations, requiring adjustments to our credit loss assumptions. While we had no direct losses related to the Los Angeles wildfires, the concentration of our loan portfolio in fire-prone areas further increases exposure, while the growing frequency and severity of wildfires due to climate change heightens long-term risks. These factors may necessitate increases to our allowance for credit losses to account for elevated credit risks. While we continuously evaluate our allowance to ensure it reflects current and expected risks, there can be no assurance it will be sufficient to cover actual losses, particularly in the context of ongoing and future wildfire-related challenges.
Previous report
In light of the recent executive order titled “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity,” which revokes previous mandates promoting DEI and directs federal agencies to combat “illegal DEI” practices in the private sector, we must reassess our ESG strategies to ensure compliance with the evolving regulatory environment. The order signals a shift in federal oversight and enforcement priorities, potentially affecting internal policies, hiring practices, supplier diversity programs, and corporate governance frameworks.
Previous report
The executive order rescinds prior directives, such as Executive Order 11246, which required affirmative action and non-discriminatory practices by federal contractors. As a result, federal agencies may reevaluate existing contracts, scrutinize hiring and promotion policies, and take enforcement actions against companies perceived to be engaging in practices that do not align with the revised federal standards. Additionally, new guidance or rulemaking stemming from the executive order could impose restrictions on voluntary DEI initiatives, training programs, or supplier diversity efforts. These developments may necessitate changes to our internal policies, reporting obligations, and public disclosures, creating operational and compliance challenges.
Previous report
Failure to align our DEI efforts with the current legal framework could result in reputational damage, legal challenges, and adverse impacts on our operations. Government investigations, enforcement actions, or private litigation challenging our DEI-related policies could lead to financial penalties, increased legal costs, and potential restrictions on our ability to engage in government contracting. Moreover, various private third-party organizations continue to evaluate companies based on ESG and DEI practices. Unfavorable ratings from these entities could influence investor decisions, limit access to capital, and generate negative sentiment among stakeholders.
Previous report
While the executive order aims to eliminate specific DEI programs, investors, customers, and other stakeholders may still expect transparency and commitment to broader ESG goals, including workforce diversity, community engagement, and responsible corporate governance. Companies that scale back DEI initiatives to comply with federal mandates may face backlash from institutional investors, advocacy groups, and employees who view such actions as a retreat from social responsibility commitments. Additionally, inconsistencies between federal and state-level DEI policies may create further complexities, as certain states continue to mandate affirmative action or corporate diversity disclosures.
Previous report
Adapting to the recent regulatory changes is crucial to maintaining our reputation, ensuring operational continuity, and meeting stakeholder expectations in the evolving ESG landscape. Noncompliance or perceived noncompliance with the executive order and related regulatory guidance could expose us to increased regulatory scrutiny, litigation risks, and limitations on business opportunities. At the same time, misalignment with investor and stakeholder expectations regarding ESG and DEI commitments could impair our brand value, reduce employee engagement and retention, and negatively impact our stock performance. Given these factors, we must carefully assess and adjust our policies, disclosures, and risk mitigation strategies to navigate the shifting legal and business environment effectively.
Reworded paragraphs (25)
Previous wording
Our primary market areas are in the Puget Sound region of Washington and Kitsap, Clallam, Jefferson, Grays Harbor, Thurston, and Benton counties. Following the acquisition of seven banking branches in 2023, our footprint expanded to include Klickitat County in Washington, and Lincoln, Malheur and Tillamook counties in Oregon. Adverse economic conditions in our market areas could impact our growth rate, reduce our customers’ ability to repay loans, and adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Broader economic factors such as inflation, unemployment and money supply fluctuations also may adversely affect our profitability. Trade wars, tariffs, or shifts in trade policies between the United States and other nations could disrupt supply chains, increase costs for businesses, and reduce export opportunities for our customers. These developments may, in turn, negatively impact these businesses and, by extension, our operations and financial performance.
Current wording
Our primary market areas are in the Puget Sound region of Washington and Kitsap, Clallam, Jefferson, Grays Harbor, Thurston, and Benton counties. Following the acquisition of seven banking branches in 2023, our footprint expanded to include Klickitat County in Washington, and Lincoln, Malheur and Tillamook counties in Oregon. Adverse economic conditions in our market areas, including declining employment, reduced consumer spending, or business failures, could adversely affect our growth, customers’ ability to repay loans, and consequently, our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Previous wording
A downturn in economic conditions, be it due to inflation, a recession, war, geopolitical conflicts, adverse weather, or other factors, could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, and results of operations, including but not limited to:
Current wording
A downturn in economic conditions, whether due to recessionary conditions, inflation or deflation, interest rate volatility, geopolitical conflicts, market instability, adverse weather events, or other factors, could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, and results of operations. Any of these conditions could lead to:
Previous wording
Our loan portfolio predominantly comprises assets secured by real estate or fixtures affixed to real property. Any deterioration in the real estate markets associated with the collateral securing mortgage loans could significantly impact borrowers' repayment capabilities and the value of collateral. Real estate values are affected by various factors, including economic conditions, governmental rules or policies, and natural disasters such as earthquakes, and trade-related pressures that may affect construction costs or materials availability. If we are required to liquidate a significant amount of collateral during a period of reduced real estate values, our financial condition and profitability could be adversely affected.
Current wording
A substantial portion of our loan portfolio consists of loans secured by real estate or fixtures affixed to real property. Any decline in real estate market values could materially affect borrowers' ability to repay loans and reduce the value of collateral. Real estate values are affected by various factors, including economic trends, government regulations, zoning and tax policies, interest rates, natural disasters (including earthquakes and floods), and disruptions in construction or materials supply. Forced liquidation of collateral during periods of declining real estate values could materially impair our financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
Our consumer loans accounted for $620.2 million, or 24.5% of our total gross loan portfolio as of December 31, 2024, of which $541.9 million (87.4% of total consumer loans) consisted of indirect home improvement loans (some of which were not secured by a lien on the real property), $74.9 million (12.1% of total consumer loans) consisted of marine loans secured by boats, and $3.3 million (0.5% of total consumer loans) consisted of other consumer loans, which includes personal lines of credit, credit cards, automobile, direct home improvement, loans on deposit, and recreational loans. Generally, we consider these types of loans to involve a higher degree of risk compared to first mortgage loans on owner-occupied, one-to-four-family residential properties. As a result of our large portfolio of consumer loans, it may become necessary to increase the level of provision for credit losses on loans, which would reduce profits. Consumer loans generally entail greater risk than do one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of loans that are secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles and boats. In these cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance.
Current wording
Our consumer loans accounted for $597.0 million, or 22.5% of our total gross loan portfolio as of December 31, 2025, of which $525.8 million (88.1% of total consumer loans) consisted of indirect home improvement loans (some of which were not secured by a lien on the real property), $68.1 million (2.6% of total consumer loans) consisted of marine loans secured by boats, and $3.0 million (0.1% of total consumer loans) consisted of other consumer loans, which includes personal lines of credit, credit cards, automobiles, direct home improvement, loans on deposit, and recreational loans. Generally, we consider these types of loans to involve a higher degree of risk compared to first mortgage loans on owner-occupied, one-to-four-family residential properties. As a result of our large portfolio of consumer loans, it may become necessary to increase the level of provision for credit losses on loans, which would reduce profits. Consumer loans generally entail greater risk than one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of loans that are secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles and boats. In these cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance.
Previous wording
Most of our consumer loans are originated indirectly by or through third parties, which presents greater risk than our direct lending products which involves direct contact between us and the borrower. Unlike a direct loan where the borrower makes an application directly to us, in these loans the dealer, who has a direct financial interest in the loan transaction, assists the borrower in preparing the loan application. Although we disburse the loan proceeds directly to the dealer upon receipt of a “completion certificate” signed by the borrower, because we do not have direct contact with the borrower, these loans may be more susceptible to a material misstatement on the loan application or having the loan proceeds being misused by the borrower or the dealer. In addition, if the work is not properly performed, the borrower may cease payment on the loan until the problem is rectified.
Current wording
Most of our consumer loans are originated indirectly through third-party dealers, which presents greater risk than our direct lending products because we do not have direct contact with the borrower. Unlike direct loans where the borrower applies with us directly, in indirect originations the dealer, who has a financial interest in completing the sale, assists the borrower in preparing the loan application. Although we disburse the loan proceeds directly to the dealer upon receipt of a “completion certificate” signed by the borrower, the absence of direct interaction with the borrower increases the risk of material misstatements in the loan application or misuse of loan proceeds by either the borrower or the dealer. In addition, if the work is not properly performed, the borrower may cease payment on the loan until the problem is rectified.
Previous wording
Our indirect home improvement lending, the largest component of our consumer loan portfolio, is reliant on our relationships with home improvement contractors and dealers. Specifically, our indirect home improvement loan operations rely on our ability to establish and maintain relationships with reputable contractors and dealers who originate loans at the point of sale. As of December 31, 2024, our indirect home improvement contractor/dealer network included 46** **active contractors and dealers located across Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Colorado, Arizona, Minnesota, Nevada, Texas, Utah, Massachusetts, Montana, and New Hampshire. Indirect home improvement loans totaled $541.9 million, or 21.4% of our total gross loan portfolio, at December 31, 2024, reflecting approximately 29,700 loans with an average balance of approximately $18,500.
Current wording
Our indirect home improvement lending, the largest component of our consumer loan portfolio, is reliant on our relationships with home improvement contractors and dealers. Specifically, our indirect home improvement loan operations rely on our ability to establish and maintain relationships with reputable contractors and dealers who originate loans at the point of sale. As of December 31, 2025, our indirect home improvement contractor/dealer network included 33** **active contractors and dealers located across Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Colorado, Arizona, Minnesota, Nevada, Texas, Utah, Massachusetts, Montana, and New Hampshire. Indirect home improvement loans totaled $525.8 million, or 19.8% of our total gross loan portfolio, at December 31, 2025, reflecting approximately 29,000 loans with an average balance of approximately $18,000.
Previous wording
Although we have established relationships with home improvement contractors and dealers, these partnerships are generally not exclusive, some are newly formed, and they may be terminated at any time. An economic downturn or recession, coupled with tighter credit availability for contractors, dealers, and their customers, could lead to increased business closures, reduced sales, and lower loan volume within our contractor/dealer network. This could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Additionally, competition poses a significant risk. If competitors offer superior service or more attractive loan products, our contractor/dealer partners may terminate their relationships with us or refer customers to our competitors. Our reliance on a concentrated group of contractors and dealers further heightens this risk, as five dealers accounted for 74.1% of our 2024 annual loan volume. The loss of any one of these key dealers could materially reduce our loan origination volume. Failure to grow existing relationships or develop new ones could have a significant adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Current wording
Although we have established relationships with home improvement contractors and dealers, these partnerships are generally not exclusive, some are newly formed, and they may be terminated at any time. An economic downturn or recession, coupled with tighter credit availability for contractors, dealers, and their customers, could lead to increased business closures, reduced sales, and lower loan volume within our contractor/dealer network. This could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Additionally, competition poses a significant risk. If competitors offer superior service or more attractive loan products, our contractor/dealer partners may terminate their relationships with us or refer customers to our competitors. Our reliance on a concentrated group of contractors and dealers further heightens this risk, as five dealers accounted for 74.5% of our 2025 annual loan volume. The loss of any one of these key dealers could materially reduce our loan origination volume. Failure to grow existing relationships or develop new ones could have a significant adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Previous wording
At December 31, 2024, our loan portfolio included $590.5 million of commercial real estate loans, including $174.9 million secured by non-owner occupied commercial real estate properties, and $245.2 million of multi-family real estate loans, or 23.3% of our total gross loan portfolio. The credit risk associated with these types of loans is generally higher than that of one-to-four-family residential loans. Repayment typically depends on the successful operation and income stream of the property securing the loan, as well as the value of the real estate collateral, both of which can be significantly affected by economic conditions.
Current wording
At December 31, 2025, our loan portfolio included $969.5 million of commercial real estate loans, or 36.5% of our total gross loan portfolio, including $177.1 million secured by non-owner occupied commercial real estate properties, and $262.2 million of multi-family real estate loans. The credit risk associated with these types of loans is generally higher than that of one-to-four-family residential loans. Repayment typically depends on the successful operation and income stream of the property securing the loan, as well as the value of the real estate collateral, both of which can be significantly affected by economic conditions.
Previous wording
At December 31, 2024, our commercial business loan portfolio included commercial and industrial loans of $287.0 million, or 11.3%, and warehouse lending of $12.9 million, or 0.4%, of our total gross loan portfolio. Commercial business lending involves risks that are different from those associated with residential and commercial real estate lending. Real estate lending is generally considered to be collateral-based lending with loan amounts based on predetermined loan to collateral values and liquidation of the underlying real estate collateral being viewed as the primary source of repayment in the event of borrower default. Our commercial and industrial business loans are primarily made based on the cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The borrowers’ cash flow may be unpredictable and collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. This collateral may consist of equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, or other business assets. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers. Other collateral securing these loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise, may be illiquid, and may fluctuate in value based on the specific type of business and equipment. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial and industrial business loans may be substantially dependent on the success of the business itself, which, in turn, is often dependent in part upon general economic conditions and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. For additional information see, “Our residential mortgage warehouse lending and construction warehouse lending programs are subject to various risks that could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.”
Current wording
At December 31, 2025, our commercial business loan portfolio included commercial and industrial loans of $301.1 million, or 11.3%, and warehouse lending of $28.2 million, or 1.1%, of our total gross loan portfolio. Commercial business lending involves risks that are different from those associated with residential and commercial real estate lending. Real estate lending is generally considered to be collateral-based lending with loan amounts based on predetermined loan to collateral values and liquidation of the underlying real estate collateral being viewed as the primary source of repayment in the event of borrower default. Our commercial and industrial business loans are primarily made based on the cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The borrowers’ cash flow may be unpredictable and collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. This collateral may consist of equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, or other business assets. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers. Other collateral securing these loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise, may be illiquid, and may fluctuate in value based on the specific type of business and equipment. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial and industrial business loans may be substantially dependent on the success of the business itself, which in turn, is often dependent in part upon general economic conditions and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. For additional information see, “Our residential mortgage warehouse lending program is subject to various risks that could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.”
Previous wording
Our lending activities include extending real estate construction loans to individuals and builders, primarily for residential property development. As of December 31, 2024, our construction and development loan portfolio totaled $330.7 million, constituting 13.1% of our total gross loan portfolio, excluding $174.1 million in unfunded construction loan commitments. Of this portfolio, $223.3 million was allocated to speculative residential real estate projects, and $42.0 million was allocated to non-speculative residential custom construction. Additionally, we had** **three commercial note-secured lines of credit totaling $47.5 million in commitments, directed towards residential construction re-lenders with an outstanding balance of $10.7 million at December 31, 2024. The risks associated with the collateral underlying our commercial construction warehouse lines are similar to those associated with our residential construction and development loans.
Current wording
Our lending activities include extending real estate construction loans to individuals and builders, primarily for residential property development. As of December 31, 2025, our construction and development loan portfolio totaled $396.5 million, constituting 14.9% of our total gross loan portfolio, excluding $235.4 million in unfunded construction loan commitments. Of this portfolio, $266.2 million was allocated to speculative residential real estate projects, and $42.3 million was allocated to non-speculative residential custom construction. Additionally, we had** **two commercial note-secured lines of credit totaling $55.0 million in commitments, directed towards residential construction re-lenders with an outstanding balance of $29.2 million at December 31, 2025. The risks associated with the collateral underlying our commercial construction warehouse lines are similar to those associated with our residential construction and development loans.
Previous wording
Furthermore, as of December 31, 2024, our outstanding construction and development loans included $180.4 million in speculative one-to-four-family construction loans and $11.9 million in land acquisition and development loans. Speculative construction loans involve financing projects without a committed buyer, with repayment relying heavily on market demand upon project completion. Fluctuating market conditions can significantly impact the salability of such properties and, by extension, loan repayment. The absence of a confirmed buyer during the construction phase increases uncertainty and risk. Land acquisition loans are often associated with properties lacking income-generating capabilities, with repayment depending on the successful development, sale, or lease of the property. Unlike developed properties, undeveloped land tends to be illiquid and may not readily convert to cash. The lack of income and potential challenges in liquidating the collateral increases the risk of these loans, especially in the event of default. Given these inherent uncertainties, rigorous monitoring, continuous market evaluations, and proactive management of speculative construction and land acquisition loans are essential to mitigate risks and minimize potential adverse impacts on our loan portfolio and financial performance.
Current wording
Furthermore, as of December 31, 2025, our outstanding construction and development loans included $134.4 million in speculative one-to-four-family construction loans and $4.5 million in land acquisition and development loans. Speculative construction loans involve financing projects without a committed buyer, with repayment relying heavily on market demand upon project completion. Fluctuating market conditions can significantly impact the salability of such properties and, by extension, loan repayment. The absence of a confirmed buyer during the construction phase increases uncertainty and risk. Land acquisition loans are often associated with properties lacking income-generating capabilities, with repayment depending on the successful development, sale, or lease of the property. Unlike developed properties, undeveloped land tends to be illiquid and may not readily convert to cash. The lack of income and potential challenges in liquidating the collateral increases the risk of these loans, especially in the event of default. Given these inherent uncertainties, rigorous monitoring, continuous market evaluations, and proactive management of speculative construction and land acquisition loans are essential to mitigate risks and minimize potential adverse impacts on our loan portfolio and financial performance.
Previous wording
At December 31, 2024, $5.0 million in** **real estate construction and development loans were nonperforming. A substantial increase in nonperforming loans in this segment could significantly affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
At December 31, 2025, $9.2 million in** **real estate construction and development loans were nonperforming. A substantial increase in nonperforming loans in this segment could significantly affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
At December 31, 2024, we had approved residential warehouse lending lines to three companies in varying amounts from $3.0 million to $9.0 million, for an aggregate amount of $19.5 million. At December 31, 2024, there was $2.2 million outstanding under these residential warehouse lines, compared to $573,000 outstanding at December 31, 2023.
Current wording
At December 31, 2025, we had approved residential warehouse lending lines to three companies in varying amounts from $3.0 million to $9.0 million, for an aggregate amount of $15.5 million. At December 31, 2025, there was $2.5 million outstanding under these residential warehouse lines, compared to $2.2 million outstanding at December 31, 2024.
Previous wording
At December 31, 2024, $617.3 million, excluding loans held for sale of $27.8 million, or 24.4% of our total loan portfolio was secured by first liens on one-to-four-family residential loans. Additionally, home equity lines of credit and second lien mortgages totaled $75.1 million, or 3.0% of our total loan portfolio at that date. These loans are sensitive to regional and local economic fluctuations, which can significantly impact borrowers’ ability to meet payment obligations, making loss levels difficult to predict. A downturn in housing markets, particularly in Washington (and to a lesser extent in Oregon), where a concentration of our loans exists could reduce the value of the collateral securing these loans and increase our risk of loss upon a default by the borrower. Economic decline or reduced real estate sales volumes and prices, coupled with higher unemployment rates, may increase loan delinquencies and asset quality concerns, which could also negatively impact demand for our products and services.
Current wording
At December 31, 2025, $628.8 million, excluding loans held for sale of $43.7 million, or 23.7% of our total loan portfolio was secured by first liens on one-to-four-family residential loans. Additionally, home equity lines of credit and second lien mortgages totaled $88.3 million, or 3.3% of our total loan portfolio at that date. These loans are sensitive to regional and local economic fluctuations, which can significantly impact borrowers’ ability to meet payment obligations, making loss levels difficult to predict. A downturn in housing markets, particularly in Washington (and to a lesser extent in Oregon), where a concentration of our loans exists could reduce the value of the collateral securing these loans and increase our risk of loss upon a default by the borrower. Economic decline or reduced real estate sales volumes and prices, coupled with higher unemployment rates, may increase loan delinquencies and asset quality concerns, which could also negatively impact demand for our products and services.
Previous wording
At December 31, 2024, our nonperforming assets (which consisted of nonaccrual loans, other real estate owned (“OREO”), and other repossessed assets) were $13.6 million or 0.54% of total assets. Nonperforming assets adversely affect our earnings in various ways. We do not record interest income on nonaccrual loans or foreclosed assets, thereby adversely affecting our income and increasing our loan administration costs. Upon foreclosure or similar proceedings, we record the repossessed asset at the estimated fair value, less costs to sell, which may result in a write down or loss. If we experience increases in nonperforming loans and nonperforming assets, our losses and troubled assets could increase significantly, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, as our loan administration costs could increase, each of which could have an adverse effect on our net income and related ratios, such as return on assets and equity. A significant increase in the level of nonperforming assets from current levels would also increase our risk profile and may impact the capital levels our regulators believe are appropriate in light of the increased risk profile.
Current wording
At December 31, 2025, our nonperforming assets (which consisted of nonaccrual loans) were $18.7 million or 0.59% of total assets. Nonperforming assets adversely affect our earnings in various ways. We do not record interest income on nonaccrual loans or foreclosed assets, thereby adversely affecting our income and increasing our loan administration costs. Upon foreclosure or similar proceedings, we record the repossessed asset at the estimated fair value, less costs to sell, which may result in a write down or loss. If we experience increases in nonperforming loans and nonperforming assets, our losses and troubled assets could increase significantly, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, as our loan administration costs could increase, each of which could have an adverse effect on our net income and related ratios, such as return on assets and equity. A significant increase in the level of nonperforming assets from current levels would also increase our risk profile and may impact the capital levels our regulators believe are appropriate in light of the increased risk profile.
Previous wording
Our earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon our net interest income, which is significantly affected by interest rates. Interest rates are highly sensitive to factors beyond our control, such as general economic conditions and policies set by governmental and regulatory bodies, particularly the Federal Reserve. Increases in interest rates could reduce our net interest income, weaken the housing market by curbing refinancing activity and home purchases, and negatively affect the broader U.S. economy, potentially leading to slower economic growth or recessionary conditions.
Current wording
Our earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon our net interest income, which is significantly affected by interest rates. Interest rates are highly sensitive to factors beyond our control, including general economic conditions, market expectations, and policies set by governmental and regulatory bodies, particularly the Federal Reserve. Increases in interest rates could reduce our net interest income, weaken the housing market by further curbing refinancing activity and home purchases, and negatively affect the broader U.S. economy, potentially leading to slower economic growth or recessionary conditions. Interest rates may have remained elevated in 2025, with volatility continuing in short- and long-term yields, which may affect net interest income and credit quality.
Previous wording
Our net interest margin, the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, can be adversely affected by interest rate changes. While yields on assets and costs of liabilities tend to move in the same direction, they may do so at different speeds, causing the margin to expand or contract. As our interest-bearing liabilities often have shorter durations than our interest-earning assets, a rise in the interest rates may lead to funding costs increasing faster than asset yields, compressing our net interest margin. Additionally, changes in the slope of the yield curve, such as flattening or inversion, can further pressure our margins as funding costs rise relative to asset yields. Conversely, falling rates can increase loan prepayments, leading to reinvestment in lower-yielding assets, reducing income.
Current wording
Our net interest margin, the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, can be adversely affected by interest rate changes. While yields on assets and costs of liabilities tend to move in the same direction, they may do so at different speeds, causing the margin to expand or contract. As our interest-bearing liabilities often have shorter durations than our interest-earning assets, a rise in the interest rates may lead to funding costs increasing faster than asset yields, compressing our net interest margin. Additionally, changes in the slope of the yield curve, such as flattening or inversion, can further pressure our margins as funding costs rise relative to asset yields. Conversely, falling rates could increase loan prepayments, leading to reinvestment in lower-yielding assets, and reducing income.
Previous wording
In a heightened rate environment, retaining deposits can become more costly. At December 31, 2024, we held $869.3 million in certificates of deposit maturing within one year and $1.31 billion in noninterest-bearing and NOW checking accounts, and savings and money market accounts. If deposit and borrowing rates rise faster than loan and investment yields, our net interest income and overall earnings could decline. Additionally, adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit may face increased default risks in a rising rate environment.
Current wording
In a heightened rate environment, retaining deposits can become more costly. At December 31, 2025, we held $1.06 billion in certificates of deposit maturing within one year and $1.53 billion in noninterest-bearing and NOW checking accounts, and savings and money market accounts. If deposit and borrowing rates rise faster than loan and investment yields, our net interest income and overall earnings could decline. Additionally, adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit may face increased default risks in a rising rate environment.
Previous wording
Changes in interest rates also affect the fair value of our MSRs. At December 31, 2024, we serviced $1.63 billion in loans, with associated MSRs recorded at an amortized cost of $9.2 million and an estimated fair value of $21.0 million. Rising rates generally increase MSR value by extending the life of underlying loans, while falling rates typically reduce MSR value through faster loan prepayments. Declines in MSR fair value could reduce our earnings. For additional information, see "Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Account Policies –Subsequent Events", “Note 5 – Mortgage Servicing Rights” and “Note 16 – Fair Value Measurements” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10–K.
Current wording
Changes in interest rates also affect the fair value of our MSRs. At December 31, 2025, we serviced $1.67 billion in loans, with associated MSRs recorded at an amortized cost of $8.6 million and an estimated fair value of $21.8 million. Rising rates generally increase MSR value by extending the life of underlying loans, while falling rates typically reduce MSR value through faster loan prepayments. Declines in MSR fair value could reduce our earnings. For additional information, see "Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Account Policies –Subsequent Events", “Note 4 – Mortgage Servicing Rights” and “Note 14 – Fair Value Measurements” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10–K.
Previous wording
Interest rate fluctuations also influence the fixed-rate investment securities, which inversely correlates with rate changes. At December 31, 2024, the fair value of our securities available-for-sale was $281.2 million, with unrealized net losses of $29.1 million reflected in stockholders' equity. These unrealized losses on securities have been partially offset by unrealized gains on cash flow and fair value hedges with net unrealized gains of $7.2 million at December 31, 2024. Further declines in fair value from rising rates could have an adverse effect on stockholders’ equity.
Current wording
Interest rate fluctuations also influence the fixed-rate investment securities, which inversely correlate with rate changes. At December 31, 2025, the fair value of our securities available-for-sale was $288.7 million, with unrealized net losses of $16.8 million, net of tax, reflected in stockholders' equity. These unrealized losses on securities have been partially offset by unrealized gains on cash flow and fair value hedges with net unrealized gains of $992,000, net of tax, at December 31, 2025. Further declines in fair value from sustained or additional rate increases could have an adverse effect on stockholders’ equity.
Previous wording
Although we sell loans into the secondary market without recourse, we provide customary representations and warranties to buyers. If these representations and warranties are breached, we may be required to repurchase the loans, potentially incurring a loss. As of December 31, 2024, we recorded a holdback reserve of $2.0 million to cover potential losses related to these guarantees for one-to-four-family loans sold into the secondary market.
Current wording
Although we sell loans into the secondary market without recourse, we provide customary representations and warranties to buyers. If these representations and warranties are breached, we may be required to repurchase the loans, potentially incurring a loss. As of December 31, 2025, we recorded a holdback reserve of $1.8 million to cover potential losses related to these guarantees for one-to-four-family loans sold into the secondary market.
Previous wording
Decreases in the fair value of securities available-for-sale resulting from increases in interest rates could have an adverse effect on shareholders’ equity. Additionally, there is no assurance that the declines in market value will not result in credit losses, which would lead to additional provisions for credit losses that could materially affect our net income and capital levels.
Current wording
Decreases in the fair value of securities available-for-sale resulting from increases in interest rates could have an adverse effect on shareholders’ equity. Additionally, there is no assurance that the decline in market value will not result in credit losses, which would lead to additional provisions for credit losses that could materially affect our net income and capital levels.
Previous wording
Under federal and state laws and regulations governing the safety and soundness of insured depository institutions, regulatory agencies such as state banking regulators, the DFI, the Federal Reserve, and the FDIC (as the insurer of bank deposits), have the authority to compel or restrict our actions if they determine that our capital levels are insufficient or that we are operating in a manner inconsistent with safe and sound banking practices. In addition to safety and soundness examinations, we and our subsidiaries are subject to oversight by state and federal regulators, including the CFPB, to ensure compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and consumer protection initiatives. This regulatory process may result in requirements to address identified concerns through informal or formal supervisory actions, such as board resolutions, memoranda of understanding, written agreements, or consent or cease-and-desist orders, requiring corrective actions or prohibiting specific activities. Failure to comply with the terms of such actions or directives could result in heightened supervisory measures, including consent orders, prompt corrective action restrictions, or additional regulatory penalties. These actions could impose significant restrictions on our ability to pursue new or existing business initiatives, which may adversely affect our business, reputation, and operational flexibility.
Current wording
Under federal and state laws and regulations governing the safety and soundness of insured depository institutions, regulatory agencies such as state banking regulators, the DFI, the Federal Reserve, and the FDIC (as the insurer of bank deposits), have the authority to compel or restrict our actions if they determine that our capital levels are insufficient or that we are operating in a manner inconsistent with safe and sound banking practices. In addition to safety and soundness examinations, we and our subsidiaries are subject to oversight by state and federal regulators to ensure compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and consumer protection initiatives. This regulatory process may result in requirements to address identified concerns through informal or formal supervisory actions, such as board resolutions, memoranda of understanding, written agreements, or consent or cease-and-desist orders, requiring corrective actions or prohibiting specific activities. Failure to comply with the terms of such actions or directives could result in heightened supervisory measures, including consent orders, prompt corrective action restrictions, or additional regulatory penalties. These actions could impose significant restrictions on our ability to pursue new or existing business initiatives, which may adversely affect our business, reputation, and operational flexibility.
Previous wording
The effects of climate change continue to raise significant concerns about the state of the environment. However, under a new Trump administration, federal policy may shift to reduce the emphasis on climate change initiatives and environmental regulations. This could include scaling back federal participation in international agreements, such as the Paris Agreement, and reducing regulatory pressures on businesses, including banks, to address climate-related risks. Legislative and regulatory proposals aimed at combating climate change may face greater scrutiny or diminished priority.
Current wording
The effects of climate change continue to raise significant concerns about the state of the environment. Federal and state policy approaches to climate change continue to evolve, and changes in legislative or regulatory priorities could alter the requirements and expectations placed on businesses, including banks, to address climate-related risks.
Previous wording
The Company is a separate legal entity from its subsidiary and does not have significant operations of its own. The long-term ability of the Company to pay dividends to its stockholders and debt payments is based primarily upon the ability of the Bank to make capital distributions to the Company, and also on the availability of cash at the holding company level. The availability of dividends from the Bank is limited by the Bank’s earnings and capital, as well as various statutes and regulations. In the event, the Bank is unable to pay dividends to the Company, the Company may not be able to pay dividends on its common stock or make payments on its outstanding debt. Consequently, the inability to receive dividends from the Bank could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects. At December 31, 2024, FS Bancorp had $9.2 million in unrestricted cash to support dividend and debt payments.
Current wording
The Company is a separate legal entity from its subsidiary and does not have significant operations of its own. The long-term ability of the Company to pay dividends to its stockholders and debt payments is based primarily upon the ability of the Bank to make capital distributions to the Company, and also on the availability of cash at the holding company level. The availability of dividends from the Bank is limited by the Bank’s earnings and capital, as well as various statutes and regulations. In the event the Bank is unable to pay dividends to the Company, the Company may not be able to pay dividends on its common stock or make payments on its outstanding debt. Consequently, the inability to receive dividends from the Bank could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects. At December 31, 2025, FS Bancorp had $8.1 million in unrestricted cash to support dividend and debt payments.