Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 26, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Feb 26, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-27.
0001437749-25-005393
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-02-26.
0001437749-26-005830
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 106 previous paragraphs and 112 current paragraphs.
88 unchanged; 13 reworded; 10 added; 5 removed; 0 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 17 previous and 16 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (10)
Current report
The yield curve was challenged by flatness and/or inversion during 2025, with a semblance of steepness on the longest portion of the yield curve only beginning to be experienced towards the end of the year. Three consecutive 25 bps rate reductions from the FRB in September, October and December resulted in the FFTR falling to a range of 3.50% - 3.75%, and Prime to 6.75%, as of December 31, 2025.
Current report
Significant improvement in the overall loss position of our investment securities portfolio was experienced in 2025 as a result of changes in the interest rate environment and the corresponding impact on the market value of our investment securities portfolio. While this improvement benefitted other comprehensive income, and as a result, overall capital levels in 2025, the investment securities portfolio remains in an overall loss position and is still subject to the factors noted above.
Current report
Organic expansion into new markets could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
Organically expanding into new geographical markets presents unique challenges associated with brand awareness, talent acquisition and relationship building. It also exposes us to new economies and potentially different economic drivers. While these challenges can be approached with more gradual and measured strategies compared to entering a new market by acquisition, the success of organic expansion depends on our ability to find the appropriate personnel, successfully implement our community banking model and ensure continual fit with our strategic goals and high standards for performance. Failure to do so could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations in addition to damaging Bancorp’s reputation as a premier community bank.
Current report
We began to expand our geographic footprint organically in 2025, announcing the appointment of a market president in December that will help lead our entry into the south-central Kentucky market. While we feel this expansion is a natural extension of our deep Kentucky roots, this strategic initiative represents entrance into a market that is new to Bancorp. As such, our ability to build brand recognition, develop and grow a talented team of relationship managers and implement our full-service, community banking model in a new market from the ground up will be key to successfully establishing ourselves in south-central Kentucky.
Current report
During 2025, the disclosure of several large loan losses resulting from suspected fraud were made by a number of regional banks, creating broader fraud-based credit concerns for the banking industry generally. While fraud associated with more operationally-focused transactions, such as wire transfers, card fraud or check fraud typically involve smaller individual amounts and occur with more frequency, credit fraud stemming from the origination of loans to borrowers under false pretenses can drive substantial losses with just one occurrence. The inability to prevent such fraud through our underwriting and operational processes could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our overall reputation.
Current report
The development and use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology presents risks and challenges that may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
We, or our third-party vendors, clients or counterparties may develop or incorporate AI technology into certain business processes, services or products. While we have established programs to manage our increasing exposure to AI, including processes for monitoring related risks, managing third party relationships, incident response, as well as employee awareness and education, the rapid adoption and broad use of AI across technological platforms and industries exposes us to growing and evolving risks that could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
Generative AI models, whether developed or used internally or by third-parties, may produce output or take undesirable action, reflect biases included in any data or assumptions in which they are trained, disclose private or confidential information or otherwise operate in a harmful manner. To the extent use of such models, or AI technology generally, limits transparency or grows in complexity, any failure to understand, monitor or adapt to such technology could present unique risks to our operations and business.
Current report
Further, the legal and regulatory environment related to AI is uncertain and continually evolving, expanding to incorporate intellectual property, privacy, consumer protection, employment and other laws applicable to the use of AI. These laws and regulations could impact our implementation and use of AI technology, subject us to risk of non-compliance and legal or regulatory consequences, harm our reputation and increase costs related to prevention, mitigation or resolution of such issues.
Removed paragraphs (5)
Previous report
These levels of interest rates were sustained for over a year until September of 2024, when the FRB reduced the FFTR 50 bps, representing their first rate reduction in over four years, lowering the FFTR to a range of 4.75% - 5.00%, and Prime to 8.00%. Consistent with a strategy of engineering a “soft landing,” they followed suit in November and December of 2024, cutting the FFTR further with respective 25 bps reductions, bringing the FFTR to a range of 4.25% - 4.50%, and Prime to 7.50%, as of December 31, 2024.
Previous report
The dramatic rise in interest rates experienced in 2022 provided significant benefit to NIM, as interest earning assets experienced higher yields and elevated levels of liquidity allowed deposit costs to remain near pandemic-era lows. However, as liquidity dissipated in 2023, driven in large part by the institutional failures of that year, intense competition for deposits created significant pricing pressure and drove deposit costs up. The resulting shift in Bancorp’s deposit mix, with a large portion of non-interest bearing and lower-rate deposits migrating to higher-yielding alternatives, created significant NIM compression, which was a scenario that continued into 2024 in conjunction with Bancorp’s substantial loan growth. While short term interest rates have recently declined consistent with the FRB’s rate reductions, the middle and longer-term portions of the yield curve have been relatively stagnant. Managing volatility within the interest rate environment will continue to be a primary focus for Bancorp, and the banking industry generally, as we enter 2025.
Previous report
A combination of higher interest rates and rising central business district vacancies across the country have created credit and collateral concerns over the past year, specifically within the CRE sector. While we believe the quality of our CRE portfolio, and the overall loan portfolio, remains solid, with no exposure to large office towers and minimal exposure to central business districts, we are not immune from potential deterioration in the value of loan collateral and could be negatively impacted by the effects of any such activity.
Previous report
Transactions between Bancorp and its former insurance subsidiary, the Captive, may be subject to certain IRS responsibilities and penalties.
Previous report
The Captive, formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of Bancorp, was a Nevada-based captive insurance company that was taxed under Section 831(b) of the Internal Revenue Code. On April 10, 2023, the IRS issued a proposed regulation that would potentially classify section 831(b) captive activity as a, “listed transaction,” and possibly disallow the related tax benefits, both prospectively and retroactively. The regulation was finalized in January 2025 and its impact is being evaluated by management. Bancorp elected not to renew the Captive in August of 2023 and ultimately dissolved the Captive in December of 2023. The finalization of the proposal and any disallowance of related tax benefits could negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.
Reworded paragraphs (13)
Previous wording
The interest rate environment has experienced significant volatility over the past several years. The FRB’s severe, pandemic-driven interest rate reductions in March of 2020 lowered the FFTR to a range of 0% - 0.25%, and Prime to 3.25%, levels that were sustained for approximately two years. In an effort to combat the resulting inflation that had risen to its highest levels in decades, the FRB increased the FFTR a total of 525 bps via numerous, incremental rate increases over the course of 2022 and 2023, driving the FFTR to a range of 5.25% - 5.50-%, and Prime to 8.50%, by July of 2023.
Current wording
Interest rates have experienced significant volatility over the past several years. A rising rate environment that was driven by the FRB’s strategy to combat decades-high inflation via numerous, incremental rate increases over the course of 2022 and 2023 took the FFTR to a range of 5.25% - 5.50%, and Prime to 8.50%, by July of 2023. These levels were sustained until September of 2024, when the FRB began its attempt to engineer a “soft landing,” with several rate reductions that brought the FFTR to a range of 4.25% - 4.50%, and Prime to 7.50%, as of December 31, 2024.
Previous wording
The current economic outlook remains uncertain and is regularly changing as new economic data becomes available and the FRB’s efforts to manage economic challenges continue. Recent projections indicate that the FRB will slow or halt FFTR rate reductions in 2025. While NIM expansion was experienced in the second half of 2024, the previously mentioned flattening of the yield curve, pricing pressure/competition for both loans and deposits, and changing levels of liquidity could continue to pose challenges to NIM and net interest spread in 2025.
Current wording
The current economic outlook is regularly changing as new economic data becomes available. Recent projections indicate the potential for additional rate reductions in 2026. While NIM expansion was experienced in 2025, the previously mentioned yield curve challenges and pricing pressure/competition for both loans and deposits could continue to pose challenges to NIM and net interest spread expansion in 2026.
Previous wording
While the economic outlook for 2025 is generally positive, proposed policy changes from the incoming administration, including tariffs and extended or additional tax cuts, the FRB’s continued efforts to control inflation and other economic challenges, and compounding geopolitical risks create a number of uncertainties heading into 2025. The impact these changes, and any other developments, have on local, regional and national economic conditions could have a significant effect on our borrowers’ ability to meet contractual obligations.
Current wording
While the economic outlook for 2026 is generally positive, projecting modest growth, the FRB’s continued effort to navigate economic challenges, including stubborn inflation and a softening labor market, coupled with geopolitical and trade tensions, create a number of uncertainties heading into 2026. The impact that these factors, and any other developments, have on local, regional and national economic conditions could have a significant effect on our borrowers’ ability to meet contractual obligations.
Previous wording
Credit-related concerns stemming from the higher interest rate environment and contractual renewal and maturity activity may be experienced over the next year. Strong loan volumes were experienced during the historically low pandemic-era interest rate environment that began in 2020 and was marked by Prime falling to 3.25%, a level at which it remained until 2022. Given the standard five-year term often associated with many of our traditional lending facilities, 2025 will begin a period of elevated interest rate risk for certain borrowers, as notes originated or renewed during that period will either renew or mature in an interest rate environment that is now significantly higher, with Prime more than doubling since 2020 and standing at 7.50% as of December 31, 2024.
Current wording
Credit-related concerns stemming from the changing interest rate environment and contractual renewal and maturity activity may be experienced over the next year. Strong loan volumes were experienced during the historically low pandemic-era interest rate environment that began in 2020 and was marked by Prime falling to 3.25%, a level at which it remained until 2022. Given the standard five-year term often associated with many of our traditional lending facilities, a period of elevated interest rate risk for certain borrowers will continue in 2026, as notes originated or renewed during that period will either renew or mature in an interest rate environment that is now significantly higher, with Prime more than doubling since 2020 and standing at 6.75% as of December 31, 2025.
Previous wording
Income from WM&T constitutes approximately 45% of non-interest income. WM&T AUM are expressed in terms of market value, and a significant portion of fee income is based upon those values, which generally fluctuate consistent with overall capital markets. Any decline in the market value of WM&T AUM could have a meaningful impact on non-interest income and negatively affect our financial results.
Current wording
Income from WM&T constitutes approximately 44% of non-interest income. WM&T AUM are expressed in terms of market value, and a significant portion of fee income is based upon those values, which generally fluctuate consistent with overall capital markets. Any decline in the market value of WM&T AUM could have a meaningful impact on non-interest income and negatively affect our financial results.
Previous wording
Bancorp’s intangible assets primarily relate to core deposits and customer relationships. Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized on an accelerated basis over their estimated life. Intangible assets, premises and equipment and other long-lived assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. In the event that we conclude that all or a portion of our intangible assets may be impaired, a non-cash charge for the amount of such impairment would be recorded to earnings. Such a charge would have no impact on tangible capital. At December 31, 2024, Bancorp had intangible assets of $16 million.
Current wording
Bancorp’s intangible assets primarily relate to core deposits and customer relationships. Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized on an accelerated basis over their estimated life. Intangible assets, premises and equipment and other long-lived assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. In the event that we conclude that all or a portion of our intangible assets may be impaired, a non-cash charge for the amount of such impairment would be recorded to earnings. Such a charge would have no impact on tangible capital. At December 31, 2025, Bancorp had intangible assets of $12 million.
Previous wording
In assessing the potential for realization of DTAs, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the DTAs will not be realized. Assessing the need for, or the sufficiency of, a valuation allowance requires management to evaluate all available evidence, both negative and positive, including whether future taxable income in sufficient amounts and character within the carryback and carryforward periods is available under tax law, including the use of tax planning strategies. We have concluded that, based on the level of positive evidence, it is more likely than not that at December 31, 2024 all DTAs will be realized. At December 31, 2024, Bancorp had DTAs totaling $72 million.
Current wording
In assessing the potential for realization of DTAs, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the DTAs will not be realized. Assessing the need for, or the sufficiency of, a valuation allowance requires management to evaluate all available evidence, both negative and positive, including whether future taxable income in sufficient amounts and character within the carryback and carryforward periods is available under tax law, including the use of tax planning strategies. We have concluded that, based on the level of positive evidence, it is more likely than not that at December 31, 2025 all DTAs will be realized. At December 31, 2025, Bancorp had DTAs totaling $45 million.
Previous wording
We’ve experienced a shift in the mix of our deposit portfolio over the past two years, consistent with a higher interest rate environment. Customers have moved from non-interest or low-interest bearing deposits into higher yielding options, particularly time deposits and money market offerings, which has driven a substantial increase in the cost of deposits and overall funding. Further, alternative investment options for customers holding excess levels of liquidity, such as treasury bonds, have resulted in a portion of deposit balances being invested with non-bank competitors, such as brokerages. While we have generally not experienced fallout within the customer base as a result, such activity impacts our overall deposit levels.
Current wording
We’ve experienced a shift in the mix of our deposit portfolio over the past several years, consistent with a higher interest rate environment. Customers have moved from non-interest or low-interest bearing deposits into higher yielding options, particularly time deposits and money market offerings, which has driven a substantial increase in the cost of deposits and overall funding. Further, alternative investment options for customers holding excess levels of liquidity, such as treasury bonds, have resulted in a portion of deposit balances being invested with non-bank competitors, such as brokerages. While we have generally not experienced fallout within the customer base as a result, such activity impacts our overall deposit levels.
Previous wording
Policies and procedures are intended to ensure that the process for changing methodologies occurs in an appropriate manner. Because of the uncertainty surrounding judgments and estimates pertaining to these matters, there can be no assurances that actual our results will not differ from those estimates. See the section titled “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for more information.
Current wording
Policies and procedures are intended to ensure that the process for changing methodologies occurs in an appropriate manner. Because of the uncertainty surrounding judgments and estimates pertaining to these matters, there can be no assurances that actual our results will not differ from those estimates. See the section titled “Critical Accounting Estimates” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for more information.
Previous wording
We will be subject to increased regulation once our total consolidated assets exceed $10 billion.
Current wording
We will be subject to increased regulation once our total consolidated assets exceed $10 billion as of any year-end.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2024, Bancorp had total consolidated assets of $8.86 billion. However, should our total consolidated assets exceed $10 billion, we will become subject to increased regulatory requirements. These requirements include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) supervision, examination and enforcement by the CFPB with respect to consumer financial protection laws; (ii) enhanced methodologies for the determination of FDIC insurance assessments, which could result in higher assessment rates; (iii) limitations on interchange transaction fees for debit card transactions, which would reduce our interchange revenue; and (iv) adherence to enhanced regulatory and risk management frameworks.
Current wording
As of December 31, 2025, Bancorp had total consolidated assets of $9.54 billion. However, should our total consolidated assets exceed $10 billion, we will become subject to increased regulatory requirements. These requirements include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) supervision, examination and enforcement by the CFPB with respect to consumer financial protection laws; (ii) enhanced methodologies for the determination of FDIC insurance assessments, which could result in higher assessment rates; (iii) limitations on interchange transaction fees for debit card transactions, which would reduce our interchange revenue; and (iv) adherence to enhanced regulatory and risk management frameworks.
Previous wording
Key provisions from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 are set to expire December 31, 2025. While the recent elections have generally been perceived as a positive for tax policy, any political gridlock regarding the structure of tax policy, the expiration, renewal or reformation of current tax provisions, or the proposal of additional changes to the tax code could present challenges or necessitate strategic changes for our business. Further, such changes, or delays in making crucial tax policy decisions, could have adverse repercussions for both our business and that of our customers.
Current wording
Key provisions from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 were originally set to expire December 31, 2025. However, legislation enacted in 2025 by the current administration, namely the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” made many of these provisions permanent or extended them with modifications. While this has generally been perceived as a positive for tax policy, any political gridlock regarding the structure of tax policy, the expiration, renewal or reformation of current tax provisions, or the proposal of additional changes to the tax code could present challenges or necessitate strategic changes for our business. Further, such changes, or delays in making crucial tax policy decisions, could have adverse repercussions for both our business and that of our customers.
Previous wording
Companies are facing increasing scrutiny from regulators, investors and other stakeholders related to their ESG practices and disclosure. Investor advocacy groups, investment funds and influential investors are also increasingly focused on these practices, especially as they relate to the environment, health and safety, diversity, labor conditions and human rights. Increased ESG-related compliance costs could result in increases to our overall operational costs. New government regulations could also result in new or more stringent forms of ESG oversight and expanding mandatory and voluntary reporting, diligence and disclosure. Additionally, concerns over the long-term impacts of climate change have led and will continue to lead to governmental efforts to mitigate those impacts. Failure to adapt or comply with related legislation, regulatory requirements or investor or stakeholder expectations and standards could negatively impact our reputation, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
While the current administration has a reduced focus on these practices and disclosures, future government regulations could result in new or more stringent forms of ESG oversight and the expansion of mandatory and voluntary reporting, diligence and disclosure. Additionally, concerns over the long-term impacts of climate change have led and will continue to lead to governmental efforts to mitigate those impacts. Failure to adapt or comply with related legislation, regulatory requirements or investor or stakeholder expectations and standards could negatively impact our reputation, financial condition and results of operations.
Rearranged current paragraphs (1)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Companies have faced increased scrutiny from regulators, investors and other stakeholders related to their ESG practices and disclosure over the past several years. Investor advocacy groups, investment funds and influential investors are also increasingly focused on these practices, especially as they relate to the environment, health and safety, diversity, labor conditions and human rights. Any increase in ESG-related compliance costs could result in increases to our overall operational costs.