Laird Superfood Inc

Previous wording

Our business is subject to various risks and uncertainties. Investors should carefully read the following factors as well as the cautionary statements referred to in“Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”* included herein. If any of the risks and uncertainties described below or elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K occur, the Company*’s business, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Current wording

Our business is subject to various risks and uncertainties. Investors should carefully read the following factors as well as the cautionary statements referred to in“Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”* included herein. If any of the risks and uncertainties described below or elsewhere in this Form 10-K occur, the Company*’s business, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Previous wording

We are an early-stage company. We were formed and commenced operations in June 2015. We face all the risks faced by newer companies, including significant competition from existing and emerging competitors, many of which are established and have greater access to capital than we do. In addition, as a new business, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other known and unknown factors. We will need to transition from an early-stage company to a company capable of supporting larger scale commercial activities. If we are not successful in such a transition, our business, results and financial condition will be harmed.

Current wording

We are an early-stage company. We were formed and commenced operations in June 2015. We face all the risks faced by young companies, including significant competition from existing and emerging competitors, many of which are established and have greater access to capital than we do. In addition, as a newer business, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays, and other known and unknown factors. We will need to transition from an early-stage company to a company capable of supporting larger scale commercial activities. If we are not successful in such a transition, our business, results, and financial condition will be harmed.

Previous wording

To date, we have financed our operations through our initial public offering, private placements of our common and preferred stock and borrowings under loan agreements. We have devoted substantially all our financial resources and efforts to developing our products, workforce, building awareness of our brand, and growing retail distribution. Our long-term growth and success are dependent upon our ability to generate cash from operating activities. Although our goal is to generate cash from operations to sustain our expenses into the foreseeable future, and while we have substantially reduced our quarterly cash burn from historic levels as evidenced by generating positive cash flows from operations in the fourth quarter of 2023, there is no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient cash from operations or access the capital we need to grow our business long-term. Our inability to obtain additional capital could have a material adverse effect on our ability to fully implement our business plan and grow our business, to a greater extent than we can with our existing financial resources.

Current wording

We have historically financed our operations through our initial public offering, private placements of our common and preferred stock, borrowings under loan agreements, and, recently, through our core operating activities. We have devoted substantially all our financial resources and efforts to developing our products, workforce, building awareness of our brand, and growing retail distribution. Our long-term growth and success are dependent upon our ability to consistently generate cash from operating activities. Although we have been generating cash from operations over the last 15 months, there is no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient cash from operations or access the capital we need to grow our business long term. Our inability to obtain additional capital could have a material adverse effect on our ability to fully implement our business plan and grow our business, to a greater extent than we can with our existing financial resources.

Previous wording

We may not successfully accomplish any of these objectives, and even if we are successful in growing our revenues, we expect our revenue growth rate will decline as our revenue increases. Since our inception in June 2015, we have not yet demonstrated the ability to achieve profitability at scale. Consequently, any predictions about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history or had previously achieved profitability.

Current wording

We may not successfully accomplish any of these objectives, and even if we are successful in growing our revenues, we expect our revenue growth rate will decline as our revenue increases. Although we have generated positive cash flow during the year ended December 31, 2024, we may not generate positive cash flow in the future. Consequently, considering our limited operating history, any predictions about our future success or viability may not be accurate.

Previous wording

The expansion of our products and customer base has resulted and may continue to result in increases in our overhead and selling expenses. Any increase in expenditures in anticipation of future sales that do not materialize would adversely affect our profitability. In addition, if we are unable to effectively manage the growth of our business, the quality of our products may suffer and we may be unable to address competitive challenges, which would adversely affect our overall business, operations and financial condition.

Current wording

The majority of our direct costs are variable, and we believe that we have headcount to support significant growth. However, any future increases in expenditures in anticipation of future sales that do not materialize could adversely affect our profitability. In addition, if we are unable to effectively manage the growth of our business, the quality of our products may suffer, and we may be unable to address competitive challenges, which would adversely affect our overall business, operations, and financial condition.

Previous wording

Although we achieved profitability and positive cash flow from operations during the three months ended December 31, 2023, we have experienced losses in every period since the company’s inception. We may not be able to sustain free cashflow positive operations in other future periods or be profitable in the future. In 2023 and 2022, we incurred net losses of $10.2 and $40.3 million respectively. Although we significantly decreased our operating expenses in 2023 compared to the prior-year period, over time our operating expenses may increase as we hire additional employees; support our strategic and other customer relationships; innovate and commercialize products; build our brand, expand our marketing channels and drive consumer adoption of our products; increase our customer base, supplier network and co-manufacturing partners and review geographic expansion. These efforts may prove more expensive than we anticipate, and we may not succeed in increasing our revenues and margins sufficiently to offset the anticipated higher expenses. Accordingly, we may not be able to successfully implement our long-term growth strategies or achieve or sustain profitability, and we may incur significant losses for the foreseeable future.

Current wording

Although we achieved positive cash flow during the year ended December 31, 2024, we have not achieved consistent profitability, and in the past, we have experienced significant operating losses. While we are confident in our strategy, we may not be able to sustain free cashflow positive operations in future periods or be profitable in the future. In 2024 and 2023, we incurred operating losses of $2.2 and $10.7 million, respectively. Over time our operating expenses may increase as we hire additional employees, support our strategic and other customer relationships, innovate and commercialize products, build our brand, expand our marketing channels, drive consumer adoption of our products, increase our customer base, supplier network, and co-manufacturing partners and review geographic expansion. These efforts may prove more expensive than we anticipate, and we may not succeed in increasing our revenues and margins sufficiently to offset the anticipated higher expenses. Accordingly, we may not be able to successfully implement our long-term growth strategies or achieve or sustain profitability, and we may incur significant losses for the foreseeable future.

Previous wording

We face significant competition from these and other retailers and producers. Any changes in their merchandising and operational strategies could negatively affect our sales and profitability. In particular, if natural, organic, and functional food and beverage competitors seek to gain or retain market share by reducing prices, we would likely be forced to reduce our prices on similar product offerings in order to remain competitive, which may result in a decrease in our market share, net sales and profitability and may require a change in our operating strategies.

Current wording

The food and beverage industry is very competitive both online and in wholesale markets. We compete with larger retailers with longer histories, greater brand recognition, more resources, and numerous natural and organic producers. Changes in our competitors' strategies or consumer preferences could negatively affect our sales and profitability. Despite our efforts to differentiate ourselves by providing an expanding selection of natural, organic, and functional products, competitive pricing, convenience, and exceptional customer service, some of our competitors have significantly more resources than we do, which may pose significant challenges. For example, if natural, organic, and functional food and beverage competitors seek to gain or retain market share by reducing prices, we would likely be forced to reduce our prices on similar product offerings in order to remain competitive, which may result in a decrease in our market share, net sales and profitability and may require a change in our operating strategies.

Previous wording

We have been able to compete successfully by differentiating ourselves from our competitors by providing an expanding selection of natural, organic, and functional products, competitive pricing, convenience and exceptional customer service. If changes in consumer preferences decrease the competitive advantage attributable to these factors, or if we fail to otherwise positively differentiate our product offering or customer experience from our competitors, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Current wording

If changes in consumer preferences decrease the competitive advantage attributable to these factors, or if we fail to otherwise positively differentiate our product offering or customer experience from our competitors, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Previous wording

The sale of products for human use and consumption involves the risk of injury or illness to consumers. Such injuries may result from inadvertent mislabeling, tampering by unauthorized third parties or product contamination or spoilage. Under certain circumstances, we have in the past been, and may be required to recall or withdraw products, suspend production of our products or cease operations, which may lead to a material adverse effect on our business. For example, in the first quarter of 2023, we discovered a product quality issue with coconut milk powder from one of our suppliers and immediately initiated a voluntary product withdrawal and contacted all impacted wholesaler customers and e-commerce customers to aggressively pull back as much of the affected product as possible. In connection with this withdrawal, we incurred costs associated with inventory obsolescence, quality testing, and remedial discounts and replacement orders of $0.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2022 and $0.1 million in 2023, net of recoveries. In addition, we implemented a robust sensory testing program to prevent future quality issues.

Current wording

The sale of products for human use and consumption involves the risk of injury or illness to consumers. Such injuries may result from inadvertent mislabeling, tampering by unauthorized third parties, deficiencies on behalf of our co-manufacturers, product contamination, or spoilage. Under certain circumstances we have in the past been, and may be required in the future, to recall or withdraw products, suspend production of our products, or cease operations, which may lead to a material adverse effect on our business. For example, in the first quarter of 2023, we discovered a sensory product quality issue with coconut milk powder from one of our suppliers and immediately initiated a voluntary product withdrawal. We contacted all impacted wholesaler customers and e-commerce customers to aggressively pull back as much of the affected product as possible. In connection with this withdrawal, we incurred costs associated with inventory obsolescence, quality testing, remedial discounts and replacement orders, and lost sales due to out of stocks. We implemented a robust sensory testing program to prevent future quality issues.

Previous wording

Even if a situation does not necessitate a recall or market withdrawal, product liability claims might be asserted against us. While we are subject to governmental inspection and regulations and believe our facilities and those of our co-packers and suppliers comply in all material respects with all applicable laws and regulations, if the consumption of any of our products causes, or is alleged to have caused, a health-related illness (such as listeria) or death to a consumer, we may become subject to claims or lawsuits relating to such matters. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused illness or physical harm could cause consumers to lose confidence in the safety and quality of our products. Moreover, claims or liabilities of this type might not be covered by our insurance or by any rights of indemnity or contribution that we may have against others. Although we maintain product liability and product recall insurance in an amount that we believe to be consistent with market practice, we cannot be sure that we will not incur claims or liabilities for which we are not insured or that exceed the amount of our insurance coverage. A product liability judgment against us or a product recall could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Current wording

Even if a situation does not necessitate a recall or market withdrawal, product liability claims might be asserted against us. While we are subject to governmental inspection and regulations and believe our facilities and those of our co-packers and suppliers comply in all material respects with all applicable laws and regulations, if the purchase or consumption of any of our products is alleged to have caused a legally recognizable injury (including financial loss), a health-related illness (such as listeria) or death to a consumer, we may become subject to claims or lawsuits relating to such matters. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused loss, illness, or physical harm could cause consumers to lose confidence in the safety and quality of our products or accuracy of our marketing. Moreover, claims or liabilities of this type might not be covered by our insurance or by any rights of indemnity or contribution that we may have against others, including our co-manufacturers. Although we maintain product liability and product recall insurance in an amount that we believe to be consistent with market practice, we cannot be sure that we will not incur claims or liabilities for which we are not insured or that exceed the amount of our insurance coverage. A product liability judgment against us or a product recall could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Previous wording

We rely on independent third-party certification, such as certifications of our products as “organic” or “Non-GMO” (non-genetically modified organisms), to differentiate our products from others. We must comply with the requirements of independent organizations or certification authorities in order to label our products as certified organic. For example, we can lose our “organic” certification if a manufacturing plant becomes contaminated with non-organic materials, or if it is not properly cleaned after a production run. In addition, all raw materials must be certified organic. The loss of any independent certifications could adversely affect our market position as an organic and natural products company, which could harm our business.

Current wording

We rely on independent third-party certification, such as certifications of our products as “organic” or “Non-GMO” (non-genetically modified organisms), to differentiate our products from others. We must comply with the requirements of independent organizations or certification authorities in order to label our products as certified organic. We must maintain our organic handler certification and ensure that our organic ingredient suppliers hold and maintain necessary certification. For example, we can lose our “organic” certification if a manufacturing plant becomes contaminated with non-organic materials, if it is not adequately cleaned after a production run, or we mislabel a product as “organic.” In addition, all raw materials must be certified organic. The loss of any independent certifications could adversely affect our market position as an organic and natural products company, which could harm our business. Additionally, if any of our third-party certifiers are subject to compliance or legal issues or negative publicity, our reputation and business could be harmed by our association with such entity.

Previous wording

Agricultural products are vulnerable to adverse weather conditions, including severe rains, drought and temperature extremes, floods and windstorms, which are quite common but difficult to predict. Agricultural products also are vulnerable to crop disease and to pests, which may vary in severity and effect, depending on the stage of production at the time of infection or infestation, the type of treatment applied and climatic conditions. Unfavorable growing conditions caused by these factors can reduce both crop size and crop quality and, in extreme cases, entire harvests may be lost. Additionally, because approximately 67% of our inventory is concentrated in one geographical location by co-manufacturing and third-party logistics partners, adverse weather or natural disasters, including fires, earthquakes, winter storms, droughts, or volcanic events could result in significant costs and meaningfully reduce our capacity to fulfill orders and maintain normal business operations. These factors may result in lower sales volume and increased costs due increased costs of products. Incremental costs, including transportation, may also be incurred if we need to find alternate short-term supplies of products from alternative areas. These factors can increase costs, decrease revenues and lead to additional charges to earnings, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

Agricultural products are vulnerable to adverse weather conditions, including severe rains, drought and temperature extremes, floods, and windstorms, which are quite common but difficult to predict. Agricultural products also are vulnerable to crop disease and to pests, which may vary in severity and effect, depending on the stage of production at the time of infection or infestation, the type of treatment applied and climatic conditions. Unfavorable growing conditions caused by these factors can reduce both crop size and crop quality and, in extreme cases, entire harvests may be lost. Additionally, as of December 31, 2024, because approximately 71% of our inventory was concentrated in one geographical area by co-manufacturing and third-party logistics partners, adverse weather, or natural disasters, including fires, earthquakes, winter storms, droughts, or volcanic events could result in significant costs and meaningfully reduce our capacity to fulfill orders and maintain normal business operations. These factors may result in lower sales volume and increased costs due increased costs of products. Incremental costs, including transportation, may also be incurred if we need to find alternate short-term supplies of products from alternative areas. These factors can increase costs, decrease revenues and lead to additional charges to earnings, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Previous wording

We rely on suppliers and vendors to meet our high-quality standards and supply products in a timely and efficient manner. There is, however, no assurance that quality natural and organic products will continue to be available to meet our specific and growing needs. This may be due to, among other reasons, problems with our suppliers’ and vendors’ businesses, finances, labor relations, ability to export materials, international shipping delays, product quality issues, costs, production, crop yields, insurance, and reputation, as well as disease outbreaks or pandemics such as the COVID-19 pandemic, acts of war, terrorism, natural disasters, fires, earthquakes, flooding or other catastrophic occurrences. If for any reason our suppliers or vendors became unable or unwilling to continue to provide services to us, this would likely lead to a temporary interruption in our ability to import our products until we found another entity that could provide these services. Failure to find a suitable replacement, even on a temporary basis, would have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet our current production targets, make it difficult to grow and would hurt our results of operations.

Current wording

We rely on suppliers and vendors to meet our high-quality standards and supply products in a timely and efficient manner. Although we work with multiple suppliers for each of our key raw materials, there is no assurance that quality natural and organic products will continue to be available to meet our specific and growing needs. This may be due to, among other reasons, problems with our suppliers’ and vendors’ businesses, finances, labor relations, ability to export materials, international shipping delays, product quality issues, costs, production, crop yields, insurance, and reputation, as well as disease outbreaks or pandemics, acts of war, terrorism, natural disasters, fires, earthquakes, flooding or other catastrophic occurrences. If for any reason our suppliers or vendors became unable or unwilling to continue to provide services to us, this would likely lead to a temporary interruption in our ability to import our products until we found another entity that could provide these services. Failure to find a suitable replacement, even on a temporary basis, would have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet our current production targets, make it difficult to grow and would hurt our results of operations.

Previous wording

We are reliant on Laird Hamilton and Gabrielle Reece to develop new products and market our brand.

Current wording

We rely on our founders, Laird Hamilton and Gabrielle Reece.

Previous wording

Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Reece may engage in outside business activities from time to time, including the XPT Extreme Performance Training brand, Laird Apparel and various endorsement opportunities. These activities may interfere with the respective time and attention Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Reece can devote to the Company’s business and affairs, which could have a material and adverse effect on the business. Also, we have entered only limited non-competition and non-solicitation agreements with Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Reece, which makes us vulnerable to competition from them. These conflicts of interest may result in the loss of business opportunities, which may materially and adversely affect our prospects, business advantage, financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Reece may engage in outside business activities from time to time, including the XPT Extreme Performance Training brand, Laird Apparel, and various endorsement opportunities. These activities may interfere with the respective time and attention Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Reece can devote to the Company’s business and affairs, which could have a material and adverse effect on the business. We have also entered into limited non-competition and non-solicitation agreements with Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Reece, which makes us vulnerable to competition from them. These conflicts of interest may result in the loss of business opportunities, which may materially and adversely affect our prospects, business advantage, financial condition, and results of operations.

Previous wording

We sell a substantial portion of our products through retailers such as Costco, through distributors such as United Natural Foods, Inc. and KeHE Distributors, and online throughAmazon.com, and we depend on these third parties to sell our products to consumers.

Current wording

We sell a substantial portion of our products through retailers such as Costco, through distributors such as United Natural Foods, Inc. and KeHE Distributors, and online through Amazon, and we depend on these third parties to sell our products to consumers.

Previous wording

The loss of, or business disruption at, one or more of these retailers or distributors or a negative change in our relationship with Costco orAmazon.com or a disruption toAmazon.com as a sales channel could have a material adverse effect on our business. If we do not maintain our relationship with existing retailers and distributors or develop relationships with new retailers and distributors, the growth of our business may be adversely affected, and our business may be harmed.

Current wording

The loss of, or business disruption at, one or more of these retailers or distributors or a negative change in our relationship with Costco or Amazon or a disruption to Amazon as a sales channel could have a material adverse effect on our business. If we do not maintain our relationship with existing retailers and distributors or develop relationships with new retailers and distributors, the growth of our business may be adversely affected, and our business may be harmed.

Previous wording

We are not the exclusive seller of our products into e-commerce channels, such asAmazon.com, and face competition in that channel from resellers of our products. Further, the terms of our agreements with these distributors allow us to plan for the future, maintain growth and strengthen our relationships with key customers. If we are required to obtain additional or alternative distribution agreements or arrangements in the future, we cannot be certain that we will be able to do so on satisfactory terms or in a timely manner. Our inability to enter into satisfactory distribution agreements may inhibit our ability to implement our business plan or to establish markets necessary to expand the distribution of our products successfully.

Current wording

We are not the exclusive seller of our products into e-commerce channels, such as Amazon, and face competition in that channel from resellers of our products. Further, the terms of our agreements with these distributors allow us to plan for the future, maintain growth and strengthen our relationships with key customers. If we are required to obtain additional or alternative distribution agreements or arrangements in the future, we cannot be certain that we will be able to do so on satisfactory terms or in a timely manner. Our inability to enter into satisfactory distribution agreements may inhibit our ability to implement our business plan or to establish markets necessary to expand the distribution of our products successfully.

Previous wording

These laws and regulations affect various aspects of our business. For example, certain food ingredient products manufactured by Laird Superfood are regulated under the United States Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), as administered by the FDA. Under the FDCA, pre-marketing approval by the FDA is required for the sale of a food ingredient which is a food additive unless the substance is generally recognized as safe, under the conditions of its intended use by qualified experts in food safety. We believe that most food ingredients in our products are generally recognized as safe. However, this status cannot be determined until actual formulations and uses are finalized. As a result, we may be adversely affected if the FDA determines that our food ingredient products do not meet the criteria for generally recognized as safe.

Current wording

These laws and regulations affect various aspects of our business. For example, certain food ingredient products manufactured by Laird Superfood are regulated under the United States Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), as administered by the FDA. Under the FDCA, pre-marketing approval by the FDA is required for the sale of a food ingredient which is a food additive unless the substance is generally recognized as safe, under the conditions of its intended use by qualified experts in food safety. We believe that most food ingredients in our products are generally recognized as safe. However, this status cannot be determined for some ingredients until actual formulations and uses are finalized. As a result, we may be adversely affected if the FDA determines that our food ingredient products do not meet the criteria for generally recognized as safe. Food and beverage products that contain unapproved ingredients that are not generally recognized as safe may be considered to be adulterated under the FDCA, which could result in market withdrawal or recall of such product or other enforcement actions. There is increasing government and public scrutiny on food additives and ingredients, and it is possible that the regulations governing the ingredients in our products could change, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Previous wording

The regulations to which we are subject are complex and have tended to become more stringent over time. Regulatory changes could result in restrictions on our ability to carry on or expand our operations, higher than anticipated costs or lower than anticipated sales. The failure to comply with applicable regulations could jeopardize our ability to sell our products and result in enforcement actions and third-party lawsuits such as:

Current wording

Overall, regulatory changes could result in restrictions on our ability to carry on or expand our operations, higher than anticipated costs or lower than anticipated sales. The failure to comply with applicable regulations could jeopardize our ability to sell our products and result in enforcement actions and third-party lawsuits such as:

Previous wording

Any of these sanctions could result in higher than anticipated costs or lower than anticipated sales and harm our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also be required to take corrective actions, such as installing additional equipment or taking other actions, each of which could require us to make substantial capital expenditures. In addition, we could be required to indemnify our employees in connection with any expenses or liabilities that they may incur individually in connection with regulatory action against them. As a result, our future business prospects could deteriorate due to regulatory constraints, and our profitability could be impaired by our obligation to provide such indemnification to our employees.

Current wording

Any of these sanctions could result in higher than anticipated costs or lower than anticipated sales and harm our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also be required to take corrective actions, such as reformulating, or relabeling our products, or taking other actions, which could require us to make substantial capital expenditures. In addition, we could be required to indemnify our employees in connection with any expenses or liabilities that they may incur individually in connection with regulatory action against them. As a result, our future business prospects could deteriorate due to regulatory constraints, and our profitability could be impaired by our obligation to provide such indemnification to our employees.

Previous wording

Litigation and regulatory enforcement concerning marketing and labeling of food products could adversely affect our business and reputation.

Current wording

Regulatory enforcement concerning marketing and labeling of food or dietary supplement products could adversely affect our business and reputation.

Previous wording

Products that we sell carry claims as to their origin, ingredients or health benefits, including, by way of example, the use of the term “natural”, “functional”, or “healthy”, or similar synonyms or implied statements relating to such benefits. Although the FDA and the USDA each has issued statements regarding the appropriate use of the word “natural,” there is no single, United States government regulated definition of the term “natural” for use in the food industry, which is true for many other adjectives common in the better-for-you and functionally focused food industry. The resulting uncertainty has led to consumer confusion, distrust and legal challenges. Plaintiffs have commenced legal actions against several food companies that market “natural” products, asserting false, misleading and deceptive advertising and labeling claims, including claims related to genetically modified ingredients. In limited circumstances, the FDA has taken regulatory action against products labeled “natural” but that nonetheless contain synthetic ingredients or components. Should we become subject to similar claims, consumers may avoid purchasing products from us or seek alternatives, even if the basis for the claim is unfounded. Adverse publicity about these matters may discourage consumers from buying our products. The cost of defending against any such claims could be significant. Any loss of confidence on the part of consumers in the truthfulness of our labeling or ingredient claims would be difficult and costly to overcome and may significantly reduce our brand value. Any of these events could adversely affect our reputation and brand and decrease our sales, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

Products that we sell carry claims as to their origin, ingredients, or health benefits, including, by way of example, the use of the term “natural,” “functional,” or “healthy,” or similar synonyms or implied statements relating to such benefits. Although the FDA and the USDA each has issued statements regarding the appropriate use of the word “natural,” there is no single, United States government regulated definition of the term “natural” for use in the food industry, which is true for many other adjectives common in the better-for-you and functionally focused food industry. The resulting uncertainty has led to consumer confusion, distrust, and legal challenges. Plaintiffs have commenced legal actions against several food companies that market “natural” products, asserting false, misleading, and deceptive advertising and labeling claims, including claims related to genetically modified ingredients, preservatives, allegedly synthetic ingredients, contaminants such as heavy metals or microplastics, environmental impact, and other claims. In limited circumstances, the FDA has taken regulatory action against products labeled “natural” but that nonetheless contain synthetic ingredients or components. Should we become subject to similar claims, consumers may avoid purchasing products from us or seek alternatives, even if the basis for the claim is unfounded. Adverse publicity about these matters may discourage consumers from buying our products. The cost of defending against any such claims could be significant. Any loss of confidence on the part of consumers in the truthfulness of our labeling or ingredient claims would be difficult and costly to overcome and may significantly reduce our brand value. Any of these events could adversely affect our reputation and brand and decrease our sales, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

Similarly, certain USDA regulations set forth the minimum standards producers must meet in order to have their products labeled as “certified organic,” and we currently manufacture several organic products that are covered by these regulations. While we believe our products and our supply chain are in compliance with these regulations, changes to food regulations may increase our costs to remain in compliance. We could lose our “organic” certification if a facility becomes contaminated with non-organic ingredients, if we do not use raw materials that are certified organic, or if key ingredients used in our products are no longer allowed to be used in food certified as “organic.” The loss of our “organic” certifications could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Current wording

Similarly, certain USDA regulations set forth the minimum standards producers must meet in order to have their products labeled as “certified organic,” and we currently manufacture several organic products that are covered by these regulations. While we believe our products and our supply chain are in compliance with these regulations, changes to food regulations may increase our costs to remain in compliance. We could lose our “organic” certification if a facility becomes contaminated with non-organic ingredients, if we do not use raw materials that are certified organic, or if key ingredients used in our products are no longer allowed to be used in food certified as “organic.” The loss of our “organic” certifications and subsequent ineligibility period could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Previous wording

In addition, the USDA has proposed a rule requiring disclosure of the use of genetic engineering in manufacturing a product or an ingredient used in a product. The rule has not been finalized, and we are unable to predict with certainty what the final requirements will be. If the USDA issues bioengineering disclosure regulations inconsistent with our practices, the resulting changes in labeling could adversely affect customer acceptance of our product and materially and adversely affect our business.

Current wording

In addition, the USDA requires disclosure of the use of genetic engineering in manufacturing a product or an ingredient used in a product. We believe we are in material compliance with the mandatory bioengineering food disclosure standard. If the USDA determines our practices are inconsistent with the bioengineering disclosure regulations, it may be necessary to make changes in our labeling and we could face enforcement actions, either or both of which could adversely affect customer acceptance of our product and materially and adversely affect our business.

Previous wording

Our reputation could suffer from real or perceived issues involving the labeling or marketing of our products.

Current wording

Our reputation could suffer from real or perceived issues involving regulatory enforcement or litigation concerning the marketing or labeling of our products.

Previous wording

The marketing and labeling of any food product in recent years has brought increased risk that consumers will bring class action lawsuits and that the FTC and/or state attorneys general will bring legal action concerning the truth and accuracy of the marketing and labeling of the product. Examples of causes of action that may be asserted in a consumer class action lawsuit include fraud, unfair trade practices and breach of state consumer protection statutes. The FTC and/or state attorneys general may bring legal action that seeks removal of a product from the marketplace and impose fines and penalties. Even when unmerited, class claims, action by the FTC or state attorneys general enforcement actions can be expensive to defend and adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and consumers and our corporate and brand image, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Current wording

The marketing and labeling of any food product in recent years has brought increased risk that consumers will bring class action lawsuits and that the FTC and/or state attorneys general will bring legal action concerning the truth and accuracy of the marketing and labeling of the product. Examples of causes of action that may be asserted in a consumer class action lawsuit include fraud, unfair trade practices and breach of state consumer protection statutes. The FTC and/or state attorneys general may bring legal action that seeks removal of a product from the marketplace and impose fines and penalties. Even when unmerited, class claims, action by the FTC or state attorneys general enforcement actions can be expensive to defend and adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and consumers and our corporate and brand image, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Additionally, we may have to enter settlement agreements to resolve such claims, even when unmerited, which could result in restrictions to our product offering, labeling, or advertising in addition to a sizeable cash payment or other remedies sought by the plaintiffs.

Previous wording

The FTC revised its Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising (the “Guides”), which became effective on December 1, 2009. Although the Guides are not binding, they explain how the FTC interprets Section 5 of the FTC Act’s prohibition on unfair or deceptive acts or practices. Consequently, the FTC could bring a Section 5 enforcement action based on practices that are inconsistent with the Guides. Under the revised Guides, advertisements that feature a consumer and convey his or her atypical experience with a product or service are required to clearly disclose the results that consumers can generally expect. In contrast to the 1980 version of the Guides, which allowed advertisers to describe atypical results in a testimonial as long as they included a disclaimer such as “results not typical,” the revised Guides no longer contain such a safe harbor. The revised Guides also add new examples to illustrate the long-standing principle that “material connections” between advertisers and endorsers (such as payments or free products), connections that consumers might not expect, must be disclosed. While we do request that public persons who we engage as paid advertisers, or provide samples of product to, disclose their relationship with us prior to sharing on social media or other endorsement, we cannot ensure all recipients comply with this request and we do not regularly monitor what they post on social media. If we were held responsible for the content of their posts on social media or other endorsements, we could be forced to alter our practices. We have continually adapted our marketing efforts to be compliant with the revised Guides. However, it is possible that our use, and that of our employees, of testimonials in the advertising and promotion of our products will be significantly impacted and therefore might negatively affect our sales.

Current wording

We have continually adapted our marketing efforts to be compliant with the Endorsement Guides, as they are periodically revised. However, it is possible that our use, and that of our employees, of testimonials in the advertising and promotion of our products could be significantly impacted by enforcement or litigation, which might negatively affect our sales.

Previous wording

In addition to the federal regulatory issues listed above, there are a growing number of state regulations that might impair our ability to operate and avoid interruption. For example, California currently enforces legislation commonly referred to as “Proposition 65” that requires that “clear and reasonable” warnings be given to consumers who are exposed to chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity. Although we seek to comply with the requirements of Proposition 65, as well as to educate our customers regarding the substance of Proposition 65 and the relative metals contents in various natural foods, there can be no assurance that we will not be adversely affected by litigation or other actions relating to Proposition 65 or future legislation that is similar or related thereto. Also, the Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010 in California requires us to audit our vendors with respect to risks of human trafficking and slavery and mitigate these risks in our operations. Any failure to disclose issues or other non-compliance could subject us to action by the California Attorney General or other regulatory authorities. Increased compliance costs associated with operating in California and other states could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

In addition to the federal regulatory issues listed above, there are a growing number of state regulations that might impair our ability to operate and avoid interruption. For example, California currently enforces legislation commonly referred to as “Proposition 65” that requires that “clear and reasonable” warnings be given to consumers who are exposed to chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity. Although we seek to comply with the requirements of Proposition 65, as well as to educate our customers regarding the substance of Proposition 65 and the relative metals contents in various natural foods, there can be no assurance that we will not be adversely affected by litigation or other actions relating to Proposition 65 or future legislation that is similar or related thereto.

Previous wording

As a public company, and particularly after we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the listing requirements of the NYSE American and other applicable securities rules and regulations impose various requirements on public companies. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to compliance with these requirements. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, these rules and regulations have made it more expensive for us to obtain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, which could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors. We cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we will incur as a public company or the timing of such costs, however such costs may be material to our business.

Current wording

As a public company, and particularly after we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” we may incur significant legal, accounting, and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the listing requirements of the NYSE American and other applicable securities rules and regulations impose various requirements on public companies. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to compliance with these requirements. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly.

Previous wording

Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE American. We must meet certain financial and liquidity criteria to maintain the listing of our common stock on the NYSE American. If we fail to meet any listing standards or if we violate any listing requirements, our common stock may be delisted. A delisting of our common stock from the NYSE American may materially impair our stockholders’ ability to buy and sell our common stock and could have an adverse effect on the market price of, and the efficiency of the trading market for, our common stock. The delisting of our common stock could significantly impair our ability to raise capital and the value of your investment.

Current wording

Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE American. We must meet certain financial and liquidity criteria to maintain the listing of our common stock on the NYSE American. If we fail to meet any listing standards or if we violate any listing requirements, our common stock may be delisted. A delisting of our common stock from the NYSE American may materially impair our shareholders’ ability to buy and sell our common stock and could have an adverse effect on the market price of, and the efficiency of the trading market for, our common stock. The delisting of our common stock could significantly impair our ability to raise capital and the value of your investment.

Previous wording

In addition, we are subject to Nevada's Combination with Interested Shareholders Statute (Nevada Revised Statutes 74.411 - 74.444), which prohibits an interested stockholder from entering into a "combination" with the corporation, unless certain conditions are met. These provisions are expected to discourage certain types of coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of our company to first negotiate with our Boad. These provisions may delay or prevent someone from acquiring or merging with us, which may cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Current wording

In addition, we are subject to Nevada's Combination with Interested Shareholders Statute (Nevada Revised Statutes 74.411 - 74.444), which prohibits an interested stockholder from entering into a "combination" with the corporation, unless certain conditions are met. These provisions are expected to discourage certain types of coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of our company to first negotiate with our Board. These provisions may delay or prevent someone from acquiring or merging with us, which may cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Previous wording

Our articles of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forums for substantially all disputes between us and our shareholders, which could limit our shareholders’*** ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees.***

Current wording

Our articles of incorporation provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forums for substantially all disputes between us and our shareholders, which could limit our shareholders’*** ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees.***

Previous wording

Despite becoming a Nevada corporation as of December 31, 2023, our articles of incorporation retain the provision that provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for:

Current wording

Despite being a Nevada corporation, our articles of incorporation include a provision that provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for:

Previous wording

In addition, our articles of incorporation provides that the federal district courts of the United States will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum. This exclusive forum provision does not apply to claims under the Exchange Act.

Current wording

In addition, our articles of incorporation provide that the federal district courts of the United States will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum. This exclusive forum provision does not apply to claims under the Exchange Act.