Skip to main content

CASSAVA SCIENCES INC

For the period ended Sep 30, 2024. Filed Nov 7, 2024.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Sep 30, 2024 · Filed Nov 7, 2024

FLNA$0.45+0.4%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 14 previous paragraphs and 15 current paragraphs.

10 unchanged; 3 reworded; 1 added; 0 removed; 1 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (1)

Current report

In addition, another objective of the Phase 2b Study was to measure changes in cognitive outcome measures using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, or CANTAB, over the 28-day study period. In connection with our settlement with the SEC, the SEC’s complaint alleged, among other things, that disclosures relating to the Phase 2b Study’s cognition results (the “Cognition Disclosures”), which reported results from apost hoc sensitivity analysis, were inadequate and misleading.
Reworded paragraphs (3)

Previous wording

The validity of CSF biomarker assays and bioanalysis conducted by CUNY for the Company’s Phase 2b Study has been called into question.

Current wording

The validity of aspects of ** the Company**’s Phase 2b Study has been called into question.

Previous wording

As part of the Internal Investigation being conducted by the Ad Hoc Investigation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, the Committee is evaluating information contained in the DOJ indictment of Dr. Wang as well as information from the Company’s ongoing discussions with the SEC. To date, the Internal Investigation has determined that certain statistical information contained in an attachment to an email sent by a former senior employee of Cassava to Dr. Wang before the CUNY Bioanalysis of CSF biomarkers was conducted could have been used to unblind him as to some number of Phase 2b Study participants. Unblinded information, if accessed in connection with bioanalysis, could be improperly utilized to manipulate underlying samples or data to skew reported results.

Current wording

As part of the Internal Investigation being conducted by the Ad Hoc Investigation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, the Committee has evaluated information contained in the DOJ indictment of Dr. Wang as well as information from the Company’s discussions with the SEC. To date, the Internal Investigation has determined that certain statistical information contained in an attachment to an email sent by a former senior employee of Cassava to Dr. Wang before the CUNY Bioanalysis of CSF biomarkers was conducted could have been used to unblind him as to some number of Phase 2b Study participants. Unblinded information, if accessed in connection with bioanalysis, could be improperly utilized to manipulate underlying samples or data to skew reported results.

Previous wording

The Internal Investigation has not, to date, determined, and may never be able to determine with any reasonable degree of certainty, whether Dr. Wang unblinded himself as to some number of Phase 2b Study participants. Nevertheless, the fact that Dr. Wang possessed information that could have been used to so unblind himself, together with the allegations in the DOJ indictment, undermine the blinded study design and create substantial uncertainty about the validity of the CUNY Bioanalysis of CSF biomarkers. There can be no assurance that such uncertainty will not adversely impact the FDA’s review of an NDA with respect to simufilam following completion of our Phase 3 clinical studies or cause the FDA to request additional information regarding simufilam.

Current wording

The Internal Investigation has not, to date, determined, and may never be able to determine with any reasonable degree of certainty, whether Dr. Wang unblinded himself as to some number of Phase 2b Study participants. Nevertheless, the fact that Dr. Wang possessed information that could have been used to so unblind himself, together with the allegations in the DOJ indictment, undermine the blinded study design and create substantial uncertainty about the validity of the CUNY Bioanalysis of CSF biomarkers.
Rearranged current paragraphs (1)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Accordingly, in light of the foregoing uncertainties and allegations, you should not rely on the CUNY Bioanalysis of CSF biomarkers reported by the Company in connection with the Phase 2b Study or the Cognition Disclosures from the Phase 2b Study. There can be no assurance that such uncertainties and allegations will not adversely impact the FDA’s review of an NDA with respect to simufilam following completion of our Phase 3 clinical studies or cause the FDA to request additional information regarding simufilam.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Accordingly, in light of the foregoing uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on the CUNY Bioanalysis of CSF biomarkers reported by the Company in connection with the Phase 2b Study.