Iridium Communications Inc.
For the period ended Sep 30, 2025. Filed Oct 23, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Sep 30, 2025 · Filed Oct 23, 2025
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-06-30; filed 2025-07-24.
0001628280-25-035835
Item 1A. Risk FactorsUnregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of ProceedsDefaults Upon Senior SecuritiesMine Safety DisclosuresCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-09-30; filed 2025-10-23.
0001418819-25-000009
Item 1A. Risk FactorsUnregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of ProceedsDefaults Upon Senior SecuritiesMine Safety DisclosuresThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 9 previous paragraphs and 17 current paragraphs.
8 unchanged; 0 reworded; 9 added; 1 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 1 previous and 1 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (9)
Current report
Our business is subject to risks and events that, if they occur, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and the trading price of our securities. In addition to the other information set forth in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the factors described in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2025, as supplemented by the following.
Current report
We could lose market share and revenue as a result of increasing competition from companies in the wireless communications industry, including cellular and other satellite operators, and from the extension of land-based communications services.
Current report
We face intense competition in all of our markets, which could result in a loss of customers and lower revenue and make it more difficult for us to enter new markets. We compete primarily on the basis of coverage, quality, portability, and pricing of services and products.
Current report
The provision of satellite-based services and products is subject to downward price pressure when capacity exceeds demand or as a result of aggressive discounting by some operators under financial pressure to expand their respective market share. In addition, we may face competition from new competitors, new technologies, or new equipment, including new and proposed LEO constellations and satellite direct-to-device services. For example, in September 2025, SpaceX signed an agreement to acquire certain rights and licenses to an aggregate 50MHz of S-band spectrum, and announced plans to develop a global satellite direct-to-device service using the acquired spectrum. Although development of such a direct-to-device service using the acquired spectrum faces regulatory, technical and business hurdles, if successfully deployed, it could significantly increase competition to portions of our business. In addition, we may face competition for our services in the United States from service providers with ancillary terrestrial component, or ATC, authorities who are designing a satellite operating business and a terrestrial component around their spectrum holdings. Finally, some of our competitors have announced plans for the launch of additional satellites. As a result of competition, we may not be able to successfully retain our existing customers and attract new customers.
Current report
In addition to our satellite-based competitors, terrestrial voice and data service providers, both wireline and wireless, could further expand into rural and remote areas and provide the same general types of services and products that we provide through our satellite-based system. Although satellite communications services and terrestrial communications services are not entirely interchangeable, the two compete in some markets and for some services. Consumers generally perceive terrestrial wireless voice communication products and services as cheaper and more convenient than those that are satellite-based. Many of our terrestrial competitors have greater resources, wider name recognition and newer technologies than we do. In addition, industry consolidation could negatively affect our competitive position by increasing the scale or scope of our competitors, thereby making it more difficult for us to compete in various market segments.
Current report
Our agreements with U.S. government customers, particularly the DoD, which represent a significant portion of our revenue, are subject to termination and renewal.
Current report
The U.S. government, through a dedicated gateway owned and operated by the DoD, has been and continues to be, directly and indirectly, our largest customer, representing 27% and 25% of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. We provide the majority of our services to the U.S. government pursuant to our EMSS, SDA, and EMSS capabilities and security sustainment services (“ECS3”) contracts. We entered into these contracts in September 2019, May 2022, and March 2024, respectively. The EMSS contract continues through September 2026 with one six-month extension option exercisable at the election of the U.S. government; the SDA contract had a base term until January 2025, and we are currently in the first of up to five one-year options exercisable at the election of the U.S. government to extend the term; and the ECS3 contract had a base term through March 2025, and we are currently in the first of up to four one-year extension options exercisable at the election of the U.S. government. The U.S. government may terminate these agreements, in whole or in part, at any time for its convenience. Our relationship with the U.S. government is also subject to the overall U.S. government policies, budget and appropriation decisions and processes. U.S. government budget and policy decisions, including with respect to defense spending, are based on government priorities and objectives, which are subject to change and are driven by numerous factors, including administration changes, geopolitical events and macroeconomic conditions, and are beyond our control. If the U.S. government terminates any or all of these agreements, we would lose a significant portion of our revenue.
Current report
In addition to budget policy uncertainty, government shutdowns, the use of continuing resolutions, and the federal debt ceiling could adversely affect the funding for our U.S. government contracts or entering into new contracts, including renewals. For example, if the current government shutdown, which began October 1, 2025, continues for an extended period of time, we could experience a delay or suspension of funding for our U.S. government contracts and delay on new contract awards, which could disrupt our cash flows.
Current report
Further, operational control of some of our contracts has been moved from the Defense Information Systems Agency to the U.S. Space Force. In connection with this operational shift, changes in internal pricing and cost recovery have resulted in reduced subscribers under the EMSS contract. Lower subscriber use may negatively affect our ability to negotiate a renewal of the EMSS contract on favorable terms in 2026, which could reduce our revenue from that contract.
Removed paragraphs (1)
Previous report
There have been no material changes from the risk factors described in the Annual Report.