FORUM ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES INC

Previous wording

•We have incurred impairment charges and we may incur additional impairment charges in the future.

Current wording

•During the year ended December 31, 2024, we incurred impairment charges and we may incur additional impairment charges in the future.

Previous wording

•ability or willingness of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) and other major producers to set and maintain production limits;

Current wording

•ability or willingness of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and other allied producing countries (“OPEC+”) and other major producers to set and maintain production limits;

Previous wording

The oil and natural gas industry has historically experienced periodic reductions in the overall level of exploration and development activities in connection with declines in commodity prices. As a result, there are periodic reductions in the demand for our products and services, downward pressure on the prices that we charge and ultimately an adverse impact on our business. Although during 2022 and 2023, oil and gas prices and demand increased significantly from the historic lows seen in the first half of 2020, it is uncertain whether prices will maintain current levels, decline or increase. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the demand or pricing for oil and natural gas will follow historic patterns, including as a result of increased availability of alternative energy sources. Declines in oil and natural gas prices, decreased levels of exploration, development, and production activity, use of alternative sources of energy, and the willingness of customers to invest in their equipment relative to historical norms may negatively affect:

Current wording

The oil and natural gas industry has historically experienced periodic reductions in the overall level of exploration and development activities in connection with declines in commodity prices. As a result, there are periodic reductions in the demand for our products and services, downward pressure on the prices that we charge and ultimately an adverse impact on our business. Although during 2023 and 2024, oil and gas prices and demand remained relatively steady, it is uncertain whether prices will maintain current levels, decline or increase. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the demand or pricing for oil and natural gas will follow historic patterns, including as a result of increased availability of alternative energy sources. Declines in oil and natural gas prices, decreased levels of exploration, development, and production activity, use of alternative sources of energy, and the willingness of customers to invest in their equipment relative to historical norms may negatively affect:

Previous wording

The EPA has asserted federal authority over hydraulic fracturing using fluids that contain “diesel fuel” under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”) Underground Injection Control Program and has issued permitting guidance for hydraulic fracturing operations involving the use of diesel fuel in fracturing fluids in those states where the EPA is the permitting authority. Additionally, in March 2015, the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) issued final rules, including new requirements relating to public disclosure, wellbore integrity and handling of flowback water, to regulate hydraulic fracturing on federal and Indian lands. These rules were rescinded by rule in December 2017; however, in January 2018, California and a coalition of environmental groups filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of California to challenge the BLM’s rescission of the rules. The Northern District of California upheld the rescission in 2020, but this decision was then appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. This litigation is ongoing and future implementation of the BLM rules is uncertain at this time.

Current wording

The EPA has asserted federal authority over hydraulic fracturing using fluids that contain “diesel fuel” under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”) Underground Injection Control Program and has issued permitting guidance for hydraulic fracturing operations involving the use of diesel fuel in fracturing fluids in those states where the EPA is the permitting authority. Additionally, in March 2015, the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) issued final rules, including new requirements relating to public disclosure, wellbore integrity and handling of flowback water, to regulate hydraulic fracturing on federal and Indian lands. These rules were rescinded by rule in December 2017; however, in January 2018, California and a coalition of environmental groups filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of California to challenge the BLM’s rescission of the rules. The Northern District of California upheld the rescission in 2020, but this decision was then appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. These challenges remain ongoing and future implementation of the BLM rules is uncertain at this time.

Previous wording

In past sessions, Congress has considered, but not passed, the adoption of legislation to provide for federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing under the SDWA and to require disclosure of the chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process. Some states have adopted, and other states are considering adopting, legal requirements that could impose more stringent permitting, public disclosure or well construction requirements on hydraulic fracturing activities or impose bans or moratoria on these activities altogether. Local governments also may seek to adopt ordinances within their jurisdictions regulating the time, place and manner of drilling activities in general or hydraulic fracturing activities in particular, in some cases banning hydraulic fracturing entirely. For example, the Colorado state legislature passed a package of hydraulic fracturing regulations in April 2019. Under the new law, the state oil and natural gas agency must review well locations for environmental protection criteria. In addition, the legislation broadened the authority for local governments to further regulate or restrict hydraulic fracturing. In April 2021, the California Governor’s Office directed state regulators to end the issuance of new permits for hydraulic fracturing by January 2024. In February 2018, the Oklahoma Corporation Commission released a protocol that requires operators to suspend hydraulic fracturing well completion operations in response to certain levels of seismic activity.

Current wording

In past sessions, Congress has considered, but not passed, the adoption of legislation to provide for federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing under the SDWA and to require disclosure of the chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process. Some states have adopted, and other states are considering adopting, legal requirements that could impose more stringent permitting, public disclosure or well construction requirements on hydraulic fracturing activities or impose bans or moratoria on these activities altogether. Local governments also may seek to adopt ordinances within their jurisdictions regulating the time, place and manner of drilling activities in general or hydraulic fracturing activities in particular, in some cases banning hydraulic fracturing entirely. For example, the Colorado state legislature passed a package of hydraulic fracturing regulations in April 2019. Under the new law, the state oil and natural gas agency must review well locations for environmental protection criteria. In addition, the legislation broadened the authority for local governments to further regulate or restrict hydraulic fracturing. In April 2021, the California Governor’s Office directed state regulators to end the issuance of new permits for hydraulic fracturing, rules effective October 2024. In February 2018, the Oklahoma Corporation Commission released a protocol that requires operators to suspend hydraulic fracturing well completion operations in response to certain levels of seismic activity.

Previous wording

In January 2021, President Biden signed an executive order that, among other things, instructed the Secretary of the Interior to pause new oil and natural gas leases on public lands or in offshore waters pending completion of a comprehensive review and reconsideration of federal oil and natural gas permitting and leasing practices. Following that executive order, the acting Secretary of the Interior issued an order imposing a 60 day pause on the issuance of new leases, permits and right-of-way grants for oil and gas drilling on federal lands, unless approved by senior officials at the Department of the Interior. In March 2021, prior to the expiration of the Secretary of the Interior’s order, President Biden announced that career staff at the Department of the Interior would resume processing oil and gas drilling permits. In August 2022, a federal judge for the U.S. District Court of the Western District of Louisiana issued a permanent injunction against the pause of oil and natural gas leasing on public lands or in offshore waters of the thirteen plaintiff states that brought the lawsuit, which followed a June 2021 nationwide preliminary injunction by the district court that was subsequently vacated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The full impact of these federal actions remains unclear, and if other restrictions or prohibitions become effective in the future, they could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Current wording

In January 2021, President Biden signed an executive order that, among other things, instructed the Secretary of the Interior to pause new oil and natural gas leases on public lands or in offshore waters pending completion of a comprehensive review and reconsideration of federal oil and natural gas permitting and leasing practices. Following that executive order, the acting Secretary of the Interior issued an order imposing a 60 day pause on the issuance of new leases, permits and right-of-way grants for oil and gas drilling on federal lands, unless approved by senior officials at the Department of the Interior. In March 2021, prior to the expiration of the Secretary of the Interior’s order, President Biden announced that career staff at the Department of the Interior would resume processing oil and gas drilling permits. In August 2022, a federal judge for the U.S. District Court of the Western District of Louisiana issued a permanent injunction against the pause of oil and natural gas leasing on public lands or in offshore waters of the thirteen plaintiff states that brought the lawsuit, which followed a June 2021 nationwide preliminary injunction by the district court that was subsequently vacated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The full impact of these federal actions remains unclear, and if other restrictions or prohibitions become effective in the future, they could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, there exists the potential that the Trump Administration pursues new or amended laws, regulations, executive actions, or other initiatives that may alter restrictions on hydraulic fracturing activities and states may act to further regulate such activities in the absence of federal regulations or in light of regulatory uncertainty.

Previous wording

The U.S. government imposed global tariffs on certain imported steel and aluminum products pursuant to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as well as tariffs on imports of various Chinese product (including steel) pursuant to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. In response, China and other countries have imposed retaliatory tariffs on a wide range of U.S. products, including those containing steel and aluminum. In 2019, the U.S. government entered into tariff agreements with Mexico and Canada to remove Section 232 tariffs, and, in 2021 and 2022, the U.S. government entered into tariff agreements with the European Union, Japan, and the United Kingdom to ease Section 232 tariffs on the close allies and trade partners, but Section 232 tariffs still remain in effect with respect to the other nations. In addition, the U.S. government issued a final determination pursuant to an anti-dumping duty order on certain hot-rolled steel products from Japan, in which it found imports of the subject merchandise were sold in the United States at prices below normal value during the October 2019 to September 2020 time period. As a result, the U.S. government assessed a dumping margin of 24.07% for imports from Japan of the subject steel products. Further, the U.S. government conducted a sunset review on its existing anti-dumping duty on certain hot-rolled steel products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the United Kingdom that was issued in 2016, and determined to continue the anti-dumping duty order on all subject steel products except for those from Brazil. Our efforts to mitigate the impact of tariffs on raw materials through the diversification of our supply chain, exemption requests and other measures may not be sufficiently successful. Furthermore, a prolonged imposition of tariffs on our goods could have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations.

Current wording

The U.S. government imposed global tariffs on certain imported steel and aluminum products pursuant to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as well as tariffs on imports of various Chinese product (including steel) pursuant to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. In response, China and other countries have imposed retaliatory tariffs on a wide range of U.S. products, including those containing steel and aluminum. In 2019, the U.S. government entered into tariff agreements with Mexico and Canada to remove Section 232 tariffs, and, in 2021 and 2022, the U.S. government entered into tariff agreements with the European Union, Japan, and the United Kingdom to ease Section 232 tariffs on the close allies and trade partners, but Section 232 tariffs still remain in effect with respect to the other nations. In addition, the U.S. government issued a final determination pursuant to an anti-dumping duty order on certain hot-rolled steel products from Japan, in which it found imports of the subject merchandise were sold in the United States at prices below normal value during the October 2019 to September 2020 time period. As a result, the U.S. government assessed a dumping margin of 24.07% for imports from Japan of the subject steel products. Further, the U.S. government conducted a sunset review on its existing anti-dumping duty on certain hot-rolled steel products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the United Kingdom that was issued in 2016, and determined to continue the anti-dumping duty order on all subject steel products except for those from Brazil. More recently, the Trump Administration has proposed significantly increased tariffs on foreign imports into the U.S., particularly from China, which may impact our cost of raw materials. Our efforts to mitigate the impact of tariffs on raw materials through the diversification of our supply chain, exemption requests and other measures may not be sufficiently successful. Furthermore, a prolonged imposition of tariffs on our goods could have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations.

Previous wording

•In December 2009, the EPA determined that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and certain other GHGs endanger public health and the environment because emissions of such gases are, according to the EPA, contributing to warming of the Earth’s atmosphere and other climatic changes. In October 2015, the EPA finalized the Clean Power Plan (“CPP”), which tried to impose additional obligations on the power generation sector to reduce GHG emissions. In August 2019, the EPA finalized the repeal of the 2015 regulations and replaced them with the Affordable Clean Energy rule (“ACE”), which designates heat rate improvement, or efficiency improvement, as the best system of emissions reduction for carbon dioxide from existing coal-fired electric utility generating units. In 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia struck down the ACE rule but did not reinstate the former CPP regulation. In June 2022, the CPP was struck down by the United States Supreme Court, which held that Congress did not grant EPA the authority to devise emissions caps based on the generation-shifting approach the EPA took in the CPP. In May 2023, the EPA proposed to vacate the ACE rule and establish control methods to reduce the GHG emissions of power generation sector through control methods that include carbon capture and storage, low-GHG hydrogen co-firing and natural gas co-firing.

Current wording

•In December 2009, the EPA determined that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and certain other GHGs endanger public health and the environment because emissions of such gases are, according to the EPA, contributing to warming of the Earth’s atmosphere and other climatic changes. In October 2015, the EPA finalized the Clean Power Plan (“CPP”), which tried to impose additional obligations on the power generation sector to reduce GHG emissions. In August 2019, the EPA finalized the repeal of the 2015 regulations and replaced them with the Affordable Clean Energy rule (“ACE”), which designates heat rate improvement, or efficiency improvement, as the best system of emissions reduction for carbon dioxide from existing coal-fired electric utility generating units. In 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia struck down the ACE rule but did not reinstate the former CPP regulation. In June 2022, the CPP was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court, which held that Congress did not grant EPA the authority to devise emissions caps based on the generation-shifting approach the EPA took in the CPP. In May 2023, the EPA proposed to vacate the ACE rule and establish control methods to reduce the GHG emissions of power generation sector through control methods that include carbon capture and storage, low-GHG hydrogen co-firing and natural gas co-firing. In April 2024, the EPA published rules to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants (Clean Power Plan 2.0), which faced immediate criticism and challenges.

Previous wording

•In August 2020, the EPA rescinded methane and volatile organic compound emissions standards for new and modified oil and gas transmission and storage infrastructure previously promulgated in 2016, as well as methane limits for new and modified oil and gas production and processing equipment. The EPA also relaxed requirements for oil and gas operators to monitor emissions leaks. However, in November 2021, the EPA proposed new source performance standards (“NSPS”) updates and emission guidelines to reduce methane and other pollutants from the oil and gas industry. In December 2022, the EPA issued a supplemental proposal to update, strengthen, and expand the November 2021 NSPS updates and further reduce methane and other pollutants from the oil and gas industry. The final rule was issued in December 2023. The EPA has also adopted rules requiring the reporting of GHG emissions from specified large GHG emission sources in the U.S., including oil and natural gas systems. In July 2023, the EPA proposed to add reporting that would capture “other large release events” such as abnormal methane emission events that are not fully accounted for using existing methods.

Current wording

•In August 2020, the EPA rescinded methane and volatile organic compound emissions standards for new and modified oil and gas transmission and storage infrastructure previously promulgated in 2016, as well as methane limits for new and modified oil and gas production and processing equipment. The EPA also relaxed requirements for oil and gas operators to monitor emissions leaks. However, in November 2021, the EPA proposed new source performance standards (“NSPS”) updates and emission guidelines to reduce methane and other pollutants from the oil and gas industry. In December 2022, the EPA issued a supplemental proposal to update, strengthen, and expand the November 2021 NSPS updates and further reduce methane and other pollutants from the oil and gas industry. The final rule was issued in December 2023. The EPA has also adopted rules requiring the reporting of GHG emissions from specified large GHG emission sources in the U.S., including oil and natural gas systems. In July 2023, the EPA proposed to add reporting that would capture “other large release events” such as abnormal methane emission events that are not fully accounted for using existing methods. There is ongoing D.C. Circuit litigation for these standards, and in October 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court denied industry and state petitioners’ applications to stay the implementation of the rule while merits of the challenges are litigated. Additionally, at the end of 2024, EPA announced proposed amendment to the NSPS with additional emissions standards and limitations for GHGs and other hazardous air pollutants.

Previous wording

Efforts have also been made and continue to be made in the international community toward the adoption of international treaties or protocols that would address global climate change issues. Although the U.S. had withdrawn from the Paris Agreement in November 2020, the Biden Administration officially reentered the U.S. into the agreement in February 2021. Under the Paris Agreement, the Biden Administration has committed the United States to reducing its GHG emissions by 50 - 52% from 2005 levels by 2030. In November 2021, the U.S. and other countries entered into the Glasgow Climate Pact, which includes a range of measures designed to address climate change, including but not limited to the phase-out of fossil fuel subsidies, reducing methane emissions 30% by 2030, and cooperating toward the advancement of the development of clean energy.

Current wording

Efforts have also been made and continue to be made in the international community toward the adoption of international treaties or protocols that would address global climate change issues. In November 2021, the U.S. and other countries entered into the Glasgow Climate Pact, which includes a range of measures designed to address climate change, including but not limited to the phase-out of fossil fuel subsidies, reducing methane emissions 30% by 2030, and cooperating toward the advancement of the development of clean energy. Although the Biden Administration officially reentered the U.S. into the Paris Agreement in February 2021, the Trump Administration signed an executive order withdrawing the U.S. from the agreement in January 2025. While it is not possible at this time to predict how any such actions may impact our business, such actions could reduce activity from federal, state, and local legislative bodies and administrative agencies and the number of GHG laws, regulations, and other binding commitments.

Previous wording

The market price of common stock of companies engaged in the oil and natural gas equipment manufacturing and services industry has been volatile. Likewise, the market price of our common stock has varied significantly in the past. For example, in 2023, the market price of our common stock reached a high of $33.84 per share on February 10, 2023, and a low of $19.31 per share on December 12, 2023. We expect our stock price to continue to remain volatile given the cyclical nature of our industryand our limited public float.

Current wording

The market price of common stock of companies engaged in the oil and natural gas equipment manufacturing and services industry has been volatile. Likewise, the market price of our common stock has varied significantly in the past. For example, in 2024, the market price of our common stock reached a high of $23.21 per share on January 2, 2024, and a low of $12.83 per share on November 1, 2024. We expect our stock price to continue to remain volatile given the cyclical nature of our industryand our limited public float.

Previous wording

Our senior secured asset-based lending facility (the “Credit Facility”) and our second lien seller term loan credit agreement we entered into to fund a portion of the purchase price of the Variperm Acquisition (the “Seller Term Loan”) also contain covenants, which, among other things, require us in certain circumstances, on a consolidated basis, to maintain specified financial ratios or conditions. As a result of these covenants, we are limited in the manner in which we conduct our business, and we may be unable to engage in favorable business activities or finance future operations or capital needs. Our ability to borrow under the Credit Facility and comply with some of the covenants, ratios or tests contained in our debt agreements may be affected by events beyond our control. If market or other economic conditions deteriorate, and there is a decrease in our accounts receivable and inventory, our ability to borrow under our Credit Facility will be reduced and our ability to comply with these covenants, ratios or tests may be impaired. A failure to comply with the covenants, ratios or tests would result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, would cause some or all of our indebtedness to become immediately due and payable and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

Our senior secured asset-based lending facility (the “Credit Facility”) and the bond terms (the “Bond Terms”) that govern our outstanding 10.50% senior secured bonds (the “2029 Bonds”) also contain covenants, which, among other things, require us in certain circumstances, on a consolidated basis, to maintain specified financial ratios or conditions. As a result of these covenants, we are limited in the manner in which we conduct our business, and we may be unable to engage in favorable business activities or finance future operations or capital needs. Our ability to borrow under the Credit Facility and comply with some of the covenants, ratios or tests contained in our debt agreements may be affected by events beyond our control. If market or other economic conditions deteriorate, and there is a decrease in our accounts receivable and inventory, our ability to borrow under our Credit Facility will be reduced and our ability to comply with these covenants, ratios or tests may be impaired. A failure to comply with the covenants, ratios or tests would result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, would cause some or all of our indebtedness to become immediately due and payable and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

Any borrowings under our Credit Facility would be at variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk. If interest rates were to increase, our debt service obligations on such variable rate indebtedness would increase even though the amount borrowed remained the same, and our net income and cash flows, including cash available for servicing our indebtedness, would correspondingly decrease. Assuming all loans available under our amended Credit Facility upon closing of the Variperm Acquisition are fully drawn, each quarter point change in interest rates would result in an approximately $0.6 million change in annual interest expense on our indebtedness under our Credit Facility. In the future, we may enter into interest rate swaps that involve the exchange of floating for fixed rate interest payments in order to reduce interest rate volatility. However, we may not maintain interest rate swaps with respect to all of our variable rate indebtedness, and any swaps we enter into may not fully mitigate our interest rate risk.

Current wording

Any borrowings under our Credit Facility would be at variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk. If interest rates were to increase, our debt service obligations on such variable rate indebtedness would increase even though the amount borrowed remained the same, and our net income and cash flows, including cash available for servicing our indebtedness, would correspondingly decrease. Assuming borrowings under our amended Credit Facility outstanding as of December 31, 2024, each quarter point change in interest rates would result in an approximately $0.2 million change in annual interest expense on our indebtedness under our Credit Facility. In the future, we may enter into interest rate swaps that involve the exchange of floating for fixed rate interest payments in order to reduce interest rate volatility. However, we may not maintain interest rate swaps with respect to all of our variable rate indebtedness, and any swaps we enter into may not fully mitigate our interest rate risk.

Previous wording

We have incurred impairment charges and we may incur additional impairment charges in the future.

Current wording

During the year ended December 31, 2024, we incurred impairment charges and we may incur additional impairment charges in the future.