Skip to main content

Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc.

For the period ended Sep 30, 2026. Filed Nov 3, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Sep 30, 2026 · Filed Nov 3, 2026

AQST$3.61-1.4%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-Q

Period ended 2026-06-30; filed 2026-08-11.

0001398733-26-000042

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Current report: 10-Q

Period ended 2026-09-30; filed 2026-11-03.

0001398733-26-000074

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 177 previous paragraphs and 178 current paragraphs.

103 unchanged; 59 reworded; 12 added; 10 removed; 5 previous and 4 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 7 previous and 7 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (12)

Current report

On September 16, 2026, the Company resubmitted the Anaphylm New Drug Application to the FDA, and on September 17, 2026, the Company announced the resubmission. On October 15, 2026, the Company announced that the FDA had acknowledged the resubmission as complete, classified it as a Class 2 response and assigned a PDUFA goal date of March 16, 2027.

Current report

The Company continues to advance commercial-readiness activities for a potential U.S. launch of Anaphylm, if approved. The Company has a coordinated launch plan across medical affairs, market access, commercial, operations, manufacturing and supply readiness, with activities and investments staged against the regulatory timeline, and remains on track to be launch-ready during the first quarter of 2027, if Anaphylm is approved by the FDA.

Current report

AQST-108 is a topically delivered adrenergic agonist prodrug candidate being developed for potential dermatologic indications. Following completion of a first-in-human study in which no serious or topical adverse events were observed, the Company is advancing the program in atopic dermatitis. The Company opened an IND for this product candidate in the fourth quarter of 2025.

Current report

•Libervant® (diazepam) buccal film is a product candidate consisting of a buccally administered film formulation of diazepam, a benzodiazepine. If approved for U.S. market access, Libervant would be indicated for the acute treatment of intermittent, stereotypic episodes of frequent seizure activity (i.e., seizure clusters, acute repetitive seizures) that are distinct from a patient’s usual seizure pattern in patients with epilepsy. Libervant has received tentative FDA approval for patients two to five and twelve years of age and older. It is not currently available for U.S. market access. Final FDA approval for patients twelve years of age and older is subject to expiration of the orphan drug exclusivity for Valtoco® on January 10, 2027, and final FDA action, with a PDUFA goal date of March 23, 2027. The Company has also submitted a Type 9 NDA seeking to add patients six to eleven years of age to the label, with a PDUFA goal date of March 29, 2027.

Current report

On October 13, 2026, the Company entered into a license agreement with Eton pursuant to which the Company granted Eton exclusive U.S. rights to commercialize Libervant, subject to applicable regulatory approvals. Eton will be responsible for U.S. commercialization, while the Company received a $10,000 upfront license fee and is eligible to receive up to $47,500 in contingent regulatory and sales-based milestone payments and mid-teens royalties on net sales. The Company will remain the exclusive manufacturer and supplier of Libervant under a 20-year supply agreement, subject to specified exceptions. See Note 21, Subsequent Events to the accompanying Condensed Financial Statements. See “Licensed Commercial Products, Product Candidates and Other Products – Libervant” for a discussion of the licensing arrangement for Libervant outside the United States.

Current report

On May 19, 2026, the SEC proposed amendments to streamline filer status categories for companies subject to reporting obligations under the Exchange Act into two primary categories: “large accelerated filers” and “non-accelerated filers.” The public float requirement for large accelerated filer status would be revised from $700,000 to $2,000,000 and would require a registrant to have been subject to Exchange Act reporting requirements for at least 60 consecutive calendar months before it could become a large accelerated filer. The proposal would eliminate the accelerated filer and smaller reporting company categories as separate filer status categories and would instead extend existing accommodations and scaled disclosure requirements currently available to smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies to all non-accelerated filers. The proposal is intended to simplify the existing reporting framework, under which companies may be required to evaluate overlapping filer statuses, including large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company and emerging growth company status. As a “non-accelerated filer”, we would also benefit from certain emerging growth company-style accommodations, including exemptions from pay-versus-performance disclosure and shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation, including say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachute advisory votes. As of the date of this filing, the proposal remain pending and has not been adopted. The Company cannot predict whether the SEC will adopt the proposed amendments as proposed, with modifications, or at all.

Current report

License and royalty revenue decreased 21%, or $214, for the three months ended September 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to lower estimated royalty revenues.

Current report

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025

Current report

Interest income and other income, net was $853 and $306 for the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025.

Current report

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025
Removed paragraphs (10)

Previous report

•Libervant® – a buccally, or inside of the cheek, administered soluble film formulation of diazepam, Libervant was developed as an alternative to device-dependent rescue therapies currently available to patients with refractory epilepsy, which are a rectal gel and nasal sprays.

Previous report

On April 26, 2024, the FDA approved Libervant® (diazepam) buccal film for U.S. market access for the acute treatment of intermittent, stereotypic episodes of frequent seizure activity (i.e., seizure clusters, ARS) that are distinct from a patient’s usual seizure pattern in patients with epilepsy between two to five years of age. Libervant is the first and only orally administered rescue product for the treatment of seizure cluster in patients between ages two to five. The only other current FDA approved products for these ARS patients between two to five years of age is a diazepam rectal gel and a diazepam nasal spray. In October 2024, Libervant 5mg, 7.5mg, 10mg, 12.5mg and 15 mg for ARS patients between two and five years of age became available through multiple retail distribution channels. In the fourth quarter of 2024, the FDA granted seven years of ODE to Libervant for ARS patients between two to five years of age. Libervant was originally granted Orphan Drug Designation on November 10, 2016.

Previous report

On February 14, 2025, in a lawsuit brought by Neurelis, the owner of the FDA approved nasal spray Valtoco, against the FDA (Neurelis, Inc. v. Califf, for which the Company joined as a Defendant Intervenor) challenging the FDA's approval of Libervant for ARS patients aged between two and five years, the U.S. District for the District of Columbia issued a final appealable order entering a judgment in favor of Neurelis's motion for summary judgment and vacating the FDA’s approval of Libervant. The District Court's ruling was not based on grounds of safety or efficacy of Libervant, but rather on the grounds that the law granting ODE to the FDA approved nasal spray Valtoco for patients aged six years and older should be interpreted to extend to children aged two to five years, despite that Valtoco was not approved by the FDA to treat these younger patients at the time the FDA approved Libervant for this pediatric age group. The FDA is appealing this ruling. As a result of the District Court ruling, the FDA converted the approval of Libervant for patients aged between two and five years to a "tentative approval" and Aquestive has ceased marketing activities for Libervant in the United States.

Previous report

On February 24, 2025, Aquestive filed a request with the FDA that the FDA also confirm approval of Libervant for ARS patients aged between two and five years on the FDA regulatory grounds of clinical superiority over the other currently existing FDA approved ARS drugs. FDA’s orphan drug regulations define a “clinically superior” drug as “a drug shown to provide a significant therapeutic advantage over and above that provided by an approved orphan drug (that is otherwise the same drug)” in one of three ways: the basis of greater efficacy or safety, or providing a major contribution to patient care. The FDA has taken this request under advisement and has not yet provided a response to the Company.

Previous report

Prior to the FDA approval of Libervant for ARS patients between two to five years, the FDA granted tentative approval in August 2022 for Libervant for the same indication in patients with epilepsy 12 years of age and older, finding that Libervant had met all required quality, safety, and efficacy standards for approval. However, due to the existing FDA regulatory grant of ODE for Valtoco for use in ARS patients 6 years of age and older, the FDA determined that Libervant was not yet eligible for marketing in the United States for this patient population of 12 years of age and older. We filed for FDA approval for use of Libervant for these ARS patients aged between 6 and 11 years in Q2 2026. However, as a result of the ODE granted by the FDA to Valtoco and the District Court's ruling, the FDA cannot give final approval for U.S. market access for Libervant for any age group until the expiration of the ODE or a determination by the FDA of inapplicability of the ODE for Libervant, unless the District Court's ruling vacating the FDA approval of Libervant for ARS patients aged between two and five years is overturned on appeal. In the event that the District Court's ruling is reversed without further right of appeal, and the tentative approval of Libervant for ARS patients aged between two and five is converted to a final approval by the FDA, the Company would only be able to market Libervant for ARS patients aged between two and five years and would continue to be restricted from market access of Libervant for older ARS patients until the expiration of the ODE for Valtoco. However, overcoming the orphan drug marketing exclusivity determination is difficult to establish, with limited precedent, and there can be no assurance that the FDA will agree with our position seeking to overcome such market exclusivity and approve Libervant for U.S. market access for any age group earlier than January 2027, the scheduled date for expiration of ODE for Valtoco. See “Licensed Commercial Products, Product Candidates and Other Products – Libervant” for a discussion of the licensing arrangement for Libervant.

Previous report

Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2025

Previous report

License and royalty revenue increased 313%, or $5,092, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to the recognition of royalty revenue from Zevra.

Previous report

Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
Reworded paragraphs (59)

Previous wording

These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the advancement and related timing of our product candidate Anaphylm™ (dibutepinephrine) sublingual film through clinical development and approval by the FDA, including our ability to address the concerns raised by the FDA in the Complete Response Letter (CRL) dated January 30, 2026 and Type A meeting with the FDA on March 26, 2026, and for the FDA to approve Anaphylm or whether the FDA may request further information from us, disagree with our protocols, study designs, or findings or otherwise undertake a lengthy review of our resubmission, and challenges regarding the following commercial launch of Anaphylm, if approved by the FDA; the advancement and related timing of potential international regulatory filings and marketing authorization of Anaphylm outside of the U.S.; Anaphylm’s potential to be the first and only non-invasive orally delivered epinephrine product and to be accepted as an alternative to existing standards of care, if approved by the FDA; the expected growth of the U.S. epinephrine market including in value and the opportunity such growth presents to the Company should Anaphylm be approved by the FDA; the advancement, growth and related timing of our AdrenaVerse™ pipeline epinephrine prodrug product candidates, including AQST-108 (epinephrine) topical gel, through clinical development and FDA regulatory approval process, including design and timing of clinical studies including those necessary to support the indication of alopecia areata and atopic dermatitis for AQST-108 or other possible indications; the potential sale or outlicensing of Anaphylm, Libervant or other product candidates; anticipated timelines, milestones, and guidance relating to regulatory submissions, clinical studies, regulatory interactions, and potential approvals, which are subject to change based on regulatory feedback, protocol alignment, data sufficiency, and other factors outside the Company’s control; the approval for U.S. market access of Libervant and overcoming the orphan drug market exclusivity of an FDA approved nasal spray product of another company extending to January 2027; the commercial opportunity of Libervant, Anaphylm, AQST-108 and our other product candidates, should these product candidates be approved by the FDA; the focus on continuing to manufacture Suboxone®, Emylif®, Sympazan®, Ondif® and other licensed products; the potential benefits our products and product candidates could bring to patients; the achievement of clinical and commercial milestones, product orders and fulfillment; our cash requirements, cash funding and cash burn; short-term and longer term liquidity and the ability to fund our business operations; our growth and future financial and operating results and financial position, including with respect to our 2026 financial outlook; and business strategies, market opportunities, and other statements that are not historical facts.

Current wording

These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the advancement and related timing of Anaphylm™ (dibutepinephrine) Sublingual Film through the FDA regulatory review and approval process; our ability to address the matters identified by the FDA in the Complete Response Letter ("CRL") dated January 30, 2026; the FDA’s review of the Class 2 resubmission of the Anaphylm NDA and potential approval by the March 16, 2027 PDUFA goal date; the Company’s commercial launch strategy, launch readiness and potential launch of Anaphylm, if approved; the significance, interpretation and sufficiency of the human factors and pharmacokinetic study results and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data supporting the NDA resubmission; whether the NDA resubmission adequately addresses the deficiencies identified by the FDA in the CRL; the potential approval of Anaphylm by the FDA; potential international regulatory submissions and marketing authorizations for Anaphylm, including the anticipated timing of submissions in Canada and the European Union; Anaphylm’s potential to be the first and only non-invasive orally delivered epinephrine product and to be accepted as an alternative to existing standards of care, if approved by the FDA; the advancement, growth and related timing of our AdrenaVerse™ pipeline epinephrine prodrug product candidates, including AQST-108 (epinephrine) topical gel, through clinical development and FDA regulatory approval process, including design and timing of clinical studies including those necessary to support possible indications; the potential sale or outlicensing of Anaphylm or other product candidates; anticipated timelines, milestones, and guidance relating to regulatory submissions, clinical studies, regulatory interactions, and potential approvals, which are subject to change based on regulatory feedback, protocol alignment, data sufficiency, and other factors outside the Company’s control; the timing and outcome of FDA review of Libervant, including potential final approval, label expansion and commercial availability; Eton’s commercialization of Libervant; the potential receipt by the Company of contingent milestone and royalty payments; and the Company’s manufacture and supply of Libervant; the commercial opportunity of Libervant, Anaphylm, AQST-108 and our other product candidates, should these product candidates be approved by the FDA; the focus on continuing to manufacture Suboxone®, Emylif®, Sympazan®, Ondif® and other licensed products; the potential benefits our products and product candidates could bring to patients; the achievement of clinical and commercial milestones, product orders and fulfillment; our cash requirements, cash funding and cash burn; short-term and longer term liquidity and the ability to fund our business operations; our growth and future financial and operating results and financial position, including with respect to our 2026 financial outlook; and business stra…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, risks associated with our development work, including any delays or changes to the timing, cost and success of our product development activities and clinical trials and plans, including those relating to Anaphylm, AQST-108, and our other product candidates; risks related to our existing indebtedness and potential future obligations under our Credit Agreement, including the risk that, should Anaphylm receive FDA approval, our indebtedness will increase substantially, and there is no assurance that revenues from the commercialization of Anaphylm will be sufficient to service or repay such obligations; and that, if Anaphylm does not receive FDA approval, we will be required to maintain larger cash reserves to fund ongoing operations and will not be able to deploy those funds for other purposes; risks that restrictive covenants contained in our Credit Agreement could limit our operational flexibility, including restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness or make investments, and impair our ability to raise additional capital when needed; risk of delays in advancement of the regulatory approval process through the FDA of our product candidates, including the filing of the respective NDAs, for Anaphylm, AQST-108, Libervant and other product candidates, or failure to receive FDA approval at all of any for these product candidates; risk of FDA inspections of manufacturing and clinical study sites for any of our product candidates, including Anaphylm; risk of government shutdowns or actions to reduce government workforces on the ability of the FDA to act on the approval of our product candidates, including Anaphylm and Libervant; risk of the Company’s ability to generate sufficient clinical and other human factor data, including with respect to our submission of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) comparability data for FDA approval of Anaphylm; risks associated with our ability to address the FDA’s comments on and identified deficiencies in our NDA for Anaphylm, including the concerns raised by the FDA in the CRL and Type A Meeting; risks associated with the success of any competing products, including generics; risks and uncertainties inherent in commercializing a new product (including technology risks, financial risks, market risks and implementation risks and regulatory limitations); risk of development of a sales and marketing capability for commercialization of our product candidates, including Anaphylm, if approved by the FDA; risks associated with the potential impact on the value of the Company of the sale or outlicensing of our product and product candidates, including Libervant and Anaphylm and other product candidates;…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Current wording

These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, risks associated with our development work, including any delays or changes to the timing, cost and success of our product development activities and clinical trials and plans, including those relating to Anaphylm, AQST-108, and our other product candidates; risks related to our existing indebtedness and potential future obligations under our Credit Agreement, including the risk that, should Anaphylm receive FDA approval, our indebtedness will increase substantially, and there is no assurance that revenues from the commercialization of Anaphylm will be sufficient to service or repay such obligations; and that, if Anaphylm does not receive FDA approval, we will be required to maintain larger cash reserves to fund ongoing operations and will not be able to deploy those funds for other purposes; risks that restrictive covenants contained in our Credit Agreement could limit our operational flexibility, including restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness or make investments, and impair our ability to raise additional capital when needed; risks that preliminary, topline, interim or summary human factors, pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic results may differ from final analyses or may be interpreted differently by regulatory authorities; the possibility that the FDA may disagree with the Company's interpretation of study results, findings or conclusions, or may request additional information, analyses, human factors studies or clinical studies; risks associated with our ability to address the FDA's comments on and identified deficiencies in our NDA, including the concerns raised by the FDA in the CRL, and whether the FDA may request further information from us (including additional studies), disagree with our protocols, study designs or findings, or otherwise undertake a lengthy review of our NDA resubmission; the risk that the FDA may consider issues raised in one or more citizen petitions or similar submissions relating to Anaphylm; risks associated with obtaining regulatory approvals outside the United States; risks of delays in, or failure to obtain, regulatory approval of Anaphylm; risk of government shutdowns or actions to reduce government workforces on the ability of the FDA to act on the approval of our product candidates, including Anaphylm and Libervant; risks associated with the success of any competing products, including generics; risks and uncertainties inherent in commercializing a new product (including technology risks, financial risks, market risks and implementation risks and regulatory limitations); risk of development of a sales and marketing capability for commercialization of our product candidates, including Anaph…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

Aquestive is a pharmaceutical company advancing medicines to bring meaningful improvement to patients' lives through innovative science and delivery technologies. The worldwide leader in delivering trusted, quality medications on oral film, Aquestive operates as both a developer of its own proprietary products and a Contract Development and Manufacturing Organization (CDMO) for licensees, with its headquarters in New Jersey and U.S.-based manufacturing facilities in Indiana. The Company is the exclusive manufacturer of four commercialized products marketed by its licensees across six continents using proprietary, best-in-class technologies like PharmFilm®. Aquestive's AdrenaVerse™ platform contains a library of more than 20 epinephrine prodrugs enabling the pursuit of various potential allergy and dermatological indications. The Company is advancing Anaphylm™ (dibutepinephrine) sublingual film for the treatment of severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, and AQST-108 (epinephrine) topical gel for various potential dermatological conditions.

Current wording

Aquestive is a biopharmaceutical company advancing medicines to bring meaningful improvement to patients' lives through innovative science. The worldwide leader in delivering trusted, quality medications on oral film, Aquestive operates with its headquarters in New Jersey and U.S.-based manufacturing facilities in Indiana. The Company is the exclusive manufacturer of four commercialized products marketed by its licensees across six continents using proprietary, best-in-class technologies like PharmFilm®. Aquestive's AdrenaVerse™ platform contains a library of more than 20 epinephrine prodrugs enabling the pursuit of various potential allergy and dermatological indications. The Company is advancing Anaphylm™ (dibutepinephrine) sublingual film for the treatment of Type 1 allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, and AQST-108 (epinephrine) topical gel for various potential dermatological conditions.

Previous wording

We manufacture licensed products at our facilities and anticipate that our current manufacturing capacity is sufficient for commercial quantities of our licensed products and product candidates currently in development. Our facilities have been inspected by the FDA, TGA, and DEA, and are subject to inspection by all applicable health agencies, including ANVISA and EMA. Not all collaborative or licensed products of the Company that may be commercially launched in the future will necessarily be manufactured by us.

Current wording

We manufacture licensed products at our facilities and anticipate that our current manufacturing capacity is sufficient for commercial quantities of our licensed products and product candidates currently in development. Our facilities have been inspected by the FDA, TGA, and DEA, and are subject to inspection by all applicable health agencies, including ANVISA and

Previous wording

•Anaphylm™ (dibutepinephrine) sublingual film – the first and onlynon-invasive, orally delivered epinephrine prodrug product candidate in development that has shown clinical results comparable to auto-injectors (such as EpiPen® and Auvi-Q®) for the emergency treatment of allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. Epinephrine is the standard of care in the treatment of anaphylaxis and is typically administered via intramuscular injection, including manual auto-injectors such as EpiPen and Auvi-Q, which require patients or their caregivers to inject epinephrine into the patient’s thigh during an emergency allergic reaction. As a result of this route of administration, many patients and their caregivers are reluctant to use injectable products. In August 2024, a nasal spray device was approved by the FDA for the treatment of severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. However, Anaphylm would, if approved by the FDA, allow a patient to simply place a dissolvable strip, approximately the size and weight of a postage stamp, under the tongue, providing an appropriate medication where it is needed and when it is needed.

Current wording

•Anaphylm™ (dibutepinephrine) sublingual film – the first and only non-invasive, orally delivered epinephrine prodrug product candidate in development that has shown clinical results comparable to auto-injectors (such as EpiPen® and Auvi-Q®) for the emergency treatment of allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. Epinephrine is the standard of care in the treatment of anaphylaxis and is typically administered via intramuscular injection, including manual auto-injectors such as EpiPen and Auvi-Q, which require patients or their caregivers to inject epinephrine into the patient’s thigh during an emergency allergic reaction. As a result of this route of administration, many patients and their caregivers are reluctant to use injectable products. In August 2024, a nasal spray device was approved by the FDA for the treatment of severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. However, Anaphylm would, if approved by the FDA, allow a patient to simply place a dissolvable strip, approximately the size and weight of a postage stamp, under the tongue, providing an appropriate medication where it is needed and when it is needed.

Previous wording

We completed the Anaphylm NDA submission to the FDA in the first quarter of 2025. On June 13, 2025, the NDA submission was accepted by the FDA and a PDUFA target action date of January 31, 2026 was assigned. The Company was informed in September 2025 that the FDA would not hold an Advisory Committee meeting regarding the approval of Anaphylm.

Current wording

We completed the Anaphylm NDA submission to the FDA in the first quarter of 2025. On June 13, 2025, the NDA submission was accepted by the FDA and a PDUFA goal date of January 31, 2026 was assigned. The Company was informed in September 2025 that the FDA would not hold an Advisory Committee meeting regarding the approval of Anaphylm.

Previous wording

On January 30, 2026, the Company received a CRL that focused on administration and labeling guidance. Clinical trial results submitted as part of the NDA regarding comparability to approved auto-injectors (such as EpiPen and Auvi-Q), such as bracketing, repeat dose, and sustainability, were not questioned in the CRL. In addition, there were also no CMC issues noted in the CRL. The FDA cited deficiencies in the Anaphylm human factors (HF) validation study. These included instances of difficulty opening the pouch, torn film during pouch opening, incorrect placement the film during administration, chewing the film, and/or removal of the film after administration. If unaddressed, the FDA believes these issues could cause significant safety issues in the setting of anaphylaxis. To resolve the FDA’s concerns, the Company modified the pouch opening, instructions for use, pouch and carton labeling, and conducted a new HF validation study with these modifications and a pharmacodynamic (PK) study requested by the FDA to test the affect of these modifications.

Current wording

On January 30, 2026, the Company received a CRL that focused on administration and labeling guidance. Clinical trial results submitted as part of the NDA regarding comparability to approved auto-injectors (such as EpiPen and Auvi-Q), such as bracketing, repeat dose, and sustainability, were not questioned in the CRL. In addition, there were no CMC issues noted in the CRL. The FDA cited deficiencies in the Anaphylm human factors (HF) validation study. These included instances of difficulty opening the pouch, torn film during pouch opening, incorrect placement of the film during administration, chewing the film, and/or removal of the film after administration. If unaddressed, the FDA believes these issues could cause significant safety issues in the setting of anaphylaxis. To resolve the FDA’s concerns, the Company modified the pouch opening, instructions for use, pouch and carton labeling, and conducted a new HF validation study with these modifications and a pharmacokinetic (PK) study requested by the FDA to test the effect of these modifications.

Previous wording

On August 10, 2026, the Company announced results from its recent HF validation study and PK study for Anaphylm. The new HF study evaluated a revised packaging design, incorporating modifications to the pouch opening, instructions for use, and pouch and carton labeling intended to address previously identified issues. The new HF study shows significant improvement across each deficiency identified by the FDA. The median time to open a pouch decreased from 17 seconds in the previous study to 3 seconds. The number of participants who had difficulty opening the pouch decreased from 26 (out of 166) to 1 (out of 105). The number of participants who incorrectly administered the film in the mouth decreased from 20 (out of 166) to 2 (out of 105). In the latest HF study, no participants were observed chewing the film or removing the film. In addition, using the revised packaging and revised instructions for use, the Company conducted a single PK study in healthy volunteers comparing self-administration to clinician-administered as well as manual IM administration. No administration errors were observed in the self-administration arm of the PK study. In a separate PK arm evaluating purposely misplaced (top‑of‑tongue) administration requested by the FDA, geometric mean Cmax was lower and Tmax longer than with correct sublingual placement, as expected, though the observed pharmacodynamic response was comparable to or of greater magnitude than that observed with injectable epinephrine. No serious adverse events, serious events, or events leading to study drug discontinuation were reported in the PK study.The Company will include the HF and clinical PK data in its planned resubmission of the Anaphylm New Drug Application to the FDA, which the Company is expecting to complete in the third quarter of 2026. The Company plans to request accelerated review of the resubmission, though no expedited review can be guaranteed.

Current wording

On August 10, 2026, the Company announced results from its recent HF validation study and PK study for Anaphylm. The new HF study evaluated a revised packaging design, incorporating modifications to the pouch opening, instructions for use, and pouch and carton labeling intended to address previously identified issues. The new HF study shows significant improvement across each deficiency identified by the FDA. The median time to open a pouch decreased from 17 seconds in the previous study to 3 seconds. The number of participants who had difficulty opening the pouch decreased from 26 (out of 166) to 1 (out of 105). The number of participants who incorrectly administered the film in the mouth decreased from 20 (out of 166) to 2 (out of 105). In the latest HF study, no participants were observed chewing the film or removing the film. In addition, using the revised packaging and revised instructions for use, the Company conducted a single PK study in healthy volunteers comparing self-administration to clinician-administered as well as manual IM administration. No administration errors were observed in the self-administration arm of the PK study. In a separate PK arm evaluating purposely misplaced (top‑of‑tongue) administration requested by the FDA, geometric mean Cmax was lower and Tmax longer than with correct sublingual placement, as expected, though the observed pharmacodynamic response was comparable to or of greater magnitude than that observed with injectable epinephrine. No serious adverse events, or events leading to study drug discontinuation were reported in the PK study.

Previous wording

The Company is concurrently pursuing regulatory strategies outside the United States. Based on feedback from regulatory agencies, the Company expects to submit regulatory applications in Canada, the EU and United Kingdom by utilizing its existing clinical data. The Company expects to file its New Drug Submission in Canada in 2026 and the EU in 2027. The Company believes that these markets represent important opportunities to potentially expand access to the Company's non-invasive epinephrine therapy globally.

Current wording

The Company is concurrently pursuing regulatory strategies outside the United States. Based on feedback from regulatory agencies, the Company expects to submit regulatory applications by utilizing its existing clinical data. The Company expects to submit a New Drug Submission to Health Canada in the fourth quarter of 2026 and plans to file in the European Union in the first quarter of 2027. The Company believes that these markets represent important opportunities to potentially expand access to the Company’s non-invasive epinephrine therapy globally.

Previous wording

The Company believes that the original Anaphylm NDA submission is supported by a comprehensive clinical development program consisting of eleven independent clinical studies with approximately 967 total administrations across 411 subjects, including 840 single-dose and 127 repeat-dose exposures of Anaphylm. As part of the clinical development program, Aquestive conducted a first-of-its-kind oral allergy syndrome study, which demonstrated Anaphylm's performance in a real-world, allergen-induced setting. The program demonstrated that Anaphylm delivers a PK profile comparable to the leading epinephrine auto-injectors. These studies showed that Anaphylm was generally well-tolerated and had a safety profile similar to that of epinephrine.

Current wording

The Company believes that the Anaphylm NDA resubmission is supported by a comprehensive clinical development program consisting of twelve independent clinical studies with approximately 1,063 total administrations across 451 subjects, including 904 single-dose and 127 repeat-dose exposures of Anaphylm in adults and 32 single-dose exposures in pediatrics. As part of the clinical development program, Aquestive conducted a first-of-its-kind oral allergy syndrome study, which demonstrated Anaphylm's performance in a real-world, allergen-induced setting. The program demonstrated that Anaphylm delivers a PK profile comparable to the leading epinephrine auto-injectors. These studies showed that Anaphylm was generally well-tolerated and had a safety profile similar to that of epinephrine.

Previous wording

(acidic- lemon water, and basic- baking soda water). The most consumed beverages, such as soda, milk, coffee, and juice, have acidity between lemon water and normal water. The primary PK parameters were the maximum amount of epinephrine measured in plasma (Cmax) and exposure, or the area under the curve (AUC), at predefined time points after dosing, in 30 healthy adult subjects. Topline PK and PD data from the study showed no statistically significant difference in PK and PD results between the different groups based on temperature and pH variability in the mouth.

Current wording

In June 2024, we reported positive topline PK data from the Company's temperature / pH study of Anaphylm. The single-dose, five-period, randomized crossover study was designed to compare the PK and PD of Anaphylm just after consuming normal water at different temperatures (hot, cold, and room temperature) as well as water of different pHs (acidic- lemon water, and basic- baking soda water). The most consumed beverages, such as soda, milk, coffee, and juice, have acidity between lemon water and normal water. The primary PK parameters were the maximum amount of epinephrine measured in Cmax and exposure, or the AUC, at predefined time points after dosing, in 30 healthy adult subjects. Topline PK and PD data from the study showed no statistically significant difference in PK and PD results between the different groups based on temperature and pH variability in the mouth.

Previous wording

In October 2024, we reported positive topline data from an oral allergy syndrome challenge study (now referred to as the "OASIS" study), meeting both primary and secondary endpoints. The two-part study demonstrated that Anaphylm's PK and PD profile during allergen-induced oral physiological changes was consistent with its profile without an allergen challenge. In addition, following allergen exposure where 94% of subjects exhibited moderate to severe symptoms per the predefined oral severity score, rapid symptom resolution was observed beginning as early as 2 minutes post-administration. The median time to complete symptom resolution was 12 minutes compared to 74 minutes at screening baseline, with 50% of all symptoms across all subjects resolving by 5 minutes. The mean time of symptom resolution for edema, which affected approximately 25% of subjects, was 5 minutes after Anaphylm administration. The PK profile remained consistent, with median Tmax maintained at 12 minutes and comparable Cmax values between allergen-exposed and non-exposed cohorts. The safety profile was favorable, with all adverse events classified as mild to moderate and resolving without medical intervention.

Current wording

In October 2024, we reported positive topline data from an OASIS study, meeting both primary and secondary endpoints. The two-part study demonstrated that Anaphylm's PK and PD profile during allergen-induced oral physiological changes was consistent with its profile without an allergen challenge. In addition, following allergen exposure where 94% of subjects exhibited moderate to severe symptoms per the predefined oral severity score, rapid symptom resolution was observed beginning as early as 2 minutes post-administration. The median time to complete symptom resolution was 12 minutes compared to 74 minutes at screening baseline, with 50% of all symptoms across all subjects resolving by 5 minutes. The mean time of symptom resolution for edema, which affected approximately 25% of subjects, was 5 minutes after Anaphylm administration. The PK profile remained consistent, with median Tmax maintained at 12 minutes and comparable Cmax values between allergen-exposed and non-exposed cohorts. The safety profile was favorable, with all adverse events classified as mild to moderate and resolving without medical intervention.

Previous wording

•AQST-108(epinephrine) topical gel – Our product candidate, AQST‑108, is generated from our AdrenaVerse™ platform which contains a library of over twenty epinephrine prodrugs intended to control absorption and conversion rates across a variety of possible dosage forms and delivery sites. Epinephrine plays a critical role in immune suppression but, until now, its role has been limited due to issues in the absorption and conversion of epinephrine in the human body. We believe that our AdrenaVerse epinephrine prodrug platform has demonstrated the ability to harness the therapeutic potential of epinephrine through highly differentiated prodrug formulations, which are designed to achieve absorption, provide sustained local exposure and avoid systemic exposure.

Current wording

•AQST-108(epinephrine) topical gel – Our product candidate, AQST‑108, is generated from our AdrenaVerse™ platform which contains a library of over twenty epinephrine prodrugs intended to control absorption and conversion rates across a variety of possible dosage forms and delivery sites. Epinephrine plays a critical role in immune suppression but, until now, its utility has been limited due to issues in the absorption and conversion of epinephrine in the human body. We believe that our AdrenaVerse epinephrine prodrug platform has demonstrated the ability to harness the therapeutic potential of epinephrine through highly differentiated prodrug formulations, which are designed to achieve absorption, provide sustained local exposure and avoid systemic exposure.

Previous wording

AQST‑108 is a topically delivered adrenergic agonist prodrug, which we believe has the potential to support the re-establishment of immune privilege in the hair follicle and we are pursuing its development for the possible treatment of alopecia areata, which is an autoimmune disease leading to hair loss on the scalp, face and, in more severe cases, other body areas. We completed the first human clinical trial for AQST-108 in 2024. The two-part trial was designed to assess the safety and local tolerability of AQST-108. Part 1 was designed as a single ascending dose escalation study to assess the safety and PK of five different dose levels. The 1.0% dose of AQST-108 was chosen based on the down selection from the highest dose to move into the Part 2 study of the development program. In Part 2, three formulations based on excipient variations were evaluated in twelve healthy subjects. In Parts 1 and 2, no serious adverse events or topical adverse events were observed. In Part 2, the calculated percentage of AQST-108 observed in the skin remained consistent across all studied formulations and zero post-dose AQST-108 concentrations in plasma were observed. We opened an IND for this product candidate in the fourth quarter of 2025.

Current wording

We completed the first human clinical trial for AQST-108 in 2024. The two-part trial was designed to assess the safety and local tolerability of AQST-108. Part 1 was designed as a single ascending dose escalation study to assess the safety and PK of five different dose levels. The 1.0% dose of AQST-108 was chosen based on the down selection from the highest dose to move into the Part 2 study of the development program. In Part 2, three formulations based on excipient variations were evaluated in twelve healthy subjects. In Parts 1 and 2, no serious adverse events or topical adverse events were observed. In Part 2, the calculated percentage of AQST-108 observed in the skin remained consistent across all studied formulations and zero post-dose AQST-108 concentrations in plasma were observed.

Previous wording

The Company recently completed its second phase 1 clinical trial, which was designed to further characterize the safety, tolerability, and pharmacologic profile of the topical epinephrine prodrug gel. There were no drug related adverse events observed in the study and the data did not indicate signs of systemic absorption. In addition, Aquestive identified a biomarker signal through the suppression of the cytokine Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin (TSLP) when compared to placebo. The TSLP signaling pathway involves the activation of Janus Kinase (JAK) 1 and JAK2. This signal will be explored further in upcoming studies. AQST-108 is believed to have potential immunomodulatory effects, including downregulation of certain chemoattractants and inflammatory mediators, while stabilizing mast cells. We continue to believe AQST-108 has potential application across a variety of dermatologic inflammatory indications, including atopic dermatitis. We plan to conduct additional pre-clinical and clinical studies for AQST-108 in the second half of 2026 through the first half of 2027.

Current wording

The Company recently completed its second phase 1 clinical trial, which was designed to further characterize the safety, tolerability, and pharmacologic profile of the topical epinephrine prodrug gel. There were no drug-related adverse events observed in the study and the data did not indicate signs of systemic absorption. In addition, Aquestive identified a biomarker signal through the suppression of the cytokine TSLP when compared to placebo. The TSLP signaling pathway involves the activation of JAK 1 and JAK 2. This signal will be explored further in upcoming studies. AQST-108 is believed to have potential immunomodulatory effects, including downregulation of certain chemoattractants and inflammatory mediators, while stabilizing mast cells. The Company expects to conduct additional clinical work beginning in the first quarter of 2027. We continue to believe AQST-108 has potential application across a variety of dermatologic inflammatory indications, including atopic dermatitis. The planned study is expected to collect genomic and biomarker data to inform further development of AQST-108 and the AdrenaVerse platform. The Company continues to evaluate additional potential dermatologic indications.

Previous wording

Our portfolio also includes other products and product candidates that we have licensed, or will seek to license, or for which we have licensed our intellectual property for commercialization. In the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, our licensed product portfolio generated $28,265 and $18,723 in revenue to Aquestive, respectively. Those products include:

Current wording

Our portfolio also includes other products and product candidates that we have licensed, or will seek to license, or for which we have licensed our intellectual property for commercialization. In the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, our licensed product portfolio generated $35,822 and $31,530 in revenue to Aquestive, respectively. Those products include:

Previous wording

•Suboxone® – a sublingual film formulation of buprenorphine and naloxone, respectively an opioid agonist and antagonist, that is marketed in the United States and internationally for the treatment of opioid dependence. Suboxone was launched by our licensee, Indivior, in 2010. Suboxone is the most prescribed branded product in its category and was the first sublingual film product for the treatment of opioid dependence. We are the sole and exclusive supplier and manufacturer of Suboxone and have produced over 3.0 billion doses of Suboxone since its launch in 2010. As of June 30, 2026, Suboxone branded products retain approximately 24% film market share as generic film-based products have penetrated this market.

Current wording

•Suboxone® – a sublingual film formulation of buprenorphine and naloxone, respectively an opioid agonist and antagonist, that is marketed in the United States and internationally for the treatment of opioid dependence. Suboxone was launched by our licensee, Indivior, in 2010. Suboxone is the most prescribed branded product in its category and was the first sublingual film product for the treatment of opioid dependence. We are the sole and exclusive supplier and manufacturer of Suboxone and have produced over 3.0 billion doses of Suboxone since its launch in 2010. As of

Previous wording

•Sympazan®– an oral soluble film formulation of clobazam used for the treatment of seizures associated with a rare, intractable form of epilepsy known as Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, or LGS, in patients aged two years of age or older, was approved by the FDA on November 1, 2018. We commercially launched Sympazan in December 2018. On October 26, 2022, we entered into a License Agreement with Otter Pharmaceuticals, LLC, a subsidiary of Assertio Holdings, Inc., pursuant to which we granted an exclusive, worldwide license of its intellectual property for Sympazan to Assertio during the term of that agreement for an upfront payment of $9,000. Additionally, we subsequently received from Assertio a $6,000 milestone payment upon its receipt of a notice of allowance from the United States Patent and Trademark Office of its patent application U.S. Serial No. 16/561,573, and payment of the related allowance fee. Aquestive is the exclusive sole manufacturer and supplier of Sympazan for Assertio and will receive manufacturing fees from Assertio for the product through the expiration of such License Agreement. On April 8, 2026 Assertio entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Cosette to divest a portfolio of products, including Sympazan, to Cosette. Under the Asset Purchase Agreement, Assertio assigned and transferred its rights and certain obligations arising post closing relating to Sympazan to Cosette. Cosette assumed the intellectual property license and rights to commercialize Sympazan and will continue to purchase product and pay royalties and make milestone-related payments to Aquestive under the Assertio Agreement.

Current wording

•Sympazan®– an oral soluble film formulation of clobazam used for the treatment of seizures associated with a rare, intractable form of epilepsy known as LGS, in patients aged two years of age or older, was approved by the FDA on November 1, 2018. We commercially launched Sympazan in December 2018. On October 26, 2022, we entered into a License Agreement with Otter Pharmaceuticals, LLC, a subsidiary of Assertio Holdings, Inc., pursuant to which we granted an exclusive, worldwide license of its intellectual property for Sympazan to Assertio during the term of that agreement for an upfront payment of $9,000. Additionally, we subsequently received from Assertio a $6,000 milestone payment upon its receipt of a notice of allowance from the United States Patent and Trademark Office of its patent application U.S. Serial No. 16/561,573, and payment of the related allowance fee. Aquestive is the exclusive sole manufacturer and supplier of Sympazan for Assertio and will receive manufacturing fees from Assertio for the product through the expiration of such License Agreement. On April 8, 2026 Assertio entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Cosette to divest a portfolio of products, including Sympazan, to Cosette. Under the Asset Purchase Agreement, Assertio assigned and transferred its rights and certain obligations arising post closing relating to Sympazan to Cosette. Cosette assumed the intellectual property license and rights to commercialize Sympazan and will continue to purchase product and pay royalties and make milestone-related payments to Aquestive under the Assertio Agreement.

Previous wording

On May 12, 2026, we issued the Term Loan Facility and used the proceeds from the issuance to repay the outstanding principal balance under the 13.5% Notes of $45,000, and $2,000 exit fee. We also incurred a prepayment penalty of $3,825 and other transaction expenses. We recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $11,683 on the Condensed Statements of

Current wording

On May 12, 2026, we issued the Term Loan Facility and used the proceeds from the issuance to repay the outstanding principal balance under the 13.5% Notes of $45,000, and $2,000 exit fee. We also incurred a prepayment penalty of $3,825 and other transaction expenses. We recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $11,683 on the Condensed Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2026. The loss represents the difference between the carrying value of the 13.5% Notes as of May 12, 2026 and the total payoff amount of the 13.5% Notes.

Previous wording

Interest expense consists of interest costs on the outstanding balances of the Term Loan Facility at a floating rate equal to three-month SOFR, subject to a floor of 2.75%, plus an applicable margin of 6.25%, payable quarterly and interest costs on the outstanding balances of our 13.5% Notes prior to redemption at a fixed rate of 13.5%, payable quarterly, amortization of the discount associated with the long-term portion of the legal settlement, annual agency fee related to the Term Loan Facility, as well as amortization of issuance costs and debt discounts for the Term Loan Facility and the 13.5% Notes. The issuance of the Term Loan Facility and the repayment of the 13.5% Notes are discussed in Note 13, Long-Term Debt, to our Condensed Financial Statements. See Liquidity and Capital Resources below for further detail on the Term Loan Facility.

Current wording

Interest expense consists of interest costs on the outstanding balances of the Term Loan Facility at a floating rate equal to three-month SOFR, subject to a floor of 2.75%, plus an applicable margin of 6.25%, payable quarterly and interest costs on the outstanding balances of our 13.5% Notes prior to redemption at a fixed rate of 13.5%, payable quarterly, amortization of the discount associated with the long-term portion of the legal settlement, annual agency fee related to the Term Loan Facility, as well as amortization of issuance costs and debt discounts for the Term Loan Facility and the 13.5% Notes. The issuance of the

Previous wording

Interest income and other income, net consists of earnings derived from interest-bearing accounts, money market Treasury mutual funds, and other miscellaneous income and expense items including expenses associated with the issuance of the RTW Warrants. These interest-bearing accounts have no minimum amounts to be maintained in the accounts for which interest and dividends are earned.

Current wording

Interest income and other income, net consists of earnings derived from interest-bearing accounts, money market Treasury mutual funds, Treasury Bills, and other miscellaneous income and expense items including expenses associated with the issuance of the RTW Warrants. The interest-bearing accounts have no minimum amounts to be maintained in the accounts for which interest and dividends are earned.

Previous wording

Comparison of the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025

Current wording

Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 and 2025

Previous wording

For the six months ended June 30, 2026, total revenues increased 51%, or $9,542, compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to increases in manufacture and supply revenue, license and royalty revenue, and proprietary product revenue, net.

Current wording

For the three months ended September 30, 2026, total revenues decreased 41%, or $5,250, compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to decreases in manufacture and supply revenue.

Previous wording

Manufacture and supply revenue increased approximately 23%, or $3,928, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to higher Suboxone revenues of approximately $7,200, partially offset by lower Ondif revenues of approximately $3,700.

Current wording

Manufacture and supply revenue decreased approximately 42%, or $4,808, for the three months ended September 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to lower Suboxone revenues of approximately $5,600, partially offset by higher Ondif revenues of approximately $1,100 due to timing of product orders.

Previous wording

Co-development and research fees increased 54%, or $204, for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was driven by the timing of the achievement of research and co-development performance obligations which are expected to fluctuate among reporting periods.

Current wording

Co-development and research fees decreased 75%, or $228, for the three months ended September 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. This decrease was driven by the timing of the achievement of research and co-development performance obligations which are expected to fluctuate among reporting periods.

Previous wording

For the three months ended June 30, 2026, total revenues increased 38%, or $3,816, compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to increases in manufacture and supply revenue, license and royalty revenue, and proprietary product revenue, net.

Current wording

For the nine months ended September 30, 2026, total revenues increased 14%, or $4,292, compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to increases in license and royalty revenue, partially offset by decreases in manufacture and supply revenue.

Previous wording

Manufacture and supply revenue increased approximately 24%, or $2,328, for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to higher Suboxone revenues of approximately $4,600, partially offset by lower Ondif revenues of approximately $2,200.

Current wording

Manufacture and supply revenue decreased approximately 3%, or $880, for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to lower Ondif revenues of approximately $2,600, partially offset by higher Suboxone revenues of approximately $1,600.

Previous wording

License and royalty revenue increased 58%, or $487, for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to the recognition of royalty revenue from Zevra.

Current wording

License and royalty revenue increased 183%, or $4,878, for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to royalty revenue from Zevra.

Previous wording

Co-development and research fees for the six months ended June 30, 2026 increased 6%, or $44 compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was driven by the timing of the achievement of research and co-development performance obligations which are expected to fluctuate among reporting periods.

Current wording

Co-development and research fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 decreased 17%, or $184 compared to the same period in the prior year. This decrease was driven by the timing of the achievement of research and co-development performance obligations which are expected to fluctuate among reporting periods.

Previous wording

Proprietary product revenue, net increased by $478 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to the change in the estimated returns allowance provision in the prior year period due to the withdrawal of the product as U.S. market access ended in April 2025.

Current wording

Proprietary product revenue, net increased by $478 for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to the change in the estimated returns allowance provision in the prior year period due to the withdrawal of the product as U.S. market access ended in April 2025.

Previous wording

Manufacture and supply costs and expenses decreased 12%, or $544, for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease in manufacture and supply costs was due to changes in product mix.

Current wording

Manufacture and supply costs and expenses decreased 20%, or $900, for the three months ended September 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease in manufacture and supply costs was due to changes in product mix.

Previous wording

Research and development expenses decreased 3% or $143 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease in R&D expenses is primarily due to lower development and manufacturing costs associated with the Anaphylm program, partially offset by increases in preclinical costs associated with AQST-108.

Current wording

Research and development expenses decreased 6% or $279 for the three months ended September 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease in R&D expenses was primarily due to lower share-based compensation, which was the result of acceleration of compensation due to severance in the prior year period, partially offset by higher clinical trial costs associated with the Anaphylm program.

Previous wording

Total project expenses for Anaphylm decreased 12%, or $149 over the comparable period in 2025. Anaphylm development and manufacturing expenses decreased by $199, partially offset by increases in clinical trial costs of $95. Total project expenses for AQST-108 decreased $38, over the comparable period in 2025. AQST-108 clinical trial expenses decreased $28 over the comparable period in 2025.

Current wording

Total project expenses for Anaphylm increased 29%, or $267 over the comparable period in 2025. Anaphylm clinical trial costs increased by $669 due to the HF and PK studies completed for the Anaphylm NDA resubmission, partially offset by decreases in product research expenses of $387. Total project expenses for AQST-108 increased $425 over the comparable period in 2025. AQST-108 clinical trial costs increased $180 over the comparable period in 2025 due to a credit received from a vendor in the prior year period.

Previous wording

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 11%, or $1,358 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase primarily represents higher legal fees of approximately $2,100, higher severance costs of approximately $1,400 which includes acceleration of share-based compensation, higher personnel costs of approximately $900, and higher share-based compensation expenses of approximately $300 as well as other expenses, partially offset by lower commercial spending of approximately $2,600, lower regulatory and licensing fees of approximately $1,000 related to the regulatory fee for Libervant, and lower regulatory expenses related to Anaphylm of approximately $240.

Current wording

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 7%, or $1,081 for the three months ended September 30, 2026 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease primarily represents lower legal fees of approximately $1,500, lower commercial spending of approximately $1,400, and lower regulatory expenses related to Anaphylm of approximately $600, partially offset by higher personnel costs of approximately $900, higher share-based compensation expenses of approximately $400, and higher consulting and outside services expenses of approximately $400 as well as other expenses.

Previous wording

Interest expense was $2,807 and $2,781 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. These amounts represent interest incurred on the Term Loan Facility, the 13.5% Notes prior to redemption, amortization of the debt and legal settlement discounts and capitalized debt issuance costs.

Current wording

Interest expense was $1,845 and $2,779 for the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. These amounts represent interest incurred on the Term Loan Facility, the 13.5% Notes prior to redemption, amortization of the debt and legal settlement discounts and capitalized debt issuance costs.

Previous wording

Interest expense related to amortization of the discount on the royalty obligations was $972 and $1,434 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. These amounts are due to the accounting associated with the royalty obligations as part of the 13.5% Notes issuance. The decrease from the comparable period is due to a lower effective interest rate as a result from the update to theprobability-weighted cash flows for future sales as of December 31, 2025.

Current wording

Interest expense related to amortization of the discount on the royalty obligations was $973 and $1,433 for the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. These amounts are due to the accounting associated with the royalty obligations as part of the 13.5% Notes issuance. The decrease from the comparable period is due to a lower effective interest rate as a result from the update to theprobability-weighted cash flows for future sales as of December 31, 2025.

Previous wording

Interest expense related to the sale of future revenue was $61 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, and represents amortization of the issuance costs. These amounts are due to the accounting associated with the sale of future revenue related to KYNMOBI royalties sold to Marathon on November 3, 2020 and do not represent or imply a monetary obligation or cash outflow at any time during the life of the transaction. In June 2023, Sunovion announced that it had voluntarily withdrawn KYNMOBI from the U.S. and Canadian markets. Therefore, the Company likely will not receive any of the additional contingent payments under the Monetization Agreement. As a result, the Company discontinued recording interest expense related to the sale of future revenue in the fourth quarter of 2022. See Note 15, Sale of Future Revenue to our Condensed Financial Statements for details.

Current wording

Interest expense related to the sale of future revenue was $62 and $61 for the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, and represents amortization of the issuance costs. These amounts are due to the accounting associated with the sale of future revenue related to KYNMOBI royalties sold to Marathon on November 3, 2020 and do not represent or imply a monetary obligation or cash outflow at any time during the life of the transaction. In June 2023, Sunovion announced that it had voluntarily withdrawn KYNMOBI from the U.S. and Canadian markets. Therefore, the Company likely will not receive any of the additional contingent payments under the Monetization Agreement. As a result, the Company discontinued recording interest expense related to the sale of future revenue in the fourth quarter of 2022. See Note 15, Sale of Future Revenue to our Condensed Financial Statements for details.

Previous wording

Manufacture and supply costs and expenses decreased 9% or $727 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease was largely due to changes in product mix.

Current wording

Manufacture and supply costs and expenses decreased 13% or $1,627 for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease was largely due to changes in product mix.

Previous wording

R&D expenses decreased 14% or $1,300 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease in R&D expenses is primarily due to a decrease in clinical trial costs and product research expenses associated with the Anaphylm program, and decreases in share-based compensation, partially offset by increases in personnel costs and increases in clinical trial costs associated with AQST-108. The tables below provide a breakdown of the major costs included in total R&D expenses and project costs by type of expense for each of the main clinical development projects in which we are engaged for each period presented:

Current wording

R&D expenses decreased 11% or $1,579 for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease in R&D expenses is primarily due to a decrease in clinical trial costs and product research expenses associated with the Anaphylm program, and decreases in share-based compensation, which was the result of acceleration of compensation due to severance in the prior year period, partially offset by increases in personnel costs and increases in AQST-108 clinical trial costs. The tables below provide a breakdown of the major costs included in total R&D expenses and project costs by type of expense for each of the main clinical development projects in which we are engaged for each period presented:

Previous wording

Total project expenses for Anaphylm decreased 42%, or $1,552 over the comparable period in 2025. Anaphylm clinical trial expenses and product research expenses decreased $1,156 and $336 respectively over the comparable period in 2025. AQST-108 clinical trial expenses increased $347 over the comparable period in 2025.

Current wording

Total project expenses for Anaphylm decreased 28%, or $1,285 over the comparable period in 2025. Anaphylm clinical trial expenses and product research expenses decreased $487 and $723, respectively over the comparable period in 2025. AQST-108 clinical trial expenses, and development and manufacturing expenses increased $527 and $223, respectively over the comparable period in 2025.

Showing the first 40 of 59 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.

Rearranged current paragraphs (4)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

EMA. Not all collaborative or licensed products of the Company that may be commercially launched in the future will necessarily be manufactured by us.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

September 30, 2026, Suboxone branded products retain approximately 25% film market share as generic film-based products have penetrated this market.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Term Loan Facility and the repayment of the 13.5% Notes are discussed in Note 13, Long-Term Debt, to our Condensed Financial Statements. See Liquidity and Capital Resources below for further detail on the Term Loan Facility.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

During the three months ended September 30, 2026, 160,548 shares were issued upon the exercise of the Warrants issued under the Securities Purchase Agreements, with the Company receiving proceeds of $154.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (5)

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

In June 2024, we reported positive topline PK data from the Company's temperature / pH study of Anaphylm. The single-dose, five-period, randomized crossover study was designed to compare the PK and PD of Anaphylm just after consuming normal water at different temperatures (hot, cold, and room temperature) as well as water of different pHs

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026. The loss represents the difference between the carrying value of the 13.5% Notes as of May 12, 2026 and the total payoff amount of the 13.5% Notes.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Proprietary product revenue, net increased by $797 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to the change in the estimated returns allowance provision in the prior year period due to the withdrawal of the product as U.S. market access ended in April 2025.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Interest income and other income, net decreased 58%, or $1,214 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease from the comparable period is primarily due to the ERTC credit received in April 2025.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $11,683 resulting from the repayment of $45,000 for the outstanding 13.5% Notes, which also included a prepayment penalty of $3,825, exit fee of $2,000, and other transaction fees. There was no loss on extinguishment of debt in the comparable period in 2025.