Archrock, Inc.

Previous wording

Uncertainty on future inflation trends and fluctuations on interest rates have created further uncertainty for the economy and for our customers. Elevated inflation will increase our labor costs and the costs of parts, lube oil and other materials used in our operations. An increase in inflation rates could negatively affect our profitability and cash flows, due to higher wages, higher operating costs, higher financing costs, and/or higher supplier prices. We may be unable to pass along such higher costs to our customers. In addition, inflation may adversely affect customers’ financing costs, cash flows, and profitability, which could adversely impact their operations and our ability to collect receivables.

Current wording

Uncertainty on future inflation trends and fluctuations in interest rates have created further uncertainty for the economy and for our customers. Elevated inflation will increase our labor costs and the costs of parts, lube oil and other materials used in our operations. An increase in inflation rates could negatively affect our profitability and cash flows, due to higher wages, higher operating costs, higher financing costs, and/or higher supplier prices. We may be unable to pass along such higher costs to our customers. In addition, inflation may adversely affect customers’ financing costs, cash flows, and profitability, which could adversely impact their operations and our ability to collect receivables.

Previous wording

Additionally, trade tensions or restrictions on free trade, including the tariffs that have been proposed by the current administration, could exacerbate these effects. Any widespread imposition of new or increased tariffs could increase the cost of imported materials and products, such as steel, which accordingly could increase costs of our products, disrupt our supply chain, cause adverse financial impacts due to volatility in foreign exchange rates and interest rates, increase inflationary pressures on raw materials and energy, and negatively impact our profit margins. New or increased tariffs could also negatively affect U.S. national or regional economies, which could affect the demand for our products.

Current wording

Additionally, trade tensions or restrictions on free trade, including the tariffs that have been imposed and proposed by the current administration, could exacerbate these effects. Any widespread imposition of new or increased tariffs and trade restrictions could increase the cost of imported materials and products, such as steel, which accordingly could increase costs of our products, disrupt our supply chain, cause adverse financial impacts due to volatility in foreign exchange rates and interest rates, increase inflationary pressures on raw materials and energy, and negatively impact our profit margins. New or increased tariffs could also negatively affect U.S. national or regional economies, which could affect the demand for our products.

Previous wording

The conflict in Ukraine, the Israel-Hamas war and related price volatility and geopolitical instability could negatively impact our business.

Current wording

The conflict in Ukraine, the Israel-Hamas war, other geopolitical conflicts, and related price volatility and geopolitical instability could negatively impact our business.

Previous wording

In late February 2022, Russia launched significant military action against Ukraine, and in October 2023, Israel launched a military response against Hamas in Gaza. These ongoing conflicts have caused, and could intensify, volatility in oil and natural gas prices, and the extent and duration of these military actions, sanctions and resulting market disruptions could be significant and could potentially have a substantial negative impact on the global economy and/or our business for an unknown period of time. Any such volatility and disruptions may also magnify the impact of other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section.

Current wording

In late February 2022, Russia launched significant military action against Ukraine, and in October 2023, Israel launched a military response against Hamas in Gaza. These ongoing conflicts and other geopolitical conflicts, such as the developments in Venezuela, have caused, and could intensify, volatility in oil and natural gas prices, and the extent and duration of these military actions, sanctions and resulting market disruptions could be significant and could potentially have a substantial negative impact on the global economy and/or our business for an unknown period of time. Any such volatility and disruptions may also magnify the impact of other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section.

Previous wording

We face significant competitive pressures that may cause us to lose market share and harm our financial performance.

Current wording

We face significant competitive pressures that may cause us to lose market share and negatively affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Previous wording

In addition, we could face significant competition from new entrants into the compression services business. Some of our existing competitors or new entrants may expand or fabricate new compressors that would create additional competition for the services we provide to our customers. In addition, our customers may purchase and operate their own compression fleets in lieu of using our natural gas compression services. We also may not be able to take advantage of certain opportunities or make certain investments because of our debt levels and our other obligations. Any of these competitive pressures could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

In addition, we could face significant competition from new entrants into the compression services business and heightened competition from consolidation of our competitors. Some of our existing competitors or new entrants may expand or fabricate new compressors that would create additional competition for the services we provide to our customers. Certain of these competitors may have greater financial, technical and marketing resources than us, and may be in a better competitive position. In addition, our customers may purchase and operate their own compression fleets in lieu of using our natural gas compression services. In recent years, consolidation in the oil and gas industry has led to combinations of our customers, who have leveraged their size and purchasing power to pursue economies of scale and pricing concessions, which could lead to decreased demand for our products and services. We also may not be able to take advantage of certain opportunities or make certain investments because of our debt levels and our other obligations. Any of these competitive pressures could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Previous wording

Any acquisitions we complete are subject to substantial risks that could reduce our ability to make distributions to our common stockholders.

Current wording

Any acquisitions we complete, including the NGCS Acquisition, are subject to substantial risks that could reduce our ability to make distributions to our common stockholders.

Previous wording

Even if we do make acquisitions that we believe will increase the amount of cash available for distribution to our common stockholders, these acquisitions may nevertheless result in a decrease in the amount of cash available for distribution to our common stockholders. Any acquisition involves potential risks, including, among other things:

Current wording

Even if we do make acquisitions that we believe will increase the amount of cash available for distribution to our common stockholders, these acquisitions, including the NGCS Acquisition, may nevertheless result in a decrease in the amount of cash available for distribution to our common stockholders. Any acquisition, including the NGCS Acquisition, involves potential risks, including, among other things:

Previous wording

We have developed, and we will continue to develop objectives related to sustainability matters. Statements related to these objectives are made using various underlying assumptions and reflect our current intentions, and do not constitute a guarantee that they will be achieved. Our efforts to research, establish, accomplish, and accurately report on these objectives expose us to numerous operational, reputational, financial, legal and other risks. Our ability to achieve any objective is subject to numerous factors and conditions, many of which are outside of our control, including the availability of alternative energy sources in the jurisdictions in which we operate, the capacity of electrical grids to support traditional

Current wording

We have developed, and we will continue to develop objectives related to sustainability matters. Statements related to these objectives are made using various underlying assumptions and reflect our current intentions, and do not constitute a guarantee that they will be achieved or achieved within the projected timeframe. Our efforts to research, establish, accomplish, and accurately report on these objectives expose us to numerous operational, reputational, financial, legal and other risks. Our ability to achieve any objective is subject to numerous factors and conditions, many of which are outside of our control, including the availability of alternative energy sources in the jurisdictions in which we operate, the capacity of electrical grids to support traditional and alternative energy sources, and the broader economic and legal circumstances affecting energy and electricity locally. We cannot predict the ultimate impact of achieving our objectives, or the various implementation aspects, on our financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, we had $2.2 billion in outstanding debt obligations, net of unamortized debt premiums and unamortized deferred financing costs, outstanding under our Credit Facility and Senior Notes. Many factors, including factors beyond our control, may affect our ability to make payments on our outstanding indebtedness. These factors include those discussed elsewhere in these Risk Factors.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, we had $2.4 billion in outstanding debt obligations, net of unamortized debt premiums and unamortized deferred financing costs, outstanding under our Credit Facility and senior notes. Many factors, including factors beyond our control, may affect our ability to make payments on our outstanding indebtedness. These factors include those discussed elsewhere in these Risk Factors.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Debt Agreements.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Debt Agreements, excluding the 2034 Notes, which were issued in January 2026 and not subject to covenant compliance as of December 31, 2025. See Note 15 (“Long-Term Debt”) for further details.

Previous wording

Historically, we have financed acquisitions, operating expenditures and capital expenditures with a combination of cash provided by operating and financing activities. However, to the extent we are unable to finance our operating expenditures, capital expenditures, scheduled interest and debt repayments and any future dividends with net cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under the Credit Facility, we may require additional capital. Periods of instability in the capital and credit markets (both generally and in the oil and gas industry in particular) could limit our ability to access these markets to raise debt or equity capital on affordable terms or to obtain additional financing. Among other things, our lenders may seek to increase interest rates, enact tighter lending standards, refuse to refinance existing debt at maturity at favorable terms or at all and may reduce or cease to provide funding to us. If we are unable to access the capital and credit markets on favorable terms, or if we are not successful in raising capital within the time period required or at all, we may not be able to grow or maintain our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

Historically, we have financed acquisitions, operating expenditures and capital expenditures with a combination of cash provided by operating and financing activities. However, to the extent we are unable to finance our operating expenditures, capital expenditures, scheduled interest and debt repayments and any future dividends with net cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under the Credit Facility, we may require additional capital. Periods of instability in the capital and credit markets (both generally and in the oil and gas industry in particular) could limit our ability to access these markets to raise debt or equity capital on affordable terms or to obtain additional financing. Among other things, our lenders may seek to increase interest rates, enact tighter lending standards, refuse to refinance existing debt at maturity at favorable terms or at all and may reduce or cease to provide funding to us. Additionally, extended lead times for newly fabricated equipment can increase near-term capital needs and create timing inconsistency between funding availability and capital expenditures. If we are unable to access the capital and credit markets on favorable terms, or if we are not successful in raising capital within the time period required or at all, we may not be able to grow or maintain our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

The erosion of the financial condition of our customers could adversely affect our business.

Current wording

The erosion of the financial condition of our customers could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Previous wording

Our five most significant customers collectively accounted for 35%, 33% and 32% of our revenues during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Our services are provided to these customers pursuant to contract operations service agreements, which generally have an initial term of 12 to 36 months, or up to 60 months for the largest horsepower units in our fleet, and continue thereafter until terminated by either party with 30 days’ advance notice. The loss of all or even a portion of the services we provide to these customers, as a result of competition or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

Our five most significant customers collectively accounted for 35%, 35% and 33% of our revenues during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Our services are provided to these customers pursuant to contract operations service agreements, which generally have an initial term of 12 to 36 months, or generally up to 60 months for the largest horsepower units in our fleet, and continue thereafter until terminated by either party with 30 days’ advance notice. The loss of all or even a portion of the services we provide to these customers, as a result of competition or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

Many of our contract operations service agreements have short initial terms and are cancelable on short notice after the initial term, and we cannot be sure that such contracts will be extended or renewed after the end of the initial contractual term. Any such non renewals, or renewals at reduced rates or the loss of contracts with any significant customer could adversely impact our results of operations.

Current wording

Many of our contract operations service agreements have short initial terms and are cancelable on short notice after the initial term, and we cannot be sure that such contracts will be extended or renewed after the end of the initial contractual term. Any such non-renewals, or renewals at reduced rates or the loss of contracts with any significant customer could adversely impact our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Previous wording

The length of our contract operations service agreements with customers varies based on operating conditions and customer needs. Our initial contract terms typically are not long enough to enable us to recoup the cost of the equipment we utilize to provide contract operations services, and these contracts are typically cancelable on short notice after the initial term. We cannot be sure that a substantial number of these contracts will be extended or renewed by our customers or that any of our customers will continue to contract with us. The inability to negotiate extensions or renew a substantial portion of our contract operations services contracts, the renewal of such contracts at reduced rates, the inability to contract for additional services with our customers or the loss of all or a significant portion of our services contracts with any significant customer could lead to a reduction in revenue and net income and could require us to record asset impairments. Moreover, we have limited ability to increase prices during our initial contract terms. As a result, we are unable to pass increases in the prices of the equipment, materials and services we utilize to provide contract operations services, as a result of inflation of otherwise, onto our customers, which could result in a reduction in net income. This could have a material adverse effect upon our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Current wording

The length of our contract operations service agreements with customers varies based on operating conditions and customer needs. Our initial contract terms typically are not long enough to enable us to recoup the cost of the equipment we utilize to provide contract operations services, and these contracts are typically cancelable on short notice after the initial term. We cannot be sure that a substantial number of these contracts will be extended or renewed by our customers or that any of our customers will continue to contract with us. The inability to negotiate extensions or renew a substantial portion of our contract operations services contracts, the renewal of such contracts at reduced rates, the inability to contract for additional services with our customers or the loss of all or a significant portion of our services contracts with any significant customer could lead to a reduction in revenue and net income and could require us to record asset impairments. Moreover, we have limited ability to increase prices during our initial contract terms. As a result, we are unable to pass increases in the prices of the equipment, materials and services we utilize to provide contract operations services, as a result of inflation, tariffs, or otherwise, onto our customers, which could result in a reduction in net income. This could have a material adverse effect upon our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Previous wording

We depend on particular suppliers and are vulnerable to product shortages and price increases. With respect to our suppliers of newly–fabricated compression equipment specifically, we occasionally experience long lead times, and therefore may at times make purchases in anticipation of future business. If we are unable to purchase compression equipment or other integral equipment, materials and services from third-party suppliers, we may be unable to retain existing customers or compete for new customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

We depend on particular suppliers and are vulnerable to product shortages and price increases. With respect to our suppliers of newly–fabricated compression equipment specifically, we occasionally experience long lead times, and therefore may at times make purchases in anticipation of future business. If we are unable to purchase compression equipment or other integral equipment, materials and services from third-party suppliers, we may be unable to retain existing customers or compete for new customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Previous wording

Some equipment, materials and services used in our business are obtained from a limited group of suppliers. Our reliance on these suppliers involves several risks, including price increases (as a result of inflation or otherwise), inferior quality and a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of such equipment, materials and services in a timely manner. Additionally, we occasionally experience long lead times from our suppliers of newly–fabricated compression equipment and may at times make purchases in anticipation of future business. We do not have long–term contracts with some of these suppliers, and the partial or complete loss of certain of these suppliers could have a negative impact on our results of operations and could damage our customer relationships.

Current wording

Some equipment, materials and services used in our business are obtained from a limited group of suppliers. Our reliance on these suppliers involves several risks, including price increases (as a result of inflation, tariffs or otherwise), inferior quality and a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of such equipment, materials and services in a timely manner. Additionally, we occasionally experience long lead times from our suppliers of newly–fabricated compression equipment and may at times make purchases in anticipation of future business. We do not have long–term contracts with some of these suppliers, and the partial or complete loss of certain of these suppliers could have a negative impact on our results of operations and could damage our customer relationships.

Previous wording

If we are unable to purchase compression equipment, in particular, on a timely basis to meet the demands of our customers, our existing customers may terminate their contractual relationships with us, or we may not be able to compete for business from new or existing customers, which, in each case, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Further, supply chain bottlenecks could adversely affect our ability to obtain necessary materials, parts or lube oil used in our operations or increase the costs of such items. A significant increase in the price of such equipment, materials and services, as a result of inflation, or other factors, could have a negative impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Current wording

If we are unable to purchase compression equipment, in particular, on a timely basis to meet the demands of our customers, our existing customers may terminate their contractual relationships with us, or we may not be able to compete for business from new or existing customers, which, in each case, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Further, supply chain bottlenecks could adversely affect our ability to obtain necessary materials, parts or lube oil used in our operations or increase the costs of such items. A significant increase in the price of such equipment, materials and services, as a result of inflation, tariffs or other factors, could have a negative impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Previous wording

We may not realize the intended benefits of our process and technology transformation project, which could have an adverse effect on our business.

Current wording

We may not realize the intended benefits of our process and technology transformation project, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

Between 2019 and 2021, we invested in a process and technology transformation project that replaced our existing ERP, supply chain and inventory management systems and expanded the remote monitoring capabilities of our compression fleet. Beginning in 2023, our focus shifted to fully harnessing these technologies across our business. We expect the technological transformations to lower our internal costs and improve our profitability over time. However, the implementation of the process and technology transformation project has required significant capital and other resources from which we may not realize the benefits we expect to realize. Any such difficulties could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

We utilize technology in all aspects of our business to drive operational efficiencies and enhance our value proposition to our customers. Our investments have focused on implementing cloud-based solutions to replace legacy systems, the automation of workflows, integration of digital and mobile tools for our field service technicians and expanded remote monitoring capabilities of our compression fleet. The implementation of the process and technology transformation project has required significant capital and other resources from which we may not realize the benefits we expect to realize. Any such difficulties could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

Threats of cyber-attacks or terrorism could affect our business.

Current wording

Cyber-attacks or terrorism could affect our business, results of operations and our reputation.

Previous wording

We rely on our information technology systems and data for critical operations. We own and manage some of these technology systems, but also rely on the systems provided by a host of third-party service providers, vendors, and business partners. We and certain of our third-party providers collect, maintain and process data about customers, employees, business partners and others, including personally identifiable information, as well as proprietary information belonging to our business, such as trade secrets. We are subject to numerous and evolving cybersecurity risks and threats, including cyber-attacks, computer viruses and terrorism that threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of critical technology systems or information and may disrupt our operations and harm our operating results. Our industry requires the continued operation of sophisticated information technology systems and network infrastructure. Any integration of artificial intelligence in our or relevant third parties’ operations, products or services is expected to pose new and/or unknown cybersecurity risks and challenges. In addition, we have acquired and may continue to acquire companies with cybersecurity vulnerabilities and/or unsophisticated security measures, which exposes us to significant cybersecurity, operational, and financial risks.

Current wording

We rely on our information technology systems and data for critical operations. We own and manage some of these technology systems, but also rely on the systems provided by a host of third-party service providers, vendors, and business partners. We and certain of our third-party providers collect, maintain and process data about customers, employees, business partners and others, including personally identifiable information, as well as proprietary information belonging to our business, such as trade secrets. We are subject to numerous and evolving cybersecurity risks and threats, including cyber-attacks, computer viruses and terrorism that threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of critical technology systems or information and may disrupt our operations and harm our operating results. Our industry requires the continued operation of sophisticated information technology systems and network infrastructure. Any integration of AI in our or relevant third parties’ operations, products or services is expected to pose new and/or unknown cybersecurity risks and challenges. In addition, we have acquired and may continue to acquire companies with cybersecurity vulnerabilities and/or unsophisticated security measures, which exposes us to significant cybersecurity, operational, and financial risks.

Previous wording

Despite our implementation of security measures, our technology systems and data are vulnerable to material compromises, disruption and failures due to social engineering/phishing, malware (including ransomware), malfeasance by insiders, human or technological error, hacking, viruses, and as a result of bugs, misconfigurations or exploited vulnerabilities in software or hardware, acts of war or terrorism and other causes. Given the complexity of our technology systems, which includes operational technology deployed in the field, we are unable to comprehensively identify, patch or mitigate against all security vulnerabilities. In addition, a successful cyberattack against a critical third party could materially impact our operations and financial results, and because we cannot control the scope or effectiveness of the security measures deployed by our third-party suppliers and service providers, such as cloud services that support our internal and customer-facing operations, successful cyberattacks that disrupt or result in unauthorized access to third-party technology systems can materially impact our operations and financial results.

Current wording

Despite our implementation of security measures, our technology systems and data are vulnerable to material compromises, disruption and failures due to social engineering/phishing, malware (including ransomware), malfeasance by insiders, human or technological error, hacking, viruses, and as a result of bugs, misconfigurations or exploited vulnerabilities in software or hardware, acts of war or terrorism and other causes. Given the complexity of our technology systems, which includes operational technology deployed in the field, we are unable to comprehensively identify, patch or mitigate against all security vulnerabilities. In addition, a successful cyberattack against a critical third party could materially impact our operations and financial results, and because we cannot control the scope or effectiveness of the security measures deployed by our third-party suppliers and service providers, such as cloud services that support our internal and customer-facing operations, successful cyberattacks that disrupt or result in unauthorized access to third-party technology systems can materially impact our operations and financial results. We and certain of our third-party providers have experienced cyberattacks and other incidents, and we expect such attacks and incidents to occur in the future. While to date no incidents have had any material operational or financial impact, we cannot guarantee that material incidents will not occur in the future.

Previous wording

Cyberattacks are expected to accelerate on a global basis in frequency and magnitude as threat actors are increasingly sophisticated in using techniques and tools, including generative and other artificial intelligence, that circumvent security controls, evade detection and remove forensic evidence. As a result, there is no guarantee that we will detect, investigate, remediate or recover from future attacks or incidents, or avoid a material adverse impact to our systems or information. There also can be no assurance that our cybersecurity risk management program and processes, including our policies, controls or procedures, will be fully implemented, complied with or effective in protecting our systems and information. If our information technology systems were to fail and we were unable to recover in a timely way, we may be unable to fulfill critical business functions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

Cyberattacks are expected to accelerate on a global basis in frequency and magnitude as threat actors are increasingly sophisticated in using techniques and tools, including generative and other AI, that circumvent security controls, evade detection and remove forensic evidence. As a result, there is no guarantee that we will detect, investigate, remediate or recover from future attacks or incidents, or avoid a material adverse impact to our systems or information. There also can be no assurance that our cybersecurity risk management program and processes, including our policies, controls or procedures, will be fully implemented, complied with or effective in protecting our systems and information. If our information technology systems were to fail and we were unable to recover in a timely way, we may be unable to fulfill critical business functions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

The nature of our industry and assets makes us a target for terrorist activities designed to disrupt our ability to service our customers. Increased cybersecurity regulations and an escalating cyber terrorist threat environment are expected to require additional investments in security that we cannot currently predict. The implementation of security guidelines and measures and maintenance of insurance, to the extent available, addressing such activities could increase costs. We cannot guarantee that any costs and liabilities incurred in relation to an attack or incident will be covered by our existing insurance policies or that applicable insurance will be available to us in the future on economically reasonable terms or at all. These types of events could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition, these types of events could require significant management attention and resources and could adversely affect our reputation among customers and the public.

Current wording

The nature of our industry and assets makes us a target for terrorist activities designed to disrupt our ability to service our customers. Increased cybersecurity regulations and an escalating cyber terrorist threat environment are expected to require additional investments in security that we cannot currently predict. We are also subject to evolving cybersecurity and data privacy laws and regulations that are increasingly complex. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in significant legal liability, regulatory investigations and penalties, or harm to our reputation in the marketplace. The implementation of security requirements and measures and the maintenance of insurance, to the extent available, addressing such activities could significantly increase costs. We cannot guarantee that any costs and liabilities incurred in relation to an attack or incident, such as lost business, penalties or damages, will be covered by our existing insurance policies or that applicable insurance will be available to us in the future on economically reasonable terms or at all. These types of events could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition, these types of events could require significant management attention and resources and could adversely affect our reputation among customers and the public.

Previous wording

From time to time, we are subject to various claims, tax audits, litigation and other proceedings that could ultimately be resolved against us and require material future cash payments or charges, which could impair our financial condition or results of operations.

Current wording

From time to time, we are subject to various claims, tax audits, litigation and other proceedings that could ultimately be resolved against us and require material future cash payments or charges, which could impair our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Previous wording

The size, nature and complexity of our business make us susceptible to various claims, tax audits, litigation and binding arbitration proceedings. We are currently, and may in the future become, subject to various claims, which, if not resolved within amounts we have accrued, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, including our ability to pay dividends. Similarly, any claims, even if fully indemnified or insured, could negatively impact our reputation among our customers and the public and make it more difficult for us to compete effectively or obtain adequate insurance in the future. See Part I, Item 3 “Legal Proceedings” of this form 10-K and Note 16

Current wording

The size, nature and complexity of our business make us susceptible to various claims, tax audits, litigation and binding arbitration proceedings. We are currently, and may in the future become, subject to various claims, which, if not resolved within amounts we have accrued, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, including our ability to pay dividends. Similarly, any claims, even if fully indemnified or insured, could negatively impact our reputation among our customers and the public and make it more difficult for us to compete effectively or obtain adequate insurance in the future. See Part I, Item 3 “Legal Proceedings” of this Form 10-K and Note 16 (“Commitments and Contingencies”) to our Financial Statements for additional information regarding certain legal proceedings to which we are a party.

Previous wording

On March 8, 2024, the EPA published even more stringent rules with respect to methane and VOC for new and existing sources, via NSPS Subparts OOOOb and OOOOc, with the OOOOb rules for sources constructed, modified, or reconstructed after December 6, 2022, which became effective on May 7, 2024. The OOOOc rules for existing sources gives the States a two-year deadline to develop and submit to EPA plans for addressing emissions from those sources.

Current wording

In March 2024, the EPA published even more stringent rules with respect to methane and VOC for new and existing sources, via NSPS Subparts OOOOb and OOOOc, with the OOOOb rules for sources constructed, modified, or reconstructed after December 6, 2022, which became effective on May 7, 2024. The OOOOc rules for existing sources give the States a two-year deadline to develop and submit to EPA plans for addressing emissions from those sources. However, EPA issued a direct interim final rule in July 2025 and a final rule in December 2025 that pushed the substantive deadlines in OOOOb and OOOOc back to January 2027. EPA has also been working on a proposed rule to roll back significant portions of the OOOOb and OOOOc, which rule proposal is in interagency review at the White House Office of Management and Budget and is expected for publication soon.

Previous wording

On April 10, 2024, BoLM published a separate final rule, known as the “Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation” rule, to address methane emissions from oil and gas activities on public lands, which became effective on June 10, 2024. The rule is currently stayed pending litigation in North Dakota, Texas, Montana, Wyoming, and Utah. Among the newly adopted methane requirements that may impact our operations are broader applicability to compression equipment relative to the existing rules, increased work practices and inspection requirements and mandates for certain new zero–emissions equipment.

Current wording

In April 2024, BoLM published a separate final rule, known as the “Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation” rule, to address methane emissions from oil and gas activities on public lands, which became effective on June 10, 2024. The rule is currently stayed pending litigation in North Dakota, Texas, Montana, Wyoming, and Utah. Among the newly adopted methane requirements that may impact our operations are broader applicability to compression equipment relative to the existing rules, increased work practices and inspection requirements and mandates for certain new zero-emissions equipment. Notably, however, in November 2025, BoLM announced that it will not enforce requirements of the rule that carried a December 10, 2025 deadline until December 10, 2026.

Previous wording

Meanwhile, several states — including, most notably, New Mexico and Colorado — have continued to develop their own more stringent methane rules that will or are anticipated to impose additional requirements on the industry. For example, Colorado’s Air Quality Control Commission adopted the “Midstream Rule” on December 20, 2024, to address GHG emissions from midstream oil and gas operations, including from natural gas compressor stations. Under the Midstream Rule, midstream facilities must begin taking steps to reduce GHG emissions from combustion fuel equipment by February 14, 2025.

Current wording

Meanwhile, several states — including, most notably, New Mexico and Colorado — have continued to develop their own more stringent methane rules that will or are anticipated to impose additional requirements on the industry. For example, Colorado’s Air Quality Control Commission adopted the “Midstream Rule” on December 20, 2024, to address GHG emissions from midstream oil and gas operations, including from natural gas compressor stations. Under the Midstream Rule, midstream facilities were required to begin taking steps to reduce GHG emissions from combustion fuel equipment by February 14, 2025, and are required to meet certain GHG emissions limits by the end of 2030. The Midstream Rule is subject to ongoing judicial challenges.

Previous wording

We do not believe that these rules will have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, but we cannot yet definitively predict the impact of any revision of the current rules or issuance of new rules, which impact could be material.

Current wording

We do not believe that these rules will have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, but we cannot yet definitively predict the impact of any revision of the current rules or issuance of new rules, the impact of which could be material.

Previous wording

On October 1, 2015, the EPA issued a new NAAQS ozone standard of 70 ppb, which is a tightening from the 75-ppb standard set in 2008. This new standard became effective on December 28, 2015, and the EPA completed designating attainment/non–attainment regions under the revised ozone standard in 2018. In November 2016, the EPA proposed an implementation rule for the 2015 NAAQS ozone standard, but the agency has yet to issue a final implementation rule. State implementation of the revised NAAQS could result in stricter permitting requirements, delay or prohibit our customers’ ability to obtain such permits and result in increased expenditures for pollution control equipment, the costs of which could be significant. By law, the EPA must review each NAAQS every five years. In December 2018 and again in December 2020, the EPA announced that it was retaining without revision the 2015 NAAQS ozone standard. In June 2021, the EPA commenced a process for reconsidering the December 2020 decision. In August 2023, the EPA announced a new review of the ozone NAAQS and most recently released reports on December 23, 2024, related to its review. We do not believe continued implementation of the NAAQS ozone standard will have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, but we cannot yet predict the impact, if any, of any new Federal Implementation Plan involving new NAAQS standards.

Current wording

In October 2015, the EPA issued a new NAAQS ozone standard of 70 ppb, which is a tightening from the 75-ppb standard set in 2008. This new standard became effective on December 28, 2015, and the EPA completed designating attainment/non–attainment regions under the revised ozone standard in 2018. In November 2016, the EPA proposed an implementation rule for the 2015 NAAQS ozone standard, but the agency has yet to issue a final implementation rule. State implementation of the revised NAAQS could result in stricter permitting requirements, delay or prohibit our customers’ ability to obtain such permits and result in increased expenditures for pollution control equipment, the costs of which could be significant. By law, the EPA must review each NAAQS every five years. In December 2018 and again in December 2020, the EPA announced that it was retaining without revision the 2015 NAAQS ozone standard. In June 2021, the EPA commenced a process for reconsidering the December 2020 decision. In August 2023, the EPA announced a new review of the ozone NAAQS and most recently released reports on December 23, 2024, related to its review. We do not believe continued implementation of the NAAQS ozone standard will have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, but we cannot yet predict the impact, if any, of any new Federal Implementation Plan involving new NAAQS standards.

Previous wording

Congress and various federal and state legislative and regulatory bodies have previously considered legislation to restrict or regulate emissions of GHG. Energy legislation and other initiatives continue to be proposed that may berelevant to GHG emissions issues. For example, the SEC adopted rules in March 2024 that would, if the rules survive legal challenge, mandate extensive disclosure for certain public companies of climate-related data, risks and opportunities, including financial impacts, physical and transition risks, related governance and strategy, and greenhouse gas emissions. Almost half of the states, either individually or through multi–state regional initiatives, have begun to address GHG emissions, primarily through the planned development of emission inventories or regional GHG cap and trade programs. Various states, such as California, Colorado and New York have passed or proposed similar climate change disclosure laws. Although most of the state–level initiatives have to date been focused on large sources of GHG emissions, such as electric power plants, it is possible that smaller sources such as our natural gas–powered compressors could become subject to GHG–related regulation. Depending on the particular program, we could be required to control emissions or to purchase and surrender allowances for GHG emissions resulting from our operations. Our customers or other business partners may require us to provide additional climate-related information if they are also subject to these or additional climate-related disclosure laws or regulations. These actions could result in increased (i) costs to operate and maintain our facilities, (ii) capital expenditures to install new emission controls on our facilities, and (iii) costs to administer and manage any potential GHG emissions regulations or carbon trading or tax programs. Such climate-related disclosure requirements could result in increased compliance costs, and possible litigation and reputational risks if such disclosures are incomplete, inaccurate, misleading or do not otherwise meet the expectations of our stakeholders. Moreover, such requirements may not always be uniform across jurisdictions, which may result in increased complexity and cost for compliance. In addition, we may take voluntary steps to mitigate any impact our operations might have on climate change. As a result, we may experience increases in energy, transportation and raw material costs, capital expenditures or insurance premiums; however, there is no guarantee that such efforts will have the desired effects.

Current wording

Almost half of the states, either individually or through multi–state regional initiatives, have begun to address GHG emissions, primarily through the planned development of emission inventories or regional GHG cap and trade programs. Various states, such as California, Colorado and New York have passed or proposed similar climate change disclosure laws. Although most of the state–level initiatives have to date been focused on large sources of GHG emissions, such as electric power plants, it is possible that smaller sources such as our natural gas–powered compressors could become subject to GHG–related regulation. Depending on the particular program, we could be required to control emissions or to purchase and surrender allowances for GHG emissions resulting from our operations. Our customers or other business partners may require us to provide additional climate-related information if they are also subject to these or additional climate-related disclosure laws or regulations. These actions could result in increased (i) costs to operate and maintain our facilities, (ii) capital expenditures to install new emission controls on our facilities, and (iii) costs to administer and manage any potential GHG emissions regulations or carbon trading or tax programs. Such climate-related disclosure requirements could result in increased compliance costs, and possible litigation and reputational risks if such disclosures are incomplete, inaccurate, misleading or do not otherwise meet the expectations of our stakeholders. Moreover, such requirements may not always be uniform across jurisdictions, which may result in increased complexity and cost for compliance. In addition, we may take voluntary steps to mitigate any impact our operations might have on climate change. As a result, we may experience increases in energy, transportation and raw material costs, capital expenditures or insurance premiums; however, there is no guarantee that such efforts will have the desired effects.

Previous wording

The $1 trillion legislative infrastructure package passed by Congress in November 2021 includes a number of climate-focused spending initiatives targeted at climate resilience, enhanced response and preparation for extreme weather events, and clean energy and transportation investments. Significant additional legislative action by Congress also occurred in August 2022 with the Inflation Reduction Act, signed into law by the former administration, which provides $391 billion in funding for research and development and incentives for low-carbon energy production methods, carbon capture, and other programs directed at encouraging de-carbonization and addressing climate change. The IRA also amends the Clean Air Act to include a Methane Emissions and Waste Reduction Incentive Program for petroleum and natural gas systems. This program requires the EPA to impose a “waste emissions charge” on certain natural gas and oil sources that are already required to report under EPA’s GHG Reporting Program. In November 2024, the EPA released its final rule to implement the methane emissions fee with an effective date in January 2025, which is expected to apply to reporting year 2024 emissions. While the current administration has issued an executive order pausing the disbursement of all unspent funds appropriated through the IRA and has already begun to roll back these environmental policies implemented during the former administration, U.S. climate leaders have vowed to continue protecting and building on climate progress. Such

Current wording

The $1 trillion legislative infrastructure package passed by Congress in November 2021 included a number of climate-focused spending initiatives targeted at climate resilience, enhanced response and preparation for extreme weather events, and clean energy and transportation investments. Significant additional legislative action by Congress also occurred in August 2022 with the Inflation Reduction Act, signed into law by the former administration, which provided $391 billion in funding for research and development and incentives for low-carbon energy production methods, carbon capture, and other programs directed at encouraging de-carbonization and addressing climate change. The IRA also amended the Clean Air Act to include a Methane Emissions and Waste Reduction Incentive Program for petroleum and natural gas systems. This program required the EPA to impose a “waste emissions charge” on certain natural gas and oil sources that were already required to report under EPA’s GHG Reporting Program. In November 2024, the EPA released its final rule to implement the methane emissions fee with an effective date in January 2025, which was expected to apply to reporting year 2024 emissions. Twenty-three states have filed a lawsuit challenging the rule, and the change in U.S. presidential administration provides additional uncertainty as to the rule’s future. While the current administration issued an executive order pausing the disbursement of all unspent funds appropriated through the IRA and rolling back these environmental policies implemented during the former administration, with legislative action culminating in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which eliminated most of the Inflation Reduction Act’s incentives and delayed the commencement of the methane waste emissions charge on oil and gas sources by a decade to 2034. Notably, Congress eliminated EPA’s regulations in support of the waste emissions charge using the Congressional Review Act effective on March 14, 2025 and, as of September 12, 2025, EPA has proposed to suspend the GHG Reporting Program for oil and gas sources until 2034 and to eliminate such reporting for all other sources. U.S. climate leaders have vowed to continue pressing for climate progress although major new climate legislation seems unlikely in the immediate future. Such legislation, regulations, and initiatives, as well as uncertainty regarding the future success of such regulations and initiatives in reducing demand for oil and gas, could indirectly affect our business and our results of operations by reducing demand for our services.

Previous wording

Separately, the EPA has promulgated regulations controlling GHG emissions under its existing CAA authority. The EPA has adopted rules requiring many facilities, including petroleum and natural gas systems, to inventory and report their GHG emissions. In 2024, we did not operate any facilities that were subject to these reporting obligations. In addition, the EPA rules provide air permitting requirements for certain large sources of GHG emissions. The requirement for large sources of GHG emissions to obtain and comply with permits will affect some of our and our customers’ largest new or modified facilities going forward but is not expected to cause us to incur material costs. As noted above, the EPA has undertaken efforts to regulate emissions of methane, considered a GHG, in the oil and gas sector, and could develop additional, more stringent rules in the future.

Current wording

Separately, the EPA has promulgated regulations controlling GHG emissions under its existing CAA authority. The EPA has adopted rules requiring many facilities, including petroleum and natural gas systems, to inventory and report their GHG emissions. As noted above, in September 2025, EPA proposed to suspend those requirements until 2034. In 2025, we did not operate any facilities that were subject to these reporting obligations. In addition, the EPA rules provide air permitting requirements for certain large sources of GHG emissions. The requirement for large sources of GHG emissions to obtain and comply with permits will affect some of our and our customers’ largest new or modified facilities going forward but is not expected to cause us to incur material costs. As noted above, the EPA has previously undertaken efforts to regulate emissions of methane, considered a GHG, in the oil and gas sector, and could develop additional, more stringent rules at some point in the future.

Previous wording

With the re-election of the current administration, however, these climate-focused initiatives have and will likely face major headwinds, and regulations will likely be scaled back (during his first term, more than 125 U.S. environmental rules and policies were rolled back). Already, the current administration has released a series of executive orders impacting the energy sector. Ranging from declaring a national emergency due to the U.S.’s inadequate energy supply, infrastructure, and prices, to halting wind energy leasing and promoting fossil fuel exploration, these executive orders are already reshaping the current direction of the U.S. climate agenda. At this time, we cannot determine how the current administration will continue to proceed and cannot accurately predict the ensuing impact on social cost or other interagency climate efforts, which may give rise to a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Current wording

In an executive order issued in January 2021, the former administration asked the heads of all executive departments and agencies to review and take action to address any federal regulations, orders, guidance documents, policies and any similar agency actions promulgated during the prior administration that may be inconsistent with or present obstacles to the administration’s stated goals of protecting public health and the environment, and conserving national monuments and refuges. The executive order also established an Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases, which is called on to, among other things, capture the full costs of GHG emissions, including the “social cost of carbon,” “social cost of nitrous oxide” and “social cost of methane,” which are “the monetized damages associated with incremental increases in greenhouse gas emissions,” including “changes in net agricultural productivity, human health, property damage from increased flood risk, and the value of ecosystem services.” In early 2025, however, the new administration disbanded the Working Group and withdrew all of its published guidance, ordering EPA to review whether and how to use the social cost of carbon in federal permitting and regulatory decisions and directing the agencies in the meantime to follow OMB regulatory analysis guidance from 2003 that is virtually silent on climate. The current administration also released a series of executive orders impacting the energy sector, ranging from declaring a national emergency due to the U.S.’s inadequate energy supply, infrastructure, and prices, to halting wind energy leasing and promoting fossil fuel exploration. These executive orders are already reshaping the current direction of the U.S. climate agenda and have led to rulemaking actions by EPA that are beginning to undo U.S. climate regulation, including a February 12, 2026 final rule overturning the 2009 CAA endangerment finding respecting GHGs and all federal GHG emissions standards for vehicles and engines. At this time, we cannot determine how the current administration will continue to proceed and cannot accurately predict the ensuing impact of climate-related policy shifts on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous wording

At the international level, the U.S. joined the international community at the 21st COP of the UNFCCC in Paris, France, which resulted in the “Paris Agreement,” which intended for signatory countries to nationally determine their contributions and set GHG emission reduction goals every five years beginning in 2020. While the Paris Agreement did not impose direct requirements on emitters, national plans to meet its pledge resulted in new regulatory requirements. After withdrawing from the Paris Agreement in November 2020, the U.S. re-entered the Paris Agreement in April 2021 along with a new “nationally determined contribution” that the U.S. would achieve GHG emissions reductions of at least 50% relative to 2005 levels by 2030. In November 2021, at COP26 in Glasgow, the U.S. and European Union jointly announced the launch of the “Global Methane Pledge,” by which signatory countries aim to cut global methane pollution at least 30% by 2030 relative to 2020 levels, including “all feasible reductions” in the energy sector. The December 2023 COP28 meeting in Dubai reaffirmed commitments to the Paris Agreement and concluded that the world should move away from fossil fuel energy in a just, orderly, and equitable manner and aim to achieve net zero GHG emissions by 2050, while recognizing a transitional role for fossil fuels. In November 2024, at COP29 in Azerbaijan, countries agreed on the final building blocks that set out how carbon markets will operate under the Paris Agreement, among other outcomes that further indicate the global push to mitigate climate change. Given that the current administration has issued an executive order that initiated the process to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Agreement and from any commitments made under the UNFCCC, however, it remains to be seen which of these aforementioned U.S. commitments will survive in 2025 and beyond. Just as we cannot fully anticipate the impact of the methane rules discussed above, we also cannot predict whether potential future re-entry, or pending withdrawal from, into the Paris Agreement or other international pledges will result in any particular new federal regulatory requirements or whether such requirements will cause us to incur material costs. Nevertheless, several states and geographic regions in the U.S. have adopted legislation and regulations to reduce emissions of GHGs, including cap and trade regimes and commitments to contribute to meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement.

Current wording

At the international level, the U.S. joined the international community at the 21st COP of the UNFCCC in Paris, France, which resulted in the “Paris Agreement,” which intended for signatory countries to nationally determine their contributions and set GHG emission reduction goals every five years beginning in 2020. While the Paris Agreement did not impose direct requirements on emitters, national plans to meet its pledge resulted in new regulatory requirements. After withdrawing from the Paris Agreement in November 2020, the U.S. re-entered the Paris Agreement in April 2021 along with a new “nationally determined contribution” that the U.S. would achieve GHG emissions reductions of at least 50% relative to 2005 levels by 2030. In November 2021, at COP26 in Glasgow, the U.S. and European Union jointly announced the launch of the “Global Methane Pledge,” by which signatory countries aim to cut global methane pollution at least 30% by 2030 relative to 2020 levels, including “all feasible reductions” in the energy sector. The December 2023 COP28 meeting in Dubai reaffirmed commitments to the Paris Agreement and concluded that the world should move away from fossil fuel energy in a just, orderly, and equitable manner and aim to achieve net zero GHG emissions by 2050, while recognizing a transitional role for fossil fuels. In November 2024, at COP29 in Azerbaijan, countries agreed on the final building blocks that set out how carbon markets will operate under the Paris Agreement, among other outcomes that further indicate the global push to mitigate climate change. However, the current administration issued an executive order in January 2025 that initiated the process to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Agreement and from any commitments made under the UNFCCC. COP30 took place in Brazil in November 2025 with no official participation or representatives attending from the U.S. In January 2026, the U.S. officially withdrew from the Paris Agreement. Just as we cannot fully anticipate the impact of the methane rules discussed above, we also cannot predict whether the withdrawal from or potential future re-entry into the Paris Agreement or other international pledges will result in any particular new federal regulatory requirements or whether such requirements will cause us to incur material costs. Nevertheless, several states and geographic regions in the U.S. have adopted legislation and regulations to reduce emissions of GHGs, including cap and trade regimes and commitments that contribute to meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement.

Previous wording

Increasingly, parties have sought to bring suit against various natural gas and oil companies alleging that the companies have been aware of the adverse effects of climate change but defrauded their investors or customers by failing to adequately disclose those impacts. Any such litigation targeting our customers could negatively impact their operation and, in turn, decrease demand for our operations, which could have an adverse impact on our financial condition.

Current wording

Increasingly, parties have sought to bring suit against various natural gas and oil companies alleging that the companies have been aware of the adverse effects of climate change but defrauded their investors or customers by failing to adequately disclose those impacts. Any such litigation targeting our customers could negatively impact their operations and, in turn, decrease demand for our operations, which could have an adverse impact on our financial condition.

Previous wording

Supply and demand for oil and natural gas is dependent upon a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include, among others, the potential adoption of new government regulations, including those related to fuel conservation measures and climate change regulations, technological advances in fuel economy and energy generation devices. For example, legislative, regulatory or executive actions intended to reduce emissions of GHG could increase the cost of consuming crude oil and natural gas, thereby potentially causing a reduction in the demand for such products. A broader transition to alternative fuels or energy sources, whether resulting from potential new government regulation, carbon taxes or consumer preferences could result in decreased demand for crude oil, natural gas and NGLs. Any decrease in demand for these products could consequently reduce demand for our services and could have a negative effect on our business.

Current wording

Supply and demand for oil and natural gas is dependent upon a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include, among others, the potential adoption of new government regulations, including those related to fuel conservation measures and climate change regulations, technological advances in fuel economy and energy generation devices. For example, legislative, regulatory or executive actions intended to reduce emissions of GHG could increase the cost of consuming crude oil and natural gas, thereby potentially causing a reduction in the demand for such products. A broader transition to alternative fuels or energy sources, whether resulting from potential new government regulation, carbon taxes or consumer preferences could result in decreased demand for crude oil, natural gas and NGLs. In addition, increased focus of our customers on reducing emissions from, or the use of, combustion engines in compression could increase demand for electric compressors or require us to make modifications to our existing natural gas-powered units. Any decrease in demand for these products could consequently reduce demand for our services and could have a negative effect on our business.