Crocs, Inc.
For the period ended Apr 23, 2024. Filed Apr 23, 2024.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.
Apr 23, 2024 · Filed Apr 23, 2024
Contents
2023 Compensation Program
Base Salary. The Committee sets the base salary of the Chief Executive Officer. Base salary for other named executive officers is set by the Committee after considering the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer.
Base salary is reviewed on an annual basis and at the time of hire or promotion. Annual adjustments are influenced by the results of our operations, revenue and profitability levels, individual performance, changes in responsibility, peer company comparisons, and other factors (e.g., internal equity and succession planning).
The base salaries of our named executive officers as of December 31, 2023 are below:
| Named Executive Officer | 2023 Base Salary($) |
|---|---|
| Andrew Rees | 1,100,000 |
| Michelle Poole | 725,000 |
| Anne Mehlman | 675,000 |
| Rick Blackshaw | 675,000 |
| Adam Michaels | 600,000 |
Mss. Poole and Mehlman and Messrs. Blackshaw and Michaels received a 4% salary increase in 2023 as a result of an annual evaluation of executive compensation relative to peer companies in the market and individual performance.
Annual Incentive Awards. The Committee believes that an annual cash incentive program to our named executive officers for meeting or exceeding Company performance goals provides our officers additional incentive to meet or exceed our strategic Company goals and ensures that we attract and retain talented named executive officers.
Performance weightings are primarily driven by pay philosophy, culture, organizational structure as well as sharing of resources, capital and/or employees. Incentive compensation for brand executives is linked to both enterprise goals and brand goals, which the Committee believes can promote teaming across brands and regions. Furthermore, the Committee believes that the scorecards should support and align the Company’s evolving strategy as well as provide accountability clarity and alignment with respect to the Company’s multi-brand strategy.
The Committee believes that the enterprise- and brand- specific metrics diversifies the performance goals among our STIP and LTIP, drives performance across key metrics that we believe drive stockholder value and also supports our strategic priorities.
For brand executives, this incentivizes them to focus on the success and performance of their brands, while keeping the overall success of the company in mind. For corporate executives, this incentivizes them to assist the brand executives in their success, while still emphasizing overall Company performance.
In 2023, the Committee weighted 80% of the STIP on financial metrics and 20% on strategic operating goals to provide focus and incentive to achieve key strategic non-financial objectives during the Company’s continued growth. As discussed above in “—Named Executive Officer Incentive Program Changes,” the non-financial objectives were further refined in 2023 to reflect strategic priorities and predetermined corporate responsibility and sustainability strategic initiatives were added to each of the non-financial metrics in all three of our STIP scorecards to increase focus on near-term goals.
Each year, the Committee establishes a target STIP for each named executive officer expressed as a percentage of the executive’s base salary, based on factors such as: the estimated contribution and responsibility of the named executive officer, market practices, internal equity and the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer (for all named executive officers excluding himself).
For 2023, the targets for our named executive officers were:
| Named Executive Officer | STIP Target (as a percentage of Base Salary) |
|---|---|
| Andrew Rees | 200% |
| Michelle Poole | 100% |
| Anne Mehlman | 100% |
| Richard Blackshaw | 100% |
| Adam Michaels | 100% |
In 2023, the STIP target (as a percentage of base salary) increased 50 percentage points for Mr. Rees, 25 percentage points for Mr. Blackshaw, and 10 percentage points for Ms. Mehlman and Mr. Michaels, as a result of an annual evaluation of executive compensation relative to peer companies in the market.
The total STIP award actually paid to each named executive officer is determined based on the extent to which specified weighted objective performance goals are achieved with potential payouts ranging from 50% to 200% of the incentive plan target; there are no payouts for below-threshold performance.
For purposes of the 2023 performance year, the Committee selected: (i) Enterprise adjusted EBIT, Enterprise adjusted free cash flow, Enterprise strategic initiative performance, and ESG progress for Messrs. Rees and Michaels and Ms. Mehlman, the named executive officers on the Crocs, Inc. Enterprise scorecard, (ii) Crocs Brand adjusted EBIT, Enterprise adjusted free cash flow, Crocs Brand strategic initiative performance, and ESG progress for Ms. Poole, the named executive officer on the Crocs Brand Scorecard, and (iii) HEYDUDE Brand adjusted EBIT, Enterprise adjusted free cash flow, HEYDUDE Brand strategic initiative performance, and corporate responsibility and sustainability progress for Mr. Blackshaw, the named executive officer on the HEYDUDE Brand scorecard as performance measures in the STIP. The Committee continued to include Enterprise and brand-specific adjusted EBIT, as applicable, and Enterprise adjusted free cash flow to more closely align compensation with key performance metrics associated with profitability.
Based on 2023 actual results, our named executive officers were eligible to be paid annual cash incentive awards at the applicable percentages of their respective target STIP award amounts set forth in the table below. The Committee has discretion to depart from the formula in approving the STIP awards by decreasing, but not increasing, incentive awards after results are known. The Committee did not exercise that discretion in 2023.
For 2023, these goals and their applicable weightings and earned payouts were:
| Crocs, Inc. Enterprise (1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Performance Targets | Weighting | Actual Performance | Weighted 2023 Actual Performance as a Percentage of Target |
| Enterprise adjusted EBIT (2): $1,179.1 million | 40.0% | $1,076.3 million(78.2% payout) | 31.3% |
| Enterprise adjusted free cash flow (3): $1,005.0 million | 40.0% | $1,134.1 million(132.1% payout) | 52.8% |
| Objectives associated with Crocs, Inc. Enterprise strategic initiative performance (4) | 10.0% | 3 of 5 Targets Achieved(90.0% payout) | 9.0% |
| Objectives associated with corporate responsibility and sustainability progress (5) | 10.0% | 4 of 4 Targets Achieved(100.0% payout) | 10.0% |
| TOTAL: | 103.1% | ||
(1) The Crocs, Inc. Enterprise scorecard is applicable to Messrs. Rees and Michaels and Ms. Mehlman.
(2) Enterprise adjusted EBIT is calculated as described in footnote (1) of the Short-Term Incentive Program Scorecards table on page 35.
(3) Enterprise adjusted free cash flow is calculated as described in footnote (4) of the Short-Term Incentive Program Scorecards table on page 35.
(4) The Enterprise strategic initiative performance targets related to: (i) enterprise resource planning implementation, (ii) trading company implementation, (iii) the HEYDUDE distribution center project, (iv) China growth, and (v) HEYDUDE gross margin improvement. These strategic initiative performance targets were evaluated based on Committee discretion.
(5) The corporate responsibility and sustainability progress performance targets related to: (i) our bio-resin production target, (ii) environmental sustainability, (iii) community and inclusivity, and (iv) governance. These strategic initiative performance targets were evaluated based on Committee discretion.
| Crocs Brand (1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Performance Targets | Weighting | Actual Performance | Weighted 2023 Actual Performance as a Percentage of Target |
| Crocs Brand adjusted EBIT (2): $1,049.1 million | 40.0% | $1,067.9 million(104.5% payout) | 41.8% |
| Enterprise adjusted free cash flow (3): $1,005.0 million | 40.0% | $1,134.1 million(132.1% payout) | 52.8% |
| Objectives associated with Crocs Brand strategic initiative performance (4) | 10.0% | 4 of 4 Targets Achieved (100.0% payout) | 10.0% |
| Objectives associated with corporate responsibility and sustainability progress (5) | 10.0% | 4 of 4 Targets Achieved(100.0% payout) | 10.0% |
| TOTAL: | 114.6% | ||
(1)The Crocs Brand scorecard is applicable to Ms. Poole.
(2) Crocs Brand adjusted EBIT is calculated by excluding interest expenses, tax expense, foreign currency changes, and non-recurring entries from GAAP net income attributable to common stockholders, such as expansion costs and duplicate rents costs primarily related to our distribution centers, HEYDUDE integration costs, and other costs.
(3) Enterprise adjusted free cash flow is calculated as described in footnote (4) of the Short-Term Incentive Program Scorecards table on page 35.
(4) The Crocs Brand strategic initiative performance targets related to: (i) sandal growth, (ii) China growth, (iii) distribution management, and (iv) wholesale management. These strategic initiative performance targets were evaluated based on Committee discretion.
(5) The corporate responsibility and sustainability progress performance targets related to: (i) our bio-resin production target, (ii)
environmental sustainability, (iii) community and inclusivity, and (iv) governance. These strategic initiative performance targets were evaluated based on Committee discretion.
| HEYDUDE Brand (1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Performance Targets | Weighting | Actual Performance | Weighted 2023 Actual Performance as a Percentage of Target |
| HEYDUDE Brand adjusted EBIT (2): $432.3 million | 40.0% | $232.1 million(0.0% payout) | 0.0% |
| Enterprise adjusted free cash flow (3): $1,005.0 million | 40.0% | $1,134.1 million(132.1% payout) | 52.8% |
| Objectives associated with HEYDUDE Brand strategic initiative performance (4) | 10.0% | 3 of 4 Targets Achieved (90.0% payout) | 9.0% |
| Objectives associated with corporate responsibility and sustainability progress (5) | 10.0% | 4 of 4 Targets Achieved(100.0% payout) | 10.0% |
| TOTAL: | 71.8% | ||
(1) The HEYDUDE Brand scorecard is applicable to Mr. Blackshaw.
(2) HEYDUDE Brand adjusted EBIT is calculated by excluding interest expenses, tax expense, foreign currency changes, and non-recurring entries from GAAP net income attributable to common stockholders, such as expansion costs and duplicate rent costs primarily related to our distribution centers and other costs.
(3)Enterprise adjusted free cash flow is calculated as described in footnote (4) of the Short-Term Incentive Program Scorecards table on page 35.
(4) The HEYDUDE Brand strategic initiative performance targets related to: (i) inventory management, (ii) gross margin improvements, (iii) international business development, and (iv) key account management. These strategic initiative performance targets were evaluated based on Committee discretion.
(5) The corporate responsibility and sustainability progress performance targets related to: (i) our bio-resin production target, (ii) environmental sustainability, (iii) community and inclusivity, and (iv) governance. These strategic initiative performance targets were evaluated based on Committee discretion.
Long-Term Equity Awards. The Committee grants long-term equity awards annually to the named executive officers in order to provide long-term performance-based compensation, to encourage the named executive officers to continue their employment throughout the vesting periods of the awards, and to align management and stockholder interests. The awards vest over a 3-year period (other than the Adjusted 3-year cumulative revenue PSUs, which cliff vest at the end of the 3-year performance period), subject to continued performance, which also assists with long-term incentives and retention. We believe that a significant portion of each named executive officer’s compensation should be in the form of equity awards. For 2023, the amount of LTIP awards granted to our named executive officers was based on a review of market practices by Meridian, the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer (for executive officers other than himself), personal performance, internal equity, and expected future contributions, among other factors.
2023 Long-Term Performance Incentive Program. In 2023, all of our named executive officers received grants of time-based RSUs and PSUs, 67% of which were PSUs earned based on satisfaction of performance goals and 33% of which were time-based RSUs that vest based on continued service. The material terms of these 2023 time-based RSU and PSU awards were as follows:
| Time-Based RSUs | Performance-Based RSUs | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Goals | Potential Awards | Further Time Vesting | ||||
| Vest in three annual installments beginning one year after the date of grant | Achievement of financial performance targets for Adjusted 3-year cumulative revenue and 2023 Adjusted EBITDA operating margin | For the 2023 Adjusted EBITDA operating margin PSUs and Adjusted 3-year cumulative revenue PSUs, executive may earn from 50% to 200% and 60% to 200%, respectively, of the target number of PSUs based on the level of achievement of the performance goal - no PSUs are earned if performance falls below established threshold goals | Earned 2023 Adjusted EBITDA operating margin PSUs vest 33% upon satisfaction of performance goal and 33% in each of the next two years, subject to continued serviceAdjusted 3-year cumulative revenue PSUs cliff vest at the end of the 3-year performance period, subject to continued service | |||
The Committee grants performance-based awards to support our pay-for-performance philosophy and better align the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders. The Committee grants time-based RSUs because it generally believes that full-value awards such as time-based RSUs offer a stronger retention incentive than stock options while also providing alignment with stockholders. In addition, time-based RSUs and PSUs are less dilutive to our current stockholders as fewer time-based RSUs and PSUs are necessary to provide the same equity benefit compared to stock options.
The Committee selected Adjusted 3-year cumulative revenue and 2023 Adjusted EBITDA operating margin as the financial performance metrics for the 2023 PSU grant because it views these metrics as primary drivers of enhanced stockholder value and appropriate measures of performance given our continued, successful growth.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.