Skip to main content

DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC

For the period ended Sep 30, 2025. Filed Nov 7, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Sep 30, 2025 · Filed Nov 7, 2025

DUK$127.78-1.8%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-Q

Period ended 2025-06-30; filed 2025-08-05.

0001326160-25-000168

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Current report: 10-Q

Period ended 2025-09-30; filed 2025-11-07.

0001326160-25-000192

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 235 previous paragraphs and 249 current paragraphs.

70 unchanged; 113 reworded; 55 added; 33 removed; 19 previous and 11 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 41 previous and 42 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (55)

Current report

•In July 2025, Duke Energy Carolinas filed its final license application with the FERC to extend the operating license for the Bad Creek Pumped Storage Hydroelectric Station. Located in South Carolina, Bad Creek is designed to produce significant amounts of energy when our customers need it most, performing a vital role on the company's system since 1991. If approved, the application would extend plant operations for an additional 50 years through 2077.

Current report

•In August 2025, we filed applications with the NCUC, PSCSC and FERC to combine our utilities that operate in the Carolinas, by which Duke Energy Progress will merge into Duke Energy Carolinas. This proposed transaction would result in a single electric utility serving our North Carolina and South Carolina service territories. The single utility’s ability to plan, execute and operate resources more efficiently is expected to result in substantial cost savings to benefit customers by reducing the overall costs to serve. The targeted effective date is January 1, 2027, subject to regulatory approvals.

Current report

•System Post-Implementation Costs represents the net impact of charges related to nonrecurring customer billing adjustments as a

Current report

•Preferred Redemption Costs represents charges related to the redemption of Series B Preferred Stock.

Current report

(a)Net of $5 million tax benefit. $17 million recorded within Operating Revenues, $1 million recorded within Operations, maintenance and other and $3 million recorded within Other Income and expenses.

Current report

(b)Net of $5 million tax benefit. $17 million recorded within Operating Revenues, $1 million recorded within Operations, maintenance and other and $3 million recorded within Other Income and expenses.

Current report

(d) Recorded in Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of tax.

Current report

•a $286 million increase in storm recovery revenues at Duke Energy Florida;

Current report

•a $550 million increase in storm recovery revenues at Duke Energy Florida;

Current report

•a $244 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes;

Current report

•a $52 million increase in cost of natural gas revenues primarily due to higher commodity prices; and

Current report

•a $7 million increase due to higher pricing from the 2024 Piedmont North Carolina rate case.

Current report

•a $274 million increase in cost of natural gas revenues primarily due to higher commodity prices;

Current report

•a $92 million increase due to higher pricing from the 2024 Piedmont North Carolina rate case; and

Current report

•a $20 million increase in operations, maintenance and other primarily due to higher customer IT system costs and employee-related expenses.

Current report

Other's results were primarily driven by lower interest income and higher interest expense, partially offset by impacts from the redemption of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock in the prior year.

Current report

Preferred Redemption Costs. The decrease was due to the redemption of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock in the prior year.

Current report

Operating Expenses. The increase was driven by higher captive insurance losses due to claims experience and accrued reserves released in the prior year, partially offset by contributions to the Duke Energy Foundation in the prior year.

Current report

Preferred Redemption Costs. The decrease was due to the redemption of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock in the prior year.

Current report

•a $107 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes;

Current report

Interest Expense. The increase was primarily due to higher outstanding debt balances, current year return on deferred nuclear production tax credit liability and absence of prior year return on deferred South Carolina grid costs, partially offset by current year return on deferred storm costs.

Current report

•a $550 million increase in storm recovery revenues at Duke Energy Florida;

Current report

•an $83 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes; and

Current report

•a $606 million increase in operation, maintenance and other primarily due to higher storm amortization at Duke Energy Florida and increased costs related to customer products and services and higher employee-related expenses, partially offset by lower storm costs in the current year at Duke Energy Progress;

Current report

Other Income and expenses, net. The increase was primarily due to higher AFUDC equity rate and base compared to the prior year and intercompany interest income at Duke Energy Progress.

Current report

Interest Expense. The increase was primarily due to higher outstanding debt balances at Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida, partially offset bylower intercompany interest expense andcurrent year return on deferred storm costs at Duke Energy Progress.

Current report

Income Tax Expense. The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income, partially offset by an increase in solar PTCs.

Current report

•a $26 million increase in rider revenues primarily due to the NCEMPA rider;

Current report

•a $15 million increase due to transmission revenues from higher network demand and rates.

Current report

•a $23 million increase in operation, maintenance and other primarily due to increased costs related to customer products and services and higher employee-related expenses, partially offset by lower storm costs in the current year.

Current report

Interest Expense. The increase was primarily due to higher outstanding debt balances, partially offset by lower intercompany interest expense and thecurrent year return on deferred storm costs.

Current report

Income Tax Expense. The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income, partially offset by an increase in the amortization of EDIT and higher AFUDC equity.

Current report

•a $586 million increase in operation, maintenance and other primarily due to higher storm amortization;

Current report

Interest Expense. The increase was primarily driven by higher outstanding debt balances and interest rates.

Current report

Income Tax Expense. The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income, partially offset by an increase in solar PTCs.

Showing the first 40 of 55 passages. Open the source sections for the rest.

Removed paragraphs (33)

Previous report

(b) Recorded in Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax.

Previous report

(b)Recorded in Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax.

Previous report

•a $235 million increase in storm recovery revenues at Duke Energy Florida;

Previous report

•a $30 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes; and

Previous report

•a $43 million decrease in impairment of assets and other charges primarily related to the impacts of the 2024 South Carolina rate case order at Duke Energy Carolinas in the prior year.

Previous report

•a $264 million increase in storm recovery revenues at Duke Energy Florida;

Previous report

•a $150 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes;

Previous report

•an $80 million increase in cost of natural gas revenues primarily due to higher capacity charges, partially offset by lower natural gas costs passed through to customers and higher secondary marketing;

Previous report

•a $16 million increase in depreciation and amortization primarily due to higher depreciable base; and

Previous report

•a $222 million increase in cost of natural gas revenues primarily due to higher commodity prices, an increase in volumes and lower secondary marketing, partially offset by lower natural gas costs passed through to customers;

Previous report

•an $84 million increase due to higher pricing from the 2024 Piedmont North Carolina rate case; and

Previous report

Operating Expenses. The increase was driven by higher loss experience related to captive insurance claims.

Previous report

•a $212 million increase due to higher pricing from the South Carolina rate case and Year 2 of the North Carolina MYRP;

Previous report

•a $264 million increase in storm recovery revenues at Duke Energy Florida;

Previous report

•a $77 million increase in rider revenues primarily due to higher rates for the SPP at Duke Energy Florida and NCEMPA rider, the recovery of South Carolina storm recovery charges through securitization and recovery of North Carolina residential decoupling revenues at Duke Energy Progress;

Previous report

•a $315 million increase in operation, maintenance and other primarily due to higher storm amortization at Duke Energy Florida and higher storm costs in the current year at Duke Energy Progress;

Previous report

Income Tax Expense. The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income, partially offset by an increase in the amortization of income tax credits and lower state tax expense.

Previous report

•a $37 million increase in rider revenues primarily due to NCEMPA rider, the recovery of South Carolina storm recovery charges through securitization and recovery of North Carolina residential decoupling revenues;

Previous report

•a $17 million increase in retail sales due to improved weather compared to prior year.

Previous report

•a $37 million increase in operation, maintenance and other primarily due to higher storm costs in the current year; and

Previous report

Income Tax Expense. The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income, partially offset by lower state tax expense and an increase in the amortization of EDIT.

Previous report

Income Tax Expense. The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income, partially offset by an increase in the amortization of income tax credits.

Previous report

•a $43 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes; and

Previous report

•a $10 million decrease in retail fuel revenues primarily due to lower fuel rates.

Previous report

•a $46 million increase in operation, maintenance and other primarily due to an increase in the TDSIC rider amortization and higher employee-related expenses.

Previous report

•a $15 million decrease in fuel used in electric generation and purchased power primarily due to lower deferred fuel and Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.(MISO) amortization, partially offset by higher natural gas costs.

Previous report

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense was flat year over year primarily due to an increase in pretax income offset by an increase in the amortization of EDIT.

Previous report

•a $168 million increase in cost of natural gas revenues driven by higher commodity prices, higher volumes and lower secondary marketing, partially offset by lower natural gas costs passed through to customers; and

Previous report

•an $84 million increase due to higher pricing from the 2024 North Carolina rate case.

Previous report

•a $168 million increase in the cost of natural gas due to higher commodity prices, higher volumes and lower secondary marketing, partially offset by lower natural gas costs passed through to customers;

Previous report

•a $19 million increase in operations, maintenance and other primarily due to higher customer charges, labor and service company costs; and

Previous report

•a $608 million decrease in proceeds from net issuances of long-term debt, primarily due to timing of issuances and redemptions of long-term debt.
Reworded paragraphs (113)

Previous wording

Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes for the six months ended June 30, 2025, and with Duke Energy’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Current wording

Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and with Duke Energy’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Previous wording

In August 2025, we entered into an Investment Agreement to receive $6 billion in exchange for a 19.7% indirect investment in Duke Energy Florida. Subject to regulatory approvals, the transaction is expected to be completed through a series of closings through mid-2028. In July 2025, we announced the sale of Piedmont’s Tennessee Business to Spire, Inc. for $2.48 billion. Subject to regulatory approvals, we expect to complete the Piedmont transaction in the first quarter of 2026. Proceeds from both transactions will support Duke Energy’s expanded 2025-2029 capital plan of $87 billion and limit the need for additional long-term debt or common equity through 2029.

Current wording

In August 2025, we entered into an investment agreement to receive $6 billion in exchange for a 19.7% indirect investment in Duke Energy Florida. Subject to regulatory approvals, the transaction is expected to be completed through a series of closings starting in 2026 through mid-2028. In July 2025, we announced the sale of Piedmont’s Tennessee business to Spire Inc. for $2.48 billion. Subject to regulatory approvals, we expect to complete the Piedmont transaction on March 31, 2026. Proceeds from both transactions will support Duke Energy’s expanded capital plan and replaces certain originally planned long-term debt and common equity issuances through 2029.

Previous wording

Both of these transactions, along with our unwavering focus on operational excellence and value creation, demonstrate our continued ability to meet the unprecedented growth anticipated across our service territories in the decades ahead. See Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Dispositions," for further information.

Current wording

Both of these transactions, along with our unwavering focus on operational excellence and value creation, demonstrate our continued ability to meet the unprecedented long-term growth anticipated across our service territories. See Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Dispositions," for further information.

Previous wording

Building a Smarter Energy Future. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, we continued to move our regulatory strategy forward and execute on investments for building a smarter energy future while maintaining our focus on safety and operational excellence, our customers, growth of our business as well as the engagement and empowerment of our employees. These priorities enable us to provide strong, sustainable value for our employees, customers, communities and shareholders.

Current wording

Building a Smarter Energy Future. During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, we continued to move our regulatory strategy forward and execute on investments for building a smarter energy future while maintaining our focus on safety and operational excellence, our customers, growth of our business as well as the engagement and empowerment of our employees. These priorities enable us to provide strong, sustainable value for our employees, customers, communities and shareholders.

Previous wording

•In January 2025, Piedmont and Duke Energy Indiana received constructive orders on their general rate cases from the NCUC and IURC, respectively. New rates were effective in November 2024 for Piedmont and late February 2025 for Duke Energy Indiana. New rates were also effective in January 2025 for Duke Energy Florida's new three-year rate plan. In June 2025, Duke Energy Progress filed a South Carolina base rate case and Duke Energy Kentucky filed a natural gas base rate case. In July 2025, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a South Carolina base rate case. Our regulatory efforts focus on securing critical investments for reliable customer service while ensuring timely cost recovery across our service territories.

Current wording

•In January 2025, Piedmont and Duke Energy Indiana received constructive orders on their general rate cases from the NCUC and IURC, respectively. New rates were effective in November 2024 for Piedmont and late February 2025 for Duke Energy Indiana. New rates were also effective in January 2025 for Duke Energy Florida's new three-year rate plan. In June 2025, Duke Energy Progress filed a South Carolina base rate case and Duke Energy Kentucky filed a natural gas base rate case. In July 2025, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a South Carolina base rate case. In October 2025, Duke Energy Kentucky received a constructive order on its electric base rate case filed last December and Duke Energy Progress reached a comprehensive settlement in its South Carolina base rate case. Our regulatory efforts continue to focus on securing critical investments for reliable customer service while ensuring timely cost recovery across our service territories.

Previous wording

•In February 2025, Duke Energy Progress filed an application to construct and operate a second CC unit in Person County at the Roxboro Plant in North Carolina and Duke Energy Indiana filed for a CPCN for the Cayuga CC Project. In March 2025, a final air permit was issued for the Cayuga CC Project. In June 2025, Duke Energy Carolinas announced its intent to submit an application to the PSCSC for approval to build a new CC unit in Anderson County, South Carolina. These advanced natural gas plants, along with our planned CTs at the existing Duke Energy Carolinas' Marshall Steam Station, will provide critical generation as we continue to modernize our energy infrastructure in the coming years.

Current wording

•In October 2025, Duke Energy Progress received an order from the NCUC granting the CPCN for the second CC unit in Person County and Duke Energy Indiana received an order from the IURC granting the CPCN for the Cayuga CC project. Also in October 2025, Duke Energy Carolinas filed for a CECPCN with the PSCSC for a new CC unit in Anderson County, South Carolina. These advanced natural gas plants, along with our planned CTs, will provide critical generation as we continue to modernize our energy infrastructure in the coming years.

Previous wording

•We reached key milestones to recover costs related to critical storm restoration activities from the 2024 historic storm season while also seeking to minimize customer bill impacts resulting from hurricanes Debby, Helene and Milton. In February 2025, the FPSC voted to approve Duke Energy Florida's storm cost recovery of approximately $1.1 billion over 12 months beginning in March 2025. In April 2025, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress received a constructive order from the NCUC on Phase I proceedings in North Carolina related to storm securitization and reached a settlement with the North Carolina Public Staff to resolve all remaining issues in Phase 2 in advance of the evidentiary hearing. A Phase 2 order approving the settlement was received in June 2025. In March 2025, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a petition for storm securitization with the PSCSC for authorization to finance the estimated South Carolina-retail allocable share of storm costs and reached a comprehensive settlement with key parties in June 2025. In July 2025, the settlement was approved by the PSCSC and a financing order was issued in August 2025. We expect to securitize the related Carolinas' storm costs by the end of 2025.

Current wording

•We reached key milestones to recover costs related to critical storm restoration activities from the 2024 historic storm season while also seeking to minimize customer bill impacts resulting from hurricanes Debby, Helene and Milton. In February 2025, the FPSC voted to approve Duke Energy Florida's storm cost recovery of approximately $1.1 billion over 12 months beginning in March 2025. During 2025, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress reached constructive settlements in Phase 2 proceedings and financing orders have been issued by both the NCUC and PSCSC. In Septe mber 2025, we issued North Carolina storm recovery bonds and expect to securitize the related South Carolina storm costs by the end of 2025.

Previous wording

•Our nuclear sites continue to benefit our customers and communities by reliably generating large amounts of electricity with low operating costs, providing thousands of well-paying jobs and producing economic and tax benefits for our local communities. In March 2025, the NRC issued the subsequent renewed licenses for Oconee, allowing an additional 20 years of operation of the units through 2053 and 2054. Oconee is the first of Duke Energy's nuclear facilities to reach this significant milestone and receive approval to operate for 80 years. In April 2025, we submitted a subsequent license renewal application to the NRC for Robinson, which would extend the plant's operations an additional 20 years through 2050. We've also continued to sell nuclear PTCs in 2025 as allowed under the IRA, working to further lower the cost of building a smarter energy future for our customers.

Current wording

•Our nuclear sites continue to positively impact the customers we serve by safely producing clean, reliable and low-cost electricity, as well as providing economic benefits for our local communities that includes thousands of well-paying jobs and significant tax benefits. During 2025, we continue to sell nuclear PTCs to further reduce the cost of electricity for our customers. Additionally, in March 2025, the NRC issued a subsequent license renewal for Oconee that allows an additional 20 years of operation through 2054. Oconee is the first Duke Energy nuclear facility to reach this significant approval milestone to permit extension of its operations to 80 years. In April 2025, we submitted an application to the NRC for Robinson to extend the plant's operations an additional 20 years through 2050.

Previous wording

Operational Excellence. In June 2025, as summer's first heat wave brought triple-digit temperatures to parts of North Carolina and South Carolina, our customers set a new summertime record for electricity usage, surpassing the previous summertime record set in July 2024. We maintain a focus on operational excellence and prepare for the arrival of extreme weather to deliver on customer commitments by identifying potential risks, effectively maintaining adequate short-term planning reserves, leveraging outage scheduling optimization, and controlling planned and emergent equipment issues.

Current wording

Operational Excellence. In June 2025, as the summer's first heat wave brought triple-digit temperatures to parts of North Carolina and South Carolina, our customers set a new summertime record for electricity usage, surpassing the previous summertime record set in July 2024. We maintain our focus on operational excellence and prepare for extreme weather by identifying potential risks, effectively maintaining adequate short-term planning reserves, leveraging outage scheduling optimization and controlling planned and emergent equipment issues.

Previous wording

•In June 2025, the governor of North Carolina announced Amazon is planning to invest an estimated $10 billion to launch a new high-tech cloud computing and artificial intelligence innovation campus in Richmond County, North Carolina. The site selected for this project was included in Duke Energy's Site Readiness Program in 2019, a program that helps state, regional, and local economic development partners increase the competitiveness of potential industrial land. These new data centers will be located in Duke Energy Progress' service territory and the investment is expected to be among the largest in North Carolina's history, a testament to the impactful and ongoing work of continuing to bring economic development success to the vibrant communities we proudly serve.

Current wording

Economic Development. In June 2025, the governor of North Carolina announced Amazon is planning to invest an estimated $10 billion to launch a new high-tech cloud computing and artificial intelligence innovation campus in Richmond County, North Carolina. The site selected for this project was included in Duke Energy's Site Readiness Program in 2019, a program that helps state, regional and local economic development partners increase the competitiveness of potential industrial land. These new data centers will be located in Duke Energy Progress' service territory and the investment is expected to be among the largest in North Carolina's history, a testament to the impactful and ongoing work of continuing to bring economic development success to the vibrant communities we proudly serve.

Previous wording

See Notes 4 and 16 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and "Income Taxes," for additional information.

Current wording

See Notes 4 and 17 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and "Income Taxes," for additional information.

Previous wording

From August through October 2024, a series of major storm events occurred that resulted in significant damage to utility infrastructure within our service territories and primarily impacted Duke Energy Carolinas', Duke Energy Progress' and Duke Energy Florida's electric utility operations. Hurricanes Debby, Helene and Milton caused widespread outages and included unprecedented damage to certain assets, including the hardest-hit areas on the western coast of Florida and certain regions in western North Carolina and upstate South Carolina. Appropriate storm cost recovery mechanisms are in place to track and recover incremental costs from such events. Funding restoration activities and, in some cases, the complete rebuild of critical infrastructure, for a series of sequential events of this magnitude has resulted in incremental financing needs until cost recovery occurs and may impact the near-term results of operations, financial position, or cash flows of the impacted registrants. Regulatory filings have been made or are in process for recovery of storm costs across all jurisdictions and full recovery is expected by early 2026. For more information related to storm cost estimates, regulatory asset deferrals, and financing activities, see "Liquidity and Capital Resources" and Notes 4 and 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and "Debt and Credit Facilities."

Current wording

From August through October 2024, a series of major storm events occurred that resulted in significant damage to utility infrastructure within our service territories and primarily impacted Duke Energy Carolinas', Duke Energy Progress' and Duke Energy Florida's electric utility operations. Hurricanes Debby, Helene and Milton caused widespread outages and included unprecedented damage to certain assets, including the hardest-hit areas on the western coast of Florida and certain regions in western North Carolina and upstate South Carolina. Appropriate storm cost recovery mechanisms are in place to track and recover incremental costs from such events. Funding restoration activities and, in some cases, the complete rebuild of critical infrastructure, for a series of sequential events of this magnitude has resulted in incremental financing needs until cost recovery occurs and may impact the near-term results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the impacted registrants. Regulatory filings have been made for recovery of storm costs across all jurisdictions and full recovery is expected by early 2026. For more information related to storm costs, regulatory asset deferrals and financing activities, see "Liquidity and Capital Resources" and Notes 4, 6 and 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," "Debt and Credit Facilities" and Variable Interest Entities."

Previous wording

In April 2024, the EPA issued final rules under section 111 of the Clean Air Act (EPA Rule 111) regulating GHG emissions from existing coal-fired and new natural gas-fired power plants. Duke Energy is analyzing the potential impacts the rules could have on the Company, which could be material and may influence the timing, nature and magnitude of future generation investments in our service territories. Cost recovery for future expenditures will be pursued through the normal ratemaking process with federal and state utility commissions, which permit recovery of reasonable and prudently incurred costs associated with Duke Energy’s regulated operations. Duke Energy is participating in legal challenges to the final rules. In June 2025, the EPA proposed to repeal EPA Rule 111. For more information, see "Other Matters."

Current wording

In April 2024, the EPA issued final rules under section 111 of the Clean Air Act (EPA Rule 111) regulating GHG emissions from existing coal-fired and new natural gas-fired power plants. Duke Energy is analyzing the potential impacts the rules could have on the Company, which could be material and may influence the timing, nature and magnitude of future generation investments in our service territories. Cost recovery for future expenditures will be pursued through the normal ratemaking process with federal and state utility commissions, which permit recovery of reasonable and prudently incurred costs associated with Duke Energy’s regulated operations. Duke Energy is participating in legal challenges to the final rules. In June 2025, the EPA proposed to repeal EPA Rule 111 as well as an alternative proposal for a narrower set of requirements. For more information, see "Other Matters."

Previous wording

The Company continues to monitor the ongoing stability of markets for key materials and supplies. Public policy outcomes, including potential impacts from new or escalating tariffs or other actions from federal executive orders, federal legislation or other rulemakings, could disrupt or impact Duke Energy's supply chain, future financial results, capital plan execution or the ability to execute on the Company's vision for a smarter energy future.

Current wording

The Company continues to monitor the ongoing stability of markets for key materials and supplies, including potential restrictions on the trade of certain rare earth materials and technologies used in electric utility infrastructure. Public policy outcomes, including potential impacts from new or escalating tariffs or other actions from federal executive orders, federal legislation or other rulemakings, could disrupt or impact Duke Energy's supply chain, future financial results, capital plan execution or the ability to execute on the Company's vision for a smarter energy future.

Previous wording

In August 2025, Duke Energy, Progress Energy and Florida Progress entered into an Investment Agreement for Florida Progress to receive $6 billion in exchange for a 19.7% indirect investment in Duke Energy Florida. The transaction is subject to the satisfaction of certain customary conditions described in the Investment Agreement, including receipt of the approval of the FERC and completion of review by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States (CFIUS), as well as approval, or a determination that the transaction does not require approval, by the NRC. The transaction is expected to be completed through a series of closings through June 30, 2028. Termination of the transaction under certain specified circumstances could require the investor to pay a $240 million termination fee to Progress Energy and result in Duke Energy seeking alternative funding sources through 2029, including additional long-term debt and common equity issuances. For additional information, see Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Dispositions.”

Current wording

In August 2025, Duke Energy, Progress Energy and Florida Progress entered into an investment agreement for Florida Progress to receive $6 billion in exchange for a 19.7% indirect investment in Duke Energy Florida. The transaction is subject to the satisfaction of certain customary conditions described in the investment agreement, including receipt of the approval of the FERC and completion of review by CFIUS, as well as approval, or a determination that the transaction does not require approval, by the NRC. The transaction is expected to be completed through a series of closings through June 30, 2028. Termination of the transaction under certain specified circumstances could require the investor to pay a $240 million termination fee to Progress Energy and result in Duke Energy seeking alternative funding sources through 2029, including additional long-term debt and common equity issuances. For additional information, see Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Dispositions.”

Previous wording

In July 2025, Piedmont entered into an agreement (Purchase Agreement) to sell Piedmont’s Tennessee Business. Completion of the transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including approval from the TPUC and expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the HSR. There is no assurance of the transaction as failure to obtain related approvals or to satisfy conditions in the Purchase Agreement could result in termination of the transaction. The Purchase Agreement contains termination rights and Spire Inc. may be required to pay a termination fee equal to 6.5% of the purchase price under certain circumstances that result in termination of the transaction. Termination of the contract could also result in Duke Energy seeking alternative funding sources for its 2025-2029 capital and investment expenditures plan, including additional long-term debt and common equity issuances. Completion of the transaction could impact the operating revenues and profitability of Piedmont, including potential recognition of a gain on sale. In the third quarter of 2025, Duke Energy and Piedmont will reclassify the Piedmont disposal unit to assets held for sale. For additional information, see Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Dispositions.”

Current wording

In July 2025, Piedmont entered into a purchase agreement to sell Piedmont’s Tennessee business. Completion of the transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including approval from the TPUC and expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the HSR. The HSR waiting period for the transaction expired in September 2025. There is no assurance of the transaction as failure to obtain related approvals or to satisfy conditions in the purchase agreement could result in termination of the transaction. The purchase agreement contains termination rights and Spire Inc. may be required to pay a termination fee equal to 6.5% of the purchase price under certain circumstances that result in termination of the transaction. Termination of the purchase agreement could also result in Duke Energy seeking alternative funding sources for its 2025-2029 capital and investment expenditures plan, including additional long-term debt and common equity issuances. Completion of the transaction could impact the operating revenues and profitability of Piedmont, including potential recognition of a gain on sale. In the third quarter of 2025, Duke Energy and Piedmont reclassified the Piedmont Tennessee Disposal Group to assets held for sale. For additional information, see Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Dispositions.”

Previous wording

GAAP reported EPS was $1.25 for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to $1.13 for the three months ended June 30, 2024. In addition to the drivers below, GAAP reported EPS increased primarily due to impairments related to the 2024 South Carolina rate case in the prior year.

Current wording

GAAP reported EPS was $1.81 for the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to $1.60 for the three months ended September 30, 2024. In addition to the drivers below, GAAP reported EPS increased primarily due to the net impact of charges related to nonrecurring customer billing adjustments in the prior year and charges related to the redemption of Series B Preferred Stock in the prior year.

Previous wording

As discussed above, management also evaluates financial performance based on adjusted EPS. Duke Energy’s adjusted EPS was$1.25 for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to$1.18 for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The increase in adjusted EPS was primarily due to the implementation of new rates and riders, partially offset by higher operation and maintenance expense and interest expense.

Current wording

As discussed above, management also evaluates financial performance based on adjusted EPS. Duke Energy’s adjusted EPS was $1.81 for the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to $1.62 for the three months ended September 30, 2024. The increase in adjusted EPS was primarily due to the implementation of new rates and riders, along with higher sales volumes, partially offset by higher interest expense, milder weather, and higher depreciation and property taxes on a growing asset base.

Current wording

(c) Recorded in Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of tax.

Previous wording

GAAP Reported EPS was $3.00 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to $2.57 for the six months ended June 30, 2024. In addition to the drivers below, GAAP reported EPS increased primarily due to impairments related to the 2024 South Carolina rate case in the prior year.

Current wording

GAAP Reported EPS was $4.81 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, compared to $4.17 for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. In addition to the drivers below, GAAP reported EPS increased primarily due to impairments related to the 2024 South Carolina rate case in the prior year, the net impact of charges related to nonrecurring customer billing adjustments in the prior year and charges related to the redemption of Series B Preferred Stock in the prior year.

Previous wording

As discussed above, management also evaluates financial performance based on adjusted EPS. Duke Energy’s adjusted EPS was $3.00 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to $2.62 for the six months ended June 30, 2024. The increase in adjusted EPS was primarily due to the implementation of new rates and riders, higher sales volumes and favorable weather, partially offset by higher interest expense, operation and maintenance expense and depreciation expense on a growing asset base.

Current wording

As discussed above, management also evaluates financial performance based on adjusted EPS. Duke Energy’s adjusted EPS was $4.81 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, compared to $4.24 for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. The increase in adjusted EPS was primarily due to the implementation of new rates and riders, along with higher retail sales volumes, partially offset by higher interest expense, operation and maintenance expense, and depreciation and property taxes on a growing asset base.

Previous wording

The remaining information presented in this discussion of results of operations is on a GAAP basis. Management evaluates segment performance based on segment income. Segment income is defined as income from continuing operations net of income attributable to noncontrolling interests and preferred stock dividends. Segment income includes intercompany revenues and expenses that are eliminated in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Current wording

The remaining information presented in this discussion of results of operations is on a GAAP basis. Management evaluates segment performance based on segment income. Segment income is defined as income from continuing operations net of income attributable to noncontrolling interests and preferred stock dividends. Segment income includes intercompany revenues and expenses that are eliminated on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Previous wording

EU&I’s results were driven by higher revenues from rate cases across multiple jurisdictions, storm recovery revenues and higher weather-normal retail sales volumes, partially offset by higher operation and maintenance and depreciation expenses. The following is a detailed discussion of the variance drivers by line item.

Current wording

EU&I’s results were driven by higher revenues from rate cases across multiple jurisdictions and higher weather-normal retail sales volumes, partially offset by higher operation and maintenance and depreciation expenses. The following is a detailed discussion of the variance drivers by line item.

Previous wording

•a $279 million increase due to higher pricing from jurisdictional rate cases primarily at Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Indiana, Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Progress;

Current wording

•a $238 million increase due to higher pricing from jurisdictional rate cases primarily at Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Indiana, Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Progress;

Previous wording

•a $393 million decrease in fuel revenues primarily due to net lower rates in the current year.

Current wording

•a $329 million decrease in fuel revenues primarily due to net lower rates in the current year.

Previous wording

•a $332 million increase in operation, maintenance and other primarily driven by higher storm amortization at Duke Energy Florida, increased costs related to customer products and services programs, litigation and environmental costsand higher employee-related expenses in the current year, as well as joint owner reimbursements in the prior year at Duke Energy Carolinas and increase in TDSIC rider amortizationsat Duke Energy Indiana;

Current wording

•a $341 million increase in operation, maintenance and other primarily driven by higher storm amortization at Duke Energy Florida, increased costs related to customer products and services programs at Duke Energy Carolinas, higher plant maintenance at Duke Energy Indiana and higher employee-related expenses across all jurisdictions, partially offset by lower storm costs in the current year at Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Ohio;

Previous wording

•a $156 million increase in depreciation and amortization primarily due to higher depreciable base across all jurisdictions and higher depreciation rates driven by rate cases; and

Current wording

•a $96 million increase in depreciation and amortization primarily due to higher depreciable base across all jurisdictions and higher depreciation rates driven by rate cases; and

Previous wording

•a $20 million increase in property and other taxes due to a higher base on which property taxes are levied, partially offset by sales and use tax at Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress.

Current wording

•a $49 million increase in property and other taxes due to a higher base on which property taxes are levied and higher sales and use tax refunds in the prior year at Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress.

Previous wording

•a $349 million decrease in fuel used in electric generation and purchased power primarily due tohigher recovery of fuel expense in the prior year at Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress, and lower fuel cost recovery and lower purchased power driven by the expiration of contractsin the prior year at Duke Energy Florida, partially offset byhigher fuel costs and purchased power at Duke Energy Ohio; and

Current wording

•a $355 million decrease in fuel used in electric generation and purchased power primarily due tohigher recovery of fuel expense in the prior year at Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress and lower fuel cost recovery and lower purchased power driven by the expiration of contractsin the prior year at Duke Energy Florida, partially offset byhigher fuel costs and purchased power at Duke Energy Ohio.

Previous wording

Other Income and Expense. The increase was primarily driven byhigher AFUDC equity rate and base compared to the prior year across all jurisdictions.

Current wording

Other Income and Expense. The increase was primarily driven byhigher AFUDC equity base and rates comp ared to the prior year across all jurisdictions.

Previous wording

Income Tax Expense. The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income.

Current wording

Income Tax Expense. The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income, partially offset by an increase in the amortization of nuclear PTCs, investment tax credits and EDIT. The ETRs for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, were 13.5% and 14.1%, respectively.

Previous wording

EU&I’s results were driven by higher revenues from rate cases across multiple jurisdictions, higher weather-normal retail sales volumes and improved weather, offset by higher operation and maintenance and depreciation expenses. The following is a detailed discussion of the variance drivers by line item.

Current wording

EU&I’s results were driven by higher revenues from rate cases across multiple jurisdictions, higher weather-normal retail sales volumes and higher transmission revenues, partially offset by higher operation and maintenance and depreciation expenses. The following is a detailed discussion of the variance drivers by line item.

Previous wording

•a $497 million increase due to higher pricing from jurisdictional rate cases primarily at Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Indiana, Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Progress;

Current wording

•a $735 million increase due to higher pricing from jurisdictional rate cases primarily at Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Indiana, Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Progress;

Previous wording

•a $104 million increase in rider revenues primarily due to the SPP at Duke Energy Florida, NCEMPA rider true-up, the recovery of South Carolina storm recovery charges through securitization and recovery of North Carolina residential decoupling revenues at Duke Energy Progress, as well as the Uncollectible Expense Riders and Distribution Capital Investment Rider and higher OVEC rider collections and OVEC sales into PJM Interconnection, LLC at Duke Energy Ohio;

Current wording

•a $112 million increase in rider revenues primarily due to the SPP at Duke Energy Florida, the North Carolina Municipal Power Agency (NCEMPA) rider at Duke Energy Progress, as well as the Uncollectible Expense Riders and Distribution Capital Investment Rider and higher OVEC rider collections and OVEC sales into PJM at Duke Energy Ohio;

Previous wording

•a $65 million increase in other revenues due to higher transmission revenues across all jurisdictions and higher Clean Energy Connection subscription revenues at Duke Energy Florida.

Current wording

•an $82 million increase in other revenues due to higher transmission revenues across all jurisdictions and higher Clean Energy Connection subscription revenues at Duke Energy Florida; and

Previous wording

•an $86 million increase in retail sales due to favorable weather compared to prior year; and

Current wording

•a $60 million increase in retail sales due to favorable weather compared to prior year.

Previous wording

•a $649 million decrease in fuel revenues primarily due to net lower rates in the current year, partially offset by higher volumes.

Current wording

•a $978 million decrease in fuel revenues primarily due to net lower rates in the current year, partially offset by higher volumes.

Previous wording

•a $440 million increase in operation, maintenance and other primarily driven by higher storm amortization at Duke Energy Florida, increased costs related to customer products and services programs, litigation and environmental costs and higher employee-related expenses in the current year, as well as joint owner reimbursements in the prior year at Duke Energy Carolinas, anincrease in TDSIC rider amortizations at Duke Energy Indiana and higher storm costs at Duke Energy Progress;

Current wording

•a $781 million increase in operation, maintenance and other primarily driven by higher storm amortization at Duke Energy Florida, increased litigation and environmental costs, as well as joint owner reimbur sements in the prior year at Duke Energy Carolinas, anincrease in TDSIC rider amortizations at Duke Energy Indiana, increased customer products and services program costs and higher employee-related expenses across all jurisdictions, partially offset by lower storm costs in the current year at Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Florida;

Previous wording

•a $265 million increase in depreciation and amortization primarily due to higher depreciable base across all jurisdictions and higher depreciation rates driven by rate cases; and

Current wording

•a $361 million increase in depreciation and amortization primarily due to higher depreciable base across all jurisdictions and higher depreciation rates driven by rate cases; and

Showing the first 40 of 113 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.

Rearranged current paragraphs (11)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Note: Total EPS may not foot due to rounding.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

•a $94 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes; and

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

•a $22 million increase in other revenues primarily due to higher transmission revenues across all jurisdictions.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Preferred Dividends. The decrease was due to the redemption of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock in the prior year.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

•a $279 million increase due to higher pricing from the 2024 South Carolina rate case and Year 2 of the North Carolina MYRP;

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

•a $60 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes;

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

•a $23 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

•a $65 million increase in depreciation and amortization primarily due to higher depreciable base; and

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

•a $20 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes; and

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

•a $38 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes; and

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

•a $214 million increase in the cost of natural gas primarily due to higher commodity prices;
Rearranged previous paragraphs (19)

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

(a)Net of $8 million tax benefit. $42 million recorded within Impairment of assets and other charges, $2 million within Operations,

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

maintenance and other, and an $11 million reduction recorded within Interest Expense.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

•a $29 million increase in other revenues due to higher transmission revenues.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Interest Expense. The increase was primarily driven by higher outstanding debt balances at Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

•a $12 million increase due to higher pricing from the 2024 Piedmont North Carolina rate case; and

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

•a $16 million increase in Midwest rider revenue.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

•a $25 million increase in depreciation and amortization primarily due to higher depreciable base.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense. The increase in tax expense is primarily due to an increase in pretax income.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Other's results were impacted by higher interest expense, lower equity earnings from the NMC investment and lower return on investments that fund certain employee benefit obligations.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Interest Expense. The increase was primarily due to higher outstanding debt balances.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

•a $49 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes at Duke Energy Progress; and

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

•a $39 million increase in retail sales due to improved weather compared to the prior yearat Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Progress.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Interest Expense. The increase was primarily due to higher outstanding debt balances at Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

•a $49 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes;

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Interest Expense. The increase was primarily due to higher outstanding debt balances.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

•a $22 million increase in retail sales due to improved weather compared to prior year.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

•a $279 million increase in operation, maintenance, and other primarily due to higher storm amortization;

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

•a $54 million increase in depreciation and amortization primarily due to higher depreciable base; and

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

•a $15 million increase in depreciation and amortization due to higher depreciable base.