Bancorp, Inc.

Note 1. Organization and Nature of Operations

The Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation and a registered financial holding company. Its primary, wholly-owned subsidiary is The Bancorp Bank, National Association (the “Bank”), which is a federally chartered commercial bank located in Sioux Falls, South Dakota and is a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insured institution. As a federally chartered institution, its primary regulator is the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”). The Company hastwo primary operating segments which consist of Fintech Solutions and Credit Solutions.

Through partner relationships, Fintech Solutions delivers payment, deposit, and lending products that attract deposits and generate fee income. Deposits generated through these partner relationships are deployed into loan and lease products offered by both Fintech sponsored lending and the Credit Solutions business line. The Company primarily earns fee-based income from fintech products, and such products include sponsored issuance of deposit accounts and debit, credit, and prepaid cards; sponsored lending products for fintech partners; and payment processing solutions, including acquiring, ACH, and near-and real-time payment services in support of its partners.

Credit Solutions is our lending operation and makes the following types of loans: (i) Real estate bridge lending (“REBL”); (ii) Institutional Banking comprised of security-backed lines of credit (“SBLOC”), cash value insurance policy-backed lines of credit (“IBLOC”) and advisor financing; and (iii) Commercial Loans which includes Small Business Loans (“SBL”) which is comprised primarily of Small Business Administration (“SBA”) loans and direct lease financing.

The Company and the Bank are affected by state and federal legislation and regulations and are subject to regulation by certain state and federal agencies. Accordingly, they are examined periodically by those regulatory authorities.

Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements of the Company, as of March 31, 2026 and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, are unaudited. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). However, in the opinion of management, these interim financial statements include all necessary adjustments to fairly present the results of the interim periods presented. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 (the “2025 Form 10-K”). The results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026 may not necessarily be indicative of the results of operations anticipated for the full year ending December 31, 2026.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

There have been no significant changes as of March 31, 2026 from the Company’s significant accounting policies as described in the 2025 Form 10-K.

Subsequent Events

The Company evaluated its March 31, 2026 financial statements for subsequent events through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued. The Company is not aware of any subsequent events which would require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.

Note 3. Earnings Per Share

The Company calculates earnings per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period, assuming all potentially dilutive common shares were issued.

Diluted earnings per share considers the potential dilution that could occur if securities, including stock options and RSUs or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised and converted into common stock. Stock options are dilutive if their exercise prices are less than the current stock price. RSUs are dilutive because they represent grants over vesting periods which do not require employees to pay exercise prices. The dilution shown in the tables below includes the potential dilution from both stock options and RSUs. The weighted-average computation of the dilutive effect of potentially issuable shares of Common stock under the treasury stock method excludes the effect of securities that would be anti-dilutive.

The calculation of weighted-average common shares outstanding during each respective period includes activity related to share repurchases made under the Company’s share repurchase programs, as discussed further in “Note 8. Shareholders’ Equity.”

The following table summarizes the calculation of earnings per share:

Note 4. Investment Securities

The Company’s investments in debt securities are classified as available-for-sale, and are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

The amortized cost and fair value of the Company’s investment securities at March 31, 2026, by contractual maturity, are shown below (dollars in thousands). Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities based on the timing of cashflows from the underlying collateral.

The table below indicates the length of time individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position (dollars in thousands):

Note 5. Loans, net

The Company’s loans originate from several lending lines of business, including:

SBLs, or small business loans, are comprised primarily of Small Business Administration “SBA” loans.

Direct lease financing includes lease financing for commercial and government vehicle fleets and, to a lesser extent, provides lease financing for other equipment.

SBLOCs, or securities-backed lines of credit, are made to individuals, trusts and other entities and are secured by a pledge of marketable securities maintained in one or more accounts for which the Company obtains a securities account control agreement.

IBLOCs, or insurance policy cash value-backed lines of credit, are collateralized by the cash surrender value of eligible insurance policies.

Advisor financingare loans to investment advisors for purposes of debt refinancing, acquisition of another firm or internal succession.

REBL, or real estate bridge lending, are transitional commercial mortgage loans which are made to improve and rehabilitate existing properties which already have cash flow, and which are collateralized by those properties.

Fintech loans consist of short-term extensions of credit, including secured credit card loans, made in conjunction with marketers and servicers.

Other loans include warehouse financing related to loan sales to third-party purchasers of REBL loans, and also includes loans the Company generally no longer offers, including commercial loans, CRA loans and HELOC.

Major classifications of loans, excluding commercial loans at fair value, are as follows (dollars in thousands):

(1)At March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, IBLOC loans amounted to $459.3 million and $467.5 million, respectively.

(2)As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, fintech loans included $1.22 billion and $729.1 million of secured credit card accounts which are backed dollar for dollar by cash collateral by each individual cardholder and are required to be repaid in full monthly. For secured credit card accounts, we recognize a loan receivable and a deposit liability for the cash collateral that secures those accounts. The remaining fintech loans consist of cashflow underwritten short-term liquidity products to individual borrowers ranging in maturity from 30 to 365 days.

(3)As of both March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, Other loans includes $110.7 million related to warehouse financing related to loan sales to third-party purchasers of real estate bridge loans.

During the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the Company purchased $0.2 million and $15.4 million of SBLs, respectively, none of which were credit deteriorated. Additionally, in the first three months of 2026, the Company participated in SBLs with other institutions in the amount of $0.3 million.

Non-Accrual and Delinquency

A detail of the Company’s delinquent and non-accrual loans by loan category is as follows (dollars in thousands):

The following table summarizes non-accrual loans with and without an ACL as of the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

Interest which would have been earned on loans classified as non-accrual for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, was $1.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively. No income on non-accrual loans was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026 or 2025.

During the three months ended March 31, 2026 amounts reversed from interest income totaled $0.6 million, and primarily consist of $0.4 million of REBL and $0.2 million of SBL commercial mortgage. During the three months ended March 31, 2025 amounts reversed from interest income totaled $0.5 million and primarily consist of $0.3 million of REBL and $0.1 million of SBL non-real estate. The interest reversals represent interest receivable balance on loans at the time of transfer into non-accrual status.

Loan Modifications

There were no loan modifications for the three months ended March 31, 2026. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, loans modified to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty, and related information are as follows (dollars in thousands):

The following table shows an analysis of loans that were modified during the three months ended March 31, 2025, presented by loan classification (dollars in thousands):

The following table describes the financial effect of modifications made during the three months ended March 31, 2025:

(1)Percentage represents the principal of loans deferred divided by the principal of the total loan portfolio.

The Company hadno commitments to extend additional credit to loans classified as modified as of March 31, 2026. As of March 31, 2025, there were no specific reserves on the $8.1 million of loans classified as modified.

Allowance for Credit Loss

The Company had no significant changes to its quantitative and qualitative measures used in measuring the allowance for credit losses as of March 31, 2026. For additional information regarding the Company’s allowance estimate, see Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 5, “Loans, net,” in the 2025 Form 10-K.

A summary of the Company’s primary portfolio pools and loans accordingly classified by year of origination, at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

In the above tables, the special mention classification indicates weaknesses that may, if not cured, threaten the borrower’s future repayment ability. A substandard classification reflects an existing weakness indicating the possible inadequacy of net worth and other repayment sources. These classifications are used both by regulators and peers, as they have been correlated with an increased probability of credit losses.

A detail of the changes in the ACL by loan category is as follows (in thousands):

A summary of the Company’s gross charge-offs classified by portfolio segment and year of origination are as follows (dollars in thousands):

Total net charge-offs decreased $8.4 million, to $30.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, from $39.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The improvement in net charge-offs was primarily driven by improved performance of fintech and direct lease financing.

The Company has agreements with a partner to originate and service fintech loans, which includes credit enhancement provisions through which incurred losses on fintech loans are covered by the partner. The Company recognizes an estimate of loss on this portfolio through its allowance for credit losses on its fintech loans on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, with provision for credit losses on fintech loans recognized on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, the Company recognizes a corresponding amount of credit enhancement asset on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and non-interest income — fintech loan credit enhancement in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The measurement of the expected loan losses and the related credit enhancement are based on the same estimate and are equal and correlate to like amounts in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company has recognized a credit enhancement asset on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the estimated recovery of its realized losses on fintech loans of $29.8 million and $31.1 million as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. All fintech loans are covered by credit enhancement agreements as of March 31, 2026.

Direct lease financing

The scheduled maturities of the direct financing leases reconciled to the total lease receivables as of March 31, 2026 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

(1)Of the total residual value, $42.9 million is not guaranteed by the lessee or other guarantors.

Off-Balance Sheet Exposure

In addition to estimating credit loss for outstanding loans, the Company estimates expected credit losses over the entire period in which there is exposure to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancelable by the Company. The estimate of loss for unfunded loan commitments relates to our off-balance sheet credit exposure, and is adjusted through the provision for unfunded commitments. The estimate considers the likelihood that funding will occur over the estimated life of the commitment. The amount of the reserve on such exposures as of March 31, 2026 and as of December 31, 2025 was $1.6 million and $1.4 million, respectively, and is recognized within Other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Note 6. Debt

The Company’s debt and borrowing arrangements consist of:

Assets pledged as collateral that are not available to pay the Company’s general obligations as of March 31, 2026 consisted of $4.75 billion of loans held for investment at amortized cost and $251.7 million of investment securities that were pledged for short-term-borrowing agreements. In addition, there were $13.6 million of loans held for investment at amortized cost that were pledged for other long-term borrowings at March 31, 2026.

Short-term borrowings

The Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and Federal Reserve Bank lines are periodically utilized to manage liquidity. The amount of loans pledged varies and the collateral may be unpledged at any time to the extent the collateral exceeds advances. As of March 31, 2026, based on the amount of loans and investment securities pledged, as outlined above, total capacity of short-term borrowings was $3.45 billion, there was $470.0 million borrowed and $2.98 billion available capacity.

Note 7. Fair Value Measurements

Recurring Measurements

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, segregated by fair value hierarchy, are summarized below (dollars in thousands) as of the dates indicated:

Activity in Level 3 instruments is summarized below (dollars in thousands):

(1)For commercial loans at fair value, gains or losses are recognized in Non-interest income—Net realized and unrealized gains on commercial loans, at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Information related to assumptions used in the valuation of Level 3 instruments is as follows(dollars in thousands):

Non-Recurring Measurements

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis consist of certain loans that are collateral-dependent with specific reserves that are recognized in Loans, net on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and Other real estate owned.

Collateral-dependent loans were $29.2 million and $15.2 million as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. Loans recorded at amortized cost that are in non-accrual status are treated as collateral dependent to the extent they have resulted from borrower financial difficulty (and not from administrative delays or other mitigating factors) and are not brought current. For these loans, fair value is measured based on inputs including recent sales of similar collateral, and is a Level 3 measurement. At March 31, 2026, the Company’s basis in the non-accrual loans, or the loan principal of $34.7 million was reduced by specific reserves of $5.5 million within the ACL as of that date, representing the deficiency between principal and estimated collateral values, which were reduced by estimated costs to sell.

Other real estate owned (OREO) were $61.0 million and $60.7 million as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively and are periodically measured for impairment based on any decline in fair value below carrying value. For OREO, fair value is based upon appraisals of the underlying collateral by third-party appraisers, reduced by 7% to 10% for estimated selling costs, and is a Level 3 non-recurring measurement. During the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the Company did not recognize unrealized losses from the impairment of OREO and realized gains (losses) on the disposition of OREO. Unrealized and realized gains or losses on OREO are recognized in Other Non-interest expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements.

Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments

The following tables provide information regarding carrying amounts and estimated fair values of all the Company’s financial instruments (dollars in thousands) as of the dates indicated:

Note 8. Shareholders’ Equity

Share Repurchases

2026 Repurchase Program

On July 7, 2025, the Board authorized a share repurchase program of up to $200.0 million for 2026 (the “2026 Repurchase Plan”).

During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company repurchased 843,061 shares of its common stock in the open market under the 2026 Repurchase Program at an average price of $59.31 per share.

2025 Repurchase Program

On October 23, 2024, the Board approved a common stock repurchase program for the 2025 fiscal year (the “2025 Repurchase Program”), which authorizes the Company to repurchase $37.5 million in value of the Company’s common stock per fiscal quarter in 2025, for a maximum amount of $150.0 million. On July 7, 2025, the Board authorized the increase of the capacity of the Company’s existing share repurchase program for the third and fourth quarters of 2025 to $300.0 million.

During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company repurchased 684,445 shares of its common stock in the open market under the 2025 Repurchase Program at an average price of $54.79 per share.

Stock-Based Compensation

Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)

In the first quarter of 2026, the Company granted 388,821 RSUs, having a vesting period ofthree years. At issuance, the RSUs had a fair value of $62.05 per unit.

For additional information regarding the Company’s stock-based compensation plans, see Note 13, “Stock-Based Compensation,” in the 2025 Form 10-K.

Note 9. Regulatory Matters

It is the policy of the Federal Reserve that financial holding companies should pay cash dividends on common stock only out of income available over the past year and only if prospective earnings retention is consistent with the organization’s expected future needs and financial condition. The policy provides that a financial holding company should not maintain a level of cash dividends that undermines the financial holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries.

Various federal and state statutory provisions limit the amount of dividends that subsidiary banks can pay to their holding companies without regulatory approval. Without the prior approval of the OCC, a dividend may not be paid if the total of all dividends declared by a bank in any calendar year is in excess of the current year’s net income combined with the retained net income of the two preceding years. Additionally, a dividend may not be paid in excess of a bank’s retained earnings. Moreover, an insured depository institution may not pay a dividend if the payment would cause it to be less than “adequately capitalized” under the prompt corrective action framework as defined in the Federal Deposit Insurance Act or if the institution is in default in the payment of an assessment due to the FDIC. Similarly, a banking organization that fails to satisfy regulatory minimum capital conservation buffer requirements will be subject to certain limitations, which include restrictions on capital distributions.

In addition to these explicit limitations, federal and state regulatory agencies are authorized to prohibit a banking subsidiary or financial holding company from engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice. Depending upon the circumstances, the agencies could take the position that paying a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice.

As of March 31, 2026, the Bank met all regulatory requirements for classification as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.

The following table sets forth our regulatory capital amounts and ratios for the periods indicated:

Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies

The Delaware FCRA Matter. On June 12, 2019, the Bank was served with a qui tam lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware, New Castle County. The Delaware Department of Justice intervened in the litigation. The case is titled The State of Delaware, Plaintiff, Ex rel. Russell S. Rogers, Plaintiff-Relator v. The Bancorp Bank, Interactive Communications International, Inc., and InComm Financial Services, Inc., Defendants. The lawsuit alleged that the defendants violated the Delaware False Claims and Reporting Act the (“DFCRA”) by not paying balances on certain open-loop “Vanilla” prepaid cards to the State of Delaware as unclaimed property. The complaint sought actual and treble damages, statutory penalties, and attorneys’ fees. The Bank filed an answer denying the allegations.. The Bank and other defendants previously filed a motion to dismiss the action, but that motion to dismiss was denied and the parties proceeded to engage in the first phase of discovery. On March 25, 2025, the State of Delaware filed a motion to dismiss or to stay the lawsuit without prejudice, due to a related administrative proceeding commenced by or on behalf of the State of Delaware Office of Unclaimed Property and the Bank responded to that motion by seeking dismissal with prejudice. On February 10, 2026, the court granted the State of Delaware’s motion to dismiss or stay in part, dismissing with prejudice the operative complaint alleging DFCRA violations by Bancorp and InComm and stating in pertinent that “[f]or avoidance of doubt, this means neither the State nor Relator may seek damages for any such claim via this action now that the State has sought dismissal for the purposes of pursuing administrative remedies for any of the alleged violations of Delaware’s Abandoned and Unclaimed Property Law.” Bancorp and InComm will now proceed to separate administrative proceedings in Delaware related to those certain open-loop “Vanilla” prepaid cards.

THE CFPB CID Matter. On March 27, 2023, the Bank received a Civil Investigative Demand (“CID”) from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) seeking documents and information related to the Bank’s escheatment practices in connection with certain accounts offered through one of the Bank’s program partners. The Bank responded to the CID and has not received further inquiries from the CFPB regarding the matter.

The City Attorney of San Francisco Matter. On November 21, 2023, TBBK Card Services, Inc. (“TBBK Card”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, was served with a complaint filed in the Superior Court of the State of California (the “California Superior

Court”), captioned People of the State of California, acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu, Plaintiff v. InComm Financial Services, Inc., TBBK Card Services, Inc., Sutton Bank, Pathward, N.A., and Does 1-10, Defendants. The complaint principally alleges that the defendants engaged in unlawful, unfair or fraudulent business acts and practices related to the packaging of “Vanilla” prepaid cards and the refund process for unauthorized transactions that occurred due to card draining practices. On December 14, 2023, the case was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. On March 26, 2024, the case was remanded to the California Superior Court. TBBK Card has vigorously defended against the claims. On May 6, 2024, TBBK Card filed a motion to quash service of the summons as to TBBK Card for lack of personal jurisdiction. TBBK Card’s motion to quash, and subsequent related appeals, were denied. On December 12, 2025, an amended complaint containing additional factual allegations was filed in the California Superior Court. The Company is not yet able to determine whether the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or operations.

The Oxygen Matter. On November 25, 2024, the Bank commenced arbitration through the American Arbitration Association seeking approximately $1.808 million from Oxygen, Inc. (“Oxygen”) owed under a Private Label Account Program Agreement related to unpaid invoices and indemnification obligations owed by Oxygen. On January 13, 2025, Oxygen answered the Bank’s arbitration demand, generally denying the allegations made by the Bank, and filed a Counterclaim against the Bank. The Counterclaim alleges (i) that the termination of the Private Label Account Program Agreement was pretextual, (ii) the Bank breached its notification obligations in terminating the Private Label Account Program Agreement, (iii) the Bank breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and (iv) conversion of $1.2 million by the Bank. Thead damnum clause of the Counterclaim also seeks compensatory damages in an amount not less than $40 million. The Bank believes it has meritorious defenses and intends to vigorously defend against the Counterclaim. The Company is not yet able to determine whether the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or operations.

The Putative Class Action Matter. On March 14, 2025, Nathan Linden filed a putative securities class action complaint captioned Nathan Linden v. The Bancorp, Inc., et al. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against the Company and certain of its current and former officers. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and purports to assert a class action on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Company securities between January 25, 2024 and March 4, 2025. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and omissions about the Company’s business, prospects, and operations, with a focus on the Company’s commercial real estate bridge loan (“REBL”) portfolio and related provision for credit losses. On September 29, 2025, the court appointed Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”) as lead plaintiff; the case is now captioned Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. The Bancorp, Inc., et al. On December 22, 2025, SEPTA filed its amended class action complaint, which alleges that between January 26, 2024 and March 25, 2025, the defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and omissions about certain loans in the Company’s REBL portfolio and related provision for credit losses. The named plaintiff seeks unspecified damages, fees, interest, and costs. The Company intends to vigorously defend against the allegations in the amended complaint. On February 20, 2026, the Company filed its motion to dismiss the amended complaint and further briefing on that motion remains outstanding. The Company is not yet able to determine whether the ultimate resolution of the matter will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or operations.

The Ingenium Matter. On February 2, 2026, the Bank was made aware of a complaint filed in the Delaware Superior Court, Complex Commercial Division by Ingenium Capital Group, LLC (“Ingenium”) captioned as Ingenium Capital Group, LLC v. The Bancorp Bank, N.A., C.A. No. N26C-01-487 PAW CCLD. Prior to service of the complaint, on February 19, 2026, Ingenium filed its amended complaint. In the amended complaint, Ingenium alleges that the Bank committed fraud or breached a letter of understanding signed in January 2023 by inducing Ingenium to invest upwards of $10 million in Oxygen, Inc. (the same entity that the Bank is arbitrating against in the Oxygen Matter described above) and then by terminating its contract with Oxygen in February 2024. The amended complaint seeks not less than $10 million in damages, plus costs of litigation, and interest. The Bank intends to vigorously defend against the claims. We are not yet able to estimate any potential liability of the Bank.

In addition, we are a party to various routine legal proceedings arising out of the ordinary course of our business. Management believes that none of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or operations.

Note 11. Segment Financials

The following tables provide segment information for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

(1)Non-interest income of the Fintech segment includes $45.9 million of Fintech loan credit enhancement income related to the estimated recovery from a Fintech partner for losses on fintech loans where the measurement of the expected loan loss and credit enhancement are based on the same estimate. The remainder of Non-interest income for Fintech is $34.4 million total fintech fees.