Skip to main content

NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST INC

For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Feb 21, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2024 · Filed Feb 21, 2025

ADAM$5.69-3.9%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-K

Period ended 2023-12-31; filed 2024-02-23.

0001273685-24-000033

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Current report: 10-K

Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-21.

0001273685-25-000028

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 316 previous paragraphs and 305 current paragraphs.

232 unchanged; 68 reworded; 4 added; 14 removed; 2 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (4)

Current report

•Our investments may include subordinated tranches of RMBS, CMBS and ABS, which are subordinate in right of payment to more senior securities that have greater risk of loss than other investments.

Current report

Our investments in a mortgage loan originator exposes us to additional risks.

Current report

As of December 31, 2024, we owned a 50% equity interest in an entity that originates residential loans. Unlike our investments in residential mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”), our investments in the loan originator are unsecured and not collateralized by any property of the originator. In addition, we do not manage the loan originator in which we have made investments, and because none of our investments give us a controlling stake in the loan originator, our ability to influence the business and operations of the originator is limited, in some instances significantly so. Also, because the loan originator is a private closely-held enterprise, there are significant restrictions on our ability to sell or otherwise transfer our investments (which are generally illiquid). In the event that the loan originator in which we have made investments should experience a significant decline in its business and operations or otherwise not be able to respond adequately to managerial, compliance or operational challenges that it may encounter, we may be required to write-down all or a portion of the applicable investment, which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and our book value.

Current report

The remedies available to us to resolve delinquent loans may not fully compensate us for any losses incurred and may result in lengthy and expensive legal processes.
Removed paragraphs (14)

Previous report

•Our investments may include subordinated tranches of CMBS, RMBS and ABS, which are subordinate in right of payment to more senior securities and residential loans that have greater risk of loss than other investments.

Previous report

•We may not be able to complete the sale of our joint venture equity interests in multi-family properties on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Previous report

•The discontinuation of LIBOR and the transition from LIBOR to an alternative reference rate, such as SOFR, may adversely impact our borrowings, operations, cash flows and assets and the value of our Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock.

Previous report

•under certain of our arrangements, neither partner may have control, and an impasse could be reached, which might have a negative influence on our investment; and

Previous report

The proposed disposition of our portfolio of joint venture equity interests in multi-family properties is subject to a number of risks, including the risk that we may be unable to complete the sale of our joint venture equity portfolio on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Previous report

In September 2022, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved a strategic repositioning of our business pursuant to which we will opportunistically dispose over time our joint venture equity investments in multi-family properties and, following disposition, we will reallocate the capital associated with such assets to our targeted assets. Accordingly, we are considering various opportunities to monetize our multi-family joint venture equity investments. As of December 31, 2023, we held $236.3 million in joint venture equity interests in multi-family properties, representing approximately 4.6% of our total investment portfolio. As a result of unfavorable market conditions that negatively impacted our ability to secure a reasonable buyer and completely exit our investment in the joint venture equity interests, as of December 31, 2023, we have disposed of six multi-family joint venture equity investments under this disposition strategy. Additionally, as of December 31, 2023, we have reclassified certain of these joint venture equity investments from held for sale to held and used because of the increased expected time to completion of sales. Although we intend to acquire additional targeted assets with the proceeds from the sale of our joint venture equity interests, we face significant competition for acquisition of our targeted assets and we may not be able or have the opportunity to make suitable investments on favorable terms. We can provide no assurances regarding the timing or pricing of the sales of our joint venture equity interests in multi-family properties, or that such sales will occur at all. Moreover, to the extent we hold these investments as held for sale, we are required to carry the properties at the lesser ofthe net carrying amount of the assets or the estimated net fair value. If the estimated net fair value of the real estate held for sale is less than the net carrying amount of the assets, an impairment of real estate charge is recorded. We have incurred and may in the future incur impairment charges on these properties while we hold them for sale. If we cannot sell these joint venture equity interests in a timely manner and/or on terms acceptable to us, we may have less flexibility to rotate into more preferred asset classes and/or we may incur a loss on these investments, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Previous report

The discontinuation of LIBOR and the transition from LIBOR to an alternative reference rate, such as SOFR, may adversely impact our borrowings, operations, cash flows and assets and the value of investments in our Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock.

Previous report

Our repurchase agreements, subordinated debt, mortgage debt related to our consolidated multi-family properties, Series D Preferred Stock, Series E Preferred Stock and certain of our floating rate assets, particularly residential loans, are linked to LIBOR, which has been the subject of recent reform. The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, the regulator of LIBOR, stopped publishing USD LIBOR for the one week and two month USD LIBOR tenors on December 31, 2021 and stopped publishing the remainder of USD LIBOR tenors on June 30, 2023. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee, which was convened by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to help ensure a successful transition from LIBOR, proposed that the SOFR would replace LIBOR. SOFR is based on overnight Treasury General Collateral repo rates. We continue to integrate SOFR into our operations, as it has become in many cases, and will likely become in other cases, the new reference rate for hedges and a range of interest rate investments and financing arrangements.

Previous report

In light of the cessation of the publication of LIBOR, our material contracts that were indexed to LIBOR have been amended to transition to an alternative reference rate and any of our other unmodified agreements that incorporate LIBOR as the referenced rate have provisions in place that provide for identification of an alternative reference rate or specify an alternative reference rate, or by operation of law specify an alternative reference rate, to LIBOR upon its phase-out. However, the full impact of the transition remains unpredictable and these efforts may not be successful in mitigating the legal and financial risk from transitioning to an alternative reference rate in our legacy agreements. In addition, any resulting differences in interest rate standards among our assets and our financing arrangements may result in interest rate mismatches between our assets and the borrowings used to fund such assets. Furthermore, the transition away from LIBOR may adversely impact our ability to manage and hedge exposures to fluctuations in interest rates using derivative instruments. In addition, we cannot predict potential other unforeseen impacts of the transition away from LIBOR.

Previous report

Given that SOFR is a secured rate backed by government securities, it is a rate that does not take into account bank credit risk (as was the case with LIBOR). SOFR is therefore likely to be lower than LIBOR was and is less likely to correlate with the funding costs of financial institutions. Moreover, SOFR has a limited history, having been first published in April 2018, and has been more volatile than other benchmark or market rates, including LIBOR, during certain periods. The future performance of SOFR, and SOFR-based reference rates, cannot be predicted based on SOFR’s history or otherwise. Future levels of SOFR may bear little or no relation to historical levels of SOFR, LIBOR or other rates. SOFR-based rates will differ from LIBOR, and the differences may be material. While we will continue to use SOFR, certain factors may impact SOFR, including factors causing SOFR to cease to exist, the establishment of new methods of calculating SOFR, or the use of alternative reference rates. As such, the effect of the transition to SOFR may adversely impact our cost of capital, which could ultimately adversely impact our results of operations, cash flows and the market value and liquidity of our investments.

Previous report

In addition, holders of our Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock should be aware that, with the discontinuance of LIBOR, the dividend rate on our Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock will be determined for the relevant period by the fallback provisions applicable to such preferred stock. From and including October 15, 2027 for our Series D Preferred Stock (“Series D Preferred Stock Floating Rate Period”) and from and including January 15, 2025 for our Series E Preferred Stock (the “Series E Preferred Stock Floating Rate Period,” and together with the Series D Preferred Stock Floating Rate Period, the “Floating Rate Period”), and because Three-Month LIBOR Rate (as defined in the Articles Supplementary of the Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock) will have ceased publication, under the terms of the Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock, we will appoint a calculation agent to determine whether there is an industry accepted substitute or successor base rate to Three-Month LIBOR Rate. If, after such consultation, the calculation agent determines that there is an industry accepted substitute or successor base rate, the calculation agent shall use such substitute or successor base rate. In such case, the calculation agent in its sole discretion may also implement other technical changes to the Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock in a manner that is consistent with industry accepted practices for such substitute or successor base rate. We currently anticipate that the successor rate to be chosen by the calculation agent during the Floating Rate Period will be three-month CME Term SOFR plus the applicable tenor spread adjustment of 0.26161% per annum.

Previous report

The selection of a successor rate, and any decisions, determinations or elections made by us or the calculation agent in connection with implementing a successor rate with respect to the Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock in accordance with their terms during the Floating Rate Period, could result in adverse consequences to the applicable dividend rate on the Series D Preferred Stock or Series E Preferred Stock, which could adversely affect the return on, value of and market for the Series D Preferred Stock or Series E Preferred Stock. Further, there is no assurance that the characteristics of any successor rate will be similar to LIBOR, or that any successor rate will produce the economic equivalent of LIBOR.

Previous report

Increasing attention to, and social expectations on businesses to address, climate change and other environmental and social impacts, alongside investor and societal explanations regarding voluntary ESG disclosures, may result in increased costs in order for us to comply and decreased access to capital. Moreover, increasing attention to climate change and its associated risks may also lead to the expectation of voluntary ESG disclosures from our industry, which may cause a reduction in the production or origination of certain of our targeted assets or changes that make the returns on these assets less attractive, including residential mortgages, MBS and/or direct or indirect investments in real properties, and could negatively impact our portfolio and our results of operations, financial condition and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.

Previous report

Additionally, organizations that provide information to investors on corporate governance and related matters have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters. Such ratings are used by investors to inform their investment and voting decisions. Unfavorable ESG ratings may lead to increased negative sentiment toward us or the assets in which we invest and to the diversion of investments more in line with environmental sustainability, which could have a negative impact on our access to and costs of capital.
Reworded paragraphs (68)

Previous wording

•Our portfolio of business purpose loans exposes us to new and different risks from our traditional investments in residential mortgage loans.

Current wording

•Our portfolio of business purpose loans exposes us to risks that are different from the risks involved with our traditional investments in residential mortgage loans.

Previous wording

•Declining real estate valuations and impairment charges to real estate assets, such as those held by our joint venture equity investments in multi-family properties, have adversely affected our earnings and financial condition in the past and may adversely affect our earnings and financial condition in the future.

Current wording

•Declining real estate valuations and impairment charges to real estate assets have adversely affected our earnings and financial condition in the past and may adversely affect our earnings and financial condition in the future.

Previous wording

•We cannot predict the effect that government policies, laws and interventions adopted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic or the current inflationary environment or the impact that future changes in the U.S. political environment, governmental policy or regulation will have on our business and the markets in which we operate.

Current wording

•We cannot predict the effect that changes in government policies, laws or regulations or the U.S. political environment will have on our business and the markets in which we operate.

Previous wording

Set forth below are the risks that we believe are material to stockholders and prospective investors. You should carefully consider the following risk factors and the various other factors identified in or incorporated by reference into any other documents filed by us with the SEC in evaluating our company and our business. The risks discussed herein can materially adversely affect our business, liquidity, operating results, prospects, financial condition and ability to make distributions to our stockholders, and may cause the market price of our securities to decline. The risk factors described below are not the only risks that may affect us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or not presently deemed material by us, also may materially adversely affect our business, liquidity, operating results, prospects, financial condition and ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Current wording

Set forth below are the risks that we believe are material to stockholders and prospective investors. You should carefully consider the following risk factors and the various other factors identified in or incorporated by reference into any other documents filed by us with the SEC in evaluating our Company and our business. The risks discussed herein can materially adversely affect our business, liquidity, operating results, prospects, financial condition and/or ability to make distributions to our stockholders, and may cause the market price of our securities to decline. The risk factors described below are not the only risks that may affect us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or not presently deemed material by us, also may materially adversely affect our business, liquidity, operating results, prospects, financial condition and ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Previous wording

The market value of our investment portfolio may move inversely with changes in interest rates. We anticipate that increases in interest rates will generally tend to decrease our net income and the market value of our investment portfolio, as occurred during much of 2022 and in 2023. Changes in the market values of assets in our investment portfolio where the Company elected the fair value option will be reflected in earnings and changes in the market values of assets in our investment portfolio where the Company did not elect the fair value option will be reflected in stockholders’ equity. As a result, a decline in market values of assets in our investment portfolio may reduce our earnings, book value and the market value of our securities.

Current wording

The market value of our investment portfolio may move inversely with changes in interest rates. We anticipate that increases in interest rates will generally tend to decrease our net income and the market value of our investment portfolio. Changes in the market values of assets in our investment portfolio where the Company elected the fair value option will be reflected in earnings and changes in the market values of assets in our investment portfolio where the Company did not elect the fair value option will be reflected in stockholders’ equity. As a result, a decline in market values of assets in our investment portfolio may reduce our earnings, book value and the market value of our securities.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2023, 61% of our total investment portfolio was comprised of what we refer to as "credit assets." Despite our efforts to manage credit risk, there are many aspects of credit risk that we cannot control. Our credit policies and procedures may not be successful in limiting future delinquencies, defaults, foreclosures or losses, particularly in relation to declining economic conditions or significant market disruptions, or they may not be cost effective. Our underwriting process, due diligence efforts or hedging strategies, if any, may not be effective or sufficient. Loan servicing companies or our operating partners may not cooperate with our loss mitigation efforts or those efforts may be ineffective. Service providers to securitizations, such as trustees, loan servicers, bond insurance providers, and custodians, as well as our operating partners and their property managers, may not perform in a manner that promotes our interests. Delay of foreclosures could delay resolution and increase ultimate loss severities, as a result.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2024, 49% of our total investment portfolio was comprised of what we refer to as "credit assets." Despite our efforts to manage credit risk, there are many aspects of credit risk that we cannot control. Our credit policies and procedures may not be successful in limiting future delinquencies, defaults, foreclosures or losses, particularly in relation to declining economic conditions or significant market disruptions, or they may not be cost effective. Our underwriting process, due diligence efforts or hedging strategies, if any, may not be effective or sufficient. Loan servicing companies or our operating partners may not cooperate with our loss mitigation efforts or those efforts may be ineffective. Service providers to securitizations, such as trustees, loan servicers, bond insurance providers, and custodians, as well as our operating partners and their property managers, may not perform in a manner that promotes our interests. Delay of foreclosures could delay resolution and increase ultimate loss severities, as a result.

Previous wording

A higher interest rate environment, which we have experienced since 2022, generally reduces economic activity, which, in turn, generally reduces the demand for mortgage loans due to the higher cost of borrowing and new construction redevelopment or renovation. A reduction in the volume of mortgage loans originated or in new construction, redevelopment or renovation of multi-family properties may affect the volume of targeted assets available to us, which could adversely affect our ability to acquire assets that satisfy our investment and business objectives. We also expect that higher interest rates will cause our targeted assets that were issued, originated or acquired prior to an interest rate increase to experience, as certain of them did in 2023, a decline in their fair value or provide yields that are below prevailing market interest rates. If higher interest rates or interest rate volatility cause us to be unable to acquire a sufficient volume of our targeted assets with a yield that is sufficiently above our borrowing cost, our ability to satisfy our investment objectives and to generate income and make distributions to our stockholders will be materially and adversely affected.

Current wording

A higher interest rate environment, which we have experienced since 2022, generally results in a reduction in the demand for mortgage loans due to the higher cost of borrowing and new construction redevelopment or renovation. A reduction in the volume of mortgage loans originated or in new construction, redevelopment or renovation of multi-family properties may affect the volume of targeted assets available to us, which could adversely affect our ability to acquire assets that satisfy our investment and business objectives. We also expect that higher interest rates will cause our targeted assets that were issued, originated or acquired prior to an interest rate increase to experience, as certain of them did in 2024, a decline in their fair value and/or provide yields that are below prevailing market interest rates. If higher interest rates or interest rate volatility cause us to be unable to acquire a sufficient volume of our targeted assets with a yield that is sufficiently above our borrowing cost, our ability to satisfy our investment objectives and to generate income and make distributions to our stockholders will be materially and adversely affected.

Previous wording

Interest rate fluctuations will also cause variances in the yield curve, which may reduce our net income. The relationship between short-term and longer-term interest rates is often referred to as the “yield curve.” If short-term interest rates rise disproportionately relative to longer-term interest rates (a flattening of the yield curve), our borrowing costs may increase more rapidly than the interest income earned on our interest-earning assets. Additionally, to the extent cash flows from investments that return scheduled and unscheduled principal are reinvested, the spread between the yields of the new investments and available borrowing rates may decline, which would likely decrease our net income. It is also possible that short-term interest rates may exceed longer-term interest rates (a yield curve inversion), as they do currently, in which event our borrowing costs may exceed our interest income and we could incur significant operating losses.

Current wording

Interest rate fluctuations will also cause variances in the yield curve, which may reduce our net income. The relationship between short-term and longer-term interest rates is often referred to as the “yield curve.” If short-term interest rates rise disproportionately relative to longer-term interest rates (a flattening of the yield curve), our borrowing costs may increase more rapidly than the interest income earned on our interest-earning assets. Additionally, to the extent cash flows from investments that return scheduled and unscheduled principal are reinvested, the spread between the yields of the new investments and available borrowing rates may decline, which would likely decrease our net income. It is also possible that short-term interest rates may exceed longer-term interest rates (a yield curve inversion), as they did from the middle of 2022 into the third quarter of 2024, in which event our borrowing costs may exceed our interest income and we could incur significant operating losses.

Previous wording

We are not required to observe any specific diversification criteria. As a result, our investment portfolio may, at times, be concentrated in certain asset types that are subject to higher risk of delinquency, default or foreclosure, or secured by properties concentrated in a limited number of real estate sectors or geographic locations, which increases, with respect to those sectors or geographic locations, our exposure to economic downturns and risks associated with the real estate and lending industries in general, thereby increasing the risk of loss and the magnitude of potential losses to us and our stockholders if one or more of these asset or property types perform poorly or the states or regions in which these properties are located are negatively impacted.

Current wording

We are not required to observe any specific diversification criteria. As a result, our investment portfolio may, at times, be concentrated in certain asset types that are subject to higher risk of delinquency, default or foreclosure, or secured by properties concentrated in a limited number of real estate sectors or geographic locations, which increases, with respect to those asset types, sectors or geographic locations, our exposure to economic downturns and risks associated with the real estate and lending industries in general, thereby increasing the risk of loss and the magnitude of potential losses to us and our stockholders if one or more of these asset or property types perform poorly or the states or regions in which these properties are located are negatively impacted.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2023, approximately 8.8% of our total investment portfolio represented direct or indirect investments in multi-family properties. Moreover, as of December 31, 2023, 26.3%, 20.2% and 10.3% of the outstanding balance of our Mezzanine Lending investments were made on properties located in Florida, Texas and Utah, respectively, and 38.5%, 25.0% and 11.6% of our joint venture equity investments owned multi-family properties located in Florida, Texas and Alabama, respectively. Our direct and indirect investments in multi-family properties are subject to the ability of the property owner to generate net income from operating the property, which is impacted by numerous factors and developments, including many risks that affect real estate generally. See “-Our investments in multi-family properties are subject to the ability of the property owner to generate net income from operating the property as well as the risks of delinquency, default and foreclosure” and “-Our business is subject to risks particular to real property and real estate-related assets.” To the extent any of these factors materially adversely impact the multi-family property sector or the geographic regions in which we invest, the market values of our multi-family assets and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2024, 29.0%, 26.6% and 8.2% of the outstanding balance of our Mezzanine Lending investments were made on properties located in Florida, Texas and Arizona, respectively, and 44.7%, 31.1% and 10.0% of our joint venture equity investments owned multi-family properties located in Texas, Florida and Kentucky, respectively. Our direct and indirect investments in multi-family properties are subject to the ability of the property owner to generate net income from operating the property, which is impacted by numerous factors and developments, including many risks that affect real estate generally. See “-Our investments in multi-family properties are subject to the ability of the property owner to generate net income from operating the property as well as the risks of delinquency, default and foreclosure” and “-Our business is subject to risks particular to real property and real estate-related assets.” To the extent any of these factors materially adversely impact the multi-family property sector or the geographic regions in which we invest, the market values of our multi-family assets and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Previous wording

Similarly, as of December 31, 2023, approximately 48.9% of our total investment portfolio was comprised of residential loans and non-Agency RMBS. Moreover, as of December 31, 2023, significant portions of the properties that secure our residential loans, including loans that secure Consolidated SLST, were concentrated in California, Florida, Texas, New York, New Jersey and Illinois among other states. California is particularly susceptible to wildfire risk while Florida and Texas are susceptible to hurricane, wind and flood risks. To the extent that our portfolio is concentrated in any region, or by type of asset or real estate sector, downturns or developments relating generally to such region, type of borrower, asset or sector may result in defaults or losses on a number of our assets within a short time period, which may materially adversely affect our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. See “-Our business is subject to risks particular to real property and real estate-related assets.”

Current wording

Similarly, as of December 31, 2024, approximately 41.9% of our total investment portfolio was comprised of residential loans and non-Agency RMBS, and 42.4% was comprised of Agency RMBS. Moreover, as of December 31, 2024, significant portions of the properties that secure our residential loans, including loans that secure Consolidated SLST, were concentrated in California, Florida, Texas, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Illinois among other states. California is particularly susceptible to earthquake and wildfire risks while Florida and Texas are susceptible to hurricane, wind and flood risks. To the extent that our portfolio is concentrated in any region, or by type of asset or real estate sector, downturns or developments relating generally to such region, type of borrower, asset or sector may result in defaults or losses on a number of our assets within a short time period, which may materially adversely affect our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. See “-Our business is subject to risks particular to real property and real estate-related assets.”

Previous wording

Many of the loans we own or seek to acquire have been purchased by us at a discount to par value. These residential loans sell at a discount because they generally constitute riskier investments than those selling at or above par value. The residential loans we invest in may be distressed or purchased at a discount because a borrower may have defaulted thereupon, because the borrower is or has been in the past delinquent on paying all or a portion of his obligation under the loan, because the loan may otherwise contain credit quality that is considered to be poor, because of errors by the originator in the loan origination underwriting process or because the loan documentation fails to meet certain standards. In addition, non-performing or sub-performing loans may require a substantial amount of workout negotiations and/or restructuring, which may divert the attention of our management team from other activities and entail, among other things, a substantial reduction in the interest rate, capitalization of interest payments, and a substantial write-down of the principal of the loan. However, even if such restructuring were successfully accomplished, a risk exists that the borrower will not be able or willing to maintain the restructured payments or refinance the restructured mortgage upon maturity. Although we typically expect to receive less than the principal amount or face value of the residential loans that we purchase, the return that we in fact receive thereupon may be less than our investment in such loans due to the failure of the loans to perform or reperform. An economic downturn would exacerbate the risks of the recovery of the full value of the loan or the cost of our investment therein.

Current wording

A certain portion of the loans we own or seek to acquire have been purchased by us at a discount to par value. These residential loans sell at a discount because they generally constitute riskier investments than those selling at or above par value. The residential loans we invest in may be distressed or purchased at a discount because a borrower may have defaulted thereupon, because the borrower is or has been in the past delinquent on paying all or a portion of his obligation under the loan, because the loan may otherwise contain credit quality that is considered to be poor, because of errors by the originator in the loan origination underwriting process or because the loan documentation fails to meet certain standards. In addition, non-performing or sub-performing loans may require a substantial amount of workout negotiations and/or restructuring, which may divert the attention of our management team from other activities and entail, among other things, a substantial reduction in the interest rate, capitalization of interest payments, and a substantial write-down of the principal of the loan. However, even if such restructuring were successfully accomplished, a risk exists that the borrower will not be able or willing to maintain the restructured payments or refinance the restructured mortgage upon maturity. Although we typically expect to receive less than the principal amount or face value of the residential loans that we purchase, the return that we in fact receive thereupon may be less than our investment in such loans due to the failure of the loans to perform or reperform. An economic downturn would exacerbate the risks of the recovery of the full value of the loan or the cost of our investment therein.

Previous wording

Our portfolio of business purpose loans exposes us to new and different risks from our traditional investments in residential mortgage loans.

Current wording

Our portfolio of business purpose loans exposes us to risks that are different from the risks involved with our traditional investments in residential mortgage loans.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2023, approximately 22.9% of the asset value of our total investment portfolio is comprised of business purpose loans. Business purpose loans refer to (i) short-term loans with terms of generally twelve to 24 months that are collateralized by residential properties and are made to investors who intend to rehabilitate and sell the residential property for a profit, which we refer to as “business purpose bridge loans,” and (ii) loans that finance (or refinance) non-owner occupied residential properties that are rented to one or more tenants, which we refer to as “business purpose rental loans”. Business purpose loans are directly exposed to losses resulting from default and foreclosure. Therefore, the value of the underlying property, the creditworthiness and financial position of the borrower and the priority and enforceability of the lien will significantly impact the value of such mortgages. Whether or not a loan is originated in accordance with our underwriting standards for such loans, there can be no assurance as to the adequacy of the protection of the terms of the loan, including the validity or enforceability of the loan and the maintenance of the anticipated priority and perfection of the applicable security interests. Furthermore, claims may be asserted that might interfere with enforcement of our rights. In the event of a foreclosure, we may assume direct ownership of the underlying real estate. The liquidation proceeds upon sale of such real estate may not be sufficient to recover our cost basis in the loan, resulting in a loss to us. Moreover, in the case of business purpose loans made to a borrower who then rents the property to a tenant, local, state or federal government eviction proceeding requirements may delay foreclosure or liquidation proceedings or cause us to incur additional expense. Any costs or delays involved in the completion of a foreclosure of the loan or a liquidation of the underlying property will further reduce the proceeds and thus increase the loss.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2024, approximately 25.9% of the asset value of our total investment portfolio is comprised of business purpose loans. Business purpose loans are directly exposed to losses resulting from default and foreclosure. Therefore, the value of the underlying property, the creditworthiness and financial position of the borrower and the priority and enforceability of the lien will significantly impact the value of such mortgages. Whether or not a loan is originated in accordance with our underwriting standards for such loans, there can be no assurance as to the adequacy of the protection of the terms of the loan, including the validity or enforceability of the loan and the maintenance of the anticipated priority and perfection of the applicable security interests. Furthermore, claims may be asserted that might interfere with enforcement of our rights. In the event of a foreclosure, we may assume direct ownership of the underlying real estate. The liquidation proceeds upon sale of such real estate may not be sufficient to recover our cost basis in the loan, resulting in a loss to us. Moreover, in the case of business purpose loans made to a borrower who then rents the property to a tenant, local, state or federal government eviction proceeding requirements may delay foreclosure or liquidation proceedings or cause us to incur additional expense. Any costs or delays involved in the completion of a foreclosure of the loan or a liquidation of the underlying property will further reduce the proceeds and thus increase the loss.

Previous wording

A portion of our business purpose loan portfolio currently is, and in the future may be, delinquent and subject to increased risks of credit loss for a variety of reasons, including, without limitation, because the underlying property is too highly-leveraged or the borrower experiences financial distress. Indeed, loans similar to business purpose bridge loans performed poorly during the 2008 financial crisis due, in large part, to high leverage and borrower distress and it is likely these types of loans may perform poorly in an economic downturn or in an environment of decreasing real estate prices. Delinquent loans may require a substantial amount of workout negotiations or restructuring, which may entail, among other things, a reduction in the interest rate or capitalization of past due interest. However, even if restructurings are successfully accomplished, risks still exist that borrowers will not be able or willing to maintain the restructured payments or refinance the restructured mortgage upon maturity.

Current wording

A portion of our business purpose loan portfolio currently is, and in the future may be, delinquent and subject to increased risks of credit loss for a variety of reasons, including, without limitation, because the underlying property is too highly-leveraged or the borrower experiences financial distress. Indeed, loans similar to business purpose bridge loans performed poorly during the 2008 financial crisis due, in large part, to high leverage and borrower distress and it is likely these types of loans may perform poorly in an economic downturn or in an environment of decreasing real estate prices.

Previous wording

Our investments may include subordinated tranches of CMBS, RMBS and ABS, which are subordinate in right of payment to more senior securities and have greater risk of loss than other investments.

Current wording

Our investments may include subordinated tranches of RMBS, CMBS and ABS, which are subordinate in right of payment to more senior securities and have greater risk of loss than other investments.

Previous wording

Our investments include or may include subordinated tranches of CMBS, RMBS and ABS, which are subordinated classes of securities in a structure of securities collateralized by a pool of assets consisting primarily of multi-family or other commercial mortgage loans, residential mortgage loans and auto loans, respectively. Accordingly, the subordinated tranches of securities that we own and invest in, such as certain non-Agency RMBS and ABS, are the first or among the first to bear the loss upon a restructuring or liquidation of the underlying collateral and the last to receive payment of interest and principal. Additionally, estimated fair values of these subordinated interests tend to be more sensitive to changes in economic conditions and increases in defaults, delinquencies and losses than more senior securities. Moreover, subordinated interests generally are not actively traded and may not provide holders thereof with a liquid investment, particularly during periods of market disruption. Numerous factors may affect an issuing entity’s ability to repay or fulfill its payment obligations on its subordinated securities, including, without limitation, the failure to meet its business plan, a downturn in its industry, rising interest rates, negative economic conditions or risks particular to real property. As of December 31, 2023, our portfolio included approximately $143.5 million of subordinated, first loss non-Agency RMBS. In the event any of these factors cause the securitization entities in which we own subordinated securities to experience losses, the market value of our assets, our business, financial condition and results of operations and ability to make distributions to our stockholders may be materially adversely affected.

Current wording

Our investments include or may include subordinated tranches of RMBS, CMBS and ABS, which are subordinated classes of securities in a structure of securities collateralized by a pool of assets consisting primarily of residential mortgage loans, multi-family or other commercial mortgage loans and auto loans, respectively. Accordingly, the subordinated tranches of securities that we own and invest in, such as certain non-Agency RMBS and ABS, are the first or among the first to bear the loss upon a restructuring or liquidation of the underlying collateral and the last to receive payment of interest and principal. Additionally, estimated fair values of these subordinated interests tend to be more sensitive to changes in economic conditions and increases in defaults, delinquencies and losses than more senior securities. Moreover, subordinated interests generally are not actively traded and may not provide holders thereof with a liquid investment, particularly during periods of market disruption. Numerous factors may affect an issuing entity’s ability to repay or fulfill its payment obligations on its subordinated securities, including, without limitation, the failure to meet its business plan, a downturn in its industry, rising interest rates, negative economic conditions or risks particular to real property. As of December 31, 2024, our portfolio included approximately $142.8 million of subordinated, first loss non-Agency RMBS. In the event any of these factors cause the securitization entities in which we own subordinated securities to experience losses, the market value of our assets, our business, financial condition and results of operations and ability to make distributions to our stockholders may be materially adversely affected.

Previous wording

The adverse effects of prepayments may impact us in various ways. First, certain investments, such as IOs, may experience outright losses in an environment of faster actual or anticipated prepayments. Second, particular investments may under-perform relative to any hedges that we may have constructed for these assets, resulting in a loss to us. In particular, prepayments (at par) may limit the potential upside of many RMBS to their principal or par amounts, whereas their corresponding hedges often have the potential for unlimited loss. Furthermore, to the extent that faster prepayment rates are due to lower interest rates, the principal payments received from prepayments will tend to be reinvested in lower-yielding assets, which may reduce our income in the long run. Therefore, if actual prepayment rates differ from anticipated prepayment rates, our business, financial condition and results of operations and ability to make distributions to our stockholders could be materially adversely affected.

Current wording

The adverse effects of prepayments may impact us in various ways. First, certain investments, such as IOs and MSRs, may experience outright losses in an environment of faster actual or anticipated prepayments. Second, particular investments may under-perform relative to any hedges that we may have constructed for these assets, resulting in a loss to us. In particular, prepayments (at par) may limit the potential upside of many RMBS to their principal or par amounts, whereas their corresponding hedges often have the potential for unlimited loss. Furthermore, to the extent that faster prepayment rates are due to lower interest rates, the principal payments received from prepayments will tend to be reinvested in lower-yielding assets, which may reduce our income in the long run. Therefore, if actual prepayment rates differ from anticipated prepayment rates, our business, financial condition and results of operations and ability to make distributions to our stockholders could be materially adversely affected.

Previous wording

Some of the multi-family real estate investments and loans we may originate or that underlie our CMBS may allow the borrower to make prepayments without incurring a prepayment penalty and some may include provisions allowing the borrower or operating partner to extend the term of the loan or instrument beyond the originally scheduled maturity. Because the decision to prepay or extend such a multi-family loan or instrument is typically controlled by the borrower, we may not accurately anticipate the timing of these events, which could affect the earnings and cash flows we anticipate and could impact our ability to finance these assets.

Current wording

Some of the multi-family real estate investments and loans we may originate may allow the borrower to make prepayments without incurring a prepayment penalty and some may include provisions allowing the borrower or operating partner to extend the term of the loan or instrument beyond the originally scheduled maturity. Because the decision to prepay or extend such a multi-family loan or instrument is typically controlled by the borrower, we may not accurately anticipate the timing of these events, which could affect the earnings and cash flows we anticipate and could impact our ability to finance these assets.

Previous wording

•We have experienced and may experience in the future increased volatility in our GAAP results of operations as we have elected fair value option for majority of our investments.

Current wording

We have experienced and may experience in the future increased volatility in our GAAP results of operations as we have elected fair value option for the majority of our investments.

Previous wording

We have elected the fair value option accounting model for the majority of our investments. Changes in the fair value of assets, and a portion of the changes in the fair value of liabilities, accounted for using the fair value option are recorded in our consolidated statements of operations each period, which may result in volatility in our financial results. There can be no assurance that such volatility in periodic financial results will not occur during 2024 or in future periods.

Current wording

We have elected the fair value option accounting model for the majority of our investments and certain of our liabilities. Changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities accounted for using the fair value option are recorded in our consolidated statements of operations each period, which have resulted in volatility in our financial results from period to period in the past. There can be no assurance that such volatility in periodic financial results will not occur during 2025 or in future periods.

Previous wording

In connection with our business of acquiring and holding loans, engaging in securitization transactions, and investing in CMBS, non-Agency RMBS and ABS, we rely on third-party service providers, principally loan servicers, to perform a variety of services, comply with applicable laws and regulations, and carry out contractual covenants and terms. For example, we rely on the mortgage servicers who service the mortgage loans we purchase as well as the loans underlying our CMBS, non-Agency RMBS and ABS to, among other things, collect principal and interest payments on such loans and perform loss mitigation services, such as workouts, modifications, refinancings, foreclosures, short sales and sales of foreclosed property. Both default frequency and default severity of loans may depend upon the quality of the servicer. If a servicer is not vigilant in encouraging the borrowers to make their monthly payments, the borrowers may be far less likely to make these payments, which could result in a higher frequency of default. If a servicer takes longer to liquidate non-performing assets, loss severities may be higher than originally anticipated. Higher loss severity may also be caused by less competent dispositions of real estate owned properties. Finally, in the case of the CMBS, non-Agency RMBS and ABS in which we invest, we may have no or limited rights to prevent the servicer of the underlying loans from taking actions that are adverse to our interests.

Current wording

In connection with our business of acquiring and holding loans, engaging in securitization transactions, and investing in non-Agency RMBS, we rely on third-party service providers, principally loan servicers, to perform a variety of services, comply with applicable laws and regulations, and carry out contractual covenants and terms. For example, we rely on the mortgage servicers who service the mortgage loans we purchase as well as the loans underlying our non-Agency RMBS to, among other things, collect principal and interest payments on such loans and perform loss mitigation services, such as workouts, modifications, refinancings, foreclosures, short sales and sales of foreclosed property. Both default frequency and default severity of loans may depend upon the quality of the servicer. If a servicer is not vigilant in encouraging the borrowers to make their monthly payments, the borrowers may be far less likely to make these payments, which could result in a higher frequency of default. If a servicer takes longer to liquidate non-performing assets, loss severities may be higher than originally anticipated. Higher loss severity may also be caused by less competent dispositions of real estate owned properties. Finally, in the case of the non-Agency RMBS in which we invest, we may have no or limited rights to prevent the servicer of the underlying loans from taking actions that are adverse to our interests.

Previous wording

We may find it necessary or desirable from time to time to foreclose on some of the residential mortgage loans we acquire and the foreclosure process may be lengthy and expensive. Borrowers may resist mortgage foreclosure actions by asserting numerous claims, counterclaims and defenses against us including, without limitation, numerous lender liability claims and defenses, even when such assertions may have no basis in fact, in an effort to prolong the foreclosure action and force us into a modification of the loan or a favorable buy-out of the borrower’s position. In some states, foreclosure actions can sometimes take several years or more to litigate. Moreover, during the COVID-19 pandemic, actions were taken by federal, state and local governments and regulators to make foreclosure more difficult, and in some cases, unavailable.

Current wording

We may find it necessary or desirable from time to time to foreclose on some of the residential mortgage loans we acquire and the foreclosure process may be lengthy and expensive. Borrowers may resist mortgage foreclosure actions by asserting numerous claims, counterclaims and defenses against us including, without limitation, numerous lender liability claims and defenses, even when such assertions may have no basis in fact, in an effort to prolong the foreclosure action and force us into a modification of the loan or a favorable buy-out of the borrower’s position. In some states, foreclosure actions can sometimes take several years or more to litigate. Moreover, during a crisis or significant geopolitical, economic, market or other disruption, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, actions may be taken by federal, state and local governments and regulators to make foreclosure more difficult, and in some cases, unavailable.

Previous wording

We own and originate mezzanine loans, which are loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of either the entity owning the multi-family property or a pledge of the ownership interests of the entity that owns the interest in the entity owning the multi-family property. We also own and make preferred equity investments in entities that own multi-family property. These types of assets involve a higher degree of risk than senior mortgage lending secured by income-producing real property, because the loan may become unsecured or our equity investment may be effectively extinguished as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In addition, mezzanine loans and preferred equity investments are often used to achieve a very high leverage on large commercial projects, resulting in less equity in the property and increasing the risk of loss of principal or investment. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan or preferred equity investment will be satisfied only after the senior debt, in the case of a mezzanine loan, or all senior and subordinated debt, in the case of a preferred equity investment, is paid in full. Where senior debt exists, the presence of intercreditor arrangements, which in this case are arrangements between the lender of the senior loan and the mezzanine lender or preferred equity investor that stipulate the rights and obligations of the parties, may limit our ability to amend our loan documents, assign our loans, accept prepayments, exercise our remedies or control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to borrowers or preferred equity issuers. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment, which could result in significant losses.

Current wording

We own and make preferred equity investments in entities that own multi-family property. We have made in the past, and may originate in the future mezzanine loans, which are loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of either the entity owning the multi-family property or a pledge of the ownership interests of the entity that owns the interest in the entity owning the multi-family property. These types of assets involve a higher degree of risk than senior mortgage lending secured by income-producing real property, because the loan may become unsecured or our equity investment may be effectively extinguished as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In addition, mezzanine loans and preferred equity investments are often used to achieve a very high leverage on large commercial projects, resulting in less equity in the property and increasing the risk of loss of principal or investment. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan or preferred equity investment will be satisfied only after the senior debt, in the case of a mezzanine loan, or all senior and subordinated debt, in the case of a preferred equity investment, is paid in full. Where senior debt exists, the presence of intercreditor arrangements, which in this case are arrangements between the lender of the senior loan and the mezzanine lender or preferred equity investor that stipulate the rights and obligations of the parties, may limit our ability to amend our loan documents, assign our loans, accept prepayments, exercise our remedies or control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to borrowers or preferred equity issuers. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment, which could result in significant losses.

Previous wording

Declining real estate valuations and impairment charges to real estate assets, such as certain multi-family properties owned by entities in which we have joint venture equity investments, have adversely affected our earnings and financial condition in the past and may adversely affect our earnings and financial condition in the future.

Current wording

Declining real estate valuations and impairment charges to real estate assets have adversely affected our earnings and financial condition in the past and may adversely affect our earnings and financial condition in the future.

Previous wording

For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we recognized net impairment losses of approximately $89.5 million and $2.4 million, respectively. Also in the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized a loss on reclassification of disposal group of approximately $16.2 million. These losses have a direct, adverse impact on our net income because recording an impairment loss or loss on reclassification of disposal group results in an immediate negative adjustment to net income. Impairment charges, such as those incurred in 2023 and 2022, adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash available for distribution, including cash available for us to pay distributions to our stockholders, and per share trading price of our common stock. Such impairment charges could adversely affect our earnings and financial condition in the future, particularly as we seek to opportunistically dispose of our joint venture equity investments in multi-family properties and they are reclassified as held for sale or held and used.

Current wording

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we recognized net impairment losses of approximately $48.9 million and $89.5 million, respectively. Also in the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we recognized losses on reclassification of disposal group of approximately $14.6 million and $16.2 million, respectively. These losses have a direct, adverse impact on our net income because recording an impairment loss or loss on reclassification of disposal group results in an immediate negative adjustment to net income. Impairment charges, such as those incurred in 2024 and 2023, adversely affected our financial condition, results of operations, book value, cash available for distribution, including cash available for us to pay distributions to our stockholders, and per share trading price of our common stock. Such impairment charges could adversely affect our earnings and financial condition in the future.

Previous wording

In the event of any default under a loan held directly by us, we will bear a risk of loss to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the collateral and the outstanding principal and accrued interest of the mortgage loan, and any such losses could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow from operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. Similarly, the CMBS, mezzanine loan and preferred and joint venture equity investments we own may be adversely affected by a default on any of the loans or other instruments that underlie those securities or that are secured by the related property. See “- Our investments may include subordinated tranches of CMBS, RMBS and ABS, which are subordinate in right of payment to more senior securities and have greater risk of loss than other investments.”

Current wording

In the event of any default under a loan held directly by us, we will bear a risk of loss to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the collateral and the outstanding principal and accrued interest of the mortgage loan, and any such losses could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow from operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. Similarly, the mezzanine loan and preferred and joint venture equity investments we own may be adversely affected by a default on any of the loans or other instruments that underlie those securities or that are secured by the related property. See “- Our investments may include subordinated tranches of RMBS, CMBS and ABS, which are subordinate in right of payment to more senior securities and have greater risk of loss than other investments.”

Previous wording

We make mezzanine loans to and preferred equity investments in owners of multi-family properties as part of our investment strategy and presently own joint venture equity investments in owners of multi-family properties. We consider such owners (or other owners in the case of joint venture equity investments) to be our operating partners with respect to the acquisition, improvement or financing of the underlying properties, as the case may be. We may also make indirect investments in properties through other arrangements. Such investments may involve risks not otherwise present when acquiring real estate directly, including, for example:

Current wording

We make preferred equity investments in, and may in the future originate mezzanine loans to, owners of multi-family properties as part of our investment strategy and presently own joint venture equity investments in owners of multi-family properties. We consider such owners (or other owners in the case of joint venture equity investments) to be our operating partners with respect to the acquisition, improvement or financing of the underlying properties, as the case may be. We may also make indirect investments in properties through other arrangements. Such investments may involve risks not otherwise present when acquiring real estate directly, including, for example:

Previous wording

•our operating partners may have economic or business interests or goals that are or become inconsistent with our business interests or goals, including inconsistent goals relating to the sale or refinancing of properties held in the joint venture or the timing of termination or liquidation of the joint venture;

Current wording

•our operating partners may have economic or business interests or goals that are or become inconsistent with our business interests or goals;

Previous wording

•our operating partner in a property might become insolvent, bankrupt or otherwise refuse or be unable to meet its obligations to us or the venture (including its obligation to make capital contributions or property distributions when due);

Current wording

•our operating partner in a property might become insolvent, bankrupt or otherwise refuse or be unable to meet its obligations to us or the venture, which we have experienced in recent years;

Previous wording

•disputes between us and our operating partners may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and directors from focusing their time and effort on our business, which may subject the properties owned by the applicable joint venture to additional risk;

Current wording

•disputes between us and our operating partners may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and directors from focusing their time and effort on our business;

Previous wording

•our operating partners may not perform their property oversight responsibilities;

Current wording

•our operating partners may not perform their property oversight responsibilities; and

Previous wording

Actions by one of our operating partners or one of the property managers of the multi-family properties in which we invest, which are generally out of our control, might subject us to liabilities in excess of those contemplated and thus reduce our investment returns. If we have a right of first refusal or buy/sell right to buy out an operating partner, we may be unable to finance such a buy-out if it becomes exercisable or we may be required to purchase such interest at a time when it would not otherwise be in our best interest to do so. If our interest is subject to a buy/sell right, we may not have sufficient cash, available borrowing capacity or other capital resources to allow us to elect to purchase the interest of our operating partner that is subject to the buy/sell right, in which case we may be forced to sell our interest as the result of the exercise of such right when we would otherwise prefer to keep our interest. Pursuant to the operating agreement for one of our joint venture investments, third party investors have the ability to sell their ownership interests to us at their election once a year subject to annual minimum and maximum amount limitations and we are obligated to purchase such interests for cash. We may not have sufficient cash, available borrowing capacity or other capital resources to allow us to finance the purchase of such interests, which may cause us to breach our obligations under the operating agreement, or we may be required to purchase such interest at a time when it would not otherwise be in our best interest to do so. Finally, we may not be able to sell our interest in a venture if we desire to exit the venture without our operating partner's consent.

Current wording

Actions by one of our operating partners or one of the property managers of the multi-family properties in which we invest, which are generally out of our control, might subject us to liabilities in excess of those contemplated and thus reduce our investment returns. If we have a right of first refusal or buy/sell right to buy out an operating partner, we may be unable to finance such a buy-out if it becomes exercisable or we may be required to purchase such interest at a time when it would not otherwise be in our best interest to do so. If our interest is subject to a buy/sell right, we may not have sufficient cash, available borrowing capacity or other capital resources to allow us to elect to purchase the interest of our operating partner that is subject to the buy/sell right, in which case we may be forced to sell our interest as a result of the exercise of such right when we would otherwise prefer to keep our interest. Pursuant to the operating agreement for one of our joint venture investments, third party investors have the ability to sell their ownership interests to us at their election once a year subject to annual minimum and maximum amount limitations and we are obligated to purchase such interests for cash. We may not have sufficient cash, available borrowing capacity or other capital resources to allow us to finance the purchase of such interests, which may cause us to breach our obligations under the operating agreement, or we may be required to purchase such interest at a time when it would not otherwise be in our best interest to do so. Finally, we may not be able to sell our interest in a venture if we desire to exit the venture without our operating partner's consent.

Previous wording

•adverse changes in global, national, regional and local economic and market conditions, including those relating to pandemics and health crises, ;

Current wording

•adverse changes in global, national, regional and local economic, market or political conditions, including those relating to pandemics and health crises;

Previous wording

As part of our acquisition or underwriting process for certain assets, including, without limitation, residential loans, direct and indirect multi-family property investments, CMBS, non-Agency RMBS, ABS or other mortgage-, residential housing- or other credit-related assets, we may conduct (either directly or using third parties) certain due diligence. Such due diligence may include (i) an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the asset’s or underlying asset's credit profile, (ii) a review of all or merely a subset of the documentation related to the asset or underlying asset or (iii) other reviews that we may deem appropriate to conduct. There can be no assurance that we will conduct any specific level of due diligence, or that, among other things, the due diligence process will uncover all relevant facts, the materials provided to us or that we review will be accurate and complete or that any purchase or our projection for that purchase will prove successful, which could result in losses on these assets, which, in turn, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Current wording

As part of our acquisition or underwriting process for certain assets, including, without limitation, residential loans, direct and indirect multi-family property investments, non-Agency RMBS, CMBS, ABS or other mortgage-, residential housing- or other credit-related assets, we may conduct (either directly or using third parties) certain due diligence. Such due diligence may include (i) an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the asset’s or underlying asset's credit profile, (ii) a review of all or merely a subset of the documentation related to the asset or underlying asset or (iii) other reviews that we may deem appropriate to conduct. There can be no assurance that we will conduct any specific level of due diligence, or that, among other things, the due diligence process will uncover all relevant facts, the materials provided to us or that we review will be accurate and complete or that any purchase or our projection for that purchase will prove successful, which could result in losses on these assets, which, in turn, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Previous wording

Many of the assets we own or acquire may be subject to legal, contractual and other restrictions on resale or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. For example, certain of our assets may be securitized and are held in a securitization trust and may not be sold or transferred until the note issued by the securitization trust matures or is repaid. Similarly, our joint venture equity and Mezzanine Lending investments may require the consent of our operating partner or a lender to transfer or sell our investment and may also be less attractive to a buyer due to certain contractual provisions. Moreover, because many of our assets are subordinated to more senior securities or loans or depend on the ability of a borrower, tenant or operating partner to meet their contractual obligations, any potential buyer of those assets may request to conduct due diligence on those assets, which may delay the sale or transfer of those assets. The illiquidity of certain of our assets may make it difficult for us to sell such assets on a timely basis or at all if the need or desire arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded our assets, as was the case in March 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant turmoil in our markets. As a result, our ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions may be relatively limited, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

Many of the assets we own or acquire may be subject to legal, contractual and other restrictions on resale or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. For example, certain of our assets may be securitized and are held in a securitization trust and may not be sold or transferred until the note issued by the securitization trust matures or is repaid. Similarly, our joint venture equity and Mezzanine Lending investments may require the consent of our operating partner or a lender to transfer or sell our investment and may also be less attractive to a buyer due to certain contractual provisions. Moreover, because many of our assets are subordinated to more senior securities or loans or depend on the ability of a borrower, tenant or operating partner to meet their contractual obligations, any potential buyer of those assets may request to conduct due diligence on those assets, which may delay the sale or transfer of those assets. In addition, investments in MSRs are highly illiquid and may be subject to numerous restrictions on transfers, including without limitation the receipt of third-party consents. The illiquidity of certain of our assets may make it difficult for us to sell such assets on a timely basis or at all if the need or desire arises. If we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded our assets, as was the case in March 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant turmoil in our markets. As a result, our ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions may be relatively limited, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

As part of our risk management process, models may be used to evaluate, depending on the asset class, house price appreciation and depreciation by county or region, prepayment speeds and frequency, cost and timing of foreclosures, as well as other factors. Certain assumptions used as inputs to the models may be based on historical trends. These trends may not be indicative of future results. Furthermore, the assumptions underlying the models may prove to be inaccurate, causing the model output also to be incorrect. In the event models and data prove to be incorrect, misleading or incomplete, any decisions made in reliance thereon expose us to potential risks. For example, by relying on incorrect models and data, we may buy certain assets at prices that are too high, sell certain assets at prices that are too low or miss favorable opportunities altogether, which could have a material adverse impact on our business and growth prospects.

Current wording

As part of our risk management process, models may be used to evaluate, depending on the asset class, home price appreciation and depreciation by county or region, prepayment speeds and frequency, cost and timing of foreclosures, as well as other factors. Certain assumptions used as inputs to the models may be based on historical trends. These trends may not be indicative of future results. Furthermore, the assumptions underlying the models may prove to be inaccurate, causing the model output also to be incorrect. In the event models and data prove to be incorrect, misleading or incomplete, any decisions made in reliance thereon expose us to potential risks. For example, by relying on incorrect models and data, we may buy certain assets at prices that are too high, sell certain assets at prices that are too low or miss favorable opportunities altogether, which could have a material adverse impact on our business and growth prospects.

Previous wording

The difficulty in valuation is particularly significant with respect to our less liquid investments such as our re-performing loans (or RPLs) and non-performing loans (or NPLs). RPLs are loans on which a borrower was previously delinquent but has resumed repaying. Our ability to sell RPLs for a profit depends on the borrower continuing to make payments. An RPL could become a NPL, which could reduce our earnings. Our investments in residential whole loans may require us to engage in workout negotiations, restructuring and/or the possibility of foreclosure. These processes may be lengthy and expensive. If we foreclose on underlying properties, we, through a designated servicer that we retain, will have to manage these properties and may not be able to sell them.

Current wording

The difficulty in valuation is particularly significant with respect to our less liquid investments such as our re-performing loans (“RPL”s) and non-performing loans (“NPL”s). RPLs are loans on which a borrower was previously delinquent but has resumed repaying. Our ability to sell RPLs for a profit depends on the borrower continuing to make payments. An RPL could become a NPL, which could reduce our earnings. Our investments in residential whole loans may require us to engage in workout negotiations, restructuring and/or the possibility of foreclosure. These processes may be lengthy and expensive. If we foreclose on underlying properties, we, through a designated servicer that we retain, will have to manage these properties and may not be able to sell them.

Previous wording

When we acquire residential loans or make investments in multi-family or single-family rental properties, we may come into possession of borrower non-public personal information that an identity thief could utilize in engaging in fraudulent activity or theft. We may share this information with third parties, such as loan sub-servicers, property managers, outside vendors, third parties interested in acquiring such loans from us, or lenders extending credit to us collateralized by such loans.

Current wording

When we acquire residential loans or make investments in multi-family or single-family rental properties, we often times come into possession of borrower non-public personal information that an identity thief could utilize in engaging in fraudulent activity or theft. In some cases, we share this information with third parties, such as loan sub-servicers, property managers, outside vendors, third parties interested in acquiring such loans from us, or lenders extending credit to us collateralized by such loans.

Previous wording

While we have security measures in place to protect this information and prevent security breaches, these security measures may be compromised as a result of third-party action, including intentional misconduct by computer hackers, cyber-attacks, “phishing” attacks, service provider or vendor error, or malfeasance or other intentional or unintentional acts by third parties and bad actors, including third-party service providers. Furthermore, borrower data, including personally identifiable information, may be lost, exposed, or subject to unauthorized access or use as a result of accidents, errors, or malfeasance by our employees, independent contractors, or others working with us or on our behalf. Our servers and systems, and those of our service providers, operating partners and the companies in which we invest from time to time, may be vulnerable to computer malware, break-ins, denial-of-service attacks, and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer systems, which could result in someone obtaining unauthorized access to borrowers’ data or our data, including other confidential business information. We have further developed and enhanced our cybersecurity systems and processes that are intended to protect this type of data and information; however, they may not be effective in preventing unauthorized access in the future and such unauthorized access could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. Furthermore, because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to, or to sabotage, systems change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures. We may also experience security breaches that may remain undetected for an extended period.

Current wording

While we have security measures in place to protect this information and prevent security breaches, these security measures may be compromised as a result of third-party action, including intentional misconduct by computer hackers, cyber-attacks, “phishing” attacks, service provider or vendor error, or malfeasance or other intentional or unintentional acts by third parties and bad actors, including third-party service providers. Furthermore, borrower data, including personally identifiable information, may be lost, exposed, or subject to unauthorized access or use as a result of accidents, errors, or malfeasance by our employees, independent contractors, or others working with us or on our behalf. Our servers and systems, and those of our service providers, operating partners and the companies in which we invest from time to time, may be vulnerable to computer malware, break-ins, denial-of-service attacks, and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer systems, which could result in someone obtaining unauthorized access to borrowers’ data or our data, including other confidential business information. We have further developed and enhanced our cybersecurity systems and processes that are intended to protect this type of data and information but they may not be effective in preventing unauthorized access in the future and such unauthorized access could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. Furthermore, because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to, or to sabotage, systems change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures. We may also experience security breaches that may remain undetected for an extended period.

Showing the first 40 of 68 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.

Rearranged current paragraphs (1)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Delinquent loans may require a substantial amount of workout negotiations or restructuring, which may entail, among other things, a reduction in the interest rate or capitalization of past due interest. However, even if restructurings are successfully accomplished, risks still exist that borrowers will not be able or willing to maintain the restructured payments or refinance the restructured mortgage upon maturity.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (2)

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

•Maintaining cybersecurity and data security is important to our business, and a breach could result in serious harm.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

We have made and may in the future make investments in companies that we do not control.