Silicon Valley Acquisition Corp.

proxy statements to be distributed to SVAQ's shareholders in connection with SVAQ's solicitation of proxies for the vote by SVAQ's shareholders in connection with the proposed Business Combination and other matters to be described in the Registration Statement, as well as the prospectus relating to the offer of the securities to be issued to EigenQ's and SVAQ's shareholders in connection with the completion of the proposed Business Combination. After the Registration Statement has been filed and declared effective, a definitive proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents will be mailed to SVAQ's shareholders and EigenQ's shareholders as of the record date established for voting on the proposed Business Combination. Before making any voting or investment decision, SVAQ's and other interested persons are advised to read, once available, the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus and any amendments thereto and, once available, the definitive proxy statement/prospectus, as well as other documents filed with the SEC by SVAQ in connection with the proposed Business Combination, as these documents will contain important information about EigenQ, SVAQ, and the proposed Business Combination. Shareholders of SVAQ may obtain a copy of the preliminary or definitive proxy statement/prospectus, once available, as well as other documents filed by SVAQ with the SEC, without charge, at the SEC's website located at www.sec.gov or by directing a written request to SVAQ at 228 Hamilton Avenue, 3rd Floor, Palo Alto, California 94301. Participants in the Solicitation EigenQ, SVAQ and certain of their respective directors, executive officers and other members of management and employees may, under SEC rules, be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from SVAQ's shareholders in connection with the proposed Business Combination. Information regarding the persons who may, under SEC rules, be deemed participants in the solicitation of SVAQ's shareholders in connection with the proposed Business Combination will be set forth in a proxy statement/prospectus when it is filed by SVAQ with the SEC. You can find more information about SVAQ's directors and executive officers in SVAQ's Annual Report. In the event that a Definitive Agreement is entered into, additional information regarding the participants in the proxy solicitation and a description of their direct and indirect interests will be included in the proxy statement/prospectus when it becomes available. Shareholders, potential investors and other interested persons should read the proxy statement/prospectus carefully when it becomes available before making any voting or investment decisions. You may obtain free copies of these documents from the sources described above. Trademarks and Intellectual Property All trademarks, service marks, and trade names of EigenQ, SVAQ, or their affiliates as used herein are trademarks, service marks, or registered trade names of EigenQ, SVAQ or their affiliates. Any other product, company names, or logos mentioned herein are the trademarks and/or intellectual property of their respective owners, and their use is solely for convenience and is not intended to, and does not imply, a relationship with EigenQ or SVAQ, or an endorsement or sponsorship by or of EigenQ, SVAQ or any other party. The trademarks, service marks and trade names referred to in this presentation may appear without the ®, TM or SM symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that EigenQ or SVAQ will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, their rights or the right of the applicable licensor to these trademarks, service marks and trade names.

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 4 140+ IP assets(1) Hardware-rooted architecture OEM-integrated, ready to deploy Standards-aligned (NIST / ETSI) Make our quantum-safe trust the default security layer for critical infrastructure To establish EigenQ as the infrastructure leader in post- quantum cybersecurity Mission Vision EigenQ delivers hardware-rooted, quantum-safe infrastructure solutions, to enable critical systems to operate securely in the quantum era Engaged with 50+ researchers globally ENTERPRISE- SCALE, QUANTUM-SAFE LEADERSHIP (1) For additional information regarding EigenQ's IP assets as of 12/31/2025, please see disclosures included in EigenQ's Form C-AR filed with the SEC on 4/29/2026 the "Form C-AR".

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 5 Today's Speakers Dan Nash Chief Executive Officer • Co-founder & former Head of Investment Banking at Cohen & Company Capital Markets • Has advised on 75+ de-SPACs and traditional IPOs • Brings deep capital markets expertise & proven public- company execution capability Martin Zinny Chief Financial Officer • 20+ years across public and private markets, including Fidelity Investments, Whale Rock Capital, Point72 and Millennium • Combines institutional investment discipline with public-market financial rigor Dr. José Rosas-Bustos Chief Executive Officer Dr. Jesse Van Griensven Chairman • CEO building EigenQ as a quantum- resilient trust infrastructure platform for government, enterprise and critical systems, while leading OEM/channel commercialization strategy • 20+ years across cybersecurity, secure systems and technology commercialization, including senior cybersecurity roles at Oracle Corporation • Former EigenQ CTO; Ph.D. from the University of Waterloo, patent inventor and peer-reviewed quantum-security researcher • Adjunct Professor at the University of Waterloo, Canada • Global expert in Quantum-Proof Encryption, Numerical Simulation, Quantum Computing and ML/AI • Provides scientific and strategic oversight for EigenQ's quantum platform roadmap and research collaborations • Demonstrated track record of value creation with prior successful businesses including Lakes Software, an environmental modeling software company Silicon Valley Acquisition Corp. Silicon Valley Acquisition Corp.

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 6 SVAQ + EigenQ | Building a Highly Differentiated Public Market Story Dan Nash CEO A Differentiated SPAC Platform Built for Transformative Growth Companies • Led by Dan Nash, Co-Founder & former Head of Investment Banking at Cohen & Company Capital Markets • Extensive SPAC, IPO, capital raising, and public-market execution expertise across disruptive growth sectors • Deep relationships across institutional investors, family offices, strategics, venture funds and alternative capital providers • Global advisor network spanning AI, digital infrastructure, cybersecurity, fintech, crypto, energy transition, enterprise software and emerging deep tech • Built to source, structure, finance, and support category-leading companies seeking a strategic and flexible path to the public markets • Focus on businesses with differentiated technology, large market opportunities and a credible path to durable public-company value creation Martin Zinny CFO $215M IPO completed in December 2025; listed on NASDAQ TEAM David O'Neil VP Execution Track-Record(1) $50B+ Transaction Value Executed $14B+ Total Capital Raised 55+ De-SPAC Transactions Advised WHY EIGENQ? WE BELIEVE: QUANTUM IS A GENERATIONAL OPPORTUNITY Foundational infrastructure shift with broad public and private sector focus MANDATORY SECURITY MIGRATION Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) will be a requirement, not just a theoretical risk CATEGORY-DEFINING CYBER-QUANTUM PLATFORM Multi-year head start with few direct substitutes SCALABLE, CAPITAL-LIGHT GTM OEM, distributor and VAR channels expected to enable efficient, profitable scale HARDWARE + RECURRING SOFTWARE ECONOMICS Embedded hardware revenue + IP licensing upside COMMERCIALLY MINDED QUANTUM LEADERSHIP Technical depth paired with an identifiable path to deployment and scale (1) Includes transactions relative to which Cohen & Company Capital Markets (CCM) acted as financial advisor, capital markets advisor or placement agent. Dan Nash led CCM's roles in such transactions as Co-Founder & Head of Investment Banking at CCM during relevant periods.

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 7 Investment Highlights (1) Q-Day — the arrival of a cryptographically relevant quantum computer capable of breaking the Rivest–Shamir–Adleman algorithm ("RSA") at scale. Significant Anticipated Market Tailwinds from Quantum & Government Mandated Demand Security Layer for Post-Quantum Infrastructure Team with Deep Quantum Expertise, Cryptography, Compute Infrastructure and Commercial Focus Full-Stack, Hardware-Anchored Platform Embedded into OEM Servers to Enable Deployments at Scale Production-Ready Supply Chain Capital-Light Model with Expanding Margins QUANTUM THREATS REQUIRE QUANTUM SOLUTIONS EIGENQ IS RACING TO MAKE THE QUANTUM THREAT IRRELEVANT, BEFORE Q-DAY ARRIVES (1)

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 8 The Post-Quantum Migration Is Underway Governments are mandating migration We believe security must be anchored in hardware, below the software layer "Harvest Now, Decrypt Later" is active (1) Quantum proof cryptography from NIST to replace RSA/ECC-based system (1) Nation-state adversaries are executing a strategy called "Harvest Now, Decrypt Later" (HNDL): quietly collecting encrypted government communications, financial records, and classified data today, with the intent to unlock it all once a sufficiently powerful quantum computer exists. (2) As set forth and described in the NSA's Commercial National Security Algorithm Suite 2.0 (CNSA 2.0); NSA and other government mandates are not rules and are subject to change. (3) January 2027 Procurement gate – First hard deadline as set forth in the NSA's Commercial National Security Algorithm Suite 2.0 (CNSA 2.0); NSA and other government mandates are not rules and are subject to change. May 2026 NIST Finalizes Guidelines for Implementing 'Handshake' Algorithms Known as Key- Encapsulation Mechanisms September 2025 March 2026 February 2026 NSA's CNSA 2.0 Mandate(2) JANUARY 2027 Procurement gate FIRST HARD DEADLINE(3) DECEMBER 2030 Phase-out deadline (As published in September 2022)

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 EigenQ secures where scaled compute and critical infrastructure converge k 9 Scaled Data Center Infrastructure Drives a Significant Security Opportunity(5) (1) Goldman Sachs Research (Report Date: April 17, 2026). (2) Based on the average trailing percentage of worldwide server value for each quarter of 2024 and Q1-Q3 of 2025. Worldwide server value based on Morgan Stanley Research (Report Date: January 6, 2026). (3) U.S. Federal government self-reported Civilian IT spend in FY 2025 was $75.1 billion; Based on industry reports, approximately 45% of this spend was tied to IT Infrastructure, IT Security and IT Management in the aggregate, representing $33.8 billion. Removing estimates of: (i) Approximate IT Security infrastructure (based on 45% of Federal IT Security Spend) = $5.5 billion; (ii) Approximate IT Management infrastructure (based on 10% of IT Administration (as reported by Jefferies in April 2026), and assuming 45% of such amount tied to IT Management = $1.5 billion. Equals: ~$26.8 billion of total IT Infrastructure Spend. Utilizing an industry report from IDC, assumed 80% of total IT infrastructure spend is on servers = $21.5 billion. (4) 2028E based on a static 60% of the global market. (5) Market data is presented for context only and does not represent EigenQ contracted revenue, backlog, bookings, customer pipeline, purchase orders, formal quotations, executed OEM licenses or forecast revenue. PQC migration increases performance demands and integration complexity ✓ Critical workloads need hardware- rooted security, not software retrofit ✓ OEM embedding enables native server-level quantum-safe protection ✓ Potential OEM embedding and design wins could support scalable, unit- based revenue if secured ✓ Why We Believe Hardware Matters? Global Server Market (1) $449B+ Total 2025 Spend 16.4M Units Shipped $268B+ U.S. Server Market ~$22B+ U.S. Federal Gov't Server Spend $268B $637B 2025 2028E +33% CAGR U.S. Server Market(2) ~2.4x Increase (2) (4) (3)

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 Selected U.S. Server-Market Metrics Across Priority End-Markets Defense & Government Near-Term Catalyst: Certified PQC currently required for Federal defense contractors by January 2027 – EigenQ enables compliance Note: These figures represent third-party server-market and federal IT/server-spend metrics only. They are not EigenQ-specific TAM/SAM/SOM, customer demand, pipeline, bookings, backlog, contracts, purchase orders, formal quotations, executed OEM licenses or forecast revenue. (1) Mordor Intelligence, North America Data Center Server Market & Share Analysis-Growth Trends and Forecast (2026-2031), (Report Date: January 21, 2026). (2) Fortune Business Insights, Data Center Server Market Size, Share & Growth Report (Report Date: May 4, 2026) (3) Market Data Forecast 2025 (Report Date: January 2026). (4) Mordor Intelligence, North America Data Center Server Market & Share Analysis-Growth Trends and Forecast (2026-2031), (Report Date: January 21, 2026). (5) Mordor Intelligence, North America Data Center Server Market & Share Analysis-Growth Trends and Forecast (2026-2031), (Report Date: January 21, 2026). (6) Mordor Intelligence, North America Data Center Server Market & Share Analysis-Growth Trends and Forecast (2026-2031), (Report Date: January 21, 2026). 10 Healthcare ~$30B Est. 2025 U.S. Server Market(4) Industrials & IoT ~$27B Est. 2025 U.S. Server Market(5) Est. ~$22B U.S. Federal Gov't Server Spend Est. ~$13B(1) Other Defense & Gov't Spend ~$35B Est. Defense & Government Server-Spend Context(1) Critical Infrastructure ~$24B Est. 2025 U.S. Server Market(2) Financial Institutions ~$54B Est. 2025 U.S. Server Market(3) Broad Commercial & Enterprise ~$97B Est. 2025 U.S. Server Market(6)

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 PQC+TM Bundle PCIe M.2 Compact, embedded security for edge and space-constrained systems Edge, IoT & distributed systems Drop-in upgrade for existing servers, no redesign, no downtime Existing servers & compliance upgrades CHOOSE FOR CHOOSE FOR 11 ONE PLATFORM ACROSS EVERY ENVIRONMENT PQC+TM Bundle New deployments & data center modernization Integrated, turnkey solution for new deployments with full PQC+ trust stack CHOOSE FOR M.2 No infrastructure replacement Works with existing systems Deploy in weeks

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 PARTNERSHIPS 12 Multiple Near-Term Growth Vectors 2026 2027 2028 2029+ Commercial Reach Projected Product Roadmap: Strategic Sequence BEACHHEAD Quantum Cybersecurity & Compliance SURFACE AREA EXPANSION Quantum AI – Performance & Optimization SURFACE AREA EXPANSION Quantum Internet – Network Expansion PLATFORM CONSOLIDATION Quantum Computing Solutions Launch with federal, government and critical infrastructure end- customers Expand into the global public sector including U.S.-allied governments and sovereign infrastructure operators Extend from cybersecurity beachhead into adjacent platform use cases across AI, network and compute-security Target commercial deployments in select industry verticals including banking and healthcare Initial OEM infrastructure integration with major server manufacturers Commercial IP licensing and embedded deployment model with strategic compute partners Broader government, enterprise and infrastructure ecosystem across security, AI and networking domains COMMERCIALIZATION PLAN

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 13 EigenQ Anticipates Scaling Sales Through OEM Infrastructure Distribution Global Commercial Path(1) U.S. Trusted Supply Chain Path(2) Titan + Multiple OEMs for U.S. Trusted Supply Chain Deployments WNC + Multiple OEMs for Global Commercial Deployments & Other OEMs Commercial Server Configuration & VARs Commercial & Enterprise End-Customers & Other OEMs TSC-Compatible Server Configuration U.S. Government & Critical Infrastructure Future Potential OEM Partners(3): ➢ Dell ➢ Super Micro ➢ Intel ➢ AMD ➢ NVIDIA (1) Pursuant to agreement with WNC. (2) Pursuant to purchase orders with Titan Circuits. (3) EigenQ does not currently have a commercial relationship with these OEMs. (4) Source: HPE solution brief, 'Upgrade to next-generation security for the quantum era,' document ID a00159324enw. HPE publication supports EigenQ's infrastructure integration, quote-readiness, route-to-market and commercial positioning. It does not represent contracted revenue, purchase orders, backlog, bookings, committed sales volume, or guaranteed customer adoption. (4) HPE-Published Solution Brief Confirms EigenQ's OEM Route-to-Market Readiness The solution brief describes an EigenQ + HPE security bundle built on HPE ProLiant Compute ✓ Not just a concept, positioned as a deployable solution ✓ OEM/channel validation ✓ Clear end-customer value proposition ✓ Deployment advantage → No "rip & replace" ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 14 Illustrative Unit Economics | Three Distinct Potential Revenue Streams $6K $80K ($30K) $50K ($16K) $34K End-Customer Allocated Price Channel & OEM Economics EigenQ Revenue Deployment & Fulfillment Costs Illustrative Unit Contribution Annual Recurring Renewal Revenue 1) Illustrative Single-Server Government PQC+ Bundle Hardware Sales(1) Single-server PQC+ bundle ~42% Revenue per PQC+ bundle ~32% 3) Commercial IP Licensing(3) Path to Market OEM Server EigenQ PQC+ bundle embedded Distributor TD Synnex VARs Meadowgate, Curtiss-Wright End-Customers Enterprise / Federal License IP in EigenQ's PQC+ bundle to OEM / strategic partners, with economics tied to platform access and unit deployment Fixed Annual License Fee Rights to commercialize / embed PQC+ IP, reference design, updates and technical support Unit-Based Royalty Per-unit royalty for each PQC+ bundle embedded / shipped through OEM server programs ANNUAL IP LICENSING REVENUE Fixed License Fee + (Bundles Emb. × Per-Unit Royalty) Upside Rationale: IP licensing complements hardware sales and shifts mix toward asset-light, higher-margin revenue 1 2 (1) Unit economics are illustrative only based on management estimates and subject to external validation, including with respect to pricing and costs. Example reflects PQC+ Bundle sale to federal end-user through OEM channel. (2) End-customers will be required to subscribe for software QEM renewal for one year and, for purposes of the illustrative forecasts further described on Slides 39-41 are modeled as renewing at a 90% rate thereafter. Pricing subject to external validation. (3) As further described on Slide 39, subject to Slides 40-41, EigenQ anticipates generating recurring licensing/unit-based renewal and loyalty fees for product and for bundles embedded/shipped through OEM server programs. ~68% Contribution Margin Recurring Revenue per PQC+ bundle 2) Illustrative Associated Future Annual Recurring Revenue(2)

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 15 EigenQ Occupies a Distinct Position Among Quantum / PQC Vendors POSITIONING VS. QUANTUM / PQC VENDORS Hardware- Rooted Infrastructure Integration (Chip / Board / Embedded) HIGH LOW LOW HIGH OEM / Enterprise Deployment Readiness (Infrastructure Integration, GTM Channels, Near-Term Demand) Hardware-rooted PQC platform embedded in servers and infrastructure with OEM and channel-led GTM deployment Hardware-First PQC Architecture Embedded at the Infrastructure Layer OEM & Channel-Led GTM Deployment Near-Term Catalyst: Federal & Critical Infra Multiple Revenue Streams Quantum computing platform and quantum software leader Quantum hardware systems and solutions provider Software-only PQC security platform for enterprise IT Quantum entropy and key management solutions Many traditional cybersecurity vendors (software-only PQC) U.S. Federal Gov't Mandate Requires a Comprehensive Solution, with Commercial Verticals to Follow – The EigenQ Advantage EIGENQ'S DIFFERENTIATING ATTRIBUTES

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 Key Management Team 16 COMPANY LEADERSHIP FINANCE Albert Behr Corp. Dev. Advisor 25+ years advising 1,100+ global tech companies on strategic partnerships, funding and market expansion GO-TO-MARKET PRODUCT & TECHNOLOGY Bryan Matthews Chief Revenue Officer Revenue leader with deep federal and enterprise contracting experience driving public-sector GTM, strategic accounts and federal / enterprise customer pipeline Rika Nakazawa Chief Growth Officer Global technology executive with senior GTM and strategy experience across NVIDIA, Sony, Accenture and NTT, spanning AI, cybersecurity and quantum Rob Jazwinski VP, Channel Sales 25+ years driving indirect sales growth through global reseller and partner ecosystems Raúl Zuleta Chief Technology Officer An engineer-inventor turning complex quantum technologies into globally deployed critical systems Michael Johnson Chief Product Officer Veteran product leader with 25+ years across software, security architecture and quantum- safe infrastructure Alexander Truskovsky VP, Cryptography Cryptography and security expert with leadership roles at AWS, ISARA, BlackBerry and Oracle CEO building EigenQ's quantum- resilient trust infrastructure platform; former CTO with 20+ years in cybersecurity, Oracle experience, patent inventorship and quantum- security research Dr. José Rosas-Bustos CEO University of Waterloo professor and quantum-computing expert providing scientific oversight across quantum- proof encryption, simulation, quantum computing and ML/AI Dr. Jesse Van Griensven Chairman Mark Pecen Vice-Chair Architect of next-generation communications and cryptography with 100+ global patents Finance executive focused on capital planning, forecasting, transaction readiness and public-company financial discipline William Berghoff Interim CFO Financial operations leader supporting controls, reporting discipline, treasury coordination and audit-ready processes Cristiane Lagos Executive Controller

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 17 Illustrative Management Conservative Base Case Forecast(1) $ 10 $ 138 $ 299 2026E 2027E 2028E Base Case Total Revenue Base Case Adjusted EBITDA & EBITDA Margin $ 7 $ 88 $ 195 68 % 64 % 65 % 2026E 2027E 2028E (1) EigenQ illustrative management revenue forecasts and corresponding Gross Profit, Gross Margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin information prepared as of June 2026 (Forecast Preparation Date), based on management professional experience, estimated addressable market and other assumptions and information as further described on Slides 39-41. Forecasts represent EigenQ's good faith estimates of the potential future revenue and earnings the company may be able to generate during a forecast period ending 12/31/2028, assuming the accuracy of numerous assumptions incorporated therein. Actual results may differ from forecasts due to a variety of factors; readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information and estimates and to review carefully the applicable disclaimers on Slides 2-3. Base Case Gross Profit & Gross Margin ($ in millions) $(5) $ 36 $ 106 (50)% 26 % 35 % 2026E 2027E 2028E

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 21.9 x 180.4 x 100.9 x 62.4 x 51.2 x 25.5 x 24.3 x 15.6 x 30.2 x 49.1 x 21.1 x Median: 24.9 x Median: 81.7 x 10.1 x 79.8 x 60.5 x 48.1 x 25.7 x 20.1 x 20.0 x 13.8 x 21.1 x 38.1 x 17.3 x Median: 54.3 x Median: 20.0 x 18 Valuation Benchmarking – Current Trading Revenue Multiples TEV / 2027E Revenue Multiples TEV / 2028E Revenue Multiples Y-o-Y Revenue Growth (2027E) 2027E Revenue ($M) Y-o-Y Revenue Growth (2028E) 2028E Revenue ($M) $138 $44 $85 $51 $413 $7.5B $11.3B $3.6B $7.1B $907 $14.3B 1,284% 94% 101% 25% 53% 31% 46% 28% 22% 23% 17% $299 $100 $142 $66 $824 $9.7B $16.1B $8.6B $4.6B $1.1B $16.2B 116% 126% 67% 30% 100% 29% 43% 21% 27% 22% 13% Source: FactSet. Note: Market and estimates data as of June 5, 2026. Illustrative Illustrative

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 28.6 x NM NM NM NM 71.7 x 59.2 x 41.6 x 34.5 x 76.0 x 41.6 x Median: 50.4 x 19 Valuation Benchmarking – Current Trading EBITDA & Post-CapEx EBITDA Multiples TEV / 2028E EBITDA Multiples TEV / Post-CapEx 2028E EBITDA Multiples EBITDA Margin (2028E) 2028E EBITDA ($M) Post-CapEx Cash Conversion Margin (2028E) 2028E Post-CapEx EBITDA ($M) $106 ($264) ($136) ($83) ($47) $4.9B $1.3B $2.9B $5.4B $460 $9.9B 35% (32%) (96%) (84%) (72%) 50% 28% 34% 33% 42% 61% 32.2 x NM NM NM NM 139.6 x 76.7 x 44.2 x 34.8 x 83.9 x 46.7 x Median: 61.7 x $94 ($395) ($154) ($136) ($55) $654 $4.4B $2.2B $410 $5.0B $9.8B 31% (48%) (108%) (137%) (84%) 14% 45% 26% 37% 31% 61% Source: FactSet as of June 5, 2026. 'NM' denotes metrics or multiples that are greater than 1,000x or that are based on a negative denominator. Illustrative EBITDA and Post-CapEx EBITDA figures for EigenQ may not be comparable with the other benchmarked companies, due to, among other items, differences in calculating EBITDA (or adjusted EBITDA), differences in calculating Post-CapEx EBITDA, differences in business model, funding, scale and should be read in conjunction with Slides 2-3 and 40-41. Illustrative Illustrative

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 20 EIGENQ IS POSITIONED TO BECOME THE INFRASTRUCTURE TRUST LAYER Market-leading quantum R&D Hardware-rooted architecture Sticky infrastructure economics 2027 Mandatory migration(1) OEM distribution Quantum platform expansion beyond cyber (1) As set forth and described in the NSA's Commercial National Security Algorithm Suite 2.0 (CNSA 2.0); NSA and other government mandates are subject to change. Procurement gate

Appendix

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 Valuation • Assumes a ~$2.9B pre-money equity value for EigenQ • Implies ~$3.0B pro forma enterprise value Financing • Transaction is expected to provide gross proceeds of approximately $110M to EigenQ • $100M from a combination of anticipated trust capital retained at close and a potential PIPE(1)(5) • $25M+ in anticipated capital raised with a conversion price of $12.00 per share(4)(5) Deal Structure • Assumes EigenQ's existing shareholders will rollover 100% of their equity and are expected to own a pro forma equity ownership of ~94% in the combined company 1 2 1 2 3 4 PF Shares Outstanding (M) 312.7 Share Price ($) $10.00 PF Equity Value ($M) $3,127.1 (-) PF Net Cash ($M) ($110.0) PF Enterprise Value ($M) $3,017.1 Shares (M) % Own. EigenQ Rollover Equity 293.0 93.7% PIPE / Public Shareholders 10.0 3.2% SPAC Sponsor 7.6 2.4% Convert Investors 2.1 0.7% Uses ($M) Rollover to EigenQ $2,930 Transaction Expenses $15 Cash to Balance Sheet $110 Total $3,055 4 3 Sources ($M) EigenQ Rollover $2,930 SPAC / PIPE Investors $100 Convertibles $25 Total $3,055 Notes: 1. Assumes ~53% redemptions from SVAQ's $215M cash in trust in absence of a PIPE. 2. Excludes pro forma effects of SPAC warrants, IPO underwriter's private placement units or any private placement warrants and excludes all EigenQ warrants and equity awards. 3. Includes 425K private placement shares for SPAC Sponsor; Sponsor promote shares subject to negotiation. 4. Shown on an as-converted basis and subject to negotiation. 5. SPAC and EigenQ in discussions with investors and shown for illustrative purposes. 6. Assumes cash free debt free on a pre-money basis. Pro Forma Valuation Transaction Highlights Implied Sources & Uses Pro Forma Ownership(2) Illustrative De-SPAC Transaction Overview (6) (3) (4)(5) 22

Private & Confidential | EigenQ 2026 23 Pre-DeSPAC Close Private Placement KEY INVESTMENT POINTS • Fully funded business model: capital expected to fund upfront commercial execution through cash flow breakeven(2) • Larger raise provides line of sight to upside performance relative to conservative base case financial projections(2) • Supports a clean path to closing while removing reliance on incremental capital at de-SPAC INVESTOR-MANAGEMENT ALIGNMENT 100% expected shareholder rollover reinforces long-term alignment with new investors Pre-DeSPAC Funded Case ILLUSTRATIVE USE OF PROCEEDS DETAIL – $25M BASE PLACEMENT(3) 2027E: 28.6x EBITDA 2028E: 32.2x EBITDA 2027E / 2028E IMPLIED REVENUE MULTIPLES 21.9x / 10.1x PRIVATE PLACEMENT TARGET $25M+ PROPOSED SPAC ENTERPRISE VALUE ~$3.0B Illustrative total enterprise value in transaction $4M $5M $4M $6M $3M $3M Customer Fulfillment Readiness Public-Company Readiness Contingency & Cash Reserve (1) (1) For more information about forward-looking forecasts, metrics and multiples, see Slides 2-3 and 39-41. (2) Based on $25M private placement financing. (3) Actual uses of proceeds may vary; reflects EigenQ estimated transaction expenses as of presentation date, subject to certain assumptions. Does not include estimated SVAQ transaction expenses, including deferred underwriting fees. Transaction Execution Product R&D Channel & Sales Enablement

Private & Confidential | EigenQ 2026 NSA's CNSA 2.0 Mandate Be Quantum-Resilient By January 2027(1) 2027 24 FEDERAL POST- QUANTUM MIGRATION IS ALREADY MANDATED From Procurement Gate to Full Enforcement SEPTEMBER 2026 FIPS 140-2 sunset JANUARY 2027 Procurement gate DECEMBER 2030 Phase-out deadline DECEMBER 2031 Mandatory across NSS FIRST HARD DEADLINE (1) As set forth and described in the NSA's Commercial National Security Algorithm Suite 2.0 (CNSA 2.0); NSA and other government mandates are subject to change.

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 EIGENQ SOLUTION Securing the Trust Chain End-to-End From Entropy → Identity → Execution Certification-ready deployment No redesign required OEM-ready integration Low transition costs 25

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 26 Differentiation vs. Others: Not a Quantum Science Project, Infrastructure Certainty EigenQ Has What Others Lack • Embedded directly in hardware, no standalone sales engine or dedicated channel buildout needed • Built around OEMs, distributor and VAR channels designed to scale without a dedicated direct-sales buildout • Potential to generate recurring revenue through renewals and attestation, not purely a one-time hardware sale like most quantum plays • An infrastructure certainty bet, not a speculative quantum-compute adoption story • Positioned for near-term PQC procurement cycle, not a future quantum-compute horizon Server OEMs Classical Security Quantum Computing PQC Vendors No Rip-and-Replace Migration Path ~ ~ Federal / Enterprise Dual Lane ~ ~ Hardware-First Approach ~ ~ Near-Term Revenues ~ OEM / Channel Embedded Model ~ Hardware + Software + IP Licensing Mix ~ Quantum Safe Solutions

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 A) HPE Solution Brief

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 28

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 29

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 B) Technology & Product Support

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 31 PQC Has Limits

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 32 PQC+ Quantum-Resistant Solutions

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 33 ...That Fits at the Infrastructure Layer of OEM Servers to Enable Critical Workloads... Targets the infrastructure layer where quantum-safe security will be deployed, purchased and scaled Built for the transition: strengthening current legacy and hybrid infrastructure while preparing customers for a fully quantum-secure future End Workloads / Use Cases AI / ML | Financial Transactions | Government Workloads | Healthcare Data | Critical Infrastructure OEM Server Platform ▣ CPU / GPU / Accelerators Compute engines for workloads ▤ Smart NIC / Storage Networking, data movement, storage ♙ Firmware / Boot / Key Mgmt. Secure boot, firmware integrity, key lifecycle EigenQ Embedded Quantum-Safe Security Component PQC acceleration | Hardware root-of-trust | Secure data-in-motion | Crypto agility | QRNG for PQC key generation(1) | Platform & workload trust (1) QRNG refers to Quantum Random Number Generation. EigenQ's embedded quantum-safe security component refers to the PQC+ module combining post- quantum cryptography with QRNG-based entropy for secure key generation, plus hardware root-of-trust, secure key storage, crypto-agility and platform attestation within OEM servers.

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 34 HPE Quantum-Hardened Server EigenQ's PQC+ platform integrates with HPE ProLiant Gen12 servers to create a quantum-hardened security layer for enterprise compute environments HPE compute infra + EigenQ quantum-security layer

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 35 Hardware Accelerator Series

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 C) Commercialization & Revenue Model

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 37 Hardware-First Approach with Ability to Embed Recurring Software & Licensing Hardware Embedded Sales • Primary near-term revenue driver • Distributor + VAR channels, enable scalable global reach • Anticipated to capture large upfront revenue from infrastructure deployments Software / SDK Licensing • Recurring runtime / SDK royalties • Monetizes growing deployed hardware install base • Anticipated high-margin revenue stream from ongoing security lifecycle needs Platform Services • PQC PKI, attestation and managed key services • Subscription model layered on deployed infrastructure • Anticipated long-term, high- margin recurring revenue layer Enterprise Licensing • OEMs manufacture / integrate under EigenQ license • Ongoing royalties tied to production and usage • ARM-like ecosystem model enables capital-light growth

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 D) Financial Model Support

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 39 Illustrative Management Conservative Base Case Revenue Forecasts (All Inputs Illustrative and Subject to Validation)* 2026E (Yr 1) 2027E (Yr 2) 2028E (Yr 3) Est. Total Revenues ($M) Core channel revenue PQC+ server bundles $8.7 $117.6 $245.2 QEM renewals $0.0 $0.9 $13.6 PCle retrofit boards $1.2 $16.7 $34.7 M.2 PQC+ edge modules $0.0 $0.4 $0.7 Total core channel revenue $10.0 $135.6 $294.2 OEM licensing revenue - $2.9 $5.3 Est. Total Revenue $10.0 $138.4 $299.5 1) Information is Illustrative Only; Financial Model & Non-GAAP Metrics - Information set forth above is illustrative only, prepared as of the Forecast Preparation Date in connection with the potential proposed transactions. As EigenQ, as of the date of the Presentation, has not yet begun generating revenues and profits, finalized its revenue recognition policies and practices or externally validated pricing, pipeline, market opportunity, penetration rates, product mix, sale transaction and licensing terms, among other assumptions and inputs, the information set forth above is speculative in nature and should not be relied upon when making investment decisions. All figures are forward-looking and subject to the terms and limitations set forth on Slides 2-3; actual future EigenQ operating and financial results may vary and will likely be different, perhaps materially, from the illustrative estimates included in this Presentation. Illustrative forward-looking information is derived from internal market scenario-based models not prepared with a view towards public disclosure or adherence to GAAP presentation and requirements and should be read in conjunction with Slides 2-3 and the notes below, including Note 4. Actual results may be different from the illustrative figures presented. 2) Key Drivers – Illustrative estimated forecast period ("FP") revenues are comprised of: (i) Core Channel Revenues: potential core channel revenues from product sales, including PQC + server bundles, PCIe retrofit boards, M.2 PQC + edge modules and, beginning in FP Yr 2, QEM renewals, through prospective OEM server -> distributor -> VAR -> end-customer channels; and (ii) OEM Licensing Revenues: potential strategic OEM licensing revenues, beginning in FP Yr 2, as an illustrative license/royalty scenario that could complement core channel hardware sales if future OEM/platform licensing arrangements are secured. The illustrative estimated revenue figures reflected above are derived from Company management internal model scenarios not prepared with a view towards public disclosure. 3) Key Assumptions: a) Unit Sales – Potential future unit sales figures incorporated into management base case model are based on illustrative management assumptions regarding penetration rates of 0.053% in 2026, 0.500% in 2027, and 0.800% in 2028 applied to management's modeled channel-enabled serviceable U.S. server opportunity. The modeled denominator is derived from the broader server-market context shown on Slides 9 and 10, but constrained by assumed route-to-market readiness, prospective channel capacity, product availability, deployment timing, financing, and management's commercialization assumptions. These assumptions are not based on current customer contracts, purchase orders, formal quotations, backlog, bookings, executed OEM licenses, or binding customer commitments. b) Product Mix – Product mix assumptions incorporated into management base case model reflect management illustrative estimates of potential future federal/commercial product mix of 80%/20% for FP Yr 1, 65%/35% for FP Yr 2, and 50%/50% for FP Yr 3, reflecting management expectation, as of the Forecast Preparation Date, that federal and regulated-market adoption may precede broader commercial adoption. These mix assumptions are scenario assumptions and are not based on executed contracts or purchase commitments. Fulfillment of federal end-user orders is generally more costly than commercial customer order fulfillment due to manufacturing, freight/distribution and other government-specific requirements. QEM renewal fees are modeled as commencing in FP Yr 2, at a 90% YoY renewal rate after the initial one-year required QEM subscription period. c) Product Pricing – Modeled product pricing reflects assumed product-mix weighted average EigenQ ASPs based on management assessment, industry comparables for security appliances, anticipated value-stack positioning, and estimated federal/TAA/BAA-related cost impacts, as applicable. Pricing assumptions are not based on current customer quotes, executed contracts, purchase orders, or binding price commitments. d) OEM Licensing Revenues – Illustrative estimated revenues from OEM licensing arrangements reflect numerous assumptions, including, without limitation, that EigenQ, in the future, identifies and enters into IP out-licensing arrangements with currently anticipated or other OEM sales channel partners, taking into account estimated pricing and terms based on management professional experience and industry knowledge, as opposed to actual terms, contracts or arrangements in place as of the Forecast Preparation Date. As of the date of this Presentation, EigenQ does not have signed licensing agreements or negotiated terms of such agreements in place with OEMs and the illustrative information contained herein with respect to future potential OEM licensing arrangements, if any such arrangements materialize, is likely to be different from actual OEM licensing terms set forth in definitive agreements, purchase orders, formal quotations, or binding customer commitment therefor, as applicable. Semiconductor IP and software licensing reference point comparables support the use of a license/royalty framework as a structural analog, but actual economics would depend on future negotiated terms, including license scope, field of use, exclusivity, support obligations, royalty base, minimums, reporting/audit rights, and ASC 606 treatment. 4) Other Important Information regarding Illustrative Revenue Forecasts – The management conservative base case model from which the illustrative potential future revenue figures shown above were derived is a scenario-based market-capture model and is not intended to represent GAAP-recognized revenue, backlog, bookings, contracted revenue, or a customer-by-customer forecast. Actual revenue recognition will depend on future contract terms, including delivery and acceptance terms, performance obligations, bundled hardware/software treatment, renewal terms, OEM license structure, variable consideration, channel/principal-agent analysis, and ASC 606 review. *Prepared as of Forecast Preparation Date; as of the date of this Presentation, these illustrative forecasts are not based on current customer contracts, purchase orders, formal quotations, established customer pipeline, backlog, bookings, executed OEM licenses, committed sales volumes, or binding customer commitments and are subject to Company revenue recognition policy finalization.

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 40 Illustrative Pre-DeSPAC Funded Scenario Gross Profits, Adjusted EBITDA, Costs & Margins Estimates (Assuming Illustrative Base Case Revenue Forecasts and Other Inputs All Subject to Validation)(1)* 2026E (Yr 1) 2027E (Yr 2) 2028E (Yr 3) Est. Total Revenues ($M) – Management Conservative Base Case(2) Total Revenues (Core Channel Sales + OEM Licensing) $10.0 $138.4 $299.5 Illustrative Est. Gross Profits, Gross Margin, Adj. EBITDA, Adj. EBITDA Margin and Post-CapEx EBITDA ($M)(3)(4)(6) Gross Profits $6.8 $88.4 $194.9 Gross Margin (%) 68.3% 63.8% 65.1% Adjusted EBITDA Management Conservative Base Case $3.6 $35.9 $105.9 2026E Pre-DeSPAC Funded Case ($5.0) $35.9 $105.9 Adj. EBITDA Margin (%) Management Conservative Base Case 36% 26% 35% 2026E Pre-DeSPAC Funded Case (50%) 26% 35% Post-CapEx EBITDA Management Conservative Base Case $0.6 $25.9 $93.9 2026E Pre-DeSPAC Funded Case ($8.0) $25.9 $93.9 Illustrative Est. COGS, Operating Expenses and Capital Expenditures ($M)(5) COGS ($3.2) ($50.1) ($104.6) Operating Expenses – Baseline Operating Expenses, excluding incremental 2026E Pre-DeSPAC Funding spend ($3.3) ($52.5) ($89.0) Capital Expenditures ($3.0) ($10.0) ($12.0) III. Adj. EBITDA Case Scenario Bridge 2026E Management Conservative Base Case (MCBC) → 2026E Pre-DeSPAC Funded Case (PFAC) 2026E Adjusted EBITDA MCBC $3.6M less approx. $8.6M assumed incremental EBITDA-impacting Pre-DeSPAC funded-acceleration operating spend 2026E Adjusted EBITDA PFAC ($5.0M) See Note 5 and III. Operating Expense Scenario Bridge note below for further detail. III. Operating Expense Scenario Bridge Illustrative incremental 2026E Pre-DeSPAC Funded Case reflects assumed incremental $8.6M of EBITDA-impacting funded-acceleration operating spend including the following illustrative amounts: Product R&D funded-acceleration spend - ($3.5M) Channel & sales enablement spend - ($3.0M) Customer fulfillment readiness spend - ($1.5M) Public-company readiness spend - ($0.6M) (1) Information is Illustrative Only; Financial Model & Non-GAAP Metrics - Information set forth above is illustrative only, prepared as of the Forecast Preparation Date in connection with the potential proposed transactions. As EigenQ, as of the date of the Presentation, has not yet begun generating revenues and profits, finalized its revenue recognition policies and practices or externally validated pricing, pipeline, market opportunity, penetration rates, sale transaction and licensing terms, or confirmed anticipated costs and expenses, among other assumptions and inputs, the information set forth above is speculative in nature and should not be relied upon when making investment decisions. All figures are forward-looking and subject to the terms and limitations set forth on Slides 2-3; actual future EigenQ operating and financial results may vary and will likely be different, perhaps materially, from the illustrative estimates included in this Presentation. Illustrative forward-looking information is derived from the Company's internal market scenario-based model, which was not prepared with a view towards public disclosure or adherence to GAAP presentation and requirements and should be read in conjunction with Slides 2-3. Actual results may be different from the illustrative figures presented. (2) Incorporation of Illustrative Revenue Forecasts – Illustrative estimated Gross Profits, Gross Margin, Adj. EBITDA, Adj. EBITDA Margin, COGS and Operating Expense information is based on, and takes into account, the illustrative revenue forecast information further described on Slide 39, including the assumptions incorporated therein, all of which information is intended to be illustrative only, and is subject to change, including as meaningful product sales are effectuated and Company revenue policies and practices are finalized, among other factors. (3) Illustrative Est. Gross Profits & Gross Margin – Illustrative Est. Gross Profits (calculated as Revenues less COGS) and Est. Gross Margin (calculated as Gross Profits/Total Revenues) reflect, in addition to the assumptions incorporated into the illustrative revenue forecasts (see above), prospective product pricing and other estimates, including with regard to future OEM licensing and end-customer purchase order and contract terms, costs of goods sold (COGS) by product (as further described below), and estimated freight, warranty and fulfillment charges, which estimates were developed in good faith by EigenQ management based on information available to the Company at the Forecast Preparation Date, but are not intended to be, nor should they be considered, representative of actual, future-determined inputs and values. Illustrative Gross Margin estimates are included to highlight the Company's capital light business model, taking into account numerous assumptions and subject in all respects to the terms and limitations set forth in Slides 2-3. *Prepared as of Forecast Preparation Date; as of the date of this Presentation, the illustrative forecasts are not based on current customer contracts, purchase orders, formal quotations, established customer pipeline, backlog, bookings, executed OEM licenses, committed sales volumes or binding customer commitments.

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 41 Illustrative Pre-DeSPAC Funded Scenario Gross Profits, Adjusted EBITDA, Costs & Margins Estimates (Assuming Illustrative Base Case Revenue Forecasts and Other Inputs All Subject to Validation) (Cont'd) (4) Illustrative Est. Adjusted EBITDA & Adj. EBITDA Margin (Management Conservative Base Case & 2026E Pre-DeSPAC Funded Case) (a) General / Management Conservative Base Case (all figures except as outlined under "2026 Pre-DeSPAC Case" below) - Est. Adj. EBITDA (calculated as Gross Profit less Total Est. EBITDA-impacting Operating Expenses, before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, excluding certain cash uses described below) and Est. Adj. EBITDA Margin (calculated as Adjusted EBITDA/Total Revenues) information derived therefrom are forward-looking non-GAAP metrics/measures subject to Slides 2- 3, prepared based on the illustrative potential revenue estimates further described on Slide 39 and taking into account, also, certain preliminary inputs from anticipated core channel partners as well as EigenQ management estimates at the Forecast Preparation Date, all of which inputs, estimates and assumptions are subject to external validation and change as EigenQ's product sales ramp and its business evolves. Illustrative Adj. EBITDA estimates do not address certain cash uses, such as non- recurring transaction execution expenses, inventory/deposits, capex, working capital and cash reserves, estimates of which are subject to ongoing review by Company management, together with accounting staff and counsel. As further described below, for 2026E, the "Pre-DeSPAC Funded Case" starts with Management Conservative Base Case 2026E Adjusted EBITDA of approximately $3.6M and subtracts approximately $8.6M of incremental EBITDA-impacting pre-DeSPAC private placement-funded spend, resulting in Pre-DeSPAC Funded Case 2026E Adjusted EBITDA of approximately ($5.0M). (b) 2026E Pre-DeSPAC Funded Case - Relative to 2026E only, illustrative Est. Adj. EBITDA and Est. Adj. EBITDA Margins reflects the supplemental "Pre-DeSPAC Funded Case", which assumes July 2026 private placement proceeds are used to accelerate product readiness, channel and sales enablement, customer fulfillment readiness and public company readiness ahead of the anticipated 2027 revenue ramp, as further detailed under the heading "2026 Pre-DeSPAC Funded Case" on Slide 23, and as further detailed below. Under the assumptions incorporated into the 2026E Management Conservative Base Case model, illustrative 2026E Est. Adjusted EBITDA and Est. Adjusted EBITDA Margin would be $3.6M (reduced to ($5M) in the 2026E Pre-DeSPAC Funded Case due to an assumed $8.6M of incremental EBITDA-impacting Pre-DeSPAC funded-acceleration operating spend during 2026) and 35.5%, respectively. "Bridge" to Conservative DD 2026E Adjusted EBITDA: $3.6M less: Product R&D funded-acceleration spend: ($3.5M), less: Channel & sales enablement spend: ($3.0M), less: Customer fulfillment readiness spend: ($1.5M), less: Public-company readiness spend: ($0.6M), equals 2026E Pre-DeSPAC Funded Case Adjusted EBITDA of approximately ($5.0M). All figures are illustrative estimates. (5) Illustrative Est. COGS and Est. Operating Expenses (a) Est. COGS - Est. costs of goods sold are product-line based, with hardware/channel lines carrying higher costs than other revenue sources; est. costs of QEM renewal fees and OEM licensing revenues reflect software/license economics, taking into account, in all cases, revenue model assumptions regarding unit sales, product mix and pricing (see Slide 39) for further detail), together with management estimates of freight/shipping costs, warranty-related charges and fulfillment costs, based on professional experience and industry information. As product sales increase, manufacturing/inventory, freight/distribution costs also increase; assumes sales proceeds used for working capital and 60-day customer payment cycle, 90-day inventory availability. (b) Est. Operating Expenses - Est. operating expenses scale materially during later forecast period years to fund R&D, channel enablement, deployment support, audit/legal/SEC readiness and public company infrastructure needs. Excluded from Estimated Operating Expenses are separately identified cash uses not reflected in Adjusted EBITDA, including transaction execution expenses, inventory/deposits, capex, working capital and cash reserves, subject to further review by management, accounting staff and counsel. (6) 2028E Illustrative Est. Post-CapEx EBITDA and Post-CapEx Cash Conversion Margin (a) Est. Post-CapEx EBITDA - Est. capital expenditures scale as EigenQ's business grows; provided, however, that EigenQ's business model remains capital light, with modeled capex requirements reflecting estimated spending on lab/testing equipment, production/QA tooling, software/internal systems/demo units/channel enablement assets and other uses. All such information represent illustrative estimates, subject to change, assuming depreciation and amortization rates for pre-existing assets consistent with management professional experience with relevant equipment, assets and software systems and estimated product updates costs. (b) Est. Post-CapEx Cash Conversion Margin - Est. Post-CapEx Cash Conversion Margin is shown at a snapshot 2028E illustrative estimated level calculated as 2028E Illustrative Est. Post-CapEx EBITDA / Total Revenues (2028E), taking into consideration all of the assumptions incorporated into the illustrative estimated revenue forecasts (see Slide 39).

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 E) Risk Factors

Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 43 Certain Risks Related to the EigenQ and the Anticipated Business Combination All references to the "Company," "EigenQ," "we," "us" or "our" below refer to the Business of EigenQ, Inc. The risks presented below are certain of the general risks related to the Company's business, industry and ownership structure and are not exhaustive. These risks speak only as of the date of this Presentation and neither EigenQ nor SVAQ makes any commitment to update such disclosures. • We have a limited operating history upon which you can evaluate our performance, and accordingly, our prospects must be considered in light of the risks that any new company encounters. • We are an early stage company with a limited operating history in a nascent industry. • We may face potential difficulties in obtaining capital. • We have a limited number of suppliers for significant components of the equipment we use to build and operate our products, services and solutions. Any disruption in the availability of these components could delay our ability to expand or increase the capacity of our infrastructure or repair or replace defective equipment. • We rely on various intellectual property rights, including patents, licenses and trademarks, in order to operate our business. • We rely on licensed intellectual property, and the loss or impairment of these rights could materially harm our ability to develop and commercialize our products, services and solutions. • We may be unable to obtain, maintain and protect our intellectual property rights and proprietary information such as if the scope of patent protection obtained is not sufficiently broad. • We may face patent infringement and other intellectual property claims that could be costly to defend, result in injunctions and significant damage awards or other costs. • Our success is highly dependent on the experience and skill of our board of directors, its executive officers and key employees. • The loss of José Rosas-Bustos or Jesse Van Griensven Thé could harm our business, and we do not have any key person life insurance policies on any such people. • We are highly dependent on our ability to attract and retain senior executive leadership and key employees, such as cyber security experts, software engineers and other key technical employees, who are critical to our success. • Our business could be negatively impacted by cyber security threats, attacks and other disruptions. • We operate in a highly regulated environment, and if we are found to be in violation of any of the federal, state, or local laws or regulations applicable to us, our business could suffer. • We intend to make sales to government entities and highly regulated organizations, which are subject to a number of challenges and risks. • The exercise of warrants or conversion of other convertible securities could result in dilution to our investors. • Quantum computing may never achieve commercially relevant quantum advantage, and the timeline for achieving such advantage is highly uncertain. As a result, quantum computing may never represent a meaningful threat to classical computing infrastructure. • We have a history of operating losses and expects to incur significant expenses and continuing losses for the foreseeable future. • If we cannot execute on our strategy, including due to changing customers, technologies and competitors, our results of operations could be harmed. • If we are unable to sell new and additional product, subscription, and support offerings to our end-customers, especially to large enterprise customers, our future revenue and operating results may be harmed. • We plan to rely on channel partners to sell our products, and if these channel partners fail to perform, our ability to sell and distribute our products will be limited and our operating results will be harmed. • Global crises and geopolitical events can have a significant effect on our business operations and projections. • We are in our very early stages and have a limited operating history, which makes it difficult to forecast the future results of our operations. It is also possible quantum computing might never become a meaningful threat to legacy systems. • Our estimates of market opportunity and forecasts of market growth may prove to be inaccurate. Even if the market in which we compete achieves its anticipated growth levels, our business could fail to grow at similar rates, if at all. • We depend on advances in technology by other companies and academic institutions, if those advances do not materialize, some of our products may not be successfully commercialized. • If we fail to attract customers, including government entities and large enterprises, and retain and increase the spending of such customers over time, our revenue, business, results of operations, financial condition and growth prospects would be harmed. • Our ability to compete successfully depends on continuous innovation, timely execution of our strategy, and achieving cost reductions and failure to do so could render our quantum security solutions obsolete or less competitive. • If we cannot maintain and enhance our brand or adequately commercialize our quantum security solutions, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed. • The quantum computing industry is in its early stages and volatile, and if it does not develop, if it develops slower than we expect, if it develops in a manner that does not require use of our quantum computing security solutions, or if it encounters negative publicity or if our solution does not drive commercial engagement, the growth of our business will be harmed. • If we are unable to successfully enhance our existing products and services and introduce new products and services in response to rapid technological changes and market developments as well as evolving security threats, our competitive position and prospects will be harmed. • If we fail to maintain the efficiency of our supply chain, our business could be materially adversely affected. • Because we depend on manufacturing partners to build and ship our hardware products, we are susceptible to manufacturing and logistics delays and pricing fluctuations that could prevent us from shipping customer orders on time, if at all, or on a cost-effective basis, which may result in the loss of sales and end-customers. • If we do not accurately predict, prepare for, and respond promptly to rapidly evolving technological and market developments and successfully manage product and subscription introductions and transitions to meet changing end-customer needs in the enterprise security industry, our competitive position and prospects will be harmed. • Defects, errors, or vulnerabilities in our products, the failure of our products to prevent a security breach or incident, misuse of our products, or risks of product liability claims could harm our reputation and adversely impact our operating results. • The occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the negotiations and any subsequent definitive agreements with respect to the proposed business combination (the "Potential Transaction") between EigenQ and SVAQ, and the possibility that the terms and conditions set forth in any definitive agreements with respect to the proposed business combination may differ materially from the terms and conditions set forth in the letter of intent executed by and between the parties. • The outcome of any legal proceeding that is ongoing or may be instituted against the parties following the announcement of the Potential Transaction and any definitive agreements with respect thereto. • The inability to complete the Potential Transaction, including due to failure to obtain approval of the shareholders of EigenQ and SVAQ or other conditions to closing. • The inability to obtain or maintain the listing of the post-acquisition company's securities on the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, the New York Stock Exchange, or another national securities exchange following the Potential Transaction. • The risk that the Potential Transaction disrupts current plans and operations as a result of the announcement and consummation of the Potential Transaction. • The ability to recognize the anticipated benefits of the proposed Potential Transaction, which may be affected by, among other things, competition, the ability of the combined company to grow and manage growth profitably and retain its key employees. • Risks related to the costs of the Potential Transaction. • The ability to secure any PIPE funding or other debt or equity financing by the parties, and the ability by EigenQ or the post-acquisition company to successfully to deploy any debt or equity financing. • Changes in applicable laws or regulations, economic and market conditions, and political or geopolitical developments. • The "Risk Factors" sections of the most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC by SVAQ. • Other risks and uncertainties included in documents filed or to be filed with the SEC by SVAQ and/or EigenQ.

44 Private & Confidential | © EigenQ 2026 Thank You