Corvex, Inc.

Previous report

We may be unable to continue as a going concern if we do not successfully raise additional capital on favorable terms, or at all, or if we fail to generate sufficient revenue from operations.

Previous report

Primarily as a result of our lack of revenue, history of losses to date and our lack of liquidity, there is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. As of September 30, 2025, we had total assets of approximately $5.6 million and total liabilities of approximately $7.3 million. Even with the $3.0 million raised in November pursuant to the Series A Purchase Agreement, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents will not be sufficient to fund our projected operating requirements beyond the first quarter of 2026. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses, including in connection with the consummation of the Merger and we may never achieve profitability. Our forecast of the period through which our financial resources will be adequate to support our operations is a forward-looking statement and involves risks and uncertainties, and actual results could vary as a result of a number of factors, including the factors discussed elsewhere in this section and Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the 2024 Form 10-K. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect.

Previous report

There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient additional capital on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital or if we are unable to generate sufficient revenue from our operations, we may not stay in business. We may seek additional capital through a combination of private and public equity offerings, debt financings and strategic collaborations. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders could be significantly diluted and these newly issued securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of holders of the common stock offered hereby. Our Bridge Loan is secured by our assets, including our intellectual property, and includes covenants restricting our ability to raise additional capital, Any future debt financing, if obtained, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, which could increase our expenses and require that our assets secure such debt. Moreover, any debt we incur must be repaid regardless of our operating results. The above circumstances may discourage some investors from purchasing our stock, lending us money or from providing alternative forms of financing. In addition, the current economic instability in the world’s equity and credit markets may materially adversely affect our ability to sell additional securities and/or borrow cash. There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise additional working capital on acceptable terms or at all.

Previous report

If we are unable to raise additional capital when needed, we may be required to reduce or terminate our operations. We could be forced to sell or dispose of our rights or assets. Any inability to raise adequate funds on commercially reasonable terms would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operation and financial condition, including the possibility that a lack of funds could cause our business to fail and liquidate with little or no return to investors.

Previous report

Even if we take these actions, they may be insufficient, particularly if our costs are higher than projected or unforeseen expenses arise. Additionally, if we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams or products or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we choose to expand more rapidly than we presently anticipate, we may also need to raise additional capital sooner than expected.

Previous report

Our failure to meet the continued listing requirements of Nasdaq could result in a de-listing of our common stock.

Previous report

Our common stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”). On November 14, 2023, we were notified by Nasdaq that because the closing bid price for the Company’s common stock listed on Nasdaq was below $1.00 for 30 consecutive trading days, the Company no longer met the minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market under Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5550(a)(2), requiring a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share (the “Minimum Bid Price Requirement”). On May 15, 2024, since the Company did not regain compliance by May 13, 2024, the Company requested, and was granted, an additional 180 calendar days to regain compliance with Bid Price Requirement expiring November 11, 2024.

Previous report

On October 29, 2024, the Company completed a 1-for-15 reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding common stock. On November 12, 2024, the Company was notified by Nasdaq that it had regained compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement. On January 17, 2025, Nasdaq announced the effectiveness of new listing rules that will complicate regaining compliance with the Bid Price Requirement by removing the stay period during an appeal of a delisting determination to a hearings panel and reducing the availability of further compliance periods for issuers that implement multiple reverse stock splits.

Previous report

On May 20, 2025, we were notified by Nasdaq that because we had not yet filed our Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2025, we were not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) (the “Filing Requirement”). We had until July 21, 2025, to submit a plan to regain compliance with the Filing Requirement. On July 7, 2025, we once again received a notice from Nasdaq that we were not in compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement and, due to the fact we effected a reverse stock split within the prior year, we were not eligible for an extended compliance period. We requested a hearing to appeal the delisting of our common stock. This hearing was held on August 19, 2025. At this hearing, we presented our plan to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement. Separately, on August 21, 2025, we received a notice from Nasdaq that we were not in compliance with the Filing Requirement because we had not yet filed our 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2025.

Previous report

On August 27, 2025, we received a notice from Nasdaq that Nasdaq had granted our request to continue our listing on Nasdaq subject to (i) the Company regaining compliance with the Filing Requirement by filing its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2025 on or before September 30, 2025, and (ii) the Company demonstrating compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement on or before October 30, 2025. On September 24, 2025, we filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2025, within the extension period granted by Nasdaq. On October 7, 2025, we were notified by Nasdaq that we had regained compliance with the Filing Requirement. On October 10, 2025 we effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split, the effect of which allowed us to demonstrate compliance with the Bid Price rule within the extension period granted by Nasdaq. On November 11, 2025, we were notified by Nasdaq that we had regained compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement.

Previous report

On October 1, 2025, we received a written notice from Nasdaq indicating that we are not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1), which requires companies listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market to maintain a minimum of $2,500,000 in stockholders’ equity for continued listing (the “Stockholders’ Equity Requirement”) and serves as an additional basis of delisting before the Nasdaq Hearings Panel (the “Panel”). In our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, filed with the SEC on September 24, 2025, we reported a stockholders’ equity of approximately $1.637 million and, as a result, we did not satisfy the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement. In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2025, we reported a stockholders’ equity of approximately $(1.701) million and, as a result, we continue to not satisfy the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement.

Previous report

The Notice provided that the Panel would consider the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement in its decision regarding our continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market and provided the Company the opportunity to present our views with respect to this deficiency in writing to the Panel no later than October 8, 2025. Accordingly, we presented a written plan of compliance to the Panel with respect to the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement before such deadline and which we updated following our announcement of the Merger Agreement, the Series A Purchase Agreement and the Equity Facility. There can be no assurance that the Panel will grant the Company any further compliance period for the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement or that, in the event a compliance period is provided, that the Company will ultimately regain compliance with the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement. Our failure to regain compliance with the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement or any future non-compliance with Nasdaq listing requirements could result in Nasdaq taking steps to delist the Company’s common stock. Such a delisting would likely have a negative effect on the price of the Company’s common stock and would impair shareholders’ ability to sell or purchase the Company’s common stock. Any perception that we may not regain compliance for future noncompliance or a delisting of our common stock by Nasdaq could adversely affect our ability to attract new investors, decrease the liquidity of the outstanding shares of our common stock, reduce the price at which such shares trade and increase the transaction costs inherent in trading such shares with overall negative effects for our stockholders.

Previous report

Risks Related to the Pending Merger

Previous report

The pendency of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Previous report

The pendency of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Merger, could cause disruptions in and create uncertainty surrounding our business, including affecting our relationships with our existing and future customers, suppliers and employees, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, regardless of whether the proposed Merger is completed. In particular, we could potentially lose additional important personnel as a result of the departure of employees who decide to pursue other opportunities in light of the Merger. Also, our relationships with suppliers and other business partners could be negatively impacted. In addition, we have allocated, and will continue to allocate, significant management resources towards the completion of the Merger, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Previous report

We are subject to restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to the consummation of the Merger as provided in the Merger Agreement, including, among other things, certain restrictions on our ability to hire certain employees, incur additional indebtedness, sell or transfer our assets and amend our organizational documents. These restrictions could result in our inability to respond effectively to competitive pressures, industry developments and future opportunities, retain key employees and may otherwise harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Previous report

Because of the risks associated with the Merger, we can provide no assurance that the Merger will close on the terms and conditions we currently anticipate.

Previous report

Because the lack of a public market for Corvex’s capital stock makes it difficult to evaluate the fair market value of Corvex’s capital stock, the value of our common stock to be issued to Corvex’s securityholders may be more or less than the fair market value of Corvex’s capital stock.

Previous report

The outstanding capital stock of Corvex is privately held and is not traded in any public market. The lack of a public market makes it difficult to determine the fair market value of Corvex’s capital stock. Because the percentage of Company common stock to be issued to Corvex’s securityholders was determined based on negotiations between the parties, it is possible that the value of our common stock to be issued to Corvex’s securityholders will be more or less than the fair market value of Corvex’s capital stock.

Previous report

Based upon the number of shares of our common stock expected to be issued in the Merger, pre-Merger Corvex stockholders would own approximately 96.2% of the combined company and pre-Merger Company stockholders would own approximately 3.8% of the combined company, in each case, on a fully-diluted basis (excluding out-of-the money options and warrants). Under the Exchange Ratio formula in the Merger Agreement, the relative ownership of the combined company by pre-Merger Corvex stockholders and pre-Merger Company stockholders will be adjusted to take into account funds raised in the Series A Purchase Agreement, the ChEF Purchase Agreement and the Corvex Concurrent Financing (based on a $6.25 post-Closing per share value). In addition, the Merger Agreement includes an earnout provision under which Corvex’s current stockholders and option holders would receive additional shares upon (1) the Company’s volume weighted average share price exceeding $15.00 per share for 20 of any 30 consecutive trading days on or before the fifth anniversary of the Closing and (2) the Company’s volume weighted average share price exceeding $25.00 per share for 20 of any 30 consecutive trading days on or before the seventh anniversary of the Closing. On a pro forma basis assuming all such shares are issued and prior to taking into account shares issuable pursuant to the Series A Purchase Agreement, the ChEF Purchase Agreement and the Corvex Concurrent Financing, pre-Merger Corvex stockholders would own approximately 96.9% of the combined company and pre-Merger Movano stockholders would own approximately 3.1% of the combined company, in each case, on a fully-diluted basis (excluding out-of-the money options and warrants).

Previous report

In addition, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the relative ownership of the combined company by pre-Merger Corvex stockholders and pre-Merger Company stockholders is subject to adjustment in the event that Movano’s liabilities at closing exceed $5.0 million or its expenditures through closing exceed an agreed-upon budget. In the event that our liabilities exceed $5.0 million at the closing of the Merger or our expenditures exceed the agreed upon budget, the Exchange Ratio will be adjusted and the number of shares therefore issued to Corvex’s stockholders in connection with the Merger will be adjusted.

Previous report

Failure to complete the Merger could negatively impact the stock price of the Company and future businesses and financial results of the Company.

Previous report

The Merger Agreement is subject to a number of customary closing conditions, including (a) approval by the requisite Company and Corvex stockholders of the adoption and approval of the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the transactions contemplated thereby, (b) Nasdaq’s approval of the listing of the shares of our common stock to be issued in connection with the Merger, (c) the effectiveness of the Registration Statement covering the issuance of our common stock in the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, and (d) the absence of any orders or injunctions by any governmental entity that would prohibit consummation of the Merger. Conditions to the closing of the Merger may not be fulfilled in a timely manner or at all and, accordingly, the Merger may be delayed or may not be completed. In addition, we and/or Corvex may elect to terminate the Merger Agreement under certain conditions. If the Merger is not completed, the ongoing businesses, financial condition and results of operation of the Company may be adversely affected and market prices of the Company’s common stock may decline significantly, particularly to the extent that the current market prices reflect a market assumption that the Merger will be consummated. If the consummation of the Merger is delayed, including by the receipt of a competing acquisition proposal, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Previous report

In addition, the Company has incurred and will incur substantial expenses in connection with the negotiation and completion of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, as well as the costs and expenses of filing, printing and mailing a proxy statement and all filing and other fees paid to the SEC and other regulatory agencies in connection with the Merger. If the Merger is not completed, the Company would have to recognize these expenses without realizing the expected benefits of the Merger. Any of the foregoing, or other risks arising in connection with the failure of or delay in consummating the Merger, including the diversion of management’s attention from pursuing other opportunities and the constraints in the Merger Agreement on the ability to make significant changes to the Company’s ongoing business during the pendency of the Merger, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s businesses, financial conditions and results of operations.

Previous report

Additionally, the Company’s business may be adversely impacted by the failure to pursue other beneficial opportunities due to the focus of management on the Merger, without realizing any of the anticipated benefits of completing the Merger. If the Merger Agreement is terminated and the Company’s board of directors seeks another merger or business combination, the Company’s stockholders cannot be certain that the Company will be able to find a party willing to engage in a transaction on more attractive terms than the proposed Merger.

Previous report

The Merger Agreement limits the Company’s ability to pursue alternatives to the Merger and may discourage other companies from trying to acquire the Company.

Previous report

The Merger Agreement contains “no shop” covenants that restrict the Company’s ability to, directly or indirectly, among other things, initiate, solicit, knowingly encourage or knowingly facilitate, inquiries or proposals with respect to, or, subject to certain exceptions generally related to the exercise of fiduciary duties by the Company’s board of directors, engage in any negotiations concerning, or provide any confidential or non-public information or data relating to, any acquisition proposal. These provisions, which include a $500,000 termination fee payable by the Company under certain circumstances, may discourage a potential third-party acquirer that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of the Company from considering or proposing that acquisition.

Previous report

Stockholder litigation could prevent or delay the completion of the Merger or otherwise negatively impact the business and operations of the Company.

Previous report

Stockholders of the Company may file lawsuits against Corvex, the Company and/or the directors and officers of either company in connection with the Merger. One of the conditions to the closing is that no governmental entity of competent jurisdiction shall have issued any order (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent) that has become final and non-appealable and that restrains, enjoins or otherwise prohibits the consummation of the Merger. If any plaintiff were successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting Corvex or the Company from completing the Merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, then such injunction may delay or prevent the effectiveness of the Merger and could result in significant costs to the Company, including any cost associated with the indemnification of directors and officers the Company. The Company may incur costs in connection with the defense or settlement of any stockholder lawsuits filed in connection with the Merger. Such litigation could have an adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations of the Company and could prevent or delay the completion of the Merger.