T3 Defense Inc.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Apr 9, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Apr 9, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-09-30; filed 2025-02-10.
0001213900-25-011694
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-04-09.
0001213900-26-041888
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 201 previous paragraphs and 179 current paragraphs.
31 unchanged; 28 reworded; 120 added; 139 removed; 3 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 97 previous and 14 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (120)
Current report
The audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern.
Current report
The Company recorded negative working capital of approximately $30 million (which includes $24.5 million of stock purchase warrant liabilities which will not require any cash to extinguish) and stockholders’ deficit of $15.6 million as of December 31, 2025; a net operating loss of $32.6 million and net cash used in operations of $6.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2025. Absent any other action, the Company will require additional liquidity to continue its operations for the next 12 months.
Current report
After evaluating these conditions, management concluded that its plans, when considered in aggregate, alleviate substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Those plans include: (i) cancellation of a previously contemplated $16 million intercompany note obligation arising from the acquisition of Star 26, which has been mutually agreed to be of no force or effect; (ii) the Company's existing unrestricted cash balance of approximately $7.0 million, sufficient to fund projected operating expenses of its portfolio companies through the look-forward period; (iii) an active Equity Line of Credit ("ELOC") with Esousa Holdings, LLC — legally binding, SEC-registered, and shareholder-approved — providing estimated monthly drawdown capacity of approximately $6.6 million, which exceeds the Company's projected annual operating cash needs; (iv) the Company's majority-owned subsidiaries, including Rimon Ltd. and Nimbus Robotics, which are cash-positive and require no capital support from the Company; (v) management's ongoing efforts to assist subsidiaries in securing or expanding bank credit facilities; (vi) the option to satisfy certain obligations through issuance of equity in lieu of cash; and (vii) the Company's demonstrated track record of capital markets execution, including the completion of PIPE transactions raising approximately $20 million in the prior twelve months.
Current report
Management has determined that its plans are probable of being effectively implemented and probable of mitigating the conditions described above, enabling continuation of the Company’s operations for the foreseeable future.
Current report
Our unprecedented transformation from financial technology to aerospace and defense lacks any operational track record and may completely fail.
Current report
We have recently completed our business model transformation. This transformation required or requires us to: divest our existing operations; acquire and integrate multiple defense companies; establish new regulatory compliance systems for ITAR, DFARS, and other regulations; obtain facility security clearances that typically take 12-18 months; recruit cleared personnel in a competitive market; and develop prime contractor relationships from scratch, all within a short timeframe.
Current report
We have never managed a defense program, never held a government contract, never obtained security clearances, and have no established relationships with prime defense contractors. The defense industry operates under fundamentally different business models, regulations, and customer requirements than financial services. There is no assurance that we will successfully execute this transformation or generate any returns from the substantial capital being deployed. Our complete lack of defense industry track record means investors are funding an entirely unproven strategy that may result in total loss of invested capital.
Current report
We are attempting to integrate multiple defense companies simultaneously without any aerospace and defense experience.
Current report
We have recently acquired Star 26, Tiltan and Nimbus, ITS, and are constantly pursuing other targets, all within a compressed timeframe and without any defense industry acquisition or integration experience. Each acquisition involves different countries (U.S., Israel, Europe), currencies, regulatory regimes, and business models. Managing simultaneous integrations of this magnitude typically requires extensive expertise, dedicated integration teams, and proven playbooks—none of which we possess.
Current report
Historical data shows that 70-90% of acquisitions fail to achieve projected synergies, and our complete lack of industry experience significantly increases this failure risk. We may discover post-closing that acquired technologies are obsolete, customer relationships are not transferable, key employees depart, or compliance violations trigger penalties. The complexity of simultaneous multi-jurisdictional defense acquisitions without relevant experience creates extreme execution risk.
Current report
Our Chief Executive Officer’s commitments to other companies may limit his ability to devote full-time attention to our business and could result in competition or conflicts of interest, which could adversely affect our operations and financial performance.
Current report
Menachem Shalom, our Chief Executive Officer, also serves as the Chief Executive Officer of Star 26, Motomova Inc., and Hold Me Ltd. These roles require Mr. Shalom to devote significant time and resources to the management and strategic direction of these other companies, which may reduce the time and attention he can dedicate to T3. This divided focus could impair our ability to execute our business strategy, particularly as we transition to a defense-focused company following the acquisition of Star 26. The competing demands on Mr. Shalom’s time may delay critical decision-making, hinder our ability to respond to market opportunities, or weaken our operational oversight, all of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current report
Furthermore, the businesses of Star 26, Motomova Inc., and Hold Me Ltd. may operate in sectors or pursue opportunities that compete with our current or future operations. While Star 26 is now our wholly-owned subsidiary, Motomova Inc. and Hold Me Ltd. are separate entities with potentially divergent interests. Mr. Shalom’s involvement in these companies could lead to conflicts of interest, including the allocation of business opportunities, resources, or strategic priorities that may favor these other entities over T3. Any such competition or conflicts could harm our competitive position, limit our growth prospects, and negatively impact the value of our securities.
Current report
We have divested our financial technology business and are now building a defense business, creating operational complexity and execution risk.
Current report
We are now focused on acquiring and integrating defense companies. This dual-track strategy has required and may continue to require management attention and resources across divergent activities, including: negotiating divestiture terms while managing acquisition integrations; maintaining legacy compliance obligations while implementing new defense regulations; supporting existing financial services customers during transition while pursuing defense customers; and managing employee uncertainty across both divesting and acquiring operations. The complexity of completing divestitures and acquisitions within a short timeframe significantly increases execution risk and the potential for value destruction in both transactions.
Current report
Our pivot from fintech to the defense sector exposes us to new operational, regulatory, and market risks for which we have limited prior experience.
Current report
We have successfully transitioned our business focus from financial technology services to the distribution of advanced defense technologies, primarily through exclusive distribution agreements with Israeli-based companies. This pivot represents a significant shift in our operations, requiring us to develop new expertise in the defense and homeland security markets, including sales, marketing, compliance, and supply chain management tailored to highly regulated industries. Our management team and employees have limited experience in the defense sector, which may result in challenges adapting to industry-specific practices, customer requirements, and competitive dynamics. Failure to effectively manage this transition could lead to operational inefficiencies, delays in fulfilling distribution obligations, or inability to capitalize on market opportunities, adversely affecting our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current report
We have an exclusive distribution agreement with an Israeli supplier, and any termination, non-renewal, or disruption in this relationship could severely impact our operations.
Current report
In August 2025 we executed an exclusive U.S. distribution agreement with BladeRanger Ltd. for drone payload systems. This agreement grants us rights limited to the U.S. defense and homeland security markets and imposes minimum purchase or revenue commitments (e.g., 5, 10, and 15 payloads in Years 1-3). Failure to meet these commitments could result in termination of the agreement, loss of exclusivity, or penalties, forcing us to seek alternative suppliers on less favorable terms or cease operations in these product lines. Any disputes with our suppliers, changes in their business strategies, or external factors affecting their ability to supply products (such as production delays or quality issues) could disrupt our inventory, delay deliveries to customers, and lead to lost revenue or reputational damage.
Current report
Our minimum purchase and revenue commitments under the BladeRanger distribution agreement creates financial risks, including potential cash flow strains and inventory overhang.
Current report
The BladeRanger agreement requires us to meet escalating minimum commitments, starting at 5 payloads in Year 1 and increasing thereafter. If market demand falls short—due to economic downturns, technological shifts, or competitive pressures—we may be forced to purchase excess inventory or incur shortfall penalties, straining our liquidity and working capital. Excess inventory could lead to obsolescence write-offs if products become outdated before sale. Our ability to finance these commitments depends on generating sufficient cash flows or accessing capital markets, and failure to do so could lead to defaults, termination of agreements, or dilution of shareholder equity through additional financing.
Current report
We have entered into an exclusive distribution agreement with minimum purchase and revenue commitments that we may be unable to meet, which could result in the loss of exclusivity or termination of these agreements, materially harming our business and financial condition.
Current report
Our exclusive distribution agreement with BladeRanger Ltd. requires us to achieve substantial minimum purchase targets. Specifically, we must purchase minimum quantities of drone payloads from BladeRanger (5 units in Year 1, 10 units in Year 2, and 15 units in Year 3). If we fail to meet these commitments, we may lose our exclusive distribution rights or face agreement termination, which would adversely impact our defense sector strategy.
Current report
During our transformation period, we are building new technology infrastructure to support defense operations and have divested our legacy financial technology systems. Our reputation and ability to grow our defense business depends on our ability to develop and maintain systems that meet defense industry standards for reliability, scalability, and performance, including compliance with DFARS cybersecurity requirements and maintaining systems capable of handling classified information processing once we obtain necessary clearances. The proper functioning of our future defense products and services will depend on secure networks, encrypted communications, and systems that meet government security standards.
Current report
As we build our defense business, we will depend on relationships with prime defense contractors, specialized subcontractors, and government-approved suppliers. We will depend on various third-party partners including prime contractors who control access to major defense programs, cleared facilities for classified work, and specialized defense supply chains.
Current report
To participate in defense programs, we must establish relationships with prime contractors and other defense companies for teaming agreements, joint ventures, and subcontracting opportunities. Major primes like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Raytheon control the majority of defense spending and often prefer working with established partners. Our ability to win defense contracts depends on our ability to establish these critical relationships despite our lack of track record.
Current report
Also, critical aspects of our defense technology will rely on third-party technologies, including specialized defense components, ITAR-controlled technologies, and government-furnished equipment. Our lack of established relationships in the defense industry and foreign ownership structure may be an impediment to our ability to establish partnerships with major defense contractors. Should potential partners refuse to work with us, we would be at risk of being unable to participate in major defense programs.
Current report
Some third parties that provide services to the defense industry may have significant market power and be able to impose unfavorable terms on new entrants like us. In addition, there can be no assurance that third parties will be willing to work with us on acceptable terms, or at all. If we cannot establish necessary partnerships, we may be unable to compete for defense contracts, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Current report
We lack the facility security clearances and cleared personnel required for 90% of U.S. defense contracts.
Current report
Approximately 90% of U.S. defense contracts require facility security clearances that we completely lack. Obtaining clearances involves: 12-18 month investigation periods; extensive ownership documentation complicated by our foreign ties; sophisticated security system implementation; designation of cleared U.S. citizen executives; and ongoing compliance costs exceeding $500,000 annually. Our foreign ownership through Israeli subsidiaries may preclude certain clearance levels entirely or require restrictive FOCI mitigation agreements. Without clearances, we are excluded from classified programs, sole-source contracts, prime contractor opportunities, and the majority of defense spending.
Current report
** Fixed-price defense contracts expose us to unlimited losses without cost estimation experience.**
Current report
The majority of defense contracts are fixed-price, meaning we bear all risk of cost overruns. We have zero experience estimating defense program costs, which require sophisticated models accounting for technical complexity, regulatory compliance, supply chain volatility, labor escalation, and schedule delays. Industry data shows 65% of major defense programs experience cost overruns exceeding 25%. Our lack of historical data, experienced estimators, and program management expertise virtually guarantees significant losses. A single major fixed-price contract loss could exceed our entire equity base.
Current report
Export control violations could result in criminal prosecution and permanent debarment.
Current report
Operating in defense requires strict ITAR and EAR compliance, where violations carry criminal penalties, fines up to $1 million per violation, and permanent debarment. We lack export compliance programs, technology control plans, licensing expertise, deemed export procedures, and supply chain compliance systems. Our Israeli operations create immediate deemed export risks. Recent enforcement actions include: Raytheon paying $100 million, multiple executive criminal convictions, and permanent debarments. Our lack of compliance infrastructure creates extreme risk of violations that could destroy our business.
Current report
We face overwhelming competition from established prime contractors.
Current report
The aerospace and defense industry is dominated by companies like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Raytheon with 100+ year histories, billions in R&D budgets, thousands of cleared personnel, established customer relationships, and political influence. These contractors win 80% of defense dollars through evaluation criteria favoring past performance we don’t have. As a new entrant with zero track record, we face insurmountable disadvantages in competing for contracts. Small defense companies have failure rates exceeding 60% within five years.
Current report
We must comply with complex defense regulations without any infrastructure.
Current report
Defense operations require compliance with ITAR, DFARS, CMMC, FAR, CAS, and other regulations for which we have zero infrastructure or expertise. Implementation costs typically exceed $3-5 million in year one. Common violations include inadvertent technical discussions, missing flow-down clauses, and inadequate cybersecurity. Recent enforcement: Raytheon paid $950 million, Boeing suspended from contracts. Our lack of compliance infrastructure virtually guarantees violations resulting in suspension or debarment.
Showing the first 40 of 120 passages. Open the source sections for the rest.
Removed paragraphs (139)
Previous report
Failure to complete the acquisition of Star may result in paying a termination fee to Star and could harm our common stock price and future business and operations.
Previous report
If the acquisition of Star is not completed, we are subject to the following risks:
Previous report
If the Star Agreement is terminated and the board of directors of the Company determines to seek another business combination, there can be no assurance that we will be able to find another third party to transact a business combination with, yielding comparable or greater benefits.
Previous report
If the conditions to the Star Agreement are not satisfied or waived, the acquisition may not occur.
Previous report
Even if the Star acquisition is approved by the stockholders of the Company, specified conditions must be satisfied or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, waived to complete the acquisition. These conditions are set forth in the Star Agreement. We cannot assure you that all of the conditions to the consummation of the acquisition will be satisfied or waived. If the conditions are not satisfied or waived, the acquisition may not occur or the closing may be delayed.
Previous report
We have a limited operating history in an evolving and highly volatile industry, which makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and may increase the risk that we will not be successful.
Previous report
Nukkleus, the wholly owned operating subsidiary, was formed in 2013 and since then our business model has continued to evolve. In 2021, we acquired a controlling interest in Match. In 2019, our Digital RFQ indirect subsidiary, and wholly owned subsidiary of Match, began to operate a payment processing business partly using blockchain technology. The comparability of our results in prior quarterly or annual periods should not be viewed as an indication of future performance. The “blockchain technology” used by Digital RFQ in its payment processing business and referred to throughout this annual report is intended to refer to stablecoins operated on the Bitcoin, Ethereum and Tron networks, or such other blockchain networks as Digital RFQ may determine to be reliable and well established in the financial services industry, at an advanced stage and fully tested and collaterialized based on certain criteria summarized below. The blockchain networks used by Digital RFQ in its payment processing business are maintained and operated by third parties.
Previous report
Because Digital RFQ makes use of blockchain technology only to process payments and does not hold digital assets, the criteria for the adoption and use of any blockchain network may differ from those of investors in stablecoins. Digital RFQ evaluates each blockchain and/or stablecoin on a daily and transaction-by-transaction basis, to minimize any risk associated with the blockchain or stablecoin and to ensure that Digital RFQ can reliably complete the transaction in and out of the stablecoin quickly to minimize such risk. Digital RFQ determines that a blockchain or stablecoin is suitable for use in its payment processing services by assessing the following criteria:
Previous report
To determine whether any blockchain technology meets Digital RFQ’s requirements and is a suitable candidate for use in Digital RFQ’s payment processing business, we assess the following criteria. We monitor these criteria for each blockchain or stablecoin we use regularly on an ongoing basis:
Previous report
However, because Digital RFQ makes use of blockchain technology only to process payments, and does not hold digital assets, we are able to constantly monitor the status of any blockchain network or stablecoin before, during and after a payment is processed, and determine which of the available blockchain networks is suitable for a particular transaction. We therefore do not believe we are exposed to material risks associated with holding stablecoins or other digital assets. Furthermore, we do not use stablecoins of an algorithmic nature, and in the event that we determine any particular stablecoin presents a threat or risk to the security of our business, customers or the transactions we process, we promptly move to another stablecoin network. We do not accept payment in digital assets and do not hold digital assets for investment or offer digital wallet services.
Previous report
Because we have a limited history operating our business at its current scale and scope, it is difficult to evaluate our current business and future prospects, including our ability to plan for and model future growth. For example, recently launched services require substantial resources and there is no guarantee that such expenditures will result in profit or growth of our business. The rapidly evolving nature of the market in which we operate, substantial uncertainty concerning how these markets may develop, and other economic factors beyond our control, reduces our ability to accurately forecast quarterly or annual revenue. Failure to manage our current and future growth effectively could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Previous report
We face intense and increasing competition and, if we do not compete effectively, our competitive positioning and our operating results will be harmed.
Previous report
We operate in a rapidly changing and highly competitive industry, and our results of operations and future prospects depend on, among other things:
Previous report
Despite the regulatory barriers to enter the markets we serve, we expect our competition to continue to increase. In addition to established enterprises, we may also face competition from early-stage companies attempting to capitalize on the same, or similar, opportunities as we are. Some of our current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, particularly with respect to our digital financial services products, significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources, and a larger customer base than we do. This allows them, among others, to potentially offer more competitive pricing or other terms or features, a broader range of digital financial products, or a more specialized set of specific products or services, as well as respond more quickly than we can to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer preferences.
Previous report
Our existing or future competitors may develop products or services that are similar to our products and services or that achieve greater market acceptance than our products and services. This could attract new customers away from our services and reduce our market share in the future. Additionally, when new competitors seek to enter our markets, or when existing market participants seek to increase their market share, these competitors sometimes undercut, or otherwise exert pressure on, the pricing terms prevalent in that market, which could adversely affect our market share and/or ability to capitalize on new market opportunities.
Previous report
Because we do not currently control a bank or a bank holding company, we may be subject to regulation by a variety of state, federal and international regulators across our products and services and we rely on third-party banks to provide payment-processing services to our customers. This regulation by federal, state and international authorities increases our compliance costs, as we navigate multiple regimes with different examination schedules and processes and varying disclosure requirements.
Previous report
Our current and future business prospects demand that we act to meet these competitive challenges but, in doing so, our revenue and results of operations could be adversely affected if we, for example, increase marketing expenditures or make other expenditures. All of the foregoing factors and events could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and future prospects.
Previous report
Our reputation and ability to grow our business depends on our ability to operate our service at high levels of reliability, scalability, and performance, including the ability to process and monitor, on a daily basis, a large number of transactions that occur at high volume and frequencies across multiple systems. The proper functioning of our products and services, the ability of our customers to make and receive payments, and our ability to operate at a high level, are dependent on our ability to access the blockchain networks underlying our Platforms and other supported blockchain-based products and technology, for which access is dependent on our systems’ ability to access the internet. Further, the successful and continued operations of such blockchain networks will depend on a network of computers, miners, or validators, and their continued operations, all of which may be impacted by service interruptions.
Previous report
We depend on various third-party partners and payment systems. More specifically, our offering of payments and transfer services depends on our ability to offer blockchain transaction processing, Automated Clearing House network (“ACH”) transaction processing, wire transfer and other payment processing services to our customers.
Previous report
In order to provide such transaction processing services, we have established relationships with financial institutions whereby such financial institutions provide us with access into the relevant payment networks (e.g., the card networks and the ACH). Our ability to offer our core services depends on our ability to maintain existing relationships with financial institutions and to seek out and obtain new such relationships.
Previous report
Also, critical aspects of our technology rely on third-party technologies, including blockchain networks. Our regulatory status, the status of our Platforms and of blockchain technologies more generally, may be an impediment to our ability to receive or obtain services from financial institutions. Should our partners cease providing access to such technologies and networks, we would be at risk of being unable to provide the payment processing services that are core to our customer offering.
Previous report
Some third parties that provide services to us may have or gain market power and be able to increase their prices to us without competitive constraint. In addition, there can be no assurance that third parties that provide services directly to us will continue to do so on acceptable terms, or at all, or will not suffer from outages to their systems. If any third parties were to stop providing services to us on acceptable terms, we may be unable to procure alternatives from other third parties in a timely and efficient manner and on acceptable terms, or at all, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Previous report
We are subject to credit risks in respect of counterparties, including financial institutions.
Previous report
We are and will continue to be subject to the risk of actual or perceived deterioration of the commercial and financial soundness, or perceived soundness, of other financial institutions, in particular in relation to receivables from financial institutions regarding settled payment transactions, and cash and cash-equivalents held at financial institutions. One institution defaulting, failing a stress test or requiring mail-in by its shareholders and/or creditors and/or bail-out by a government could lead to significant liquidity problems and losses or defaults by other institutions. Even the perceived lack of creditworthiness of, or questions about, a counterparty or major financial institution may lead to market-wide liquidity problems and losses or defaults by financial institutions on which we have an exposure. This risk resulting from the interdependence on financial institutions is sometimes referred to as “systemic risk” and may adversely affect financial intermediaries, such as industry payment systems and banks, with whom we interact on a daily basis. Systemic risk, particularly within the United States, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise new funding and on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Previous report
Our banking relationships for transaction processing are concentrated in a small number of partners.
Previous report
We use a small number of banks and financial institutions as banking services providers. Should our relationships with such banks and financial institutions deteriorate, we may be limited in our ability to offer the payment processing services that are core to our offerings. While we have multiple such banking partners and are working to diversify these relationships further, we do not have written agreements with such banks and financial institutions and there remains some risk that, in the short term, our ability to provide payment processing services may be affected by any interruption in the banking services we receive. As such, should our relationships with our existing banking and financial institution partners deteriorate or if such banks and financial institutions make a decision to discontinue the services they provide us, we could lose our ability to process payments, financial transfers and other transactions. In such an event, the value of our services would be negatively impacted and our institutional investor clients could be forced to process smaller transaction volume with us or to cease transaction processing through us entirely.
Previous report
Certain large customers provide a significant share of our revenue and the termination of such agreements or reduction in business with such customers could harm our business. If we lose or are unable to renew these and other marketplace and enterprise client contracts at favorable terms, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Previous report
The largest customer of our FX operations which is no longer operating, TCM, provided significant contribution to our revenue. For the year ended September 30, 2024, our largest customer, TCM, represented 81.1% of our revenue. The agreement with TCM has been terminated which could potentially have an adverse affect on our operations.
Previous report
Our products and services may be exploited to facilitate illegal activity such as fraud, money laundering, gambling, tax evasion, and scams. If any of our customers use our products or services to further such illegal activities, we could be subject to liability and our business could be adversely affected. Our efforts to detect and monitor such transactions for compliance with law may require significant costs, and our failure to effectively deal with bad, fraudulent or fictitious transactions and material internal or external fraud could negatively impact our business.
Previous report
We may in the future be subject to liability for illegal transactions, including fraudulent payments initiated by our customers, money laundering, gambling, tax evasion, and scams. Examples of fraud include when a party knowingly uses stolen or otherwise illicitly acquired access information to a transaction. In addition, we are subject to the risk that our employees, counterparties or third-party service providers commit fraudulent activity against us or our customers.
Previous report
Criminals are using increasingly sophisticated methods to engage in illegal activities such as counterfeiting, account takeover and fraud. It is possible that incidents of fraud could increase in the future. The use of our products or services for illegal or improper purposes could subject us to claims, individual and class action lawsuits, and government and regulatory investigations, prosecutions, enforcement actions, inquiries, or requests that could result in liability and reputational harm for us. In addition, our efforts to detect and monitor such transactions for compliance with law may require significant costs.
Previous report
Moreover, certain activities that may be legal in one jurisdiction may be illegal in another jurisdiction, and certain activities that are at one time legal may in the future be deemed illegal in the same jurisdiction. As a result, there is significant uncertainty and cost associated with detecting and monitoring transactions for compliance with local laws. In the event that a customer is found responsible for intentionally or inadvertently violating the laws in any jurisdiction, we may be subject to governmental inquiries, enforcement actions, prosecuted, or otherwise held secondarily liable for aiding or facilitating such activities. Changes in law have also increased the penalties for money transmitters, e-money issuers, broker-dealers and alternative trading systems for certain illegal activities, and government authorities may consider increased or additional penalties from time to time. Owners of intellectual property rights or government authorities may seek to bring legal action against us for involvement in the sale of infringing or allegedly infringing items. Any threatened or resulting claims could result in reputational harm, and any resulting liabilities, loss of transaction volume, or increased costs could harm our business.
Previous report
Moreover, while fiat currencies can be used to facilitate illegal activities, blockchain technologies, such those used in our Platforms are relatively new and, in many jurisdictions, may be lightly regulated or largely unregulated. Many blockchains have characteristics such as the speed with which digital asset transactions can be conducted, the ability to conduct transactions without the involvement of regulated intermediaries, the ability to engage in transactions across multiple jurisdictions, the irreversible nature of certain blockchain transactions, and encryption technology that anonymizes these transactions, which may make blockchain technology susceptible to use in illegal activity.
Previous report
U.S. federal and state and foreign regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies, such as the Department of Justice, the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, The Federal Trade Commission, the IRS and various state securities and financial regulators investigate, issue subpoenas and civil investigative demands, and take legal action against persons and entities alleged to be engaged in fraudulent schemes or other illicit activity involving blockchain technologies.
Previous report
While we believe that our risk management and compliance framework is designed to detect significant illicit activities conducted by our potential or existing customers, we cannot ensure that we will be able to detect all illegal activity on our systems. If any of our customers use our products and services to further such illegal activities, our business could be adversely affected. We have not detected any material illicit activities in the past.
Previous report
Our risk management and compliance framework is key to our operations and is designed to address Anti Money Laundering (“AML”) and Counter Terrorist Finance (“CTF”) considerations consistent with our authorization by the Financial Conduct Authority as an Electronic Money Directive Agent, among others. The key elements of the regulatory framework that impact us include, but are not limited to, the following U.K. legislation:
Previous report
The primary objectives in establishing our AML/CTF policy are to:
Previous report
DigitalRFQ’s risk-based approach to AML/CTF is driven by the clients risk rating. DigitalRFQ operates a three-tiered classification of a potential client relationship:
Showing the first 40 of 139 passages. Open the source sections for the rest.
Reworded paragraphs (28)
Previous wording
In our recent acquisitions, including our acquisition of Match and our proposed acqisition of Star, our business has become increasingly complex by expanding the services we offer to include financial services and payment processing services. To effectively manage and capitalize on our growth, we must continue to expand our information technology and financial, operating, and administrative systems and controls, and continue to manage headcount, capital, and processes efficiently. Our continued growth could strain our existing resources, and we could experience ongoing operating difficulties in managing our business as it expands across numerous jurisdictions, including difficulties in hiring, training, and managing an employee base. Failure to scale and preserve our company culture with growth could harm our future success, including our ability to retain and recruit personnel and to effectively focus on and pursue our corporate objectives. If we do not adapt to meet these evolving challenges, or if our management team does not effectively scale with our growth, we may experience erosion to our brand, the quality of our products and services may suffer, and our company culture may be harmed. Moreover, the failure of our systems and processes could undermine our ability to provide accurate, timely, and reliable reports on our financial and operating results, including the financial statements provided herein, and could impact the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. In addition, our systems and processes may not prevent or detect all errors, omissions, or fraud, though we have experienced no such material errors, omissions or fraud in the past. For example, our employees may fail to identify transaction errors or fraudulent information provided by our customers. Any of the foregoing operational failures could lead to noncompliance with laws, loss of operating licenses or other authorizations, or loss of bank relationships that could substantially impair or even suspend company operations.
Current wording
In our recent acquisitions, including our acquisitions of Star 26, Tiltan and Nimbus, our business has become increasingly complex. To effectively manage and capitalize on our growth, we must continue to expand our information technology and financial, operating, and administrative systems and controls, and continue to manage headcount, capital, and processes efficiently. Our continued growth could strain our existing resources, and we could experience ongoing operating difficulties in managing our business as it expands, including difficulties in hiring, training, and managing an employee base. Failure to scale could harm our future success, including our ability to retain and recruit personnel and to effectively focus on and pursue our corporate objectives. If we do not adapt to meet these evolving challenges, or if our management team does not effectively scale with our growth, we may experience erosion to our reputation and the integration of our products and services. Moreover, the failure of our systems and processes could undermine our ability to provide accurate, timely, and reliable reports on our financial and operating results, including the financial statements provided herein, and could impact the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. In addition, our systems and processes may not prevent or detect all errors, omissions, or fraud, though we have experienced no such material errors, omissions or fraud in the past. Any of the foregoing operational failures could lead to noncompliance with laws, loss of revenues, licenses or other government authorizations, or loss of relationships that could substantially impair or even suspend company operations.
Previous wording
As a remote-first company, we are subject to heightened operational and cybersecurity risks.
Current wording
We are subject to heightened operational and cybersecurity risks.
Previous wording
As a remote-first company, we are subject to heightened operational and cybersecurity risks. We are a remote-first company, meaning that for all existing roles many of our employees work from their homes or other non-company dwellings. For example, technologies in our employees’ and service providers’ homes and shared office spaces may not be as robust and could cause the networks, information systems, applications, and other tools available to employees and service providers to be more limited or less reliable. Further, the security systems in place at our employees’ and service providers’ homes and shared office spaces may be less secure than those used in corporate offices, and while we have implemented technical and administrative safeguards to help protect our systems as our employees and service providers work from home, we may be subject to increased cybersecurity risk which could expose us to risks of data or financial loss, and could disrupt our business operations. There is no guarantee that the data security and privacy safeguards we have put in place will be completely effective or that we will not encounter risks associated with employees and service providers accessing company data and systems remotely. We also face challenges due to the need to operate with a remote workforce and are addressing so to minimize the impact on our ability to operate.
Current wording
We are subject to heightened operational and cybersecurity risks. Many of our employees work from their homes or other non-company dwellings. Technologies in our employees’ and service providers’ homes and shared office spaces may not be as robust and could cause the networks, information systems, applications, and other tools available to employees and service providers to be more limited or less reliable. Further, the security systems in place at our employees’ and service providers’ homes and shared office spaces may be less secure than those used in corporate offices, and while we have implemented technical and administrative safeguards to help protect our systems when our employees and service providers work from home, we may be subject to increased cybersecurity risk which could expose us to risks of data or financial loss, and could disrupt our business operations. There is no guarantee that the data security and privacy safeguards we have put in place will be completely effective or that we will not encounter risks associated with employees and service providers accessing company data and systems remotely.
Previous wording
Our systems, the systems of our third-party service providers and partners, and certain blockchain networks, have experienced from time to time and may experience in the future service interruptions or degradation because of hardware and software defects or malfunctions, distributed denial-of-service and other cyberattacks, insider threats, break-ins, sabotage, human error, vandalism, earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, fires, and other natural disasters, power losses, disruptions in telecommunications services, fraud, military or political conflicts, terrorist attacks, computer viruses or other malware, or other events. In addition, extraordinary site usage could cause our computer systems to operate at an unacceptably slow speed or even fail. Some of our systems, including systems of companies we have acquired, or the systems of our third-party service providers and partners are not fully redundant, and our or their disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient for all possible outcomes or events.
Current wording
Our systems, the systems of our third-party service providers and partners, and defense networks we will interact with, have experienced from time to time and may experience in the future service interruptions or degradation because of hardware and software defects or malfunctions, distributed denial-of-service and other cyberattacks, insider threats, break-ins, sabotage, human error, vandalism, earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, fires, and other natural disasters, power losses, disruptions in telecommunications services, fraud, military or political conflicts, terrorist attacks, computer viruses or other malware, or other events. In addition, extraordinary site usage could cause our computer systems to operate at an unacceptably slow speed or even fail. Some of our systems, particularly those we have acquired from Star 26 and Tiltan, or the systems of our third-party service providers and partners are not fully redundant, and our or their disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient for all possible outcomes or events.
Previous wording
If any of our systems, or those of our third-party service providers, are disrupted for any reason, our products and services may fail, resulting in unanticipated disruptions, slower response times and delays in our services, including our customers’ payments through our Platforms. This could lead to failed or unauthorized payments, incomplete or inaccurate accounting, loss of customer information, increased demand on limited customer support resources, customer claims, and complaints with regulatory organizations, lawsuits, or enforcement actions.
Current wording
If any of our systems, or those of our third-party service providers, are disrupted for any reason, our defense products and services may fail, resulting in unanticipated disruptions, slower response times and delays in our services. For defense contracts, system failures could result in program delays, cost overruns, performance penalties, or contract terminations. This could lead to missed contract milestones, incomplete or inaccurate program reporting, loss of sensitive government information, increased demand on limited program management resources, government claims, and complaints with regulatory organizations, lawsuits, or enforcement actions. A prolonged interruption in the availability or reduction in the availability, speed, or functionality of our products and services could harm our business. Frequent or persistent interruptions in our services could cause current or potential defense customers or partners to believe that our systems are unreliable, leading them to select other contractors or to avoid or reduce the use of our products and services, and could permanently harm our reputation and brands in the defense community. Moreover, to the extent that any system failure or similar event results in damages to our customers or their programs, these customers or the government could seek significant compensation or contractual penalties from us for their losses, and those claims, even if unsuccessful, are likely to be time-consuming and costly for us to address. Problems with the reliability or security of our systems would harm our reputation, and damage to our reputation and the cost of remedying these problems could negatively affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. In addition, we are continually developing our information systems and technologies to meet defense industry requirements. Implementation of new systems and technologies is complex, expensive, time-consuming, and may not be successful. If we fail to timely and successfully implement new information systems and technologies, or improvements or upgrades to existing information systems and technologies, or if such systems and technologies do not operate as intended, it could have an adverse impact on our business, internal controls (including internal controls over financial reporting), operating results, and financial condition. Because we will be subject to defense regulation in multiple jurisdictions, frequent or persistent interruptions could also lead to regulatory scrutiny, significant fines and penalties, potential debarment, and mandatory and costly changes to our business practices, and ultimately could cause us to lose facility security clearances or government contracts that we need to operate, or prevent or delay us from obtaining additional clearances and contracts that may be required for our business.
Previous wording
Third parties upon which we rely to process transactions may refuse to process transactions adequately, may breach their agreements with us, refuse to renew agreements on commercially reasonable terms, take actions that degrade the functionality of our services, impose additional costs or requirements on us, or give preferential treatment to competitive services or suffer outages in their systems, any of which could disrupt our operations and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Current wording
Third parties upon which we rely for defense programs may refuse to partner with us, may breach their agreements with us, refuse to enter into agreements on commercially reasonable terms, take actions that degrade the functionality of our services, impose additional costs or requirements on us, or give preferential treatment to established defense contractors, any of which could prevent us from competing effectively and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Previous wording
There is no assurance that we will maintain profitability or that our revenue and business models will be successful.
Current wording
There is no assurance that we will achieve and maintain profitability or that our revenue and business models will be successful.
Previous wording
We are subject to complex income and non-income tax laws and regulations in the United States and a variety of foreign jurisdictions. Both the United States and foreign jurisdictions may revise corporate income tax and other non-income tax laws which could impact the amount of tax due in such jurisdiction.
Current wording
We are subject to complex income and non-income tax laws and regulations in the United States and a variety of foreign jurisdictions. Our Israeli subsidiaries and cross-border defense operations create particular complexity. Both the United States and foreign jurisdictions may revise corporate income tax and other non-income tax laws which could impact the amount of tax due in such jurisdiction.
Previous wording
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, as provided in the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Nukkleus — Critical Accounting Policies”. The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities, and equity, and the amount of revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Significant estimates and judgments involve the identification of performance obligations in revenue recognition, evaluation of tax positions, inter-company transactions, and the valuation of stock-based awards and the fiat reserves we hold, among others. Our operating results may be adversely affected if our assumptions change or if actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our operating results to fall below the expectations of analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in the trading price of Nukkleus Common Stock.
Current wording
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, as provided in the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of T3 — Critical Accounting Policies”. The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities, and equity, and the amount of revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Significant estimates and judgments involve the identification of performance obligations in revenue recognition, particularly for defense contracts with multiple deliverables and milestone payments, evaluation of tax positions, inter-company transactions, and the valuation of stock-based awards, among others. Defense contracts require particular judgment in percentage-of-completion accounting and estimating costs to complete. Our operating results may be adversely affected if our assumptions change or if actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our operating results to fall below the expectations of analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in the trading price of our Common Stock.
Previous wording
The accounting rules and regulations that we must comply with are complex and subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC, and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported financial results and may even affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement or effectiveness of a change. Recent actions and public comments from the FASB and the SEC have focused on the integrity of financial reporting and internal controls. In addition, many companies’ accounting policies are being subject to heightened scrutiny by regulators and the public.
Current wording
The accounting rules and regulations that we must comply with are complex and subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC, and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. As we transition to defense contracting, we must adopt government cost accounting standards and comply with DCAA requirements, which are significantly different from our previous financial services accounting. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported financial results and may even affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement or effectiveness of a change. Recent actions and public comments from the FASB and the SEC have focused on the integrity of financial reporting and internal controls. In addition, many companies’ accounting policies are being subject to heightened scrutiny by regulators and the public.
Previous wording
There remains uncertainty on how companies can account for blockchain transactions, value, and related revenue. Uncertainties in or changes to regulatory or financial accounting standards could result in the need to change our accounting methods, restate our financial statements or impair our ability to provide timely and accurate financial information, which could adversely affect our financial statements, result in a loss of investor confidence, and more generally impact our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Current wording
There remains uncertainty on how companies transitioning between industries should account for discontinued operations, acquisition-related costs, and transformation expenses. Uncertainties in or changes to regulatory or financial accounting standards could result in the need to change our accounting methods, restate our financial statements or impair our ability to provide timely and accurate financial information, which could adversely affect our financial statements, result in a loss of investor confidence, and more generally impact our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Previous wording
Additional financing may not be available on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we incur additional debt, the debt holders would have rights senior to holders of Nukkleus’s commons stock to make claims on our assets, and the terms of any debt could restrict our operations.
Current wording
Additional financing may not be available on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we incur additional debt, the debt holders would have rights senior to holders of our Common Stock to make claims on our assets, and the terms of any debt could restrict our operations.
Previous wording
We operate in a relatively new industry that is not widely understood and requires highly skilled and technical personnel. We believe that our future success is highly dependent on the talents and contributions of our senior management team, including Menachem Shalom, our Chief Executive Officer and a director and other key service providers across finance, compliance, legal, talent and marketing.
Current wording
We operate in an industry that requires highly skilled and technical personnel. We believe that our future success is highly dependent on the talents and contributions of our senior management team, including Menachem Shalom, our Chief Executive Officer and a director and other key service providers across finance, compliance, legal, talent and marketing.
Previous wording
Our business involves the collection, storage, processing and transmission of confidential information, customer, employee, service provider and other personal data, as well as information required to access customer assets. We have built our reputation on the premise that our products and services offer customers a secure way to accept and make payments and store value. As a result, any actual or perceived security breach of us or our third-party partners may:
Current wording
As we transition to the defense industry, we will handle highly sensitive defense-related data, technical specifications, and potentially classified information once we obtain necessary clearances. Our business will involve the collection, storage, processing and transmission of confidential information, defense contractor data, employee, service provider and other personal data, as well as information required to support defense programs. For our defense operations, we must build our reputation on the premise that our systems meet stringent defense industry security requirements including CMMC, DFARS, and NIST standards. As a result, any actual or perceived security breach of us or our third-party partners may:
Previous wording
Further, any actual or perceived breach or cybersecurity attack directed at other financial institutions or blockchain companies, whether or not we are directly impacted, could lead to a general loss of customer confidence in the use of technology to conduct financial transactions, which could negatively impact us including the market perception of the effectiveness of our security measures and technology infrastructure.
Current wording
Further, any actual or perceived breach or cybersecurity attack directed at other defense contractors or government systems, whether or not we are directly impacted, could lead to a general loss of customer confidence in our ability to protect sensitive defense information, which could negatively impact us including the market perception of the effectiveness of our security measures and technology infrastructure.
Previous wording
An increasing number of organizations, including large businesses, technology companies and financial institutions, as well as government institutions, have disclosed breaches of their information security systems, some of which have involved sophisticated and highly targeted attacks, including on their websites, mobile applications, and infrastructure. Attacks upon systems across a variety of industries, including the payment processing, forex and CFD industry, are increasing in their frequency, persistence, and sophistication, and, in many cases, are being conducted by sophisticated, well-funded, and organized groups and individuals, including state actors. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized, improper, or illegal access to systems and information (including customers’ personal data and digital assets), disable or degrade services, or sabotage systems are constantly evolving, may be difficult to detect quickly, and often are not recognized or detected until after they have been launched against a target. These attacks may occur on our systems or those of our third-party service providers or partners. Certain types of cyberattacks could harm us even if our systems are left undisturbed. For example, attacks may be designed to deceive employees and service providers into releasing control of our systems to a hacker, while others may aim to introduce computer viruses or malware into our systems with a view to stealing confidential or proprietary data. Additionally, certain threats are designed to remain dormant or undetectable until launched against a target and we may not be able to implement adequate preventative measures.
Current wording
An increasing number of organizations, including defense contractors, government agencies, and critical infrastructure providers, have disclosed breaches of their information security systems, some of which have involved sophisticated and highly targeted attacks, including on their websites, classified networks, and infrastructure. Attacks upon systems across the defense industry are increasing in their frequency, persistence, and sophistication, and, in many cases, are being conducted by sophisticated, well-funded, and organized groups and individuals, including nation-state actors specifically targeting defense contractors. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized, improper, or illegal access to systems and information (including customers’ personal data and digital assets), disable or degrade services, or sabotage systems are constantly evolving, may be difficult to detect quickly, and often are not recognized or detected until after they have been launched against a target. These attacks may occur on our systems or those of our third-party service providers or partners. Certain types of cyberattacks could harm us even if our systems are left undisturbed. For example, attacks may be designed to deceive employees and service providers into releasing control of our systems to a hacker, while others may aim to introduce computer viruses or malware into our systems with a view to stealing confidential or proprietary data. Additionally, certain threats are designed to remain dormant or undetectable until launched against a target and we may not be able to implement adequate preventative measures.
Previous wording
Although we do not have a past history of material security breaches or cyberattacks, and do not believe we are a target of such breaches or attacks, we have developed systems and processes designed to protect the data we manage, prevent data loss and other security breaches, effectively respond to known and potential risks. We expect to continue to expend significant resources to bolster these protections, but there can be no assurance that these security measures will provide absolute security or prevent breaches or attacks. Threats can come from a variety of sources, including criminal hackers, hacktivists, state-sponsored intrusions, industrial espionage, and insiders. Certain threat actors may be supported by significant financial and technological resources, making them even more sophisticated and difficult to detect. As a result, our costs and the resources we devote to protecting against these advanced threats and their consequences may increase over time.
Current wording
Although we do not have a past history of material security breaches or cyberattacks, as we enter the defense industry we will become a more attractive target for state-sponsored attacks. We are developing systems and processes designed to protect the data we manage, prevent data loss and other security breaches, and meet defense industry cybersecurity requirements. We expect to continue to expend significant resources to bolster these protections, but there can be no assurance that these security measures will provide absolute security or prevent breaches or attacks. Threats can come from a variety of sources, including criminal hackers, hacktivists, state-sponsored intrusions, industrial espionage, and insiders. In the defense industry, certain threat actors are supported by significant financial and technological resources, making them even more sophisticated and difficult to detect. As a result, our costs and the resources we devote to protecting against these advanced threats and their consequences will increase over time.
Previous wording
Although we maintain insurance coverage that we believe is adequate for our business, it may be insufficient to protect us against all losses and costs stemming from security breaches, cyberattacks, and other types of unlawful activity, or any resulting disruptions from such events. Outages and disruptions of our systems, including any caused by cyberattacks, may harm our reputation and our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Current wording
Although we maintain insurance coverage that we believe is adequate for our business, it may be insufficient to protect us against all losses and costs stemming from security breaches, cyberattacks, and other types of unlawful activity, or any resulting disruptions from such events. Defense-specific cyber insurance is particularly expensive and may exclude nation-state attacks. Outages and disruptions of our systems, including any caused by cyberattacks, may harm our reputation and our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Previous wording
Natural disasters or other catastrophic events may also cause damage or disruption to our operations, international commerce, and the global economy, and could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition. Our business operations are subject to interruption by natural disasters, fire, power shortages, and other events beyond our control.
Current wording
Natural disasters or other catastrophic events may cause damage or disruption to our operations, international commerce, and the global economy, and could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition. Our business operations are subject to interruption by natural disasters, fire, power shortages, and other events beyond our control. Our Israeli subsidiaries face particular risks from regional conflicts, including potential facility damage, workforce mobilization for military service, and operational disruptions.
Previous wording
In addition, our global operations expose us to risks associated with public health crises, such as pandemics and epidemics, which could harm our business and cause our operating results to suffer. For example, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in difficulties and changes to our customer support, and created operational challenges, which have in the past, adversely impacted our business and operating results.
Current wording
In addition, our global operations expose us to risks associated with public health crises, such as pandemics and epidemics, which could harm our business and cause our operating results to suffer. Defense programs may be delayed or suspended during national emergencies, affecting our revenue and operations.
Previous wording
Further, war, acts of terrorism, labor activism and other geopolitical unrest could cause disruptions in our business or the businesses of our partners or the economy as a whole. In the event of a natural disaster, including a major earthquake, blizzard, or hurricane, or a catastrophic event such as a fire, power loss, or telecommunications failure, we may be unable to continue our operations and may endure system interruptions, reputational harm, delays in development of our products and services, lengthy interruptions in service, breaches of data security, and loss of critical data, all of which could have an adverse effect on our future operating results.
Current wording
Further, war, acts of terrorism, labor activism and other geopolitical unrest could cause disruptions in our business or the businesses of our partners or the economy as a whole. While increased global tensions may drive defense spending, they also create operational risks for our international operations, particularly in Israel. In the event of a natural disaster, including a major earthquake, blizzard, or hurricane, or a catastrophic event such as a fire, power loss, or telecommunications failure, we may be unable to continue our operations and may endure system interruptions, reputational harm, delays in program execution, lengthy interruptions in service, breaches of data security, and loss of critical data, all of which could have an adverse effect on our future operating results.
Previous wording
We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates or complete acquisitions in the future, which could adversely affect our future growth; or businesses that we acquire may not perform as well as expected or may be more difficult or expensive to integrate and manage than expected, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition, the process of integrating these acquisitions may disrupt our business and divert our resources.
Current wording
We may not be able to identify suitable defense acquisition candidates or complete acquisitions in the future, which could adversely affect our future growth; or businesses that we acquire may not perform as well as expected or may be more difficult or expensive to integrate and manage than expected, particularly given the specialized nature of defense operations and our lack of industry knowledge, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition, the process of integrating these acquisitions may disrupt our business and divert our resources.
Previous wording
In addition, acquisitions outside our current operating jurisdictions often involve additional or increased risks including, for example:
Current wording
In addition, acquisitions of defense companies, particularly those outside our current operating jurisdictions often involve additional or increased risks including, for example:
Previous wording
These risks may arise for a number of reasons: we may not be able to find suitable businesses to acquire at affordable valuations or on other acceptable terms; we may face competition for acquisitions from other potential acquirers; we may need to borrow money or sell equity or debt securities to the public to finance acquisitions and the terms of these financings may be adverse to us; changes in accounting, tax, securities or other regulations could increase the difficulty or cost for us to complete acquisitions; we may incur unforeseen obligations or liabilities in connection with acquisitions; we may need to devote unanticipated financial and management resources to an acquired business; we may not realize expected operating efficiencies or product integration benefits from an acquisition; we could enter markets where we have minimal prior experience; and we may experience decreases in earnings as a result of non-cash impairment charges.
Current wording
These risks may arise for a number of reasons: we may not be able to find suitable defense businesses to acquire at affordable valuations or on other acceptable terms; we may face competition for acquisitions from other established defense companies; we may need to borrow money or sell equity or debt securities to the public to finance acquisitions and the terms of these financings may be adverse to us; changes in accounting, tax, securities or other regulations could increase the difficulty or cost for us to complete acquisitions; we may incur unforeseen obligations or liabilities in connection with acquisitions including environmental remediation costs common in aerospace facilities; we may need to devote unanticipated financial and management resources to an acquired business; we may not realize expected operating efficiencies or product integration benefits from an acquisition; we are entering the defense market where we have no prior experience; and we may experience decreases in earnings as a result of non-cash impairment charges.
Previous wording
Delaware law and our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws will contain certain provisions, including anti-takeover provisions that limit the ability of stockholders to take certain actions and could delay or discourage takeover attempts that stockholders may consider favorable.
Current wording
Delaware law and our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws contain certain provisions, including anti-takeover provisions that limit the ability of stockholders to take certain actions and could delay or discourage takeover attempts that stockholders may consider favorable.
Previous wording
Nukkleus’s Certificate of Incorporation and bylaws contains provisions that could have the effect of rendering more difficult, delaying, or preventing an acquisition deemed undesirable by the Nukkleus Board and therefore depress the trading price of Nukkleus Common Stock. In addition, as a Delaware corporation, the Company will generally be subject to provisions of Delaware law, including the DGCL. These provisions could also make it difficult for stockholders to take certain actions, including electing directors who are not nominated by the current members of the Nukkleus Board or taking other corporate actions, including effecting changes in management.
Current wording
T3 Defense’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws contain provisions that could have the effect of rendering more difficult, delaying, or preventing an acquisition deemed undesirable by the Board and therefore depress the trading price of our Common Stock. Additionally, our foreign ownership structure and defense operations may trigger CFIUS review of certain transactions, potentially limiting strategic alternatives. In addition, as a Delaware corporation, the Company will generally be subject to provisions of Delaware law, including the DGCL. These provisions could also make it difficult for stockholders to take certain actions, including electing directors who are not nominated by the current members of the Board or taking other corporate actions, including effecting changes in management.
Previous wording
Such provisions, alone or together, could delay or prevent hostile takeovers and changes in control or changes in the Nukkleus Board or management.
Current wording
Such provisions, alone or together, could delay or prevent hostile takeovers and changes in control or changes in the Board or management.
Previous wording
Any provision of Nukkleus’s Certificate of Incorporation or bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control could limit the opportunity for stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of the Company’s capital stock and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for Nukkleus Common Stock.
Current wording
Any provision of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation or Amended and Restated Bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control could limit the opportunity for stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of the Company’s capital stock and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our Common Stock.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (3)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
A prolonged interruption in the availability or reduction in the availability, speed, or functionality of our products and services could harm our business. Frequent or persistent interruptions in our services could cause current or potential customers or partners to believe that our systems are unreliable, leading them to switch to our competitors or to avoid or reduce the use of our products and services, and could permanently harm our reputation and brands.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Moreover, to the extent that any system failure or similar event results in damages to our customers or their business partners, these customers or partners could seek significant compensation or contractual penalties from us for their losses, and those claims, even if unsuccessful, are likely to be time-consuming and costly for us to address. Problems with the reliability or security of our systems would harm our reputation, and damage to our reputation and the cost of remedying these problems could negatively affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Because we are subject to regulation in certain jurisdictions, frequent or persistent interruptions could also lead to regulatory scrutiny, significant fines and penalties, and mandatory and costly changes to our business practices, and ultimately could cause us to lose existing licenses or banking relationships that we need to operate, or prevent or delay us from obtaining additional licenses that may be required for our business.