OLB GROUP, INC.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Apr 1, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Apr 1, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-04-15.
0001213900-25-032064
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-04-01.
0001213900-26-037906
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 227 previous paragraphs and 259 current paragraphs.
171 unchanged; 39 reworded; 49 added; 17 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 35 previous and 35 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (49)
Current report
We are dependent on the continued services and performance of our senior management and other key employees, the loss of any of whom could adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
Current report
The Bitcoin network features a large and growing number of miners competing for limited mining rewards. This competition intensifies with each participant added to the network. The competitive environment is exacerbated by the fact that the Bitcoin protocol halves mining rewards approximately every four years, reducing the potential earnings for miners and increasing the importance of operational efficiency. This requires us to continuously invest in new mining equipment to earn consistent Bitcoin mining rewards.
Current report
Limited transaction capacity and scaling issues may impact mining results
Current report
Bitcoin’s “proof of work” validation mechanism inherently limits the number of transactions that can be processed per second. This limitation poses significant scaling challenges, affecting the network’s ability to handle a high volume of transactions efficiently. As part of mining rewards are related to transaction fees, these issues may cause volatility in the rewards earned. During periods of high-demand and low-capacity, earned fees may exceed the block standard block reward. Conversely, increased capacity may lead to lower transaction fees if demand is reduced.
Current report
Efforts to increase transaction capacity, such as sharding and other scalability solutions, are ongoing. However, their effectiveness, implementation timeline, and applicability to Bitcoin remain uncertain. These efforts may change the economics of Bitcoin mining, or potentially require new hardware or software to unlock.
Current report
As a participant in the digital asset ecosystem, our business growth and development are closely tied to the widespread acceptance and scalability of digital assets, including Bitcoin. The competitive dynamics in Bitcoin mining, including the limited transaction capacity and the continual halving of mining rewards, present challenges that could impact our operational efficiency and profitability. Efforts to scale digital asset transactions may lead to significant changes in the competitive landscape of the digital asset market. These changes could affect the value of Bitcoin and, by extension, the valuation of the company.
Current report
However, there is no certainty that scalability solutions will be universally effective for us or that they will not disadvantage certain participants. Given these challenges, there is a risk that our business, financial condition, and operating results could be materially adversely affected. The value of our common stock may also be impacted by these industry-wide issues.
Current report
We have recently adopted a digital asset treasury strategy with a focus on Bitcoin, and we may be unable to successfully implement this new strategy.
Current report
We have recently adopted our Treasury Policy primarily dedicated to Bitcoin, including potential investments in Bitcoin. There is no assurance that we will be able to successfully implement this new strategy or operate Bitcoin-related activities at the scale or profitability currently anticipated. This strategic shift requires specialized employee skillsets and operational, technical and compliance infrastructure to support Bitcoin. This also requires that we implement different security protocols, and treasury management practices. Further, there is ongoing scrutiny and limited formal guidance from regulatory agencies, including Nasdaq and the SEC, with respect to the treatment of public company cryptocurrency strategies. There is no assurance that we will be able to execute this strategy by building out the needed infrastructure within the timeframe that we currently anticipate. Errors by key management could result in significant loss of funds and reduced rewards. As a result, our shift towards a Bitcoin digital asset treasury strategy could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Current report
In addition, the Bitcoin ecosystem rapidly evolves, with frequent upgrades and protocol changes that may require significant adjustments to our operational setup. The upgrades and protocol changes may require that we incur unanticipated costs and could cause temporary service disruptions. We may also need to employ third-party service providers in our operations, which may introduce risks outside of our control, including significant cybersecurity risks. Any of these operational risks could materially and adversely affect our ability to execute our Bitcoin digital asset treasury strategy, prevent us from realizing positive returns and severely hurt our financial condition.
Current report
If we are unable to successfully maintain our power arrangements on acceptable terms or at all or if we must otherwise relocate to replacement sites, our operations may be disrupted, and our business results may suffer.
Current report
As part of our initial buildout phase, we set up and began operations across four cities in the United States, with three in Pennsylvania and one in Tennessee. After consolidating our operations, we currently operate out of one location in Selmer, Tennessee. We entered into definitive power arrangements with Pickwick Electric Cooperative, the utility company in Tennessee, which is intended to cover sites for our data centers that we may utilize in the near future.
Current report
If we are forced to locate alternative sites because of unacceptable power arrangements, we may not be successful in identifying adequate replacement sites to house our miners. Even if we identify such sites, we may not be successful in leasing the necessary facilities at rates that are economically viable to support our mining activities. Even if we successfully secure the sites for our data centers, in the future, we may not be able to renew those on acceptable terms, in which case we would need to relocate our established mining operations. Relocating any mining operation may force us to incur the costs to transition to a new facility including, but not limited to, transportation expenses and insurance, downtime while we are unable to mine, legal fees to negotiate the new lease, de-installation at our current facility and, ultimately, installation at any new facility we identify. These costs may be substantial, and we cannot guarantee that we will be successful in transitioning our miners to a new facility. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.
Current report
We depend on third parties to provide us with certain critical equipment and rely on components and raw materials that may be subject to price fluctuations or shortages, including ASIC chips that have been subject to an ongoing significant shortage.
Current report
In order to build and sustain our operations we will depend on third parties to provide us with ASIC mining equipment, which may be subject to price fluctuations or shortages. For example, the ASIC chip is the key component of a mining machine as it determines the efficiency of the device. The production of ASIC chips typically requires highly sophisticated silicon wafers, which currently only a small number of fabrication facilities, or wafer foundries, in the world are capable of producing. We believe that the current microchip and semiconductor shortage that the entire industry is experiencing leads to price fluctuations and disruption in the supply of key miner components. Specifically, the ASIC chips have been subject to a significant price increases and shortages.
Current report
Our ability to source ASIC mining equipment and other critical components in a timely matter and at an acceptable price and quality level is critical to our operational buildout timeline and the development under our current business model. See “Business—Bitcoin Mining Technology”. We will be exposed to the risk of disruptions or other failures in the overall global supply chain for Bitcoin mining hardware. This is particularly relevant to the ASIC mining equipment production since there are only a small number of fabrication facilities capable of such production, which increases our risk exposure to manufacturing disruptions or other supply chain failures. There is also a risk that a manufacturer or seller of ASIC computers or other necessary mining equipment may adjust the prices according to Bitcoin, other Bitcoin prices or otherwise, so the cost of new machines could become unpredictable and extremely high. As a result, at times, we may be forced to obtain miners and other hardware at premium prices, to the extent they are even available. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.
Current report
We may not be able to successfully implement or consummate our planned digital asset investment strategy.
Current report
As of the date of this prospectus, we have not executed any material investments beyond Bitcoin mining, and there is a real possibility that the proposed strategy may never be implemented if risk factors prove prohibitive or regulatory standards cannot be met. The Company continues only to evaluate potential asset classes, investment parameters, and risk management practices under the highest scrutiny, with absolute priority placed on security, custody, and regulatory adherence. There can be no assurance that we will proceed with or benefit from any digital asset investments.
Current report
We are exposed to risk of nonperformance by counterparties, including our counterparties under our power arrangements.
Current report
We are exposed to risk of nonperformance by counterparties, whether contractual or otherwise. Risk of nonperformance includes inability or refusal of a counterparty to perform because of a counterparty’s financial condition and liquidity or for any other reason. For example, our counterparties under our power arrangements may be unable to deliver the required amount of power at the required time for a variety of technical or economic reasons. Furthermore, there is a risk that during a period of power price fluctuations or prolonged or sharp power price increases on the market, our counterparties may find it economically preferable to refuse to supply power to us, despite the contractual arrangements. Any significant nonperformance by counterparties, could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.
Current report
Additionally, our mining operations could be materially adversely affected by power outages and similar disruptions. Given the power requirements for our mining equipment, it would not be feasible to run this equipment on back-up power generators in the event of a government restriction on electricity or a power outage. Under some of our power arrangements, our power supply could be automatically reduced or curtailed by the market regulators or grid operators in cases of certain system disruptions or emergencies. If we are unable to receive adequate power supply and are forced to reduce or shut down our operations due to the availability or cost of electrical power, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.
Current report
Bitcoin mining activities are energy-intensive, which may restrict the geographic locations of miners and have a negative environmental impact. Government regulators may potentially restrict the ability of electricity suppliers to provide electricity to mining operations, such as ours, or even fully or partially ban mining operations.
Current report
Mining Bitcoin requires massive amounts of electrical power, and electricity costs are expected to account for a significant portion of our overall costs. The availability and cost of electricity will restrict the geographic locations of our mining activities. Any shortage of electricity supply or increase in electricity costs in any location where we plan to operate may negatively impact the viability and the expected economic return for Bitcoin mining activities in that location.
Current report
Further, our business model can only be successful and our mining operations can only be profitable if the costs, including electrical power costs, associated with Bitcoin mining are lower than the price of Bitcoin itself. As a result, any mining operation we establish can only be successful if we can obtain sufficient electrical power for that site on a cost-effective basis, and our establishment of new mining data centers requires us to find sites where that is the case. Even if our electrical power costs do not increase, significant fluctuations in, and any prolonged periods of, low Bitcoin prices may also cause our electrical supply to no longer be cost-effective.
Current report
In addition, there may be significant competition for suitable Bitcoin mining sites. Government regulators, including local permitting officials, may also potentially restrict our ability to set up Bitcoin mining operations in certain locations. They can also restrict the ability of electricity suppliers to provide electricity to mining operations in times of electricity shortage, or may otherwise potentially restrict or prohibit the provision of electricity to mining operations.
Current report
As Bitcoin mining becomes more widespread, government scrutiny related to restrictions on Bitcoin mining facilities and their energy consumption significantly increases. The considerable consumption of electricity by mining operators may also have a negative environmental impact, including contribution to climate change, which could set the public opinion against allowing the use of electricity for Bitcoin mining activities or create a negative consumer sentiment and perception of Bitcoin, specifically, or Bitcoin generally. This, in turn, could lead to governmental measures restricting or prohibiting Bitcoin mining or the use of electricity for Bitcoin mining activities. Any such development in the jurisdictions where we plan to operate could increase our compliance burdens and have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results. Government regulators in other countries may also ban or substantially limit their local Bitcoin mining activities, which could have a material effect on our supply chains for mining equipment or services and the price of Bitcoin.
Current report
The concentration of our holdings in Bitcoin could enhance the risks inherent in our Bitcoin treasury strategy.
Current report
The concentration of our Bitcoin holdings limits the risk mitigation that we could achieve if we were to purchase a more diversified portfolio of treasury assets, and the absence of diversification enhances the risks inherent in our Bitcoin treasury strategy. Any future significant declines in the price of Bitcoin would have, a more pronounced impact on our financial condition than if we used our cash to purchase a more diverse portfolio of assets.
Current report
On January 10, 2024, the SEC approved the listing and trading of spot Bitcoin and exchange traded products (ETPs), the shares of which can be sold in public offerings and are traded on U.S. national securities exchanges. To the extent investors view our Common Stock as providing exposure to Bitcoin, it is possible that the value of our Common Stock may be influenced by the trading activity and performance of these spot Bitcoin ETPs. Additionally, on May 23, 2024, the SEC approved rule changes permitting the listing and trading of spot ETPs that invest in ether, the main crypto asset supporting the Ethereum blockchain. The listing and trading of spot ETPs for ether offers investors another alternative to gain exposure to digital assets, which could result in a decline in the trading price of Bitcoin as well as a decline in the value of our Class A Ordinary Shares relative to the value of our Bitcoin.
Current report
Furthermore, recommendations by broker-dealers to buy, hold, or sell complex products and non-traditional ETPs, or an investment strategy involving such products, may be subject to additional or heightened scrutiny that would not be applicable to broker-dealers making recommendations with respect to our securities. Based on how we are viewed in the market relative to ETPs, and other vehicles which offer economic exposure to Bitcoin, such as Bitcoin futures exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”), leveraged Bitcoin futures ETFs, and similar vehicles offered on international exchanges, any premium or discount in our Common Stock relative to the value of our Bitcoin holdings may increase or decrease in different market conditions.
Current report
Our business may be significantly impacted by reputational risks and may impact how our business is perceived by customers, counterparties, and regulators.
Current report
Reputational risks represent a significant concern in our industry, particularly due to the volatile and evolving nature of the Bitcoin markets. Our business faces potential reputational harm from several industry wide factors, including perceived regulatory non-compliance, catastrophic market volatile events, industry association with fraudulent or illegal activities. Such incidents can lead to a loss of trust among our customers, investors, and partners, adversely affecting our business.
Current report
In addition, negative public perception, fueled by media coverage or social media discourse, can impact investor confidence and our company’s market valuation. For example, incorrect or misleading statements about the power consumption of the Bitcoin network may damage the Company’s perception as being energy efficient.
Current report
Regulatory bodies may also view our operations with increased skepticism in the wake of certain events, potentially leading to stricter scrutiny and additional compliance requirements. Furthermore, as a company operating in a nascent and often misunderstood sector, any perceived ethical missteps or failures in corporate governance can be magnified, causing long-term damage to our brand and standing in the industry.
Current report
Effectively managing these reputational risks is critical to maintaining our market position and ensuring sustainable growth. Failure to address or mitigate these risks adequately could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operational results.
Current report
Regulatory changes or actions may alter the nature of an investment in us or restrict the use of Bitcoin in a manner that adversely affects our business, prospects or operations.
Current report
Governments may in the future take regulatory actions that prohibit or severely restrict the right to acquire, own, hold, sell, use or trade Bitcoin or to exchange Bitcoin for fiat currency. Similar actions by governments or regulatory bodies could result in restriction of the acquisition, ownership, holding, selling, use or trading in our securities. Such a restriction could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue this segment at all, raise new capital which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and harm investors in our securities.
Current report
Future regulatory actions and regulatory changes related to our business or Bitcoin may impact our ability to continue to operate and such actions could affect our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue this segment at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations.
Current report
Such events would have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue this segment at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any Bitcoins we hold or expect to acquire for our own account and harm investors in our securities.
Current report
Political or economic crises may motivate large-scale sales of Bitcoins, which could result in a reduction in value and adversely affect us.
Showing the first 40 of 49 passages. Open the source sections for the rest.
Removed paragraphs (17)
Previous report
We may be subject to liabilities arising prior to the Asset Acquisition under certain “successor liability” theories.
Previous report
We acquired our business by means of a foreclosure of the relevant secured lender’s security interest in the assets in the Asset Acquisition through an auction under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. Although the general rule in the context of transactions such as the Asset Acquisition is that a purchaser of assets does not assume the seller’s liabilities, various courts have established exceptions to this general rule, including where the purchaser is a ‘mere continuation’ of the seller and there is a ‘continuity of enterprise.’ To date, we have had one lawsuit whereby we have been found to have successor liability. This matter was settled by the parties. This is a highly fact specific inquiry, and there can be no assurance that any interested creditor, the United States (through the Internal Revenue Service) or state or local taxing agencies will not seek to hold us responsible for any existing liabilities at the time of the Asset Acquisition under one or more of these successor liability theories, for which we have no indemnification protection under the agreements relating to the Asset Acquisition.
Previous report
We anticipate that the growth of our business will continue to depend on third-party relationships, including relationships with our app developers, theme designers, referral sources, resellers, payment processors and other partners. In addition to growing our third-party partner ecosystem, we intend to pursue additional relationships with other third-parties, such as technology and content providers and implementation consultants. Identifying, negotiating and documenting relationships with third parties requires significant time and resources as does integrating third-party content and technology. Some of the third parties that sell our services have the direct contractual relationships with the merchants, and therefore we risk the loss of such merchants if the third parties fail to perform their obligations. Our agreements with providers of cloud hosting, technology, content and consulting services are typically non-exclusive and do not prohibit such service providers from working with our competitors or from offering competing services. These third-party providers may choose to terminate their relationship with us or to make material changes to their businesses, products or services. Our competitors may be effective in providing incentives to third parties to favor their products or services or to prevent or reduce subscriptions to our platform. In addition, these providers may not perform as expected under our agreements or under their agreements with our merchants, and we or our merchants may in the future have disagreements or disputes with such providers. If we lose access to products or services from a particular supplier, or experience a significant disruption in the supply of products or services from a current supplier, especially a single-source supplier, it could have an adverse effect on our business and operating results.
Previous report
The use of cryptocurrencies to, among other things, buy and sell goods and services and complete transactions, is part of a new and rapidly evolving industry that employs digital assets based upon a computer-generated mathematical and/or cryptographic protocol. Cryptocurrencies are not recognized as legal tender by any U.S. or foreign governmental authority, and they are not backed by the full faith and credit of, or endorsed by, any government. The value of cryptocurrency in respect of any specific transaction is based on the agreement of the parties thereto, and the value of such cryptocurrency more broadly is based on the agreement of market participants. Currently, a significant portion of cryptocurrency demand is generated by speculators seeking to profit from short- or long-term price fluctuations. It is doubtful that any given cryptocurrency has any intrinsic value.
Previous report
If any of those events occur, it may have a material adverse effect on our ability to pursue this business segment, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any cryptocurrencies we hold or expect to acquire for our own account and harm investors in our securities.
Previous report
Banks and financial institutions may not provide banking services, or may cut off services, to businesses that provide cryptocurrency-related services or that accept cryptocurrencies as payment, including financial institutions of investors in our securities.
Previous report
A number of companies that provide Bitcoin and/or other cryptocurrency-related services have been unable to find banks or financial institutions that are willing to provide them with bank accounts and other services. Similarly, a number of companies and individuals or businesses associated with cryptocurrencies have had and may continue to have their existing bank accounts closed or services discontinued with financial institutions. We also may be unable to obtain or maintain these services for our business. The difficulty that many businesses that provide Bitcoin and/or other cryptocurrency-related services have and may continue to have in finding banks and financial institutions willing to provide them services may be decreasing the usefulness of cryptocurrencies as a payment system and harming public perception of cryptocurrencies and could decrease its usefulness and harm its public perception in the future. Similarly, the usefulness of cryptocurrencies as a payment system and the public perception of cryptocurrencies could be damaged if banks or financial institutions were to close the accounts of businesses providing Bitcoin and/or other cryptocurrency-related services. This could occur as a result of compliance risk, cost, government regulation or public pressure. The risk applies to securities firms, clearance and settlement firms, national stock and commodities exchanges, the over the counter market and the Depository Trust Company, which, if any of such entities adopts or implements similar policies, rules or regulations, could result in the inability of our investors to open or maintain stock or commodities accounts, including the ability to deposit, maintain or trade our securities. Such factors would have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue this segment at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and harm investors.
Previous report
As with any computer code generally, flaws in Bitcoin codes may be exposed by malicious actors. Bitcoin are held in software wallets, which may be subject to cyberattacks. Several errors and defects have been found previously, including those that disabled some functionality for users and exposed users’ information. Exploitations of flaws in the source code that allow malicious actors to take or create money have previously occurred. If a malicious actor or botnet (a volunteer or hacked collection of computers controlled by networked software coordinating the actions of the computers) obtains control of more than 50% of the processing power on a distributed ledger network, such actor or botnet could manipulate the network to adversely affect the associated cryptocurrency and its users. If a malicious actor or botnet obtains a majority of the processing power dedicated to mining of Bitcoin, it may be able to alter the distributed ledger network on which transactions of Bitcoin reside and rely by constructing fraudulent blocks or preventing certain transactions from completing in a timely manner, or at all.
Previous report
If regulatory changes or interpretations require the regulation of Bitcoin or other digital assets under the securities laws of the United States or elsewhere, including the Securities Act, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or similar laws of other jurisdictions and interpretations by the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), Department of Treasury or other agencies or authorities, we may be required to register and comply with such regulations, including at a state or local level. To the extent that we decide to continue operations, the required registrations and regulatory compliance steps may result in extraordinary expense or burdens to us. We may also decide to cease certain operations. Any disruption of our operations in response to the changed regulatory circumstances may be at a time that is disadvantageous to us.
Previous report
Current and future legislation and SEC and CFTC rulemaking and other regulatory developments, including interpretations released by a regulatory authority, may impact the manner in which Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies are viewed or treated for classification and clearing purposes. In particular, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies may not be excluded from the definition of “security” by SEC rulemaking or interpretation requiring registration of all transactions, unless another exemption is available, including transacting in Bitcoin amongst owners and require registration of trading platforms as “exchanges”. We cannot be certain as to how future regulatory developments will impact the treatment of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies under the law. If we determine not to comply with such additional regulatory and registration requirements, we may seek to cease certain of our operations in this business segment or be subjected to fines, penalties and other governmental action. Any such action may adversely affect an investment in us. Such circumstances would have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue this segment at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any cryptocurrencies we hold or expect to acquire for our own account and harm investors.
Previous report
As an “emerging growth company” under applicable law, we will be subject to lessened disclosure requirements, which could leave our stockholders without information or rights available to stockholders of more mature companies.
Previous report
For as long as we remain an “emerging growth company”, we have elected to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to:
Previous report
We expect to take advantage of these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an “emerging growth company.” Because of these lessened regulatory requirements, our stockholders would be left without information or rights available to stockholders of more mature companies.
Previous report
We have elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards for an emerging growth company. This election allows us to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. As a result of this election, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates, and thus investors may have difficulty evaluating or comparing our business, performance or prospects in comparison to other public companies, which may have a negative impact on the value and liquidity of our common stock.
Previous report
On March 20, 2024, the board of directors approved a reverse stock split in the amount of 1 for 10 shares and recommended that the stockholders approve the reverse stock split in the same amount at a meeting of the stockholders to be held on April 26, 2024. The purpose of the reverse stock split is to have the shares of common stock trade in excess of $1.00 per share so that the company will be in compliance with the NASDAQ minimum share price requirement. There can be no assurance that the stock price, after the reverse stock split, if approved by the stockholders, will continue to trade above $1.00 per share. Furthermore, there can be no assurances that the stock price after the one for 10 reverse stock split will not trade below the amount equal to 10 times these stock price per share on the date of the reverse stock split.
Previous report
We incur substantial costs as a result of being a public company and our management expects to devote substantial time to public company compliance programs.
Previous report
As a public company, we incur significant legal, insurance, accounting and other expenses, including costs associated with public company reporting. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment will result in increased general and administrative expenses and may divert management’s time and attention from product development and commercialization activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us, and our business may be harmed. These laws and regulations could make it more difficult and costlier for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance for our directors and officers, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified executive officers and qualified members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit and compensation committees. In addition, if we are unable to continue to meet the legal, regulatory and other requirements related to being a public company, we may not be able to maintain the listing of our common stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market, which would likely have a material adverse effect on the trading price of our common stock.
Reworded paragraphs (39)
Previous wording
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information contained in this annual report, before deciding to invest in our common stock. If any of the following risks materialize, our business, financial condition, results of operation and prospects will likely be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Current wording
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information contained in this annual report, before deciding to invest in our common stock. If any of the following risks materialize, our business, financial condition, results of operations, cashflows and prospects will likely be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Previous wording
We have limited cash resources and operating losses throughout our history. As of December 31, 2024 we had a working capital deficit of $8,650,939 and a net loss of $11,224,911. Our cash flow used by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $2,600,306. Notwithstanding the foregoing, management has concluded that it has sufficient liquidity to continue operations for a period of at least twelve months from the date of this Annual Report, which conclusion would not have been possible without close monitoring of the Company’s projected cash flow and operating expenses for a period of at least the next twelve months.
Current wording
We have limited cash resources and operating losses throughout our history. As of December 31, 2025 we had a working capital deficit of $6,640,236 and a net loss of $5,874,051. Our cash flow used by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $1,330,383. Notwithstanding the foregoing, management has concluded that it has sufficient liquidity to continue operations for a period of at least twelve months from the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which conclusion would not have been possible without close monitoring of the Company’s projected cash flow and operating expenses for a period of at least the next twelve months.
Previous wording
Our operations are subject to a broad range of complex and evolving laws and regulations. As a result, we must perform our services in compliance with the legal and regulatory requirements of multiple jurisdictions. Some of these laws and regulations may be difficult to ascertain or interpret and may change from time to time. Violation of such laws and regulations could subject us to fines and penalties, damage our reputation, constitute a breach of our client agreements, impair our ability to obtain and renew required licenses, and decrease our profitability or competitiveness. If any of these effects were to occur, our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Current wording
Our operations are subject to a broad range of complex and evolving laws and regulations. As a result, we must perform our services in compliance with the legal and regulatory requirements of multiple jurisdictions. Some of these laws and regulations may be difficult to ascertain or interpret and may change from time to time. Violation of such laws and regulations could subject us to fines and penalties, damage our reputation, constitute a breach of our client agreements, impair our ability to obtain and renew required licenses, and decrease our profitability or competitiveness. If any of these effects were to occur, our operating results, cash flows and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Previous wording
The financial services and payment technology industries are highly competitive, and our payment services and solutions compete against all forms of financial services and payment systems, including cash and checks, and electronic, mobile, E-commerce and integrated payment platforms. If we are unable to differentiate ourselves from our competitors and drive value for our merchants, we may not be able to compete effectively. Our competitors may introduce their own value-added or other innovative services or solutions more effectively than we do, which could adversely impact our current competitive position and prospects for growth. They also may be able to offer and provide services that we do not offer. In addition, in certain of our markets in which we operate, we process “on-us” transactions whereby we receive fees as a merchant acquirer and for processing services for the issuing bank. As competition in these markets grows, the number of transactions in which we receive fees for both of these roles may decrease, which could reduce our revenue and margins in these jurisdictions. We also compete against new entrants that have developed alternative payment systems, E-commerce payment systems, payment systems for mobile devices and customized integrated software payment solutions. Failure to compete effectively against any of these competitive threats could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, some of our competitors are larger and have greater financial resources than us, enabling them to maintain a wider range of product offerings, mount extensive promotional campaigns and be more aggressive in offering products and services at lower rates, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
The financial services and payment technology industries are highly competitive, and our payment services and solutions compete against all forms of financial services and payment systems, including cash and checks, and electronic, mobile, E-commerce and integrated payment platforms. If we are unable to differentiate ourselves from our competitors and drive value for our merchants, we may not be able to compete effectively. Our competitors may introduce their own value-added or other innovative services or solutions more effectively than we do, which could adversely impact our current competitive position and prospects for growth. They also may be able to offer and provide services that we do not offer. In addition, in certain of our markets in which we operate, we process “on-us” transactions whereby we receive fees as a merchant acquirer and for processing services for the issuing bank. As competition in these markets grows, the number of transactions in which we receive fees for both of these roles may decrease, which could reduce our revenue and margins in these jurisdictions. We also compete against new entrants that have developed alternative payment systems, E-commerce payment systems, payment systems for mobile devices and customized integrated software payment solutions. Failure to compete effectively against any of these competitive threats could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In addition, some of our competitors are larger and have greater financial resources than us, enabling them to maintain a wider range of product offerings, mount extensive promotional campaigns and be more aggressive in offering products and services at lower rates, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Previous wording
Failure to compete effectively against any of these or other competitive threats could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
Failure to compete effectively against any of these or other competitive threats could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Previous wording
Our products and services are based on sophisticated software and computing systems that are constantly evolving. We often encounter delays and cost overruns in developing changes implemented to our systems. In addition, the underlying software may contain undetected errors, viruses or defects. Defects in our software products and errors or delays in our processing of electronic transactions could result in additional development costs, diversion of technical and other resources from our other development efforts, loss of credibility with current or potential merchants, harm to our reputation or exposure to liability claims. In addition, we rely on technologies supplied to us by third parties that may also contain undetected errors, viruses or defects that could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Although we attempt to limit our potential liability for warranty claims through disclaimers in our software documentation and limitation of liability provisions in our licenses and other agreements with our merchants and partners, we cannot assure that these measures will be successful in limiting our liability. Additionally, we and our merchants and partners are subject to card network rules. If we do not comply with card network requirements or standards, we may be subject fines or sanctions, including suspension or termination of our registrations and licenses necessary to conduct business.
Current wording
Our products and services are based on sophisticated software and computing systems that are constantly evolving. We often encounter delays and cost overruns in developing changes implemented to our systems. In addition, the underlying software may contain undetected errors, viruses or defects. Defects in our software products and errors or delays in our processing of electronic transactions could result in additional development costs, diversion of technical and other resources from our other development efforts, loss of credibility with current or potential merchants, harm to our reputation or exposure to liability claims. In addition, we rely on technologies supplied to us by third parties that may also contain undetected errors, viruses or defects that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Although we attempt to limit our potential liability for warranty claims through disclaimers in our software documentation and limitation of liability provisions in our licenses and other agreements with our merchants and partners, we cannot assure that these measures will be successful in limiting our liability. Additionally, we and our merchants and partners are subject to card network rules. If we do not comply with card network requirements or standards, we may be subject fines or sanctions, including suspension or termination of our registrations and licenses necessary to conduct business.
Previous wording
Fraud by merchants or others could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
Fraud by merchants or others could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Previous wording
We may be liable for certain fraudulent transactions and credits initiated by merchants or others. Examples of merchant fraud include merchants or other parties knowingly using a stolen or counterfeit credit or debit card, card number, or other credentials to record a false sales or credit transaction, processing an invalid card or intentionally failing to deliver the merchandise or services sold in an otherwise valid transaction. Criminals are using increasingly sophisticated methods to engage in illegal activities such as counterfeiting and fraud. Failure to effectively manage risk and prevent fraud could increase our chargeback liability or cause us to incur other liabilities. It is possible that incidents of fraud could increase in the future. Increases in chargebacks or other liabilities could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
We may be liable for certain fraudulent transactions and credits initiated by merchants or others. Examples of merchant fraud include merchants or other parties knowingly using a stolen or counterfeit credit or debit card, card number, or other credentials to record a false sales or credit transaction, processing an invalid card or intentionally failing to deliver the merchandise or services sold in an otherwise valid transaction. Criminals are using increasingly sophisticated methods to engage in illegal activities such as counterfeiting and fraud. Failure to effectively manage risk and prevent fraud could increase our chargeback liability or cause us to incur other liabilities. It is possible that incidents of fraud could increase in the future. Increases in chargebacks or other liabilities could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Previous wording
Our OmniSoft subsidiary principally generates revenues through the sale of subscriptions to our platform and the sale of additional solutions to our merchants. Our subscription plans typically have a one-month term, although a small percentage of our merchants have annual or multi-year subscription terms. Our merchants have no obligation to renew their subscriptions after their subscription term expires. As a result, even though the number of merchants using our platform has grown rapidly in recent years, there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain these merchants. We have historically experienced merchant turnover as a result of many of our merchants being small- and medium-sized businesses, or SMBs, that are more susceptible than larger businesses to general economic conditions and other risks affecting their businesses. Many of these SMBs are in the entrepreneurial stage of their development and there is no guarantee that their businesses will succeed. Our costs associated with subscription renewals are substantially lower than costs associated with generating revenue from new merchants or costs associated with generating sales of additional solutions to existing merchants. Therefore, if we are unable to retain merchants or if we are unable to increase revenues from existing merchants, even if such losses are offset by an increase in new merchants or an increase in other revenues, our operating results could be adversely impacted.
Current wording
Our OmniSoft subsidiary principally generates revenue through the sale of subscriptions to our platform and the sale of additional solutions to our merchants. Our subscription plans typically have a one-month term, although a small percentage of our merchants have annual or multi-year subscription terms. Our merchants have no obligation to renew their subscriptions after their subscription term expires. As a result, even though the number of merchants using our platform has grown rapidly in recent years, there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain these merchants. We have historically experienced merchant turnover as a result of many of our merchants being small- and medium-sized businesses, or SMBs, that are more susceptible than larger businesses to general economic conditions and other risks affecting their businesses. Many of these SMBs are in the entrepreneurial stage of their development and there is no guarantee that their businesses will succeed. Our costs associated with subscription renewals are substantially lower than costs associated with generating revenue from new merchants or costs associated with generating sales of additional solutions to existing merchants. Therefore, if we are unable to retain merchants or if we are unable to increase revenues from existing merchants, even if such losses are offset by an increase in new merchants or an increase in other revenues, our operating results could be adversely impacted.
Previous wording
We may experience difficulties with software development that could delay or prevent the development, introduction or implementation of new solutions and enhancements. Software development involves a significant amount of time for our research and development team, as it can take our developers months to update, code and test new and upgraded solutions and integrate them into our platform. We must also continually update, test and enhance our software platform. For example, our design team spends a significant amount of time and resources incorporating various design enhancements, such as customized colors, fonts, content and other features, into our platform. The continual improvement and enhancement of our platform requires significant investment and we may not have the resources to make such investment. Our improvements and enhancements may not result in our ability to recoup our investments in a timely manner, or at all. To the extent we are not able to improve and enhance the functionality, performance, reliability, design, security and scalability of our platform in a manner that responds to our merchants’ evolving needs, our business, operating results and financial condition will be adversely affected.
Current wording
We may experience difficulties with software development that could delay or prevent the development, introduction or implementation of new solutions and enhancements. Software development involves a significant amount of time for our research and development team, as it can take our developers months to update, code and test new and upgraded solutions and integrate them into our platform. We must also continually update, test and enhance our software platform. For example, our design team spends a significant amount of time and resources incorporating various design enhancements, such as customized colors, fonts, content and other features, into our platform. The continual improvement and enhancement of our platform requires significant investment and we may not have the resources to make such investment. Our improvements and enhancements may not result in our ability to recover our investments in a timely manner, or at all. To the extent we are not able to improve and enhance the functionality, performance, reliability, design, security and scalability of our platform in a manner that responds to our merchants’ evolving needs, our business, operating results and financial condition will be adversely affected.
Previous wording
Cryptocurrencies and blockchain technologies are relatively new and highly speculative. Bitcoin and blockchain technologies have limited history, and their risks cannot be fully known at this time. As Bitcoin assets and blockchain technologies become more widely available, we expect the services and products associated with them to evolve. In order to stay current with the industry, our business model may need to evolve as well. From time to time, we may modify aspects of our business model relating to our product mix and service offerings. We cannot offer any assurance that these or any other modifications will be successful or will not result in harm to our business. We may not be able to manage growth effectively, which could damage our reputation, limit our growth and negatively affect our operating results. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations.
Current wording
As Bitcoin assets and blockchain technologies become more widely available, we expect the services and products associated with them to evolve. In order to stay current with the industry, our business model may need to evolve as well. From time to time, we may modify aspects of our business model relating to our Bitcoin mining. We cannot offer any assurance that any modifications will be successful or will not result in harm to our business. We may not be able to manage growth effectively, which could damage our reputation, limit our growth and negatively affect our operating results. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations.
Previous wording
We may not be able to compete with other companies, some of which have greater resources and experience.
Current wording
We may not be able to compete with other companies, some of whom have greater resources and experience.
Previous wording
Our Bitcoin mining operation in Tennessee is, and any future mining farms we establish will be, subject to a variety of risks relating to physical condition and operation, including:
Current wording
Our current Bitcoin mining farm in Tennessee is, and any future mining farms we establish will be, subject to a variety of risks relating to physical condition and operation, including:
Previous wording
Cryptocurrency exchanges and other trading venues are relatively new and, in most cases, largely unregulated and may therefore be the subject of fraud and failures.
Current wording
Bitcoin exchanges and other trading venues are relatively new and, in most cases, largely unregulated and may therefore be subject to fraud and failures.
Previous wording
When cryptocurrency exchanges or other trading venues are involved in fraud or experience security failures or other operational issues, such events could result in a reduction in cryptocurrency prices or confidence and impact our success and have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue this segment at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects and operations.
Current wording
When Bitcoin exchanges or other trading venues are involved in fraud or experience security failures or other operational issues, such events could result in a reduction in Bitcoin prices or confidence and impact our success and have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue this segment at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects and operations.
Previous wording
Cryptocurrency market prices depend, directly or indirectly, on the prices set on exchanges and other trading venues, which are new and, in most cases, largely unregulated as compared to established, regulated exchanges for securities, commodities or currencies. For example, during the past several years, a number of Bitcoin exchanges have closed due to fraud, business failure or security breaches. In many of these instances, the customers of the closed exchanges were not compensated or made whole for partial or complete losses of their account balances. While smaller exchanges are less likely to have the infrastructure and capitalization that may provide larger exchanges with some stability, larger exchanges may be more likely to be appealing targets for hackers and “malware” (i.e., software used or programmed by attackers to disrupt computer operation, gather sensitive information or gain access to private computer systems) and may be more likely to be targets of regulatory enforcement action. We do not maintain any insurance to protect from such risks, and do not expect any insurance for customer accounts to be available (such as federal deposit insurance) at any time in the future, putting customer accounts at risk if any such events occur. In the event we experience fraud, security failures, operational issues or similar events such factors would have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue this segment at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects and operations.
Current wording
Bitcoin market prices depend, directly or indirectly, on the prices set on exchanges and other trading venues, which are new and, in most cases, largely unregulated as compared to established, regulated exchanges for securities, commodities or currencies. For example, during the past three years, a number of Bitcoin exchanges have closed due to fraud, business failure or security breaches. In many of these instances, the customers of the closed exchanges were not compensated or made whole for partial or complete losses of their account balances. While smaller exchanges are less likely to have the infrastructure and capitalization that may provide larger exchanges with some stability, larger exchanges may be more likely to be appealing targets for hackers and “malware” (i.e., software used or programmed by attackers to disrupt computer operation, gather sensitive information or gain access to private computer systems) and may be more likely to be targets of regulatory enforcement action. We do not maintain any insurance to protect from such risks, and do not expect any insurance for customer accounts to be available (such as federal deposit insurance) at any time in the future, putting customer accounts at risk from such events. In the event we face fraud, security failures, operational issues or similar events, such factors would have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue this segment at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects and operations.
Previous wording
As cryptocurrencies have grown in both popularity and market size, governments around the world have reacted differently to cryptocurrencies, with certain governments deeming them illegal while others have allowed their use and trade.
Current wording
As Bitcoin have grown in both popularity and market size, governments around the world have reacted differently to Bitcoin with certain governments deeming them illegal while others have allowed their use and trade.
Previous wording
Governments may in the future curtail or outlaw the mining, acquisition, use, trading or redemption of cryptocurrencies. Ownership of, holding or trading in cryptocurrencies may then be considered illegal and subject to sanction. Governments may also take regulatory action that may increase the cost and/or subject Bitcoin mining companies to additional regulation. The effect of any future regulatory change on our business or any Bitcoin mining operation that may impact our business is impossible to predict, but such change could be substantial and may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects and operations.
Current wording
Governments may in the future curtail or outlaw the acquisition, use or redemption of Bitcoin. Ownership of, holding or trading in Bitcoin may then be considered illegal and subject to sanction. Governments may also take regulatory action that may increase the cost and/or subject Bitcoin companies to additional regulation. The effect of any future regulatory change on our business or on Bitcoin that may impact our business is impossible to predict, but such change could be substantial and would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects and operations.
Previous wording
The development and acceptance of cryptographic and algorithmic protocols governing the issuance of and transactions in cryptocurrencies is subject to a variety of factors that are difficult to evaluate.
Current wording
The development and acceptance of Bitcoin and algorithmic protocols governing the issuance of and transactions in Bitcoin is subject to a variety of factors that are difficult to evaluate.
Previous wording
The growth of this industry in general, and the use of cryptocurrencies in particular, is subject to a high degree of uncertainty, and the slowing or stopping of the development or acceptance of developing protocols may occur and is unpredictable. The factors include, but are not limited to:
Current wording
The use of Bitcoin to, among other things, buy and sell goods and services and complete transactions, is part of a new and rapidly evolving industry that employs digital assets based upon a computer-generated mathematical and/or Bitcoin protocol. The growth of this industry in general, and the use of Bitcoin in particular, is subject to a high degree of uncertainty, and the slowing or stopping of the development or acceptance of developing protocols may occur and is unpredictable. The factors include, but are not limited to:
Previous wording
The impact of geopolitical events on the supply and demand for cryptocurrencies is uncertain.
Current wording
The impact of geopolitical events on the supply and demand for Bitcoin is uncertain.
Previous wording
Crises may motivate large-scale purchases of cryptocurrencies which could increase the price of cryptocurrencies rapidly. This may increase the likelihood of a subsequent price decrease as crisis-driven purchasing behavior wanes, adversely affecting the value of any cryptocurrencies we hold or expect to acquire for our own account. Such risks are similar to the risks of purchasing commodities in general uncertain times, such as the risk of purchasing, holding or selling gold.
Current wording
Regional or global crises may motivate large-scale purchases of Bitcoin which could increase the price of Bitcoin rapidly. This may increase the likelihood of a subsequent price decrease as crisis-driven purchasing behavior wanes, adversely affecting the value of any Bitcoin we hold or expect to acquire for our own account. Such risks are similar to the risks of purchasing commodities in general uncertain times, such as the risk of purchasing, holding or selling gold.
Previous wording
As an alternative to gold or fiat currencies that are backed by central governments, cryptocurrencies, which are relatively new, are subject to supply and demand forces. How such supply and demand will be impacted by geopolitical events is uncertain but could be harmful to us and investors in our securities. Nevertheless, political or economic crises may motivate large-scale acquisitions or sales of cryptocurrencies either globally or locally. Such events would have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue this segment at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any cryptocurrencies we hold or expect to acquire for our own account.
Current wording
As an alternative to gold or fiat currencies that are backed by central governments, Bitcoin, which are relatively new, are subject to supply and demand forces. How such supply and demand will be impacted by geopolitical events is uncertain but could be harmful to us and investors in our securities. Nevertheless, political or economic crises may motivate large-scale acquisitions or sales of Bitcoin either globally or locally. Such events would have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue this segment at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any Bitcoin we hold or expect to acquire for our own account.
Previous wording
Acceptance and/or widespread use of Bitcoin is uncertain.
Current wording
Acceptance and/or widespread use of Bitcoins is uncertain.
Previous wording
Currently, there is a relatively small use of Bitcoin and/or other cryptocurrencies in the retail and commercial marketplace for goods or services. In comparison there is relatively large use by speculators, which contributes to price volatility.
Current wording
Currently, there is a relatively small use of Bitcoin in the retail and commercial marketplace for goods or services. In comparison there is relatively large use by speculators contributing to price volatility.
Previous wording
The relative lack of acceptance of Bitcoin in the retail and commercial marketplace limits the ability of end-users to use them to pay for goods and services. Such lack of acceptance or decline in acceptances would have a material adverse effect on our ability to pursue this business segment at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any Bitcoin we hold or expect to acquire for our own account.
Current wording
The relative lack of acceptance of Bitcoin in the retail and commercial marketplace limits the ability of end-users to use them to pay for goods and services. Such lack of acceptance or decline in acceptances would have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue this segment at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any Bitcoin we hold or expect to acquire for our own account.
Previous wording
In order to incentivize miners to continue to contribute to the Bitcoin network, the Bitcoin network may either formally or informally transition from a set reward to transaction fees earned upon solving a block. This transition could be accomplished by miners independently electing to record in the blocks they solve only those transactions that include payment of a transaction fee. If transaction fees paid for bitcoin transactions become too high, the marketplace may be reluctant to accept Bitcoin as a means of payment and existing users may be motivated to switch from Bitcoin to another cryptocurrency or to fiat currency. Decreased use and demand for Bitcoin may adversely affect its value and result in a reduction in the price of Bitcoin and the value of our securities.
Current wording
In order to incentivize miners to continue to contribute to the Bitcoin network, the Bitcoin network may either formally or informally transition from a set reward to transaction fees earned upon solving a block. This transition could be accomplished by miners independently electing to record in the blocks they solve only those transactions that include payment of a transaction fee. If transaction fees paid for Bitcoin transactions become too high, the marketplace may be reluctant to accept Bitcoin as a means of payment and existing users may be motivated to switch from Bitcoin to another Bitcoin or to fiat currency. Decreased use and demand for Bitcoin may adversely affect its value and result in a reduction in the price of Bitcoin and the value of our securities.
Previous wording
Despite our efforts and processes to prevent breaches, our devices, as well as our servers, computer systems and those of third parties that we use in our operations, are vulnerable to cyber security risks, including cyber-attacks such as viruses and worms, phishing attacks, denial-of-service attacks, physical or electronic break-ins, employee theft or misuse, and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our servers and computer systems or those of third parties that we use in our operations. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.
Current wording
As with any computer code generally, flaws in Bitcoin codes may be exposed by malicious actors. Several errors and defects have been found previously, including those that disabled some functionality for users and exposed users’ information. Exploitations of flaws in the source code that allow malicious actors to take or create money have previously occurred. Despite our efforts and processes to prevent breaches, our devices, as well as our servers, computer systems and those of third parties that we use in our operations, are vulnerable to cyber security risks, including cyber-attacks such as viruses and worms, phishing attacks, denial-of-service attacks, physical or electronic break-ins, employee theft or misuse, and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our servers and computer systems or those of third parties that we use in our operations. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any Bitcoin or other Bitcoin we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.
Previous wording
It may be illegal now, or in the future, to acquire, own, hold, sell or use Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies, participate in the blockchain or utilize similar digital assets in one or more countries, the ruling of which would adversely affect us.
Current wording
It may be illegal in the future, to acquire, own, hold, sell or use Bitcoin, participate in the blockchain or utilize similar digital assets in one or more countries, the ruling of which would adversely affect us.
Previous wording
Although currently Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, the blockchain and digital assets generally are not regulated or are lightly regulated in most countries, including the United States, one or more countries may take regulatory actions in the future that could severely restrict the right to acquire, own, hold, sell or use these digital assets or to exchange for fiat currency. Such restrictions may adversely affect us. Such circumstances would have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue this segment at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any cryptocurrencies we hold or expect to acquire for our own account and harm investors.
Current wording
Although currently Bitcoin, the blockchain and digital assets generally are not regulated or are lightly regulated in most countries, including the United States, and the United States may take regulatory actions in the future that could severely restrict the right to acquire, own, hold, sell or use these digital assets or to exchange for fiat currency. If the United States, federally, or individual states, take regulatory action to restrict the right to mine, acquire, hold sell or use digital assets, our business would be impacted. Such circumstances would have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue this segment at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any Bitcoin we hold or expect to acquire for our own account and could harm our investors.
Previous wording
Lack of liquid markets, and possible manipulation of blockchain/Bitcoin-based assets may adversely affect us.
Current wording
Lack of liquid markets, possible manipulation of blockchain/Bitcoin-based assets and lack of effectiveness of safeguards for our Bitcoin may adversely affect us.
Previous wording
Digital assets that are represented and trade on a ledger-based platform may not necessarily benefit from viable trading markets. Stock exchanges have listing requirements and vet issuers, requiring them to be subjected to rigorous listing standards and rules and monitoring investors transacting on such platform for fraud and other improprieties. These conditions may not necessarily be replicated on a distributed ledger platform, depending on the platform’s controls and other policies. The more lax a distributed ledger platform is about vetting issuers of digital assets or users that transact on the platform, the higher the potential risk for fraud or the manipulation of digital assets. These factors may decrease liquidity or volume, or increase volatility of digital securities or other assets trading on a ledger-based system. Such circumstances may have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue this segment at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any cryptocurrencies we hold or expect to acquire for our own account and harm investors.
Current wording
Digital assets that are represented and trade on a ledger-based platform may not necessarily benefit from viable trading markets. Stock exchanges have listing requirements and vet issuers, requiring them to be subjected to rigorous listing standards and rules and monitoring investors transacting on such platform for fraud and other improprieties. These conditions may not necessarily be replicated on a distributed ledger platform, depending on the platform’s controls and other policies. We have elected to use Coinbase – the largest US exchange by volume, and a publicly listed company – to sell our Bitcoin in an attempt to combat these issues. Coinbase maintains robust exchange controls, and operates futures markets, custodial services, and is a partner in multiple Bitcoin ETFs. We believe these elements significantly limit the ability of market manipulation due to low-liquidity. However, Coinbase does not have the same vetting of issuers as a national securities exchange, which leads to a higher potential risk for fraud or manipulation of digital assets. Such fraud or manipulation may decrease liquidity or volume, or increase volatility of digital securities or other assets, which may adversely affect us. Such circumstances would have a material adverse effect our ability to sell Bitcoin at profitable prices, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any Bitcoin we hold or expect to acquire for our own account and harm investors.
Previous wording
If federal or state legislatures or agencies initiate or release tax determinations that change the classification of Bitcoin as property for tax purposes (in the context of when such Bitcoin are held as an investment), such determination could have a negative tax consequence on our Company or our stockholders.
Current wording
If federal or state legislatures or agencies initiate or release tax determinations that change the classification of Bitcoin as property for tax purposes (in the context of when such Bitcoin are held as an investment), such determination could have a negative tax consequence on our Company or our shareholders.
Previous wording
Current IRS guidance indicates that digital assets such as Bitcoin should be treated and taxed as property, and that transactions involving the payment of Bitcoin for goods and services should be treated as barter transactions. While such treatment would create a potential tax reporting requirement for any circumstance where the ownership of Bitcoin passes from one person to another, usually by means of Bitcoin transactions (including off-blockchain transactions), it preserves the right to apply capital gains treatment to those transactions. Any change to such tax treatment may adversely affect an investment in our Company.
Current wording
Current IRS guidance indicates that digital assets such as Bitcoin should be treated and taxed as property, and that transactions involving the payment of Bitcoin for goods and services should be treated as barter transactions. While this treatment creates a potential tax reporting requirement for any circumstance where the ownership of a Bitcoin passes from one person to another, usually by means of Bitcoin transactions (including off-blockchain transactions), it preserves the right to apply capital gains treatment to those transactions which may adversely affect an investment in our Company.
Previous wording
Competitive conditions within the Bitcoin mining industry require that we use sophisticated technology in the operation of our future Bitcoin mining business segment. We plan to utilize third-party software applications in our mining operations. Further, some of our operations may be conducted through collaboration with software providers. The industry for blockchain technology is characterized by rapid technological changes, new product introductions, enhancements and evolving industry standards. New technologies, techniques or products could emerge that might offer better performance than the software and other technologies we plan to utilize, and we may have to manage transitions to these new technologies to remain competitive. We may not be successful, generally or relative to our competitors in the Bitcoin mining industry, in timely implementing new technology into our systems, or doing so in a cost-effective manner. During the course of implementing any such new technology into our operations, we may experience the system interruptions and failures discussed above. Furthermore, there can be no assurances that we will recognize, in a timely manner or at all, the benefits that we may expect as a result of our implementing new technology into our operations.
Current wording
Competitive conditions within the Bitcoin industry require that we use sophisticated technology in the operation of our business. The industry for blockchain technology is characterized by rapid technological changes, new product introductions, enhancements and evolving industry standards. New technologies, techniques or products could emerge that might offer better performance than the software and other technologies we currently utilize, and we may have to manage transitions to these new technologies to remain competitive. We may not be successful, generally or relative to our competitors in the Bitcoin industry, in timely implementing new technology into our systems, or doing so in a cost-effective manner. During the course of implementing any such new technology into our operations, we may experience the system interruptions and failures discussed above. Furthermore, there can be no assurances that we will recognize, in a timely manner or at all, the benefits that we may expect as a result of our implementing new technology into our operations.
Previous wording
As of April 1, 2025, there are 856,313 warrants to purchase shares of our common stock outstanding (with a weighted average exercise price of $68.33 and 20,000 outstanding options to purchase shares of common stock (with a weighted average exercise price of $0.10. If and when these securities are exercised into shares of our common stock, the number of our shares of common stock outstanding will increase. Such increase in our outstanding shares, and any sales of such shares, could have a material adverse effect on the market for our common stock and the market price of our common stock.
Current wording
As of March 31, 2026, there are 596,405 warrants to purchase shares of our common stock outstanding (with a weighted average exercise price of $62.43 and 20,000 outstanding options to purchase shares of common stock (with a weighted average exercise price of $0.10. If and when these securities are exercised into shares of our common stock, the number of our shares of common stock outstanding will increase. Such increase in our outstanding shares, and any sales of such shares, could have a material adverse effect on the market for our common stock and the market price of our common stock.
Previous wording
As of April 1, 2025, Ronny Yakov, our chief executive officer, owned or controlled approximately 23.99% of our outstanding voting stock. Accordingly, Mr. Yakov has the ability to have a substantial influence on matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election and removal of directors and the approval of any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. As a result, our other stockholders may have little influence over matters submitted for stockholder approval. In addition, the ownership of Mr. Yakov could preclude any unsolicited acquisition of us, and consequently, adversely affect the price of our common stock. Further, he may make decisions that are adverse to our interests.
Current wording
As of March 31, 2026, Ronny Yakov, our chief executive officer, owned or controlled approximately 35% of our outstanding voting stock. Accordingly, Mr. Yakov has the ability to have a substantial influence on matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election and removal of directors and the approval of any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. As a result, our other stockholders may have little influence over matters submitted for stockholder approval. In addition, the ownership of Mr. Yakov could preclude any unsolicited acquisition of us, and consequently, adversely affect the price of our common stock. Further, he may make decisions that are adverse to our interests.
Previous wording
On May 16, 2023, we received written notice from the Listing Qualifications Department of Nasdaq notifying us that, for a period of 30 consecutive business days, we failed to maintain a minimum closing bid price of $1.00 as required for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), we had 180 calendar days, or until November 13, 2023, to regain compliance. On November 14, 2023, the Company received a letter (the “Extension Notice”) from Nasdaq notifying the Company that it had been granted an additional 180-day period, or until May 13, 2024, to regain compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1).
Current wording
On January 29, 2026, The OLB Group, Inc. (“we”, “us” or “our”) received written notice from the Listing Qualifications Department of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) notifying us that, for a period of 30 consecutive business days, we failed to maintain a minimum closing bid price of $1.00 as required for continued listing on the NASDAQ Capital Market pursuant to NASDAQ Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). In accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), we have 180 calendar days, or until July 28, 2026, to regain compliance. If, at any time during the 180-day grace period, our closing bid price is $1.00 or more for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days, we will have regained compliance and NASDAQ will provide us with written confirmation of such.
Previous wording
Since completing our public offering of shares of our common stock in August 2020, a limited number of securities analysts have been providing research coverage of our common stock. If securities analysts do not continue to cover our common stock, the lack of research coverage may cause the market price of our common stock to decline. The trading market for our common stock may be affected in part by the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about our business. If one or more of the analysts who elect to cover us downgrade our stock, our stock price could decline rapidly. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us, we could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline. In addition, under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and a global settlement among the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, other regulatory agencies and a number of investment banks, which was reached in 2003, many investment banking firms are required to contract with independent financial analysts for their stock research. It may be difficult for a company such as ours, with a smaller market capitalization, to attract independent financial analysts that will cover our common stock. This could have a negative effect on the market price of our stock.
Current wording
A limited number of securities analysts have been providing research coverage of our common stock. If securities analysts do not continue to cover our common stock, the lack of research coverage may cause the market price of our common stock to decline. The trading market for our common stock may be affected in part by the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about our business. If one or more of the analysts who elect to cover us downgrade our stock, our stock price could decline rapidly. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us, we could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline. In addition, under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and a global settlement among the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, other regulatory agencies and a number of investment banks, which was reached in 2003, many investment banking firms are required to contract with independent financial analysts for their stock research. It may be difficult for a company such as ours, with a smaller market capitalization, to attract independent financial analysts that will cover our common stock. This could have a negative effect on the market price of our stock.