Skip to main content

Cadrenal Therapeutics, Inc.

For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 31, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Mar 31, 2026

CVKD$0.98-2.0%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-K

Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-03-13.

0001213900-25-023759

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Current report: 10-K

Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-03-31.

0001213900-26-036946

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 219 previous paragraphs and 246 current paragraphs.

128 unchanged; 81 reworded; 35 added; 9 removed; 1 previous and 2 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 133 previous and 131 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (35)

Current report

The following discussion of risk factors contains forward-looking statements. These risk factors may be important to understanding any statement in this Annual Report or elsewhere. The following information should be read in conjunction with Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes beginning on F-1 of this Annual Report.

Current report

You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, in addition to other information contained in this Annual Report, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Our business, financial condition and operating results can be affected by a number of factors, whether currently known or unknown, including but not limited to those described below. Any one or more of such factors could directly or indirectly cause our actual results of operations and financial condition to vary materially from past or anticipated future results of operations and financial condition. Any of these factors, in whole or in part, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price. References to past events are provided by way of example only and are not intended to be a complete listing or a representation as to whether or not such factors have occurred in the past or their likelihood of occurring in the future.

Current report

Our financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern.

Current report

We had an accumulated deficit of approximately $39.0 million as of December 31, 2025 and a net loss of approximately $13.2 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. We expect to incur significant expenses and continued losses from operations for the foreseeable future. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents will not be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for the next twelve months. We will require additional financing as we continue to execute our business strategy, including the need for additional funds for the commencement of our planned clinical trials. Our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, were prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern; however, we have incurred significant losses from operations to date and we expect our expenses to increase in connection with the commencement of our planned clinical trials. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for one year after the financial statements are issued. Our auditor’s report on our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 contains an explanatory paragraph with respect to this uncertainty. Our liquidity may be negatively impacted as a result of research and development cost increases in addition to general economic and industry factors. In order to meet our expected obligations, we intend to raise additional funds through partnering and equity and debt financings or a combination of these potential sources of liquidity. There can be no assurance that funding will be available on acceptable terms, on a timely basis, or at all. The various ways that we could raise capital carry potential risks. Any additional financing will likely involve the issuance of our equity securities, which will have a dilutive effect on our stockholders. Any debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants that may impact our ability to conduct our business. If we raise funds through partnering, such as collaborations and licensing arrangements, we might be required to relinquish significant rights to our technologies or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. If we do not succeed in raising additional funds on acceptable terms or at all, we may be unable to complete the planned clinical trials. As such, we cannot conclude that such plans will be effectively implemented within one year after the date that the financial statements included in this Annual Report are filed with the SEC and there is uncertainty regarding our ability to maintain liquidity sufficient to operate our business effectively, which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Current report

Any shutdown of the U.S. federal government may adversely affect our business.

Current report

Our future success depends heavily on FDA review of our Phase 3 trial protocol and commencement of our Phase 3 clinical trial.

Current report

We completed our EOP2 meeting with FDA on March 26, 2026. Although we clarified a potential registrational path for our planned Phase 3 pivotal trial of CAD-1005 in patients with HIT, we have not yet received the meeting minutes from the FDA, which may contain additional information not discussed in the meeting. Our Phase 3 trial protocol will still be subject to any further comments we may receive from the FDA upon their review of the protocol. The FDA may also require us to conduct additional studies.

Current report

The 12-LOX platform of assets is subject to significant clinical risks that could impede our ability to advance CAD-1005 or our second-generation oral candidates.

Current report

Our second-generation oral 12-LOX inhibitors for Type 1 Diabetes and vascular health are in early development; any safety or efficacy failures in these programs could negatively impact the perceived value of the 12-LOX platform of assets as a whole. Since the Phase 2 study of CAD-1005 for patients with HIT was not powered for statistical significance, the observed benefit in thrombotic events could be due to chance rather than the product candidate’s efficacy. In addition, the Phase 2 trial did not complete enrollment, only 24 patients out of a planned 60 were treated in the trial before it was terminated. There can be no assurance that future trials will not have recruitment difficulties given the acute and complex nature of the disease.

Current report

Our business depends on timely interactions with the FDA, including the review of regulatory submissions, scheduling of formal meetings, and oversight of clinical trials. In fact, we recently attended an EOP2 meeting with the FDA to discuss a registration pathway for our Phase 3 trial. Disruptions at the FDA and other federal agencies, including substantial leadership departures, personnel cuts, policy changes and those related to the federal government shutdown, may result in reduced staffing or suspension of non-essential FDA operations, which could delay or cancel meetings with the FDA, hinder regulatory guidance, delay the implementation or enforcement of regulatory requirements in a timely fashion or at all, and postpone the review of IND applications, New Drug Applications (NDAs), and Biologics License Applications (BLAs). Any delay in our interactions with the FDA or future meetings will result in delay in us commencing future clinical trials of our lead product candidate CAD-1005 in patients with HIT. These disruptions may also affect the initiation, conduct, and monitoring of other clinical trials, particularly those requiring FDA authorization or ongoing regulatory engagement. Interruptions in FDA activities could materially delay our development timelines, increase operational costs, and adversely impact our ability to complete our planned clinical trials and to advance product candidates toward approval and commercialization. Any such delays or uncertainties may have a significant negative effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Current report

In addition, the current U.S. administration is focused on reducing costs of the federal government generally, including significantly reducing the number of government employees. Without appropriation of additional funding to federal agencies, our business operations related to our product development activities for the U.S. market could be impacted. The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, the ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory and policy changes. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of the SEC and other government agencies on which our operations may rely is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.

Current report

There is substantial uncertainty as to whether and how the new administration will seek to modify or revise the requirements and policies of the FDA and other regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over our product candidates and any products for which we obtain approval. Additionally, the new administration could also issue or promulgate executive orders, regulations, policies or guidance that adversely affect us or create a more challenging or costly environment to pursue the development of new therapeutic candidates. Complying with any new legislation and regulatory requirements could be time-intensive and expensive.

Current report

Our business is dependent on the Old Dominion License Agreement, and the termination, non-renewal or failure to maintain that agreement could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects.

Current report

We do not own the intellectual property rights to our lead product candidate, CAD-1005, and instead license them and rely on the Old Dominion License Agreement for the development, manufacture and commercialization of CAD-1005. As a result, our ability to advance our CAD-1005 clinical program, obtain regulatory approval, and commercialize CAD-1005, if approved, is dependent on our continued rights under such agreement. The Old Dominion License Agreement may be terminated by the Licensor upon the occurrence of certain events, including our failure to meet development or regulatory milestones, to use commercially reasonable efforts, to make required payments (including upfront, milestone or royalty payments), or to comply with other material obligations. In addition, the Licensor may have the right to terminate the agreement for insolvency-related events or, in some circumstances, for convenience. Any termination would result in the loss of our rights to the licensed intellectual property, which would likely force us to discontinue development and commercialization of the CAD-1005. The Old Dominion License Agreement also requires us to make significant payments to the Licensor, including upfront fees, development and regulatory milestone payments, and royalties on future sales. These obligations increase our operating expenses and may reduce our profitability, if achieved, and could require us to raise additional capital.

Current report

If we were to lose our rights under the Old Dominion License Agreement, or if the agreement were otherwise terminated or materially modified in a manner adverse to us, we may be unable to continue development or commercialization of CAD-1005 on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. In such event, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects would be materially and adversely affected.

Current report

We do not have a manufacturing infrastructure and do not intend to develop one. We do not have any long-term supply agreements with any manufacturers of CAD-1005 or frunexian. With respect to the drug candidates we acquired from eXIthera and Veralox, we intend to execute contracts with third-party CDMOs for the supply of drug substance and drug product in accordance with cGMP, but do not yet have such contracts in place.

Current report

In addition, healthcare reform legislation enacted in recent years has materially altered the post-approval commercial landscape for pharmaceutical products. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) grants the U.S. government authority to negotiate prices for certain drugs and biologics reimbursed under Medicare, imposes inflation-based rebate obligations, and modifies reimbursement structures under Medicare Part B and Part D. While these provisions generally apply a number of years after a product’s initial approval, they may reduce long-term pricing flexibility, decrease the commercial value of approved products, influence development and launch strategies, and reduce the anticipated return on investment for one or more of our product candidates.

Current report

The ACA itself significantly reshaped the U.S. healthcare and pharmaceutical landscape. Among other things, it expanded access to health insurance coverage, increased utilization of healthcare services and prescription drugs, and imposed new transparency, pricing, and rebate obligations on pharmaceutical manufacturers. The ACA also included the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act, which established an abbreviated approval pathway for biosimilar biological products and a statutory exclusivity framework for reference biologics. This framework has materially affected competition dynamics, pricing pressure, and lifecycle management strategies for biologic products and may reduce the duration or magnitude of market exclusivity for any biologic product candidates we may develop or commercialize. The ACA also expanded mandatory manufacturer discounts and rebates under government healthcare programs, including Medicaid and the Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, and increased reporting and compliance obligations under federal healthcare laws, such as the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. These provisions have increased the complexity and cost of compliance for pharmaceutical manufacturers and reduced net revenues derived from government-reimbursed sales. If any of our products are approved and become eligible for coverage under government healthcare programs, these requirements could materially reduce our realized revenue and profitability.

Current report

In addition, the ACA strengthened and expanded the federal 340B drug pricing program, which requires manufacturers to provide significant discounts to certain covered entities. Expansion of the 340B program, as well as continued regulatory and judicial developments affecting its scope and enforcement, may further reduce net pricing and create additional uncertainty regarding distribution channels, contracting arrangements, and compliance exposure.

Current report

Beyond the ACA, subsequent legislation has expanded FDA’s authority over the development and approval of drug and biologic products. The Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act of 2012 (“FDASIA”) created, among other programs, the breakthrough therapy designation and expanded FDA’s expedited development and review tools for products intended to treat serious or life-threatening diseases. While these programs may offer the potential for accelerated development or approval, they also involve greater regulatory uncertainty, enhanced FDA interaction, and increased post-approval obligations, and FDA retains broad discretion in determining eligibility and requirements. The 21st Century Cures Act of 2016 further modified FDA approval standards by permitting the Agency, in appropriate circumstances, to consider real-world evidence, biomarkers, surrogate endpoints, and novel clinical trial designs in support of marketing approval or label expansions. Although these provisions were intended to increase flexibility and efficiency in drug development, they create uncertainty regarding how FDA will apply these evolving evidentiary standards to particular products or development programs, including ours.

Current report

More recently, the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022 (“FDORA”), enacted as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, significantly expanded FDA’s authority over products approved under accelerated or other expedited approval pathways. FDORA enhances FDA’s ability to require that confirmatory clinical trials be underway prior to approval, mandates additional post-approval reporting and oversight, and provides FDA with greater authority to expedite withdrawal of approval if required post-approval studies fail to verify clinical benefit, are not conducted with due diligence, or do not meet regulatory expectations. As a result, even if one or more of our product candidates receives accelerated approval, we may be required to conduct additional costly and time-consuming studies, and FDA may ultimately withdraw approval.

Current report

Recent legislation has also imposed additional requirements on clinical development programs, including obligations to submit and implement diversity action plans for certain late-stage clinical trials. Compliance with these requirements may increase development costs, extend clinical timelines, complicate patient enrollment, and adversely affect our ability to complete studies, particularly for rare diseases or highly specialized patient populations.

Current report

Congress continues to consider additional legislative and regulatory reforms that could further amend the ACA, modify FDA approval pathways, expand government pricing controls, increase compliance and reporting requirements, or otherwise affect exclusivity, reimbursement, and commercialization. We cannot predict whether, when, or in what form such changes may be adopted, nor how FDA and other agencies may interpret or implement them. If we are unable to successfully adapt our development and commercialization strategies to this evolving legislative and regulatory environment, or if future changes under the ACA or other healthcare laws impose more stringent requirements, delay or prevent approvals, increase development or compliance costs, restrict pricing or reimbursement, or result in withdrawal of approval, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects could be materially adversely affected.

Current report

Use of artificial intelligence in research, development, and commercial activities presents operational, regulatory, ethical, and reputational risks that could adversely affect our business.

Current report

We increasingly rely on artificial intelligence (“AI”) and machine-learning systems across our research, development, clinical, manufacturing, and commercial operations. These tools support activities such as target identification, compound screening, biomarker discovery, clinical-trial design and recruitment, pharmacovigilance monitoring, supply-chain optimization, and commercial analytics. Because AI models—particularly those applied to biological and clinical datasets—can behave unpredictably or produce biased or inaccurate outputs, our reliance on such systems may expose us to operational and scientific risks. Any errors or limitations in AI-generated insights could delay discovery efforts, impair the design or execution of our clinical trials, misinform safety or efficacy assessments, or otherwise negatively impact the advancement of our pipeline candidates.

Current report

The regulatory environment applicable to AI remains highly uncertain and continues to evolve in the United States and globally. Regulators have begun scrutinizing AI applications in healthcare and life sciences, and we may face new obligations related to transparency, data provenance, model documentation, validation standards, or auditability. In particular, new or forthcoming requirements from U.S. federal agencies and international authorities could impose additional burdens on our R&D workflows or clinical-trial operations, limiting how we design studies, analyze endpoints, select patient populations, or interact with clinical investigators and regulatory bodies. As noted by recent legal and regulatory commentary, public companies must carefully assess and disclose material AI-related risks, and the SEC has emphasized that inaccurate or overstated claims about AI capabilities—commonly referred to as “AI-washing”—may give rise to enforcement actions and shareholder litigation. Any failure to provide accurate AI-related disclosures could subject us to reputational damage, regulatory proceedings, or securities claims.

Current report

Our use of AI may also introduce data-integrity and cybersecurity risks. AI systems used in drug development frequently involve sensitive clinical, genomic, or proprietary datasets, making them potential targets for data-poisoning attacks, model manipulation, or unauthorized access. Compromised AI tools could corrupt datasets, distort model outputs related to safety or efficacy, or expose confidential patient or trial information. Additionally, reliance on third-party AI vendors, cloud providers, or specialized platforms—some outside traditional pharmaceutical quality-system regulations—may increase our exposure to operational disruptions, confidentiality breaches, or compliance failures.

Current report

We also face competitive risks. AI-enabled research continues to transform discovery timelines, trial execution, and manufacturing processes within the biopharmaceutical industry. If competitors adopt more advanced AI systems, access higher-quality proprietary datasets, or integrate AI more efficiently into R&D or commercial processes, we may be placed at a competitive disadvantage. Conversely, over-reliance on emerging AI technologies that ultimately do not perform as expected could divert resources, impair strategic decision-making, or delay program progression.

Current report

As AI technologies and regulatory expectations evolve, we may incur significant additional costs to update systems, retrain personnel, validate models, modify documentation, or enhance governance and oversight. If we fail to appropriately manage these risks, our research productivity, clinical development timelines, regulatory interactions, commercial performance, financial condition, or reputation could be materially adversely affected.

Current report

The Nasdaq has recently proposed a new rule change to (i) adopt Listing Rule 5550(a)(6) to require issuers listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market to maintain a minimum Market Value of Listed Securities (as defined in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5005(a)(23)) of at least $5 million for a period of thirty (30) consecutive business days, and (ii) amend Rule 5810 to suspend trading and immediately delist from Nasdaq securities of issuers that do not satisfy the proposed new requirements, and Rule 5815 to set forth the procedures for requesting a hearing before a Hearings Panel and the scope of the Panel’s discretion.

Current report

Even if our product candidates receive FDA approval, there is no guarantee that the trading price of our Common Stock will increase following approval, and in the past, some companies have not necessarily experienced such an increase.

Current report

The market price of our Common Stock may not increase following the approval of one or more of our product candidates by the FDA or other regulatory authorities and may instead remain flat or decline. Although FDA approval may be viewed as an important development milestone, historical experience in the biopharmaceutical industry demonstrates that regulatory approval does not necessarily result in an increase in a company’s stock price, and in some cases has been followed by a decrease in market value.

Current report

Any stock price reaction to FDA approval may be negatively affected by a variety of factors, including investor expectations that exceeded the actual scope or conditions of approval, limitations or restrictions in the approved labeling, safety warnings or post-approval study requirements, lack of perceived differentiation from existing therapies, uncertainty regarding reimbursement or pricing, or concerns regarding market adoption and commercial execution. In addition, investors may shift their focus following approval from regulatory milestones to commercialization risks, including manufacturing scale-up, marketing capabilities, and competitive dynamics.

Current report

Moreover, approval of a product candidate does not guarantee commercial success or meaningful revenue generation. Our ability to generate value following approval will depend on numerous factors, including physician and patient acceptance, coverage and reimbursement decisions by third-party payors, the competitive landscape (including the availability of alternative or lower-cost therapies), our ability to effectively market and distribute any approved product, and our compliance with ongoing regulatory obligations. If our actual commercial performance or post-approval development plans fail to meet investor expectations, the market price of our Common Stock may decline.

Current report

In addition, broader factors unrelated to the regulatory status or underlying performance of our product candidates may adversely affect our stock price. These factors may include general volatility in the equity markets, changes in macroeconomic or geopolitical conditions, shifts in investor sentiment toward biotechnology or small-capitalization companies, analyst coverage or forecasts, and the trading behavior of institutional investors or other significant stockholders.
Removed paragraphs (9)

Previous report

Additionally, in August 2022, President Biden signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which includes provisions that effectively authorize the government to establish prices for certain high-spend single-source drugs and biologics reimbursed by the Medicare program, starting in 2026 for Medicare Part D drugs and 2028 for Medicare Part B drugs. It is not yet certain which products the federal government will select and subject to government-established prices, or how the federal government will establish prices for selected products, as the IRA specifies a ceiling price but not a minimum price. One or more of our product candidates, if approved, could be selected and subject to the government-established price.

Previous report

The IRA also contains provisions that impose rebates if certain prices increase at a rate that outpaces the rate of inflation, beginning October 1, 2022, for Medicare Part D drugs and January 1, 2023, for Medicare Part B drugs. Separate IRA provisions redesign the Medicare Part D benefit in various ways, including by shifting a greater portion of costs to manufacturers within certain coverage phases and replacing the Part D coverage gap discount program with a new manufacturer discounting program. Failure to comply with IRA provisions may subject manufacturers to various penalties, including civil monetary penalties. The impact of the IRA on our business and the broader pharmaceutical industry remains uncertain, as the federal government has yet to make various IRA implementation decisions.

Previous report

The 2010 Affordable Care Act is intended to broaden access to health Insurance and reduce or constrain the growth of healthcare spending. Further, the Affordable Care Act imposes a significant annual fee on companies that manufacture or import branded prescription drug products. It also increased the amount of the rebates drug manufacturers must pay to state Medicaid programs, required that Medicaid rebates be paid on managed Medicaid utilization, and increased the additional rebate on “line extensions” (such as extended-release formulations) of solid oral dosage forms of branded products. The law also contains substantial provisions affecting fraud and abuse compliance and transparency, which may require us to modify our business practices with healthcare practitioners, and incur substantial costs to ensure compliance.

Previous report

Many members of the Republican Party have consistently opposed the Affordable Care Act since it was signed. Efforts to repeal the Act have been attempted numerous times and some portions of the Act have been amended in 2017 and 2018. It is unclear whether further amendments or repeal will be effectuated and what the effect on the healthcare sector will be. In addition to potential changes to the Affordable Care Act, there are indications that the Medicaid and Medicare programs may be restructured, which could lead to revisions in coverage and reimbursement of prescription drugs. While we are unable to predict what legislation, if any, may potentially be enacted, to the extent that future changes affect how our product candidates could be paid for and/or reimbursed by the government and private payers, our business could be adversely affected.

Previous report

In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the Affordable Care Act was enacted. For example, the Budget Control Act of 2011 included, among other things, provisions that have led to 2% across-the-board reductions in Medicare payment amounts. Several states have adopted or are considering adopting laws that require pharmaceutical companies to provide notice prior to raising prices and to justify price increases. We expect that additional healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services, and in turn could significantly reduce the projected value of certain development projects and reduce our profitability.

Previous report

Foreign sales of tecarfarin could also be adversely affected by the imposition of governmental controls, political and economic instability, trade restrictions and changes in tariffs, any of which may adversely affect our results of operations.

Previous report

The Animal Welfare Act, or AWA, is the federal law that covers the treatment of certain animals used in research. Currently, the AWA imposes a wide variety of specific regulations that govern the humane handling, care, treatment and transportation of certain animals by producers and users of research animals, most notably relating to personnel, facilities, sanitation, cage size, and feeding, watering and shipping conditions. Third parties with whom we contract are subject to registration, inspections and reporting requirements under the AWA. Furthermore, some states have their own regulations, including general anti-cruelty legislation, which establish certain standards in handling animals. Comparable rules, regulations, and or obligations exist in many foreign jurisdictions. If we or our contractors fail to comply with regulations concerning the treatment of animals used in research, we may be subject to fines and penalties and adverse publicity, and our operations could be adversely affected.

Previous report

The effects of climate change, such as extreme weather conditions, create financial risks to our business. For example, the demand for our products may be affected by unseasonable weather conditions. The effects of climate change could also disrupt our operations by impacting the availability and cost of materials needed for manufacturing and could increase insurance and other operating costs. We could also face indirect financial risks passed through the supply chain and disruptions that could result in increased prices for our products and the resources needed to produce them.

Previous report

Climate change is continuing to receive ever-increasing attention worldwide. Many scientists, legislators and others attribute climate change to increased levels of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, which could lead to additional legislative and regulatory efforts to limit greenhouse gas emissions. For example, new federal or state restrictions on emissions of carbon dioxide that may be imposed on vehicles and automobile fuels could adversely affect demand for vehicles, annual miles driven or the products we sell or lead to changes in automotive technology. Compliance with any new or more stringent laws or regulations, or stricter interpretations of existing laws, could require increased capital expenditures to improve our product portfolio to meet such new laws, regulations and standards. While we have been committed to continuous improvements to our product portfolio to meet and exceed anticipated regulatory standard levels, there can be no assurance that our commitments will be successful, that our products will be accepted by the market, that proposed regulation or deregulation will not have a negative competitive impact or that economic returns will reflect our investments in new product development.
Reworded paragraphs (81)

Previous wording

We were formed in January 2022 and have had limited operations to date. We have to manufacture product, complete clinical trials and receive regulatory approval of NDAs before commercial sales of our product candidates can commence. The likelihood of success of our business plan must be considered in light of the problems, substantial expenses, difficulties, complications and delays frequently encountered in connection with building and expanding clinical development pharmaceutical businesses and the regulatory and competitive environment in which we operate. Pharmaceutical product development is a highly speculative undertaking, involves a substantial degree of risk and is a capital-intensive business.

Current wording

We were formed in January 2022 and have had limited operations to date. We have not yet performed any clinical trials. We have to manufacture product, complete clinical trials and receive regulatory approval of NDAs before commercial sales of our product candidates can commence. The likelihood of success of our business plan must be considered in light of the problems, substantial expenses, difficulties, complications and delays frequently encountered in connection with building and expanding clinical development pharmaceutical businesses and the regulatory and competitive environment in which we operate. Pharmaceutical product development is a highly speculative undertaking, involves a substantial degree of risk and is a capital-intensive business.

Previous wording

We are a development-stage company and our success is dependent upon our ability to obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize our product candidate, tecarfarin, and we have not demonstrated an ability to perform the functions necessary for the approval or successful commercialization of any product candidate. We have yet to demonstrate our ability to overcome the risks frequently encountered in our industry and are still subject to many of the risks common to such enterprises, including our ability to implement our business plan, market acceptance of our proposed business and lead product, under-capitalization, cash shortages, limitations with respect to personnel, financing and other resources, competition from better funded and experienced companies, and uncertainty of our ability to generate revenues. In fact, though individual team members have experience running clinical trials and our Chief Executive Officer has been involved with the development of tecarfarin for six years, as a company we have yet to prove that we can successfully run a clinical trial. There is no assurance that our activities will be successful or will result in any revenues or profit, and the likelihood of our success must be considered in light of the stage of our development. In addition, no assurance can be given that we will be able to consummate our business strategy and plans, or that financial, technological, market, or other limitations may force us to modify, alter, significantly delay, or significantly impede the implementation of such plans. We have insufficient results for investors to use to identify historical trends. Investors should consider our prospects in light of the risk, expenses and difficulties we will encounter as an early-stage company. Our revenue and income potential are unproven and our business model is continually evolving. We are subject to the risks inherent to the operation of a new business enterprise, and cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully address these risks.

Current wording

We are a development-stage company and our success is dependent upon our ability to obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize our product candidates and we have not demonstrated an ability to perform the functions necessary for the approval or successful commercialization of any product candidate. We have yet to demonstrate our ability to overcome the risks frequently encountered in our industry and are still subject to many of the risks common to such enterprises, including our ability to implement our business plan, market acceptance of our proposed business and lead product, under-capitalization, cash shortages, limitations with respect to personnel, financing and other resources, competition from better funded and experienced companies, and uncertainty of our ability to generate revenues. In fact, though individual team members have experience running clinical trials, we have yet to prove that we can successfully run a clinical trial and our lead product candidate. There is no assurance that our activities will be successful or will result in any revenues or profit, and the likelihood of our success must be considered in light of the stage of our development. In addition, no assurance can be given that we will be able to consummate our business strategy and plans, or that financial, technological, market, or other limitations may force us to modify, alter, significantly delay, or significantly impede the implementation of such plans. We have insufficient results for investors to use to identify historical trends. Investors should consider our prospects in light of the risk, expenses and difficulties we will encounter as an early-stage company. Our revenue and income potential are unproven and our business model is continually evolving. In fact, we have recently changed our focus from the development of tecarfarin to the development of CAD-1005. We are subject to the risks inherent to the operation of a new business enterprise, and cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully address these risks.

Previous wording

To date, we have not generated any revenue from operations and we expect to continue to incur significant operating losses in connection with the development and sale of tecarfarin. We may continue to incur operating losses until such time, if ever, as we are able to achieve sufficient levels of revenue from operations. Our ability to achieve profitability will depend on regulatory approval of our product candidate and if approved, the market acceptance of our product offering and our capacity to develop, introduce and sell our product to our targeted markets. There can be no assurance that we will ever generate significant sales or achieve profitability. Accordingly, the extent of future losses and the time required to achieve profitability, if ever, cannot be predicted at this point.

Current wording

To date, we have not generated any revenue from operations and we expect to continue to incur significant operating losses in connection with the development and sale of our product candidates. We may continue to incur operating losses until such time, if ever, as we are able to achieve sufficient levels of revenue from operations. Our ability to achieve profitability will depend on regulatory approval of our product candidates and, if approved, the market acceptance of our product offering and our capacity to develop, introduce and sell our product to our targeted markets. In fact, if the FDA determines that we require larger patients numbers in our planned clinical trial of CAD-1005 in patients with HIT or additional clinical trials our financing needs will increase and our ability to commercialize our product candidate will be delayed beyond our currently planned timeline. There can be no assurance that we will ever generate significant sales or achieve profitability. Accordingly, the extent of future losses and the time required to achieve profitability, if ever, cannot be predicted at this point.

Previous wording

Even if we can secure such arrangements, we may continue to have obligations and expenses that exceed the revenue generated by these marketed products. In addition, we could incur significant development and other expenses if we were to make alterations to the manufacturing process for tecarfarin, for preparation and submission of a supplemental NDA for such alterations, if required by the FDA, and in connection with the launch of tecarfarin, if approved. Further, as we pursue FDA approval for tecarfarin, we expect that our research and development expenses will continue to increase significantly as we advance our pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial.

Current wording

Even if we can secure such arrangements, we may continue to have obligations and expenses that exceed the revenue generated by these marketed products. In addition, we could incur significant development and other expenses if we were to make alterations to the manufacturing process for any product candidate including CAD-1005, for preparation and submission of a supplemental NDA for such alterations, if required by the FDA, and in connection with the launch of such product, if approved. Further, as we pursue FDA approval for CAD-1005, we expect that our research and development expenses will continue to increase significantly as we advance our product candidates and conduct planned clinical trials.

Previous wording

Our cash and the proceeds from our completed financings will only fund our operations for a limited time, and we will need to raise additional capital to fund our planned pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial and to support our development and commercialization efforts for our product candidate, tecarfarin.

Current wording

Our cash and the proceeds from our completed financings will only fund our operations for a limited time, and we will need to raise additional capital to fund our planned clinical trials and to support our development and commercialization efforts for our product candidates.

Previous wording

If we do not succeed in raising additional funds on acceptable terms, we will be unable to commence our planned Phase 3 pivotal clinical trial or obtain approval of our product candidate from the FDA and other regulatory authorities. In addition, we could be forced to delay, discontinue or curtail product development, forego sales and marketing efforts, and forego licensing in attractive business opportunities.

Current wording

If we do not succeed in raising additional funds on acceptable terms, we will be unable to commence our planned clinical trials or obtain approval of our product candidates from the FDA and other regulatory authorities If the FDA determines that we require larger patients numbers in our clinical trial or additional clinical trials our financing needs will increase and our ability to commercialize our product candidate will be delayed beyond our currently planned timeline. In addition, we could be forced to delay, discontinue or curtail product development, forego sales and marketing efforts, and forego licensing in attractive business opportunities.

Previous wording

We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient in the aggregate to meet our anticipated cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. We will, however, require additional financing as we continue to execute our business strategy, including that we will require additional funds for the initiation of enrollment of patients and completion of the planned pivotal Phase 3 trial. Our liquidity may be negatively impacted as a result of research and development cost increases in addition to general economic and industry factors. We anticipate that, to the extent that we require additional liquidity, it will be funded through the incurrence of other indebtedness, additional equity financings, or a combination of these potential sources of liquidity. In addition, we may raise additional funds to finance future cash needs through grant funding and/or corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities or convertible debt, our stockholders will experience dilution. Debt financing, if available, would result in increased fixed payment obligations and may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements with third parties, it may be necessary to relinquish valuable rights to our products, future revenue streams or product candidates or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. The covenants under future credit facilities may limit our ability to obtain additional debt financing. We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Any failure to raise capital in the future could have a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to pursue our business strategies.

Current wording

We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents will not be sufficient in the aggregate to meet our anticipated cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. We will require additional financing prior to commencing any clinical trial and as we continue to execute our business strategy, including that we will require additional funds for the initiation of enrollment of patients and completion of the planned clinical trials. Our liquidity may be negatively impacted as a result of research and development cost increases in addition to general economic and industry factors. We anticipate that, to the extent that we require additional liquidity, it will be funded through the incurrence of other indebtedness, additional equity financings, or a combination of these potential sources of liquidity. In addition, we may raise additional funds to finance future cash needs through grant funding and/or corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities or convertible debt, our stockholders will experience dilution. Debt financing, if available, would result in increased fixed payment obligations and may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements with third parties, it may be necessary to relinquish valuable rights to our products, future revenue streams or product candidates or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. The covenants under future credit facilities may limit our ability to obtain additional debt financing. We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Any failure to raise capital in the future could have a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to pursue our business strategies.

Previous wording

Other than our at-the-market facility with H.C. Wainwright & Co., we do not currently have any arrangements or credit facilities in place as a source of funds, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient additional capital on acceptable terms, or at all. Availability of funding from the at-the-market facility is limited due to certain restrictions. We anticipate that the additional funding we require will be funded through a combination of private and public equity offerings, debt financings and strategic collaborations. Debt financing, if obtained, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, including issuing shares of our Common Stock or other securities and incurring additional debt, and could increase our expenses and require that our assets secure such debt. Equity financing, if obtained, could result in dilution to our then existing stockholders and/or require such stockholders to waive certain rights and preferences. If such financing is not available on satisfactory terms, or is not available at all, we may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate the development of business opportunities and our operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected. We can provide no assurances that any additional sources of financing will be available to us on favorable terms, if at all. In addition, if we are unable to secure sufficient capital to fund our operations, we might have to enter into strategic collaborations that could require us to share commercial rights to our products or product candidates with third parties in ways that we currently do not intend or on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we choose to pursue additional indications and/or geographies for any of our products or product candidates or otherwise expand more rapidly than we presently anticipate, we may also need to raise additional capital sooner than expected.

Current wording

Other than our at-the-market facility with H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (“H.C.W.”) we do not currently have any arrangements or credit facilities in place as a source of funds, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to use such facility or even if we can use such facility there can be no assurance that we will raise sufficient additional capital on acceptable terms, or at all. Availability of funding from the at-the-market facility is limited due to certain restrictions. We anticipate that the additional funding we require will be funded through a combination of private and public equity offerings, debt financings and strategic collaborations. Debt financing, if obtained, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, including issuing shares of our Common Stock or other securities and incurring additional debt, and could increase our expenses and require that our assets secure such debt. Equity financing, if obtained, could result in dilution to our then existing stockholders and/or require such stockholders to waive certain rights and preferences. If such financing is not available on satisfactory terms, or is not available at all, we may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate the development of business opportunities and our operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected. We can provide no assurances that any additional sources of financing will be available to us on favorable terms, if at all. In addition, if we are unable to secure sufficient capital to fund our operations, we might have to enter into strategic collaborations that could require us to share commercial rights to our products or product candidates with third parties in ways that we currently do not intend or on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we choose to pursue additional indications and/or geographies for any of our products or product candidates or otherwise expand more rapidly than we presently anticipate, we may also need to raise additional capital sooner than expected.

Previous wording

Our business is dependent upon the success of our investigational product candidate, tecarfarin, which requires additional clinical testing before we can seek regulatory approval and potentially launch commercial sales. We do not own any other product candidates or have any other products in clinical development.

Current wording

Our business is dependent upon the success of our lead investigational product candidate, CAD-1005, which require additional clinical testing before we can seek regulatory approval and potentially launch commercial sales.

Previous wording

Our business and future success depends upon our ability to obtain regulatory approval of and then successfully commercialize our product candidate, tecarfarin. Tecarfarin is in late clinical stage development. Our main focus and the investment of a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources is expected to be in the development of our only product candidate, tecarfarin, for which we are currently planning a Phase 3 clinical trial. Even though we are pursuing a registration pathway based on specific FDA input and guidance, there are many uncertainties known and unknown that may affect the outcome of the trial. These include adequate patient enrollment, adequate supply of our product candidate, potential changes in the regulatory landscape, the results of the trial being successful, and FDA acceptance of the data to support approval. We also rely on third parties to conduct the appropriate clinical trials, and their failure to perform in accordance with applicable law would have a negative effect on our regulatory submission.

Current wording

Our business and future success depends upon our ability to obtain regulatory approval of and then successfully commercialize our product candidates. Our main focus and the investment of a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources is expected to be in the development of CAD-1005, for which we are currently planning a pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial for the treatment of HIT with a primary endpoint of reduction in thrombotic events. Even if the FDA agrees with our planned registration pathway, there are many uncertainties known and unknown that may affect the outcome of the trial. These include adequate patient enrollment, adequate supply of our product candidate, potential changes in the regulatory landscape, the results of the trial being successful, and FDA acceptance of the data to support approval. We will also rely on third parties to conduct the appropriate clinical trials, and their failure to perform in accordance with applicable law would have a negative effect on our regulatory submission.

Previous wording

Our future success depends heavily on our ability to successfully manufacture, develop, obtain regulatory approval, and commercialize tecarfarin, which may never occur. We currently generate no revenues from our product candidate, and we may never be able to develop or commercialize a marketable drug.

Current wording

Our future success depends heavily on our ability to successfully manufacture, develop, obtain regulatory approval, and commercialize our product candidates, which may never occur. We currently generate no revenues from our product candidates, and we may never be able to develop or commercialize a marketable drug.

Previous wording

All of our current data for our product candidate are the results of clinical trials conducted by third parties and do not necessarily provide sufficient evidence that our products are viable as potential pharmaceutical products.

Current wording

All of our current data for our product candidates are the results of clinical trials conducted by third parties and do not necessarily provide sufficient evidence that our products are viable as potential pharmaceutical products or that we can successfully conduct clinical trials.

Previous wording

We possess toxicology, pharmacokinetic, and other preclinical data and clinical data on tecarfarin from studies and trials conducted several years ago by third parties. As of now, tecarfarin has been tested in eleven clinical trials and is now in preparation to enter a pivotal Phase 3 trial. There is no guarantee that Phase 1 or Phase 2 results can or will be replicated by the pivotal Phase 3 study. Further, as the clinical trials were conducted by third parties and were completed prior to our ownership of the technology and data, we cannot be assured that such trials were conducted in compliance with applicable statutes, rules, regulations, and guidelines applicable to such trials.

Current wording

We possess toxicology, pharmacokinetic, and other preclinical data and clinical data on our product candidates from studies and trials conducted by third parties, some of which were several years ago. There is no guarantee that Phase 1 or Phase 2 results, as applicable, from the clinical trials for our product candidates that were conducted by third-parties can or will be replicated by our planned clinical trials for such product candidates. Further, as the clinical trials were conducted by third parties and were completed prior to our ownership of the technology and data, we cannot be assured that such trials were conducted in compliance with applicable statutes, rules, regulations, and guidelines applicable to such trials.

Previous wording

Previous clinical trials using tecarfarin have had different trial designs, doses, parameters and endpoints than the planned Phase 3 clinical trial that is expected to serve as a basis for approval of tecarfarin. We intend to design the Phase 3 protocol based on input from our recent meeting with the FDA, however, there can be no assurance that the protocol will be accepted by the FDA. We plan to use a fixed dose in future clinical trials that we believe provides good coverage given the dose ranges tested clinically; however, it is possible that the dose selected will not be the optimal dose and so drug effects may be limited or not be demonstrated sufficiently in clinical testing.

Current wording

Previous clinical trials may have had different trial designs, doses, parameters and endpoints than the planned clinical trials. With respect to our planned Phase 3 clinical trial that is expected to serve as a basis for approval of CAD-1005, we intend to design the Phase 3 protocol based on input from our EOP2 meeting with the FDA. Our Phase 3 trial protocol will still be subject to any further comments we may receive from the FDA upon their review of the protocol. However, it is possible that the results seen in the Veralox Phase 2 trial may not be demonstrated sufficiently in our clinical testing.

Previous wording

As all of our clinical trials to date were conducted by third parties, we cannot be assured that such clinical trials were in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations.

Current wording

As all of the clinical trials for our product candidates to date were conducted by third parties, we cannot be assured that such clinical trials were in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations.

Previous wording

We did not acquire tecarfarin until April of 2022, and do not have first-hand knowledge of how the Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials were completed. As such, we cannot be assured that such clinical trials were conducted in full compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. Additionally, we cannot be assured historical data for such trials are accurate and sufficient for acceptance by the FDA. While we are not aware of any issues in relation to such trials and the performance thereof, we cannot be assured that we may learn in the future that there was a failure to abide by such laws, rules and regulations, which could potentially expose us to issues with regards to our Phase 3 clinical trials or otherwise create risks unknown to us with regards to our technology.

Current wording

Since we did not acquire CAD-1005, tecarfarin and frunexian until December 2025, April 2022 and September 2025, respectively, we do not have first-hand knowledge of how the Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials for such product candidates, as applicable, were completed to date. As such, we cannot be assured that such clinical trials were conducted in full compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. Additionally, we cannot be assured historical data for such trials are accurate and sufficient for acceptance by the FDA. While we are not aware of any issues in relation to such trials and the performance thereof, we cannot be assured that we may learn in the future that there was a failure to abide by such laws, rules and regulations, which could potentially expose us to issues with regards to our planned clinical trials or otherwise create risks unknown to us with regards to our technology.

Previous wording

Despite the global burden of cardiovascular disease, investment in cardiovascular drug development has stagnated over the past two decades, with relative underinvestment compared with other therapeutic areas. The reasons for this trend are multifactorial, but of primary concern is the high cost of conducting cardiovascular outcome trials in the current regulatory environment that demands a direct assessment of risks and benefits, using clinically meaningful cardiovascular endpoints. In addition, clinical trials are difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and are uncertain as to outcome. Success in early phases of pre-clinical and clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful, and interim results of a clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results. There is no guarantee that our clinical trials will reach statistical significance on their endpoints, or demonstrate superiority to warfarin or any other therapy. A failure of one or more of clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. Our product candidate may prove to have undesirable or unintended side effects, toxicities or other characteristics that may preclude our obtaining regulatory approval or prevent or limit commercial use with respect to one or all intended indications. In addition, we may experience other numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, the clinical trial process that could delay or prevent our ability to continue development. Development stage risks include the following:

Current wording

Despite the global burden of cardiovascular disease, investment in cardiovascular drug development has stagnated over the past two decades, with relative underinvestment compared with other therapeutic areas. The reasons for this trend are multifactorial, but of primary concern is the high cost of conducting cardiovascular outcome trials in the current regulatory environment that demands a direct assessment of risks and benefits, using clinically meaningful cardiovascular endpoints. In addition, clinical trials are difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and are uncertain as to outcome. Success in early phases of pre-clinical and clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful, and interim results of a clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results. There is no guarantee that our clinical trials will reach statistical significance on their endpoints, or that any product candidate including CAD-1005 will demonstrate superiority to current standard of care or any other therapy. A failure of one or more of clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. Our product candidate may prove to have undesirable or unintended side effects, toxicities or other characteristics that may preclude our obtaining regulatory approval or prevent or limit commercial use with respect to one or all intended indications. In addition, we may experience other numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, the clinical trial process that could delay or prevent our ability to continue development. Development stage risks include the following:

Previous wording

Even if we successfully complete our clinical trials, we may not receive regulatory approval for tecarfarin, and we may not be able to commercialize our product candidate and our ability to generate revenue will be limited.

Current wording

Even if we successfully complete our clinical trials, we may not receive regulatory approval for our product candidates, and we may not be able to commercialize our product candidates and our ability to generate revenue will be limited.

Previous wording

The research, testing, manufacturing, labeling, packaging, storage, approval, sale, marketing, advertising and promotion, pricing, export, import and distribution of drug products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and other regulatory authorities in the United States and other countries, which regulations differ from country to country. We are not permitted to market our product candidate in the United States until we receive approval of an NDA from the FDA and in non-U.S. markets until we receive the requisite approval from comparable regulatory agencies in such countries. Of the large number of drugs in development, only a small number are submitted for approval to the FDA through an NDA and even fewer are eventually approved for commercialization. We may not succeed at gaining regulatory approval, which would materially harm our business.

Current wording

The research, testing, manufacturing, labeling, packaging, storage, approval, sale, marketing, advertising and promotion, pricing, export, import and distribution of drug products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and other regulatory authorities in the United States and other countries, which regulations differ from country to country. We are not permitted to market our product candidates in the United States until we receive approval of an NDA from the FDA and, in non-U.S. markets, until we receive the requisite approval from comparable regulatory agencies in such countries. Of the large number of drugs in development, only a small number are submitted for approval to the FDA through an NDA and even fewer are eventually approved for commercialization. We may not succeed at gaining regulatory approval, which would materially harm our business.

Previous wording

The process of obtaining regulatory approvals is expensive, often takes many years, if approval is obtained at all, and can vary substantially based upon, among other things, the type, complexity and novelty of the product candidates involved, the jurisdiction in which regulatory approval is sought and the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities. Changes in regulatory review for a submitted product application may cause delays in approval or rejection of an application. Regulatory approval obtained in one jurisdiction does not necessarily mean that a product candidate will receive regulatory approval in all jurisdictions in which we may seek approval, but the failure to obtain approval in one jurisdiction may negatively impact our ability to seek or gain approval in a different jurisdiction. Obtaining foreign regulatory approvals and compliance with foreign regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and could delay or prevent the introduction of our products in certain countries. If we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements in international markets and/or fail to receive applicable marketing approvals, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of tecarfarin or any future product candidates will be harmed.

Current wording

The process of obtaining regulatory approvals is expensive, often takes many years, if approval is obtained at all, and can vary substantially based upon, among other things, the type, complexity and novelty of the product candidates involved, the jurisdiction in which regulatory approval is sought and the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities. Changes in regulatory review for a submitted product application may cause delays in approval or rejection of an application. Regulatory approval obtained in one jurisdiction does not necessarily mean that a product candidate will receive regulatory approval in all jurisdictions in which we may seek approval, but the failure to obtain approval in one jurisdiction may negatively impact our ability to seek or gain approval in a different jurisdiction. Obtaining foreign regulatory approvals and compliance with foreign regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and could delay or prevent the introduction of our products in certain countries. If we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements in international markets and/or fail to receive applicable marketing approvals, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our current product candidates or any future product candidates will be harmed.

Previous wording

Although we have been granted orphan drug designation for tecarfarin, this does not mean FDA will approve the NDA. Even if we obtain FDA approval, we may not be able to obtain or maintain orphan drug exclusivity for tecarfarin. We may not be the first to obtain marketing approval of tecarfarin designation for the orphan-designated indication due to the uncertainties associated with developing pharmaceutical products. In addition, exclusive marketing rights in the United States may be limited if we seek approval for an indication broader than the orphan-designated indication or may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if we are unable to assure sufficient quantities of the product to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition. Further, even if we obtain orphan drug exclusivity for a product, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the product from competition because different drugs with different active moieties may be approved for the same condition, or the competitive product is otherwise outside the scope of exclusivity. Even after an orphan drug is approved, the FDA can subsequently approve the same drug with the same active moiety for the same condition if the FDA concludes that the later drug is clinically superior in that it is shown to be safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care or the manufacturer of the product with orphan exclusivity is unable to maintain sufficient product quantity. Orphan drug designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a drug nor gives the drug any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process, nor does it prevent competitors from obtaining approval of the same product candidate for indications other than those in which orphan drug designation have been granted.

Current wording

CAD-1005 has ODD from the FDA for prophylaxis of thrombosis in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) as well as FDA Fast Track designation for the treatment and prevention of HIT and orphan designation from the EMA for the treatment of platelet-activating factor 4 disorders. Tecarfarin has ODD from the FDA for the prevention of systemic thromboembolism (blood clots) of cardiac origin in patients with ESKD and AFib, as well as for the prevention of thrombosis and thromboembolism in patients with an implanted mechanical circulatory support device, which includes LVADs, a mechanical heart pump. However, these orphan designations do not guarantee that the FDA or the EMA will approve the NDAs (or equivalent in the European Union) for such product candidates. Even if we obtain FDA or EMA approval, we may not be able to obtain or maintain orphan drug exclusivity for such product candidates. We may not be the first to obtain marketing approval of CAD-1005 and/or tecarfarin for their respective orphan-designated indications due to the uncertainties associated with developing pharmaceutical products. In addition, exclusive marketing rights in the United States may be limited if we seek approval for an indication broader than the orphan-designated indication or may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if we are unable to assure sufficient quantities of the product to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition. Further, even if we obtain orphan drug exclusivity for a product, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the product from competition because different drugs with different active moieties may be approved for the same condition, or the competitive product is otherwise outside the scope of exclusivity. Even after an orphan drug is approved, the FDA can subsequently approve the same drug with the same active moiety for the same condition if the FDA concludes that the later drug is clinically superior in that it is shown to be safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care or the manufacturer of the product with orphan exclusivity is unable to maintain sufficient product quantity. Orphan designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a drug nor gives the drug any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process, nor does it prevent competitors from obtaining approval of the same product candidate for indications other than those in which orphan designation have been granted.

Previous wording

If a product candidate is intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition and the product candidate demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical need for this condition, the sponsor may apply for FDA Fast Track designation. However, a Fast Track designation does not ensure that the product candidate will receive marketing approval or that approval will be granted within any particular timeframe. As a result, while we have received Fast Track designation for tecarfarin for the prevention of systemic thromboembolism of cardiac origin in patients with ESKD and AFib, we may not experience a faster development process, review or approval compared to conventional FDA procedures. In addition, the FDA may withdraw Fast Track designation if it believes that the designation is no longer supported by data from our clinical development program. Fast Track designation alone does not guarantee qualification for the FDA’s priority review procedures.

Current wording

If a product candidate is intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition and the product candidate demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical need for this condition, the sponsor may apply for FDA Fast Track designation. However, a Fast Track designation does not ensure that the product candidate will receive marketing approval or that approval will be granted within any particular timeframe. As a result, while CAS-1005 has received Fast Track designation for the treatment and prevention of HIT and tecarfarin for the prevention of systemic thromboembolism of cardiac origin in patients with ESKD and AFib an, we may not experience a faster development process, review or approval compared to conventional FDA procedures. In addition, the FDA may withdraw Fast Track designation if it believes that the designation is no longer supported by data from our clinical development program. Fast Track designation alone does not guarantee qualification for the FDA’s priority review procedures and does not assure ultimate approval by the FDA.

Previous wording

Even if we obtain regulatory approval, we will still face ongoing regulatory requirements and tecarfarin may face future development and regulatory difficulties.

Current wording

Even if we obtain regulatory approval, we will still face ongoing regulatory requirements and our product candidates may face future development and regulatory difficulties.

Previous wording

Even if we receive regulatory approval of tecarfarin or any future product candidates, we will be subject to ongoing regulatory obligations, such as post market surveillance and cGMP requirements, and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense. We may also be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements or experience unanticipated problems with product candidates. In addition, third parties on whom we rely must comply with regulatory requirements, and any non-compliance on their part may negatively impact our business, assuming we obtain regulatory authorization at all.

Current wording

Even if we receive regulatory approval of our current product candidates or any future product candidates, we will be subject to ongoing regulatory obligations, such as post market surveillance and cGMP requirements, and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense. We may also be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements or experience unanticipated problems with product candidates. In addition, third parties on whom we rely must comply with regulatory requirements, and any non-compliance on their part may negatively impact our business, assuming we obtain regulatory authorization at all.

Previous wording

Any regulatory approvals that we receive for product candidates will require surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product candidate. The FDA may also require a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (“REMS”) program in order to approve product candidates, which could entail requirements for a medication guide, physician communication plans or additional elements to ensure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries and other risk minimization tools. The FDA could also require a boxed warning, sometimes referred to as a Black Box Warning on the product label to identify a particular safety risk, which could affect commercial efforts to promote and sell the product. In addition, if the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority approves product candidates, the manufacturing processes, labeling, packaging, distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion, import, export and recordkeeping for product candidates will be subject to extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration, as well as continued compliance with cGMPs and current good clinical practices (“GCPs”) for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval. We are also subject to certain user fees imposed by the regulatory agencies. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with product candidates, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with our third-party manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in, among other things:

Current wording

Any regulatory approvals that we receive for product candidates will require surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product candidate. The FDA may also require a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (“REMS”) program in order to approve product candidates, which could entail requirements for a medication guide, physician communication plans or additional elements to ensure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries and other risk minimization tools. The FDA could also require a boxed warning, sometimes referred to as a Black Box Warning on the product label to identify a particular safety risk, which could affect commercial efforts to promote and sell the product. In addition, if the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority approves product candidates, the manufacturing processes, labeling, packaging, distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion, import, export and recordkeeping for product candidates will be subject to extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration, as well as continued compliance with cGMP and current GCP for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval. We are also subject to certain user fees imposed by the regulatory agencies. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with product candidates, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with our third-party manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in, among other things:

Previous wording

The FDA’s and other regulatory authorities’ policies may change, such as those required by the 21 st Century Cures Act, and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of tecarfarin or any future product candidates. In addition, it is unclear what changes, if any, the new presidential administration may bring. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.

Current wording

The policies of the FDA and other regulatory authorities may change, such as those required by the 21 st Century Cures Act, and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our current product candidates or any future product candidates. In addition, it is unclear what changes, if any, the new presidential administration may bring. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.

Previous wording

As part of the regulatory process, we must conduct clinical trials for each product candidate to demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of the FDA and other regulatory authorities. As we advance tecarfarin or any future product candidates we expect that our expenses will increase. The number and design of the clinical trials that will be required varies depending upon product candidate, the condition being evaluated, current medical strategies and the trial results themselves. Therefore, it is difficult to accurately estimate the cost of the clinical trials. Clinical trials are very expensive and difficult to design and implement, in part because they are subject to rigorous regulatory requirements. The clinical trial process is also time consuming. We estimate that clinical trials of product candidates including tecarfarin, will take at least several years to complete. Furthermore, failure can occur at any stage of the trials, and we could encounter problems that cause us to abandon or repeat clinical trials. The commencement and completion of clinical trials may be delayed or prevented by several factors, including:

Current wording

As part of the regulatory process, we must conduct clinical trials for each product candidate to demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of the FDA and other regulatory authorities. As we advance CAD-1005 or any future product candidates we expect that our expenses will increase. The number and design of the clinical trials that will be required varies depending upon product candidate, the condition being evaluated, current medical strategies and the trial results themselves. Therefore, it is difficult to accurately estimate the cost of the clinical trials. Clinical trials are very expensive and difficult to design and implement, in part because they are subject to rigorous regulatory requirements. The clinical trial process is also time consuming. We estimate that clinical trials of each of our product candidates, will take at least several years to complete. Furthermore, failure can occur at any stage of the trials, and we could encounter problems that cause us to abandon or repeat clinical trials. The commencement and completion of clinical trials may be delayed or prevented by several factors, including:

Previous wording

In addition, we or the FDA may suspend or terminate our clinical trials at any time if it appears that we are exposing participants to unacceptable health risks or if the FDA finds deficiencies in our Investigational New Drug, or IND, submissions or the conduct of these trials. Therefore, we cannot predict with any certainty when, if ever, future clinical trials will commence or be completed.

Current wording

In addition, we or the FDA may suspend or terminate our clinical trials at any time if it appears that we are exposing participants to unacceptable health risks or if the FDA finds deficiencies in our IND submissions or the conduct of these trials. Therefore, we cannot predict with any certainty when, if ever, future clinical trials will commence or be completed.

Previous wording

Delays in the enrollment of patients in any or all of our clinical trials could increase our development costs and delay completion of our clinical trials and associated regulatory submissions.

Current wording

Delays or difficulty in the enrollment of patients in any or all of our clinical trials could increase our development costs and delay completion of our clinical trials and associated regulatory submissions.

Previous wording

We may not be able to initiate or continue clinical trials for our product candidates if we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in these trials as required by the FDA or other regulatory authorities. A pandemic or epidemic would likely make this even more challenging. Even if we are able to enroll a sufficient number of patients in our clinical trials, if the pace of enrollment is slower than we expect, the development costs for our product candidates may increase, and the completion of our trials may be delayed or our trials could become too expensive to complete.

Current wording

We may not be able to initiate or continue clinical trials for our product candidates if we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in these trials as required by the FDA or other regulatory authorities. The Phase 2 trial of CAD-1005 in patients with HIT enrolled only 24 patients out of a planned 60 and was terminated early. It is unclear whether the trial would have been fully enrolled if it were not terminated early. A pandemic or epidemic would likely make this even more challenging. Even if we are able to enroll a sufficient number of patients in our clinical trials, if the pace of enrollment is slower than we expect, the development costs for our product candidates may increase, and the completion of our trials may be delayed or our trials could become too expensive to complete.

Previous wording

Even if approved, tecarfarin may not have labeling that allows us to successfully commercialize it.

Current wording

Even if approved, our product candidates may not have labeling that allows us to successfully commercialize it.

Previous wording

The commercial success of tecarfarin and any of our future product candidates will depend in significant measure upon our ability to obtain approval from the FDA and other regulatory authorities of labeling describing a product candidate’s expected features or benefits. Regulatory authorities may approve tecarfarin for fewer or more limited indications than we request or may approve tecarfarin with labeling that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that indication. Failure to achieve approval from the FDA or other regulatory authorities of product labeling containing certain types of information on features or benefits of our products will prevent or substantially limit our advertising and promotion of such features in order to differentiate our product candidates or any future product candidates from those products already existing in the market. This may make it difficult or impossible to achieve commercial success.

Current wording

The commercial success of our product candidates will depend in significant measure upon our ability to obtain approval from the FDA and other regulatory authorities of labeling describing a product candidate’s expected features or benefits. Regulatory authorities may approve a product candidate for fewer or more limited indications than we request or may approve a product candidate with labeling that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that indication. Failure to achieve approval from the FDA or other regulatory authorities of product labeling containing certain types of information on features or benefits of our products will prevent or substantially limit our advertising and promotion of such features in order to differentiate our product candidates or any future product candidates from those products already existing in the market. This may make it difficult or impossible to achieve commercial success.

Previous wording

If our product candidate is approved, our success depends on our commercialization efforts, which may not be achieved. If we are unable to commercialize our product candidate, or experience significant delays in doing so, our business could be materially harmed.

Current wording

If any of our product candidates is approved, our success depends on our commercialization efforts, which may not be achieved. If we are unable to commercialize our product candidate, or experience significant delays in doing so, our business could be materially harmed.

Previous wording

We will invest a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources into the development and commercialization of tecarfarin. Product revenues from our product candidate, tecarfarin, which will not be realized until after regulatory approval, if ever, will depend on the successful development, regulatory approval and eventual commercialization of these product candidates. The success of our product candidate will depend on several factors, including the following:

Current wording

We will invest a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources into the development and commercialization of our product candidates. Product revenues from our product candidates which will not be realized until after regulatory approval, if ever, will depend on the successful development, regulatory approval and eventual commercialization of these product candidates. The success of our product candidate will depend on several factors, including the following:

Previous wording

If we do not achieve one or more of these factors in a timely manner or at all, we could experience significant delays or an inability to successfully commercialize our product candidate, which would materially harm our business. In addition, even if we obtain regulatory approvals for tecarfarin, the timing or scope of any approval may prohibit or reduce our ability to commercialize tecarfarin successfully. For example, if the approval process takes too long, we may miss market opportunities and give other companies the ability to develop competing products or establish market dominance. Also, any regulatory approval we ultimately obtain may be limited or subject to restrictions or post-approval commitments that render tecarfarin not commercially viable. For example, regulatory authorities may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials or, outside the U.S., they may not accept or approve the price we intend to charge for tecarfarin. Further, the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may place conditions on approvals, such as risk management plans and Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies, or REMS, to assure the safe use of the drug. If the FDA concludes a REMS is needed, the sponsor of the NDA must submit a proposed REMS; the FDA will not approve the NDA without an approved REMS, if required. A REMS could include medication guides, physician communication plans, and/or elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries and other risk minimization tools. The FDA may also require a REMS for an approved product when new safety information emerges. Any of these limitations on approval or marketing could restrict the commercial promotion, distribution, prescription or dispensing of tecarfarin. Moreover, product approvals may be withdrawn for non-compliance with regulatory standards or if problems occur following the initial marketing of the product. Any of the foregoing scenarios could materially harm the commercial success of tecarfarin.

Current wording

If we do not achieve one or more of these factors in a timely manner or at all, we could experience significant delays or an inability to successfully commercialize our product candidate, which would materially harm our business. In addition, even if we obtain regulatory approvals for any of our product candidates, the timing or scope of any approval may prohibit or reduce our ability to commercialize such product candidate successfully. For example, if the approval process takes too long, we may miss market opportunities and give other companies the ability to develop competing products or establish market dominance. Also, any regulatory approval we ultimately obtain may be limited or subject to restrictions or post-approval commitments that render such product candidate not commercially viable. For example, regulatory authorities may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials or, outside the U.S., they may not accept or approve the price we intend to charge for a product candidate. Further, the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may place conditions on approvals, such as risk management plans and Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (“REMS”), to assure the safe use of the drug. If the FDA concludes a REMS is needed, the sponsor of the NDA must submit a proposed REMS; the FDA will not approve the NDA without an approved REMS, if required. A REMS could include medication guides, physician communication plans, and/or elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries and other risk minimization tools. The FDA may also require a REMS for an approved product when new safety information emerges. Any of these limitations on approval or marketing could restrict the commercial promotion, distribution, prescription or dispensing of such product candidate. Moreover, product approvals may be withdrawn for non-compliance with regulatory standards or if problems occur following the initial marketing of the product. Any of the foregoing scenarios could materially harm the commercial success of our product candidates.

Previous wording

Our potential future product candidate, tecarfarin, may fail to achieve the degree of market acceptance by physicians, patients, healthcare payors and others in the medical community necessary for commercial success.

Current wording

Our product candidates may fail to achieve the degree of market acceptance by physicians, patients, healthcare payors and others in the medical community necessary for commercial success.

Previous wording

The commercial success of any potential future product candidates, including tecarfarin, for which we may obtain marketing approval from the FDA or other regulatory authorities will depend upon their acceptance by the medical community and third-party payors as clinically useful, cost-effective and safe. The degree of market acceptance of any drug depends on a number of factors, such as:

Current wording

The commercial success of any of our product candidates for which we may obtain marketing approval from the FDA or other regulatory authorities, will depend upon their acceptance by the medical community and third-party payors as clinically useful, cost-effective and safe. The degree of market acceptance of any drug depends on a number of factors, such as:

Previous wording

We have never submitted an NDA to the FDA or comparable applications to other regulatory authorities and expect to rely on consultants and third-party contract research organizations, or CROs, with expertise in this area to assist us in this process. Securing FDA approval requires the submission of pre-clinical, clinical and/or pharmacokinetic data, information about product manufacturing processes and inspection of facilities and supporting information to the FDA for each therapeutic indication to establish a product candidate’s safety and efficacy for each indication. Regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions impose similar requirements. If we are unable to successfully complete the approval process with the FDA or comparable applications of other regulatory authorities, our business will not be successful.

Current wording

We have never submitted an NDA to the FDA or comparable applications to other regulatory authorities and expect to rely on consultants and third-party contract research organizations (“CROs”), with expertise in this area to assist us in this process. Securing FDA approval requires the submission of pre-clinical, clinical and/or pharmacokinetic data, information about product manufacturing processes and inspection of facilities and supporting information to the FDA for each therapeutic indication to establish a product candidate’s safety and efficacy for each indication. Regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions impose similar requirements. If we are unable to successfully complete the approval process with the FDA or comparable applications of other regulatory authorities, our business will not be successful.

Previous wording

After approval of tecarfarin, tecarfarin will remain subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional risk and expense.

Current wording

After approval of a product candidate, it will remain subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional risk and expense.

Previous wording

Drug products remain subject to the jurisdiction of the FDA and non-U.S. regulatory authorities after they have been approved. Even if we obtain regulatory approval of tecarfarin, the FDA and other regulatory authorities may impose significant restrictions on its indicated uses or marketing or the conditions of approval, or impose ongoing requirements for potentially costly and time-consuming post-approval trials, including Phase 4 clinical trials, and post-market surveillance to monitor safety and efficacy. Our product candidate, if approved, as well as our marketed products are subject to ongoing regulatory requirements governing the manufacturing, labeling, packaging, storage, distribution, safety surveillance, advertising, promotion, sampling, recordkeeping and reporting of adverse events and other post-market information. These requirements include registration with the FDA and continued compliance with cGMPs and current Good Clinical Practices requirements, or cGCPs, for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval.

Current wording

Drug products remain subject to the jurisdiction of the FDA and non-U.S. regulatory authorities after they have been approved. Even if we obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates, the FDA and other regulatory authorities may impose significant restrictions on their indicated uses or marketing or the conditions of approval, or impose ongoing requirements for potentially costly and time-consuming post-approval trials, including Phase 4 clinical trials, and post-market surveillance to monitor safety and efficacy. Our product candidates, if approved, as well as our marketed products, are subject to ongoing regulatory requirements governing the manufacturing, labeling, packaging, storage, distribution, safety surveillance, advertising, promotion, sampling, recordkeeping and reporting of adverse events and other post-market information. These requirements include registration with the FDA and continued compliance with cGMP and current GCP requirements for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval.

Showing the first 40 of 81 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.

Rearranged current paragraphs (2)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

We have recently completed the manufacturing of tecarfarin drug product in accordance with cGMP. We have executed contracts with third-party pharmaceutical CDMOs for the development of validated processes and the supply of active pharmaceutical ingredients and clinical trial material for tecarfarin in accordance with cGMP requirements. Such CDMOs have the capability to scale-up for commercial production of tecarfarin. However, we have not entered into any long-term supply agreements or commercialization partnerships with these vendors. Certain material suppliers and manufacturing sites for our product candidates are in locations outside of the U.S.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Factors affecting competition in these markets include the financial, research and development, testing, and marketing strengths of individual competitors, trends in industry consolidation, consumers’ product options, product quality, price and technology, reputation, customer service capabilities and access to market partners and customers. If approved, CAD-1005 would compete with existing non-heparin anticoagulants such as direct thrombin antagonists (bivalirudin and argatroban), fondaparinux (a direct Xa antagonist), and DOACS. Eliquis is manufactured and distributed by Bristol Myers Squibb, Pradaxa is manufactured and distributed by Boehringer Ingelheim, Xarelto is manufactured and distributed by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Savaysa is manufactured and distributed by Daiichi Sankyo, each of which is a competitor product of tecarfarin.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Our amended and restated bylaws, provide that we will indemnify our directors and executive officers, in each case to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.