Rumble Inc.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 5, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Mar 5, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-03-25.
0001013762-25-001863
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-03-05.
0001213900-26-024099
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 184 previous paragraphs and 240 current paragraphs.
86 unchanged; 73 reworded; 81 added; 24 removed; 1 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 107 previous and 122 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (81)
Current report
Although our growth rate has moderated over the last several years, our business and operations remain complex, and renewed or uneven growth in any future period, changes in our mix of products and services, or shifts in customer demand could again place significant demands on our management and our operational and financial resources. Our organizational structure has become more complex as we have scaled our operational, financial, and management controls, as well as our reporting systems and procedures, and this complexity will remain in periods when our growth rate slows.
Current report
If our growth reaccelerates, occurs in any new area (such as new products, services, or geographies), or is concentrated in particular parts of our business, we may face challenges integrating, developing, training, and motivating personnel across multiple jurisdictions and navigating a complex multinational regulatory landscape. Conversely, if our growth remains modest or slows further, we may be required to adjust our cost structure and resource allocation, which could be disruptive to our operations and affect our ability to maintain service levels and pursue strategic initiatives.
Current report
Our continued expansion into the cloud services market may not be successful and may expose us to a range of operational, technical, and competitive risks that could materially affect our performance. In addition to the other risks described in the “Risk Factors” section herein, risks specific to our cloud services business include:
Current report
If we fail to manage these risks effectively or mitigate their consequences, our reputation, customer relationships, and competitive position could suffer, resulting in a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current report
On July 18, 2025, the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (the “GENIUS Act”) was passed and signed into law of the United States, which directs for a federal regulatory framework for the issuance of “payment stablecoins” that are designed to be used as a means of payment and settlement. While the GENIUS Act has been signed into law, it will not become effective until the earlier of January 18, 2027 or 120 days after the primary federal payment stablecoin regulators issue any final regulations implementing the GENIUS Act. The impact of these legal and regulatory changes associated with the GEINUS Act will depend in part on how such act is implemented through rulemaking by U.S. regulators. Therefore, while a consistent federal framework could increase institutional and consumer confidence in stablecoins over time, the scope, timing, and substance of implementing the associated regulations and supervisory practices remain uncertain.
Current report
We are also exposed to risks relating to market and customer acceptance of stablecoins. If customers, vendors, or regulators lose confidence in a particular stablecoin or the stablecoin market more broadly because of volatility, negative publicity, enforcement actions, or failures of major issuers, demand for our stablecoin payment options could decline, and we could be required to incur additional costs to modify our payment infrastructure, transition to alternative digital asset arrangements, or revert to traditional payment methods.
Current report
The operation of our non-custodial crypto wallet exposes us to significant regulatory, operational, security, and market risks that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and reputation.
Current report
The operation of the Rumble Wallet, our recently launched non-custodial crypto wallet, which enables users to hold multiple cryptocurrencies, engage in tipping on our video platform, and utilize on- and off-ramps through partnership with a third-party crypto exchange, exposes us to significant regulatory, operational, security, and market risks that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and reputation.
Current report
The cryptocurrency industry is subject to extensive and evolving regulatory scrutiny in the United States and internationally, including from federal agencies and state financial regulators. Our crypto wallet and associated features, even though non-custodial in nature (meaning we do not hold or control users’ private keys or assets), may be deemed to involve money transmission, securities activities, or other regulated financial services, particularly in connection with tipping functionality and integrations with third-party exchanges for fiat-to-crypto conversions. Changes in laws, regulations, or interpretations, such as classifications of certain cryptocurrencies as securities, enhanced know-your-customer or anti-money laundering requirements, or restrictions on non-custodial wallets, could require us to obtain licenses, modify our offerings, or cease operations in certain jurisdictions. Noncompliance, whether actual or alleged, could result in investigations, enforcement actions, fines, penalties, or litigation, which may be costly and time-consuming to defend. For example, if regulators view our tipping feature as facilitating unregistered securities transactions or unlicensed money services, we could face significant liabilities.
Current report
Our reliance on a partnership with an existing crypto exchange for on- and off-ramp services introduces dependency risks. The exchange may experience operational disruptions, security breaches, regulatory issues, or insolvency, which could interrupt our users’ ability to deposit or withdraw funds, leading to user dissatisfaction, loss of trust, and potential claims against us. We have limited control over the exchange’s compliance, performance, or risk management practices, and any failures on the exchange’s part could be attributed to us by users or regulators, harming our brand and exposing us to liability.
Current report
Security vulnerabilities remain a critical concern, despite the non-custodial design. Our video platform’s integration with the wallet could be targeted by cyberattacks, phishing schemes, or exploits aimed at users’ devices or our software interfaces, potentially resulting in unauthorized access, theft of user assets, or data breaches. User errors, such as loss of private keys or exposure to scams, could also lead to financial losses for which users might seek to hold us responsible through lawsuits or negative publicity.
Current report
Competition in the crypto wallet space is significant, with established players offering similar non-custodial solutions. If our wallet fails to achieve sufficient user adoption due to usability issues, lack of supported cryptocurrencies, or superior alternatives, we may incur substantial development and marketing costs without corresponding benefits. Moreover, broader market events, such as crypto market crashes, exchange failures (such as the FTX bankruptcy), or increased regulatory crackdowns, could reduce overall interest in cryptocurrencies, diminishing the value of our wallet features and potentially leading to impairment of related investments or assets. Any of these risks could result in increased operating expenses, loss of users, damage to our reputation, or material adverse effects on our financial performance.
Current report
Our increasing use of artificial intelligence technologies presents significant regulatory, legal, operational, cybersecurity, and reputational risks that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current report
Our business increasingly relies on artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies, including generative AI and emerging agentic systems, to support operational efficiency, product development, data analysis, and innovation. While these technologies present important opportunities, their development, integration, and use involve substantial risks that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation, and the market price of our securities.
Current report
The regulatory environment surrounding AI is evolving rapidly and inconsistently across jurisdictions, creating compliance challenges, increased costs, and uncertainty. In the United States, regulators, including the SEC, have intensified scrutiny of AI-related disclosures and the risk of “AI-washing,” while emerging state and federal rules increasingly address automated decision-making, transparency, bias, and consumer protection. Internationally, comprehensive regimes, such as the EU AI Act, apply extraterritorially and may require us to classify and manage AI systems based on risk, conduct assessments or audits, implement additional safeguards, or limit certain uses. We may not always be able to anticipate how courts and regulators will apply existing laws to AI, predict how new legal frameworks will develop to address AI, or otherwise respond to these frameworks as they are still rapidly evolving. Failure to anticipate or comply with applicable requirements could result in fines, enforcement actions, operational restrictions, or reputational harm. Divergent and changing rules may require us to tailor AI deployments by jurisdiction, and we may also have to expend resources to adapt to new legal frameworks and adjust our offerings in certain jurisdictions if the legal frameworks on AI are not consistent across jurisdictions.
Current report
Our use of AI also exposes us to legal, intellectual property, and liability risks. AI-generated outputs, including content, code, analytics, or decision recommendations, may be inaccurate, fabricated, biased, or derived from third-party materials without appropriate rights, potentially leading to claims of copyright or patent infringement, defamation, privacy violations, or discrimination under applicable laws. We could face litigation, regulatory investigations, indemnity claims from customers, or direct liability if AI-driven outputs cause harm, contribute to flawed business decisions, or produce discriminatory or misleading results, and evolving interpretations of intermediary liability, fair use, and product liability add further uncertainty.
Current report
Our reliance on third-party AI providers and infrastructure creates vendor and concentration risk. Disruptions at key vendors, such as outages, performance issues, abrupt policy or pricing changes, feature deprecations, or terminations, could impair critical functions, delay product development, degrade user experiences, or increase our costs. We have limited visibility into vendors’ models, training data, update practices, and internal controls, and may inherit issues such as inaccuracies, bias, data retention concerns, or intellectual property infringement, notwithstanding contractual protections that may be insufficient or difficult to enforce. New or evolving regulations addressing AI supply chains and third-party risk may impose additional obligations on us as a user of these services.
Current report
Our reliance on third-party AI providers and infrastructure creates vendor and concentration risk. Disruptions at key vendors, such as outages, performance issues, abrupt policy or pricing changes, feature deprecations, or terminations, could impair critical functions, delay product development, degrade user experiences, or increase our costs. We have limited visibility into vendors’ models, training data, update practices, and internal controls, and may inherit issues such as inaccuracies, bias, data retention concerns, or intellectual property infringement, notwithstanding contractual protections that may be insufficient or difficult to enforce. New or evolving regulations addressing AI supply chains and third-party risk may impose additional obligations on us as a user of these services.
Current report
Operational, cybersecurity, and data privacy risks are amplified by AI adoption. AI systems can exhibit errors, hallucinations, model drift, degraded performance, adversarial vulnerabilities, or unexpected behaviors that, without adequate human oversight and safeguards, could disrupt operations, diminish product quality, impact financial reporting, adversely affect individuals, or undermine trust in our offerings. AI systems often process large volumes of data and expand the attack surface, while techniques such as AI-enabled malware, deepfakes, model inversion extraction, or prompt-injection attacks may increase the sophistication of threats. Breaches, unauthorized access to or acquisition of, or misuse of data, including personal information, used in or produced by AI systems could lead to financial losses, regulatory penalties, and litigation, and AI systems may inadvertently expose proprietary or personal information.
Current report
Reputational and ethical risks are significant, as AI raises concerns about bias, misinformation, job displacement, and environmental or other societal impacts. Public scrutiny, negative media coverage, stakeholder backlash, or association with controversial AI practices could damage our brand, customer relationships, ability to attract and retain talent, or investor confidence, particularly as expectations for robust AI governance, transparency, and board oversight continue to increase. Mitigating these risks requires ongoing investment in governance frameworks, policies, training, audits, ethical guidelines, insurance, and technical safeguards, which may increase expenses and affect profitability.
Current report
The pace of AI evolution and uncertainty in applicable laws and stakeholder expectations make it difficult to predict or fully mitigate all risks, and any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, AI may not develop in accordance with market acceptance of features, products, or services. We regularly evaluate our product roadmaps and make significant changes as our understanding of the technological challenges and market landscape of AI, as well as our product ideas and designs, continue to evolve. As a result of these or other factors, our AI strategy and investments may not be successful in the foreseeable future, or at all, which could adversely affect our business, reputation, or financial results.
Current report
Prolonged or escalating trade disputes could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current report
Our business, operations, and financial condition may be adversely affected by ongoing trade disputes, including tariffs, trade restrictions, and other protectionist measures imposed by governments globally. While we do not directly engage in the importation or exportation of goods, we operate within a complex global ecosystem that is highly sensitive to disruptions caused by trade conflicts. These disputes could lead to increased costs, supply chain disruptions, and reduced demand for our products and services, even though our operations are primarily service-based. Trade disputes may result in higher costs for hardware, components, or software services provided by our suppliers, who may face tariffs or other trade barriers and are likely to pass these costs on to us. Additionally, trade disputes may disrupt the global supply chains on which our partners or customers rely, potentially reducing advertising spend and delaying the development, deployment, or adoption of our cloud technology solutions. Trade disputes may also contribute to broader economic uncertainty, including inflationary pressures, currency fluctuations, or reduced global investment in advertising and technology, leading to decreased demand for our advertising and cloud offerings, as customers seek to reduce costs. Geopolitical tensions arising from trade conflicts could also result in regulatory changes, such as export controls or data localization requirements, which may increase our compliance costs or restrict our ability to operate in certain markets.
Current report
The unpredictable nature, duration, and severity of trade disputes make it difficult for us to fully mitigate their impact. Prolonged or escalating trade disputes could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current report
In the United States, the patchwork of state comprehensive consumer privacy laws continues to expand, with new laws taking effect in Indiana, Kentucky, and Rhode Island on January 1, 2026, bringing the total to approximately 20 states with such frameworks. Recent developments include California’s finalized regulations (effective in phases starting January 1, 2026) on automated decision-making technology, risk assessments, and cybersecurity audits under the CCPA, as well as heightened focus on sensitive data (such as precise geolocation, health information, biometrics, and neural data) in various states, such as Maryland (effective 2025), Oregon, Colorado, Connecticut (with amendments lowering thresholds and expanding protections effective mid-2026), and Utah (with amendments to allow the right of correction, effective mid-2026). Enforcement by U.S. state attorneys general and the FTC has intensified in 2025, targeting issues such as dark patterns, universal opt-out mechanisms, data broker practices, children’s privacy, and sensitive data handling, with expectations of continued aggressive activity in 2026.
Current report
Compliance with a rapidly evolving regulatory landscape of privacy and data protection laws that apply to our cloud services business poses significant operational, financial, and reputational risks, including but not limited to, the GDPR, LGPD, PIPEDA, CCPA, and an expanding patchwork of U.S. state comprehensive privacy laws. As we expand further internationally, we may become subject to similar or more stringent privacy laws in additional jurisdictions.
Current report
Emerging regulations add further complexity to the regulatory landscape of privacy laws. The EU AI Act, now in phased enforcement (with prohibitions effective since 2025, core high-risk system obligations largely applying from August 2026, and remaining provisions by 2027), categorizes AI systems by risk and may require significant changes to our technology, operations, transparency measures, or governance if our cloud services involve or support AI deployments. Potential U.S. federal cybersecurity mandates, including ongoing developments in incident response, enhanced focus on cloud security configurations, and sector-specific rules, introduce additional uncertainty and compliance burdens.
Current report
We are exposed to significant regulatory, operational, compliance, privacy, and legal risks related to age verification and child online safety laws implemented in various U.S. states and foreign jurisdictions.
Current report
The implementation and enforcement of age verification and child online safety laws in various U.S. states and foreign jurisdictions present significant regulatory, operational, compliance, privacy, and legal risks to our business as a video services provider, which could adversely affect our MAUs, revenue, reputation, and financial condition. Numerous laws, regulations, and legally-binding codes, such as the U.S. federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, California’s Age Appropriate Design Code, the UK’s Online Safety Act and Age Appropriate Design Code, the CCPA and other U.S. state comprehensive privacy laws, the GDPR, and the DSA, impose various obligations on companies that process minors’ data and/or provide online services, or other interactive platforms used by children, including prohibiting showing minors advertising, requiring age verification, limiting the use of minors’ personal information, requiring certain consents to process such personal information and extending certain rights to children and their parents with respect to that personal information. These laws may result in restrictions on the use of certain of our products or services by teens, may prohibit us from offering certain of our products or services to teens, and may decrease daily active users or user engagement in various jurisdictions. These laws may be, and in some cases already have been, subject to legal challenges and changing interpretations which may further complicate our efforts to comply with laws applicable to us. Some of these obligations have wide-ranging application, including for services that do not intentionally target child users (defined in some circumstances as a user under the age of 18 years old). The resulting patchwork of regulations is rapidly evolving, with potential for additional jurisdictions to adopt similar measures, creating inconsistent and overlapping obligations.
Current report
We have already implemented a minimum age of 17 for registered users on our video platform and require users to provide their date of birth. However, compliance with these new laws may require us to implement additional measures and complex age verification technologies, such as biometric data checks, third-party ID verification, or parental consent mechanisms, which could involve substantial development, integration, and ongoing maintenance costs. This may decrease our advertising and subscription revenue, and increase legal risk and compliance costs for us and our third-party partners, which may harm the profitability of our business. These systems may generally deter users from using our platform and create risks of inaccurate age determinations, user circumvention, or over-blocking of legitimate adult users, potentially resulting in reduced user acquisition, engagement, and retention, particularly among younger demographics that represent a significant portion of our growth. Noncompliance, whether due to technical failures, conflicting jurisdictional interpretations, or delays in implementation, could lead to investigations, enforcement actions, substantial fines, class-action lawsuits, or injunctions that restrict our operations in impacted regions. If we challenge these laws, as a defendant or through industry-wide challenges, we could be negatively impacted by protracted legal battles, adverse rulings, or requirements to fundamentally alter our platform’s features, content moderation, or user experience. Additionally, varying international standards may force us to create region-specific versions of our platform, increasing operational complexity and costs while potentially fragmenting our global user community.
Current report
Broader market reactions, such as user backlash against perceived privacy intrusions or reduced platform accessibility, could erode trust in our brand and lead to competitive disadvantages if our competitors are able to adapt more effectively. We may incur significant expenses for legal counsel, technology upgrades, and compliance programs, and there is no assurance that these measures will fully mitigate the risks. The materialization of any of these factors could have a substantial negative impact on our business and results of operations.
Current report
The provision of our Charter requiring exclusive forum in certain courts in the State of Delaware or the federal district courts of the United States for certain types of lawsuits may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against our directors and officers.
Current report
On November 10, 2025, we entered into the ND Business Combination Agreement. Please refer to “Significant Events and Transactions” under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report for more information. The following are several risks we face in connection with the ND Business Combination.
Current report
The consummation of the ND Business Combination is subject to certain conditions, which could delay, extend or prevent the Exchange Offer and the ND Business Combination.
Current report
Rumble’s public exchange offer to Northern Data Shareholders (“Northern Data Shareholders”) for acquiring all outstanding no-par value bearer shares of Northern Data by exchanging one share of Northern Data for 2.0281 shares of newly issued Class A Common Stock of Rumble (the “Exchange Offer”) will be subject to several conditions, including the conditions relating to the relevant registration statement, the conditions relating to merger control approvals and investment control clearances (collectively, the “Regulatory Conditions”), and certain other conditions. The timing for settlement of the Exchange Offer and completion of the ND Business Combination will depend on the satisfaction of such conditions. As a result, the Exchange Offer and the ND Business Combination could be delayed, extended, amended or terminated, which could result in the Northern Data Shareholders not receiving our Class A Common Shares.
Current report
Under the terms of the ND Business Combination Agreement, if the Exchange Offer is not settled by the End Date (as defined below), the ND Business Combination Agreement may be terminated by either party. If the ND Business Combination Agreement is terminated, the ND Business Combination will not be consummated.
Current report
Under the terms of the Exchange Offer, all conditions to the Exchange Offer must be satisfied by the end of the acceptance period, except for the Regulatory Conditions. The Regulatory Conditions must be satisfied by December 31, 2026 (the “End Date”). If the Regulatory Conditions are not satisfied by the End Date, or if any other condition is not satisfied at the end of the acceptance period (unless any such non-satisfied condition has been waived, if permissible), the Exchange Offer will terminate and settlement will not occur. The parties currently expect the Regulatory Conditions to be satisfied and the ND Business Combination to be completed in the first half of 2026 but in no event later than the End Date. As a result, the exchange of shares ofthe issued and outstanding no-par value bearer share of Northern Data (the “Northern Data Shares”) pursuant to the Exchange Offer may be made on a date that is significantly later than the end of the acceptance period, or may not occur.
Current report
Furthermore, pursuant to the ND Business Combination Agreement, Rumble or Northern Data may terminate the ND Business Combination Agreement under certain circumstances, including, among others, if: (i) the Exchange Offer lapses due to non-satisfaction of conditions before the End Date; (ii) the Exchange Offer has not settled by the End Date; (iii) a closing condition cannot ultimately be fulfilled; or (iv) a competent governmental authority or court permanently enjoins the closing of the Exchange Offer. No assurance can be given that all of the conditions to the Exchange Offer will be satisfied or, if they are, as to the timing of the settlement of the Exchange Offer. If the conditions to the Exchange Offer are not satisfied or validly waived in advance, or if termination rights are exercised, the Exchange Offer will terminate, settlement of the Exchange Offer will not occur, and the ND Business Combination will not be completed.
Current report
Rumble and Northern Data must obtain governmental and regulatory approvals or clearances to consummate the ND Business Combination, which, if delayed or not granted, may delay or jeopardize the Exchange Offer and the ND Business Combination. In addition, conditions imposed by such agencies in connection with their approvals may adversely impact the business, financial condition, or results of operations of Rumble and Northern Data, including the loss of value of assets or businesses that may be required to be divested in connection with obtaining approvals under merger control or competition laws or foreign direct investment laws.
Showing the first 40 of 81 passages. Open the source sections for the rest.
Removed paragraphs (24)
Previous report
We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, rapid growth, which has placed, and may continue to place, significant demands on our management and our operational and financial resources. Our organizational structure is becoming more complex as we scale our operational, financial, and management controls, as well as our reporting systems and procedures, and expand internationally. As we continue to grow, we face challenges of integrating, developing, training, and motivating a rapidly growing employee base in our various offices in multiple jurisdictions and navigating a complex multinational regulatory landscape. If we fail to manage our anticipated growth and change in a manner that preserves the functionality of our platforms and solutions, the quality of our products and services may suffer, which could negatively affect our brand and reputation and harm our ability to attract customers.
Previous report
Our ongoing expansion into the cloud service business may not be successful and involves various risks relating to this business that may negatively affect our operating results. In addition to other risks related to our cloud services business described in these “Risk Factors,” such risks include risks related to:
Previous report
Our commitment to diversity of opinion and refusal to censor otherwise allowable content on our platforms that does not violate our moderation policy has in the past resulted and is likely to continue to result in malicious media campaigns and advertiser boycotts directed against us. For example, in August 2024, we filed a lawsuit against the World Federation of Advertisers, as well as the advertising agency WPP and its subsidiary GroupM. Our lawsuit alleges that an initiative called the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), created by the WFA, established arbitrary and biased standards for the content on digital platforms where its members may want to advertise. GARM used those one-size-fits-all biased standards to perpetrate an advertiser boycott against Rumble and other platforms that did not censor content that GARM disliked. The suit also notes that GARM has vast reach since it counts the six largest ad agency holding companies among its members, including defendant WPP. We subsequently amended our complaint to add Diageo plc as a defendant.
Previous report
Our management team has limited experience managing a public company, which exposes us to additional risks, including the risk that we cannot enhance, maintain, and adhere to our internal controls and procedures.
Previous report
Some members of our management team have limited experience managing a publicly traded company, interacting with public company investors, and complying with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies. Our management team may not successfully or efficiently manage our transition to being a public company that is subject to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under the federal securities laws and the continuous scrutiny of securities analysts and investors. These new obligations and constituents will require significant attention from our senior management and could divert their attention away from the day-to-day management of our business, which could harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Previous report
Additionally, as a public company, we are subject to significant requirements for enhanced financial reporting and internal controls. The process of designing and implementing effective internal controls is a continuous effort that requires us to anticipate and react to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a system of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy our reporting obligations as a public company, and we are still in the process of generating a mature system of internal controls and integration across business systems. Inability to establish or maintain appropriate internal financial reporting controls and procedures may result in material misstatements in our consolidated financial statements and failure to meet our reporting obligations on a timely basis, causing harm to our operating results.
Previous report
Matters impacting our internal controls may cause us to be unable to report our financial information on a timely basis and thereby subject us to adverse regulatory consequences, including sanctions by the SEC or violations of applicable stock exchange listing rules, which may result in a breach of the covenants under existing or future financing arrangements. There also could be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in us and the reliability of our financial statements. Confidence in the reliability of our financial statements also could suffer if we continue to report a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting. This could materially adversely affect us and lead to a decline in the market price of our securities.
Previous report
We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. If we are unable to remediate these material weaknesses, we may not be able to accurately or timely report our financial condition or results of operations.
Previous report
Effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to provide reasonable assurance regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. As described under Item 9A “Controls and Procedures” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2024 and for the year then ended, we identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.
Previous report
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. We identified material weaknesses in our internal control over our financial statement close process specifically related to an insufficient complement of accounting and finance personnel with the necessary U.S. GAAP technical expertise to timely identify and account for complex or non-routine transactions.
Previous report
As of December 31, 2024, the Company identified material weaknesses corresponding to the control activities component of internal control under the COSO Framework. Specifically, we did not adequately design certain key controls at a sufficient level of precision, including account reconciliation, to address relevant financial reporting risks including inadequate design of procedures to ensure completeness and accuracy of the accounting for content creator agreements, and associated assets, liabilities and expenses. Deficiencies in control activities contributed to the potential for there to have been material accounting errors in financial statement account balances and disclosures. While the above material weaknesses did not result in a material misstatement of our previously issued financial statements, it could result in a misstatement of our account balances or disclosures that would not be prevented or detected and would therefore result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements.
Previous report
We are working to remediate the material weaknesses and are taking steps to strengthen our internal control over financial reporting through the continued hiring of additional appropriately skilled finance and accounting personnel with the requisite technical knowledge and skills. With the additional skilled personnel, we are taking appropriate and reasonable steps to remediate these material weaknesses through formalization of accounting policies and controls around content creator agreements, and retention of external accounting advisors for complex accounting transactions. We will not be able to fully remediate these control deficiencies until these steps have been completed and have been operating effectively for a sufficient period of time. The hiring of additional finance and accounting personnel and the implementation of improvements to our accounting and proprietary systems and controls may be costly and time consuming.
Previous report
We cannot assure you that the measures we have taken to date and those we expect to take in the future will be sufficient to remediate the material weaknesses we identified or avoid the identification of additional material weaknesses in the future. If the steps we take do not remediate the material weaknesses in a timely manner, there could continue to be a reasonable possibility that these material weaknesses or other control deficiencies could result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis, which could in turn cause our stock price to decline significantly and make raising capital more difficult. If we fail to remediate our material weaknesses, identify future material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting or fail to meet the demands that will be placed upon us as a public company, including the requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley, we may be unable to accurately report our financial results or report them within the timeframes required by law or stock exchange regulations. Failure to comply with Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley could also potentially subject us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities. If additional material weaknesses exist or are discovered in the future, and we are unable to remediate any such material weakness, our reputation, results of operations and financial condition could suffer.
Previous report
Additionally, the regulatory environment surrounding stablecoins remains uncertain and rapidly evolving. Legislatures and regulatory bodies, including foreign authorities, continue to evaluate whether stablecoins constitute securities, commodities, or other regulated financial instruments. New laws, regulations, or enforcement actions could impose significant compliance obligations on us, such as anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) requirements, restrict our ability to accept certain stablecoins altogether, result in unfavorable changes in use, transfer, and redemption of stablecoins, or impose tax liabilities upon stablecoin holders. Noncompliance with such regulations, even unintentional, could result in fines, penalties, legal proceedings, and reputational harm. Furthermore, if a stablecoin issuer on which we rely is deemed non-compliant with applicable laws, it could disrupt our payment operations or expose us to liability as a downstream user.
Previous report
Additional risks relate to the market acceptance of stablecoins. If customers or vendors lose confidence in stablecoins due to volatility, scandals, or legislative or regulatory actions, demand for our stablecoin payment option could decline, forcing us to incur costs to adapt our payment infrastructure or revert to traditional payment methods. Conversely, if we cease accepting stablecoins in response to these risks, we may alienate a segment of our customer base that prefers cryptocurrency payments, potentially reducing our market competitiveness.
Previous report
Fluctuations in the broader cryptocurrency market could indirectly impact our stablecoin operations. A significant downturn in cryptocurrency prices or public sentiment could trigger redemption pressures on stablecoin issuers, straining their reserves and increasing the likelihood of instability. Such events could disrupt our payment processing capabilities and harm our financial position.
Previous report
The development and use of AI may result in reputational harm, liability, or other adverse consequences to our business operations.
Previous report
We are evaluating AI technologies for use in the operation of our business. There are significant risks involved in deploying AI and there can be no assurance that any usage of AI will enhance our products or services or be beneficial to our business, including our profitability. AI technologies are complex and rapidly evolving, and we face significant potential disruption from other companies as well as an evolving regulatory landscape. Any integration of any AI technologies into our products or services may result in new or enhanced governmental or regulatory scrutiny, intellectual property claims, litigation, confidentiality or security risks, ethical concerns, negative user perceptions as to automation and AI, or other complications that could adversely affect our business, reputation, or financial results. As a result of the complexity and rapid development of AI, it is also the subject of evolving review by various U.S. governmental and regulatory agencies, and other foreign jurisdictions are applying, or are considering applying, their platform moderation, intellectual property, cybersecurity, and data protection laws to AI and/or are considering general legal frameworks on AI. We may not always be able to anticipate the appropriate response to these rapidly evolving frameworks. We may also have to expend resources to adjust our product or service offerings in certain jurisdictions if the legal frameworks governing the use of AI are not consistent across jurisdictions. If we fail to adopt AI technologies effectively or experience delays in integrating these technologies into our operations, we may face significant risks to our competitive position, financial performance, and long-term growth prospects. Competitors who successfully leverage AI may gain advantages in operational efficiency, innovation, data analysis, and customer personalization, potentially eroding our market share and reputation.
Previous report
Uncertainty around new and emerging AI technologies, such as generative AI, may require additional investment in the development of appropriate protections and safeguards for handling the use of data with AI technologies, which may be costly and could impact our expenses. AI technologies, including generative AI, may create content that is factually inaccurate or flawed, or otherwise unlawful, harmful or policy-violating. Such content may expose us to brand or reputational harm and/or legal liability. It is also uncertain how various laws related to online services, intermediary liability, copyright and other issues will apply to content generated by AI. The use of certain AI technologies presents emerging ethical and social issues, and if we offer solutions that draw scrutiny or controversy due to their perceived or actual impact on users or on society as a whole, we may experience brand or reputational harm, competitive harm, and/or legal liability. As such, it is not possible to predict all of the risks related to the use of AI, and developments in regulatory frameworks governing the use of AI and in related stakeholder expectations may adversely affect our ability to develop and use AI or subject us to liability.
Previous report
Our Charter contains forum limitations for certain disputes between us and our stockholders that could limit the ability of stockholders to bring claims against us or our directors, officers and employees.
Previous report
We have and will continue to incur significant expenses and administrative burdens as a public company, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous report
We face significant increases in insurance, legal, compliance, accounting, administrative and other costs and expenses as a public company that we did not incur as a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including the requirements of Section 404, as well as rules and regulations subsequently implemented by the SEC, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and the rules and regulations promulgated and to be promulgated thereunder, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC and the securities exchanges, impose additional reporting and other obligations on public companies.
Previous report
Compliance with public company requirements has increased, and is expected to continue to increase, our costs and has made, and is expected to continue to make, certain activities more time-consuming. Several of those requirements require us to carry out activities that we have not done previously. In addition, we incurred and will continue to incur additional expenses associated with SEC reporting requirements. Furthermore, if any issues in complying with those requirements are identified, we could incur additional costs to rectify those issues, and the existence of those issues could adversely affect our reputation or investor perceptions of us. Furthermore, if we are unable to satisfy our obligations as a public company, our securities could be subject to delisting, and we could face fines, sanctions and other regulatory actions and potentially civil litigation.
Previous report
The additional reporting and other obligations imposed by various rules and regulations applicable to public companies will increase legal and financial compliance costs and the costs of related legal, accounting and administrative activities. These increased costs require us to divert a significant amount of money that could otherwise be used to expand the business and achieve strategic objectives. Advocacy efforts by stockholders and third-parties may also prompt additional changes in governance and reporting requirements, which could further increase costs.
Reworded paragraphs (73)
Previous wording
Weakened global economic conditions, including the effects of heightened inflation, may affect our business and operating results.
Current wording
Weakened global economic conditions may affect our business and operating results.
Previous wording
Our overall performance depends in part on worldwide economic conditions. Global financial developments and downturns seemingly unrelated to us or our industry may negatively affect us. The U.S. and other key international economies have been affected from time to time by falling demand for a variety of goods and services, restricted credit, reduced liquidity, reduced corporate profitability, weak economic growth, volatility in credit, equity and foreign exchange markets, bankruptcies, implemented or threatened tariffs, trade wars, inflation and overall uncertainty with respect to the economy. Weak economic conditions or the perception thereof, or significant uncertainty regarding the stability of financial markets related to stock market volatility, inflation, recession, changes in governmental fiscal, monetary and tax policies, among others, could adversely impact our business and operating results.
Current wording
Our overall performance depends in part on worldwide economic conditions. Global financial developments and downturns seemingly unrelated to us or our industry may negatively affect our business and operating results. The U.S. and other key international economies have been affected from time to time by falling demand for a variety of goods and services, restricted credit, reduced liquidity, reduced corporate profitability, weak economic growth, volatility in credit, equity and foreign exchange markets, bankruptcies, implemented or threatened tariffs, trade wars, inflation and overall uncertainty with respect to the economy. Weak economic conditions or the perception thereof, or significant uncertainty regarding the stability of financial markets related to stock market volatility, inflation, recession risks, changes in governmental fiscal, monetary and tax policies, among others, could adversely impact our business and operating results.
Previous wording
High inflation rates in the U.S. and globally may result in reduced consumer confidence and discretionary spending, decreased demand by advertisers for our products and services, increases in our labor and other operating costs, constrained credit and liquidity, reduced government spending and volatility in financial markets. The Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve has raised, may again raise, or may delay lowering the target federal funds rate in response to concerns over inflation risk. Higher than typical interest rates impact the cost of any borrowing that we may make from time to time and could impact our ability to access the capital markets. Higher than typical interest rates, especially if coupled with reduced government spending and volatility in financial markets, may have the effect of further increasing economic uncertainty and heightening these risks. In an inflationary environment, we may be unable to increase our revenues at or above the rate at which our costs increase, which could negatively impact our operating margins and could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. In such an environment, in which we also face significant competition from larger and well-capitalized competitors, we may experience rising costs to secure the services of top content creators. We also may experience lower-than-expected advertising sales, reduced demand for our cloud services offerings, and potential adverse impacts on our competitive position if there is a decrease in consumer spending.
Current wording
High inflation rates in the U.S. and globally may result in reduced consumer confidence and discretionary spending, decreased demand by advertisers for our products and services, increases in our labor and other operating costs, constrained credit and liquidity, reduced government spending, and volatility in financial markets. While the Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve has implemented rate cuts in late 2025, further cuts in 2026 are expected to be limited in light of inflationary risks. Higher than typical interest rates impact the cost of any borrowing that we may make from time to time and could impact our ability to access the capital markets. Higher than typical interest rates, especially if coupled with reduced government spending and volatility in financial markets, may have the effect of further increasing economic uncertainty and heightening these risks. In an inflationary environment, we may be unable to increase our revenues at or above the rate at which our costs increase, which could negatively impact our operating margins and could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. In such an environment, in which we also face significant competition from larger and well-capitalized competitors, we may experience rising costs to secure the services of top content creators. We also may experience lower-than-expected advertising sales, reduced demand for our cloud services offerings, and potential adverse impacts on our competitive position if there is a decrease in consumer spending.
Previous wording
The growth of our user base, as measured by our current key performance metrics, including monthly active users (MAUs), may not be sustainable and should not be considered indicative of future levels of active viewers and future performance. In addition, we may not realize sufficient revenue to achieve or, if achieved, maintain profitability. As we grow our business, our revenue growth rates may slow or reverse in future periods due to several reasons, which may include slowing demand for our services, increasing competition, a decrease in the growth of our overall market, an inability to scale our systems, technology or infrastructure effectively, and the failure to capitalize on growth opportunities or the maturation of our business. We may incur losses in the future for several reasons, including insufficient growth in the level of engagement, a failure to retain our existing level of engagement, increasing competition, the failure to continue to attract content creators with large followings, the payment of fixed payment obligations to content creators who join our platform that turn out to be unprofitable over the term of the applicable contract as a result of actual performance that does not meet our original modeled financial projections for that creator, the unavailability of certain popular content creators for extended periods of time due to personal or other reasons, as well as other risks described in these “Risk Factors,” and we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications and delays and other unknown factors. We expect to continue to make investments in the development and expansion of our business, which may not result in increased or sufficient revenue or growth, including relative to other comparable companies, as a result of which we may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability.
Current wording
The growth of our user base, as measured by our current key performance metrics, including MAUs, may not be sustainable and should not be considered indicative of future levels of active viewers and future performance. In addition, we may not realize sufficient revenue to achieve or, if achieved, maintain profitability. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, we incurred a significant net loss and did not achieve profitability. As we grow our business, our revenue growth rates may slow or reverse in future periods due to several reasons, which may include slowing demand for our services, increasing competition, a decrease in the growth of our overall market, an inability to scale our systems, technology or infrastructure effectively, and the failure to capitalize on growth opportunities or the maturation of our business. We may incur losses in the future for several reasons, including insufficient growth in the level of engagement, a failure to retain our existing level of engagement, increasing competition, the failure to continue to attract content creators with large followings, the payment of fixed payment obligations to content creators who join our platform that turn out to be unprofitable over the term of the applicable contract as a result of actual performance that does not meet our original modeled financial projections for that creator, the unavailability of certain popular content creators for extended periods of time due to personal or other reasons, as well as other risks described in these “Risk Factors,” and we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications and delays and other unknown factors. We expect to continue to make investments in the development and expansion of our business, which may not result in increased or sufficient revenue or growth, including relative to other comparable companies, as a result of which we may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability.
Previous wording
If we fail to maintain adequate operational and financial resources, particularly if we continue to grow rapidly, we may be unable to execute our business plan or maintain high levels of service and customer satisfaction.
Current wording
If we fail to maintain adequate operational and financial resources, particularly if our business returns to a period of rapid growth or experiences any significant change, we may be unable to execute our business plan or maintain high levels of service and customer satisfaction.
Previous wording
To manage growth in our operations and personnel, we will need to continue to grow and improve our operational, financial, and management controls and our reporting systems and procedures. We will require significant capital expenditures and the allocation of valuable management resources to grow and change in these areas. Our expansion has placed, and our expected future growth will continue to place, a significant strain on our management, customer experience, research and development, sales and marketing, administrative, financial, and other resources.
Current wording
To manage changes in our operations and personnel, whether driven by renewed growth, shifts in our business, or efforts to improve efficiency, we will need to continue to grow and improve our operational, financial, and management controls and our reporting systems and procedures. We will need to incur significant capital expenditures and allocate valuable management resources to adapt these areas to evolving business conditions, and our past expansion has placed, and our future expansion or restructuring may continue to place, a significant strain on our management, customer experience, research and development, sales and marketing, administrative, financial, and other resources.
Previous wording
We anticipate that significant additional investments will be required to scale our operations and increase productivity, to address the needs of our customers, to further develop and enhance our products and services, including our cloud services business, to expand into new geographic areas and to scale with our overall growth. If additional investments are required due to significant growth, this will increase our cost base, which will make it more difficult for us to offset any future revenue shortfalls by reducing expenses in the short term.
Current wording
We anticipate that significant additional investments may be required to scale or reconfigure our operations and increase productivity, to address the needs of our customers, to further develop and enhance our products and services, including our cloud services business, to expand into new geographic areas, and to support our business even if our overall growth remains modest. If additional investments are required due to significant growth or other changes in our business, our cost base would increase, which may make it more difficult for us to offset any future revenue shortfalls or periods of slower growth by reducing expenses in the short term.
Previous wording
Our future success depends in part on the continued growth in the use of our mobile apps and platforms by our users. The use of mobile technology may not continue to grow at historical rates, users may not continue to use mobile technology to access digital media and adjacent businesses, and monetization rates for content on mobile devices and connected TV apps may be lower than monetization rates on traditional desktop platforms. Further, mobile devices may not be accepted as a viable long-term platform for several reasons, including actual or perceived lack of security of information and possible disruptions of service or connectivity. In addition, traffic on our mobile platforms may not continue to grow if we do not continue to innovate and introduce enhanced products on such platforms, or if users believe that our competitors offer superior mobile products. The growth of traffic on our mobile products may also slow or decline if our mobile applications are no longer compatible with operating systems such as iOS, Android, Windows or the devices they support. If use of our mobile platforms does not continue to grow, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.
Current wording
Our future success depends in part on the continued growth in the use of our mobile apps and platforms by our users. The use of mobile technology may not continue to grow at historical rates, users may not continue to use mobile technology to access digital media and adjacent businesses, and monetization rates for content on mobile devices and connected TV apps may be lower than monetization rates on traditional desktop platforms. Further, mobile devices may not be accepted as a viable long-term platform for several reasons, including actual or perceived lack of security of information and possible disruptions of service or connectivity. In addition, traffic on our mobile platforms may not continue to grow if we do not continue to innovate and introduce enhanced products on such platforms, or if our users believe that our competitors offer superior mobile products. The growth of traffic on our mobile products may also slow or such traffic may decline if our mobile applications are no longer compatible with operating systems such as iOS, Android, Windows, or the devices they support. If the use of our mobile platforms does not continue to grow, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.
Previous wording
A significant portion of our traffic accesses our content and services through mobile devices and, as a result, our ability to grow traffic, engagement and advertising revenue is increasingly dependent on our ability to generate revenue from content viewed and engaged with on mobile devices. A key element of our strategy is focusing on mobile apps and connected TV apps, and we expect to continue to devote significant resources to the creation and support of developing new and innovative mobile and connected TV products, services and apps. We are dependent on the interoperability of our content and our apps with popular mobile operating systems, streaming tools, networks and standards that we do not control, such as the Android and iOS operating systems. We also depend on the availability of the Rumble app on mobile app stores, such as Apple’s App Store and the Google Play Store, and if our access to such stores is limited or terminated, regardless of the legitimacy of the stated reasons, our ability to reach users through our mobile app will be negatively impacted. We may not be successful in maintaining or developing relationships with key participants in the mobile and connected TV industries or in developing content that operates effectively with these technologies, systems, tools, networks, or standards. Any changes in such systems, or changes in our relationships with mobile operating system partners, handset and connected TV manufacturers, or mobile carriers, or in their terms of service or policies that reduce or eliminate our ability to distribute and monetize our content, impair access to our content by blocking access through mobile devices, make it hard to readily discover, install, update or access our content and apps on mobile devices and connected TVs, limit the effectiveness of advertisements, give preferential treatment to competitive, or their own, content or apps, limit our ability to measure the effectiveness of branded content, or charge fees related to the distribution of our content or apps could adversely affect the consumption and monetization of our content on mobile devices. Additionally, our operating expenses will increase if the number of platforms for which we develop our product expands. In the event that it is more difficult to access our content or use our apps and services, particularly on mobile devices and connected TVs, or if our users choose not to access our content or use our apps on their mobile devices and connected TVs or choose to use mobile products or connected TVs that do not offer access to our content or our apps, or if the preferences of our traffic require us to increase the number of platforms on which our product is made available to our traffic, our traffic growth, engagement, ad targeting and monetization could be harmed and our business and operating results could be adversely affected.
Current wording
A significant portion of our traffic accesses our content and services through mobile devices and, as a result, our ability to grow traffic, engagement and advertising revenue is increasingly dependent on our ability to generate revenue from content viewed and engaged with on mobile devices. A key element of our strategy is focusing on mobile apps and connected TV apps, and we expect to continue to devote significant resources to the creation and support of developing new and innovative mobile and connected TV products, services and apps. We are dependent on the interoperability of our content and our apps with popular mobile operating systems, streaming tools, networks and standards that we do not control, such as the Android and iOS operating systems. We also depend on the availability of the Rumble app on mobile app stores, such as Apple’s App Store and the Google Play Store, and if our access to such stores is limited or terminated, regardless of the legitimacy of the stated reasons, our ability to reach users through our mobile app will be negatively impacted. We may not be successful in maintaining or developing relationships with key participants in the mobile and connected TV industries or in developing content that operates effectively with these technologies, systems, tools, networks, or standards. Any changes in such systems, or changes in our relationships with mobile operating system partners, handset and connected TV manufacturers, or mobile carriers, or in their terms of service or policies that reduce or eliminate our ability to distribute and monetize our content, impair access to our content by blocking access through mobile devices, make it hard to readily discover, install, update or access our content and apps on mobile devices and connected TVs, limit the effectiveness of advertisements, give preferential treatment to competitive, or their own, content or apps, limit our ability to measure the effectiveness of branded content, or charge fees related to the distribution of our content or apps could adversely affect the consumption and monetization of our content on mobile devices. Additionally, our operating expenses would increase if the number of platforms for which we develop our product expands. In the event that it becomes more difficult to access our content or use our apps and services, particularly on mobile devices and connected TVs, or if our users choose not to access our content or use our apps on their mobile devices and connected TVs or choose to use mobile products or connected TVs that do not offer access to our content or our apps, or if the preferences of our traffic require us to increase the number of platforms on which our product is made available to our traffic, our traffic growth, engagement, ad targeting, and monetization could be harmed and our business and operating results could be adversely affected.
Previous wording
Our products and services depend on the ability of users to access our content and services on the internet. Currently, this access is provided by companies that have significant market power in the broadband and internet access marketplace, including incumbent telephone companies, cable companies, mobile communications companies and government-owned service providers. Laws or regulations that adversely affect the growth, popularity or use of the internet, including changes to laws or regulations impacting internet neutrality, could decrease the demand for our products or offerings, increase our operating costs, require us to alter the manner in which we conduct our business and/or otherwise adversely affect our business. We could experience discriminatory or anti-competitive practices that could impede our growth, cause us to incur additional expense or otherwise negatively affect our business. For example, paid prioritization could enable internet service providers, or ISPs, to impose higher fees and otherwise adversely impact our business. Internationally, government regulation concerning the internet, and in particular, network neutrality, may be developing or may not exist at all. Within such an environment, without network neutrality regulations, we could experience discriminatory or anti-competitive practices that could impede both our and our customers’ domestic and international growth, increase our costs or adversely affect our business.
Current wording
Our products and services depend on the ability of users to access our content and services on the internet. Currently, this access is provided by companies that have significant market power in the broadband and internet access marketplace, including incumbent telephone companies, cable companies, mobile communications companies, and government-owned service providers. Laws or regulations that adversely affect the growth, popularity or use of the internet, including changes to laws or regulations impacting internet neutrality, could decrease the demand for our products or offerings, increase our operating costs, require us to alter the manner in which we conduct our business and/or otherwise adversely affect our business. We could experience discriminatory or anti-competitive practices that could impede our growth, cause us to incur additional expense or otherwise negatively affect our business. For example, paid prioritization could enable internet service providers, or ISPs, to impose higher fees and otherwise adversely impact our business. Internationally, government regulations concerning the internet, and in particular, network neutrality, may be developing or may not exist at all. Within such an environment, without network neutrality regulations, we could experience discriminatory or anti-competitive practices that could impede both our and our customers’ domestic and international growth, increase our costs, or adversely affect our business.
Previous wording
We track certain performance metrics, such as our MAUs, based on data from third parties. While these numbers are based on what we believe to be reasonable calculations for the applicable periods of measurement, our third-party providers periodically encounter difficulties in providing accurate data for such metrics as a result of a variety of factors, including human and software errors. We expect these challenges may continue to occur, and potentially to increase as our engagement grows. There are also inherent challenges in measuring usage across our large user base. For example, as further described in our “Key Business Metrics” section, there is a potential for minor overlap in our usage data due to users who access Rumble’s content through the web, our mobile apps, and connected TVs in a given measurement period.
Current wording
We track certain performance metrics, such as our MAUs, based on data from third parties. While these numbers are based on what we believe to be reasonable calculations for the applicable periods of measurement, our third-party providers periodically encounter difficulties in providing accurate data for such metrics as a result of a variety of factors, including human and software errors. We expect these challenges may continue to occur, and potentially to increase as our engagement grows. There are also inherent challenges in measuring usage across our large user base. For example, as further described in the “Key Business Metrics” section herein, there is a potential for minor overlap in our usage data due to users who access Rumble’s content through the web, our mobile apps, and connected TVs in a given measurement period.
Previous wording
For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, advertising revenue represents 66% and 74% of total revenue. In addition, a substantial portion of our revenue is derived from one advertiser accounting for approximately 16% and 46% of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. As is common in our industry, our advertisers do not have long-term advertising commitments with us. In addition, many of our advertisers purchase advertising services through one of several large advertising agency holding companies. Our revenue could be harmed by the loss of, or a deterioration in our relationship with, any of our largest advertisers or with any advertising agencies or the holding companies that control them. Advertising agencies and potential new advertisers may view our advertising products and services as experimental and unproven, and we may need to devote additional time and resources to educate them about our products and services. Advertisers may cease doing business with us, or they may reduce the prices they are willing to pay to advertise with us, if we do not deliver ads in an effective manner, or if they do not believe that their investment in advertising with us will generate a competitive return relative to alternatives, including online, mobile, and traditional advertising platforms. Advertisers may refuse to advertise on our platform due to a perceived risk to their brand safety standards, especially given the concentration of news and political content on our platform. We believe that our access to certain advertisers has been, and may continue to be, inhibited by the apparent political bias of these companies, some of which we believe may exercise near monopolistic control over the advertising industry. In response, we filed an antitrust lawsuit alleging a conspiracy to withhold advertising revenue from Rumble and other digital media platforms. Our actions to counter these efforts, whether through litigation or publicity campaigns, may not be successful. Any of the foregoing developments may adversely affect our business and operating results.
Current wording
For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, advertising revenue represents 50% and 66% of total revenue, respectively. In addition, a substantial portion of our revenue is derived from one advertiser, accounting for approximately 5% and 16% of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. As is common in our industry, our advertisers do not have long-term advertising commitments with us. In addition, many of our advertisers purchase advertising services through one of several large advertising agency holding companies. Our revenue could be harmed by the loss of, or a deterioration in our relationship with, any of our largest advertisers or with any advertising agencies or the holding companies that control them. Advertising agencies and potential new advertisers may view our advertising products and services as experimental and unproven, and we may need to devote additional time and resources to educate them about our products and services. Advertisers may cease doing business with us, or they may reduce the prices they are willing to pay to advertise with us, if we do not deliver ads in an effective manner, or if they do not believe that their investment in advertising with us will generate a competitive return relative to alternatives, including online, mobile, and traditional advertising platforms. Advertisers may refuse to advertise on our platform due to a perceived risk to their brand safety standards, especially given the concentration of news and political content on our platform. Although we have seen recent increases in the uptake of new brand advertisers, the pace of adoption has been slower than we anticipated, and this slower pace may persist or worsen in the future. We believe that our access to certain advertisers has been, and may continue to be, inhibited by the apparent political bias of these companies, some of which we believe may exercise near-monopolistic control over the advertising industry. In response, we filed an antitrust lawsuit alleging a conspiracy to withhold advertising revenue from Rumble and other digital media platforms. Our actions to counter these efforts, whether through litigation or publicity campaigns, may not be successful. Any of the foregoing developments may adversely affect our business and operating results.
Previous wording
Although we are building our own technical infrastructure, we depend on third-party vendors, including internet service providers and data centers to, among other things, provide customer support, develop software, host videos uploaded by our users, transcode videos (compressing a video file and converting it into a standard format optimized for streaming), stream videos to viewers, support our cloud services offerings, and process payments. These vendors provide certain critical services to our technical infrastructure that are time-consuming and costly for us to develop independently. Outages in those services would materially affect our video services and our ability to provide cloud services. Outages may expose us to having to offer credits to subscribers, loss of subscribers, and reputational damage. We are unlikely to be able to fully offset these losses with any credits we might receive from our vendors.
Current wording
Although we are building our own technical infrastructure, we depend on third-party vendors, including internet service providers and data centers to, among other things, provide customer support, develop software, host videos uploaded by users, transcode videos (compressing a video file and converting it into a standard format optimized for streaming), stream videos to viewers, support our cloud services offerings, and process payments. These vendors provide certain critical services to our technical infrastructure that are time-consuming and costly for us to develop independently. Outages in those services would materially affect our video services and our ability to provide cloud services. Outages may expose us to having to offer credits to subscribers, loss of subscribers, and reputational damage. We are unlikely to be able to fully offset these losses with any credits we might receive from our vendors.
Previous wording
Technologies that enable blocking of certain online advertisements, or that otherwise impair our ability to deliver advertising, could harm our operating results.
Current wording
Technologies that enable blocking of certain online advertisements or otherwise impair our ability to deliver advertising could harm our operating results.
Previous wording
Newly developed technologies could block or obscure the display of or targeting of our content. For example, in June 2020, Apple announced plans to require applications using its mobile operating systems to obtain an end user’s permission to track them or access their device’s advertising identifier for advertising and advertising measurement purposes, as well as other restrictions that could adversely affect our ability to deliver advertising, which could harm our operating results. Additionally, some providers of consumer mobile devices and web browsers have implemented, or announced plans to implement, means to make it easier for internet users to prevent the placement of cookies or to block other tracking technologies, which could, if widely adopted, result in the use of third-party cookies and other methods of online tracking becoming significantly less effective and have a significant impact on our ability to monetize our user base.
Current wording
Newly developed technologies could block or obscure the display or targeting of our content. For example, in June 2020, Apple announced plans to require applications using its mobile operating systems to obtain an end user’s permission to track them or access their device’s advertising identifier for advertising and advertising measurement purposes, as well as other restrictions that could adversely affect our ability to deliver advertising, which could harm our operating results. Additionally, some providers of consumer mobile devices and web browsers have implemented, or announced plans to implement, means to make it easier for internet users to prevent the placement of cookies or to block other tracking technologies, which could, if widely adopted, result in the use of third-party cookies and other methods of online tracking becoming significantly less effective and have a significant impact on our ability to monetize our user base.
Previous wording
Most advertisers rely on tools that measure the effectiveness of their ad campaigns or that verify viewability of their ads on a platform in order to allocate their advertising spend among various formats and platforms. If we are unable to measure the effectiveness of advertising on our platform or we are unable to convince advertisers that our platform should be part of a larger advertising budget, our ability to increase the demand and pricing of our advertising products and maintain or scale our advertising revenue may be limited. Our tools may be less developed than those of other platforms with which we compete for advertising spend, in particular relative to those platforms that collect more personal information than we do. Therefore, our ability to develop and offer tools that accurately measure the effectiveness of a campaign or verify ad viewability on our platform will be critical to our ability to attract new advertisers and retain, and increase spend from, our existing advertisers.
Current wording
Most advertisers rely on tools that measure the effectiveness of their ad campaigns or verify the viewability of their ads on a platform in order to allocate their advertising spend among various formats and platforms. If we are unable to measure the effectiveness of advertising on our platform or we are unable to convince advertisers that our platform should be part of a larger advertising budget, our ability to increase the demand and pricing of our advertising products and maintain or scale our advertising revenue may be limited. Our tools may be less developed than those of other platforms with which we compete for advertising spend, in particular relative to those platforms that collect more personal information than we do. Therefore, our ability to develop and offer tools that accurately measure the effectiveness of a campaign or verify ad viewability on our platform will be critical to our ability to attract new advertisers and retain and increase spend from our existing advertisers.
Previous wording
Our cloud services business relies on a small number of key third-party service providers and a small number of customer relationships, the disruption of which could harm our operating results.
Current wording
Our cloud services business depends on a small number of key third-party service providers and a small number of customer relationships, the disruption of which could harm our operating results.
Previous wording
As we continue to expand our cloud services offerings, we have entered into agreements with certain third-party service providers. The success of our future business activities in the cloud services space may depend upon such existing third-party providers, some of which may compete with us in other lines of business. If our existing third-party service agreements terminate for any reason, or if the commercial terms of such agreements are changed or do not continue to be renewed on favorable terms, we would need to enter into new third-party service agreements, which could negatively impact our revenues, ability to attract future cloud services customers, public reputation, and profitability.
Current wording
As we continue to expand our cloud services offerings, we have entered into agreements with certain third-party service providers. The success of our future business activities in the cloud services space may depend upon such existing third-party providers, some of which may compete with us in other lines of business. If our existing third-party service agreements with them are terminated for any reason, or if the commercial terms of such agreements are changed or do not continue to be renewed on favorable terms, we would need to enter into new third-party service agreements, which could negatively impact our revenues, ability to attract future cloud services customers, public reputation, and profitability.
Previous wording
In addition, our initial cloud service offerings revolve around a small number of customer relationships. If we fail to deliver our product to the desired specifications of these initial customers, or if these initial customers terminate their cloud services agreements for any reason, future customers may doubt our ability to offer cloud services, which would negatively impact our revenues, public reputation, and profitability.
Current wording
In addition, our initial cloud service offerings revolve around a small number of customer relationships. If we fail to deliver our products and services to the desired specifications of these initial customers, or if these initial customers terminate their cloud services agreements for any reason, future customers may question our ability to offer adequate cloud services, which would negatively impact our revenues, public reputation, and profitability.
Previous wording
We rely on our existing content creators, and on the recruiting of new content creators. The loss of a material portion of our existing content creators could result in material harm to our business and results of operations. In the recent past, our ability to recruit and maintain content creators may have been in part due to trends in American politics, where certain commentators have sought a neutral internet platform. A change in such trends, including possible changes to competing platforms’ moderation policies that make those platforms more hospitable to a diverse range of viewpoints, could result in the loss of existing content creators or a failure to recruit new content creators, which may materially harm our business and results of operations. Recently, one of our popular content creators, Dan Bongino, accepted a position in the Trump Administration as Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and it is possible that additional prominent content creators may pursue other career opportunities, in government, politics or otherwise that may interrupt their activities on Rumble. Additionally, as we expand into international markets, we may fail to recruit new content creators in those markets, limiting our appeal to international audiences.
Current wording
We rely on our existing content creators and on the recruitment of new content creators. The loss of a material portion of our existing content creators could result in material harm to our business and results of operations. In the recent past, our ability to recruit and maintain content creators may have been in part due to trends in American politics, where certain commentators have sought a neutral internet platform. A change in such trends, including possible changes to competing platforms’ moderation policies that make those platforms more hospitable to a diverse range of viewpoints, could result in the loss of existing content creators or a failure to recruit new content creators, which may materially harm our business and results of operations. Additionally, as we expand into international markets, we may fail to recruit new content creators in those markets, limiting our appeal to international audiences.
Previous wording
Our user base and user engagement growth are directly driven by the content available on our platform. We have acquired and expect to continue to acquire content by providing economic incentives, including minimum guaranteed earnings, to a limited number of content creators, including sports leagues. These incentives have included and may continue to include equity grants and cash payments. This content acquisition strategy is intended to allow us to enter key content verticals and secure top content creators in those verticals before we have full monetization capabilities in place. Our present focus is to grow users and usage consumption and experiment with monetization levers, which may not maximize profitability in the immediate term, but which we believe positions our business for the long term. As of December 31, 2024, we had entered into programming and content agreements with a minimum contractual cash commitment of $30 million. In addition to the minimum contractual cash commitments, we have programming and content agreements that have variable cost arrangements. These future costs are dependent upon many factors and are difficult to anticipate, however, these costs may be substantial. To the extent our revenue and/or user growth assumptions associated with any particular creator do not meet our expectations, our financial performance, results of operations and liquidity may be negatively impacted, since a failure to achieve these expectations is not expected to reduce our fixed payment obligations to any such creator.
Current wording
Our user base and user engagement growth are directly driven by the content available on our platform. We have acquired and expect to continue to acquire content by providing economic incentives, including minimum guaranteed earnings, to a limited number of content creators, including sports leagues. These incentives have included and may continue to include equity grants and cash payments. This content acquisition strategy is intended to allow us to enter key content verticals and secure top content creators in those verticals before we have full monetization capabilities in place. Our present focus is to grow users and usage consumption and experiment with monetization levers, which may not maximize profitability in the immediate term, but which we believe position our business for the long term. As of December 31, 2025, we had entered into programming and content agreements with a minimum contractual cash commitment of $45 million. In addition to the minimum contractual cash commitments, we have programming and content agreements that have variable cost arrangements. These future costs are dependent upon many factors and are difficult to anticipate; however, these costs may be substantial. To the extent our revenue and/or user growth assumptions associated with any particular creator do not meet our expectations, our financial performance, results of operations and liquidity may be negatively impacted, since a failure to achieve these expectations is not expected to reduce our fixed payment obligations to any such creator.
Previous wording
Additionally, acquisitions or asset purchases made entirely or partially for cash may reduce our cash reserves or require us to obtain financing. We may seek to obtain additional cash to fund an acquisition by selling equity or debt securities. We may be unable to secure the equity or debt funding necessary to finance future acquisitions on terms that are acceptable to us. If we finance acquisitions by issuing equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders will experience ownership dilution. The occurrence of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows, particularly in the case of a larger acquisition or substantially concurrent acquisitions.
Current wording
Additionally, acquisitions or asset purchases made entirely or partially for cash may reduce our cash reserves or require us to obtain financing. We may seek to obtain additional cash to fund an acquisition by selling equity or debt securities. We may be unable to secure the equity or debt funding necessary to finance future acquisitions on terms that are acceptable to us. If we finance acquisitions by issuing equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders would experience ownership dilution. The occurrence of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows, particularly in the case of a larger acquisition or substantially concurrent acquisitions.
Previous wording
We rely on sophisticated information technology systems and infrastructure to support our business. At the same time, cyber incidents, including deliberate attacks, are prevalent and have increased globally in recent years. It is possible that new, escalated or ongoing military conflicts, including the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and Israel-Hamas war, could result in increased cyber-attacks or cybersecurity incidents by state actors or others. Our technologies, systems and networks and those of our vendors, suppliers and other business partners may become the target of cyberattacks or information security breaches that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of proprietary and other information, or other disruption of business operations. In addition, certain cyber incidents, such as surveillance or vulnerabilities in widely used open source software, may remain undetected for an extended period. Our systems for protecting against cybersecurity risks may not be sufficient. Like most major online platforms, Rumble is routinely targeted by cyberattacks that can result in interruptions to our services. We have observed an increase in such attacks as our reach expands and we expect these attacks to continue in the future. As the sophistication of cyber incidents continues to evolve, we are and will likely continue to be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any vulnerability to cyber incidents. Additionally, any of these systems may be susceptible to outages due to fire, floods, power loss, telecommunications failures, usage errors by employees, computer viruses, cyber-attacks or other security breaches or similar events. The failure of any of our information technology systems may cause disruptions in our operations, which could adversely affect our revenues and profitability, and lead to claims related to the disruption of our services from users of the Rumble platform, advertisers, and customers of our cloud services.
Current wording
We rely on sophisticated information technology systems and infrastructure to support our business. At the same time, cyber incidents, including deliberate attacks, are prevalent and have increased globally in recent years. It is possible that new, escalated or ongoing military conflicts, including the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, could result in increased cyber-attacks or cybersecurity incidents by state actors or others. Our technologies, systems, and networks and those of our vendors, suppliers, and other business partners may become the target of cyberattacks or information security breaches that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss, or destruction of proprietary and other information, or other disruption of business operations. In addition, certain cyber incidents, such as surveillance or vulnerabilities in widely used open source software, may remain undetected for an extended period. Our systems for protecting against cybersecurity risks may not be sufficient. Like most major online platforms, Rumble is routinely targeted by cyberattacks that can result in interruptions to our services. We have observed an increase in such attacks as our reach expands and we expect these attacks to continue in the future. As the sophistication of cyber incidents continues to evolve, we are and will likely continue to be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any vulnerability to cyber incidents. Additionally, any of these systems may be susceptible to outages due to fire, floods, power loss, telecommunications failures, usage errors by employees, computer viruses, cyber-attacks, or other security breaches or similar events. The failure of any of our information technology systems may cause disruptions in our operations, which could adversely affect our revenues and profitability and lead to claims related to the disruption of our services from users of the Rumble platform, advertisers, and customers of our cloud services.
Previous wording
Spam activity, including inauthentic and fraudulent user activity, if undetected, may contribute, from time to time, to some amount of overstatement of our performance indicators and may negatively impact our reputation.
Current wording
Spam activities, including inauthentic and fraudulent user activities, if undetected, may contribute, from time to time, to some amount of overstatement of our performance indicators and may negatively impact our reputation.
Previous wording
Like other major online platforms, spam activity, including inauthentic and fraudulent user activity, if undetected, may contribute, from time to time, to some amount of overstatement of our performance indicators, including reporting of MAUs by Google Analytics, our third-party analytics provider. We also use paid advertising in order to attract users to our platform; however, we cannot be certain that all or substantially all activity that results from such advertising is genuine. Real or perceived inaccuracies in such metrics may harm our reputation and negatively affect our business. We continually seek to improve our ability to estimate the total number of spam-generated users and eliminate them from the calculation of our MAUs; however, we will not succeed in identifying and removing all spam.
Current wording
Like other major online platforms, spam activities, including inauthentic and fraudulent user activities, if undetected, may contribute, from time to time, to some amount of overstatement of our performance indicators, including reporting of MAUs by Google Analytics, our third-party analytics provider. We also use paid advertising in order to attract users to our platform; however, we cannot be certain that all or substantially all activities that result from such advertising are genuine. Real or perceived inaccuracies in such metrics may harm our reputation and negatively affect our business. We continually seek to improve our ability to estimate the total number of spam-generated users and eliminate them from the calculation of our MAUs; however, we will not succeed in identifying and removing all spam.
Previous wording
Our cloud services business may not achieve success, and, as a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Current wording
Our cloud services business may not achieve our intended results, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Previous wording
Media campaigns and advertising boycotts against us may be intended to interfere with our relationships with streaming partners and advertisers, and these campaigns and boycotts may intensify if political polarization increases in the United States and Canada.
Current wording
Our commitment to diversity of opinion and refusal to censor otherwise allowable content on our platforms that does not violate our moderation policy has in the past resulted and is likely to continue to result in malicious media campaigns and advertiser boycotts directed against us. Media campaigns and advertising boycotts against us may be intended to interfere with our relationships with streaming partners and advertisers, and these campaigns and boycotts may intensify if political polarization increases in the United States and Canada.
Previous wording
Our recently implemented Bitcoin treasury strategy exposes us to various risks associated with holding Bitcoin.
Current wording
Our Bitcoin treasury strategy exposes us to various risks associated with holding Bitcoin.
Previous wording
We have invested and plan to continue to invest a portion of our corporate treasury in Bitcoin as a reserve asset, exposing us to significant financial, operational, and regulatory risks due to its characteristics that are specific to cryptocurrencies. The value of Bitcoin is highly volatile and subject to rapid, material, and unpredictable fluctuations driven by market speculation, macroeconomic conditions, investor sentiment, and global events. For example, historical price swings have seen Bitcoin decline by more than 50% in a matter of months, and there can be no assurance that similar or greater declines will not occur in the future. Such volatility could result in material reductions in the value of our Bitcoin holdings, adversely impacting our financial condition, liquidity, and reported earnings, particularly if we are required to recognize impairment losses under applicable accounting standards.
Current wording
We have invested and may continue to invest a portion of our corporate treasury in Bitcoin as a reserve asset, exposing us to significant financial, operational, and regulatory risks due to its characteristics that are specific to cryptocurrencies. The value of Bitcoin is highly volatile and subject to rapid, material, and unpredictable fluctuations driven by market speculation, macroeconomic conditions, investor sentiment, and global events. For example, historical price swings have seen Bitcoin decline by more than 50% in a matter of months, and there can be no assurance that similar or greater declines will not occur in the future. Such volatility could result in material reductions in the value of our Bitcoin holdings, adversely impacting our financial condition, liquidity, and reported earnings, particularly if we are required to recognize impairment losses under applicable accounting standards.
Previous wording
Market perception of our Bitcoin strategy poses further risks. Investors, analysts, or customers may view our investment as speculative or misaligned with our core business, potentially leading to stock price volatility or loss of confidence in our management’s financial strategy. Conversely, if Bitcoin’s value declines significantly, we may face pressure to divest at a loss, incurring transaction costs and tax implications. The accounting treatment of Bitcoin as an indefinite-lived intangible asset under U.S. GAAP requires us to assess for impairment periodically, which could lead to earnings volatility and negatively affect our financial statements, even if we do not intend to sell.
Current wording
Market perception of our Bitcoin strategy poses further risks. Investors, analysts, or customers may view our investment as speculative or misaligned with our core business, potentially leading to stock price volatility or loss of confidence in our management’s financial strategy. Conversely, if Bitcoin’s value declines significantly, we may face pressure to divest at a loss, incurring transaction costs and tax implications. The accounting treatment of Bitcoin at fair value under U.S. GAAP requires us recognize changes in fair value in earnings each reporting period, which could lead to earnings volatility and negatively affect our financial statements, even if we do not intend to sell.
Previous wording
Broader market or technological developments, such as shifts in blockchain adoption, competition from other cryptocurrencies, or disruptions to the Bitcoin network, such as forks, mining centralization, or energy regulation, could also diminish the value or utility of our holdings. Moreover, macroeconomic factors, such as rising interest rates, inflation, or shifts in monetary policy, may reduce institutional interest in Bitcoin, further depressing its value. These risks are heightened by ongoing debates over cryptocurrency regulation in the U.S. and globally, which remain unresolved and could materially impact our investment.
Current wording
Broader market or technological developments, such as shifts in blockchain adoption, competition from other cryptocurrencies, or disruptions to the Bitcoin network, such as forks, mining centralization, or energy regulation, could also diminish the value or utility of our holdings. Moreover, macroeconomic factors, such as rising interest rates, inflation, or shifts in monetary policy, may reduce institutional interest in Bitcoin, further depressing its value. These risks are heightened by ongoing debates over cryptocurrency regulations in the U.S. and globally, which remain unresolved and could materially impact our investment in Bitcoin.
Previous wording
Although stablecoins are designed to maintain a stable value while being pegged to fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar, the stability and reliability of stablecoins are not guaranteed and depend on various factors beyond our control, including the financial health of the issuing entity, the adequacy and liquidity of reserve assets, and the effectiveness of the underlying stabilization mechanisms. If a stablecoin that we accept experiences a significant devaluation or “de-pegging” event, where its value deviates materially from its intended peg, we may incur losses on payments already received, face disruptions in transaction processing, or lose customer confidence, all of which could negatively impact our financial condition and reputation. Stablecoins are not subject to any deposit insurance protection scheme, and the presence of fiat currency reserves is not a guarantee for redemption. There is a possibility that the assets held in reserves are not sufficient or may not be available for redemption at times of extremely high demand. Volatility spikes in the cryptocurrency markets also might lead to occasions where the price of a stablecoin deviates from the underlying fiat currency.
Current wording
Although stablecoins are designed to maintain a stable value while being pegged to a reference asset or fiat currency, such as the U.S. dollar, their stability and reliability are not guaranteed and depend on factors beyond our control, including the financial health and risk management of the issuing entity, the adequacy, liquidity, and segregation of reserve assets, and the effectiveness of the underlying stabilization mechanisms. If a stablecoin that we accept experiences a significant devaluation or “de-pegging” event, or if its reserves prove to be insufficient or inaccessible, we may incur losses on payments already received, face disruptions in transaction processing, or lose customer confidence, any of which could negatively impact our financial condition and reputation. Stablecoins are not protected by deposit insurance, and in periods of market stress, there is a risk that reserves may not be sufficient or available for timely redemption, or that the price of a stablecoin may deviate materially from its intended peg. Further, fiat-based stablecoins may be subject to greater oversight and regulation, potentially in multiple jurisdictions, and may be further dependent on actions taken by the banking industry and regulators to support such stablecoins. Other geopolitical factors also may influence government or regulatory support of such stablecoins, all of which could affect the value of such stablecoins or lead to a de-pegging event.
Previous wording
Accepting stablecoins also introduces operational and cybersecurity risks. The blockchain networks and digital wallets we use to process and store stablecoin transactions may be vulnerable to hacking, phishing attacks, software bugs, and network failures. A security breach or technical failure could result in the loss or theft of stablecoin funds, for which we may have limited recourse due to the decentralized and irreversible nature of blockchain transactions. Moreover, reliance on third-party service providers, such as cryptocurrency exchanges or custodians, to facilitate stablecoin transactions introduces counterparty risk. If these providers, or any stablecoin issuers, experience insolvency, operational disruptions, or fraudulent activity, our ability to process payments or convert stablecoins to fiat currency could be impaired, potentially leading to financial losses or liquidity constraints.
Current wording
Accepting stablecoins also introduces operational and cybersecurity risks. The blockchain networks and digital wallets we use to process and store stablecoin transactions may be vulnerable to hacking, phishing attacks, smart-contract or software bugs, key-management failures, and network congestion or outages, and a security breach or technical failure could result in the loss or theft of stablecoin funds, for which we may have limited recourse due to the decentralized and generally irreversible nature of blockchain transactions. Our reliance on third-party service providers, such as exchanges, payment processors, custodians, and wallet providers, to facilitate stablecoin transactions and convert stablecoins to fiat currency introduces additional counterparty and operational risk; if any such provider or any stablecoin issuer experiences insolvency, regulatory restrictions, operational disruptions, or fraudulent activity, our ability to process payments, safeguard customer balances, or access liquidity could be impaired, potentially leading to financial losses or liquidity constraints.
Previous wording
We collect, store, and process large amounts of user video content and personal information of our users and subscribers. If our security measures are breached, our sites and applications may be perceived as not being secure, traffic and advertisers may curtail or stop viewing our content or using our services, our business and operating results could be harmed, and we could face legal claims from users and subscribers.
Current wording
We collect, store, and process large amounts of video content and personal information of our users and subscribers. If our information security safeguards and measures are breached, our sites and applications may be perceived as not being secure, traffic and advertisers may curtail or stop viewing our content or using our services, our business and operating results could be harmed, and we could face legal claims from users and subscribers.
Previous wording
We collect, store, and process large amounts of video content (including videos that are not intended for public consumption) and personal information of our users, cloud customers, and subscribers. We also share such information, where appropriate, with third parties that help us operate our business. Despite our efforts, we may fail to properly secure our systems and our user and subscriber data. This could be caused by technical issues (bugs), obsolete technology, human error or internal or external malfeasance, undiscovered vulnerabilities, and could lead to unauthorized disclosure of data, unauthorized changes or data losses. For example, we routinely receive reports from security researchers regarding potential vulnerabilities in our applications. We also rely on open-source software for various functions, which may contain undiscovered security flaws and create additional technical vulnerabilities. In addition, despite our ongoing and additional investments in cybersecurity, such improvements and review may not identify abuses of our platforms and misuse of user data. The existence of such vulnerabilities, if undetected or detected but not remediated, could result in unauthorized access to our systems or the data of our users.
Current wording
We collect, store, and process large amounts of video content (including videos that are not intended for public consumption) and personal information of our users, cloud customers, and subscribers. We also share such personal information, where appropriate, with third parties that help us operate our business. We aim to secure our systems but despite our efforts, we may fail to properly secure our systems and our user and subscriber data. This could be caused by technical issues (bugs), viruses, obsolete technology, human error, internal or external malfeasance, or undiscovered vulnerabilities, and could lead to unauthorized disclosure, acquisition, or loss of personal or confidential information. We routinely receive reports from security researchers regarding potential vulnerabilities in our applications. We also rely on open-source software for various functions, which may contain undiscovered security flaws and create additional technical vulnerabilities. Despite our ongoing and additional investments in our cybersecurity posture, such improvements and review may not identify abuses of our platforms and misuse of user and subscriber data. The existence of such vulnerabilities, if undetected or detected but not remediated, could result in unauthorized access to or acquisition of user and subscriber data on our systems.
Previous wording
A data breach could expose us to regulatory actions and litigation. Depending on the circumstances, we may be required to disclose a suspected breach to regulators, affected individuals, and the public. This could lead to regulatory actions, including the possibility of fines, class action or traditional litigation by affected individuals, reputational harm, costly investigation and remedial efforts, the triggering of indemnification obligations under data-protection agreements with subscribers, vendors, and partners, higher premiums for cybersecurity insurance and other insurance policies, and the inability to obtain cybersecurity insurance or other forms of insurance. We do not presently have cybersecurity insurance to compensate for any losses that may result from any breach of security, and given industry trends generally, we expect that any such cybersecurity insurance coverage will be difficult to obtain in the future on acceptable terms. As a result, our results of operations or financial condition may be materially adversely affected if we experience a cybersecurity-related loss.
Current wording
A cybersecurity incident or breach could expose us to regulatory actions and litigation. Depending on the circumstances, we may be required to disclose a suspected cybersecurity incident or breach to regulatory authorities or law enforcement, affected individuals, and the public. This could lead to regulatory actions, including the possibility of fines, class actions or other litigation by affected individuals, reputational harm, costly investigation and remedial efforts, the triggering of indemnification obligations under data-protection agreements with subscribers, vendors or third-party service providers, and business partners, higher premiums for cybersecurity insurance and other insurance policies, and the inability to obtain cybersecurity insurance or other forms of insurance. We do not presently maintain cybersecurity insurance to cover losses that may result from any breach of security, and given industry trends generally, we expect that any such cybersecurity insurance coverage will be difficult to obtain in the future on acceptable terms. As a result, our results of operations or financial condition may be materially and adversely affected if we experience a cybersecurity-related loss.
Previous wording
We are subject to data privacy and security laws and regulations that apply to the collection, transmission, storage, use, processing, destruction, retention and security of personal information, including additional laws or regulations relating to health information. Our current privacy policies and practices, which are publicly available at rumble.com/s/privacy, are designed to comply with privacy and data protection laws in the United States and Canada. These policies and practices inform users how we handle personal information and, as permitted by law, allow users to change or delete the personal information in their user accounts. The legislative and regulatory landscape for privacy and data protection continues to evolve in jurisdictions worldwide, and these laws may at times be conflicting. It is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our practices, and our efforts to comply with the evolving data protection rules may be unsuccessful. We must devote significant resources to understanding and complying with this changing landscape. Failure to comply with federal, state, provincial and international laws regarding privacy and security of personal information could expose us to penalties under such laws, orders requiring that we change our practices, claims for damages or other liabilities, regulatory investigations and enforcement action (including fines and criminal prosecution of employees), litigation, significant costs for remediation, and damage to our reputation and loss of goodwill, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Even if we have not violated these laws, government investigations and private lawsuits into these issues typically require the expenditure of significant resources and generate negative publicity, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Additionally, if we are unable to properly protect the privacy and security of personal information, including protected health information, we could be found to have breached our contracts with certain third parties.
Current wording
We are subject to data privacy, data protection, and security laws and regulations that apply to the collection, transmission, storage, use, processing, destruction, retention, and security of personal information. Our current privacy and data protection policies and practices, which are publicly available at rumble.com/s/privacy, are designed to comply with privacy and data protection laws in the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom, Brazil, and Canada. These policies and practices inform users how we handle personal information and, as permitted by law, allow users to correct or delete the personal information in their user accounts. The legislative and regulatory landscape regarding privacy and data protection continues to evolve rapidly in jurisdictions worldwide, and these laws may at times be in conflict or subject to changing legal or regulatory interpretation. Regulations or laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our practices, and our efforts to comply with the evolving data protection rules may be unsuccessful. We may need to devote significant resources to understanding and complying with this evolving data privacy, data protection and data security legal and regulatory landscape. Failure to comply with federal, state, provincial and international laws regarding privacy, data protection, and security of personal information could expose us to penalties under such laws, or orders regarding our practices, claims for damages or other liabilities, regulatory investigations and enforcement actions (including fines, litigation, or significant remediation costs), and damage to our reputation and loss of goodwill, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, financial condition, and prospects. Even if we have not violated these laws, government investigations and private lawsuits into these issues typically require the expenditure of significant internal and external resources and generate negative publicity, which could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, financial condition, and prospects. Additionally, if we are unable to properly protect the privacy, data protection, and security of personal information, we could be found to have breached our contracts with certain third parties.
Previous wording
There are numerous U.S. and Canadian federal, state, and provincial laws and regulations related to the privacy and security of personal information. Determining whether protected information has been handled in compliance with applicable privacy standards and our contractual obligations can be complex and may be subject to changing interpretation. If we fail to comply with applicable privacy laws, we could face civil and criminal penalties. Failing to take appropriate steps to keep consumers’ personal information secure can also constitute unfair acts or practices in or affecting commerce and be construed as a violation of Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (the “FTCA”), 15 U.S.C. § 45(a). The Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) expects a company’s data security measures to be reasonable and appropriate in light of the sensitivity and volume of consumer information it holds, the size and complexity of its business, and the cost of available tools to improve security and reduce vulnerabilities. In addition, state attorneys general are authorized to bring civil actions seeking either injunctions or damages in response to violations that threaten the privacy of state residents. We cannot be sure how these regulations will be interpreted, enforced or applied to our operations. In addition to the risks associated with enforcement activities and potential contractual liabilities, our ongoing efforts to comply with evolving laws and regulations at the federal and state level may be costly and require ongoing modifications to our policies, procedures and systems.
Current wording
Due to the numerous U.S. federal, state, and Canadian federal and provincial laws and regulations related to the privacy, data protection, and security of personal information, determining whether personal information has been handled in compliance with applicable privacy standards and our contractual obligations can be complex and may be subject to changing legal and regulatory interpretation. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) expects a company’s data security measures to be reasonable and appropriate in light of the sensitivity and volume of consumer information it holds, the size and complexity of its business, and the cost of available tools to improve security and reduce vulnerabilities. If we fail to comply with applicable privacy laws, we could face civil and criminal penalties. Failing to take appropriate steps to keep consumers’ personal information secure may also constitute unfair acts or practices in or affecting commerce and be construed as a violation of Section 5(a) of the FTCA. In addition, U.S. state attorneys general may bring civil actions seeking either injunctions or damages in response to violations of applicable state law. We cannot be sure how these regulations will be interpreted, enforced or applied to our operations. In addition to the risks associated with enforcement activities and potential contractual liabilities, our ongoing efforts to comply with evolving laws and regulations at the federal and state level may be costly and require ongoing modifications to our policies, procedures and systems.
Previous wording
Internationally, laws, regulations and standards in many jurisdictions apply broadly to the collection, transmission, storage, use, processing, destruction, retention and security of personal information. For example, in the European Union, the collection, transmission, storage, use, processing, destruction, retention and security of personal data is governed by the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) in addition to other applicable laws and regulations. The GDPR, together with national legislation, regulations and guidelines of the European Union Member States governing the collection, transmission, storage, use, processing, destruction, retention and security of personal data, impose strict obligations with respect to, and restrictions on, the collection, use, retention, protection, disclosure, transfer and processing of personal data. The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data to countries outside the European Union that are not deemed to have protections for personal information, including the United States. The GDPR authorizes fines for certain violations of up to 4% of the total global annual turnover of the preceding financial year or €20 million, whichever is greater. Such fines are in addition to any civil litigation claims by data subjects. Separately, Brexit has led and could also lead to legislative and regulatory changes and may increase our compliance costs and expose us to two parallel regulatory regimes, each of which authorizes similar fines and other potentially divergent enforcement actions for certain violations. Other jurisdictions outside the European Union are similarly introducing or enhancing privacy and data security laws, rules and regulations, which could increase our compliance costs and the risks associated with noncompliance. We cannot guarantee that we are, or will be, in compliance with all applicable U.S., Canadian, or other international regulations as they are enforced now or as they evolve.
Current wording
Internationally, the laws, regulations, and standards in many jurisdictions apply broadly to the collection, transmission, storage, use, processing, destruction, retention, and security of personal information. In the EU, the collection, transmission, storage, use, processing, destruction, retention, and security of personal information (i.e., personal data) is governed by the provisions of the EU GDPR and the EU GDPR as assimilated in the law of the UK (the “UK GDPR”) (the EU GDPR and the UK GDPR, collectively, the “GDPR”) in addition to other applicable laws and regulations. The GDPR, together with national legislation, regulations, and guidelines of the EU Member States governing the collection, transmission, storage, use, processing, destruction, retention, and security of personal data, impose strict obligations with respect to the collection, use, retention, protection, disclosure, transfer, and processing of personal data. The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data to countries outside the EU that are not deemed to have protections for personal information, including the United States. The GDPR authorizes fines for certain violations of up to 4% of the total global annual turnover of the preceding financial year or €20 million, whichever is greater. Such fines are in addition to any civil litigation claims by data subjects. GDPR enforcement remains robust, with coordinated actions and a new 2026 regulation supplementing cross-border enforcement procedures to streamline investigations (effective in phases, with full application by 2027). Separately, Brexit has led to legislative and regulatory changes and may increase our data protection compliance costs and expose us to two parallel regulatory regimes, each of which authorizes similar fines and other potentially divergent enforcement actions for certain violations. In Brazil and Canada, respectively, organizations are subject to Brazil’s data protection law, the Lei Geral de Protectao de Dados (the “LGPD”), which imposes similar requirements to those imposed under the GDPR, and Canada’s Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (the “PIPEDA”) regarding the collection, transmission, storage, use, processing, destruction, retention, and security of personal information. Other jurisdictions outside the EU are similarly introducing or enhancing privacy, data protection, and data security laws, rules, and regulations, which could increase our compliance costs and the risks associated with noncompliance. We cannot guarantee that we are, or will be, in compliance with all applicable U.S. or other international laws or regulations as they are enforced now or as they may be enforced in the future.
Previous wording
Our cloud services business operates in a highly regulated environment, subject to a complex and rapidly evolving array of domestic and international laws, regulations, and industry standards governing data privacy, cybersecurity, data localization, and cross-border data transfers.
Current wording
Our cloud services business operates in a highly regulated environment, subject to a complex and rapidly evolving array of domestic and international laws, regulations, and industry standards governing data privacy, cybersecurity, data localization, cross-border data transfers, and emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence.
Showing the first 40 of 73 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
The occurrence of any of these factors, or our inability to successfully mitigate the results of the associated impact, could also damage our reputation, negatively impact our relationship with our customers, and otherwise materially harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition.