Skip to main content

Zedge, Inc.

For the period ended Jul 31, 2025. Filed Oct 28, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Oct 28, 2025

ZDGE$2.24-2.6%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-K

Period ended 2024-07-31; filed 2024-10-29.

0001213900-24-091735

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Current report: 10-K

Period ended 2025-07-31; filed 2025-10-28.

0001213900-25-103098

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 245 previous paragraphs and 251 current paragraphs.

152 unchanged; 64 reworded; 35 added; 29 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 108 previous and 107 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (35)

Current report

We currently incorporate AI into certain existing and planned products, as well as our internal operations. For example, in fiscal 2023 we launched pAInt, a generative AI creation suite within the Zedge App. We also rely on AI tooling, automation platforms, and emerging practices such as “vibe coding” to improve operational efficiency, enhance content creation workflows, and accelerate product development. Developing, testing, and deploying these AI systems, particularly those leveraging third-party services, may increase our cost profile due to high computing costs, which could reduce our margins and adversely affect our financial results. Achieving consistent, secure, and compliant AI adoption across departments—including Product & Engineering, Content Operations, Trust & Safety, Customer Support, Finance, and Legal/Compliance—requires ongoing investment in training, governance, and change management. Failure by any function to adopt or appropriately use these tools could reduce productivity, impair product quality, or cause compliance or security issues.

Current report

AI technologies are complex, resource-intensive, and rapidly evolving. Market demand and acceptance of AI-driven offerings, such as pAInt and Zedge Premium, remain uncertain, and our product development efforts may not achieve widespread adoption or may be outpaced by competitors. Competitors with greater financial, technical, data, or distribution resources may gain an advantage in attracting and retaining AI talent and in acquiring training data and compute capacity, which could impair our ability to maintain competitive AI capabilities. If our AI solutions, or those of others in our industry, draw controversy due to their perceived or actual societal impact—such as generating biased, harmful, or misleading content—we may experience brand or reputational harm, competitive harm, or legal liability, which could slow user adoption of our products.

Current report

The use of AI also raises ethical, reputational, and legal concerns. AI systems can generate or amplify content that is inaccurate, misleading, biased, discriminatory, harmful, or otherwise controversial, or be misused by third parties. If our AI tools produce, or are perceived to produce, such outputs, or if we fail to implement adequate human oversight, testing, and safeguards (including data governance, evaluation, and post-deployment monitoring), our brand and competitive standing could be harmed and we could face complaints, investigations, or litigation. Potential litigation or government regulation related to AI may increase the burden and cost of research and development, further subjecting us to reputational harm, competitive harm, or legal liability. Failure to address perceived or actual technical, legal, compliance, privacy, security, or ethical issues could undermine public confidence in AI, slowing customer adoption of our AI-driven products and services, such as pAInt and Zedge Premium.

Current report

We are susceptible to platform and competitive risks arising from the rapid adoption and integration of AI by established technology platforms, app stores, search engines, and new market entrants. For example, platforms may incorporate AI-driven wallpaper, emoji, or other personalization features directly into their services or AI overviews, reduce referral traffic, alter algorithms or terms governing AI content, or restrict use of third-party AI tools, any of which could decrease usage of our products or increase customer acquisition costs. Over time, improvements in AI accuracy, efficiency, and capabilities could disrupt our business model if we fail to anticipate and respond effectively.

Current report

Operationally, AI models depend on the quality, provenance, and security of data and on reliable third-party infrastructure. Inadequate, outdated, biased, or compromised datasets can produce flawed outputs and “model drift.” Our reliance on third-party models, APIs, datasets, and cloud providers exposes us to outages, cost volatility, performance degradation, or changes in licensing or acceptable-use terms, which could disrupt our operations if these services become unavailable or are no longer offered on commercially reasonable terms. Integrating AI introduces new cybersecurity risks, including prompt-injection, data exfiltration, model poisoning, and supply-chain vulnerabilities, as well as the risk that employees inadvertently input confidential or personal data into external systems.

Current report

Additionally, laws and regulations focused on the development and use of AI are proliferating globally and continue to evolve (for example, comprehensive AI frameworks in the EU and emerging federal and state guidance in the U.S.). Compliance may require significant documentation, transparency and record-keeping, risk assessments, model governance, content provenance or watermarking, impact assessments, vendor oversight, and restrictions on certain use cases. Noncompliance could result in investigations, fines, injunctions, remediation obligations, or other sanctions. Cross-border data transfer rules, sanctions, and export controls may affect access to datasets, models, or compute resources in some jurisdictions.

Current report

Finally, AI-related development and inference can increase energy consumption and costs, and investor or regulatory focus on sustainability may impose additional constraints. If we fail to implement robust AI governance, align employee practices with our policies, maintain sufficient human oversight, and continuously evaluate and improve our systems, the risks described above could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and reputation.

Current report

In addition, on April 24, 2024, President Biden signed the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACA), which required ByteDance, TikTok’s Chinese owner, to divest the app’s U.S. operations by January 19, 2025, or face a nationwide ban. This law was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in January 2025 inTikTok v. Garland.

Current report

After briefly going offline in mid-January, TikTok continued to operate in the U.S. under a series of executive orders signed by President Trump, each delaying enforcement of the federal ban by 75- to 90-day increments. The most recent extension set a compliance deadline of September 17, 2025. Shortly before that date, the U.S. and China announced they had reached a framework agreement to transition TikTok’s U.S. operations toward a U.S.-based ownership structure, aimed at preserving continued operation in the U.S. while satisfying national security concerns. Consistent with this framework, on September 16, 2025, the President signed a new executive order further extending the compliance deadline to December 16, 2025.

Current report

Should TikTok fail to complete an approved divestiture or meet U.S. requirements under the PAFACA and its implementing regulations by December 16, 2025, enforcement of the federal ban could resume, including removal of the app from U.S. app stores and other restrictions. This poses material risks to advertising and e-commerce, including revenue tied to TikTok-based promotions on Zedge’s platform.

Current report

Platform-driven changes to content accessibility may also impact our traffic and revenue. For instance, in late September 2025, Google updated its Search Engine Results Page (SERP) to allow users to copy emojis directly from search results, bypassing third-party sites like Emojipedia. This change could reduce organic traffic to our content-dependent services, potentially leading to a decline in revenue.

Current report

Similarly, Apple is experiencing industry pushback and country-specific regulations. In response to a recent U.S. antitrust settlement, effective January 2025 Apple now allows all digital apps in the United States to include a “prominent link” or button directing users to the developer’s website to process payments for in-app purchases, subject to Apple’s updated commission structure and compliance requirements. In the EU, pursuant to the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and related March 2025 enforcement actions, Apple has been required to (i) permit third-party app stores, (ii) allow side-loading of apps from the web, and (iii) support alternative in-app payment systems without imposing anti-steering restrictions, with similar obligations anticipated for Google. South Korea and Australia have also advanced legislative proposals that, if enacted, could mandate alternative billing options. Further complicating the competitive landscape, regulators in the United Kingdom are reviewing Apple’s compliance with its existing commitments under the UK Competition and Markets Authority’s mobile ecosystem investigation. These global regulatory shifts may require us to adopt highly nuanced, jurisdiction-specific billing and distribution strategies, devote additional resources to compliance, and manage multiple app versions tailored to local rules. Changes to billing options and distribution channels may disrupt the user experience and payment flow, potentially reducing paying user conversion rates. Conversely, opting not to implement alternative options where available could result in missed monetization opportunities. Any of these developments could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Current report

If we violate, or if a platform provider believes we have violated, its terms of service or applicable policies, the provider may limit or terminate our access to its platform, with or without notice. This risk extends to emerging AI-content compliance rules, such as disclosure or watermarking requirements, which may be interpreted differently across jurisdictions. Given our dependence on single-source distribution via Google Play and the App Store, any limitation or termination could significantly reduce our reach, impair monetization, and materially harm our business.

Current report

We operate in a highly competitive industry with low barriers to entry, and our failure to compete effectively, particularly with our AI-based offerings, could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Current report

The industry for digital content and AI-based offerings, including mobile personalization, emoji content, and photo competition platforms, is intensely competitive with low barriers to entry. We compete with a diverse range of entities, from large media companies and established online marketplaces to emerging startups and generative AI providers offering content creation, licensing, and personalization tools. Competitors include stock content suppliers, providers of free or low-cost imagery and music, social media platforms, and AI-driven content creation services. Key competitive factors include the quality, relevance, and breadth of content; effectiveness of AI technologies; pricing; ease of access; and brand reputation. Many competitors have greater financial, technical, or marketing resources, or stronger brand recognition, enabling them to innovate faster or offer more attractive pricing and terms to users and content creators. Low barriers to entry allow new entrants to quickly develop platforms that could divert users and creators from our offerings, such as Zedge Premium and pAInt, by providing easier submission processes, higher royalties, or exclusive distribution incentives. Additionally, advancements in generative AI could render our content or tools less competitive if competitors deploy superior AI-driven solutions. Increased competition, pricing pressures, or failure to meet user and creator expectations could reduce our market share, lower margins, or limit growth, materially harming our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Current report

Our efforts to develop and expand our content licensing business exposes us to a number of risks that could limit our ability to grow, achieve commercial success, and maintain our overall, business, results of operations, and financial condition. Contributors may choose not to provide their content for licensing purposes, which could prevent us from scaling our licensing business.

Current report

The success of our licensing business depends in part on contributors agreeing to make their content available for licensing, including through opt-in mechanisms across our platforms such as Zedge Premium and GuruShots. Contributors may decline to opt-in for licensing because of concerns over compensation, exclusivity, loss of control, or how their content may be used by third parties, such as for commercial applications including training AI systems. If we cannot secure sufficient contributor participation, the breadth, diversity, and quality of our licensing catalog may be inadequate, which would materially limit our ability to generate revenue from licensing activities and harm our overall growth prospects.

Current report

Our licensing catalog may not contain the types of content prospective licensors seek, which could limit demand for our licensing business.

Current report

The success of our content licensing business depends on our ability to maintain a catalog of content that meets the specific and evolving needs of prospective licensors, including e-commerce vendors, stock photo libraries, and companies seeking datasets to train AI models. If our catalog is too limited in subject matter, quality, or format, licensors may choose to obtain content from other providers or develop their own sources. A mismatch between available content and market demand could diminish our licensing business’s viability, harm our reputation, and negatively impact user engagement and revenue across our broader ecosystem.

Current report

Challenges in delivering “content-on-demand” could undermine our ability to secure or generate the content that prospective licensors require.

Current report

We aim to provide prospective licensors the ability to request content through on-demand generation tools, by engaging our contributor community, or by finding other methods of securing rights to content or development of content that we own. However, there is no assurance that we can fulfill such requests at the required scale, quality, or within the necessary timeframe due to limitations in our technology, contributor base, or compliance with regulatory requirements. If we are unable to deliver requested content, or if generated content raises intellectual property, authenticity, or ethical concerns, prospective licensors may elect not to engage with us. This could harm our reputation and limit the growth and sustainability of our licensing business.

Current report

Dependence on a limited number of prospective licensing partners could restrict our growth and profitability.

Current report

Our content licensing business may initially rely on a relatively small number of potential licensing partners. The market for such content is novel and unproven, and revenue depends on a few partners, with no assurance of additional orders, renewals or favorable terms. We may fail to meet contractual obligations, such as API performance requirements, or prevent unauthorized use of our content by third parties, which could require costly enforcement efforts. Regulatory or market factors may reduce the value of AI training content, and failure to prevent partner misuse could harm our reputation. If we fail to establish or maintain these relationships, or if prospective licensors reduce or discontinue their reliance on third-party content providers, our ability to scale and sustain our licensing business could be significantly impaired. Because these partners may have substantial bargaining power, they may also impose unfavorable terms that reduce our margins or restrict our flexibility. As a result, there can be no assurance that our licensing business will achieve or sustain commercial success.

Current report

Our recent restructuring efforts may not achieve anticipated financial and operational goals, increasing our investment risk.

Current report

Our recent restructuring efforts may not achieve the anticipated cost savings, operational efficiencies, or strategic benefits, which could hinder our ability to meet financial and operational goals and further complicate our growth trajectory. Failure to realize these expected outcomes could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Current report

In July 2025, the U.S. government enacted The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) which includes a broad range of tax reform provisions that may affect our financial results. The OBBBA includes, among other provisions, the allowance of immediate expensing of qualifying domestic research and development expenses and permanent extensions of certain provisions within the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law in 2017. The Inflation Reduction Act (“IRA”), signed into law in 2022, includes various corporate tax provisions including a new alternative corporate minimum tax on applicable corporations. The IRA tax provisions may become applicable to us in future years, which could result in additional taxes, a higher effective tax rate, reduced cash flows and lower overall profitability of our operations.

Current report

The OECD introduced significant changes to the international tax law framework through the Pillar Two guidelines. The framework outlines a coordinated set of rules to prevent multinational enterprises from shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions by implementing a 15% global minimum tax. Many countries in which we operate, including the member states of the EU, have enacted Pillar Two. Pillar Two rules began applying to us in fiscal year 2025. In January 2025, the United States issued an executive order announcing opposition to aspects of these rules. In late June 2025, a shared understanding of a new “side-by-side” solution to address U.S. concerns with Pillar Two was announced. If agreed upon and legislated by the OECD countries, this would exclude U.S.-parented groups from certain provisions of Pillar Two. The potential effects of Pillar Two may vary depending on the specific provisions and rules implemented by each country that adopts Pillar Two and may include tax rate changes, higher effective tax rates, potential tax disputes and adverse impacts to our cash flows, tax liabilities, results of operations and financial position.

Current report

Global tax developments applicable to multinational companies may continue to result in new tax regimes or changes to existing tax laws, regulations, and taxation officer interpretations. If the U.S. or foreign taxing authorities change tax laws, our overall taxes could increase, lead to a higher effective tax rate, harm our cash flows, results of operations and financial position.

Current report

Political, economic and military conditions in and surrounding Israel, including the ongoing war in Gaza, the June 2025 ’12-Day War’ between Israel and Iran and related cross-border hostilities involving Hezbollah in Lebanon and Houthi militants in Yemen, may materially and adversely affect our business, operations and financial condition. A portion of our personnel and operations are located in Israel; accordingly, regional instability and escalation directly affect our people, facilities, vendors and service continuity (including potential airspace or infrastructure disruptions, cyberattacks, electricity or network interruptions, impaired logistics, or temporary office closures). Israeli reserve-duty mobilizations may require some employees or contractors to serve for extended periods, which can delay product development, reduce support capacity and impact hiring and retention. The security situation can also impair domestic demand, international travel, partner engagement and supplier reliability, and may increase insurance costs or leave certain risks uninsurable. Broader macroeconomic effects, such as currency volatility, higher risk premia, capital-market dislocation, sanctions or trade restrictions, and shifts in advertiser or consumer spending, could further pressure our results. Although temporary ceasefires have occurred, cross-border rocket, drone and missile activity has persisted intermittently, and future flare-ups or a wider regional conflict (including renewed hostilities with Iran or coordinated attacks by Iran-aligned groups) could occur without notice. Any of these developments, together or separately, could disrupt our operations, harm our ability to execute our strategy, increase costs, delay initiatives, or otherwise negatively affect our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Current report

The EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) and the UK GDPR impose stringent privacy requirements, increase compliance costs, and authorize substantial fines for non-compliance. Changes to data protection laws in the UK, introduced by the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, introduce an additional compliance burden represented by divergence of UK privacy standards previously aligned to those in the EU, following the UK’s exit from the EU on December 31, 2020. Several countries have enacted or are considering laws mandating local storage and processing of data or restricting cross-border data flows, potentially requiring us to modify systems architecture or withdraw certain services from affected jurisdictions.

Current report

In parallel, legislators and regulators globally are moving quickly to address AI-specific risks and operators of AI systems may face significant compliance obligations. California and Colorado have enacted AI laws imposing transparency, risk-management, and accountability requirements, and other states are considering similar measures. For example, Colorado’s SB 24-205, effective in 2026, will require deployers and developers of high-risk AI systems to implement risk management policies, conduct impact assessments, and provide transparency disclosures. Additional state and federal legislative activity may result in further binding obligations. In addition, the EU Regulation on Artificial Intelligence (“EU AI Act”) entered into force in August 2024, with phased applicability beginning in 2025, imposing obligations on providers and users of AI systems, including risk classification, data-governance, documentation, transparency, and human-oversight requirements, backed by significant fines for non-compliance. In addition to these EU-wide requirements, EU Member States are beginning to introduce their own individual AI laws, which have the potential to go beyond those requirements of the EU AI Act. The UK, Canada, and Australia are developing their own AI-specific legal frameworks. Complying with overlapping and potentially inconsistent regimes may require us to modify algorithms, retrain models, restrict features, alter data-handling practices, or delay or forego product launches.

Current report

In addition, as major platforms and competitors integrate their own AI features, such as Google’s AI Overviews in search, AI-driven emoji rendering, or direct delivery of wallpaper and personalization content, traffic to our properties, including Emojipedia and the Zedge Marketplace, could decline, which could adversely impact user acquisition, engagement, and monetization. AI outputs may also inadvertently infringe third-party intellectual property, produce flawed, biased, misleading, or harmful content, or fail to meet user expectations, exposing us to legal claims, regulatory scrutiny, and reputational harm.

Current report

Efforts to comply with this complex and evolving legal landscape may require substantial modifications to our data-processing practices, AI governance, and product features, increasing operational costs and reducing speed to market. Failure to comply—or perceived failure to comply—with applicable privacy, security, or AI-related obligations may result in investigations, enforcement actions, litigation, fines, negative publicity, loss of user trust, and other harm to our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Moreover, compliance failures or breaches by our service providers or other third parties with whom we share data may subject us to liability and reputational damage even if we are not directly at fault.

Current report

Finally, emerging policy trends—including initiatives by major search and platform operators to integrate AI-generated content and features directly into their core services—could lead to regulatory changes impacting discoverability of our products and services, use of our content in training AI models, and our ability to monetize user-generated or AI-generated content. These developments, whether arising from statutory changes, administrative rule-making, or industry-imposed standards, could materially and adversely affect our operations, competitive position, and results of operations.

Current report

The regulatory landscape for online tracking continues to evolve, particularly in relation to the use of cookies and similar technologies. In the EU, UK, and certain other jurisdictions, businesses are required to obtain informed user consent before placing non-essential cookies or engaging in behavioral advertising. To facilitate compliance, many publishers, including us, employ consent management platforms (“CMPs”) that present cookie banners or preference centers, record user choices, and transmit consent signals to advertising partners. However, CMP implementation increases operational complexity, may cause user friction, and can materially reduce the percentage of users granting consent for personalized advertising. Industry data indicates that consent rates can vary widely (often below 70% in some markets), and further regulatory changes or browser-level restrictions on CMP frameworks (such as Google Chrome’s planned third-party cookie phase-out) could depress those rates further. A sustained drop in consent rates would directly impact the volume and value of addressable advertising inventory.
Removed paragraphs (29)

Previous report

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Previous report

Risk Factor Summary

Previous report

In addition, on April 24, 2024 President Joe Biden signed a bill that would ban TikTok in the United States if ByteDance, TikTok’s Chinese owner, didn’t sell the platform to a non-Chinese owner within nine months. Although TikTok is challenging the legality of this bill in court it is unclear if they will prevail. The negative impact of a TikTok ban could be material impacting advertising and ecommerce. In light of TikTok running ads in Zedge’s platform a ban could negatively impact revenue.

Previous report

Similarly, Apple is experiencing industry pushback and country-specific regulations. In response to a recent antitrust lawsuit, Apple now allows all digital apps in the United States to include a link to the developer’s website to process payments for in-app purchases. Additionally, in the EU, pursuant to the Digital Markets Act, all major app store operators such as Google and Apple will be forced to introduce more country-specific billing policies that allow developers to offer alternative billing methods, and it is expected that other markets may follow suit. Further complicating this landscape, a recent ruling by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California inEpic Games v. Google mandates that Google must open its Android app store to third-party competitors for three years, from November 1, 2024 through November 1, 2027, which will likely foster increased competition and could lead to changes in fee structures and app distribution practices.

Previous report

If we violate, or a platform provider believes we have violated, its terms of service, the platform provider reserves the right to limit or cease access to their platform. If we are unable to maintain a productive working relationship with any platform distribution and access to our products and services could also be curtailed or permanently disabled. This is especially true in instances where we are dependent on single source providers for their respective services. Any limitation or discontinuation of access to any platform could significantly reduce our ability to distribute and/or provide access to our products to users and would like result in materially and adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Previous report

Over the last several years, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (the “OECD”) has been working on a Base Erosion and Profits Shifting Project that would change various aspects of the existing framework under which our tax obligations are determined in many of the countries in which we operate. In this regard, the OECD has proposed policies aiming to modernize global tax systems, including a country-by-country 15% minimum effective tax rate (“Pillar Two”) for multinational companies. Numerous countries have enacted, or are in the process of enacting, legislation to implement the Pillar Two model rules with a subset of the rules becoming effective during our fiscal year ending July 31, 2025, and the remaining rules becoming effective for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2026, or in later periods. At this point in time, we do not expect material tax impacts associated with Pillar Two rules in the countries where we operate for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2025. As these rules continue to evolve with new legislation and guidance, we will continue to monitor and account for the enactment of Pillar Two rules in the countries where we operate, and the potential impacts such rules may have on our effective tax rate and cash flows in future years.

Previous report

Because a portion of our operations are conducted in Israel and certain members of our board of directors and management, as well as a many of our employees and consultants, are located in Israel, our business and operations are directly affected by economic, political, geopolitical and military conditions affecting Israel. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have occurred between Israel and its neighboring countries and other hostile non-state actors. These conflicts have involved missile strikes, hostile infiltrations and terrorism against civilian targets in various parts of Israel, which have negatively affected business conditions in Israel.

Previous report

On October 7, 2023, Hamas militants and members of other terrorist organizations infiltrated Israel’s southern border from the Gaza Strip and conducted a series of terror attacks on civilian and military targets. Thereafter, Hamas launched extensive rocket attacks on Israeli population and industrial centers located along the Israeli border with the Gaza Strip. Shortly following the attack, Israel’s security cabinet declared war against Hamas and launched an aerial bombardment of various targets within the Gaza Strip. The Israeli government subsequently called for the evacuation of over one million residents of the northern part of the Gaza Strip and initiated ground operations in the Gaza Strip. The intensity and duration of Israel’s current war against Hamas is difficult to predict as are such war’s economic implications on the global economy.

Previous report

The intensity and duration of Israel’s current war against Hamas is difficult to predict, and as are such war’s economic implications on the Company’s business and operations.

Previous report

Other terrorist organizations have since joined the hostilities, including Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Palestinian military organizations in the West Bank. In September 2024 Israel initiated a ground invasion of southern Lebanon to rid it of Hezbollah operatives who have been shelling Israel since October 8, 2023. Israeli officials have stated that their aim is to allow tens of thousands of its citizens to return home without the threat of attack by Hezbollah militants.

Previous report

Furthermore, Iran has fired hundreds of missiles and drones into Israel and Israel has recently responded to that action with attacks on military sites in Iran.

Previous report

As a result of the Israeli security cabinet’s decision to declare war against Hamas and more recently expand their operations against Hezbollah, several hundred thousand Israeli reservists were drafted to perform immediate military service. Certain of our employees and consultants in Israel have been mobilized for service in the current war against Hamas as of the date of this report, and such persons are expected may be absent for an extended period of time. As a result, our operations, including the development and launch of additional products, may be disrupted by such absences, which may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Previous report

The State of Israel is currently at war with Hamas and Hezbollah, terrorist organizations that control the Gaza Strip and Lebanon, respectively, and has had various armed conflicts with its neighbors as well as terrorist acts committed within Israel by hostile elements.

Previous report

We currently incorporate AI into specific existing and planned products, as well as our internal operations. For instance, in fiscal 2023, we launched pAInt, a generative AI wallpaper maker within the Zedge App. Additionally, we have other offerings utilizing AI in soft launch or development and we view this evolving technology as a key driver and focus of new products. While AI offers substantial opportunities, it also carries inherent risks to our business, reputation and financial results.

Previous report

AI technologies are complex and evolving rapidly. Our competitors may possess greater financial and technological resources, providing them with a competitive edge in attracting, motivating, and retaining top AI professionals. This could pose challenges in building and maintaining our AI capabilities. In addition, market acceptance of AI technologies is uncertain, and we may be unsuccessful in product development efforts which incorporate AI. Our products offerings that use AI could fail to achieve market acceptance, or our competitors may use AI technologies more efficiently than we do.

Previous report

Furthermore, the use of AI brings to the forefront emerging ethical concerns. Should we introduce solutions that generate content that is misleading, biased, harmful or controversial due to perceived or actual societal impact, we may face potential harm to our brand and reputation, competitive disadvantages, or even legal liabilities.

Previous report

In addition, we are susceptible to competitive risks arising from the rapid adoption and integration of new technologies by established industry participants, emerging startups, and other market entrants. Over time, AI tools are likely to enhance their accuracy and ability to handle complex tasks, potentially disrupting the landscape for educational technology businesses like ours. We must remain vigilant in our efforts to predict and respond to these developments in a timely and cost-effective manner.

Previous report

Zedge is exposed to claims from prior owners of GuruShots objecting to the determination that the conditions for payment of the earnout for the first year following acquisition were not met, and that the user acquisition spend obligations that we have made to the sellers of GuruShots are not required.

Previous report

In connection with the acquisition of GuruShots, the Company has (i) committed to a retention pool of $4 million in cash to be paid to the founders and employees of GuruShots that will be payable over three years from closing of the acquisition based on the beneficiaries thereof remaining employed by the Company or a subsidiary; and (ii) agreed to make certain minimum investments in user acquisition for GuruShots in the period covered by the earnout to be contingently paid to the prior owners of GuruShots subject to GuruShots maintaining agreed upon levels of return on ad spend (ROAS). GuruShots’ financial performance during the period from the April 2022 acquisition through July 31, 2024, was materially impacted by a combination of industry specific, macroeconomic, and geopolitical challenges that contributed to negatively impacting ROAS. The conditions for payment of the earnout for the first year following the acquisition were not met and no earnout payment was made or accrued.

Previous report

Although we believe that we have acted in compliance with our obligations, we could be exposed to liability to the prior owners of GuruShots. One of the prior owners of GuruShots has objected to the determination that the conditions for payment of the earnout for the first year following acquisition were not met. We responded to the objection in great detail and believe the assertion to be without merit.

Previous report

As noted above, we have responded to a claim from one of the prior owners of GuruShots, who objected to our determination that the conditions for payment of the earnout for the first year following acquisition were not met. We believe the assertion to be without merit.

Previous report

For example, on July 10, 2023, the European Commission adopted its adequacy decision relating to the new EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (“DPF”). This was followed by the UK Government’s approval of the UK extension to the DPF, which is effective as of October 12, 2023. The DPF and UK extension are now lawful means for transferring personal data from the European Economic Area (“EEA”), or the UK to the U.S. (in addition to Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”)). The DPF (and the associated steps that the U.S. Government has taken in connection with the DPF) should improve the ability for personal data to flow from the EEA or UK to the U.S., however the DPF is likely to be subject to challenge and may be invalidated in the future. While this does not present an immediate risk to our business, monitoring and ensuring compliance with shifting data transfer requirements could result in additional costs incurred.

Previous report

In addition, the EU General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (“GDPR”) and the UK General Data Protection Regulation (the “UK GDPR”), incorporating the GDPR into UK law, impose more stringent data protection requirements, provide an enforcement authority which substantially increases compliance costs, and impose large penalties for noncompliance. Such laws and regulations may require companies to implement new privacy and security policies, conduct processing or transfer impact assessments, permit individuals to access, correct and delete personal information stored or maintained by such companies, inform individuals of security breaches that affect their personal information, and, among other things, obtain individuals’ consent to use personal information for certain purposes. In addition, some countries have enacted, or are currently considering, legislation that imposes local storage and processing of data to avoid any form of transfer to a third country, or other restrictions on transfer and disclosure of personal data outside of that country which may impact our compliance obligations, potentially exposing us to liability, and increase the cost and complexity of delivering our products and services.

Previous report

In June 2018, California passed the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), effective January 1, 2020. The CCPA is a privacy law that provides consumers significant rights over the use of their personal information, including the right to object to the “sale” of their personal information. Amendments to the CCPA under the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), effective January 1, 2023, expand some of the CCPA rights to residents to restrict the use of certain information. These laws may restrict our ability to use personal information in connection with our business operations, and along with other state laws, such as the California Online Privacy Protection Act, create compliance obligations. The CCPA also provides a private right of action for certain data breaches.

Previous report

Additionally, alongside California, several other states have also enacted comprehensive consumer data privacy laws that are currently effective or will become effective in the coming years. Moreover, some U.S. states have more specific consumer data privacy requirements, some with onerous notice, consent, and other obligations. These laws generally place limitations on the collection, processing, and use of consumer personal information and create data privacy and protection compliance obligations for businesses covered under the law (the jurisdictional requirements of which may vary). Some of the laws specifically regulate the processing of information from individuals under the age of 18.

Previous report

Several states have enacted laws requiring businesses subject to the laws to implement cyber and data security programs. For example, New York enacted the Stop Hacks and Improve Electronic Data Security Act (SHIELD Act), effective March 2020, which requires companies with data relating to New Yorkers to adopt comprehensive cybersecurity programs. Since 2010, Massachusetts, through 201 CMR 17.00, has required companies that own or license the personal information of Massachusetts residents to develop, implement, and maintain a Written Information Security Program.

Previous report

In addition, Lithuania, Israel, and Norway each have unique data privacy regulations that impact how and what we can do with employee data and require local compliance efforts.

Previous report

Efforts to comply with these and other data privacy and security restrictions that may be adopted could require us to modify our data processing practices and policies, increasing the cost of our operations. Failure to comply could subject us to criminal and civil sanctions and other penalties. In part due to the uncertainty of the legal climate, complying with regulations, and any applicable rules or guidance from regulatory authorities or self-regulatory organizations relating to privacy, data protection, information security and consumer protection, may result in substantial costs and may require changes to our business practices, which may limit our growth strategy, adversely impact our ability to attract or retain players, and otherwise negatively affect our business, reputation, legal exposure, financial condition and results of operations.

Previous report

Any failure or perceived compliance failure with our posted privacy policies, our privacy-related obligations to users or other third parties, or any other legal obligations or regulatory requirements relating to privacy, data protection, or information security may result in official investigations or enforcement actions, litigation, legal claims, or negative publicity from consumer advocacy groups or the press and could result in significant liability, cause our users to lose trust in us to the point of severing their relationship with us, and otherwise materially and adversely affect our business. Furthermore, the costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, the laws, regulations, and policies that are applicable to us may limit the adoption and use of, and reduce the overall demand for, our products and services. Additionally, service providers or other third parties that we work with, violate applicable laws, regulations, or agreements, such violations may put our users’ and/or employees’ data at risk, could result in formal investigations or enforcement actions, fines, litigation, claims or negative publicity from consumer advocacy groups or the press and could result in significant liability, cause our players to lose trust in us and otherwise materially and adversely affect our reputation and business. Further, public scrutiny of data practices and privacy, or complaints about, such practices, especially when lodged against technology companies, may heighten the chances for an official investigation and result in modifications to existing or the introduction of new regulatory requirements resulting in higher costs and risks.
Reworded paragraphs (64)

Previous wording

If we fail to keep up with rapid technological changes in the internet and smartphone industries and adapt our products and services accordingly, our results of operations and future growth may be adversely affected.

Current wording

If we fail to keep up with rapid technological changes in the internet, smartphone industries, and artificial intelligence (“AI”), and adapt our products and services accordingly, our results of operations and future growth may be adversely affected.

Previous wording

The internet and smartphone industries are characterized by rapid and innovative technological changes. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to respond to fast changing technologies, adapt our products and services to evolving industry standards and improve the performance, functionality and reliability of our products and services. Our failure to continue to adapt to such changes could harm our business. If we are slow to develop products and services that are compatible with smartphones, or if the products and services we develop are not widely accepted and used by smartphone users, we may not be able to capture a significant share of this important market. In addition, the widespread adoption of new internet, networking or telecommunications technologies or other technological changes for smartphones could require substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our products, services or infrastructure. If we fail to keep up with rapid and innovative technological changes to remain competitive, our future growth may be materially and adversely affected and our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Current wording

The internet and smartphone industries are characterized by rapid and innovative technological changes. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to respond to fast changing technologies, adapt our products and services, including those of Emojipedia, to evolving industry standards and improve the performance, functionality and reliability of our products and services. For example, AI platforms, including ChatGPT and Claude, now return emoji results in response to user queries. While it is too early to accurately quantify the impact of these changes on Emojipedia’s monthly active users (MAU), we believe they are likely to result in reduced traffic and adversely affect revenue. Our increasing reliance on AI technologies for various operational aspects, such as content moderation, personalization, and user engagement, may pose risks if these systems fail or produce unintended outcomes. Technical issues, data inaccuracies, or system malfunctions could disrupt our services and negatively impact user experience. Ensuring the reliability and accuracy of AI systems requires ongoing maintenance, testing, and potential human oversight, which may increase operational complexity and costs. Our failure to continue to adapt to such changes could harm our business. If we are slow to develop products and services that are compatible with smartphones, or if the products and services we develop are not widely accepted and used by smartphone users, we may not be able to capture a significant share of this important market. In addition, the widespread adoption of new internet, networking or telecommunications technologies or other technological changes for smartphones could require substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our products, services or infrastructure. If we fail to keep up with rapid and innovative technological changes to remain competitive, our future growth may be materially and adversely affected and our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Previous wording

A key component of our growth strategy involves the adoption and utilization of artificial intelligence (AI), which introduces certain risks.

Current wording

A key component of our growth strategy involves the adoption, integration, and effective utilization of AI technologies across our products, services, and internal operations, which introduces significant and evolving risks.

Previous wording

Intellectual property ownership surrounding AI technologies has not been fully addressed by U.S. courts or other federal or state laws or regulations, Our ongoing development and use of generative AI tools may result in copyright infringement claims, disputes over ownership and licensing, and potential patent infringement claims, among other things. These legal challenges could be costly to defend against, leading to substantial financial obligations and reputational damage. The evolving regulatory environment and uncertain legal precedents in this field further increase our exposure to litigation risks, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Current wording

Intellectual property ownership surrounding AI technologies has not been fully addressed by U.S. courts or federal and state laws, nor by international legal frameworks globally. Our ongoing development and use of generative AI tools may result in copyright infringement claims, disputes over ownership and licensing, and potential patent infringement claims, among other things. These legal challenges could be costly to defend against, leading to substantial financial obligations and reputational damage. The evolving regulatory environment and uncertain legal precedents in this field further increase our exposure to litigation risks, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Previous wording

Further, our use of generative AI in aspects of our platforms may present risks and challenges that could increase as AI solutions become more prevalent. AI algorithms may be flawed. Datasets may be insufficient or contain biased information. These deficiencies and other failures of AI systems could have negative impacts on our users’ experience and subject us to competitive harm, regulatory action, legal liability, and brand or reputational harm.

Current wording

Further, our use of generative AI in aspects of our platforms may present risks and challenges that could increase as AI solutions become more prevalent. AI algorithms may be flawed. Datasets may be insufficient or contain biased information. These deficiencies and other failures of AI systems could have negative impacts on our users’ experience and subject us to competitive harm, regulatory action, legal liability, and brand or reputational harm. Contractual indemnities from vendors may be unavailable or insufficient. We may also face claims related to privacy (including the processing of personal or biometric information), publicity rights, deceptive practices, or content moderation failures. Defending such claims can be costly and time-consuming, could require changes to our products or processes, and could harm our reputation and financial results.

Previous wording

The size of our user base and our users’ level of engagement and paid conversion are fundamental to our success. Our financial performance has been and will continue to be dependent on our ability to successfully add new users, retain and engage existing users and convert them into paying users and/or subscribers. We expect that the size of our user base will fluctuate or decline in one or more markets from time to time. If consumers and/or creators do not perceive our products as useful, effective, entertaining, reliable, and/or trustworthy, we may not be able to attract or keep users or otherwise maintain or increase the frequency and duration of their engagement or the percentage of users that are converted into or remain paying subscribers. There is no guarantee that we will not experience a decline in our user base or engagement levels. User engagement can be difficult to measure, particularly as we introduce new and different products and services, and as various privacy regulations evolve. Any number of factors can negatively affect user retention, growth, engagement and conversion, including if:

Current wording

The size of our user base and our users’ level of engagement and paid conversion are fundamental to our success. Our financial performance has been and will continue to be dependent on our ability to successfully add new users, retain and engage existing users and convert them into paying users and/or subscribers. We expect that the size of our user base will fluctuate or decline in one or more markets from time to time. If consumers and/or creators do not perceive our products as useful, effective, entertaining, reliable, and/or trustworthy, we may not be able to attract or keep users or otherwise maintain or increase the frequency and duration of their engagement or the percentage of users that are converted into or remain paying subscribers. We may continue to see declines in our user base or engagement levels, which could further erode our ability to maintain or grow revenue. User engagement can be difficult to measure, particularly as we introduce new and different products and services, and as various privacy regulations evolve. Any number of factors can negatively affect user retention, growth, engagement and conversion, including if:

Previous wording

Revenues of freemium apps and websites typically rely on a small percentage of users that convert into paying users by making in-app purchases of digital goods and/or paid subscriptions; however, the vast majority of users play for free or only occasionally make purchases or opt-in for paid subscriptions. Accordingly, only a small percentage of our users are paying users. In addition, a small portion of paying users generate a disproportionate percentage of revenue. Because of this, it is imperative for us to both retain these valuable customers and to maintain or increase their spend over time. In fiscal 2024, we experienced an 8% decline in paid subscriptions. Conversely, over the past seven years, GuruShots has successfully increased the compounded annual growth rate of monthly spending per paying player by around 9.9%. There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to retain paying users, grow or maintain subscription levels or that paying users will maintain or increase their spending. We may experience a net decline in paying players resulting in a decrease in revenue resulting in a materially adverse outcome for our business and financial results.

Current wording

Revenues of freemium apps and websites typically rely on a small percentage of users that convert into paying users by making in-app purchases of digital goods and/or paid subscriptions; however, the vast majority of users play for free or only occasionally make purchases or opt-in for paid subscriptions. Accordingly, only a small percentage of our users are paying users. In addition, a small portion of paying users generate a disproportionate percentage of revenue. Because of this, it is imperative for us to both retain these valuable customers and to maintain or increase their spend over time. In fiscal 2025, we experienced a 17% increase in subscription revenue and a 29% increase in subscription billings. Conversely, over the past nine years, GuruShots has successfully increased the compounded annual growth rate of monthly spending per paying player by around 6.2%. There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to retain paying users, grow or maintain subscription levels or that paying users will maintain or increase their spending. We may experience a net decline in paying players resulting in a decrease in revenue resulting in a materially adverse outcome for our business and financial results.

Previous wording

In fiscal 2024, approximately 79% of our revenues (excluding GuruShots) were generated from selling advertising inventory. We generally enter into arrangements with the major programmatic advertising networks to monetize our advertising inventory. We need to maintain good relationships with these advertising networks to provide us with a sufficient inventory of advertisements. Online advertising, including through mobile applications, is an intensely competitive industry. Many large companies, such as Applovin, Meta and Google, invest significantly in data analytics to make their properties and platforms more attractive to advertisers. Our advertising revenue is primarily a function of the number and hours of engagement of our free users and our ability to provide innovative advertising products that are relevant to our users, maintain or increase user engagement and satisfaction with our products, and enhance returns and add incremental gains for our advertising partners. If our relationship with any advertising partners terminates for any reason, or if the commercial terms of our relationships are changed or do not continue to be renewed on favorable terms, or if we cannot source high-quality ads consistent with our brand or product experience, we would need to qualify new advertising partners, which could negatively impact our revenues, at least in the short term.

Current wording

In fiscal 2025, approximately 75% of our revenues (excluding GuruShots) were generated from selling advertising inventory. We generally enter into arrangements with the major programmatic advertising networks to monetize our advertising inventory. We need to maintain good relationships with these advertising networks to provide us with a sufficient inventory of advertisements. Online advertising, including through mobile applications, is an intensely competitive industry. Many large companies, such as Applovin, Meta and Google, invest significantly in data analytics to make their properties and platforms more attractive to advertisers. Our advertising revenue is primarily a function of the number and hours of engagement of our free users and our ability to provide innovative advertising products that are relevant to our users, maintain or increase user engagement and satisfaction with our products, and enhance returns and add incremental gains for our advertising partners. If our relationship with any advertising partners terminates for any reason, or if the commercial terms of our relationships are changed or do not continue to be renewed on favorable terms, or if we cannot source high-quality ads consistent with our brand or product experience, we would need to qualify new advertising partners, which could negatively impact our revenues, at least in the short term.

Previous wording

In addition, internet-connected devices and operating systems controlled by third parties increasingly contain features that allow device users to disable functionality that allows for the delivery of advertising on their devices or reduce the ability to provide personalized or targeted advertising, which results in less valuable ads. Device and browser manufacturers may include or expand these features as part of their standard device specifications. For example, when Apple announced that UDID, a standard device identifier used in some applications, was being superseded and would no longer be supported, application developers were required to update their apps to utilize alternative device identifiers such as universally unique identifier, or, more recently, identifier-for-advertising, which simplifies the process for Apple users to opt out of behavioral targeting. Furthermore, laws and regulations may also make it more difficult to deliver personalized or targeted advertising or impose requirements that result in more users making elections to block our ability to deliver targeted ads. If users do not elect to participate in functionality that supports the delivery of targeted advertising on their devices, our ability to deliver effective advertising campaigns could suffer, which could cause our business, financial condition, or operating results to be adversely affected.

Current wording

In addition, internet-connected devices and operating systems controlled by third parties increasingly contain features that allow device users to disable functionality that allows for the delivery of advertising on their devices or reduce the ability to provide personalized or targeted advertising, which results in less valuable ads. Device and browser manufacturers may include or expand these features as part of their standard device specifications. For example, when Apple announced that IDFA, a standard device identifier used in some applications, was being superseded and would no longer be supported, application developers were required to update their apps to utilize alternative device identifiers such as universally unique identifier, or, more recently, identifier-for-advertising, which simplifies the process for Apple users to opt out of behavioral targeting. Furthermore, laws and regulations may also make it more difficult to deliver personalized or targeted advertising or impose requirements that result in more users making elections to block our ability to deliver targeted ads. If users do not elect to participate in functionality that supports the delivery of targeted advertising on their devices, our ability to deliver effective advertising campaigns could suffer, which could cause our business, financial condition, or operating results to be adversely affected.

Previous wording

We anticipate that our growth and profitability will continue to depend on our ability to sell our advertising inventory. Companies that advertise with us may choose to utilize other advertising channels or may reduce or eliminate their marketing altogether for a variety of reasons, many of which are out of our control, including, without limitation, if the demand for mobile phone personalization industry declines or otherwise falls out of favor with advertisers or consumers.

Current wording

We anticipate that our growth and profitability will continue to depend on our ability to sell our advertising inventory. Companies that advertise with us may choose to utilize other advertising channels or may reduce or eliminate their marketing altogether for a variety of reasons, many of which are out of our control, including, without limitation, if the demand for mobile phone personalization industry declines or otherwise falls out of favor with advertisers or consumers. In addition, we previously disclosed that disruptions caused by U.S. regulatory action, specifically the TikTok ban that took effect in early 2025 shortly after President Trump assumed office, had an immediate impact on advertiser behavior. During that period, U.S. advertising revenue fell, with TikTok advertising spend for the most part disappearing. This experience illustrates how government-mandated restrictions on a major advertiser can impact revenue quickly. Should future regulation, such as a reinstated or expanded ban on TikTok or restrictions on other platforms result, our revenue could be materially and adversely affected.

Previous wording

Further, our advertisers’ ability to effectively target their advertising to our user’s interests may be negatively impacted by the degree to which our privacy control measures that we have implemented or may implement in the future in connection with regulations, regulatory actions, the user experience, or otherwise, and our advertising revenue may decrease or otherwise be curtailed as a result. Changes to operating systems’ practices and policies, such as Apple’s deprecating the Identifier for Advertisers (“IDFA”) and Google’s Privacy Sandbox which is meant to make current tracking mechanisms obsolete, and block covert tracking techniques, like fingerprinting may also reduce the quantity and quality of the data and metrics that can be collected or used by us and our partners. These limitations may adversely affect our advertisers’ ability to effectively target advertisements and measure their performance, which could reduce the demand and pricing for our advertising products and harm our business. As such, our digital property’s current and potential advertiser clients may ultimately find digital advertising to be less effective than traditional advertising media or marketing methods or other technologies for promoting their products and services, and they may even reduce their spending on mobile advertising from current levels as a result or for other reasons.

Current wording

Further, our advertisers’ ability to effectively target their advertising to our user’s interests may be negatively impacted by the degree to which our privacy control measures that we have implemented or may implement in the future in connection with regulations, regulatory actions, the user experience, or otherwise, and our advertising revenue may decrease or otherwise be curtailed as a result. Changes to operating systems’ practices and policies, such as Apple’s deprecating the Identifier for Advertisers (“IDFA”) and changes by Google to its advertising and tracking policies, including the planned deprecation of third-party cookies in Chrome and a shift away from certain elements of its Privacy Sandbox initiative, as well as efforts to block covert tracking techniques like fingerprinting, may also reduce the quantity and quality of the data and metrics that can be collected or used by us and our partners. These limitations may adversely affect our advertisers’ ability to effectively target advertisements and measure their performance, which could reduce the demand and pricing for our advertising products and harm our business. As such, our digital property’s current and potential advertiser clients may ultimately find digital advertising to be less effective than traditional advertising media or marketing methods or other technologies for promoting their products and services, and they may even reduce their spending on mobile advertising from current levels as a result or for other reasons.

Previous wording

In fiscal 2024, revenue from well developed economies accounted for approximately 80% of our total revenues and 69% of our total advertising revenues were generated by three advertising demand partners. While our end users are located around the world, the revenue is generated in the United States from our advertising partners. During the past five years, we have experienced a shift in our Zedge App’s regional customer make-up with the percentage of our total MAU from emerging markets increasing, while the portion from well-developed markets is decreasing. In fiscal 2024, 79% of our Zedge App’s users were located in emerging markets with 21% of users in well-developed regions compared to 78% and 22% respectively in fiscal 2023. India comprised 30% of our MAU as of July 31, 2024. This shift has negatively impacted revenues because well-developed markets command materially higher advertising rates when compared to those in emerging markets. Although we are investing in reversing this trend, we may not be successful in this effort which may result in lower revenues and profitability. Although GuruShots’ and Emojipedia’s user bases are more heavily weighted to well-developed economies, we are still exposed to the impact of a shift in our Zedge App’s user base toward emerging markets.

Current wording

In fiscal 2025, revenue from well developed economies accounted for approximately 81% of our total revenues and 72% of our total advertising revenues were generated by three advertising demand partners. While our end users are located around the world, the revenue is generated in the United States from our advertising partners. During the past five years, we have experienced a shift in our Zedge App’s regional customer make-up with the percentage of our total MAU from emerging markets increasing, while the portion from well-developed markets is decreasing. In fiscal 2025, 76.7% of our Zedge App’s users were located in emerging markets with 23.3% of users in well-developed regions compared to 21.1% and 78.9% respectively in fiscal 2024. India comprised 32.5% of our MAU as of July 31, 2025. This shift has negatively impacted revenues because well-developed markets command materially higher advertising rates when compared to those in emerging markets. Although we are investing in reversing this trend, we may not be successful in this effort which may result in lower revenues and profitability. Although GuruShots’ and Emojipedia’ s user bases are more heavily weighted to well-developed economies, our overall revenue remains sensitive to the regional composition of our Zedge App’s user base.

Previous wording

Three advertising demand partners, mainly, Google, Vungle and AppLovin were responsible for 69% of overall advertising revenue in fiscal 2024. If any of these advertising demand partners were to alter their spend on our digital properties the outcome could result in lowering revenues and profitability.

Current wording

Three advertising demand partners, mainly, Google, Liftoff, and AppLovin were responsible for 72% of advertising revenue in fiscal 2025. If any of these advertising demand partners were to alter their spend on our digital properties the outcome could result in lowering revenues and profitability.

Previous wording

Our apps’ user base is heavily weighted to smartphones running the Android operating system, which constituted approximately 96% of our MAU (excluding Emojipedia) as of July 31, 2024, and most of our revenues for fiscal 2024. Any significant downturn in the overall demand for Android smartphones or the use of Android smartphones could significantly and adversely affect the demand for our products and services and would materially affect our revenues.

Current wording

Our apps’ user base is heavily weighted to smartphones running the Android operating system, which constituted approximately 95% of our MAU (excluding Emojipedia) as of July 31, 2025, and most of our revenues for fiscal 2025. Any significant downturn in the overall demand for Android smartphones or the use of Android smartphones could significantly and adversely affect the demand for our products and services and would materially affect our revenues.

Previous wording

In fiscal 2024, approximately 79% of our revenues excluding GuruShots were generated from advertising sales. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in diversifying our revenue mix by identifying new revenue drivers that complement our advertising-heavy business. Although the Zedge App had initial success in converting freemium users into paid subscribers, starting with zero in January 2019 and ending fiscal 2023 with approximately 647,000, we ended fiscal 2024 with 669,000 subscribers, a 3.4% increase and there is no guarantee that we will be successful in improving subscriber base growth or in maintaining our current subscriber base. To date, Zedge Premium has taken longer to scale than we originally anticipated. Furthermore, we are still integrating GuruShots and have not achieved its expected growth trajectory or realized synergies between GuruShots and our legacy operations. Finally, Android users constitute approximately 96% of our overall MAU and are prone to spend less money in apps than iOS and web users. Even if our new initiatives are successful on one platform, we may not be able to replicate that success across other platforms.

Current wording

In fiscal 2025, approximately 75% of our revenues excluding GuruShots were generated from advertising sales. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in diversifying our revenue mix by identifying new revenue drivers that complement our advertising-heavy business. Although the Zedge App had initial success in converting freemium users into paid subscribers, starting with zero in January 2019 and ending fiscal 2024 with approximately 669,000, we ended fiscal 2025 with 984,000 subscribers, a 47% increase and we may not be successful in improving subscriber base growth or in maintaining our current subscriber base. Furthermore, the subscription growth we experienced in fiscal 2025 was fueled by converting users to lifetime subscriptions and offers that aligned with localized pricing dynamics. We may not be able to continue to be able to drive this growth as market dynamics may change. To date, Zedge Premium has taken longer to scale than we originally anticipated. Furthermore, we are still integrating GuruShots and have not achieved its expected growth trajectory or realized synergies between GuruShots and our legacy operations. Finally, Android users constitute approximately 95% of our overall MAU and are prone to spend less money in apps than iOS and web users. Even if our new initiatives are successful on one platform, we may not be able to replicate that success across other platforms.

Previous wording

We rely on third-party platforms, such as the iOS App Store, Meta, and Google Play Store, to distribute our apps and collect revenues generated on these platforms. If these platforms adopt policies including those relating to advertising, privacy, or monetization that are counter to our strategy it could result in materially and adversely affecting our business.

Current wording

We rely on third-party platforms, primarily the iOS App Store, Meta, and Google Play Store, to distribute our apps, process payments, and collect revenues generated on these platforms. These platforms exercise significant control over app distribution, monetization, advertising, and privacy policies, and frequently update their algorithms and terms of service. In addition, the integration of AI-driven content and search results by these platforms (e.g., Google’s “AI Overviews” and similar generative AI features from Apple and Meta) may reduce organic traffic to our properties by embedding content directly in platform experiences. If these platforms adopt policies — including those relating to AI integration, advertising, privacy, monetization, or content display — that are counter to our strategy, our business could be materially and adversely affected.

Previous wording

Our products and services depend on mobile app stores and other third parties such as data center service providers, as well as third party cloud infrastructure and service providers, payment aggregators, computer systems, internet transit providers and other communications systems and service providers. Our mobile applications are almost exclusively accessed through and depend on the Google Play Store and Apple’s App Store. While our mobile applications are generally free to download from these stores, we offer our users the opportunity to make in-app purchases and/or purchase paid subscriptions. In certain instances, we determine the prices at which these items and subscriptions are sold. These purchases are processed by Google’s and Apple’s in-app payment and subscription systems. As of July 31, 2024 we paid Google and Apple up to 30% of the revenue we generated across their respective platforms for processing fees. Our revenues and earnings could be negatively impacted should Google or Apple decide to impose higher processing fees. Further, our cashflow may be negatively impacted if either platform changes the timing of their payments to us. While we do not anticipate any interruption in their distribution platforms or ability to accept customer payments, any such disruptions, even temporary, may have material impacts on our business and operations.

Current wording

Our products and services depend almost entirely on mobile app stores, particularly Google Play and Apple’s App Store, and on other third parties such as data center service providers, as well as third party cloud infrastructure and service providers, payment aggregators, computer systems, internet transit providers and other communications systems and service providers. Our mobile applications are almost exclusively accessed through and depend on the Google Play Store and Apple’s App Store. While our apps are generally free to download, we monetize through in-app purchases, subscriptions, and advertising, all of which depend on compliance with evolving platform policies. As of July 31, 2025, we paid Google and Apple processing fees of up to 30% for transactions, and we remain exposed to changes in fee structures, payout timing, and permitted monetization models. Any interruption, degradation, or policy change, including restrictions on AI-generated content or mandatory labeling of such content, could materially impact our business. While we do not anticipate any interruption in their distribution platforms or ability to accept customer payments, any such disruptions, even temporary, may have material impacts on our business and operations.

Previous wording

We are subject to the standard policies and terms of service of third-party platforms, which govern the marketing, promotion, distribution, content and operation of our apps on their platforms. Each platform provider has the discretion to make changes to its operating system, payment services, manner in which their mobile operating system operates as well as change and interpret the terms and conditions of its developer policies. These changes may be harmful to our business and result in a negative outcome. For example, in September 2019, our Zedge App was temporarily removed from Google Play because they asserted that the Zedge App violated their malicious behavior policy. As a result, prospective Android users were prevented from installing our Zedge App, freemium users were unable to convert into paying subscribers and existing users we unable to purchase Zedge Credits. Shortly after the notice was issued, two of our major advertising suppliers ceased serving advertisements to our Zedge App. In addition, Google Play sent a notification to users that had the problematic version of the app on their phone recommending that they uninstall it. We identified the source of the problem as buggy code from a long-term, third-party advertising partner’s standard technology integration in our app. We corrected the problem by removing the offensive code, releasing a new version of our app and our Zedge App was reinstated after approximately 72 hours and concurrently the two major advertising suppliers resumed purchasing our advertising inventory. We estimate the immediate financial impact of the suspension resulted in approximately $100,000 in lost revenue and a material decline in MAU with the majority of uninstalls in emerging markets.

Current wording

We are subject to the standard policies and terms of service of third-party platforms, which govern the marketing, promotion, distribution, content and operation of our apps on their platforms. Each platform provider has the discretion to make changes to its operating system, payment services, manner in which their mobile operating system operates as well as change and interpret the terms and conditions of its developer policies. These changes may be harmful to our business and result in a negative outcome. For example, in September 2019, our Zedge App was temporarily removed from Google Play because they asserted that the Zedge App violated their malicious behavior policy. As a result, prospective Android users were prevented from installing our Zedge App, freemium users were unable to convert into paying subscribers and existing users were unable to purchase Zedge Credits. Shortly after the notice was issued, two of our major advertising suppliers ceased serving advertisements to our Zedge App. In addition, Google Play sent a notification to users that had the problematic version of the app on their phone recommending that they uninstall it. We identified the source of the problem as buggy code from a long-term, third-party advertising partner’s standard technology integration in our app. We corrected the problem by removing the offensive code, releasing a new version of our app and our Zedge App was reinstated after approximately 72 hours and concurrently the two major advertising suppliers resumed purchasing our advertising inventory. We estimate the immediate financial impact of the suspension resulted in approximately $100,000 in lost revenue and a material decline in MAU with the majority of uninstalls in emerging markets.

Previous wording

For example, pursuant to Google’s policy whereby only Google Play’s in-app billing system could be used for transactions in its store, we were mandated to stop the provision of non-native payment options to our users on Android during 2021, which caused disruptions for users and led to a decline in Paying Users. Since announcing this policy in 2020, following industry pushback and country-specific regulations Google has introduced in select markets the option of “user choice billing,” which allows eligible developers to offer users an additional billing system alongside Google Play’s billing system, and in the European Economic Area the option for eligible developers to offer users an alternative to Google Play’s billing system. We are exploring such solutions on a country-by-country basis. However, as these solutions are in their infancy, they may evolve following subsequent regulatory mandates or organically at Google’s behest, and as such we will need to be ready to continuously adapt to such changes. Any deadlines imposed on developers by future iterations of Google’s policy will require prompt and active development, and failure to do so may result in the discontinuation of the provision of alternative billing methods to our users.

Current wording

For example, pursuant to Google’s policy whereby only Google Play’s in-app billing system could be used for transactions in its store, we were mandated to stop the provision of non-native payment options to our users on Android during 2021, which caused disruptions for users and led to a decline in Paying Users. Since announcing this policy in 2020, following industry pushback and country-specific regulations Google has introduced in select markets the option of “user choice billing,” which allows eligible developers to offer users an additional billing system alongside Google Play’s billing system, and in the European Economic Area the option for eligible developers to offer users an alternative to Google Play’s billing system. In July 2025, the Japan Fair Trade Commission approved a settlement requiring Google to allow alternative billing systems in Japan beginning in 2026, and other jurisdictions are considering similar measures. We are exploring such solutions on a country-by-country basis. However, as these solutions are in their infancy, they may evolve following subsequent regulatory mandates or organically at Google’s behest, and as such we will need to be ready to continuously adapt to such changes. Any deadlines imposed on developers by future iterations of Google’s policy will require prompt and active development; failure to comply could result in the discontinuation of alternative billing methods for our users. Additionally, a December 2024 ruling inEpic Games v. Google, now under appeal, requires Google to permit third-party app stores and direct app downloads on Android devices in the United States from November 1, 2024 through November 1, 2027, which could alter app distribution economics, fee structures, and competitive dynamics in ways that may materially affect our business.

Previous wording

Although Zedge Premium’s gross transaction revenue has shown modest growth it is still too early to state with conviction that Zedge Premium will have a materially positive impact on our business. In order to do so, we still need, among other things, to:

Current wording

Although Zedge Premium’s gross transaction revenue has shown impressive growth it is still too early to state with conviction that Zedge Premium will have a materially positive impact on our business. In order to do so, we still need, among other things, to:

Previous wording

Although our products are leaders in their specific verticals, including mobile phone personalization, emoji related content and information, and digital photo competitions, we cannot guarantee that our brands will be able to maintain their leadership position. Our products face potential competition from other internet companies, app developers and smartphone manufacturers, and new market entrants may also emerge. If we are not able to differentiate our products from that of our competitors, drive value for our customers, and/or effectively align our resources with our goals and objectives, we may not be able to compete effectively against our competitors. Our failure to compete effectively against any of the foregoing competitive threats could materially and adversely harm our business. Increased competition may result in new products and offerings which may in turn require us to take actions to retain and attract our users and advertisers in such a fashion which would lower our gross margins. If we fail to compete effectively, our market share would decrease and our results from operations, revenues and profits would be materially and adversely affected.

Current wording

Although our products are leaders in their specific verticals, including mobile phone personalization, emoji related content and information, and digital photo competitions, we cannot guarantee that our brands will be able to maintain their leadership position. Our products face potential competition from other internet companies, app developers and smartphone manufacturers, and new market entrants may also emerge. AI models used by competitors may produce biased or discriminatory outcomes if not properly managed, potentially giving us a competitive advantage if we effectively address algorithmic bias through robust data curation, model evaluation, and fairness measures; however, failure to do so could result in unfair treatment of users or creators, violating anti-discrimination laws and damaging our brand reputation, thereby harming our competitive position. If we are not able to differentiate our products from that of our competitors, drive value for our customers, and/or effectively align our resources with our goals and objectives, we may not be able to compete effectively against our competitors. Our failure to compete effectively against any of the foregoing competitive threats could materially and adversely harm our business. Increased competition may result in new products and offerings which may in turn require us to take actions to retain and attract our users and advertisers in such a fashion which would lower our gross margins. If we fail to compete effectively, our market share would decrease and our results from operations, revenues and profits would be materially and adversely affected.

Previous wording

Our net loss in fiscal 2024 was $9.2 million, our net loss in fiscal 2023 was $6.1 million. Our ability to maintain profitability and positive cash flow from operating activities depends on various factors, including but not limited to, the acceptance of our products and services by mobile phone and internet users, the growth and maintenance of our user base, user acquisition spend and associated return, our ability to maintain existing and obtain new advertisers, our ability to grow our revenues, the success of each of our digital brands as measured by their respective key performance indicators, the effectiveness of our new product initiatives, selling and marketing activities as well as control our costs and expenses. We may not be able to sustain profitability or positive cash flow from operating activities, and any such positive cash flow may not be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated capital expenditures and other cash needs. As such, we may not be able to fund our operating expenses and expenditures out of cash flows, which would require us to utilize debt or equity financing which we may not be able to secure or which we may only secure on terms that are not favorable, which may result in significant dilution or voluntary or involuntary dissolution or liquidation proceeding of us and a total loss of your investment.

Current wording

Our net loss in fiscal 2025 was $2.4 million, our net loss in fiscal 2024 was $9.2 million. Our ability to maintain profitability and positive cash flow from operating activities depends on various factors, including but not limited to, the acceptance of our products and services by mobile phone and internet users, the growth and maintenance of our user base, user acquisition spend and associated return, our ability to maintain existing and obtain new advertisers, our ability to grow our revenues, the success of each of our digital brands as measured by their respective key performance indicators, the effectiveness of our new product initiatives, selling and marketing activities as well as control our costs and expenses. We may not be able to sustain profitability or positive cash flow from operating activities, and any such positive cash flow may not be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated capital expenditures and other cash needs. As such, we may not be able to fund our operating expenses and expenditures out of cash flows, which would require us to utilize debt or equity financing which we may not be able to secure or which we may only secure on terms that are not favorable, which may result in significant dilution or voluntary or involuntary dissolution or liquidation proceeding of us and a total loss of your investment.

Previous wording

Tax laws may change as new laws are passed and new interpretations of the law are issued or applied. Our existing corporate structure and intercompany arrangements have been implemented in a manner that we believe comply with current prevailing tax laws. However, the tax positions that we take advantage of could be undermined due to changing tax laws, both in the United States and in other applicable jurisdictions, including Norway, Lithuania, and Israel. In addition, the tax authorities in the United States and other jurisdictions in which we operate regularly examine income and other tax returns and we expect that they may examine our income and other tax returns. The ultimate outcome of these examinations may not benefit our business.

Current wording

Tax laws may change as new laws are passed and new interpretations of the law are issued or applied. Our existing corporate structure and intercompany arrangements have been implemented in a manner that we believe comply with current prevailing tax laws. However, the tax positions that we take advantage of could be undermined due to changing tax laws, both in the United States and in other applicable jurisdictions, including Lithuania, and Israel. In addition, the tax authorities in the United States and other jurisdictions in which we operate regularly examine income and other tax returns and we expect that they may examine our income and other tax returns. The ultimate outcome of these examinations may not benefit our business.

Previous wording

Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2024 was 19.3% compared with 7.0% for fiscal 2023. In general, changes in applicable U.S. federal and state and foreign tax laws and regulations, or their interpretation and application, including the possibility of retroactive effect, could affect our tax expense.

Current wording

Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2025 was 11.9% compared with 19.3% for fiscal 2024. In general, changes in applicable U.S. federal and state and foreign tax laws and regulations, or their interpretation and application, including the possibility of retroactive effect, could affect our tax expense.

Previous wording

We have significant operations in Europe and Israel that are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Norwegian Krone, Euro and Israeli Shekel, subjecting us to foreign currency risk. The strengthening or weakening of the U.S. Dollar versus these currencies impacts the expenses generated in these foreign currencies when converted into the U.S. Dollar. In fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023, we recorded a loss of $190,000 and a gain of $36,000, respectively, from foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. Dollar. Included in these amounts were losses from hedging activities of $245,000 and gains of $14,000 in fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023, respectively. While we regularly enter into transactions to hedge portions of our foreign currency exposure, it is impossible to predict or eliminate the effects of this exposure. Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates could significantly impact our financial results.

Current wording

The substantial majority of our revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars, and our operating expenses are generally denominated in the local currencies of the countries where our operations are located. We have significant operations in Europe and Israel that are denominated in the Euro and Israeli Shekel. The strengthening or weakening of the U.S. Dollar versus these currencies impacts the expenses generated in these foreign currencies when converted into the U.S. Dollar. In fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2024, we recorded losses of $151,000 and $190,000, respectively, from foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. Dollar. Included in these amounts were gains from hedging activities of $44,000 and losses of $245,000 in fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2024, respectively. While we regularly enter into transactions to hedge portions of our foreign currency exposure, it is impossible to predict or eliminate the effects of this exposure. Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates could significantly impact our financial results.

Previous wording

During the past five years, we have experienced a shift in our Zedge App’s regional customer make-up with the portion of our total MAU from emerging markets increasing, and the portion from well-developed markets decreasing. In Q4 of fiscal 2024, our Zedge App’s users in emerging markets declined by 15% while its users in well-developed regions declined 19% when compared to fiscal 2023. India comprised 30% of our MAU as of July 31, 2024. This shift has negatively impacted revenues because well-developed markets command materially higher advertising rates when compared to those in emerging markets. Although we are investing in reversing this trend, we may not be successful in this effort which may result in lower revenues and profitability.

Current wording

During the past five years, we have experienced a shift in our Zedge App’s regional customer make-up with the portion of our total MAU from emerging markets increasing, and the portion from well-developed markets decreasing. In Q4 of fiscal 2025, our Zedge App’s users in emerging markets declined by 13.6% while its users in well-developed regions declined 1.8% when compared to fiscal 2024. India comprised 32.5% of our MAU as of July 31, 2025. This shift has negatively impacted revenues because well-developed markets command materially higher advertising rates when compared to those in emerging markets. Although we are investing in reversing this trend, we may not be successful in this effort which may result in lower revenues and profitability.

Previous wording

Maintaining and promoting awareness of our services is important to our ability to attract and retain customers. We spend a significant amount on marketing activities to acquire new customers and retain and engage existing customers and have plans to maintain and increase that focus. For example, in 2024 and 2023 our marketing expenses were approximately $6.9 million and $3.2 million, respectively, and we expect our marketing expenses to continue to account for a significant portion of our operating expenses. Our business depends on a high degree of app installs from the app stores and website traffic, which is dependent on many factors, including the availability of appealing website content and search engine optimization, affiliate marketing and display advertising, as well as social media and email. The marketing efforts we implement may not succeed for a variety of reasons, including our inability to execute and implement our plans. External factors beyond our control may also impact the success of our marketing initiatives.

Current wording

Maintaining and promoting awareness of our services is important to our ability to attract and retain customers. We spend a significant amount on marketing activities to acquire new customers and retain and engage existing customers and have plans to maintain and increase that focus. For example, in 2025 and 2024 our marketing expenses were approximately $8.2 million and $6.9 million, respectively, and we expect our marketing expenses to continue to account for a significant portion of our operating expenses. Our business depends on a high degree of app installs from the app stores and website traffic, which is dependent on many factors, including the availability of appealing website content and search engine optimization, affiliate marketing and display advertising, as well as social media and email. The marketing efforts we implement may not succeed for a variety of reasons, including our inability to execute and implement our plans. External factors beyond our control may also impact the success of our marketing initiatives.

Previous wording

Our digital presence heavily depends on search engine traffic, primarily from platforms like Google. A key driver of our success in this domain is our website’s visibility and ranking in response to search queries. As search engines frequently update their algorithms, affecting our link placements and rankings we need to regularly manage our search engine optimization in order to avoid a material decrease in web traffic to our online properties. Substituting free traffic with paid alternatives could also lead to increased costs. These risks highlight the critical importance of continuous adaptation to the evolving search engine landscape and the potential consequences if we do not adequately navigate these challenges.

Current wording

Our digital presence heavily depends on search engine traffic, primarily from platforms like Google. A key driver of our success in this domain is our website’s visibility and ranking in response to search queries. Search engines frequently update their algorithms, which may affect our link placements and rankings, and require ongoing investment in search engine optimization to mitigate potential traffic losses. In addition, the integration of artificial intelligence features by search engines, such as AI-generated overviews, summaries, or embedded rich media, may reduce the likelihood that users click through to our properties, as they may receive the desired content directly within the search results page. These developments could also extend to the direct display of emojis, wallpapers, or other types of content that we currently provide, further diminishing referral traffic. A sustained decrease in organic traffic from these or similar changes could require us to increase our reliance on paid user acquisition or other marketing channels, potentially increasing costs and adversely affecting margins. These risks highlight the critical importance of continuous adaptation to the evolving search engine and AI landscape and the potential consequences if we do not effectively anticipate, respond to, and capitalize on these changes.

Previous wording

Conditions in Israel, including the October 7, 2023 attack by Hamas and other terrorist organizations from the Gaza Strip and Israel’s war against them, may adversely affect our operations.

Current wording

Conditions in Israel, including the October 7, 2023 attack by Hamas and other terrorist organizations from the Gaza Strip and Israel’s war against them, may adversely affect our operations adversely affect operations and financial condition, particularly given the ongoing war in Gaza, the June 2025 ’12-Day War’ between Israel and Iran, broader regional instability, and potential long-term impacts on Israel’s economy, technology sector, and foreign investment.

Previous wording

Prior to the Hamas attack in October 2023, the Israeli government pursued extensive changes to Israel’s judicial system, which sparked extensive political debate and unrest. In response to such initiative, many individuals, organizations and institutions, both within and outside of Israel, have voiced concerns that the proposed changes may negatively impact the business environment in Israel including due to reluctance of foreign investors to invest or transact business in Israel as well as to increased currency fluctuations, downgrades in credit rating, increased interest rates, increased volatility in security markets, and other changes in macroeconomic conditions. The risk of such negative developments has increased in light of the recent Hamas attacks and the war against Hamas declared by Israel. To the extent that any of these negative developments do occur, they may have an adverse effect on our business and our results of operations.

Current wording

Prior to the Hamas attack in October 2023, the Israeli government pursued extensive changes to Israel’s judicial system, which sparked extensive political debate, mass protests, and civil unrest. In response to such initiative, many individuals, organizations and institutions, both within and outside of Israel, have voiced concerns that the proposed changes may negatively impact the business environment in Israel including due to reluctance of foreign investors to invest or transact business in Israel as well as to increased currency fluctuations, downgrades in credit rating, increased interest rates, increased volatility in security markets, and other changes in macroeconomic conditions. The risk of such negative developments has increased in light of the war with Hamas. To the extent that any of these negative developments do occur, they may have an adverse effect on our business and our results of operations.

Previous wording

In addition, recent political uprisings and conflicts in various countries in the Middle East, including Syria, are affecting the political stability of those countries. In addition, the threats that Iran and various extremist groups in the region make against Israel may escalate in the future and turn violent, which could affect the Israeli economy in general and us in particular. Any armed conflicts, terrorist activities or political instability in the region could adversely affect business conditions, harm our results of operations and make it harder for us to raise capital.

Current wording

In addition, recent political uprisings and conflicts in various countries in the Middle East, including Syria and Lebanon, are affecting the political stability of those countries. In addition, the ongoing threats that Iran and various extremist groups in the region make against Israel may escalate in the future and turn violent, which could affect the Israeli economy in general and us in particular. Any armed conflicts, terrorist activities or political instability in the region could adversely affect business conditions, harm our results of operations and make it harder for us to raise capital.

Previous wording

For the most part, we do not have commercial insurance that cover losses that may occur as a result of an event associated with the security situation in either of these locations. Although the Israeli government has in the past covered the reinstatement value of certain damages that were caused by terrorist attacks or acts of war, we cannot assure you that this government coverage will be maintained or, if maintained, will be sufficient to compensate us fully for damages incurred. Any losses or damages incurred would likely cause a significant disruption in our employees’ lives and possibly put their lives at risk, which would have a material adverse effect on our operations. Any armed conflicts or political instability in the region would likely negatively affect business conditions generally and could harm our results of operations.

Current wording

For the most part, we do not have commercial insurance that cover losses that may occur as a result of an event associated with the security situation in Israel. Although the Israeli government has in the past covered the reinstatement value of certain damages that were caused by terrorist attacks or acts of war, we cannot assure you that this government coverage will be maintained or, if maintained, will be sufficient to compensate us fully for damages incurred. Any losses or damages incurred would likely cause a significant disruption in our employees’ lives and possibly put their lives at risk, which would have a material adverse effect on our operations. Any armed conflicts or political instability in the region would likely negatively affect business conditions generally and could harm our results of operations.

Previous wording

We have offices and other significant operations located in Lithuania, Israel, and Norway, and, therefore, our results may be adversely affected by political, economic and military instability in these countries.

Current wording

We have offices and other significant operations in Lithuania and Israel, and, therefore, our results may be adversely affected by political, economic and military instability in these countries.

Previous wording

The overwhelming majority of our employees are located in Lithuania, Israel, and Norway and many of our senior managers live in Israel or Lithuania. For those that reside in Israel and Lithuania political, economic and military conditions directly affect our business. Any hostilities involving these countries or the interruption or curtailment of trade between these countries and their trading partners could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Furthermore, there is always the chance that the citizens in these countries will be required to serve in the army or perform public duty in the event of an armed conflict.

Current wording

The overwhelming majority of our employees are located in Lithuania and Israel and many of our senior managers live in these countries. For those that reside in Israel and Lithuania political, economic and military conditions directly affect our business. Any hostilities involving these countries or the interruption or curtailment of trade between these countries and their trading partners could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Furthermore, there is always the chance that the citizens in these countries will be required to serve in the army or perform public duty in the event of an armed conflict.

Previous wording

The Republic of Lithuania borders both the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad and the Republic of Belarus, who are aligned in Russia’s illegal invasion of the Ukraine. This places Lithuania at a higher risk of military conflict, may negatively impact the ability to travel to and from Lithuania, and may damage the economy. This action also negatively impacted GuruShots because it utilizes a small number of outsourced contractors based in the Ukraine. This resulted in temporarily disrupting the work product associated with these contractors at the outset of the war.

Current wording

The Republic of Lithuania borders both the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad and the Republic of Belarus, who are aligned in Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine. This places Lithuania at a higher risk of military conflict, may negatively impact the ability to travel to and from Lithuania, and may damage its economy. This action also negatively impacted GuruShots because it utilizes a small number of outsourced contractors based in Ukraine. This resulted in temporarily disrupting the work product associated with these contractors at the outset of the war.

Previous wording

Our ability to compete and grow depends in large part on the efforts and talents of our employees. Such employees, particularly product managers, designers and engineers, are in high demand, and we devote significant resources to identifying, hiring, training, and successfully integrating and retaining these employees. The loss of employees or the inability to hire additional skilled employees as necessary could result in significant disruptions to our business, and the integration of replacement personnel could be time-consuming and expensive and cause additional disruptions to our business.

Current wording

Our ability to compete and grow depends in large part on the efforts and talents of our employees. Such employees, particularly product managers, designers and engineers, are in high demand, and we devote significant resources to identifying, hiring, training, and successfully integrating and retaining these employees. The specialized nature of AI development further intensifies competition for skilled personnel, and challenges in attracting and retaining qualified AI professionals could impede our ability to innovate and maintain our AI systems effectively. We may need to offer competitive compensation and invest in training programs to build and sustain our AI capabilities, increasing operational costs. The loss of employees or the inability to hire additional skilled employees as necessary could result in significant disruptions to our business, and the integration of replacement personnel could be time-consuming and expensive and cause additional disruptions to our business.

Previous wording

In April of 2022 we completed the acquisition of GuruShots Ltd, an Israeli based company. GuruShots utilized a small number of outsourced contractors based in the Ukraine. Russia’s illegal invasion of the Ukraine in February 2022 resulted in temporarily disrupting the work product associated with these contractors. Furthermore, Zedge employees situated in Vilnius were distracted due to the proximity to the Belarusian border and uncertainty related to Belarus’ complicity with Russia’s illegal action and associated intent. In addition, consumer prices have risen materially throughout the Eurozone leaving uncertainty about how this may impact employment costs in the future.

Current wording

In April of 2022 we completed the acquisition of GuruShots Ltd, an Israeli based company. GuruShots utilized a small number of outsourced contractors based in Ukraine. Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 resulted in temporarily disrupting the work product associated with these contractors. Furthermore, Zedge employees situated in Vilnius were distracted due to the proximity to the Belarusian border and uncertainty related to Belarus’ complicity with Russia’s illegal action and associated intent. In addition, consumer prices have risen materially throughout the Eurozone leaving uncertainty about how this may impact employment costs in the future.

Previous wording

In October of 2023 Hamas, a designated terrorist organization, launched a savage terror attack in Israel along with launching thousands of rockets into Israeli sovereign territory. The State of Israel declared war against Hamas resulting in the mobilization of more than 300,000 army reserve. In addition, Hezbollah, another designated terrorist organization, based in Lebanon, has been indiscriminately shelling Israeli territory. Some GuruShots employees were impacted and the regular and consistent rocket barrage is taking a toll on productivity. Coupled with this, most, if not all, schools are along with our office closed making the work environment complex. It remains unclear how long this conflict will continue and what the impact on productivity will be.

Current wording

In October of 2023 Hamas, a designated terrorist organization, launched a savage terror attack in Israel along with launching thousands of rockets into Israeli sovereign territory. The State of Israel declared war against Hamas resulting in the mobilization of more than 300,000 army reserve. In addition, Hezbollah, another designated terrorist organization, based in Lebanon, has been indiscriminately shelling Israeli territory. Some GuruShots employees were impacted and the regular and consistent rocket barrage is taking a toll on productivity. Coupled with this, most, if not all, schools are along with our office closed making the work environment complex. In June of 2025 Israel and Iran entered into the ’12-Day War’ during which our office and schools were closed and there were shelter in place orders that were issued. The constant barrage of ballistic missiles launched from Iran and Yemen interrupted our operations.

Previous wording

We may enter into strategic alliances, including joint ventures or minority equity investments, or acquisitions with various third parties to further our business purpose from time to time. These alliances and acquisitions could subject us to a number of risks, including risks associated with sharing proprietary information, non-performance by the third party and increased expenses in establishing new strategic alliances, any of which may materially and adversely affect our business. We may have limited ability to monitor or control the actions of these third parties and, to the extent any of these strategic third parties suffer negative publicity or harm to their reputation from events relating to their business, we may also suffer negative publicity or harm to our reputation by virtue of our association with any such third party.

Current wording

We may enter into strategic alliances, including joint ventures or minority equity investments, or acquisitions with various third parties to further our business purpose from time to time. An important focus of our business is to identify business relationships that can enhance our services, enable us to develop solutions that differentiate us from our competitors, drive users to our websites, and monetize our data. We have entered into several alliance agreements or license agreements with respect to certain of our datasets and services and may enter into similar agreements in the future. These arrangements may require us to restrict our use of certain of our technologies or datasets among certain customer industries, restrict content on our websites, or grant licenses on terms that ultimately may prove to be unfavorable to us, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations. These alliances and acquisitions could subject us to a number of risks, including risks associated with sharing proprietary information, non-performance by the third party and increased expenses in establishing new strategic alliances, any of which may materially and adversely affect our business. Relationships with our alliance agreement partners may be the subject of contractual disputes, and if we or our partners are not successful in maintaining or commercializing the alliance agreements’ services, such commercial failure could adversely affect our business. We may have limited ability to monitor or control the actions of these third parties and, to the extent any of these strategic third parties suffer negative publicity or harm to their reputation from events relating to their business, we may also suffer negative publicity or harm to our reputation by virtue of our association with any such third party.

Previous wording

The application of existing domestic and international laws and regulations to us relating to issues such as user privacy and data protection, artificial intelligence, security, defamation, pricing, advertising, taxation, gambling, sweepstakes, promotions, consumer protection, artificial intelligence and machine learning, accessibility, content regulation, quality of services, law enforcement demands, telecommunications, mobile, and intellectual property ownership and infringement in many instances is unclear or unsettled. Further, the application to us or our subsidiaries of existing laws regulating or requiring licenses for certain businesses of our advertisers can be unclear. U.S. export control laws and regulations also impose requirements and restrictions on exports to certain nations and persons and on our business. Internationally, we may also be subject to laws regulating our activities in foreign countries and to foreign laws and regulations that are inconsistent from country to country. Any new legislation, in the U.S. or abroad, may be difficult to comply with in a timely and comprehensive manner and may expose our business to increased costs. If the rules, doctrines or currently available defenses change, if international jurisdictions refuse to apply protections similar to those that are currently available in the U.S. or the EU, or if a court were to disagree with our application of those rules to our solutions, our potential liability for information or content created by third parties and posted to our platform could require us to expend significant resources to try to comply with the new rules and implement additional measures to reduce our exposure to such liability or we could incur liability and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed.

Current wording

The application of existing domestic and international laws and regulations to us relating to issues such as user privacy and data protection, security, defamation, pricing, advertising, taxation, gambling, sweepstakes, promotions, consumer protection, artificial intelligence and machine learning, accessibility, content regulation, quality of services, law enforcement demands, telecommunications, mobile, and intellectual property ownership and infringement in many instances is unclear or unsettled. Further, the application to us or our subsidiaries of existing laws regulating or requiring licenses for certain businesses of our advertisers can be unclear. U.S. export control laws and regulations also impose requirements and restrictions on exports to certain nations and persons and on our business. Internationally, we may also be subject to laws regulating our activities in foreign countries and to foreign laws and regulations that are inconsistent from country to country. The regulatory landscape for AI is rapidly evolving, with new laws and guidelines emerging globally. Compliance with diverse and potentially conflicting AI regulations across jurisdictions may require significant resources and adjustments to our AI development and deployment practices. Failure to adhere to applicable AI laws could result in legal penalties, restrictions on our operations, and harm to our reputation. Any new legislation, in the U.S. or abroad, may be difficult to comply with in a timely and comprehensive manner and may expose our business to increased costs. If the rules, doctrines or currently available defenses change, if international jurisdictions refuse to apply protections similar to those that are currently available in the U.S. or the EU, or if a court were to disagree with our application of those rules to our solutions, our potential liability for information or content created by third parties and posted to our platform could require us to expend significant resources to try to comply with the new rules and implement additional measures to reduce our exposure to such liability or we could incur liability and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed.

Showing the first 40 of 64 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.