AirJoule Technologies Corp
For the period ended Sep 30, 2024. Filed Nov 13, 2024.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Sep 30, 2024 · Filed Nov 13, 2024
What changed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2024-06-30; filed 2024-08-23.
0001213900-24-072000
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of OperationsCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2024-09-30; filed 2024-11-13.
0001213900-24-097448
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of OperationsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 129 previous paragraphs and 119 current paragraphs.
42 unchanged; 58 reworded; 18 added; 28 removed; 1 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 8 previous and 8 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (18)
Current report
Change of Company Name
Current report
AirJoule Technologies Corporation
Current report
Effective November 13, 2024, Montana Technologies Corporation changed its corporate name to AirJoule Technologies Corporation, pursuant to an amended and restated certificate of incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State.
Current report
AirJoule Technologies LLC
Current report
Effective November 13, 2024, Montana Technologies LLC changed its corporate name to AirJoule Technologies LLC, pursuant to an amended and restated certificate of incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State.
Current report
Statement of Work – Related Party
Current report
In November 2024, we executed a statement of work with AirJoule, LLC under the Master Services Agreement, dated as of March 4, 2024, by and between us and AirJoule, LLC, pursuant to which we will provide AirJoule, LLC with engineering and administrative services. Once each calendar year, unless otherwise agreed by the Board of Managers of AirJoule, LLC, or the AJ Board, we will provide equity awards to AirJoule, LLC employees in amounts approved by the AJ Board.
Current report
Components of Our Results of Operations
Current report
Under the equity method of accounting, our investment is initially recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. Upon initial investment, we evaluate whether there are basis differences between the carrying value and fair value of our proportionate share of the investee’s underlying net assets. Typically, we amortize basis differences identified on a straight-line basis over the underlying assets’ estimated useful lives when calculating the attributable earnings or losses, excluding the basis differences attributable to in-process research and development and goodwill. If we are unable to attribute all of the basis differences to specific assets or liabilities of the investee, the residual excess of the cost of the investment over the proportional fair value of the investee’s assets and liabilities is considered to be equity method goodwill and is recognized within the equity investment balance, which is tracked separately within our memo accounts. We subsequently record in the statements of operations our share of income or loss of the other entity within other income/expense, which results in an increase or decrease to the carrying value of our investment. If the share of losses exceeds the carrying value of our investment, we will suspend recognizing additional losses and will continue to do so unless we commit to providing additional funding.
Current report
We evaluate our equity method investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that a decline in value has occurred that is other than temporary. Evidence considered in this evaluation includes, but would not necessarily be limited to, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, recent operating trends and forecasted performance of the investee, market conditions in the geographic area or industry in which the investee operates and our strategic plans for holding the investment in relation to the period of time expected for an anticipated recovery of its carrying value. If the investment is determined to have a decline in value deemed to be other than temporary it is written down to estimated fair value.
Current report
Additionally, if an equity method investee recognizes a goodwill impairment charge in its separate financial statements, we will recognize its share of the impairment in its financial statements in the same manner in which it recognizes other earnings of the investee.
Current report
Research and Development expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2024 was $(0.1) million as compared to $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2023. The $0.9 million decrease was primarily related to the reimbursement of costs per the statement of work with AirJoule, LLC. Refer to Note 13 –Subsequent Events for further detail.
Current report
Depreciation and amortization
Current report
Income tax benefit (expense)
Current report
During the nine months ended September 30, 2024, net cash used in operating activities was $21.6 million and primarily reflected our net income from operations and decreases in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities.
Current report
During the nine months ended September 30, 2023, net cash used in operating activities was $4.0 million and primarily reflected our net loss from operations offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities.
Current report
During the nine months ended September 30, 2023, minimal cash was used in investing activities.
Current report
During the nine months ended September 30, 2023, minimal cash was provided by financing activities.
Removed paragraphs (28)
Previous report
We believe that we have a capital efficient and highly scalable business model. We estimate that a capital expenditure investment of less than $25 million per production line to coat aluminum contactors has the potential to generate approximately $50 million in Annualized EBITDA per line for the Company.
Previous report
Recapitalization
Previous report
Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition II Corp. (“XPDB”) previously entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), dated June 5, 2023, as amended on February 5, 2024, with XPDB Merger Sub, LLC, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of XPDB (“Merger Sub”), and pursuant to which, on March 14, 2024, Merger Sub was merged with and into Legacy Montana, with Legacy Montana surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of XPDB (the “Merger” and, together with the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, the “Business Combination”). In connection with the closing of the Business Combination (the “Closing”), the Company changed its name from “Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition II Corp.” to “Montana Technologies Corporation.”
Previous report
Prior to the Recapitalization, all of the outstanding preferred units of Legacy Montana were converted to Class B common units. As a result of the Business Combination, (i) each issued and outstanding Class B common unit and Class C common unit of Legacy Montana was converted into the right to receive approximately 23.8 shares of newly issued shares of Class A common stock of Montana Technologies Corporation, (ii) each issued and outstanding Class A common unit of Legacy Montana converted into the right to receive approximately 23.8 shares of newly issued shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of Montana Technologies Corporation and (iii) each option to purchase common units of Legacy Montana converted into the right to receive an option to purchase Class A common stock of Montana Technologies Corporation having substantially similar terms to the corresponding option, including with respect to vesting and termination-related provisions, except that such options represented the right to receive a number of shares of Class A common stock equal to the number of common units subject to the corresponding option immediately prior to the effective time of the merger multiplied by approximately 23.8.
Previous report
The recapitalization was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Under this method of accounting, although XPDB acquired the outstanding equity interests in Legacy Montana at the Closing, XPDB is treated as the “acquired company” and Legacy Montana was treated as the accounting acquirer for financial statement purposes. Accordingly, the Business Combination was treated as the equivalent of Legacy Montana issuing stock for the net assets of XPDB, accompanied by a recapitalization.
Previous report
Furthermore, the historical financial statements of Legacy Montana became the historical financial statements of the Company upon the consummation of the merger. As a result, the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect (i) the historical operating results of Legacy Montana prior to the merger; (ii) the combined results of XPDB and Legacy Montana following the close of the merger; (iii) the assets and liabilities of Legacy Montana at their historical cost and (iv) Legacy Montana’s equity structure for all periods presented, as affected by the recapitalization presentation after completion of the merger.
Previous report
In connection with the Recapitalization, XPDB entered into a subscription agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”) with a certain investor (the “PIPE Investor”), pursuant to which, among other things, the PIPE Investor agreed to subscribe for and purchase from XPDB, and XPDB agreed to issue and sell to the PIPE Investor, an aggregate of 588,235 newly issued shares of Class A common stock (the “Committed Shares”) on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein. On March 14, 2024, in connection with the Business Combination, the Company consummated the issuance and sale of the Committed Shares to the PIPE Investor.
Previous report
After giving effect to the Recapitalization, the redemption of Class A common stock in connection with the Special Meeting and the consummation of the issuance and sale of the Committed Shares, there were 53,823,412 shares of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding, consisting of 49,063,770 shares of Class A common stock and 4,759,642 shares of Class B common stock issued and outstanding. Of those shares, 45,821,456 were issued to holders of Legacy Montana equity securities in respect of such Legacy Montana equity securities, representing approximately 85.5% of the Company’s voting power at the Closing.
Previous report
The Company’s Class A common stock and public warrants to purchase Class A common stock commenced trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”) under the symbols “AIRJ” and “AIRJW,” respectively, on March 15, 2024.
Previous report
Subscription agreements
Previous report
Prior to the Closing, Montana entered into common unit subscription agreements (the “Subscription Agreements”) with certain investors party thereto (the “Investors”), resulting in Aggregate Transaction Proceeds in the Business Combination of approximately $43,365,000 million. Pursuant to the Subscription Agreements, and subject to the conditions set forth therein, the Investors agreed to purchase from Montana and Legacy Montana agreed to issue and sell to the Investors, an aggregate number of Legacy Montana Class B Common Units as converted into an aggregate of 5,807,647 shares of Class A common stock (such shares, the “Conversion Shares”) upon the Closing as part of the consideration relating thereto. On May 9, 2024 and May 10, 2024, the Company received $6.0 million owed under the Subscription Agreements as reported as subscription proceeds received on the condensed consolidated statements of equity (deficit).
Previous report
On June 5, 2024, the Company entered into subscription agreements (the “ Additional Subscription Agreements”) with certain continuing and new investors (the “PIPE Investors”), pursuant to which, among other things, the PIPE Investors agreed to subscribe for and purchase from Montana, and Montana agreed to issue and sell to the PIPE Investors, an aggregate of approximately 1,238,500 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 for an aggregate purchase price of $12,385,000. The purchase of shares under this agreement was completed in June 2024.
Previous report
Investment in AirJoule, LLC
Previous report
On January 25, 2024, Montana entered into a joint venture formation framework agreement (the “Framework Agreement”) with GE Ventures LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“GE Vernova”), and, solely for the purposes specified therein, GE Vernova LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“GE Vernova Parent”), pursuant to which Legacy Montana and GE Vernova agreed, subject to the terms and conditions of the Framework Agreement, including certain closing conditions specified therein, to form a joint venture (the “AirJoule JV”) in which each of Montana and GE Vernova will hold a 50% interest. The purpose of the AirJoule JV is to incorporate GE Vernova’s proprietary sorbent materials into systems that utilize Legacy Montana’s AirJoule® water capture technology and to manufacture and bring products incorporating the combined technologies to market in the Americas, Africa, and Australia.
Previous report
Upon the closing of the transaction on March 4, 2024, (the “JV Closing”), each party to the agreement entered into (i) an amended and restated limited liability company agreement of the AirJoule JV (the “A&R Joint Venture Agreement”), pursuant to which, among other things, the AirJoule JV has the exclusive right to manufacture and supply products incorporating the combined technologies to leading original equipment manufacturers and customers in the Americas, Africa and Australia, (ii) master services agreements, pursuant to which, among other things, each party to the agreement agree to provide certain agreed services to the AirJoule JV for a period of at least two years following the JV Closing (unless earlier terminated by the parties thereto) and (iii) an intellectual property agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, each of the Company and GE Vernova Parent license certain intellectual property to the AirJoule JV.
Previous report
The business and affairs of the A&R Joint Venture Agreement shall be managed by a Board of Managers, consisting of two managers (including the chairman) appointed by the Company and two managers appointed by GE Vernova. Following the second anniversary of the JV Closing, if the Board of Managers reach an impasse that cannot be resolved through the process set forth in the A&R Joint Venture Agreement, the A&R Joint Venture Agreement generally provides that the Company may require GE Vernova to sell GE Vernova’s 50% interest to the Company or GE Vernova may require the Company to purchase GE Vernova’s 50% interest, but only, in each case, if the GE Match Date has not yet occurred. The price for GE Vernova’s interest will depend on the fair market value of the interest, as set forth in the A&R Joint Venture Agreement, with a minimum value of approximately $5 million. The A&R Joint Venture Agreement also provides similar call and put rights with respect to GE Vernova’s interest if the GE Match Date does not occur by the sixth anniversary of the JV Closing or if the Company is acquired by a competitor of GE Vernova.
Previous report
In the event that a change in applicable laws or regulations has a material adverse effect on GE Vernova’s interest in the AirJoule JV, or GE Vernova determines that the Company fails to meet certain financial performance benchmarks, GE Vernova may require the Company to purchase GE Vernova’s interest for a total purchase price of $1.00.
Previous report
We own 50% interest in AirJoule, LLC. A variable interest entity (“VIE”), AirJoule, LLC is to be consolidated by its primary beneficiary if the Company has both (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company determined that it does not meet the control criterion for consolidating AirJoule and, accordingly, accounts for its variable interest in AirJoule, LLC under the equity method.
Previous report
In addition to $10.0 million in cash, we contributed a perpetual license in our intellectual property with a carrying value of zero in exchange for the investment in AirJoule. In applying the equity method, our investment was initially recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. As such the Company recognized a gain of $333.5 million (and treated as a temporary item for tax purposes resulting in a deferred tax liability of approximately $87.8 million) as presented on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Previous report
Appointment of additional executive officers
Previous report
On May 7, 2024, the Company announced the expansion of its management team, including the appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and the transition of the previous CFO to the role of Chief Administrative Officer (“CAO”).
Previous report
Key Financial Definitions/Components of Results
Previous report
The Company’s equity method investments are assessed for impairment whenever changes in the facts and circumstances indicate a loss in value may have occurred. When a loss is deemed to have occurred and is other than temporary, the carrying value of the equity method investment is written down to fair value. In evaluating whether a loss is other than temporary, the Company considers the length of time for which the conditions have existed and its intent and ability to hold the investment.
Previous report
Research and Development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2024 was $1,050,804 as compared to $1,099,143 for the three months ended June 30, 2023. The $48,339 decrease in research and development is a result of timing of services and purchases. The Company expects that its research and development expenses will increase in future periods commensurate with the expected growth of its business.
Previous report
Depreciation Expense
Previous report
Equity loss on earnings from investment AirJoule, LLC
Previous report
Income Taxes
Previous report
Net cash used in operating activities was $17,576,561 during the six months ended June 30, 2024 compared to net cash used in operating activities of $1,856,812 during the six months ended June 30, 2023. The period-to-period change was a result of Montana’s net loss from operations, a decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities reflecting payments made in the six months ended June 30, 2024 and the change in fair value of earnout shares liability and True Up Shares.
Reworded paragraphs (58)
Previous wording
The following “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”)” should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024 and 2023, and our audited financial statements as of the year ended December 31, 2023, included in Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 20, 2024
Current wording
The following “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”)” should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023, and our audited financial statements as of the year ended December 31, 2023, included in Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 20, 2024
Previous wording
This discussion includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. Such statements include, but are not limited to, possible business combinations and the financing thereof, and related matters, as well as all other statements other than statements of historical fact included herein. Factors that might cause or contribute to such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to: our status as an early stage company with limited operating history, which may make it difficult to evaluate the prospects for our future viability; our initial dependence on revenue generated from a single product; significant barriers we face to deploy our technology; the dependence of our commercialization strategy on our relationship with third parties; our history of losses; and other risks and uncertainties described in our other Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings.
Current wording
This discussion includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. Such statements include, but are not limited to, possible business combinations and the financing thereof, and related matters, as well as all other statements other than statements of historical fact included herein. Factors that might cause or contribute to such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to: our status as an early stage company with limited operating history, which may make it difficult to evaluate the prospects for our future viability; our initial dependence on revenue generated from a single product; significant barriers we face to deploy our technology; the dependence of our commercialization strategy on our relationship with third parties; our history of losses; accuracy of assumptions underlying projections related to our equity method goodwill impairment testing; and other risks and uncertainties described in our other Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings.
Previous wording
Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” to “Montana,” “we”, “us”, “our”, and the “Company” are intended to refer to (i) following the Business Combination (as defined below), the business and operations of Montana Technologies Corporation (formerly Montana Technologies LLC) and its consolidated subsidiaries, and (ii) prior to the Business Combination, Montana (the predecessor entity in existence prior to the consummation of the Business Combination) and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Current wording
Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” to “we”, “us”, “our”, and the “Company” are intended to refer to (i) following the Business Combination (as defined below), the business and operations of AirJoule Technologies Corporation, formerly known as Montana Technologies Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, and (ii) prior to the Business Combination, AirJoule Technologies LLC, formerly known as Montana Technologies LLC (the predecessor entity in existence prior to the consummation of the Business Combination) and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Previous wording
We are an atmospheric renewable energy and water harvesting technology company that aims to provide energy and cost-efficient, sustainable dehumidification, evaporative cooling and atmospheric water generation. As compared to currently existing HVAC systems, our AirJoule technology is designed to reduce energy consumption, minimize/eliminate harmful refrigerants, and generate material cost efficiencies. AirJoule is a climate solution technology that harvests the untapped supply of renewable thermal energy in water vapor in the atmosphere in an effort to provide significant energy efficiency gains in HVAC and a potential source of potable water. We are focused on scaling manufacturing through global joint ventures and deploying AirJoule units worldwide as a key part of the solution to address global warming and water scarcity.
Current wording
We are an atmospheric water harvesting technology company that aims to provide energy and cost-efficient atmospheric water generation, sustainable dehumidification, and evaporative cooling. AirJoule is a climate solution technology that harvests the water vapor in the atmosphere and provides pure water in an effort to combat water scarcity. AirJoule also provides dehumidified air, which can be used for a variety of industrial uses, including HVAC systems. In a HVAC utilization, our AirJoule technology is designed to reduce energy consumption, minimize/eliminate harmful refrigerants, and generate material cost efficiencies. We are focused on scaling manufacturing through global joint ventures and deploying AirJoule units worldwide as a key part of the solution to address water scarcity and global warming.
Previous wording
The AirJoule system seeks to address two of the world’s most problematic issues: increasing demand for comfort cooling and rising water stress. We estimate that our Total Addressable Market (“TAM”) globally is approximately $455 billion, comprised of a TAM in the HVAC sector of approximately $355 billion and a TAM in the atmospheric water harvesting sector of approximately $100 billion. We obtained the HVAC estimate from an independent report prepared by thebrainyinsights.com and the atmospheric harvesting estimate from conversations with water.org.
Current wording
The AirJoule system seeks to address two of the world’s most problematic issues: rising water stress and increasing demand for comfort cooling. We estimate that our Total Addressable Market, or TAM, globally is approximately $455 billion, comprised of a TAM in the atmospheric water harvesting sector of approximately $100 billion and a TAM in the HVAC sector of approximately $355 billion.
Previous wording
We aim to offer our products and services in global markets where demand for comfort cooling and water stress are highest. In light of our proprietary technology, we believe that we are uniquely positioned to provide curated solutions that satisfy our customers’ needs and expectations within the HVAC and atmospheric water harvesting sectors. Additionally, with several partnerships in place and a rapidly growing pipeline of new opportunities, we believe that we possess the potential for global scalability at attractive margins. We anticipate that our existing partnerships with Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, BASF (an international chemical company), and CATL (an international lithium-ion electric vehicle battery manufacturer) will help accelerate manufacturing of materials and components as well as provide product validation and commercialization. See “— Our Competitive Strengths — Our Partners.”
Current wording
We aim to offer our products and services in global markets where demand for water security and comfort cooling are highest. In light of our proprietary technology, we believe that we are uniquely positioned to provide curated solutions that satisfy our customers’ needs and expectations within the atmospheric water harvesting and HVAC sectors. Additionally, with several partnerships in place and a rapidly growing pipeline of new opportunities, we believe that we possess the potential for global scalability at attractive margins. We anticipate that our existing partnerships with Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, BASF (an international chemical company), and CATL (an international lithium-ion electric vehicle battery manufacturer) will help accelerate manufacturing of materials and components as well as provide product validation and commercialization.
Previous wording
The Company anticipates that it will earn revenue from the sale of various key components that will be used in the assembly of AirJoule systems. As of June 30, 2024 no revenue has been earned.
Current wording
We anticipate that we will earn revenue from the sale of various key components that will be used in the assembly of AirJoule systems. As of September 30, 2024 no revenue has been earned.
Previous wording
Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our condensed consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make certain estimates, judgments, and assumptions that we believe are reasonable based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions can be subjective and complex and may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues, and expenses reported in those financial statements. As a result, actual results could differ from such estimates and assumptions. Such changes to estimates could potentially result in impacts that would be material to the consolidated financial statements.
Current wording
Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our condensed consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make certain estimates, judgments, and assumptions that we believe are reasonable based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions can be subjective and complex and may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues, and expenses reported in those financial statements. As a result, actual results could differ from such estimates and assumptions. Such changes to estimates could potentially result in impacts that would be material to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Previous wording
While our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements appearing in Item 1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we believe that the following accounting policies were most critical to the judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Current wording
While our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements appearing in Item 1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we believe that the following accounting policies were most critical to the judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Previous wording
We account for share-based compensation arrangements granted to employees in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation: Stock Compensation,” by measuring the grant date fair value of the award and recognizing the resulting expense over the period during which the employee is required to perform service in exchange for the award. Equity-based compensation expense is only recognized for awards subject to performance conditions if it is probable that the performance condition will be achieved. The Company accounts for forfeitures when they occur.
Current wording
We account for share-based compensation arrangements granted to employees in accordance with ASC 718,Share-based Compensation, by measuring the grant date fair value of the award and recognizing the resulting expense over the period during which the employee is required to perform services in exchange for the award. Equity-based compensation expense is only recognized for awards subject to performance conditions if it is probable that the performance condition will be achieved. We account for forfeitures when they occur.
Previous wording
The Company estimates the fair value of Earnout Shares awards to employees, which are considered compensatory awards and accounted for under ASC 718 using the Monte-Carlo simulation model*.*The Monte-Carlo simulation model was selected as the valuation methodology for the Earnout Shares due to the path-dependent nature of triggering events. Under ASC 718, such Earnout shares are measured at fair value as of the grant date and expense is recognized over the applicable time-based vesting period (the triggering event is a market condition and does not impact expense recognition). The Monte-Carlo model requires the use of highly subjective and complex assumptions, estimates and judgements, including the current stock price, volatility of the underlying stock, expected term the risk-free interest rate, the selection of comparable companies, and the probability of possible future events. Changes in any or all of these estimates and assumptions or the relationships between those assumptions impact our valuations as of each valuation date and may have a material impact on the valuation of Common Stock. An increase of 100-basis points in interest rates would not have a material impact on the Company’s stock-based compensation. During the period from the date of the Business Combination through June 30, 2024 the Company did not record stock-based compensation expense associated with these Earnout Shares as the performance conditions associated with these Earnout Shares were not deemed probable of achievement. Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense for these Earnout Shares with a performance-based vesting condition that was not deemed probable of occurring as of June 30, 2024 was $13.0 million which is expected to vest subject to the performance-based vesting condition being satisfied or deemed probable.
Current wording
We estimate the fair value of Earnout Shares awards to employees, which are considered compensatory awards and accounted for under ASC 718 using the Monte-Carlo simulation model*.*The Monte-Carlo simulation model was selected as the valuation methodology for the Earnout Shares due to the path-dependent nature of triggering events. Under ASC 718, such Earnout shares are measured at fair value as of the grant date and expense is recognized over the applicable time-based vesting period (the triggering event is a market condition and does not impact expense recognition). The Monte-Carlo model requires the use of highly subjective and complex assumptions, estimates and judgements, including the current stock price, volatility of the underlying stock, expected term the risk-free interest rate, the selection of comparable companies, and the probability of possible future events. Changes in any or all of these estimates and assumptions or the relationships between those assumptions impact our valuations as of each valuation date and may have a material impact on the valuation of Common Stock. An increase of 100-basis points in interest rates would not have a material impact on our stock-based compensation. During the period from the date of the Business Combination through September 30, 2024 we did not record stock-based compensation expense associated with these Earnout Shares as the performance conditions associated with these Earnout Shares were not deemed probable of achievement. Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense for these Earnout Shares with a performance-based vesting condition that was not deemed probable of occurring as of September 30, 2024 was $4.5 million which is expected to vest subject to the performance-based vesting condition being satisfied or deemed probable.
Previous wording
In connection with the reverse recapitalization and pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, eligible former Legacy Montana Equityholders are entitled to receive the Earnout Shares upon the Company achieving certain Earnout Milestones (as described in the Merger Agreement). The settlement of the Earnout Shares to the holders of Legacy Montana common units contain variations in something other than the fair value of the issuer’s equity shares. As such, management determined that they should be classified as a liability and recognized at fair value at each reporting period with changes in fair value included in earnings.
Current wording
In connection with the reverse recapitalization and pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, eligible former Legacy Montana Equityholders are entitled to receive the Earnout Shares upon us achieving certain Earnout Milestones (as described in the Merger Agreement). The settlement of the Earnout Shares to the holders of Legacy Montana common units contain variations in something other than the fair value of the issuer’s equity shares. As such, management determined that they should be classified as a liability and recognized at fair value at each reporting period with changes in fair value included in earnings.
Previous wording
We estimated fair value of the Earnout Shares with a Monte Carlo simulation using a distribution of potential outcomes for expected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”) and stock price at expected commission dates, utilizing a correlation coefficient for EBITDA and stock price, and assuming $50 million of Annualized EBITDA per production line, with six production lines commissioned over a five-year period. EBITDA was discounted to the valuation date with a weighted average cost of capital estimate and forecasted to each estimated commission date. Earnout mechanics at each estimated commission date were assessed, and if the Earnout Thresholds were achieved, the future value of the Earnout Shares was discounted to the valuation date utilizing a risk-free rate commensurate with the overall term. Expected EBITDA assumes that each production line will achieve equivalent production generating $50 million of Annualized EBITDA. The commission dates used reflected management’s best estimates regarding the time to complete full construction and operational viability of a production line, including all permitting, regulatory approvals and necessary or useful inspections. The Earnout term of 5 years and the Earnout mechanics represent contractual inputs. The contingent Earnout Shares liability involves certain assumptions requiring significant judgment and actual results may differ from assumed and estimated amounts.
Current wording
We estimated fair value of the Earnout Shares with a Monte Carlo simulation using a distribution of potential outcomes for expected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or EBITDA, and stock price at expected commission dates, utilizing a correlation coefficient for EBITDA and stock price, and assuming $50 million of Annualized EBITDA per production line, with each of the production lines commissioned over a five-year period. EBITDA was discounted to the valuation date with a weighted average cost of capital estimate and forecasted to each estimated commission date. Earnout mechanics at each estimated commission date were assessed, and if the Earnout Thresholds were achieved, the future value of the Earnout Shares was discounted to the valuation date utilizing a risk-free rate commensurate with the overall term. Expected EBITDA assumes that each production line will achieve equivalent production generating $50 million of Annualized EBITDA. The commission dates used reflected management’s best estimates regarding the time to complete full construction and operational viability of a production line, including all permitting, regulatory approvals and necessary or useful inspections. The Earnout term of 5 years and the Earnout mechanics represent contractual inputs. The contingent Earnout Shares liability involves certain assumptions requiring significant judgment and actual results may differ from assumed and estimated amounts.
Previous wording
We do not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. We evaluate all of its financial instruments, including the True Up Shares issued in connection with the Subscription Agreement and the Subject Vesting Shares issued in connection with the Business Combination, to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives, pursuant to ASC 480 and FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”). The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is reassessed at the end of each reporting period.
Current wording
We do not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. We evaluate all of its financial instruments, including the True Up Shares issued in connection with the Subscription Agreement and the Subject Vesting Shares issued in connection with the Business Combination, to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives, pursuant to ASC 480 (defined below) and FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, or ASC 815. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is reassessed at the end of each reporting period.
Previous wording
The True Up Shares issued under the Subscription Agreement do not qualify as equity under ASC 815-40; therefore, the Class A common stock (the “True Up Shares”) is required to be classified as a liability and measured at fair value with subsequent changes in fair value recorded in earnings. Changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative liability is recognized as a non-cash gain or loss on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the derivative liability is discussed in Note 11Fair Value Measurements.
Current wording
The True Up Shares issued under the Subscription Agreement do not qualify as equity under ASC 815; therefore, the Class A common stock, or the True Up Shares is required to be classified as a liability and measured at fair value with subsequent changes in fair value recorded in earnings. Changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative liability is recognized as a non-cash gain or loss on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the derivative liability is discussed in Note 11 -Fair Value Measurements.
Previous wording
The Subject Vesting Shares liability was an assumed liability of XPDB in the Merger as described in Note 4 - Recapitalization. The Subject Vesting Shares vest and are no longer subject to forfeiture as described in Note 4. They do not meet the “fixed-for-fixed” criterion and thus are not considered indexed to the issuer’s stock. As such, management determined that the Subject Vesting Shares should be classified as a liability and recognized at fair value at each reporting period with changes in fair value included in earnings. The estimated fair value of the Subject Vesting Share liability was determined utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation, with underlying forecast mathematics based on geometric Brownian motion in a risk-neutral framework. The Calculation of the value of the Subject Vesting Shares considered the $12.00 and $14.00 vesting conditions in addition to the vesting related to the Earnout Milestone Amount. The Subject Vesting Shares liability involves certain assumptions requiring significant judgment and actual results may differ from assumed and estimated amounts. See Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements.
Current wording
The Subject Vesting Shares liability was an assumed liability of XPDB. The Subject Vesting Shares liability vest and are no longer subject to forfeiture as described in Note 4 -Recapitalization. They do not meet the “fixed-for-fixed” criterion and thus are not considered indexed to the issuer’s stock. As such, management determined that the Subject Vesting Shares should be classified as a liability and recognized at fair value at each reporting period with changes in fair value included in earnings. The estimated fair value of the Subject Vesting Share liability was determined utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation, with underlying forecast mathematics based on geometric Brownian motion in a risk-neutral framework. The Calculation of the value of the Subject Vesting Shares considered the $12.00 and $14.00 vesting conditions in addition to the vesting related to the Earnout Milestone Amount. The Subject Vesting Shares liability involves certain assumptions requiring significant judgment and actual results may differ from assumed and estimated amounts. See Note 11 –Fair Value Measurements.
Previous wording
We account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting whereby the identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquired business, including contingent consideration, as well as any non-controlling interest in the acquired business, are recorded at their estimated fair values as of the date that we obtain control of the acquired business. We measure goodwill as the fair value of the consideration transferred including the fair value of any non-controlling interest recognized, less the net recognized amount of the identifiable assets and liabilities combined, all measured at their fair value as of the acquisition date. Transaction costs, other than those associated with the issuance of debt or equity securities, that the Company incurs in connection with a business combination are expensed as incurred.
Current wording
We account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting whereby the identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquired business, including contingent consideration, as well as any non-controlling interest in the acquired business, are recorded at their estimated fair values as of the date that we obtain control of the acquired business. We measure goodwill as the fair value of the consideration transferred including the fair value of any non-controlling interest recognized, less the net recognized amount of the identifiable assets and liabilities combined, all measured at their fair value as of the acquisition date. Transaction costs, other than those associated with the issuance of debt or equity securities, that we incur in connection with a business combination are expensed as incurred.
Previous wording
Any contingent consideration is measured at fair value at the acquisition date. For contingent consideration that does not meet all the criteria for equity classification, such contingent consideration is required to be recorded at its initial fair value at the acquisition date, and on each balance sheet date thereafter. Changes in the estimated fair value of liability-classified contingent consideration are recognized on the consolidated statements of operations in the period of change.
Current wording
Any contingent consideration is measured at fair value at the acquisition date. For contingent consideration that does not meet all the criteria for equity classification, such contingent consideration is required to be recorded at its initial fair value at the acquisition date, and on each balance sheet date thereafter. Changes in the estimated fair value of liability-classified contingent consideration are recognized on the condensed consolidated statements of operations in the period of change.
Previous wording
In accordance with ASC 323, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures, investments in entities over which the Company does not have a controlling financial interest but has significant influence are accounted for using the equity method, with the Company’s share of earnings or losses reported in earnings or losses from equity method investments on the statements of operations. Under the equity method, the Company’s investments are initially measured and recognized using the cost accumulation model following the guidance in ASC 805-50-30. After initial recognition, the consolidated financial statements include the Company’s share of undistributed earnings or losses, and impairment, if any, until the date on which significant influence ceases.
Current wording
In accordance with ASC 323,Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures, investments in entities over which we do not have a controlling financial interest but has significant influence are accounted for using the equity method, with our share of earnings or losses reported in earnings or losses from equity method investments on the statements of operations.
Previous wording
We determine the accounting classification of warrants it issues as either liability or equity classified by first assessing whether the warrants meet liability classification in accordance with ASC 480-10, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (“ASC 480”), then in accordance with ASC 815-40 (“ASC 815”), Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock.. In order for a warrant to be classified in stockholders’ deficit, the warrant must be (i) indexed to the Company’s equity and (ii) meet the conditions for equity classification.
Current wording
We determine the accounting classification of warrants it issues as either liability or equity classified by first assessing whether the warrants meet liability classification in accordance with ASC 480-10,Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, or ASC 480, then in accordance with ASC 815-40,Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock, or ASC 815. In order for a warrant to be classified in stockholders’ deficit, the warrant must be (i) indexed to our equity and (ii) meet the conditions for equity classification.
Previous wording
If a warrant does not meet the conditions for stockholders’ deficit classification, it is carried on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as a warrant liability measured at fair value, with subsequent changes in the fair value of the warrant recorded in other non-operating losses (gains) in the consolidated statements of operations. If a warrant meets both conditions for equity classification, the warrant is initially recorded, at its relative fair value on the date of issuance, in stockholders’ deficit in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, and the amount initially recorded is not subsequently remeasured at fair value.
Current wording
If a warrant does not meet the conditions for stockholders’ deficit classification, it is carried on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as a warrant liability measured at fair value, with subsequent changes in the fair value of the warrant recorded in other non-operating losses (gains) in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. If a warrant meets both conditions for equity classification, the warrant is initially recorded, at its relative fair value on the date of issuance, in stockholders’ deficit in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, and the amount initially recorded is not subsequently remeasured at fair value.
Previous wording
Prior to the Business Combination on March 14, 2024, the Company was a limited liability company (“LLC”) and treated as a partnership for income tax purpose. As a Partnership, the Company was not directly liable for federal income taxes. As of the date of the Business Combination, the operations of the Company ceased to be taxed as a partnership resulting in a change in tax status for federal and state income tax purposes.
Current wording
Prior to the Business Combination on March 14, 2024, we were a limited liability company, or LLC, and treated as a partnership for income tax purpose. As a Partnership, we were not directly liable for federal income taxes. As of the date of the Business Combination, the operations of the Company ceased to be taxed as a partnership resulting in a change in tax status for federal and state income tax purposes.
Previous wording
The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes under ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that is included in the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Current wording
We follow the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes under ASC 740,Income Taxes, or ASC 740. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that is included in the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Previous wording
ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. Management has evaluated the Company’s tax positions, including its previous status as a pass-through entity for federal and state tax purposes, and has determined that the Company has taken no uncertain tax positions that require adjustment to the condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company’s reserve related to uncertain tax positions was zero as of June 30, 2024 and December 31, 2023. There were no unrecognized tax benefits and no amounts accrued for interest and penalties as of June 30, 2024 and December 31, 2023. The Company is currently not aware of any issues under review that could result in significant payments, accruals or material deviation from its position.
Current wording
ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. We recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. Management has evaluated our tax positions, including its previous status as a pass-through entity for federal and state tax purposes, and has determined that we have taken no uncertain tax positions that require adjustment to the condensed consolidated financial statements. Our reserves related to uncertain tax positions was zero as of September 30, 2024 and December 31, 2023. There were no unrecognized tax benefits and no amounts accrued for interest and penalties as of September 30, 2024 and December 31, 2023. We are currently not aware of any issues under review that could result in significant payments, accruals or material deviation from its position.
Previous wording
A discussion of recently issued accounting standards applicable to Montana is described in Note 3, Significant Accounting Policies, in the Notes to Financial Statements contained elsewhere in thisCurrent Report on Form 10-Q.
Current wording
A discussion of recently issued accounting standards applicable to the Company is described in Note 3 -Significant Accounting Policies, in the Notes to Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this Current Report on Form 10-Q.
Previous wording
The three and six months ended June 30, 2024 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2023
Current wording
The three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023
Previous wording
The following table sets forth the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations data for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024 and 2023:
Current wording
The following table sets forth the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations data for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023:
Previous wording
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2024 was $3,211,205 as compared to $1,813,014 for the three months ended June 30, 2023. The $1,398,191 increase in general and administrative reflects increases in professional services such as legal, audit and accounting services. Montana expects that its general and administrative expenses will increase in future periods commensurate with the expected growth of its business and increased expenditures associated with its status as an exchange-listed public company.
Current wording
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2024 was $2.4 million as compared to $3.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2023. The $1.1 million decrease was primarily related to increases in professional services such as legal, audit and accounting services offset by the reimbursement of costs incurred per the statement of work with AirJoule, LLC. Refer to Note 13 –Subsequent Events for further detail. We expect that our general and administrative expenses will increase in future periods commensurate with the expected growth of our business and increased expenditures associated with our status as an exchange-listed public company.
Previous wording
General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2024 was $4,024,444 as compared to $2,031,189 for the six months ended June 30, 2023. The $1,993,255 increase in general and administrative reflects increases in professional services such as legal and audit and accounting. Montana expects that its general and administrative expenses will increase in future periods commensurate with the expected growth of its business and increased expenditures associated with its status as an exchange listed public company.
Current wording
General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 was $6.5 million as compared to $5.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. The $0.9 million increase was primarily related to increases in professional services such as legal and audit and accounting offset by the reimbursement of costs incurred per the statement of work with AirJoule, LLC. Refer to Note 13 –Subsequent Events for further detail. We expect that our general and administrative expenses will increase in future periods commensurate with the expected growth of our business and increased expenditures associated with our status as an exchange listed public company.
Previous wording
Research and Development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2024 was $1,896,961 as compared to $1,704,087 for the six months ended June 30, 2023. The $192,874 increase in research and development reflects increases in personnel and prototype related costs as the Company continues to develop its products and technology. The Company expects that its research and development expenses will increase in future periods commensurate with the expected growth of its business.
Current wording
Research and Development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 was $1.8 million as compared to $2.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. The $0.7 million decrease in research and development was primarily related to the reimbursement of costs incurred per the statement of work with AirJoule, LLC, partially offset by an increase in personnel and prototype related costs as the Company continues to develop its products and technology. We expect that our research and development expenses will increase in future periods commensurate with the expected growth of our business.
Previous wording
Sales and marketing for the three months ended June 30, 2024 was $74,841 as compared to $128,153 for the three months ended June 30, 2023. In 2023, Montana incurred non-recurring expenses related to business development that ended in July 2023. Montana expects that its sales and marketing expenses will increase in future periods commensurate with the expected growth of its business.
Current wording
Sales and marketing for the three months ended September 30, 2024 was $23,639 as compared to $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2023. In 2023, we incurred non-recurring expenses related to business development that ended in July 2023. We expect that our sales and marketing expenses will increase in future periods commensurate with the expected growth of our business.
Previous wording
Sales and marketing for the six months ended June 30, 2024 was $112,566 as compared to $138,576 for the six months ended June 30, 2023. In 2023, Montana incurred non-recurring expenses related to business development that ended in July 2023. Montana expects that its sales and marketing expenses will increase in future periods commensurate with the expected growth of its business.
Current wording
Sales and marketing for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 was $0.1 million as compared to $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. In 2023, we incurred non-recurring expenses related to business development that ended in July 2023. We expect that our sales and marketing expenses will increase in future periods commensurate with the expected growth of our business.
Previous wording
Depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2024 and 2023 was $1,216 and $1,085, respectively. Depreciation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2024 and 2023 was $2,301 and $2,168, respectively.
Current wording
Depreciation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023 was $2,136 and $1,086, respectively. Depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023 was $4,437 and $3,256, respectively.
Previous wording
Interest income was $216,480 and $242,626, respectively for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024 compared to $3,551 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023. This is a result of the increase in our cash balance after the closing of the Business Combination.
Current wording
Interest income was $0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared to $6,264 and $9,815 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023. This is a result of the increase in our cash balance.
Previous wording
An equity method investment received in exchange for noncash consideration is measured at fair value. As a result, for the six months ended June 30, 2024, we recognized a gain of $333,500,000 on the contribution to AirJoule, LLC for the difference between our zero carrying value and the fair value of the perpetual license to intellectual property that we transferred to AirJoule, LLC.
Current wording
An equity method investment received in exchange for noncash consideration is measured at fair value. As a result, for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, we recognized a gain of $333.5 million on the contribution to AirJoule, LLC for the difference between our zero carrying value and the fair value of the perpetual license to intellectual property that we transferred to AirJoule, LLC.
Previous wording
The Company determined the fair value of the intellectual property by applying the multi-period excess earnings method, which involved the use of significant estimates and assumptions related to forecasted revenue growth rate and customer attrition rate, Level 3 measurements. Valuation specialists were used to develop and evaluate the appropriateness of the multi-period excess earnings method, the Company's discount rates, attrition rate and fair value estimates using its cash flow projections.
Current wording
We determined the fair value of the intellectual property by applying the multi-period excess earnings method, which involved the use of significant estimates and assumptions related to forecasted revenue growth rate and customer attrition rate, Level 3 measurements. Valuation specialists were used to develop and evaluate the appropriateness of the multi-period excess earnings method, our discount rates, attrition rate and fair value estimates using its cash flow projections.
Previous wording
Our share of the losses reported by AirJoule, LLC are classified as equity loss from investment in AirJoule, LLC. The investment is evaluated for impairment annually and if facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable, an impairment charge would be recorded.
Current wording
Equity loss from investment in AirJoule, LLC
Previous wording
As previously noted, on January 25, 2024, we entered into a joint venture with GE Ventures LLC, the AirJoule JV which closed on March 4, 2024. For the three months ended June 30, 2024 and for the period from March 4, 2024 to June 30, 2024, we recognized a loss of $580,788 and $607,170, respectively from our 50% equity investment in the AirJoule JV.
Current wording
As previously noted, on January 25, 2024, AirJoule Technologies, LLC entered into a joint venture with GE Ventures LLC, the AirJoule JV which closed on March 4, 2024. For the three months ended September 30, 2024 and for the period from March 4, 2024 to September 30, 2024, we recognized a loss of $2.3 million and $3.0 million, respectively from our 50% equity investment in the AirJoule JV.
Previous wording
Upon consummation of the Business Combination, the Company expensed approximately $53.7 million in Earnout Shares liability. The change in fair value of $13.1 million and $5.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, is due to a decrease in the estimated fair value of the liability and is recognized as a gain in other income (expenses) in the statements of operations. The fair value of the liability decreased primarily due changes in the valuation inputs, mainly a change in the timing of future cash flows, a decrease in the stock price and an increase in the volatility.
Current wording
Upon consummation of the Business Combination, we expensed approximately $53.7 million in Earnout Shares liability. The change in fair value of $31.8 million and $37.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, is due to a decrease in the estimated fair value of the liability and is recognized as a gain in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the liability decreased primarily due changes in the valuation inputs, mainly a change in the timing of future cash flows, a decrease in the stock price and an increase in the volatility.
Previous wording
Fair value of True Up Shares liability
Current wording
Change in fair value of True Up Shares liability
Showing the first 40 of 58 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (1)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Change in fair value of Earnout Shares liability
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Fair value of Earnout Shares liability