Whitehawk Therapeutics, Inc.
For the period ended Sep 30, 2026. Filed Nov 9, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Sep 30, 2026 · Filed Nov 9, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2026-06-30; filed 2026-08-06.
0001193125-26-337933
Item 1A. Risk FactorsUnregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of ProceedsDefaults Upon Senior SecuritiesMine Safety DisclosuresOther InformationCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2026-09-30; filed 2026-11-09.
0001193125-26-453576
Item 1A. Risk FactorsUnregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of ProceedsDefaults Upon Senior SecuritiesMine Safety DisclosuresOther InformationThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 487 previous paragraphs and 514 current paragraphs.
449 unchanged; 29 reworded; 33 added; 5 removed; 4 previous and 3 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (33)
Current report
We would face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators and the negotiation process is time-consuming and complex. Whether we reach a definitive agreement for a collaboration will depend, among other things, upon our assessment of the collaborator’s resources and expertise, the terms and conditions of the proposed collaboration and the proposed collaborator’s evaluation of a number of factors. Those factors may include the design or results of clinical trials, the likelihood of approval by the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, the potential market for the subject product candidate, the costs and complexities of manufacturing and delivering such product candidate to patients, the potential of competing drugs, the existence of uncertainty with respect to our ownership of intellectual property and industry and market conditions generally. The potential collaborator may also consider alternative product candidates or technologies for similar indications that may be available to collaborate on and whether such collaboration could be more attractive than the one with us for our product candidate. Further, we may not be successful in our efforts to establish a collaboration or other alternative arrangements for product candidates because they may be deemed to be at too early of a stage of development for collaborative effort and third parties may not view them as having the requisite potential to demonstrate safety and efficacy.
Current report
A provisional patent application is not examined and cannot itself issue as a patent. To claim the benefit of a provisional application’s filing date, a corresponding non-provisional or PCT application generally must be filed within twelve months, and failure to do so would result in the loss of that priority date. We cannot assure you that we or our licensors will file such applications in a timely manner, or that the applications, if filed, will be sufficient to support the priority claim.
Current report
A PCT application does not itself result in an issued patent. To obtain patent protection, national or regional phase applications must be filed in each jurisdiction of interest within the deadlines applicable in that jurisdiction, which are measured from the earliest priority date. Pursuing protection in every jurisdiction would be prohibitively expensive, so we and our licensors will elect to pursue protection in only a subset of jurisdictions, and the claims that issue may differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We cannot assure you that national or regional phase applications will be filed in a timely manner or in all jurisdictions that may be commercially important to us.
Current report
Even if patents issue from our or our licensors’ applications, the claims granted may be significantly narrower than those originally filed, may not cover the ADC Therapies as ultimately developed and commercialized, and may be challenged, narrowed, circumvented, or invalidated. If we are unable to obtain and maintain meaningful patent protection for the ADC Therapies, we may be unable to exclude competitors from developing and marketing the same or similar products; the perceived value of our product candidates, and of our company, may be reduced; and we may be unable to assert infringement claims or counterclaims against third parties or to negotiate favorable settlements. In addition, if we experience delays in our clinical trials or in obtaining regulatory approval, the period during which we could market our product candidates under patent protection would be shortened.
Current report
Patent term is generally measured from the earliest non-provisional or PCT filing date to which a patent claims priority, and does not include the period during which a provisional application is pending. Because of the time required for clinical development and regulatory review, any such patents may expire before or shortly after our product candidates, if approved, are commercialized.
Current report
Even if resolved in our favor, litigation or other legal proceedings relating to our intellectual property rights may cause us to incur significant expenses and could distract our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments and if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase our operating losses and reduce the resources available for development activities or any future sales, marketing or distribution activities. We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to conduct such litigation or proceedings adequately. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their greater financial resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could compromise our ability to compete in the marketplace.
Current report
Government actions in certain jurisdictions, including sanctions-related measures and decrees directed at patent owners from countries such as the United States, may prevent us from obtaining, maintaining, or enforcing patent rights, or may allow third parties to use our patented inventions without compensation.
Current report
Governments may take actions that limit or eliminate patent protection or increase its cost. For example, in March 2022, the Russian government issued Decree No. 299, which provides that where the Russian government authorizes the use of a patented invention without the owner’s consent, the compensation payable to owners from countries that Russia considers “unfriendly,” which include the United States, is set at zero. As a result, we may be unable to obtain compensation for, or to enforce otherwise valid patent rights against, certain uses of our inventions in Russia, and we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in Russia or from selling or importing products made using our inventions into Russia.
Current report
Sanctions imposed by the United States and other governments on Russia, and Russia’s countermeasures, may also impede our ability to file, prosecute, maintain, and enforce patents in Russia. Although the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control has authorized certain intellectual property-related transactions in Russia, including filing and prosecuting patent applications and paying maintenance fees, sanctions-related restrictions and the reluctance of financial institutions to process Russia-related payments may make it difficult or impossible to pay local counsel and other intermediaries, which could result in the abandonment or lapse of patent applications or patents. These actions could result in the partial or complete loss of patent rights in Russia.
Current report
Other jurisdictions, including China and Brazil, also have laws under which patented inventions may be exploited without the patent owner’s consent in certain circumstances, such as compulsory licensing. More generally, geopolitical developments in the United States and abroad, including sanctions, export controls, and trade measures, could increase the uncertainty and cost of prosecuting and maintaining patent applications and of maintaining, enforcing, or defending patents. Any of these developments could impair our competitive position in the affected jurisdictions and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. See also our risk factors regarding security and data privacy breaches and regarding doing business in China.
Current report
Defects of form may also exist in the preparation or filing of our and our licensors’ patents and patent applications, or may arise in the future, including with respect to priority claims, inventorship listings, ownership, claim scope, timely responses to official actions, and timely requests for patent term adjustment. If there are material defects, an issued patent may be invalid or unenforceable, and we may lose patent rights or the ability to exclude others.
Current report
We share, and expect to continue to share, trade secrets and other confidential information with third parties located in jurisdictions that present a heightened risk of misappropriation, including through cybersecurity intrusions, and our ability to restrict former personnel from joining competitors may be limited.
Current report
Because we may rely on third parties to manufacture our product candidates and to conduct preclinical studies and clinical trials, we share, and expect to continue to share, trade secrets, know-how, and other confidential information with those parties, many of which are located outside the United States, including in China. Sharing proprietary information increases the risk of unintended disclosure or misappropriation. Any disclosure, whether intentional or unintentional, by our employees, by the employees of third parties with whom we share facilities, or by third-party consultants and vendors, or any misappropriation by third parties, including through a cybersecurity breach, could enable competitors to duplicate or surpass our technological achievements and erode our competitive position.
Current report
We may need to share proprietary information, including trade secrets, with business partners, collaborators, contractors, and others located in countries at heightened risk of theft of trade secrets, including through direct intrusion by private parties or by state actors and those affiliated with or controlled by state actors. Our confidentiality agreements may not effectively prevent disclosure of confidential information and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure, and the legal protections available for trade secrets, and the practical ability to enforce them, vary by jurisdiction. Monitoring unauthorized disclosure is difficult, and enforcing a trade secret claim is expensive, time-consuming, and unpredictable. Competitors may also purchase our products, if approved, and attempt to reverse engineer or replicate some or all of the competitive advantages we derive from our development efforts, or design around our protected technologies. See also our risk factors regarding security and data privacy breaches and regarding doing business in China.
Current report
In addition, the laws of many jurisdictions limit the enforceability of non-compete provisions in employment agreements. If such provisions are unenforceable, former employees may be free to join our competitors or to form competing businesses, potentially using know-how they gained while working for us.
Current report
Our rights to the linker-payload used in all of our product candidates are held through a sublicense from WuXi Biologics, which in turn licenses the technology from Hangzhou DAC. If WuXi Biologics’ license from Hangzhou DAC is terminated, or if WuXi Biologics fails to comply with its obligations under that license, our rights could be terminated or impaired.
Current report
Under the License Agreement, we have been granted worldwide development and commercialization rights to the ADC Therapies, which include rights to use linker-payloads that WuXi Biologics has licensed from Hangzhou DAC. If WuXi Biologics were to breach or otherwise fail to comply with its obligations under the Upstream License, including payment, diligence, or other obligations, Hangzhou DAC may have the right to terminate the Upstream License, which could result in the termination of our sublicense. The same could occur if the Upstream License expires or terminates for any other reason, including the insolvency or a change of control of either party.
Current report
We may have limited visibility into WuXi Biologics’ compliance with the Upstream License and limited ability to cure any breach on its behalf. The Upstream License may be complex and susceptible to multiple interpretations, and disputes could arise among us, WuXi Biologics, and Hangzhou DAC regarding, among other things, the scope of the rights granted, sublicensing rights, financial and diligence obligations, whether our technology infringes intellectual property of Hangzhou DAC that is not covered by the license, and the ownership of jointly created inventions. The resolution of any such dispute could narrow our rights or increase our financial obligations.
Current report
Because many of our product candidates currently use the same linker-payload architecture, the termination or impairment of our rights to the linker-payload would affect our pipeline, and we may be unable to develop, manufacture, or commercialize our product candidates. In that event, competitors, including parties to which WuXi Biologics or Hangzhou DAC may license the same or similar technology, could gain the freedom to develop and market competing products. See also our risk factors regarding security and data privacy breaches and regarding doing business in China.
Current report
Third parties, including our contract research and manufacturing organizations and other collaborators, may own or claim rights in inventions relating to our product candidates, and co-owners of patent rights may be able to license those rights to our competitors or impede our enforcement efforts.
Current report
We rely on third parties, including WuXi Biologics and its subsidiaries, contract research organizations, and contract development and manufacturing organizations, to conduct testing, process development, and manufacturing for our product candidates. Agreements with these parties may provide that improvements or inventions made in the course of their work are owned solely by the third party or jointly with us. If we determine that rights to such an improvement are necessary to commercialize our product candidates or maintain our competitive advantage, we may need to obtain a license from the third party. We may not be able to obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, and any license may be non-exclusive, giving our competitors access to the same technology. Failure to obtain a necessary license could prevent us from commercializing our product candidates or force us to cease some of our business operations.
Current report
Certain patents or patent applications relating to our product candidates may be co-owned with third parties. Our rights in such patents may depend on agreements among the co-owners to which we are not a party. Under United States law, absent agreement to the contrary, each co-owner of a patent generally may make, use, offer to sell, and sell the patented invention, and license it to others, without the consent of, or any obligation to account to, the other co-owners. Co-owners of patents relating to our product candidates could therefore license their interests to our competitors. In addition, all co-owners generally must join as plaintiffs in an infringement action, so we may need the cooperation of any co-owner to enforce such patents, and that cooperation may not be provided.
Current report
Disputes regarding inventorship and ownership may also arise from conflicting views about the contributions of different individuals, from the effects of foreign laws where foreign nationals or foreign entities are involved in developing the subject matter of a patent, or from conflicting obligations of third parties involved in developing our product candidates. Our product candidates incorporate antibodies designed by WuXi Biologics and a linker-payload designed by Hangzhou DAC, each of which is located in China. The failure to name the proper inventors on a patent can result in the patent being invalid or unenforceable. Litigation may be necessary to resolve such disputes, and if we fail to defend against such claims, we could lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or the right to use, intellectual property that is important to our product candidates. Even if we are successful, litigation could result in substantial costs and distraction to our management and other employees.
Current report
The use of artificial intelligence and other new and evolving technologies in our operations, or by our collaborators and service providers, may present risks to our intellectual property and confidential information and may subject us to evolving legal requirements.
Current report
We and our third-party collaborators and service providers may use artificial intelligence, machine learning, and other automated or computational technologies (collectively, “AI”) in connection with our research, development, regulatory, and operational activities. The use of AI can give rise to intellectual property risks, including uncertainty regarding the patentability and ownership of AI-assisted inventions, the compromise of proprietary or confidential information, inaccurate or biased outputs, data privacy and cybersecurity issues, disputes regarding the provenance of data used to train or operate AI systems, and claims of infringement or misappropriation.
Current report
The legal framework governing inventorship of AI-assisted inventions is evolving. In November 2025, the USPTO rescinded the guidance it issued in February 2024 and issued revised guidance stating that AI systems cannot be named as inventors, that the same legal standard for inventorship applies to all inventions regardless of whether AI was used, and that the factors set forth in Pannu v. Iolab Corp., 155 F.3d 1344 (Fed. Cir. 1998), apply only in determining whether multiple natural persons qualify as joint inventors. Further changes in USPTO guidance, court decisions, or legislation in the United States or abroad could affect our ability to obtain, maintain, or enforce patents covering inventions developed with the assistance of AI. If we or our licensors are unable to establish that a natural person conceived each claimed invention, patents covering those inventions could be challenged as invalid or unenforceable on inventorship grounds.
Current report
Information that we or our service providers input into third-party AI tools may be retained, used to train models, or disclosed to others, which could compromise trade secrets or, in some circumstances, patentability. AI may have errors or inadequacies that are not easily detectable, and if the data used to train AI, or the content that AI applications assist in producing, are deficient, inaccurate, or biased, our business may be adversely affected. We also expect increasing government regulation of AI, including the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act, which entered into force on August 1, 2024 and imposes obligations on providers and deployers of AI systems, and which may increase our compliance costs. Our employees, collaborators, or third-party service providers may incorporate AI tools into their work in ways that do not meet evolving regulatory or industry standards.
Current report
Although we assess our banking relationships as we believe necessary or appropriate, our access to funding sources and other credit arrangements in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize our current and projected future business operations could be significantly impaired by factors that affect us, the financial institutions with which we have arrangements
Current report
We may integrate AI, including generative artificial intelligence (“Gen AI”), machine learning, and automated decision-making technologies into our operations. The use of AI technology, including Gen AI, can give rise to intellectual property risks, including uncertainty regarding ownership of AI-generated inventions, compromises to proprietary IP, inaccuracy, bias, data privacy and cybersecurity issues, data provenance disputes, and infringement or misappropriation claims. The legal landscape for AI-generated inventions remains uncertain, and development of the law in the U.S. and abroad could impact our ability to enforce proprietary rights or protect against infringing uses. Depending on actions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that would weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce patents. For example, on February 13, 2024, the USPTO issued AI Inventorship guidance entitled “Inventorship Guidance for AI-assisted Inventions” which indicated that the three-part test articulated in Pannu v. Iolab Corp. 155 F.3d 1344 (Fed. Cir. 1998) was relevant to the inventorship analysis of AI-assisted inventions. However, the USPTO rescinded the February 13, 2024, guidance and issued a new guidance document entitled “Revised Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions” on November 28, 2025, which treats AI systems as tools, applies the same inventorship standard regardless of AI assistance, and provides that the Pannu factors only apply when determining whether multiple natural persons qualify as joint inventors. Although this guidance reduces certain uncertainty, it is not binding on courts, and its application to specific AI-assisted inventions is thus highly uncertain and subject to fact-dependent, and the standards applied in other jurisdictions may differ and may change based on USPTO guidance and law.
Current report
Our employees may use AI including Gen AI in certain circumstances to perform portions of their work. There can be no assurance that employees will not inadvertently or improperly input information that is proprietary, confidential, or sensitive information, including trade secrets, into AI systems in a manner that results in unauthorized disclosure or loss of confidentiality. Many AI tools are provided by third-party vendors, and we may have limited ability to control or verify how information submitted by employees is processed, stored, retained, or used by such providers, including whether such information may be incorporated into model training or otherwise accessed or disclosed. Any failure to adequately prevent the disclosure or misuse of our proprietary or confidential information, whether due to employee error, inadequate controls, evolving AI system functionality, or third-party practices, could result in the loss of trade secret protection and the disclosure of confidential information related to our inventions and product candidates, which could preclude us from obtaining patents covering disclosed inventions and product candidates, all of which could impair or preclude our ability to obtain patent protection covering the disclosed subject matter, or result in breaches of confidentiality obligations to our collaborators and other third parties, or violations of privacy laws. Any of these outcomes could adversely affect our business.
Current report
AI is a rapidly evolving field, and we cannot predict how AI technologies and their adoption will develop or how those developments will affect our business. AI, including Gen AI, may have errors or inadequacies that are not easily detectable. If the data used to train AI or the content AI applications assist in producing are deficient, inaccurate, or biased, our business may be adversely affected. We expect increasing government regulation of AI use (including the EU’s AI Act which entered into force on August 1, 2024), which may significantly increase compliance costs. This legislation may impose significant obligations on providers and deployers of AI systems. The legal and regulatory landscape for AI-related intellectual property remains uncertain and continues to evolve, and developments in the law in the U.S. and abroad could increase our compliance costs or affect our ability to enforce and protect our proprietary rights.
Current report
The rapid evolution of AI (including Gen AI) may, to the extent we decide to integrate such technologies with our products and services, require the application of significant resources to design, develop, test and maintain such products and services to help ensure that any such AI is implemented in accordance with applicable law and regulation and in a socially responsible manner and to minimize any real or perceived unintended harmful impacts. We also may need to expend further resources to adjust our business practices, as these laws and regulations evolve, especially where requirements across jurisdictions are inconsistent. Such an increase in operating expenses, as well as any actual or perceived failure to comply with such laws and regulations, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
Current report
Our vendors may in turn incorporate AI tools (including Gen AI) into their own offerings, and the providers of these AI tools may not meet existing or rapidly evolving regulatory or industry standards, including with respect to privacy and data security. Further, bad actors around the world could use increasingly sophisticated methods, including the use of Gen AI, to engage in illegal activities involving the theft and misuse of personal information, financial and other confidential information and intellectual property. Any of these effects could damage our reputation, result in the loss of valuable property and information, cause us to breach applicable laws and regulations, and adversely impact our business.
Removed paragraphs (5)
Previous report
Through the License Agreement, we have transitioned to a new pipeline and are pursuing different targets and indications from those we have historically pursued, which has risks.
Previous report
We in-licensed the ADC Therapies, which are focused on new targets and indications that are different from the targets and indications for FYARRO. Transitioning to a new product candidate pipeline has many risks, including the ability to obtain sufficient capital to cover expenses to fund operations. These risks may be further exacerbated by the FYARRO Divestiture, as FYARRO has historically been our only source of revenue. The ADC Therapies represent a new pipeline with new targets and indications from historical current clinical pipeline and FYARRO. As a result, we have competitors that are better established in the market, have greater experience with such line of business or have greater resources than we do. Furthermore, certain of our current employees may have limited experience with discovery, research and development, preclinical studies and clinical trials relating to ADC Therapies and may have limited experience with respect to other programs we may explore as we seek to expand our pipeline. We may also be required to incur additional costs, including hiring additional personnel or equipment or engaging with new service providers. We may also have issues with the transfer of materials or learnings.
Previous report
• business unit or development function, or available funding or external factors such as an acquisition that diverts resources or creates competing priorities;
Previous report
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us more difficult and may prevent attempts our stockholders to replace or remove our management.
Reworded paragraphs (29)
Previous wording
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, have a limited operating history and have two clinical products and one preclinical product in development, which may make it difficult for you to evaluate our current business and likelihood of success and viability.
Current wording
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, have a limited operating history and have three clinical product candidates and additional preclinical programs, which may make it difficult for you to evaluate our current business and likelihood of success and viability.
Previous wording
We just recently commenced clinical trials with two of our product candidates and one product candidate is in the preclinical stage. As a result, it may be more difficult for you to accurately predict our likelihood of success and viability than it could be if we had a longer operating history. In addition, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other known and unknown factors and risks frequently experienced by clinical-stage biopharmaceutical companies in rapidly evolving fields.
Current wording
We just recently commenced clinical trials with the ADC Therapies and have additional programs in the preclinical stage. As a result, it may be more difficult for you to accurately predict our likelihood of success and viability than it could be if we had a longer operating history. In addition, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other known and unknown factors and risks frequently experienced by clinical-stage biopharmaceutical companies in rapidly evolving fields.
Previous wording
We have incurred significant net losses since our inception, have only generated revenue from product sales for a portion of our operating history (February 2022 through March 2025), and have financed our operations principally through private placements and public offerings of our securities, federal grants and proceeds from licenses. Our net loss was $16.6 million and $52.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. We had an accumulated deficit of $392.1 million as of June 30, 2026, and $353.3 million as of December 31, 2025. These losses have resulted primarily from costs incurred in connection with research and development activities, costs incurred in connection with developing and commercializing FYARRO and general and administrative costs associated with our operations. As a result of our acquisition of the ADC Therapies, we expect to continue to incur significant selling, general and administrative expenses as well as research and development expenses related to our ongoing operations, including, identifying and designing additional product candidates, conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials for our product candidates, and navigating the regulatory approval process for the ADC Therapies and any future product candidates. Although our expenses decreased overall given the divestiture of FYARRO, including related commercial and clinical expenses, and headcount reductions, the amount of our future expenses and potential losses is uncertain.
Current wording
We have incurred significant net losses since our inception, have only generated revenue from product sales for a portion of our operating history (February 2022 through March 2025), and have financed our operations principally through private placements and public offerings of our securities, federal grants and proceeds from licenses. Our net loss was $21.2 million and $17.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. We had an accumulated deficit of $413.3 million as of September 30, 2026, and $353.3 million as of December 31, 2025. These losses have resulted primarily from costs incurred in connection with research and development activities, costs incurred in connection with developing and commercializing FYARRO and general and administrative costs associated with our operations. As a result of our acquisition of the ADC Therapies, we expect to continue to incur significant selling, general and administrative expenses as well as research and development expenses related to our ongoing operations, including, identifying and designing additional product candidates, conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials for our product candidates, and navigating the regulatory approval process for the ADC Therapies and any future product candidates. Although our expenses decreased overall given the divestiture of FYARRO, including related commercial and clinical expenses, and headcount reductions, the amount of our future expenses and potential losses is uncertain.
Previous wording
our ability to complete IND application enabling studies and successfully submit INDs or IND supplements or comparable applications, which become effective without any objections by the FDA or comparable regulatory authorities before commencing a clinical trial for the ADC Therapies and any future product candidates;
Current wording
our ability to complete IND enabling studies and successfully submit INDs or IND supplements or comparable applications, which become effective without any objections by the FDA or comparable regulatory authorities before commencing a clinical trial for the ADC Therapies and any future product candidates;
Previous wording
Following the FYARRO Divestiture, we do not have any approved products and our pipeline is comprised solely of preclinical and clinical assets. The ADC Therapies are early in development. Going forward, our business will depend on our ability to advance our current and future product candidates through preclinical studies and clinical trials and obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates, which may fail in development or suffer delays that adversely affect their commercial viability.
Current wording
Following the FYARRO Divestiture, we do not have any approved products and our pipeline is comprised solely of preclinical and clinical assets. The ADC Therapies are early in clinical development. Going forward, our business will depend on our ability to advance our current and future product candidates through preclinical studies and clinical trials and obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates, which may fail in development or suffer delays that adversely affect their commercial viability.
Previous wording
Prior to initiating clinical trials of our product candidates, we need to complete IND-enabling studies and file an IND or similar application to the FDA or regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions. The FDA cleared our IND applications for HWK-007 and HWK-016 in the fourth quarter of 2025 and the first quarter of 2026, respectively, and we anticipate FDA clearance of our IND for HWK-206 in mid-2026 but we may not be able to receive such clearance on the timeline we expect. Moreover, we cannot be sure that submission of an IND will result in the FDA allowing further clinical trials to begin, or that, once begun, issues will not arise that result in the suspension or termination of clinical trials. Additionally, even if such regulatory authorities agree with the design and implementation of the clinical trials set forth in an IND, we cannot guarantee that such regulatory authorities will not change their requirements in the future. These considerations also apply to new clinical trials we may submit as amendments to existing INDs or to a new IND. Any failure to file INDs on the timelines we expect or to obtain regulatory clearance for our trials may prevent us from developing product candidates on a timely basis, if at all. A product candidate can unexpectedly fail at any stage of preclinical and clinical development. The historical failure rate for product candidates is high due to risks relating to safety, efficacy, clinical execution, changing standards of medical care and other unpredictable variables. The results from preclinical studies or early clinical trials of a product candidate may not be predictive of the results that will be obtained in later stage clinical trials of the product candidate. If we experience failures, setbacks or delays in our preclinical studies, clinical trials, manufacturing or regulatory efforts, our business may be materially harmed.
Current wording
Prior to initiating clinical trials of our product candidates, we need to complete IND-enabling studies and file an IND or similar application to the FDA or regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions. For example, we completed IND-enabling studies, filed INDs for the ADC Therapies and the FDA cleared the INDs for HWK-007, HWK-016 and HWK-206 in the fourth quarter of 2025, first quarter of 2026 and third quarter of 2026, respectively, but we may not be able to receive such clearance for other product candidates on the timeline we expect. Moreover, we cannot be sure that submission of an IND will result in the FDA allowing further clinical trials to begin, or that, once begun, issues will not arise that result in the suspension or termination of clinical trials. Additionally, even if such regulatory authorities agree with the design and implementation of the clinical trials set forth in an IND, we cannot guarantee that such regulatory authorities will not change their requirements in the future. These considerations also apply to new clinical trials we may submit as amendments to existing INDs or to a new IND. Any failure to file INDs on the timelines we expect or to obtain regulatory clearance for our trials may prevent us from developing product candidates on a timely basis, if at all. A product candidate can unexpectedly fail at any stage of preclinical and clinical development. The historical failure rate for product candidates is high due to risks relating to safety, efficacy, clinical execution, changing standards of medical care and other unpredictable variables. The results from preclinical studies or early clinical trials of a product candidate may not be predictive of the results that will be obtained in later stage clinical trials of the product candidate. If we experience failures, setbacks or delays in our preclinical studies, clinical trials, manufacturing or regulatory efforts, our business may be materially harmed.
Previous wording
Our product candidates are next-generation ADCs using the same linker-payload designed by Hangzhou DAC and new antibodies designed by WuXi Biologics. Though ADC-based product candidates have been or are currently being evaluated by others in clinical trials using similar targets or the same linker-payload architectures, our product candidates and their antibody components have never been evaluated in human clinical trials prior to our Phase 1 studies of HWK-007 and HWK-016 that commenced in the first quarter of 2026. If our product candidates encounter safety or efficacy problems, developmental delays or regulatory issues or other problems, such problems could impact the development plans for our other product candidates because all of our product candidates currently use the same linker-payload architecture.
Current wording
Our product candidates are next-generation ADCs using the same linker-payload designed by Hangzhou DAC and new antibodies designed by WuXi Biologics. Though ADC-based product candidates have been or are currently being evaluated by others in clinical trials using similar targets or the same linker-payload architectures, our product candidates and their antibody components have never been evaluated in human clinical trials prior to our Phase 1 studies of HWK-007 and HWK-016 that commenced in the first quarter of 2026 and of HWK-206 that commenced in the third quarter of 2026. If our product candidates encounter safety or efficacy problems, developmental delays or regulatory issues or other problems, such problems could impact the development plans for our other product candidates because all of our product candidates currently use the same linker-payload architecture.
Previous wording
We may develop product candidates, in combination with one or more currently approved or unapproved therapies to treat cancer or other diseases. Patients may not be able to tolerate product candidates in combination with other therapies or dosing of product candidates in combination with other therapies may have unexpected consequences. Even if any of our product candidates that we develop in the future were to receive regulatory approval or be commercialized for use in combination with other existing therapies, we would continue to be subject to the risks that the FDA, EMA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities could revoke approval of the therapy used in combination with such products, or safety, efficacy, manufacturing or supply issues could arise with these existing therapies. In addition, it is possible that existing therapies with which product candidates are approved for use could themselves fall out of favor or be relegated to later lines of treatment. This could result in the need to identify other combination therapies for product candidates, the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions requiring additional clinical trials, or our own products being removed from the market or being less successful commercially.
Current wording
We may develop product candidates, in combination with one or more currently approved or unapproved therapies to treat cancer or other diseases. Patients may not be able to tolerate product candidates in combination with other therapies or dosing of product candidates in combination with other therapies may have unexpected consequences. Even if any of our product candidates that we develop in the future were to receive regulatory approval or be commercialized for use in combination with other existing therapies, we would continue to be subject to the risks that the FDA, EMA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities could revoke approval of the therapy used in combination with such products, or safety, efficacy, manufacturing or supply issues could arise with these existing therapies. In addition, it is possible that existing therapies with which product candidates are approved for use could themselves fall out of favor or be relegated to later lines of treatment. This could result in the need to identify other combination therapies for product candidates, the
Previous wording
We believe that accessing external innovation and expertise is important to our success; and while we plan to leverage our leadership team’s prior business development experience as we evaluate potential in-licensing and acquisition opportunities to further expand our portfolio, such as with the in-license of the ADC Therapies, we may not be able to identify suitable licensing or acquisition opportunities, and even if we do, we may not be able to successfully secure such licensing and acquisition opportunities. The licensing or acquisition of third-party intellectual property rights is a competitive area, and several more established companies may pursue strategies to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights that we may consider attractive or necessary. These companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their size, capital resources and greater clinical development and commercialization capabilities. In addition, companies that perceive us to be a competitor may be unwilling to assign or license rights to us. We may also be unable to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights on terms that would allow us to make an appropriate return on our investment, or at all. If we are unable to successfully license or acquire additional product candidates to expand our portfolio, our pipeline, competitive position, business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects may be materially harmed.
Current wording
We believe that accessing external innovation and expertise is important to our success; and while we plan to leverage our leadership team’s prior business development experience as we evaluate potential in-licensing and acquisition opportunities to further expand our portfolio, such as with the in-license of the ADC Therapies, we may not be able to identify suitable licensing or acquisition opportunities, and even if we do, we may not be able to successfully secure such licensing and acquisition opportunities. The licensing or acquisition of third-party intellectual property rights is a competitive area, and several more established companies may pursue strategies to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights that we may consider attractive or necessary. These companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their size, capital resources and greater clinical development and commercialization capabilities.
Previous wording
We may seek Fast Track designations from the FDA for our product candidates. Even if one or more of our product candidates receive Fast Track designation, we may not lead to a faster development or review process, or we may be unable to maintain or effectively utilize such a designation.
Current wording
A Fast Track designation for HWK-206 may not lead to a faster development or review process, or we may be unable to maintain or effectively utilize such a designation. We may seek Fast Track designations from the FDA for other product candidates. Even if one or more of our product candidates receive Fast Track designation, we may not lead to a faster development or review process, or we may be unable to maintain or effectively utilize such a designation.
Previous wording
We may seek Fast Track designation for our product candidates, and we may not be successful in securing such additional designation or in expediting development if such designations were received. Even if we receive Fast Track designation for product candidates, the FDA may withdraw such Fast Track designation if it believes that the Fast Track designation is no longer supported by data from our clinical development program.
Current wording
In November 2026, we announced that the FDA granted Fast Track designation for HWK-206 for the treatment of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer with disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. We may seek Fast Track designation for other product candidates, and we may not be successful in securing such additional designation or in expediting development if such designations were received. Even if we receive Fast Track designation for product candidates, the FDA may withdraw such Fast Track designation if it believes that the Fast Track designation is no longer supported by data from our clinical development program.
Previous wording
Legislative and regulatory proposals have been made to expand post-approval requirements and restrict sales and promotional activities for biotechnology products. We cannot be sure whether additional legislative changes will be enacted, or whether FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact of such changes on the regulatory approvals of our product candidates, if any, may be. In addition, increased scrutiny by Congress of the FDA’s approval process may significantly delay or prevent regulatory approval, as well as subject us to more stringent product labeling and post-marketing testing and other requirements. Further, in view of the Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, this landmark decision may invite various stakeholders to bring lawsuits against the FDA to challenge longstanding decisions and policies, including market exclusivities, which could lead to uncertainties in the industry. Further, changes in the leadership of the FDA and other federal agencies under the current administration may also lead to new policies and changes in the regulations and operations of the FDA, which may impact our clinical development plans.
Current wording
Legislative and regulatory proposals have been made to expand post-approval requirements and restrict sales and promotional activities for biotechnology products. We cannot be sure whether additional legislative changes will be enacted, or whether FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact of such changes on the regulatory approvals of our product candidates, if any, may be. In addition, increased scrutiny by Congress of the FDA’s approval process may significantly delay or prevent regulatory approval, as well as subject us to more stringent product labeling and post-marketing testing and other requirements. Further, in view of the Supreme Court decision in
Previous wording
Additionally, the collection and use of health data in the European Union is governed by the General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”), which extends the geographical scope of European Union data protection law to non-European Union entities under certain conditions and imposes substantial obligations upon companies and new rights for individuals. Failure to comply with the GDPR and the applicable national data protection laws of European Union member states may result in fines up to €20.0 million or up to 4% of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher, and other administrative penalties. Additionally, the UK has implemented legislation that substantially implements the GDPR, the UK GDPR, which provides for similar obligations and provides for penalties for noncompliance of up to the greater of £17.5 million or four percent of worldwide revenues. The UK enacted the UK Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 on June 19, 2025, which made targeted amendments to the UK GDPR and the UK Data Protection Act. The
Current wording
Additionally, the collection and use of health data in the European Union is governed by the General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”), which extends the geographical scope of European Union data protection law to non-European Union entities under certain conditions and may impose substantial obligations upon companies and new rights for individuals. Failure to comply with the GDPR and the applicable national data protection laws of European Union member states may result in fines up to €20.0 million or up to 4% of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher, and other administrative penalties. Additionally, the UK has implemented legislation that substantially implements the GDPR, the UK GDPR, which provides for similar obligations and provides for penalties for noncompliance of up to the greater of £17.5 million or four percent of worldwide revenues. The UK enacted the UK Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 on June 19, 2025, which made targeted amendments to the UK GDPR and the UK Data Protection Act. The European Union also has enacted numerous laws and regulations addressing cybersecurity. Similar laws have been proposed, and in certain cases enacted, in other foreign jurisdictions. For example, on August 20, 2021, the Personal Information Protection Law (“PIPL”) of the People’s Republic of China was adopted and went into effect on November 1, 2021. The PIPL allows for fines of up to 50 million renminbi or 5% of a covered company’s revenue in the prior year.
Previous wording
the federal HIPAA, which created new federal criminal statutes that prohibit a person from knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, any healthcare benefit program, regardless of the payor (e.g., public or private) and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up by any trick or device a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items or services relating to healthcare matters; similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;
Current wording
the federal HIPAA, which created new federal criminal statutes that prohibit a person from knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, any healthcare benefit program, regardless of the payor (e.g., public or private) and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up by any trick or device a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items or services relating to healthcare matters; similar to the federal
Previous wording
We currently rely on third parties to manufacture or supply our product candidates and their components and raw materials, many of which are sole source manufacturers and suppliers. For the near term, Hangzhou DAC will continue to manufacture the CPT113 linker-payload and WuXi Biologics will continue to manufacture the antibodies underlying our ADC product candidates. A subsidiary of WuXi Biologics will carry forward majority of the IND-enabling CMC, including antibody development, bioconjugation and fill and finish.
Current wording
We currently rely on third parties to manufacture or supply our product candidates and their components and raw materials, many of which are sole source manufacturers and suppliers. For the near term, Hangzhou DAC will continue to manufacture the CPT113 linker-payload and WuXi Biologics and its subsidiary will continue to manufacture the antibodies underlying our ADC Therapies, including antibody development, bioconjugation and fill and finish.
Previous wording
As of August 3, 2026, we have 32 full-time or part-time employees. In order to successfully implement our plans and strategies, from time to time we may need additional managerial, operational, development, financial and other personnel. In order to successfully implement our plans and strategies, from time to time we may need additional managerial, operational, development, sales, marketing, financial and other personnel. Future growth would impose significant added responsibilities on members of management, including:
Current wording
As of November 5, 2026, we had 37 full-time or part-time employees. In order to successfully implement our plans and strategies, from time to time we may need additional managerial, operational, development, financial and other personnel. In order to successfully implement our plans and strategies, from time to time we may need additional managerial, operational, development, sales, marketing, financial and other personnel. Future growth would impose significant added responsibilities on members of management, including:
Previous wording
Despite the implementation of security measures in an effort to protect systems that store our information, given their size and complexity and the increasing amounts of information maintained on and processed by our internal information technology systems, and those of our third-party CROs, other contractors (including sites performing our clinical trials) and consultants, these systems are potentially vulnerable to breakdown or other damage or interruption from service interruptions, system malfunction, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures, as well as security breaches and incidents from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees, contractors, consultants, business partners, and/or other third parties, or from cyber-attacks by malicious third parties (including the deployment of harmful malware, ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, social engineering and other means to affect service reliability and threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of systems and information), which may compromise our system infrastructure or lead to the loss, destruction, alteration or dissemination of, or damage to, our data. As the cyber-threat landscape evolves, these attacks are growing in frequency, sophistication and intensity, and are becoming increasingly difficult to detect. These risks may be heightened due to the increasing number of our and our vendors’ and contractors’ personnel working remotely. Further geopolitical events such as wars and conflicts may increase the cybersecurity threats we and the third parties we work with face. Any disruption or security breach or incident resulting in a loss, destruction, unavailability, or unauthorized alteration, dissemination, or other processing of, or damage to, our data or applications, or for it to be believed or reported that any of these occurred, we could incur liability and reputational damage and the development and commercialization of our product candidates could be delayed. We cannot assure you that our data protection efforts and our investment in information technology, or the efforts or investments of CROs, consultants or other third parties, have prevented or will prevent significant breakdowns or breaches in systems or other cyber incidents that cause loss, destruction, unavailability, or unauthorized alteration, dissemination, or other processing of, or damage to, our data that could have a material adverse effect upon our reputation, business, operations or financial condition. For example, any such event that were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations could result in a material disruption of our programs and the development of our product candidates could be delayed. In addition, the loss, unauthorized alteration, or unavailability of clinical trial data for our product candidates could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. Furthe…
Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.
Current wording
Despite the implementation of security measures in an effort to protect systems that store our information, given their size and complexity and the increasing amounts of information maintained on and processed by our internal information technology systems, and those of our third-party CROs, other contractors (including sites performing our clinical trials) and consultants, these systems are potentially vulnerable to breakdown or other damage or interruption from service interruptions, system malfunction, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures, as well as security breaches and incidents from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees, contractors, consultants, business partners, and/or other third parties, or from cyber-attacks by malicious third parties (including the deployment of harmful malware, ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, social engineering and other means to affect service reliability and threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of systems and information), which may compromise our system infrastructure or lead to the loss, destruction, alteration or dissemination of, or damage to, our data. As the cyber-threat landscape evolves, these attacks are growing in frequency, sophistication and intensity, and are becoming increasingly difficult to detect. These risks may be heightened due to the increasing number of our and our vendors’ and contractors’ personnel working remotely. Additionally, new and evolving technologies, including artificial intelligence technologies that facilitate the identification and exploitation of security vulnerabilities, may increase cybersecurity risks. Further geopolitical events such as wars and conflicts may increase the cybersecurity threats we and the third parties we work with face. Any disruption or security breach or incident resulting in a loss, destruction, unavailability, or unauthorized alteration, dissemination, or other processing of, or damage to, our data or applications, or for it to be believed or reported that any of these occurred, we could incur liability and reputational damage and the development and commercialization of our product candidates could be delayed. We cannot assure you that our data protection efforts and our investment in information technology, or the efforts or investments of CROs, consultants or other third parties, have prevented or will prevent significant breakdowns or breaches in systems or other cyber incidents that cause loss, destruction, unavailability, or unauthorized alteration, dissemination, or other processing of, or damage to, our data that could have a material adverse effect upon our reputation, business, operations or financial condition. For example, any such event that were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations could result in a material disruption of our programs and the development of our product candidates could be delayed. In addition, the loss, unauthorized alterati…
Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.
Previous wording
Our NOL carryforwards may be unavailable to offset future taxable income because of restrictions under United States tax law. Our federal NOLs generated in tax years beginning before January 1, 2018 are only permitted to be carried forward for 20 taxable years under applicable United States federal tax law, and therefore could expire unused. Our federal NOLs generated in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such NOLs is generally limited to 80% of our current year taxable income.
Current wording
Our NOL carryforwards may be unavailable to offset future taxable income because of restrictions under United States federal or state tax law. Our U.S. federal NOLs generated in tax years beginning before January 1, 2018 are only permitted to be carried forward for 20 taxable years under applicable United States federal tax law, and therefore could expire unused. Our U.S. federal NOLs generated in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such NOLs is generally limited to 80% of our current year taxable income.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2025, after consideration of the NOLs that have been estimated to expire unused under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), we had federal NOL carryforwards of approximately $118.9 million, $40.6 million of which will begin to expire in 2030, and the remaining $78.3 million do not expire. We also have state NOL carryforwards of approximately $22.2 million available as of December 31, 2025, of which $21.3 million will begin to expire in 2037.
Current wording
As of December 31, 2025, after consideration of the NOLs that have been estimated to expire unused under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), we had U.S. federal NOL carryforwards of approximately $118.9 million, $40.6 million of which will begin to expire in 2030, and the remaining $78.3 million do not expire. We also have state NOL carryforwards of approximately $22.2 million available as of December 31, 2025, of which $21.3 million will begin to expire in 2037.
Previous wording
Pending patent applications cannot be enforced against third parties practicing the technology claimed in such applications unless, and until, patents issue from such applications, and then only to the extent the issued claims cover the technology. There can be no assurance that our patent applications or the patent applications of our licensors will result in additional patents being issued in any particular jurisdiction or that issued patents will afford sufficient protection against competitors with similar technology, nor can there be any assurance that the patents issued will not be infringed, designed around or invalidated by third parties.
Current wording
Our patent portfolio covering the ADC Therapies is at an early stage and includes provisional applications and applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”). We do not currently own or in-license any issued patents covering the ADC Therapies, and our ability to obtain patent protection and to exclude competitors is therefore uncertain. Pending patent applications cannot be enforced against third parties practicing the technology claimed in such applications unless, and until, patents issue from such applications, and then only to the extent the issued claims cover the technology. There can be no assurance that our patent applications or the patent applications of our licensors will result in patents being issued in any particular jurisdiction or that issued patents will afford sufficient protection against competitors with similar technology, nor can there be any assurance that the patents issued will not be infringed, designed around or invalidated by third parties.
Previous wording
We cannot be certain that the claims in our licensed United States pending patent applications, corresponding international patent applications and patent applications in certain foreign territories, will be considered patentable by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “USPTO”), courts in the United States or by the patent offices and courts in foreign countries, nor can we be certain that the claims in our issued patent will not be found invalid or unenforceable if challenged.
Current wording
We cannot be certain that the claims in our owned or licensed United States pending patent applications, corresponding international patent applications and patent applications in certain foreign territories, will be considered patentable by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “USPTO”), courts in the United States or by the patent offices and courts in foreign countries, nor can we be certain that the claims in our issued patent will not be found invalid or unenforceable if challenged.
Previous wording
For example, the BIOSECURE Act was signed into law as a part of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, which includes Section 851 regarding a “[p]rohibition on contracting with certain biotechnology providers." This law restricts federal government contracts, grants, and loans from being issued to companies that use biotechnology equipment or services produced or provided by select Chinese biotechnology companies (each, a “biotechnology company of concern”), as part of such companies’ performance of those agreements with the U.S. government. This legislation, including its implementing regulations, or similar legislation in the future, could adversely impact our current or future third-party arrangements with certain companies, including those in China or Chinese-owned U.S. companies, which could delay or impact our clinical trials and consequently delay or obstruct successful commercialization of our product candidates. Foreign CMOs may be a target of U.S. legislation, including the BIOSECURE Act, and trade restrictions and other foreign regulatory requirements could increase the cost or reduce the supply of material available to us, delay the procurement or supply of such material, restrict or even prohibit our ability to work with such CMOs, or have an adverse effect on our ability to secure significant commitments from governments to purchase potential therapies. Once the implementing regulations of Section 851 come into effect, which will be no later than the third quarter of 2028, some of our business partners like WuXi Biologics may be designated as biotechnology companies of concern through the criteria and process established by the implementing regulations. Even if we do not seek any covered federal government contracts, grants, or loans, it is possible that commercial partners, government agencies, or other third parties may view our business less favorable if we contract with entities that ultimately become biotechnology companies of concern.
Current wording
For example, the BIOSECURE Act was signed into law as a part of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, which includes Section 851 regarding a “[p]rohibition on contracting with certain biotechnology providers." This law restricts federal government contracts, grants, and loans from being issued to companies that use biotechnology equipment or services produced or provided by select Chinese biotechnology companies (each, a “biotechnology company of concern”), as part of such companies’ performance of those agreements with the U.S. government. This legislation, including its implementing regulations, or similar legislation in the future, could adversely impact our current or future third-party arrangements with certain companies, including those in China or Chinese-owned U.S. companies, which could delay or impact our clinical trials and consequently delay or obstruct successful commercialization of our product candidates. Foreign CMOs may be a target of U.S. legislation, including the BIOSECURE Act, and trade restrictions and other foreign regulatory requirements could increase the cost or reduce the supply of material available to us, delay the procurement or supply of such material, restrict or even prohibit our ability to work with such CMOs, or have an adverse effect on our ability to secure significant commitments from governments to purchase potential therapies. Once the implementing regulations of Section 851 come into effect, which will be no later than the third quarter of 2028, some of our business partners like WuXi Biologics may be designated as biotechnology companies of concern through the criteria and process established by the implementing regulations. Even if we do not seek any covered federal government contracts, grants, or loans, it is possible that commercial partners, government agencies, or other third parties may view our business less favorably if we contract with entities that ultimately become biotechnology companies of concern.
Previous wording
In addition, other U.S. national security laws and regulations could also affect the transfer of certain types of data abroad, including to China. For example, the Department of Justice issued a final rule which took effect in April 2025 that places limitations, and in some cases prohibitions, on certain transfers of sensitive personal data to business partners located in
Current wording
In addition, other U.S. national security laws and regulations could also affect the transfer of certain types of data abroad, including to China. For example, the Department of Justice issued a final rule which took effect in April 2025 that places limitations, and in some cases prohibitions, on certain transfers of sensitive personal data to business partners located in China and other designated countries, or with other specified links to China and other designated countries. These rules also may broadly require us to extract promises from other third-party service providers that they will not transfer data we share with them onward to parties linked to countries of concern.
Previous wording
As described in Note 12 (Commitments and contingencies) to the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we have been, are, and may in the future become, party to lawsuits and legal proceedings including, without limitation, actions and proceedings in the ordinary course of business relating to our collaboration partners, directors, officers, stockholders, intellectual property rights, employment matters and the safety or efficacy of our products, which will cause us to incur legal fees and other costs related thereto, including potential expenses for the reimbursement of legal fees of officers and directors under indemnification obligations. For example, in June 2022, EOC filed a Request for Arbitration with the International Chamber of Commerce’s International Court of Arbitration against us. In the Request for Arbitration, EOC claimed that we breached certain provisions of the EOC License Agreement, including failing to provide certain manufacturing information to EOC. As a result, we became party to a lengthy arbitration process and, although we were found not liable for any damages to EOC in the arbitration panel’s final award in September 2024, we nevertheless experienced management distraction and incurred significant legal fees to defend ourselves.
Current wording
As described in Note 12 (Commitments and contingencies) to the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we have been and may in the future become, party to lawsuits and legal proceedings including, without limitation, actions and proceedings in the ordinary course of business relating to our collaboration partners, directors, officers, stockholders, intellectual property rights, employment matters and the safety or efficacy of our products, which will cause us to incur legal fees and other costs related thereto, including potential expenses for the reimbursement of legal fees of officers and directors under indemnification obligations. For example, in June 2022, EOC filed a Request for Arbitration with the International Chamber of Commerce’s International Court of Arbitration against us. In the Request for Arbitration, EOC claimed that we breached certain provisions of the EOC License Agreement, including failing to provide certain manufacturing information to EOC. As a result, we became party to a lengthy arbitration process and, although we were found not liable for any damages to EOC in the arbitration panel’s final award in September 2024, we nevertheless experienced management distraction and incurred significant legal fees to defend ourselves.
Previous wording
the failure of the ADC Products or any product candidates that we may develop, if approved, for marketing and commercialization, to achieve commercial success;
Current wording
the failure of the ADC Therapies or any product candidates that we may develop, if approved, for marketing and commercialization, to achieve commercial success;
Previous wording
On February 12, 2024, we filed a universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-277018) (the “Shelf Registration Statement”), which became effective on April 30, 2024. No securities have yet been sold under the Shelf Registration Statement. We have established, and may in the future establish, “at-the-market” programs pursuant to which we may offer and sell shares of our common stock pursuant to the Shelf Registration Statement. Further, pursuant to the (i) Registration Rights Agreement dated March 4, 2025, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 to register the shares of common stock (including those subject to pre-funded warrants) issued and sold in the PIPE Financing that closed on March 4, 2025, which registration statement was declared effective on April 8, 2025, and (ii) Registration Rights Agreement dated May 14, 2026, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 to register the shares of common stock (including those subject to pre-funded warrants) issued and sold in the PIPE Financing that closed on May 14, 2026, which registration statement was declared effective on June 9, 2026.
Current wording
On February 12, 2024, we filed a universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-277018) (the “Shelf Registration Statement”), which became effective on April 30, 2024. No securities have yet been sold under the Shelf Registration Statement. We have established, and may in the future establish, “at-the-market” programs pursuant to which we may offer and sell shares of our common stock pursuant to the Shelf Registration Statement. Further, pursuant to the (i) Registration Rights Agreement dated March 4, 2025, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 to register the shares of common stock (including those subject to pre-funded warrants) issued and sold in the 2024 PIPE Financing that closed on March 4, 2025, which registration statement was declared effective on April 8, 2025, and (ii) Registration Rights Agreement dated May 14, 2026, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 to register the shares of common stock (including those subject to pre-funded warrants) issued and sold in the 2026 PIPE Financing that closed on May 14, 2026, which registration statement was declared effective on June 9, 2026.
Previous wording
Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), as receiver, and on March 27, 2023, First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company assumed all of SVB’s customer deposits and certain other liabilities and acquired substantially all of SVB’s loans and certain other assets from the FDIC. Similarly, on March 12, 2023, Signature Bank and Silvergate Capital Corp. were each swept into receivership. While we only had a minimal amount of our cash directly at SVB and, since that date, the FDIC has stated that all depositors of SVB would be made whole, and First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company has assumed our deposits from SVB, there is no guarantee that the federal government would guarantee all depositors as they did with SVB depositors in the event of further bank closures and continued instability in the global banking system may adversely impact our business and financial condition.
Current wording
In addition, actual events involving limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions, transactional counterparties or other companies in the financial services industry or the financial services industry generally, or concerns or rumors about any events of these kinds or other similar risks, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems. For example, on March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), as receiver, and on March 27, 2023, First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company assumed all of SVB’s customer deposits and certain other liabilities and acquired substantially all of SVB’s loans and certain other assets from the FDIC. Similarly, on March 12, 2023, Signature Bank and Silvergate Capital Corp. were each swept into receivership. While we only had a minimal amount of our cash directly at SVB and, since that date, the FDIC has stated that all depositors of SVB would be made whole, and First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company has assumed our deposits from SVB, there is no guarantee that the federal government would guarantee all depositors as they did with SVB depositors in the event of further bank closures and continued instability in the global banking system may adversely impact our business and financial condition.
Previous wording
Our operations and performance may be affected by political or civil unrest or military action, including the current conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, terrorist activity, unstable governments and legal systems. As a result of global economic conditions, some third-party payers may delay or be unable to satisfy their reimbursement obligations. Job losses or other economic hardships may also affect patients’ ability to afford healthcare as a result of increased co-pay or deductible obligations, greater cost sensitivity to existing co-pay or deductible obligations, lost healthcare insurance coverage or for other reasons. Our ability to conduct clinical trials in regions experiencing political or civil unrest could negatively affect clinical trial enrollment or the timely completion of a clinical trial. We believe the aforementioned economic conditions could lead to reduced demand for our drug products, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, business and results of operations.
Current wording
Our operations and performance may be affected by political or civil unrest or military action, including the current conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, terrorist activity, unstable governments and legal systems. As a result of global economic conditions, some third-party payers may delay or be unable to satisfy their reimbursement obligations. Job losses or other economic hardships may also affect patients’ ability to afford healthcare as a result of increased co-pay or deductible obligations, greater cost sensitivity to existing co-pay or deductible obligations, lost healthcare insurance coverage or for other reasons. Our ability to conduct clinical trials in regions experiencing political or civil unrest could negatively affect clinical trial enrollment or the timely completion of a clinical trial. We believe the aforementioned economic conditions could lead to reduced demand for our drug products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Previous wording
Additionally, there is ongoing uncertainty regarding the federal budget and federal spending levels, including the possible impacts of a failure to increase the “debt ceiling.” Any U.S. government default on its debt could have broad macroeconomic effects that could, among other things, disrupt access to capital markets and deepen recessionary conditions. Further, as of June 30, 2026, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $190.0 million consisting of U.S. government treasury bills, commercial paper, and corporate debt securities. Any default by the U.S. government or credit downgrade of the securities we hold could impact the liquidity or valuation of our investments.
Current wording
Additionally, there is ongoing uncertainty regarding the federal budget and federal spending levels, including the possible impacts of a failure to increase the “debt ceiling.” Any U.S. government default on its debt could have broad macroeconomic effects that could, among other things, disrupt access to capital markets and deepen recessionary conditions. Further, as of September 30, 2026, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $169.7 million consisting of U.S. government treasury bills, commercial paper, and corporate debt securities. Any default by the U.S. government or credit downgrade of the securities we hold could impact the liquidity or valuation of our investments.
Rearranged current paragraphs (3)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions requiring additional clinical trials, or our own products being removed from the market or being less successful commercially.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
In addition, companies that perceive us to be a competitor may be unwilling to assign or license rights to us. We may also be unable to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights on terms that would allow us to make an appropriate return on our investment, or at all. If we are unable to successfully license or acquire additional product candidates to expand our portfolio, our pipeline, competitive position, business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects may be materially harmed.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, this landmark decision may invite various stakeholders to bring lawsuits against the FDA to challenge longstanding decisions and policies, including market exclusivities, which could lead to uncertainties in the industry. Further, changes in the leadership of the FDA and other federal agencies under the current administration may also lead to new policies and changes in the regulations and operations of the FDA, which may impact our clinical development plans.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (4)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
European Union also has enacted numerous laws and regulations addressing cybersecurity. Similar laws have been proposed, and in certain cases enacted, in other foreign jurisdictions. For example, on August 20, 2021, the Personal Information Protection Law (“PIPL”) of the People’s Republic of China was adopted and went into effect on November 1, 2021. The PIPL allows for fines of up to 50 million renminbi or 5% of a covered company’s revenue in the prior year.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
China and other designated countries, or with other specified links to China and other designated countries. These rules also may broadly require us to extract promises from other third-party service providers that they will not transfer data we share with them onward to parties linked to countries of concern.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
trading volume of our common stock; and
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
In addition, actual events involving limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions, transactional counterparties or other companies in the financial services industry or the financial services industry generally, or concerns or rumors about any events of these kinds or other similar risks, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems. For example, on March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, which appointed the Federal Deposit