ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC

Previous wording

We have NUPLAZID and DAYBUE products, including DAYBUE and DAYBUE STIX, that are approved for commercialization in the U.S. The successful commercialization of such products is subject to many risks, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to maintain or increase sales of such products. Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected and the price of our common stock may decline because of many factors, some of which are outside our control, including, but not limited to, the following:

Current wording

NUPLAZID, DAYBUE and DAYBUE STIX are approved for commercialization in the U.S., DAYBUE is approved for commercialization in Canada and Israel, and DAYBU is approved for commercialization in the EU. The successful commercialization of such products is subject to many risks, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to maintain or increase sales of such products. Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected and the price of our common stock may decline because of many factors, some of which are outside our control, including, but not limited to, the following:

Previous wording

the scope and terms of the FDA’s approval of our products, including the inclusion of a boxed warning for NUPLAZID or other warnings and precautions for our products;

Current wording

the scope and terms of the FDA’s or other applicable regulatory authorities’ approval of our products, including differences in the scope of approved indications and patient populations across jurisdictions, such as the more limited indication and patient population for which DAYBU is approved in the EU, the inclusion of a boxed warning for NUPLAZID or other warnings and precautions for our products;

Previous wording

Additionally, our success is dependent on our ability to obtain regulatory approval for, and successfully commercialize, trofinetide in jurisdictions outside the U.S., including DAYBU in the EU. We will face in jurisdictions outside the U.S., such as the EU, if approved for marketing, risks and uncertainties similar to the risks and uncertainties faced in the U.S. with respect to commercialization outside of the U.S., including, but not limited to, government reimbursement of the cost of trofinetide. If the commercialization of our products and future sales is less successful than expected or perceived as disappointing, our stock price could decline significantly and the long-term success of our products and our company could be harmed.

Current wording

Additionally, our success is dependent on our ability to obtain regulatory approval for, and successfully commercialize, trofinetide in jurisdictions outside the U.S. We face in jurisdictions outside the U.S., such as Canada, the EU and Israel, risks and uncertainties similar to the risks and uncertainties faced in the U.S. with respect to commercialization outside of the U.S., including, but not limited to, government reimbursement of the cost of trofinetide. If the commercialization of our products and future sales is less successful than expected or perceived as disappointing, our stock price could decline significantly and the long-term success of our products and our company could be harmed.

Previous wording

If a product or product candidate does not provide a treatment regimen that is at least as beneficial as the current standard of care or otherwise does not provide patient benefit, that product or product candidate will not achieve market acceptance and will not generate sufficient revenues to achieve or maintain profitability. With respect to our approved products specifically, successful commercialization will depend on whether and to what extent physicians, patients, caregivers, long-term care facilities and pharmacies, over whom we have no control, determine to utilize our products. NUPLAZID is available in the U.S. to treat hallucinations and delusions associated with PDP, and DAYBUE products are available in the U.S. to treat Rett syndrome, both indications for which no other FDA-approved pharmaceutical treatments currently exist. DAYBUE is also the first and only product approved in Canada and Israel for the treatment of Rett syndrome.

Current wording

If a product or product candidate does not provide a treatment regimen that is at least as beneficial as the current standard of care or otherwise does not provide patient benefit, that product or product candidate will not achieve market acceptance and will not generate sufficient revenues to achieve or maintain profitability. With respect to our approved products specifically, successful commercialization will depend on whether and to what extent physicians, patients, caregivers, long-term care facilities and pharmacies, over whom we have no control, determine to utilize our products. NUPLAZID is available in the U.S. to treat hallucinations and delusions associated with PDP, and DAYBUE and DAYBUE STIX are available in the U.S. to treat Rett syndrome, both indications for which no other FDA-approved pharmaceutical treatments currently exist. DAYBUE is also the first and only product approved in Canada and Israel for the treatment of Rett syndrome, and DAYBU is the first and only product approved in the EU to treat neurobehavioral symptoms of Rett syndrome in adults and pediatric patients aged five years and older. The more limited scope of the approved indication and patient population in the EU compared to the U.S., Canada and Israel may limit the market opportunity for DAYBU in the EU.

Previous wording

Similarly, even if DAYBUE products are prescribed for the treatment of Rett syndrome, issues may arise with respect to patient acceptance, adherence, persistence and compliance rates for a variety of reasons, including due to the expected clinical benefits or expected and actual side effects a patient might incur. If patients do not adhere to the recommended dosing of DAYBUE products, or do not maintain the recommended dosing of DAYBUE for sufficient periods of time, patients and physicians may believe that DAYBUE products are less effective, and as a result they may discontinue taking it and prescribing it. Additionally, if physicians or patients titrate DAYBUE below the recommended doses, patients may not experience the desired outcomes, and physicians or patients may develop negative beliefs about the effectiveness of DAYBUE products and/or discontinue their use.

Current wording

Similarly, even if DAYBUE products are prescribed for the treatment of Rett syndrome or the neurobehavioral symptoms of Rett syndrome, issues may arise with respect to patient acceptance, adherence, persistence and compliance rates for a variety of reasons, including due to the expected clinical benefits or expected and actual side effects a patient might incur. If patients do not adhere to the recommended dosing of DAYBUE products, or do not maintain the recommended dosing of DAYBUE products for sufficient periods of time, patients and physicians may believe that DAYBUE products are less effective, and as a result they may discontinue taking it and prescribing it. Additionally, if physicians or patients titrate DAYBUE products below the recommended doses, patients may not experience the desired outcomes, and physicians or patients may develop negative beliefs about the effectiveness of DAYBUE products and/or discontinue their use.

Previous wording

Patients who are prescribed medicine for the treatment of their conditions generally rely on third-party payors, including U.S. and foreign governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare, Medicaid and EU member states, managed care organizations and commercial payors, among others, to reimburse all or part of the costs associated with their prescription drugs. Coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party payors are critical to product acceptance. Coverage decisions may depend upon clinical and economic standards that disfavor drug products when lower cost therapeutic alternatives are already available or subsequently become available. Even with coverage for our products, the resulting reimbursement payment rates might not be adequate or may require out-of-pocket obligations, such as deductibles and co-pay or coinsurance payments, that patients find unacceptably high. Patients may not use our products if coverage is not provided or reimbursement is inadequate to cover a significant portion of its cost.

Current wording

Patients who are prescribed medicine for the treatment of their conditions generally rely on third-party payors, including U.S. and foreign governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare, Medicaid and EU Member States, as well as managed care organizations and commercial payors, among others, to reimburse all or part of the costs associated with their prescription drugs. Coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party payors are critical to product acceptance. Coverage decisions may depend upon clinical and economic standards that disfavor drug products when lower cost therapeutic alternatives are already available or subsequently become available. Even with coverage for our products, the resulting reimbursement payment rates might not be adequate or may require out-of-pocket obligations, such as deductibles and co-pay or coinsurance payments, that patients find unacceptably high. Patients may not use our products if coverage is not provided or reimbursement is inadequate to cover a significant portion of its cost.

Previous wording

Legislators, policymakers and healthcare insurance funds in the EU may continue to propose and implement cost-containing measures to keep healthcare costs down. These measures could include limitations on the prices we would be able to charge for product candidates that we may successfully develop and for which we may obtain regulatory approval or the level of reimbursement available for these products from governmental authorities or third-party payors. Consequently, a downward trend in prices of medicinal products in some countries could contribute to similar downward trends elsewhere.

Current wording

Legislators, policymakers and healthcare insurance funds in the EU may continue to propose and implement cost-containing measures to keep healthcare costs down. These measures could include limitations on the prices we would be able to charge for our products or product candidates that we may successfully develop and for which we may obtain regulatory approval or the level of reimbursement available for these products from governmental authorities or third-party payors. Consequently, a downward trend in prices of medicinal products in some countries could contribute to similar downward trends elsewhere.

Previous wording

Third-party payors, whether governmental or commercial, whether in the U.S. or globally, are developing increasingly sophisticated methods of controlling healthcare costs. The current environment is putting pressure on companies to price products below what they may feel is appropriate. For example, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) imposes rebates on many Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D products to penalize price increases that outpace inflation on an annual basis. In addition, HHS has been empowered to negotiate the price of certain single-source drugs that have been on the market for at least 7 years covered under Medicare as part of the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Each year up to 20 products will be selected by HHS for the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Based upon the current law, we believe that 2029 is the earliest year NUPLAZID could be subject to a negotiated price, as we expect to apply and qualify for the small biotech exception, which provides an exemption from selection until 2027 (for initial price negotiation in 2029). In 2029, if selected, we expect that the price negotiation for NUPLAZID would be limited as we qualify as a “specified small manufacturer” and will receive the discount phase-in for NUPLAZID in years 2029 and 2030. Products subject to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program are expected to experience a significant reduction in reimbursement from the Medicare program on a per unit basis. If coverage and adequate reimbursement are not available, or are available only to limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our current and any future product candidates that we develop, which could have an adverse effect on our operating results and our overall financial condition. Selling our products at less than an optimized price would impact our revenues and could impact our overall success as a company. We have changed, and may continue to change, the price of our products from time to time, however, we do not know if the price we have selected, or may select in the future, for our products is or will be the optimized price. Additionally, we do not know whether and to what extent third-party payors will react to any possible future changes in the price of our products. In the U.S., no uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for drug products exists among third-party payors. Outside the U.S., reimbursement and healthcare payment systems vary significantly by country, and many countries have instituted price ceilings on specific products and therapies. Further, one payor’s determination to provide coverage and reimbursement for a product does not ensure that other payors will also provide coverage and reimbursement for the product. Therefore, coverage and reimbursement for our products both in the U.S. and outside may differ significantly from payor to payor. As a result, the coverage determination process is often a time-consuming and costly proces…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Current wording

Third-party payors, whether governmental or commercial, whether in the U.S. or globally, are developing increasingly sophisticated methods of controlling healthcare costs. The current environment is putting pressure on companies to price products below what they may feel is appropriate. For example, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) imposes rebates on many Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D products to penalize price increases that outpace inflation. In addition, HHS has been empowered to negotiate the price of certain single-source drugs that have been on the market for at least 7 years covered under Medicare as part of the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Each year up to 20 products will be selected by HHS for the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Based upon the current law, we believe that 2029 is the earliest year NUPLAZID could be subject to a negotiated price, as we expect to apply and qualify for the small biotech exception, which provides an exemption from selection until 2027 (for initial price negotiation in 2029). In 2029, if selected, we expect that the price negotiation for NUPLAZID would be limited as we qualify as a “specified small manufacturer” and will receive the discount phase-in for NUPLAZID in years 2029 and 2030. Products subject to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program are expected to experience a significant reduction in reimbursement from the Medicare program on a per unit basis. If coverage and adequate reimbursement are not available, or are available only to limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our current and any future product candidates that we develop, which could have an adverse effect on our operating results and our overall financial condition. Selling our products at less than an optimized price would impact our revenues and could impact our overall success as a company. We have changed, and may continue to change, the price of our products from time to time, however, we do not know if the price we have selected, or may select in the future, for our products is or will be the optimized price. Additionally, we do not know whether and to what extent third-party payors will react to any possible future changes in the price of our products. In the U.S., no uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for drug products exists among third-party payors. Outside the U.S., reimbursement and healthcare payment systems vary significantly by country, and many countries have instituted price ceilings on specific products and therapies. Further, one payor’s determination to provide coverage and reimbursement for a product does not ensure that other payors will also provide coverage and reimbursement for the product. Therefore, coverage and reimbursement for our products both in the U.S. and outside may differ significantly from payor to payor. As a result, the coverage determination process is often a time-consuming and costly process that will require u…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

An HTA of medicinal products is becoming an increasingly common part of the pricing and reimbursement procedures in some EU Member States, including those representing the larger markets. The HTA process is the procedure to assess therapeutic, economic and societal impact of a given medicinal product in the national healthcare systems of the individual country. The outcome of an HTA will often influence the pricing and reimbursement status granted to these medicinal products by the competent authorities of individual EU Member States. The extent to which pricing and reimbursement decisions are influenced by the HTA of the specific medicinal product currently varies between EU Member States. On January 12, 2025, Regulation No 2021/2282 on HTA entered into application through a phased implementation. It is intended to boost cooperation among EU Member States in assessing health technologies, including new medicinal products. The HTA Regulation establishes a framework for joint clinical assessments, joint scientific consultations, and the early identification of emerging health technologies. This regulation permits EU Member States to use common HTA tools, methodologies, and procedures across the EU and requires them to rely on EU‑level joint clinical assessment reports for the clinical components of their national HTA evaluations. Individual EU Member States continue to be responsible for assessing non-clinical (e.g., economic, social, ethical) aspects of health technologies, and making decisions on pricing and reimbursement. As implementation of the HTA Regulation is phased in and key methodological and procedural guidance continues to evolve, there remains uncertainty regarding the evidence requirements, timing, and impact of joint clinical assessments on national reimbursement processes. The new framework may result in additional or differently structured evidentiary expectations, misalignment between assessment and regulatory timelines, or delays in national decisions. Any adverse or delayed HTA outcomes, or divergent national reimbursement decisions, could negatively affect our ability to obtain or maintain favorable pricing and reimbursement status for any product candidates, if approved. If we are unable to maintain favorable pricing and reimbursement status in EU Member States for product candidates that we may successfully develop and for which we may obtain regulatory approval, any anticipated revenue from and growth prospects for those products in the EU could be negatively affected.

Current wording

An HTA of medicinal products is becoming an increasingly common part of the pricing and reimbursement procedures in some EU Member States, including those representing the larger markets. The HTA process is the procedure to assess therapeutic, economic and societal impact of a given medicinal product in the national healthcare systems of the individual country. The outcome of an HTA will often influence the pricing and reimbursement status granted to these medicinal products by the competent authorities of individual EU Member States. The extent to which pricing and reimbursement decisions are influenced by the HTA of the specific medicinal product currently varies between EU Member States. On January 12, 2025, Regulation No 2021/2282 on HTA entered into application through a phased implementation. It is intended to boost cooperation among EU Member States in assessing health technologies, including new medicinal products. The HTA Regulation establishes a framework for joint clinical assessments, joint scientific consultations, and the early identification of emerging health technologies. This regulation permits EU Member States to use common HTA tools, methodologies, and procedures across the EU and requires them to rely on EU‑level joint clinical assessment reports for the clinical components of their national HTA evaluations. Individual EU Member States continue to be responsible for assessing non-clinical (e.g., economic, social, ethical) aspects of health technologies, and making decisions on pricing and reimbursement. As implementation of the HTA Regulation is phased in and key methodological and procedural guidance continues to evolve, there remains uncertainty regarding the evidence requirements, timing, and impact of joint clinical assessments on national reimbursement processes. The new framework may result in additional or differently structured evidentiary expectations, misalignment between assessment and regulatory timelines, or delays in national decisions. Any adverse or delayed HTA outcomes, or divergent national reimbursement decisions, could negatively affect our ability to obtain or maintain favorable pricing and reimbursement status for any product candidates, if approved. If we are unable to maintain favorable pricing and reimbursement status in EU Member States for our products or product candidates that we may successfully develop and for which we may obtain regulatory approval, any anticipated revenue from and growth prospects for those products in the EU could be negatively affected.

Previous wording

requirement of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy to mitigate the risk of off-label use in populations where the FDA may believe that the potential risks of use may outweigh its benefits;

Current wording

requirement of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy to mitigate the risk of off-label use in populations where the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may believe that the potential risks of use may outweigh its benefits;

Previous wording

Preclinical testing and clinical trials are long, expensive and unpredictable processes that can be subject to delays. Preliminary, initial, top-line or interim results of clinical trials do not necessarily predict final results and such results may change as more patient data becomes available and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final results. In addition, success in preclinical testing and early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials even after promising results in earlier trials. Of the large number of product candidates in development, only a small percentage result in the submission of an NDA to the FDA or comparable regulatory filing to regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions, and even fewer are approved for marketing. Even if clinical trials are completed, we or our collaborators may not submit applications for required authorizations to manufacture and/or market potential products or any such application may not be reviewed and approved by the appropriate regulatory authorities in a timely manner, if at all.

Current wording

Nonclinical testing and clinical trials are long, expensive and unpredictable processes that can be subject to delays. Preliminary, initial, topline or interim results of clinical trials do not necessarily predict final results and such results may change as more patient data becomes available and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final results. In addition, success in nonclinical testing and early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials even after promising results in earlier trials. Of the large number of product candidates in development, only a small percentage result in the submission of an NDA to the FDA or comparable regulatory filing to regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions, and even fewer are approved for marketing. Even if clinical trials are completed, we or our collaborators may not submit applications for required authorizations to manufacture and/or market potential products or any such application may not be reviewed and approved by the appropriate regulatory authorities in a timely manner, if at all.

Previous wording

Our drug development programs are at various stages of development and the historical rate of failures for product candidates in our industry is extremely high. We have had several clinical studies that did not achieve statistical significance on certain endpoints, including the unsuccessful Phase 3 ADVANCE-2 study of pimavanserin for the treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia in March 2024, the unsuccessful Phase 2 study of pimavanserin for the treatment of irritability associated with autism spectrum disorder in pediatric populations (Pediatric Phase 2 Trial) in October 2024 and the unsuccessful Phase 3 COMPASS PWS study of intranasal carbetocin for the treatment of hyperphagia in Prader-Willi Syndrome in September 2025. At this time, we are not planning to conduct any additional clinical studies for any new indications for pimavanserin or any additional clinical studies with intranasal carbetocin.

Current wording

Our drug development programs are at various stages of development and the historical rate of failures for product candidates in our industry is extremely high. We have had several clinical studies that did not achieve statistical significance on certain endpoints, including the unsuccessful Phase 3 ADVANCE-2 study of pimavanserin for the treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia in March 2024, the unsuccessful Phase 2 study of pimavanserin for the treatment of irritability associated with autism spectrum disorder in pediatric populations (Pediatric Phase 2 Trial) in October 2024, the unsuccessful Phase 3 COMPASS PWS study of intranasal carbetocin for the treatment of hyperphagia in Prader-Willi Syndrome in September 2025 and the Phase 2 portion of the RADIANT trial of remlifanserin for ADP in September 2026, which narrowly missed the primary endpoint. At this time, we are not planning to conduct any additional clinical studies for any new indications for pimavanserin or any additional clinical studies with intranasal carbetocin. We plan to continue enrolling our two ongoing Phase 3 studies evaluating remlifanserin in ADP while implementing amendments to the Phase 3 program, including removing the 30 mg dosage arm.

Previous wording

An unfavorable outcome in any of our ongoing or future development efforts for trofinetide or in the post-marketing studies for DAYBUE could be a major set-back for the programs and for us, generally. In particular, an unfavorable outcome in our trofinetide programs or in the post-marketing studies for DAYBUE, may require us to delay, devote additional substantial resources to, reduce the scope of, or eliminate the affected program and could have a material adverse effect on us and the value of our common stock. Also, although we have submitted a marketing application for the approval of trofinetide in the EU, there is no guarantee we will receive regulatory approval.

Current wording

An unfavorable outcome in any of our ongoing or future development efforts for trofinetide or in the post-marketing studies for DAYBUE could be a major set-back for the programs and for us, generally. In particular, an unfavorable outcome in our trofinetide programs or in the post-marketing studies for DAYBUE, may require us to delay, devote additional substantial resources to, reduce the scope of, or eliminate the affected program and could have a material adverse effect on us and the value of our common stock.

Previous wording

obtaining clearance from the FDA to commence clinical trials pursuant to an Investigational New Drug application;

Current wording

obtaining clearance from the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities to commence clinical trials pursuant to an Investigational New Drug application;

Previous wording

The process of integrating any acquired business, technology, service, or product may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures and may divert significant management attention from our ongoing business operations. As a result, we will incur a variety of costs in connection with an acquisition and may never realize its anticipated benefits. Moreover, any product candidate we identify, select and acquire or license may require additional, time-consuming development or regulatory efforts prior to commercial sale, including preclinical studies, if applicable, and extensive clinical testing and approval by the FDA and applicable foreign regulatory authorities. All product candidates are prone to the risk of failure that is inherent in pharmaceutical product development, including the possibility that the product candidate will not be shown to be sufficiently safe and/or effective for approval by regulatory authorities. In addition, any such products that are approved may not be manufactured or produced economically, successfully commercialized or widely accepted in the marketplace or be more effective or desired than other commercially available alternatives.

Current wording

The process of integrating any acquired business, technology, service, or product may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures and may divert significant management attention from our ongoing business operations. As a result, we will incur a variety of costs in connection with an acquisition and may never realize its anticipated benefits. Moreover, any product candidate we identify, select and acquire or license may require additional, time-consuming development or regulatory efforts prior to commercial sale, including nonclinical studies, if applicable, and extensive clinical testing and approval by the FDA and applicable foreign regulatory authorities. All product candidates are prone to the risk of failure that is inherent in pharmaceutical product development, including the possibility that the product candidate will not be shown to be sufficiently safe and/or effective for approval by regulatory authorities. In addition, any such products that are approved may not be manufactured or produced economically, successfully commercialized or widely accepted in the marketplace or be more effective or desired than other commercially available alternatives.

Previous wording

the amount of U.S. product sales from our products;

Current wording

the amount of product sales from our products;

Previous wording

the costs of manufacturing and distributing our products for commercial use in the U.S.;

Current wording

the costs of manufacturing and distributing our products for commercial use;

Previous wording

the variation in our gross-to-net adjustments from quarter to quarter, primarily because of the fluctuation in our share of the donut hole for Medicare Part D patients;

Current wording

the variation in our gross-to-net adjustments from quarter to quarter, primarily because of the fluctuation in our share of product costs beyond annual patient out-of-pocket thresholds (known as “catastrophic coverage”) for Medicare Part D patients;

Previous wording

the incurrence of preclinical or clinical expenses that could fluctuate significantly from period to period, including reimbursement obligations pursuant to our collaboration agreements;

Current wording

the incurrence of nonclinical or clinical expenses that could fluctuate significantly from period to period, including reimbursement obligations pursuant to our collaboration agreements;

Previous wording

We depend on our employees, consultants, and CROs, as well as regulatory agencies and other parties, for the continued operation of our business. While we maintain disaster recovery plans, those plans may not adequately protect us. Despite any precautions that we or any third parties on whom we depend take for catastrophic events, including earthquakes, fires or other natural disasters, these events could result in significant disruptions to our research and development, clinical trials, manufacturing and the commercialization of our products. Long-term disruptions in the infrastructure caused by these types of events, particularly involving geographies in which we or third parties on whom we depend have offices or manufacturing, distribution or clinical trial sites, could adversely affect our businesses, including as a result of the affected third parties’ decision to deprioritize their service commitments to us. Although we carry business interruption insurance policies and typically have provisions in our contracts that protect us in certain events, our coverage might not include or be adequate to compensate us for all losses that may occur. Any catastrophic event affecting us or the third parties on whom we depend could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospect.

Current wording

We depend on our employees, consultants, and CROs, as well as regulatory agencies and other parties, for the continued operation of our business. While we maintain disaster recovery plans, those plans may not adequately protect us. Despite any precautions that we or any third parties on whom we depend take for catastrophic events, including earthquakes, fires or other natural disasters, these events could result in significant disruptions to our research and development, clinical trials, manufacturing and the commercialization of our products. Long-term disruptions in the infrastructure caused by these types of events, particularly involving geographies in which we or third parties on whom we depend have offices or manufacturing, distribution or clinical trial sites, could adversely affect our businesses, including as a result of the affected third parties’ decision to deprioritize their service commitments to us. Although we carry business interruption insurance policies and typically have provisions in our contracts that protect us in certain events, our coverage might not include or be adequate to compensate us for all losses that may occur. Any catastrophic event affecting us or the third parties on whom we depend could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

Previous wording

Although we design and manage our current preclinical studies and clinical trials, we currently do not have the ability to conduct clinical trials for our product candidates on our own. We rely on CROs, medical institutions, clinical investigators, and contract laboratories to perform data collection and analysis and other aspects of our clinical trials. In addition, we also rely on third parties to assist with our preclinical studies, including studies regarding biological activity, safety, absorption, metabolism, and excretion of product candidates. Some of these third parties may experience shutdowns or other disruptions as a result of adverse geopolitical or macroeconomic developments and therefore may be unable to provide the level of service that we have received in the past.

Current wording

Although we design and manage our current nonclinical studies and clinical trials, we currently do not have the ability to conduct clinical trials for our product candidates on our own. We rely on CROs, medical institutions, clinical investigators, and contract laboratories to perform data collection and analysis and other aspects of our clinical trials. In addition, we also rely on third parties to assist with our nonclinical studies, including studies regarding biological activity, safety, absorption, metabolism, and excretion of product candidates. Some of these third parties may experience shutdowns or other disruptions as a result of adverse geopolitical or macroeconomic developments and therefore may be unable to provide the level of service that we have received in the past.

Previous wording

Our preclinical activities or clinical trials may be delayed, suspended, or terminated if:

Current wording

Our nonclinical activities or clinical trials may be delayed, suspended, or terminated if:

Previous wording

Failure to perform by these third parties may increase our development costs, delay our ability to obtain regulatory approval, and delay or prevent the commercialization of our product candidates, if approved. We currently use several CROs to perform services for our preclinical studies and clinical trials. While we believe that there are numerous alternative sources to provide these services, in the event that we seek such alternative sources, we may not be able to enter into replacement arrangements without delays, additional expenditures, or at all, any of which could negatively affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

Current wording

Failure to perform by these third parties may increase our development costs, delay our ability to obtain regulatory approval, and delay or prevent the commercialization of our product candidates, if approved. We currently use several CROs to perform services for our nonclinical studies and clinical trials. While we believe that there are numerous alternative sources to provide these services, in the event that we seek such alternative sources, we may not be able to enter into replacement arrangements without delays, additional expenditures, or at all, any of which could negatively affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

Previous wording

We currently depend, and in the future will continue to depend, on third parties to manufacture our products and product candidates. If these manufacturers fail to provide us or our collaborators with adequate supplies of clinical trial materials and commercial product or fail to comply with the requirements of regulatory authorities, we may be unable to develop or commercialize our products or product candidates, if approved.

Current wording

We currently depend, and in the future will continue to depend, on third parties to manufacture our products and product candidates. If these manufacturers fail to provide us or our collaborators with adequate supplies of clinical trial materials and commercial product or fail to comply with the requirements of regulatory authorities, we may be unable to develop, commercialize, or continue to supply our products or product candidates, if approved.*

Previous wording

We have no manufacturing facilities and only limited experience as an organization in the manufacturing of drugs or in designing drug-manufacturing processes. We have contracted with third-party manufacturers to produce, in collaboration with us, our products and product candidates.

Current wording

We have no manufacturing facilities. We have contracted with third-party manufacturers to produce, in collaboration with us, our products and product candidates.

Previous wording

We have contracted with Patheon to manufacture NUPLAZID 10 mg tablet and 34 mg capsule drug product and DAYBUE for commercial use, Catalent to manufacture NUPLAZID 34 mg drug product for commercial use in the U.S., Bend to manufacture DAYBUE for commercial use, and Halo to manufacture trofinetide DAYBUE STIX 5g, 6g, and 8g drug product stick packs for commercial use in the U.S. Additionally, we have contracted with Siegfried to manufacture API to be used in the manufacture of NUPLAZID drug product for commercial use, and Corden, FIS and Flamma to manufacture API to be used in the manufacture of DAYBUE drug product for commercial use. However, we have not entered into any agreements with any alternate suppliers for 10 mg NUPLAZID drug product or NUPLAZID API. We may face delays or increased costs in our supply chain that could jeopardize the commercialization of our products. While we currently have sufficient API for both NUPLAZID and DAYBUE products and NUPLAZID and DAYBUE finished products on hand to continue our commercial and clinical operations as planned, depending on the effects of geopolitical and macroeconomic developments and whether such developments cause disruptions, we may face such delays or costs in future years. If any third party in our supply or distribution chain for materials or finished product is adversely impacted by geopolitical and macroeconomic developments, including rapid changes in U.S. trade policy, such as the imposition of tariffs and trade barriers as well as potential retaliatory measures taken by other governments, our supply chain may be disrupted, limiting our ability to manufacture, test and distribute our products for commercial sales and our product candidates for our clinical trials and research and development operations. For example, it takes approximately two years for our third-party manufacturers to produce DAYBUE API, and a supply chain disruption in DAYBUE API would cause delays or increased costs to us that could jeopardize the commercialization of DAYBUE products.

Current wording

We have contracted with Patheon to manufacture NUPLAZID 10 mg tablet and 34 mg capsule drug product and DAYBUE for commercial use, Catalent to manufacture NUPLAZID 34 mg drug product for commercial use in the U.S., Bend to manufacture DAYBUE for commercial use, and Halo to manufacture trofinetide DAYBUE STIX 5g, 6g, and 8g drug product stick packs for commercial use in the U.S. Additionally, we have contracted with Siegfried to manufacture API to be used in the manufacture of NUPLAZID drug product for commercial use, and Corden, FIS and Flamma to manufacture API to be used in the manufacture of DAYBUE drug product for commercial use. However, we have not entered into any agreements with any alternate suppliers for 10 mg NUPLAZID drug product or NUPLAZID API. We may face delays or increased costs in our supply chain that could jeopardize the commercialization of our products. While we currently have sufficient API for both NUPLAZID and DAYBUE products and NUPLAZID and DAYBUE finished products on hand to continue our commercial and clinical operations as planned, depending on the effects of geopolitical and macroeconomic developments and whether such developments cause disruptions, we may face such delays or costs in future years. If any third party in our supply or distribution chain for materials or finished product is adversely impacted by geopolitical and macroeconomic developments, including rapid changes in U.S. trade policy, such as the imposition of tariffs and trade barriers as well as potential retaliatory measures taken by other governments, our supply chain may be disrupted, limiting our ability to manufacture, test and distribute our products for commercial sales and our product candidates for our clinical trials and research and development operations. For example, it takes approximately twelve months for our third-party manufacturers to produce DAYBUE API, and a supply chain disruption in DAYBUE API would cause delays or increased costs to us that could jeopardize the commercial supply of DAYBUE products.

Previous wording

Failures or difficulties faced at any level of our supply chain could materially adversely affect our business and delay or impede the development and commercialization of our products or product candidates, if approved, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Further, changes in federal policy could affect the geopolitical landscape and could give rise to circumstances that negatively affect our business. The third parties that manufacture our products and product candidates have manufacturing activities located in Canada, the European Union and Switzerland. The U.S. has implemented, and has proposed to further implement, tariffs that may affect the availability of imported raw materials used in the production of our products and/or increase the costs of our third-party manufacturers and the expense to us to produce our products and product candidates. Additionally, other governments have enacted, and may continue to enact, retaliatory measures in response to such tariffs. If such actions were to materially affect us or our third-party manufacturers, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our products, which would have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Current wording

Failures or difficulties faced at any level of our supply chain could materially adversely affect our business and delay or impede the development and commercialization of our products or product candidates, if approved, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Further, changes in federal policy could affect the geopolitical landscape and could give rise to circumstances that negatively affect our business. The third parties that manufacture our products and product candidates have manufacturing activities located in the United States, Canada, the EU and Switzerland. The U.S. has implemented, and has proposed to further implement, tariffs that may affect the availability of imported raw materials used in the production of our products and/or increase the costs of our third-party manufacturers and the expense to us to produce our products and product candidates. Additionally, other governments have enacted, and may continue to enact, retaliatory measures in response to such tariffs. If such actions were to materially affect us or our third-party manufacturers, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our products, which would have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Previous wording

In the EU, on January 12, 2025, Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 on HTA entered into application through a phased implementation. It is intended to increase cooperation among EU Member States in assessing clinical aspects of health technologies, including new medicinal products, by establishing a framework for joint clinical assessments, joint scientific consultations, and the early identification of emerging health technologies. The HTA Regulation permits EU Member States to use common tools, methodologies, and procedures and requires them to rely on EU‑level joint clinical assessment reports for the clinical components of their national HTA evaluations. EU Member States, however, remain responsible for assessing non‑clinical aspects, such as economic, ethical, and social considerations, and for making pricing and reimbursement decisions at the national level. As implementation of the HTA Regulation is phased in and key methodological and procedural guidance continues to evolve, there remains uncertainty regarding the evidence requirements, timing, and impact of joint clinical assessments on national reimbursement processes. The new framework may result in additional or differently structured evidentiary expectations, misalignment between assessment and regulatory timelines, or delays in national decisions. Any adverse or delayed HTA outcomes, or divergent national reimbursement decisions, could negatively affect our ability to obtain or maintain favorable pricing and reimbursement status for any product candidates, if approved. If we are unable to maintain favorable pricing and reimbursement status in EU Member States for product candidates that we may successfully develop and for which we may obtain regulatory approval, any anticipated revenue from and growth prospects for those products in the EU could be negatively affected.

Current wording

In the EU, on January 12, 2025, Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 on HTA entered into application through a phased implementation. It is intended to increase cooperation among EU Member States in assessing clinical aspects of health technologies, including new medicinal products, by establishing a framework for joint clinical assessments, joint scientific consultations, and the early identification of emerging health technologies. The HTA Regulation permits EU Member States to use common tools, methodologies, and procedures and requires them to rely on EU‑level joint clinical assessment reports for the clinical components of their national HTA evaluations. EU Member States, however, remain responsible for assessing non‑clinical aspects, such as economic, ethical, and social considerations, and for making pricing and reimbursement decisions at the national level. As implementation of the HTA Regulation is phased in and key methodological and procedural guidance continues to evolve, there remains uncertainty regarding the evidence requirements, timing, and impact of joint clinical assessments on national reimbursement processes. The new framework may result in additional or differently structured evidentiary expectations, misalignment between assessment and regulatory timelines, or delays in national decisions. Any adverse or delayed HTA outcomes, or divergent national reimbursement decisions, could negatively affect our ability to obtain or maintain favorable pricing and reimbursement status for any product candidates, if approved. If we are unable to maintain favorable pricing and reimbursement status in EU Member States for our products or product candidates that we may successfully develop and for which we may obtain regulatory approval, any anticipated revenue from and growth prospects for those products in the EU could be negatively affected.

Previous wording

The pharmaceutical industry is subject to stringent regulation by the FDA and other regulatory agencies in the U.S. and by comparable foreign regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions. Neither we nor our collaborators can market a pharmaceutical product in the U.S. until it has completed rigorous preclinical testing and clinical trials and an extensive regulatory clearance process implemented by the FDA. Satisfaction of regulatory requirements typically takes many years, depends upon the type, complexity and novelty of the product, and requires substantial resources. Even if regulatory approval is obtained, the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities may impose significant restrictions on the indicated uses, conditions for use, labeling, advertising, promotion, and/or marketing of such products, and requirements for post-approval studies, including additional research and development and clinical trials. These limitations may limit the size of the market for the product or result in the incurrence of additional costs. Any delay or failure in obtaining required approvals could have a material adverse effect on our ability to generate revenues from the particular product candidate, if approved.

Current wording

The pharmaceutical industry is subject to stringent regulation by the FDA and other regulatory agencies in the U.S. and by comparable foreign regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions. Neither we nor our collaborators can market a pharmaceutical product in the U.S. until it has completed rigorous nonclinical testing and clinical trials and an extensive regulatory clearance process implemented by the FDA. Satisfaction of regulatory requirements typically takes many years, depends upon the type, complexity and novelty of the product, and requires substantial resources. Even if regulatory approval is obtained, the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities may impose significant restrictions on the indicated uses, conditions for use, labeling, advertising, promotion, and/or marketing of such products, and requirements for post-approval studies, including additional research and development and clinical trials. These limitations may limit the size of the market for the product or result in the incurrence of additional costs. Any delay or failure in obtaining required approvals could have a material adverse effect on our ability to generate revenues from the particular product candidate, if approved.

Previous wording

In addition, on December 11, 2025, the European Commission, the Parliament and the European Council reached a political agreement on a comprehensive overhaul of EU pharmaceutical legislation (the Pharma Package). The reform has been under negotiation since the European Commission submitted its proposal in April 2023. This package, comprised of a new directive and regulation to replace existing legislation, aims to modernize the EU framework. The political agreement is still subject to formal approval by the European Parliament and Council. If approved in the form proposed, the Pharma Package will, among other changes, reduce the baseline market protection period by one year, with limited opportunities for extensions, capped at a maximum of eleven years; reshape the incentives regime for orphan medicinal products, by introducing “breakthrough” orphan medicinal products (those addressing diseases with no available medicinal treatment), which will benefit from 11 years of market exclusivity; and expand the “Bolar” exemption to permit generic and biosimilar manufacturers to conduct preparatory activities for regulatory submissions, including pricing and reimbursement, and participate in procurement tenders while patent protection remains in force. A decrease in market exclusivity opportunities for our product candidates in the EU, combined with the expanded Bolar exemption, could open them to generic or biosimilar competition earlier than under the current regime, potentially impacting reimbursement status and the commercial prospects of our product candidates

Current wording

On December 11, 2025, the Parliament and the Council of the EU reached a political agreement on a comprehensive overhaul of EU pharmaceutical legislation (the Pharma Package). The reform has been under negotiation since the EC submitted its proposal in April 2023. The Pharma Package, comprised of a new directive and regulation to replace existing legislation, aims to modernize the EU framework. The Council formally adopted its first-reading position on the EU Pharmaceutical Package on September 28, 2026. The legislation is still subject to formal approval by the European Parliament, following which it will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and enter into force. The Pharma Package encompasses a broad range of measures, including changes to regulatory data and market protection periods, including an eight-year regulatory data protection period and a one-year market protection period, with opportunities for additional periods of market protection subject to specified conditions and a maximum combined regulatory protection period of eleven years; changes to the orphan medicinal product framework, including a reduction in the standard period of orphan market exclusivity from ten to nine years, an eleven-year period of orphan market exclusivity for certain “breakthrough” orphan medicinal products, and changes to the incentives available for additional orphan indications; and an expansion of the “Bolar” exemption to permit certain activities relating to generic and biosimilar medicines while relevant intellectual property rights remain in force, including submissions for procurement tenders. A decrease in market exclusivity opportunities for our products or product candidates in the EU, combined with the expanded Bolar exemption, could open them to generic or biosimilar competition earlier than under the current regime, potentially impacting reimbursement status and the commercial prospects of our products or product candidates.

Previous wording

For example, the use of NUPLAZID for the treatment of PDP competes with off-label use of various antipsychotic drugs, including the generic drugs quetiapine, clozapine, risperidone, aripiprazole, and olanzapine. In addition, DAYBUE products competes indirectly with off-label usage of branded and generic prescription medications targeted at individual symptoms of Rett syndrome, including antiepileptics, antipsychotics, antidepressants and benzodiazepines. Further, there are several currently disclosed programs in development for Rett syndrome. UCB S.A. has announced plans to initiate a Phase 3 clinical trial of fenfluramine in patients with Rett syndrome during 2026. Taysha Gene Therapies is conducting pivotal clinical trial of a AAV9 intrathecal delivered gene therapy to treat Rett syndrome. Neurogene has initiated a pivotal clinical trial of its investigational adeno-associated virus gene therapy candidate, NGN-401, delivered using intracerebroventricular administration to treat Rett Syndrome. Several academic institutions and pharmaceutical companies are currently conducting clinical trials for the treatment of various symptoms of Rett syndrome, including Unravel Bio and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, which are jointly conducting an early-stage study with vorinostat (RVL-001).

Current wording

For example, the use of NUPLAZID for the treatment of PDP competes with off-label use of various antipsychotic drugs, including the generic drugs quetiapine, clozapine, risperidone, aripiprazole, and olanzapine. In addition, DAYBUE products compete indirectly with off-label usage of branded and generic prescription medications targeted at individual symptoms of Rett syndrome, including antiepileptics, antipsychotics, antidepressants and benzodiazepines. Further, there are several currently disclosed programs in development for Rett syndrome. UCB S.A. has announced plans to initiate a Phase 3 clinical trial of fenfluramine in patients with Rett syndrome during 2026. Taysha Gene Therapies is conducting pivotal clinical trial of a AAV9 intrathecal delivered gene therapy to treat Rett syndrome. Neurogene has initiated a pivotal clinical trial of its investigational adeno-associated virus gene therapy candidate, NGN-401, delivered using intracerebroventricular administration to treat Rett Syndrome. Several academic institutions and pharmaceutical companies are currently conducting clinical trials for the treatment of various symptoms of Rett syndrome, including Unravel Bio and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, which are jointly conducting an early-stage study with vorinostat (RVL-001).

Previous wording

preclinical studies and clinical trials of potential pharmaceutical products;

Current wording

nonclinical studies and clinical trials of potential pharmaceutical products;

Previous wording

The market prices for securities of biotechnology companies in general, and drug discovery and development companies in particular, have been highly volatile and may continue to be highly volatile in the future. From the period between January 2, 2026 to July 28, 2026, the closing price of our common stock has ranged from a low of $20.32 per share to a high of $27.51 per share. Furthermore, especially as we and our market capitalization have grown, the price of our common stock has been increasingly affected by quarterly and annual comparisons with the valuations and recommendations of the analysts who cover our business. The following factors, in addition to other risk factors described in this section, may have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock:

Current wording

The market prices for securities of biotechnology companies in general, and drug discovery and development companies in particular, have been highly volatile and may continue to be highly volatile in the future. From the period between January 2, 2026 to October 28, 2026, the closing price of our common stock has ranged from a low of $18.62 per share to a high of $30.57 per share. Furthermore, especially as we and our market capitalization have grown, the price of our common stock has been increasingly affected by quarterly and annual comparisons with the valuations and recommendations of the analysts who cover our business. The following factors, in addition to other risk factors described in this section, may have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock:

Previous wording

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a particular company’s securities, securities class action litigation has been brought against that company. For example, we, and certain of our current and former officers and directors, are subject to numerous lawsuits related to prior statements about NUPLAZID and our sNDA seeking approval of pimavanserin for the treatment of hallucinations and delusions associated with DRP, as described in “Legal Proceedings”. If we are not successful in defense of these claims, we may have to make significant payments to, or other settlements with, our stockholders and their attorneys. Even if such claims are not successful, the litigation has resulted in additional costs in the past and could result in further substantial costs and diversion of our management’s attention and resources in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition.

Current wording

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a particular company’s securities, securities class action litigation has been brought against that company. For example, we, and certain of our current and former officers and directors, are subject to numerous lawsuits related to prior statements about NUPLAZID and our sNDA seeking approval of pimavanserin for the treatment of hallucinations and delusions associated with dementia-related psychosis, as described in “Legal Proceedings”. If we are not successful in defense of these claims, we may have to make significant payments to, or other settlements with, our stockholders and their attorneys. Even if such claims are not successful, the litigation has resulted in additional costs in the past and could result in further substantial costs and diversion of our management’s attention and resources in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition.