SPRUCE BIOSCIENCES, INC.

Previous wording

As of March 31, 2026, we had cash and cash equivalents of $54.1 million. In October 2020, we consummated our initial public offering and issued 92,000 shares of common stock for net proceeds of $93.4 million. In February 2023, we completed a private placement for net proceeds of $50.9 million. In April 2023, we received a $15.0 million upfront payment under a collaboration and license agreement with Kaken Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. In October 2025, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain institutional investors to sell and issue (i) 502,181 shares of common stock and (ii) pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 233,144 shares of common stock in a private placement transaction, which were exercised in full by December 31, 2025. Our total net proceeds were $46.6 million. On January 7, 2026, we entered into the Avenue Loan Agreement, which makes available to the company term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $50.0 million, subject to the company’s achievement of certain regulatory milestones, which we may not achieve. Additionally, on April 22, 2026, we closed our previously announced underwritten public offering of 1,150,000 shares of our common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 50,000 shares of our common stock, and we granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 180,000 additional shares of common stock, which was exercised in full. The gross proceeds to us from the offering were approximately $69.0 million.

Current wording

As of June 30, 2026, we had cash and cash equivalents of $96.3 million. In October 2020, we consummated our initial public offering and issued 92,000 shares of common stock for net proceeds of $93.4 million. In February 2023, we completed a private placement for net proceeds of $50.9 million. In April 2023, we received a $15.0 million upfront payment under a collaboration and license agreement with Kaken Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. In October 2025, we completed a private placement for total net proceeds of $46.6 million. On January 7, 2026, we entered into the Avenue Loan Agreement, which makes available to the company term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $50.0 million, subject to the company’s achievement of certain regulatory milestones, which we may not achieve. On April 22, 2026, we closed our previously announced underwritten public offering of 1,150,000 shares of our common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 50,000 shares of our common stock, and we granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 180,000 additional shares of common stock, which was exercised in full. The net proceeds to us from the offering were $64.4 million. Additionally, in August 2026 we completed a private placement for gross proceeds of $5.5 million.

Previous wording

We are a late-stage biopharmaceutical company founded in 2014, and our operations to date have focused primarily on raising capital, establishing and protecting our intellectual property portfolio, organizing and staffing our company, business planning, and conducting preclinical and clinical development of, and manufacturing development for, our product candidates. Additionally, as an organization, we have not yet demonstrated an ability to successfully complete clinical development, obtain regulatory approvals, manufacture a commercial-scale product, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful commercialization. As we build our capabilities and expand our organization, we have not yet demonstrated an ability to overcome many of the risks and uncertainties frequently encountered by companies in new and rapidly evolving fields, particularly in the biopharmaceutical area. Consequently, any predictions about our future performance may not be as accurate as they would be if we had a history of successfully developing and commercializing biopharmaceutical products.

Current wording

We are a late-stage biopharmaceutical company incorporated in 2016, and our operations to date have focused primarily on raising capital, establishing and protecting our intellectual property portfolio, organizing and staffing our company, business planning, and conducting preclinical and clinical development of, and manufacturing development for, our product candidates. Additionally, as an organization, we have not yet demonstrated an ability to successfully complete clinical development, obtain regulatory approvals, manufacture a commercial-scale product, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful commercialization. As we build our capabilities and expand our organization, we have not yet demonstrated an ability to overcome many of the risks and uncertainties frequently encountered by companies in new and rapidly evolving fields, particularly in the biopharmaceutical area. Consequently, any predictions about our future performance may not be as accurate as they would be if we had a history of successfully developing and commercializing biopharmaceutical products.

Previous wording

Investment in biopharmaceutical product development is highly speculative because it entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that any potential product candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate effectiveness in the targeted indication or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory approval and become commercially viable. We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any product revenue to date, and we continue to incur significant research and development and other expenses related to our ongoing operations. As a result, we are not profitable and have incurred significant net losses since our inception. If our product candidates are not successfully developed and approved, we may never generate any revenue. For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, we reported net losses of $12.3 million and $14.0 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $301.5 million.

Current wording

Investment in biopharmaceutical product development is highly speculative because it entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that any potential product candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate effectiveness in the targeted indication or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory approval and become commercially viable. We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any product revenue to date, and we continue to incur significant research and development and other expenses related to our ongoing operations. As a result, we are not profitable and have incurred significant net losses since our inception. If our product candidates are not successfully developed and approved, we may never generate any revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, we reported net losses of $28.5 million and $16.1 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $317.7 million.

Previous wording

receipt of marketing approvals from applicable regulatory authorities, including one or more new drug applications (“NDAs”) from the FDA, and maintaining such approvals;

Current wording

receipt of marketing approvals from applicable regulatory authorities and maintaining such approvals;

Previous wording

We also held two Type B meetings with the FDA ahead of our anticipated BLA submission for TA-ERT; the first in December 2025 to discuss our clinical data and regulatory strategy, and the second in January 2026 to discuss CMC requirements. During the December 2025 meeting, the FDA confirmed that the integrated study data from interventional clinical studies of TA-ERT and the available natural history data could potentially serve as an adequate and well-controlled study for purposes of the FDA’s review of the effects of TA-ERT on CSF HS-NRE, which could serve as a RLSE to support an accelerated approval. Following the January 2026 CMC meeting, the FDA considered the company’s plan to address DP PPQ batch requirements for the BLA submission, and in the official meeting minutes, the FDA shared its requirement for one DP PPQ batch at the time of BLA submission and data from a second DP PPQ batch prior to midcycle of BLA review.

Current wording

We also held two Type B meetings with the FDA ahead of our anticipated BLA submission for TA-ERT; the first in December 2025 to discuss our clinical data and regulatory strategy, and the second in January 2026 to discuss CMC requirements. During the December 2025 meeting, the FDA confirmed that the integrated study data from interventional clinical studies of TA-ERT and the available natural history data could potentially serve as an adequate and well-controlled study for purposes of the FDA’s review of the effects of TA-ERT on CSF HS-NRE, which could serve as a surrogate endpoint to support an accelerated approval. Following the January 2026 CMC meeting, the FDA considered the company’s plan to address DP PPQ batch requirements for the BLA submission, and in the official meeting minutes, the FDA shared its requirement for one DP PPQ batch at the time of BLA submission and data from a second DP PPQ batch prior to midcycle of BLA review.

Previous wording

Based, in part, on these discussions, we intend to submit the BLA for TA-ERT for the treatment of MPS IIIB in the fourth quarter of 2026, and if successful and FDA approval is received, potentially commercially launch in mid-2027. However, even if we submit the BLA as planned, we may be unsuccessful in providing sufficient evidence of CSF HS-NRE as a RLSE to predict clinical benefit in support of an accelerated approval, and after reviewing our BLA submission, the FDA may ultimately reject CSF HS-NRE as a RLSE. For example, the FDA has in the past rejected accelerated approval following submission of a BLA under accelerated approval pathway by another company focusing on the treatment of an ultra-rare neurodegenerative disease, in part due to uncertainty regarding the appropriateness of the designated RLSE, and the FDA may reject similar BLA applications in the future. If our BLA submission is viewed as having similarities to another BLA submission that was previously rejected by the FDA, this could impact the likelihood of success of our BLA application or could influence investor perception of our likelihood of success, which could cause the price of our common stock to decline, and could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. If the FDA rejects CSF HS-NRE as a RLSE, we may be required to conduct longer-term follow up, to enroll additional patients in our current study, or to perform a new clinical study, all of which could be challenging with an ultra-rare and fatal genetic disease like MPS IIIB and could make us experience significant delays in, or could prevent us from, obtaining accelerated regulatory approval. Failure to obtain accelerated approval would result in a longer time period to commercialization, if any, and would increase the cost of development and harm our competitive position in the marketplace.

Current wording

Based, in part, on these discussions, we intend to submit the BLA for TA-ERT for the treatment of MPS IIIB in the fourth quarter of 2026, and if successful and FDA approval is received, potentially commercially launch in mid-2027. However, even if we submit the BLA as planned, we may be unsuccessful in providing sufficient evidence of CSF HS-NRE to predict clinical benefit in support of an accelerated approval, and after reviewing our BLA submission, the FDA may ultimately issue a Complete Response Letter. For example, the FDA has in the past rejected accelerated approval following submission of a BLA under accelerated approval pathway by another company focusing on the treatment of an ultra-rare neurodegenerative disease, in part due to uncertainty regarding the appropriateness of the proposed surrogate endpoint, and the FDA may reject similar BLA applications in the future. If our BLA submission is viewed as having similarities to another BLA submission that was previously rejected by the FDA, this could impact the likelihood of success of our BLA application or could influence investor perception of our likelihood of success, which could cause the price of our common stock to decline, and could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. If the FDA rejects CSF HS-NRE as a surrogate endpoint, we may be required to conduct longer-term follow up, to enroll additional patients in our current study, or to perform a new clinical study, all of which could be challenging with an ultra-rare and fatal genetic disease like MPS IIIB and could make us experience significant delays in, or could prevent us from, obtaining accelerated regulatory approval. Failure to obtain accelerated approval would result in a longer time period to commercialization, if any, and would increase the cost of development and harm our competitive position in the marketplace.

Previous wording

The clinical development, manufacturing, labeling, storage, record-keeping, advertising, promotion, import, export, marketing, and distribution of our product candidates subject to extensive regulation by the FDA in the United States and by comparable foreign regulatory authorities in foreign markets. In the United States, we are not permitted to market TA-ERT or any other current or future product candidates until we receive regulatory approval from the FDA. The process of obtaining regulatory approval is expensive, often takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials and can vary substantially based upon the type, complexity, and novelty of the product candidates involved, as well as the target indications and patient population. Approval policies or regulations may change, and the FDA has substantial discretion in the drug approval process, including the ability to delay, limit, or deny approval of a product candidate for many reasons. Despite the time and expense invested in clinical development of product candidates, regulatory approval is never guaranteed. Neither we nor any future collaborator is permitted to market TA-ERT or any other current or future product candidates in the United States until we receive approval of an NDA or BLA from the FDA. Similar requirements and risks are applicable in foreign markets. We have not previously submitted an NDA or BLA to the FDA, or similar drug approval filings to comparable foreign authorities.

Current wording

The clinical development, manufacturing, labeling, storage, record-keeping, advertising, promotion, import, export, marketing, and distribution of our product candidates subject to extensive regulation by the FDA in the United States and by comparable foreign regulatory authorities in foreign markets. In the United States, we are not permitted to market TA-ERT or any other current or future product candidates until we receive regulatory approval from the FDA. The process of obtaining regulatory approval is expensive, often takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials and can vary substantially based upon the type, complexity, and novelty of the product candidates involved, as well as the target indications and patient population. Approval policies or regulations may change, and the FDA has substantial discretion in the drug approval process, including the ability to delay, limit, or deny approval of a product candidate for many reasons. Despite the time and expense invested in clinical development of product candidates, regulatory approval is never guaranteed. Neither we nor any future collaborator is permitted to market TA-ERT or any other current or future product candidates in the United States until we receive approval of a new drug application (“NDA”) or BLA from the FDA. Similar requirements and risks are applicable in foreign markets. We have not previously submitted an NDA or BLA to the FDA, or similar drug approval filings to comparable foreign authorities.

Previous wording

the data collected from clinical trials may not be sufficient to satisfy the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities to support the submission of an NDA, BLA or other comparable submissions in foreign jurisdictions or to obtain regulatory approval in the United States or elsewhere, requiring, in the case of adult patients with classic CAH, additional clinical trials beyond our ongoing Phase 2b clinical trial prior to any such approval;

Current wording

the data collected from clinical trials may not be sufficient to satisfy the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities to support the submission of an NDA, BLA or other comparable submissions in foreign jurisdictions or to obtain regulatory approval in the United States or elsewhere;

Previous wording

We operate in a global economy, which includes utilizing third-party suppliers in several countries outside the United States. There is inherent risk, based on the complex relationships among the United States and the other countries in which we conduct our business, that political, diplomatic, and national security factors can lead to global trade restrictions and changes in trade policies and export regulations that may adversely affect our business and operations. The current international trade and regulatory environment is subject to significant ongoing uncertainty. The U.S. government has announced imposition of substantial tariffs affecting a wide range of products and jurisdictions and has indicated an intention to continue developing new trade policies, including with respect to the pharmaceutical industry. In response, certain foreign governments have announced or implemented retaliatory tariffs and other protectionist measures. These developments, including legal challenges to such tariffs, have created a dynamic and unpredictable trade landscape, which may adversely impact our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, has initiated an investigation to determine whether pharmaceutical ingredients, including finished drug product, manufactured outside the United States, pose a national security risk and should be subject to additional tariffs.

Current wording

We operate in a global economy, which includes utilizing third-party suppliers in several countries outside the United States. There is inherent risk, based on the complex relationships among the United States and the other countries in which we conduct our business, that political, diplomatic, and national security factors can lead to global trade restrictions and changes in trade policies and export regulations that may adversely affect our business and operations. The current international trade and regulatory environment is subject to significant ongoing uncertainty. The U.S. government has announced imposition of substantial tariffs affecting a wide range of products and jurisdictions and has indicated an intention to continue developing new trade policies, including with respect to the pharmaceutical industry. In response, certain foreign governments have announced or implemented retaliatory tariffs and other protectionist measures. These developments, including legal challenges to such tariffs, have created a dynamic and unpredictable trade landscape, which may adversely impact our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, has initiated an investigation to determine whether pharmaceutical ingredients, including finished drug product, manufactured outside the United States, pose a national security risk and should be subject to additional tariffs. Based on this investigation, on April 2, 2026, the President issued a proclamation imposing up to a 100% tariff on certain patented pharmaceuticals and associated pharmaceutical ingredients. These tariffs will become effective September 29, 2026, unless they are “expressly reduced, modified, or terminated.”

Previous wording

The current administration is pursuing policies to reduce regulations and expenditures across government including at HHS, the FDA, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) and related agencies. These actions, presently directed by executive orders or memoranda from the Office of Management and Budget, may propose policy changes that create additional uncertainty for our business. For example, the current administration has announced agreements with several pharmaceutical companies that require the drug manufacturers to offer, through a direct to consumer platform (“TrumpRx”), U.S. patients and Medicaid programs prescription drug Most-Favored Nation pricing equal to or lower than those paid in other developed nations, with additional mandates for direct-to-patient discounts and repatriation of foreign revenues. Other recent actions, for example, include (1) directives to reduce agency workforce and cut programs; (2) directing HHS and other agencies to lower prescription drug costs through a variety of initiatives, including by improving upon the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program and establishing Most-Favored-Nation pricing for pharmaceutical products; (3) imposing tariffs on certain imported pharmaceutical products; and (4) as part of the Make America Healthy Again (“MAHA”) Commission’s recent Strategy Report, working across government agencies to increase enforcement on direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising. Additionally, the current administration recently called on Congress to enact “The Great Healthcare Plan,” to codify and expand Most-Favored Nation pricing, lower government subsidies to private insurance companies, increase healthcare price transparency, expand pharmaceutical drugs available for over-the-counter purchase, and enact restrictions on pharmacy benefit manager, or PBM, payment methodologies, among other things. These actions and policies may significantly reduce U.S. drug prices, potentially impacting manufacturers’ global pricing strategies and profitability, while increasing their operational costs and compliance risks. In June 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo decision greatly reduced judicial deference to regulatory agencies, which could increase successful legal challenges to federal regulations affecting our operations. Congress may introduce and ultimately pass health care related legislation that could impact the drug approval process and make changes to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program created under the IRA. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability or commercialize our product candidates, if approved.

Current wording

The current administration is pursuing policies to reduce regulations and expenditures across government including at HHS, the FDA, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) and related agencies. These actions, presently directed by executive orders or memoranda from the Office of Management and Budget, may propose policy changes that create additional uncertainty for our business. For example, the current administration has announced agreements with certain pharmaceutical companies that require the drug manufacturers to offer, through a direct to consumer platform (“TrumpRx”), U.S. patients and Medicaid programs prescription drug Most-Favored Nation pricing equal to or lower than those paid in other developed nations, with additional mandates for direct-to-patient discounts and repatriation of foreign revenues. Other recent actions, for example, include (1) directives to reduce agency workforce and cut programs; (2) directing HHS and other agencies to lower prescription drug costs through a variety of initiatives, including by improving upon the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program and establishing Most-Favored-Nation pricing for pharmaceutical products; (3) imposing tariffs on certain imported pharmaceutical products; and (4) as part of the Make America Healthy Again (“MAHA”) Commission’s recent Strategy Report, working across government agencies to increase enforcement on direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising. Additionally, the current administration recently called on Congress to enact “The Great Healthcare Plan,” to codify and expand Most-Favored Nation pricing, lower government subsidies to private insurance companies, increase healthcare price transparency, expand pharmaceutical drugs available for over-the-counter purchase, and enact restrictions on pharmacy benefit manager, or PBM, payment methodologies, among other things. These actions and policies may significantly reduce U.S. drug prices, potentially impacting manufacturers’ global pricing strategies and profitability, while increasing their operational costs and compliance risks. In June 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo decision greatly reduced judicial deference to regulatory agencies, which could increase successful legal challenges to federal regulations affecting our operations. Congress may introduce and ultimately pass health care related legislation that could impact the drug approval process and make changes to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program created under the IRA. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability or commercialize our product candidates, if approved.

Previous wording

In addition, certain foreign activities related to drugs, biologics, and research, especially with regard to China, have come under increased scrutiny in the United States. Chinese contract manufacturing organizations may become subject to legislation, trade restrictions, sanctions, tariffs and other regulatory requirements by the U.S. government, which could restrict or even prohibit our ability to work with such entities. For example, on December 10, 2025, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 (“NDAA”) passed overwhelmingly in the U.S. House of Representatives (the “House”) and includes the BIOSECURE Act which, in its current form, would prohibit the U.S. government from procuring biotechnology equipment or services from “biotechnology companies of concern,” and would prohibit U.S. government contracts, loans and grants to any entity that uses biotechnology equipment or services from a designated “biotechnology company of concern.” “Biotechnology companies of concern” include companies identified on the U.S. Department of Defense’s “Chinese military companies operating in the United States” list (the 1260H List) and also authorizes the U.S. government to identify additional entities for inclusion as “biotechnology companies of concern. The U.S. Senate has since passed the NDAA and on December 18, 2025, President Trump signed the NDAA into law. Under the BIOSECURE Act, we may be restricted in our ability to work with certain Chinese biotechnology manufacturing companies to the extent we would contract with, or otherwise receive funding from, the U.S. government. In addition, if we, our suppliers, or our customers were to be designated under the BIOSECURE Act, this could potentially cause harm to our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Current wording

In addition, certain foreign activities related to drugs, biologics, and research, especially with regard to China, have come under increased scrutiny in the United States. Chinese contract manufacturing organizations may become subject to legislation, trade restrictions, sanctions, tariffs and other regulatory requirements by the U.S. government, which could restrict or even prohibit our ability to work with such entities. For example, on December 18, 2025, President Trump signed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 (“NDAA”) into law. On June 8, 2024, the Department of Defense released the annual 1260H List which included a number of contract manufactures, making them biotechnology companies of concern. The BIOSECURE Act prohibits U.S. federal agencies from entering into or renewing any contract, loan, or grant with any entity that uses biotechnology equipment or services produced or provided by a “biotechnology company of concern” to perform that contract. The BIOSECURE Act also prohibits U.S. government loan and grant recipients from using federal loan or grant money to enter into contracts with entities that use equipment from “biotechnology companies of concern” in the performance of any federal prime contract or subcontract. The Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) of the U.S. Government will issue a list of “biotechnology companies of concern,” which will include certain companies that are identified on the U.S. Department of Defense’s annual List of Chinese Military Companies, also known as the 1260H List, other entities which the U.S. Government has deemed as such pursuant to a separate designation process, and certain subsidiary, parent, and successor entities of the foregoing. The BIOSECURE Act includes a safe harbor provision providing that the restrictions do not apply to equipment or services that were formerly but are no longer provided by a “biotechnology company of concern.” The BIOSECURE Act also includes a grandfathering provision providing that the prohibitions shall not apply for a five-year period to biotechnology equipment or services produced or provided under a contract or agreement entered into before the applicable effective date. Under the NDAA BIOSECURE Act related language we may be restricted in our ability to work with certain Chinese biotechnology manufacturing companies to the extent we would contract with, or otherwise receive funding from, the U.S. government. In addition, if we, our suppliers, or our customers were to be designated under the NDAA BIOSECURE Act related language, this could potentially cause harm to our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Previous wording

Health Technology Assessment (“HTA”) of medicinal products is becoming an increasingly common part of the pricing and reimbursement procedures in some EU Member States, including those representing the larger markets. The HTA process is the procedure to assess therapeutic, economic and societal impact of a given medicinal product in the national healthcare systems of the individual country. The outcome of an HTA will often influence the pricing and reimbursement status granted to these medicinal products by the competent authorities of individual EU Member States. The extent to which pricing and reimbursement decisions are influenced by the HTA of the specific medicinal product currently varies between EU Member States. In December 2021, Regulation No 2021/2282 on HTA, amending Directive 2011/24/EU, was adopted in the EU. This Regulation, which entered into force in January 2022, began to apply on January 12, 2025 through a phased implementation. The Regulation initially applies to new active substances for oncology and advanced therapy medicinal products. It will be expanded to orphan medicinal products in January 2028, and to all centrally authorized medicinal products as of 2030. Select high-risk medical devices will also come into scope in 2026. It is intended to boost cooperation among EU Member States in assessing health technologies, including new medicinal products, and providing the basis for cooperation at EU level for joint clinical assessments in these areas. The Regulation permits EU Member States to use common HTA tools, methodologies, and procedures across the EU to identify promising technologies early, and continuing voluntary cooperation in other areas. Individual EU Member States will continue to be responsible for assessing non-clinical (e.g., economic, social, ethical) aspects of health technologies, and making decisions on pricing and reimbursement. If we are unable to maintain favorable pricing and reimbursement status in EU Member States for product candidates that we may successfully develop and for which we may obtain regulatory approval, any anticipated revenue from and growth prospects for those products in the EU could be negatively affected.

Current wording

Moreover, in order to obtain reimbursement for our products in some European countries, including some EU Member States, we may be required to compile additional data comparing the cost-effectiveness of our products to other available therapies. The Health Technology Assessment (“HTA”) of medicinal products is becoming an increasingly common part of the pricing and reimbursement procedures in some EU Member States, including those representing the larger markets. The HTA process is the procedure to assess therapeutic, economic and societal impact of a given medicinal product in the national healthcare systems of the individual country. The outcome of an HTA will often influence the pricing and reimbursement status granted to these medicinal products by the competent authorities of individual EU Member States. The extent to which pricing and reimbursement decisions are influenced by the HTA of the specific medicinal product currently varies between EU Member States. In December 2021, Regulation No 2021/2282 on HTA, amending Directive 2011/24/EU, was adopted in the EU. This Regulation, which entered into force in January 2022, began to apply on January 12, 2025 through a phased implementation. The Regulation initially applies to new active substances for oncology and advanced therapy medicinal products. It will be expanded to orphan medicinal products in January 2028, and to all centrally authorized medicinal products as of 2030. Select high-risk medical devices will also come into scope in 2026. It is intended to boost cooperation among EU Member States in assessing health technologies, including new medicinal products, and providing the basis for cooperation at EU level for joint clinical assessments in these areas. The Regulation permits EU Member States to use common HTA tools, methodologies, and procedures across the EU to identify promising technologies early, and continuing voluntary cooperation in other areas. Individual EU Member States will continue to be responsible for assessing non-clinical (e.g., economic, social, ethical) aspects of health technologies, and making decisions on pricing and reimbursement. If we are unable to maintain favorable pricing and reimbursement status in EU Member States for product candidates that we may successfully develop and for which we may obtain regulatory approval, any anticipated revenue from and growth prospects for those products in the EU could be negatively affected.

Previous wording

As of March 31, 2026, we had 14 employees, all of whom are full-time. As our development and commercialization plans and strategies develop, and as we transition into operating as a public company, we expect to need additional development, managerial, operational, financial, sales, marketing, and other personnel. Future growth would impose significant added responsibilities on members of management, including:

Current wording

As of June 30, 2026, we had 22 employees, all of whom are full-time. As our development and commercialization plans and strategies develop, and as we transition into operating as a public company, we expect to need additional development, managerial, operational, financial, sales, marketing, and other personnel. Future growth would impose significant added responsibilities on members of management, including:

Previous wording

Remote work increases risks to our information technology systems and data, as personnel utilize network connections, computers, and devices outside the control of us or the third parties with whom we work, including working at home, while in transit and in public locations. Additionally, future or past business transactions (such as acquisitions or integrations) could expose us to additional cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities, as our systems could be negatively affected by vulnerabilities present in acquired or integrated entities’ systems and technologies. Furthermore, we may discover security issues that were not found during due diligence of such acquired or integrated entities, and it may be difficult to integrate companies into our information technology environment and security program.

Current wording

Remote work increases risks to our information technology systems and data, as personnel utilize network connections, computers, and devices outside the control of us or the third parties with whom we work, including working at home, while in transit

Previous wording

We have incurred substantial losses during our history and do not expect to become profitable in the near future, and we may never achieve profitability. As of December 31, 2025, after reducing net operating losses (“NOLs”) and tax credits for amounts not expected to be utilized, we had federal NOL carryforwards of approximately $163.1 million and state NOL carryforwards of approximately $150.0 million. The federal NOL carryforwards arising in taxable years beginning prior to 2018 will begin to expire in 2036 and state NOL carryforwards will begin to expire in 2036, unless previously utilized. We also have federal and state tax credit carryforwards totaling $34.2 million and $2.8 million, respectively. The federal tax credit carryforwards will begin to expire in 2036, unless previously utilized. The state tax credits will not expire.

Current wording

We have incurred substantial losses during our history and do not expect to become profitable in the near future, and we may never achieve profitability. As of December 31, 2025, after reducing net operating losses (“NOLs”) and tax credits for amounts not expected to be utilized, we had federal NOL carryforwards of approximately $163.1 million and state NOL carryforwards of approximately $150.0 million. The federal NOL carryforwards arising in taxable years beginning prior to 2018 will begin to expire in

Previous wording

the size and growth, if any, of the markets for MPS IIIB, major depressive disorder, and other disorders that we may target;

Current wording

the size and growth, if any, of the markets for MPS IIIB and other disorders that we may target;

Previous wording

(“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), and reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation. We will be able to take advantage of these scaled disclosures for so long as our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250.0 million measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter, or our annual revenue is less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700.0 million measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter. Investors may find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

Current wording

We are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in the Exchange Act which allows us to take advantage of exemptions, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), and reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation. We will be able to take advantage of these scaled disclosures for so long as our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250.0 million measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter, or our annual revenue is less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700.0 million measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter. Investors may find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

Previous wording

We expect the rules and regulations applicable to public companies to continue to substantially increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. If these requirements divert the attention of our management and personnel from other business concerns, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The increased costs will decrease our net income or increase our net loss, and may require us to reduce costs in other areas of our business. For example, we expect these rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance and we may be required to incur substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. We cannot predict or estimate the amount or timing of additional costs we may incur to respond to these requirements. The impact of these requirements could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as executive officers.

Current wording

We expect the rules and regulations applicable to public companies to continue to substantially increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. If these requirements divert the attention of our management and personnel from other business concerns, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The increased costs will decrease our net income or increase our net loss, and may require us to reduce costs in other areas of our business. For example, we expect these rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance and we may be required to incur substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. We cannot predict or estimate the amount or timing of additional costs we may incur to respond to these

Previous wording

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could occur at any time. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of our common stock. As of March 31, 2026, there were 1,372,278 shares of our common stock outstanding.

Current wording

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could occur at any time. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of our common stock. As of June 30, 2026, there were 2,752,810 shares of our common stock outstanding.

Previous wording

In February 2023, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with several institutional and accredited investors, including holders of more than 5% of our total common stock outstanding on the date of the securities purchase agreement, pursuant to which we issued and sold 214,873 shares of common stock, pre-funded warrants to purchase 10,666 shares of common stock, and warrants to purchase 169,147 shares of common stock. All of the pre-funded warrants have been exercised. Additionally, in October 2025, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain institutional investors, pursuant to which we agreed to sell and issue 502,181 shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 233,144 shares of common stock in a private placement transaction. Pursuant to the securities purchase agreements, we have registered for resale such securities. In December 2025, three holders of pre-funded warrants to purchase shares of common stock exercised those warrants to purchase 233,144 shares of common stock. On January 7, 2026, we also entered into the Avenue Loan Agreement, pursuant to which we issued a warrant to purchase $3.2 million in shares of common stock at a price of $50.00 per share. Lender may also elect to convert up to $4.0 million of the principal amount outstanding under the Avenue Loan Agreement into shares of our common stock at a price of $60.00 per share. If these additional shares of common stock, and the shares of common stock issued or issuable pursuant to such pre-funded warrants and warrants, are resold, or if it is perceived that they will be resold, in the public market, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

Current wording

In February 2023, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with several institutional and accredited investors, including holders of more than 5% of our total common stock outstanding on the date of the securities purchase agreement, pursuant to which we issued and sold 214,873 shares of common stock, pre-funded warrants to purchase 10,666 shares of common stock, and warrants to purchase 169,147 shares of common stock. All of the pre-funded warrants have been exercised. Additionally, in October 2025, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain institutional investors, pursuant to which we agreed to sell and issue 502,181 shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 233,144 shares of common stock in a private placement transaction. Pursuant to the securities purchase agreements, we have registered for resale such securities. In December 2025, three holders of pre-funded warrants to purchase shares of common stock exercised those warrants to purchase 233,144 shares of common stock. On January 7, 2026, we also entered into the Avenue Loan Agreement, pursuant to which we issued a warrant to purchase $3.2 million in shares of common stock at a price of $50.00 per share. Lender may also elect to convert up to $4.0 million of the principal amount outstanding under the Avenue Loan Agreement into shares of our common stock at a price of $60.00 per share. In August 2026, we entered into a stock purchase agreement pursuant to which we agreed to sell and issue 121,203 shares of common stock in a private placement transaction. If these additional shares of common stock, and the shares of common stock issued or issuable pursuant to such pre-funded warrants and warrants, are resold, or if it is perceived that they will be resold, in the public market, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

Previous wording

We expect that we will need significant additional capital in the future to continue our planned operations, including conducting clinical trials, commercialization efforts, expanded research and development activities, and costs associated with operating a public company. To raise capital, we may sell common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner we determine from time to time, including through the registration statement on Form S-3, declared effective in November 2025, covering the sale of up to $300.0 million of our securities (the “Shelf Registration”). For example, in March 2026, we entered into an Open Market Sales Agreement SM (the “Sales Agreement”) with Jefferies LLC (“Jefferies”), pursuant to which we may elect to issue and sell, from time to time, shares of common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $75.0 million under the Shelf Registration through Jefferies acting as the sales agent and/or principal. As of March 31, 2026, we have not issued any shares of common stock pursuant to the Sales Agreement. Additionally, on April 22, 2026, we closed our previously announced underwritten public offering of 1,150,000 shares of our common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 50,000 shares of our common stock. In addition, we granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 180,000 additional shares of common stock, which was exercised in full. The gross proceeds to us from the offering, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, were approximately $69.0 million. As described in the section titled “Risk Factors—Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could cause our stock price to fall” above, we have in the past entered into transactions where we issued and sold common stock, pre-funded warrants and common warrants to purchase shares of our common stock, and we may enter into other or similar transactions in the future. If we sell additional shares of common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities, investors may be materially diluted by subsequent sales. Such sales may also result in material dilution to our existing stockholders, and new investors could gain rights, preferences and privileges senior to the holders of our common stock.

Current wording

We expect that we will need significant additional capital in the future to continue our planned operations, including conducting clinical trials, commercialization efforts, expanded research and development activities, and costs associated with operating a public company. To raise capital, we may sell common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner we determine from time to time, including through the registration statement on Form S-3, declared effective in November 2025, covering the sale of up to $300.0 million of our securities (the “Shelf Registration”). For example, in March 2026, we entered into an Open Market Sales Agreement SM (the “Sales Agreement”) with Jefferies LLC (“Jefferies”), pursuant to which we may elect to issue and sell, from time to time, shares of common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $75.0 million under the Shelf Registration through Jefferies acting as the sales agent and/or principal. As of June 30, 2026, we have not issued any shares of common stock pursuant to the Sales Agreement. Additionally, on April 22, 2026, we closed our previously announced underwritten public offering of 1,150,000 shares of our common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 50,000 shares of our common stock. In addition, we granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 180,000 additional shares of common stock, which was exercised in full. The net proceeds to us from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us, were $64.4 million. As described in the section titled “Risk Factors—Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could cause our stock price to fall” above, we have in the past entered into transactions where we issued and sold common stock, pre-funded warrants and common warrants to purchase shares of our common stock, and we may enter into other or similar transactions in the future. If we sell additional shares of common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities, investors may be materially diluted by subsequent sales. Such sales may also result in material dilution to our existing stockholders, and new investors could gain rights, preferences and privileges senior to the holders of our common stock.

Previous wording

The requirements for patentability may differ in certain countries. For example, unlike other countries, China has a heightened requirement for patentability, and specifically requires a detailed description of medical uses of a claimed drug. In India, unlike the United States, there is no link between regulatory approval for a drug and its patent status. In addition to India, certain countries in Europe and developing countries, including China, have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties. In addition, some countries limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies or government contractors.

Current wording

The requirements for patentability may differ in certain countries. For example, unlike other countries, China has a heightened requirement for patentability, and specifically requires a detailed description of medical uses of a claimed drug. In India, unlike the United States, there is no link between regulatory approval for a drug and its patent status. In addition to India, certain countries in

Previous wording

In those countries, we may have limited remedies if patents are infringed or if we are compelled to grant a license to a third party, which could materially diminish the value of those patents. This could limit our potential revenue opportunities. Accordingly,

Current wording

In those countries, we may have limited remedies if patents are infringed or if we are compelled to grant a license to a third party, which could materially diminish the value of those patents. This could limit our potential revenue opportunities. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we own or license.

Previous wording

Presently we have intellectual property rights, through licenses from third parties including Lilly, related to our product candidates. Because our program may require the use of additional proprietary rights held by third parties, the growth of our business will likely depend in part on our ability to acquire, in-license or use these proprietary rights. In addition, our product candidates may require specific formulations to work effectively and efficiently and these rights may be held by others. We may be unable to acquire or in-license, on reasonable terms, proprietary rights related to any compositions, formulations, methods of use, processes or other intellectual property rights from third parties that we identify as being necessary for our product candidates. Even if we are able to obtain a license to such proprietary rights, it may be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us. In that event, we may be required to expend significant time and resources to develop or license replacement technology.

Current wording

Presently we have intellectual property rights, through licenses from third parties, related to our product candidates. Because our program may require the use of additional proprietary rights held by third parties, the growth of our business will likely depend in part on our ability to acquire, in-license or use these proprietary rights. In addition, our product candidates may require specific formulations to work effectively and efficiently and these rights may be held by others. We may be unable to acquire or in-license, on reasonable terms, proprietary rights related to any compositions, formulations, methods of use, processes or other intellectual property rights from third parties that we identify as being necessary for our product candidates. Even if we are able to obtain a license to such proprietary rights, it may be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us. In that event, we may be required to expend significant time and resources to develop or license replacement technology.

Previous wording

Third parties may also raise similar claims before the USPTO, even outside the context of litigation or infringement. Such mechanisms could include re-examination, post-grant review, inter partes review, derivation proceedings, and equivalent proceedings in foreign jurisdictions (e.g., opposition proceedings). For example, we were a party to an opposition proceeding with the European Patent Office with respect to EP Patent No. 3,784,233, a Revocation Proceeding with respect to EP Patent No. 3,784,233 (the “’233 Patent”), and a Unified Patent Court (UPC) Revocation Proceeding with respect to EP Patent No. 3,784,233. Oral proceedings took place on November 25, 2025, and on December 16, 2025, the Opposition Division issued a Decision of the Opposition Division stating the ’233 Patent is revoked. The Decision of the Opposition Division may be appealed by filing a notice of appeal and grounds of appeal with the EPO’s Boards of Appeal, due within a non-extendable period of two months and four months respectively from the date of the written decision. We may be subject to new or additional third-party pre-issuance submission of prior art to the USPTO or become involved in other post-grant review procedures, derivations, reexaminations, orinter partes review proceedings, in the United States or oppositions or similar proceedings in foreign jurisdictions, challenging our patent rights. The legal threshold for initiating such proceedings may be low, so that even proceedings with a low probability of success might be initiated. An adverse determination in any such challenges may result in loss of exclusivity or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated, or held unenforceable, in whole or in part, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and products, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and products.

Current wording

Third parties may also raise similar claims before the USPTO, even outside the context of litigation or infringement. Such mechanisms could include re-examination, post-grant review, inter partes review, derivation proceedings, and equivalent proceedings in foreign jurisdictions (e.g., opposition proceedings). For example, we are a party to three post-grant review (PGR) proceedings with the United States Patent Office with respect to U.S. Patent Nos. 12,576,084, 12,569,490, and 12,569,491. As another example, we were a party to potential revocation proceedings with respect to Australian Patent Nos. 2019260793 and 2021324839. These Australian patents have been revoked. We may be subject to new or additional third-party pre-issuance submission of prior art to the USPTO or become involved in other post-grant review procedures, derivations, reexaminations, orinter partes review proceedings, in the United States or oppositions or similar proceedings in foreign jurisdictions, challenging our patent rights. The legal threshold for initiating such proceedings may be low, so that even proceedings with a low probability of success might be initiated. An adverse determination in any such challenges may result in loss of exclusivity or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated, or held unenforceable, in whole or in part, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and products, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and products.

Previous wording

In addition to seeking patents for some of our technology and products, we also rely on trade secrets, including unpatented know-how, technology and other proprietary information, to maintain our competitive position, especially where we do not believe patent protection is appropriate or obtainable. However, trade secrets are difficult to protect. We rely in part on confidentiality

Current wording

In addition to seeking patents for some of our technology and products, we also rely on trade secrets, including unpatented know-how, technology and other proprietary information, to maintain our competitive position, especially where we do not believe patent protection is appropriate or obtainable. However, trade secrets are difficult to protect. We rely in part on confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, outside scientific collaborators, sponsored researchers, and other advisors, and inventions agreements with employees, consultants, and advisors, to protect our trade secrets and other proprietary information. In addition to contractual measures, we try to protect the confidential nature of our proprietary information using commonly accepted physical and technological security measures. Despite these efforts, we cannot provide any assurances that all such agreements have been duly executed, and these agreements may not effectively prevent disclosure of confidential information and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. In addition, others may independently discover our trade secrets and proprietary information. For example, the FDA, as part of its Transparency Initiative, is currently considering whether to make additional information publicly available on a routine basis, including information that we may consider to be trade secrets or other proprietary information, and it is not clear at the present time how the FDA’s disclosure policies may change in the future, if at all. Costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection could adversely affect our competitive business position.