Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Previous wording

We qualify as a “smaller reporting company” within the meaning of the Exchange Act and may take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to smaller reporting companies, which could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance to the performance of other public companies.

Current wording

For as long as we qualify as a “smaller reporting company” within the meaning of the Exchange Act, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to smaller reporting companies, which could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance to the performance of other public companies.

Previous wording

efforts. We also could be required to seek collaborators for palazestrant, OP-3136, or any future product candidates we may develop at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable or on terms that are less favorable than might otherwise be available or relinquish or license on unfavorable terms our rights to our product candidates in markets where we otherwise would seek to pursue development or commercialization ourselves. Any of the above events could significantly harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects and cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Current wording

Our failure to raise capital as and when needed or on acceptable terms would have a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to pursue our business strategy, and we may have to delay, reduce the scope of, suspend or eliminate one or more of our research-stage programs, clinical trials, or future commercialization efforts. We also could be required to seek collaborators for palazestrant, OP-3136, or any future product candidates we may develop at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable or on terms that are less favorable than might otherwise be available or relinquish or license on unfavorable terms our rights to our product candidates in markets where we otherwise would seek to pursue development or commercialization ourselves. Any of the above events could significantly harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects and cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Previous wording

We have incurred net losses in each reporting period since our inception, have not generated any revenue from product sales to date, and have financed our operations principally through sales of our equity securities, including sales of our common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase our common stock to selected institutional and accredited investors in private placement transactions, at-the-market offerings, our initial public offering and other public offerings and private financings. We have incurred net losses of $53.1 million and $30.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. We had an accumulated deficit of $650.6 million as of March 31, 2026. Our losses have resulted principally from expenses incurred in research and development of palazestrant, OP-3136 and from management and administrative costs and other expenses that we have incurred while building our business infrastructure. Our lead product candidate, palazestrant, and OP-3136 are both in clinical trials. As a result, we expect that it will be several years, if ever, before we have a commercialized product and generate revenue from product sales. Even if we succeed in receiving marketing approval for palazestrant or OP-3136 in one of our lead indications and proceed to commercializing palazestrant or OP-3136, we expect that we will continue to incur substantial research and development and other expenses as we continue the clinical development programs for palazestrant in other indications or for OP-3136.

Current wording

We have incurred net losses in each reporting period since our inception, have not generated any revenue from product sales to date, and have financed our operations principally through sales of our equity securities, including sales of our common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase our common stock to selected institutional and accredited investors in private placement transactions, at-the-market offerings, our initial public offering and other public offerings and private financings. We have incurred net losses of $63.2 million and $43.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. We had an accumulated deficit of $713.8 million as of June 30, 2026. Our losses have resulted principally from expenses incurred in research and development of palazestrant, OP-3136 and from management and administrative costs and other expenses that we have incurred while building our business infrastructure. Our lead product candidate, palazestrant, and OP-3136 are both in clinical trials. As a result, we expect that it will be several years, if ever, before we have a commercialized product and generate revenue from product sales. Even if we succeed in receiving marketing approval for palazestrant or OP-3136 in one of our lead indications and proceed to commercializing palazestrant or OP-3136, we expect that we will continue to incur substantial research and development and other expenses as we continue the clinical development programs for palazestrant in other indications or for OP-3136.

Previous wording

In addition, our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern. However, we have incurred losses and negative cash flows from operations. As a development stage company, we expect to incur significant and increasing losses until regulatory approval is granted for palazestrant or OP-3136. Regulatory approval is not guaranteed and may never be obtained. As a result, these conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern over the long term.

Current wording

In addition, our condensed consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern. However, we have incurred losses and negative cash flows from operations. As a development stage company, we expect to incur significant and increasing losses until regulatory approval is granted for palazestrant or OP-3136. Regulatory approval is not guaranteed and may never be obtained. As a result, these conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern over the long term.

Previous wording

On September 5, 2023, we entered into the Original Loan Agreement with the Bank, which provided us with the Original Credit Facility, of which $25.0 million became available in September 2023 as Term Loan A upon the closing of a private placement and the issuance of our common stock to selected institutional and accredited investors pursuant to a securities purchase agreement, and the remaining $25.0 million could have been made available upon approval of the Bank in its discretion. The Original Credit Facility was scheduled to mature on August 1, 2027. On June 28, 2024, we entered into the First Amendment with the Bank, which, among other things, (i) increased the aggregate principal amount of the Original Credit Facility from up to $50.0 million to up to $100.0 million of which the Term Loan A of $25.0 million was immediately available, an additional $25.0 million as Term Loan B became available upon achieving certain milestones related to the execution of a first-line pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial of palazestrant in combination with ribociclib, and an additional $50.0 million as Term Loan C which may be made available upon the approval of the Bank in its discretion, and (ii) extended the maturity date to July 1, 2028. On June 27, 2025, we entered into the Second Amendment with the Bank, which, among other things, (i) decreased the interest rate to a floating rate equal to the greater of 6.0% or the prime rate, and (ii) extended the draw period of Term Loan A to January 15, 2026. As of December 31, 2025, we had an outstanding liability of $3.0 million under the Credit Facility, representing the full amount drawn to date. On January 11, 2026, we entered into the Third Amendment, which, among other things, (i) extended the draw period of Term Loan A to January 31, 2027, (ii) extended the draw period of Term Loan B to January 31, 2027, (iii) extended the draw period of Term Loan C to January 31, 2027, and (iv) extended the maturity date to January 1, 2029. Based on the occurrence of specified (a) development milestones related to the pivotal Phase 3 OPERA-01 clinical trial of palazestrant or (b) receipt of proceeds from capital financing, the draw period of Term Loan B and Term Loan C may be further extended to July 31, 2027, and the maturity date (as so extended) may be further extended to July 1, 2029.

Current wording

On September 5, 2023, we entered into the Original Loan Agreement with the Bank, which provided us with the Original Credit Facility, of which $25.0 million became available in September 2023 as Term Loan A upon the closing of a private placement and the issuance of our common stock to selected institutional and accredited investors pursuant to a securities purchase agreement, and the remaining $25.0 million could have been made available upon approval of the Bank in its discretion. The Original Credit Facility was scheduled to mature on August 1, 2027. On June 28, 2024, we entered into the First Amendment with the Bank, which, among other things, (i) increased the aggregate principal amount of the Original Credit Facility from up to $50.0 million to up to $100.0 million of which the Term Loan A of $25.0 million was immediately available, an additional $25.0 million as Term Loan B became available upon achieving certain milestones related to the execution of a first-line pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial of palazestrant in combination with ribociclib, and an additional $50.0 million as Term Loan C which may be made available upon the approval of the Bank in its discretion, and (ii) extended the maturity date to July 1, 2028. On June 27, 2025, we entered into the Second Amendment with the Bank, which, among other things, (i) decreased the interest rate to a floating rate equal to the greater of 6.0% or the prime rate, and (ii) extended the draw period of Term Loan A to January 15, 2026. As of December 31, 2025, we had an outstanding liability of $3.0 million under the Credit Facility, representing the full amount drawn to date. On January 11, 2026, we entered into the Third Amendment, which, among other things, (i) extended the draw period of Term Loan A to January 31, 2027, (ii) extended the draw period of Term Loan B to January 31, 2027, (iii) extended the draw period of Term Loan C to January 31, 2027, and (iv) extended the maturity date to January 1, 2029. Based on the occurrence of specified (a) development milestones related to the pivotal Phase 3 OPERA-01 clinical trial of palazestrant or (b) receipt of proceeds from capital financing, the draw period of Term Loan B and Term Loan C may be further extended to July 31, 2027, and the maturity date (as so extended) may be further extended to July 1, 2029. On July 1, 2026, the Company entered into the Fourth Amendment, which, among other things, added Olema Oncology International Limited as a secured guarantor under the Loan Agreement.

Previous wording

Clinical development is a lengthy and expensive process with an uncertain outcome, and results of earlier studies and trials may not be predictive of future trial results. Failure can occur at any stage of clinical development. We have never completed a pivotal clinical trial or submitted a NDA to the FDA or similar drug approval filings to comparable foreign authorities. If we are ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval for palazestrant, OP-3136, or any future product candidates we may develop, we will be unable to generate product revenue and our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects will be significantly harmed.

Current wording

Clinical development is a lengthy and expensive process with an uncertain outcome, and results of earlier studies and trials may not be predictive of future trial results. Failure can occur at any stage of clinical development. We have never completed a pivotal clinical trial or submitted an NDA to the FDA or similar drug approval filings to comparable foreign authorities. If we are ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval for palazestrant, OP-3136, or any future product candidates we may develop, we will be unable to generate product revenue and our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects will be significantly harmed.

Previous wording

There is significant uncertainty related to third-party payor coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products. In the United States, for example, principal decisions about reimbursement for new products are typically made by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency within HHS. CMS decides whether and to what extent a new product will be covered and reimbursed under Medicare, and private third-party payors often follow CMS’s decisions regarding coverage and reimbursement to a substantial degree. However, one third-party payor’s determination to provide coverage for a product candidate does not assure that other payors will also provide coverage for the product candidate. Moreover, eligibility for reimbursement does not imply that any drug will be paid for in all cases or at a rate that covers our costs, including research, development, manufacture, sale and distribution. Interim reimbursement levels for new drugs, if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover our costs and may not be made permanent. Reimbursement rates may vary according to the use of the drug and the clinical setting in which it is used, may be based on reimbursement levels already set for lower cost drugs and may be incorporated into existing payments for other services. As a result, the coverage determination process is often time-consuming and costly. This process will require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our product to each third-party payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be applied consistently or obtained in the first instance.

Current wording

There is significant uncertainty related to third-party payor coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products. In the United States, for example, principal decisions about reimbursement for new products are typically made by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). CMS decides whether and to what extent a new product will be covered and reimbursed under Medicare, and private third-party payors often follow CMS’s decisions regarding coverage and reimbursement to a substantial degree. However, one third-party payor’s determination to provide coverage for a product candidate does not assure that other payors will also provide coverage for the product candidate. Moreover, eligibility for reimbursement does not imply that any drug will be paid for in all cases or at a rate that covers our costs, including research, development, manufacture, sale and distribution. Interim reimbursement levels for new drugs, if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover our costs and may not be made permanent. Reimbursement rates may vary according to the use of the drug and the clinical setting in which it is used, may be based on reimbursement levels already set for lower cost drugs and may be incorporated into existing payments for other services. As a result, the coverage determination process is often time-consuming and costly. This process will require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our product to each third-party payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be applied consistently or obtained in the first instance.

Previous wording

A primary trend in the U.S. healthcare industry and elsewhere is cost containment. Government authorities and third-party payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular products and requiring substitutions of generic products and/or biosimilars. For example, HHS imposes rebates on many Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D products to penalize price increases that outpace inflation on an annual basis. In addition, HHS has been empowered to negotiate the price of certain single-source drugs that have been on the market for at least seven (7) years covered under Medicare as part of the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Each year up to twenty (20) products will be selected by HHS for the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Products subject to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program are expected to experience a significant reduction in reimbursement from the Medicare program on a per unit basis. Increasingly, third-party payors are requiring that drug companies provide them with predetermined discounts from list prices and are challenging the prices charged for medical products. Further, such payors are increasingly examining the medical necessity and reviewing the cost effectiveness of medical product candidates. There may be especially significant delays in obtaining coverage and reimbursement for newly approved drugs. Third-party payors may limit coverage to specific product candidates on an approved list, known as a formulary, which might not include all FDA-approved drugs for a particular indication. We may need to conduct expensive pharmaco-economic studies to demonstrate the medical necessity and cost effectiveness of our product. Nonetheless, palazestrant, OP-3136, or any future product candidates we may develop may not be considered medically necessary or cost effective. We cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement will be available for any product that we commercialize and, if reimbursement is available, what the level of reimbursement will be.

Current wording

A primary trend in the U.S. healthcare industry and elsewhere is cost containment. Government authorities and third-party payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular products and requiring substitutions of generic products and/or biosimilars. For example, HHS imposes rebates on many Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D products to penalize price increases that outpace inflation. In addition, HHS has been empowered to negotiate the price of certain single-source drugs that have been on the market for at least seven (7) years covered under Medicare as part of the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Each year up to twenty (20) products will be selected by HHS for the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Products subject to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program are expected to experience a significant reduction in reimbursement from the Medicare program on a per unit basis. Increasingly, third-party payors are requiring that drug companies provide them with predetermined discounts from list prices and are challenging the prices charged for medical products. Further, such payors are increasingly examining the medical necessity and reviewing the cost effectiveness of medical product candidates. There may be especially significant delays in obtaining coverage and reimbursement for newly approved drugs. Third-party payors may limit coverage to specific product candidates on an approved list, known as a formulary, which might not include all FDA-approved drugs for a particular indication. We may need to conduct expensive pharmaco-economic studies to demonstrate the medical necessity and cost effectiveness of our product. Nonetheless, palazestrant, OP-3136, or any future product candidates we may develop may not be considered medically necessary or cost effective. We cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement will be available for any product that we commercialize and, if reimbursement is available, what the level of reimbursement will be.

Previous wording

At the state level, legislatures have increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. Any such approved importation plans, when implemented, may result in lower drug prices for products covered by those programs.

Current wording

At the state level, legislatures have increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. For example, on June 15, 2026, the FDA approved Colorado’s Section 804 Importation Program proposal to import certain drugs from Canada for specific state healthcare programs. It is unclear how this and Florida’s similar program, approved by the FDA in 2024, will be implemented and whether they will overcome potential legal, regulatory, or industry challenges in the United States and/or Canada. Any such approved importation plans, when implemented, may result in lower drug prices for products covered by those programs.

Previous wording

We operate in a global economy, which includes utilizing third-party suppliers in countries outside of the United States. The current international trade and regulatory environment is subject to significant ongoing uncertainty. There is inherent risk, based on the complex relationships among the United States and the countries in which we conduct our business, that political, diplomatic, and national security factors can lead to global trade restrictions and changes in trade policies and export regulations that may adversely affect our business and operations. The U.S. government has announced imposition of substantial tariffs affecting a wide range of products and jurisdictions and has indicated an intention to continue developing new trade policies, including with respect to the pharmaceutical industry. In response, certain foreign governments have announced or implemented retaliatory tariffs and other protectionist measures. These developments, including legal challenges related to such tariffs, have created a dynamic and unpredictable trade landscape, which may adversely impact our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects. The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, has initiated an investigation to determine whether pharmaceutical ingredients, including finished drug product, manufactured outside the United States pose a national security risk and should be subject to additional tariffs.

Current wording

We operate in a global economy, which includes utilizing third-party suppliers in countries outside of the United States. The current international trade and regulatory environment is subject to significant ongoing uncertainty. There is inherent risk, based on the complex relationships among the United States and the countries in which we conduct our business, that political, diplomatic, and national security factors can lead to global trade restrictions and changes in trade policies and export regulations that may adversely affect our business and operations. The U.S. government has announced imposition of substantial tariffs affecting a wide range of products and jurisdictions and has indicated an intention to continue developing new trade policies, including with respect to the pharmaceutical industry. In response, certain foreign governments have announced or implemented retaliatory tariffs and other protectionist measures. These developments, including legal challenges related to such tariffs, have created a dynamic and unpredictable trade landscape, which may adversely impact our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects. The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, initiated an investigation to determine whether pharmaceutical ingredients, including finished drug product, manufactured outside the United States pose a national security risk and should be subject to additional tariffs. Based on this investigation, on April 2, 2026, the U.S. President issued a proclamation imposing up to a 100% tariff on certain patented pharmaceuticals and associated pharmaceutical ingredients. These tariffs will become effective September 29, 2026, unless they are expressly reduced, modified, or terminated.

Previous wording

As of March 31, 2026, we had 137 full-time employees, consisting of clinical, research, operations, regulatory, and administrative personnel. 40 of our employees hold Ph.D. or M.D. degrees. In order to successfully implement our development and commercialization plans and strategies, we expect to need additional managerial, operational, sales, marketing, financial and other personnel. Future growth would impose significant added responsibilities on members of management, including:

Current wording

As of June 30, 2026, we had 150 full-time employees, consisting of clinical, research, operations, regulatory, and administrative personnel. 39 of our employees hold Ph.D. or M.D. degrees. In order to successfully implement our development and commercialization plans and strategies, we expect to need additional managerial, operational, sales, marketing, financial and other personnel. Future growth would impose significant added responsibilities on members of management, including:

Previous wording

As of May 7, 2026, we had 87,347,471 shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 13,594,149 shares of common stock outstanding (which are immediately exercisable at an exercise price of $0.0001 per share of common stock, subject to beneficial ownership limitations). Refer to Notes 2 and 12 of our notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report for further information regarding the pre-funded warrants. Shares issued upon the exercise of any such pre-funded warrants as well as stock options outstanding under our equity incentive plans or pursuant to future awards granted under those plans will become available for sale in the public market to the extent permitted by the provisions of applicable vesting schedules, and Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities Act.

Current wording

As of August 6, 2026, we had 87,497,607 shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 13,594,149 shares of common stock outstanding (which are immediately exercisable at an exercise price of $0.0001 per share of common stock, subject to beneficial ownership limitations). Refer to Notes 2 and 12 of our notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report for further information regarding the pre-funded warrants. Shares issued upon the exercise of any such pre-funded warrants as well as stock options outstanding under our equity incentive plans or pursuant to future awards granted under those plans will become available for sale in the public market to the extent permitted by the provisions of applicable vesting schedules, and Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities Act.

Previous wording

We qualify as a “smaller reporting company” within the meaning of the Exchange Act and may take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to smaller reporting companies, which could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance to the performance of other public companies.

Current wording

For as long as we qualify as a “smaller reporting company” within the meaning of the Exchange Act, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to smaller reporting companies, which could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance to the performance of other public companies.

Previous wording

Because our annual revenue was less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates was less than $700.0 million measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter for the year ended December 31, 2025, we qualify as a “smaller reporting company” as defined in the Exchange Act. We may take advantage of certain of the scaled disclosures available to smaller reporting companies including, among other things, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 404), presenting only the two most recent fiscal years of audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and presenting reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements. We cannot predict whether investors will find our securities less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result of our reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.

Current wording

Because our annual revenue was less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates was less than $700.0 million measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter for the year ended December 31, 2025, we qualify as a “smaller reporting company” as defined in the Exchange Act. However, based on the market value of our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates as of the end of our second fiscal quarter for the year ending December 31, 2026, we expect that we will no longer qualify as a smaller reporting company. For as long as we remain a smaller reporting company, we may take advantage of certain of the scaled disclosures available to smaller reporting companies including, among other things, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 404), presenting only the two most recent fiscal years of audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and presenting reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements. We cannot predict whether investors will find our securities less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result of our reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile. Once we no longer qualify as a smaller reporting company, we will be subject to increased disclosure and compliance obligations. The loss of smaller reporting company status and compliance with such additional obligations may increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs and cause management and other personnel to divert attention from operational and other business matters to devote additional time to public company reporting requirements.