Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

Previous wording

Under the accelerated approval pathway, continued approval may be contingent upon verification of a clinical benefit in confirmatory trials. These post-marketing requirements and commitments may not be feasible and/or could impose significant burdens and costs on us; could negatively impact our development, manufacturing and supply of our products; and could negatively impact our financial results. Failure to meet post-approval commitments and requirements, including completion of enrollment and in particular, any failure to obtain safety and efficacy data that supports clinical benefits from our ongoing and planned studies of our products, could lead to negative regulatory action from the FDA and/or withdrawal of regulatory approval of one or more of our products that have received accelerated approval. FDORA, enacted in 2022, has expanded FDA's expedited withdrawal procedures for drugs approved via the accelerated approval pathway if a sponsor fails to conduct any required post-approval study with due diligence. For example, on November 3, 2025, we announced topline results from our ESSENCE trial, a confirmatory trial intended to verify the clinical benefits of VYONDYS 53 and AMONDYS 45, which primary endpoint did not meet statistical significance. We submitted supplemental new drug applications ("sNDAs") related to these products in April 2026. However, these results could lead to regulatory actions from the FDA, including changes to our drug labels, revocation of accelerated approvals and directives to remove these products from the market altogether.

Current wording

Under the accelerated approval pathway, continued approval may be contingent upon verification of a clinical benefit in confirmatory trials. These post-marketing requirements and commitments may not be feasible and/or could impose significant burdens and costs on us; could negatively impact our development, manufacturing and supply of our products; and could negatively impact our financial results. Failure to meet post-approval commitments and requirements, including completion of enrollment and in particular, any failure to obtain safety and efficacy data that supports clinical benefits from our ongoing and planned studies of our products, could lead to negative regulatory action from the FDA and/or withdrawal of regulatory approval of one or more of our products that have received accelerated approval. FDORA, enacted in 2022, has expanded FDA's expedited withdrawal procedures for drugs approved via the accelerated approval pathway if a sponsor fails to conduct any required post-approval study with due diligence. For example, on November 3, 2025, we announced topline results from our ESSENCE trial, a confirmatory trial intended to verify the clinical benefits of VYONDYS 53 and AMONDYS 45, which primary endpoint did not meet statistical significance. We submitted sNDAs related to these products in April 2026, which the FDA accepted for filing in June 2026. However, these results could lead to regulatory actions from the FDA, including changes to our drug labels, revocation of accelerated approvals and directives to remove these products from the market altogether.

Previous wording

The U.S. government and individual states continue to aggressively pursue healthcare reform, which includes ongoing attempts to manage utilization as well as control and/or lower the cost of prescription drugs and biologics. Recent years have seen a number of reform initiatives focused on drug pricing and payment. For example, the Inflation Reduction Act ("IRA"), passed in 2022, IRA has had and will likely continue to have a significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry. In 2025, the current presidential administration issued two executive orders with multiple directives aimed at lowering drug prices. In the wake of these executive orders and related executive initiatives, a number of pharmaceutical manufacturers have announced direct-to-consumer offerings with discounted prices and/or reached agreement with the federal government regarding pricing for drugs, including prices for Medicaid drugs and newly launched products. Many of these reform initiatives would require additional legal and/or administrative action to implement and may be subject to legal challenge. See the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, “Item 1. Business – Government Regulation – U.S. Healthcare and Other Reform." There is no assurance that federal or state health care reform will not adversely affect our future business and financial results, and we cannot predict how future federal or state legislative, judicial or administrative changes relating to healthcare policy will affect our business. The U.S. government, state legislatures and foreign governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost-containment programs to limit the growth of government-paid and private insurance healthcare costs, including proposed or implemented reforms. Cost containment initiatives might include, among other possible actions, implementation or modification of:

Current wording

The U.S. government and individual states continue to aggressively pursue healthcare reform, which includes ongoing attempts to manage utilization as well as control and/or lower the cost of prescription drugs and biologics. Recent years have seen a number of reform initiatives focused on drug pricing and payment. For example, the Inflation Reduction Act ("IRA"), passed in 2022, has had and will likely continue to have a significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry. In 2025, the current presidential administration issued two executive orders with multiple directives aimed at lowering drug prices. In the wake of these executive orders and related executive initiatives, a number of pharmaceutical manufacturers have announced direct-to-consumer offerings with discounted prices and/or reached agreement with the federal government regarding pricing for drugs, including prices for Medicaid drugs and newly launched products. In January 2026, the current presidential administration announced a healthcare plan calling for codification of most-favored-nation pricing arrangements with pharmaceutical manufacturers, and in April 2026, the administration issued a further executive order establishing tariffs on certain imported patented pharmaceuticals while offering relief from such tariffs to manufacturers that commit to most-favored-nation pricing and to onshoring research and manufacturing operations. The federal government has also launched a website that offers access to pharmaceutical direct-to-consumer discount drug offers and discloses generic drug pricing. Many of these reform initiatives would require additional legal and/or administrative action to implement and may be subject to legal challenge. See the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, “Item 1.

Previous wording

Additionally, in its 2024 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled the “Chevron doctrine,” which gives deference to regulatory agencies’ statutory interpretations in litigation against federal government agencies, such as the FDA, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) and other federal agencies where the law is ambiguous. The Loper decision could result in additional legal challenges to regulations and guidance issued by federal agencies, including the FDA and the CMS, on which we rely. Any such legal challenges, if successful, could have a material impact on our business. Additionally, the Loper decision may result in increased regulatory uncertainty, inconsistent judicial interpretations and other impacts to the agency rulemaking process, any of which could adversely impact our business and operations. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action or as a result of legal challenges, either in the U.S. or abroad. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, our business could be materially harmed.

Current wording

Additionally, in its 2024 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled the “Chevron doctrine,” which gives deference to regulatory agencies’ statutory interpretations in litigation against federal government agencies, such as the FDA, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (the “CMS”) and other federal agencies where the law is ambiguous. The Loper decision could result in additional legal challenges to regulations and guidance issued by federal agencies, including the FDA and the CMS, on which we rely. Any such legal challenges, if successful, could have a material impact on our business. Additionally, the Loper decision may result in increased regulatory uncertainty, inconsistent judicial interpretations and other impacts to the agency rulemaking process, any of which could adversely impact our business and operations. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action or as a result of legal challenges, either in the U.S. or abroad. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, our business could be materially harmed.

Previous wording

Additionally, in November 2025, we announced topline results from our ESSENCE trial, a confirmatory trial intended to verify the clinical benefits of VYONDYS 53 and AMONDYS 45, which primary endpoint did not meet statistical significance. We submitted sNDAs related to these products in April 2026. However, these results could lead to regulatory actions from the FDA, including changes to our drug labels or revocation of accelerated approvals and directives to remove these products from the market altogether, negatively impact patient demand for these products or result in changes to reimbursement and coverage of these products by payors. Such outcomes could adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, financial guidance, ability to accurately forecast key financial metrics, and prospects.

Current wording

Additionally, in November 2025, we announced topline results from our ESSENCE trial, a confirmatory trial intended to verify the clinical benefits of VYONDYS 53 and AMONDYS 45, which primary endpoint did not meet statistical significance. We submitted sNDAs related to these products in April 2026, which the FDA accepted for filing in June 2026. However, these results could lead to regulatory actions from the FDA, including changes to our drug labels or revocation of accelerated approvals and directives to remove these products from the market altogether, negatively impact patient demand for these products or result in changes to reimbursement and coverage of these products by payors. Such outcomes could adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, financial guidance, ability to accurately forecast key financial metrics, and prospects.

Previous wording

In addition to receiving accelerated approval in the U.S., EXONDYS 51 has been approved for marketing in Israel, Libya, Kuwait, and Georgia, AMONDYS 45 in Libya, Kuwait, and Georgia, and VYONDYS 53 in Libya, Kuwait, and Georgia. We may not receive approval to commercialize these products in additional countries. Our partner for ELEVIDYS, Roche, has received certain approvals for ELEVIDYS in territories outside of the U.S. In November 2016, we submitted a MAA for eteplirsen to the EMA and the application was validated in December 2016. As we announced on June 1, 2018, the CHMP of the EMA adopted a negative opinion for eteplirsen. In September 2018, the CHMP of the EMA confirmed its negative opinion for eteplirsen, and the EC adopted the CHMP opinion in December 2018. During 2019, we sought follow-up EMA scientific advice for eteplirsen. Once data from our ongoing studies are available, we plan to evaluate future engagement with the EMA on potential next steps for eteplirsen.

Current wording

In addition to receiving accelerated approval in the U.S., EXONDYS 51 has been approved for marketing in Israel, Libya, Kuwait, and Georgia, AMONDYS 45 in Libya, Kuwait, and Georgia, and VYONDYS 53 in Libya, Kuwait, and Georgia. We may not receive approval to commercialize these products in additional countries. In November 2016, we submitted a MAA for eteplirsen to the EMA and the application was validated in December 2016. As we announced on June 1, 2018, the CHMP of the EMA adopted a negative opinion for eteplirsen. In September 2018, the CHMP of the EMA confirmed its negative opinion for eteplirsen, and the EC adopted the CHMP opinion in December 2018. During 2019, we sought follow-up EMA scientific advice for eteplirsen. Once data from our ongoing studies are available, we plan to evaluate future engagement with the EMA on potential next steps for eteplirsen.

Previous wording

Our partner for ELEVIDYS, Roche, has received certain approvals for ELEVIDYS in territories outside of the U.S. On September 24, 2025, the EC refused marketing authorization under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council for ELEVIDYS for ambulatory individuals aged three to seven years with Duchenne. We also announced in June 2025 that we paused our ENVISION study for ELEVIDYS and such study remains paused.

Current wording

Our partner for ELEVIDYS, Roche, has received certain approvals for ELEVIDYS in territories outside of the U.S. On September 24, 2025, the EC refused marketing authorization under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council for ELEVIDYS for ambulatory individuals aged three to seven years with Duchenne. We also announced in June 2025 that we paused our ENVISION study for ELEVIDYS, and such study remains on clinical hold.

Previous wording

We established a global EAP for our products in some countries where these products currently have not been approved. While we generate revenue from the distribution of these products through our EAP, we cannot predict whether historical revenues from this program will continue, whether we will be able to continue to distribute our products through our EAP, or whether revenues will exceed revenues historically generated from sales through our EAP, especially in light of current geopolitical issues. Reimbursement of aforementioned products through our EAPs may cease to be available if authorization for an EAP expires or is terminated. For example, healthcare providers may prefer to wait until such time as our products are approved by a regulatory authority in their country before prescribing any of our products. Even if a healthcare provider is interested in obtaining access to our products for its patient through our EAP, the patient may not be able to obtain access to our products if funding for the drug is not secured. Also geo-political changes and challenges might negatively impinge upon future revenue generated through our EAP.

Current wording

We established a global EAP for our products in some countries where these products currently have not been approved. While we generate revenue from the distribution of these products through our EAP, we cannot predict whether historical revenues from this program will continue, whether we will be able to continue to distribute our products through our EAP, or whether revenues will exceed revenues historically generated from sales through our EAP, especially in light of current geopolitical issues. Reimbursement of aforementioned products through our EAPs may cease to be available if authorization for an EAP expires or is terminated. For example, healthcare providers may prefer to wait until such time as our products are approved by a regulatory authority in their country before prescribing any of our products. Even if a healthcare provider is interested in obtaining access to our products for its patient through our EAP, the patient may not be able to obtain access to our products if funding for the drug is not secured. Also geo-political and distribution changes and challenges might negatively impinge upon future revenue generated through our EAP.

Previous wording

Any failure to maintain revenues from sales of our products through our EAP and/or to generate revenues from commercial sales of these products exceeding historical sales due to geo-political challenges like those potentially resulting from the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine or the instability in the Middle-East or Venezuela , could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

Current wording

Any failure to maintain revenues from sales of our products through our EAP and/or to generate revenues from commercial sales of these products exceeding historical sales due to distribution or geo-political challenges, including those potentially resulting from the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine or the instability in the Middle-East or Venezuela , could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

Previous wording

Due to the nature of our products and product candidate pipeline, in addition to NCE exclusivity and new biologic exclusivity, orphan drug exclusivity is especially important for our products that are eligible for orphan drug designation. While orphan drug designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a drug, nor gives the drug any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process, orphan drug exclusivity qualifies such drug for market exclusivity—meaning that FDA is unable to approve any other marketing application for the same chemical or biological product—for seven years from the time of approval of the applicable marketing authorization. For eligible products, we plan to rely on orphan drug exclusivity to maintain a competitive position. If we do not have adequate patent protection for our products, then the relative importance of obtaining regulatory exclusivity is even greater. While orphan status for any of our products, if granted or maintained, would provide market exclusivity in the U.S. for seven years from the time of approval of the applicable market authorization, we would not be able to exclude other companies from obtaining regulatory approval of products using the same or similar active ingredient for the same indication during or beyond the exclusivity period applicable to our product on the basis of orphan drug status. For example, the exclusivity period for EXONDYS 51, which received initial FDA approval in September 2016, ended in September 2023. Recent litigation has raised questions about the appropriate scope of orphan drug exclusivity. A decision in 2021 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs. Becerra regarding interpretation of the Orphan Drug Act’s exclusivity provisions as applied to drugs and biologics approved for orphan indications narrower than the product’s orphan designation has the potential to significantly broaden the scope of orphan exclusivity for such products. Specifically, the court held that, under the statute, orphan drug exclusivity blocks approval of another company’s application for the same chemical or biological product for the entire disease or condition for which the drug is granted orphan drug designation, regardless of whether the ultimate marketing approval only covered a narrower use or indication. While the FDA has since taken the position that it will continue to apply orphan drug exclusivity only on the basis of the specific indication, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in 2024 in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo has the potential to impact how the Agency applies the Catalyst decision. Our ability to obtain or seek to work around orphan exclusivity, as well as our ability to retain orphan exclusivity that the FDA previously has recognized for our products, may be impacted depending on how the Catalyst decision is ultimately implemented. Legislation has been introduced to amend the Orphan Drug A…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Current wording

Due to the nature of our products and product candidate pipeline, in addition to NCE exclusivity and new biologic exclusivity, orphan drug exclusivity is especially important for our products that are eligible for orphan drug designation. While orphan drug designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a drug, nor gives the drug any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process, orphan drug exclusivity qualifies such drug for market exclusivity—meaning that FDA is unable to approve any other marketing application for the same chemical or biological product—for seven years from the time of approval of the applicable marketing authorization. For eligible products, we plan to rely on orphan drug exclusivity to maintain a competitive position. If we do not have adequate patent protection for our products, then the relative importance of obtaining regulatory exclusivity is even greater. While orphan status for any of our products, if granted or maintained, would provide market exclusivity in the U.S. for seven years from the time of approval of the applicable market authorization, we would not be able to exclude other companies from obtaining regulatory approval of products using the same or similar active ingredient for the same indication during or beyond the exclusivity period applicable to our product on the basis of orphan drug status. For example, the exclusivity period for EXONDYS 51, which received initial FDA approval in September 2016, ended in September 2023.

Previous wording

Duchenne and LGMD are rare, fatal genetic disorders. Duchenne affects an estimated one in approximately every 3,500 to 5,000 males born worldwide, of which up to 13% are estimated to be amenable to exon 51 skipping, up to 8% are estimated to be amenable to exon 53 skipping and up to 8% are estimated to be amenable to exon 45 skipping. LGMDs as a class affect an estimated range of approximately one in every 14,500 to one in every 123,000 individuals. FSHD is a rare neuromuscular disease with an estimated U.S. prevalent population of approximately 13,000. DM1 is also a rare neuromuscular disease with an estimated U.S. prevalent population of approximately 30,000. Our estimates of the size of these patient populations are based on a limited number of published studies as well as internal analyses. Various factors may decrease the market size of our products and product candidates, including the severity of the disease, patient demographics and the response of patients’ immune systems to our products and product candidates. If the results of these studies or our analysis of them do not accurately reflect the relevant patient population, our assessment of the market may be inaccurate, making it difficult or impossible for us to meet our revenue goals, or to maintain profitability.

Current wording

Duchenne and LGMD are rare, fatal genetic disorders. Duchenne affects an estimated one in approximately every 3,500 to 5,000 males born worldwide, of which up to 13% are estimated to be amenable to exon 51 skipping, up to 8% are estimated to be amenable to exon 53 skipping and up to 8% are estimated to be amenable to exon 45 skipping. LGMDs as a class affect an estimated range of approximately one in every 14,500 to one in every 123,000 individuals. FSHD is a rare neuromuscular disease with an estimated U.S. prevalent population of approximately 16,000. DM1 is also a rare neuromuscular disease with an estimated U.S. prevalent population of approximately 40,000. Our estimates of the size of these patient populations are based on a limited number of published studies as well as internal analyses. Various factors may decrease the market size of our products and product candidates, including the severity of the disease, patient demographics and the response of patients’ immune systems to our products and product candidates. If the results of these studies or our analysis of them do not accurately reflect the relevant patient population, our assessment of the market may be inaccurate, making it difficult or impossible for us to meet our revenue goals, or to maintain profitability.

Previous wording

exon skipping product candidates, such as Wave (targeting various exons, including 53 and 51), Nippon (targeting various exons, including 51 and 45, and notably for exon 53 for which it has received accelerated FDA approval for its product Viltepso (viltolarsen)), Dyne pursuing antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates for exons 44, 45, 51, and 53, Novartis (formerly Avidity Biosciences ("Avidity")) pursuing antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates for exons 44, 45 and 51, SQY Therapeutics and BioMarin (for exon 51), Entrada (notably for exon 44, 45, 50, and 51);

Current wording

exon skipping product candidates, such as Wave (targeting various exons, including 53); Nippon (targeting various exons, including 51 and 44, and notably for exon 53 for which it has received accelerated FDA approval for its product Viltepso (viltolarsen)); Dyne pursuing antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates for exons 44, 45, 51 (for which the FDA has accepted for review a BLA), 53, and 55; Novartis (formerly Avidity Biosciences ("Avidity")) pursuing antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates for exons 44, 45 and 51, SQY Therapeutics and BioMarin (for exon 51); and Entrada (notably for exon 44, 45, 50, and 51);

Previous wording

other approaches that may be palliative in nature or potentially complementary with our products and product candidates and that are or were once being developed including but not limited to, Santhera (approved product vamorolone), Capricor Therapeutics (in partnership with Nippon), BioPhytis, Italfarmaco (approved product Givinostat), Dystrogen and Edgewise Therapeutics. Although BioMarin announced on May 31, 2016 its intent to discontinue clinical and regulatory development of drisapersen as well as its other clinical stage candidates, BMN 044, BMN 045 and BMN 053, then-currently in Phase 2 studies for distinct forms of Duchenne, it further announced its intent to continue to explore the development of next generation oligonucleotides for the treatment of Duchenne. Indeed, BioMarin is conducting clinical trials for BMN-351, an oligonucleotide therapy. In addition, while Wave announced its intention to discontinue development of suvodirsen and suspend development of WVE-N531, it is conducting clinical trials for its exon 53 oligonucleotide, WVE-N531.

Current wording

other approaches that may be palliative in nature or potentially complementary with our products and product candidates and that are or were once being developed including but not limited to, Santhera (approved product vamorolone), Capricor Therapeutics (in partnership with Nippon), BioPhytis, Italfarmaco (approved product Givinostat), Dystrogen and Edgewise Therapeutics.

Previous wording

In the siRNA field, we face competition by third parties who are also developing product candidates targeting the same disease states as our product candidates, including but not limited to Novartis (formerly Avidity) (DM1, FSHD), Dyne (DM1, FSHD), Arthex Biotech (DM1), PepGen (DM1), Vertex Pharmaceuticals ("Vertex") (DM1), Entrada (FSHD), Celularity (FSHD), EpiCrispr Biotechnologies (FSHD), Biohaven (SCA), Vico Therapeutics (SCA, Huntington’s), Skyhawk Therapeutics (SCA, Huntington’s), uniQure (Huntington’s), Roche Ionis (Huntington’s), Wave (Huntington’s), and PTC (Huntington’s). Some, but not all, of these entities’ product candidates use RNA technologies. Several of these companies’ product candidates are further along in development and may obtain regulatory approval in advance of our product candidates. These and other competitors may have greater financial, scientific, and commercial resources than us, which may impact our ability to secure the technologies we desire or to otherwise effectively compete in these disease states.

Current wording

In the siRNA field, we face competition by third parties who are also developing product candidates targeting the same disease states as our product candidates, including but not limited to Novartis (formerly Avidity) (DM1, FSHD), Dyne (DM1, FSHD), Arthex Biotech (DM1), PepGen (DM1), Vertex Pharmaceuticals ("Vertex") and Entrada (DM1), Celularity (FSHD), EpiCrispr Biotechnologies (FSHD), Biohaven (SCA), Vico Therapeutics (SCA, Huntington’s), Skyhawk Therapeutics (SCA, Huntington’s), uniQure (Huntington’s), Wave (Huntington’s), and PTC (Huntington’s). Some, but not all, of these entities’ product candidates use RNA technologies. Several of these companies’ product candidates are further along in development and may obtain regulatory approval in advance of our product candidates. These and other competitors may have greater financial, scientific, and commercial resources than us, which may impact our ability to secure the technologies we desire or to otherwise effectively compete in these disease states.

Previous wording

If any of our competitors are successful in obtaining regulatory approval for any of their product candidates, it may limit our ability to enter into the market, gain market share or maintain market share in the Duchenne, DM1, FSHD, SCA, Huntington's, and IPF spaces or other diseases targeted by our platform technologies, products and product candidate pipeline.

Current wording

If any of our competitors are successful in obtaining regulatory approval for any of their product candidates, it may limit our ability to enter into the market, gain market share or maintain market share in the Duchenne, DM1, FSHD, SCA, and Huntington's spaces or other diseases targeted by our platform technologies, products and product candidate pipeline.

Previous wording

disputes may arise between us and a collaborator that cause the delay or termination of the research, development or commercialization of our products or product candidates, or that result in costly litigation or arbitration that diverts management attention and resources;

Current wording

disputes may arise between us and a collaborator or strategic partner that cause the delay or termination of the research, development, manufacturing, or commercialization of our products or product candidates, or that result in costly litigation or arbitration that diverts management attention and resources;

Previous wording

For example, we will have limited influence and control over the development and commercialization activities of Roche in the territories in which it leads development and commercialization of ELEVIDYS. Roche’s development and commercialization activities in the territories where it is the lead party may adversely impact our own efforts in the U.S. As a further example, Arrowhead conducted the Phase 1/2 single ascending dose studies for SRP-1001 (FSHD1) and SRP-1003 (DM1), for which we announced early results in March 2026. Failure by Roche or Arrowhead to meet their obligations under the Roche Collaboration Agreement and Arrowhead Collaboration Agreement, to apply sufficient efforts at developing and commercializing collaboration products, or to comply with applicable legal or regulatory requirements, may materially adversely affect our business and our results of operations. In addition, to the extent we rely on Roche to commercialize any products for which we obtain regulatory approval, we will receive less revenues than if we commercialized these products ourselves.

Current wording

For example, we will have limited influence and control over the development and commercialization activities of Roche in the territories in which it leads development and commercialization of ELEVIDYS. Roche’s development and commercialization activities in the territories where it is the lead party may adversely impact our own efforts in the U.S. As a further example, Arrowhead has conducted the Phase 1/2 ascending dose studies for SRP-1001 (FSHD1) and SRP-1003 (DM1) to date, for which we announced early and limited results in March 2026. Failure by Roche or Arrowhead to meet their obligations under the Roche Collaboration Agreement and Arrowhead Collaboration Agreement, to apply sufficient efforts at developing and commercializing collaboration products, or to comply with applicable legal or regulatory requirements, may materially adversely affect our business and our results of operations. In addition, to the extent we rely on Roche to commercialize any products for which we obtain regulatory approval, we will receive less revenues than if we commercialized these products ourselves.

Previous wording

Even if we achieve the long-term benefits associated with strategic transactions, our expenses and short-term costs may increase materially and adversely affect our liquidity and short-term net income (loss). Future licenses or acquisitions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, the creation of contingent liabilities, impairment or expenses related to goodwill, and impairment or amortization expenses related to other intangible assets, which could harm our financial condition.

Current wording

Even if we achieve the long-term benefits associated with strategic transactions, our expenses and short-term costs may increase materially and adversely affect our liquidity and short-term net (loss) income. Future licenses or acquisitions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, the creation of contingent liabilities, impairment or expenses related to goodwill, and impairment or amortization expenses related to other intangible assets, which could harm our financial condition.

Previous wording

In addition, adverse events or new safety signals have in the past resulted and could result in the future in regulatory agency actions or cause delays in commercialization. For example, in response to two reported cases of ALF resulting in death of non-ambulatory patients, we suspended shipment of ELEVIDYS in the U.S. to non-ambulatory patients in June 2025. Additionally, in July 2025, we disclosed a reported case of ALF in a non-ambulatory patient participating in our Stage 1/2 LGMD trial for SRP-9004, who was not treated with ELEVIDYS. Thereafter, in response to a request from the FDA that we voluntarily stop all shipments of ELEVIDYS in the U.S., we suspended shipment of ELEVIDYS in the U.S. to ambulatory patients effective July 22, 2025. On July 28, 2025, the FDA informed us that it recommended the removal of the voluntary hold for ambulatory patients. In response, we resumed commercial shipments of ELEVIDYS for ambulatory patients in the U.S. Further, the Company has agreed with the FDA to a boxed warning for ALI and ALF and the removal of non-ambulatory population from the Indication and Usage section of ELEVIDYS' Prescribing Information. In November 2025, we announced the FDA's approval of dosing in a clinical trial for ELEVIDYS to evaluate the use of an enhanced immunosuppressive regimen as part of treatment with ELEVIDYS for non-ambulatory patients. It is currently unclear whether the FDA will pursue further actions related to ELEVIDYS, such as additional studies, additional product modifications, label supplements or controls, in the future.

Current wording

In addition, adverse events or new safety signals have in the past resulted and could result in the future in regulatory agency actions or cause delays in commercialization. For example, in response to two reported cases of ALF resulting in death of non-ambulatory patients, we suspended shipment of ELEVIDYS in the U.S. to non-ambulatory patients in June 2025. Additionally, in July 2025, we disclosed a reported case of ALF in a non-ambulatory patient participating in our Phase 1 LGMD trial for SRP-9004, who was not treated with ELEVIDYS. Thereafter, in response to a request from the FDA that we voluntarily stop all shipments of ELEVIDYS in the U.S., we suspended shipment of ELEVIDYS in the U.S. to ambulatory patients effective July 22, 2025. On July 28, 2025, the FDA informed us that it recommended the removal of the voluntary hold for ambulatory patients. In response, we resumed commercial shipments of ELEVIDYS for ambulatory patients in the U.S. Further, the Company has agreed with the FDA to a boxed warning for ALI and ALF and the removal of non-ambulatory population from the Indication and Usage section of ELEVIDYS' Prescribing Information. In November 2025, we announced the FDA's approval of dosing in a clinical trial for ELEVIDYS to evaluate the use of an enhanced immunosuppressive regimen as part of treatment with ELEVIDYS for non-ambulatory patients. It is currently unclear whether the FDA will pursue further actions related to ELEVIDYS, such as additional studies, additional product modifications, label supplements or controls, in the future.

Previous wording

Regulatory requirements governing gene therapy products have evolved and may continue to change in the future. Within the FDA, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (“CBER”) regulates gene therapy products. Within the CBER, the review of gene therapy and related products is consolidated in the Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies, and the FDA has established the Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee to advise CBER on its reviews. The CBER works closely with the National Institutes of Health (the “NIH”). The FDA and the NIH have published guidance documents with respect to the development and submission of gene therapy protocols. For example, on January 28, 2020, the FDA issued final guidance documents that updated draft guidance documents that were originally released in July 2018 to reflect recent advances in the field, and to set forth the framework for the development, review and approval of gene therapies. These final guidance documents pertain to the development of gene therapies for the treatment of specific disease categories, including rare diseases, and to manufacturing and long-term follow up issues relevant to gene therapy, among other topics. The FDA also issued a new guidance document in September 2021 describing the FDA’s approach for determining whether two gene therapy products were the same or different for the purpose of assessing orphan drug exclusivity, as well as a final guidance document in January 2024 on human gene therapy product incorporating human genome editing. The FDA also issued a draft guidance in December 2023 that provides recommendations for developing a potency assurance strategy for gene therapy products. In addition, the FDA can put an IND on hold if the information in an IND is not sufficient to assess the risks in pediatric patients.

Current wording

Regulatory requirements governing gene therapy products have evolved and may continue to change in the future. Within the FDA, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (“CBER”) regulates gene therapy products. Within the CBER, the review of gene therapy and related products is consolidated in the Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies, and the FDA has established the Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee to advise CBER on its reviews. The CBER works closely with the National Institutes of Health (the “NIH”). The FDA has published guidance documents in recent years with respect to the regulation of gene therapy products. These guidance documents have generally been intended by FDA to promote greater transparency and increase efficiency in the development of gene therapy products. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that these guidance documents will enable the accelerated development or approval of any particular gene therapy products.

Previous wording

These regulatory review agencies, committees and advisory groups and the new requirements and guidelines they promulgate may lengthen the regulatory review process, require us to perform additional or larger studies, increase our development costs, lead to changes in regulatory positions and interpretations, delay or prevent approval and commercialization of these treatment candidates or lead to significant post-approval studies, limitations or restrictions. As we advance our product candidates, we will be required to consult with these regulatory and advisory groups and comply with applicable requirements and guidelines, failure of which may lead to delayed or discontinued development of our product candidates. For example, the FDA has approved dosing in a clinical trial of ELEVIDYS to evaluate the use of an enhanced immunosuppressive regimen as part of treatment with ELEVIDYS for non-ambulatory patients. FDA may also seek additional clinical trials or studies related to ELEVIDYS, which could adversely impact the Company.

Current wording

These regulatory review agencies, committees and advisory groups, including changes in FDA leadership, and the new requirements and guidelines they promulgate may lengthen the regulatory review process, require us to perform additional or larger studies, increase our development costs, lead to changes in regulatory positions and interpretations, delay or prevent approval and commercialization of these treatment candidates or lead to significant post-approval studies, limitations or restrictions. As we advance our product candidates, we will be required to consult with these regulatory and advisory groups and comply with applicable requirements and guidelines, failure of which may lead to delayed or discontinued development of our product candidates. For example, the FDA has approved dosing in a clinical trial of ELEVIDYS to evaluate the use of an enhanced immunosuppressive regimen as part of treatment with ELEVIDYS for non-ambulatory patients. FDA may also seek additional clinical trials or studies related to ELEVIDYS, which could adversely impact the Company.

Previous wording

For example, we are in the process of conducting various clinical trials for ELEVIDYS, including to evaluate the use of an enhanced immunosuppressive regimen as part of treatment with ELEVIDYS for non-ambulant individuals living with Duchenne. Resumption of dosing in the non-ambulatory population will depend on the FDA’s analysis of whether this data positively changes ELEVIDYS’s risk/benefit profile. We intend to discuss with the FDA the results of this study and a potential pathway forward to resume commercial dosing in the non-ambulatory population. The FDA may interpret the data from these trials differently than us and, regardless of the trial results, not permit us to resume shipments to non-ambulatory patients.

Current wording

For example, we are in the process of conducting various clinical trials for ELEVIDYS, including to evaluate the use of an enhanced immunosuppressive regimen as part of treatment with ELEVIDYS for non-ambulant individuals living with Duchenne. Resumption of dosing in the non-ambulatory population will depend on the FDA’s analysis of whether this data positively changes ELEVIDYS’s risk/benefit profile. We intend to discuss with the FDA the results of this study and a potential pathway forward to resume commercial dosing in the non-ambulatory population. The FDA may interpret the data from these trials differently than us and, regardless of the trial results, not permit us to resume shipments to non-ambulatory patients. In addition, in November 2025, we announced topline results from our ESSENCE trial, a confirmatory trial intended to verify the clinical benefits of VYONDYS 53 and AMONDYS 45, which primary endpoint did not meet statistical significance. We submitted sNDAs related to these products in April 2026, which the FDA accepted for filing in June 2026. The FDA may interpret the results of the ESSENCE trial differently from us, which could lead to regulatory actions from the FDA, including changes to our drug labels, revocation of accelerated approvals and directives to remove these products from the market altogether.

Previous wording

Preliminary or topline data from our preclinical studies and clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time are based on preliminary analyses of then-available data, and the results, related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular preclinical study or clinical trial. We also make assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data. As a result, the topline or preliminary results may differ from future results of the same studies or trials, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Topline data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data. As a result, topline data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. For example, we announced topline results from our ESSENCE trial, a confirmatory trial intended to verify the clinical benefits of VYONDYS 53 and AMONDYS 45. We submitted sNDAs related to these products in April 2026.

Current wording

Preliminary or topline data from our preclinical studies and clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time are based on preliminary analyses of then-available data, and the results, related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular preclinical study or clinical trial. We also make assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data. As a result, the topline or preliminary results may differ from future results of the same studies or trials, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Topline data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data. As a result, topline data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. For example, we announced topline results from our ESSENCE trial, a confirmatory trial intended to verify the clinical benefits of VYONDYS 53 and AMONDYS 45. We submitted sNDAs related to these products in April 2026, which the FDA accepted for filing in June 2026.

Previous wording

With respect to the pre-commercial distribution of our products to patients outside of the U.S., we have contracted with third party distributors and service providers to distribute our products in certain countries through our EAP. We will need to continue building out our network for commercial distribution in jurisdictions in which our products are approved, which will also require third party contracts. The use of distributors and service providers involves certain risks, including, but not limited to, risks that these organizations will not comply with applicable laws and regulations, or not provide us with accurate or timely information regarding serious adverse events and/or product complaints regarding our products. Any such events may result in regulatory actions that may include suspension or termination of the distribution and sale of our products in a certain country, loss of revenue, and/or reputational damage, which could harm our results of operations and business.

Current wording

With respect to the pre-commercial distribution of our products to patients outside of the U.S., we have contracted with third party distributors and service providers to distribute our products in certain countries through our EAP. We will need to maintain and continue building out our network for commercial distribution in jurisdictions in which our products are approved, as well as in jurisdictions in which our products are available through our EAP, all of which will require third party contracts. The use of distributors and service providers involves certain risks, including, but not limited to, risks that these organizations will not comply with contractual obligations and applicable laws and regulations, or not provide us with accurate or timely information regarding serious adverse events and/or product complaints regarding our products. Any such events may result in regulatory actions that may include suspension or termination of the distribution and sale of our products in a certain country, loss of revenue, and/or reputational damage, which could harm our results of operations and business.

Previous wording

We rely on, and expect to continue relying on for the foreseeable future, a limited number of third parties to manufacture and supply materials (including raw materials, starting materials and subunits), API and drug product and to provide labeling and packaging of vials and storage of our products and product candidates. The limited number of third parties with facilities, expertise and the capability suited to manufacture our products and product candidates creates a risk that we may not be able to obtain materials and APIs in the quantity and purity that we require. As of the date of this Quarterly Report, we have dual sourcing for the APIs and drug product for all three of our PMO commercial products and one source for ELEVIDYS drug substance and drug product manufacturing.

Current wording

We rely on, and expect to continue relying on for the foreseeable future, a limited number of third parties to manufacture and supply materials (including raw materials, starting materials and subunits), API and drug product and to provide release testing and labeling and packaging of vials and storage of our products and product candidates. The limited number of third parties with facilities, expertise and the capability suited to manufacture our products and product candidates creates a risk that we may not be able to obtain materials and APIs in the quantity and purity that we require. As of the date of this Quarterly Report, we have dual sourcing for the APIs for all three of our PMO commercial products and EXONDYS 51 drug product, one active source for AMONDYS 45 and VYONDYS 53 drug product, and one source for ELEVIDYS drug substance and drug product manufacturing.

Previous wording

In light of the limited number of third parties with the expertise to produce our products and product candidates, the lead time needed to manufacture them, and the availability of underlying materials, we may not be able to, in a timely manner or at all, establish or maintain sufficient clinical, commercial and other manufacturing arrangements on the commercially reasonable terms necessary to provide adequate supply of our products and product candidates. Furthermore, we may not be able to obtain the significant financial capital that may be required in connection with such arrangements. Even after successfully engaging third parties to execute the manufacturing process for our products and product candidates, such parties may not comply with the terms and timelines they have agreed to for various reasons, some of which may be out of their or our control, which impacts our ability to execute our business plans on expected or required timelines in connection with the commercialization of our products and the continued development of our product candidates.

Current wording

In light of the limited number of third parties with the expertise to produce our products and product candidates, the lead time needed to manufacture them, and the availability of underlying materials, we may not be able to, in a timely manner or at all, establish or maintain sufficient clinical, commercial and other manufacturing arrangements on the commercially reasonable terms necessary to provide adequate supply of our products and product candidates. Furthermore, we may not be able to obtain the significant financial capital that may be required in connection with such arrangements. Even after successfully engaging third parties to execute the manufacturing process and release testing for our products and product candidates, such parties may not comply with the terms and timelines they have agreed to for various reasons, some of which may be out of their or our control, which impacts our ability to execute our business plans on expected or required timelines in connection with the commercialization of our products and the continued development of our product candidates.

Previous wording

We may also be impacted by development, operation, or production disruptions involving these third parties and our partners, the reasons for which also may be outside of their or our control. Several factors could cause production interruptions, disturbances or supply chain issues at our third party manufacturing sites, including but not limited to talent acquisition/retention, equipment malfunctions, quality control and quality assurance issues, facility contamination, raw material shortages or contamination, man-made or natural disasters, public-health pandemics or epidemics, disruption in utility services, regulatory decisions and delays and possible negative effects of such delays on supply chains and expected timelines for product availability, production yield issues, shortages of qualified personnel, discontinuation of facility or business, government shutdowns, economic sanctions, human error, or disruptions in the operations of suppliers, including those caused by geopolitical conflicts or tariffs. In addition, the need to prioritize rated orders issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency pursuant to the U.S. Defense Production Act could impact the manufacturing, supply chain and distribution of our products and product candidates. Any interruption in the operation of our third-party manufacturing, supply, or distribution partners or any of their suppliers or partners could result in the cancellation of shipments, loss of product in the manufacturing process or a shortfall in supply of our products, product candidates or materials. In turn, any delay or interruption in the supply of finished commercial or clinical products could hinder our ability to distribute our products to meet commercial or clinical demand or execute our commercialization or clinical trial plans on the timing that we expect, which could result in the loss of potential revenues, adversely affect our ability to gain regulatory or market acceptance, or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects.

Current wording

We may also be impacted by development, operation, or production disruptions involving these third parties and our partners, the reasons for which also may be outside of their or our control. Several factors could cause production interruptions, disturbances or supply chain issues at our third party manufacturing, supply, testing, packaging, and distribution sites, including but not limited to talent acquisition/retention, equipment malfunctions, quality control and quality assurance issues, facility contamination, raw material shortages or contamination, man-made or natural disasters, public-health pandemics or epidemics, disruption in utility services, regulatory decisions and delays and possible negative effects of such delays on supply chains and expected timelines for product availability, production yield issues, shortages of qualified personnel, discontinuation of facility or business, government shutdowns, economic sanctions, human error, or disruptions in the operations of suppliers and other partners, including those caused by geopolitical conflicts or tariffs. In addition, the need to prioritize rated orders issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency pursuant to the U.S. Defense Production Act could impact the manufacturing, supply chain and distribution of our products and product candidates. Any interruption in the operation of our third-party manufacturing, supply, packaging, release testing, or distribution partners or any of their suppliers or partners could result in the cancellation of shipments, loss of product in the manufacturing process or a shortfall in supply of our products, product candidates or materials. In turn, any delay or interruption in the supply of finished commercial or clinical products could hinder our ability to distribute our products to meet commercial or clinical demand or execute our commercialization or clinical trial plans on the timing that we expect, which could result in the loss of potential revenues, adversely affect our ability to gain regulatory or market acceptance, or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects.

Previous wording

In addition, several of the components used in our testing are currently from single-source suppliers. If these single-source suppliers fail to satisfy the Company's requirements on a timely basis, or if the Company is forced to change suppliers, the Company could suffer delays, a possible loss of revenue, or incur higher costs, any of which could adversely affect its operating results.

Current wording

In addition, several of the components used in our manufacturing processes and for testing are currently from single-source suppliers. If these single-source suppliers fail to satisfy the Company's requirements on a timely basis, or if the Company is forced to change suppliers, the Company could suffer delays, a possible loss of revenue, or incur higher costs, any of which could adversely affect its operating results.

Previous wording

If any of the third parties on which we rely cease providing quality manufacturing and related services to us, and we are not able to engage appropriate replacements in a timely manner, our ability to manufacture our products or product candidates in sufficient quality and quantity required for our planned commercial, pre-clinical and clinical or EAPs, our various product research, development and commercialization efforts would be adversely affected. For example, with respect to ELEVIDYS, we rely on a third party to develop, manufacture, obtain and maintain regulatory approval for necessary diagnostic tests for ELEVIDYS. Any delay or failure by us or our collaborators to develop, obtain or maintain regulatory approval of the necessary diagnostic tests could harm our business, possibly materially. In addition, in connection with our siRNA programs, we currently collaborate with and rely on Arrowhead to supply drug substance manufacturing and testing services for ongoing and future clinical trials. If in the future we seek to directly manage manufacturing of any clinical and commercial products and product candidates in our siRNA pipeline, such change may divert attention from management and could shift resources from our commercial manufacturing for our other drug products and product candidates.

Current wording

If any of the third parties on which we rely cease providing quality manufacturing and related services to us, and we are not able to engage appropriate replacements in a timely manner, our ability to manufacture our products or product candidates in sufficient quality and quantity required for our planned commercial, pre-clinical and clinical or EAPs, our various product research, development and commercialization efforts would be adversely affected.

Previous wording

Our ability to accurately predict commercial demand may also be impacted by regulatory decisions. For instance, following a safety label update process, the non-ambulatory population has been removed from the Indications and Usages section of the ELEVIDYS Prescribing Information. This removal has impacted our previously forecasted demand for ELEVIDYS, which increases the risk of products and portions of our products’ supply expiring before sale or having excess materials on hand, which could have a material impact on our financial operations. To date, this has resulted in recorded reserves related to excess inventory. These types of events may continue to cause volatility in demand for ELEVIDYS, which could result in our inability to accurately forecast commercial demand for ELEVIDYS.

Current wording

Our ability to accurately predict commercial demand may also be impacted by regulatory decisions. For instance, following a safety label update process, the non-ambulatory population has been removed from the Indications and Usages section of the ELEVIDYS Prescribing Information. This removal has impacted our previously forecasted demand for ELEVIDYS, which increases the risk of products and portions of our products’ supply expiring before sale or having excess materials on hand, which could have a material impact on our financial operations. To date, this has resulted in recorded reserves related to excess inventory. These types of events may continue to cause volatility in demand for ELEVIDYS, which could result in our inability to accurately forecast commercial demand for ELEVIDYS. In addition, we announced in November 2025 topline results from our ESSENCE trial, a confirmatory trial intended to verify the clinical benefits of VYONDYS 53 and AMONDYS 45. We submitted sNDAs related to these products in April 2026, which the FDA accepted for filing in June 2026. Any future regulatory decision or action related to VYONDYS 53 or AMONDYS 45 could impact our previously-forecasted demand for these products, which may increase the risk of products and portions of our products’ supply expiring before sale or having excess materials on hand. Changes in demand also may lead to changes in our commercial relationships, including pricing, that are difficult to predict and could have a negative impact on our business.

Previous wording

In addition, if our third-party manufacturers and testing sites are unable to satisfy requirements related to the manufacturing of ELEVIDYS, our ability to meet commercial demand may be adversely impacted, which could result in the loss of potential revenues, adversely affect our ability to gain market acceptance of ELEVIDYS, or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects.

Current wording

If our third-party manufacturers and testing sites are unable to satisfy requirements related to the manufacturing of our products and product candidates, our ability to meet commercial demand may be adversely impacted, which could result in the loss of potential revenues, adversely affect our ability to gain market acceptance of our products or product candidates, or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects.

Previous wording

The third parties we use in the manufacturing process for our products and product candidates may fail to comply with cGMP regulations.

Current wording

We or the third parties we use in the manufacturing process for our products and product candidates may fail to comply with cGMP regulations.

Previous wording

Our contract manufacturers are required to produce and test our materials, APIs and drug products under cGMP. We and our contract partners are subject to periodic inspections by the FDA, EMA and corresponding state and foreign authorities to ensure strict compliance with cGMP and other applicable government regulations. In addition, before we can begin to commercially manufacture and test our product candidates in third-party or our own facilities, we must obtain regulatory approval from the FDA, which includes a review of the manufacturing and testing processes and facilities. A manufacturing authorization also must be obtained from the appropriate EU regulatory authorities and may be required by other foreign regulatory authorities. The timeframe required to obtain such approval or authorization is uncertain. In order to obtain approval, we need to demonstrate that all of our processes, methods and equipment are compliant with cGMP, and perform extensive audits of vendors, contract laboratories and suppliers. In complying with cGMP, we are obligated to expend time, money and effort in production, record keeping and quality control to seek to assure that the product meets applicable specifications and other requirements.

Current wording

Our contract partners are required to produce and test our materials, APIs and drug products under cGMP. We do not have direct operational control over a third-party's compliance with regulations and requirements. We and our contract partners are subject to periodic inspections by the FDA, EMA and corresponding state and foreign authorities to ensure strict compliance with cGMP and other applicable government regulations. In addition, before we can begin to commercially manufacture and test our product candidates in third-party or our own facilities, we must obtain regulatory approval from the FDA, which includes a review of the manufacturing and testing processes and facilities. A manufacturing authorization also must be obtained from the appropriate EU regulatory authorities and may be required by other foreign regulatory authorities. The timeframe required to obtain such approval or authorization is uncertain. In order to obtain approval, we need to demonstrate that all of our processes, methods and equipment are compliant with cGMP, and perform extensive audits of vendors, contract laboratories and suppliers. In complying with cGMP, we are obligated to expend time, money and effort in production, record keeping and quality control to seek to assure that the product meets applicable specifications and other requirements.

Previous wording

We do not have direct operational control over a third-party’s compliance with regulations and requirements. In addition, changes in cGMP could negatively impact the ability of our contract manufacturers to complete the manufacturing process of our products and product candidates in a compliant manner on the schedule we require for commercial and clinical trial use, respectively. Failure by our contract manufacturing and testing partners to achieve, maintain compliance with, or adhere to applicable cGMP and other applicable government regulations, including failure to detect or control anticipated or unanticipated errors, or our contract partners experiencing problems, may result in significant negative consequences, including product seizures or recalls, postponement or cancellation of clinical trials, clinical holds, loss or delay of product approvals, patient injury or death, fines and sanctions, loss of revenue, termination of the development of a product candidate, reputational damage, shipment delays, inventory shortages, inventory write-offs and other product-related charges and increased manufacturing costs. If we experience any of these consequences, the success of our commercialization of our products and/or our development efforts for our product candidates could be significantly delayed, fail or otherwise be negatively impacted.

Current wording

Failure by us or our contract manufacturing and testing partners to achieve, maintain compliance with, or adhere to applicable cGMP and other applicable government regulations, including failure to detect or control anticipated or unanticipated errors, or our contract partners experiencing problems, may result in significant negative consequences, including product seizures or recalls, postponement or cancellation of clinical trials, clinical holds, loss or delay of product approvals, patient injury or death, fines and sanctions, loss of revenue, termination of the development of a product candidate, reputational damage, shipment delays, inventory shortages, inventory write-offs and other product-related charges and increased manufacturing costs. If we experience any of these consequences, the success of our commercialization of our products and/or our development efforts for our product candidates could be significantly delayed, fail or otherwise be negatively impacted.

Previous wording

Finally, with respect to ELEVIDYS and our gene therapy programs, the current capacity to produce and test our viral vectors or gene therapy product candidates at commercial levels is limited, and the availability of sufficient GMP compliant capacity may result in delays in our development plans or increased capital expenditures, and the development and sales of any gene therapy products, if approved, may be materially harmed.

Current wording

Finally, with respect to ELEVIDYS and our gene therapy programs in particular, the current capacity to produce and test our viral vectors or gene therapy product candidates at commercial levels is limited, and the availability of sufficient GMP compliant capacity may result in delays in our development plans or increased capital expenditures, and the development and sales of any gene therapy products, if approved, may be materially harmed. We also rely on a third party to develop, manufacture, obtain and maintain regulatory approval for necessary diagnostic tests for ELEVIDYS. Any delay or failure by us or our collaborators to develop, obtain or maintain regulatory approval of the necessary diagnostic tests could harm our business, possibly materially.

Previous wording

We have historically focused on optimizing manufacturing, including for our product candidates, gene therapy and other programs. We may not be able to successfully increase manufacturing capacity for the production of materials, APIs and drug products, whether in collaboration with third party manufacturers or on our own, in a manner that is safe, compliant with cGMP conditions or other applicable legal or regulatory requirements, in a cost-effective manner, in a time frame required to meet our timeline for commercialization, clinical trials and other business plans, or at all.

Current wording

We have historically focused on optimizing manufacturing, including for our product candidates, gene therapy, PMOs, and other programs. For example, as our product candidates advance to later clinical stages, we have sought and may seek in the future to alter manufacturing and/or other product components and processes to optimize the products and product candidates for the scale-up necessary for later stage clinical trials, potential approval, and commercialization. We may not be able to successfully increase manufacturing capacity or optimize manufacturing processes for the production of materials, APIs and drug products, whether in collaboration with third party manufacturers or on our own, in a manner that is safe, compliant with cGMP conditions or other applicable legal or regulatory requirements, in a cost-effective manner, in a time frame required to meet our timeline for commercialization, clinical trials and other business plans, or at all.

Previous wording

During our work with our third-party manufacturers to increase and/or optimize manufacturing capacity, they may make proprietary improvements in the manufacturing processes for our products or product candidates. We may not own or be able to secure ownership of such improvements or may have to share the intellectual property rights to those improvements. Additionally, we may need additional processes, technologies and validation studies, which could be costly and which we may not be able to develop or acquire from third parties. Failure to secure the intellectual property rights required for the manufacturing process needed for large-scale clinical trials or the continued development of our product candidates could cause significant delays in our business plans or otherwise negatively impact the continued development of our product candidates.

Current wording

During our work with our third-party manufacturers to increase and/or optimize manufacturing capacity and processes, they may make proprietary improvements in the manufacturing or testing processes for our products or product candidates. We may not own or be able to secure ownership of such improvements or may have to share the intellectual property rights to those improvements. Additionally, we may need additional processes, technologies and validation studies, which could be costly and which we may not be able to develop or acquire from third parties. Failure to secure the intellectual property rights required for the manufacturing and testing processes needed for large-scale clinical trials or the continued development of our product candidates could cause significant delays in our business plans or otherwise negatively impact the continued development of our product candidates.

Previous wording

Further, the physical and chemical properties of biologics such as ours generally cannot be fully characterized. As a result, assays of the finished product may not be sufficient to ensure that the product will perform in the intended manner. Accordingly, we employ multiple steps to control our manufacturing process to assure that the process works and the product candidate is made strictly and consistently in compliance with the process. We may encounter problems hiring and retaining the experienced scientific, quality control and manufacturing personnel needed to operate our manufacturing process, which could result in delays in our production or difficulties in maintaining compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. Problems with the manufacturing process, even minor deviations from the normal process, could result in delays in product release, product defects or manufacturing failures that result in lot failures, product recalls, product liability claims or insufficient inventory. We may encounter problems achieving adequate quantities and quality of clinical and/or commercial-grade materials that meet FDA, EMA or other applicable foreign standards or specifications with consistent and acceptable production yields and costs. We also face risk of damage during shipping and storage of the APIs or finished drug product. Lot failures or product recalls could cause us to delay clinical trials or product launches, or may result in an inability to fulfill demand for commercial supply of our products, which could be costly to us and otherwise harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, the FDA, the EMA and other foreign regulatory authorities may require us to submit samples of any approved product together with the protocols showing the results of applicable tests at any time. Under some circumstances, the FDA, the EMA or other foreign regulatory authorities may require that we not distribute a lot until the competent authority authorizes its release.

Current wording

Several factors could result in delays in and expenses relating to this manufacturing control process. We or our third-party partners may encounter problems hiring and retaining the experienced scientific, quality control and manufacturing personnel needed to operate our manufacturing process, which could result in delays in our production or difficulties in maintaining compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. Problems with the manufacturing or testing processes, even minor deviations from the normal process, could result in delays in product release, product defects or manufacturing failures that result in lot failures, product recalls, product liability claims or insufficient inventory. We may encounter problems achieving adequate quantities and quality of clinical and/or commercial grade materials that meet FDA, EMA or other applicable foreign standards or specifications with consistent and acceptable production yields and costs, which may and has resulted in write-offs of batches of our products not meeting our quality specifications. We also face risk of damage during shipping and storage of the APIs or finished drug product. Lot failures or product recalls could cause us to delay clinical trials or product launches or may result in an inability to fulfill demand for commercial supply of our products, which could be costly to us and otherwise harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Previous wording

The patent positions of pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other life sciences companies can be highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions for which important legal principles remain unresolved. This uncertainty is heightened for our PMO- based products and product candidates, our gene therapy-based products and product candidates, and our siRNA product candidates for which there has not been a significant number of patent litigations involving such technologies. Congress periodically considers changes to patent law, and that such changes could have adverse effects. No consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology patents has emerged to date in the U.S. and tests used for determining the patentability of patent claims in all technologies are in flux. The USPTO and patent offices in other jurisdictions have often required that patent applications directed to pharmaceutical and/or biotechnology-related inventions be limited or narrowed substantially to cover only the specific innovations exemplified in the patent application, thereby limiting the scope of protection against competitive challenges. Accordingly, even if we or our licensors are able to obtain patents, the patents might be substantially narrower than anticipated. Thus, there is no assurance as to the degree and range of protections any of our patents, if issued, may afford us or whether patents will be issued. Patents which may be issued to us may be subjected to further governmental review that may ultimately result in the reduction of their scope of protection or term of patent, and pending patent applications may have their requested breadth of protection significantly limited before being issued, if issued at all. The pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other life sciences patent situation outside the U.S. can be even more uncertain.

Current wording

PMO- based products and product candidates, our gene therapy-based products and product candidates, and our siRNA product candidates for which there has not been a significant number of patent litigations involving such technologies. Congress periodically considers changes to patent law, and that such changes could have adverse effects. No consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology patents has emerged to date in the U.S. and tests used for determining the patentability of patent claims in all technologies are in flux. The USPTO and patent offices in other jurisdictions have often required that patent applications directed to pharmaceutical and/or biotechnology-related inventions be limited or narrowed substantially to cover only the specific innovations exemplified in the patent application, thereby limiting the scope of protection against competitive challenges. Accordingly, even if we or our licensors are able to obtain patents, the patents might be substantially narrower than anticipated. Thus, there is no assurance as to the degree and range of protections any of our patents, if issued, may afford us or whether patents will be issued. Patents which may be issued to us may be subjected to further governmental review that may ultimately result in the reduction of their scope of protection or term of patent, and pending patent applications may have their requested breadth of protection significantly limited before being issued, if issued at all. The pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other life sciences patent situation outside the U.S. can be even more uncertain.

Previous wording

The number and complexity of both federal and state laws continues to increase, and additional governmental resources are being used to enforce these laws and to prosecute companies and individuals who are believed to be violating them. We anticipate that government scrutiny of pharmaceutical sales and marketing practices and other activities will continue for the foreseeable future and subject us to the risk of government investigations and enforcement actions. Given the breadth of the laws and regulations, limited guidance for certain laws and regulations, and evolving government interpretations of the laws and regulations, governmental authorities may possibly conclude that our business practices are non-compliant. For example, in September 2025, the FDA stated that it intends to more aggressively enforce requirements for direct-to-consumer ("DTC") drug advertising and sent more than 100 warning or untitled letters to companies for allegedly deceptive prescription drug advertising, which represents a dramatic increase in FDA actions as compared to prior years. The FDA also announced plans to expand its oversight of digital and social media advertising and to initiate a rulemaking that would call for drug companies to disclose additional safety information in DTC broadcast advertisements. The nature and extent of changes to FDA regulations and enforcement approach is unclear but may impact pharmaceutical marketing efforts industry-wide, including for us, which could in turn impact our sales and operations. As another example, recent government communications indicate that the longstanding focus of federal enforcement agencies on pharmaceutical company activities will continue. In 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) issued a white collar enforcement plan identifying enforcement priorities for prosecuting corporate and white collar crime which includes health care fraud. Similarly, the DOJ-HHS False Claims Act Working Group enforcement priorities include drug pricing and kickbacks related to drugs paid for by federal healthcare programs.

Current wording

The number and complexity of both federal and state laws continues to increase, and additional governmental resources are being used to enforce these laws and to prosecute companies and individuals who are believed to be violating them. We anticipate that government scrutiny of pharmaceutical sales and marketing practices and other activities will continue for the foreseeable future and subject us to the risk of government investigations and enforcement actions. Given the breadth of the laws and regulations, limited guidance for certain laws and regulations, and evolving government interpretations of the laws and regulations, governmental authorities may possibly conclude that our business practices are non-compliant. For example, in September 2025, the FDA stated that it intends to more aggressively enforce requirements for direct-to-consumer ("DTC") drug advertising and sent more than 100 warning or untitled letters to companies for allegedly deceptive prescription drug advertising, which represents a dramatic increase in FDA actions as compared to prior years. The FDA also announced plans to expand its oversight of digital and social media advertising and to initiate a rulemaking that would call for drug companies to disclose additional safety information in DTC broadcast advertisements. The nature and extent of changes to FDA regulations and enforcement approach is unclear but may impact pharmaceutical marketing efforts industry-wide, including for us, which could in turn impact our sales and operations. As another example, recent government communications indicate that the longstanding focus of federal enforcement agencies on pharmaceutical company activities will continue. In 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) issued a white collar enforcement plan identifying enforcement priorities for prosecuting corporate and white collar crime which includes health care fraud. Similarly, the DOJ-HHS False Claims Act Working

Previous wording

Requirements are subject to challenge and change. For instance, the PHS 340B drug pricing program continues to be subject to legal and regulatory activity, including litigation, at the federal and state levels, and any related developments could alert the scope of the program and our obligation to offer discounts. Continued expansion of the PHS 340B drug pricing program and growth of entities claiming entitlement to 340B pricing, including in ways that may be inconsistent with the statutory scheme, could impact our revenue. Changes to the calculation of rebates under the Medicaid program could increase our Medicaid rebate obligations and decrease the prices charged to 340B covered entities. Any such changes in Medicare average sales price reporting could implicate those pricing calculations and the Medicare reimbursement rates for drugs. For example, beginning in 2026, enhanced documentation and certification requirements must be met for manufacturers to exclude certain service fees from pricing calculations under the Medicare program.

Current wording

Requirements are subject to challenge and change. For instance, the PHS 340B drug pricing program continues to be subject to legal and regulatory activity, including litigation, at the federal and state levels, and any related developments could alter the scope of the program and our obligation to offer discounts. Continued expansion of the PHS 340B drug pricing program and growth of entities claiming entitlement to 340B pricing, including in ways that may be inconsistent with the statutory scheme, could impact our revenue. Changes to the calculation of rebates under the Medicaid program could increase our Medicaid rebate obligations and decrease the prices charged to 340B covered entities. Any such changes in Medicare average sales price reporting could implicate those pricing calculations and the Medicare reimbursement rates for drugs. For example, beginning in 2026, enhanced documentation and certification requirements must be met for manufacturers to exclude certain service fees from pricing calculations under the Medicare program.