MapLight Therapeutics, Inc.

Previous wording

Investment in biopharmaceutical product development is highly speculative because development efforts entail substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that any potential product candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate efficacy or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory approval and become commercially viable. We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales to date. As a result, we are not profitable, have incurred substantial losses in each period since our inception and expect to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future.

Current wording

Investment in biopharmaceutical product development is highly speculative because development efforts entail substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that any potential product candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate efficacy or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory approval and become commercially viable. We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales to date. As a result, we are not profitable, have incurred substantial losses in each period since our inception and expect to incur substantial losses for the foreseeable future.

Previous wording

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, our net losses were $77.6 million, $55.7 million and $81.6 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $281.0 million. Substantially all of our losses have resulted from expenses incurred in connection with the development of our pipeline and platform, research and development, clinical trials and from general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We expect to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future, and we expect these losses to increase as we continue the development of our product candidates. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if, and as, we:

Current wording

For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, our net losses were $60.7 million and $22.3 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $421.2 million. Substantially all of our losses have resulted from expenses incurred in connection with the development of our platform, research and development, clinical trials and from general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We expect to incur substantial losses for the foreseeable future, and we expect these losses to increase as we continue the development of our product candidates. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if, and as, we:

Previous wording

conduct clinical trials of ML-007C-MA and ML-004 and advance our preclinical programs;

Current wording

conduct additional clinical trials for ML-007C-MA and ML-004 and advance our preclinical programs;

Previous wording

As of September 30, 2025, we had $227.2 million of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. In October 2025, we completed our initial public offering and the concurrent private placement, raising estimated aggregate net proceeds of $269.8 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions, the placement agent fee and estimated offering expenses. We believe our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to fund our operations through 2027. This estimate is based on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and our future capital requirements and the period through which our existing resources will support our operations may vary significantly from what we expect. We will require additional capital in order to complete clinical development of any of our current programs, and our spending levels will vary based on new and ongoing development and corporate activities. Because the length of time and activities associated with development of our programs and product candidates is highly uncertain, we are unable to estimate the actual funds we will require for development and any approved marketing and future commercialization activities, if any. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

Current wording

Our operations have consumed substantial amounts of cash since our inception. We expect to continue to spend substantial amounts of cash to conduct further research and development, preclinical studies and clinical trials of our current and future product candidates, to seek regulatory approvals for our product candidates and to launch and commercialize any products if we receive regulatory approval. As of March 31, 2026, we had $395.2 million of cash, cash equivalents and investments. Based on our current operational plans and assumptions, we believe our existing cash, cash equivalents and investments will be sufficient to fund our operations through 2027. This estimate is based on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and our future capital requirements and the period through which our existing resources will support our operations may vary significantly from what we expect. We will require additional capital in order to complete clinical development of any of our current programs, and our spending levels will vary based on new and ongoing development and corporate activities. Because the length of time and activities associated with development of our programs and product candidates is highly uncertain, we are unable to estimate the actual funds we will require for development and any approved marketing and future commercialization activities, if any. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

Previous wording

the effectiveness of our platform in identifying and assessing additional indications of interest based on circuit specific pathways;

Current wording

the effectiveness of our platform in identifying additional targets and indications of interest;

Previous wording

our ability to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority that the applicable product candidate is safe and effective as for its intended uses;

Current wording

our ability to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority that the applicable product candidate is safe and effective for its intended uses;

Previous wording

our ability to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority that the applicable product candidate's risk-benefit ratio for its proposed indication is acceptable;

Current wording

our ability to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority that the applicable product candidate's benefit risk assessment for its proposed indication is acceptable;

Previous wording

Many of these factors are beyond our control, and it is possible that none of our product candidates, including ML-007C-MA and ML-004, will ever obtain regulatory approval even if we expend substantial time and resources seeking such approval. If we experience significant delays or are otherwise unable to successfully commercialize our product candidates, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

Current wording

Many of these factors are beyond our control, and it is possible that none of our product candidates will ever obtain regulatory approval even if we expend substantial time and resources seeking such approval. If we experience significant delays or are otherwise unable to successfully commercialize our product candidates, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

Previous wording

Additionally, clinical or regulatory setbacks to other companies developing similar products or within adjacent fields may impact the clinical development of and regulatory pathway for our current or future product candidates, or may negatively impact the perceptions of value or risk of our technologies.

Current wording

Additionally, clinical or regulatory setbacks to other companies developing similar products or within adjacent fields may impact the clinical development of and regulatory pathway for our current or future product candidates or may negatively impact the perceptions of value or risk of our product candidates or technologies.

Previous wording

Clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and is inherently uncertain as to outcome. We cannot guarantee that any clinical trials will be conducted as planned or completed on schedule, if at all. The clinical development of ML-007C-MA and ML-004 is susceptible to the risk of failure inherent at any stage of development, including failure to demonstrate efficacy in a clinical trial or across a broad population of patients, the occurrence of AEs that are severe or medically or commercially unacceptable, failure to comply with protocols or applicable regulatory requirements and determination by the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority that a product candidate may not continue development or is not approvable. Additionally, because ML-007C-MA is a fixed-combination drug product, we will need to demonstrate that each component of the product candidate makes a contribution to the claimed effects (safety and tolerability) and the dosage of each component (amount, frequency, duration) in combination is safe and effective for a significant patient population requiring such concurrent therapy as defined in the labeling for the drug. In addition, if the PAC we have selected has regulatory challenges, it may adversely impact the development of our fixed-combination drug product. It is possible that even if one of our product candidates has a beneficial effect, that effect will not be detected during clinical evaluation as a result of one or more of a variety of factors, including the size, duration, design, measurements, conduct or analysis of our clinical trials. Conversely, as a result of the same factors, our clinical trials may indicate an apparent positive effect of one of our product candidates that is greater than the actual positive effect, if any. Similarly, in our clinical trials we may fail to detect toxicity of or intolerability caused by one of our product candidates, or mistakenly believe that our product candidates are toxic or not well tolerated when that is not, in fact, the case. In addition, varying interpretations of the data obtained from preclinical and clinical testing could delay, limit or prevent marketing approval of a product candidate.

Current wording

Clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and is inherently uncertain as to outcome. We cannot guarantee that any clinical trials will be conducted as planned or completed on schedule, if at all. Clinical development is susceptible to the risk of failure inherent at any stage of development, including failure to demonstrate efficacy in a clinical trial or across a broad population of patients, the occurrence of AEs that are severe or medically or commercially unacceptable, failure to comply with protocols or applicable regulatory requirements and determination by the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority that a product candidate may not continue development or is not approvable. Additionally, given that ML-007C-MA is a fixed-combination drug product, we will need to demonstrate that each component of the product candidate makes a contribution to the claimed effects (safety and tolerability) and the dosage of each component (amount, frequency, duration) in combination is safe and effective for a significant patient population requiring such concurrent therapy as defined in the labeling for the drug. In addition, if the PAC we have selected has regulatory challenges, it may adversely impact the development of our fixed-combination drug product. It is possible that even if one of our product candidates has a beneficial effect, that effect will not be detected during clinical evaluation as a result of one or more of a variety of factors, including the size, duration, design, measurements, conduct or analysis of our clinical trials. Conversely, as a result of the same factors, our clinical trials may indicate an apparent positive effect of one of our product candidates that is greater than the actual positive effect, if any. Similarly, in our clinical trials we may fail to detect toxicity of or intolerability caused by one of our product candidates, or mistakenly believe that our product candidates are toxic or not well tolerated when that is not, in fact, the case. In addition, varying interpretations of the data obtained from preclinical and clinical testing could delay, limit or prevent marketing approval of a product candidate.

Previous wording

This lengthy approval process as well as the unpredictability of clinical trial results may result in our failing to obtain regulatory approval to market any product candidate we develop, which would significantly harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. There is no assurance that the endpoints and trial designs used for the approval of currently approved drugs will be acceptable for future approvals, including for those of our product candidates. The FDA and other comparable foreign authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and determining when or whether regulatory approval will be obtained for any product candidate that we develop. Even if we believe the data collected from our current or future clinical trials of our product candidates are promising, such data may not be sufficient to support approval by the FDA or any other regulatory authority.

Current wording

This lengthy approval process as well as the unpredictability of clinical trial results may result in our failing to obtain regulatory approval to market any product candidate we develop, which would significantly harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. There is no assurance that the endpoints and trial designs used for the approval of currently approved drugs will be acceptable for future approvals, including for those of our product candidates. For example, in 2024, the FDA published revised draft guidance for drug development in early AD with a recommendation to use consensus diagnostic criteria intended to establish the true biological presence of AD, rather than criteria based on syndromic or other definitions. The FDA and other comparable foreign authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and determining when or whether regulatory approval will be obtained for any product candidate that we develop. Even if we believe the data collected from our current or future clinical trials of our product candidates are promising, such data may not be sufficient to support approval by the FDA or any other regulatory authority.

Previous wording

We may experience delays in completing our clinical trials or preclinical studies and initiating or completing additional clinical trials. We may also experience numerous unforeseen events during our clinical trials that could delay or prevent our ability to receive marketing approval or commercialize the product candidates we develop, including:

Current wording

We may experience delays in initiating or completing our clinical trials or preclinical studies. We may also experience numerous unforeseen events during our clinical trials that could delay or prevent our ability to receive marketing approval or commercialize the product candidates we develop, including:

Previous wording

the number of subjects or patients required for clinical trials may be larger than we anticipate, enrollment in these clinical trials may be insufficient or slower than we anticipate, the number of clinical trials being conducted at any given time may be high and result in fewer available patients for any given clinical trial or patients may drop out of clinical trials at a higher rate than we anticipate;

Current wording

the number of subjects or patients required for clinical trials may be larger than we anticipate, enrollment in these clinical trials may be insufficient or slower than we anticipate, the number of competing clinical trials being conducted at any given time may be high and result in fewer available patients for any given clinical trial or patients may drop out of clinical trials at a higher rate than we anticipate;

Previous wording

Our inability to enroll a sufficient number of patients for our clinical trials could result in significant delays or might require us to abandon one or more clinical trials altogether. Delays in patient enrollment may result in increased costs, affect the timing or outcome of the planned clinical trials, product candidate development and approval process, prevent completion of these trials and jeopardize our ability to seek and obtain the regulatory approval required to commence product sales and generate revenue, which could adversely affect our ability to advance the development of our product candidates, cause the value of our company to decline and limit our ability to obtain additional financing, if needed.

Current wording

Our inability to enroll a sufficient number of patients for our clinical trials could result in significant delays or might require us to abandon one or more clinical trials altogether. Our clinical trials may face delays if we are required to restrict enrollment to a more selective group of participants based on age, disease severity or biomarkers, among other factors. For example, in 2024 the FDA published revised draft guidance for drug development in early AD with a recommendation to use consensus diagnostic criteria intended to establish the true biological presence of AD, rather than criteria based on syndromic or other definitions. Delays in patient enrollment may result in increased costs, affect the timing or outcome of the planned clinical trials, product candidate development and approval process, prevent completion of these trials and jeopardize our ability to seek and obtain the regulatory approval required to commence product sales and generate revenue, which could adversely affect our ability to advance the development of our product candidates, cause the value of our company to decline and limit our ability to obtain additional financing, if needed.

Previous wording

Obtaining authorization from regulatory authorities for clinical trials of ML-004 in children and adolescents may require longer duration of studies than we currently anticipate, which could delay our development programs or preclude us from pursuing approval in the populations for which we are seeking approval.

Current wording

Obtaining authorization from regulatory authorities for clinical trials in adolescents and pediatric patients may require longer duration of studies than we currently anticipate, which could delay our development programs or preclude us from pursuing approval in the populations for which we are seeking approval.

Previous wording

Pediatric drug development may require additional trials to determine safe dosing and long-term safety. These additional trials may require investment of significant additional resources beyond those required for regulatory approval of the drugs in adults. We cannot guarantee that we will receive regulatory approval to commercialize our product candidates in the pediatric populations or the adult population.

Current wording

Pediatric drug development, including with respect to ML-004 for the treatment of adolescents, may require additional trials to determine safe dosing and long-term safety. These additional trials may require investment of significant additional resources beyond those required for regulatory approval of the drugs in adults. We cannot guarantee that we will receive regulatory approval to commercialize our product candidates in the pediatric populations or the adult population.

Previous wording

We have never commercialized a product, and even if any of our product candidates is approved by the appropriate regulatory authorities for marketing and sale, it may nonetheless fail to achieve sufficient market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community. Many of the indications for our product candidates have well-established standards of care that physicians, patients and payors are familiar with and, in some cases, are available generically. Even if our product candidates are successful in registrational clinical trials, they may not be successful in displacing these current standards of care if we are unable to demonstrate superior efficacy, safety, ease of administration and/or cost-effectiveness. For example, physicians may be reluctant to take their patients off their current medications and switch their treatment regimen to our product candidates. Further, patients often acclimate to the treatment regimen that they are currently taking and do not want to switch unless their physicians recommend switching products or they are required to switch due to lack of coverage and adequate reimbursement. Even if we are able to demonstrate our product candidates' safety and efficacy to the FDA and other regulators, safety or efficacy concerns in the medical community may hinder market acceptance.

Current wording

We have never commercialized a product, and even if any of our product candidates is approved by the appropriate regulatory authorities for marketing and sale, it may nonetheless fail to achieve sufficient acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community. Many of the indications for our product candidates have well-established standards of care that physicians, patients and payors are familiar with and, in some cases, are available generically. Even if our product candidates are successful in registrational clinical trials, they may not be successful in displacing these current standards of care if we are unable to demonstrate superior efficacy, safety, ease of administration and/or cost-effectiveness. For example, physicians may be reluctant to take their patients off their current medications and switch their treatment regimen to our product candidates. Further, patients often acclimate to the treatment regimen that they are currently taking and do not want to switch unless their physicians recommend switching products or they are required to switch due to lack of coverage and adequate reimbursement. Even if we are able to demonstrate our product candidates' safety and efficacy to the FDA and other regulators, safety or efficacy concerns in the medical community may hinder market acceptance.

Previous wording

We have focused our research and development efforts on addressing disorders of the CNS. Efforts by biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies in this field have faced certain challenges in drug development historically. In particular, we are developing ML-007C-MA for the treatment of schizophrenia and ADP, and clinical trials focused on neuropsychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia or ADP rely on subjective patient-reported outcomes as key endpoints. This makes them more difficult to evaluate than indications with more objective endpoints. Furthermore, these indications are often subject to a placebo effect, which may make it more challenging to isolate the beneficial effects of our product candidates. There can be no guarantee that we will successfully overcome these challenges with our product candidates or that we will not encounter other challenges in the development of our product candidates.

Current wording

We have focused our research and development efforts on addressing disorders of the CNS. Efforts by biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies in this field have faced certain challenges in drug development historically. For example, we are currently developing ML-007C-MA for the treatment of schizophrenia and ADP, and clinical trials focused on neuropsychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia or ADP rely on subjective patient-reported outcomes as key endpoints. This makes these trials more difficult to evaluate than indications with more objective endpoints. Furthermore, these indications are often subject to a placebo effect, which may make it more challenging to isolate the beneficial effects of our product candidates. There can be no guarantee that we will successfully overcome these challenges with our product candidates or that we will not encounter other challenges in the development of our product candidates.

Previous wording

Following any such strategic transaction, we may not achieve any expected synergies to justify the transaction. For example, such transactions may require us to incur non-recurring or other charges, increase our near-term and long-term expenditures, experience significant integration or implementation challenges or disrupt our management or business. These transactions would entail numerous operational and financial risks, including exposure to unknown liabilities; disruption of our business and diversion of our management's time and attention in order to manage a collaboration or develop acquired products, product candidates or technologies; incurrence of substantial debt or dilutive issuances of equity securities to pay transaction consideration or costs; higher-than-expected acquisition or integration costs, write-downs of assets or goodwill or impairment charges; increased amortization expenses; difficulty and cost in facilitating the transaction or combining the operations and personnel of any acquired business; impairment of relationships with key suppliers, manufacturers or customers of any acquired business due to changes in management and ownership; and the inability to retain key employees of any acquired business.

Current wording

Following any such strategic transaction, we may not achieve any expected synergies to justify the transaction. For example, such transactions may require us to incur non-recurring or other charges, increase our near-term and long-term expenditures, experience significant integration or implementation challenges or disrupt our management or business. These transactions would entail numerous operational and financial risks, including exposure to unknown liabilities; disruption of our business and diversion of our management's time and attention in order to manage a collaboration or develop acquired products, product candidates or technologies; incurrence of substantial debt or dilutive issuances of equity securities to pay transaction consideration or costs; higher-than-expected acquisition or integration costs, write-downs of assets or goodwill or impairment charges; increased amortization expenses; difficulty and cost in facilitating the transaction or combining the operations and personnel of any acquired business;

Previous wording

Successful sales of our product candidates in the U.S. market, if approved, will depend, in part, on the extent to which our products will be covered by third-party payors, such as government health programs like Medicaid and Medicare, or private health insurance (including managed care plans). These third-party payors are increasingly limiting coverage and/or reducing reimbursements for medical products and services. A third-party payor's decision to provide coverage for a drug product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Further, one payor's determination to provide coverage for a drug product does not ensure that other payors will also provide coverage for the drug product. Coverage policies and third-party payor reimbursement rates may change at any time. Third-party payors are increasingly reducing coverage for medical drugs and services and implementing measures to control utilization of drugs (such as requiring prior authorization for coverage). Patient copays can be significant and may vary among products within a class depending upon the formulary status of an agent with a particular payor. Inconsistencies in formulary status across state Medicaid plans and commercial payers may result in coverage gaps in some geographical areas.

Current wording

Successful sales of our product candidates in the U.S. market, if approved, will depend, in part, on the extent to which our products will be covered by third-party payors, such as government health programs like Medicaid and Medicare, or private health insurance (including managed care plans). These third-party payors are increasingly limiting coverage and/or reducing reimbursements for medical products and services. A third-party payor's decision to provide coverage for a drug product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Further, one payor's determination to provide coverage for a drug product does not ensure that other payors will also provide coverage for the drug product. Coverage policies and third-party payor reimbursement rates may change at any time. Third-party payors are increasingly reducing coverage for medical drugs and services and implementing measures to control utilization of drugs (such as requiring prior authorization for coverage). Patient copays can be significant and may vary among products within a class depending upon the formulary status of an agent with a particular payor. Inconsistencies in formulary status across state Medicaid plans and commercial payors may result in coverage gaps in some geographical areas.

Previous wording

The market for ML-007C-MA for schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease psychosis, ML-004 for autism spectrum disorders and any other product candidates we may develop may be smaller than we expect.

Current wording

The market for our current or future product candidates may be smaller than we expect.

Previous wording

Our estimates of the potential market opportunity for ML-007C-MA for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia and ADP, ML-004 for ASD and any other product candidates we may develop include several key assumptions based on our industry knowledge, industry publications and third-party research reports. There can be no assurance that any of these assumptions are, or will remain, accurate. If the actual markets for ML-007C-MA or ML-004 for these or other indications, or for any other product candidate we may develop, is smaller than we expect, our revenue, if any, may be limited and it may be more difficult for us to achieve or maintain profitability.

Current wording

Our estimates of the potential market opportunity for ML-007C-MA for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia and ADP, ML-004 for ASD and any other product candidates we may develop include several key assumptions based on our industry knowledge, industry publications and third-party research reports. There can be no assurance that any of these assumptions are, or will remain, accurate. If the actual markets for ML-007C-MA or ML-004 for these or other indications, or for any other product candidate we may develop, are smaller than we expect, our revenue, if any, may be limited and it may be more difficult for us to achieve or maintain profitability.

Previous wording

We are developing ML-007C-MA for the treatment of schizophrenia, ADP and other potential indications. We may face competition from typical and atypical antipsychotic treatments that work primarily by inhibiting dopamine and serotonin receptors. In addition, we are aware of several product candidates in clinical development that are designed to modulate muscarinic receptors, such as KarXT, which is marketed as COBENFY for the treatment of schizophrenia and being developed for additional indications by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; emraclidine, which is being developed by AbbVie Inc.; NBI-'568, NBI-'570 and NBI-'567, which are being developed by Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.; and NMRA-861 and NMRA-898, which are being developed by Neumora Therapeutics, Inc.

Current wording

We are developing ML-007C-MA for the treatment of schizophrenia, ADP and other potential indications. We may face competition from typical and atypical antipsychotic treatments that work primarily by inhibiting dopamine and serotonin receptors. In addition, we are aware of several product candidates in development that are designed to modulate muscarinic receptors, such as Cobenfy (also known as KarXT), which is marketed for the treatment of schizophrenia and being developed for additional indications by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; emraclidine, which is being developed by AbbVie Inc.; direclidine, NBI-'570 and NBI-'567, which are being developed by Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.; and NMRA-861 and NMRA-898, which are being developed by Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. and Syremis Therapeutics Ltd.

Previous wording

We are developing ML-004 for the treatment of ASD. There are no FDA-approved pharmaceutical treatments for social communication deficits in ASD. In the treatment of the irritability symptoms associated with ASD, we may face competition from ABILIFY, marketed by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and RISPERDAL, marketed by Johnson & Johnson, as well as from generic forms of those drugs that are being marketed and sold.

Current wording

We are developing ML-004 for the treatment of ASD. There are currently no FDA-approved pharmaceutical treatments for social communication deficits in ASD. In the treatment of the irritability symptoms associated with ASD, we may face competition from ABILIFY, marketed by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and RISPERDAL, marketed by Johnson & Johnson, as well as from generic forms of those drugs that are being marketed and sold.

Previous wording

If ML-007C-MA, ML-004 or any of our other product candidates are approved for commercialization, we may seek to enter into agreements with third parties to market them in certain jurisdictions outside the United States. We expect that we would be subject to additional risks related to international pharmaceutical operations, including:

Current wording

If any of our current or future product candidates are approved for commercialization, we may seek to enter into agreements with third parties to market them in certain jurisdictions outside the United States. We expect that we would be subject to additional risks related to international pharmaceutical operations, including:

Previous wording

Since the ACA's passage, legislative changes to the ACA have been proposed and adopted. On July 4, 2025, the annual reconciliation bill, the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," or OBBBA, was signed into law, which is expected to reduce Medicaid spending and enrollment by implementing work requirements for some beneficiaries, capping state-directed payments, reducing federal funding, and limiting provider taxes used to fund the program. OBBBA also narrows access to ACA marketplace exchange enrollment and declines to extend the ACA's enhanced advanced premium tax credits, set to expire in 2025, which, among other provisions in the law, are anticipated to reduce the number of Americans with health insurance. Additionally, under the sequestration required by the Budget Control Act of 2011, beginning April 1, 2013, Medicare payments to providers were reduced, which will remain in effect through 2032 unless additional Congressional action is taken. On March 11, 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 was signed into law, which eliminated the statutory cap on the Medicaid drug rebate effective January 1, 2024. The rebate was previously capped at 100% of a drug's average manufacturer price.

Current wording

For example, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, or collectively the ACA, was enacted in the United States in 2010 and substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both the government and private insurers. Since the ACA's passage, legislative changes to the ACA have been proposed and adopted. For example, on July 4, 2025, the annual reconciliation bill, the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," or OBBBA, was signed into law, which narrowed access to ACA marketplace exchange enrollment and declined to extend the ACA's enhanced advanced premium tax credits, set to expire in 2025, which, among other provisions in the law, are anticipated to reduce the number of Americans with health insurance. The OBBBA is also expected to reduce Medicaid spending and enrollment by implementing work requirements for some beneficiaries, capping state-directed payments, reducing federal funding, and limiting provider taxes used to fund the program. Congress is considering proposed legislation intended to further reduce healthcare costs with alternatives to replace the expired ACA subsidies. We expect that additional U.S. federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that the U.S. federal government will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand for our product candidates, if approved, or additional pricing pressures.

Previous wording

We are unable to predict the future course of federal or state healthcare legislation and regulation in the U.S. directed at broadening the availability of healthcare and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare, particularly in light of the recent U.S. Presidential and Congressional elections. The current Presidential administration is pursuing policies to reduce regulations and expenditures across the federal government, including at HHS, the FDA, the CMS, and related agencies. These actions, presently directed by executive orders or memoranda from the Office of Management and Budget, may propose policy changes that create additional uncertainty for our business. These actions and proposals include, for example, include (1) reducing agency workforce and cut programs; (2) rescinding a Biden administration executive order tasking the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation to consider new payment and healthcare models to limit drug spending; (3) eliminating the Biden administration's executive order that directed HHS to establish an AI task force and develop a strategic plan; (4) directing HHS and other agencies to lower prescription drug costs through a variety of initiatives, including by improving upon the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program and establishing most-favored-nation pricing for pharmaceutical products; (5) imposing tariffs of imported pharmaceutical products; and (6) directing certain federal agencies to enforce existing law regarding hospital and price plan price transparency and by standardizing prices across hospitals and health plans. Additionally, in its June 2024 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, or Loper Bright, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the longstanding Chevron doctrine, under which courts were required to give deference to regulatory agencies' reasonable interpretations of ambiguous federal statutes The Loper Bright decision could result in additional legal challenges to current regulations and guidance issued by federal agencies applicable to our operations, including those issued by the FDA. Congress may introduce and ultimately pass health care related legislation that could, among others, impact the drug approval process and make changes to modify the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program created under the IRA.

Current wording

The current Presidential administration is pursuing policies to reduce regulations and expenditures across the federal government, including at HHS, the FDA, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, and related agencies. These actions, presently directed by executive orders or memoranda from the Office of Management and Budget, may propose policy changes that create additional uncertainty for our business. For example, the current administration has announced agreements with several pharmaceutical companies that require the drug manufacturers to offer, through a direct-to-consumer platform, patients in the United States and Medicaid programs prescription drug Most-Favored Nation pricing equal to or lower than those paid in other developed nations, with additional mandates for direct-to-patient discounts and repatriation of foreign revenues. Other actions and proposals include, for example: (1) directing agencies to reduce workforce and cut programs; (2) directing HHS and other agencies to lower prescription drug costs through a variety of initiatives, including by improving upon the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program and establishing most-favored-nation pricing for pharmaceutical products; (3) imposing tariffs of imported pharmaceutical products; and (4) as part of the Make America Healthy Again Commission’s Strategy Report released in September 2025, working across government agencies to increase enforcement on direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising. Additionally, the current administration recently called on Congress to enact "The Great Healthcare Plan," to codify and expand Most-Favored Nation pricing, lower government subsidies to private insurance companies, increase healthcare price transparency, expand pharmaceutical drugs available for over-the-counter purchase, and enact restrictions on pharmacy benefit manager payment methodologies, among other things. Additionally, in its June 2024 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the U.S. Supreme Court greatly reduced judicial deference to regulatory agencies, which could increase successful legal challenges to federal regulations affecting our operations. Congress may introduce and ultimately pass health care related legislation that could, among others, impact the drug approval process and make changes to modify the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program.

Previous wording

At the state level, legislatures have increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. Some measures are designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. Some states have enacted legislation creating so-called prescription drug affordability boards, which ultimately may attempt to impose price limits on certain drugs in these states, while some states are also seeking to implement general, across-the-board price caps for pharmaceuticals, or are seeking to regulate drug distribution. Legally mandated price controls on payment amounts by third-party payors or other restrictions could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. This could reduce the ultimate demand for our product candidates, if approved, or put pressure on our product pricing, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Current wording

At the state level, legislatures and state agencies have increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations that are designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, that are designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. Some states have enacted legislation creating so-called prescription drug affordability boards, which ultimately may attempt to impose price limits on certain drugs in these states, while some states are also seeking to implement general, across-the-board price caps for pharmaceuticals, or are seeking to regulate drug distribution. Legally mandated price controls on payment amounts by third-party payors or other restrictions could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. Any of these actions could reduce the ultimate demand for our product candidates, if approved, or put pressure on our product pricing, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Previous wording

We are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and the handling, use, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. Although we do not currently manufacture our drug products or product candidates on site, our research and development activities do involve the use of biological and hazardous materials and produce hazardous waste products at small quantities. We generally contract with third parties for the disposal of these materials and wastes. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials, which could cause an interruption of our commercialization efforts, research and development efforts and business operations, environmental damage resulting in costly clean-up and liabilities under applicable laws and regulations governing the use, storage, handling and disposal of these materials and specified waste products. Although we believe that the safety procedures utilized by our third-party manufacturers for handling and disposing of these materials generally comply with the standards prescribed by these laws and regulations, we cannot guarantee that this is the case or eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials.

Current wording

We are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and the handling, use, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. Although we do not currently manufacture our drug products or product candidates on site, our research and development activities do involve the use of biological and hazardous materials and produce hazardous waste products at small quantities. We generally contract with third parties for the disposal of these materials and wastes. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials, which could cause an interruption of our commercialization efforts, research and development efforts and business operations, environmental damage resulting in costly clean-up and liabilities under applicable laws and regulations governing the use, storage, handling and disposal of these materials and specified waste products. Although we believe that the safety procedures utilized by our third-party manufacturers for handling and disposing of these materials generally comply with the standards prescribed by these laws and regulations, we cannot guarantee that this is the case or eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials. In such an event, we may be held liable for any resulting damages and such liability could exceed our resources and state or federal or other applicable authorities may curtail our use of certain materials and/or interrupt our business operations. Furthermore, environmental laws and regulations are complex, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent. We cannot predict the impact of such changes and cannot be certain of our future compliance. In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These current or future laws and regulations may impair our research, development or production efforts. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions.

Previous wording

the federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, information related to payments and other "transfers of value" made to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), certain non-physician practitioners (physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified nurse anesthetists, anesthesiology assistants and certified nurse-midwives) and teaching hospitals and other healthcare providers, as well as ownership and investment interests held by such healthcare professionals and their immediate family members; and

Current wording

the federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) to report annually to the CMS information related to payments and other "transfers of value" made to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), certain non-physician practitioners (physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified nurse anesthetists, anesthesiology assistants and certified nurse-midwives) and teaching hospitals and other healthcare providers, as well as ownership and investment interests held by such healthcare professionals and their immediate family members; and

Previous wording

analogous state and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers; some state laws require biopharmaceutical companies to comply with the biopharmaceutical industry's voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government and may require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures; some state laws that require biopharmaceutical companies to report information on the pricing of certain drug products; and some state and local laws that require the registration or pharmaceutical sales representatives.

Current wording

analogous state and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers; some state laws that require certain regulatory licenses to manufacture or distribute our products commercially and/or the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives in the jurisdiction; some state laws that require biopharmaceutical companies to comply with the biopharmaceutical industry's voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government and may require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures; and some state laws that require biopharmaceutical companies to report information on the pricing of certain drug products.

Previous wording

Outside the United States, an increasing number of laws, regulations and industry standards govern data privacy and security. For example, the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation, or EU GDPR, the United Kingdom's General Data Protection Regulation, or UK GDPR, Australia's Privacy Act, Brazil's General Data Protection Law (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, Law No. 13,709/2018) and China's Personal Information Protection Law impose strict requirements for processing personal data. In Canada, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and various related provincial laws, as well as Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation, may apply to our operations.

Current wording

Outside the United States, an increasing number of laws, regulations and industry standards govern data privacy and security. For example, the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation, or EU GDPR, the United Kingdom's General Data Protection Regulation, or UK GDPR, Australia's Privacy Act, Brazil's General Data Protection Law (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, Law No. 13,709/2018), South Korea's Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA), Chile's new Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719), Argentina's Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL), Mexico's Federal Law on the Protection of Personal Data held by Private Parties, and China's Personal Information Protection Law impose strict requirements for processing personal data. In Canada, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and various related provincial laws, as well as Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation, may apply to our operations.

Previous wording

Additionally, the U.S. Department of Justice issued a rule entitled Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countries of Concern or Covered Persons, which places additional restrictions on certain data transactions occurring on or after the effective date of the rule involving countries of concern (e.g., China, Russia, Iran) and covered individuals (i.e., individuals and entities located in or controlled by individuals or entities located in those jurisdictions) that may impact certain business and management activities, such as licensing and partnership engagements, vendor engagements, employment of or access to data by certain individuals, and investor agreements. Violations of the rule could lead to significant civil and criminal fines and penalties. Although the U.S. Department of Justice has issued compliance guidance and responded to frequently asked questions, there is currently no enforcement or case law to provide additional guidance on how the rule will be interpreted by the U.S. Department of Justice, and there is a risk that our interpretation of its applicability, scope and requirements could be incorrect, incomplete, or misapplied. The rule applies regardless of whether data is anonymized, key-coded, pseudonymized, de-identified or encrypted, which presents particular challenges for companies like ours and may impact our ability to transfer or provide access to data in connection with certain transactions or agreements.

Current wording

Additionally, the U.S. Department of Justice issued a rule entitled Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countries of Concern or Covered Persons, which places additional restrictions on certain data transactions occurring on or after the effective date of the rule involving countries of concern (e.g., China, Russia, Iran) and covered persons (i.e., individuals and entities who are designated as such by the U.S. Attorney General or considered "foreign persons" and are majority owned by, organized under the laws of, a primary resident in, or a contractor of, a covered person or country of concern, as applicable) that may impact certain business and management activities, such as licensing and partnership engagements, vendor engagements, employment of or access to data by certain individuals, and investor agreements. Violations of the rule could lead to significant civil and criminal fines and penalties. Although the U.S. Department of Justice has issued compliance guidance and responded to frequently asked questions, there is currently no enforcement or case law to provide additional guidance on how the rule will be interpreted by the U.S. Department of Justice, and there is a risk that our interpretation of its applicability, scope and requirements could be incorrect, incomplete, or misapplied. The rule applies regardless of whether data is anonymized, key-coded, pseudonymized, de-identified or encrypted, which presents particular challenges for companies like ours and may impact our ability to transfer or provide access to data in connection with certain transactions or agreements.

Previous wording

We use artificial intelligence, or AI, including generative AI, and machine learning, or ML, technologies to develop our products and services (collectively, "AI/ML" technologies). For example, we use an internally developed algorithm for drug discovery purposes and to identify drug targets. The development and use of AI/ML present various privacy and security risks that may impact our business. AI/ML are subject to privacy and data security laws, as well as increasing regulation and scrutiny. Several jurisdictions around the globe, including Europe and certain U.S. states, have proposed enacted, or are considering laws governing the development and use of AI/ML, such as the EU's AI Act and Colorado's AI Act. We expect other jurisdictions will adopt similar laws. Additionally, certain privacy laws extend rights to consumers (such as the right to delete certain personal data) and regulate automated decision making, which may be incompatible with our use of AI/ML. These obligations may make it harder for us to conduct our business using AI/ML, lead to regulatory fines or penalties, require us to change our business practices, retrain our AI/ML, or prevent or limit our use of AI/ML. For example, the Federal Trade Commission has required other companies to turn over (or disgorge) valuable insights or trainings generated through the use of AI/ML where they allege the company has violated privacy and consumer protection laws. If we cannot use AI/ML or that use is restricted, our business may be less efficient, or we may be at a competitive disadvantage. Our employees and personnel also use AI and/or automated decision-making technologies to perform their work, and the disclosure and use of personal data in AI technologies is subject to various privacy laws and other privacy obligations. Governments have passed and are likely to pass additional laws regulating AI and/or automated decision-making technologies. Our use of this technology could result in additional compliance costs, regulatory investigations and actions, and lawsuits. If we are unable to use generative AI and/or automated decision-making technologies, it could make our business less efficient and result in competitive disadvantages.

Current wording

We use or plan to use artificial intelligence, or AI, including generative AI, and machine learning, or ML, technologies in the development of our current or future product candidates (collectively, "AI/ML" technologies). For example, we use an internally developed algorithm for drug discovery purposes and to identify drug targets. The development and use of AI/ML present various privacy and security risks that may impact our business. AI/ML are subject to privacy and data security laws, as well as increasing regulation and scrutiny. Several jurisdictions around the globe, including Europe and certain U.S. states, have proposed enacted, or are considering laws governing the development and use of AI/ML, such as the EU's AI Act and Colorado's AI Act. We expect other jurisdictions will adopt similar laws. Additionally, certain privacy laws extend rights to consumers (such as the right to delete certain personal data) and regulate automated decision making, which may be incompatible with our use of AI/ML. These obligations may make it harder for us to conduct our business using AI/ML, lead to regulatory fines or penalties, require us to change our business practices, retrain our AI/ML, or prevent or limit our use of AI/ML. For example, the Federal Trade Commission has required other companies to turn over (or disgorge) valuable insights or trainings generated through the use of AI/ML where they allege the company has violated privacy and consumer protection laws. If we cannot use AI/ML or that use is restricted, our business may be less efficient, or we may be at a competitive disadvantage. Our employees and personnel also use AI and/or automated decision-making technologies to perform their work, and the disclosure and use of personal data in AI technologies is subject to various privacy laws and other privacy obligations. Governments have passed and are likely to pass additional laws regulating AI and/or automated decision-making technologies. Our use of this technology could result in additional compliance costs, regulatory investigations and actions, and lawsuits. If we are unable to use generative AI and/or automated decision-making technologies, it could make our business less efficient and result in competitive disadvantages.

Previous wording

In addition to data privacy and security laws, we are and may become in the future contractually subject to industry standards adopted by industry groups. We are also bound by other contractual obligations related to data privacy and security, and our efforts to comply with such obligations may not be successful.

Current wording

In addition to data privacy and security laws, we are and may in the future become contractually subject to industry standards adopted by industry groups. We are also bound by other contractual obligations related to data privacy and security, and our efforts to comply with such obligations may not be successful.

Previous wording

In particular, plaintiffs have become increasingly more active in bringing privacy-related claims against companies, including class claims and mass arbitration demands. Some of these claims allow for the recovery of statutory damages on a per violation basis and, if viable, carry the potential for monumental statutory damages, depending on the volume of data and the number of violations. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business or financial condition, including loss of customers; inability to process personal data or to operate in certain jurisdictions; limited ability to develop or commercialize our products; expenditure of time and resources to defend any claim or inquiry; adverse publicity; or by requiring substantial changes to our business model or operations.

Current wording

In particular, plaintiffs have become increasingly more active in bringing privacy-related claims against companies, including class claims and mass arbitration demands. Some of these claims allow for the recovery of statutory damages on a per violation basis and, if viable, carry the potential for monumental statutory damages, depending on the volume of data and the number of violations. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business or financial condition, including our inability to process personal data or to operate in certain jurisdictions; our limited ability to develop or commercialize our products; our expenditure of time and resources to defend any claim or inquiry; adverse publicity we may encounter; or by requiring substantial changes that may be required to our business model or operations.

Previous wording

We have relied upon and plan to continue to rely upon third parties, including independent clinical investigators, contracted laboratories and third-party CROs, to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements and to monitor and manage data for our ongoing preclinical and clinical programs. We rely on these parties for execution of our preclinical studies and clinical trials, and control only certain aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our studies and trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal and regulatory requirements and scientific standards and our reliance on these third parties does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. We and our third-party contractors and CROs are required to comply with Good Laboratory Practice, or GLP, regulations as applicable, and GCP regulations, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities for all of our products in clinical development. Regulatory authorities enforce these GLP and GCP regulations through periodic inspections of laboratories conducting GLP studies, trial sponsors, principal investigators and trial sites. If we, our investigators or any of our CROs or contracted laboratories fail to comply with applicable GLP and GCP regulations, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional preclinical studies or clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. We cannot assure you that upon inspection by a given regulatory authority such regulatory authority will determine that any of our preclinical studies or clinical trials comply with applicable GLP or GCP regulations. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with drug products produced in compliance with applicable cGMP regulations. Our failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat preclinical studies or clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process.

Current wording

We have relied upon and plan to continue to rely upon third parties, including independent clinical investigators, contracted laboratories and third-party CROs, to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements and to monitor and manage data for our ongoing preclinical and clinical programs. We rely on these parties for execution of our preclinical studies and clinical trials, and control only certain aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our studies and trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal and regulatory requirements and scientific standards and our reliance on these third parties does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. We and our third-party contractors and CROs are required to comply with Good Laboratory Practice, or GLP, regulations as applicable, and GCP regulations, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities for all of our products in clinical development. Regulatory authorities enforce these GLP and GCP regulations through periodic inspections of laboratories conducting GLP studies, trial sponsors, principal investigators and trial sites. If we, our investigators or any of our CROs or contracted laboratories fail to comply with applicable GLP and GCP regulations, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable, we may be required to add more clinical trial sites or enroll additional participants and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional preclinical studies or clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. For example, certain companies developing drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and related conditions have recently reported enrolling irregularities and potential misconduct by certain of their clinical sites, including falsification of data and enrolling participants that may not have met inclusion and exclusion criteria. We cannot assure you that upon inspection by a given regulatory authority such regulatory authority will determine that any of our preclinical studies or clinical trials comply with applicable GLP or GCP regulations. Further, these laboratories, investigators and CROs are not our employees, and we will not be able to control, other than by contract, the amount of resources, including time, that they devote to our product candidates and clinical trials. If independent laboratories, investigators or CROs fail to devote sufficient resources to the development of our product candidates, or if their performance is substandard, it may delay or compromise the prospects for approval and commercialization of any product candidates that we develop. In addition, the use of third-party service providers requires us to disclose our proprietary information to these parties, which could increase the risk that this inf…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

We do not currently have the infrastructure or capability internally to manufacture all our product candidates for use in the conduct of our preclinical studies and clinical trials or, if our products are approved, for commercial supply. We rely on, and expect to continue to rely on, contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs. Any replacement of our CMOs could require significant effort and expertise because there may be a limited number of qualified CMOs. For example, we currently rely on a limited number of single-source suppliers for manufacturing components of ML-007C-MA. Reliance on third-party providers may expose us to more risk than if we were to manufacture our product candidates ourselves. We are dependent on our CMOs for the production of our product candidates in accordance with relevant regulations, such as cGMP regulations, which require, among other things, quality control, quality assurance and the maintenance of records and documentation. Moreover, many of the third parties with whom we contract may also have relationships with other commercial entities, including our competitors, for whom they may also be conducting product development activities that could harm our competitive position.

Current wording

We do not currently have the infrastructure or capability internally to manufacture all our product candidates for use in the conduct of our preclinical studies and clinical trials or, if our products are approved, for commercial supply. We rely on, and expect to continue to rely on, contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs. Any replacement of our CMOs could require significant effort and expertise because there may be a limited number of qualified CMOs. For example, we currently rely on a limited number of single-source suppliers for manufacturing components of ML-007C-MA. Reliance on third-party providers may expose us to more risk than if we were to manufacture our product candidates ourselves. We are dependent on our CMOs for the manufacture of our product candidates in accordance with relevant regulations, such as cGMP regulations, which require, among other things, quality control, quality assurance and the maintenance of records and documentation. Moreover, many of the third parties with whom we contract may also have relationships with other commercial entities, including our competitors, for whom they may also be conducting product development activities that could harm our competitive position.

Previous wording

If we were to experience an unexpected loss of supply of or if any supplier were unable to meet our demand for any of our product candidates, we could experience delays in our research or ongoing and planned clinical trials or commercialization. We could be unable to find alternative suppliers of acceptable quality, and with the appropriate volumes, who could meet our timelines at an acceptable cost. Moreover, our suppliers are often subject to strict manufacturing requirements and rigorous testing requirements, which could limit or delay production. The long transition periods necessary to switch manufacturers and suppliers, if necessary, could significantly delay our preclinical studies, our clinical trials and the commercialization of our products, if approved, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operation and prospects. In complying with the applicable manufacturing regulations of the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities, we and our third-party suppliers must spend significant time, money and effort in the areas of design and development, testing, production, record-keeping and quality control to assure that the products meet applicable specifications and other regulatory requirements. The failure to comply with these requirements could result in an enforcement action against us, including the seizure of products and shutting down of production. We and any of these third-party suppliers may also be subject to audits by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities. If any of our third-party suppliers fails to comply with cGMP regulations or other applicable manufacturing regulations, our ability to develop and commercialize the products could suffer significant interruptions. We face risks inherent in relying on CMOs, as any disruption, such as a fire, natural hazards, vandalism or an outbreak of contagious disease affecting the CMO or any supplier of the CMO could significantly interrupt our manufacturing capability. In case of a disruption, we will have to establish alternative manufacturing sources. This would require substantial capital on our part, which we may not be able to obtain on commercially acceptable terms or at all. Additionally, we would likely experience months of manufacturing delays as the CMO builds or locates replacement facilities and seeks and obtains necessary regulatory approvals. If this occurs, we will be unable to satisfy manufacturing needs on a timely basis, if at all.

Current wording

If we were to experience an unexpected loss of supply of or if any supplier were unable to meet our demand for any of our product candidates, we could experience delays in our research or ongoing and planned clinical trials or commercialization. We could be unable to find alternative suppliers of acceptable quality, and with the appropriate volumes, who could meet our timelines at an acceptable cost. Moreover, our suppliers are often subject to strict manufacturing requirements and rigorous testing requirements, which could limit or delay production. The long transition periods necessary to switch manufacturers and suppliers, if necessary, could significantly delay our preclinical studies, our clinical trials and the commercialization of our products, if approved, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operation and prospects. In complying with the applicable manufacturing regulations of the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities, we and our third-party suppliers must spend significant time, money and effort in the areas of design and development, testing, production, record-keeping and quality control to assure that the products meet applicable specifications and other regulatory requirements. The failure to comply with these requirements could result in an enforcement action against us, including the seizure of products and shutting down of production. We and any of these third-party suppliers may also be subject to audits by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities. If any of our third-party suppliers fails to comply with cGMP regulations or other applicable manufacturing regulations, our ability to develop and commercialize the products could suffer significant interruptions. We face risks inherent in relying on CMOs, as any disruption, such as a fire, natural hazards, vandalism or an outbreak of contagious disease affecting the CMO or any supplier of the CMO could significantly interrupt our manufacturing capability. In case of a disruption, we will have to establish alternative manufacturing sources. This would require substantial capital on our part, which we may not be able to obtain on commercially acceptable terms or at all. Additionally, we would likely experience significant manufacturing delays as the CMO builds or locates replacement facilities and seeks and obtains necessary regulatory approvals. If this occurs, we will be unable to satisfy manufacturing needs on a timely basis, if at all.

Previous wording

We are highly dependent on the management, clinical, research and development, manufacturing, financial and business development expertise of our executive officers, particularly Christopher A. Kroeger, M.D., our Chief Executive Officer and Founder, and Erin Foff, M.D., Ph.D., our Chief Medical Officer. Each of our executive officers may currently terminate their employment with us at any time. We do not currently maintain "key person" insurance for any of our executives or employees.

Current wording

We are highly dependent on the management, clinical, research and development, manufacturing, financial and business development expertise of our executive officers, particularly Christopher A. Kroeger, M.D., our Chief Executive Officer and Founder, and Erin Foff, M.D., Ph.D., our Chief Medical Officer. Each of our executive officers may terminate their employment with us at any time. We do not currently maintain "key person" insurance for any of our executives or employees.