Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

Previous wording

the generation and dissemination of new data and analyses and the consistency of any new data and analyses with prior results, whether they support a favorable safety, efficacy and effectiveness profile of our products and any potential impact on our FDA approval status and/or FDA package insert for our products, including our ongoing discussions with FDA for ELEVIDYS in response to incidents of ALF resulting in patient death;

Current wording

the generation and dissemination of new data and analyses and the consistency of any new data and analyses with prior results, whether they support a favorable safety, efficacy and effectiveness profile of our products and any potential impact on our FDA approval status and/or FDA package insert for our products;

Previous wording

ESSENCE trial, a confirmatory trial intended to verify the clinical benefits of our two PMO Products, VYONDYS and AMONDYS, and acceptance of the same by the FDA and medical community since continued approval of accelerated approval products or transition to traditional approval for such products may be contingent upon verification of a clinical benefit in confirmatory trials, particularly in light of FDA's expanded expedited withdrawal procedures as set forth in FDORA;

Current wording

our ability to timely comply with FDA post-marketing requirements and commitments, including through successfully conducting additional studies that confirm clinical efficacy, effectiveness and safety of our products, and acceptance of the same by the FDA and medical community, including our ESSENCE trial, a confirmatory trial intended to verify the clinical benefits of VYONDYS 53 and AMONDYS 45, since continued approval of accelerated approval products or transition to traditional approval for such products may be contingent upon verification of a clinical benefit in confirmatory trials, particularly in light of FDA's expanded expedited withdrawal procedures as set forth in FDORA;

Previous wording

the occurrence of any side effects, adverse reactions or misuse, or any unfavorable publicity in these areas, including recent patient deaths associated with our products and product candidates and the associated public coverage;

Current wording

the occurrence of any side effects, adverse reactions or misuse, or any unfavorable publicity in these areas, including patient deaths associated with our products and product candidates and the associated public coverage;

Previous wording

our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approvals to commercialize our product candidates, and to commercialize our products in markets outside of the U.S., including following the topline results of our ESSENCE trial, a confirmatory trial to verify the clinical benefits of two of our PMO products: AMONDYS and VYONDYS;

Current wording

our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approvals to commercialize our product candidates, and to commercialize our products in markets outside of the U.S., including following the topline results of our ESSENCE trial, a confirmatory trial to verify the clinical benefits of AMONDYS 45 and VYONDYS 53; and

Previous wording

the process leading to a patient’s first infusion of our products and any future commercial products may be slower for certain patients. For example, the time to first infusion may take longer if a patient chooses to put in an intravenous port, which eases access to the vein. In addition, the capacity of any infusion centers responsible for the administration of ELEVIDYS may impact timing. Delays in the process prior to infusion could negatively impact the sales of our products, including any future gene therapy products; and

Current wording

the process leading to a patient’s first infusion of our products and any future commercial products may be slower for certain patients. For example, the time to first infusion may take longer if a patient chooses to put in an intravenous port, which eases access to the vein. In addition, payor and reimbursement discussions, negotiations and decisions could impact timing and may lead to delays in infusion. Delays in the process prior to infusion could negatively impact the sales of our products, including any future gene therapy products.

Previous wording

Even though EXONDYS 51, VYONDYS 53, AMONDYS 45 and ELEVIDYS have received accelerated approval from the FDA, they face future post-approval development and regulatory requirements, which present additional challenges for us to successfully navigate.

Current wording

Even though certain of our products have received accelerated approval from the FDA, they face future post-approval development and regulatory requirements, which present additional challenges for us to successfully navigate.

Previous wording

The accelerated approvals for EXONDYS 51, VYONDYS 53 and AMONDYS 45 granted by the FDA were based on an increase in the surrogate biomarker of dystrophin in skeletal muscles observed in some patients treated with these products. The accelerated approval for ELEVIDYS in non-ambulatory patients granted by the FDA was based on an effect on the surrogate endpoint of expression of ELEVIDYS micro-dystrophin, the protein produced by ELEVIDYS. As of the date of issuance of this Quarterly

Current wording

EXONDYS 51, VYONDYS 53, and AMONDYS 45 are currently subject to ongoing FDA requirements governing labeling, packaging, storage, advertising, promotion and recordkeeping, and we are required to submit additional safety, efficacy and other post-marketing information to the FDA. The accelerated approvals for our PMO Products granted by the FDA were based on an increase in the surrogate biomarker of dystrophin in skeletal muscles observed in some patients treated with these products. The accelerated approval for ELEVIDYS in non-ambulatory patients granted by the FDA was based on an effect on the surrogate endpoint of expression of ELEVIDYS micro-dystrophin, the protein produced by ELEVIDYS. In November 2025, we announced that the FDA approved an update to ELEVIDYS' Prescribing Information to include a boxed warning for risk of ALI and ALF and the removal of the non-ambulatory population from the Indication and Usage section.

Previous wording

Under the accelerated approval pathway, continued approval may be contingent upon verification of a clinical benefit in confirmatory trials. These post-marketing requirements and commitments may not be feasible and/or could impose significant burdens and costs on us; could negatively impact our development, manufacturing and supply of our products; and could negatively impact our financial results. Failure to meet post-approval commitments and requirements, including completion of enrollment and in particular, any failure to obtain safety and efficacy data that supports clinical benefits from our ongoing and planned studies of our products, could lead to negative regulatory action from the FDA and/or withdrawal of regulatory approval of EXONDYS 51, VYONDYS 53, AMONDYS 45 or ELEVIDYS. FDORA, enacted in 2022, has expanded FDA's expedited withdrawal procedures for drugs approved via the accelerated approval pathway if a sponsor fails to conduct any required post-approval study with due diligence. For example, on November 3, 2025, we announced topline results from our ESSENCE trial, a confirmatory trial intended to verify the clinical benefits of two of our PMO Products: VYONDYS and AMONDYS, which primary endpoint did not meet statistical significance. Our analysis of the ESSENCE trial results is ongoing. However, these topline results could lead to regulatory actions from the FDA, including changes to our drug labels, revocation of accelerated approvals and directives to remove these products from the market altogether. Additionally, we intend to seek alignment with the FDA regarding the results of our ESSENCE trial and a path to traditional approval of VYONDYS and AMONDYS.

Current wording

Under the accelerated approval pathway, continued approval may be contingent upon verification of a clinical benefit in confirmatory trials. These post-marketing requirements and commitments may not be feasible and/or could impose significant burdens and costs on us; could negatively impact our development, manufacturing and supply of our products; and could negatively impact our financial results. Failure to meet post-approval commitments and requirements, including completion of enrollment and in particular, any failure to obtain safety and efficacy data that supports clinical benefits from our ongoing and planned studies of our products, could lead to negative regulatory action from the FDA and/or withdrawal of regulatory approval of one or more of our products that have received accelerated approval. FDORA, enacted in 2022, has expanded FDA's expedited withdrawal procedures for drugs approved via the accelerated approval pathway if a sponsor fails to conduct any required post-approval study with due diligence. For example, on November 3, 2025, we announced topline results from our ESSENCE trial, a confirmatory trial intended to verify the clinical benefits of VYONDYS 53 and AMONDYS 45, which primary endpoint did not meet statistical significance. We submitted supplemental new drug applications ("sNDAs") related to these products in April 2026. However, these results could lead to regulatory actions from the FDA, including changes to our drug labels, revocation of accelerated approvals and directives to remove these products from the market altogether.

Previous wording

Further, the current administration has also undertaken significant efforts to reduce the size and spending of the federal government, including at the FDA. A significant reduction in FDA’s workforce or FDA’s budget, or other disruptions at FDA, including the government shutdown, could materially impact FDA’s ability to engage in a variety of activities that may affect our business, including routine regulatory and oversight activities. For example, any reduction in FDA’s workforce could lead to disruptions and delays in FDA’s review and oversight of our post-approval confirmatory trials.

Current wording

Further, the current administration has also undertaken significant efforts to reduce the size and spending of the federal government, including at the FDA. A significant reduction in FDA’s workforce or FDA’s budget, or other disruptions at FDA, including any government shutdown, could materially impact FDA’s ability to engage in a variety of activities that may affect our business, including routine regulatory and oversight activities. For example, any reduction in FDA’s workforce could lead to disruptions and delays in FDA’s review and oversight of our post-approval confirmatory trials.

Previous wording

Manufacturers of drug products and their facilities are subject to continual review and periodic inspections by the FDA and other regulatory authorities for compliance with FDA requirements, including cGMP regulations. Drug product manufacturers are required to continuously monitor and report adverse events from clinical trials and commercial use of the product. If we or a regulatory agency discover previously unknown adverse events or events of unanticipated severity or frequency, a regulatory agency may establish additional regulatory requirement including, among other things, labeling changes, implementation of risk evaluation and mitigation strategy program, or additional post-marketing studies or clinical trials. For example, following two patient deaths due to ALF in non-ambulatory patients associated with the use of ELEVIDYS, FDA proposed, and we agreed to, a safety label supplement for ELEVIDYS to include a boxed warning for ALI and ALF. Subsequently, on July 18, 2025, we announced a reported case of ALF resulting in death in a patient following dosing in the Company's Phase 1/2 LGMD trial for SRP-9004. As of the date of issuance of this Quarterly Report, the Company remains in ongoing discussions with FDA regarding the label supplement for ELEVIDYS. If we or a regulatory agency discover previously unknown problems with a product, such as problems with a facility where the API or drug product is manufactured or tested, a regulatory agency may impose restrictions on that product and/or the manufacturer, including removal of specific product lots from the market, withdrawal of the product from the market, suspension of manufacturing or suspension of clinical trials using the same manufacturing materials. Sponsors of drugs approved under FDA accelerated approval provisions also are required to submit to the FDA, at least 30 days before initial use, all promotional materials intended for use after the first 120 days following marketing approval. If we or the manufacturing facilities for our products fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, a regulatory agency may:

Current wording

Manufacturers of drug products and their facilities are subject to continual review and periodic inspections by the FDA and other regulatory authorities for compliance with FDA requirements, including cGMP regulations. Drug product manufacturers are required to continuously monitor and report adverse events from clinical trials and commercial use of the product. If we or a regulatory agency discover previously unknown problems with a product, such as problems with a facility where the API or drug product is manufactured or tested, a regulatory agency may impose restrictions on that product and/or the manufacturer, including removal of specific product lots from the market, withdrawal of the product from the market, suspension of manufacturing or suspension of clinical trials using the same manufacturing materials. Sponsors of drugs approved under FDA accelerated approval provisions also are required to submit to the FDA, at least 30 days before initial use, all promotional materials intended for use after the first 120 days following marketing approval. If we or the manufacturing facilities for our products fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, a regulatory agency may:

Previous wording

We expect that third party payors, including private insurers and government health benefit programs, will continue to consider the efficacy, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety of our products, including any new data and analyses that we are able to collect and make available in a compliant manner, in determining whether to approve reimbursement for our products and at what levels. If there are considerable delays in the generation of new evidence or if any new data and information we collect is not favorable, third party payors may make coverage decisions that negatively impact sales of our products. For example, in light of the ELEVIDYS Suspension and ongoing discussions with FDA, certain third-party payors have restricted reimbursement for ELEVIDYS for ambulatory patients, notwithstanding FDA's recommendation that we resume shipments of ELEVIDYS to ambulatory patients in the U.S. We continue to have discussions with payors, some of which may eventually deny coverage. Additionally, in early October, the New York Drug Utilization Review Board recommended that Medicaid pause coverage of ELEVIDYS and other state Medicaid programs may re-assess coverage in light of the recent developments and increasing fiscal pressures. We may not receive approval for reimbursement of our products from additional insurers on a satisfactory rate or basis, in which case our business would be materially adversely affected. In addition, obtaining these approvals can be a time consuming and expensive process. Our business would be materially adversely affected if we are not able to maintain favorable coverage decisions and/or fail to receive additional favorable coverage decisions from third party insurers, in particular during re-authorization processes for patients that have already initiated therapy. Our business could also be adversely affected if government health programs, private health insurers, including managed care organizations, or other reimbursement bodies or payors limit the indications for which our products will be reimbursed or fail to recognize approval or accelerated approval and surrogate endpoints as clinically meaningful.

Current wording

We expect that third party payors, including private insurers and government health benefit programs, will continue to consider the efficacy, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety of our products, including any new data and analyses that we are able to collect and make available in a compliant manner, in determining whether to approve reimbursement for our products and at what levels. If there are considerable delays in the generation of new evidence or if any new data and information we collect is not favorable, third party payors may make coverage decisions that negatively impact sales of our products. For example, following the ELEVIDYS Suspension, certain third-party payors have restricted coverage for ELEVIDYS for certain segments of the ambulatory patient population, notwithstanding FDA's recommendation that we resume shipments of ELEVIDYS to ambulatory patients in the U.S. We continue to have discussions with payors, some of which may eventually deny coverage. Additionally, while the New York Drug Utilization Review Board recommended in October 2025 that Medicaid pause coverage of ELEVIDYS, New York Department of Health did not pause coverage, but instead restricted coverage based on age. We may not receive approval for reimbursement of our products from additional insurers on a satisfactory rate or basis, in which case our business would be materially adversely affected. In addition, obtaining these approvals can be a time consuming and expensive process. Our business would be materially adversely affected if we are not able to maintain favorable coverage decisions and/or fail to receive additional favorable coverage decisions from third party insurers, in particular during re-authorization processes for patients that have already initiated therapy. Our business could also be adversely affected if government health programs, private health insurers, including managed care organizations, or other reimbursement bodies or payors limit the indications for which our products will be reimbursed or fail to recognize approval or accelerated approval and surrogate endpoints as clinically meaningful.

Previous wording

Furthermore, we cannot predict to what extent an economic recession, changes in fiscal policy, restrictions in eligibility for or reductions in funding government health care programs such as Medicaid or general increase in unemployment rates may disrupt global healthcare systems and access to our products or result in a widespread loss of individual health insurance coverage due to unemployment or trends in employee attrition, a shift from commercial payor coverage to government payor coverage, or an increase in demand for patient assistance and/or free drug programs, any of which would adversely affect access to our products and our net sales.

Current wording

Furthermore, we cannot predict to what extent an economic recession, changes in fiscal policy, restrictions in eligibility for or reductions in funding government health care programs such as Medicaid or a general increase in unemployment rates or shift from commercial payor coverage to government payor coverage may disrupt access to our products or result in an increase in demand for patient assistance and/or free drug programs, any of which would adversely affect access to our products and our net sales.

Previous wording

We expect to experience pricing pressures in connection with the sale of our current and future products due to a number of factors, including current and future healthcare reforms and initiatives by government health programs and private insurers (including managed care plans) to reduce healthcare costs, the scrutiny of pharmaceutical pricing, the ongoing debates on reducing government spending and additional legislative proposals. These healthcare reform efforts or any future legislation or regulatory actions aimed at controlling and reducing healthcare costs, including through measures designed to limit reimbursement, restrict access or impose unfavorable pricing modifications on pharmaceutical products, could impact our and our partners’ ability to obtain or maintain reimbursement for our products at satisfactory levels, or at all, which could materially harm our business and financial results.

Current wording

We expect to experience pricing pressures in connection with the sale of our current and future products due to a number of factors, including current and future healthcare reforms and initiatives by government health programs and private insurers (including managed care plans) to reduce healthcare costs, the scrutiny of pharmaceutical pricing, the ongoing debates on reducing government spending and additional legislative, regulatory or executive initiatives. These healthcare reform efforts or any future legislation or regulatory actions aimed at controlling and reducing healthcare costs, including through measures designed to limit reimbursement, restrict access or impose unfavorable pricing modifications on pharmaceutical products, could impact our and our partners’ ability to obtain or maintain reimbursement for our products at satisfactory levels, or at all, which could materially harm our business and financial results.

Previous wording

The U.S. government and individual states continue to aggressively pursue healthcare reform, which includes ongoing attempts to manage utilization as well as control and/or lower the cost of prescription drugs and biologics. See “Item 1. Business – Government Regulation – U.S. Healthcare and Other Reform” in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. There is no assurance that federal or state health care reform will not adversely affect our future business and financial results, and we cannot predict how future federal or state legislative, judicial or administrative changes relating to healthcare policy will affect our business.

Current wording

The U.S. government and individual states continue to aggressively pursue healthcare reform, which includes ongoing attempts to manage utilization as well as control and/or lower the cost of prescription drugs and biologics. Recent years have seen a number of reform initiatives focused on drug pricing and payment. For example, the Inflation Reduction Act ("IRA"), passed in 2022, IRA has had and will likely continue to have a significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry. In 2025, the current presidential administration issued two executive orders with multiple directives aimed at lowering drug prices. In the wake of these executive orders and related executive initiatives, a number of pharmaceutical manufacturers have announced direct-to-consumer offerings with discounted prices and/or reached agreement with the federal government regarding pricing for drugs, including prices for Medicaid drugs and newly launched products. Many of these reform initiatives would require additional legal and/or administrative action to implement and may be subject to legal challenge. See the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, “Item 1. Business – Government Regulation – U.S. Healthcare and Other Reform." There is no assurance that federal or state health care reform will not adversely affect our future business and financial results, and we cannot predict how future federal or state legislative, judicial or administrative changes relating to healthcare policy will affect our business. The U.S. government, state legislatures and foreign governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost-containment programs to limit the growth of government-paid and private insurance healthcare costs, including proposed or implemented reforms. Cost containment initiatives might include, among other possible actions, implementation or modification of:

Previous wording

The U.S. government, state legislatures and foreign governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost-containment programs to limit the growth of government-paid and private insurance healthcare costs, including proposed or implemented reforms involving price controls, waivers from Medicaid drug rebate law requirements, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products for branded prescription drugs and implementing new requirements for, or eliminating caps on, rebates paid on products under government healthcare programs. Recent workforce reductions in and restructuring of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, including at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, may create regulatory uncertainty, potentially impacting drug and biologic development programs and approvals. These cost containment measures may include, among other possible actions, implementation or modification of:

Current wording

increases in, or elimination of caps on, rebates paid on products under government healthcare programs;

Previous wording

mechanisms utilized by managed care organizations to control utilization of drugs and other health care; and

Current wording

mechanisms utilized by managed care organizations to control utilization of drugs and other health care; or

Previous wording

For example, in March and June 2025, we announced two reported cases of ALF resulting in death in non-ambulatory patients following treatment with ELEVIDYS. Following these announcements, FDA proposed, and we agreed to, a safety label supplement for ELEVIDYS to include a boxed warning for ALI and ALF. Subsequently, on July 18, 2025 we announced a reported case of ALF resulting in death in a patient following dosing in the Company’s Phase 1/2 LGMD trial for SRP-9004. These announcements have impacted, and may continue to, impact the market adoption of our products and create uncertainty among patients, providers, and payers. Although we have resumed shipments to ambulatory patients in the U.S., we may continue to experience hesitation from patients, payers and healthcare providers, which could adversely impact our business. The degree to which such hesitation continues, and the degree to which it could adversely impact our business, is uncertain and difficult to predict.

Current wording

For example, in March and June 2025, we announced two reported cases of ALF resulting in death in non-ambulatory patients following treatment with ELEVIDYS. Following these announcements, the FDA proposed, and we agreed to, a safety label supplement for ELEVIDYS to include a boxed warning for ALI and ALF. Subsequently, on July 18, 2025 we announced a reported case of ALF resulting in death in a patient following dosing in our Phase 1 LGMD trial for SRP-9004. In November 2025, the Company announced the conclusion of the label supplement for ELEVIDYS, including the addition of a boxed warning for risk of ALI and ALF and the removal of the non-ambulatory population from the Indication and Usage section of ELEVIDYS' Prescribing Information. These announcements have impacted, and may continue to, impact the market adoption of our products and create uncertainty among patients, providers, and payers. Although we have resumed shipments to ambulatory patients in the U.S., we may continue to experience hesitation from patients, payers and healthcare providers, which could adversely impact our business. The degree to which such hesitation continues, and the degree to which it could adversely impact our business, is uncertain and difficult to predict.

Previous wording

Additionally, on November 3, 2025, we announced topline results from our ESSENCE trial, a confirmatory trial intended to verify the clinical benefits of two of our PMO Products: VYONDYS and AMONDYS, which primary endpoint did not meet statistical significance. Our analysis of the trial results is ongoing. However, these topline results could lead to regulatory actions from the FDA, including changes to our drug labels or revocation of accelerated approvals and directives to remove these products from the market altogether, negatively impact patient demand for these products or result in changes to reimbursement and coverage of these products by insurance companies.

Current wording

Additionally, in November 2025, we announced topline results from our ESSENCE trial, a confirmatory trial intended to verify the clinical benefits of VYONDYS 53 and AMONDYS 45, which primary endpoint did not meet statistical significance. We submitted sNDAs related to these products in April 2026. However, these results could lead to regulatory actions from the FDA, including changes to our drug labels or revocation of accelerated approvals and directives to remove these products from the market altogether, negatively impact patient demand for these products or result in changes to reimbursement and coverage of these products by payors. Such outcomes could adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, financial guidance, ability to accurately forecast key financial metrics, and prospects.

Previous wording

Public perception may be influenced by claims that gene therapy is unsafe, and gene therapy may not gain the acceptance of the public or the medical community. In particular, our success will depend upon physicians who specialize in the treatment of genetic diseases targeted by our product candidates, prescribing treatments that involve the use of our product candidates in lieu of, or in addition to, existing treatments with which they are familiar and for which greater clinical data may be available.

Current wording

Gene therapy remains a newly applied technology, with only a few gene therapy products approved to date in the U.S., the EU or elsewhere, including ELEVIDYS. Public perception may be influenced by claims that gene therapy is unsafe, and gene therapy may not gain the acceptance of the public or the medical community. In particular, our success will depend upon physicians who specialize in the treatment of genetic diseases targeted by our product candidates, prescribing treatments that involve the use of our product candidates in lieu of, or in addition to, existing treatments with which they are familiar and for which greater clinical data may be available.

Previous wording

More restrictive government regulations or negative public opinion would harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, financial guidance, ability to accurately forecast key financial metrics, and prospects and may delay or impair the development and commercialization of our gene therapy product candidates or demand for ELEVIDYS or any other products we may develop. For example, earlier gene therapy trials of other sponsor's products led to several well-publicized adverse events, including death, and other gene therapy trials have failed to demonstrate efficacy. In addition, in March and June 2025 we announced two reported cases of ALF resulting in death of non-ambulatory patients following treatment with ELEVIDYS, as well as one case of ALF resulting in death of a non-ambulatory patient following dosing in the Company’s Phase 1/2 LGMD trial for our gene therapy product candidate, SRP-9004. In response to these announcements, FDA revoked the platform technology designation for the Company’s AAVrh74 Platform Technology associated with both ELEVIDYS and SRP-9004. The degree to which these events have impacted or will impact market acceptance of ELEVIDYS in ambulatory patients, or any of our other drug products, is uncertain and difficult to estimate, which may result in unpredictable variability in our financial forecasts.

Current wording

More restrictive government regulations or negative public opinion would harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, financial guidance, ability to accurately forecast key financial metrics, and prospects and may delay or impair the development and commercialization of our gene therapy product candidates or demand for ELEVIDYS or any other products we may develop. For example, earlier gene therapy trials of other sponsor's products led to several well-publicized adverse events, including death, and other gene therapy trials have failed to demonstrate efficacy. In addition, in March and June 2025 we announced two reported cases of ALF resulting in death of non-ambulatory patients following treatment with ELEVIDYS, as well as one case of ALF resulting in death of a non-ambulatory patient following dosing in our Phase 1 LGMD trial for our gene therapy product candidate, SRP-9004. In response to these announcements, FDA revoked the platform technology designation for the Company’s AAVrh74 Platform Technology previously granted on June 2, 2025. The degree to which these events have impacted or will impact market acceptance of ELEVIDYS in ambulatory patients, or any of our other drug products, is uncertain and difficult to estimate, which may result in unpredictable variability in our financial forecasts.

Previous wording

In addition to receiving accelerated approval in the U.S., EXONDYS 51 has been approved for marketing in Israel, Libya, Kuwait, and Georgia, AMONDYS 45 in Libya, Kuwait, and Georgia, and VYONDYS 53 in Libya, Kuwait, and Georgia. We may not receive approval to commercialize these products in additional countries. Our partner for ELEVIDYS, Roche, has received certain approvals for ELEVIDYS in territories outside of the U.S. In November 2016, we submitted a MAA for eteplirsen to the EMA and the application was validated in December 2016. As we announced on June 1, 2018, the CHMP of the EMA adopted a negative opinion for eteplirsen. In September 2018, the CHMP of the EMA confirmed its negative opinion for eteplirsen, and the European Commission adopted the CHMP opinion in December 2018. During 2019, we sought follow-up EMA scientific advice for eteplirsen. Once data from our ongoing studies are available, we plan to evaluate future engagement with the EMA on potential next steps. On September 24, 2025, the European Commission refused marketing authorization under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council for “Elevidys – delandistrogene moxeparvovec”) for ambulatory individuals aged three to seven years with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). We also announced in June 2025 that we paused our ENVISION study and such study remains paused.

Current wording

In addition to receiving accelerated approval in the U.S., EXONDYS 51 has been approved for marketing in Israel, Libya, Kuwait, and Georgia, AMONDYS 45 in Libya, Kuwait, and Georgia, and VYONDYS 53 in Libya, Kuwait, and Georgia. We may not receive approval to commercialize these products in additional countries. Our partner for ELEVIDYS, Roche, has received certain approvals for ELEVIDYS in territories outside of the U.S. In November 2016, we submitted a MAA for eteplirsen to the EMA and the application was validated in December 2016. As we announced on June 1, 2018, the CHMP of the EMA adopted a negative opinion for eteplirsen. In September 2018, the CHMP of the EMA confirmed its negative opinion for eteplirsen, and the EC adopted the CHMP opinion in December 2018. During 2019, we sought follow-up EMA scientific advice for eteplirsen. Once data from our ongoing studies are available, we plan to evaluate future engagement with the EMA on potential next steps for eteplirsen.

Previous wording

We established a global EAP for our products in some countries where these products currently have not been approved. While we generate revenue from the distribution of these products through our EAP, we cannot predict whether historical revenues from this program will continue, whether we will be able to continue to distribute our products through our EAP, or whether revenues will exceed revenues historically generated from sales through our EAP. Reimbursement of aforementioned products through our EAPs may cease to be available if authorization for an EAP expires or is terminated. For example, healthcare providers in EAP jurisdictions may not be convinced that their patients benefit sufficiently from our products or alternatively, may prefer to wait until such time as our products are approved by a regulatory authority in their country before prescribing any of our products. Even if a healthcare provider is interested in obtaining access to our products for its patient through the EAP, the patient may not be able to obtain access to our products if funding for the drug is not secured. Also geo-political changes and challenges might negatively impinge upon future revenue generated through our EAP.

Current wording

We established a global EAP for our products in some countries where these products currently have not been approved. While we generate revenue from the distribution of these products through our EAP, we cannot predict whether historical revenues from this program will continue, whether we will be able to continue to distribute our products through our EAP, or whether revenues will exceed revenues historically generated from sales through our EAP, especially in light of current geopolitical issues. Reimbursement of aforementioned products through our EAPs may cease to be available if authorization for an EAP expires or is terminated. For example, healthcare providers may prefer to wait until such time as our products are approved by a regulatory authority in their country before prescribing any of our products. Even if a healthcare provider is interested in obtaining access to our products for its patient through our EAP, the patient may not be able to obtain access to our products if funding for the drug is not secured. Also geo-political changes and challenges might negatively impinge upon future revenue generated through our EAP.

Previous wording

Our business and financial results have not yet been materially adversely affected by the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, or the conflict in the Middle-East. However, access to and reimbursement for patients in those regions through our EAP and consequently, our ability to generate revenue from sales of our products in Russia, Ukraine or the Middle East may be adversely affected in the future. The U.S. and other nations have raised the possibility of sanctions on companies that do business with Russia or its allies, including Belarus. We also may be adversely impacted by sanctions imposed on third parties with which we do business, such as third-party distributors and service providers of our EAP.

Current wording

To date, our business and financial results have not yet been materially adversely affected by the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, recent events in Venezuela, or the conflict in the Middle-East. However, access to and reimbursement for patients in those regions through our EAP and consequently, our ability to generate revenue from sales of our products in Russia, Ukraine, Venezuela, the Middle East, or other territories potentially impacted by the current geopolitical issues, may be adversely affected in the future. Even though, the supply of healthcare related products have generally been exempted from global sanctions in the past, the U.S. and other nations have raised the possibility of sanctions on companies that do business with Russia or its allies, including Belarus, including healthcare companies. We also may be adversely impacted by sanctions imposed on third parties with which we do business, such as third-party distributors and service providers of our EAP. In addition, economic sanctions imposed on the U.S. could disrupt operations and have a negative impact on our business.

Previous wording

Any failure to maintain revenues from sales of our products through our EAP and/or to generate revenues from commercial sales of these products exceeding historical sales due to geo-political challenges like those potentially resulting from the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine or the instability in the Middle-East, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

Current wording

Any failure to maintain revenues from sales of our products through our EAP and/or to generate revenues from commercial sales of these products exceeding historical sales due to geo-political challenges like those potentially resulting from the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine or the instability in the Middle-East or Venezuela , could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

Previous wording

Due to the nature of our products and product candidate pipeline, in addition to NCE exclusivity and new biologic exclusivity, orphan drug exclusivity is especially important for our products that are eligible for orphan drug designation. While orphan drug designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a drug, nor gives the drug any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process, orphan drug exclusivity qualifies such drug for market exclusivity—meaning that FDA is unable to approve any other marketing application for the same chemical or biological product—for seven years from the time of approval of the applicable marketing authorization. For eligible products, we plan to rely on orphan drug exclusivity to maintain a competitive position. If we do not have adequate patent protection for our products, then the relative importance of obtaining regulatory exclusivity is even greater. While orphan status for any of our products, if granted or maintained, would provide market exclusivity in the United States for seven years from the time of approval of the applicable market authorization, we would not be able to exclude other companies from obtaining regulatory approval of products using the same or similar active ingredient for the same indication during or beyond the exclusivity period applicable to our product on the basis of orphan drug status. For example, the exclusivity period for EXONDYS 51, which received initial FDA approval in September 2016, ended in September 2023. Recent litigation has raised questions about the appropriate scope of orphan drug exclusivity. A decision in 2021 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs. Becerra regarding interpretation of the Orphan Drug Act’s exclusivity provisions as applied to drugs and biologics approved for orphan indications narrower than the product’s orphan designation has the potential to significantly broaden the scope of orphan exclusivity for such products. Specifically, the court held that, under the statute, orphan drug exclusivity blocks approval of another company’s application for the same chemical or biological product for the entire disease or condition for which the drug is granted orphan drug designation, regardless of whether the ultimate marketing approval only covered a narrower use or indication. While the FDA has since taken the position that it will continue to apply orphan drug exclusivity only on the basis of the specific indication, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in 2024 in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo has the potential to impact how the Agency applies the Catalyst decision. Our ability to obtain or seek to work around orphan exclusivity, as well as our ability to retain orphan exclusivity that the FDA previously has recognized for our products, may be impacted depending on how the Catalyst decision is ultimately implemented. Legislation has been introduced to amend the Orph…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Current wording

Due to the nature of our products and product candidate pipeline, in addition to NCE exclusivity and new biologic exclusivity, orphan drug exclusivity is especially important for our products that are eligible for orphan drug designation. While orphan drug designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a drug, nor gives the drug any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process, orphan drug exclusivity qualifies such drug for market exclusivity—meaning that FDA is unable to approve any other marketing application for the same chemical or biological product—for seven years from the time of approval of the applicable marketing authorization. For eligible products, we plan to rely on orphan drug exclusivity to maintain a competitive position. If we do not have adequate patent protection for our products, then the relative importance of obtaining regulatory exclusivity is even greater. While orphan status for any of our products, if granted or maintained, would provide market exclusivity in the U.S. for seven years from the time of approval of the applicable market authorization, we would not be able to exclude other companies from obtaining regulatory approval of products using the same or similar active ingredient for the same indication during or beyond the exclusivity period applicable to our product on the basis of orphan drug status. For example, the exclusivity period for EXONDYS 51, which received initial FDA approval in September 2016, ended in September 2023. Recent litigation has raised questions about the appropriate scope of orphan drug exclusivity. A decision in 2021 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs. Becerra regarding interpretation of the Orphan Drug Act’s exclusivity provisions as applied to drugs and biologics approved for orphan indications narrower than the product’s orphan designation has the potential to significantly broaden the scope of orphan exclusivity for such products. Specifically, the court held that, under the statute, orphan drug exclusivity blocks approval of another company’s application for the same chemical or biological product for the entire disease or condition for which the drug is granted orphan drug designation, regardless of whether the ultimate marketing approval only covered a narrower use or indication. While the FDA has since taken the position that it will continue to apply orphan drug exclusivity only on the basis of the specific indication, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in 2024 in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo has the potential to impact how the Agency applies the Catalyst decision. Our ability to obtain or seek to work around orphan exclusivity, as well as our ability to retain orphan exclusivity that the FDA previously has recognized for our products, may be impacted depending on how the Catalyst decision is ultimately implemented. Legislation has been introduced to amend the Orphan Drug A…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

an inability to retain an adequate number of effective commercial personnel;

Current wording

an inability to retain an adequate number of effective commercial personnel. For example, a number of commercial personnel have departed from the Company in connection with and following our Restructuring, which has resulted in the need for additional hiring and training efforts, which may continue in the future;

Previous wording

The patient population living with Duchenne, LGMD, FSHD and DM1 is small and has not been established with precision. If the actual number of patients is smaller than we estimate, our revenue and ability to achieve profitability may be adversely affected.

Current wording

The patient populations living with the diseases we target are small and have not been established with precision. If the actual number of patients is smaller than we estimate, our revenue and ability to achieve profitability may be adversely affected.

Previous wording

The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are highly competitive and subject to significant and rapid technological change, including the use of artificial intelligence (“AI”). We are aware of many pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that are actively engaged in research and development in areas in which our products and product candidates are aimed. Some of these competitors are developing or testing product candidates that now, or may in the future, compete directly with our products or product candidates. For example, we face competition in the fields of Duchenne, gene therapy and siRNA by third parties who are developing or who had once developed:

Current wording

The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are highly competitive and subject to significant and rapid technological change, including the use of artificial intelligence (“AI”). We are aware of many pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that are actively engaged in research and development in areas in which our products and product candidates are aimed. Some of these competitors have approved products or are developing or testing product candidates that now, or may in the future, compete directly with our products or product candidates. For example, we face competition in the fields of Duchenne, gene therapy and siRNA by third parties who are developing or who had once developed:

Previous wording

(i) exon skipping product candidates, such as Wave (targeting various exons, including 53 and 51), Nippon Shinyaku (targeting various exons, including 51 and 45, and notably for exon 53 for which it has received accelerated FDA approval for its product Viltepso (viltolarsen)), Dyne Therapeutics pursuing antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates for exons 44, 45, 51, and 53, Avidity Biosciences pursuing antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates for exons 44, 45 and 51, SQY Therapeutics and BioMarin (for exon 51), Entrada (notably for exon 44, 45, 50, and 51);

Current wording

exon skipping product candidates, such as Wave (targeting various exons, including 53 and 51), Nippon (targeting various exons, including 51 and 45, and notably for exon 53 for which it has received accelerated FDA approval for its product Viltepso (viltolarsen)), Dyne pursuing antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates for exons 44, 45, 51, and 53, Novartis (formerly Avidity Biosciences ("Avidity")) pursuing antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates for exons 44, 45 and 51, SQY Therapeutics and BioMarin (for exon 51), Entrada (notably for exon 44, 45, 50, and 51);

Previous wording

(iv) other disease modifying approaches, such as PTC Therapeutics and Satellos, which has a small molecule candidate, ataluren, that targets nonsense mutations; and

Current wording

other disease modifying approaches, such as PTC and Satellos, which has a small molecule candidate, ataluren, that targets nonsense mutations; and

Previous wording

(v) other approaches that may be palliative in nature or potentially complementary with our products and product candidates and that are or were once being developed including but not limited to, Santhera (approved product vamorolone), Capricor Therapeutics (in partnership with Nippon Shinyaku), BioPhytis, Italfarmaco (approved product Givinostat), Dystrogen and Edgewise Therapeutics. Although BioMarin announced on May 31, 2016 its intent to discontinue clinical and regulatory development of drisapersen as well as its other clinical stage candidates, BMN 044, BMN 045 and BMN 053, then-currently in Phase 2 studies for distinct forms of Duchenne, it further announced its intent to continue to explore the development of next generation oligonucleotides for the treatment of Duchenne. Indeed, BioMarin is conducting clinical trials for BMN-351, an oligonucleotide therapy. In addition, while Wave announced its intention to discontinue development of suvodirsen and suspend development of WVE-N531, it is conducting clinical trials for its exon 53 oligonucleotide, WVE-N531.

Current wording

other approaches that may be palliative in nature or potentially complementary with our products and product candidates and that are or were once being developed including but not limited to, Santhera (approved product vamorolone), Capricor Therapeutics (in partnership with Nippon), BioPhytis, Italfarmaco (approved product Givinostat), Dystrogen and Edgewise Therapeutics. Although BioMarin announced on May 31, 2016 its intent to discontinue clinical and regulatory development of drisapersen as well as its other clinical stage candidates, BMN 044, BMN 045 and BMN 053, then-currently in Phase 2 studies for distinct forms of Duchenne, it further announced its intent to continue to explore the development of next generation oligonucleotides for the treatment of Duchenne. Indeed, BioMarin is conducting clinical trials for BMN-351, an oligonucleotide therapy. In addition, while Wave announced its intention to discontinue development of suvodirsen and suspend development of WVE-N531, it is conducting clinical trials for its exon 53 oligonucleotide, WVE-N531.

Previous wording

In the siRNA field, we face competition by third parties who are also developing product candidates targeting the same disease states as our product candidates, including but not limited to Avidity (DM1, FSHD), Dyne (DMI, FSHD), Arthex Biotech (DM1), PepGen (DM1), Vertex Pharmaceuticals (DM1), Entrada (FSHD), Celularity (FSHD), Novartis (FSHD), Biohaven Pharmaceuticals (SCA), Vico Therapeutics (SCA, Huntington’s), Skyhawk Therapeutics (SCA, Huntington’s), uniQure (Huntington’s), Roche Ionis (Huntington’s), Wave (Huntington’s), and PTC Therapeutics (Huntington’s). Some, but not all, of these entities’ product candidates use RNA technologies. Several of these companies’ product candidates are further along in development and may obtain regulatory approval in advance of our product candidates. These and other competitors may have greater financial, scientific, and commercial resources than us, which may impact our ability to secure the technologies we desire or to otherwise effectively compete in these disease states.

Current wording

In the siRNA field, we face competition by third parties who are also developing product candidates targeting the same disease states as our product candidates, including but not limited to Novartis (formerly Avidity) (DM1, FSHD), Dyne (DM1, FSHD), Arthex Biotech (DM1), PepGen (DM1), Vertex Pharmaceuticals ("Vertex") (DM1), Entrada (FSHD), Celularity (FSHD), EpiCrispr Biotechnologies (FSHD), Biohaven (SCA), Vico Therapeutics (SCA, Huntington’s), Skyhawk Therapeutics (SCA, Huntington’s), uniQure (Huntington’s), Roche Ionis (Huntington’s), Wave (Huntington’s), and PTC (Huntington’s). Some, but not all, of these entities’ product candidates use RNA technologies. Several of these companies’ product candidates are further along in development and may obtain regulatory approval in advance of our product candidates. These and other competitors may have greater financial, scientific, and commercial resources than us, which may impact our ability to secure the technologies we desire or to otherwise effectively compete in these disease states.

Previous wording

Moderna Therapeutics, Avidity, Dyne Therapeutics, Stoke Therapeutics, Ultragenyx, Sanofi, Arrakis Therapeutics, Altay Therapeutics, Novartis, Life Edit, VectorY Therapeutics, Biogen, Arvinas, and Design Therapeutics. Additionally, several companies and institutions have entered into collaborations or other agreements for the development of product candidates, including mRNA, gene therapy and gene editing (CRISPR and AAV, among others) and small molecule therapies that are potential competitors for therapies being developed in the muscular dystrophy, neuromuscular and rare disease space, including, but not limited to, Astellas Pharma, Biogen Inc., Ionis, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi, Shire (now Takeda), Eli Lilly, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Moderna Therapeutics, Inc., Akashi, Capricor Therapeutics (in partnership with Nippon Shinyaku), Oxford University, Exonics Therapeutics (acquired by Vertex Pharmaceuticals), and Editas Medicine. Because many of our products are in various stages of preclinical and clinical development, and given the unpredictability inherent in drug development, it is difficult to predict which third parties may provide the most competition.

Current wording

In addition, we are aware of many pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that are actively engaged in research and development using platform technologies that may be viewed as competing with ours beyond and including those companies mentioned immediately above, such as Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Alnylam"), Arbutus (formerly Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Corp.), Deciphera Pharmaceuticals (now Ono Pharmaceuticals), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Roche Innovation Center Copenhagen (formerly Santaris Pharma A/S), Shire plc (now Takeda), Biogen Inc. ("Biogen"), Moderna Therapeutics ("Moderna"), Stoke Therapeutics, Ultragenyx, Sanofi, Arrakis Therapeutics, Altay Therapeutics, Life Edit, VectorY Therapeutics, Arvinas, and Design Therapeutics. Additionally, several companies and institutions have entered into collaborations or other agreements for the development of product candidates, including mRNA, gene therapy and gene editing (CRISPR and AAV, among others) and small molecule therapies that are potential competitors for therapies being developed in the muscular dystrophy, neuromuscular and rare disease space, including, but not limited to, Astellas Pharma, Biogen, Ionis, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi, Shire (now Takeda), Eli Lilly, Alnylam, Moderna, Akashi, Capricor (in partnership with Nippon), Oxford University, Exonics Therapeutics (acquired by Vertex), and Editas Medicine. Because many of our products are in various stages of preclinical and clinical development, and given the unpredictability inherent in drug development, it is difficult to predict which third parties may provide the most competition.

Previous wording

If any of our competitors are successful in obtaining regulatory approval for any of their product candidates, it may limit our ability to enter into the market, gain market share or maintain market share in the Duchenne, DM1, FSHD, SCA, Huntington's, and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis spaces or other diseases targeted by our platform technologies, products and product candidate pipeline.

Current wording

If any of our competitors are successful in obtaining regulatory approval for any of their product candidates, it may limit our ability to enter into the market, gain market share or maintain market share in the Duchenne, DM1, FSHD, SCA, Huntington's, and IPF spaces or other diseases targeted by our platform technologies, products and product candidate pipeline.

Previous wording

Substantial overlap may exist between the addressable patient population for ELEVIDYS and the patient populations eligible for treatment with our PMO products. In the future, if approved for such use, ELEVIDYS may be used in combination with our PMO products or may be adopted as a separate treatment regimen. Accordingly, ELEVIDYS may compete with our PMO products. As a result, successful commercialization of ELEVIDYS may reduce sales of our PMO products, potentially resulting in significant accounting charges relating to write-off of inventory if such inventory becomes in excess, obsolete or unusable.

Current wording

Substantial overlap may exist between the addressable patient population for ELEVIDYS and the patient populations eligible for treatment with our PMO Products. In the future, if approved for such use, ELEVIDYS might be used in combination with our PMO Products or may be adopted as a separate treatment regimen. Accordingly, ELEVIDYS may compete with our PMO Products. As a result, successful commercialization of ELEVIDYS may reduce sales of our PMO Products, potentially resulting in significant accounting charges relating to write-off of inventory if such inventory becomes in excess, obsolete or unusable.

Previous wording

We have entered into multiple collaborations and strategic transactions and may seek or engage in future strategic collaborations, alliances, acquisitions or licensing agreements or other relationships that complement or expand our business. We may not be able to complete such transactions, and such transactions, if executed, may increase our capital requirements, dilute our stockholders, cause us to incur debt or assume contingent liabilities and subject us to other risks.

Current wording

We have entered into multiple collaborations and strategic transactions, including with Roche and Arrowhead, and we may seek or engage in future strategic collaborations, alliances, acquisitions or licensing agreements or other relationships that complement or expand our business. We may not be able to complete such transactions, and such transactions, if executed, may increase our capital requirements, dilute our stockholders, cause us to incur debt or assume contingent liabilities and subject us to other risks.

Previous wording

We have entered into multiple collaborations, including with Roche, Arrowhead, Nationwide, Duke University, Dyno Therapeutics, and Hansa Biopharma. We may not realize the anticipated benefits of such collaborations, and the anticipated benefits of any future collaborations or strategic relationships, each of which involves numerous risks, including:

Current wording

We have entered into multiple collaborations, including with Roche, Arrowhead, Nationwide, Duke University, and Hansa Biopharma. We may not realize the anticipated benefits of such collaborations, and the anticipated benefits of any future collaborations or strategic relationships, each of which involves numerous risks, including:

Previous wording

For example, we will have limited influence and control over the development and commercialization activities of Roche in the territories in which it leads development and commercialization of ELEVIDYS, and if the exclusive option is exercised, in the territories in which it may lead commercialization of certain other products. Roche’s development and commercialization activities in the territories where it is the lead party may adversely impact our own efforts in the U.S. Failure by Roche to meet its obligations under the Roche Agreement, to apply sufficient efforts at developing and commercializing collaboration products, or to comply with applicable legal or regulatory requirements, may materially adversely affect our business and our results of operations. In addition, to the extent we rely on Roche to commercialize any products for which we obtain regulatory approval, we will receive less revenues than if we commercialized these products ourselves.

Current wording

For example, we will have limited influence and control over the development and commercialization activities of Roche in the territories in which it leads development and commercialization of ELEVIDYS. Roche’s development and commercialization activities in the territories where it is the lead party may adversely impact our own efforts in the U.S. As a further example, Arrowhead conducted the Phase 1/2 single ascending dose studies for SRP-1001 (FSHD1) and SRP-1003 (DM1), for which we announced early results in March 2026. Failure by Roche or Arrowhead to meet their obligations under the Roche Collaboration Agreement and Arrowhead Collaboration Agreement, to apply sufficient efforts at developing and commercializing collaboration products, or to comply with applicable legal or regulatory requirements, may materially adversely affect our business and our results of operations. In addition, to the extent we rely on Roche to commercialize any products for which we obtain regulatory approval, we will receive less revenues than if we commercialized these products ourselves.

Previous wording

denial by the regulatory agencies of permission to proceed with our planned clinical trials or any other clinical trials we may initiate, or placement of a clinical trial on hold. For example, on July 21, 2025, we announced that the FDA placed certain of our LGMD programs, including SRP-9003, on clinical hold following a case of ALF resulting in the death of a patient in our Phase 1/2 LGMD clinical trial for SRP-9004, which could impact the timing of a BLA submission for SRP-9003;

Current wording

denial by the regulatory agencies of permission to proceed with our planned clinical trials or any other clinical trials we may initiate, or placement of a clinical trial on hold. For example, on July 21, 2025, we announced that the FDA placed our LGMD programs, including SRP-9003, on clinical hold following a case of ALF resulting in the death of a patient in our Phase 1 LGMD clinical trial for SRP-9004, which has impacted the timing of a BLA submission for SRP-9003;

Previous wording

Further, any reduction in FDA’s workforce could delay or materially impact FDA’s feedback on our development programs, including through meetings and other informal interactions, and affect FDA’s review and oversight of our product candidates. Additionally, changes in FDA personnel under the new presidential administration may lead to changes in the regulations, policies and operations of the FDA, which may impact our clinical development plans. Any of these actions could adversely affect the development and approval of our product candidates. In addition, as a result of the government shutdown, the FDA staff may be unable to process and review regulatory submissions in a timely manner or at all.

Current wording

Further, any reduction in the FDA’s workforce could delay or materially impact the FDA’s feedback on our development programs, including through meetings and other informal interactions, and affect the FDA’s review and oversight of our product candidates. Additionally, changes in the FDA personnel under the current presidential administration may lead to changes in the regulations, policies and operations of the FDA, which may impact our clinical development plans. Any of these actions could adversely affect the development and approval of our product candidates. In addition, as a result of any government shutdown, the FDA staff may be unable to process and review regulatory submissions in a timely manner or at all.