Skip to main content

CRISPR Therapeutics AG

For the period ended Jun 4, 2026. Filed Apr 21, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.

Jun 4, 2026 · Filed Apr 21, 2026

CRSP$50.07+3.1%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Primary Elements of Executive Compensation Program

To achieve our compensation objectives, we provide executives with a total compensation package consisting primarily of the following fixed and variable compensation elements:

Compensation ElementPurpose
Base SalaryRecognize performance of job responsibilities and attract and retain individuals with superior talent
Annual Cash Incentive ProgramProvide short-term incentives to attain key business and program objectives
Equity Incentive AwardsPromote the maximization of shareholder value by aligning the interests of our executive officers and shareholders

We do not have a specific policy regarding the percentage allocation between short-term and long-term, or fixed and variable, compensation elements.

Our executive officers, including our NEOs, are also eligible to participate in our standard employee benefit plans, such as our employee stock purchase plan and retirement, health and welfare benefits plans, on the same basis as our other employees. In addition, as described below, our executive officers, including our NEOs, are entitled to certain change-in-control payments and benefits, as well as certain termination payments and benefits not in connection with a change in control.

Base Salary

We pay base salaries to our executive officers, including our NEOs, as the fixed portion of their compensation to provide them with a reasonable degree of financial certainty, and to attract and retain top-performing individuals. At the time of hire, base salaries are determined for our executive officers, including our NEOs. Typically, at the beginning of each year, the Compensation Committee reviews base salaries for our executive officers, including our NEOs, to determine if an increase is appropriate. In addition, base salaries may be adjusted in the event of a promotion or significant change in responsibilities.

2025 Base Salary

In March 2025, the Compensation Committee reviewed the base salaries of our executive officers, including our NEOs. The Compensation Committee considered the factors described above under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Governance of Executive Compensation Program—Compensation-Setting Factors,” including an analysis prepared by Alpine. The Compensation Committee recommendation aspires to generally align the base salaries of our executive officers, including our NEOs, to approximately the fiftieth percentile of our peer group. Thereafter, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors to adjust the annual base salaries of our NEOs as set forth below, effective as of January 1, 2025, and the Board of Directors approved that recommendation.

2024 AnnualBase Salary ($)(1)2025 AnnualBase Salary ($)(1)PercentageIncrease
Samarth Kulkarni, Ph.D.746,235768,6223.0%
Raju Prasad, Ph.D.479,136493,5103.0%
Naimish Patel, M.D.535,000551,0503.0%
James R. Kasinger479,774494,1673.0%
Julianne Bruno, M.B.A. (2)460,000473,8003.0%

(1)

The actual base salaries paid to our NEOs in 2025 are set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” below.

(2)

Ms. Bruno resigned as our Chief Operating Officer effective as of March 24, 2025.

Annual Cash Bonuses

We provide short-term incentive compensation opportunities to our executive officers, including our NEOs, in the form of annual cash bonuses to drive our short-term success under our senior executive cash incentive bonus plan. The annual cash bonus review provides that:

the Compensation Committee will establish the annual corporate performance goals and weighting;

the Compensation Committee will review and establish a target bonus opportunity for each executive;

annual cash bonuses may not be paid unless and until the Compensation Committee makes a determination with respect to achievement of the annual corporate performance goals; and

-22-

the Compensation Committee may adjust annual cash bonuses based on individual performance, and based on such other terms and conditions as it may in its discretion determine.

The Compensation Committee may also make certain immaterial rounding adjustments to the annual cash bonuses.

Corporate Performance Goals

At the end of each year, the Compensation Committee, after reviewing management’s proposal, establishes the annual corporate performance goals that it believes will be the most significant drivers of our short-term and long-term success. The corporate performance goals include target achievement dates based on calendar quarters. The Compensation Committee then recommends to the Board of Directors that it approve of the proposed corporate performance goals. Each corporate performance goal has a percentage weighting, and may include an additional percentage weighting for overachievement, based on the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the goal’s relative significance. Each executive officer, including each NEO, is eligible to receive an annual performance-based cash bonus based primarily on achievement of corporate performance goals as assessed by our Compensation Committee and Board of Directors with adjustment for individual performance based on input on individual performance achievement from our Chief Executive Officer. Each executive officer, including each NEO, has a target annual bonus award amount, expressed as a percentage of each NEO’s base salary then in effect. After the fiscal year is completed, the Compensation Committee reviews actual corporate and individual performance against the stated goals (as discussed in more detail below) and determines subjectively what it believes to be the appropriate level of cash bonus, if any, for our NEOs.

As a general matter, at the end of the year for which the corporate performance goals have been established, the Compensation Committee, after reviewing management’s self-assessment, evaluates our achievement of the prior year’s corporate performance goals, and our overall success for the year, and determines the total percentage achievement level for the Company. The Compensation Committee then recommends to the Board of Directors that it approve of such percentage achievement level for the Company.

In addition, our Chief Executive Officer evaluates the other executive officers’ individual performance, including the other NEOs’ individual performance, and makes recommendations for total percentage achievement level for each such executive officer. Such evaluation is made, in part, by considering the performance relative to the executive officer’s functional attainments and impact on corporate goals, as well as other factors related to conformance with the Company’s core values and policies and the expected competencies and skills for the executive officer’s role. The Compensation Committee considers our Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations, and discusses, reviews and recommends the total percentage achievement level for each of the executive officers. The Compensation Committee then independently evaluates our Chief Executive Officer’s performance using similar criteria used in our Chief Executive Officer’s evaluation of the other executive officers. Since an executive officer’s total percentage achievement level is determined by taking the Company’s percentage achievement level for the most recently completed fiscal year together with the individual executive officer’s percentage achievement level awarded in connection with the annual performance review cycle, the total percentage achievement level for such executive officer could exceed the stated percentage achievement level for the Company. The Compensation Committee then recommends to the Board of Directors that it approve the total percentage achievement level for each executive officer, including our NEOs.

For 2025, the actual bonus amounts for our NEOs were reviewed and approved by our Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors.

Target Annual Bonuses

At the beginning of each year, the Compensation Committee reviews the annual target bonuses for our executive officers, including our NEOs and, if appropriate, makes a recommendation to the Board of Directors to adjust the annual target bonus for our NEOs. The Compensation Committee considers the factors described above and benchmarking analyses prepared by the Compensation Committee’s third-party compensation consultant, with an emphasis on market data from our compensation peer group for comparable positions. Target annual bonuses represent a specific percentage of annual base salary.

2025 Target Annual Bonus

In March 2025, the Compensation Committee reviewed the target annual bonuses of our executive officers, including our NEOs. The Compensation Committee considered the factors described under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Primary Elements of Executive Compensation Program—Annual Cash Bonuses” above, as well as the benchmarking analyses prepared by Alpine, particularly the market data from the companies in the compensation peer group. The Compensation Committee recommendation aspires to generally align the target annual bonuses of our executive officers, including our NEOs, to approximately the fiftieth percentile of our peer group. The target annual bonus for each of our NEOs did not change in 2025 as compared to 2024.

2024 TargetAnnual Bonus2025 TargetAnnual Bonus

-23-

Samarth Kulkarni, Ph.D.70%70%
Raju Prasad, Ph.D.45%45%
Naimish Patel, M.D.45%45%
James R. Kasinger45%45%
Julianne Bruno, M.B.A. (1)45%45%

(1)

Ms. Bruno resigned as our Chief Operating Officer effective as of March 24, 2025.

2025 Corporate Performance Goals

In the fourth quarter of 2024, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors approved our 2025 annual corporate performance goals and weightings, as summarized below.

CategoryCorporate GoalsWeighting
Program Goals● Advance pre-clinical and clinical activities related to our in vivo programs● Advance clinical activities related to our CAR T programs in auto-immune disease and immuno-oncology● Advance next-generation activities in hemoglobinopathies● Advance pre-clinical and clinical activities related to our regenerative medicine programs65%
Platform and Capabilities● Continue to advance platform activities, including enhancing scientific and manufacturing capabilities20%
G&A Goals● Manage operations in a fiscally-responsible manner, including advancing strategic partnerships and alliances and high organizational engagement15%

Our executive compensation program seeks to incentivize and reward strong corporate performance. In the fourth quarter of 2025, the Compensation Committee evaluated our achievement of the 2025 corporate performance goals, considering the extent to which we had achieved each goal, the weighting established for each goal, management’s self-assessment, and our overall corporate performance in 2025. The Compensation Committee determined that we achieved meaningful corporate goals during 2025 and exceeded our base 2025 corporate performance goals. Thereafter, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors the foregoing, including the approval of up to 120% achievement level, and the Board of Directors accepted that recommendation and approved the same.

Highlights of our 2025 corporate performance include:

Program Goals:

In vivo:

Advancing a portfolio of programs leveragingin vivo editing for both common and rare diseases, as well as using siRNA approaches.

In vivo liver editing:

o

Establishment of a leading platform forin vivo gene editing, including a proprietary LNP delivery platform to enable gene editing in the liver using both CRISPR/Cas9 and our novel, proprietary SyNTase editing technologies.

o

Ongoing clinical trial of CTX310 targeting angiopoietin-related protein 3 (ANGPTL3) in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, mixed dyslipidemias, or severe hypertriglyceridemia.

In November 2025, presented positive Phase 1 data from our ongoing clinical trial evaluating CTX310 during a late-breaking session at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions and published simultaneously in The New England Journal of Medicine in a peer-reviewed article entitled “Phase 1 Trial of CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing Targeting ANGPTL3.” Based on the positive Phase 1 results we have advanced CTX310 into Phase 1b clinical trials, prioritizing development in severe hypertriglyceridemia and refractory hypercholesterolemia.

o

Progressing earlier stage investigational in vivo programs, including: CTX340, CTX460 and CTX321 through IND/CTA-enabling studies.

siRNA-based programs

o

Our siRNA-based portfolio includes clinical-stage programs in cardiovascular and thromboembolic diseases, developed in collaboration with Sirius.

In May 2025, partnered with Sirius Therapeutics and certain of its affiliates, or Sirius, and entered into a collaboration, option and license agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, we and Sirius are collaborating on the research, development, manufacture, commercialization and use of certain collaboration products utilizing Sirius’ siRNA technology for targeting Factor XI, including

-24-

CTX611 (formerly known as SRSD107); and (2) Sirius granted to us options to exclusively license Sirius siRNA technology to target up to two licensed targets for the research, develop, manufacture and commercialization of licensed products.

o

Ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial of CTX611 in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. CTX611 is a novel double-stranded, long-acting siRNA, designed to target the human coagulation factor XI, or FXI, messenger RNA and inhibit FXI protein expression.

CAR T (Autoimmune Disease and Immuno-oncology):

Continued to advance zugo-cel (formerly CTX112) in both autoimmune disease and hematologic malignancies.

Autoimmune disease:

o

Ongoing clinical trial of zugo-cel in adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, or SLE, systemic sclerosis, and inflammatory myositis.

In December 2025 and updated in January 2026, released preliminary clinical data demonstrating zugo-cel has been well tolerated to date. The first patient with SLE, refractory to 9 prior therapies with a baseline Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000, or SLEDAI-2K, score of 8, has maintained drug-free DORIS clinical remission through month 9 following CAR T therapy. Additionally, the second SLE patient with a baseline SLEDAI-2K score of 8, has sustained B cell depletion with SLEDAI-2K score of 0 through month 2 following CAR T therapy.

o

Initiated a second clinical trial of zugo-cell in adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia purpura and warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia; such clinical trial is ongoing.

Immuno-oncology:

o

Ongoing clinical trial of zugo-cel in adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies who have received at least two prior lines of therapy.

In December 2025, we released initial clinical data and shared that the recommended Phase 2 dose had been recently endorsed for the large b-cell lymphoma cohort.

Positive clinical data generated through December 2025 support the advancement of zugo-cel into the Phase 2 portion of the ongoing Phase 1/2 clinical trial.

Hemoglobinopathies:

To date, CASGEVY has been approved by regulatory authorities in the United States, European Union, Great Britain, Canada, Switzerland, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait for the treatment of eligible patients 12 years and older with severe sickle cell disease, or SCD, or transfusion-dependent beta thalassemia, or TDT.

We and Vertex continue to investigate CASGEVY, including in clinical trials designed to assess the safety and efficacy of a single dose of CASGEVY in patients ages 12 to 35 with severe SCD and TDT, respectively, two pivotal trials in patients 5 to 11 years of age, one in severe SCD and a second in TDT, and long-term follow-up clinical trials designed to follow participants for up to 15 years after CASGEVY infusion.

At the American Society of Hematology annual meeting, or ASH, in December 2025, positive data from the pivotal studies of CASGEVY in children ages 5 to 11 years old with SCD or TDT were presented. The safety profile of CASGEVY in younger patients is consistent with myeloablative conditioning and autologous transplant in both SCD and TDT, as established in clinical studies in older patients. Consistent with studies in older patients, children treated with CASGEVY have durable increases in HbF and stable allelic editing.

In addition, longer-term data for people with SCD and TDT ages 12 years and older treated with CASGEVY were also presented at ASH. These data, as of April 2025, continue to demonstrate the transformative, durable clinical benefits that CASGEVY provides to people living with SCD or TDT. In SCD, 100% of patients (45/45) achieved VF12 in either CLIMB-121 or the long-term follow-up study CLIMB-131, with a mean duration of VOC-free for 35.3 months (range 12.9–67.7 months). In TDT, 98.2% of patients (55/56) achieved TI12 in either CLIMB-111 or CLIMB-131 with a mean duration of transfusion independence of 41.4 months (range 13–72.3 months). The safety profile remained consistent with myeloablative conditioning and autologous transplant in both SCD and TDT.

Continued to advance internally developed targeted conditioning program, as well asin vivo hematopoietic stem cell editing approaches utilizing lipid nanoparticle-mediated delivery through preclinical studies.

Regenerative Medicine:

Progress in regenerative medicine continues. Advancing CTX213, a deviceless beta cell replacement product candidate consisting of unencapsulated precursor islet cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells for the treatment of T1D. CTX213 benefits from work on a precursor product candidate. Preclinical studies have shown direct administration of CTX213 leads to improved glycemic control and C-peptide production in a diabetic rat model.

Platform & Capabilities:

-25-

We continued to build and enhance our scientific and manufacturing capabilities, including next-generation technologies, including editing modalities, that can enable new therapies.

Developed a proprietary, next-generation, site-specific gene correction platform called SyNTase editing. SyNTase editors represent a significant advance over currently described prime editing systems by combining compact Cas9 proteins with a novel class of engineered polymerases. When integrated with optimized Cas9, SyNTase editors can utilize engineered templates with improved serum stability, enabling higher target correction efficiency.

G&A Goals:

We continued to build and advance certain strategic partnerships and alliances and manage our operations in a fiscally-responsible manner.

2025 Annual Cash Bonuses

In the first quarter of 2026, the Compensation Committee considered our Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations with respect to the individual performance for 2025 of our executive officers, including our other NEOs, and independently evaluated the same for each executive officer, including our Chief Executive Officer, using similar criteria used in our Chief Executive Officer’s evaluation of the other executive officers. Thereafter, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors the total percentage achievement level based on corporate performance goals and individual performance for each of our executive officers, including our other NEOs, and the Board of Directors accepted that recommendation and approved the same. For fiscal year 2025, our Board of Directors determined that the individual performance of each of Dr. Kulkarni, Dr. Prasad, Mr. Kasinger and Dr. Patel for 2025 merited a total percentage achievement level that equaled 122.5%, based on individual impact to corporate goals, individual competencies and skills, demonstrated leadership and embodiment of our core way of working: collaborative, undaunted, entrepreneurial, and results-oriented. Ms. Bruno departed the Company in April 2025, accordingly, she was not eligible to receive a bonus in 2025.

The table below sets forth the target annual cash bonus for each NEO who was eligible to earn a bonus, and the actual bonus amount earned by such NEO, for 2025.

Target AnnualCash Bonus ($)Actual AnnualCash Bonus ($)
Samarth Kulkarni, Ph.D.538,035659,093
Raju Prasad, Ph.D.222,080272,047
Naimish Patel, M.D.247,973303,766
James R. Kasinger222,375272,410
Julianne Bruno, M.B.A. (1)213,210—

(1)

Ms. Bruno resigned as our Chief Operating Officer effective as of March 24, 2025. As a result, she was not eligible to receive a bonus for 2025.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

We view long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards as an important element of our executive compensation program. The value of equity awards is directly related to share price appreciation over time, which incentivizes our executive officers to achieve long-term corporate goals and create long-term value for our shareholders. Equity awards also help us attract and retain top-performing executive officers in a competitive market.

Consistent with the practice of our peer group companies and historical practice, we grant our employees, including our NEOs, a mix of stock options and restricted stock units at the time of hire, and in certain instances at the time of promotion, equity awards are granted to our executive officers, including our NEOs. In addition, during our annual employee performance review cycle, as a general practice, we grant a mix of equity awards to employees, including our NEOs, twice yearly with the initial award made during the third or fourth quarter of the year for which the equity grant is awarded and the remainder of the annual equity grant is awarded during the first quarter of the following year. We believe granting equity awards bi-annually better delivers consistent equity value to our employees. As a general practice, the first tranche of awards are comprised of 100% stock options and equate roughly to one-third of a typical annual option grant and the second tranche of awards are comprised of a mix of equity awards roughly equating to two-thirds of a typical annual option grant, as well as restricted stock units adjusted for performance. The Compensation Committee recommendation aspires to generally align equity awards granted to our executive officers, including our NEOs, to the sixtieth percentile of our peer group. For more information on our equity award grant policy, see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Other Compensation Policies and Practices—Equity Award Grant Policy” below.

At the beginning of each year, the Compensation Committee typically reviews the equity awards for our executive officers, including our NEOs, and determines, based upon performance in the prior year, the amounts of the second tranche of annual equity awards it deems reasonable and appropriate based on the factors described above under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Governance of Executive Compensation Program—Compensation-Setting Factors”, as well as the benchmarking analyses prepared by the Compensation Committee’s third-party compensation consultant. In addition, the Compensation Committee may deem it advisable to grant subsequent equity awards to our executive officers (including our NEOs), in the event of a promotion, significant change in responsibilities, recognition for achievement of other performance milestones, recognition of other contributions to the Company, or for purposes of retention. See, for example, the complete list of equity awards granted to our NEOs in

-26-

2025 described below in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 2025” table, as well as additional information contained below under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Primary Elements of Executive Compensation Program—Retention of Executive Leadership Team.”

2025-2026 Annual Equity Awards Based on 2025 Performance

Stock Options(Number of Shares)(1)(2)Restricted StockUnits(Number of Shares)(2)(3)
Samarth Kulkarni, Ph.D. (4)163,74981,875
Raju Prasad, Ph.D. (5)54,99927,500
Naimish Patel, M.D. (6)54,99930,000
James R. Kasinger (7)54,99925,000
Julianne Bruno, M.B.A. (8)——

(1)

The stock options vest, and become exercisable, over a four-year period, with 1/48 th of the underlying shares vesting on a monthly basis after the vesting commencement date, so that all of the underlying shares will be vested on the date four years after the vesting commencement date, subject to continuous service to us or any of our subsidiaries.

(2)

Under applicable SEC reporting rules, all awards granted in March 2026 will not be reported in the compensation tables below, but rather will be reported in the compensation tables in the Company’s proxy statement in 2027 with respect to 2026 compensation.

(3)

Restricted stock units are subject to time-based vesting criteria established by the Compensation Committee. Vesting terms for restricted stock units granted in 2025 are described in the notes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2025” table below. Restricted stock units granted in March 2026 will vest annually over four years. In addition, information regarding certain retention-focused awards granted in 2025 are not included in this table, but are described under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Primary Elements of Executive Compensation Program—Retention of Executive Leadership Team” below.

(4)

The equity incentive awards summarized above for Dr. Kulkarni reflect an award of 49,500 stock options granted in October 2025, 114,249 stock options granted in March 2026 and 81,875 restricted stock units granted in March 2026.

(5)

The equity incentive awards summarized above for Dr. Prasad reflect an award of 16,500 stock options granted in October 2025, as well as an award of 38,499 stock options granted in March 2026 and 27,500 restricted stock units granted in March 2026.

(6)

The equity incentive awards summarized above for Dr. Patel reflect an award of 16,500 stock options granted in October 2025, 38,499 stock options granted in March 2026 and 30,000 restricted stock units granted in March 2026.

(7)

The equity incentive awards summarized for Mr. Kasinger reflect an award of 16,500 stock options granted in October 2025, as well as an award of 38,499 stock options granted in March 2026 and 25,000 restricted stock units granted in March 2026.

(8)

Ms. Bruno resigned as our Chief Operating Officer effective as of March 24, 2025 and, as a result, Ms. Bruno was not eligible for annual equity awards based on 2025 performance.

Retention of Executive Leadership Team

A primary goal of our executive compensation program is to attract, motivate and retain our executive leadership team. The Compensation Committee believes that it is in the best interests of our shareholders to maintain a disciplined, yet flexible, executive compensation program that is focused on reinforcing and encouraging retention of our executive officers. Moreover, the Compensation Committee believes that continuity amongst our executive leadership team is critical to the operation of our business, our ability to consistently deliver key corporate performance objectives, and our ability to focus on shareholder value creation without distraction. On an ongoing basis, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with its independent compensation advisor, Alpine, and the Board of Directors, evaluates the overall compensation packages for the Company’s executive leadership team to assess the need for retention in light of specific circumstances facing the Company. Given the Company’s stage of development, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors believe that equity grants with time-based vesting features best promote executive retention because this feature incentivizes our executive leadership team to remain at the Company during the vesting period. However, in certain instances, equity grants with performance-based vesting features serve as an appropriate motivational and retention vehicle for certain members of our executive management team.

In the second quarter of 2025, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with Alpine, recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors approved, the grant of retention equity awards to certain executive officers in the form of time-based restricted stock units in an effort to incentivize such executives continued employment with the Company through the next phase of the Company’s development and as a result of their individual impact and leadership to date. The Compensation Committee and independent members of the Board of Directors believe the leadership of Dr. Prasad and Dr. Patel are important to lead the Company through the next phase of the Company’s development. Accordingly, Dr. Prasad was granted 20,000 restricted stock units and Dr. Patel was granted 25,000 restricted stock units. Each such award vests in full on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to continued service to the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.