Skip to main content

Arcadia Biosciences, Inc.

For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 26, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Mar 26, 2026

RKDA$0.16-3.5%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-K

Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-03-25.

0000950170-25-044487

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Current report: 10-K

Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-03-26.

0001193125-26-126238

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 73 previous paragraphs and 65 current paragraphs.

41 unchanged; 15 reworded; 9 added; 17 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (9)

Current report

Commencing in April 2025, the U.S. government announced and imposed a series of reciprocal tariffs on most U.S. trading partners in reliance on the International Economic Emergency Power Act, or IEEPA. Effective August 7, 2025, the U.S. government implemented a 19% reciprocal tariff rate on goods originating from Thailand, where our coconut water is sourced and processed. In October 2025, the United States and Thailand reached a preliminary framework agreement on reciprocal trade, which maintains a 19% rate while identifying certain product categories that may be eligible for a zero percent reciprocal tariff rate; however the scope and implementation timeline of those exemptions remain subject to further negotiation.

Current report

On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the use of the IEEPA to impose tariffs was not authorized by Congress, invalidating a significant portion of tariffs announced in April 2025. While the ruling struck down the IEEPA-based tariffs, it does not prevent the administration from imposing tariffs using other legal or statutory authorities. Following the decision, the administration signed a new executive order to impose new duties and announced a 10% global tariff on imports entering the United States (subject to certain exceptions) under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which provides for tariffs up to 15% for a period of up to 150 days unless extended by Congress. The administration has indicated its intention to pursue alternative statutory mechanisms to reinstate or impose new tariffs. As a result, there remains substantial uncertainty regarding future tariff rates and the countries and products to which such tariffs would apply.

Current report

Arcadia has identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting as discussed in Item 9A, "Controls and Procedures" of Part II of this Report. If Arcadia identifies additional material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting, if Arcadia is unable to comply with the requirements of Section 404(a) in a timely manner, if Arcadia is unable to assert that its internal control over financial reporting is effective or, once required, if Arcadia's independent registered public accounting firm is unable to attest that Arcadia's internal control over financial reporting is effective, investor confidence in Arcadia may be adversely affected and, as a result, the value of its common stock.

Current report

Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. If we fail to satisfy the continued listing requirements of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”), such as the corporate governance, minimum stockholders equity or minimum closing bid price requirements, Nasdaq may take steps to delist our common stock. If we receive a deficiency letter regarding such listing requirements, we would attempt to take actions to regain compliance with applicable listing requirements within any cure periods applicable to such requirements; however, wecan provide no assurance that any such action taken by us would allow our common stock to continue to be listed.

Current report

Further, on January 13, 2026, Nasdaq filed with the SEC, pursuant to the Exchange Act and Rule 19b-4 promulgated thereunder, a proposed rule change to adopt a new Market Value of Listed Securities (“MVLS”) continued listing requirement of at least $5 million. Specifically, under the proposed new rule, if a company fails to have a MVLS of at least $5 million for 30 consecutive business days, its listed securities will be subject to immediate suspension and delisting without a cure period to regain compliance, delisting would not be stayed pending any appeal by the company, and the appeal process from such a suspension and delisting determination would be very limited. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on January 29, 2026. Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act provides that within 45 days of the publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or within such longer period up to 90 days as the SEC may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the SEC shall either approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. On March 16, 2026, the SEC announced that pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act, it was designating a longer period of time within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that the SEC has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change and the issues raised therein, and designated April 29, 2026, as the date by which the SEC would either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change.

Current report

Based on the number of shares of our common stock outstanding (other than shares held by directors and officers) as of March 19, 2026, and the last consolidated bid price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on March 19, 2026, our MVLS was approximately $3.4 million. Accordingly, if the SEC subsequently approves the rule change as proposed and if our MVLS remains below the minimum $5 million requirement for 30 consecutive business days after the new rule becomes effective and the date that such determination period commences, our common stock would be subject to immediate suspension and delisting from the Nasdaq Capital Market.

Current report

If our common stock were to be delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market, the common stock may be eligible for trading on an over-the-counter market such as the OTCQX Best Market, OTCQB Venture Market or OTCID Basic Market, operated by the OTC Markets Group. The quotation of the common stock on an OTC marketplace, compared to being listed on a national securities exchange such as the Nasdaq Capital Market, may present significant risks to the holders of common stock, including lower availability and efficiency of market price quotations, significantly less liquidity, increased price volatility, increased transaction costs, and the application of state securities laws that could result in restrictions on the sale of our common stock. Stockholders may not be able to sell their shares of common stock on any such substitute marketplace in the quantities, at the times, or at the prices that could potentially be available on a more liquid trading market. If we are not able to obtain a listing on another stock exchange or quotation service for our common stock, it may be extremely difficult or impossible for stockholders to sell their shares of common stock.

Current report

The SEC and FINRA have adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exemptions including without limitation if the issuer has net tangible assets exceeding $2 million and has been in continuous operation for at least three years, and other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges (including the Nasdaq Capital Market) or authorized for quotation on certain automated quotation systems, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system. As of December 31, 2025, our net tangible assets exceeded $2 million. If we do not retain a listing on Nasdaq and if the price of our common stock is less than $5.00, then our common stock may be deemed a penny stock unless one of the exemptions applies. If our common stock is deemed to be a penny stock, trading in our common stock would be subject to additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell penny stocks. If our stock is deemed to be a penny stock, then the penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, before effecting a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document containing specified information, including information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks involved in investing in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements containing price and market information relating to the penny stock. In addition, broker-dealers who sell these securities to persons other than established customers (as defined in the applicable rules) and “accredited investors” must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction and a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for our common stock, and therefore stockholders may have difficulty selling their shares.

Current report

If applicable, the penny stock rules may make it difficult for investors to sell their shares of our common stock. Because of the rules and restrictions applicable to a penny stock, there is less trading in penny stocks and the market price of our common stock may be adversely affected. Also, the additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by such requirements may discourage brokers from effecting transactions in our common stock if it is deemed to be a penny stock. Accordingly, investors may not always be able to resell their shares of our common stock publicly at times and prices acceptable to them.
Removed paragraphs (17)

Previous report

Our proposed Exchange transaction with Roosevelt is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Failure to complete, or delays in completing, the proposed Exchange transaction with Roosevelt could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, business, financial condition and/or stock price.

Previous report

Our previously announced proposed Exchange transaction with Roosevelt is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Some of those risks and uncertainties include the following, among others:

Previous report

The closing of the Exchange transaction is subject to approval by our stockholders of certain proposals relating to the transactions contemplated by the Exchange Agreement, as well as the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. Our stockholders might not approve the proposals that are required in order for us to be able to close the Exchange transaction, or the Exchange Agreement might be terminated for other reasons. We cannot assure you that the proposed Exchange will be successfully completed. Any failure to satisfy a required condition to closing may delay or prevent the completion of the transaction, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, business, financial condition and/or stock price.

Previous report

We may require additional funding in order to be able to close the Exchange transaction.

Previous report

If the Exchange with Roosevelt is not completed, our board of directors would be required to consider alternatives for our business and assets, which might include seeking the dissolution and liquidation of the Company, seeking an acquisition transaction or similar transaction with another company, initiating bankruptcy proceedings, or other alternatives. There can be no assurance regarding the outcome of such a process. We would have very limited cash resources, might be unable to raise additional funding, and could be forced to reduce or suspend operations, seek dissolution proceedings, or seek federal bankruptcy protection.

Previous report

We would remain liable for significant transaction costs, including legal, accounting, financial advisory and other costs relating to the Exchange regardless of whether the Exchange is consummated.

Previous report

If the Exchange is not completed, the trading price of Arcadia’ common stock may decline to the extent that the then-current market prices for our common stock reflect a market assumption that the Exchange will be completed.

Previous report

We could be subject to litigation related to the Exchange Agreement, the Exchange transaction or any failure to complete the Exchange.

Previous report

We could potentially lose key personnel during the pendency of the Exchange.

Previous report

If the Exchange is not completed, we would not realize the potential benefits of the Exchange, which could have a negative effect on our results of operations, financial condition, business and stock price.

Previous report

If the Exchange is consummated, then if the Company, which we will sometimes refer to after consummation of the Exchange as the "combined company," is unable to realize the substantial strategic and financial benefits currently anticipated from the Exchange, Arcadia stockholders will have experienced dilution of their ownership interests in the Company without receiving any commensurate benefit, or only receiving part of the commensurate benefit to the extent the combined company is able to realize only part of the strategic and financial benefits currently anticipated from the Exchange. In addition, any shares of common stock that the Company may issue following consummation of the Exchange will further dilute the ownership interests of the Company's current stockholders.

Previous report

If the Exchange Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, the Company may be required to reimburse Roosevelt's expenses up to $500,000 or $750,000, depending on the reasons for the termination.

Previous report

If the Exchange transaction with Roosevelt is not completed, we will have extremely limited cash resources. Although we may try to pursue an alternative transaction, if no alternate transaction can be negotiated and completed or we are not successful in raising additional required funding, we may be forced to reduce or suspend operations, file for federal bankruptcy protection or seek dissolution or liquidation proceedings. In such an event, our creditors would have first claim on the value of our assets which, other than remaining cash, would most likely be liquidated in one or more transactions or a bankruptcy sale, in which case our common stock would have little or no value. We can give no assurance as to the magnitude of the net proceeds of such a sale and whether such proceeds would be sufficient to satisfy our obligations to its creditors, let alone to permit any distribution to our equity holders.

Previous report

If the Exchange is consummated, the combined company will require significant additional funding in order to develop the Roosevelt assets and conduct the combined company's anticipated business. If such funding involves the issuance of equity securities, our stockholders would suffer additional dilution to their percentage ownership interests in the Company, which could be material. If such funding involves debt financing, the agreements relating to such financing may involve restrictive covenants or other provisions that will limit our operating flexibility. If the Exchange is consummated and the combined company fails to raise sufficient funds, the combined company would not be able to successfully execute on its business strategy.

Previous report

Failure to timely complete the proposed Exchange transaction with Roosevelt could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, business, prospects and our stock price.

Previous report

Arcadia is continuously seeking to maintain and/or improve its internal control environment. As a result, Arcadia may experience higher than anticipated operating expenses, as well as higher auditor fees during and after the implementation of these changes. If Arcadia is unable to implement any of the required changes to its internal control over financial reporting effectively or efficiently or are required to do so earlier than anticipated, it could adversely affect its operations, financial reporting, and results of operations and could result in an adverse opinion on internal controls from Arcadia’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Previous report

In addition, in connection with the proposed Exchange transaction, the Company will need to file an initial listing application with Nasdaq and satisfy the initial listing standards for listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market, which in certain instances are different from and more restrictive than Nasdaq’s continued listing standards. Approval of continued listing of the common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market is a closing condition under the Exchange Agreement
Reworded paragraphs (15)

Previous wording

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared using the generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, as shown in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, included in this Report, we have an accumulated deficit, recurring net losses and net cash used in operations, and resources that will not be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements, which raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. If we cannot continue as a viable entity, we might be required to reduce or cease operations or seek dissolution and liquidation or bankruptcy protection, and our stockholders would likely lose most or all of their investment in us.

Current wording

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared using the generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, as shown in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, included in this Report, we have an accumulated deficit, recurring net losses and net cash used in operations, and resources that will not be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements, which raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern may hinder our ability to obtain further required financing. If we cannot continue as a viable entity, we might be required to reduce or cease operations or seek dissolution and liquidation or bankruptcy protection, and our stockholders would likely lose most or all of their investment in us.

Previous wording

We have incurred significant net losses since our formation in 2002 and we expect to continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future. We incurred net losses of $7.0 million and $14.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of $278.9 million. Net cash used in operations was $9.6 million and $15.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. We expect to continue to incur losses. If we are unable to adequately control the costs associated with operating our business, including costs of development and commercialization of its traits, our business, financial condition, operating results, and prospects will suffer.

Current wording

We have incurred significant net losses since our formation in 2002 and we expect to continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future. We incurred net losses of $2.3 million and $7.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $281.2 million. Net cash used in operations was $4.7 million and $9.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. We expect to continue to incur losses and there are no assurances that we will become profitable at all or on a sustained basis.

Previous wording

Arcadia will require additional financing and may not be able to obtain such financing on favorable terms, if at all, which could adversely impact the Company’s operations and ability to continue its business. Such additional funding may not be available, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and would materially and adversely affect our ability to continue operations.

Current wording

We will require additional financing and may not be able to obtain such financing on favorable terms, if at all, which could adversely impact our operations and ability to continue our business. Such additional funding may not be available, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and would materially and adversely affect our ability to continue operations.

Previous wording

Arcadia will require additional funding in the near term to fund its business and the marketing and sale of its products and to provide working capital to fund other aspects of its business. There are no assurances that required funding will be available at all or will be available in sufficient amounts or on reasonable terms. If future financings involve the issuance of equity securities, Arcadia’s existing stockholders would suffer dilution. If Arcadia is able to raise debt financing, it may be subject to restrictive covenants that limit its operating flexibility. Arcadia may not be able to raise sufficient additional funds on terms that are favorable to it, if at all. If Arcadia fails to raise sufficient funds and continues to incur losses, its ability to continue its operations, take advantage of strategic opportunities, or otherwise respond to competitive pressures, would likely be significantly limited. Delays in obtaining, or the inability to obtain, required funding would materially and adversely affect our ability to satisfy our current and future liabilities and obligations, and would materially and adversely affect our ability to continue operations. If we do not have sufficient funds to continue operations, we could be required to seek dissolution and liquidation, bankruptcy protection or other alternatives that would likely result in our stockholders losing some or all of their investment in us.

Current wording

Arcadia will require additional funding in the near term to fund its business and the marketing and sale of its products and to provide working capital to fund other aspects of its business. There are no assurances that required funding will be available at all or will be available in sufficient amounts or on reasonable terms. If funding is obtained through future financings involving the issuance of equity securities, Arcadia’s existing stockholders would suffer dilution. If Arcadia is able to raise funding through debt financing, it may be subject to restrictive covenants that limit its operating flexibility. Arcadia may not be able to raise sufficient additional funds on terms that are favorable to it, if at all. If Arcadia fails to raise sufficient funds and continues to incur losses, its ability to continue its operations, take advantage of strategic opportunities, or otherwise respond to competitive pressures, would likely be significantly limited. Delays in obtaining, or the inability to obtain, required funding would materially and adversely affect our ability to satisfy our current and future liabilities and obligations, and would materially and adversely affect our ability to continue operations. If we do not have sufficient funds to continue operations, we could be required to seek dissolution and liquidation, bankruptcy protection or other alternatives that would likely result in our stockholders losing some or all of their investment in us.

Previous wording

Arcadia’s gross profit margins on its consumer products may be impacted by a variety of factors, including but not limited to variations, freight costs, pricing, customer requirements, market acceptance rate and promotional support costs.

Current wording

Arcadia’s gross profit margins on its consumer products may be impacted by a variety of factors, including but not limited to variations, in freight costs, pricing, customer requirements, market acceptance rate and promotional support costs.

Previous wording

Arcadia expects that its gross profit as a percentage of net sales could fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including product pricing, retail discounts, and input costs. If Arcadia is not able to increase its selling prices or improve product sizes sufficiently, or in a timely manner, to offset increased input costs, or if its sales volume decreases significantly, there could be a negative impact on its financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

Arcadia expects that its gross profit as a percentage of net sales could fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including product pricing, retail discounts, and input costs. If Arcadia is not able to increase its selling prices to offset increased input costs, or if its sales volume decreases significantly, there could be a negative impact on its financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

Arcadia’s future performance will depend on the continued services and contributions of its management team and other key employees and, if the Exchange is consummated, Roosevelt's management team and key employees, the loss of whose services might significantly delay or prevent the achievement of the Company's objectives. The replacement of any member of our management team involves significant time and costs and such loss could significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our business objectives.

Current wording

Arcadia’s future performance will depend on the continued services and contributions of its management team and other key employees, the loss of whose services might significantly delay or prevent the achievement of the Company's objectives. The replacement of any member of our management team involves significant time and costs and such a loss could significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our business objectives.

Previous wording

Additionally, Arcadia’s business is dependent on its ability to recruit and maintain a highly skilled and educated workforce with expertise in a range of disciplines, including supply chain management, marketing, and other subjects relevant to its operations. All of Arcadia’s current employees are at-will employees, and the failure to retain or hire skilled and highly educated personnel could limit its growth and hinder its business.

Current wording

Additionally, Arcadia’s business is dependent on its ability to recruit and maintain a highly skilled and educated workforce with expertise in a range of disciplines, including supply chain management, marketing, and other areas relevant to its operations. All of Arcadia’s current employees are at-will employees, and the failure to retain or hire skilled and highly educated personnel could limit its growth and hinder its business.

Previous wording

Arcadia utilizes and critically relies upon information technology systems in all aspects of its business, including large amounts of data to support its products. Failure to effectively prevent, detect, and recover from the increasing number and sophistication of information security threats could result in theft, misuse, modification, and destruction of information, including trade secrets and confidential business information, and cause business disruptions, and reputational damage, which could significantly affect Arcadia’s results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

Arcadia utilizes and critically relies upon information technology systems in all aspects of its business, including large amounts of data to support its products. Failure to effectively prevent, detect, and recover from the increasing number and sophistication of information security threats could result in theft, misuse, modification, and destruction of information, including trade secrets and confidential business information, and cause business disruptions, or reputational damage, which could significantly affect Arcadia’s results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

As a result of policy changes and government proposals, there may be greater restrictions and economic disincentives on international trade. The new tariffs and other changes in U.S. trade policy could trigger retaliatory actions by affected countries, and foreign governments have instituted or are considering imposing trade sanctions on U.S. goods. Such changes have the potential to adversely impact the U.S. economy or sectors thereof, our industry and the demand for our products in countries outside of the U.S. where we sell our products and that are adversely affected by such changes, and as a result, could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Because our Zola coconut water product is sourced in Thailand, such steps, if adopted and if they affect countries that impact our business, could adversely impact our business and operations, increase our costs, and make our products less competitive.

Current wording

As a result of policy changes and government proposals, there may be greater restrictions and economic disincentives on international trade. New tariffs and other changes in U.S. trade policy could trigger retaliatory actions by affected countries, and foreign governments have instituted or are considering imposing trade sanctions on U.S. goods. Such changes have the potential to adversely impact the U.S. economy or sectors thereof, our industry and the demand for our products, and as a result, could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Because our Zola coconut water product is sourced in Thailand, such steps, if adopted and if they affect countries that impact our business, could adversely impact our business and operations, increase our costs, and make our products less competitive.

Previous wording

As a result of being a public company, Arcadia is obligated to develop and maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting. Arcadia may not complete our analysis of its internal control over financial reporting in a timely manner, or these internal controls may not be determined to be effective, which may adversely affect investor confidence in Arcadia and, as a result, the value of its common stock.

Current wording

As a result of being a public company, Arcadia is obligated to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting. If Arcadia is unable to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, investor confidence in Arcadia may be adversely affected and, as a result, the value of its common stock.

Previous wording

Future sales in the public market of Arcadia’s common stock, or shares issued upon exercise of its outstanding stock options or warrants, or the perception by the market that these issuances or sales could occur, could lower the market price of Arcadia’s common stock or make it difficult for Arcadia to raise additional capital. In addition, a large number of shares of common stock are issuable to the Limited Partners of Roosevelt if the Exchange transaction is consummated. Arcadia’s stockholders may experience substantial dilution and a reduction in the price that they are able to obtain upon the sale of their shares. As of December 31, 2024, we had 1,364,940 shares of common stock outstanding, substantially all of which Arcadia believes may be sold publicly, subject in some cases to volume and other limitations, provisions or limitations in registration rights agreements, or prospectus delivery or other requirements relating to the effectiveness and use of registration statements registering the resale of such shares. As of December 31, 2024, we had 43,059 shares of Arcadia’s common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options under our equity incentive plans at a weighted-average exercise price of $86.18 per share, and outstanding warrants and preferred investment options to purchase 1,083,435 shares of common stock at a weighted-average exercise price of $34.27 per share. Subject to applicable vesting requirements, upon exercise of these options or warrants, the underlying shares may be resold into the public market, subject in some cases to volume and other limitations or prospectus delivery requirements pursuant to registration statements registering the resale of such shares. In the case of outstanding options and warrants that have exercise prices that are below the market price of Arcadia’s common stock from time to time, Arcadia’s stockholders would experience dilution upon the exercise of these options and warrants.

Current wording

Future sales in the public market of Arcadia’s common stock, or shares issued upon exercise of its outstanding stock options or warrants, or the perception by the market that these issuances or sales could occur, could lower the market price of Arcadia’s common stock or make it difficult for Arcadia to raise additional capital, and Arcadia’s stockholders may experience substantial dilution and a reduction in the price that they are able to obtain upon the sale of their shares. As of December 31, 2025, we had 1,373,120 shares of common stock outstanding, substantially all of which Arcadia believes may be sold publicly, subject in some cases to volume and other limitations, provisions or limitations in registration rights agreements, or prospectus delivery or other requirements relating to the effectiveness and use of registration statements registering the resale of such shares. As of December 31, 2025, we had 127,131 shares of Arcadia’s common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options under our equity incentive plans at a weighted-average exercise price of $19.37 per share, and outstanding warrants and preferred investment options to purchase 1,016,252 shares of common stock at a weighted-average exercise price of $26.68 per share. In addition, on January 9, 2026, we entered into inducement letter agreements with certain holders of outstanding preferred investment options pursuant to which such holders exercised certain outstanding preferred investment options covering an aggregate of 808,595 shares of common stock and/or Abeyance Shares. Pursuant to the terms of the investment options, if exercise of the investment options would have otherwise caused a holder to exceed the beneficial ownership limitations set forth in the holder's investment options (4.99% or 9.99%, as applicable), as determined by the holder, we agreed to hold such holder's balance of exercised shares in abeyance and not issue such shares (the "Abeyance Shares") until we receive notice from the holder that the balance of shares may be issued in compliance with such beneficial ownership limitations (with such Abeyance Shares evidenced through the holder's existing investment options, and deemed prepaid). In connection with the transaction, we also issued new preferred investment options to purchase 1,617,190 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.325 per share. Subject to applicable vesting requirements, upon exercise of any of the above options or warrants, the underlying shares may be resold into the public market, subject in some cases to volume and other limitations or prospectus delivery requirements pursuant to registration statements registering the resale of such shares. In the case of outstanding options and warrants that have exercise prices that are below the market price of Arcadia’s common stock from time to time, Arcadia’s stockholders would experience dilution upon the exercise of these options and warrants.

Previous wording

The market price of Arcadia’s common stock has been and may continue to be volatile. After making adjustments for the impact of reverse stock splits, since shares of our common stock were sold in its initial public offering in May 2015 at a price of $6,400.00 per share, Arcadia’s stock price has ranged from $1.85 to $6,984.00, through December 31, 2024. The market price of Arcadia’s common stock is subject to wide fluctuations in response to various risk factors, some of which are beyond Arcadia’s control and may not be related to its operating performance, including:

Current wording

The market price of Arcadia’s common stock has been and may continue to be volatile. After making adjustments for the impact of reverse stock splits, since shares of our common stock were sold in its initial public offering in May 2015 at a price of $6,400.00 per share, Arcadia’s stock price has ranged from $1.82 to $6,984.00, through December 31, 2025. The market price of Arcadia’s common stock is subject to wide fluctuations in response to various risk factors, some of which are beyond Arcadia’s control and may not be related to its operating performance, including:

Previous wording

Arcadia’s common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. If Arcadia fails to satisfy the continued listing requirements of Nasdaq, such as the corporate governance requirements or the minimum closing bid price requirement, Nasdaq may take steps to delist Arcadia’s common stock. Such a delisting would have a negative effect on the price of Arcadia’s common stock, impair the ability to sell or purchase Arcadia’s common stock when persons wish to do so, and materially adversely affect Arcadia’s ability to raise capital or pursue strategic restructuring, refinancing or other transactions on acceptable terms, or at all. Delisting from the Nasdaq Capital Market could also have other negative results, including the potential loss of institutional investor interest and fewer business development opportunities.

Current wording

If our common stock were to be delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market, such a delisting would have a negative effect on the liquidity of our common stock, could decrease the price of our common stock, could result in a loss of confidence by institutional or other investors, employees, business partners or other third parties, result in fewer business development opportunities or opportunities for entering into strategic transactions, impair investors' ability to sell or purchase our common stock when they wish to do so, and materially adversely affect our ability to raise capital or pursue financing, strategic or other transactions on acceptable terms, or at all.

Previous wording

Certain of our outstanding warrants (which in some instances are denominated as “investment option” securities) to purchase shares of common stock that we issued in prior offerings provide that, in the event of certain kinds of “fundamental transactions,” including, among other things, a merger or consolidation of the Company, sale of all or substantially all of our assets or a sale of a certain percentage of our common stock, where the Company is not the surviving entity (as defined in the warrant or investment option) in the transaction or the Company’s common stock is no longer registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the holders of such warrants have the option, by delivering a notice within 30 days after the closing of the transaction, to require us to pay to such holders an amount of cash equal to the Black-Scholes value of the warrants, calculated as provided in the warrants. The Company believes that these provisions are not applicable to the proposed Exchange transaction with Roosevelt contemplated by the Exchange Agreement, as described elsewhere in this Report. However, if such amounts were determined to be applicable and warrant holders timely delivered notices under the applicable provisions of the warrants, the amounts that the Company might be required to pay under such provisions could be material. In addition, if one or more holders of such warrants or investment options believes that such provisions are applicable and initiates legal proceedings to require the Company to make such payments, resolving such matters could involve significant time and expense, and an adverse outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

Certain of our outstanding warrants (which in some instances are denominated as “investment option” securities) to purchase shares of common stock that we issued in prior offerings provide that, in the event of certain kinds of “fundamental transactions,” including, without limitation, a merger or consolidation of the Company or sale of all or substantially all of our assets or a sale of a certain percentage of our common stock, in each case where the Company is not the surviving entity (as defined in the warrant or investment option) in the transaction or the Company’s common stock is no longer registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the holders of such warrants have the option, by delivering a notice within 30 days after the closing of the transaction, to require us to pay to such holders an amount of cash equal to the Black-Scholes value of the warrants, calculated as provided in the warrants. If the Company engaged in a transaction where the holders had such rights, the amounts that the Company might be required to pay under such provisions could be material. In addition, if one or more holders of such warrants or investment options believes that such provisions are applicable and initiates legal proceedings to require the Company to make such payments, resolving such matters could involve significant time and expense, and an adverse outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.