TransUnion
For the period ended May 12, 2026. Filed Mar 24, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.
May 12, 2026 · Filed Mar 24, 2026
Contents
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
This proxy statement summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement and our 2025 Annual Report (which includes our 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K) carefully before voting.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
| Time and Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2026 at12:00 p.m. Central Daylight Time | Record Date: March 16, 2026 | Virtual Meeting Access: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRU2026 |
|---|
Voting: Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. We urge you to vote before the meeting.
| Vote by internet at http://www.proxyvote.com | Vote by telephone at 1-800-690-6903 |
| Vote by mail by completing and returning your proxy card or voter instruction card | Vote your shares during the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRU2026 |
Voting Matters
| Agenda Item | Board VoteRecommendation | PageReference |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Election of Directors The Board recommends the election of each of the 12 director nominees for a one-year term. | FOR each Director Nominee | 36 |
| 2. Ratification of Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as TransUnion’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board is asking stockholders to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as TransUnion’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for fiscal year 2026. | FOR | 39 |
| 3. Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of TransUnion’s Named Executive Officers The Board is asking stockholders to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of TransUnion’s named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. | FOR | 42 |
| 4. Advisory Vote on a Stockholder Proposal Requesting a Stockholder Right to Call a Special Meeting The Board recommends stockholders vote against the stockholder proposal requesting a stockholder right to call a special meeting of stockholders as described in this proxy statement, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting. | AGAINST | 80 |
Submitting Questions During the Annual Meeting
We are committed to ensuring, to the extent possible, that stockholders will be afforded the ability to participate at the virtual meeting similarly to how they would participate at anin-person meeting. As part of the Annual Meeting, we will answer questions following the presentation of each proposal to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, and will hold a live online Q&A session, during which we intend to answer questions submitted before or during the Annual Meeting, as time permits. Questions must be confined to matters properly brought before the Annual Meeting and/or of general Company concern. We reserve the right to edit profanity or other inappropriate language, or to exclude questions that are not pertinent to meeting matters or that are otherwise inappropriate. If we receive substantially similar questions, we will group such questions together and provide a single response to avoid repetition. We kindly ask stockholders not to ask more than two questions in order to allow us to answer questions from as many stockholders as possible. Questions may be submitted during the Annual Meeting throughwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRU2026.
Technical Assistance During the Annual Meeting
If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during thecheck-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the login page atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRU2026. Please check in beginning at 11:45 a.m. Central Daylight Time on May 12, 2026, the day of the Annual Meeting, so we may address any technical difficulties before the Annual Meeting.
Corporate Governance Highlights
The Board is responsible for overseeing our assets and business affairs in an honest, fair and ethical manner driven by comprehensive corporate governance principles, including the following:
| Governance Highlights | |
|---|---|
| Majority voting for directors Declassified Board of Directors No supermajority voting provisions Clawback policy Stock ownership guidelines for executives and directors 11 of 12 director nominees are independent Mandatory retirement age of 75 for directors (subject to waiver) | No poison pill Independent Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance (“NCG”) Committees No pledging or hedging of TransUnion stock Active stockholder engagement Robust director nominee selection process Bylaws include proxy access provision |
Director Nominees – Key Facts
The following table provides summary information about each director nominee as of March 16, 2026. More detailed information about each director nominee’s background, skill set and experience can be found beginning on page 21.
| Name and Occupation · Age · Director Since · Independent · Committee Membership(1)(2) · Other Public Company Boards | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A · C · N · M · R · T · E | |||||||||||
| George M. Awad Principal, Gibraltar Capital Corporation | 65 | 2013 | ☑ | ● | C | ● | — | ||||
| Christopher A. Cartwright President & Chief Executive Officer, TransUnion | 60 | 2019 | ● | — | |||||||
| Sayan Chakraborty(3) Former President, Product and Technology, Workday, Inc. | 58 | 2026 | ☑ | ● | — | ||||||
| Suzanne P. Clark President and CEO, U.S. Chamber of Commerce | 58 | 2017 | ☑ | ● | C | AGCO Corporation | |||||
| Hamidou Dia VP, Applied AI Engineering, Google Cloud | 61 | 2022 | ☑ | ● | ● | — | |||||
| Russell P. Fradin Operating Partner, Clayton, Dubilier & Rice | 70 | 2018 | ☑ | ● | C | ● | ● | Alight, Inc. | |||
| Charles E. Gottdiener CEO, Anaplan, Inc. | 61 | 2022 | ☑ | ● | ● | C | — | ||||
| Pamela A. Joseph Former CEO and Executive Chair, Xplor Technologies | 67 | 2015 | ☑ | ● | ● | ● | C | Paychex, Inc. Adyen N.V. | |||
| Ravi Kumar(4) CEO, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 54 | 2022 | ☑ | ● | ● | Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | |||||
| Thomas L. Monahan, III CEO, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. | 59 | 2017 | ☑ | C | ● | ● | — | ||||
| Charlotte B. Yarkoni(3) Former President, Commerce, Ecosystems, Cloud and AI, Microsoft Corporation | 56 | 2026 | ☑ | ● | Fiserv | ||||||
| Linda K. Zukauckas CFO, Integrity, LLC | 64 | 2023 | ☑ | C | ● | — | |||||
| (1) Effective April 1, 2025, Mr. Monahan stepped down from his role as the Chairperson of the Audit Committee and as a member of the Audit Committee. The Board appointed Ms. Zukauckas to serve as the Chairperson of the Audit Committee, effective April 1, 2025. (2) Effective April 1, 2025, Mr. Fradin stepped down from his role as the Chairperson of the Compensation Committee but continues to serve as a member of the Compensation Committee. The Board appointed Mr. Monahan to serve as the Chairperson of the Compensation Committee, effective April 1, 2025. (3) Each of Mr. Chakraborty and Ms. Yarkoni was appointed by the Board to serve as a director, effective January 5, 2026, to fill a newly created directorship and to serve for the balance of the one-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting, or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. Mr. Chakraborty and Ms. Yarkoni were each recommended to the Board by a third-party search firm. (4) Ravi Kumar Singisetti is also referred to herein as “Ravi Kumar” or “Mr. Kumar.” | Key: A – Audit Committee C – Compensation Committee N – Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee M – Mergers, Acquisitions and Integration Committee R – Risk and Compliance Committee T – Technology Committee E – Executive Committee C – Committee Chairperson ● – Committee Member |
|---|
Executive Compensation Highlights
Executive Compensation Philosophy
Our executive compensation program is based on a philosophy that aligns the interests of our executives and stockholders. The following are key objectives of our compensation philosophy:
| • | Attract, motivate and retain highly experienced executives who are vital to our short- and long-term success, profitability and growth; |
| • | Align the focus of our executives with the interests of our stockholders by rewarding executives for the achievement of strategic goals that successfully drive our strategy, operations and business performance and, thereby enhance stockholder value; |
| • | Differentiate pay and rewards based on criticality of role and actual individual and company financial performance while remaining fair and equitable; and |
| • | Promote thoughtful decision-making while discouraging unnecessary and excessive risk-taking. |
Strong Stockholder Support
Our most recent Say-on-Pay vote was held at our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and received 95.14% stockholder support. We believe this strong Say-on-Pay vote outcome demonstrates stockholder support for our executive compensation program.
Executive Compensation Payouts are Aligned with our Named Executive Officers’ (“NEOs”) and the Company’s Performance During 2025
| • | Our NEOs’ 2025 annual incentive payouts were 154% of target resulting from above target performance achievement on all three performance measures: Defined Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, Defined Consolidated Revenue and Defined Adjusted Diluted Earnings per Share. |
| • | Our 2023 PSU (as defined on page 44) performance total weighted payout was 142% of target resulting from above target performance achievement on Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA (30% weighting), Cumulative Revenue (20% weighting), and Relative TSR (as defined on page 44) (50% weighting). |
Target Compensation Mix is Linked to Company Performance and Aligned with Stockholders’ Interests
| • | 93% of our CEO’s 2025 target compensation and 83% of our other NEOs’ 2025 target compensation is “at-risk” based on Company and share price performance. |
| • | 80% of our CEO’s 2025 target compensation and 65% of our other NEOs’ 2025 target compensation is based on long-term incentives aligned with stockholders’ interests. |
| CEO TARGET PAY MIX(1) | ALL OTHER NEOS’ TARGET PAY MIX(1) |
|---|
| (1) | Amounts shown have been rounded to the nearest whole percentage. |
See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 43 and “Executive Compensation” on page 63 for additional details on our executive compensation programs.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.