Skip to main content

HANCOCK WHITNEY CORP

For the period ended Mar 17, 2026. Filed Mar 17, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.

Mar 17, 2026 · Filed Mar 17, 2026

HWC$71.48+0.1%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits

Elements of Our Compensation Program

In 2025, our executive officer compensation program consisted of the following elements: base salary, annual cash incentives, long-term equity incentives, retirement benefits, change in control protections, and other benefits including limited perquisites.

Base Salary

We pay base salaries to our executive officers as compensation for performing their day-to-day responsibilities. Base salaries are set based on a variety of factors, including scope of the job, experience, market comparable positions, internal pay equity and alignment, and an overall assessment of Company and individual performance. We rely substantially on industry and Compensation Peer Group compensation data provided by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant to evaluate whether the base salaries of our executives are competitive in the marketplace and also evaluate the actual performance of each executive to determine if base salary increases are warranted.

The Compensation Committee believes that executives’ base salaries should generally align with the market 50th percentile of the Compensation Peer Group. The Compensation Committee may, however, set an executive’s salary above the Compensation Peer Group median if it determines that specific performance, needs, or other circumstances justify a base salary at a higher level.

After reviewing the 2024 Compensation Peer Group compensation study, provided by its independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee determined that the base salaries of our NEOs were within the competitive range for peer executives. In early 2025, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with its independent compensation consultant, approved the following base salary increases for each of our NEOs, effective April 1, 2025, in recognition of individual and Company performance, which positioned the base salary of the NEOs within approximately 10% of the median of the Compensation Peer Group.

NEO2024 SalaryIncreaseEffective 20252025 SalaryPercentage Increase
John M. Hairston$1,202,580$24,052$1,226,6322.00%
Michael M. Achary$600,000$40,000$640,0006.67%
D. Shane Loper$735,000$55,000$790,0007.48%
Christopher S. Ziluca$540,000$25,000$565,0004.63%
Michael Otero$475,000$25,000$500,0005.26%

Annual Cash Incentive

The Company uses annual cash incentives to focus attention on current strategic priorities and drive achievement of short-term corporate strategic objectives. Each NEO has a target annual incentive opportunity that may be earned between 0% and 200% based on corporate performance.

For purposes of the annual cash incentive, the Compensation Committee measures corporate performance based on actual performance compared to pre-established performance goals as a base completion percentage. The Compensation Committee may also review the Company’s performance compared to the performance of certain regional and top quartile peers, together with the Company’s progress with respect to certain corporate strategic objectives to further assess overall corporate performance. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to increase or decrease the amount of annual cash incentive earned based on these factors.

For 2025, the annual cash incentive plan used three key performance measurement metrics: adjusted EPS, adjusted pre-provision net revenue, and one credit quality metric. The Compensation Committee may also approve adjustments as it deems appropriate as discussed below based on its overall assessment of Company performance against the performance of regional and top quartile peers and consideration of other corporate strategic objectives.

The financial performance goals for the annual cash incentive and actual results for 2025 are set forth below:

CorporatePerformance Goal% of PlanComponent2025Threshold2025 Target2025Maximum2025 ActualResults
Adjusted EPS40%$4.22$5.27$6.32$5.72
Adjusted Pre-Provision Net Revenue ($ in millions)40%$530.5$663.1$795.7$679.9
Net Charge-Offs (% of average loans)20%0.24%0.22%0.19%0.22%

For 2025, comparing actual corporate performance to the 2025 corporate performance goal targets, the resulting completion percentage was driven by above target performance for the Adjusted EPS and Adjusted Pre-Provision Net Revenue metrics, and target performance for the Net-Charge Offs metric. After considering these results and reviewing our overall financial performance compared to regional and top quartile peers and relative impact to annual plan in comparison to peers, the Compensation Committee determined that annual cash incentive awards to our executive officers were earned based on the actual aggregate completion percentage of 122.14%. No modifications or discretion were utilized by the Compensation Committee.

In addition to awards made under our annual cash incentive plan for corporate performance, the plan also allows for the Compensation Committee (for all officers) and the CEO (for officers other than himself) to recommend adjustments based on results of near-term performance related to one-time initiatives, specific development efforts, or short-term projects. For 2025, no such adjustments were recommended. For the year ended December 31, 2025, the following cash bonuses were awarded:

NamedExecutive OfficerTarget Value as a % of Base SalaryCorporate PerformanceCompletionCorporate Performance AwardTotal CashIncentive
John M. Hairston120%122.14%$1,789,088$1,789,088
Michael M. Achary100%122.14%$769,619$769,619
D. Shane Loper120%122.14%$1,137,966$1,137,966
Christopher S. Ziluca65%122.14%$443,648$443,648
Michael Otero65%122.14%$392,046$392,046

For 2026, the annual cash incentive plan will continue to use the same three performance metrics and weightings. We believe these performance metrics provide a direct alignment of executive and shareholder interests.

Long-Term Incentives

The purpose of our long-term incentive program is to ensure that our executives focus not only on short-term returns but also on achieving long-term Company goals, growth and creation of shareholder value. We further believe that equity ownership by our executive officers aligns executives’ interests with those of our shareholders. In 2025, the Compensation Committee used both performance-based stock unit awards (PSUs) and time-based restricted stock unit awards (RSUs) for long-term incentive compensation, with a higher percentage of the total award value being delivered to our NEOs in the form of PSUs. The relative weighting of the award values strengthens the alignment of the executive and shareholder interests. The PSUs only provide value to the executive if threshold achievement is met, as described below. We used RSUs as a portion of our long-term awards because we believe they provide an effective retention incentive for the executives and align the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders.

The Compensation Committee sets the target value of the equity awards granted as a percentage of each executive’s base salary, with the target percentage based upon the executive’s position. We believe using a percentage of base salary as the target provides us greater control and consistency relative to the value of equity awards we grant each year. For 2025, the long-term incentive allocations for the NEOs were set as follows:

NamedExecutive OfficerTarget Value of LTI as a % of Base SalaryLTI Target Value% Delivered in Performance Awards% Delivered in Restricted Stock Units
John M. Hairston240%$2,943,91660%40%
Michael M. Achary140%$896,00060%40%
D. Shane Loper150%$1,185,00060%40%
Christopher S. Ziluca100%$565,00060%40%
Michael Otero100%$500,00060%40%

The RSUs approved and granted in 2025 vest based on continued service, with the awards vesting in annual increments over a three-year period. Cash dividend equivalents based on the amount of any dividends paid by the Company on its common stock during the vesting period are accrued and accumulated interest-free on each of the RSUs and paid only if and when the underlying unit(s) become vested.

For the PSUs approved and granted in 2025, the Company based grants on three nearly equally weighted performance measures:

Three-year relative Total Shareholder Return (34%)

Three-year average relative Operating Return on Average Assets (ROAA) (33%)

Three-year average relative Return on Average Tangible Common Equity (ROATCE) (33%)

In the case of each of the three metrics, there is a three-year performance period after which vesting will be determined based on certified results. In the case of TSR, performance will be based on the return to shareholders from the beginning of the performance period to the end of the performance period (a 20-day averaging period is used at both the beginning and the end of the performance period). In the case of Operating ROAA and ROATCE, the average of each of the three one-year periods within the three-year performance period is used.

The Compensation Committee believes that the growth targets represent appropriately challenging performance that will lead to increased shareholder value if achieved.

For all PSUs granted, results that fall in-between the “maximum,” “target” and “threshold” levels of the applicable performance criteria will be paid out on a sliding scale.

NEOs received the following long-term incentive awards for fiscal year 2025:

NamedExecutive OfficerRSUsValue of RSUAwards (1)PSUsValue ofPSU Awards (1)Total AwardValue
John M. Hairston20,946$1,177,58431,418$1,766,320$2,943,904
Michael M. Achary6,375$358,4039,563$537,632$896,034
D. Shane Loper8,431$473,99112,646$710,958$1,184,949
Christopher S. Ziluca4,020$226,0046,030$339,007$565,011
Michael Otero3,557$199,9755,336$299,990$499,964

(1)

For purposes of determining the number of RSUs and PSUs to be granted, the Compensation Committee values each award based on the closing price of our common stock on the day prior to the grant date, which values are reflected in the table above. For purposes of determining the grant date fair value of the awards to be reported in the “Summary Compensation Table,” the awards are valued in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 as required by SEC rules. The PSUs subject to the TSR, ROAA and ROATCE metrics are valued as of the date of grant based on the grant date fair value of the PSUs determined using a Monte Carlo simulation method, as set forth in Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.

PSUs granted in 2023 with a three-year service-vesting period ending February 1, 2026 vested on February 1, 2026, after certification of performance results by the Compensation Committee on January 28, 2026. One-half of these PSUs could be earned based on the Company’s TSR relative to a peer group for the three-year performance period. The Company’s relative TSR compared to the applicable peer group was slightly below the 75th percentile, which resulted in our executive officers vesting at 193.33% of the target awards. The other half of these PSUs could be earned based upon achievement of collective EPS relative to a two-year performance goal. The Company’s collective EPS was below target performance, which resulted in our executive officers vesting at 65.14% of the target awards. In the aggregate, our NEOs vested in 129.24% of the targeted shares equaling 80,566 shares valued at $5,542,941 calculated using the closing price of our common stock on January 30, 2026, the day prior to the vesting. Net shares issued upon vesting of the award and after payment of withholding taxes are subject to an additional two-year post-vest holding period.

Retirement Benefits

Retirement benefits also play an important role within our overall executive compensation strategy because providing our executives with financial security at retirement means they are incentivized to remain long-term associates of our Company. Based on information provided by the Compensation Committee’s consultant, we believe that our retirement program, including the benefits that are earned based on service, is comparable to programs offered by the companies in our Compensation Peer Group. Our retirement program continues to be an essential component to ensure that our executive compensation program remains competitive.

During 2025, the Company maintained the following two retirement plans available to all eligible associates:

Hancock Whitney Corporation Pension Plan

Hancock Whitney Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan

The Hancock Whitney Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan was also available to our NEOs. These plans are described in more detail under “Executive Compensation – Pension Benefits” and “Executive Compensation – Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” herein.

Perquisites and Other Benefits

We seek to maintain a cost conscious culture in connection with the benefits we provide to our executive officers, consistent with our objective to tie a significant portion of executive compensation to Company performance. Our NEOs receive limited perquisites, such as club dues, professional organization dues, Company paid parking, Company provided auto allowances, executive physicals, and housing allowances for certain executives who do not reside permanently in the New Orleans, LA area, but have extensive business-related job responsibilities in the market. We also provide our executive officers long-term disability insurance coverage that provides tax-free benefits. Based on information provided by the Compensation Committee’s consultant, we believe the perquisites provided to our NEOs are reasonable in light of industry practices and perquisites available to executive officers of the companies in our Compensation Peer Group. We review the perquisites provided to our executive officers periodically to ensure that our benefits are consistent with our overall compensation objective of providing competitive compensation to our executive officers.

Employment Contracts and Change in Control Agreements

We do not have employment contracts with the NEOs. However, each NEO has a change in control agreement that protects the executive’s employment for two years following a change in control of the Company. The occurrence or potential occurrence of a change in control would create uncertainty regarding whether the employment of our executive officers whom we consider to be key employees would be continued. In the Compensation Committee’s view, providing these change in control protections better enables the executive officers to focus on the Company’s business and serve the shareholders’ interests, particularly during periods of consolidation or merger and acquisition activity within the banking industry.

Under the agreements, if the executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause during the two-year period following a change in control, then the executive is entitled to a severance payment equal to a multiple of two or three times the executive’s base salary plus the average bonus paid to the executive for the three fiscal years preceding the termination, and continued medical coverage of 24 or 36 months, depending on the executive’s position. The executive is also entitled to this severance payment if the executive resigns due to disability during the protected period or because of a material reduction in the executive's base salary or duties, or the executive’s relocation during the protected period after notice and an opportunity to cure is provided to the Company. Under these agreements, the NEOs are responsible for any excise tax payments due. The agreements also bind the executives to certain non-solicitation, non-disparagement and confidentiality covenants. These agreements are described in more detail under “Executive Compensation – Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” herein.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

The Compensation Committee considers the tax and accounting implications in the design of its compensation programs. For example, in the selection of long-term incentive instruments, the Compensation Committee reviews the projected expense amounts and expense timing associated with alternative types of awards. The grant-date fair value of share-based awards that are settled in stock, such as RSAs, RSUs and PSUs, is expensed over the service period or vesting period of the grant. For those grants with a two-year post-vest holding requirement, the grant-date fair value is reduced by a liquidity discount to reflect the holding period requirement.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We believe that the executive officers of our Company should maintain equity interests in the Company to ensure that they have a meaningful economic stake in the Company and that the interests of our executives and our shareholders are aligned. Effective January 1, 2009 and most recently amended, effective January 1, 2022, we adopted stock ownership guidelines that require our executive officers to own directly or indirectly a minimum level of Company common stock, depending upon the executive’s position. The executive may satisfy their ownership guidelines with common stock owned directly; beneficially owned in a trust, by a spouse and/or minor child; held in an IRA or 401(k); held in the Automatic Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan; or held in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan; as well as time-vesting restricted stock and restricted stock units.

Under the guidelines, our Chief Executive Officer is required to maintain ownership of Company common stock worth five times his base salary. Each of our other executive officers is required to maintain ownership of Company common stock worth three times his or her base salary. The value of the executive’s stock holdings and satisfaction of the ownership guidelines are measured as of January 1 each year by reference to the closing price of a share of common stock of the Company on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar year. The executives are expected to make continuous progress toward their respective ownership requirements and satisfy the applicable ownership guidelines within five years following the effective date of the amended guidelines or such later date that the executive becomes subject to the guidelines based on the date initially designated by the Board as an executive officer. Until the executive officer has satisfied the stock ownership guidelines, the executive officer must retain one-half of any shares acquired from the Company (net of any tax withholdings). Once the guidelines have been satisfied, any future sales of stock are only permitted to the extent that the guidelines continue to be met immediately following such sale.

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.