Skip to main content

MYOMO, INC.

For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 9, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Mar 9, 2026

MYO$1.40+15.7%Stored close · as of Nov 9, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-K

Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-03-10.

0000950170-25-036349

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Current report: 10-K

Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-03-09.

0001193125-26-098531

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 227 previous paragraphs and 235 current paragraphs.

175 unchanged; 48 reworded; 11 added; 4 removed; 0 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (11)

Current report

Changes made by direct to consumer advertising platforms (such as social media) in how they reach prospective patients could adversely impact our lead generation efforts, resulting in higher advertising cost per addition to our patient pipeline and have an adverse effect on revenues.

Current report

We rely on a variety of direct-to-consumer advertising companies to help us reach and educate prospective patients, their caregivers, and families regarding the potential benefits of the MyoPro. These companies are subject to various privacy laws and regulations regarding the use of protected patient health and other identifying information in advertising activities. Changes in the algorithms and other methods used by these companies to remain in compliance with these laws and regulations, which we do not control, nor have input into, may adversely affect our lead generation, our Cost Per Pipeline Add, and our revenues. For instance, in the first quarter of 2025, a social media advertising company we utilize made a change to the algorithm they use to target prospective patients. This change negatively impacted lead generation and Cost Per Pipeline Add during 2025. Methods and algorithms used by media companies are continually evolving and we cannot provide any assurance that future changes will not impact our revenues and results of operations.

Current report

Our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments at December 31, 2025 was approximately $18.4 million. On November 4, 2025, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Avenue, which provided us with $17.5 million in committed funding under two tranches. The first tranche of $12.5 million was funded at closing on November 4, 2025. A portion of the proceeds were used to re-pay in full amounts outstanding under our credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank.

Current report

The terms of our Loan and Security Agreement with Avenue require us to meet certain operating covenants and place restrictions on our operating and financial flexibility. Our level of indebtedness and debt service obligations could adversely affect our financial condition and may make it more difficult for us to fund our operations.

Current report

If we raise additional capital through debt financing, the terms of any new debt could further restrict our ability to operate our business.

Current report

While AI and machine learning present opportunities for enhanced productivity and innovation, they also introduce cybersecurity, data privacy, IT, intellectual property, regulatory, legal, operational, competitive, reputational and other risks that could adversely impact our business and reputation. Specifically, risks related to bias, AI hallucinations, discrimination, harmful content, misinformation, fraud, scams, targeted attacks, surveillance, data leakage, inequality, environmental harms, and other harms may flow from our development, use, or deployment of AI technologies. Further, the use of certain AI technology can give rise to intellectual property risks, including compromises to proprietary intellectual property and intellectual property infringement.

Current report

The evolving regulatory landscape surrounding AI also poses a risk, as new laws and regulations could impose additional compliance burdens, resulting in increased operational costs to comply with U.S. and non-U.S. laws concerning the use of AI. We expect to see increasing regulation related to AI use and ethics, which may also significantly increase the burden and cost of research, development and compliance in this area. For example, the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act (“AI Act”) originally entered into force on August 1, 2024, and is expected to undergo amendments as introduced in the EU’s November 2025 Digital Omnibus. As enacted, the AI Act imposes significant obligations on providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems and encourages providers and deployers of AI systems to account for EU ethical principles in their development and use of these systems.

Current report

Likewise, in the United States, the regulatory environment is complex and uncertain. Over the past year, states have advanced, and in some cases passed, dozens of laws focusing on AI governance and regulation, including on deployment of AI in healthcare settings. At the federal level, the Trump Administration has endorsed a federal moratorium on the enforcement of state AI laws, including through a December 11, 2025, executive order on “Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence.” So far, these efforts have not been successful at curtailing state action on AI regulation, contributing to a complicated legislative patchwork, which may be litigated in state and federal courts. Various federal and state regulators have also issued guidance and focused enforcement efforts on the use of AI in regulated sectors, such as healthcare. The FDA, for example, issued guidance on the use of AI in medical devices, requiring detailed risk management and review processes to obtain approvals. If we develop or use AI systems that are governed by these laws or regulations we will need to meet higher standards of data quality, transparency, and human oversight, as well as adhering to specific and potentially burdensome and costly ethical, accountability, and administrative requirements. We may also be subject to significant enforcement or litigation in the event of any perceived non-compliance.

Current report

We are committed to implementing governance and control mechanisms to mitigate these risks, but there can be no assurance that such measures will adequately prevent or mitigate the adverse effects that the integration and use of AI may have on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. To the extent that AI is integrated into our products and services, the rapid evolution of AI may require the application of significant resources to design, develop, test and maintain our products and services to help ensure that AI is implemented in accordance with applicable law and regulation and in a socially responsible manner and to minimize any real or perceived unintended harmful impacts.

Current report

Actions of activist stockholders could be disruptive and costly and could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, and/or share price

Current report

While we strive to maintain constructive communications with our stockholders, we may, from time to time, be subject to demands from activist stockholders. Any activist campaign against the Company that contests, conflicts with, or seeks to change, our board composition, leadership, strategic direction, or business mix could have an adverse effect on us because: (i) responding to actions by activist stockholders could disrupt our operations, be costly or time-consuming, or divert the attention of our board of directors and senior management from their regular duties, which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition; (ii) perceived uncertainties as to our future direction, including as a result of possible changes to the composition of our board, may lead to the perception of a change in the direction of the business or lack of continuity, any of which may be exploited by our competitors, cause concern to our customers, employees, and/or business partners and result in the loss of potential business opportunities, or make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners, and may adversely affect our relationships with vendors, customers, business partners, and other third parties; (iii) these types of actions could cause significant fluctuations in our share price based on temporary or speculative market perceptions or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals and prospects of our business; and (iv) if individuals are elected to our board of directors with a specific agenda, it may adversely affect our ability to effectively implement our business strategy and create additional value for our stockholders. In addition, a proxy contest for the election of directors at our annual meeting would require us to incur significant legal fees and proxy solicitation expenses and require significant time and attention by management and our board of directors.
Removed paragraphs (4)

Previous report

Our cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash at December 31, 2024 was approximately $25.2 million. On December 6, 2024, we completed a public offering, selling 3,450,000 shares at $5.00 per share, generating net proceeds after fees and expenses of approximately $15.8 million. On July 11, 2024, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank, which provides us the ability to borrow up to $4.0 million against eligible accounts receivable. The line of credit is undrawn as of the issuance date of these financial statements. Availability under the line of credit is approximately $1.0 million as of December 31, 2024. In February 2025, we entered into an amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement, which among other things, provided for a $3 million term loan facility which could be drawn at any time until February 28, 2026. On January 19, 2024, we completed a registered direct offering of our common stock and pre-funded warrants, generating net proceeds of approximately $5.4 million.

Previous report

In July 2024, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Silicon Valley Bank. Pursuant to the terms of the Loan Agreement, we may request advances on a revolving line of credit whereby we may borrow up to $4 million (the “Revolving Line”), which Revolving Line may be increased to $5.5 million at Silicon Valley Bank’s sole discretion upon the occurrence of certain events. The Revolving Line is secured on a first priority basis by all of our assets other than intellectual property and certain customary exceptions. In February 2025, we entered into an amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement, which among other things, provided for a $3 million term loan facility which could be drawn at any time until February 28, 2026. To the extent we use the Revolving Line, or the term loan facility, such indebtedness may create additional financing risk for us, particularly if our business or prevailing financial market conditions are not conducive to paying off or refinancing our outstanding debt obligations at maturity. This indebtedness could also have important negative consequences, including the fact that:

Previous report

our failure to comply with the restrictive covenants under the Loan Agreement could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, would accelerate our obligation to repay this indebtedness, and Silicon Valley Bank could seek to enforce our security interest in the assets securing such indebtedness.

Previous report

our ability to remediate the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting;
Reworded paragraphs (48)

Previous wording

We have a history of losses since inception. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 we incurred net losses of $6.2 million and $8.1 million, respectively. At December 31, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $103.1 million. The extent and duration of future operating and net losses will depend on our ability to increase the number of patients entering our pipeline in a manner that does not significantly increase our advertising cost per pipeline addition, increase revenues to absorb the headcount and additional clinical, reimbursement and manufacturing capacity we expect to add during 2025, the ability of our supply chain to meet our volume requirements without disruption and our ability to compensate for additional R&D spending expected in 2025. However, there can be no assurance that we can cost effectively grow our revenues without requiring additional capital.

Current wording

We have a history of losses since inception. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 we incurred net losses of $15.6 million and $6.2 million, respectively. At December 31, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $118.1 million. The extent and duration of future operating and net losses will depend on our ability to increase revenues, increase the number of patients entering our pipeline at a lower advertising cost per addition to our patient pipeline, or Cost Per Pipeline Add, our ability to manage fixed costs associated with clinical, reimbursement and manufacturing capacity and our ability to compensate for an elevated level of research and development ("R&D") spending. However, there can be no assurance that we can cost effectively grow our revenues without requiring additional capital.

Previous wording

Our cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash at December 31, 2024 were approximately $25.2 million. On December 6, 2024, we completed a public offering of our common stock, generating net proceeds of approximately $15.8 million. On July 11, 2024, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank, a division of First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company (“Silicon Valley Bank”), which provides us the ability to borrow up to $4.0 million against eligible accounts receivable. The line of credit remains undrawn as of the issuance date of these financial statements. Availability under the line of credit is approximately $1.0 million as of December 31, 2024. In February 2025, we entered into an amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement, which among other things, provided for a $3 million term loan facility which could be drawn at any time until February 28, 2026. On January 19, 2024, we completed a registered direct offering of our common stock and pre-funded warrants, generating net proceeds of approximately $5.4 million. We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash at December 31, 2024 will be sufficient to fund our operations for the twelve months from the date of this report. If we encounter obstacles such as those that have been referred to above, we may not be able to return to operating cash flow breakeven on a quarterly basis, and additional capital may be required.

Current wording

Our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments at December 31, 2025 were approximately $18.4 million. On November 4, 2025, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the "Loan and Security Agreement") with Avenue, which provided us with $17.5 million in committed funding under two tranches. The first tranche of $12.5 million was funded at closing on November 4, 2025. A portion of these funds were used to re-pay in full the debt outstanding with Silicon Valley Bank. We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments at December 31, 2025 will be sufficient to fund our operations for the twelve months from the date of this report. If we encounter obstacles such as those that have been referred to above, we may not be able to return to operating cash flow breakeven on a quarterly basis, and additional capital may be required.

Previous wording

Revenues from providing the MyoPro directly to patients, a sales channel we refer to as direct billing, represented 78% and 71% of product revenues for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. In 2024, we began providing the MyoPro to Medicare Part B patients. Revenues from patients with Medicare Part B represented 63% of direct billing revenues (49% of total revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2024. Our historical focus on patients with commercial insurers who have previously reimbursed for the MyoPro also impacts our payer concentration. Beginning in September 2021, a large Medicare Advantage insurer that has historically reimbursed for the MyoPro began denying claims after having granted a pre-authorization and after we delivered the devices to patients, and these post-service denials currently continue. Revenues from patients insured by this payer represented 23% and 54% of direct billing revenues (18% and 35% of total revenue) during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. With a small number of exceptions, appeals filed with the payer have been successful and these claims have ultimately been paid. However, this payer is now providing us with fewer pre-authorizations to serve new patients, requiring additional appeals efforts. This is common with other Medicare Advantage plans as well. If CMS were to change their coverage and reimbursement criteria for the MyoPro, or the aforementioned commercial payer and other Medicare Advantage payers further reduce the number of MyoPro’s that they will authorize for their insured patients, our revenues and cash flows would be negatively impacted, which would have an adverse effect on our business.

Current wording

Revenues from providing the MyoPro directly to patients, a sales channel we refer to as direct billing, represented 74% and 78% of product revenues for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. In 2024, we began providing the MyoPro to Medicare Part B patients. Revenues from patients with Medicare Part B represented 54% and 49% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Our historical focus on patients with commercial insurers who have previously reimbursed for the MyoPro also impacts our payer concentration. Beginning in September 2021, a large Medicare Advantage insurer that has historically reimbursed for the MyoPro began denying claims after having granted a pre-authorization and after we delivered the devices to patients, and these post-service denials currently continue. Revenues from patients insured by this payer represented 7% and 18% of total revenue during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. With a small number of exceptions, appeals filed with the payer have been successful and these claims have ultimately been paid. However, this payer is now providing us with fewer pre-authorizations to serve new patients, requiring additional appeals efforts. This is common with other Medicare Advantage plans as well. If CMS were to change their coverage and reimbursement criteria for the MyoPro, or the aforementioned commercial payer and other Medicare Advantage payers further reduce the number of MyoPro’s that they will authorize for their insured patients, our revenues and cash flows would be negatively impacted, which would have an adverse effect on our business.

Previous wording

We sell our products in countries throughout the world. Significant political, trade, or regulatory developments in the jurisdictions in which we may sell our products, such as those stemming from the change in U.S. federal administration, are difficult to predict and may have a material adverse effect on us. These developments may include tariffs or changes in reimbursement policies for Medicaid and Medicare. For example, on February 1, 2025, the U.S. imposed a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, which were subsequently suspended for a period of one month, and a 10% additional tariff on imports from China. Historically, tariffs have led to increased trade and political tensions. In response to tariffs, other countries have implemented retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. While we have not been affected by such developments as of the date of this annual report on Form 10-K, we cannot provide any assurance that changes in political, trade, regulatory, and economic conditions, including U.S. trade policies, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Current wording

While it has not had a material impact on our business to date, we sell our products in countries throughout the world and import materials into the United States. Significant political, trade, or regulatory developments in the jurisdictions in which we may sell our products are difficult to predict and may have a material adverse effect on us. These developments may include export controls, tariffs or changes in reimbursement policies for Medicaid and Medicare. For example, on February 1, 2025, the U.S. imposed a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, which was subsequently suspended for a period of one month. The U.S. has also imposed significant tariffs on imports from China and other countries, and these tariffs may continue to escalate, depending on the status of trade negotiations. Historically, tariffs have led to increased trade and political tensions. In response to tariffs, other countries have implemented retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. While we estimate that tariffs assessed on our imports are expected to have less than a 100 basis point (1%) impact on gross margin in 2026, we cannot provide any assurance that the final tariffs actually imposed, changes in political, trade, regulatory, and economic conditions, including U.S. trade policies, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Previous wording

Sales of our device depend, in part, on the extent to which our products are covered by third-party payers, such as government health programs, commercial insurance and managed healthcare organizations. See section titled “Business Section – Government Regulation – Health Insurance Reimbursement”, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Third-party payers are increasingly challenging the prices charged, examining the medical necessity and creating additional restrictions on coverage, and reviewing the cost-effectiveness of medical products and services and imposing controls to manage costs. Third-party payers may limit coverage to specific products on an approved list, also known as a formulary, which might not include all of the approved products for a particular indication. In addition, CMS may issue local or national coverage determinations which could result in more restrictive coverage for our products. The coverage determination process is often a time-consuming and costly process that requires us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our products to each payer separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be obtained. In addition, the absence of in-network contracts with Medicare Advantage plans or commercial insurers could result in utilization management for out-of-network patients. Currently, we are almost entirely dependent on third parties to cover the cost of our products to patients and rely on their reimbursement for the cost of our products. If CMS, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (the “VA”) health insurance companies and other third-party payers do not provide adequate coverage or reimbursement for our products, then our sales will be limited to clinical facilities and individuals who can pay for our devices without reimbursement. To our knowledge, from inception through December 31, 2024, fewer than 50 units have been self-paid or funded by non-profit foundations. Some commercial health insurance plans have published statements that they will not cover the cost of the MyoPro for their members. In the event we are unsuccessful in obtaining additional coverage and adequate reimbursement for our products from third-party payers, our sales will be significantly constrained. Currently, reimbursement for the cost of our products is obtained primarily on a case-by-case basis until such time, if any, we obtain broad coverage policies with Medicare and third-party payers. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain these broad coverage policies or that Medicare or its local administrative billing contractors will not establish more restrictive coverage requirements for the MyPro in the future (for example, in the form of a local or national coverage determination). See section titled“Business Section – Government Regulation – Health Insurance Reimbursement”, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Current wording

In addition, the absence of in-network contracts with Medicare Advantage plans or commercial insurers could result in heightened utilization management, prior authorization, or denials for out-of-network patients. Currently, we are almost entirely dependent on third parties to cover the cost of our products to patients and rely on their reimbursement for the cost of our products. If CMS, the VA, Medicare Advantage organizations, health insurance companies and other third-party payers do not provide adequate coverage or reimbursement for our products, then our sales will be limited to clinical facilities and individuals who can pay for our devices without reimbursement. To our knowledge, from inception through December 31, 2025, fewer than 50 units have been self-paid or funded by non-profit foundations. Some commercial health insurance plans have published statements that they will not cover the cost of the MyoPro for their members. In the event we are unsuccessful in obtaining additional coverage and adequate reimbursement for our products from third-party payers, our sales will be significantly constrained. Currently, reimbursement for the cost of our products is obtained primarily on a case-by-case basis until such time, if any, we obtain broad coverage policies with Medicare and third-party payers. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain these broad coverage policies or that Medicare or its local administrative billing contractors will not establish more restrictive coverage requirements for the MyPro in the future (for example, in the form of a local or national coverage determination). See section titled“Business Section – Government Regulation – Health Insurance Reimbursement”, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Previous wording

In connection with Medicare reimbursement, in November 2023 CMS reclassified the MyoPro from the durable medical equipment benefit to the brace benefit category effective January 1, 2024, thereby allowing for lump sum reimbursement. Such lump sum reimbursements based on the fees posted by CMS, are now being made. CMS published final payment determinations for the MyoPro Motion W (L8701) and the MyoPro Motion G (L8702), effective April 1, 2024. These fees were subsequently updated to approximately $34,300 for the Motion W and approximately $67,500 for the Motion G, effective January 1, 2025. The fees are subject to annual inflationary adjustments. Our claims can be reviewed on a case-by-case basis at any time by CMS.

Current wording

In connection with Medicare reimbursement, in November 2023 CMS reclassified the MyoPro from the durable medical equipment benefit to the brace benefit category effective January 1, 2024, thereby allowing for lump sum reimbursement. Such lump sum reimbursements based on the fees posted by CMS are now being made. CMS published final payment determinations for the MyoPro Motion W (L8701) and the MyoPro Motion G (L8702), effective April 1, 2024. These fees are typically updated annually to account for inflation and were recently updated to approximately $34,970 for the Motion W and approximately $68,800 for the Motion G, effective January 1, 2026. Our claims can be reviewed, audited, or subject to recoupment on a case-by-case basis at any time by CMS, its contractors, or other government authorities.

Previous wording

There can be no assurance that the final fees will be sufficient to permit us to generate gross margin required to allow us to operate on a profitable basis. Third-party payers also may continue to deny or limit coverage, limit reimbursement or reduce their levels of payment, or our costs of production may increase faster than increases in reimbursement levels. In addition, we may not obtain coverage and reimbursement approvals in a timely manner. Our failure to operate profitably could negatively impact market acceptance of MyoPro.

Current wording

There can be no assurance that these fees will be sufficient to permit us to generate gross margin required to allow us to operate on a profitable basis. Third-party payers may also continue to deny or limit coverage, limit reimbursement or reduce their levels of payment, or our costs of production may increase faster than increases in reimbursement levels. In addition, we may not obtain coverage and reimbursement approvals in a timely manner. Our failure to operate profitably could negatively impact market acceptance of MyoPro.

Previous wording

Revenues from patients who are covered by Medicare Advantage insurance plans have become a significant portion of our overall revenues. Approximately 25% and 57% of our product revenues were derived from patients with Medicare Advantage insurance plans for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Since CMS published reimbursement amounts for the MyoPro in April 2024, revenues from Medicare Part B patients represented 49% of total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024. If CMS amends, restricts, or retracts its November 2023 rule classifying MyoPro as a brace, amends or retracts any published fees, or establishes more restrictive inclusion criteria for coverage, our Medicare revenues could be negatively impacted and insurers offering Medicare Advantage insurance plans may no longer cover or adequately reimburse for the MyoPro. As a result, our overall revenues and cash flows would be negatively impacted, which could have an adverse effect on our business. See “Risks Related to our Reliance on Third Parties—We may not be able to obtain third-party payer reimbursement, including reimbursement by Medicare, for our products” for additional information about CMS coverage decisions.

Current wording

Revenues from patients who are covered by Medicare and Medicare Advantage insurance plans have historically been a significant portion of our overall revenues. However, Medicare Advantage plans have been reducing the number of authorizations for the MyoPro since the second half of 2024, which is negatively impacting our revenues. Revenue from patients with Medicare Advantage insurance plans decreased 2% in 2025 compared to 2024. Approximately 20% and 25% of our product revenues were derived from patients with Medicare Advantage insurance plans for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. CMS published reimbursement amounts for the MyoPro in February 2024, which became effective in April 2024. Revenues from Medicare Part B patients represented 54% and 49% of total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. If CMS amends, restricts, or retracts its November 2023 rule classifying MyoPro as a brace, amends or retracts any published fees, or establishes more restrictive inclusion criteria for coverage, our Medicare revenues could be negatively impacted and insurers offering Medicare Advantage insurance plans may no longer cover or adequately reimburse for the MyoPro. Further, continued utilization management efforts by Medicare Advantage plans could result in further decreases in authorizations. As a result of these factors, our overall revenues and cash flows would be negatively impacted, which could have an adverse effect on our business.

Previous wording

While we are the manufacturer of record with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, (the “FDA”) for the MyoPro device we sell, we have contracted with Cogmedix, Inc. (“Cogmedix”), a contract manufacturer with expertise in the medical device industry, for the contract manufacture of certain subassemblies and the sourcing of some of our components and raw materials. Pursuant to this contract, Cogmedix manufactures subassemblies for the MyoPro pursuant to our specifications at its facility in West Boylston, Massachusetts. As the manufacturer of the MyoPro, we ultimately remain responsible to the FDA for overseeing Cogmedix’s manufacturing activities to ensure that they conform with product specifications and applicable laws and regulations, including FDA’s good manufacturing practice requirements for medical devices. Any failure to effectively oversee the regulatory compliance of the product and contract manufacturing activities by Cogmedix can lead to potential enforcement actions, including civil or criminal liabilities, as well as recalls with the FDA. We may terminate our relationship with Cogmedix at any time upon sixty (60) days’ written notice. For our business strategy to be successful, Cogmedix must be able to manufacture our subassemblies in sufficient quantities, and to source raw materials and components, in compliance with regulatory requirements and quality control standards, in accordance with agreed upon specifications, at acceptable costs and on a timely basis. Increases in our product sales, whether forecasted or unanticipated, or supply chain constraints that may arise for any number of reasons, could strain the ability of Cogmedix to manufacture an increasingly large supply of our current or future subassemblies in a manner that meets these various requirements. In addition, although we are not restricted from engaging an alternative manufacturer, the process of moving our manufacturing activities would be time consuming and costly, and may limit our ability to meet our sales commitments, which could harm our reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, any new contract manufacturer would need to be compliant with FDA regulations the international management system standard for medical systems set by the International Organization for Standardization (“ISO”), ISO 13485:2016.

Current wording

While we are the manufacturer of record with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, (the “FDA”) for the MyoPro device we sell, we have contracted with Cogmedix, Inc. (“Cogmedix”), a contract manufacturer with expertise in the medical device industry, for the contract manufacture of certain subassemblies and the sourcing of some of our components and raw materials. Pursuant to this contract, Cogmedix manufactures subassemblies for the MyoPro pursuant to our specifications at its facility in West Boylston, Massachusetts. As the manufacturer of the MyoPro, we ultimately remain responsible to the FDA for overseeing Cogmedix’s manufacturing activities to ensure that they conform with product specifications and applicable laws and regulations, including FDA’s good manufacturing practice requirements for medical devices. Any failure to effectively oversee the regulatory compliance of the product and contract manufacturing activities by Cogmedix can lead to potential enforcement actions, including civil or criminal liabilities, as well as recalls with the FDA. We may terminate our relationship with Cogmedix at any time upon sixty (60) days’ written notice. For our business strategy to be successful, Cogmedix must be able to manufacture our subassemblies in sufficient quantities, and to source raw materials and components, in compliance with regulatory requirements and quality control standards, in accordance with agreed upon specifications, at acceptable costs and on a timely basis. Increases in our product sales, whether forecasted or unanticipated, or supply chain constraints that may arise for any number of reasons, could strain the ability of Cogmedix to manufacture an increasingly large supply of our current or future subassemblies in a manner that meets these various requirements. In addition, although we are not restricted from engaging an alternative manufacturer, the process of moving our manufacturing activities would be time-consuming and costly, and may limit our ability to meet our sales commitments, which could harm our reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, any new contract manufacturer would need to be compliant with FDA regulations and the international management system standard for medical systems set by the International Organization for Standardization (“ISO”), ISO 13485:2016.

Previous wording

Our ability to grow our business is dependent on our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations or to raise additional capital to meet our obligations, if necessary. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to enable us to fund our operations for at least the next twelve months from the issuance date of these financial statements. If additional capital is required to achieve operating cash flow breakeven, we may be unable to obtain additional funds on reasonable terms, or at all. Our ability to secure financing and the cost of raising such capital are dependent on numerous factors, including general economic and capital markets conditions, credit availability from lenders, investor confidence and the existence of regulatory and tax incentives that are conducive to raising capital. Uncertainty in the financial markets has caused banks and financial institutions to decrease the amount of capital available for lending and has significantly increased the risk premium of such borrowings. In addition, such turmoil and uncertainty has significantly limited the ability of companies to raise funds through the sale of equity or debt securities. If we are unable to raise additional funds, we may need to delay, modify or abandon some or all of our business plans or cease operations. If we raise funds through the issuance of debt, the amount of any indebtedness that we may raise in the future may be substantial, and we may be required to secure such indebtedness with our assets and may have substantial interest expenses. If we default on any future indebtedness, our lenders could declare all outstanding principal and interest to be due and payable and our secured lenders may foreclose on the facilities securing such indebtedness. Usage of our line of credit requires us to meet financial and operating covenants, which could place limits on our operations, decrease our liquidity and increase the amount of cash flow required to service our debt. If we raise funds through the issuance of equity securities, such issuance could result in dilution to our stockholders and the newly issued securities may have rights senior to those of the holders of our common stock.

Current wording

Our ability to grow our business is dependent on our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations or to raise additional capital to meet our obligations, if necessary. We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to enable us to fund our operations for at least the next twelve months from the issuance date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If additional capital is required to achieve operating cash flow breakeven, we may be unable to obtain additional funds on reasonable terms, or at all. Our ability to secure financing and the cost of raising such capital are dependent on numerous factors, including general economic and capital markets conditions, credit availability from lenders, investor confidence and the existence of regulatory and tax incentives that are conducive to raising capital. If we are unable to raise additional funds, we may need to delay, modify or abandon some or all of our business plans or cease operations. If we raise funds through the issuance of debt, the amount of any indebtedness that we may raise in the future may be substantial, and we may be required to secure such indebtedness with our assets and may have substantial interest expenses. If we default on our existing or any future indebtedness, our lenders could declare all outstanding principal and interest to be due and payable and our secured lenders may foreclose on the facilities securing such indebtedness. Our term loan facility with Avenue requires us to meet financial and operating covenants, which could place limits on our operations, decrease our liquidity and increase the amount of cash flow required to service our debt. If we raise funds through the issuance of equity securities, such issuance could result in dilution to our stockholders and the newly issued securities may have rights senior to those of the holders of our common stock.

Previous wording

we will need to repay our indebtedness by making payments of interest and principal, which will reduce the amount of money available to finance our operations; and

Current wording

On November 4, 2025, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Avenue that is secured by a lien on all of our assets. Pursuant to the Loan and Security Agreement, we are subject to certain financial covenants requiring us to (i) maintain at all times $2.5 million in unrestricted cash, (ii) achieve at least 75% of our trailing three-month projected revenue and (iii) achieve cash burn for the trailing six months of no more than (A) 150% of our projected cash burn from the closing date of the Loan and Security Agreement through December 31, 2026 and (B) the greater of 150% of our projected cash burn or $2.0 million beginning January 1, 2027. The Loan and Security Agreement also contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default for financings of this type, including covenants restricting us from transferring any part of our business or intellectual property, incurring additional indebtedness, engaging in mergers or acquisitions, repurchasing shares, paying dividends or making other distributions, making investments, and creating other liens on our assets, including our intellectual property, in each case subject to customary exceptions. If we raise any additional debt financing, the terms of such additional debt could further restrict our operating and financial flexibility. These restrictions may include, among other things, limitations on the incurrence of additional debt and specific restrictions on the use of our assets, as well as prohibitions on our ability to create liens, pay dividends, redeem capital stock or make investments. In addition, we will need to repay our indebtedness by making payments of interest and principal, which will reduce the amount of money available to finance our operations. If we default under the terms of the Loan and Security Agreement, Avenue may accelerate all of our repayment obligations and take control of our pledged assets, potentially requiring us to renegotiate our agreement on terms less favorable to us or to immediately cease operations. Further, if we were to be liquidated, Avenue’s right to repayment would be senior to the rights of the holders of our common stock. Avenue could declare an event of default upon the occurrence of any circumstance that could reasonably be expected to result in what they interpret as a material adverse effect as defined under the Loan and Security Agreement. Any declaration by Avenue of an event of default could significantly harm our business and prospects and could cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Previous wording

The industries in which we operate are highly competitive and subject to rapid technological change. The publishing of fees for the Healthcare Common Procedures Coding System (“HCPCS”) billing codes for our products may attract competition. If our competitors are better able to develop and market products that are safer, more effective, less costly, easier to use, or are otherwise more attractive, we may be unable to compete effectively with other companies.

Current wording

The industries in which we operate are highly competitive and subject to rapid technological change. The publishing of fees for the HCPCS billing codes for our products may attract competition. If our competitors are better able to develop and market products that are safer, more effective, less costly, easier to use, or are otherwise more attractive, we may be unable to compete effectively with other companies.

Previous wording

Industrial and medical robotics is characterized by intense competition and rapid technological change, and we will face competition on the basis of product features, clinical outcomes, price, services and other factors. We are experiencing competition in the United States from companies such as Neurolutions, and in Germany from companies such as Vincent Systems and HKK Bionics. Publication of fees by CMS under our HCPCS billing codes L8701 and L8702 is also expected to attract competition in the United States. Competitors may include large medical device and other companies, some of which have significantly greater financial and marketing resources than we do, and firms that are more specialized than we are with respect to particular markets. Our competition may respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies, undertake more extensive marketing campaigns, and have greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do or may be more successful in attracting potential customers, employees and strategic partners.

Current wording

Industrial and medical robotics is characterized by intense competition and rapid technological change, and we will face competition on the basis of product features, clinical outcomes, price, services and other factors. We are experiencing competition in the United States from companies such as Neurolutions and MicroTransponder, Inc., and in Germany from companies such as Vincent Systems and HKK Bionics. Publication of fees by CMS under our HCPCS billing codes L8701 and L8702 is also expected to attract competition in the United States. Competitors may include large medical device and other companies, some of which have significantly greater financial and marketing resources than we do, and firms that are more specialized than we are with respect to particular markets. Our competition may respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies, undertake more extensive marketing campaigns, and have greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do or may be more successful in attracting potential customers, employees and strategic partners.

Previous wording

If these independent O&P providers do not follow our inclusion/exclusion criteria for patient selection or do not provide adequate follow-on care, then our reputation may be harmed by patient dissatisfaction. This could also lead to product returns and adversely affect our financial condition. When issues with O&P providers have arisen in the past, we have supplied additional training and documentation and/or ended the business relationship.

Current wording

If these independent O&P providers do not comply with applicable coverage or billing requirements or do not provide adequate follow-on care, then our reputation may be harmed by patient dissatisfaction. This could also lead to product returns and adversely affect our financial condition. When issues with O&P providers have arisen in the past, we have supplied additional training and documentation and/or ended the business relationship.

Previous wording

Limited sources exist to obtain reliable market data with respect to the number of mobility-impaired individuals and the occurrence of upper extremity paralysis in our target markets. In addition, there are no third-party reports or studies regarding what percentage of those with upper extremity paralysis would be able to use orthotics in general, or our current or planned future products in particular. In order to use our current products marketed to those with upper extremity paralysis, users must meet a set of inclusion criteria and not have a medical condition which disqualifies them from being an appropriate candidate. Future products for those with upper extremity paralysis may have the same or other restrictions. Our business strategy is based, in part, on our estimates of the number of upper extremity impaired individuals and the incidence of upper extremity injuries in our target markets and the percentage of those groups that would be able to use our current and future products. Our assumptions and estimates may be inaccurate and may change.

Current wording

Limited sources exist to obtain reliable market data with respect to the number of mobility-impaired individuals and the occurrence of upper extremity paralysis in our target markets. In addition, there are no third-party reports or studies regarding what percentage of those with upper extremity paralysis would be able to use orthotics in general, or our current or planned future products in particular. In order to use our current products marketed to those with upper extremity paralysis, users must meet a set of inclusion criteria and not have a medical condition which disqualifies them from being an appropriate candidate. Future products for those with upper extremity paralysis may have the same or other restrictions. Our business strategy is based, in part, on our estimates of the number of upper extremity impaired individuals and the incidence of upper extremity injuries in our target markets and the percentage of those groups that would be able to use our current and future products that also carry insurance that will reimburse for the device. Our assumptions and estimates may be inaccurate and may change.

Previous wording

In addition, because we operate in a new market, the actions of our competitors could adversely affect our business. Adverse events such as product defects or legal claims with respect to competing or similar products could cause reputational harm to the market on the whole. Further, adverse regulatory findings or reimbursement-related decisions with respect to other products could negatively impact the entire market and, accordingly, our business.

Current wording

In addition, because we operate in a relatively new market, the actions of our competitors could adversely affect our business. Adverse events such as product defects or legal claims with respect to competing or similar products could cause reputational harm to the market on the whole. Further, adverse regulatory findings or reimbursement-related decisions with respect to other products could negatively impact the entire market and, accordingly, our business.

Previous wording

While clinical data have established the safety of MyoPro products, our products undergo periodic updates for various reasons, including performance and reliability improvements and cost reductions. For example, in January 2022, we announced the availability of MyoPro2+. Because MyoPro users generally do not have feeling in their upper extremities, they may not immediately notice adverse effects from updates to the MyoPro, which could exacerbate their impact. If MyoPro products are shown to present new risks or to be unsafe or cause such unforeseen effects in the future, our business and reputation could be harmed, including through field corrections, withdrawals, removals, mandatory product recalls, suspension or withdrawal of FDA registration, significant legal liability or harm to our business reputation.

Current wording

While clinical data have established the safety of MyoPro products, our products undergo periodic updates for various reasons, including performance and reliability improvements and cost reductions. For example, in April 2025, we announced the availability of MyoPro2x. Because MyoPro users generally do not have feeling in their upper extremities, they may not immediately notice adverse effects from updates to the MyoPro, which could exacerbate their impact. If MyoPro products are shown to present new risks or to be unsafe or cause such unforeseen effects in the future, our business and reputation could be harmed, including through field corrections, withdrawals, removals, mandatory product recalls, suspension or withdrawal of FDA registration, significant legal liability or harm to our business reputation.

Previous wording

In the ordinary course of our business, in the future we may enter into collaborations, in-licensing arrangements, joint ventures, strategic alliances or partnerships to develop the MyoPro and to pursue new markets. We are selling the MyoPro in several European countries, as well as Australia. In January 2021, we announced that we had entered into a joint venture with Beijing Ryzur Medical Investment Co., Ltd. (“Ryzur Medical”), to manufacture and sell the products containing our technology in China, including Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macau. The company is named Jiangxi Myomo Medical Assistive Appliance Co., Ltd. (the “JV Company”). In December 2021, we entered into a technology license agreement and a trademark license agreement with the JV Company, under which we were entitled to receive a license fee of $2.7 million and the JV Company will commit to purchase a minimum of $10.75 million of MyoPro control units over the next ten years. During 2023, we received full payment of the $2.7 million initial license fee and have received payment for MyoPro control units of $50,000. This and any other of these relationships may require us to incur non-recurring and other charges, increase our near and long-term expenditures, issue securities that dilute our existing stockholders or disrupt our management and business. In addition, proposing, negotiating and implementing collaborations, licensing arrangements, joint ventures, strategic alliances or partnerships may be a lengthy and complex process. We may not identify, secure, or complete any such transactions or arrangements in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis, on acceptable terms or at all. We have limited institutional knowledge and experience with respect to these business development activities, and we may also not realize the anticipated benefits of any such transaction or arrangement. In particular, these collaborations may not result in the development of products that achieve commercial success or result in significant revenues and could be terminated prior to developing any products. Any delays in entering into new strategic partnership agreements related to our products could delay the development and commercialization of our products in certain geographies, which would harm our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

In the ordinary course of our business, in the future we may enter into collaborations, in-licensing arrangements, joint ventures, strategic alliances or partnerships to develop the MyoPro and to pursue new markets. We are selling the MyoPro in several European countries, as well as Australia. In January 2021, we announced that we had entered into a joint venture with Beijing Ryzur Medical Investment Co., Ltd. (“Ryzur Medical”), to manufacture and sell the products containing our technology in China, including Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macau. The company is named Jiangxi Myomo Medical Assistive Appliance Co., Ltd. (the “JV Company”). In December 2021, we entered into a technology license agreement and a trademark license agreement with the JV Company, under which we were entitled to receive a license fee of $2.7 million, which we received in 2023, and the JV Company committed to purchase a minimum of $10.75 million of MyoPro control units over the next ten years. In November 2025, we were notified that Ryzur Medical filed for bankruptcy in China and is in the process of being liquidated. As a result, the operations of the JV Company are now severely limited. Chinaleaf Capital, a minority investor in the JV Company, is currently leading the process of restructuring the JV Company and raising additional capital in order to re-start normal operations. According to the terms of the JV Contract, the sale of shares in the JV Company will not dilute our ownership. We cannot provide any assurance that we will accept any terms and conditions that new investors, if any, will require and we may exercise our right to terminate the joint venture in the future. This and any other of these relationships may require us to incur legal fees,as well as non-recurring and other charges, increase our near and long-term expenditures, or disrupt our management and business. In addition, proposing, negotiating and implementing collaborations, licensing arrangements, joint ventures, strategic alliances or partnerships may be a lengthy and complex process. We may not identify, secure, or complete any such transactions or arrangements in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis, on acceptable terms or at all. We have limited institutional knowledge and experience with respect to these business development activities, and we may also not realize the anticipated benefits of any such transaction or arrangement. In particular, these collaborations may not result in the development of products that achieve commercial success or result in significant revenues and could be terminated prior to developing any products. Any delays in entering into new strategic partnership agreements related to our products could delay the development and commercialization of our products in certain geographies, which would harm our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

Moreover, there are significant costs and risks inherent in selling our products, particularly in international markets, including: (a) time and difficulty in building a widespread network of distribution partners; (b) increased shipping and distribution costs, which could increase our expenses and reduce our margins; (c) potentially lower margins in some regions; (d) longer collection cycles in some regions; (e) compliance with foreign laws and regulations; (f) compliance with anti-bribery, anti-corruption, and anti-money laundering laws, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations, by us, our employees, and our business partners; (g) currency exchange rate fluctuations and related effects on our results of operations; (h) economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in foreign economies and markets; (i) compliance with tax, employment, immigration, and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad; (j) workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in the United States; (k) business interruptions resulting from geopolitical actions, including war and terrorism, or natural disasters, including earthquakes, typhoons, floods and fires; and (l) other costs and risks of doing business internationally, such as new tariffs which may be imposed. For example, we have entered into a joint venture with Ryzur Medical, to manufacture and sell the products containing the Company’s technology in China, including Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macau. In connection with this joint venture, we may encounter challenges in working with our joint venture partners, including with respect to compliance with local laws and domestic laws related to foreign operations.

Current wording

Moreover, there are significant costs and risks inherent in selling our products, particularly in international markets, including: (a) time and difficulty in building a widespread network of distribution partners; (b) increased shipping and distribution costs, which could increase our expenses and reduce our margins; (c) potentially lower margins in some regions; (d) longer collection cycles in some regions; (e) compliance with foreign laws and regulations; (f) compliance with anti-bribery, anti-corruption, and anti-money laundering laws, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations, by us, our employees, and our business partners; (g) currency exchange rate fluctuations and related effects on our results of operations; (h) economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in foreign economies and markets; (i) compliance with tax, employment, immigration, and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad; (j) workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in the United States; (k) business interruptions resulting from geopolitical actions, including war and terrorism, or natural disasters, including earthquakes, typhoons, floods and fires; and (l) other costs and risks of doing business internationally, such as new tariffs which may be imposed.

Previous wording

We are subject to extensive governmental regulations relating to the design, development, manufacturing, labeling and marketing, delivery and billing of our products, and a failure to comply with such regulations could lead to withdrawal or recall of our products from the market.

Current wording

We are subject to extensive governmental regulations relating to the design, development, manufacturing, labeling, marketing, delivery and billing of our products, and a failure to comply with such regulations could lead to withdrawal or recall of our products from the market.

Previous wording

In 2012, we listed the MyoPro device as a Class I, 510(k)-exempt, limb orthosis with the FDA. From time to time, the FDA may disagree with the classification regulation under which a registrant lists their device. For example, the FDA may disagree with a registrant’s determination to classify their device as a Class I medical device. Instead, the FDA may determine the device to be a Class II or Class III device requiring the submission of a premarket notification, or 510(k), or a premarket approval application for premarket clearance or approval. As the FDA is now giving more attention to the differentiated performance of myoelectric controlled orthotics, we elected to change our device listing to be under a Class II classification regulation for biofeedback devices. Under the classification regulation, we believe our device remains 510(k)-exempt as a prescription battery powered external limb orthosis that is indicated for functional improvement, a device which is generally 510(k)-exempt under the classification regulation. In the event that the FDA determines that our devices, whether by functionality or marketing claims, exceed the limitations on 510(k)-exemption such that premarket clearance or approval is required (i.e., that our device is intended for a use different from the intended use of a legally marketed device in the generic type of device under the applicable classification regulation or that our modified device operates using a different fundamental scientific technology than such a legally marketed device), should be classified as Class II devices or Class III devices requiring premarket clearance or approval, or should FDA decide to reclassify our device as a Class II or Class III device requiring premarket clearance or approval, we could be precluded from marketing our devices for clinical use within the United States for months or longer depending on the requirements of the classification. Obtaining premarket clearance or approval could significantly increase our regulatory costs, including expense associated with required preclinical (animal) and clinical (human) trials, more extensive mechanical and electrical testing and other costs.

Current wording

In 2012, we listed the MyoPro device as a Class I, 510(k)-exempt, limb orthosis with the FDA. From time to time, the FDA may disagree with the classification regulation under which a registrant lists their device. For example, the FDA may disagree with a registrant’s determination to classify their device as a Class I medical device. Instead, the FDA may determine the device to be a Class II or Class III device requiring the submission of a premarket notification, or 510(k), or a premarket approval application for premarket clearance or approval. As the FDA is now giving more attention to the differentiated performance of myoelectric controlled orthotics, we elected to change our device listing to be under a Class II classification regulation for biofeedback devices. Under the classification regulation, we believe our device remains 510(k)-exempt as a prescription battery powered external limb orthosis that is indicated for functional improvement, a device which is generally 510(k)-exempt under the classification regulation. In the event that the FDA determines that our devices, whether by functionality or marketing claims, exceed the limitations on 510(k)-exemption such that premarket clearance or approval is required (i.e., that our device is intended for a use different from the intended use of a legally marketed device in the generic type of device under the applicable classification regulation or that our modified device operates using a different fundamental scientific technology than such a legally marketed device), should be classified as Class II devices or Class III devices requiring premarket clearance or approval, or should FDA decide to reclassify our device as a Class II or Class III device requiring premarket clearance or approval, we could be precluded from marketing our devices for clinical use within the United States for months or longer depending on the requirements of the classification. Obtaining premarket clearance or approval could significantly increase our regulatory costs, including expenses associated with required preclinical (animal) and clinical (human) trials, more extensive mechanical and electrical testing and other costs.

Previous wording

We are registered with the FDA as a manufacturer for medical devices. We are also subject to regulation by foreign governmental agencies in connection with international sales. The agencies enforce laws and regulations that govern the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, advertising, marketing and distribution, and market surveillance of our medical device products. Following the introduction of a product, the governmental agencies will periodically review our product development methodology, quality management systems, and product performance. We are under a continuing obligation to ensure that all applicable regulatory requirements, such as the FDA’s medical device good manufacturing practice / Quality System Regulation (“QSR”) requirements and the FDA’s medical device reporting requirements for certain device-related adverse events and malfunction, continue to be met. Our facilities are subject to periodic and unannounced inspection by U.S. and foreign regulatory agencies to audit compliance with the QSR, and comparable foreign regulations.

Current wording

We are registered with the FDA as a manufacturer for medical devices. We are also subject to regulation by foreign governmental agencies in connection with international sales. The agencies enforce laws and regulations that govern the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, advertising, marketing and distribution, and market surveillance of our medical device products. Following the introduction of a product, the governmental agencies will periodically review our product development methodology, quality management systems, and product performance. We are under a continuing obligation to ensure that all applicable regulatory requirements, such as the FDA’s medical device good manufacturing practice / Quality Management System Regulation (“QMSR”) requirements and the FDA’s medical device reporting requirements for certain device-related adverse events and malfunction, continue to be met. Our facilities are subject to periodic and unannounced inspection by U.S. and foreign regulatory agencies to audit compliance with the QMSR, and comparable foreign regulations.

Previous wording

The process of complying with the applicable QSR, medical device reporting, and other requirements can be costly and time consuming, and could delay or prevent the production, manufacturing or sale of the MyoPro. If the FDA determines that we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, they may issue an inquiry or an untitled or warning letter with one or more citations of non-compliance. These inquiries or letters, if not closed promptly, can result in fines, delays or suspensions of regulatory clearances, closure of manufacturing sites, seizures or recalls of products and damage to our reputation. Similarly, if we fail to comply with applicable foreign regulatory requirements, we may be subject to, among other things, fines, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals, product recalls, seizure of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecution. Recent changes in enforcement practice by the FDA and other agencies have resulted in increased enforcement activity, which increases the compliance risk that we and other companies in our industry are facing.

Current wording

The process of complying with the applicable QMSR, medical device reporting, and other requirements can be costly and time consuming, and could delay or prevent the production, manufacturing or sale of the MyoPro. If the FDA determines that we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, they may issue an inquiry or an untitled or warning letter with one or more citations of non-compliance. These inquiries or letters, if not closed promptly, can result in fines, delays or suspensions of regulatory clearances, closure of manufacturing sites, seizures or recalls of products and damage to our reputation. Similarly, if we fail to comply with applicable foreign regulatory requirements, we may be subject to, among other things, fines, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals, product recalls, seizure of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecution. Recent changes in enforcement practice by the FDA and other agencies have resulted in increased enforcement activity, which increases the compliance risk that we and other companies in our industry are facing.

Previous wording

In addition, governmental agencies of the United States or other countries may impose new requirements regarding registration, labeling or prohibited materials that may require us to modify or re-register the MyoPro once it is already on the market or otherwise impact our ability to market the MyoPro in the United States or other countries. For example, on February 2, 2024, the FDA published a final rule to amend its QSR requirements to align more closely with the international consensus standards for medical devices by converging with quality management system (“QMS”) requirements used by other regulatory authorities from other countries. Specifically, the final rule does so primarily by incorporating by reference the 2016 edition of the ISO 13485 standard. The amended regulation is referred to as the Quality Management System Regulation (“QMSR”) and is effective February 2, 2026. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing authorization that we may have obtained, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations, financial condition and our ability to achieve or sustain profitability. The process of complying with these governmental regulations can be costly and time consuming, and could delay or prevent the production, manufacturing or sale of the MyoPro. For instance, the FDA may issue mandates, known as 522 orders, requiring us to conduct post-market surveillance studies of our devices. Failure to comply could result in enforcement of the FFDCA against us or our products including an agency request that we recall our MyoPro products.

Current wording

In addition, governmental agencies of the United States or other countries may impose new requirements regarding registration, labeling or prohibited materials that may require us to modify or re-register the MyoPro once it is already on the market or otherwise impact our ability to market the MyoPro in the United States or other countries. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing authorization that we may have obtained, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations, financial condition and our ability to achieve or sustain profitability. The process of complying with these governmental regulations can be costly and time consuming, and could delay or prevent the production, manufacturing or sale of the MyoPro. For instance, the FDA may issue mandates, known as 522 orders, requiring us to conduct post-market surveillance studies of our devices. Failure to comply could result in enforcement of the FFDCA against us or our products including an agency request that we recall our MyoPro products.

Previous wording

Our relationships with healthcare providers and physicians and third-party payers will be subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.

Current wording

Our relationships with healthcare providers and physicians and third-party payers are subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.

Previous wording

We are subject to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and the federal False Claims Act, which may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we sell, market and distribute our products. In particular, the promotion, sales and marketing of healthcare items and services, as well as certain business arrangements in the healthcare industry (e.g., healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payers), are subject to extensive laws designed to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, structuring and commission(s), certain customer incentive programs and other business arrangements generally. Marketing and promotional programs may also be affected by the application of healthcare privacy laws relating to the use of information gathered by social media companies in advertising activities. We are also subject to patient information and privacy and security regulation by both the federal government and the states and foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct business. See section titled “Business – Government Regulation – Healthcare Privacy Laws and Regulations”, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Current wording

We are subject to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and the federal False Claims Act, which may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we sell, market and distribute our products. In particular, the promotion, sales and marketing of healthcare items and services, as well as certain business arrangements in the healthcare industry (e.g., healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payers), are subject to extensive laws designed to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, structuring and commission(s), certain customer incentive programs and other business arrangements generally. In August 2025, we launched our MyoConnect program, whereby we engage with and educate therapists and other healthcare professionals regarding the MyoPro with an objective of generating referrals. Such programs are subject to heightened scrutiny under federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws, and we must ensure that we operate this program in a compliant manner. Marketing and promotional programs may also be affected by the application of healthcare privacy laws relating to the use of information gathered by social media companies in advertising activities. We are also subject to patient information and privacy and security regulation by both the federal government and the states and foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct business. See section titled “Business – Government Regulation – Healthcare Privacy Laws and Regulations”, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Previous wording

If we or our third-party manufacturers or key suppliers fail to comply with the applicable good manufacturing practice requirements, including FDA’s Quality System Regulation, our manufacturing operations could be interrupted.

Current wording

If we or our third-party manufacturers or key suppliers fail to comply with the applicable good manufacturing practice requirements, including FDA’s Quality Management System Regulation, our manufacturing operations could be interrupted.

Previous wording

We and our third-party manufacturers and key suppliers are also required to comply with the FDA’s QSR which covers the methods and documentation of the production, control, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, storage and shipping of our products. In February 2024, the FDA issued the QMSR Final Rule to amend the QSR, incorporating by reference, ISO 13485:2016. The rule will become effective on February 2, 2026. Until then, manufacturers are required by the FDA to comply with the QSR. We, Cogmedix, our electromechanical kit manufacturer, and other key suppliers are also subject to the regulations of foreign jurisdictions regarding the manufacturing process with respect to the market for our products abroad.

Current wording

We and our third-party manufacturers and key suppliers are also required to comply with the FDA’s QMSR which covers the methods and documentation of the production, control, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, storage and shipping of our products. We, Cogmedix, our electromechanical kit manufacturer, and other key suppliers are also subject to the regulations of foreign jurisdictions regarding the manufacturing process with respect to the market for our products abroad.

Previous wording

We continue to monitor our quality management, as well as that of our third-party manufacturers and suppliers to improve our overall level of compliance. Our facilities and those of our third-party manufacturers and key suppliers are subject to periodic and unannounced inspection by U.S. and foreign regulatory agencies to audit compliance with the QSR and comparable foreign regulations. If our facilities or the facilities of our third-party manufacturers and suppliers are found to be in violation of applicable laws and regulations, or if we or our third-party manufacturers and suppliers fail to take satisfactory corrective action in response to an adverse inspection, the regulatory authority could take enforcement action, including any of the following sanctions:

Current wording

We continue to monitor our quality management, as well as that of our third-party manufacturers and suppliers to improve our overall level of compliance. Our facilities and those of our third-party manufacturers and key suppliers are subject to periodic and unannounced inspection by U.S. and foreign regulatory agencies to audit compliance with the QMSR and comparable foreign regulations. If our facilities or the facilities of our third-party manufacturers and suppliers are found to be in violation of applicable laws and regulations, or if we or our third-party manufacturers and suppliers fail to take satisfactory corrective action in response to an adverse inspection, the regulatory authority could take enforcement action, including any of the following sanctions:

Previous wording

Our internal computer systems, or those of our customers, collaborators or other contractors, may be subject to cyber-attacks, compromises or security incidents, which could result in a material disruption of our product development programs.

Current wording

Our internal computer systems, or those of our customers, collaborators or other contractors, third-party service providers and vendors may be subject to cyber-attacks, compromises or security incidents, which could result in a material disruption of our product development programs.

Previous wording

Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems and infrastructures and those of our customers, collaborators, contractors, or other third parties are vulnerable to damage, compromise or interruption from computer viruses, unauthorized access, misuse, or other security compromises or breaches. Cyber-attacks are increasing in their frequency, sophistication and intensity, and have become increasingly difficult to detect. Cyber-attacks could include the deployment of harmful malware, ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, wrongful conduct by employees, vendors, or other third parties, hostile foreign governments, industrial espionage, social engineering and business email compromises, and other means to affect service reliability and threaten or compromise the security, confidentiality, integrity and availability of systems and information. Cyber-attacks also could include phishing attempts or e-mail fraud to cause payments or information to be transmitted to an unintended recipient. We have in the past experienced threats and security incidents related to our data and systems, and we may in the future experience other threats, compromises, breaches, or incidents. A cyber-attack or security compromise or incident could cause interruptions in our operations and could result in a material disruption of our business operations, damage to our reputation or a loss of revenues.

Current wording

Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems and infrastructures and those of our customers, collaborators, contractors, third-party service providers, vendors or other third parties are vulnerable to damage, compromise or interruption from computer viruses, unauthorized access, misuse, or other security compromises or breaches. Cyber-attacks are increasing in their frequency, sophistication and intensity, and have become increasingly difficult to detect and may be enhanced or facilitated by AI. Cyber-attacks could include the deployment of harmful malware, ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, wrongful conduct by employees, vendors, or other third parties, hostile foreign governments, industrial espionage, social engineering and business email compromises, and other means to affect service reliability and threaten or compromise the security, confidentiality, integrity and availability of systems and information. Cyber-attacks also could include phishing attempts or e-mail fraud to cause payments or information to be transmitted to an unintended recipient. Further, attempts to disrupt or gain unauthorized access to our and our third-party vendors’ information systems from malicious third parties or insider threats may incorporate widely varying and frequently changing tactics, which may be enhanced or facilitated by AI. Like other companies in our industry, we, and our third-party vendors, have in the past experienced threats and security incidents related to our data and systems, and we may in the future experience other threats, compromises, breaches, or incidents. For example, in February 2026, a third-party service provider notified the Company of a ransomware attack affecting the service provider’s systems, which may have exposed data maintained on Company systems. At this time, the Company does not have sufficient information regarding the scope or impact of the incident to determine whether it is material to the Company. A cyber-attack or security compromise or incident could cause interruptions in our operations and could result in a material disruption of our business operations, damage to our reputation or a loss of revenues.

Previous wording

We could be required to expend significant amounts of money and other resources to detect, mitigate and respond to these threats, compromises, or breaches and to repair or replace information technology systems infrastructure or networks and could suffer financial loss or the loss of valuable confidential and/or proprietary information. In addition, we could be subject to regulatory actions, inquiries, investigations, orders, penalties, fines, and/or claims made by individuals and groups in private litigation, including those involving privacy and security issues related to data collection and use practices and other data privacy and security laws and regulations, including claims for misuse or inappropriate disclosure of data, as well as unfair or deceptive practices. Although we develop and maintain systems and controls designed to prevent these events from occurring, and we have a process designed to identify and mitigate threats, the development and maintenance of these systems, controls and processes is costly and requires ongoing monitoring and updating as technologies change and efforts to overcome security measures become increasingly sophisticated. Moreover, despite our efforts, instances of unauthorized access to our computer systems have occurred in the past, though these events have not resulted in financial loss or disruption to our operations. The possibility of these events occurring in the future cannot be eliminated entirely. There can be no assurance that any measures we take will prevent or adequately address cyber-attacks or security compromises or incidents that could adversely affect our business.

Current wording

We could be required to expend significant amounts of money and other resources to detect, mitigate and respond to these threats, compromises, or breaches and to repair or replace information technology systems infrastructure or networks and could suffer financial loss or the loss of valuable confidential and/or proprietary information. In addition, we could be subject to regulatory actions, inquiries, investigations, orders, penalties, fines, and/or claims made by individuals and groups in private litigation, including those involving privacy and security issues related to data collection and use practices and other data privacy and security laws and regulations, including claims for misuse or inappropriate disclosure of data, as well as unfair or deceptive practices. Although we develop and maintain systems and controls designed to prevent these events from occurring, and we have a process designed to identify and mitigate threats, the development and maintenance of these systems, controls and processes is costly and requires ongoing monitoring and updating as technologies change and efforts to overcome security measures become increasingly sophisticated. Moreover, despite our efforts, instances of unauthorized access to our computer systems have occurred in the past, though these events have not resulted in financial loss or disruption to our operations. The possibility of these events occurring in the future cannot be eliminated entirely. There can be no assurance that any measures we take will prevent or adequately address cyber-attacks or security compromises or incidents that could adversely affect our business. Our contracts may not contain limitations of liability, and even where they do, there can be no assurance that limitations of liability in our contracts are sufficient to protect us from liabilities, damages, or claims related to our privacy and data security obligations. Further, although we maintain cyber liability insurance, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities related to any experienced cybersecurity incident or data breach.

Previous wording

The GDPR imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data outside of the EEA or the UK to countries that do not ensure an adequate level of protection, like the United States in certain circumstances unless adequate safeguards (such as the European Commission approved standard contractual clauses (“SCCs”) or the UK International Data Transfer Agreement/Addendum, (“UK IDTA”) and transfer impact assessments carried out when relying on the SCCs and UK IDTA. The international transfer obligations under the EU data protection laws will require significant effort and cost and may result in us needing to make strategic considerations around where EEA and UK personal data is transferred and which service providers we can utilize for the processing of EEA and UK personal data. Any inability to transfer personal data from the EEA and UK to the United States in compliance with data protection laws may impede our ability to conduct trials and may adversely affect our business and financial position. Although the UK is regarded as a third country under the EU GDPR, the European Commission (“EC”) has now issued a decision recognizing the UK as providing adequate protection under the EU GDPR and, therefore, transfers of personal data originating in the EEA to the UK remain unrestricted. Like the EU GDPR, the UK GDPR restricts personal data transfers outside the UK to countries not regarded by the UK as providing adequate protection. The UK government has confirmed that personal data transfers from the UK to the EEA remain free flowing.

Current wording

The GDPR imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data outside of the EEA or the UK to countries that do not ensure an adequate level of protection, like the United States in certain circumstances unless adequate safeguards (such as the European Commission approved standard contractual clauses (“SCCs”) or the UK International Data Transfer Agreement/Addendum, (“UK IDTA”) and transfer impact assessments carried out when relying on the SCCs and UK IDTA. The international transfer obligations under the EU data protection laws will require significant effort and cost and may result in us needing to make strategic considerations around where EEA and UK personal data is transferred and which service providers we can utilize for the processing of EEA and UK personal data. Any inability to transfer personal data from the EEA and UK to the United States in compliance with data protection laws may impede our ability to conduct trials and may adversely affect our business and financial position. Although the UK is regarded as a third country under the EU GDPR, the European Commission (“EC”) issued a decision recognizing the UK as providing adequate protection under the EU GDPR and, therefore, transfers of personal data originating in the EEA to the UK remain unrestricted. In December 2025, the European Commission adopted a decision to extend the validity of the UK adequacy decision for six years until December 2031, determining that the UK continues to offer a level of data protection that is “essentially equivalent” to the EU standards. This follows the UK’s adoption of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (the “DUAA”) on June 19, 2025. Like the EU GDPR, the UK GDPR restricts personal data transfers outside the UK to countries not regarded by the UK as providing adequate protection. The UK government has confirmed that personal data transfers from the UK to the EEA remain free flowing.

Previous wording

The UK’s data protection regime is independent from but aligned to the EU’s data protection regime. However, following the UK’s exit (“Brexit”) from the European Union (“EU”), there will be increasing scope for divergence in application, interpretation and enforcement of the data protection laws between these territories. For example, the UK Government has announced plans to introduce a Digital Information and Smart Data Bill (“Data Reform Bill”) into the UK legislative process to reform the UK’s data protection regime following Brexit. If passed, the final version of the Digital Reform Bill may have the effect of further altering the similarities between the UK and EEA data protection regimes and threaten the UK adequacy decision from the EU Commission, which may lead to additional compliance costs and could increase our overall risk. The respective provisions and enforcement of the EU GDPR and UK GDPR may further diverge in the future and create additional regulatory challenges and uncertainties. This lack of clarity on future UK laws and regulations and their interaction with EU laws and regulations could add legal risk, complexity and cost to our handling of European personal data and our privacy and data security compliance programs, and could require us to implement different compliance measures for the UK and the EEA.

Current wording

The UK’s data protection regime is independent from but aligned to the EU’s data protection regime. However, following the UK’s exit (“Brexit”) from the European Union (“EU”), there will be increasing scope for divergence in application, interpretation and enforcement of the data protection laws between these territories. For example, the DUAA may have the effect of further altering the similarities between the UK and EEA data protection regimes, which may lead to additional compliance costs and could increase our overall risk. This lack of clarity on future UK laws and regulations and their interaction with EU laws and regulations could add legal risk, complexity and cost to our handling of European personal data and our privacy and data security compliance programs, and could require us to implement different compliance measures for the UK and the EEA.

Previous wording

Litigation to establish or challenge the validity of patents, or to defend against or assert against others infringement, unauthorized use, enforceability or invalidity claims, can be lengthy and expensive and may result in our patents being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our not being granted new patents related to our pending patent applications. Even if we prevail, litigation may be time consuming and force us to incur significant costs, and any damages or other remedies awarded to us may not be valuable and management’s attention could be diverted from managing our business. In addition, U.S. patents and patent applications may be subject to interference proceedings, and U.S. patents may be subject to re-examination and review in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Foreign patents may also be subject to opposition or comparable proceedings in the corresponding foreign patent offices. Any of these proceedings may be expensive and could result in the loss of a patent or denial of a patent application, or the loss or reduction in the scope of one or more of the claims of a patent or patent application.

Current wording

Litigation to establish or challenge the validity of patents, or to defend against or assert against others infringement, unauthorized use, enforceability or invalidity claims, can be lengthy and expensive and may result in our patents being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our not being granted new patents related to our pending patent applications. For example, the validity of one of our patents in Europe is currently being challenged. Even if we prevail, litigation may be time-consuming and force us to incur significant costs, and any damages or other remedies awarded to us may not be valuable and management’s attention could be diverted from managing our business. In addition, U.S. patents and patent applications may be subject to interference proceedings, and U.S. patents may be subject to re-examination and review in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Foreign patents may also be subject to opposition or comparable proceedings in the corresponding foreign patent offices. Any of these proceedings may be expensive and could result in the loss of a patent or denial of a patent application, or the loss or reduction in the scope of one or more of the claims of a patent or patent application.

Previous wording

In addition, we seek to protect our trade secrets, know-how and confidential information that is not patentable by entering into confidentiality and assignment agreements with our employees and certain of our contractors and confidentiality agreements with certain of our consultants, scientific advisors and other vendors and contractors. However, we may fail to enter into the necessary agreements, and even if entered into, these agreements may be breached or otherwise fail to prevent disclosure, third-party infringement or misappropriation of our proprietary information, may be limited as to their term and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure or use of proprietary information. Enforcing a claim that a third-party illegally obtained and is using our trade secrets is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. We also have taken precautions to initiate reasonable safeguards to protect our information technology systems. However, these measures may not be adequate to safeguard our proprietary information, which could lead to the loss or impairment thereof or to expensive litigation to defend our rights against competitors who may be better funded and have superior resources. In addition, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or reverse engineer certain aspects of our products that we consider proprietary or our proprietary information may otherwise become known or may be independently developed by our competitors or other third parties. If other parties are able to use our proprietary technology or information, our ability to compete in the market could be harmed. Further, unauthorized use of our intellectual property may have occurred, or may occur in the future, without our knowledge.

Current wording

In addition, we seek to protect our trade secrets, know-how and confidential information that is not patentable by entering into confidentiality and assignment agreements with our employees and certain of our contractors and confidentiality agreements with certain of our consultants, scientific advisors and other vendors and contractors. However, we may fail to enter into the necessary agreements, and even if entered into, these agreements may be breached or otherwise fail to prevent disclosure, third-party infringement or misappropriation of our proprietary information, may be limited as to their term and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure or use of proprietary information. Enforcing a claim that a third-party illegally obtained and is using our trade secrets is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. We have also taken precautions to initiate reasonable safeguards to protect our information technology systems. However, these measures may not be adequate to safeguard our proprietary information, which could lead to the loss or impairment thereof or to expensive litigation to defend our rights against competitors who may be better funded and have superior resources. In addition, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or reverse engineer certain aspects of our products that we consider proprietary or our proprietary information may otherwise become known or may be independently developed by our competitors or other third parties. If other parties are able to use our proprietary technology or information, our ability to compete in the market could be harmed. Further, unauthorized use of our intellectual property may have occurred, or may occur in the future, without our knowledge.

Previous wording

We rely on trademark protection to distinguish our products from the products of our competitors. We have registered the trademarks “MyoPro” (Registration No. 4,532,331), “MYOMO” (Registration No. 4,451,445), “MyoPal” (Registration No. 6,086,533) and “MyoCare” (Registration No. 6,579,736) in the United States. The MyoPro mark is registered in Canada and in selected EU countries with pending registration. In jurisdictions where we have not yet registered our trademark and are using it, and as permitted by applicable local law, we seek to rely on common law trademark protection where available. Third parties may oppose our trademark applications, or otherwise challenge our use of the trademarks, and may be able to use our trademarks in jurisdictions where they are not registered or otherwise protected by law. If our trademarks are successfully challenged or if a third-party is using confusingly similar or identical trademarks in particular jurisdictions before we do, we could be forced to rebrand our products, which could result in loss of brand recognition, and could require us to devote additional resources to marketing new brands. If others are able to use our trademarks, our ability to distinguish our products may be impaired, which could adversely affect our business. Further, we cannot assure you that competitors will not infringe upon our trademarks, or that we will have adequate resources to enforce our trademarks.

Current wording

We rely on trademark protection to distinguish our products from the products of our competitors. We have registered the trademarks “MyoPro” (Registration No. 4,532,331), “MYOMO” (Registration No. 4,451,445), “MyoPal” (Registration No. 6,086,533), “MyoCare” (Registration No. 6,579,736) and MyoCoach (Registration No. 6,867,077) in the United States. The MyoPro mark is registered in Canada and in selected EU countries. In jurisdictions where we have not yet registered our trademark and are using it, and as permitted by applicable local law, we seek to rely on common law trademark protection where available. Third parties may oppose our trademark applications, or otherwise challenge our use of the trademarks, and may be able to use our trademarks in jurisdictions where they are not registered or otherwise protected by law. If our trademarks are successfully challenged or if a third-party is using confusingly similar or identical trademarks in particular jurisdictions before we do, we could be forced to rebrand our products, which could result in loss of brand recognition, and could require us to devote additional resources to marketing new brands. If others are able to use our trademarks, our ability to distinguish our products may be impaired, which could adversely affect our business. Further, we cannot assure you that competitors will not infringe upon our trademarks, or that we will have adequate resources to enforce our trademarks.

Previous wording

Our stockholders will experience significant dilution upon the issuance of common stock if the shares of our common stock underlying our warrants are exercised or converted.

Current wording

Our stockholders will experience significant dilution upon the issuance of common stock if the shares of our common stock underlying our warrants are exercised or converted or if Avenue elects to convert some principal payments into common stock.

Previous wording

We have a significant number of securities convertible into, or allowing the purchase of, our common stock. Investors could be subject to increased dilution upon the conversion or exercise of these securities. For example, in conjunction with equity offerings in January 2024, August 2023 and January 2023, we issued 224,730, 1,920,000 and 6,830,926 pre-funded warrants, respectively. Each pre-funded warrant is exercisable for one share of common stock at the nominal exercise price of $0.0001 per share. As of December 31, 2024, we had 7,061,519 shares issuable upon the exercise of pre-funded warrants with an exercise price of $0.0001 per share, 668,250 shares issuable upon the exercise of other warrants, with a weighted-average exercise price of $7.50 per share and 1,218,792 unvested restricted stock units outstanding. In addition, we had 23,194 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options under our equity incentive plans, with a weighted-average exercise price of $42.98 per share.

Current wording

We have a significant number of securities convertible into, or allowing the purchase of, our common stock. Investors could be subject to increased dilution upon the conversion or exercise of these securities. For example, in conjunction with equity offerings in January 2024, August 2023 and January 2023, we issued 224,730, 1,920,000 and 6,830,926 pre-funded warrants, respectively. Each pre-funded warrant is exercisable for one share of common stock at the nominal exercise price of $0.0001 per share. As of December 31, 2025, we had 3,763,258 shares issuable upon the exercise of pre-funded warrants with an exercise price of $0.0001 per share, 1,367,187 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants issued to Avenue, with an exercise price of $0.96 per share (subject to adjustment in the event we complete an equity offering at a lower price per share before June 30, 2026). In addition, Avenue, at their sole discretion, can convert up to $3 million of principle ($4 million if the second tranche is borrowed) at a price per share of $1.15. We also have 1,752,473 unvested restricted stock units outstanding and 21,494 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options under our equity incentive plans, with a weighted-average exercise price of $45.00 per share.

Previous wording

The stock market in general, and the market price of our common stock in particular will likely be subject to fluctuation, whether due to, or irrespective of, our operating results, financial condition and prospects. For example, from December 31, 2023 to December 31, 2024, the high and low sales price of our common stock on the NYSE American has fluctuated from a low of $2.51 to a high of $6.74 per share. During the period from January 1, 2025 to the date of the filing of this report, our stock price has ranged from $4.21 to $7.17.

Current wording

The stock market in general, and the market price of our common stock in particular will likely be subject to fluctuation, whether due to, or irrespective of, our operating results, financial condition and prospects. For example, from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025, the high and low sales price of our common stock on the NYSE American has fluctuated from a low of $0.71 to a high of $7.17 per share. During the period from January 1, 2026 to the date of the filing of this report, our stock price has ranged from $0.64 to $1.10.

Showing the first 40 of 48 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.

Rearranged current paragraphs (1)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Sales of our device depend, in part, on the extent to which our products are covered by third-party payers, such as government health programs, commercial insurance and managed healthcare organizations. See section titled “Business Section – Government Regulation – Health Insurance Reimbursement”, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Third-party payers are increasingly challenging the prices charged, examining the medical necessity and creating additional restrictions on coverage, and reviewing the cost-effectiveness of medical products and services and imposing controls to manage costs. For example, revenue from patients with Medicare Advantage plans decreased by 2% in 2025 compared to 2024. Third-party payers may limit coverage to specific products on an approved list, also known as a formulary, which might not include all of the approved products for a particular indication. In addition, CMS may issue local or national coverage determinations which could result in more restrictive coverage for our products. The coverage determination process is often a time-consuming and costly process that requires us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our products to each payer separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be obtained.