LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 26, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Feb 26, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-27.
0000950170-25-029046
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-02-26.
0001193125-26-076810
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 145 previous paragraphs and 144 current paragraphs.
115 unchanged; 27 reworded; 2 added; 3 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 1 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (2)
Current report
For example, the United States government recently announced and, in some cases, implemented tariffs on certain products from various countries, which resulted in certain affected countries imposing or threatening to impose retaliatory or reciprocal tariffs on products from the United States, including agricultural products such as corn. The trade policies and tariff initiatives of the current Presidential administration could adversely affect certain markets within which we operate. Specifically, the imposition of tariffs on agricultural products, including any retaliatory or reciprocal tariffs imposed by other countries, could impact the selling prices of our products or the cost of imported components or equipment used in our capital activities. In addition, such policies could lead to reduced demand for agricultural and consumer products, increase input costs for our customers, and disrupt supply chains.
Current report
The ultimate impact of changing trade policies on our business will depend on various factors, including the magnitude, duration and nature of tariffs. While we actively monitor these developments, we may not be able to fully mitigate the adverse impact of potential tariff initiatives or other trade-related disruptions.
Removed paragraphs (3)
Previous report
Domestic and regional inflation trends, increased interest rates and other factors could lead to the erosion of economies and adversely impact us.
Previous report
The following is a list of terms used in this report.
Reworded paragraphs (27)
Previous wording
The price of natural gas in North America and worldwide has been volatile in recent years and had declined on average due in part to the development of significant natural gas reserves, including shale gas, and the rapid improvement in shale gas extraction techniques, such as hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling. However, recent disruptions in the global supply chain may continue to have an impact in the near term in fiscal year 2025. Future production of natural gas from shale formations could be reduced by regulatory changes that restrict drilling or hydraulic fracturing or increase its cost or by reduction in oil exploration and development prompted by lower oil prices and resulting in production of less associated natural gas. Additionally, increased demand for natural gas, particularly in the Gulf Coast Region, due to increased industrial demand and increased natural gas exports could result in increased natural gas prices.
Current wording
The price of natural gas in North America is volatile and impacted by geopolitical instability, the level of domestic drilling activity and temporary supply disruption from severe weather events. In addition, future production of natural gas from shale formations could be reduced by regulatory changes that restrict drilling or hydraulic fracturing or increase its cost or by reduction in oil exploration and development prompted by lower oil prices and resulting in production of less associated natural gas. Further, increased demand for natural gas, particularly in the Gulf Coast Region, due to increased industrial demand, increased power generation demand, especially from artificial intelligence data centers, and increased natural gas exports could result in increased natural gas prices.
Previous wording
The equipment required for the manufacture of our products is specialized, and the time for replacement of such equipment can be lengthy, resulting in extended downtime in the affected unit. In addition, the cost for such equipment could be influenced by changes in regulatory policies (including tariffs) of foreign governments, as well as the U.S. laws and policies affecting foreign trade and investment. Although we use various reliability and inspection programs and maintain a significant inventory of spare equipment, which are intended to mitigate the extent of production losses, unplanned outages may still occur. As a result, these planned and unplanned downtime events at our chemical facilities have in the past and could in the future adversely affect our liquidity, operating results and financial condition.
Current wording
The equipment required for the manufacture of our products is specialized, and the time for replacement of such equipment can be lengthy, resulting in extended downtime in the affected unit. In addition, the cost for such equipment could be influenced by changes in regulatory policies (including tariffs) of foreign governments, as well as the United States laws and policies affecting foreign trade and investment. Although we use various reliability and inspection programs and maintain a significant inventory of spare equipment, which are intended to mitigate the extent of production losses, unplanned outages may still occur. As a result, these planned and unplanned downtime events at our chemical facilities have in the past and could in the future adversely affect our liquidity, operating results and financial condition.
Previous wording
Our operations are subject to hazards inherent in the manufacture, transportation, storage and distribution of chemical products, including some products that are highly toxic and corrosive. These hazards include, among other things, explosions; fires; severe weather and natural disasters; train derailments, collisions, vessel groundings and other transportation and maritime incidents; leaks and ruptures involving storage tanks, pipelines and rail cars; spills, discharges and releases of toxic or hazardous substances or gases; deliberate sabotage and terrorist incidents; mechanical failures; unscheduled plant downtime; labor difficulties and other risks. Some of these hazards can cause bodily injury and loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property and equipment and environmental damage and may result in suspension of operations for an extended period of time and/or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties and liabilities. We periodically experience minor releases of ammonia related to leaks from our equipment. Similar events may occur in the future. As a result, such events could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Current wording
Our operations are subject to hazards inherent in the manufacture, transportation, storage and distribution of chemical products, including some products that are highly toxic and corrosive. These hazards include, among other things, explosions; fires; severe weather and natural disasters; train derailments, collisions, vessel groundings and other transportation and maritime incidents; leaks and ruptures involving storage tanks, pipelines and rail cars; spills, discharges and releases of toxic or hazardous substances or gases; deliberate sabotage and terrorist incidents; mechanical failures; unscheduled plant downtime; labor difficulties and other risks. Some of these hazards have and may in the future cause bodily injury and loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property and equipment and environmental damage and may result in suspension of operations for an extended period of time and/or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties and liabilities. We periodically experience minor releases of ammonia related to leaks from our equipment. Similar events may occur in the future. As a result, such events could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Previous wording
We rely on railroad, trucking, pipeline and other transportation service providers to transport raw materials to our manufacturing facilities, to coordinate and deliver finished products to our storage and distribution system and our retail centers and to ship finished products to our customers. These transportation operations, equipment and services are subject to various hazards, including adverse operating conditions, extreme weather conditions, system failures, work stoppages, equipment and personnel shortages, delays, accidents such as spills and derailments and other accidents and operating hazards.
Current wording
We rely on railroad, trucking, pipeline and other transportation service providers to transport raw materials to our manufacturing facilities, to coordinate and deliver finished products to our storage and distribution system and to ship finished products to our customers. These transportation operations, equipment and services are subject to various hazards, including adverse operating conditions, extreme weather conditions, system failures, work stoppages, equipment and personnel shortages, delays, accidents such as spills and derailments and other accidents and operating hazards.
Previous wording
We compete with many U.S. producers and producers in other countries, including state-owned and government-subsidized entities. Some competitors have greater total resources and are less dependent on earnings from chemical sales, which makes them less vulnerable to industry downturns and better positioned to pursue new expansion and development opportunities. Our competitive position could suffer to the extent we are not able to expand our own resources sufficiently either through investments in new or existing operations or through acquisitions, joint ventures or partnerships. An inability to compete successfully could result in the loss of customers, which could adversely affect our sales and profitability.
Current wording
We compete with many United States producers and producers in other countries, including state-owned and government-subsidized entities. Some competitors have greater total resources and are less dependent on earnings from chemical sales, which makes them less vulnerable to industry downturns and better positioned to pursue new expansion and development opportunities. Our competitive position could suffer to the extent we are not able to expand our own resources sufficiently either through investments in new or existing operations or through acquisitions, joint ventures or partnerships. An inability to compete successfully could result in the loss of customers, which could adversely affect our sales and profitability.
Previous wording
For 2024, five customers accounted for approximately 30% of our consolidated net sales. The loss of, or a material reduction in purchase levels by, one or more of these customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity if we are unable to replace one or more customers with other sales on substantially similar terms.
Current wording
For 2025, five customers accounted for approximately 32% of our consolidated net sales. The loss of, or a material reduction in purchase levels by, one or more of these customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity if we are unable to replace one or more customers with other sales on substantially similar terms.
Previous wording
As we continue to increase our dependence on information technologies to conduct our operations the risks associated with cybersecurity also increase. Cybersecurity breaches may be the result of, among other things, negligent or unauthorized activity by our employees or by third parties who use cyber-attack techniques involving malware, ransomware, hacking and phishing. Such cyber-attacks continue to increase in frequency and potential harm, and the methods used to gain unauthorized access evolve, making it increasingly difficult to anticipate, prevent, and detect incidents. We rely on our enterprise resource planning software and other information systems, among other things, to manage our manufacturing, supply chain, accounting and financial functions. Additionally, third parties on whose systems we place significant reliance for the conduct of our business are also subject to cybersecurity risks. We are significantly dependent upon internet connectivity and a third-party cloud hosting vendor. We have implemented security procedures and measures in order to protect our information from being vulnerable to theft, loss, damage or interruption from a number of potential sources or events. Although we believe these measures and procedures are appropriate, we may not have the resources or technical sophistication to anticipate, prevent, or recover from rapidly evolving types of cyber-attacks. Compromises to our information systems could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.
Current wording
As we continue to increase our dependence on information technologies to conduct our operations the risks associated with cybersecurity also increase. Cybersecurity breaches may be the result of, among other things, negligent or unauthorized activity by our employees or by third parties who use cyber-attack techniques involving malware, ransomware, hacking and phishing. Such cyber-attacks continue to increase in frequency and potential harm, and the methods used to gain unauthorized access evolve, making it increasingly difficult to anticipate, prevent, and detect incidents. We rely on our enterprise resource planning software and other information systems, among other things, to manage our manufacturing, supply chain, accounting and financial functions. Additionally, third parties on whose systems we place significant reliance for the conduct of our business are also subject to cybersecurity risks. We are significantly dependent upon internet connectivity and a third-party cloud hosting vendor. We have implemented security procedures and measures in order to protect our information from being vulnerable to theft, loss, damage or interruption from a number of potential sources or events. Although we believe these measures and procedures are appropriate, we may not have the resources or technical sophistication to anticipate, prevent, or recover from rapidly evolving types of cyber-attacks, including the risks from emerging technologies like artificial intelligence. Compromises to our information systems could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.
Previous wording
From time to time, our business is affected by cyclical factors such as inflation, currency exchange rates, global energy policy and costs, regulatory policies (including tariffs), global market conditions and economic downturns in specific industries. Certain sales are sensitive to the level of activity in the agricultural, mining, automotive and housing industries. Therefore, substantial changes in these factors could adversely affect our operating results, liquidity, financial condition and capital resources.
Current wording
From time to time, our business is affected by cyclical factors such as inflation, currency exchange rates, global energy policy and costs, regulatory policies (including tariffs), global market conditions and economic downturns in specific industries. Certain sales are sensitive to the level of activity in the agricultural, mining, automotive and housing industries. Therefore, substantial changes in these macroeconomic factors could adversely affect our operating results, liquidity, financial condition and capital resources.
Previous wording
In addition, conditions in the international market for nitrogen fertilizer significantly influence our operating results. The international market for fertilizers is influenced by such factors as the relative value of the U.S. currency and its impact on the importation of fertilizers, foreign agricultural policies, the existence of, or changes in, import or foreign currency exchange barriers in certain foreign markets and other regulatory policies (including tariffs) of foreign governments, as well as the U.S. laws and policies affecting foreign trade and investment.
Current wording
In addition, conditions in the international market for nitrogen fertilizer significantly influence our operating results. The international market for fertilizers is influenced by such factors as the global supply and demand balance for each product and changes in the volume of international trade, the relative value of the United States currency and its impact on the importation of fertilizers, foreign agricultural policies, the existence of, or changes in, import duties (including tariffs, anti-dumping duties and counter-vailing duties) or foreign currency exchange barriers in certain foreign markets and other regulatory policies of foreign governments, as well as the United States laws and policies affecting foreign trade and investment.
Previous wording
Both the U.S. and many other countries are experiencing inflation, which, in turn, is leading to increased costs in multiple industry segments, including agriculture and related industries. The persistence of inflation has led central bankers to increase interest rates within their regions. There is no guarantee that these measures will arrest the inflationary trend. Further, these factors, taken together with reduced productivity and constraints on the labor supply could lead to recessionary periods in the regions in which the Company does business. While we will take measures within our control to manage the effects of inflation, higher interest rates and other factors, ultimately, they are outside of our control. Further, the persistence and/or severity of one or more of them could adversely affect our financial performance and/or operations.
Current wording
In recent years, both the United States and many other countries have experienced higher than normal inflation, which, in turn, lead to increased costs in multiple industry segments, including agriculture and related industries. The persistence of inflation had led central bankers to increase interest rates within their regions although the Federal Reserve has implemented rate cuts during the past year. While inflation has decreased, there remain various factors that can cause prices to rise again. There is no guarantee that current monetary policy will arrest inflationary pressures. Further, these factors, taken together with reduced productivity and constraints on the labor supply could lead to recessionary periods in the regions in which the Company does business. While we will take measures within our control to manage the effects of inflation, higher interest rates and other factors, ultimately, they are outside of our control. Further, the persistence and/or severity of one or more of them could adversely affect our financial performance and/or operations.
Previous wording
An increase of imported agricultural products could adversely affect our business.
Current wording
An increase of imported nitrogen based products could adversely affect our business.
Previous wording
Russia, Ukraine and Trinidad have substantial capacity to produce and export fertilizers. Producers in these countries also benefit from below-market prices for natural gas, due to government regulation and other factors.
Current wording
Russia, Northern Africa and the Middle East have substantial capacity to produce and export fertilizers. Producers in some of these countries and regions also benefit from below-market prices for natural gas, due to government regulation and other factors.
Previous wording
In addition, producers in China have substantial capacity to produce and export urea. Depending on various factors, including prevailing prices from other exporters, the price of coal and regulatory policies, including the price of China’s export tariff, higher volumes of urea from China could be imported into the U.S. at prices that could have an adverse effect on the selling prices of other nitrogen products, including the nitrogen products we manufacture and sell.
Current wording
In addition, producers in China have substantial capacity to produce and export ammonia and urea. Depending on various factors, including prevailing prices from other exporters, the price of coal and regulatory policies, including the limitation of export volumes through quotas, higher volumes of urea from China could be imported into the U.S. at prices that could have an adverse effect on the selling prices of other nitrogen products, including the nitrogen products we manufacture and sell.
Previous wording
Natural disasters may also directly affect our physical facilities, especially our chemical facilities, or those of our suppliers or customers and could affect our sales, our production capability and our ability to deliver products to our customers. In the past, hurricanes affecting the Gulf Coast of the U.S. have negatively affected our operations and those of our customers. Any future natural disasters affecting the areas in which we or our suppliers or customers operation could negatively affect our business operations and financial performance.
Current wording
Natural disasters may also directly affect our physical facilities, especially our chemical facilities, or those of our suppliers or customers and could affect our sales, our production capability and our ability to deliver products to our customers. In the past, extreme weather such as severe storms, frigid cold temperatures, flooding and hurricanes affecting the Gulf Coast of the United States have negatively affected our operations and those of our customers. Any future natural disasters affecting the areas in which we or our suppliers or customers operation could negatively affect our business operations and financial performance.
Previous wording
Geopolitical conditions, including political turmoil and volatility, regional conflicts, terrorism and war have negatively affected and could negatively affect U.S. and foreign companies, the financial markets, the industries where we operate, our operations and our profitability.
Current wording
Geopolitical conditions, including political turmoil and volatility, regional conflicts, terrorism and war have negatively affected and could negatively affect United States and foreign companies, the financial markets, the industries where we operate, our operations and our profitability.
Previous wording
Geopolitical events, instability and terrorist attacks in the United States and elsewhere, including events like Russia’s occupation of Ukraine and ongoing conflict in the Middle East, have in the past and can in the future negatively affect our operations. While the occupation of Ukraine has had an effect on commodity prices and fertilizer supply (primarily ammonia and urea from Russia), there is no guarantee that the current conflict will not draw military intervention from other countries or further retaliation from Russia, which, in turn, could lead to a much larger conflict. It is possible that supply chain, trade routes and the markets we currently serve could be further adversely affected, which, in turn, could materially, adversely affect our business operations and financial performance.
Current wording
Geopolitical events, instability and terrorist attacks in the United States and elsewhere have in the past, and can in the future negatively affect our operations. For example, Russia’s occupation of Ukraine and the ongoing conflict in the Middle East have impacted our operations. While the occupation of Ukraine has had an effect on commodity prices and fertilizer supply (primarily ammonia and urea from Russia), there is no guarantee that the current conflict will not draw military intervention from other countries or further retaliation from Russia, which, in turn, could lead to a much larger conflict. It is possible that production volumes, supply chain and trade routes for our products that are traded globally, and the markets we currently serve, could be further adversely affected, which, in turn, could materially, adversely affect our business operations and financial performance. Instability in the Middle East, especially Iran, and in Venezuela, may impact global energy prices, in particular oil prices. This could impact United States oil and natural gas prices, which, in turn, could materially, adversely affect our business operations and financial performance.
Previous wording
For example, we may not be able to maintain a level of cash flows sufficient to pay the principal and interest on our debt, including the $478 million principal amount of our 6.25% senior secured notes due 2028 (the “Senior Secured Notes”). In addition, if we were to draw on our Revolving Credit Facility, such borrowings would be at variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk.
Current wording
For example, we may not be able to maintain a level of cash flows sufficient to pay the principal and interest on our debt, including the $438.6 million principal amount of our 6.25% senior secured notes due 2028 (the “Senior Secured Notes”). In addition, if we were to draw on our Revolving Credit Facility, such borrowings would be at variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk.
Previous wording
Our business is subject to numerous health, safety, security and environmental laws and regulations. The manufacture and distribution of chemical products and our other activities entail health, safety and environmental risks and impose obligations under health, safety and environmental laws and regulations, many of which provide for substantial fines, injunctive relief and potential criminal sanctions for violations. Although we believe we have established processes to monitor, review and manage our businesses to comply with the numerous health, safety and environmental laws and regulations, we previously were, and in the future, may be, subject to fines, penalties, sanctions and injunctive relief for violations and substantial expenditures for cleanup costs and other liabilities relating to the handling, manufacture, use, emission, discharge or disposal of wastes, effluents, emission and other materials at or from our present and former chemical facilities. Further, a number of our facilities are dependent on environmental permits to operate, the loss, or inability to renew or modification of which could have a material adverse effect on their operations and our results of operation and financial condition. These operating permits are subject to modification, renewal and revocation. In addition, third parties may contest our ability to receive or renew certain permits that we need to operate, which can lengthen the application process or even prevent us from obtaining necessary permits. Delays in obtaining permits or unanticipated permit conditions could delay projects, increase the costs of operations or make operations unfeasible. We regularly monitor and review our operations, procedures and policies for compliance with permits, laws and regulations. Despite these compliance efforts, risk of noncompliance, the risk of loss or modification of permits or changing regulatory or permit interpretation is inherent in the operation of our business.
Current wording
Our business is subject to numerous health, safety, security and environmental laws and regulations. The manufacture, storage, handling and distribution of chemical products entail health, safety and environmental risks and impose obligations under health, safety and environmental laws and regulations, many of which provide for substantial fines, injunctive relief and potential criminal sanctions for violations. Although we believe we have established processes to monitor, review and manage our businesses to comply with the numerous health, safety and environmental laws and regulations, we previously were, and in the future, may be, subject to fines, penalties, sanctions and injunctive relief for violations and substantial expenditures for cleanup costs and other liabilities relating to the handling, manufacture, use, storage, emission, release, discharge or disposal of wastes, pollutants, effluents, hazardous substances, and other materials at or from our present and former chemical facilities, or where third-party sites where we disposed our wastes. Further, a number of our facilities are dependent on environmental permits to operate, the loss, or inability to renew or modification of which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate those facilities and, as a result, a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. These operating permits are subject to modification, renewal and revocation. In addition, third parties may contest our ability to receive or renew certain permits that we need to operate, which can lengthen the application process or even prevent us from obtaining necessary permits. Delays in obtaining permits or unanticipated permit conditions could delay projects, increase the costs of operations or make operations unfeasible. We regularly monitor and review our operations, procedures and policies for compliance with permits, laws and regulations. Despite these compliance efforts, risk of noncompliance, the risk of loss or modification of permits or changing regulatory or permit interpretation is inherent in the operation of our business.
Previous wording
Explosions and/or losses at other chemical facilities that we do not own (such as the April 2013 explosion in West, Texas) could also result in new or additional legislation or regulatory changes, particularly relating to public health, safety or any of the products manufactured and/or sold by us or the inability on the part of our customers to obtain or maintain insurance as to certain products manufactured and/or sold by us, which could have a negative effect on our revenues, cash flow and liquidity.
Current wording
Explosions, release incidents, and/or losses at other chemical facilities that we do not own or operate (such as the April 2013 explosion in West, Texas) could also result in new or additional legislation or regulatory changes, particularly relating to public health, safety or any of the products manufactured and/or sold by us or the inability on the part of our customers to obtain or maintain insurance as to certain products manufactured and/or sold by us, which could have a negative effect on our revenues, cash flow and liquidity.
Previous wording
Additionally, under CERCLA or similar state statutes, we may be required to conduct environmental investigation and remediation (and pay for natural resource damages) at presently or formerly owned or operated sites or at sites at which materials from our operations have been disposed or released. Such liability is often strict and joint and several, meaning that we may be required to pay a disproportionate share of remediation costs if other responsible parties are unable to pay. Additionally, we could be required to conduct additional cleanup at sites where we previously participated in remediation efforts in response to new information or new regulatory requirements. Although we cannot presently provide a precise estimate of the ultimate cost of the exposure with respect to investigation and remediation obligations, we make accruals as warranted and we do not believe that the reasonably possible range of loss in excess of accruals would be material to our operations. However, given the uncertainties inherent to any estimation of remediation costs, potential changing regulations, the uncertainties of litigation and other factors, the ultimate amounts that we pay or expend could vary significantly from the amount we accrue and have a material impact on our business and operations.
Current wording
Additionally, under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act or similar state statutes, we may be required to conduct environmental investigation and remediation (and pay for natural resource damages) at presently or formerly owned or operated sites or at sites at which materials from our operations have been disposed or released. Such liability is strict and joint and several, meaning that we may be required to pay a disproportionate share of remediation costs if other responsible parties are unable to pay. Additionally, we could be required to conduct additional cleanup at sites where we previously participated in remediation efforts in response to new information or new regulatory requirements. Although we cannot presently provide a precise estimate of the ultimate cost of the exposure with respect to investigation and remediation obligations, we make accruals as warranted and we do not believe that the reasonably possible range of loss in excess of accruals would be material to our operations. However, given the uncertainties inherent to any estimation of remediation costs, potential changing regulations, the uncertainties of litigation and other factors, the ultimate amounts that we pay or expend could vary significantly from the amount we accrue and have a material impact on our business and operations.
Previous wording
The “Secure Handling of Ammonium Nitrate Act of 2007” was enacted by the U.S. Congress, and subsequently the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) published a notice of proposed rulemaking in 2011. This regulation proposes to require sellers, buyers, their agents and transporters of solid AN and certain solid mixtures containing AN to possess a valid registration issued by DHS, keep certain records, report the theft or unexplained loss of regulated materials, and comply with certain other new requirements. We and others affected by this proposal have submitted appropriate comments to DHS regarding the proposed regulation. It is possible that DHS could significantly revise the requirements currently being proposed. Depending on the provisions of the final regulation to be promulgated by DHS and on our ability to pass these costs to our customers, these requirements may have a negative effect on the profitability of our AN business and may result in fewer distributors who are willing to handle the product. DHS has not finalized this rule, and has indicated that its next action, and the timing of such an action, is undetermined.
Current wording
The “Secure Handling of Ammonium Nitrate Act of 2007” was enacted by the United States Congress and directs the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) to regulate the sale, transfer, and possession of ammonium nitrate. Subsequently, DHS published a notice of proposed rulemaking in 2011 that would require sellers, buyers, their agents and transporters of solid AN and certain solid mixtures containing AN to possess a valid registration issued by DHS, keep certain records, report the theft or unexplained loss of regulated materials, and comply with certain other new requirements. We and others affected by this proposal submitted appropriate comments to DHS regarding the proposed regulation. The regulation was not finalized, and DHS has indicated that its next action, and the timing of such an action, is undetermined. It is possible that DHS could again propose similar or revised requirements. Depending on the provisions of any promulgated regulation by DHS and on our ability to pass these costs to our customers, these requirements may have a negative effect on the profitability of our AN business and may result in fewer distributors who are willing to handle the product.
Previous wording
On August 1, 2013, U.S. President Obama issued an executive order addressing the safety and security of chemical facilities in response to recent incidents involving chemicals such as the explosion at West, Texas. The President directed federal agencies to enhance existing regulations and make recommendations to the U.S. Congress to develop new laws that may affect our business. In January 2016, the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (“CSB”) released its final report on the West, Texas incident. The CSB report identifies several federal and state regulations and standards that could be strengthened to reduce the risk of a similar incident occurring in the future. While the CSB does not have authority to directly regulate our business, the findings in this report, and other activities taken in response to the West, Texas incident by federal, state, and local regulators may result in additional regulation of our processes and products.
Current wording
On August 1, 2013, United States President Obama issued an executive order addressing the safety and security of chemical facilities in response to recent incidents involving chemicals such as the explosion at West, Texas. The President directed federal agencies to enhance existing regulations and make recommendations to the United States Congress to develop new laws that may affect our business. In January 2016, the United States Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (“CSB”) released its final report on the West, Texas incident. The CSB report identifies several federal and state regulations and standards that could be strengthened to reduce the risk of a similar incident occurring in the future. While the CSB does not have authority to directly regulate our business (beyond accidental release reporting), the findings in this report, and other activities taken in response to the West, Texas incident by federal, state, and local regulators may result in additional regulation of our processes and products.
Previous wording
In 2024, the U.S. EPA finalized revisions to its Risk Management Program (“RMP”) under Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act. The revisions are the results of many years of back-and-forth among changing administrations. The current RMP rule includes requirements for certain facilities to perform hazard analyses including a safer technologies and alternatives analysis, an analysis of natural hazards, third-party auditing in certain circumstances, increased transparency (including incident reports and making certain information publicly available), and new emergency response requirements. Although the new rule was effective in 2024, many of the new requirements have a 2027 implementation timeline. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is likewise considering changes to its Process Safety Management standards. In addition, DHS, the EPA, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives updated a joint chemical advisory on the safe storage, handling, and management of AN. While these actions may result in additional regulatory requirements or changes to our operators, it is difficult to predict at this time how these and any other possible regulations, if and when adopted, will affect our business, operations, liquidity or financial results.
Current wording
In 2024, the United States EPA finalized revisions to its Risk Management Program (“RMP”) under Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act. The revisions are the results of many years of back-and-forth among changing administrations. The current RMP rule includes requirements for certain facilities to perform hazard analyses including a safer technologies and alternatives analysis, an analysis of natural hazards, third-party auditing in certain circumstances, increased transparency (including incident reports and making certain information publicly available), and new emergency response requirements. Although the new rule was effective in 2024, many of the new requirements have a 2027 implementation timeline. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is likewise considering changes to its Process Safety Management standards. In addition, DHS, the EPA, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives updated a joint chemical advisory on the safe storage, handling, and management of AN. While these actions may result in additional regulatory requirements or changes to our operators, it is difficult to predict at this time how these and any other possible regulations, if and when adopted, will affect our business, operations, liquidity or financial results.
Previous wording
Greenhouse gas regulation could: increase the price of the electricity and other energy sources purchased by our chemical facilities; increase costs for natural gas and other raw materials (such as ammonia); potentially restrict access to or the use of certain raw materials necessary to produce our chemical products; and require us to incur substantial expenditures to retrofit our chemical facilities to comply with the proposed new laws and regulations regulating greenhouse gas emissions. Federal, state and local governments may also pass laws mandating the use of alternative energy sources, such as wind power and solar energy, which may increase the cost of energy use in certain of our chemical and other manufacturing operations. For example, over time, the EPA has promulgated rules seeking to limit greenhouse gases from electric power plants. Various of these rules have been either struck down in court or repealed with changes in administration. The EPA’s most recent attempt to limit greenhouse gasses from power plants was finalized in 2024 and was subject to immediate legal challenge. Should the rule be upheld, it could result in increased electricity costs.
Current wording
Greenhouse gas regulation could: increase the price of the electricity and other energy sources purchased by our chemical facilities; increase costs for natural gas and other raw materials (such as ammonia); potentially restrict access to or the use of certain raw materials necessary to produce our chemical products; and require us to incur substantial expenditures to retrofit our chemical facilities to comply with the proposed new laws and regulations regulating greenhouse gas emissions. Federal, state and local governments may also pass laws mandating the use of alternative energy sources, such as wind power and solar energy, which may increase the cost of energy use in certain of our chemical and other manufacturing operations. For example, over time, the EPA has promulgated rules seeking to limit greenhouse gases from electric power plants. Various of these rules have been either struck down in court or repealed with changes in administration. The EPA’s most recent attempt to limit greenhouse gasses from power plants was finalized in 2024 and was subject to immediate legal challenge. Should the rule be upheld, it could result in increased electricity costs and increased operating restrictions.
Previous wording
If we, or other companies with which we do business become subject to laws or regulations related to climate change, it could have a material adverse effect on us. The United States may enact new laws, regulations and interpretations relating to climate change, including potential cap-and-trade systems, carbon taxes and other requirements relating to reduction of carbon footprints and/or greenhouse gas emissions. Other countries have enacted climate change laws and regulations, and the United States has been involved in discussions regarding international climate change treaties, although the continued commitment to such treaties is uncertain under the Trump administration. The federal government and some of the states and localities in which we operate have considered or have enacted certain climate change laws and regulations relating to greenhouse gas emissions or requiring disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions. Although these laws and regulations have not had any known material adverse effect on us to date, they could result in substantial costs, including compliance costs, monitoring and reporting costs and capital. Furthermore, our reputation could be damaged if we violate climate change laws or regulations. We cannot predict how future laws and regulations, or future interpretations of current laws and regulations, related to climate change will affect our business, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition. Lastly, the potential physical impacts of climate change on our operations are highly uncertain and would be particular to the geographic circumstances in areas in which we operate. These may include changes in rainfall and storm patterns and intensities, water shortages and changing temperatures. Any of these matters could have a material adverse effect on us.
Current wording
If we, or other companies with which we do business become subject to laws or regulations related to climate change, it could have a material adverse effect on us. The United States may enact new laws, regulations and interpretations relating to climate change, including potential cap-and-trade systems, carbon taxes and other requirements relating to reporting and reduction of carbon footprints and/or greenhouse gas emissions. Other countries have enacted climate change laws and regulations, and the United States has been involved in discussions regarding international climate change treaties, although the continued commitment to such treaties is uncertain under the Trump administration. The federal government and some of the states and localities in which we operate have considered or have enacted certain climate change laws and regulations relating to greenhouse gas emissions or requiring disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions. Although these laws and regulations have not had any known material adverse effect on us to date, they could result in substantial costs, including compliance costs, monitoring and reporting costs and capital. Furthermore, our reputation could be damaged if we violate climate change laws or regulations. We cannot predict how future laws and regulations, or future interpretations of current laws and regulations, related to climate change will affect our business, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition. Lastly, the potential physical impacts of climate change on our operations are highly uncertain and would be particular to the geographic circumstances in areas in which we operate. These may include changes in rainfall and storm patterns and intensities, water shortages and changing temperatures. Any of these matters could have a material adverse effect on us.
Previous wording
In May 2023, our Board authorized a $150 million stock repurchase program. Total repurchase authority remaining under the repurchase program was $109 million as of December 31, 2024. The repurchase program may be suspended, terminated or modified at any time for any reason, including market conditions, the cost of repurchasing securities, the availability of alternative investment opportunities, liquidity, and other factors deemed appropriate. Under the repurchase program, we are authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market or privately negotiated transactions. Such purchases may be made pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 plans or other means as determined by our management and in accordance with the requirements of the SEC. The repurchase program does not obligate us to purchase any particular number or type of securities. During 2024, we repurchased approximately 1.5 million shares of common stock at an average cost of $8.13 per share.
Current wording
In May 2023, our Board authorized a $150 million stock repurchase program. Total repurchase authority remaining under the repurchase program was $107 million as of December 31, 2025. The repurchase program may be suspended, terminated or modified at any time for any reason, including market conditions, the cost of repurchasing securities, the availability of alternative investment opportunities, liquidity, and other factors deemed appropriate. Under the repurchase program, we are authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market or privately negotiated transactions. Such purchases may be made pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 plans or other means as determined by our management and in accordance with the requirements of the SEC. The repurchase program does not obligate us to purchase any particular number or type of securities. During 2025, we repurchased approximately 0.3 million shares of common stock at an average cost of $9.15 per share.
Previous wording
We have authorized and unissued (including shares held in treasury) approximately 78.4 million shares of common stock and approximately 5.2 million shares of preferred stock as of December 31, 2024. These unissued shares could be used by our management to make it more difficult, and thereby discourage an attempt to acquire control of us.
Current wording
We have authorized and unissued (including shares held in treasury) approximately 78.3 million shares of common stock and approximately 5.2 million shares of preferred stock as of December 31, 2025. These unissued shares could be used by our management to make it more difficult, and thereby discourage an attempt to acquire control of us.