LandBridge Co LLC

Previous wording

The SUAs we enter into and the sand, brackish water and other resources that we or our customers sell are substantially dependent on drilling, completion and production activities by E&P companies on or around our acreage. Similarly, the services WaterBridge and Desert Environmental provide from which we earn royalties and fees are substantially dependent on those same activities. If E&P companies do not maintain such activities on or around our land, their demand for the use of our land and resources and WaterBridge’s and Desert Environmental’s services will decline, negatively impacting our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Current wording

The SUAs we enter into and the sand, brackish water and other resources that we or our customers sell are substantially dependent on drilling, completion and production activities by E&P companies on or around our acreage. Similarly, the services WaterBridge provides, from which we earn royalties and fees, are substantially dependent on these same activities. If E&P companies do not maintain such activities on or around our land, their demand for the use of our land and resources and WaterBridge’s services will decline, negatively impacting our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Previous wording

Demand for the use of our land and resources, as well as the services provided by WaterBridge and Desert Environmental, depends substantially on capital spending by producers to construct and maintain infrastructure on and around our acreage and explore for, develop and produce oil and natural gas in the area. These expenditures are generally dependent on such producers’ overall financial position, capital allocation priorities and ability to access capital, and their views of future demand for, and prices of, oil and natural gas. Volatility in oil or natural gas prices (or the perception that oil or natural gas prices will decrease) affects such producers’ capital expenditures and willingness to pursue development activities. This, in turn, could lead to lower demand for the use of our land and resources or WaterBridge’s and Desert Environmental’s services, delays in payment of, or nonpayment of, amounts that are owed to us and cause lower rates and lower utilization of our land. In addition, we own oil and gas royalty interests that generate revenue based on oil and natural gas prices and production. As a result, a significant decrease in the price of oil and natural gas or decrease in levels of production of oil and natural gas on and around our land could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position. For additional information, please see “—The willingness of E&P companies to engage in drilling, completion and production activities on and around our land is substantially influenced by the market prices of oil and natural gas, which are highly volatile. A substantial or extended decline in oil and natural gas prices may adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.”

Current wording

Demand for the use of our land and resources, as well as the services provided by WaterBridge, depends substantially on capital spending by producers to construct and maintain infrastructure on and around our acreage and explore for, develop and produce oil and natural gas in the area. These expenditures are generally dependent on such producers’ overall financial position, capital allocation priorities and ability to access capital, and their views of future demand for, and prices of, oil and natural gas. Volatility in oil or natural gas prices (or the perception that oil or natural gas prices will decrease) affects such producers’ capital expenditures and willingness to pursue development activities. This, in turn, could lead to lower demand for the use of our land and resources or WaterBridge’s services, delays in payment of, or nonpayment of, amounts that are owed to us and cause lower rates and lower utilization of our land. In addition, we own oil and gas royalty interests that generate revenue based on oil and natural gas prices and production. As a result, a significant decrease in the price of oil and natural gas or decrease in levels of production of oil and natural gas on and around our land could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position. For additional information, please see “—The willingness of E&P companies to engage in drilling, completion and production activities on and around our land is substantially influenced by the market prices of oil and natural gas, which are highly volatile. A substantial or extended decline in oil and natural gas prices may adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.”

Previous wording

For the year ended December 31, 2024, we received revenue from approximately 186 customers, and our top ten customers represented 78% of our total revenues. While we expect these revenue streams to be recurring, our contracts with our significant customers, which represent a large portion of our revenues, typically do not contain minimum volume commitment provisions for land use or brackish water volumes to be purchased. As a result, our revenues are dependent on ongoing demand from these customers, which may decrease due to factors beyond our control. Our producers make all decisions as to investments in, and production from, their wells, and our revenues are dependent upon decisions made by such producers, among other factors. For example, we cannot control whether a producer chooses to develop a property or the success of drilling and development activities, which depend on a number of factors under the control of such producer. There can be no assurance that such producers will take actions or make decisions that will be beneficial to us, which could result in adverse effects on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Current wording

For the year ended December 31, 2025, we received revenue from approximately 208 customers, and our top ten customers represented 73% of our total revenues. While we expect these revenue streams to be recurring, our contracts with our significant customers, which represent a large portion of our revenues, typically do not contain minimum volume commitment provisions for land use or brackish water volumes to be purchased. As a result, our revenues are dependent on ongoing demand from these customers, which may decrease due to factors beyond our control. Our producers make all decisions as to investments in, and production from, their wells, and our revenues are dependent upon decisions made by such producers, among other factors. For example, we cannot control whether a producer chooses to develop a property or the success of drilling and development activities, which depend on a number of factors under the control of such producer. There can be no assurance that such producers will take actions or make decisions that will be beneficial to us, which could result in adverse effects on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Previous wording

Market prices for oil and natural gas are volatile and a decrease in prices could reduce drilling, completion and production activities by producers on or around our land, resulting in a reduction in the use of our land and resources and WaterBridge’s and Desert Environmental’s services, as well as the amount of revenues we receive from the production of oil and natural gas. The market prices for oil and natural gas are subject to U.S. and global macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions, among other things, and, historically, have been subject to significant price fluctuations and may continue to change in the future. Prices for oil and natural gas may fluctuate widely in response to relatively minor changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control and the control of producers on or around our land, such as:

Current wording

Market prices for oil and natural gas are volatile and a decrease in prices could reduce drilling, completion and production activities by producers on or around our land, resulting in a reduction in the use of our land and resources and WaterBridge’s services, as well as the amount of revenues we receive from the production of oil and natural gas. The market prices for oil and natural gas are subject to U.S. and global macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions, among other things, and, historically, have been subject to significant price fluctuations and may continue to change in the future. Prices for oil and natural gas may fluctuate widely in response to relatively minor changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control and the control of producers on or around our land, such as:

Previous wording

These factors have at times resulted in, and may in the future result in, a reduction in global economic activity and volatility in the global financial markets and make it extremely difficult to predict future oil and natural gas price movements with certainty. A sustained decline in oil and natural gas prices may reduce the amount of oil and natural gas that can be produced economically by producers on or around our land, which may reduce such producers’ willingness to develop such land and use our land and resources and WaterBridge’s and Desert Environmental’s services. Producers on or around our land could also determine during periods of low oil and natural gas prices to shut-in or curtail production from wells on such land, or plug and abandon marginal wells that otherwise may have been allowed to continue to produce for a longer period under conditions of higher prices. The scale and duration of the impact of these factors cannot be predicted but could lead to an increase in our customers’ operating costs or a decrease in our or our customers’ revenues, and any substantial decline in the price of oil and natural gas or prolonged period of low oil and natural gas prices may materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Current wording

These factors have at times resulted in, and may in the future result in, a reduction in global economic activity and volatility in the global financial markets and make it extremely difficult to predict future oil and natural gas price movements with certainty. A sustained decline in oil and natural gas prices may reduce the amount of oil and natural gas that can be produced economically by producers on or around our land, which may reduce such producers’ willingness to develop such land and use our land and resources and WaterBridge’s services. Producers on or around our land could also determine during periods of low oil and natural gas prices to shut-in or curtail production from wells on such land, or plug and abandon marginal wells that otherwise may have been allowed to continue to produce for a longer period under conditions of higher prices. The scale and duration of the impact of these factors cannot be predicted but could lead to an increase in our customers’ operating costs or a decrease in our or our customers’ revenues, and any substantial decline in the price of oil and natural gas or prolonged period of low oil and natural gas prices may materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Previous wording

Because a significant portion of our future revenue growth is expected to be derived from WaterBridge and Desert Environmental, any development that materially and adversely affects either of their businesses, operations or financial condition could have a material adverse impact on us.

Current wording

Because a significant portion of our future revenue growth is expected to be derived from WaterBridge, any development that materially and adversely affects either of their businesses, operations or financial condition could have a material adverse impact on us.

Previous wording

WaterBridge is, and Desert Environmental is anticipated to be, among our most significant customers and are expected to play an increasingly important role in our financial performance over the long term. Accordingly, we are indirectly subject to the business risks faced by WaterBridge and Desert Environmental. Because a significant portion of our revenues is derived from WaterBridge and Desert Environmental, any development that materially and adversely affects either of WaterBridge’s or Desert Environmental’s businesses, operations or financial condition could have a material adverse impact on us.

Current wording

WaterBridge is among our most significant customers and is expected to play an increasingly important role in our financial performance over the long term. Accordingly, we are indirectly subject to the business risks faced by WaterBridge. Because a significant portion of our revenues is derived from WaterBridge, any development that materially and adversely affects WaterBridge’s businesses, operations or financial condition could have a material adverse impact on us.

Previous wording

Pursuant to the Shared Services Agreement, WaterBridge provides general and administrative services, as well as limited operational and maintenance services to us, together with four dedicated employees providing field services and three dedicated employees providing corporate services. Our success depends on the efforts, experience, diligence, skill and network of business contacts of such personnel and the quality of services that WaterBridge offers. However, the allocation of such resources is generally within WaterBridge’s discretion. We can offer no assurance that WaterBridge will continue to provide services to us or that we will continue to have access to WaterBridge’s personnel or that the Manager will be able to recruit and retain personnel necessary to provide us with key services. If the Shared Services Agreement is terminated and no suitable replacement is found to provide management and operating services for our land, or if the Manager is unable to recruit and retain those personnel necessary to perform services under the Shared Services Agreement, we may not be able to execute our business plan, and our results of operations, cash flows and financial position may be materially and adversely affected.

Current wording

Pursuant to the Shared Services Agreement, WaterBridge provides general and administrative services, as well as limited operational and maintenance services to us, together with five dedicated employees providing field services and five dedicated employees providing corporate services. Our success depends on the efforts, experience, diligence, skill and network of business contacts of such personnel and the quality of services that WaterBridge offers. However, the allocation of such resources is generally within WaterBridge’s discretion. We can offer no assurance that WaterBridge will continue to provide services to us or that we will continue to have access to WaterBridge’s personnel or that the Manager will be able to recruit and retain personnel necessary to provide us with key services. If the Shared Services Agreement is terminated and no suitable replacement is found to provide management and operating services for our land, or if the Manager is unable to recruit and retain those personnel necessary to perform services under the Shared Services Agreement, we may not be able to execute our business plan, and our results of operations, cash flows and financial position may be materially and adversely affected.

Previous wording

The successful operation and growth of our business depends to a large extent on a small number of individuals to whom many key responsibilities within our business have been assigned. Such individuals hold positions with our affiliates, including Five Point, WaterBridge and Desert Environmental, and dedicate a portion of their time and resources to the activities of such affiliates, and there can be no assurance as to the future allocation of time and resources between our business, on the one hand, and our affiliates in which our employees, other service providers, and management team hold an interest, on the other hand. We rely on our key personnel for their knowledge of the energy industry, relationships within the industry and experience in operating a business in the Permian Basin. The loss of the services of one or more of these key personnel, and the inability to recruit or retain additional key personnel, could have an adverse effect on our business. Further, we do not have currently a succession plan for the replacement of, and do not maintain “key-person” life insurance policies on, such key personnel.

Current wording

The successful operation and growth of our business depends to a large extent on a small number of individuals to whom many key responsibilities within our business have been assigned. Such individuals hold positions with our affiliates, including Five Point and WaterBridge, and dedicate a portion of their time and resources to the activities of such affiliates, and there can be no assurance as to the future allocation of time and resources between our business, on the one hand, and our affiliates in which our personnel, other service providers, and management team hold an interest, on the other hand. We rely on our key personnel for their knowledge of the energy industry, relationships within the industry and experience in operating a business in the Permian Basin. The loss of the services of one or more of these key personnel, and the inability to recruit or retain additional key personnel, could have an adverse effect on our business. Further, we do not have currently a succession plan for the replacement of, and do not maintain “key-person” life insurance policies on, such key personnel.

Previous wording

For the year ended December 31, 2024, revenues from WaterBridge, ConocoPhillips and EOG Resources each individually comprised more than 10% of our total revenues and collectively represented 48% of our total revenues. EOG Resources, WaterBridge and Occidental Petroleum each individually comprised 19%, 15% and 14% of our total accounts receivable for the year ended December 31, 2024 and collectively represented 48% of our total accounts receivable at such date. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues or outstanding accounts receivables.

Current wording

For the year ended December 31, 2025, revenues from WaterBridge, VTX Energy and ConocoPhillips each individually comprised more than 10% of our total revenues and collectively represented 47% of our total revenues. WaterBridge, VTX Energy, TPL and EOG Resources each individually comprised 21%, 19%, 14% and 11%, respectively, of our total accounts receivable for the year ended December 31, 2025 and collectively represented 65% of our total accounts receivable at such date.

Previous wording

We expect to continue to depend on key customers to support our revenues for the foreseeable future, and although each of WaterBridge, ConcoPhillips and EOG Resources operates on our land under long-term contracts, each of these customers has the right to reduce or cease operations on our acreage at their sole discretion under certain circumstances, as our contracts with such customers generally do not contain minimum commitment provisions for land use or brackish water volumes to be purchased. See “Business—Customers; Material Contracts and Marketing” for further information on our agreements with our significant customers. The loss of revenue derived from any of these customers’ operations on our land could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position. During times when the oil and natural gas markets weaken, our customers are more likely to experience financial difficulties, including generating less cash flow due to lower oil and natural gas prices and being unable to access or receive favorable terms in connection with debt or equity financing, which could result in a reduction in our customers’ activities on or around our land. Furthermore, the determination by a customer to initiate or maintain activities on or around our land largely depends on the location of our surface acreage relative to the nature and location of such customer’s operations and such customer’s need for the use of our land and resources. Our customers are limited to entities operating on and around our acreage in the Delaware Basin.

Current wording

We expect to continue to depend on key customers to support our revenues for the foreseeable future, and although each of WaterBridge, VTX Energy and ConocoPhillips operates on our land under long-term contracts, each of these customers has the right to reduce or cease operations on our acreage at their sole discretion under certain circumstances, as our contracts with such customers generally do not contain minimum commitment provisions for land use or brackish water volumes to be purchased. See “Business—Customers; Material Contracts and Marketing” for further information on our agreements with our significant customers. The loss of revenue derived from any of these customers’ operations on our land could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position. During times when the oil and natural gas markets weaken, our customers are more likely to experience financial difficulties, including generating less cash flow due to lower oil and natural gas prices and being unable to access or receive favorable terms in connection with debt or equity financing, which could result in a reduction in our customers’ activities on or around our land. Furthermore, the determination by a customer to initiate or maintain activities on or around our land largely depends on the location of our surface acreage relative to the nature and location of such customer’s operations and such customer’s need for the use of our land and resources. Our customers are limited to entities operating on and around our acreage in the Delaware Basin.

Previous wording

Concerns over global economic conditions, global health threats, trade policies, increased trade restrictions and tariffs, supply chain disruptions, increased demand, labor shortages associated with a fully employed U.S. labor force, geopolitical issues, inflation, interest rates, the availability and cost of credit and the United States financial markets and other factors have contributed to increased economic uncertainty. Although inflation in the United States had been relatively low for many years, there was a significant increase in inflation beginning in the second half of 2021, with a general decline beginning in the second half of 2022 and a relative settling in in 2023 and 2024. In addition, the incoming presidential administration has stated an intention to impose tariffs on international goods, such as those produced in China. To the extent that any U.S. trade policy results in retaliatory tariffs against the U.S., such as the recently announced tariffs from China on U.S. natural gas and crude oil, such developments could result in inflationary pressures and have an adverse effect on our customers’ business, and reduce demand for use of our land and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Though we incorporate inflation escalators in most of our long-term customer contracts, contractual provisions providing for inflation escalators in certain contracts are subject to caps, which may limit the amount of any single pricing increase, and may also vary as to the commencement date of such increases and the timing and calculation of the applicable adjustment. As a result, inflation may outpace the revenue adjustments provided by those provisions. Our customers may also experience supply chain constraints, due to international trade policies or otherwise, and inflationary pressure on their cost structures, which could impact the revenues we receive from them. Our customers also may face shortages of equipment, raw materials, supplies, commodities, labor and services, which may prevent them from executing their development plans on or around our land. These supply chain constraints, trade policies and inflationary pressures may continue to adversely impact our customers’ operating costs and, if they are unable to manage their supply chain, it may impact their ability to procure materials and equipment in a timely and cost-effective manner, if at all, which could materially and adversely affect the revenues received in respect of our customers’ operations on or around our land.

Current wording

Concerns over global economic conditions, global health threats, trade policies, increased trade restrictions and tariffs, supply chain disruptions, increased demand, labor shortages associated with a fully employed U.S. labor force, geopolitical issues, inflation, interest rates, the availability and cost of credit and the United States financial markets and other factors have contributed to increased economic uncertainty. Although inflation in the United States had been relatively low for many years, there was a significant increase in inflation beginning in the second half of 2021, with a general decline beginning in the second half of 2022 and a relative settling in in 2023 and 2024. In addition, the current presidential administration has stated an intention to continue imposing tariffs on international goods, such as those produced in both China and Europe. To the extent that any U.S. trade policy results in retaliatory tariffs against the U.S., such developments could result in inflationary pressures and have an adverse effect on our customers’ business, and reduce demand for use of our land and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Though we incorporate inflation escalators in most of our long-term customer contracts, contractual provisions providing for inflation escalators in certain contracts are subject to caps, which may limit the amount of any single pricing increase, and may also vary as to the commencement date of such increases and the timing and calculation of the applicable adjustment. As a result, inflation may outpace the revenue adjustments provided by those provisions. Our customers may also experience supply chain constraints, due to international trade policies or otherwise, and inflationary pressure on their cost structures, which could impact the revenues we receive from them. Our customers also may face shortages of equipment, raw materials, supplies, commodities, labor and services, which may prevent them from executing their development plans on or around our land. These supply chain constraints, trade policies and inflationary pressures may continue to adversely impact our customers’ operating costs and, if they are unable to manage their supply chain, it may impact their ability to procure materials and equipment in a timely and cost-effective manner, if at all, which could materially and adversely affect the revenues received in respect of our customers’ operations on or around our land.

Previous wording

Subject to certain exceptions, our customers assume responsibility for, including control and removal of, all other pollution or contamination that may result from their operations on our acreage, such as Desert Environmental’s oil reclamation, solid waste and landfill operations. We may have liability in such cases if we are grossly negligent or commit willful acts, or as owners of the land under laws that impose strict, joint and several liability for pollution clean-up, such as CERCLA (as defined herein). Our customers generally agree to indemnify and defend us against claims relating to contamination resulting from their operations and related closure and remedial obligations, damage or loss of a well, reservoir, geological formation, underground strata, or water resources, or the loss of oil, natural gas, mineral, or water, but sometimes such indemnity and defense is subject to exceptions for claims for gross negligence or willful misconduct, and we may not be able to collect under these indemnities if the applicable customer is in financial distress. Our customers also generally assume responsibility for claims arising from their employees’ personal injury or death, or the damage or loss of their property, to the extent that their employees are injured or their properties are damaged by operations on our acreage, but sometimes such indemnity and defense is subject to exceptions for claims resulting from our gross negligence or willful misconduct, and we may not be able to collect under these indemnities if the applicable customer is in financial distress. However, we might not succeed in enforcing such contractual risk allocation or might incur an unforeseen liability falling outside the scope of such risk allocation.

Current wording

Subject to certain exceptions, our customers assume responsibility for, including control and removal of, all other pollution or contamination that may result from their operations on our acreage, such as WaterBridge’s oil reclamation, solid waste and landfill operations. We may have liability in such cases if we are grossly negligent or commit willful acts, or as owners of the land under laws that impose strict, joint and several liability for pollution clean-up, such as CERCLA (as defined herein). Our customers generally agree to indemnify and defend us against claims relating to contamination resulting from their operations and related closure and remedial obligations, damage or loss of a well, reservoir, geological formation, underground strata, or water resources, or the loss of oil, natural gas, mineral, or water, but sometimes such indemnity and defense is subject to exceptions for claims for gross negligence or willful misconduct, and we may not be able to collect under these indemnities if the applicable customer is in financial distress. Our customers also generally assume responsibility for claims arising from their employees’ personal injury or death, or the damage or loss of their property, to the extent that their employees are injured or their properties are damaged by operations on our acreage, but sometimes such indemnity and defense is subject to exceptions for claims resulting from our gross negligence or willful misconduct, and we may not be able to collect under these indemnities if the applicable customer is in financial distress. However, we might not succeed in enforcing such contractual risk allocation or might incur an unforeseen liability falling outside the scope of such risk allocation.

Previous wording

While we have implemented and maintain commercially reasonable security measures and safeguards, such security measures and safeguards may not be sufficient to protect against an attack. Attackers are increasingly using advances in technologies, such as artificial intelligence and encryption bypasses that may evade our efforts. Emerging artificial intelligence technologies may improve or expand the capabilities of malicious third parties in a way we cannot predict at this time, including being used to develop new hacking tools, exploit vulnerabilities, obscure malicious activities and increase the difficulty detecting threats. Moreover, some of our networks and systems are managed by third-party service providers and are not under our direct control. We regularly enter into transactions with third parties, some of whom may have less sophisticated electronic systems or networks and may be more vulnerable to cyberattacks. Our reliance on these third parties means that any vulnerability in their systems could propagate to our own systems, increasing our risk exposure despite our internal controls.

Current wording

While we have implemented and maintain commercially reasonable security measures and safeguards, such security measures and safeguards may not be sufficient to protect against or effectively mitigate an attack. Attackers are increasingly using advances in technologies, such as artificial intelligence and encryption bypasses that may evade our efforts. Emerging artificial intelligence technologies may improve or expand the capabilities of malicious third parties in a way we cannot predict, including being used to develop new hacking tools, exploit vulnerabilities, obscure malicious activities and increase the difficulty detecting threats. Moreover, some of our networks and systems are managed by third-party service providers and are not under our direct control. We regularly enter into transactions with third parties, some of whom may have less sophisticated electronic systems or networks and may be more vulnerable to cyberattacks. Our reliance on these third parties means that any vulnerability in their systems could propagate to our own systems or affect our data, increasing our risk exposure despite our internal controls.

Previous wording

Our future results following the Recent Acquisitions and other acquisitions will suffer if we do not effectively manage our expanded operations.

Current wording

Our future results following our acquisitions will suffer if we do not effectively manage our expanded operations.

Previous wording

Since our formation, the size of our asset base has increased significantly. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to manage this expanded business, which poses substantial challenges for management, including challenges related to the management and monitoring of expanded acreage, new operations and associated increased costs and complexity. We may also face increased scrutiny from governmental authorities as a result of the significant increase in the size of our business. There can be no assurances that we will be successful or that we will realize the expected operating efficiencies, cost savings, revenue enhancements or other benefits currently anticipated from the Recent Acquisitions.

Current wording

Since our formation, the size of our asset base has increased significantly. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to manage this expanded business, which poses substantial challenges for management, including challenges related to the management and monitoring of expanded acreage, new operations and associated increased costs and complexity. We may also face increased scrutiny from governmental authorities as a result of the significant increase in the size of our business. There can be no assurances that we will be successful or that we will realize the expected operating efficiencies, cost savings, revenue enhancements or other benefits currently anticipated from our acquisitions.

Previous wording

The ESA and comparable state laws restrict activities that may affect endangered or threatened species or their habitats. Similar protections are offered to migratory birds under the MBTA. To the degree that species listed under the ESA or similar state laws, or are protected under the MBTA, live in the areas where we and our customers operate, both our and our customers’ abilities to conduct or expand operations and construct facilities could be limited, or both we and our customers could be forced to incur additional material costs. Additionally, the FWS may make determinations on the listing of unlisted species as endangered or threatened under the ESA. For example, in November 2022, the FWS designated two distinct population segments of the lesser prairie chicken under the ESA, which live in certain areas in southeastern New Mexico and western Texas; however, the U.S. Senate voted to rescind this decision, although the joint resolution was vetoed by President Biden, and the listing decision is currently subject to litigation. In May 2024, the FWS designated the dunes sagebrush lizard under the ESA, which also lives in certain areas in southeastern New Mexico and western Texas, and this listing decision is also subject to litigation. The designation of previously unidentified endangered or threatened species could indirectly cause us or our customers to incur additional costs, cause our or our customers’ operations to become subject to operating restrictions or bans and limit future development activity in affected areas, which developments could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Current wording

The ESA and comparable state laws restrict activities that may affect endangered or threatened species or their habitats. Similar protections are offered to migratory birds under the MBTA. To the degree that species listed under the ESA or similar state laws, or are protected under the MBTA, live in the areas where we and our customers operate, both our and our customers’ abilities to conduct or expand operations and construct facilities could be limited, or both we and our customers could be forced to incur additional material costs. Additionally, the FWS may make determinations on the listing of unlisted species as endangered or threatened under the ESA. For example, in November 2022, the FWS designated two distinct population segments of the lesser prairie chicken under the ESA, which live in certain areas in southeastern New Mexico and western Texas. The listing decision was challenged by the states of Texas, Kansas and Oklahoma, and various industry groups, with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas vacating the rule for the northern district population segment in March 2025. In May 2024, the FWS designated the dunes sagebrush lizard under the ESA, which also lives in certain areas in southeastern New Mexico and western Texas. This listing decision is subject to ongoing litigation. The designation of previously unidentified endangered or threatened species could indirectly cause us or our customers to incur additional costs, cause our or our customers’ operations to become subject to operating restrictions or bans and limit future development activity in affected areas, which developments could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Previous wording

Concerns over the risk of climate change have increased the focus by global, regional, national, state and local regulators on GHG emissions, including carbon dioxide emissions, and on transitioning to a lower-carbon future. A number of countries and states have adopted, or are considering the adoption of, regulatory frameworks to reduce GHG emissions. These regulatory measures may include, among others, adoption of cap and trade regimes, carbon taxes, increased efficiency standards, prohibitions on the sales of new automobiles with internal combustion engines, and incentives or mandates for battery-powered automobiles and/or wind, solar or other forms of alternative energy. These include laws such as the IRA, which appropriates significant federal funding for renewable energy initiatives and amends the CAA to impose a first-time fee on the emission of methane from sources required to report their GHG emissions to the EPA, beginning in calendar year 2024 at $900 per ton of methane, increasing to $1,200 in 2025, and set at $1,500 for 2026 and each year after. However, we cannot predict whether, how, or when the incoming Trump Administration might take action to revise or repeal the methane emissions charge rule or the finalized EPA rules related to GHG emissions. Additionally, Congress may take actions to repeal or revise the IRA, including with respect to the methane emissions charge, which timing or outcome similarly cannot be predicted. Compliance with changes in laws, regulations and obligations relating to climate change could result in increased costs of compliance for our customers on or around our land or costs of consuming oil and natural gas for such products, and thereby reduce demand for the use of our land and resources, which could reduce our profitability. Changes in laws and regulations may also result in delays or increased costs associated with obtaining permits needed for oil and natural gas operations. Additionally, our customers on or around our land could incur reputational risk tied to changing customer or community perceptions of our customers or their customers’ contribution to, or detraction from, the transition to a lower-carbon economy. These changing perceptions could lower demand for oil and natural gas products, resulting in lower prices and lower revenues as consumers avoid carbon-intensive industries, and could also pressure banks and investment managers to shift investments and reduce lending.

Current wording

Concerns over the risk of climate change have increased the focus by global, regional, national, state and local regulators on GHG emissions, including carbon dioxide emissions, and on transitioning to a lower-carbon future. A number of countries and states have adopted, or are considering the adoption of, regulatory frameworks to reduce GHG emissions. These regulatory measures may include, among others, adoption of cap and trade regimes, carbon taxes, increased efficiency standards, prohibitions on the sales of new automobiles with internal combustion engines, and incentives or mandates for battery-powered automobiles and/or wind, solar or other forms of alternative energy. These include laws such as the IRA, which appropriated significant federal funding for renewable energy initiatives and amended the CAA to impose a first-time fee on the emission of methane from sources required to report their GHG emissions to the EPA. In May 2024, the EPA issued a final rule to implement the IRA’s methane fee, although in February 2025, Congress repealed the rule under the Congressional Review Act. Additionally, in the OBBBA, Congress delayed the implementation of the methane emission fee until 2034. We cannot predict if the Trump Administration and / or Congress may take further actions with respect to the IRA or the methane emissions fee. Compliance with changes in laws, regulations and obligations relating to climate change could result in increased costs of compliance for our customers on or around our land or costs of consuming oil and natural gas for such products, and thereby reduce demand for the use of our land and resources, which could reduce our profitability. Changes in laws and regulations may also result in delays or increased costs associated with obtaining permits needed for oil and natural gas operations. Additionally, our customers on or around our land could incur reputational risk tied to changing customer or community perceptions of our customers or their customers’ contribution to, or detraction from, the transition to a lower-carbon economy. These changing perceptions could lower demand for oil and natural gas products, resulting in lower prices and lower revenues as consumers avoid carbon-intensive industries, and could also pressure banks and investment managers to shift investments and reduce lending.

Previous wording

Separately, banks and other financial institutions, including investors, may decide to adopt policies that restrict or prohibit investment in, or otherwise funding, us or our customers on or around our land based on climate change-related concerns, which could affect our and our customers on or around our land’s access to and cost of capital for potential growth projects. Additionally, insurers may decide to raise rates and/or cease insuring us or our customers on or around our land based on climate change-related concerns.

Current wording

Separately, banks and other financial institutions, including investors, may decide to adopt policies that restrict or prohibit investment in, or otherwise funding, us or our customers on or around our land based on climate change-related concerns, which could affect our and our customers on or around our land’s access to and cost of capital for potential growth projects. However, this trend has been declining recently. Additionally, insurers may decide to raise rates and/or cease insuring us or our customers on or around our land based on climate change-related concerns.

Previous wording

Approaches to climate change and transition to a lower-carbon economy, including government regulation, company policies, and consumer behavior, are continuously evolving. For example, the SEC has adopted a new rule regarding climate change, which it has stayed pending various legal challenges, that, if ultimately made effective, implements significant disclosure obligations and would require us to update and develop our controls to accommodate these new obligations. The incoming Trump Administration, however, may seek to repeal the SEC rule though the timeline for any repeal, if at all, is subject to a number of uncertainties. While we intend to pursue opportunities related to the transition to a lower-carbon economy, there can be no assurance that our efforts will be successful. At this time, we cannot predict how such approaches may develop or otherwise reasonably or reliably estimate their impact on us or our customers’ financial condition, results of operations and ability to compete. However, any long-term material adverse effect on the oil and natural gas industry may affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Current wording

Approaches to climate change and transition to a lower-carbon economy, including government regulation, company policies, and consumer behavior, are continuously evolving. While we intend to pursue opportunities related to the transition to a lower-carbon economy, there can be no assurance that our efforts will be successful. At this time, we cannot predict how such approaches may develop or otherwise reasonably or reliably estimate their impact on us or our customers’ financial condition, results of operations and ability to compete. However, any long-term material adverse effect on the oil and natural gas industry may affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Previous wording

Increased investor attention to environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) matters may impact our or our customers’ business.

Current wording

Increased investor attention to sustainability-related matters may impact our or our customers’ business.

Previous wording

Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny from stakeholders related to their ESG practices. Companies that do not adapt to or comply with investor or stakeholder expectations and standards, which are evolving, or which are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for ESG issues, regardless of whether there is a legal requirement to do so, may suffer from reputational damage and the business, financial condition, and/or stock price of such a company could be materially and adversely affected. Increased attention to climate change, increasing and sometimes conflicting societal expectations on companies to address climate change, and potential consumer use of substitutes to energy commodities may result in increased costs, reduced demand for our customers’ products and services, lower demand for the use of our land and resources, reduced profits, increased governmental investigations and litigation against us.

Current wording

Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny from stakeholders related to their sustainability practices. Companies that do not adapt to or comply with investor or stakeholder expectations and standards, which are evolving, or which are perceived to have not responded appropriately to sustainability issues, regardless of whether there is a legal requirement to do so, may suffer from reputational damage and the business, financial condition, and/or stock price of such a company could be materially and adversely affected. Increased attention to climate change, increasing and sometimes conflicting societal expectations on companies to address climate change, and potential consumer use of substitutes to energy commodities may result in increased costs, reduced demand for our customers’ products and services, lower demand for the use of our land and resources, reduced profits, increased governmental investigations and litigation against us.

Previous wording

Moreover, while we may create and publish voluntary disclosures regarding ESG matters from time to time, many of the statements in those voluntary disclosures are based on expectations and assumptions or hypothetical scenarios that may be incorrect or may change with the passage of time. Such expectations and assumptions or hypothetical scenarios are necessarily uncertain and may be prone to error or subject to misinterpretation given the long timelines involved and the lack of an established approach to identifying, measuring and reporting on many ESG matters. Additionally, voluntary disclosures regarding ESG matters, as well as any ESG disclosures mandated by law, could result in litigation or government investigations or enforcement action regarding the sufficiency or validity of such disclosures. In addition, failure or a perception (whether or not valid) of failure to adequately pursue or implement ESG strategies or achieve ESG goals or commitments, which are often aspirational, including any GHG reduction or neutralization goals or commitments, could result in litigation and damage our reputation, cause our investors or consumers to lose confidence in us, or otherwise negatively impact our operations. Moreover, even if we voluntarily elect to pursue climate or ESG goals, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to pursue or implement such goals because of potential costs, technical or operational obstacles, uncertainty in long-term assumptions and expectations or other market or technological developments beyond our control. Similarly, we cannot guarantee that participation in any sustainability, climate-related, or ESG certification program or framework will have the intended results on our ESG profile.

Current wording

Moreover, while we may create and publish voluntary disclosures regarding sustainability matters from time to time, many of the statements in those voluntary disclosures are based on expectations and assumptions or hypothetical scenarios that may be incorrect or may change with the passage of time. Such expectations and assumptions or hypothetical scenarios are necessarily uncertain and may be prone to error or subject to misinterpretation given the long timelines involved and the lack of an established approach to identifying, measuring and reporting on many sustainability matters. Additionally, voluntary disclosures regarding sustainability matters, as well as any sustainability disclosures mandated by law, could result in litigation or government investigations or enforcement action regarding the sufficiency or validity of such disclosures. In addition, failure or a perception (whether or not valid) of failure to adequately pursue or implement sustainability strategies or achieve sustainability goals or commitments, which are often aspirational, including any GHG reduction or neutralization goals or commitments, could result in litigation and damage our reputation, cause our investors or consumers to lose confidence in us, or otherwise negatively impact our operations. Moreover, even if we voluntarily elect to pursue climate or sustainability goals, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to pursue or implement such goals because of potential costs, technical or operational obstacles, uncertainty in long-term assumptions and expectations or other market or technological developments beyond our control. Similarly, we cannot guarantee that participation in any sustainability or, climate-related certification program or framework will have the intended results on our sustainability profile.

Previous wording

In addition, certain organizations that provide proxy advisory services to investors on corporate governance and related matters have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters. Currently, there are no universal standards for such scores or ratings, but the importance of sustainability evaluations is becoming more broadly accepted by certain investors and shareholders. Such ratings are used by some investors to inform their investment and voting decisions. Additionally, certain investors use these scores to benchmark companies against their peers and if a company is perceived as lagging, these investors may engage with companies to require improved ESG disclosure or performance. While such ratings do not impact all investors’ investment or voting decisions, unfavorable ESG ratings may lead to increased negative investor sentiment toward us or our customers and to the diversion of investment to other industries, which could have a negative impact on our share price and/or our access to and costs of capital.

Current wording

In addition, certain organizations that provide proxy advisory services to investors on corporate governance and related matters have developed rating and proxy voting recommendation processes for evaluating companies on their approach to sustainability matters. Such ratings and proxy advisory services are used by some investors to inform their investment and voting decisions. Additionally, certain investors use these scores to benchmark companies against their peers and if a company is perceived as lagging, these investors may engage with companies to require improved sustainability disclosure or performance. While such ratings do not impact all investors’ investment or voting decisions, unfavorable sustainability ratings may lead to increased negative investor sentiment toward us or our customers and to the diversion of investment to other industries, which could have a negative impact on our share price and/or our access to and costs of capital.

Previous wording

Furthermore, certain public statements with respect to ESG matters, such as emissions reduction goals, other environmental targets, or other commitments addressing certain social issues, are becoming increasingly subject to heightened scrutiny from public and governmental authorities related to the risk of potential “greenwashing” (i.e., misleading information or false claims overstating potential ESG benefits). For example, the SEC has recently taken enforcement action against companies for ESG-related misconduct, including alleged greenwashing. Certain regulators, such as the SEC and various state agencies, as well as non-governmental organizations and other private actors have also filed lawsuits under various securities and consumer protection laws alleging that certain ESG-statements, goals, or standards were misleading, false, or otherwise deceptive. Any alleged claims of greenwashing against us or others in our industry may lead to further negative sentiment and diversion of investments. We could also face increasing costs as we attempt to comply with and navigate further regulatory ESG-related focus and scrutiny.

Current wording

Furthermore, certain public statements with respect to sustainability matters, such as emissions reduction goals, other environmental targets, or other commitments addressing certain social issues, are becoming increasingly subject to heightened scrutiny from public and governmental authorities related to the risk of potential “greenwashing” (i.e., misleading information or false claims overstating potential sustainability benefits). For example, the SEC hastaken enforcement action against companies for sustainability-related misconduct, including alleged greenwashing. Certain regulators, such as the SEC and various state agencies, as well as non-governmental organizations and other private actors have also filed lawsuits under various securities and consumer protection laws alleging that certain sustainability-statements, goals, or standards were misleading, false, or otherwise deceptive. Any alleged claims of greenwashing against us or others in our industry may lead to further negative sentiment and diversion of investments. We could also face increasing costs as we attempt to comply with and navigate further regulatory sustainability-related focus and scrutiny.

Previous wording

Additionally, certain employment practices and social initiatives are the subject of scrutiny by both those calling for the continued advancement of such policies, as well as those who believe they should be curbed, including government actors, and the complex regulatory and legal frameworks applicable to such initiatives continue to evolve. We cannot be certain of the impact of such regulatory, legal and other developments on our business. More recent political developments could mean that the Company faces increasing criticism or litigation risks from certain “anti-ESG” parties, including various governmental agencies.

Current wording

Additionally, certain employment practices and social initiatives are the subject of scrutiny by both those calling for the continued advancement of such policies, as well as those who believe they should be curbed, including government actors, and the complex regulatory and legal frameworks applicable to such initiatives continue to evolve. We cannot be certain of the impact of such regulatory, legal and other developments on our business. More recent political developments could mean that the Company faces increasing criticism or litigation risks from certain “anti-sustainability” parties, including various governmental agencies.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, we had $385.5 million of total debt outstanding. Our ability to make scheduled payments on, or to refinance, our indebtedness and financial commitments depends on our financial condition and operating performance, which are subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions including financial, business and other factors beyond our control, and may vary significantly from year to year. As a result, the amount of debt that we can manage in some periods may not be appropriate for us in other periods and we may be unable to generate sufficient cash flow to permit us to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness. Any insufficiency may impact our business.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, we had $570.7 million of total debt outstanding. Our ability to make scheduled payments on, or to refinance, our indebtedness and financial commitments depends on our financial condition and operating performance, which are subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions including financial, business and other factors beyond our control, and may vary significantly from year to year. As a result, the amount of debt that we can manage in some periods may not be appropriate for us in other periods and we may be unable to generate sufficient cash flow to permit us to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness. Any insufficiency may impact our business.

Previous wording

We are subject to interest rate risk, which may cause our debt service obligations to increase significantly. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding under our credit facility as of December 31, 2024 was 8.39% in the case of revolving credit borrowings and 8.47% in the case of term loan borrowings.

Current wording

We are subject to interest rate risk, which may cause our debt service obligations to increase significantly. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding under the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2025 was 6.13%.

Previous wording

Borrowings under our credit facility bear interest at variable rates and expose us to interest rate risk. The weighted average interest rate on our borrowings outstanding under our credit facility as of December 31, 2024 was 8.39% in the case of revolving credit borrowings and 8.47% in the case of term loan borrowings. If interest rates increase, our debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness would increase even if the amount borrowed remained the same, and we would be required to devote more of our cash flow to servicing our indebtedness.

Current wording

Borrowings under the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at variable rates and expose us to interest rate risk. The weighted average interest rate on our borrowings outstanding under the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2025 was 6.13%. If interest rates increase, our debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness would increase even if the amount borrowed remained the same, and we would be required to devote more of our cash flow to servicing our indebtedness.

Previous wording

If we fail to comply with the restrictions and covenants in our credit facility or our future debt agreements, there could be an event of default under the terms of such agreements, which could result in an acceleration of payment.

Current wording

If we fail to comply with the restrictions and covenants in the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility, the Indenture or our future debt agreements, there could be an event of default under the terms of such agreements, which could result in an acceleration of payment.

Previous wording

A breach of compliance with any restriction or covenant in our credit facility or any of our future debt agreements could result in a default under the terms of the applicable agreement, and our ability to comply with such restrictions and covenants may be affected by events beyond our control. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with these restrictions and covenants. A default could result in acceleration of the indebtedness and a declaration of all amounts borrowed due and payable, which could have an adverse effect on us and negatively impact our ability to borrow. If an acceleration occurs, we may be unable to make all of the required payments and may be unable to find alternative financing. Even if alternative financing were available at that time, it may not be on terms that are favorable or acceptable to us. Additionally, we may not be able to amend our credit agreement or such future agreements governing our indebtedness or obtain necessary waivers on satisfactory terms.

Current wording

A breach of compliance with any restriction or covenant in the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility, the Indenture or any of our future debt agreements could result in a default under the terms of the applicable agreement, and our ability to comply with such restrictions and covenants may be affected by events beyond our control. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with these restrictions and covenants. A default could result in acceleration of the indebtedness and a declaration of all amounts borrowed due and payable, which could have an adverse effect on us and negatively impact our ability to borrow. If an acceleration occurs, we may be unable to make all of the required payments and may be unable to find alternative financing. Even if alternative financing were available at that time, it may not be on terms that are favorable or acceptable to us. Additionally, we may not be able to amend the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility or such future agreements governing our indebtedness or obtain necessary waivers on satisfactory terms.

Previous wording

Our obligations under our credit facility are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of our assets and various guarantees.

Current wording

Our obligations under the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of our assets and various guarantees.

Previous wording

The amounts borrowed pursuant to the terms of our credit agreement are secured by substantially all of our and our subsidiaries’ present and after-acquired assets. Additionally, our obligations under our credit facility are jointly and severally guaranteed by us and our material subsidiaries.

Current wording

The amounts borrowed pursuant to the terms of the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility are secured by substantially all of our and our subsidiaries’ present and after-acquired assets. Additionally, our obligations under the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility are jointly and severally guaranteed by us and our material subsidiaries.

Previous wording

As a result of the above, in the event of the occurrence of a default under our credit facility, the administrative agent may enforce its security interests (for the ratable benefit of the lenders under our credit facility and the other secured parties) over our and/or our subsidiaries’ assets that secure the obligations under our credit facility, take control of our assets and business, force us to seek bankruptcy protection, or force us to curtail or abandon our current business plans. If that were to happen, you may lose all, or a part of, your investment in our Class A shares.

Current wording

As a result of the above, in the event of the occurrence of a default under the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility, the administrative agent may enforce its security interests (for the ratable benefit of the lenders under the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility and the other secured parties) over our and/or our subsidiaries’ assets that secure the obligations under the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility, take control of our assets and business, force us to seek bankruptcy protection, or force us to curtail or abandon our current business plans. If that were to happen, you may lose all, or a part of, your investment in our Class A shares.

Previous wording

As a result of the IPO, we became a public company, and, as such, we must comply with new laws, regulations and requirements, certain corporate governance provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, related regulations of the SEC and the NYSE rules, with which we were not required to comply as a private company. Complying with these statutes, regulations and requirements will occupy a significant amount of time of our board of directors and management and will significantly increase our costs and expenses. We are continuing our efforts to:

Current wording

As a public company, we must comply with new laws, regulations and requirements, certain corporate governance provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, related regulations of the SEC and the NYSE and NYSE Texas rules. Complying with these statutes, regulations and requirements occupy a significant amount of time of our board of directors and management and significantly increase our costs and expenses. We are continuing our efforts to:

Previous wording

comply with rules promulgated by the NYSE;

Current wording

comply with rules promulgated by the NYSE and NYSE Texas;

Previous wording

We are required to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which require management to certify financial and other information in our quarterly and annual reports and provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. Although we are required to disclose changes made in our internal controls and procedures on a quarterly basis, we are not required to make our first annual assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 until the year following this Annual Report. Additionally, we are not required to have our independent registered public accounting firm attest to the effectiveness of our internal controls until our first annual report subsequent to our ceasing to be an “emerging growth company” or a “smaller reporting company” under the applicable federal securities laws. Accordingly, we may not be required to have our independent registered public accounting firm attest to the effectiveness of our internal controls until as late as our annual report for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2029, if we are no longer a “smaller reporting company.” Once it is required to do so, our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event it is not satisfied with the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed. Compliance with these requirements will strain our resources, increase our costs and distract management, and we may be unable to comply with these requirements in a timely or cost-effective manner.

Current wording

We are required to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which require management to certify financial and other information in our quarterly and annual reports and provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. As of December 31, 2025, we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act. As such, our independent registered public accounting firm is required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and we are required to disclose, to the extent material, changes made in our internal control over financial reporting on a quarterly basis. Our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event it is not satisfied with the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed. Compliance with these requirements will increase demands on our resources, increase our costs and distract management, and we may be unable to comply with these requirements in a timely or cost-effective manner.

Previous wording

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports, prevent fraud and operate successfully as a public company. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our reputation and operating results will be harmed. We are required, under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting beginning in the year following this Annual Report. This assessment will need to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting. We will take steps to improve control processes as appropriate, validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented, and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for our internal control over financial reporting. If we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting during the evaluation and testing process, we may be unable to conclude that our internal controls are effective.

Current wording

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports, prevent fraud and operate successfully as a public company. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our reputation and operating results will be harmed. We are required, under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This assessment will need to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting. We will take steps to improve control processes as appropriate, validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented, and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for our internal control over financial reporting. If we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting during the evaluation and testing process, we may be unable to conclude that our internal controls are effective.

Previous wording

Additionally, when we cease to be an “emerging growth company” under the federal securities laws, our independent registered public accounting firm may be required to express an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls. If we are unable to confirm that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could cause the price of our Class A shares to decline.

Current wording

If we are unable to confirm that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could cause the price of our Class A shares to decline.

Previous wording

We are a holding company and will have no material assets other than our equity interest in OpCo, and we do not have any independent means of generating revenue. To the extent OpCo has available cash we intend to cause OpCo to make (i) generally pro rata distributions to all holders of OpCo Units (“OpCo Unitholders”), including us, in an amount at least sufficient to allow us to pay taxes, (ii) additional distributions in an amount generally intended to allow the OpCo Unitholders (other than us) to satisfy their respective income tax liabilities with respect to their allocable share of the income of OpCo (based on certain assumptions and conventions), which additional distributions may be made on a pro rata basis to all OpCo Unitholders (including us) or a non-pro rata basis to OpCo Unitholders (other than us) in redemption of OpCo Units from such holders and (iii) non-pro rata distributions to us in an amount sufficient to cover our public company and other overhead expenses. In addition, as the sole managing member of OpCo, we intend to cause OpCo to make pro rata distributions to all of its unitholders, including to us, in an amount sufficient to allow us to fund dividends to our shareholders in accordance with our dividend policy, to the extent our board of directors declares such dividends. OpCo is a distinct legal entity and may be subject to legal or contractual restrictions that, under certain circumstances, may limit our ability to obtain cash from it. If OpCo is unable to make distributions, we may not receive adequate distributions, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows, financial position and ability to fund any dividends.

Current wording

We are a holding company and will have no material assets other than our equity interest in OpCo, and we do not have any independent means of generating revenue. To the extent OpCo has available cash we intend to cause OpCo to make (i) generally pro rata distributions to all holders (“OpCo Unitholders”) of limited liability interests in OpCo (“OpCo Units”), including us, in an amount at least sufficient to allow us to pay taxes, (ii) additional distributions in an amount generally intended to allow the OpCo Unitholders (other than us) to satisfy their respective income tax liabilities with respect to their allocable share of the income of OpCo (based on certain assumptions and conventions), which additional distributions may be made on a pro rata basis to all OpCo Unitholders (including us) or a non-pro rata basis to OpCo Unitholders (other than us) in redemption of OpCo Units from such holders and (iii) non-pro rata distributions to us in an amount sufficient to cover our public company and other overhead expenses. In addition, as the sole managing member of OpCo, we intend to cause OpCo to make pro rata distributions to all of its unitholders, including to us, in an amount sufficient to allow us to fund dividends to our shareholders in accordance with our dividend policy, to the extent our board of directors declares such dividends. OpCo is a distinct legal entity and may be subject to legal or contractual restrictions that, under certain circumstances, may limit our ability to obtain cash from it. If OpCo is unable to make distributions, we may not receive adequate distributions, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows, financial position and ability to fund any dividends.