UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES INC

Previous wording

Texas: We own 7 inpatient acute care hospitals, 13 free-standing emergency departments, 1 acute outpatient center and 20 inpatient behavioral healthcare facilities as listed in Item 2. Properties. On a combined basis, these facilities contributed 16% and 17% of our consolidated net revenues during 2024 and 2023, respectively. On a combined basis, after deducting an allocation for corporate overhead expense, these facilities generated 21% in 2024 and 26% in 2023, of our income from operations after net income attributable to noncontrolling interest.

Current wording

Texas: We own 7 inpatient acute care hospitals, 16 free-standing emergency departments, 2 acute outpatient centers and 20 inpatient behavioral healthcare facilities and 14 behavioral healthcare outpatient facilities as listed in Item 2. Properties. On a combined basis, these facilities contributed 16% of our consolidated net revenues during each of 2025 and 2024. On a combined basis, after deducting an allocation for corporate overhead expense, these facilities generated 19% in 2025 and 21% in 2024, of our income from operations after net income attributable to noncontrolling interest.

Previous wording

Nevada: We own 10 inpatient acute care hospitals, 11 free-standing emergency departments, 3 acute outpatient centers and 4 inpatient behavioral healthcare facilities as listed in Item 2. Properties. On a combined basis, these facilities contributed 18% and 16% of our consolidated net revenues during 2024 and 2023, respectively. On a combined basis, after deducting an allocation for corporate overhead expense, these facilities generated 27% in 2024 and 16% in 2023, of our income from operations after net income attributable to noncontrolling interest.

Current wording

Nevada: We own 10 inpatient acute care hospitals, 13 free-standing emergency departments, 4 acute outpatient centers and 4 inpatient behavioral healthcare facilities and 1 behavioral outpatient facility as listed in Item 2. Properties. On a combined basis, these facilities contributed 17% of our consolidated net revenues during each of 2025 and 2024. On a combined basis, after deducting an allocation for corporate overhead expense, these facilities generated 21% in 2025 and 27% in 2024, of our income from operations after net income attributable to noncontrolling interest.

Previous wording

California: We own 5 inpatient acute care hospitals, 2 acute outpatient centers, 9 inpatient behavioral healthcare facilities and 3 behavioral healthcare outpatient facilities as listed in Item 2. Properties. On a combined basis, these facilities contributed 11% of our consolidated net revenues during both 2024 and 2023, respectively. On a combined basis, after deducting an allocation for corporate overhead expense, these facilities generated 12% in both 2024 and 2023, of our income from operations after net income attributable to noncontrolling interest.

Current wording

California: We own 5 inpatient acute care hospitals, 4 acute outpatient centers, 9 inpatient behavioral healthcare facilities and 12 behavioral healthcare outpatient facilities as listed in Item 2. Properties. On a combined basis, these facilities contributed 11% of our consolidated net revenues during each of 2025 and 2024. On a combined basis, after deducting an allocation for corporate overhead expense, these facilities generated 13% in 2025 and 12% in 2024, of our income from operations after net income attributable to noncontrolling interest.

Previous wording

We derive a significant portion of our revenue from third-party payers, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Changes in these government programs in recent years have resulted in limitations on reimbursement and, in some cases, reduced levels of reimbursement for healthcare services. Payments from federal and state government programs are subject to statutory and regulatory changes, administrative rulings, interpretations and determinations, requirements for utilization review, and federal and state funding restrictions, all of which could materially increase or decrease program payments, as well as affect the cost of providing service to patients and the timing of payments to facilities. Changes resulting from the outcome of the 2024 elections may include increased reliance on Medicare Advantage programs, work requirements for Medicaid waiver program eligibility, increased focus on hospital outpatient site neutral payment policies, and similar initiatives that may reduce the availability of funding for federal healthcare programs or make eligibility for benefits more difficult. There have been proposals to substantially decrease federal funding for state Medicaid Programs. Any significant reduction in federal Medicaid funding to states would likely result in states reducing Medicaid payments to us which would have a material adverse effect on us. We are unable to predict the effect of recent and future policy changes on our operations. In addition, the uncertainty and fiscal pressures placed upon federal and state governments as a result of, among other things, deterioration in general economic conditions and the funding requirements from the federal healthcare reform legislation, may affect the availability of taxpayer funds for Medicare and Medicaid programs. In addition, the vast majority of the net revenues generated at our behavioral health facilities located in the United Kingdom are derived from governmental payers. If the rates paid or the scope of services covered by governmental payers in the United States or United Kingdom are reduced, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.

Current wording

We derive a significant portion of our revenue from third-party payers, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Changes in these government programs in recent years have resulted in limitations on reimbursement and, in some cases, reduced levels of reimbursement for healthcare services. Payments from federal and state government programs are subject to statutory and regulatory changes, administrative rulings, interpretations and determinations, requirements for utilization review, and federal and state funding restrictions, all of which could materially increase or decrease program payments, as well as affect the cost of providing service to patients and the timing of payments to facilities. Legislation adopted on July 4, 2025 (the One Big Beautiful Budget Act), attaches work and community service requirements to eligibility for Medicaid benefits that will have the effect of limiting Medicaid enrollment and expenditure. That legislation also places limits on provider fees used to increase federal Medicaid funding to states. The legislation prohibits states not previously having expanded Medicaid eligibility, which includes 9 states where we have facilities, to 138% of federal poverty level from increasing the rate of current provider fees which fund certain state supplemental payments or increasing the base of the fee to a class or items of services that the fee did not previously cover. That current provider fee threshold will remain at 6%. For states having expanded Medicaid eligibility under the legislation, the provider fee threshold will be reduced by 0.5% annually between federal fiscal years 2028 and 2032 with the resulting threshold ultimately becoming 3.5%. Under current law, and based on our current expectations, we estimate that, commencing with the 2028 state fiscal years, our aggregate annual net benefit will be reduced, on an annually increasing and relatively pro rata basis, by approximately $432 million to $480 million by 2032. The legislation also eliminates certain insurance exchange premium tax credits beyond 2025 and exchange enrollment is expected to be adversely impacted. On January 8, 2026, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R.1834 to extend for three years the enhanced premium tax credits (“EPTCs”) that expired on December 31, 2025, which is currently undergoing review in the Senate. Any significant reduction in federal Medicaid funding to states would likely result in states reducing Medicaid payments to us. We are unable to predict the effect of future policy changes on our operations. In addition, the uncertainty and fiscal pressures placed upon federal and state governments as a result of, among other things, deterioration in general economic conditions and the funding requirements from the federal healthcare reform legislation, may affect the availability of taxpayer funds for Medicare and Medicaid programs. All of these changes may be expected to reduce our revenue and likely increase the level of uncom…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

As discussed in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Summary of Various State Medicaid Supplemental Payment Programs, we receive revenues from various state and county-based programs, including Medicaid in all states in which we operate. We receive annual Medicaid revenues of approximately $100 million, or greater, from each of Texas, Nevada, California, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Washington, D.C., Kentucky, Florida, Virginia, Massachusetts and Mississippi. We also receive Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments from certain states including, most significantly,

Current wording

As discussed in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Summary of Various State Medicaid Supplemental Payment Programs, we receive revenues from various state and county-based programs, including Medicaid in all states in which we operate. We receive annual Medicaid revenues of approximately $100 million, or greater, from each of Texas, California, Nevada, Washington, D.C., Illinois, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, Massachusetts, Michigan, Florida, Mississippi and Washington. Most of these programs are approved on a year-to-year basis and there is no assurance that these revenues will continue at their current rates or at all. We are therefore particularly sensitive to potential reductions in Medicaid and other state-based revenue programs as well as regulatory, economic, environmental and competitive changes in those states.

Previous wording

We expect continued third-party efforts to aggressively manage reimbursement levels and cost controls. Reductions in reimbursement amounts received from third-party payers could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and our results of operations.

Current wording

We expect that government pressure on managed care organizations through static or reduced funding received by these payers from government sources such as through Medicare Advantage plans will in turn increase the pressure on us to not increase or reduce the rates charged by us to patients covered by those plans. We also expect continued third-party efforts to aggressively manage reimbursement levels and cost controls. Reductions in reimbursement amounts received from third-party payers could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and our results of operations.

Previous wording

In our acute care segment, during the past few years we experienced significant increases in hospital-based physician related expenses, especially in the areas of emergency room care and anesthesiology. We have implemented various initiatives to mitigate the increased expense, to the degree possible, which has moderated the rate of increase experienced during 2024 and 2023. However, significant increases in these physician related expenses could have a material unfavorable impact on our future results of operations.

Current wording

In our acute care segment, during the past few years we experienced significant increases in hospital-based physician related expenses, especially in the areas of emergency room care and anesthesiology. We have implemented various initiatives to mitigate the increased expense, to the degree possible, which has moderated the rate of increase experienced during the past several years. However, significant increases in these physician related expenses could have a material unfavorable impact on our future results of operations.

Previous wording

The nationwide shortage of nurses and other clinical staff and support personnel has been a significant operating issue facing us and other healthcare providers. In particular, like others in the healthcare industry, we experienced a shortage of nurses and other clinical staff and support personnel at our acute care and behavioral health care hospitals in many geographic areas which was exacerbated by the COVID‑19 pandemic. In some areas, the increased demand for care during the COVID-19 pandemic put a strain on our resources and staff, which required us to utilize higher‑cost temporary labor and pay premiums above standard compensation for essential workers. Personnel shortages may require us to further enhance wages and benefits to recruit and retain nurses and other clinical staff and support personnel or require us to hire expensive temporary personnel. To the extent we cannot maintain sufficient staffing levels at our hospitals, we may be required to limit the acute and behavioral health care services provided at certain of our hospitals which would have a corresponding adverse effect on our net revenues. In addition, in some markets such as California, there are requirements to maintain specified nurse-staffing levels which could adversely affect our net revenues to the extent we cannot meet those levels. If these states increase mandatory nurse-staffing ratios or additional states in which we operate adopt mandatory nurse-staffing ratios, such changes could significantly affect labor costs and have an adverse impact on revenues if we are required to limit admissions in order to meet the required ratios.

Current wording

The nationwide shortage of nurses and other clinical staff and support personnel has been a significant operating issue facing us and other healthcare providers. In particular, like others in the healthcare industry, we experienced a shortage of nurses and other clinical staff and support personnel at our acute care and behavioral health care hospitals in many geographic areas which was exacerbated by the COVID‑19 pandemic. In some areas, the increased demand for care during the COVID-19 pandemic put a strain on our resources and staff, which required us to utilize higher‑cost temporary labor and pay premiums above standard compensation for essential workers. Personnel shortages may require us to further enhance wages and benefits to recruit and retain nurses and other clinical staff and support personnel or require us to hire expensive temporary personnel. To the extent we cannot maintain sufficient staffing levels at our hospitals, we may be required to limit the acute and behavioral health care services provided at certain of our hospitals which would have a corresponding adverse effect on our net revenues.

Previous wording

Beginning in 2025 and continuing through 2027, the Medicaid disproportionate share hospital (“DSH”) allotment to the states from federal funds will be reduced. Such reductions have been delayed several times, most recently under the American Relief Act 2025, which delayed the DSH reductions through March 31, 2025. During the reduction period, state Medicaid DSH allotments from federal funds will be reduced by $8 billion annually. Reductions are imposed on states based on percentage of uninsured individuals, Medicaid utilization and uncompensated care. We receive Medicaid DSH payments in certain states including, most significantly, Texas. We are therefore particularly sensitive to potential reductions in Medicaid and other state-based revenue programs as well as regulatory, economic, environmental and competitive changes in those states. We can provide no assurance that reductions to revenues earned pursuant to these programs, particularly in the above-mentioned states, will not have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations.

Current wording

Beginning in federal fiscal year 2028, the Medicaid disproportionate share hospital (“DSH”) allotment to the states from federal funds will be reduced. During the reduction period, state Medicaid DSH allotments from federal funds will be reduced by $8 billion. Reductions are imposed on states based on percentage of uninsured individuals, Medicaid utilization and uncompensated care. We receive Medicaid DSH payments in certain states including, most significantly, Texas. We are therefore particularly sensitive to potential reductions in Medicaid and other state-based revenue programs as well as regulatory, economic, environmental and competitive changes in those states. We can provide no assurance that reductions to revenues earned pursuant to these programs, particularly in the above-mentioned states, will not have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations.

Previous wording

Although it was expected that as a result of the Legislation there would be a reduction in uninsured patients, which would reduce our expense from uncollectible accounts receivable, the Legislation makes a number of other changes to Medicare and Medicaid which we believe may have an adverse impact on us. The Legislation revises reimbursement under the Medicare and Medicaid programs to emphasize the efficient delivery of high quality care and contains a number of incentives and penalties under these programs to achieve these goals. The Legislation implements a value-based purchasing program, which will reward the delivery of efficient care. Conversely, certain facilities will receive reduced reimbursement for failing to meet quality parameters; such hospitals will include those with excessive readmission or hospital-acquired condition rates. As a result of the 2024 federal elections and the Braidwood Management v. Becerra litigation currently before the U.S. Supreme Court, it remains unclear what portions of that legislation may remain, or what any replacement or alternative programs may be created by future legislation.

Current wording

Although it was expected that as a result of the Legislation there would be a reduction in uninsured patients, which would reduce our expense from uncollectible accounts receivable, the Legislation makes a number of other changes to Medicare and Medicaid which we believe may have an adverse impact on us. The Legislation revises reimbursement under the Medicare and Medicaid programs to emphasize the efficient delivery of high quality care and contains a number of incentives and penalties under these programs to achieve these goals. The Legislation implements a value-based purchasing program, which will reward the delivery of efficient care. Conversely, certain facilities will receive reduced reimbursement for failing to meet quality parameters; such hospitals will include those with excessive readmission or hospital-acquired condition rates. As a result of the 2024 and upcoming 2026 federal elections it remains unclear what portions of that legislation may remain, or what any replacement or alternative programs may be created by future legislation.

Previous wording

A 2012 U.S. Supreme Court ruling limited the federal government’s ability to expand health insurance coverage by holding unconstitutional sections of the Legislation that sought to withdraw federal funding for state noncompliance with certain Medicaid coverage requirements. Pursuant to that decision, the federal government may not penalize states that choose not to participate in the Medicaid expansion program by reducing their existing Medicaid funding. Therefore, states can choose to accept or not to participate without risking the loss of federal Medicaid funding. As a result, many states, including Texas, have not expanded their Medicaid programs without the threat of loss of federal funding. In the past, CMS has granted section 1115 demonstration waivers providing for work and community engagement requirements for certain Medicaid eligible individuals. The previous Trump administration's section 1115 waiver policy emphasized work requirements, eligibility restrictions on Medicaid, and capped funding. The second Trump administration may, again, take a similar approach.

Current wording

A 2012 U.S. Supreme Court ruling limited the federal government’s ability to expand health insurance coverage by holding unconstitutional sections of the Legislation that sought to withdraw federal funding for state noncompliance with certain Medicaid coverage requirements. Pursuant to that decision, the federal government may not penalize states that choose not to participate in the Medicaid expansion program by reducing their existing Medicaid funding. Therefore, states can choose to accept or not to participate without risking the loss of federal Medicaid funding. As a result, many states, including Texas, have not expanded their Medicaid programs without the threat of loss of federal funding. In the past, CMS has granted section 1115 demonstration waivers providing for work and community engagement requirements for certain Medicaid eligible individuals. The previous Trump administration's section

Previous wording

The Legislation and its implementation have been, and remain, politically controversial. While attempts to repeal the entirety of the Legislation have not been successful to date, a key provision of the Legislation was repealed as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and on December 14, 2018, a Texas Federal District Court Judge declared the Legislation unconstitutional, reasoning that the individual mandate tax penalty was essential to and not severable from the remainder of the Legislation. The case was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court which ultimately held in California v. Texas that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the Legislation’s requirement to obtain minimum essential health insurance coverage, or the individual mandate. The Court dismissed the case without specifically ruling on the constitutionality of the Legislation. On September 7, 2022, the same Texas Federal District Court judge, in the case of Braidwood Management v. Becerra, ruled that the requirement that certain health plans cover services with an “A” or “B” recommendation from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force without cost sharing violates the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution and that the coverage of certain HIV prevention medication violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The government has appealed the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are unable to predict the outcome of this litigation or its potential impact at this time.

Current wording

The Legislation and its implementation have been, and remain, politically controversial. While attempts to repeal the entirety of the Legislation have not been successful to date, a key provision of the Legislation was repealed as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and on December 14, 2018, a Texas Federal District Court Judge declared the Legislation unconstitutional, reasoning that the individual mandate tax penalty was essential to and not severable from the remainder of the Legislation. The case was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court which ultimately held in California v. Texas that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the Legislation’s requirement to obtain minimum essential health insurance coverage, or the individual mandate. The Court dismissed the case without specifically ruling on the constitutionality of the Legislation. On September 7, 2022, the same Texas Federal District Court judge, in the case of Braidwood Management v. Becerra, ruled that the requirement that certain health plans cover services with an “A” or “B” recommendation from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force without cost sharing violates the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution and that the coverage of certain HIV prevention medication violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The matter was ultimately appealed before the U.S. Supreme Court, which in its June 2025 Kennedy v. Braidwood Management decision, opined in favor of HIV preventive care coverage. The impact of this decision on us cannot be predicted.

Previous wording

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) was passed on August 16, 2022, which among other things, allows for CMS to negotiate prices for certain single-source drugs and biologics reimbursed under Medicare Part B and Part D, beginning with 10 high-cost drugs paid for by Medicare Part D starting in 2026, followed by 15 Part D drugs in 2027, 15 Part B or Part D drugs in 2028, and 20 Part B or Part D drugs in 2029 and beyond. The IRA also continued certain subsidies for individuals to obtain private health insurance under the Legislation through 2025. The effect of the 2024 federal elections on IRA price negotiation provisions or on the likelihood of extended health insurance enrollment subsidies beyond 2025 is not yet known. The Trump administration has already taken steps to undo certain Biden-era executive orders, including those intended to lower drug costs for beneficiaries, and to freeze funding for federal programs. While the administration’s initial freeze has since been rescinded, the administration is likely to make other attempts to reduce federal program expenditures and can generally be expected to oppose increases in ACA and Medicaid enrollment.

Current wording

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) was passed on August 16, 2022, which among other things, allows for CMS to negotiate prices for certain single-source drugs and biologics reimbursed under Medicare Part B and Part D, beginning with 10 high-cost drugs paid for by Medicare Part D starting in 2026, followed by 15 Part D drugs in 2027, 15 Part B or Part D drugs in 2028, and 20 Part B or Part D drugs in 2029 and beyond. The IRA also continued certain subsidies for individuals to obtain private health insurance under the Legislation through 2025. These enhanced subsidies expired on December 31, 2025. The Trump administration has already taken steps to undo certain Biden-era executive orders, including those intended to lower drug costs for beneficiaries, and to freeze funding for federal programs. While the administration’s initial freeze has since been rescinded, the administration is likely to make other attempts to reduce federal program expenditures and can generally be expected to oppose increases in ACA and Medicaid enrollment.

Previous wording

Cumberland Hospital for Children and Adolescents (“Cumberland”), an indirect subsidiary of the Company, is a defendant in multi-plaintiff lawsuits filed in the Circuit Court for Richmond, Virginia (the “Cumberland Litigation”), relating to allegations of inappropriate sexual contact during medical examinations by Dr. Daniel Davidow, an independent contractor and the former medical director for Cumberland. The Company and UHS of Delaware, Inc., our administrative services subsidiary (“UHS Delaware”), were also named as co-defendants in the Cumberland Litigation. Plaintiffs have asserted claims of negligence, assault and battery (against Dr. Davidow), false imprisonment, violations of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act (“VCPA”), and vicarious liability for Dr. Davidow’s conduct against Cumberland, the Company, and UHS Delaware. The Company and UHS Delaware were dismissed from the action during the trial, which occurred in September, 2024. On September 27, 2024, a jury entered a verdict finding Dr. Davidow and Cumberland liable and awarded these three plaintiffs combined compensatory damages of $60 million for all liability theories, an additional combined $180 million in trebled damages for violation of the VCPA, and an additional combined $120 million in punitive damages. Cumberland is evaluating all legal options and intends to challenge this verdict, including the amounts awarded in the verdict, in post-trial proceedings and on appeal. Based upon Virginia law, we expect that the punitive damage amount should be reduced to a combined maximum of $1.05 million as a matter of law. There are approximately 40 additional plaintiffs making similar allegations with claims pending in the Cumberland Litigation. We expect that the trials for the remaining plaintiffs, as well as any additional plaintiffs, will be scheduled at various times over the next several years and will continue to be tried in small groups.

Current wording

For example, as discussed elsewhere herein, Cumberland Hospital for Children and Adolescents (“Cumberland”), an indirect subsidiary of the Company, is a defendant in multi-plaintiff lawsuits filed in the Circuit Court for Richmond, Virginia (the “Cumberland Litigation”), relating to allegations of inappropriate sexual contact during medical examinations by Dr. Daniel Davidow, an independent contractor and the former medical director for Cumberland. The Company and UHS of Delaware, Inc., our administrative services subsidiary (“UHS Delaware”), were also named as co-defendants in the Cumberland Litigation. Plaintiffs have asserted claims of negligence, assault and battery (against Dr. Davidow), false imprisonment, violations of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act (“VCPA”), and vicarious liability for Dr. Davidow’s conduct against Cumberland, the Company, and UHS Delaware. The Company and UHS Delaware were dismissed from the action during the trial, which occurred in September, 2024. On September 27, 2024, a jury entered a verdict finding Dr. Davidow and Cumberland liable and awarded these three plaintiffs combined compensatory damages of $60 million for all liability theories, an additional combined $180 million in trebled damages for violation of the VCPA, and an additional combined $120 million in punitive damages. Cumberland has filed post-trial motions challenging this verdict, including the amounts awarded in the verdict. Based upon Virginia law, the Court has recently reduced the punitive damage amount to a combined maximum of $1.05 million ($350,000 per plaintiff). Cumberland has filed a notice of appeal on the remaining verdict. Plaintiffs have separately filed a notice of appeal seeking to challenge the dismissal of the Company and UHS Delaware during trial, and the Court’s order reducing the punitive damages award against Cumberland. These appeals were recently dismissed by the appellate court without prejudice as premature because the judgments in favor of the first three plaintiffs are neither final nor enforceable at this time. There are approximately 40 additional plaintiffs making similar allegations with claims pending in the Cumberland Litigation. The Company and UHS Delaware remain defendants with respect to the remaining plaintiffs. We expect that the trials for the remaining plaintiffs, as well as any additional plaintiffs, will be scheduled at various times over the next several years. The next trial is tentatively planned to commence in August, 2026.

Previous wording

We are uncertain as to the ultimate financial exposure related to the Pavilion and Cumberland matters (which relate to occurrences in the 2020 policy year) and we can make no assurances regarding timing or substance of their outcome, or the amount of damages that may be ultimately held recoverable after post-judgment proceedings and appeals. As of December 31, 2024, without reduction for any potential amounts related to the Pavilion and Cumberland matters, the Company and its subsidiaries have aggregate insurance coverage of approximately $221 million remaining under commercial policies for matters applicable to the 2020 policy year (in excess of the applicable self-insured retention amounts of $10 million per single occurrence/$25 million for multi-plaintiff matters for professional liability claims and $3 million per occurrence for general liability claims). In the event the resolution of the Pavilion and/or Cumberland matters exhausts all or a significant portion of the remaining commercial insurance coverage available to the Company and its subsidiaries related to other matters that occurred in 2020, or the Pavilion and Cumberland matters cause the posting of large bonds or other collateral during the appeal processes, our future results of operations and capital resources would be materially adversely impacted.

Current wording

We are uncertain as to the ultimate financial exposure related to the Cumberland matter (which relate to occurrences in the 2020 policy year) and we can make no assurances regarding timing or substance of their outcome, or the amount of damages that may be ultimately held recoverable after post-judgment proceedings and appeals. As of December 31, 2025, without reduction for any potential amounts related to the Cumberland matter, the Company and its subsidiaries have aggregate insurance coverage of approximately $143 million remaining under commercial policies for matters applicable to the 2020 policy year (in excess of the applicable self-insured retention amounts of $10 million per single occurrence/$25 million for multi-plaintiff matters for professional liability claims and $3 million per occurrence for general liability claims). In the event the resolution of the Cumberland matter exhausts all or a significant portion of our/our subsidiaries' remaining commercial insurance coverage related to the 2020 policy year, or the Cumberland matter causes the posting of large bonds or other collateral during the appeal processes, our future results of operations and capital resources would be materially adversely impacted.

Previous wording

We are unable to predict the outcome of these matters or to reasonably estimate the amount or range of any such loss; however, these lawsuits and the related publicity and news articles that have been published concerning these matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows which in turn could cause a decline in our stock price. In an effort to resolve one or more of these matters, we may choose to negotiate a settlement. Amounts we pay to settle any of these matters may be material.

Current wording

We are unable to predict the outcome of these litigation matters or to reasonably estimate the amount or range of any such loss; however, these lawsuits and the related publicity and news articles that have been published concerning these matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows which in turn could cause a decline in our stock price. In an effort to resolve one or more of these matters, we may choose to negotiate a settlement. Amounts we pay to settle any of these matters may be material.

Previous wording

Changes U.S. and other countries’ trade policies and other factors beyond our control may adversely impact our business and operating results.

Current wording

Changes to U.S. and other countries’ trade policies and other factors beyond our control may adversely impact our business and operating results.

Previous wording

Changes in laws or policies governing the terms of foreign trade, and in particular increased trade restrictions, tariffs or taxes on imports from where our import products or materials (either directly or through our suppliers) could have an impact on our competitive position, business operations and financial results. In February 2025, the U.S. government imposed or threatened to impose new tariffs, including on imported products from Mexico, Canada and China. The impact of these tariffs is subject to a number of factors, including the effective date and duration of such tariffs, changes in the amount, scope and nature of the tariffs in the future, any retaliatory responses to such actions that the target countries may take and any mitigating actions that may become available. If significant tariffs or other restrictions are imposed on our imported pharmaceutical ingredients, medical devices, medical equipment and their ingredients and components, there could be significant strain on our supply chains, causing major disruptions in procurement processes and contract negotiations with suppliers due to increased costs, pricing volatility, longer procurement lead times and supply shortages stemming from increased production costs and import restrictions. As a result, we have to attempt to shift increased costs onto insurers and patients (in the form of higher service charges), reduce procurement volumes and delay equipment upgrades to mitigate financial strain. While we continue to evaluate the potential impact of the new tariffs on our business, given the uncertainty regarding the scope and duration of any new tariffs, as well as the potential for additional tariffs or trade barriers by the U.S., Mexico, Canada, China or other countries, we can provide no assurance that any strategies we implement to mitigate the impact of such tariffs or other trade actions will be successful.

Current wording

Changes in laws or policies governing the terms of foreign trade, and in particular increased trade restrictions, tariffs or taxes on imports from where our import products or materials (either directly or through our suppliers) could have an impact on our competitive position, business operations and financial results. Beginning in February 2025, the U.S. government has imposed or has threatened to impose new tariffs, including on imported products from the European Union, Mexico, Canada and China. The impact of these tariffs is subject to a number of factors, including the effective date and duration of such tariffs, changes in the amount, scope and nature of the tariffs in the future, any retaliatory responses to such actions that the target countries may take and any mitigating actions that may become available. If significant tariffs or other restrictions are imposed on our imported pharmaceutical ingredients, medical devices, medical equipment and their ingredients and components, there could be significant strain on our supply chains, causing major disruptions in procurement processes and contract negotiations with suppliers due to increased costs, pricing volatility, longer procurement lead times and supply shortages stemming from increased production costs and import restrictions. As a result, we have to attempt to shift increased costs onto insurers and patients (in the form of higher service charges), reduce procurement volumes and delay equipment upgrades to mitigate financial strain. While we continue to evaluate the potential impact of the new tariffs on our business, given the uncertainty regarding the scope and duration of any new tariffs, as well as the potential for additional tariffs or trade barriers by the U.S., the European Union, Mexico, Canada, China or other countries, we can provide no assurance that any strategies we implement to mitigate the impact of such tariffs or other trade actions will be successful.

Previous wording

As cyber criminals continue to become more sophisticated through evolution of their tactics, techniques and procedures, we have taken, and will continue to take, additional preventive measures to strengthen the cyber defenses of our networks and data. Although we continue to regularly review and enhance our IT systems and cybersecurity controls, we and our third-party provider have experienced, and may experience in the future, cybersecurity incidents. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 (as filed on February 27, 2024) for information regarding the 2024 cyber incident at UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and the cyber incident we experienced in 2020. While to date no incident had a material impact on our operations or financial results, we cannot guarantee that material incidents will not occur in the future. If any of our or our third-party service providers’ systems are damaged, fail to function properly or otherwise become unavailable, we may incur substantial costs to repair or replace them, and may experience loss or corruption of critical data such as protected health information or other data subject to privacy laws and proprietary business information and interruptions or disruptions and delays in our ability to perform critical functions, which could materially and adversely affect our businesses and results of operations and could result in significant penalties or fines, litigation, loss of customers, significant damage to our reputation and business, and other losses. In the event of a material breach or cyber-attack, the associated expenses and losses may exceed our current insurance coverage for such events. In addition, some adverse consequences are not insurable, such as reputational harm and third-party business interruption. In addition, our future results of operations, as well as our reputation, could be adversely impacted by theft, destruction, loss, or misappropriation of public health information, other confidential data or proprietary business information. Further, consumer confidence in the integrity, availability and confidentiality of information systems and information, including patient personal information and critical operations data, in the healthcare industry generally could be impacted to the extent there are successful cyberattacks at other healthcare services companies, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.

Current wording

As cyber criminals continue to become more sophisticated through evolution of their tactics, techniques and procedures, we have taken, and will continue to take, additional preventive measures to strengthen the cyber defenses of our networks and data. Although we continue to regularly review and enhance our IT systems and cybersecurity controls, we and our third-party provider have experienced, and may experience in the future, cybersecurity incidents. While to date no incident had a material impact on our operations or financial results, we cannot guarantee that material incidents will not occur in the future. If any of our or our third-party service providers’ systems are damaged, fail to function properly or otherwise become unavailable, we may incur substantial costs to repair or replace them, and may experience loss or corruption of critical data such as protected health information or other data subject to privacy laws and proprietary business information and interruptions or disruptions and delays in our ability to perform critical functions, which could materially and adversely affect our businesses and results of operations and could result in significant penalties or fines, litigation, loss of customers, significant damage to our reputation and business, and other losses. In the event of a material breach or cyber-attack, the associated expenses and losses may exceed our current insurance coverage for such events. In addition, some adverse consequences are not insurable, such as reputational harm and third-party business interruption. In addition, our future results of operations, as well as our reputation, could be adversely impacted by theft, destruction, loss, or misappropriation of public health information, other confidential data or proprietary business information. Further, consumer confidence in the integrity, availability and confidentiality of information systems and information, including patient personal information and critical operations data, in the healthcare industry generally could be impacted to the extent there are successful cyberattacks at other healthcare services companies, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.

Previous wording

In addition, as of December 31, 2024, we had approximately $3.9 billion of goodwill recorded on our consolidated balance sheets. Should the revenues and financial results of our acute care and/or behavioral health care facilities be materially, unfavorably impacted due to, among other things, a worsening of the economic and employment conditions in the United States that could negatively impact our patient volumes and reimbursement rates, a continued rise in the unemployment rate and increases in the number of uninsured patients treated at our facilities, we may incur future charges to recognize impairment in the carrying value of our goodwill and other intangible assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

Current wording

In addition, as of December 31, 2025, we had approximately $4.0 billion of goodwill recorded on our consolidated balance sheet. Should the revenues and financial results of our acute care and/or behavioral health care facilities be materially, unfavorably impacted due to, among other things, a worsening of the economic and employment conditions in the United States that could negatively impact our patient volumes and reimbursement rates, a continued rise in the unemployment rate and increases in the number of uninsured patients treated at our facilities, we may incur future charges to recognize impairment in the carrying value of our goodwill and other intangible assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

Previous wording

At December 31, 2024, 24.4 million shares of Class B Common Stock were reserved for issuance upon conversion of shares of Class A, C and D Common Stock outstanding, for issuance upon exercise of options to purchase Class B Common Stock and for issuance of stock under other incentive plans. Class A, C and D Common Stock are convertible on a share for share basis into Class B Common Stock. To the extent that these shares were converted into or exercised for shares of Class B Common Stock, the number of shares of Class B Common Stock available for trading in the public market place would increase substantially and the current holders of Class B Common Stock would own a smaller percentage of that class.

Current wording

At December 31, 2025, 21.3 million shares of Class B Common Stock were reserved for issuance upon conversion of shares of Class A, C and D Common Stock outstanding, for issuance upon exercise of options to purchase Class B Common Stock and for issuance of stock under other incentive plans. Class A, C and D Common Stock are convertible on a share for share basis into Class B Common Stock. To the extent that these shares are converted into or exercised for shares of Class B Common Stock, the number of shares of Class B Common Stock available for trading in the public market place would increase substantially and the current holders of Class B Common Stock would own a smaller percentage of that class.

Previous wording

In July 2024, our Board of Directors authorized a $1.0 billion increase to our stock repurchase program. During 2024, in conjunction with this program, we have repurchased approximately 3.0 million shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $599 million. As of December 31, 2024, we had an aggregate available repurchase authorization of approximately $824 million.

Current wording

In October 2025, our Board of Directors authorized a $1.5 billion increase to our stock repurchase program. During 2025, in conjunction with this program, we have repurchased approximately 4.7 million shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $899 million. As of December 31, 2025, we had an aggregate available repurchase authorization of approximately $1.425 billion.

Previous wording

As of March 18, 2024, the shares of Class A and Class C Common Stock, which constituted 10.8% of the aggregate outstanding shares of our Common Stock, had the right to elect five members of the Board of Directors and constituted 90.5% of our general voting power as of that date. Also as of that date, the shares of Class B and Class D Common Stock (excluding shares issuable upon exercise of options), which constituted 89.2% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock, had the right to elect two members of the Board of Directors and constituted 9.5% of our general voting power as of that date.

Current wording

As of March 17, 2025, the shares of Class A and Class C Common Stock, which constituted 11.1% of the aggregate outstanding shares of our Common Stock, had the right to elect five members of the Board of Directors and constituted 90.8% of our general voting power as of that date. Also as of that date, the shares of Class B and Class D Common Stock (excluding shares issuable upon exercise of options), which constituted 88.9% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock, had the right to elect two members of the Board of Directors and constituted 9.2% of our general voting power as of that date.