LifeStance Health Group, Inc.

Previous wording

If reimbursement rates paid by third-party payors are reduced or if third-party payors otherwise restrain our ability to obtain or deliver care to patients, our business could be harmed.

Current wording

If reimbursement rates paid by third-party payors are reduced or if third-party payors otherwise restrain our ability to obtain or deliver care to patients, our business could be materially harmed.

Previous wording

Private third-party payors pay for the services that we provide to many of our patients. During the year ended December 31, 2024, 96% of our patients were insured as of their latest visit. If any commercial third-party payors reduce their reimbursement rates or elect not to cover some or all of our services, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be harmed. Third-party payors may also elect to create narrow networks, which may exclude our clinicians, or otherwise terminate their agreement with us. A majority of our payor relationships operate across multiple independent regional contracts. Changes in reimbursement rates from these or other large commercial payors could adversely impact our business and results of operations.

Current wording

Private third-party payors pay for the services that we provide to many of our patients. During the year ended December 31, 2025, 95% of our patients were insured as of their latest visit. If any commercial third-party payors reduce their reimbursement rates or elect not to cover some or all of our services, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be harmed. Third-party payors may also elect to create narrow networks, which may exclude our clinicians, or otherwise terminate their agreement with us. A majority of our payor relationships operate across multiple independent regional contracts. Changes in reimbursement rates from these or other large commercial payors could adversely impact our business and results of operations.

Previous wording

Two payors individually exceeded 10% of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024: UnitedHealthcare and Elevance Health, Inc., comprising 17% and 15% of our total revenue, respectively. Therefore, changes in the reimbursement rates, coverage offered by these payors or loss of in-network status may adversely impact our business and results of operations more than changes implemented by other payors.

Current wording

Two payors individually exceeded 10% of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025: UnitedHealthcare and Elevance Health, Inc., comprising 14% and 15% of our total revenue, respectively. Therefore, changes in the reimbursement rates, coverage offered by these payors or loss of in-network status may adversely impact our business and results of operations more than changes implemented by other payors.

Previous wording

A portion of our revenue comes from government healthcare programs. Payments from federal and state government programs are subject to statutory and regulatory changes, administrative rulings, interpretations and determinations, requirements for utilization review and federal and state funding restrictions, each of which could increase or decrease program payments, as well as affect the cost of providing services to patients and the timing of payments. We are unable to predict the effect of recent and future policy changes on our operations. These rates are also generally adjusted annually for inflation. However, those adjustments may not reflect actual increases of the cost of providing healthcare services. In addition, the uncertainty and fiscal pressures placed upon federal and state governments as a result of, among other things, deterioration in general economic conditions and the funding requirements from federal healthcare reform legislation, may affect the availability of taxpayer funds for Medicare and Medicaid programs. Changes in government healthcare programs may reduce or delay the reimbursement we receive from them or private payors and could adversely impact our business and results of operations.

Current wording

A portion of our revenue comes from government healthcare programs. Payments from federal and state government programs are subject to statutory and regulatory changes, administrative rulings, interpretations and determinations, requirements for utilization review and federal and state funding restrictions, each of which could increase or decrease program payments, as well as affect the cost of providing services to patients and the timing of payments. We are unable to predict the effect of recent and future policy changes on our operations. These rates are also generally adjusted annually for inflation. However, those adjustments may not reflect actual increases of the cost of providing healthcare services. In addition, the uncertainty and fiscal pressures placed upon federal and state governments as a result of, among other things, deterioration in general economic conditions and the funding requirements from federal healthcare reform legislation, such as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the “OBBBA”), may affect the availability of taxpayer funds for Medicare and Medicaid programs. Changes in government healthcare programs may reduce or delay the reimbursement we receive from them or private payors and could adversely impact our business and results of operations.

Previous wording

We have experienced significant growth since our inception in 2017. We continually execute a number of growth initiatives, strategies and operating plans designed to enhance our business. For example, our strategy includes recruiting new clinicians, growing our business by opening select de novo centers, building our relationships with payors and developing strategic relationships with other primary care and specialist physicians to offer an integrated care model and acquiring strategic high-quality existing centers. The anticipated benefits from these efforts are based on several assumptions that may prove to be inaccurate. Moreover, we may not be able to successfully complete these growth initiatives, strategies and operating plans and realize all of the benefits, including growth targets, that we expect to achieve, or it may be more costly to do so than we anticipate. For example, we may have increased expenses related to clinician education and licensing, as well as supervising, if we are a first employer for newly recruited clinicians. We may also pivot or delay our growth strategies, which may result in slower rates of net clinician growth or revenue growth compared to prior periods of significant growth.

Current wording

We have experienced significant growth since our inception in 2017. We continually execute a number of growth initiatives, strategies and operating plans designed to enhance our business. For example, our strategy includes recruiting new clinicians, growing our business by opening select new centers, building our relationships with payors and developing strategic relationships with other primary care and specialist physicians to offer an integrated care model and acquiring strategic high-quality existing centers. The anticipated benefits from these efforts are based on several assumptions that may prove to be inaccurate. Moreover, we may not be able to successfully complete these growth initiatives, strategies and operating plans and realize all of the benefits, including growth targets, that we expect to achieve, or it may be more costly to do so than we anticipate. For example, we may have increased expenses related to clinician education and licensing, as well as supervising, if we are a first employer for newly recruited clinicians. We may also pivot or delay our growth strategies, which may result in slower rates of net clinician growth or revenue growth compared to prior periods of significant growth.

Previous wording

Our significant growth in prior periods has and may continue to put strain on our business, operations and employees. We have also significantly increased the number of patient visits conducted over this period. To manage our current and anticipated future growth effectively, we must continue to maintain and enhance our financial and accounting systems and our IT infrastructure. For example, as we implement our growth strategy, we have made strategic investments in enterprise-level scalable infrastructure, including IT and technology support to continue to facilitate virtual services to patients. If our enterprise-level infrastructure is not aligned with the needs of our clinicians and staff, then we will not be able to realize the full capacity of our services and will not recognize a return on our investment in such infrastructure updates.

Current wording

Our significant growth in prior periods has and may continue to put strain on our business, operations and employees. We have also significantly increased the number of patient visits conducted over this period. To manage our current and anticipated future growth effectively, we must continue to maintain and enhance our financial and accounting systems, and our administrative and IT infrastructure. For example, as we implement our growth strategy, we have made strategic investments in enterprise-level scalable infrastructure, including IT, administrative, including billing and patient engagement, and technology support to continue to facilitate virtual services to patients. If our enterprise-level infrastructure is not aligned with the needs of our clinicians and staff, then we will not be able to realize the full capacity of our services and will not recognize a return on our investment in such infrastructure updates.

Previous wording

Our growth depends on our ability to recruit, acquire and retain clinicians.

Current wording

Our market growth depends on our ability to recruit, acquire and retain clinicians.

Previous wording

Our model requires us to continue to hire clinicians and establish a patient base in order to produce a return on investment. When we enter new markets or expand our presence within existing markets, we may encounter difficulties in attracting new clinicians due to competition and area demographics and may encounter difficulties in attracting new patients due to a lack of patient familiarity with our brand, our lack of familiarity with local patient preferences, and preexisting relationships between patients and clinicians who are not affiliated with our Company. We cannot be certain that we will produce the anticipated revenues or return on investment or that our performance will not be materially adversely affected by new or expanded competition in our market areas.

Current wording

Our model requires us to continue to hire clinicians and establish a patient base in order to produce a return on investment. When we enter new markets or expand our presence within existing markets, we may encounter difficulties in attracting new clinicians due to competition and area demographics and may encounter difficulties in attracting new patients due to a lack of patient familiarity with our brand, our lack of familiarity with local patient preferences, and preexisting relationships between patients and clinicians who are not affiliated with our Company. We may face increased challenges in this area as the clinician population reaches retirement age, particularly if there is a shortage of clinicians willing and able to provide comparable services. If we are not able to recruit, acquire, and retain clinicians, we cannot be certain that we will produce the anticipated revenues or return on investment or that our performance will not be materially adversely affected by new or expanded competition in our market areas.

Previous wording

We may encounter competitors that have greater name recognition, longer operating histories or more resources than us. Further, our current or potential competitors may be acquired by third parties with greater available resources. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly and effectively than we can to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or patient or clinician requirements and may have the ability to initiate or withstand substantial price competition. In light of these factors, even if our model is more effective than those of our competitors, current or potential patients or clinicians may choose to turn to our competitors. If we are unable to successfully compete in the mental healthcare market, our business and prospects would be materially harmed.

Current wording

We may encounter competitors that have greater name recognition, longer operating histories or more resources than us. Further, our current or potential competitors may be acquired by third parties with greater available resources. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly and effectively than we can to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or patient or clinician requirements and may have the ability to initiate or withstand substantial price competition. Any further consolidation in the mental healthcare market may exert downward pressure on prices of our services and may have an adverse impact on our business and financial performance. In light of these factors, even if our model is more effective than those of our competitors, current or potential patients or clinicians may choose to turn to our competitors. If we are unable to successfully compete in the mental healthcare market, our business and prospects would be materially harmed.

Previous wording

Market opportunity estimates and growth forecasts are subject to significant uncertainty and are based on assumptions and estimates that may not prove to be accurate. In particular, the size and growth of the overall U.S. mental healthcare market is subject to significant variables, including a changing regulatory environment and population demographics, which can be difficult to measure, estimate or quantify. Estimating and forecasting growth opportunities in any given market are difficult and affected by multiple variables such as population growth, concentration of prospective patients and population density, among other things. Further, we may not be able to sufficiently penetrate certain market segments included in our estimates and forecasts, including due to limited deployable capital, ineffective marketing efforts or the inability to develop sufficient presence in a given market to attract patients or contract with payors or primary care and other specialist physician partners in that market. In addition, increased unemployment may lead to a loss of insurance benefits for patients, negatively impacting their ability to access our services and, in turn, our financial performance. For these reasons, estimates and forecasts relating to the size and expected growth of our target markets may prove to be inaccurate. Even if the markets in which we compete meet our size estimates and forecasted growth, our business could fail to grow at similar rates, if at all.

Current wording

Market opportunity estimates and growth forecasts are subject to significant uncertainty and are based on assumptions and estimates that may not prove to be accurate. In particular, the size and growth of the overall U.S. mental healthcare market is subject to significant variables, including a changing regulatory environment and population demographics, which can be difficult to measure, estimate or quantify. Estimating and forecasting growth opportunities in any given market are difficult and affected by multiple variables such as population growth, concentration of prospective patients and population density, among other things. Further, we may not be able to sufficiently penetrate certain market segments included in our estimates and forecasts, including due to limited deployable capital, ineffective marketing efforts or the inability to develop sufficient presence in a given market to attract patients or contract with payors or primary care and other specialist physician partners in that market. In addition, increased unemployment may lead to a loss of insurance benefits for patients, negatively impacting their ability to access our services and, in turn, our financial performance, and federal legislation may alter access to federal healthcare programs as well as the cost of plans, potentially increasing the number of uninsured and affecting the ability of patients to access and afford our services. For these reasons, estimates and forecasts relating to the size and expected growth of our target markets may prove to be inaccurate. Even if the markets in which we compete meet our size estimates and forecasted growth, our business could fail to grow at similar rates, if at all.

Previous wording

We may be adversely affected by patients’ unwillingness to pay for treatment by our clinicians. Higher numbers of unemployed individuals generally translate into more individuals without healthcare insurance to help pay for services, thereby increasing the potential for persons to elect not to seek treatment if they cannot afford to self-pay. Growth of patient receivables or deterioration in the ability to collect on these accounts, due to changes in economic conditions or otherwise, could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, patients with high deductible insurance plans may be less likely to seek treatment as a result of higher expected out-of-pocket costs.

Current wording

We may be adversely affected by patients’ unwillingness to pay for treatment by our clinicians. Higher numbers of unemployed individuals generally translate into more individuals without healthcare insurance to help pay for services, thereby increasing the potential for persons to elect not to seek treatment if they cannot afford to self-pay. Growth of patient receivables or deterioration in the ability to collect on these accounts, due to changes in economic conditions or otherwise, could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, patients with high deductible insurance plans and patients whose insurance costs may increase due to the loss of Affordable Care Act subsidies may be less likely to seek treatment as a result of higher expected out-of-pocket costs.

Previous wording

From time to time, we may operate in states that have not adopted laws related to parity between reimbursement rates for virtual services and in-person care, as presently less than half of states require reimbursement of payment parity for telehealth. If we are not able to enter into regional payor contracts that provide for reimbursement parity between in-person and virtual services, private payors may not reimburse for virtual services at the same rates as in-person care for all patients within that market. Currently, our reimbursement rates for virtual services and in-person care are substantially similar. This is driven by contractual arrangements with our payor partners or payor policies. If we are not able to enter into or renew payor contracts on these terms or if payor policies change, we may receive reimbursement for virtual services that is less than comparable to in-person services in such states, which would negatively impact our revenue with respect to such markets, and as a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

We operate in states that have not adopted laws related to parity between reimbursement rates for virtual services and in-person care, as presently less than half of states require reimbursement of payment parity for telehealth. If we are not able to enter into regional payor contracts that provide for reimbursement parity between in-person and virtual services, private payors may not reimburse for virtual services at the same rates as in-person care for all patients within that market. Currently, our reimbursement rates for virtual services and in-person care are substantially similar. This is driven by contractual arrangements with our payor partners or payor policies. If we are not able to enter into or renew payor contracts on these terms or if payor policies change, we may receive reimbursement for virtual services that is less than comparable to in-person services in such states, which would negatively impact our revenue with respect to such markets, and as a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations. To the extent that payors adopt differentiated codes for telehealth services reflecting lower relative value units, our patient service revenue from virtual services would be negatively impacted.

Previous wording

Billing for our services is complex. The practice of providing mental health services in advance of payment or prior to assessing a patient’s ability to pay for such services may have a significant negative impact on our patient service revenue, credit losses and cash flow. We bill numerous and varied payors, including self-pay patients and various forms of commercial insurance providers. Different payors typically have differing forms of billing requirements that must be met prior to receiving payment for services rendered. Self-pay patients and third-party payors may fail to pay for services even if they have been properly billed. Reimbursement to us is typically conditioned on, among other things, our providing the proper procedure and diagnosis codes. Incorrect or incomplete documentation and billing information could result in non-payment for services rendered or reduction in reimbursement. Additional factors that could complicate our billing include variation in coverage for similar services among various payors and the difficulty of adherence to specific compliance requirements, coding and various other procedures mandated by responsible parties. To the extent the complexity associated with billing for our services causes delays in our cash collections, we assume the financial risk of increased carrying costs associated with the aging of our accounts receivable as well as the increased potential for credit losses. In addition, any increase in days sales outstanding could also negatively affect our cash flows.

Current wording

Billing for our services is complex. The practice of providing mental health services in advance of payment or prior to assessing a patient’s ability to pay for such services may have a significant negative impact on our patient service revenue, credit losses and cash flow. We bill numerous and varied payors, including self-pay patients and various forms of commercial insurance providers. Different payors typically have differing forms of billing requirements that must be met prior to receiving payment for services rendered. Self-pay patients and third-party payors may fail to pay for services even if they have been properly billed. Reimbursement to us is typically conditioned on, among other things, our providing the proper procedure and diagnosis codes. Incorrect or incomplete documentation and billing information could result in non-payment for services rendered or reduction in reimbursement. Additional factors that could complicate our billing include variation in coverage for similar services among various payors and the difficulty of adherence to specific compliance requirements, coding and various other procedures mandated by responsible parties. The complexity associated with billing could adversely impact our business in various ways. To the extent the complexity associated with billing for our services causes delays in our cash collections, we assume the financial risk of increased carrying costs associated with the aging of our accounts receivable as well as the increased potential for credit losses. In addition, any increase in days sales outstanding could also negatively affect our cash flows. To the extent that payors adopt differentiated codes for telehealth services reflecting lower relative value units, our patient service revenue from virtual services would be negatively impacted.

Previous wording

We are subject, and in the future may become subject from time to time, to legal proceedings, claims and inquiries, such as claims brought by our partners in connection with commercial disputes, consumer class action claims, employment claims made by our current or former employees or other claims or proceedings. For example, on April 26, 2023, a class action litigation captioned Strong v. LifeStance Health Group, Inc. was filed against the Company by a putative class representing users of the Company's website who allege various privacy-related claims premised on the Company's use of pixel technologies on its website.

Current wording

We are subject, and in the future may become subject from time to time, to legal proceedings, claims and inquiries, such as claims brought by our partners in connection with commercial disputes, consumer class action claims, employment claims made by our current or former employees or other claims or proceedings. For example, on April 26, 2023, a class action litigation captioned Strong v. LifeStance Health Group, Inc. was filed against the Company by a putative class representing users of the Company's website who allege various privacy-related claims premised to the Company's use of pixel technologies on its website. A proposed settlement is awaiting preliminary approval that will be subject to final court approval.

Previous wording

If we fail to cost-effectively develop widespread brand awareness and maintain our reputation, or if we fail to achieve and maintain market acceptance for our mental health services, our business could suffer.

Current wording

If we fail to cost-effectively develop widespread brand awareness and maintain our reputation, or if we fail to achieve and maintain market acceptance for our mental health services or are subject to widespread negative media coverage or social media engagement, our business could suffer.

Previous wording

Our brand promotion activities may not generate awareness or increase revenue and, even if they do, any increase in revenue may not offset the expenses we incur in building our brand. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brand, we may fail to attract or retain patients, clinicians, payors and physician partners necessary to realize a sufficient return on our brand-building efforts or to achieve the widespread brand awareness we seek.

Current wording

Our brand promotion activities may not generate awareness or increase revenue and, even if they do, any increase in revenue may not offset the expenses we incur in building our brand. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brand, we may fail to attract or retain patients, clinicians, payors and physician partners necessary to realize a sufficient return on our brand-building efforts or to achieve the widespread brand awareness we seek. In addition, unfavorable publicity regarding, among other things, us, our business, our services, the healthcare industry, litigation or regulatory activity, our data privacy, or data security practices, or those of other participants in our industry, could materially adversely affect our reputation. Any negative media coverage or public perceptions about our brand, regardless of the accuracy of such reporting or perceptions, may have an adverse impact on our business and reputation, as well as have an adverse effect on our ability to attract and retain clients or clinicians, and result in decreased revenue, which could substantially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

the federal Anti-Kickback Statute that prohibits the knowing and willful offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any bribe, kickback, rebate or other remuneration for referring an individual, in return for ordering, leasing, purchasing or recommending or arranging for or to induce the referral of an individual or the ordering, purchasing or leasing of items or services covered, in whole or in part, by any federal healthcare program, such as Medicare and Medicaid. Remuneration has been interpreted broadly to be anything of value, and could include compensation, discounts or free marketing services. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation. In addition, the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims Act. Violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute may result in civil monetary penalties up to $124,732 for each violation, plus up to three times the remuneration involved. Civil penalties for such conduct can further be assessed under the federal False Claims Act. Violations can also result in criminal penalties and imprisonment. Similarly, violations can result in exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. We expect the OIG to issue new regulations adding and modifying safe harbors and to issue new fraud alerts covering the latest conduct that OIG finds problematic;

Current wording

the federal Anti-Kickback Statute that prohibits the knowing and willful offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any bribe, kickback, rebate or other remuneration for referring an individual, in return for ordering, leasing, purchasing or recommending or arranging for or to induce the referral of an individual or the ordering, purchasing or leasing of items or services covered, in whole or in part, by any federal healthcare program, such as Medicare and Medicaid. Remuneration has been interpreted broadly to be anything of value, and could include compensation, discounts or free marketing services. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation. In addition, the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims Act. Violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute may result in civil monetary penalties up to $127,973 for each violation, plus up to three times the remuneration involved, and criminal penalties can include fines up to $100,000, prison sentences up to 10 years, and possible exclusion from federal healthcare programs. Civil penalties for such conduct can further be assessed under the federal False Claims Act. Violations can also result in criminal penalties and imprisonment. Similarly, violations can result in exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. We expect the OIG to issue new regulations adding and modifying safe harbors and to issue new fraud alerts covering the latest conduct that OIG finds problematic;

Previous wording

the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, the No Surprises Act, regarding which the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services continue to issue proposed rules and updates;

Current wording

the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, the No Surprises Act, regarding which the CMS' continue to issue proposed rules and updates;

Previous wording

To enforce compliance with the federal laws, the U.S. Department of Justice and the OIG have continued their scrutiny of healthcare providers, which has led to a number of investigations, prosecutions, convictions and settlements in the healthcare industry. Dealing with investigations can be time- and resource-consuming and can divert management’s attention from the business. Any such investigation or settlement could increase our costs or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business. In addition, because of the potential for large monetary exposure under the federal False Claims Act, which provides for treble damages and mandatory minimum penalties of $13,946 to $27,894 per false claim or statement, healthcare providers often resolve allegations without admissions of liability for significant and material amounts to avoid the uncertainty of treble damages that may be awarded in litigation proceedings. Such settlements often contain additional compliance and reporting requirements as part of a consent decree, settlement agreement or corporate integrity agreement. Given the significant size of actual and potential settlements, it is expected that the government will continue to devote substantial resources to investigating healthcare providers’ compliance with the healthcare reimbursement rules and fraud and abuse laws.

Current wording

To enforce compliance with the federal laws, the U.S. Department of Justice and the OIG have continued their scrutiny of healthcare providers, which has led to a number of investigations, prosecutions, convictions and settlements in the healthcare industry. Dealing with investigations can be time- and resource-consuming and can divert management’s attention from the business. Any such investigation or settlement could increase our costs or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business. In addition, because of the potential for large monetary exposure under the federal False Claims Act, which provides for treble damages and mandatory minimum penalties of $14,308 to $28,619 per false claim or statement, healthcare providers often resolve allegations without admissions of liability for significant and material amounts to avoid the uncertainty of treble damages that may be awarded in litigation proceedings. Such settlements often contain additional compliance and reporting requirements as part of a consent decree, settlement agreement or corporate integrity agreement. Given the significant size of actual and potential settlements, it is expected that the government will continue to devote substantial resources to investigating healthcare providers’ compliance with the healthcare reimbursement rules and fraud and abuse laws.

Previous wording

The impact on us of healthcare reform legislation and other changes in the healthcare industry and in healthcare spending, including as a result of the 2024 elections, is currently unknown, but may harm our business.

Current wording

If we are unable to adapt to healthcare reform legislation and other changes in the healthcare industry and in healthcare spending, our business could be harmed.

Previous wording

Since its enactment, there have been judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the ACA as well as efforts to repeal or replace certain aspects of the ACA. While efforts to repeal all or part of the ACA have generally subsided, we cannot be certain that there will not be further legislative efforts or judicial challenges in the future, or how the ACA will be upheld by the Trump administration. In addition to judicial challenges, the Trump administration or U.S. Congress may advance new healthcare policy goals and objectives or reverse existing healthcare policy goals, through statute, regulation and executive order. For example, premium subsidies for the ACA are set to expire in 2025, which without renewal will cause premium increases for the majority of ACA enrollees in 2026 and could result in an increase in the number of uninsured. The control of the House and Senate by a single party beginning in 2025, may enable broad policy changes in the healthcare industry, potentially affecting our business.

Current wording

Since its enactment, there have been judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the ACA as well as efforts to repeal or replace certain aspects of the ACA. In particular, the OBBBA signed in July 2025 declined to extend the ACA premium tax credits which over 20 million enrollees received, likely resulting in an increase in the number of uninsured. We cannot be certain that there will not be further legislative efforts or judicial challenges to the ACA in the future, or how the ACA will be upheld or changed by the current administration. In addition to judicial challenges, the current administration or U.S. Congress may advance new healthcare policy goals and objectives or reverse existing healthcare policy goals, through statute, regulation and executive order, such as those initiated via the OBBBA.

Previous wording

Uncertainty regarding future amendments to the ACA as well as new legislative proposals to reform healthcare and government insurance programs, along with the trend toward managed healthcare in the United States, could result in reduced demand and prices for our services. We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments and other third-party payors will pay for healthcare products and services, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

Uncertainty regarding future amendments to the ACA as well as new legislative proposals to reform healthcare, such as the OBBBA, and government insurance programs, along with the trend toward managed healthcare in the United States, could result in reduced demand and prices for our services. We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments and other third-party payors will pay for healthcare products and services, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

The privacy and security of PII stored, maintained, received or transmitted electronically is a significant issue in the United States. While we strive to comply with all applicable privacy and security laws and regulations, as well as our own posted privacy policies, legal standards for privacy, including but not limited to “unfairness” and “deception,” as enforced by the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general and comprehensive privacy laws in more than 20 states, continue to evolve. Our failure or perceived failure to comply may result in proceedings or actions against us by government entities or others, or could cause us to lose customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Recently, there has been an increase in public awareness of privacy issues and in the number of private privacy-related lawsuits filed against companies. Any allegations about us, our supported practices or our supported clinicians with regard to the collection, processing, use, disclosure, or security of PII or other privacy-related matters, even if unfounded, could damage our reputation and harm our business.

Current wording

The privacy and security of PII stored, maintained, received or transmitted electronically is a significant issue in the United States. While we strive to comply with all applicable privacy and security laws and regulations, as well as our own posted privacy policies, legal standards for privacy, including but not limited to “unfairness,” “deception,” and “reasonable” as enforced by the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general and comprehensive privacy laws in more than 20 states, continue to evolve. Our failure or perceived failure to comply may result in proceedings or actions against us by government entities or others, or could cause us to lose customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Recently, there has been an increase in public awareness of privacy issues and in the number of privacy-related lawsuits filed against companies. Any allegations about us, our supported practices or our supported clinicians with regard to the collection, processing, use, disclosure, or security of PII or other privacy-related matters, even if unfounded, could damage our reputation and harm our business.

Previous wording

HIPAA requires covered entities and business associates to develop and maintain policies and procedures with respect to PHI that is used or disclosed, including the adoption of administrative, physical and technical safeguards to protect such information. HIPAA also implemented the use of standard transaction code sets and standard identifiers that covered entities must use when submitting or receiving certain electronic healthcare transactions, including activities associated with the billing and collection of healthcare claims.

Current wording

HIPAA also implemented the use of standard transaction code sets and standard identifiers that covered entities must use when submitting or receiving certain electronic healthcare transactions, including activities associated with the billing and collection of healthcare claims.

Previous wording

HIPAA imposes mandatory penalties for certain violations. Penalties for violations of HIPAA and its implementing regulations include civil monetary penalties of up to $71,162 per violation, not to exceed $2,134,831 for violations of the same standard in a single calendar year (as of 2024, and subject to periodic adjustments for inflation). However, a single breach incident can result in violations of multiple standards, which could result in significant fines. A person who knowingly obtains or discloses individually identifiable health information in violation of HIPAA may face a criminal penalty of up to $50,000 and up to one-year of imprisonment. The criminal penalties increase if the wrongful conduct involves false pretenses or the intent to sell, transfer, or use identifiable health information for commercial advantage, personal gain, or malicious harm, with a maximum fine of $250,000 and maximum imprisonment of ten years. HIPAA also authorizes state attorneys general to file suit on behalf of their residents. While HIPAA does not create a private right of action allowing individuals to bring lawsuits in civil court for violations of HIPAA, its standards have been used as the basis for duty of care in state civil suits such as those for negligence or recklessness in the misuse or breach of PHI. Any such penalties or lawsuits could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Current wording

HIPAA imposes mandatory penalties for certain violations. Penalties for violations of HIPAA and its implementing regulations include civil monetary penalties of up to $73,011 per violation, not to exceed $2,190,294 for violations of the same standard in a single calendar year (as of 2025, and subject to periodic adjustments for inflation). However, a single breach incident can result in violations of multiple standards, which could result in significant fines. A person who knowingly obtains or discloses individually identifiable health information in violation of HIPAA may face a criminal penalty of up to $50,000 and up to one-year of imprisonment. The criminal penalties increase if the wrongful conduct involves false pretenses or the intent to sell, transfer, or use identifiable health information for commercial advantage, personal gain, or malicious harm, with a maximum fine of $250,000 and maximum imprisonment of ten years. HIPAA also authorizes state attorneys general to file suit on behalf of their residents. While HIPAA does not create a private right of action allowing individuals to bring lawsuits in civil court for violations of HIPAA, its standards have been used as the basis for duty of care in state civil suits such as those for negligence or recklessness in the misuse or breach of PHI. Any such penalties or lawsuits could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Previous wording

HIPAA further requires that patients be notified of any unauthorized acquisition, access, use or disclosure of their unsecured PHI that compromises the privacy or security of such information, with certain exceptions related to unintentional or inadvertent use or disclosure by employees or authorized individuals. HIPAA specifies that such notifications must be made “without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after discovery of the breach.” If a breach affects 500 patients or more, it must be reported to HHS without unreasonable delay, and HHS will post the name of the breaching entity on its public website. Breaches affecting 500 patients or more in the same state or jurisdiction must also be reported to the local media. If a breach involves fewer than 500 people, the covered entity must record it in a log and notify HHS at least annually. Further, the HHS OCR published a proposed rule in January of 2021, which, among other things calls for greater care coordination and an individual’s rights to access patient records. The proposed rule specifically encourages the disclosure of PHI when needed to help individuals experiencing substance use disorder, serious mental illness and in emergency circumstances. The proposed rule is subject to a regulatory suspension announced by the Biden administration and we do not know when (or if) the final rule will be published or whether there may be additional changes to the regulations, but when it is, we will need to evaluate and potentially update our HIPAA regulatory programs and documentation to ensure compliance with such requirements.

Current wording

HIPAA further requires that patients be notified of any unauthorized acquisition, access, use or disclosure of their unsecured PHI that compromises the privacy or security of such information, with certain exceptions related to unintentional or inadvertent use or disclosure by employees or authorized individuals. HIPAA specifies that such notifications must be made “without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after discovery of the breach.” If a breach affects 500 patients or more, it must be reported to HHS without unreasonable delay, and HHS will post the name of the breaching entity on its public website. Breaches affecting 500 patients or more in the same state or jurisdiction must also be reported to the local media. If a breach involves fewer than 500 people, the covered entity must record it in a log and notify HHS at least annually.

Previous wording

Additionally, online tracking technologies generally used to collect and analyze information about user behavior and enhance the user experience may qualify as HIPAA violations and result in sanction. In December 2022, OCR issued a bulletin titled, “Use of Online Tracking Technologies by HIPAA Covered Entities and Business Associates,” which sets forth broad-reaching guidance for HIPAA covered entities and their business associates that utilize online tracking technologies on their webpages and applications. In the guidance, OCR takes the position that when individuals use regulated entities’ websites, the individual information gleaned from that use (including, in certain circumstances, IP address, geographic location, or other unique identifying code) may include PHI, and such information cannot be disclosed to a tracking vendor in a manner that would constitute an impermissible disclosure under HIPAA (e.g., disclosure without a valid HIPAA authorization or business associate agreement (“BAA”)). In March 2024, the OCR updated its 2023 guidance on the use of online tracking technologies on webpages and applications by HIPAA covered entities and business associates to address the disclosure of individually identifiable health information through unauthenticated, public-facing webpages. The guidance was subject to court challenge, and its interpretation and enforcement remain subject to ongoing developments. There have been several class action lawsuits, including against LifeStance, asserting that HIPAA covered entities and business associates improperly used or disclosed PHI through online tracking technologies. See “—Risks Related to Our Business and

Current wording

Additionally, online tracking technologies generally used to collect and analyze information about user behavior and enhance the user experience may qualify as HIPAA violations and result in sanction. In December 2022, OCR issued a bulletin titled, “Use of Online Tracking Technologies by HIPAA Covered Entities and Business Associates,” which sets forth broad-reaching guidance for HIPAA covered entities and their business associates that utilize online tracking technologies on their webpages and applications. In the guidance, OCR takes the position that when individuals use regulated entities’ websites, the individual information gleaned from that use (including, in certain circumstances, IP address, geographic location, or other unique identifying code) may include PHI, and such information cannot be disclosed to a tracking vendor in a manner that would constitute an impermissible disclosure under HIPAA (e.g., disclosure without a valid HIPAA authorization or business associate agreement (“BAA”)). In March 2024, the OCR updated its 2023 guidance on the use of online tracking technologies on webpages and applications by HIPAA covered entities and business associates to address the disclosure of individually identifiable health information through unauthenticated, public-facing webpages. The guidance was subject to court challenge, and its interpretation and enforcement remain subject to ongoing developments. There have been several class action lawsuits, including against LifeStance, asserting that HIPAA covered entities and business associates improperly used or disclosed PHI through online tracking technologies. See “—Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry—Litigation, including in connection with commercial disputes or employment claims, against us could be costly and time-consuming to defend.”

Previous wording

We may also be required to comply with the Federal Substance Abuse Confidentiality Regulations, known as 42 C.F.R. Part 2. In July 2020, new regulations overhauled these laws to better align with HIPAA and to facilitate better coordination of care in response to the opioid epidemic. On December 2, 2022, HHS OCR published a proposed rule containing proposals to implement the CARES Act provisions, which bring Part 2 in alignment with HIPAA including, among other things, expanding the scope of permitted disclosures of substance use disorder treatment records and applying HIPAA's breach notification standards to breaches of records protected by Part 2. Notice of Privacy Practices and arrangements with business associates and qualified service organizations will also need to be adjusted accordingly.

Current wording

We may also be required to comply with the Federal Substance Abuse Confidentiality Regulations, known as 42 C.F.R. Part 2. In July 2020, new regulations overhauled these laws to better align with HIPAA and to facilitate better coordination of care in response to the opioid epidemic. On December 2, 2022, HHS OCR published a proposed rule containing proposals to implement the CARES Act provisions, which bring Part 2 in alignment with HIPAA including, among other things, expanding the scope of permitted disclosures of substance use disorder treatment records and applying HIPAA's breach notification standards to breaches of records protected by Part 2.

Previous wording

The Final Rule, which was published in February 2024, aligned Part 2 penalties with civil and criminal enforcement authorities that apply to HIPAA violations. Under the Final Rule, the penalties for Part 2 violations have increased, rising from up to $5,000 for individuals and $10,000 for organizations on a per-violation basis to a $50,000 maximum penalty for failure to comply with the Part 2 requirements and a $250,000 maximum penalty for wrongful disclosure of individually identifiable health information. Additional changes in the Final Rule further harmonize Part 2 with HIPAA and include aligning data breach notification protocols with the HIPAA Breach Notification Rule; allowing single consents for disclosures related to treatment, payment and healthcare operations; and aligning Part 2 Patient Notice requirements with requirements of the HIPAA Notice of Privacy Practices. We will have until February 2026 to comply.

Current wording

The Final Rule, which was published in February 2024, aligned Part 2 penalties with civil and criminal enforcement authorities that apply to HIPAA violations. Additional changes in the Final Rule further harmonize Part 2 with HIPAA and include aligning data breach notification protocols with the HIPAA Breach Notification Rule; allowing single consents for disclosures related to treatment, payment and healthcare operations; and aligning Part 2 Patient Notice requirements with requirements of the HIPAA Notice of Privacy Practices. Notice of Privacy Practices and arrangements with business associates and qualified service organizations will need to be adjusted accordingly. We will have until February 2026 to comply.

Previous wording

Further, the U.S. federal government and various states and governmental agencies have adopted or are considering adopting various laws, regulations and standards regarding the collection, use, retention, security, disclosure, transfer and other processing of sensitive and personal information. For example, California implemented the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, which imposes restrictive requirements regulating the use and disclosure of health information and other personally identifiable information. These laws and regulations are not necessarily preempted by HIPAA, particularly if a state affords greater protection to individuals than HIPAA. Where state laws are more protective, we have to comply with the stricter provisions. In addition to fines and penalties imposed upon violators, some of these state laws also afford private rights of action to individuals who believe their personal information has been misused. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (together, the "CCPA") gives California residents certain privacy rights in the collection and use of their personal information, and take certain other acts in furtherance of those rights. Failure to comply with the CCPA may result in, among other things, civil penalties of up to $7,500 per violation, as well as a private right of action for certain data breaches. Additionally, California created a data protection agency authorized to implement and enforce the CCPA, which could result in increased enforcement. While the CCPA contains an exemption for PHI subject to HIPAA, we may process other personal information that is subject to the CCPA. In addition, almost 20 other states have now passed comprehensive privacy laws that have taken effect or will come into effect at various times over the next few years.

Current wording

Further, the U.S. federal government and various states and governmental agencies have adopted or are considering adopting various laws, regulations and standards regarding the collection, use, retention, security, disclosure, transfer and other processing of sensitive and personal information. For example, California implemented the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, which imposes restrictive requirements regulating the use and disclosure of health information and other personally identifiable information. These laws and regulations are not necessarily preempted by HIPAA, particularly if a state affords greater protection to individuals than HIPAA. Where state laws are more protective, we have to comply with the stricter provisions. In addition to fines and penalties imposed upon violators, some of these state laws also afford private rights of action to individuals who believe their personal information has been misused. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (together, the "CCPA") gives California residents certain privacy rights in the collection and use of their personal information, and requires businesses to take certain other acts in furtherance of those rights. Failure to comply with the CCPA may result in, among other things, civil penalties of up to $7,500 per violation, as well as a private right of action for certain data breaches. Additionally, California created a data protection agency authorized to implement and enforce the CCPA, which could result in increased enforcement. While the CCPA contains an exemption for PHI subject to HIPAA, we may process other personal information that is subject to the CCPA. In addition, almost 20 other states have now passed comprehensive privacy laws that have taken effect or will come into effect at various times over the next few years.

Previous wording

Marketing Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) impose specific requirements on communications with consumers. The TCPA and analogous state laws, for instance, impose various consumer consent requirements and other restrictions on communications with consumers by phone, fax or text message. TCPA violations can result in significant financial penalties, including penalties or criminal fines imposed by the Federal Communications Commission or fines of up to $1,500 per violation imposed through private litigation or by state authorities. The TCPA provides for substantial penalties and statutory damages and has generated significant class action activity. The costs of litigating and/or settling a TCPA or similar legal claim could be significant.

Current wording

There are many other federal and state-based data privacy and security laws and regulations that may impact our business. For example, federal, state and local privacy and consumer protection laws also govern specific technologies that we employ or how we market to, and otherwise communicate with, individuals. For example, the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) impose specific requirements on communications with consumers. The TCPA and analogous state laws, for instance, impose various consumer consent requirements and other restrictions on communications with consumers by phone, fax or text message. TCPA violations can result in significant financial penalties, including penalties or criminal fines imposed by the Federal Communications Commission or fines of up to $1,500 per violation imposed through private litigation or by state authorities. The TCPA provides for substantial penalties and statutory damages and has generated significant class action activity. The costs of litigating and/or settling a TCPA or similar legal claim could be significant.

Previous wording

Each state regulates the scope of practice under our clinicians’ licenses. There is substantial variation across states in scope of practice for many clinician types, including nurse practitioners. In a number of states in which we operate, nurse practitioners are required to have physician supervisors, in particular in connection with the prescription of Schedule II drugs. The need to provide supervisors may constrain our ability to add new clinicians to the practice, meet patient need or serve specific geographic regions. Further, supervision and scope of license laws are subject to frequent change by state legislative bodies. Changes decreasing the scope of license or increasing the onerousness of supervision requirements could adversely affect our ability to meet patient need and ultimately negatively impact our business and results of operations.

Current wording

Each state regulates the scope of practice under our clinicians’ licenses. There is substantial variation across states in scope of practice for many clinician types, including nurse practitioners. In a number of states in which we operate, nurse practitioners are required to have physician supervisors, in particular in connection with the prescription of Schedule II drugs. The need to provide supervisors may constrain our ability to add new clinicians to the practice, meet patient need or serve specific geographic regions.

Previous wording

Regulations related to telehealth are still evolving. To the extent regulations revert to their pre-COVID state, our ability to provide or be reimbursed for certain telehealth services could be impaired.

Current wording

Regulations related to telehealth are still evolving. To the extent regulations become more restrictive, our ability to provide or be reimbursed for certain telehealth services could be impaired.

Previous wording

Recent growth in our telehealth services has been facilitated by significant reduction of regulatory and reimbursement barriers for telehealth services in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including expansion of reimbursement for telehealth services, and easing of state licensure policies for clinicians, enabling more clinicians to serve patients in more states. During the public health emergency, the Drug Enforcement Agency permitted providers to prescribe certain controlled substances through telehealth without requiring those providers to have conducted an in-person medical evaluation. This flexibility has been extended through December 31, 2025. However, to the extent these regulations revert to their pre-COVID state, our ability to provide certain telehealth services may be impaired, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

Recent growth in our telehealth services has been facilitated by significant reduction of regulatory and reimbursement barriers for telehealth services, including expansion of reimbursement for telehealth services, and easing of state licensure policies for clinicians, enabling more clinicians to serve patients in more states. In recent years, the Drug Enforcement Agency ("DEA") permitted providers to prescribe certain controlled substances through telehealth without requiring those providers to have conducted an in-person medical evaluation. This flexibility had been set to terminate December 31, 2025; however, the DEA published a notice on November 10, 2025 demonstrating its intent to institute a fourth extension. The notice is presently under review by the Office of Management and Budget, and the details of the extension are not presently known. To the extent these regulations eventually revert to their prior state, our ability to provide certain telehealth services may be impaired, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, we had $290.0 million in principal amount outstanding under our 2024 Credit Agreement. Our indebtedness, or any additional indebtedness we may incur, could require us to divert funds identified for other purposes for debt service and impair our liquidity position. If we cannot generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our debt, we may need to refinance our debt, dispose of assets or issue equity to obtain necessary funds. We do not know whether we will be able to take any of these actions on a timely basis, on terms satisfactory to us or at all.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, we had $282.8 million in principal amount outstanding under our 2024 Credit Agreement. Our indebtedness, or any additional indebtedness we may incur, could require us to divert funds identified for other purposes for debt service and impair our liquidity position. If we cannot generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our debt, we may need to refinance our debt, dispose of assets or issue equity to obtain necessary funds. We do not know whether we will be able to take any of these actions on a timely basis, on terms satisfactory to us or at all.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, investment entities affiliated with TPG Inc. ("TPG"), affiliates of Silversmith Capital Partners ("Silversmith"), and affiliates of Summit Partners ("Summit" and together with TPG and Silversmith, our "Principal Stockholders"), collectively, beneficially owned approximately 57.6% of our common stock. The Principal Stockholders together will control the vote of all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders, which enables them to control the election of the members of the Board of Directors and other corporate decisions. Even when the Principal Stockholders cease to own shares of our stock representing a majority of the total voting power, for so long as the Principal Stockholders continue to own a significant percentage of our stock, the Principal Stockholders will still be able to significantly influence the composition of our Board of Directors and the approval of actions requiring stockholder approval. Accordingly, for such period of time, the Principal Stockholders will have significant influence with respect to our management, business plans and policies, including the appointment and removal of our officers, decisions on whether to raise future capital and amending our charter and bylaws, which govern the rights attached to our common stock. In particular, for so long as the Principal Stockholders continue to own a significant percentage of our stock, the Principal Stockholders will be able to cause or prevent a change of control of us or a change in the composition of our Board of Directors and could preclude any unsolicited acquisition of us. The concentration of ownership could deprive you of an opportunity to receive a premium for your shares of common stock as part of a sale of us and ultimately might affect the market price of our common stock.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, investment entities affiliated with TPG Inc. ("TPG"), affiliates of Silversmith Capital Partners ("Silversmith"), and affiliates of Summit Partners ("Summit" and together with TPG and Silversmith, our "Principal Stockholders"), collectively, beneficially owned approximately 53.7% of our common stock. The Principal Stockholders together will control the vote of all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders, which enables them to control the election of the members of the Board of Directors and other corporate decisions. Even when the Principal Stockholders cease to own shares of our stock representing a majority of the total voting power, for so long as the Principal Stockholders continue to own a significant percentage of our stock, the Principal Stockholders will still be able to significantly influence the composition of our Board of Directors and the approval of actions requiring stockholder approval. Accordingly, for such period of time, the Principal Stockholders will have significant influence with respect to our management, business plans and policies, including the appointment and removal of our officers, decisions on whether to raise future capital and amending our charter and bylaws, which govern the rights attached to our common stock. In particular, for so long as the Principal Stockholders continue to own a significant percentage of our stock, the Principal Stockholders will be able to cause or prevent a change of control of us or a change in the composition of our Board of Directors and could preclude any unsolicited acquisition of us. The concentration of ownership could deprive you of an opportunity to receive a premium for your shares of common stock as part of a sale of us and ultimately might affect the market price of our common stock.