Skip to main content

SUBURBAN PROPANE PARTNERS LP

For the period ended Sep 27, 2025. Filed Nov 26, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Nov 26, 2025

SPH$17.18-0.2%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-K

Period ended 2024-09-28; filed 2024-11-27.

0000950170-24-131309

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Current report: 10-K

Period ended 2025-09-27; filed 2025-11-26.

0001193125-25-298630

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 241 previous paragraphs and 242 current paragraphs.

216 unchanged; 23 reworded; 3 added; 2 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (3)

Current report

The deregulated retail natural gas and electricity industries in which AES participates are highly competitive. New York has instituted significant regulation of these industries, and other states have changed business rules to provide further protections to consumers. The New York Public Service Commission has been tightening its Uniform Business Practices (“UBP”) to limit ESCOs ability to offer “bundled” commodity products to consumers. A bundled product is one where a customer is charged one price for the commodity, plus the inclusion of an additional product. AES offers its customers a bundled product consisting of their natural gas or electricity, plus AES’s EnergyGuard home warranty. In 2019, the NY PSC prohibited all bundled products, except for the bundled product sold by AES because of the “value provided to customers.” The NY PSC currently permits other ESCOs to sell bundled Home Warranty Products (“HWP”) similar to AES’s EnergyGuard. Current proceedings are underway to seek to limit or prohibit ESCOs from selling certain types of HWPs that are distinguishable from EnergyGuard. It is anticipated that AES will continue to be permitted to offer its EnergyGuard bundled HWP.

Current report

labor shortages; and

Current report

On May 2, 2025, the Operating Partnership entered into a guaranty agreement (the “Guaranty Agreement”) with UMB Bank, N.A., the trustee of the Green Bonds. Pursuant to the Guaranty Agreement, the Operating Partnership guarantees to the trustee the payment of interest and principal amounts due under the Green Bonds, and the indenture and loan agreement governing the Green Bonds was amended to eliminate the financial covenant requiring SuburbanRNG-Stanfield to maintain a defined debt service coverage ratio.
Removed paragraphs (2)

Previous report

The deregulated retail natural gas and electricity industries in which AES participates are highly competitive. New York has instituted significant regulation of these industries, and other states have changed business rules to provide further protections to consumers. An Order from the NY PSC regarding low income consumers went into effect in 2018 and required that all ESCOs stop serving low-income consumers. As a result, AES returned approximately 8,400 of our customers to local utility service. A Reset Order issued by the NY PSC in 2016 attempted to impose rules that would have allowed the NY PSC to regulate ESCO pricing, which was subsequently challenged and struck down by the New York Supreme Court. On appeal, the New York State Court of Appeals issued a ruling in 2019 that held that the NY PSC cannot regulate ESCO pricing, but does have the ability to restrict an ESCO’s access to the utility distribution system if the NY PSC determines that an ESCO’s pricing is not “just and reasonable.” In December 2019, the NY PSC issued a Second Reset Order that imposed product, pricing, and other requirements on ESCOs. AES was specifically and solely exempted from complying with the criteria concerning product offerings during the pendency of further rulemaking proceedings. In September 2020, the NY PSC issued another Order reaffirming the Second Reset Order, including the exemption that allows AES to maintain its existing business model in New York while rulemaking proceedings continue.

Previous report

These industries have also seen an increase in the number of class action lawsuits brought against retailers and relating to their pricing policies and practices. Two such lawsuits were commenced against AES in 2017 and 2018, involving New York and Pennsylvania customers, respectively. AES filed motions to dismiss both actions on procedural and substantive grounds. The United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania granted AES’s motion and dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice, finding that AES did not breach its contract or defraud customers. In August of 2020, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint. In the New York action, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York granted AES’ dismissal motion in part in October 2018, but allowed plaintiff’s statutory consumer fraud and breach of contract causes of action to proceed. The complaint alleged a number of claims under various consumer statutes and common law in New York regarding pricing offered to electricity customers in the state. The case was ultimately dismissed by the District Court and the dismissal was affirmed by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in December 2023.
Reworded paragraphs (23)

Previous wording

increased costs and reduced demand for our products and services due to climate change legislation;

Current wording

increased costs and reduced demand for our products and services due to climate change legislation or regulation;

Previous wording

governmental regulation and associated costs related to permitting and environmental, health and safety compliance;

Current wording

laws or governmental regulation and associated costs related to permitting and environmental, health and safety compliance;

Previous wording

Actual weather conditions can vary substantially from year to year, significantly affecting our financial performance. For example, average temperatures in our service territories were 10% warmer than normal for fiscal 2024, 8% warmer than normal for fiscal 2023 and 10% warmer than normal for fiscal 2022, as measured by the number of heating degree days reported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. This trend of warmer than normal temperatures has had, and if it continues, could continue to have, a negative impact on our financial performance by reducing demand for our product in the future. Furthermore, variations in weather in one or more regions in which we operate can significantly affect the total volume of propane, fuel oil and other refined fuels and natural gas we sell and, consequently, our results of operations. Variations in the weather in the northeast, where we have a greater concentration of propane accounts and substantially all of our fuel oil and natural gas operations, generally have a greater impact on our operations than variations in the weather in other regions. We can give no assurance that the weather conditions in any quarter or year will not have a material adverse effect on our operations, or that our available cash will be sufficient to pay principal and interest on our indebtedness and distributions to Unitholders.

Current wording

Actual weather conditions can vary substantially from year to year, significantly affecting our financial performance. For example, average temperatures in our service territories were 9% warmer than normal for fiscal 2025, 13% warmer than normal for fiscal 2024 and 8% warmer than normal for fiscal 2023, as measured by the number of heating degree days reported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. This trend of warmer than normal temperatures has had, and if it continues, could continue to have, a negative impact on our financial performance by reducing demand for our products in the future. Furthermore, variations in weather in one or more regions in which we operate can significantly affect the total volume of propane, fuel oil and other refined fuels and natural gas we sell and, consequently, our results of operations. Variations in the weather in the northeast, where we have a greater concentration of propane accounts and substantially all of our fuel oil and natural gas operations, generally have a greater impact on our operations than variations in the weather in other regions. We can give no assurance that the weather conditions in any quarter or year will not have a material adverse effect on our operations, or that our available cash will be sufficient to pay principal and interest on our indebtedness and distributions to Unitholders.

Previous wording

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) issued an Endangerment Finding under the federal Clean Air Act, which determined that emissions of greenhouse gases (“GHG”), such as carbon dioxide, present an endangerment to public health and the environment because emissions of such gases may be contributing to the warming of the earth’s atmosphere, volatility in seasonal temperatures, increased frequency and severity of storms, floods and other climatic changes. Based on these findings, the EPA has begun adopting and implementing regulations to restrict emissions of GHGs from certain industries and require reporting by certain regulated facilities.

Current wording

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) issued an Endangerment Finding under the federal Clean Air Act, which determined that emissions of greenhouse gases (“GHG”), such as carbon dioxide, present an endangerment to public health and the environment because emissions of such gases may be contributing to the warming of the earth’s atmosphere, volatility in seasonal temperatures, increased frequency and severity of storms, floods and other climatic changes. Based on these findings, the EPA adopted and implemented regulations to restrict emissions of GHGs from certain industries and require reporting by certain regulated facilities. However, on July 29, 2025, the EPA proposed to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding which, if finalized, would eliminate the legal basis for federal regulation of GHGs under the Clean Air Act.

Previous wording

EPA leadership through 2024 has prioritized climate change mitigation measures and has implemented regulations requiring significant reductions in GHG emissions. Changes in the White House and EPA administration may result in changes to the EPA’s prioritization of climate change mitigation measures. EPA is also prioritizing environmental justice issues, which may impact how the agency addresses environmental and climate change matters and effects on communities facing disadvantages. We cannot predict the impact of future changes to the EPA’s prioritization of climate change mitigation or the impact of future GHG legislation or regulations on our business, financial condition or operations in the future.

Current wording

EPA leadership through 2024 prioritized climate change mitigation measures and implemented regulations requiring significant reductions in GHG emissions. Under the current presidential and EPA administration, however, changes to the EPA’s prioritization of climate change mitigation measures are anticipated. We cannot predict the impact of future changes to the EPA’s position on climate change mitigation or the impact of future GHG legislation or regulations on our business, financial condition or operations in the future.

Previous wording

Numerous states, municipalities and regulators have also adopted or proposed laws, regulations and policies on climate change, including GHG emission reduction targets and climate disclosure. For example, in July 2019, the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act was signed into law in New York, establishing a statewide climate action framework which includes a target to reduce net GHG emissions to 85% of 1990 levels by 2050. With respect to disclosure, in March 2024, the SEC adopted climate-change related disclosure rules requiring disclosure of Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions (but not Scope 3 GHG emissions as originally proposed) and mandating independent attestation as to such disclosures. The SEC’s rules are subject to multiple legal challenges, which have been consolidated in the U.S. Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit, and on April 4, 2024, the SEC voluntarily stayed the effective date of the legislation pending judicial resolution of the lawsuits filed. Some states are also beginning to propose or adopt their own climate change disclosure requirements that, if implemented, would require significant time and expense to collect and prepare the disclosure requirements. For example, in October 2023, California became the first state to pass its own far-reaching mandatory disclosure bills which require any entity doing business in California that meets certain annual revenue thresholds to annually disclose publicly and provide independent third-party attestation on its Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions beginning in 2026 for the prior fiscal year, and on its value chain (Scope 3) GHG emissions beginning in 2027, and biennially disclose its climate-related financial risk beginning in 2026. Similar to the SEC rulemaking, the California climate disclosure legislation is also subject to pending legal challenges in federal court in the Northern District Court of California.

Current wording

Numerous states, municipalities and regulators have also adopted or proposed laws, regulations and policies on climate change, including GHG emission reduction targets and climate disclosure. For example, in July 2019, the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act was signed into law in New York, establishing a statewide climate action framework which includes a target to reduce net GHG emissions to 85% of 1990 levels by 2050. With respect to disclosure, in March 2024, the SEC had adopted climate-change related disclosure rules requiring disclosure of Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions and mandating independent attestation as to such disclosures. The SEC’s rules were subject to multiple legal challenges, which were consolidated in the U.S. Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit. On April 4, 2024, the SEC voluntarily stayed the effective date of the legislation pending judicial resolution of the lawsuits filed and on March 27, 2025, the SEC withdrew its support in the litigation and informed the court it would no longer defend the rule’s validity. Some states are also beginning to propose or adopt their own climate change disclosure requirements that, if implemented, would require significant time and expense to collect and prepare the disclosure requirements. For example, in October 2023, California became the first state to pass its own far-reaching mandatory disclosure bills which require any entity doing business in California that meets certain annual revenue thresholds to annually disclose publicly and provide independent third-party attestation on its Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions beginning in 2026 for the prior fiscal year, and on its value chain (Scope 3) GHG emissions beginning in 2027, and biennially disclose its climate-related financial risk beginning in January 2026. The California climate disclosure legislation is subject to pending legal challenges in federal court in the Northern District Court of California, but the laws remain in effect.

Previous wording

The generation and monetization of environmental attributes and available tax credits or other incentives resulting from our investments in Oberon and IH, our construction and operation of anaerobic digesters through our wholly owned subsidiary, Suburban Renewable Energy, LLC, and our sale of renewable propane, are contingent on several state and federal programs, including the federal Renewable Fuel Standard program (“RFS”), the Inflation Reduction Act, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (“CA LCFS”), the Oregon Clean Fuels Program (“OR CFP”), and the Washington Clean Fuel Standard (“WA CFS”). A number of other states are also considering the adoption of low carbon fuel standards, with New Mexico authorizing a Clean Transportation Fuel Standard that will go into effect by June 1, 2026. New legislation, changes to the enabling legislation, changes in governmental guidance and/or changes in the regulations implementing those programs could change, or eliminate, the availability and value of a biofuel’s renewable identification number (“RIN”) or Low Carbon Fuel Standard credit (“LCFS Credit”), as well as investment tax credits and production tax credits currently available under the Inflation Reduction Act. Additionally, the markets where RINs and LCFS Credits are traded, have experienced volatility over past years and may experience continued volatility in the future. There is increasing interest at the federal, state, and local level to further reduce GHG emissions by promoting electrification, incentivizing the production of renewable energy and disincentivizing the use of fossil fuels. While our emerging renewable energy platform may benefit from additional incentives for the growth of renewable energy, our sale of propane, fuel oil and refined fuels, and natural gas may experience significant negative impact from the restrictions placed on the use of fossil fuels. We cannot predict what impact changes to existing federal, state, or local programs designed to reduce GHG emissions and address climate change may have on our business. Nor can we predict what impact the creation of future federal, state, and local programs designed to reduce GHG emissions and address climate change will have on our business.

Current wording

The generation and monetization of environmental attributes and available tax credits or other incentives resulting from our production and sale of RNG, and our sale of renewable propane, are contingent on several state and federal programs, including the federal Renewable Fuel Standard program (“RFS”), the Inflation Reduction Act, the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (“CA LCFS”), the Oregon Clean Fuels Program (“OR CFP”), and the Washington Clean Fuel Standard (“WA CFS”). A number of other states are also considering the adoption of low carbon fuel standards, with New Mexico authorizing a Clean Transportation Fuel Standard that will go into effect by July 1, 2026. New legislation, changes to the enabling legislation, changes in governmental guidance and/or changes in the regulations implementing those programs could change, or eliminate, the availability and value of a biofuel’s renewable identification number (“RIN”) or Low Carbon Fuel Standard credit (“LCFS Credit”), as well as investment tax credits and production tax credits currently available under the Inflation Reduction Act. Additionally, the markets where RINs and LCFS Credits are traded, have experienced volatility over past years and may experience continued volatility in the future. There is increasing interest at the federal, state, and local level to further reduce GHG emissions by promoting electrification, incentivizing the production of renewable energy and disincentivizing the use of fossil fuels. While our emerging renewable energy platform may benefit from additional incentives for the growth of renewable energy, our sale of propane, fuel oil and refined fuels, and natural gas may experience significant negative impact from the restrictions placed on the use of fossil fuels. We cannot predict what impact changes to existing, or creation of future, federal, state, or local programs designed to reduce GHG emissions and address climate change may have on our business.

Previous wording

Our profitability in the retail propane, fuel oil and refined fuels and natural gas businesses is largely dependent on the difference between our costs to acquire and transport product, and retail sales prices. Propane, fuel oil and other refined fuels and natural gas are commodities, and the availability of those products, and the unit prices we need to pay to acquire and transport those products, are subject to volatile changes in response to changes in production and supply or other market conditions over which we have no control, including the severity and length of winter weather, natural disasters, the price and availability of competing alternative energy sources, competing demands for the products (including for export) and infrastructure (including highway, rail, pipeline and refinery) constraints, general inflationary pressures or delays in shipping availability, backlogs at shipping ports or other points of entry and lack of available trucking or other shipping means. Our supply of these products from our usual sources may be interrupted due to these and other reasons that are beyond our control, necessitating the transportation of product, if it is available at all, by truck, rail car or other means from other suppliers in other areas, with resulting delay in receipt and delivery to customers and increased expense. As a result, our costs of acquiring and transporting alternative supplies of these products to our facilities may be materially higher at least on a short-term basis. Because we may not be able to pass on to our customers immediately, or in full, all increases in our wholesale and transportation costs of our products, these increases could reduce our profitability. Due to high inflation in the United States in recent years, we have experienced higher commodity, transportation and labor costs and increased cost of tanks and other equipment, which have impacted our profitability in recent periods; while inflationary pressures have decreased in recent periods, additional periods of high inflation could negatively impact our profitability. In addition, our inability to obtain sufficient supplies of propane, fuel oil and other refined fuels and natural gas in order for us to fully meet customer demand for these products on a timely basis could adversely affect our revenues, and consequently our profitability.

Current wording

Our profitability in the retail propane, fuel oil and refined fuels and natural gas businesses is largely dependent on the difference between our costs to acquire and transport product, and retail sales prices. Propane, fuel oil and other refined fuels and natural gas are commodities, and the availability of those products, and the unit prices we need to pay to acquire and transport those products, are subject to volatile changes in response to changes in production and supply or other market conditions, as well as tariffs, over which we have no control, including the severity and length of winter weather, natural disasters, the price and availability of competing alternative energy sources, competing demands for the products (including for export) and infrastructure (including highway, rail, pipeline and refinery) constraints, general inflationary pressures or delays in shipping availability, backlogs at shipping ports or other points of entry and lack of available trucking or other shipping means. Our supply of these products from our usual sources may be interrupted due to these and other reasons that are beyond our control, necessitating the transportation of product, if it is available at all, by truck, rail car or other means from other suppliers in other areas, with resulting delay in receipt and delivery to customers and increased expense. As a result, our costs of acquiring and transporting alternative supplies of these products to our facilities may be materially higher at least on a short-term basis. Because we may not be able to pass on to our customers immediately, or in full, all increases in our wholesale and transportation costs of our products, these increases could reduce our profitability. Due to high inflation in the United States in recent years, we have experienced higher commodity, transportation and labor costs and increased cost of tanks and other equipment, which have impacted our profitability in recent periods; while inflationary pressures have decreased in recent periods, additional periods of high inflation could negatively impact our profitability. In addition, our inability to obtain sufficient supplies of propane, fuel oil and other refined fuels and natural gas in order for us to fully meet customer demand for these products on a timely basis could adversely affect our revenues, and consequently our profitability.

Previous wording

Prices for propane, fuel oil and other refined fuels and natural gas are subject to fluctuations in response to changes in wholesale prices and other market conditions beyond our control. Heightened levels of uncertainty related to the ongoing geopolitical conflicts around the world may lead to additional economic sanctions by the United States and the international community and could further disrupt financial and commodities markets. Therefore, our average retail sales prices can vary significantly within a heating season, or from year to year, as wholesale prices fluctuate with propane, fuel oil and natural gas commodity market conditions. During periods with high product costs for propane, fuel oil and other refined fuels and natural gas, our selling prices generally increase. High prices can lead to customer conservation, resulting in reduced demand for our products. Higher commodity, transportation and labor costs due to inflationary conditions in recent periods have impacted wholesale prices and caused certain customers to reduce their consumption of energy, which had a negative impact on our sales and profitability during those periods. Future periods of high inflation could also have a negative impact.

Current wording

Prices for propane, fuel oil and other refined fuels and natural gas are subject to fluctuations in response to changes in wholesale prices and other market conditions, as well as tariffs, beyond our control. Heightened levels of uncertainty related to the ongoing geopolitical conflicts around the world may lead to additional economic sanctions by the United States and the international community and could further disrupt financial and commodities markets. Therefore, our average retail sales prices can vary significantly within a heating season, or from year to year, as wholesale prices fluctuate with propane, fuel oil and natural gas commodity market conditions. During periods with high product costs for propane, fuel oil and other refined fuels and natural gas, our selling prices generally increase. High prices can lead to customer conservation, resulting in reduced demand for our products. Higher commodity, transportation and labor costs due to inflationary conditions in recent periods have impacted wholesale prices and caused certain customers to reduce their consumption of energy, which had a negative impact on our sales and profitability during those periods. Future periods of high inflation could also have a negative impact.

Previous wording

The State of New York amended Section 349-d of the New York General Business Law (“GBL”) effective on March 18, 2024, to require that energy service companies that operate in the state, such as AES in connection with its natural gas and electricity business, first obtain written consent from the customer before any change in commodity prices can be charged to the customer. To date, the amended statute has not had a material negative impact on AES, but the Partnership continues to assess the impact that the GBL amendment may have in the future on its natural gas and electricity business. In addition, the NY PSC has issued notice of rulemaking for amendments to its Uniform Business Practices (“UBP”), that will apply to AES and other energy supply companies that operate in the state. The proposed UBP amendments, if adopted, will require AES to provide notice each month to its customers that includes a historical comparison between the rates charged by AES and what the customer would have paid had they remained with their existing utility. We anticipate that the additional notice requirements mandated by the NY PSC could have a negative effect on customer retention for energy supply companies, which could have an adverse impact on our business and operations.

Current wording

The State of New York amended Section 349-d of the New York General Business Law effective on March 18, 2024, to require increased pricing transparency by providing customers with a comparison of the prices charged by the ESCO to historic utility pricing. The NY PSC revised the UBP in accordance with the amended statute. These UBP changes require affirmative consent before an ESCO can change the price that can be charged to the customer or the term of any contract. AES has expanded its product offerings to address and minimize the impact of these changes. We anticipate that the additional notice requirements mandated by the NY PSC could have a negative effect on customer retention for energy supply companies, which could have an adverse impact on our business and operations. To date, the amended statute has not had a material negative impact on AES, but the Partnership continues to assess the impact that these changes may have in the future on its natural gas and electricity business.

Previous wording

As required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), we establish reserves based on our assessment of actual or potential loss contingencies, including contingencies related to legal claims asserted against us. Subsequent developments may affect our assessment and estimates of such loss contingencies and require us to make payments in excess of our reserves, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Current wording

As required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”), we establish reserves based on our assessment of actual or potential loss contingencies, including contingencies related to legal claims asserted against us. Subsequent developments may affect our assessment and estimates of such loss contingencies and require us to make payments in excess of our reserves, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Previous wording

From time to time, we enter into hedging transactions to reduce our business risks arising from fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. Hedging transactions expose us to risk of financial loss in some circumstances, including if the other party to the contract defaults on its obligations to us or if there is a change in the expected differential between the price of the underlying commodity or financial metric provided in the hedging agreement and the actual amount received. Transactional, margin, capital, recordkeeping, reporting, clearing and other requirements imposed on parties to derivatives transactions as a result of legislation and related rulemaking may increase our operational and transactional cost of entering into and maintaining derivatives contracts and may adversely affect the number and/or creditworthiness of derivatives counterparties available to us. If we were to reduce our use of derivatives as a result of regulatory burdens or otherwise, our results of operations could become more volatile and our cash flow could be less predictable.

Current wording

From time to time, we enter into hedging transactions to reduce our business risks arising from fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. Hedging transactions expose us to risk of financial loss in some circumstances, including if the other party to the contract defaults on its obligations to us or if there is a change in the expected differential between the price of the underlying commodity or financial metric provided in the hedging agreement and the actual amount received. Transactional, margin, capital, recordkeeping, reporting, clearing and other requirements imposed on parties to derivatives transactions as a result of legislation and related rulemaking may increase our operational and transactional cost of entering into and maintaining derivatives contracts and may adversely affect the number and/or creditworthiness of derivatives counterparties available to us. If we were to reduce our use of derivatives as a result of regulatory burdens or otherwise, our results of operations and cash flows could become more volatile.

Previous wording

We have expanded our Go Green with Suburban Propane corporate pillar with our investments in renewable and low-carbon energy sources offered through our investments in Oberon and IH, our agreement to build an anaerobic digester at Adirondack Farms, our purchase of RNG production and distribution assets through SuburbanRNG – Columbus and SuburbanRNG – Stanfield and our sales of renewable propane. The success of these businesses and investments is subject to a number of factors and risks, including unpredictability and uncertainty as to the willingness of customers in their intended markets to adopt the use of these fuels, which will be dependent upon perceptions about the benefits of these fuels relative to other alternative fuels; increases, decreases or volatility in demand; on-site operational constraints such as the availability of feedstock or the reliable operation of anaerobic digesters with respect to production of renewable fuels; use and prices of crude oil, gasoline and other fuels and energy sources; and the adoption or expansion of government policies, programs, funding or incentives in favor of these or alternative fuels.

Current wording

We have expanded our Go Green with Suburban Propane corporate pillar with our investments in renewable and low-carbon energy sources offered through our investments in Oberon and IH, our agreement to build an anaerobic digester at Adirondack Farms, our purchase of RNG production and distribution assets through SuburbanRNG-Columbus and SuburbanRNG-Stanfield and our sales of renewable propane. The success of these businesses and investments is subject to a number of factors and risks, including unpredictability and uncertainty as to the willingness of customers in their intended markets to adopt the use of these fuels, which will be dependent upon perceptions about the benefits of these fuels relative to other alternative fuels; increases, decreases or volatility in demand; on-site operational constraints such as the availability of feedstock or the reliable operation of anaerobic digesters with respect to production of renewable fuels; use and prices of crude oil, gasoline and other fuels and energy sources; the adoption or expansion of government policies, programs, funding or incentives in favor of these or alternative fuels; the ability for development stage entities such as Oberon and IH to raise capital to fund their operations and strategic growth initiatives, as well as potential changes in market valuations for these or similar assets, has resulted in impairment charges from time to time, and may result in future impairment charges. During fiscal 2025, the Partnership recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $10.2 million for Oberon, $9.6 million for IH and $6.1 million for another development-stage entity, all of which were recognized in “Other, net” on the consolidated statement of operations, to write down the carrying values of the investments in Oberon, IH and the other entity to their estimated fair values of $0, $21.6 million and $0, respectively. The Partnership will continue to monitor IH’s financial condition and other available information to determine if future adjustments are necessary, as discussed in more detail in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report.

Previous wording

on-site operational issues relating to the availability of feedstock for the anaerobic digesters or other issues relating to the reliable production of projectable quantities of renewable natural gas; labor shortages; and

Current wording

on-site operational issues relating to the availability of feedstock for the anaerobic digesters or other issues relating to the reliable production of projectable quantities of renewable natural gas;

Previous wording

We will compete with other companies and private equity sponsors for acquisition opportunities, which may increase our costs or cause us to refrain from making acquisitions. We are constructing a natural gas upgrade system at SuburbanRNG – Columbus that requires capital expenditures and there is no guarantee that the project will be completed on time or on budget, and our operations could be adversely affected by disruptions or delays which could have a negative impact on revenues and operations. The development of these products may also be negatively affected by production risks resulting from mechanical breakdowns, faulty technology, competitive markets, labor shortages or changes to the laws and regulations that mandate the use of renewable energy sources, and the other regulatory risks discussed above under the caption,“The adoption of climate change legislation could negatively impact our operations and result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for the products and services we provide.”

Current wording

We will compete with other companies and private equity sponsors for acquisition opportunities, which may increase our costs or cause us to refrain from making acquisitions. We are constructing a natural gas upgrade system at SuburbanRNG-Columbus that requires capital expenditures and there is no guarantee that the project will be completed on time or on budget, and our operations could be adversely affected by disruptions or delays which could have a negative impact on revenues and operations. The development of these products may also be negatively affected by production risks resulting from mechanical breakdowns, faulty technology, competitive markets, labor shortages or changes to the laws and regulations that mandate the use of renewable energy sources, other regulatory risks relating to GHG emissions and climate change, including as a result of changed priorities of the U.S. presidential administration and the potential for increased regulation on the state level; and the other regulatory risks discussed above under the caption,“The adoption of climate change legislation could negatively impact our operations and result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for the products and services we provide.”

Previous wording

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 provided certain tax incentives related to RNG. While we anticipate obtaining certain of those incentives for certain facilities, the availability of those incentives is subject to guidance issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS that potentially may be unfavorable with respect to RNG facilities, as well as possible unfavorable federal legislative changes to such incentives. Federal legislation has been introduced to extend certain tax incentives related to RNG while other efforts have been made to repeal provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. The outcome of the 2024 election creates additional uncertainty, and we cannot predict what impact (whether positive or negative) it may have on our business.

Current wording

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 provided certain tax incentives related to RNG. On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act “OBBBA”) was signed into law, which revises and expands certain renewable energy tax credits that were previously available under the Inflation Reduction Act. While we anticipate obtaining certain of those incentives for certain facilities, the availability of those incentives is subject to guidance issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS that potentially may be unfavorable with respect to RNG facilities, as well as possible unfavorable federal legislative changes to such incentives.

Previous wording

We rely on gas pipelines that we do not own or control and are subject to quality standards and regulations that may restricted or negatively impact our ability to deliver RNG and we may either incur additional costs or forego revenues.

Current wording

We rely on gas pipelines that we do not own or control and are subject to quality standards and regulations that may restrict or negatively impact our ability to deliver RNG and we may either incur additional costs or forego revenues.

Previous wording

Cybersecurity threats to network and data security are becoming increasingly diverse and sophisticated. As threats become more frequent, intense and sophisticated, the costs of proactive defensive measures may increase as we seek to continue to protect our information systems, websites, and network. The advancement of artificial intelligence (“AI”) and large language models has given rise to additional vulnerabilities and potential entry points for cyber threats. With generative AI tools, threat actors may have additional tools to automate breaches or persistent attacks, evade detection, or generate sophisticated phishing emails. Despite our efforts to comply with applicable cybersecurity requirements and mitigate risks of cybersecurity threats, we cannot be certain that our security measures will definitively prevent, contain, or detect all cybersecurity breaches or other instructions from malware currently in existence or developed in the future. While we have in place security procedures, such as business continuity plans or disaster recovery protocols, our continuous investments in and updates to information security programs cannot guarantee the prevention of adverse impacts due to cybersecurity threats and data breaches, which could result in significant harm to our business, reputation, and operations.

Current wording

Cybersecurity threats to network and data security are becoming increasingly diverse and sophisticated. As threats become more frequent, intense and sophisticated, the costs of proactive defensive measures may increase as we seek to continue to protect our information systems, websites, and network. The advancement of artificial intelligence and large language models has given rise to additional vulnerabilities and potential entry points for cyber threats. With generative AI tools, threat actors may have additional tools to automate breaches or persistent attacks, evade detection, or generate sophisticated phishing emails. Despite our efforts to comply with applicable cybersecurity requirements and mitigate risks of cybersecurity threats, we cannot be certain that our security measures will definitively prevent, contain, or detect all cybersecurity breaches or other instructions from malware currently in existence or developed in the future. While we have in place security procedures, such as business continuity plans or disaster recovery protocols, our continuous investments in and updates to information security programs cannot guarantee the prevention of adverse impacts due to cybersecurity threats and data breaches, which could result in significant harm to our business, reputation, and operations.

Previous wording

As of September 28, 2024, our long-term debt consisted of $350.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.875% senior notes due March 1, 2027, $650.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.0% senior notes due June 1, 2031, $80.6 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.5% green bonds due October 1, 2028 through October 1, 2033 (“Green Bonds”) and $151.0 million outstanding under our $500.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility. The payment of principal and interest on our debt will reduce the cash available to make distributions on our Common Units. In addition, we will not be able to make any distributions to holders of our Common Units if there is, or after giving effect to such distribution, there would be, an event of default under the indentures governing the senior notes, the senior secured revolving credit facility or the Green Bonds. The amount of distributions that we may make to holders of our Common Units is limited by the senior notes, and the amount of distributions that the Operating Partnership may make to us is limited by our revolving credit facility. The amount of distributions that our subsidiary WOF SW GGP 1, LLC (“SuburbanRNG – Stanfield”) may make to us is limited by the Green Bonds. The revolving credit facility and the senior notes both contain various restrictive and affirmative covenants applicable to us, the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries, respectively, including (i) restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, and (ii) restrictions on certain liens, investments, guarantees, loans, advances, payments, mergers, consolidations, distributions, sales of assets and other transactions. The revolving credit facility contains certain financial covenants:

Current wording

As of September 27, 2025, our long-term debt consisted of $350.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.875% senior notes due March 1, 2027, $650.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.0% senior notes due June 1, 2031, $80.6 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.5% green bonds due October 1, 2028 through October 1, 2033 (“Green Bonds”) and $149.2 million outstanding under our $500.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility. The payment of principal and interest on our debt will reduce the cash available to make distributions on our Common Units. In addition, we will not be able to make any distributions to holders of our Common Units if there is, or after giving effect to such distribution, there would be, an event of default under the indentures governing the senior notes, the senior secured revolving credit facility or the Green Bonds. The amount of distributions that we may make to holders of our Common Units is limited by the senior notes, and the amount of distributions that the Operating Partnership may make to us is limited by our revolving credit facility. The amount of distributions that our subsidiary WOF SW GGP 1, LLC (“SuburbanRNG-Stanfield”) may make to us is limited by the Green Bonds. The revolving credit facility and the senior notes both contain various restrictive and affirmative covenants applicable to us, the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries, respectively, including (i) restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, and (ii) restrictions on certain liens, investments, guarantees, loans, advances, payments, mergers, consolidations, distributions, sales of assets and other transactions. The revolving credit facility contains certain financial covenants:

Previous wording

The Green Bonds contain various restrictive and affirmative covenants applicable to SuburbanRNG – Stanfield, including (i) restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness and (ii) restrictions on certain liens, investments, guarantees, loans, advances, payments, mergers, consolidations, distributions, sales of assets and other transactions. The Green Bonds contain a financial covenant requiring SuburbanRNG – Stanfield’s debt service coverage ratio, as defined therein, to be not less than 1.25 to 1.00 for any fiscal quarter. SuburbanRNG – Stanfield is in compliance with all covenants and terms of the Green Bonds as of September 28, 2024.

Current wording

The Green Bonds contain various restrictive and affirmative covenants applicable to SuburbanRNG-Stanfield, including (i) restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness and (ii) restrictions on certain liens, investments, guarantees, loans, advances, payments, mergers, consolidations, distributions, sales of assets and other transactions. The Green Bonds previously included a financial covenant requiring SuburbanRNG-Stanfield’s debt service coverage ratio, as defined therein, to be not less than 1.00 to 1.00 for any fiscal quarter. SuburbanRNG-Stanfield did not comply with this ratio for the periods ended March 29, 2025, December 28, 2024, September 28, 2024 and the interim periods during fiscal 2024 which, if not waived, would have constituted an event of default under the terms of the Green Bonds. SuburbanRNG-Stanfield and the Partnership obtained waivers of this non-compliance from the holders of a majority of the outstanding Green Bonds. Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, certain events of default under the terms of the Green Bonds constitute an event of default under the Credit Agreement. The Partnership obtained a waiver from the lenders and the administrative agent under the Credit Agreement for the corresponding event of default under the Credit Agreement resulting from the event of default under the Green Bonds.

Previous wording

Ownership of Common Units may have adverse tax consequences for tax-exempt organizations and foreign investors.

Current wording

Ownership of Common Units may have adverse tax consequences for tax-exempt organizations (including Individual Retirement Accounts) and non-U.S. investors.

Previous wording

Investment in Common Units by certain tax-exempt entities and foreign persons raises issues specific to them. For example, virtually all of our taxable income allocated to organizations exempt from U.S. federal income tax, including individual retirement accounts and other retirement plans, will be unrelated business taxable income and thus will be taxable to them. Further, a tax-exempt entity with more than one unrelated trade or business (including by attribution from an investment in a partnership such as ours that is engaged in one or more unrelated trades or businesses) is required to compute the unrelated business taxable income of such tax-exempt entity separately with respect to each such trade or business (including for purposes of determining any net operating loss deduction). As a result, it may not be possible for tax-exempt entities to utilize losses from an investment in our partnership to offset unrelated business taxable income from another unrelated trade or business and vice versa.

Current wording

Investment in Common Units by certain tax-exempt entities and non-U.S. persons raises issues specific to them. For example, virtually all of our taxable income allocated to organizations exempt from U.S. federal income tax, including individual retirement accounts and other retirement plans, will be unrelated business taxable income and thus will be taxable to them. Further, a tax-exempt entity with more than one unrelated trade or business (including by attribution from an investment in a partnership such as ours that is engaged in one or more unrelated trades or businesses) is required to compute the unrelated business taxable income of such tax-exempt entity separately with respect to each such trade or business (including for purposes of determining any net operating loss deduction). As a result, it may not be possible for tax-exempt entities to utilize losses from an investment in our partnership to offset unrelated business taxable income from another unrelated trade or business and vice versa.

Previous wording

Cash distributions paid to foreign persons will be reduced by withholding taxes at the highest applicable effective U.S. tax rate, and foreign persons will be required to file U.S. federal tax returns and pay tax on their share of our taxable income allocated to them. Upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of a common unit of a publicly traded partnership by a foreign person, the transferee is generally required to withhold 10% of the amount realized on such sale, exchange or other disposition if any portion of the gain on such sale, exchange or other disposition would be treated as effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business. Beginning in 2023, the IRS has clarified the broker is generally responsible for withholding 10% of the gross proceeds upon sale of an investment in a publicly traded partnership by a foreign investor. Distributions to foreign persons may also be subject to additional withholding of 10% under these rules to the extent a portion of a distribution is attributable to an amount in excess of our cumulative net income that has not previously been distributed.

Current wording

Cash distributions paid to non-U.S. persons will be reduced by withholding taxes at the highest applicable effective U.S. tax rate, and non-U.S. persons will be required to file U.S. federal tax returns and pay tax on their share of our taxable income allocated to them. Upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of a common unit of a publicly traded partnership by a non-U.S. person, the transferee is generally required to withhold 10% of the amount realized on such sale, exchange or other disposition if any portion of the gain on such sale, exchange or other disposition would be treated as effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business. Beginning in 2023, the IRS has clarified the broker is generally responsible for withholding 10% of the gross proceeds upon sale of an investment in a publicly traded partnership by a non-U.S. investor. Distributions to foreign persons may also be subject to additional withholding of 10% under these rules to the extent a portion of a distribution is attributable to an amount in excess of our cumulative net income that has not previously been distributed.