Skip to main content

PepGen Inc.

For the period ended Sep 30, 2025. Filed Nov 12, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Sep 30, 2025 · Filed Nov 12, 2025

PEPG$2.47+6.5%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 502 previous paragraphs and 502 current paragraphs.

456 unchanged; 44 reworded; 1 added; 1 removed; 1 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (1)

Current report

If the FDA determines that a product candidate offers a treatment for a serious condition and, if approved, the product would provide a significant improvement in safety or effectiveness, the FDA may designate the product candidate for priority review. A priority review designation means that the goal for the FDA to review and take action on an application is six months, rather than the standard review period of ten months. We may request priority review for our product candidates. The FDA has broad discretion with respect to whether or not to grant priority review status to a product candidate, so even if we believe a particular product candidate is eligible for such designation or status, the FDA may decide not to grant it. Moreover, a priority review designation does not necessarily result in an expedited regulatory review or approval process or necessarily confer any advantage with respect to approval compared to conventional FDA procedures. Receiving priority review from the FDA does not guarantee approval within the six-month review cycle or at all.
Removed paragraphs (1)

Previous report

In addition, the FDA’s, EMA’s and other foreign regulatory authorities’ policies may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained, which would adversely affect our business, prospects and ability to achieve or sustain profitability.
Reworded paragraphs (44)

Previous wording

Since inception, we have incurred significant operating losses. Our net losses were $53.3 million and $46.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively. As of June 30, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $324.8 million. To date, we have financed our operations primarily with the proceeds raised from the sale of our convertible preferred stock in private placements and common stock in our IPO and our equity offerings in early 2024, described below. We have devoted substantially all of our financial resources and efforts to research and development activities, business planning, establishing and maintaining our intellectual property portfolio, acquiring and developing product and technology rights, hiring personnel, leasing premises and associated capital expenditures, raising capital, and providing general and administrative support for these operations. We are still in the early stages of development of our programs and have only advanced two product candidates into clinical development. We announced in May 2025 that we are focusing our efforts on the development of PGN-EDODM1 and were voluntarily discontinuing development of PGN-EDO51. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future. Our operating expenses and net losses may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if and as we:

Current wording

Since inception, we have incurred significant operating losses. Our net losses were $71.3 million and $67.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and September 30, 2024, respectively. As of September 30, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $342.8 million. To date, we have financed our operations primarily with the proceeds raised from the sale of our convertible preferred stock in private placements and common stock in our IPO and our equity offerings in 2024 and 2025, described below. We have devoted substantially all of our financial resources and efforts to research and development activities, business planning, establishing and maintaining our intellectual property portfolio, acquiring and developing product and technology rights, hiring personnel, leasing premises and associated capital expenditures, raising capital, and providing general and administrative support for these operations. We are still in the early stages of development of our programs and have only advanced two product candidates into clinical development. We announced in May 2025 that we are focusing our efforts on the development of PGN-EDODM1 and have voluntarily discontinued development of PGN-EDO51. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future. Our operating expenses and net losses may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if and as we:

Previous wording

continue to advance our PGN-EDODM1 program in DM1 through clinical development;

Current wording

continue to advance our PGN-EDODM1 program in DM1 through clinical development, including if enrollment for the FREEDOM2 study takes longer than anticipated;

Previous wording

While we have initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1 and more recently, a Phase 2 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1, we expect that it will be many years, if ever, before we have a product candidate ready for commercialization. We also previously completed a Phase 1 and initiated two Phase 2 clinical trials for PGN-EDO51; however, following our evaluation of the results from the 10 mg/kg cohort in the CONNECT1 trial of PGN-EDO51 in May 2025, we voluntarily decided to discontinue development of PGN-EDO51 and announced our plans to cease all research and development in DMD. All of our other research programs are still in the research or preclinical stage of development, and their risk of failure is therefore particularly high. To become and remain profitable, we must succeed in developing, obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals for and eventually commercializing a product or products that generate significant revenue. The ability to achieve this success will require us to be effective in a range of challenging activities, including:

Current wording

While we have initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1 and more recently, a Phase 2 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1, we expect that it will be many years, if ever, before we have a product candidate ready for commercialization. We also previously completed a Phase 1 and initiated two Phase 2 clinical trials for PGN-EDO51; however, following our evaluation of the results from the 10 mg/kg cohort in the CONNECT1 trial of PGN-EDO51 in May 2025, we voluntarily decided to discontinue development of PGN-EDO51 and are in the process of winding down all research and development in DMD. All of our other research programs are still in the research or preclinical stage of development, and their risk of failure is therefore particularly high. To become and remain profitable, we must succeed in developing, obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals for and eventually commercializing a product or products that generate significant revenue. The ability to achieve this success will require us to be effective in a range of challenging activities, including:

Previous wording

There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern and we will need to raise substantial additional funding. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be forced to delay, scale back or discontinue our product development programs or future commercialization efforts.

Current wording

If we are unable to raise substantial additional funding when needed, we could be forced to delay, scale back or discontinue our product development programs or future commercialization efforts.

Previous wording

We expect our expenses to increase substantially in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we identify, continue the research and development of, continue preclinical testing and initiate clinical trials of, arrange for the manufacturing of, and potentially seek marketing approval for our product candidates that successfully complete clinical testing. To date, we have initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1, and more recently, a Phase 2 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1. We previously completed a Phase 1 and initiated two Phase 2 clinical trials for PGN-EDO51. However, in May 2025, we voluntarily decided not to continue development of PGN-EDO51 following our evaluation of the results from our CONNECT1 Phase 2 clinical trial and announced our plans to cease all research and development in DMD. We expect to continue to incur expenses to wind down our DMD program through the end of 2025. If we obtain marketing approval for any product candidate, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution. Furthermore, we expect to continue to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, on attractive terms or at all, we may be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs or future commercialization efforts.

Current wording

We expect our expenses to increase substantially in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we identify, continue the research and development of, continue preclinical testing and initiate clinical trials of, arrange for the manufacturing of, and potentially seek marketing approval for our product candidates that successfully complete clinical testing. To date, we have initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1, and more recently, a Phase 2 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1. We previously completed a Phase 1 and initiated two Phase 2 clinical trials for PGN-EDO51. However, in May 2025, we voluntarily decided not to continue development of PGN-EDO51 following our evaluation of the results from our CONNECT1 Phase 2 clinical trial and are in the process of winding down all research and development in DMD. We expect to continue to incur expenses to wind down our DMD program through the end of 2025. If we obtain marketing approval for any product candidate, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution. Furthermore, we expect to continue to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, on attractive terms or at all, we may be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs or future commercialization efforts.

Previous wording

As of June 30, 2025, we had cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities of $74.7 million. Prior to our IPO in May 2022, we raised aggregate gross proceeds of $133.5 million from the private placement of convertible preferred stock. We raised aggregate gross proceeds of $122.9 million from our IPO. Subsequent to our IPO, in February 2024 we received net proceeds from our ATM program and Follow-on Offering, after deducting underwriters' fees and costs of the offerings, of $86.3 million.

Current wording

As of September 30, 2025, we had cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities of $163.7 million. Prior to our IPO in May 2022, we raised aggregate gross proceeds of $133.5 million from the private placement of convertible preferred stock. We raised aggregate gross proceeds of $122.9 million from our IPO. Subsequent to our IPO, in February 2024 we received net proceeds from our ATM program and 2024 Offering, after deducting underwriters' fees and costs of the offerings, of $86.3 million. In September 2025, we completed the 2025 Offering which resulted in net proceeds of $107.6 million after deducting underwriters' fees and estimated offering expenses.

Previous wording

There is substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. We do not believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities will be sufficient to fund our currently planned operations for at least 12 months from the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q. Based on our current operating plan, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2025 will enable us to fund our development activities and other operations into the second quarter of 2026; however, we have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we expect. We will require significant additional funding to advance PGN-EDODM1 beyond the short term and sustain our operations. We may be unable to raise additional funds, on favorable terms, if at all. If we are unable to raise capital in the near term, we will need to delay, reduce or terminate some or all planned activities to reduce costs and we may be required to initiate steps to cease operations and settle our liabilities. The failure to obtain sufficient additional funds on commercially acceptable terms to fund our operations and satisfy our obligations to creditors may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and jeopardize our ability to continue operations in the near-term.

Current wording

We will require significant additional funding to advance PGN-EDODM1 beyond the initial FREEDOM2 data readouts in 2026 to sustain our operations. We may be unable to raise additional funds, on favorable terms, if at all. If we are unable to raise such capital when needed, we will need to delay, reduce or terminate some or all planned activities to reduce costs and we may be required to initiate steps to cease operations and settle our liabilities. The failure to obtain sufficient additional funds on commercially acceptable terms to fund our operations and satisfy our obligations to creditors may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and jeopardize our ability to continue operations in the near-term.

Previous wording

We commenced operations in 2018, have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. To date, our operations have been limited to organizing and staffing our company, business planning, executing collaborations, raising capital, licensing, conducting research activities, conducting preclinical studies of our programs and clinical trials of our product candidates, filing and prosecuting patent applications and providing general and administrative support for these operations. We have initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1, and more recently, a Phase 2 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1. We previously completed a Phase 1 and initiated two Phase 2 clinical trials for PGN-EDO51. However, in May 2025, we voluntarily decided not to continue development of PGN-EDO51 following our evaluation of the results from our CONNECT1 Phase 2 clinical trial and announced our plans to cease all research and development in DMD. All of our other research programs are still in the research or preclinical stage of development, and their risk of failure is high. We have not yet demonstrated our ability to successfully complete clinical trials consistently, obtain marketing approvals, manufacture product on a commercial scale or arrange for a third party to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales, marketing and distribution activities necessary for successful product commercialization. Consequently, any predictions you make about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history or a history of successfully developing and commercializing products.

Current wording

We commenced operations in 2018, have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. To date, our operations have been limited to organizing and staffing our company, business planning, executing collaborations, raising capital, licensing, conducting research activities, conducting preclinical studies of our programs and clinical trials of our product candidates, filing and prosecuting patent applications and providing general and administrative support for these operations. We have initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1, and more recently, a Phase 2 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1. We previously completed a Phase 1 and initiated two Phase 2 clinical trials for PGN-EDO51. However, in May 2025, we voluntarily decided not to continue development of PGN-EDO51 following our evaluation of the results from our CONNECT1 Phase 2 clinical trial and are in the process of winding down all research and development in DMD. All of our other research programs are still in the research or preclinical stage of development, and their risk of failure is high. We have not yet demonstrated our ability to successfully complete clinical trials consistently, obtain marketing approvals, manufacture product on a commercial scale or arrange for a third party to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales, marketing and distribution activities necessary for successful product commercialization. Consequently, any predictions you make about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history or a history of successfully developing and commercializing products.

Previous wording

We are early in our development efforts. We have only completed a Phase 1 clinical trial for PGN-EDO51, which we have discontinued developing, and initiated additional early-stage clinical trials, and as a result it will be years before we commercialize a product candidate, if ever. If we are unable to advance our product candidates through preclinical studies and clinical trials, obtain marketing approval and ultimately commercialize them, or experience significant delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.

Current wording

We are early in our development efforts having conducted only two Phase 1 and three Phase 2 clinical trials since our inception. If we are unable to advance our product candidates through preclinical studies and clinical trials, obtain marketing approval and ultimately commercialize them, or experience significant delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.

Previous wording

We are early in our development efforts and have invested our research efforts to date in developing our EDO platform. We have a portfolio of research programs, and until May 2025, we had two product candidates in clinical trials —PGN-EDODM1 for DM1 and PGN-EDO51 for DMD. We have initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial, designated FREEDOM, for our second product candidate, PGN-EDODM1, and began dosing participants in December 2023. On February 24, 2025, we reported initial single-dose data for each of the first two cohorts (5 and 10 mg/kg) in the Phase 1 FREEDOM study. Based on the positive splicing correction observed at the 5 and 10 mg/kg dose cohorts and the totality of the blinded safety data to date, we have decided to conclude dose escalation in the FREEDOM trial with the 15 mg/kg cohort. We have also opened a Phase 2 clinical trial, FREEDOM2, in Canada and the U.K. In May 2025, we announced that based on the levels of dystrophin protein measured in the 10 mg/kg cohort of CONNECT1, we have decided to voluntarily discontinue development of our first product candidate, PGN-EDO51, and intend to wind down all DMD-related research and development activities, including our research efforts in exon 44, 45 and 53.

Current wording

We are early in our development efforts and have invested our research efforts to date in developing our EDO platform. We have a portfolio of research programs, and until May 2025, we had two product candidates in clinical trials —PGN-EDODM1 for DM1 and PGN-EDO51 for DMD. We have initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial, designated FREEDOM, for our product candidate, PGN-EDODM1, and began dosing participants in December 2023. We have reported single-dose data for all of the planned cohorts (5, 10 and 15 mg/kg) in the Phase 1 FREEDOM study. Based on the positive splicing correction observed and the totality of the blinded safety data to date, we have decided to conclude dose escalation in the FREEDOM trial with the 15 mg/kg cohort. On September 24, 2025, we reported positive initial clinical data, including a dose-dependent mean splicing correction (53.7%) at the 15 mg/kg dose level of the ongoing FREEDOM Phase 1, single ascending dose (SAD) study. We have also opened a Phase 2 clinical trial, FREEDOM2, in Canada and the U.K. All participants in the 5mg/kg cohort have been enrolled and received at least one dose. In May 2025, we announced that based on the levels of dystrophin protein measured in the 10 mg/kg cohort of CONNECT1, we decided to voluntarily discontinue development of our first product candidate, PGN-EDO51, and are in the process of winding down all DMD-related research and development activities, including our research efforts in exon 44, 45 and 53.

Previous wording

We have advanced two product candidates, PGN-EDO51 and PGN-EDODM1, into the clinic, and have completed a Phase 1 trial of PGN-EDO51 in HVs. However, the positive results we have observed in our preclinical studies and in the completed Phase 1 trial of PGN-EDO51 were not repeated at the same level in our CONNECT1 Phase 2 clinical trials, and we decided to discontinue development of PGN-EDO51. Accordingly, the results observed in our preclinical studies of PGN-EDODM1 may not be repeated in our ongoing clinical studies. Moreover, regulatory authorities may disagree with the interpretation of data from our trials.

Current wording

We advanced two product candidates, PGN-EDO51 and PGN-EDODM1, into the clinic, and completed a Phase 1 trial of PGN-EDO51 in HVs. However, the positive results we observed in our preclinical studies and in the completed Phase 1 trial of PGN-EDO51 were not repeated at the same level in our CONNECT1 Phase 2 clinical trials, and we decided to discontinue development of PGN-EDO51. Accordingly, the results observed in our preclinical and clinical studies of PGN-EDODM1 may not be repeated in our ongoing Phase 2 clinical study. Moreover, regulatory authorities may disagree with the interpretation of data from our trials.

Previous wording

The risk of failure in developing product candidates is high. It is impossible to predict when or if any product candidate would prove effective or safe in humans or will receive regulatory approval. Before obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of any product candidate, we must complete preclinical development, obtain regulatory clearance to commence clinical trials, and then conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of product candidates in humans. To date, we have initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1, and more recently, a Phase 2 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1. We previously completed a Phase 1 and initiated two Phase 2 clinical trials for PGN-EDO51. However, in May 2025, we voluntarily decided not to continue development of PGN-EDO51 following our evaluation of the results from our CONNECT1 Phase 2 clinical trial and announced our plans to cease all research and development in DMD.

Current wording

The risk of failure in developing product candidates is high. It is impossible to predict when or if any product candidate would prove effective or safe in humans or will receive regulatory approval. Before obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of any product candidate, we must complete preclinical development, obtain regulatory clearance to commence clinical trials, and then conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of product candidates in humans. To date, we have initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1, and more recently, a Phase 2 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1. We previously completed a Phase 1 and initiated two Phase 2 clinical trials for PGN-EDO51. However, in May 2025, we voluntarily decided not to continue development of PGN-EDO51 following our evaluation of the results from our CONNECT1 Phase 2 clinical trial and announced our plans to cease all research and development in DMD. We are in the process of winding down all research and development in DMD.

Previous wording

Clinical trials may fail to demonstrate that our product candidates are safe for humans and effective for indicated uses, and earlier results, both preclinical and clinical, may not be indicative of future clinical trial results. For example, as noted above, in the case of PGN-EDO51, our product candidate for DMD, based on the levels of dystrophin protein measured in the 10 mg/kg cohort of CONNECT1, despite a favorable emerging safety profile, we have decided to voluntarily discontinue development of PGN-EDO51 and intend to wind down all DMD-related research and development activities, including our research efforts in DMD relating to exons 44, 45 and 53. Even if our clinical trials are successful, changes in marketing approval policies during the development period, changes in or the enactment or promulgation of additional statutes, regulations or guidance, varying interpretations of clinical data or changes in regulatory review for each submitted product application may cause delays in the approval or rejection of an application.

Current wording

Clinical trials may fail to demonstrate that our product candidates are safe for humans and effective for indicated uses, and earlier results, both preclinical and clinical, may not be indicative of future clinical trial results. For example, as noted above, in the case of PGN-EDO51, our product candidate for DMD, based on the levels of dystrophin protein measured in the 10 mg/kg cohort of CONNECT1, despite a favorable emerging safety profile, we decided to voluntarily discontinue development of PGN-EDO51 and are in the process of winding down all DMD-related research and development activities, including our research efforts in DMD relating to exons 44, 45 and 53. Even if our clinical trials are successful, changes in marketing approval policies during the development period, changes in or the enactment or promulgation of additional statutes, regulations or guidance, varying interpretations of clinical data or changes in regulatory review for each submitted product application may cause delays in the approval or rejection of an application.

Previous wording

We are in the early stages of our programs and have initiated Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials for our PGN-EDODM1 product candidate and reported initial data from the first two cohorts of our Phase 1 trial of PGN-EDODM1, but we have not completed IND- or CTA-enabling activities for any earlier stage product candidates or advanced any other product candidates (except PGN-EDO51) into clinical development. As a result, our belief in the capabilities of our platform is based on early research, preclinical studies, and early data from our early-stage studies and clinical trials. However, the results of preclinical studies may not be predictive of the results of later preclinical studies or clinical trials, and the results of any early-stage clinical trials may not be predictive of the results of later clinical trials. For example, since PGN-EDO51 did not achieve target dystrophin levels in the CONNECT1 trial, we made the decision to discontinue development of our DMD programs.

Current wording

We are in the early stages of our programs and have initiated Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials for our PGN-EDODM1 product candidate and reported initial data from three cohorts of our Phase 1 trial of PGN-EDODM1, but we have not completed IND- or CTA-enabling activities for any earlier stage product candidates or advanced any other product candidates (except PGN-EDO51) into clinical development. As a result, our belief in the capabilities of our platform is based on early research, preclinical studies, and early data from our early-stage studies and clinical trials. However, the results of preclinical studies may not be predictive of the results of later preclinical studies or clinical trials, and the results of any early-stage clinical trials may not be predictive of the results of later clinical trials. For example, since PGN-EDO51 did not achieve target dystrophin levels in the CONNECT1 trial, we made the decision to discontinue development of our DMD programs.

Previous wording

On February 24, 2025, we reported initial single-dose data for each of the first two cohorts (5 and 10 mg/kg) in the Phase 1 FREEDOM study. While we observed robust and dose-dependent mean splicing correction (29.1%) at the 10 mg/kg dose level, we observed limited change in functional outcomes after a single dose over one month. We believe robust splicing correction with PGN-EDODM1 has the potential to lead to meaningful functional improvements with repeat dosing over time, but this may not be the case. Initial success in clinical trials, including in our FREEDOM study, may not be indicative of results obtained when additional interim data is obtained or when such trials are completed, as was the case with our CONNECT1 study. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval of their products. Our program for PGN-EDO51 was not successful and our other clinical trials, including FREEDOM and FREEDOM2, may not ultimately be successful or support further clinical development of our product candidates. There is a high failure rate for product candidates proceeding through clinical trials. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in clinical development even after achieving encouraging results in earlier studies. Such setbacks in our clinical development, including with respect to our PGN-EDO51 program, could materially harm our business and results of operations.

Current wording

We have reported single-dose data for all of the planned cohorts (5,10 and 15 mg/kg) in the Phase 1 FREEDOM study. While we observed robust dose-dependent mean splicing correction at the 10 and 15 mg/kg dose level, we observed limited change in functional outcomes after a single dose over one month. We believe robust splicing correction with PGN-EDODM1 has the potential to lead to meaningful functional improvements with repeat dosing over time, but this may not be the case. Initial success in clinical trials, including in our FREEDOM study, may not be indicative of results obtained when additional interim data is obtained or when such trials are completed, as was the case with our CONNECT1 study. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval of their products. Our program for PGN-EDO51 was not successful and our other clinical trials, including FREEDOM and FREEDOM2, may not ultimately be successful or support further clinical development of our product candidates. There is a high failure rate for product candidates proceeding through clinical trials. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in clinical development even after achieving encouraging results in earlier studies. Such setbacks in our clinical development, including with respect to our PGN-EDO51 program, could materially harm our business and results of operations.

Previous wording

From time to time, we may publicly disclose preliminary or topline data from our preclinical studies and clinical trials, which is based on a preliminary analysis of then-available data, and the results and related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular study or trial. For example, in September 2022, we announced results from our Phase 1 clinical trial of PGN-EDO51, in July 2024, we announced initial results from our CONNECT1 Phase 2 trial from the low dose (5 mg/kg) cohort as well as high level safety information for the then ongoing 10 mg/kg dose cohort, and recently, we announced initial results from the 10 mg/kg cohort of our CONNECT1 trial. On February 24, 2025, we announced initial results from our FREEDOM Phase 1 trial from the 5 and 10 mg/kg dose cohorts. The topline or preliminary results that we report may differ from future results of the same studies, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results, once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Topline data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result, topline data and preliminary results should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. For example, based on preclinical, HV and early data in patients, we believed that with a longer treatment period and higher doses of PGN-EDO51, we could expect to see higher levels of exon skipped transcript potentially resulting in significant increases in dystrophin in our CONNECT1 Phase 2 trial. However, the data from the 10 mg/kg cohort of CONNECT1 demonstrated that PGN-EDO51 did not achieve target dystrophin levels, and we made the decision to discontinue development of our DMD programs.

Current wording

From time to time, we may publicly disclose preliminary or topline data from our preclinical studies and clinical trials, which is based on a preliminary analysis of then-available data, and the results and related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular study or trial. For example, on February 24, 2025, we announced initial results from our FREEDOM Phase 1 trial from the 5 and 10 mg/kg dose cohorts and on September 24, 2025, we announced initial clinical data, including a dose-dependent mean splicing correction (53.7%) at the 15 mg/kg dose level of the ongoing FREEDOM Phase 1, single ascending dose (SAD) study. The topline or preliminary results that we report may differ from future results of the same studies, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results, once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Topline data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result, topline data and preliminary results should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. For example, based on preclinical, HV and early data in patients, we believed that with a longer treatment period and higher doses of PGN-EDO51, we could expect to see higher levels of exon skipped transcript potentially resulting in significant increases in dystrophin in our CONNECT1 Phase 2 trial. However, the data from the 10 mg/kg cohort of CONNECT1 demonstrated that PGN-EDO51 did not achieve target dystrophin levels, and we made the decision to discontinue development of our DMD programs.

Previous wording

Our lead product candidate is in early clinical development, and there may be adverse effects from treatment with any of our current or future product candidates that we cannot predict at this time. Undesirable side effects caused by our current or future product candidates could cause us to interrupt, delay or halt preclinical studies or could cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities. Although other oligonucleotide therapeutics have received regulatory approval, ours is a novel approach to oligonucleotide therapy. As a result, there is uncertainty as to the safety profile of our product candidates compared to more well-established classes of therapies, or oligonucleotide therapeutics on their own. Moreover, there have been only a limited number of clinical trials involving the use of peptide conjugated oligonucleotide therapeutics and only one completed trial involving the proprietary technology used in our EDO platform

Current wording

There may be adverse effects from treatment with any of our current or future product candidates that we cannot predict at this time. Undesirable side effects caused by our current or future product candidates could cause us to interrupt, delay or halt preclinical studies or could cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities. Although other oligonucleotide therapeutics have received regulatory approval, ours is a novel approach to oligonucleotide therapy. As a result, there is uncertainty as to the safety profile of our product candidates compared to more well-established classes of therapies, or oligonucleotide therapeutics on their own.

Previous wording

For example, in our Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials of PGN-EDO51, we observed mild, transient, reversible changes in kidney biomarkers that resolved without intervention in all but one participant who experienced a non-life threatening serious adverse event and transient mild to moderate hypomagnesemia that resolved without intervention or with low-dose oral magnesium supplementation. One participant experienced a reduction of his estimated glomerular filtration rate, or eGFR, that a subsequent nuclear scan indicated was in the normal range. There were no treatment-related SAEs, and all treatment-related adverse events were mild. Despite what we believed to be a favorable emerging safety profile for PGN-EDO51, in May 2025, following a review of the dystrophin data from the 10 mg/kg cohort, we made the voluntary decision to cease development of PGN-EDO51. On February 24, 2025, we reported initial data from the 5 and 10 mg/kg dose cohorts in our FREEDOM Phase 1 study in DM1 patients. PGN-EDODM1 was observed to have a favorable emerging safety profile and robust splicing correction in a dose-dependent manner in the 5 and 10 mg/kg dose cohorts. Based on the positive splicing correction observed at the 5 and 10 mg/kg dose cohorts and the totality of the blinded safety data to date, we have decided to conclude dose escalation in the FREEDOM trial with the 15 mg/kg cohort. Given the early stage of clinical development, there can be no assurance that PGN-EDODM1 will not cause undesirable side effects in patients with further dosing and dose escalation, including safety events similar to those observed in our studies with PGN-EDO51.

Current wording

For example, in our Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials of PGN-EDO51, we observed mild, transient, reversible changes in kidney biomarkers that resolved without intervention in all but one participant who experienced a non-life threatening serious adverse event and transient mild to moderate hypomagnesemia that resolved without intervention or with low-dose oral magnesium supplementation. One participant experienced a reduction of his estimated glomerular filtration rate, or eGFR, that a subsequent nuclear scan indicated was in the normal range. There were no treatment-related SAEs, and all treatment-related adverse events were mild. Despite what we believed to be a favorable emerging safety profile for PGN-EDO51, in May 2025, following a review of the dystrophin data from the 10 mg/kg cohort, we made the voluntary decision to cease development of PGN-EDO51. Additionally, we have reported data from the 5, 10 and 15 mg/kg dose cohorts in our FREEDOM Phase 1 study in DM1 patients. Based on the positive splicing correction observed and the totality of the blinded safety data in the FREEDOM trial to date, we decided to conclude dose escalation in the FREEDOM trial with the 15 mg/kg cohort. Although PGN-EDODM1 was generally well tolerated, we will continue to monitor safety results, including renal biomarker-related AEs, to assess optimal dose in the multi-dose cohorts in FREEDOM2. Given the early stage of clinical development, there can be no assurance that PGN-EDODM1 will not cause undesirable side effects in patients with further dosing and dose escalation, including safety events similar to those observed in our studies with PGN-EDO51.

Previous wording

We currently depend on a small number of third-party suppliers to supply the product candidates that we are evaluating in our research programs. The loss of these or future third-party suppliers, or their inability to provide us with sufficient supply, could harm our business.

Current wording

We currently depend on a small number of third-party suppliers to supply the product candidates that we are evaluating in our research and development programs. The loss of these or future third-party suppliers, or their inability to provide us with sufficient supply, could harm our business.

Previous wording

We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities and have no current plans to develop our own clinical or commercial-scale manufacturing capabilities. We rely on a small number of third-party suppliers for the manufacture of the product candidates that we are evaluating in our research programs. We expect to continue to depend on third-party suppliers for the manufacture of any product candidates we advance into preclinical and clinical development, as well as for commercial manufacture if those product candidates receive marketing approval. The facilities used by third-party manufacturers to manufacture our product candidates must be approved by the FDA, the EMA and any comparable foreign regulatory authority pursuant to inspections that will be conducted after we submit an NDA to the FDA or any comparable filing to the EMA or other foreign regulatory authority. We do not control the manufacturing process of, and are completely dependent on, third-party manufacturers for compliance with cGMP requirements for the manufacture of products. If these third-party manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA, the EMA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority, we may incur delays in our clinical trials or regulatory submissions, and they will not be able to secure and/or maintain regulatory approval for their manufacturing facilities.

Current wording

We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities and have no current plans to develop our own clinical or commercial-scale manufacturing capabilities. We rely on a small number of third-party suppliers for the manufacture and testing of the product candidates that we are evaluating in our research and development programs, including PGN-EDODM1. We expect to continue to depend on third-party suppliers for the manufacture of any product candidates we advance into preclinical and clinical development, as well as for commercial manufacture if those product candidates receive marketing approval. The facilities used by third-party manufacturers to manufacture our product candidates must be approved by the FDA, the EMA and any comparable foreign regulatory authority pursuant to inspections that will be conducted after we submit an NDA to the FDA or any comparable filing to the EMA or other foreign regulatory authority. We do not control the manufacturing process of, and are completely dependent on, third-party manufacturers for compliance with cGMP requirements for the manufacture of products. If these third-party manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA, the EMA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority, we may incur delays in our clinical trials or regulatory submissions, and they will not be able to secure and/or maintain regulatory approval for their manufacturing facilities.

Previous wording

Additionally, if supply from one approved manufacturer is interrupted, there could be a significant disruption in supply. An alternative manufacturer would need to be qualified and authorized pursuant to a submission to our approved NDA or NDA supplement which could result in further delay. Further, we will also need to verify, such as through comparability or bridging studies, that any new or modified manufacturing processes will produce our product candidate according to the specifications previously submitted to the FDA, the EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. The delays associated with the verification of a new third-party manufacturer could negatively affect our ability to develop product candidates or commercialize our products in a timely manner or within budget. Furthermore, a third-party manufacturer may possess technology related to the manufacture of our product candidate that such third-party manufacturer owns independently. This would increase our reliance on such third-party manufacturer or require us to obtain a license from such third-party manufacturer in order to have another third-party manufacturer manufacture our product candidates. We may be unsuccessful in demonstrating the comparability of clinical supplies to those previously allowed into clinical development by the FDA, the EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities which could require the conduct of additional studies or clinical trials.

Current wording

Additionally, if supply from one approved manufacturer is interrupted, there could be a significant disruption in supply. An alternative manufacturer would need to be qualified and authorized pursuant to a submission to our approved NDA or NDA supplement which could result in further delay. Further, we will also need to verify, such as through analytical comparability or clinical bridging studies, that any new or modified manufacturing processes will produce our product candidate according to the specifications previously submitted to the FDA, the EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. The delays associated with the verification of a new third-party manufacturer could negatively affect our ability to develop product candidates or commercialize our products in a timely manner or within budget. Furthermore, a third-party manufacturer may possess technology related to the manufacture of our product candidate that such third-party manufacturer owns independently. This would increase our reliance on such third-party manufacturer or require us to obtain a license from such third-party manufacturer in order to have another third-party manufacturer manufacture our product candidates. We may be unsuccessful in demonstrating the comparability of clinical supplies to those previously allowed into clinical development by the FDA, the EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities which could require the conduct of additional studies or clinical trials.

Previous wording

We may from time to time be dependent on single-source suppliers for some of the components and materials used in our product candidates.

Current wording

We are dependent on single-source suppliers for some of the components and materials used in our product candidates.

Previous wording

Although we currently do not use any single-source supplier, we may from time to time depend on such suppliers for some of the components and materials used in our product candidates. We cannot ensure that these suppliers or service providers will remain in business, have sufficient capacity or supply to meet our needs or that they will not be purchased by one of our competitors or another company that is not interested in continuing to work with us. Our use of single-source suppliers of raw materials, components, key processes and finished goods could expose us to several risks, including disruptions in supply, price increases or late deliveries. There are, in general, relatively few alternative sources of supply for substitute components. These vendors may be unable or unwilling to meet our future demands for our clinical trials or commercial sale. Establishing additional or replacement suppliers for these components, materials and processes could take a substantial amount of time and it may be difficult to establish replacement suppliers who meet regulatory requirements. Any disruption in supply from any single-source supplier or service provider could lead to supply delays or interruptions which would damage our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Current wording

Many of the suppliers for components and materials used in our product candidates, including the manufacturer for active pharmaceutical ingredient and finish product for PGN-EDODM1, are single-sourced. We cannot ensure that these suppliers or service providers will remain in business, have sufficient capacity or supply to meet our needs or that they will not be purchased by one of our competitors or another company that is not interested in continuing to work with us. Our use of single-source suppliers of raw materials, components, key processes, active pharmaceutical ingredients and finished goods could expose us to several risks, including disruptions in supply, price increases or late deliveries. There are, in general, relatively few alternative sources of supply for substitute components. These vendors may be unable or unwilling to meet our future demands for our clinical trials or commercial sale. Establishing additional or replacement suppliers for these components, materials and processes could take a substantial amount of time and it may be difficult to establish replacement suppliers who meet regulatory requirements. Any disruption in supply from any single-source supplier or service provider could lead to supply delays or interruptions which would damage our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Previous wording

Our lead product candidate is in clinical development, while all of our other product candidates are still in preclinical development. As an organization, we have only completed or initiated a small number of clinical trials and may be unable to do so for any of our other product candidates nor carry out or complete further studies for our lead candidate.

Current wording

As an organization, we have only completed or initiated a small number of clinical trials and may be unable to do so for any of our other product candidates nor carry out or complete further studies for our lead candidate.

Previous wording

Although we are currently in clinical development for one product candidate, and recently ceased clinical development for a second product candidate, we have no experience as a company in conducting, completing and managing the full suite of clinical trials necessary to obtain regulatory approvals, including approval by the FDA, the European Commission or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, or in obtaining approval of any of our product candidates. We are early in our development efforts for our product candidates. We have successfully completed a Phase 1 clinical trial and initiated Phase 2 trials for our initial product candidate, PGN-EDO51. However, in May 2025, we made the voluntary decision to end the development of PGN-EDO51. We have also initiated a Phase 1 and a Phase 2 clinical trial for our second product candidate, PGN-EDODM1. We will need to successfully complete IND- or CTA-enabling activities, early-stage, later-stage and pivotal clinical trials, in order to obtain FDA, European Commission or comparable foreign regulatory approval to market PGN-EDODM1, and any future product candidates.

Current wording

We have no experience as a company in conducting, completing and managing the full suite of clinical trials necessary to obtain regulatory approvals, including approval by the FDA, the European Commission or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, or in obtaining approval of any of our product candidates. We are early in our development efforts for our product candidates. We successfully completed a Phase 1 clinical trial and initiated Phase 2 trials for our initial product candidate, PGN-EDO51. However, in May 2025, we made the voluntary decision to end the development of PGN-EDO51. We have also initiated a Phase 1 and a Phase 2 clinical trial for PGN-EDODM1. We will need to successfully complete IND- or CTA-enabling activities, early-stage, later-stage and pivotal clinical trials, in order to obtain FDA, European Commission or comparable foreign regulatory approval to market PGN-EDODM1, and any future product candidates.

Previous wording

In addition, based on our observations in preclinical studies that treatment with PGN-EDODM1 led to robust correction of mis-splicing and myotonia, as well as the robust dose-dependent splicing correction observed in the initial data from the 5 and 10 mg/kg cohorts in our FREEDOM Phase 1 study, we believe PGN-EDODM1 has the potential to lead to meaningful functional improvements with repeat dosing over time. However, our belief based on this data may be erroneous. There can be no assurance that our expectations of robust splicing correction and improved functional outcomes will be reflected in continued clinical evaluation of PGN-EDODM1 in DM1 patients, including in our ongoing FREEDOM2 MAD study.

Current wording

In addition, based on our observations in preclinical studies that treatment with PGN-EDODM1 led to robust correction of mis-splicing and myotonia, as well as the robust dose-dependent splicing correction observed in the initial data from the 5, 10 and 15 mg/kg cohorts in our FREEDOM Phase 1 study, we believe PGN-EDODM1 has the potential to lead to meaningful functional improvements with repeat dosing over time. However, our belief based on this data may be erroneous. There can be no assurance that our expectations of robust splicing correction and improved functional outcomes will be reflected in continued clinical evaluation of PGN-EDODM1 in DM1 patients, including in our ongoing FREEDOM2 MAD study.

Previous wording

Currently, federal agencies in the U.S. are operating under a continuing resolution that is set to expire on September 30, 2025. Without appropriation of additional funding to federal agencies, our business operations related to our product development activities for the U.S. market could be impacted. The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, statutory, regulatory and policy changes, the FDA’s ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and other events that may otherwise affect the FDA’s ability to perform routine functions. Average review times at the FDA have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of other government agencies that fund research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.

Current wording

Currently, federal agencies in the U.S. are operating under a federal government shutdown due to the expiration of the continuing resolution on September 30, 2025. The duration of the current government shutdown is unknown. In addition, the current U.S. administration is focused on reducing costs of the federal government generally, including significantly reducing the number of government employees. Without appropriation of additional funding to federal agencies, our business operations related to our product development activities for the U.S. market could be impacted. The ability of the FDA to review and approve proposed clinical studies and new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, statutory, regulatory and policy changes, the FDA’s ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and other events that may otherwise affect the FDA’s ability to perform routine functions. Average review times at the FDA have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of other government agencies that fund research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.

Previous wording

Disruptions at the FDA and other federal agencies, including substantial leadership departures, personnel cuts, and policy changes, may also slow the time necessary for new drugs to be reviewed and/or approved, which would harm our business. Changes and cuts in FDA staffing have been reported by some in the pharmaceutical industry as creating delays in the FDA’s responsiveness or in its ability to review submissions or applications, issue regulations or guidance, or implement or enforce regulatory requirements in a timely fashion or at all.

Current wording

Disruptions at the FDA and other federal agencies, including substantial leadership departures, personnel cuts, and policy changes, may also slow the time necessary for proposed clinical studies or new drugs to be reviewed and/or approved, which would harm our business. Changes and cuts in FDA staffing have been reported by some in the pharmaceutical industry as creating delays in the FDA’s responsiveness or in its ability to review submissions or applications, issue regulations or guidance, or implement or enforce regulatory requirements in a timely fashion or at all.

Previous wording

With the change in the U.S. presidential administration in 2025, there is substantial uncertainty as to whether and how the Trump administration will seek to modify or revise the requirements and policies of the FDA and other regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over our product candidates and any products for which we obtain approval. This uncertainty could present new challenges and/or opportunities as we navigate development and approval of our product candidates. Additionally, the new administration could issue or promulgate executive orders, regulations, policies or guidance that adversely affect us or create a more challenging or costly environment in which to pursue the development of new therapeutic candidates.

Current wording

With the change in the U.S. presidential administration in 2025, there have been numerous legislative and regulatory changes, and there continues to be substantial uncertainty as to whether and how the Trump administration will continue to modify or revise the requirements and policies of the FDA and other regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over our product candidates and any products for which we obtain approval. This uncertainty could present new challenges and/or opportunities as we navigate development and approval of our product candidates. Additionally, the new administration could issue or promulgate executive orders, regulations, policies or guidance that adversely affect us or create a more challenging or costly environment in which to pursue the development of new therapeutic candidates.

Previous wording

On May 12, 2025, President Trump signed the executive order, “Delivering Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing,” which directs the Secretary of HHS to set and communicate most-favored-nation price targets to manufacturers and propose a rulemaking plan to impose most-favored-nation pricing if “significant progress” is not made towards achieving such pricing. It also directs the federal government to support regulatory paths to allow direct-to-patient sales for companies that meet these targets. It also states that the Administration will take additional aggressive action (for example, examining whether marketing approvals should be modified or rescinded or opening the door for individual drug importation waivers) should manufacturers fail to offer American consumers the most-favored-nation lowest price. Notably, a rule enacted under the first Trump Administration, also known as the “Most Favored Nations” rule, would have set Medicare Part B reimbursement at an amount no higher than the lowest price that a drug manufacturer receives on a particular product in an index of foreign countries. This rule was the subject of litigation and was formally rescinded by the former Biden Administration in August 2021. In July 2025, President Trump sent letters to 17 pharmaceutical companies indicating that proposals received by the Administration to date have not been sufficient and demanding that these companies extend MFN pricing to Medicaid and newly launched drugs as well as move to direct-to-consumer models priced at MFN pricing, and soliciting binding commitments from these companies by September 29, 2025. It is not known what results will occur to the extent the recipients of these letters do not reduce their U.S. prices.

Current wording

On May 12, 2025, President Trump signed the executive order, “Delivering Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing,” which directs the Secretary of HHS to set and communicate most-favored-nation price targets to manufacturers and propose a rulemaking plan to impose most-favored-nation pricing if “significant progress” is not made towards achieving such pricing. It also directs the federal government to support regulatory paths to allow direct-to-patient sales for companies that meet these targets. It also states that the Administration will take additional aggressive action (for example, examining whether marketing approvals should be modified or rescinded or opening the door for individual drug importation waivers) should manufacturers fail to offer American consumers the most-favored-nation lowest price. Notably, a rule enacted under the first Trump Administration, also known as the “Most Favored Nations” rule, would have set Medicare Part B reimbursement at an amount no higher than the lowest price that a drug manufacturer receives on a particular product in an index of foreign countries. This rule was the subject of litigation and was formally rescinded by the former Biden Administration in August 2021. In July 2025, President Trump sent letters to 17 pharmaceutical companies indicating that proposals received by the Administration to date have not been sufficient and demanding that these companies extend MFN pricing to Medicaid and newly launched drugs as well as move to direct-to-consumer models priced at MFN pricing, and soliciting binding commitments from these companies by September 29, 2025. On September 30, 2025, the White House announced the first MFN agreement (with Pfizer), and reports indicate additional negotiations are ongoing. The scope, timing, and ultimate impact of any further actions or agreements remain uncertain. Further, in September and October 2025, multiple drug manufacturers announced plans to, for certain of their drugs, lower prices to reflect similar pricing around the world, and to sell these reduced-price drugs on a direct-to-consumer purchasing platform that is yet to be developed by the federal government.

Previous wording

Among other requirements, the GDPR includes restrictions on cross-border transfers of personal data subject to the GDPR to countries outside the EEA/U.K. that have not been found to provide adequate protection to such personal data (third countries), unless a valid GDPR transfer mechanism (for example, the European Commission approved Standard Contractual Clauses, or SCCs, certification to the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (which allows for transfers to relevant U.S.-based organizations who self-certify compliance and participate in the framework) and the U.K. International Data Transfer Agreement/Addendum, or U.K. IDTA) has been put in place. Where relying on the SCCs /U.K. IDTA for data transfers, we may also be required to carry out transfer impact assessments to assess whether the recipient is subject to local laws which allow public authority access to personal data. The international transfer obligations under the EEA/U.K. data protection regimes will require significant effort and cost and may result in us needing to make strategic considerations around where EEA/U.K. personal data is transferred and which service providers we can utilize for the processing of EEA/U.K. personal data. As supervisory authorities issue further guidance on personal data export mechanisms, including circumstances where the SCCs cannot be used, and/or start taking enforcement action, we could suffer additional costs, complaints and/or regulatory investigations or fines, and/or if we are otherwise unable to transfer personal data between and among countries and regions in which we operate, it could affect the manner in which we provide our services, the geographical location or segregation of our relevant systems and operations, and could adversely affect our financial results. Switzerland has also adopted similar restrictions on transfer of personal data outside of its borders. Although the U.K. is regarded as a third country under the EU’s GDPR, the European Commission has adopted an (adequacy decision) in favor of the U.K., a decision recognizing the U.K. as providing adequate protection under the EU GDPR and enabling data transfers from EU Member States to the U.K. without additional safeguards. However, the U.K. adequacy decision will automatically expire in June 2025 unless the European Commission re-assesses and renews or extends that decision and remains under review by the Commission during this period. The U.K. government has confirmed that personal data transfers from the U.K. to the EEA remain free flowing. On October 24, 2024, the

Current wording

Among other requirements, the GDPR includes restrictions on cross-border transfers of personal data subject to the GDPR to countries outside the EEA/U.K. that have not been found to provide adequate protection to such personal data (third countries), unless a valid GDPR transfer mechanism (for example, the European Commission approved Standard Contractual Clauses, or SCCs, certification to the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (which allows for transfers to relevant U.S.-based organizations who self-certify compliance and participate in the framework) and the U.K. International Data Transfer Agreement/Addendum, or U.K. IDTA) has been put in place. Where relying on the SCCs /U.K. IDTA for data transfers, we may also be required to carry out transfer impact assessments to assess whether the recipient is subject to local laws which allow public authority access to personal data. The international transfer obligations under the EEA/U.K. data protection regimes will require significant effort and cost and may result in us needing to make strategic considerations around where EEA/U.K. personal data is transferred and which service providers we can utilize for the processing of EEA/U.K. personal data. As supervisory authorities issue further guidance on personal data export mechanisms, including circumstances where the SCCs cannot be used, and/or start taking enforcement action, we could suffer additional costs, complaints and/or regulatory investigations or fines, and/or if we are otherwise unable to transfer personal data between and among countries and regions in which we operate, it could affect the manner in which we provide our services, the geographical location or segregation of our relevant systems and operations, and could adversely affect our financial results. Switzerland has also adopted similar restrictions on transfer of personal data outside of its borders. Although the U.K. is regarded as a third country under the EU’s GDPR, the European Commission has adopted an (adequacy decision) in favor of the U.K., a decision recognizing the U.K. as providing adequate protection under the EU GDPR and enabling data transfers from EU Member States to the

Previous wording

U.K. Government introduced its Data Use and Access Bill, or U.K. Bill, into the U.K. legislative process which has now been passed. The U.K. Bill will have the effect of further altering the similarities between the U.K. and EEA data protection regime and threaten the U.K. Adequacy Decision from the European Commission. This may lead to additional compliance costs and could increase our overall risk. It is unclear how U.K. data protection laws and regulations will develop in the medium to longer term, and how data transfers to and from the U.K. will be regulated in the long term. Although the EU GDPR and the U.K. GDPR currently impose substantially similar obligations it is possible that over time the respective provisions, interpretations and enforcement of the EU GDPR and U.K. GDPR may further diverge in the future and create additional regulatory challenges and uncertainties. The lack of clarity on future U.K. laws and regulations and their interaction with EU laws and regulations could add legal risk, uncertainty, complexity and cost to our handling of U.K. and EEA personal data and our privacy and data security compliance programs, and could require us to implement different compliance measures for the U.K. and the EEA.

Current wording

U.K. without additional safeguards. The U.K. adequacy decision was due to expire in June 2025 but in May 2025 the European Commission adopted a decision to extend the validity of the U.K. adequacy decision for six months, from June until December 2025. In July 2025, the Commission published a draft adequacy decision determining that the U.K. continues to offer a level of data protection that is “essentially equivalent” to the EU standards. This follows the U.K.’s adoption of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, or the DUAA, on June 19, 2025, and signals positive momentum for the renewal of the U.K.’s adequacy status, currently set to expire on December 27, 2025. It is unclear how U.K. data protection laws and regulations will develop in the medium to longer term, and how data transfers to and from the U.K. will be regulated in the long term. Although the EU GDPR and the U.K. GDPR currently impose substantially similar obligations it is possible that over time the respective provisions, interpretations and enforcement of the EU GDPR and U.K. GDPR may further diverge in the future and create additional regulatory challenges and uncertainties. The lack of clarity on future U.K. laws and regulations and their interaction with EU laws and regulations could add legal risk, uncertainty, complexity and cost to our handling of U.K. and EEA personal data and our privacy and data security compliance programs, and could require us to implement different compliance measures for the U.K. and the EEA.

Previous wording

The development and commercialization of new drug products is highly competitive. We face competition with respect to our product candidates from major pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies worldwide. There are a number of large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that currently market and sell products or are pursuing the development of products for the treatment of many of the disorders for which we are conducting research programs. Some of these competitive products and therapies are based on scientific approaches that are the same as or similar to our approach, and others are based on entirely different approaches. Potential competitors also include academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations that conduct research, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing and commercialization.

Current wording

The development and commercialization of new drug products is highly competitive. We face competition with respect to our product candidates from major pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies worldwide. There are a number of large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that currently are pursuing the development of products for the treatment of many of the disorders for which we are conducting research programs. Some of these competitive products and therapies are based on scientific approaches that are the same as or similar to our approach, and others are based on entirely different approaches. Potential competitors also include academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations that conduct research, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing and commercialization.

Previous wording

We expect to face competition from existing products and product candidates in development for our programs. For our sole remaining clinical-stage product candidate, DM1, there are currently no approved therapies to treat the underlying cause of the disease. Pipeline candidates currently in development to treat DM1 include several approaches that target DMPK RNA. These include AOC 1001, an antibody linked siRNA in Phase 3 clinical development by Avidity Biosciences, Inc., or Avidity; DYNE-101, an antibody conjugated antisense oligonucleotide in Phase 2 clinical development by Dyne; VX-670, a peptide conjugated PMO in Phase 2 by Entrada Therapeutics, Inc., or Entrada, and Vertex; and ARO-DM1, a conjugated siRNA in Phase 1/2 clinical development by Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Arrowhead, and Sarepta. There are additional approaches under development such as ATX-01, a microRNA that modulates expression of MBNL1 by Arthex Biotech S.L., that is in Phase 1 clinical development. Another small molecule, tideglusib, which is a GSK3-ß inhibitor is in clinical development by AMO for the congenital phenotype of DM1.

Current wording

We expect to face competition from existing products and product candidates in development for our programs. For our sole clinical-stage product candidate, DM1, there are currently no approved therapies to treat the underlying cause of the disease. Pipeline candidates currently in development to treat DM1 include several approaches that target DMPK RNA. These include AOC 1001, an antibody linked siRNA in Phase 3 clinical development by Avidity Biosciences, Inc., or Avidity, which has agreed to be acquired by Novartis, subject to various closing conditions; DYNE-101, an antibody conjugated antisense oligonucleotide in Phase 2 clinical development by Dyne, with an ongoing registrational expansion cohort reportedly intended to support a potential submission for accelerated approval in the U.S. and with plans by Dyne to initiate a confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial of DYNE-101 in Q1 2026; VX-670, a peptide conjugated PMO in Phase 2 originally developed by Entrada Therapeutics, Inc., or Entrada, and Vertex; and ARO-DM1, a conjugated siRNA in Phase 1/2 clinical development by Sarepta, originally developed by Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Arrowhead. There are additional approaches under development such as ATX-01, a microRNA that modulates expression of MBNL1 by Arthex Biotech S.L., that is in Phase 1/2a clinical development. Another small molecule, tideglusib, which is a GSK3-ß inhibitor is in clinical development by AMO for the congenital phenotype of DM1.

Previous wording

We will also compete more generally with other companies developing alternative scientific and technological approaches, including other companies working to develop conjugates with oligonucleotides for extra-hepatic delivery, including Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Aro Biotherapeutics Co., Arrowhead, Avidity, Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (acquired by Novo Nordisk), Dyne, Entrada, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., PYC Therapeutics Limited and Sarepta, as well as gene therapy and gene editing approaches.

Current wording

We will also compete more generally with other companies developing alternative scientific and technological approaches, including other companies working to develop conjugates with oligonucleotides for extra-hepatic delivery, including Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Aro Biotherapeutics Co., Arrowhead, Avidity (which has agreed to be acquired by Novartis), Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (acquired by Novo Nordisk), Dyne, Entrada, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., PYC Therapeutics Limited and Sarepta, as well as gene therapy and gene editing approaches.

Previous wording

Our success depends in large part on our and our licensors’ ability to obtain and maintain patent and other intellectual property protection in the U.S. and other jurisdictions. We and our licensors have sought, and will seek, to protect our proprietary position by filing additional patent applications in the U.S. and abroad related to certain technologies and our platform that are important to our business. However, our patent portfolio is at a somewhat early stage; there are eight issued patents (one of which is a European patent validated in five countries), which we in-licensed from Oxford University Innovation Limited, or OUI, and the Medical Research Council of United Kingdom Research and Innovation, or MRC, and substantive examination of many of the currently pending patent applications we own or license has yet to begin. In addition, there can be no assurance as to whether or when our patent applications will issue as granted patents. Our ability to stop third parties from making, using, selling, marketing, offering to sell, importing and commercializing our product candidates and our technology is dependent upon the extent to which we have rights under valid and enforceable patents and other intellectual property that cover our platform and technology. If we are unable to secure, maintain, defend and enforce patents and other intellectual property with respect to our product candidates and our technology, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Current wording

Our success depends in large part on our and our licensors’ ability to obtain and maintain patent and other intellectual property protection in the U.S. and other jurisdictions. We and our licensors have sought, and will seek, to protect our proprietary position by filing additional patent applications in the U.S. and abroad related to certain technologies and our platform that are important to our business. However, our patent portfolio is at a somewhat early stage; there are nine issued patents (one of which is a European patent validated in five countries), which we in-licensed from Oxford University Innovation Limited, or OUI, and the Medical Research Council of United Kingdom Research and Innovation, or MRC, and substantive examination of many of the currently pending patent applications we own or license has yet to begin. In addition, there can be no assurance as to whether or when our patent applications will issue as granted patents. Our ability to stop third parties from making, using, selling, marketing, offering to sell, importing and commercializing our product candidates and our technology is dependent upon the extent to which we have rights under valid and enforceable patents and other intellectual property that cover our platform and technology. If we are unable to secure, maintain, defend and enforce patents and other intellectual property with respect to our product candidates and our technology, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Previous wording

Competitors may infringe our patents or other intellectual property or the intellectual property of our licensors. To cease such infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file patent infringement claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming and divert the time and attention of our management and scientific personnel. Our pending patent applications cannot be enforced against third parties practicing the technology claimed in such applications unless and until a patent issues from such applications. In addition, in an infringement proceeding or a declaratory judgment action, a court may decide that one or more of our patents is not valid or is unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question. An adverse result in any litigation or defense proceeding could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated, held unenforceable, or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing.

Current wording

Competitors may infringe our patents or other intellectual property or the intellectual property of our licensors. To cease such infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file patent infringement claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming and divert the time and attention of our management and scientific personnel. Our pending patent applications cannot be enforced against third parties practicing the technology claimed in such applications unless and until a patent issues from such applications. In addition, in an infringement proceeding or a declaratory judgment action, a court may decide that one or more of our patents is not valid or is unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question. An adverse result in any litigation or defense proceeding could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated, held unenforceable, or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing. Defense of these claims, regardless of their merit, would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a substantial diversion of employee resources from our business.

Previous wording

As of June 30, 2025, we had 62 full-time employees. As our development progresses, assuming positive results in our ongoing clinical trials and successful fundraising, we expect to experience growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly in the areas of drug development, clinical, regulatory affairs and, if any product candidate receives marketing approval, sales, marketing, distribution and coverage and reimbursement capabilities. To manage our potential future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, and continue to recruit and train necessary qualified personnel and longer-term, may need to expand our facilities. Due to our limited financial resources and the limited experience of our management team in managing a company with such anticipated growth, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. The expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and business development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations.

Current wording

As of September 30, 2025, we had 57 full-time employees. As our development progresses, we expect to experience growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly in the areas of drug development, clinical, regulatory affairs and, if any product candidate receives marketing approval, sales, marketing, distribution and coverage and reimbursement capabilities. To manage our potential future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, and continue to recruit and train necessary qualified personnel and longer-term, may need to expand our facilities. Due to our limited financial resources and the limited experience of our management team in managing a company with such anticipated growth, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. The expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and business development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations.

Previous wording

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenues, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances and/or licensing arrangements. We do not have any committed external source of funds. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a common stockholder. In February 2024, we sold shares of our common stock under our ATM program and in the Follow-on Offering, receiving aggregate net proceeds of $86.3 million after deducting underwriters' fees and costs of the offerings. Any debt financing or preferred equity financing, if available, may involve, agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, selling or licensing our assets, making capital expenditures, declaring dividends or encumbering our assets to secure future indebtedness.

Current wording

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenues, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances and/or licensing arrangements. We do not have any committed external source of funds. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a common stockholder. In February 2024, we sold shares of our common stock under our ATM program and in the Follow-on Offering, receiving aggregate net proceeds of $86.3 million after deducting underwriters' fees and costs of the offerings. In September 2025, we sold shares of our common stock in a public offering which resulted in net proceeds of $107.6 million after deducting underwriters' fees and estimated offering expenses. Any debt financing or preferred equity financing, if available, may involve, agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, selling or licensing our assets, making capital expenditures, declaring dividends or encumbering our assets to secure future indebtedness.

Previous wording

Based upon our common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2025, our executive officers, directors, greater than five percent shareholders and their affiliates beneficially own approximately 66.8% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, if these stockholders were to choose to act together, they would be able to significantly influence all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, as well as our management and affairs, even though some of these persons or entities may have interests that are different than those of yours. For example, these stockholders, if they choose to act together, could significantly influence the election of directors and approval of any merger, consolidation or sale of substantially all of our assets.

Current wording

Based upon our common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2025, our executive officers, directors, greater than five percent shareholders and their affiliates beneficially own approximately 41.5% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, if these stockholders were to choose to act together, they would be able to significantly influence all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, as well as our management and affairs, even though some of these persons or entities may have interests that are different than those of yours. For example, these stockholders, if they choose to act together, could significantly influence the election of directors and approval of any merger, consolidation or sale of substantially all of our assets.

Showing the first 40 of 44 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.

Rearranged current paragraphs (1)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Moreover, there have been only a limited number of clinical trials involving the use of peptide conjugated oligonucleotide therapeutics or our proprietary technology used in our EDO platform.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Defense of these claims, regardless of their merit, would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a substantial diversion of employee resources from our business.