Skip to main content

Dave Inc./DE

For the period ended Sep 30, 2025. Filed Nov 4, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Sep 30, 2025 · Filed Nov 4, 2025

DAVE$278.59+1.2%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 36 previous paragraphs and 10 current paragraphs.

8 unchanged; 1 reworded; 1 added; 27 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 1 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (1)

Current report

Refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Share Repurchase Authorization” for additional information regarding our authorized share repurchase program.
Removed paragraphs (27)

Previous report

ExtraCash exposes us to credit risk of our Members and if our underwriting criteria for ExtraCash is not sufficient to mitigate against this risk, or if the data we use to underwrite is inaccurate or incomplete, our financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected if a substantial number of our Members fail to repay the ExtraCash overdraft they receive.

Previous report

The ExtraCash product exposes us to financial losses if Members do not repay the ExtraCash overdraft. The timing and volume of repayments have a significant impact on our financial results and cash flows. If a large number of Members do not repay ExtraCash overdrafts, our financial condition and operating results would be adversely affected.

Previous report

Our underwriting standards may not offer adequate protection against the risk of non-payment, especially in periods of economic uncertainty such as existed more recently with rising interest rates, and inflationary pressures. We rely on consumer’s bank account data obtained through a third party in order to develop our underwriting models and in order to underwrite any particular consumer’s ExtraCash overdraft. If this data becomes unavailable or is inaccurate or incomplete, our underwriting may not adequately predict repayment of advances. In addition, if the cost to obtain this data materially increases, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

Previous report

Our ability to accurately forecast performance and determine an appropriate provision and our credit loss allowance, is critical to our business and financial results. The determination of our credit loss allowance requires many assumptions and complex analyses, including management’s evaluation of the risk inherent in the ExtraCash portfolio, composition of the portfolio, specific impaired ExtraCash receivables, and current economic conditions.

Previous report

There can be no assurance that our performance forecasts will be accurate. In periods with changing economic conditions, elevated interest rates and persistent inflationary pressures, accurately forecasting repayment of ExtraCash receivables is more difficult. Our credit loss allowance is an estimate, and if actual repayment defaults are materially greater than our credit loss allowance, or more generally, if our forecasts are not accurate, our financial position, liquidity and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Specifically, we may incur net charge-offs in excess of our reserves, or we may be required to increase our provision for credit losses, either of which would adversely affect our results of operations. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Critical Accounting Estimates” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Previous report

We primarily rely on a single bank partner, and if our present or any future key banking relationships are terminated and we are not able to secure or successfully migrate client portfolios to a new bank partner or partners, or our bank partner becomes subject to regulatory restrictions or other operational disruptions, our business would be adversely affected.

Previous report

We rely on agreements with Evolve, our primary bank partner, and Coastal Community Bank to provide ExtraCash and other deposit accounts, debit card services and other transaction services to us and our Members. In June 2024, Evolve became subject to a consent order issued by its primary regulator, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve Board”), that imposes restrictions on Evolve’s operations and risk management practices. The recent bankruptcy of Synapse Financial Technologies, Inc. (“Synapse”), also affected the ability of customers of financial technology companies that used Synapse as a service provider to access funds placed at Synapse’s partner banks, including Evolve, for a number of months. We have also entered into a Program Agreement with Coastal Community Bank to become a sponsor for our banking and ExtraCash products. Our Members have begun onboarding to Coastal Community Bank on a limited basis.

Previous report

These agreements and corresponding regulations and supervisory expectations governing banks and financial institutions may give Evolve or Coastal Community Bank substantial discretion in approving certain aspects of our business practices, including our application and qualification procedures for Members and require us to comply with certain legal requirements. Our current or future bank partner’s discretionary actions or interpretations of our obligations under these agreements could impose material limitations to, or have a material adverse effect on, our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, any disruptions or restrictions on our bank partner’s operations could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, in May 2024, Evolve experienced a cybersecurity incident that resulted in the leak of certain customer information, including the information of some of our Members.

Previous report

If our relationships with our bank partners are terminated or if one of our bank partners is unable to provide the necessary services to us, we would need to find another financial institution to provide those services, which could be difficult and expensive. Transitioning Members’ accounts from one bank partner to another, including the transition from Evolve to Coastal Community Bank, raises the risk of financial losses as a result of operational errors, including but not limited to, loss or disclosure of Member data and records, software defects, service disruption, employee misconduct, security breaches, or other similar actions or errors as well as from disputes or negotiations with an existing or prospective bank partner. Transitioning Members’ accounts from one bank partner to another also entails risk of disruption to our business from differences in the manner in which the new bank partner provides products and services to Members, including the new bank partner’s credit underwriting, regulatory compliance practices, and customer service practices and difficulties operating with more than one bank partner during any transition. The occurrence of any such events or any such changes in our bank partner’s practices could cause financial losses to our business and our Members, loss of trust, damage to our reputation, or termination of our agreements with strategic partners, each of which could result in loss of Members; loss or delayed market acceptance and sales of our products or services; legal claims against us, including from our existing or prospective bank partner; regulatory enforcement action; or diversion of resources, including through increased service expenses or financial concessions and increased insurance costs. If we are unable to find a replacement financial institution to provide the services we receive from our bank partner, we would not be able to offer ExtraCash, service our deposit accounts, debit cards and other services, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, our financial results could be adversely affected if our costs associated with using our bank partner materially change or if any penalty or claim for damages is imposed as a result of our breach of our agreements with our bank partner.

Previous report

Changes in U.S. policies may adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Previous report

The current U.S. administration has announced and/or implemented significant new tariffs and retaliatory tariffs against U.S. trading partners. Tariffs and trade restrictions may cause the prices of products to increase, which could reduce our Members’ disposable income, and adversely impact their spending, willingness to use ExtraCash, or ability to repay ExtraCash. This, in turn, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Previous report

The current U.S. administration is also implementing significant changes to the size and scope of the federal government. These changes may include reductions to government funding of various programs and agencies, alteration of the payment systems it uses, changes in policy direction, reduction and possible elimination of various federal agencies and bureaus and reduction of the overall federal government workforce. These changes, which may have a positive impact by reducing the overall federal deficit and reducing regulatory burden, may also have potential negative impacts, including impacts on the economy as a whole or different regions or segments of the economy. Accordingly, it is possible that such comprehensive changes may be materially adverse to our Members, business, financial condition and results of operation.

Previous report

Our business is subject to extensive regulation and oversight in a variety of areas under federal, state and local laws, and is subject to regulatory investigations, consumer litigation, and mass arbitrations.

Previous report

We are subject to extensive regulation under United States federal and state laws and regulations. Regulators have broad discretion with respect to the interpretation, implementation, and enforcement of these laws and regulations, including through enforcement actions that could subject us to civil money penalties, Member remediation, increased compliance costs, and limits or prohibitions on our ability to offer certain products or services or to engage in certain activities. Any failure or perceived failure to comply with any of these laws or regulations could subject us to lawsuits or governmental actions and/or damage our reputation or cause us to modify our products and operations or cease our ability to offer certain products altogether, which could materially and adversely affect our business. Moreover, any competitors subject to different, or in some cases less restrictive, legislative or regulatory regimes may have or obtain a competitive advantage over us.

Previous report

We are subject to the regulatory and enforcement authority of the CFPB, which oversees compliance with federal consumer financial protection laws. In addition, our partnership with Evolve and with Coastal Community Bank are subject to the supervisory authority of the Federal Reserve, which is the primary federal bank regulator of Evolve and Coastal Community Bank, and their respective state banking regulators. Any future bank partnership will also be subject to the supervisory authority of the partner bank’s primary federal and any applicable state bank regulator. The CFPB has broad enforcement powers, and upon determining a violation of applicable law has occurred can order, among other things, rescission or reformation of contracts, the refund of moneys, restitution, disgorgement or compensation for unjust enrichment, the payment of damages or other monetary relief, public notifications regarding violations, limits on activities or functions, remediation of practices, external compliance monitoring and civil money penalties. The cost of responding to investigations can be substantial and an adverse resolution to an investigation, including a consent order or other settlement, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and future prospects.

Previous report

For example, in January 2023, the Company received a Civil Investigative Demand from the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) staff seeking information in connection with the sale, offering, advertising, marketing or other promotion of cash advance products and online financial services. In response, the Company cooperated with the FTC staff while seeking to engage constructively with the FTC to resolve this matter.

Previous report

On August 21, 2024, the FTC staff sent the Company a proposed consent order and draft complaint, alleging that the Company had violated Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”) which prohibits “unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce” and certain provisions of the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act related to the Company’s platform and offering of the ExtraCash Product (the “Complaint”), and advising that it would recommend the filing of an enforcement action if the Company did not settle the FTC’s claims. The Company engaged in good faith negotiations with the FTC staff to settle the claims but these negotiations were unsuccessful, and on November 5, 2024, the FTC filed the Complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against the Company. The Complaint sought a permanent injunction, monetary relief for an unspecified amount and “other relief as the court determines to be just and proper.” The FTC then referred the case to the Department of Justice (the “DOJ”), and on December 30, 2024, the DOJ filed an amended civil complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, naming the Company and our Chief Executive Officer, Jason Wilk as defendants (the "Amended Complaint"). The Amended Complaint alleges that Dave violated Section 5(a) of the FTC Act as well as the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act. The DOJ is seeking injunctive relief, civil penalties, monetary relief and other relief. For additional information regarding this matter, see Part II, Item 1 “Legal Proceedings” and Note 11, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Previous report

Although the Company believes that its practices have at all times been in compliance with applicable law, the outcome of any case in litigation is uncertain. Therefore, for the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded a $7 million litigation and settlement accrual for this matter. Significant changes in the accrual may be required in future periods as the case progresses and additional information becomes available. At this time, the Company is unable to reasonably predict the possible outcome of this matter due to, among other things, the fact that it raises difficult factual and legal issues and is subject to many uncertainties and complexities. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in the litigation, and the Company may incur a loss in excess of the amount accrued. The defense or resolution of this matter could involve significant monetary costs and have a material impact on the Company’s business, financial results and operations.

Previous report

In addition, we are also subject to consumer litigation, including putative consumer class actions, and mass arbitrations, in which large groups of consumers bring arbitration claims against the Company simultaneously, which allege that we violate federal and/or state laws regulating the financial services industry. For example, there has been an increase in consumer litigation and mass arbitration demands, including several consumer litigation and mass arbitration demands that have been filed or threatened against the Company. The results of any such claims, litigation, mass arbitrations, government investigations or other legal or regulatory proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. For additional information regarding our material legal proceedings, refer to Part II, Item 1 “Legal Proceedings” and Note 11, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Previous report

Our “terms of use” for the Dave App as well as the Evolve and Coastal Community Bank agreements related to the ExtraCash and deposit accounts include arbitration clauses, and any future bank partner agreements related to the ExtraCash and deposit accounts are also expected to include arbitration clauses. If our arbitration agreements were to become unenforceable for any reason, we could experience an increase to our consumer litigation costs and exposure to potentially damaging class action lawsuits. Even if our arbitration clause remains enforceable, we would remain subject to mass arbitrations.

Previous report

We have been and may in the future also be subject to investigations and potential enforcement actions that may be brought by state regulatory authorities, state attorneys general or other state enforcement authorities and other governmental agencies. Any such actions could subject us to civil money penalties and fines, Member remediation, and increased compliance costs, damage our reputation and brand and limit or prohibit our ability to offer certain products and services or engage in certain business practices. Further, in some cases, regardless of fault, it may be less time-consuming or costly to settle these matters, which may require us to implement certain changes to our business practices, provide remediation to certain individuals or make a settlement payment to a given party or regulatory body.

Previous report

The valuation of our public and private warrants and earnout shares could materially increase the volatility of our net income (loss) in our consolidated statements of operations.

Previous report

We record changes in the fair value of our public and private warrants and earnout shares at each reporting period based on fluctuations in our stock price and the number of instruments outstanding. These mark-to-market adjustments to warrant and earnout liabilities reflect the fair value of instruments issued in connection with our initial public offering and business combination agreements. Significant movements in our stock price or the outstanding count of public warrants, private warrants or earnout shares could have a substantial effect on our net income (loss). Furthermore, the valuation models and assumptions used to measure these instruments’ fair values may introduce additional unpredictability and volatility into our financial results.

Previous report

On May 30, 2025, Jason Wilk, amember of our Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, entered into a pre-arranged stock trading plan that provides for the potential sale of up to 100,000 shares of Dave Class A Common Stock between August 29, 2025 and May 29, 2026, subject to the plan's earlier expiration or completion in accordance with its terms.

Previous report

On June 4, 2025, Kyle Beilman, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer, entered into a pre-arranged stock trading plan that provides for the potential sale of up to 70,000 shares of Dave Class A Common Stock between September 3, 2025 and December 31, 2025, subject to the plan's earlier expiration or completion in accordance with its terms.

Previous report

On June 5, 2025, Yadin Rozov, amember of our Board of Directors, entered into a pre-arranged stock trading plan that provides for the potential sale of up to 19,386 shares of Dave Class A Common Stock between September 4, 2025 and December 31, 2025, subject to the plan's earlier expiration or completion in accordance with its terms.

Previous report

These trading plans are intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act.
Reworded paragraphs (1)

Previous wording

As of the date of this Form 10-Q, there have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on March 4, 2025, other than as noted below and in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. Any of these factors could result in a significant or material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Additional risk factors not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business or results of operations. We may disclose changes to such risk factors or disclose additional risk factors from time to time in our future filings with the SEC.

Current wording

As of the date of this Form 10-Q, there have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on March 4, 2025, other than as noted in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2025 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. Any of these factors could result in a significant or material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Additional risk factors not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business or results of operations. We may disclose changes to such risk factors or disclose additional risk factors from time to time in our future filings with the SEC.