EUPRAXIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Mar 20, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
The yearly report of certain Canadian companies, filed under a joint US and Canadian system. It is the main yearly account these companies give US investors, largely as filed in Canada.
FY2024 · Filed Mar 20, 2025
Use the contents to explore the available documents and sections.
Contents
EX-99.3 · Clinical Studies
Clinical Studies
EP-104IAR has been evaluated in two clinical studies in OA patients. The first clinical study was a Phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study (protocol EP-104-101) to assess safety, PK and preliminary efficacy in 32 knee OA patients at three sites in Canada. The single 15 mg dose was generally well tolerated and showed predictable PK. The study was not powered to detect efficacy; however, patient-reported outcome measures were collected and analyzed to evaluate pain and symptom relief. Despite the limitations of this study (small size, low dose, significant underdosing in nine subjects, and high placebo response), we believe it provides promising tolerability and PK data and preliminary clinical activity data to support future development of EP-104IAR. Results of the study have been published inOsteoarthritis and Cartilage Open.
The second clinical study was SPRINGBOARD – a Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study (protocol EP-104IAR-201) that assessed the efficacy, safety and PK of a single 25 mg dose of EP-104IAR in 318 patients with moderate knee OA. The trial was conducted at 12 sites in Denmark, Poland and Czech Republic, with the last patient visit announced on May 25, 2023. Top-line data readout was announced on June 26, 2023. Results of the study have been published inThe Lancet Rheumatology.
EP-104IAR-201 met its primary endpoint with a clinically meaningful and statistically significant (p=0.004) improvement over vehicle-placebo in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (“WOMAC”) Pain at 12 weeks in the Intent to Treat population.
EP-104IAR-201 also showed statistically significant improvement over placebo at 12 weeks in three key secondary endpoints: WOMAC Function (p=0.014), OMERACT-OARSI strict responders (p=0.011) and Area Under the Curve (“AUC”) for WOMAC Pain (p<0.001). Importantly, statistical significance with OMERACT-OARSI strict responders to 15 weeks and AUC for WOMAC Pain to 24 weeks was also seen in the Phase 2b study, highlighting a strong and durable response. The secondary endpoint of the difference in change from baseline in the WOMAC Pain subscale at 24 weeks was not met, delivering statistical significance to 14 weeks.
We also performedpre-specified analyses in the moderatesub-population, which comprised 68% of the study population (n=214). Statistically significant efficacy outcomes were seen for WOMAC Pain (17 weeks) and OMERACT-OARSI strict responders (22 weeks). Additionally, 40% of moderate patients achieved near complete pain relief (WOMAC Pain score of ≤2) which was statistically significant for 22 weeks.
EP-104IAR was well tolerated, with adverse events similar to placebo, and no withdrawals due to adverse events. Changes in cortisol were minimal and transient and there were no differences in blood glucose levels between treatment groups, including diabetics. We believe these safety data and the observed PK profile support our goal of developing a product that can be used for repeat and bilateral dosing, and in certainat-risk populations.
In parallel to the main study, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (“MRI”), with macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent, was obtained from participating patients who received EP-104IAR (n=6) or placebo (n=6). Scans were performed at baseline and weeks 12, 24 and 52 (or on early exit). The data obtained in the MRIsub-study demonstrated the following results:
| • | Treatment with EP-104IAR resulted in a trend of non-statistically significant decrease in inflammation at weeks 12 and 24 when compared to placebo. The two groups were similar at one year as the clinical effect of the single EP-104IAR injection had waned by one year. |
| • | A correlation between reduction in inflammation and a reduction in WOMAC Pain scores was observed. |
| • | A trend of equivalent or improved T2 relaxation times was observed in the EP-104IAR treated group compared to the placebo group at 12 weeks and that trend held steady, or improved, at 24 weeks and 52 weeks but was not statistically significant. These data suggest a trend of potential improvement in cartilage quality and morphology in the treated group. |
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.