WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC.

Objective of Our Compensation Programs

The role of compensation is to attract and retain the talent needed to increase stockholder value and to help our businesses meet or exceed financial and operational performance goals. Our compensation programs’ objectives are to reward our NEOs and employees for successfully implementing our strategy to grow our business and create long-term stockholder value. To that end, in 2024 we used ROCE and AFFO per Share, with Relative TSR as a modifier, to measure long-term performance and we used Adjusted EBITDA, Controllable Costs, safety, and environmental metrics to measure annual performance. We believe using separate annual and long-term metrics to incent and pay NEOs helps ensure that we make business decisions aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders.

Our Pay Philosophy

Our pay philosophy throughout the entire organization is to pay for performance, be competitive in the marketplace, and consider the value a job provides to the Company. Our compensation programs reward NEOs not just for accomplishing goals, but also for how those goals are pursued. The principles of our pay philosophy influence the design and administration of our pay programs. Decisions about how we pay NEOs are based on these principles. The Committee uses several types of pay that are linked to both our long-term and short-term performance in the executive compensation programs. Included are long-term incentives, annual cash incentives, base pay, and benefits. The following details the linkage between the types of pay we use and our pay principles.

PAY PRINCIPLES

Roles in the Compensation Recommendation and Decision Process

Comparator Group

DETERMINING OUR COMPARATOR GROUP

Companies in our executive compensation benchmarking comparator group have a range of assets, market capitalization, and enterprise value. Business consolidation and unique operating models in our industry create some challenges in identifying comparator companies. Accordingly, we take a broad view of comparability to include organizations that are similar to Williams. This results in compensation that is appropriately scaled and reflects comparable complexities in business operations. We typically aim for a comparator group of 15 to 20 companies so our comparisons will be valid. The 2024 comparator group includes 16 companies which comprise a mix of both direct business competitors and companies with whom we compete for talent. Since 2017, the Committee utilizes a smaller targeted comparator company group for the purposes of measuring Relative TSR related to our performance-based RSU awards. While not perfectly aligned to our natural gas strategy, these selected companies are more similar to our specific segment of the energy industry.

HOW WE USE OUR COMPARATOR GROUP

We refer to publicly available information to analyze our comparator companies’ practices including how pay is divided among long-term incentives, annual incentives, base pay, and other forms of compensation. This allows the Committee to ensure competitiveness and appropriateness of proposed compensation packages. When setting pay, the Committee uses market median information of our comparator group, as opposed to market averages, to ensure that the impact of any unusual events that may occur at one or two companies during any particular year is diminished from the analysis. If an event is particularly unusual and surrounded by unique circumstances, the data is completely removed from the assessment. The smaller targeted comparator company group is used solely for the purposes of measuring Relative TSR related to our performance-based RSU awards.

The following lists our 2024 executive compensation benchmarking comparator group and Williams’ percentile ranking compared to our peers for total assets, market capitalization, and enterprise value as originally reported for 2023:

Pioneer Natural Resources Company was acquired in 2024. While Pioneer has been removed from the comparator group, the pay decisions for 2024 had been made with Pioneer as part of the comparator group. The Committee added Occidental Petroleum (OXY) to the comparator group for 2025. The pay decisions for 2024 were not made with Occidental Petroleum as part of the comparator group.

A separate comparator company group is used to specifically measure Relative TSR as it pertains to performance-based RSU awards. This group has been unchanged since introduced in 2017 awards:

Our Pay Setting Process

During the first quarter of the year, the Committee completes a review to ensure we are paying competitively, equitably, and in a way that encourages and rewards performance.

The compensation data of our comparator group, disclosed primarily in proxy statements, is the primary market data we use when benchmarking the competitive pay of our NEOs. Aggregate market data obtained from recognized third-party executive compensation survey companies is used to supplement and validate comparator group market data.

Although the Committee reviews relevant data as it determines compensation packages, other considerations are taken into account. Because market data alone does not reflect the strategic competitive value of various roles within our Company, internal pay equity is also considered when making pay decisions. Other considerations when making pay decisions for the NEOs include individual experience, sustained individual performance, historical pay, and tally sheets that include annual pay, benefit amounts, and the total aggregate value of the NEOs’ equity awards and holdings.

When setting pay, we determine an annual target pay mix (distribution of pay among base pay, short-term incentives, annual long-term incentives, and other forms of compensation) for the NEOs. Consistent with ourpay-for-performance philosophy, the actual amounts paid, excluding benefits, are determined based on Company and individual performance. Because performance is a factor, the target versus actual pay mix will vary, specifically as it relates to the annual cash incentives and long-term incentives.

How We Determine Each Type of Pay

Base pay, annual cash incentives, and long-term incentives accomplish different objectives. The table below illustrates a summary of the primary objectives associated with each component of pay listed in the order of most significant to the NEO’s total compensation. The table is followed by specific details regarding each pay component.

Type of Pay & Form Performance Period (years) Objectives Fixe Base pay (cash) 1 Compensates for carrying out the duties of the job Recognizes individual experiences, skills, and sustained performance Provides attraction and retention At Risk Short-term incentive: Annual cash incentive 1 Incents the accomplishment of annual business goals Aligns interests of executives to our stockholders Provides attraction and retention Long-term incentive: Performance- based RSUs 3 Incents the accomplishment of long-term sustainable business goals Aligns interests of executives to our stockholders Promotes ownership in the Company Provides attraction and retention Long-term incentive: Time-based RSU 3