SILICON LABORATORIES INC
For the period ended Apr 24, 2025. Filed Mar 12, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.
Apr 24, 2025 · Filed Mar 12, 2025
Contents
Compensation-Setting Process
Role of Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is responsible for administering our executive compensation program, as well as determining and approving the compensation for our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee regularly reports to our Board of Directors on its deliberations and actions.
The Compensation Committee uses a balanced approach to set the compensation of our executive officers, with each primary direct component of compensation (base salary, annual cash incentive bonus, and long-term incentive compensation) designed to play a specific role. The Compensation Committee determines the compensation of each executive officer with respect to each compensation component based, in part, on its own analysis of competitive market data and the recommendations of our CEO, both as described below. Additionally, the Compensation Committee periodically reviews whether our compensation policies and practices create any risks reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company and the steps that have been or should be taken to monitor and mitigate such risks. The Compensation Committee’s 2024 review determined that no such risks were identified in the current program design.
The Compensation Committee exercises its own judgment in making its compensation decisions and may accept or reject our CEO’s recommendations. In addition, the Compensation Committee receives input from its compensation consultant and meets in executive session (without our CEO present) prior to making its final determinations regarding compensation.
Differences in compensation among our executive officers are the result of the Compensation Committee’s exercise of its judgment, following its review of our CEO’s recommendations, its analysis of competitive market data and its consideration of overall Company performance, competitive pressures, business conditions and the potential financial impact of compensation decisions, including share ownership dilution. Pay decisions are based on competitive market data from the compensation consultant and a variety of other factors, including level of performance, the vesting and value of outstanding equity awards, including impact on retention, each individual’s tenure, prior experience, distinctive value to the Company, variances in job responsibilities relative to similarly titled officers at other competitive companies and the Compensation Committee’s determination of the appropriate mix of compensation elements (including base salary, cash incentives and equity incentives).
In determining the compensation of our CEO, the Compensation Committee consults with the other independent members of our Board of Directors, assesses our CEO’s individual performance and considers competitive market data and the other factors described above.
For our Named Executive Officers, the Committee targets market median for base salaries and targets greater than market total direct compensation (i.e., including incentive compensation) when our stringent performance targets are achieved. The factors described above provide the framework for compensation decision-making for each Named Executive Officer. No single factor is determinative in setting pay levels, nor is the impact of any factor on the determination of pay levels quantifiable.
Role of Management. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee works with members of our management, including our CEO. Typically, our management assists the Compensation Committee by providing information on Company performance and its perspective on compensation matters. Our CEO generally attends Compensation Committee meetings (except with respect to discussions involving his own compensation or other executive sessions of the committee).
Our CEO makes pay recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding our executive officers’ compensation (except for his own compensation) using the factors mentioned above and his own review of each NEO’s performance.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Our CEO conducts this assessment with the assistance of our Chief People Officer. Our CEO then makes formal recommendations to the Compensation Committee, using data from compensation consulting firms, regarding adjustments to base salary, annual cash incentive bonus opportunities and equity awards for his team. Our CEO also recommends performance measures and related target levels for annual cash incentive bonuses and equity awards for senior management.
The Compensation Committee solicits and reviews our CEO’s recommendations and proposals on compensation-related matters. They consider these recommendations, among other factors, as they make compensation decisions for our executive officers.
Role of Compensation Consultant. The Compensation Committee is authorized to retain the services of compensation consultants and other advisors from time to time, as it sees fit, in connection with the administration of our executive compensation programs.
The Compensation Committee retained Mercer US LLC, (“Mercer”), a compensation consulting firm providing executive compensation advisory services, to provide competitive market data and analysis regarding material elements of compensation, including base salary, cash incentives and equity incentives. Mercer served at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and did not provide any other services to the Company in 2024.
With the approval of the Compensation Committee, Mercer provided our CEO and our Chief People Officer with market data regarding compensation for our executive officers so that our CEO’s compensation recommendations to the Compensation Committee are consistent with our compensation philosophy.
Competitive Positioning. The Compensation Committee believes it is in the best interests of our stockholders to ensure that our executive compensation is competitive with that of other companies of similar size and complexity. In late 2023, the Compensation Committee directed Mercer to use industry survey data and publicly-available information from the following companies to identify and analyze the competitive market for 2024 executive compensation. Criteria for peer group selection included industry, revenue size, market capitalization, and business characteristics. The Compensation Committee adjusts the existing peer group each year to the extent needed to remove peers that are no longer a good peer comparison. The Compensation Committee selected the following companies as a compensation peer group used for 2024 compensation in consultation with Mercer:
| Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. | Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited | National Instruments Corporation |
| Cirrus Logic, Inc. | NETGEAR, Inc. |
| Diodes Incorporated | Power Integrations, Inc. |
| Knowles Corporation | Semtech Corporation |
| Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | Synaptics Incorporated |
| MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | Universal Display Corporation |
| MaxLinear, Inc. | Wolfspeed, Inc. |
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.