RYVYL Inc.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Apr 15, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Apr 15, 2026
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Notes to Financial Statements
1. Description of the Business and Basis of Presentation Organization
RYVYL Inc. (“RYVYL”) Ryvyl is a financial technology company that provides global payment acceptance and disbursement solutions. Ryvyl enables merchants to accept credit card payments through arrangements with third-party acquiring banks and payment processors. Credit card payment processing services represent the substantial majority of Ryvyl’s revenues. In addition, Ryvyl offers NEMS Core, an internally developed disbursements platform launched in late 2024 that enables businesses to seamlessly and efficiently distribute funds.
Through our Bank Identification Number (“BIN”) sponsorship arrangement, Ryvyl enables businesses to process credit card transactions, providing direct access to global card networks without the need for a traditional banking license. Although Ryvyl is not itself a payment processor, it serves as an intermediary - similar in certain respects to an independent sales organization (“ISO”) - connecting merchants with acquiring partners. However, in contrast to traditional ISOs, Ryvyl performs a broader set of functions that are typically carried out by processors, including:
| ● | applications processing and merchant underwriting; |
| ● | merchant onboarding and account configuration; |
| ● | ongoing risk monitoring and transaction-level oversight; and |
| ● | customer service and merchant support. |
In addition, Ryvyl also facilitates equipment servicing or replacement, security verifications, and handles customer support inquiries. Performing these activities enables Ryvyl to maintain direct control over the merchant experience and support processes. Ryvyl focuses on merchants operating in underserved and, in some cases, higher risk industry verticals, where Ryvyl believes that its operating structure and risk-management capabilities allow it to support customer segments that many acquiring banks and processors may not be able to serve directly.
In late 2024, Ryvyl launched NEMS Core, an internally developed global disbursements platform designed to streamline inbound and outbound payment flows for businesses. NEMS Core allows customers to initiate, validate, route, and settle disbursements through an automated, modular workflow. Its flexible architecture is intended to support a variety of payment types and volumes, enabling businesses to manage their disbursement needs in an increasingly digital and interconnected financial environment.
While NEMS Core remains in the early stages of commercialization and currently serves as a complement to Ryvyl’s acquiring services model, Ryvyl has not committed to significant future expansion of the platform and is evaluating its continued strategic relevance as part of its broader long-term operational planning.
Ryvyl employs a hybrid operating model that combines internal operational functions with external acquiring services partnerships. Internally, Ryvyl manages merchant review and underwriting, risk management, onboarding, and customer service. Externally, Ryvyl relies on acquiring banks and processing partners for transaction processing, settlement, and sponsorship under its own BIN. This structure allows Ryvyl to maintain direct merchant relationships and control over customer-facing activities, while leveraging the infrastructure and regulatory framework of established acquiring institutions.
Name Change
On May 3, 2018, PubCo formally changed its name to GreenBox POS LLC, then subsequently changed its name to GreenBox POS on December 13, 2018. On October 13, 2022 GreenBox POS changed its name to RYVYL Inc. (“RYVYL”). Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to “the Company,” “we,” “our”, “us” and “PubCo” refer to RYVYL Inc. Additionally, unless the context otherwise requires, all references to “PrivCo” or the “Private Company” refer to GreenBox POS LLC, a limited liability company, formed in the state of Washington.
Reverse Stock Split
On December 19, 2025 the Company filed a certificate of amendment to its amended and restated certificate of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada to effect a 1-for-35 reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) of the Company’s shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “common stock”). Such amendment and ratio were previously approved by the board of directors. The reverse stock split was approved by the Company’s stockholders during their annual meeting on December 15, 2025. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, effective January 2, 2026, every 35 shares of the Company’s pre-reverse split outstanding common stock were combined and reclassified into one share of common stock. Proportionate voting rights and other rights of common stockholders were not affected by the Reverse Stock Split. Any fractional shares of common stock resulting from the Reverse Stock Split were rounded up to the nearest whole share on a broker basis. All stock options outstanding and common stock reserved for issuance under the Company’s equity incentive plan outstanding immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split were adjusted by dividing the number of affected shares of common stock by 35 and, as applicable, multiplying the exercise price by 35. All share numbers, share prices, exercise prices, and per share amounts in this Report have been adjusted, on a retroactive basis to reflect the 1-for-35 Reverse Stock Split.
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Going Concern
In February 2024, the Company stopped processing credit card payments on its QuickCard platform because our processing partner’s bank informed them that they no longer wished to process payments for cannabis merchants. QuickCard was our first-generation product and was designed to address the needs of previously all-cash businesses. During the third quarter of 2024, the Company began to offer a license of the QuickCard platform, which it believed would enable it to once again serve the customer base it had lost following the discontinuation of the original QuickCard offering. However, between the remainder of 2024 and all of 2025, the Company was unable find a suitable licensing partner and, as such, it is no longer actively seeking to license the QuickCard product. As a result, the Company no longer anticipates being able to recover the loss of revenues that resulted from the discontinuation of its QuickCard product.
The loss of revenues resulting from the discontinuation of QuickCard adversely impacted the Company’s liquidity. Through the first quarter of 2025, the Company relied on the repatriation of profits from its European subsidiaries to cover some of its critical operating expenses, which it is no longer able to do following the sale of Ryvyl EU, effective June 1, 2025. The Company’s remaining businesses continue to generate operating losses, which is expected to continue to occur for at least the next 12 months from the date of this Report.
Due to these developments, management has determined that its cash balance as of December 31, 2025, will not be sufficient to fund the Company’s operations and capital needs for the next 12 months from the date of this Report. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon the successful execution of management’s intended plan over the next twelve months to improve its liquidity position, which include, without limitation:
| ● | raising additional capital through a variety of means, including private and public equity offerings and debt financings. The Company recently executed multiple successful capital raises in July 2025 and October 2025, and continues to be actively engaged in discussions with multiple parties for additional funding opportunities; |
| ● | exploring strategic initiatives, including M&A opportunities; on September 28, 2025, the Company, Ryvyl Merger Sub Inc. (a Delaware corporation and wholly owned direct subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), and RTB Digital, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“RTB”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into RTB (the “Merger”), with RTB surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company; |
| ● | continued execution of its accelerated business development efforts to drive volumes in diversified business verticals with the Company’s other products; and |
| ● | continued implementation of cost control measures to more effectively manage spending and further right-sizing the organization, where appropriate; |
Management has assessed that its intended plan described above, if successfully implemented, is appropriate and sufficient to address its liquidity shortfall and to provide funds to cover operations for the next 12 months from the date of the issuance of this Report. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in implementing our plan, that our projections of our future capital needs will prove accurate, or that any additional funding will be available on a timely manner, on favorable terms, or be sufficient to continue our operations. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, the Company’s financial condition or operating results will be materially affected. The Company bases its estimates on current and past experience, to the extent that historical experience is predictive of future performance, and other assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable under the circumstances. The Company evaluates these estimates on an ongoing basis.
Reclassification
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Cash and Restricted Cash
Cash consists of cash on hand and cash on deposit with banks. Restricted cash primarily consists of funds received from banking services clients, which have yet to be distributed to those clients’ end customers at the end of the period.
USDC
The Company holds USDC, a stablecoin, which is a crypto asset that is designed to maintain a value equivalent to one U.S. dollar. Our USDC is held in a secured digital wallet at a federally chartered crypto bank in the U.S. The Company acquired its USDC holding during the fourth quarter of 2025 in connection with the issuance of Series C convertible preferred stock (see Note 10,*Equity,*of this Report). In accordance with ASC 350-60,Intangibles – Goodwill and Other - Crypto Assets, the Company accounts for its USDC holding as a financial instrument that is measured at fair value at each reporting period, with changes recognized in net income. While not accounted for as cash or cash equivalent, we treat our USDC holdings as a liquidity resource.
Payment Processing Liabilities
Payment processing liabilities principally represent funds collected from banking services clients that have yet to be distributed to those clients’ customers at the end of the period. These liabilities are secured by funds held in restricted cash accounts and are presented as restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheets.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services.
Historically, the Company generated the majority of its revenue from payment processing services. Payment processing services revenue was typically based on a percentage of the value of each transaction processed and/or upon fixed amounts specified for each transaction or service. The Company satisfied its performance obligations and, therefore, recognized the processing fees as revenue at a point in time, upon the authorization of a merchant sale transaction. Following the sale of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ryvyl EU, effective June 1, 2025, the Company primarily generates revenue from banking services, which primarily include incoming and outgoing ACH and wire transfer transactions, and fees earned from payment processing transactions where the Company arranges for the delivery of those services to the merchant by a payment processor.
For banking services transactions, the Company typically charges specified fees on a per transaction basis, which may vary from customer to customer. The Company satisfies its performance obligation related to these transactions at a point in time, upon the authorization of the transaction in the Company’s payments platform. For revenue earned from arranging for the delivery of payment processing services to merchants by a payment processor, the Company typically charges specified fees on a per transaction basis, a percentage share of the transaction amount, or a combination of both. The Company satisfies the performance obligation related to these transactions at a point in time, upon the authorization of the transaction in the payment processor’s platform. Revenue from these transactions is recognized on a gross basis, as the Company has determined that it is the principal in the arrangements governing those transactions.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development costs primarily consist of salaries and benefits for research and development personnel and outsourced contracted services, as well as associated supplies and materials. These costs are expensed as incurred.
Internal-Use Software Development Costs
Internal-use software development costs consist of the costs related to outsourced consultants who are directly associated with and who devote time to creating and enhancing internally developed software for the Company’s platforms. Internal-use software development activities generally consist of three stages: (i) the preliminary project stage, (ii) the application development stage, and (iii) the postimplementation-operation stage. In accordance with ASC 350-40,Internal Use Software, costs incurred in the preliminary and postimplementation-operation stages of software development are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred in the application development stage, including significant enhancements and upgrades, are capitalized. Capitalized internal-use software development costs are included within intangible assets, net on the consolidated balance sheets, and are amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of three years upon the software or additional features being ready for their intended use.
Accounts Receivable, Net
Accounts receivable primarily consist of amounts recorded in connection with the sale of payment processing terminals and related accessories. Accounts receivable are recorded at invoiced amounts, net of an allowance for credit losses, and do not bear interest. In accordance with Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13,Financial Instruments–Credit Losses (ASC 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”), the Company measures its allowance for credit losses using an expected credit loss model that reflects the Company’s current estimate of expected credit losses inherent in the enterprise and the accounts receivable balance. In determining the expected credit losses, the Company considers its historical loss experience, the aging of its accounts receivable balance, current economic and business conditions, and anticipated future economic events that may impact collectability. The Company reviews its allowance for credit losses periodically and, as needed, amounts are written-off when determined to be uncollectible. As of December 31, 2025, and 2024, the allowance for credit losses was immaterial.
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets primarily consist of inventory, short term deposits, and prepaid property taxes required under lease arrangements.
Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment primarily consist of computer equipment and furniture and fixtures. Property and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three toeight years. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. For assets sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any related gain or loss is reflected in income for the period.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company applies fair value accounting for assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis. Fair value accounting establishes a three-level hierarchy priority for disclosure of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value. The ordering of priority reflects the degree to which objective prices in external active markets are available to measure fair value. The classification of assets and liabilities within the hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used for measurement are observable or unobservable.
The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible. The three levels in the hierarchy are as follows:
| ● | Level 1 – Observable inputs, such as unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities accessible to the reporting entity at the measurement date. |
| ● | Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
| ● | Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that cannot be directly corroborated by observable market data and that typically reflect management’s estimate of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
The fair value of the Company’s USDC holding is based on the quoted (unadjusted) price in the principal market for the digital asset, which is based on Level 1 inputs, in accordance with ASC 820,Fair Value Measurements.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill is recorded when the consideration paid for the acquisition of a business exceeds the fair value of the identifiable net tangible and intangible assets acquired. ASC 350-20,Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—*Goodwill,*requires companies to assess goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. Testing goodwill for impairment is performed at the reporting unit level, using a two-step test, and requires companies to compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. Goodwill is considered impaired if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. ASC 350-20 also provides for an optional qualitative assessment for testing goodwill for impairment that enables companies to skip the two-step test if it is determined that it is more likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of greater than 50%) that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount. The Company had no goodwill as of December 31, 2025.
Intangible assets consist of capitalized internal-use software development costs principally related to the Company’s internally-developed payments platform, NEMS Core. In accordance with ASC 350-30,Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—General Intangibles Other than Goodwill, the Company’s intangible assets are amortized over an estimated useful life ofthree years using the straight-line method. Intangible assets amortized under ASC 350-30 must be reviewed for impairment when indicators of impairment are present, in accordance with ASC 360-10. As of December 31, 2025, management determined that an impairment assessment over its NEMS Core intangible asset was required. Based on that assessment, management determined that the carrying value of the Company’s NEMS Core intangible asset was not recoverable and recorded an impairment of $1.8 million or one hundred percent (100%) of the carrying balance as of December 31, 2025.
Leases
The Company leases office space under non-cancellable operating leases with various expiration dates. The Company determines whether an arrangement is a lease for accounting purposes at contract inception. Operating leases are recorded as right-of-use (“ROU”) assets, which are included within noncurrent assets, and lease liabilities, which are included within current and noncurrent liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.
Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of the future lease payments over the lease term. ROU assets are based on the lease liability and are increased by prepaid lease payments and decreased by lease incentives received, where applicable. The interest rate used to determine the present value of the future lease payments is the Company’s incremental borrowing rate because the interest rate implicit in the Company’s leases is not readily determinable. The Company’s incremental borrowing rate is estimated to approximate the interest rate that the Company would pay to borrow on a collateralized basis with similar terms and payments as the lease, and in economic environments where the leased asset is located. Certain leases require the Company to pay taxes, maintenance, and other operating expenses associated with the leased asset. Such amounts are not included in the measurement of the ROU assets and lease liabilities. These lease costs are recognized as lease expenses when incurred.
The Company evaluates ROU assets related to leases for indicators of impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a ROU asset may not be recoverable. When a decision has been made to exit a lease prior to the contractual term or to sublease that space, the Company evaluates the asset for impairment and recognizes the associated impact to the ROU asset and related expense, if applicable. The evaluation is performed at the asset group level initially and when appropriate, at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows, which is at the individual lease level. Undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the related ROU assets are estimated over the ROU assets’ useful lives. If the evaluation indicates that the carrying amount of the ROU assets may not be recoverable, any potential impairment is measured based upon the fair value of the related ROU asset or asset group as determined by appropriate valuation techniques. During the quarters ended June 30, 2025, September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2025, the Company identified indicators of impairment for the ROU asset related to one of its operating leases, which indicated that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Based on the Company’s impairment analyses, it recorded an aggregate impairment charge of $0.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2025.
Foreign Currency
Assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into the reporting currency using the exchange rates in effect on the consolidated balance sheet dates. Equity accounts are translated at historical rates, except for the change in retained earnings during the period, which is the result of the income statement translation process. Revenue and expense accounts are translated using the weighted average exchange rate during the period. The cumulative translation adjustments associated with the net assets of foreign subsidiaries are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income in the accompanying consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity. Effective June 1, 2025, the Company completed the previously announced sale of its foreign subsidiary, Ryvyl EU, which comprised substantially all of its international operations. As such, the Company is no longer exposed to changes in exchange rates that would have an impact on its consolidated balance sheets on a go forward basis.
Stock Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense relates to restricted stock awards (“RSAs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”), and stock options granted to employees and non-employee directors under the Company’s equity incentive plans, which are measured based on the grant-date fair value. The fair value of RSAs and RSUs is determined by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. The fair value of stock options is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model. Generally, stock-based compensation expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements, net of operating loss carry forwards and credits, by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is not more likely than not that some portion of or all the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Judgment is required in determining and evaluating income tax provisions and valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets. We recognize an income tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.
Current income taxes are provided for in accordance with the laws of the relevant taxing authorities. As of December 31, 2025, and 2024, the Company has a full valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets.
Net Loss Per Share
The Company’s basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period without consideration of potentially dilutive securities. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding, adjusted for the dilutive effect of all potential shares of common stock. In periods in which the Company reports a net loss, all potential common shares are excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share, as their effect would be anti-dilutive. As such, for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, the Company’s diluted net loss per share was the same as the basic net loss per share, as there were no common stock equivalents outstanding that would have a dilutive effect.
Segment Reporting
Prior to June 1, 2025, the Company operated undertwo reportable segments, North America and International. As of June 1, 2025, the Company has completed the previously announced sale of its wholly owned subsidiary, Ryvyl EU, which comprised substantially all of the business previously reported under the Company’s International segment. Following the sale of Ryvyl EU, the Company views its operations and manages its business asone operating segment. As such, refer to our consolidated financial statements for the Company’s results of itsone operating segment.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09,Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”). The amended guidance enhances income tax disclosures primarily related to the effective tax rate reconciliation and income taxes paid information. This guidance requires disclosure of specific categories in the effective tax rate reconciliation and further information on reconciling items meeting a quantitative threshold. In addition, the amended guidance requires disaggregating income taxes paid (net of refunds received) by federal, state, and foreign taxes. It also requires disaggregating individual jurisdictions in which income taxes paid (net of refunds received) is equal to or greater than 5 percent of total income taxes paid (net of refunds received). The Company adopted this guidance effective for the annual reporting period beginning January 1, 2025. The adoption of ASU 2023-09 impacted the Company’s annual disclosures only, and updates are reflected under Note 11,Income Taxes, of this Report.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03,Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024 03”), and in January 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-01,Clarifying the Effective Date (“ASU 2025-01”). The amendments are intended to enhance disclosures regarding an entity’s costs and expenses by requiring additional disaggregated information disclosures about certain income statement expense line items. The amendments, as clarified by ASU 2025-01, are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect of adopting the new disclosure requirements.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-06,Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software (“ASU 2025-06”). The amendments are intended to clarify and modernize the accounting for costs related to internal-use software. The guidance removes all references to project stages and clarifies the threshold entities apply to begin capitalizing costs. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-05,Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets(“ASU 2025-05”). The amendments allow an entity to apply a practical expedient when estimating expected credit losses, which assumes that the current conditions as of the balance sheet date will not change for the remaining life of the accounts receivable and contract assets arising from contracts with customers. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, and interim reporting periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. If the practical expedient is elected, the amendments should be applied prospectively. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
3. Discontinued Operations
Pursuant to a stock purchase agreement (the “SPA”) and a Termination Agreement (the “Termination Agreement”), both dated January 23, 2025, and entered into between the Company and a purchaser (the “Purchaser”), the Company and the Purchaser completed the sale of its wholly owned subsidiary Ryvyl EU, effective June 1, 2025, which comprised substantially all of the business previously reported under the Company’s International reporting segment. Domiciled in Sofia, Bulgaria, Ryvyl EU is a European Union regulated electronic money institution that provides complete payment solutions by offering acquiring, issuing, banking services across Europe. Pursuant to the terms of the SPA and Termination Agreement, the Company received total consideration of $16.5 million, comprised of $15.0 million of short-term secured debt and a related $1.5 million of accrued interest (or termination fee), which was forgiven by the Purchaser in exchange for the acquisition of Ryvyl EU. The net assets of Ryvyl EU immediately prior to the closing of the sale were approximately $23.0 million and the Company recognized a loss on sale of approximately $6.5 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2025.
In accordance with ASC 205-20,*Presentation of Financial Statements - Discontinued Operations,*since the sale of Ryvyl EU met the held-for-sale criteria as of the second quarter of 2025 and the sale transaction was completed within the same quarter, historical assets and liabilities of Ryvyl EU have not been segregated and reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated balance sheets for all historical periods presented. Pursuant to the same guidance, the income statement activity of Ryvyl EU has been segregated and reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented in the consolidated income statements for all historical periods presented. Additionally, cash flows related to discontinued operations have not been segregated and are included in the consolidated statement of cash flows for all periods presented.
The results of operations from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, consist of the following (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | |
| Revenue | $21,033 | $37,839 |
| Cost of revenue | (12,031) | (22,806) |
| Advertising and marketing | (45) | (29) |
| General and administrative | (744) | (4,024) |
| Payroll and payroll taxes | (1,830) | (4,276) |
| Professional fees | (51) | (118) |
| Depreciation and amortization | (96) | (253) |
| Other (expense) income, net | (634) | 722 |
| Income from discontinued operations | 5,602 | 7,055 |
| Loss on sale of discontinued operations | (6,497) | - |
| Income from discontinued operations before income taxes | (895) | 7,055 |
| Provision for income taxes | (577) | (750) |
| (Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax | $(1,472) | $6,305 |
Selected financial information related to cash flows from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024 are as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 · 2024 | |||
| Depreciation of property and equipment | $5 | $13 | |
| Amortization of intangible assets | 91 | 241 | |
| Purchases of property and equipment | $76 | $ | - |
4. Property and Equipment, Net
The following table details property and equipment, less accumulated depreciation (dollars in thousands):
| December 31, | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | |
| Computers and equipment | $119 | $288 |
| Furniture and fixtures | 115 | 135 |
| Improvements | 145 | 186 |
| Total property and equipment | 379 | 609 |
| Less: accumulated depreciation | (312) | (444) |
| Net property and equipment | $67 | $165 |
Depreciation expense was $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
5. Goodwill
The following table summarizes goodwill activity and balances by reportable segment (dollars in thousands):
| Amount | ||
|---|---|---|
| Goodwill - December 31, 2024 | $18,856 | |
| Goodwill Acquired | - | |
| Goodwill Disposed (Ryvyl EU sale) | (20,580) | |
| Adjustments (1) | (1,724) | |
| Goodwill – December 31, 2025 | $ | - |
| (1) | The adjustments to goodwill pertain to foreign currency translation adjustments, which totaled positive $1.7 million for the five months ended May 31, 2025, the date immediately preceding the completion of the sale of Ryvyl EU on June 1, 2025. |
6. Intangible Assets, Net
The following table details intangible assets (dollars in thousands):
| Estimated Useful Life · Cost · Accumulated Amortization · Impairment Loss · Net | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer relationships | 2-5 years | $6,545 | $(3,517) | $(3,028) | $ | - |
| Business technology/IP | 5 years | 2,611 | (2,611) | - | - | |
| Capitalized internal-use software | 3 years | 2,902 | (819) | (1,828) | 255 | |
| Total intangible assets | $12,058 | $(6,947) | $(4,856) | $255 | ||
| Estimated Useful Life · Cost · Accumulated Amortization · Impairment Loss · Net | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer relationships | 2-5 years | $7,737 | $(4,709) | $(3,028) | $ | - |
| Business technology/IP | 5 years | 4,167 | (4,008) | - | 159 | |
| Capitalized internal-use software | 3 years | 1,647 | (4) | - | 1,643 | |
| Total intangible assets | $13,551 | $(8,721) | $(3,028) | $1,802 | ||
Amortization expense was $0.4 million and $2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively. Additionally, during the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, the Company recorded impairment charges of $1.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
The estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets as of December 31, 2025, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
| Fiscal years: | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2026 | $111 |
| 2027 | 104 |
| 2028 | 40 |
| Thereafter | - |
| Total | $255 |
7. Accrued Liabilities
The following table details the balance in accrued liabilities (in thousands):
| December 31, | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | |
| Accrued legal settlements | $3,750 | $2,467 |
| Payroll related accruals | 590 | 2,613 |
| Accrued legal and professional fees | 446 | 886 |
| Accrued taxes | 157 | 110 |
| Accrued convertible note interest | - | 366 |
| Other accrued liabilities | 1,691 | 1,704 |
| Total accrued liabilities | $6,634 | $8,146 |
8. Note Payable
Stock Purchase Agreement and Financing
On January 23, 2025, in connection with the Company securing financing, it entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “January 2025 SPA”) with a purchaser (the “Purchaser”), which provides for the sale to the Purchaser of all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock (the “Ryvyl EU Shares”) of the Company’s indirect subsidiary domiciled in Bulgaria, Ryvyl (EU) EAD (“Ryvyl EU”), by Transact Europe Holdings EOOD, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, also domiciled in Bulgaria (“Transact Europe”) for an aggregate purchase price of $15.0 million (the “Financing Purchase Price”). Under the terms of the January 2025 SPA, the Company was required to use $13.0 million of the net proceeds raised in the financing to pay the First Installment of the Repurchase Agreement (each as defined below).
On January 23, 2025, the Company, Transact Europe and the Purchaser also entered into a Termination Agreement (the “Termination Agreement”). Among other things, the Termination Agreement provided the Company with the right to terminate the January 2025 SPA and all of the transactions contemplated therein, by paying the Purchaser $16.5 million on or before 90 days after the date of execution of the January 2025 SPA (April 23, 2025). If the January 2025 SPA was terminated as a result of such payment by the Company, the Ryvyl EU Shares would not have been sold to the Purchaser and would have been returned to Transact Europe and the January 2025 SPA would be void and of no further effect, except for some provisions that survive termination. In the event that the January 2025 SPA was not so terminated, then the Purchaser could close on its purchase of the Ryvyl EU Shares; provided, however, if the Purchaser was unable to close for any reason other than the Company’s breach, including the inability to obtain any regulatory clearances required for such transfer, then the Company would have been liable for damages in the amount of $16.5 million. In the event that the Purchaser was unable to close on the transfer of the Ryvyl EU Shares, as a result of the Company’s breach, then the Company would have been liable for damages in an amount equal to the appraised value of the Ryvyl EU Shares.
The Company analyzed the terms of the January 2025 SPA and Termination Agreement and determined that they should be accounted for together as a single transaction, as neither agreement would have been entered into without the other and the exercise of each party’s rights under each agreement would result in the termination of each party’s rights under the other agreement (i.e., the January 2025 SPA would have been void and of no further effect if the Company exercised its termination rights under the Termination Agreement, and the Termination Agreement would have been void and of no further effect in the event that the January 2025 SPA was not so terminated and the Purchaser closes on its purchase of the Ryvyl EU Shares). Further, the Company determined that the terms of the agreements, in particular the Company’s unilateral termination right, were such that the Company would not be considered to have surrendered control of the Ryvyl EU Shares until the termination deadline passes and, therefore, the substance of the transaction effectively represented short-term secured debt (rather than a true sale), akin to a repurchase agreement in which a seller-borrower of securities sells those securities to a buyer-lender with an agreement to repurchase them at a stated price plus interest at a specified date or in specified circumstances, which would be accounted for as a collateralized borrowing, in accordance with ASC 860-30. As such, the Company accounted for the transaction as a secured borrowing by recognizing the Financing Purchase Price as cash in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, recording an obligation (liability) to return the cash to the Purchaser, and recognizing the difference between the Financing Purchase Price and $16.5 million termination payment as interest expense over the 90-day period from the date of execution of the January 2025 SPA to the termination deadline.
Modification Agreement
On April 23, 2025, the Company, Transact Europe, and the Purchaser executed and entered into a modification agreement (the “Modification Agreement”) which provides that, notwithstanding the terms of the Termination Agreement or the January 2025 SPA, the Purchaser will not take any actions to close on the purchase of the Ryvyl EU Shares before May 6, 2025, so that the Company and the Purchaser may attempt to enter into an alternative transaction in lieu of the securities purchase transaction under the January 2025 SPA. The Company had the right, at any time, on or before May 6, 2025, to extend this period, so that the Purchaser would not exercise such right to purchase the Ryvyl EU Shares, until May 27, 2025, in consideration for the Company’s payment to the Purchaser of $0.75 million. This payment was to be accounted for as additional interest on the secured borrowing from the date of payment to the termination deadline. All other terms of the January 2025 SPA and the Termination Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
On May 7, 2025, the Purchaser provided a letter of notice to the Company and Transact Europe, stating that due to the Company not exercising its right to terminate the SPA by payment to the Purchaser of $16.5 million within the time so prescribed by the Termination Agreement, and as the Company had not exercised its right to extend the period during which time the Purchaser agreed not to exercise its rights to close on the transaction per the Modification Agreement (the “Standstill Period”), the Company no longer had the right to terminate the SPA pursuant to the Termination Agreement, and the Standstill Period had expired. The Purchaser also notified the Company that notwithstanding the foregoing, they did not intend to take the final steps to close on the purchase of the Ryvyl EU Shares for a period of ten calendar days from and including the date of the letter, or until May 16, 2025. The parties continued discussions during this period. All other terms of the SPA and the Termination Agreement remained unchanged and in full force and effect. On May 14, 2025, the Purchaser notified the Company that it would proceed to take steps to acquire the Ryvyl EU Shares, and the Company issued a press release stating that the parties had ceased discussions to restructure the terms of the pre-funded asset sale of its Ryvyl EU subsidiary. The sale of Ryvyl EU was completed between the parties, effective June 1, 2025.
Since the $16.5 million owed to the Purchaser was effectively settled in full in exchange for the Purchaser acquiring Ryvyl EU, the amount was treated as the total consideration received by the Company for the sale of Ryvyl EU. Accordingly, the principal balance and accrued interest of $16.5 million were deemed fully repaid as of June 1, 2025, the date of the completion of the Ryvyl EU sale. See Note 3,Discontinued Operations, of this Report for additional information.
9. Long-Term Debt, Net
The following table summarizes the Company’s debts (in thousands):
| December 31, 2025 · December 31, 2024 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| $100,000,000 8% senior convertible note, due April 5, 2026 | $ | - | $18,300 |
| Less: Unamortized debt discount | - | (1,555) | |
| Net carrying value | - | 16,745 | |
| $149,900 Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL), interest rate of 3.75%, due June 1, 2050 | 150 | 155 | |
| $500,000 EIDL, interest rate of 3.75%, due May 8, 2050 | 477 | 475 | |
| Total debt | 627 | 17,375 | |
| Less: current portion | (14) | (12) | |
| Long-term debt, net | $613 | $17,363 | |
Senior Convertible Note
On November 8, 2021, the Company sold and issued, in a registered direct offering, an 8% senior convertible note, originally due November 3, 2023, and subsequently extended to April 5, 2025, in the aggregate original principal amount of $100 million (the “Note”). The Note had an original issue discount of sixteen percent (16%) resulting in gross proceeds of $84 million. The Note was sold pursuant to the terms of a Securities Purchase Agreement, dated November 2, 2021 (the “November 2021 SPA”), between the Company and the investor in the Note (the “Investor”).
The Note was issued on November 8, 2021, pursuant to an indenture dated November 2, 2021 between the Company and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as trustee (the “Base Indenture”), as supplemented by a first supplemental indenture thereto, dated November 2, 2021, relating to the Note (the “First Supplemental Indenture” and the Base Indenture as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture, the “First Indenture”). The terms of the Note included those provided in the First Indenture and those made part of the First Indenture by reference to the Trust Indenture Act.
First Exchange Agreement
On July 25, 2023, the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement (the “First Exchange Agreement”) under which the Company and the Investor agreed to exchange (the “Series A Exchanges”), in two separate exchanges, an aggregate of $22.7 million of the outstanding principal and interest under the Note for 15,000 shares of a newly authorized series of preferred stock of the Company designated as Series A Preferred Convertible Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), the terms of which were set forth in a Certificate of Designations of Rights and Preferences of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of RYVYL Inc. (the “Series A Certificate of Designations”), which the Company filed with the Nevada Secretary of State prior to the initial issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock is further described in Note 10,Equity, of this Report. As part of the First Exchange Agreement, the Company also agreed to allow for the conversion of up to an additional $9.0 million of principal (together with any accrued and unpaid interest thereon) of the Note at a conversion price equal to 97.5% of the lower of (x) the then in effect conversion price and (y) the lowest volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock during the five trading days immediately prior to such conversion; and the Investor agreed to waive any interest that would otherwise accrue on the Note during the period commencing on April 1, 2023 through, and including, December 31, 2023.
On July 31, 2023, pursuant to the terms of the First Exchange Agreement, the Company closed the initial exchange (the “Initial Series A Exchange”) and issued 6,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock in exchange for $4.3 million of the outstanding principal balance of the Note and $1.7 million of accrued interest. Additionally, upon satisfaction of all applicable closing conditions, including, without limitation, the Company having obtained any stockholder approval required for the consummation of the transactions and the issuance of the common stock issuable upon the conversion of all of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock (unless waived by the applicable other party), in the final exchange (the “Final Series A Exchange”), the parties agreed to exchange the remaining $16.7 million of the outstanding principal balance subject to the Series A Exchanges for 9,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock on a date mutually agreed to by the Company and the Investor. The Company determined that the parties’ obligation to exchange the remaining $16.7 million of the outstanding principal balance subject to the Series A Exchanges for 9,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock in the Final Series A Exchange represented an embedded conversion feature that did not require bifurcation and separate valuation because it would not meet the definition of a derivative, if freestanding, under ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”), as net settlement could not be achieved.
The Company analyzed the changes made to the Note under the First Exchange Agreement under ASC 470-50 to determine if extinguishment accounting was applicable. Under ASC 470-50-40-10, a modification or an exchange that adds or eliminates a substantive conversion option as of the conversion date is always considered substantial and requires extinguishment accounting. Since the First Exchange Agreement added a substantive conversion option, the Company determined that extinguishment accounting was applicable. In accordance with the extinguishment accounting guidance, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of $1.3 million which represented the difference between (a) the fair value of the modified Note and the 6,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued in the Initial Series A Exchange and (b) the carrying amount of the Note and the fair value of the bifurcated embedded derivative immediately prior to giving effect to the First Exchange Agreement.
Second Exchange Agreement
Under the terms of the First Exchange Agreement, a final closing was to be held upon which the Investor was to exchange an additional $16.7 million of principal of the Note into 9,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Unissued Series A Preferred Stock”) which shares of Unissued Series A Preferred Stock were convertible into shares of common stock, in accordance with the terms of the Series A Certificate of Designations.
On November 27, 2023, the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement (the “Second Exchange Agreement”) with the Investor under which the Company and the Investor agreed to exchange (the “Series B Exchange”), (i) all of the existing shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued to the Investor in the Initial Series A Exchange, (ii) the right to exchange the shares of Unissued Series A Preferred Stock for an additional $16.7 million of principal of the Note, and (iii) $60.3 million of the outstanding principal under the Note for 55,000 shares of a newly authorized series of preferred stock of the Company designated as Series B Preferred Convertible Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock,” and collectively with the Series A Preferred Stock, the “Preferred Stock”),”), the terms of which were set forth in a Certificate of Designations of Rights and Preferences of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of RYVYL Inc. (the “Series B Certificate of Designations”), which the Company filed with the Nevada Secretary of State prior to the initial issuance of any shares of Series B Preferred Stock. The Series B Preferred Stock is further described in Note 10,*Equity,*of this Report. As additional consideration for the Series B Exchange, the Company also agreed to make a cash payment to the Investor in the amount of $3.0 million. As part of the Second Exchange Agreement, the Investor also agreed to forbear from requiring the repayment of the Note (to the extent such repayment obligation arises solely as a result of the occurrence of the maturity date and not with respect to any event of default or redemption rights in the Note or pursuant to the Indenture (as such term is defined in the Second Exchange Agreement)) during the period from November 5, 2024 through, and including, April 5, 2025; and to extend the waiver of payment of interest under the Note through July 1, 2024.
On November 29, 2023, the Company closed the Series B Exchange, pursuant to which the Company issued to the Investor 55,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and paid the Investor a cash payment in the amount of $3.0 million, in exchange for 6,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock previously issued to the Investor, the right to exchange the shares of Unissued Series A Preferred Stock for an additional $16.7 million of principal of the Note, and the reduction of principal of the Note in the aggregate amount of $60.3 million.
The Company analyzed the changes made to the Note under the Second Exchange Agreement under ASC 470-50 to determine if extinguishment accounting was applicable. Under ASC 470-50-40-10, a modification or an exchange that adds or eliminates a substantive conversion option as of the conversion date is always considered substantial and requires extinguishment accounting. Since the Second Exchange Agreement eliminated a substantive conversion option (the parties’ obligation to exchange the remaining $16.7 million of outstanding principal balance subject to the Series A Exchange for 9,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock in the Final Series A Exchange), the Company determined that extinguishment accounting was applicable. In accordance with the extinguishment accounting guidance, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of $22.5 million which represents the difference between (a) the fair value of the modified Note, the fair value of the 55,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued in the Series B Exchange, and the $3.0 million cash payment made to the Investor, and (b) the carrying amount of the Note, the fair value of the bifurcated embedded derivative immediately prior to giving effect to the Second Exchange Agreement, and the fair value of the existing shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued to the Investor in the Initial Series A Exchange forfeited to the Company by the Investor.
Forbearance Agreement
On May 17, 2024, the Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement (the “Forbearance Agreement”) with the Investor pursuant to which the Investor, in consideration for the Company’s cash payment in the amount of $80,000 as an advance payment of a portion of the next interest payment, in the estimated amount of $380,000, that was due and payable under the Note on October 1, 2024, agreed to further forbear from requiring the repayment of the Note (to the extent such repayment obligation arises solely as a result of the occurrence of the maturity date and not with respect to any event of default or redemption rights in the Note or pursuant to the Indenture) during the period from April 5, 2025 through, and including, April 5, 2026. The Company analyzed the changes made to the Note under the Forbearance Agreement under ASC 470-60 to determine if the transaction qualified as a troubled debt restructuring. For a debt restructuring to be considered troubled, the debtor must be experiencing financial difficulties and the creditor must have granted a concession. The Company considered the indicators of financial difficulties provided in ASC 470-60 and determined that one or more indicators were present at the time the Forbearance Agreement was entered into, such as the existence of substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Furthermore, the Company determined that the effective borrowing rate on the Note decreased as a result of the changes made to the Note under the Forbearance Agreement and, as such, the Investor granted a concession on the debt. As a result, the changes made to the Note under the Forbearance Agreement were accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring. However, no restructuring gain or corresponding adjustment to the carrying amount of the Note was recorded because the net carrying amount of the Note at the time the Forbearance Agreement was entered into was less than the total undiscounted future principal and interest payments of the restructured Note. The $80,000 cash payment made to the Investor in connection with the Forbearance Agreement was treated as a lender fee and expensed as incurred under the troubled debt restructuring model.
Preferred Stock Repurchase and Note Repayment Agreement
On January 23, 2025, the Company entered into a Preferred Stock Repurchase and Note Repayment Agreement (the “Repurchase Agreement”) with the Investor, which provided for repayment of the outstanding balance of the Note. Pursuant to terms of the Repurchase Agreement, in consideration for an aggregate payment of $17.0 million by the Company to the Investor (the “Repurchase Price”), (i) the entire outstanding principal balance of the Note, including all accrued and unpaid interest, would be deemed to have been paid and (ii) all outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock held by the Investor would be repurchased by the Company. The Repurchase Agreement provided for the payment of the Repurchase Price in two installments, the first in the amount of $13.0 million (the “First Installment”), which was paid on January 27, 2025. The second installment, in the amount of $4.0 million (the “Second Installment”), which was due and payable on or before April 30, 2025 (the “Second Installment Date”), and the maturity date of the Note was advanced to such date. Upon the payment of the First Installment, all shares of Series B Preferred Stock held by the Investor were repurchased and the outstanding balance of the Note was reduced to $4.0 million.
The Repurchase Agreement further provided that, during the period from the payment of the First Installment until the Second Installment Date, no interest would accrue on the remaining balance of the Note and certain restrictive covenants under the Note would be temporarily waived. If the Company failed to make the Second Installment on or before the Second Installment Date, then interest would continue to accrue again on the outstanding balance of the Note and all other terms of the Note would also be restored as they were prior to the date the First Installment was paid. The Company did not make the second installment payment of $4.0 million by April 30, 2025.
The Company analyzed the changes made to the Note under the Repurchase Agreement under ASC 470-60 to determine if the transaction qualified as a troubled debt restructuring. For a debt restructuring to be considered troubled, the debtor must be experiencing financial difficulties and the creditor must have granted a concession. The Company considered the indicators of financial difficulties provided in ASC 470-60 and determined that one or more indicators were present at the time the Repurchase Agreement was entered into, such as the existence of substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Furthermore, the Company determined that the effective borrowing rate on the Note decreased as a result of the changes made to the Note under the Repurchase Agreement and, as such, the Investor granted a concession on the debt. As a result, the changes made to the Note under the Repurchase Agreement were accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring. However, no restructuring gain or corresponding adjustment to the carrying amount of the Note was recorded because the net carrying amount of the Note after giving effect to the payment of the First Installment was less than the total undiscounted future principal and interest payments of the restructured Note.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Investor converted $8.55 million of the outstanding Note principal balance into 17,106 shares of the Company’s common stock at a weighted average conversion price of $50.05 per share. In addition, the Company paid the Investor $6.9 million in January 2022 in exchange for the cancellation of $6.0 million of the outstanding principal balance. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Investor converted $1.65 million of the outstanding Note principal balance into 15,083 shares of the Company’s common stock at a weighted average conversion price of $41.30 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Investor converted $0.9 million of the outstanding Note principal balance into 23,523 shares of the Company’s common stock at a weighted average conversion price of $38.50 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Investor converted the remaining $4.0 of the outstanding Note principal balance into 203,396 shares of the Company’s common stock at a weighted average conversion price of $20.30 per share.
Ranking
The Note was the senior unsecured obligation of the Company and not the financial obligation of our subsidiaries. Until such date as the principal amount of the Note was $5 million or less, all payments due under the Note would be senior to all other indebtedness of the Company and/or any of its subsidiaries.
Maturity Date
Under its original terms, unless earlier converted, or redeemed, the Note was to mature on November 3, 2023, the second anniversary of the issuance date, which we refer to herein as the “Maturity Date,” subject to the right of the Investor to extend the date:
| (i) | if an event of default under the Note has occurred and is continuing (or any event shall have occurred and be continuing that with the passage of time and the failure to cure would result in an event of default under the Note) and |
| (ii) | for a period of 20 business days after the consummation of a fundamental transaction if certain events occur. |
We were required to pay, on the Maturity Date, all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and accrued and unpaid late charges on such principal and interest, if any.
As part of the Restructuring Agreement entered into with the Investor on August 16, 2022 (the “Restructuring Agreement”), the Company obtained a forbearance of the Maturity Date from November 5, 2023 to November 5, 2024. As part of the Second Exchange Agreement entered into with the Investor on November 27, 2023, the Company obtained a further forbearance of the Maturity Date from November 5, 2024 to April 5, 2025. Pursuant to the terms of the Repurchase Agreement entered into with the Investor on January 23, 2025, the Maturity Date was advanced to April 30, 2025 upon the payment of the First Installment on January 27, 2025. The convertible note was fully retired during the second quarter of 2025.
Interest
The Note accrued interest at the rate of 8% per annum which (a) commenced accruing on the date of issuance, (b) was computed on the basis of a 360-day year and twelve 30-day months and (c) was payable in cash quarterly in arrears on the first trading day of each calendar quarter or otherwise in accordance with the terms of the Note. If the holder elected to convert or redeem all or any portion of the Note prior to the Maturity Date, all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount being converted or redeemed would also be payable. If the Company elected to redeem all or any portion of the Note prior to the Maturity Date, all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount being redeemed would also be payable. The interest rate of the Note would automatically increase to 15% per annum upon the occurrence and continuance of an event of default (See “Events of Default” below).
Subject to the satisfaction of certain equity conditions, the terms of the Restructuring Agreement required the holder to voluntarily convert certain interest payments when due under the Note at 95% of the lower of (i) the then in effect conversion price and (ii) the lowest volume weighted average price of our common stock during the five trading days immediately prior to such conversion.
As part of the First Exchange Agreement, the Investor agreed to waive any interest that would otherwise accrue on the Note during the period commencing on April 1, 2023 through, and including, December 31, 2023. As part of the Second Exchange Agreement, the Investor agreed to extend the waiver of payment of interest under the Note through July 1, 2024. Pursuant to the terms of the Repurchase Agreement, no interest would accrue on the remaining balance of the Note during the period from the payment of the First Installment until the Second Installment Date. The convertible note was fully retired during the second quarter of 2025.
Late Charges
The Company was required to pay a late charge of 15% on any amount of principal or other amounts that are not paid when due.
Conversion
Fixed Conversions at Option of Holder
The holder of the Note could convert all, or any part, of the outstanding principal and interest of the Note, at any time at such holder’s option, into shares of our common stock at an initial fixed conversion price, which is subject to:
| ● | proportional adjustment upon the occurrence of any stock split, stock dividend, stock combination and/or similar transactions; and |
| ● | full-ratchet adjustment in connection with a subsequent offering at a per share price less than the fixed conversion price then in effect. |
Pursuant to the original terms of the Note, since during the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2022, the Company (i) failed to process at least $750 million in transaction volume or (ii) had revenue that was less than $12 million, the Note’s fixed conversion price then in effect exceeded the greater of (x) the Note’s $1.67 floor and (y) 140% of the market price as of April 1, 2022 (the “Adjustment Measuring Price”), on April 1, 2022, the fixed conversion price automatically adjusted to the Adjustment Measuring Price.
As part of the Restructuring Agreement, the Company agreed to allow for the conversion of up to $4.5 million of principal (together with any accrued and unpaid interest thereon) of the Note at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) $2.40 and (ii) 97.5% of the lower of (x) the then in effect conversion price and (y) the lowest volume weighted average price of our common stock during the five trading days immediately prior to such conversion.
As part of the First Exchange Agreement, the Company agreed to allow for the conversion of up to an additional $9.0 million of principal (together with any accrued and unpaid interest thereon) of the Note at a conversion price equal to 97.5% of the lower of (x) the then in effect conversion price and (y) the lowest volume weighted average price of our common stock during the five trading days immediately prior to such conversion.
1-Year Alternate Optional Conversion
At any time following the first anniversary of the issuance date of the Note, but only if the closing bid price of our common stock on the immediately prior trading day is less than $6.50, the holder of the Note would have the option to convert, at such holder’s option, pro rata, up to $30 million of the principal amount of the Note (in $250,000 increments) at the “alternate optional conversion price,” which was equal to the lower of (i) the then in effect conversion price and (ii) the greater of (x).the Note’s $1.67 floor price or (y)98% of the market price on the conversion date.
Alternate Event of Default Optional Conversion
If an event of default had occurred under the Note, the holder could alternatively elect to convert the Note (subject to an additional 15% redemption premium) at the “alternate event of default conversion price” equal to the lesser of:
| ● | the fixed conversion price then in effect; and |
the greater of:
| ● | the floor price; and |
| ● | 80% of the lowest volume weighted average price of our common stock during the five trading days immediately prior to such conversion. |
Beneficial Ownership Limitation
The Note could not be converted, and shares of common stock could not be issued under the Note if, after giving effect to the conversion or issuance, the applicable holder of the Note (together with its affiliates, if any) would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, which is referred to herein as the “Note Blocker”. The Note Blocker could be raised or lowered to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99% at the option of the applicable holder of the Note, except that any raise could only be effective upon 61 days’ prior notice to us.
Change of Control Redemption Right
In connection with a change of control of the Company, the holder could require us to redeem in cash, all or any portion, of the Note at a 15% redemption premium to the greater of the face value, the equity value of our Common Stock underlying the Note, and the equity value of the change of control consideration payable to the holder of our common stock underlying the Note.
The equity value of our common stock underlying the Note was calculated using the greatest closing sale price of our common stock during the period immediately preceding the consummation or the public announcement of the change of control and ending the date the holder gave notice of such redemption.
The equity value of the change of control consideration payable to the holder of our common stock underlying the Note was calculated using the aggregate cash consideration and aggregate cash value of any non-cash consideration per share of our common stock to be paid to the holders of our common stock upon the change of control.
Events of Default
Under the terms of the First Supplemental Indenture, the events of default contained in the Base Indenture did not apply to the Note. Rather, the Note contained standard and customary events of default including but not limited to: (i) the suspension from trading or the failure to list the Company’s common stock within certain time periods; (ii) failure to make payments when due under the Notes; and (iii) bankruptcy or insolvency of the Company.
If an event of default occurred, the holder could require us to redeem all or any portion of the Note (including all accrued and unpaid interest and late charges thereon), in cash, at a 15% redemption premium to the greater of the face value and the equity value of the Company’s common stock underlying the Note.
The equity value of the Company’s common stock underlying the Note was calculated using the greatest closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on any trading day immediately preceding such event of default and the date the Company makes the entire payment required.
Company Optional Redemption Rights
At any time no event of default existed, the Company could redeem all, but not less than all, of the Note outstanding in cash all, or any portion, of the Note at a 5% redemption premium to the greater of the face value and the equity value of the Company’s common stock underlying the Note.
The equity value of the Company’s common stock underlying the Note was calculated using the greatest closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on any trading day during the period commencing on the date immediately preceding such date the Company notified the applicable holder of such redemption election and the date the Company made the entire payment required.
The following table provides a summary of the changes in the Note balance from inception through December 31, 2025 (in thousands):
| Balance, December 31, 2020 | $- | |
|---|---|---|
| Convertible debentures issued | 100,000 | |
| Derivative liability | (21,580) | |
| Original issue discount of 16% | (16,000) | |
| Placement fees and issuance costs | (7,200) | |
| Accretion and write-off of debt discount | 3,435 | |
| Balance, net of unamortized debt discount of $41,345 - December 31, 2021 | 58,655 | |
| Repayments and conversion | (14,550) | |
| Accretion and write-off of debt discount | 16,996 | |
| Balance, net of unamortized debt discount of $24,349 - December 31, 2022 | 61,101 | |
| Repayments and conversion | (66,250) | |
| Accretion and write-off of debt discount | 20,443 | |
| Balance, net of unamortized debt discount of $3,906 - December 31, 2023 | 15,294 | |
| Conversions | (900) | |
| Accretion and write-off of debt discount | 2,351 | |
| Balance, net of unamortized debt discount of $1,556 – December 31, 2024 | 16,745 | |
| Repayments and conversions | (18,300) | |
| Accretion and write-off of debt discount | 1,555 | |
| Balance, net of unamortized debt discount of $0 – December 31, 2025 | $ | - |
The Note was fully retired during the second quarter of 2025. The Company recorded debt discount accretion of $0.2 million and $2.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
The Company incurred Convertible Note interest expense of $0.1 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
Derivative Liability
The senior convertible note contained embedded derivatives representing certain conversion features, redemption rights, and contingent payments upon the occurrence of certain events of default. The Company determined that these embedded derivatives required bifurcation and separate valuation.
The Company utilized a binomial lattice model to value its bifurcated derivatives included in the Note. ASC 815 does not permit an issuer to account separately for individual derivative terms and features embedded in hybrid financial instruments that require bifurcation and liability classification as derivative financial instruments. Rather, such terms and features must be combined and fair-valued as a single compound embedded derivative. The Company selected a binomial lattice model to value the compound embedded derivative because it believed this technique was reflective of all significant assumptions that market participants would likely consider in negotiating the transfer of the Note. Such assumptions included, among other inputs, stock price volatility, risk-free rates, credit risk assumptions, early redemption and conversion assumptions, and the potential for future adjustment of the conversion price due to triggering events. Additionally, there were other embedded features of the Note requiring bifurcation, other than the conversion features, which were deemed to have no value
The following table provides a summary of the changes in the derivative liability balance from inception through December 31, 2025 (in thousands):
| Balance, December 31, 2021 | $18,735 | |
|---|---|---|
| Change in fair value 2022 | (18,480) | |
| Balance, December 31, 2022 | 255 | |
| Increase in derivative liability upon extinguishment of debt | 6,312 | |
| Change in fair value 2023 | (6,548) | |
| Balance, December 31, 2023 | 19 | |
| Change in fair value 2024 | (15) | |
| Balance, December 31, 2024 | 4 | |
| Decrease in derivative liability upon extinguishment of debt | (4) | |
| Balance, December 31, 2025 | $ | - |
Small Business Association CARES Act Loans
On June 9, 2020, the Company entered into a 30-year loan agreement with the Small Business Association (“SBA”) under the CARES Act in the amount of $149,900. The loan bears interest at 3.75% per annum and requires monthly principal and interest payments of $731 beginning June 9, 2021. Both the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company signed personal guarantees under this loan. As of December 31, 2025, the loan is not in default.
On May 8, 2020, Charge Savvy, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a 27-year loan agreement with the SBA under its Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) assistance program in the amount of $150,000. The loan bears interest at 3.75% per annum and required principal and interest payments of $731 beginning on May 8, 2021, which were subsequently deferred to November 8, 2022. On August 4, 2021, Charge Savvy was granted a loan increase in the amount of $350,000 on identical terms as the initial loan, for an aggregate loan amount of $500,000. Monthly principal and interest payments on the aggregate loan are $2,477 and began on November 8, 2022. Pursuant to the terms of Security Agreements executed in connection with this loan, the SBA was granted a security interest in all tangible and intangible personal property of Charge Savvy. As of December 31, 2025, the loan is not in default.
10. Equity
Underwritten Public Offering
On July 16, 2025, the Company sold an aggregate of 439,560 shares of common stock (or prefunded warrants in lieu thereof) and common warrants to purchase up to 439,560 shares of common stock, at a combined offering price of $13.65 per share and accompanying warrant. The Company received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting placement agent fees and other offering expenses (excluding proceeds to the Company, if any, from the future exercise of the common warrants) of approximately $5.3 million. The common warrants have an exercise price of $13.65 per share, are immediately exercisable upon issuance, and expire on the five-year anniversary of the original issuance date. Through December 31, 2025, a total of 112,676 common warrants were exercised for total proceeds of $1.54 million.
Convertible Preferred Stock
As of December 31, 2025, and 2024, preferred stock consisted of the following (in thousands, except number of shares):
| Preferred Shares Authorized | Preferred Shares Issued and Outstanding | Carrying Value | Liquidation Preference | Common Stock Issuable Upon Conversion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Series C | 50,000 | 50,000 | $6,500 | $6,500 | 205,775 |
| Undesignated preferred shares | 4,880,000 | - | - | - | - |
| Total Preferred Stock | 4,930,000 | 50,000 | $6,500 | $6,500 | 205,775 |
| Preferred Shares Authorized | Preferred Shares Issued and Outstanding | Carrying Value | Liquidation Preference | Common Stock Issuable Upon Conversion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Series B | 55,000 | 53,499 | 71,622 | 61,524 | 491,493 |
| Undesignated preferred shares | 4,930,000 | - | - | - | - |
| Total Preferred Stock | 4,985,000 | 53,499 | $71,622 | $63,250 | 491,493 |
Series A and Series B Preferred Stock
On July 31, 2023, the Company issued 6,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock in exchange for $4.3 million of the outstanding principal balance of the Note, which was due April 5, 2025 and $1.7 million of accrued interest pursuant to the First Exchange Agreement entered into with the Investor on July 25, 2023. The Series A Preferred Stock had a stated value of $1,000 per share and a fair value of approximately $1,111 per share at issuance, as determined by a valuation performed by third-party experts. On November 29, 2023, the existing shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued to the Investor were forfeited to the Company by the Investor and the Company issued 55,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, along with a cash payment of $3.0 million, in exchange for $60.3 million of the outstanding principal balance of the Note pursuant to the Second Exchange Agreement entered into with the Investor on November 27, 2023. The Series B Preferred Stock had a stated value of $1,000 per share and a fair value of approximately $1,339 per share at issuance, as determined by a valuation performed by third-party experts.
On January 27, 2025, all shares of Series B Preferred Stock held by the Investor were repurchased upon payment of the First Installment Payment pursuant to the Repurchase Agreement entered into with the Investor on January 23, 2025. All previously issued Series A and Series B preferred shares were cancelled.
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
On October 6, 2025, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Series C Purchase Agreement”) with RTB, pursuant to which the Company sold an aggregate of 50,000 shares of its Series C convertible preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Series C Preferred Stock”) to RTB in a private placement (the “PIPE Financing”), which closed on October 7, 2025. Each share of Series C Preferred Stock had a stated value of $100 and was sold at a purchase price of $0.40 per share to RTB for gross proceeds of $5,000,000 to the Company. The Series C Purchase Agreement memorialized that the purchase by RTB of the Series C Preferred Stock is in furtherance of maintaining the Company’s required capital during the period prior to the closing of the Merger, and that regardless of whether the Merger takes place, the Series C Preferred Stock shall be dilutive of the economics or voting of the Company’s shares of common stock only at such times as the Merger Agreement is effective. The Series Purchase Agreement specifies that solely in the event of a Material Breach Event (as defined in the Series C Purchase Agreement), the Company shall issue to RTB warrants to purchase common stock, as outlined in the Series C Purchase Agreement.
On December 9, 2025, the Company and RTB executed an amendment to the Series C Purchase Agreement (“First Amendment to Series C Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which the original purchase price for the 50,000 Series C Preferred Stock shares was increased to $6,500,000 (an increase of $1,500,000) and the stated value per share was increased to $130 (an increase of $30). All other provisions of the Series C Purchase Agreement remained the same.
The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is classified within permanent equity, as its embedded features are indexed to the Company’s own stock and it is not mandatorily redeemable, thereby not representing an unconditional obligation to transfer cash or other assets. Accordingly, the instrument meets the criteria for equity classification under ASC 815-40,Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity, and ASC 480,Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock was recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at its issuance-date fair value and is presented within stockholders’ equity.
The holders of the Series C Preferred Stock have the following rights and preferences:
Voting – Each share of Series C Preferred Stock shall entitle the holders thereof to cast that number of votes equal to the number of whole shares of common stock into which such shares of Series C Preferred Stock are convertible as of the record date for determining stockholders entitled to vote on such matter, but subject to the Issuable Maximum and the Authorized Maximum (as defined in the Series C Purchase Agreement) and any other conversion limitations). The number of shares that may be voted are limited by a blocker provision in compliance with Nasdaq requirements.
Dividends– Holders shall be entitled to receive dividends on shares of Preferred Stock equal (on an as-if-converted-to-common-stock basis, disregarding for such purpose any conversion limitations hereunder) to and in the same form as dividends actually paid on shares of the common stock when, as and if such dividends are paid on shares of the common stock. No other dividends shall be paid on shares of Preferred Stock. No such dividends have been declared to date.
Liquidation – Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, the holders shall be entitled to receive out of the assets, whether capital or surplus, of the Company an amount equal to the stated value plus any accrued and unpaid dividends and any other amounts due and owing under the Certificate of Designation of the Series C Preferred Stock, for each share of Series C Preferred Stock before any distribution or payment shall be made to the holders of Junior Securities (as defined in the Series C Purchase Agreement) and if the assets of the Company shall be insufficient to pay in full such amounts, then the entire assets to be distributed to the holders shall be ratably distributed among the holders in accordance with the respective amounts that would be payable on such shares if all amounts payable thereon were paid in full.
Conversion at Option of Holder– Each share of Series C Preferred Stock shall be convertible, at any time and from time to time from and after the original issue date at the option of the holders thereof, into that number of shares of common stock determined by dividing the stated value of such share of Series C Preferred Stock by $0.40, subject to certain adjustments and a price floor of $0.08.
Mandatory Redemption Upon Material Breach Event - Upon a Material Breach Event (as defined in the Series C Purchase Agreement), the Company shall redeem all outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock at an aggregate redemption price equal to the aggregate stated value of the shares of Series C Preferred Stock on the closing date of the Series C Purchase Agreement (as defined therein).
11. Income Taxes
The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows (dollars in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | |
| Current: | ||
| Federal · $ · - · $ · - | ||
| State | 4 | 21 |
| International | 978 | 977 |
| Current income tax expense (benefit) | 982 | 998 |
| Deferred: | ||
| Federal | - | - |
| State | - | - |
| International | (87) | 142 |
| Deferred income tax (benefit) expense | (87) | 142 |
| Total income tax expense | $895 | $1,140 |
| Provision: | ||
| Income tax expense allocated to discontinued operations | 577 | 750 |
| Income tax expense allocated to continuing operations | 318 | 390 |
| Total income tax expense | $895 | $1,140 |
Taxes on income vary from the statutory federal income tax rate applied to earnings before tax on income as follows (dollars in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | |
| Statutory federal income tax rate of 21% applied to earnings before income taxes and extraordinary items | $(3,492) | $(5,413) |
| State taxes - net of federal benefit | 4 | 16 |
| Transaction expenses | 142 | |
| Gifts | - | 1 |
| Stock compensation (ISOs) | 22 | 74 |
| Goodwill impairment | - | 613 |
| Changes in FV of derivative liability | - | (3) |
| Derecognition expense on conversion of convertible debt | (37) | 126 |
| Sale of foreign subsidiary | 1,364 | |
| Foreign withholding tax | 314 | 384 |
| Valuation allowance | 1,911 | 6,076 |
| Return to provision adjustment | 1,283 | |
| Others | - | 53 |
| Foreign rate difference | (616) | (787) |
| Total | $895 | $1,140 |
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities arising from differences between accounting for financial statement purposes and tax purposes, less valuation reserves at year-end, are as follows (dollars in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 · 2024 | |||
| State taxes - prior year | $2 | $4 | |
| Intangible assets | 4,986 | 5,692 | |
| Fixed assets | 23 | 19 | |
| Allowance for credit losses | 367 | 453 | |
| Capitalization of research and development under Sec 174 | 1,992 | 2,357 | |
| Inventory reserve | 11 | 29 | |
| Impairment loss on investment | 410 | 315 | |
| Goodwill | 658 | 755 | |
| Stock compensation (RSUs and RSAs) | 78 | 34 | |
| Lease liability | 630 | 899 | |
| Section 163(j) limitation | 1,106 | 685 | |
| Unicap 263A | 2 | - | |
| Contingent liability | 219 | - | |
| Accrued expenses | 215 | 257 | |
| Net operating loss carryover | 33,333 | 31,140 | |
| Total deferred tax assets | 44,032 | 42,639 | |
| Deferred tax liabilities: | |||
| Goodwill | - | ||
| Intangible assets | - | ||
| Right of use assets | (351) | (844) | |
| Other | - | (87) | |
| Total deferred tax liabilities | (351) | (931) | |
| Net deferred tax assets | 43,681 | 41,708 | |
| Valuation allowance | (43,681) | (41,795) | |
| Total net deferred taxes | $ | - | $(87) |
The Company uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes as set forth in ASC 740,Income Taxes(ASC 740). Under the liability method, deferred taxes are determined based on differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates.
As of December 31, 2025, the Company had Federal and State Net Operating Loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of $128.5 million and $85.2 million, respectively. Under the new tax law, the Federal NOL arising in tax years ending after December 31, 2017, will be carried forward indefinitely. The Company does not have pre-tax reform Federal NOL carryforwards as of December 31, 2025. NOL carryforwards arising from tax years ending after December 31, 2017, are $128.5 million. The State NOL carryforwards will begin to expire in 2038.
As of December 31, 2025, and 2024, the Company maintained a full valuation allowance for NOL carryforward deferred tax assets. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be reduced if estimates of future taxable income are reduced.
The Company files a consolidated Federal income tax return and files tax returns in various state and local jurisdictions. The statutes of limitations for its consolidated Federal income tax returns are open for years 2022 and thereafter, and state and local income tax returns are open for years 2021 and thereafter.
Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recognized as a component of income tax expense. For the tax years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, the Company recognized no interest or penalties.
The components of loss from operations before income taxes, by jurisdiction, are as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | |
| United States | $(15,736) | $(32,740) |
| Foreign* | (895) | 7,055 |
| Total loss from operations before income taxes | $(16,631) | (25,685) |
| * | Reported as a component of loss from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024. See Note 3, Discontinued Operations, for additional information. |
Loss from operations before income taxes is derived from operations conducted in the United States and one foreign jurisdiction. Domestic results primarily reflect the Company’s U.S. operations, while foreign income substantially relates to the Company’s previously wholly owned subsidiary, Ryvyl EU. Effective June 1, 2025, the Company completed the sale of Ryvyl EU, which primarily drove the changes in the geographic mix of earnings compared to the prior year.
The Company paid income taxes to the following jurisdictions that individually represent greater than 5 percent of total income taxes paid during the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
| Year Ended December 31, | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | |
| Federal · $ · - · $ · - | ||
| State | 45 | - |
| Foreign | 761 | 848 |
| Total taxes paid | $806 | 848 |
12. Stock-Based Compensation
Equity Incentive Plans
The Company adopted the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan (“2023 Plan”) on November 2, 2023, which provides employees, directors, and consultants with opportunities to acquire the Company’s shares, or to receive monetary payments based on the value of such shares. Management has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to replace the 2020 Incentive and Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, the 2021 Incentive and Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, and the 2021 Restricted Stock Plan, with one plan, the 2023 Plan, pursuant to which the Company will be able to grant stock option awards, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, and other stock-based awards. The 2023 Plan provides for up to 145,665 shares of common stock. Grants made under the 2023 Plan will generally vest and become exercisable at various times from the grant dates. These awards will have such vesting or other provisions as may be established by the Board of Directors at the time of each award.
Stock Option Activity
The following table provides a summary of stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2025:
| Number of Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
|---|---|---|
| Outstanding at December 31, 2024 | 16,685 | $147.0 |
| Granted | - | N/A |
| Exercised | - | N/A |
| Cancelled/forfeited/expired | (9,093) | 149.60 |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2025 | 7,592 | $147.45 |
| Exercisable at December 31, 2025 | 7,592 | $147.45 |
There wereno stock options granted or exercised during the years December 31, 2025, and 2024.
Restricted Stock Activity
The following table provides a summary of RSA activity for the year December 31, 2025:
| Number of Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Unvested at December 31, 2024 | 2,123 | $63.70 |
| Granted | 16,733 | 8.68 |
| Vested | (15,681) | 13.34 |
| Forfeited | (324) | 46.23 |
| Unvested at December 31, 2025 | 2,851 | $43.01 |
The total grant date fair value of RSAs that vested was $0.2 and $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
The following table provides a summary of RSU activity for the year ended December 31, 2025:
| Number of Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Unvested at December 31, 2024 · - · $ · - | ||
| Granted | 65,371 | 29.61 |
| Vested | (17,525) | 28.17 |
| Forfeited | (15,396) | 31.50 |
| Unvested at December 31, 2025 | 32,450 | $28.96 |
The total grant date fair value of RSUs that vested was $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2025. There wereno RSUs granted during the year ended December 31, 2024.
13. Leases
The Company leases office space under operating leases atthree locations in the United States (California, Illinois, and Massachusetts). The Company had no finance lease obligations as of December 31, 2025.
The Company’s operating lease expense totaled $1.0 million and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, the weighted-average remaining lease term was 3.0 years and the weighted average discount rate was 12.0%.
Future minimum lease payments under our operating leases and reconciliation to lease liability as of December 31, 2025, are as follows (in thousands):
| Fiscal years: | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2026 | $968 |
| 2027 | 1,004 |
| 2028 | 1,041 |
| Thereafter | - |
| Total | 3,013 |
| Less: present value discount | (498) |
| Operating lease liability | $2,515 |
14. Related Party Transactions
Family Relationships
Through August 2025, the Company employed two brothers of its then-serving Chief Executive Officer, Fredi Nisan, Dan and Liron Nusinovich, who were paid approximately $260,000 and $131,000 per year, respectively. There are no family relationships between any of the other directors or executive officers and any other employees or directors or executive officers.
The Company did not pay any commissions to the related parties mentioned above for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024.
Fredi Nisan
On September 25, 2025, the Company and Fredi Nisan (Mr. Nisan”) entered into an Advisory Services Agreement (the “Nisan Consulting Agreement”), effective as of November 1, 2025, and continuing through April 30, 2026. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Nisan Consulting Agreement, Mr. Nisan will provide services relating to advising the Company on strategic investor partnerships, investment relationships, exploration of merger and acquisition opportunities, corporate development, and such other revenue-generating advice and consulting as the Company may reasonably request from time to time. In consideration for his consulting services and in recognition of the services the Company has agreed to pay Mr. Nisan a cash consulting fee equal to $10,000 per month, payable within five business days after the commencement of each calendar month during the term of the Nisan Consulting Agreement. With the prior written consent from the Company, the company is required to reimburse Mr. Nisan for preapproved out-of-pocket travel expenses incurred by Mr. Nisan on behalf of the Company.
Ben Errez
On August 15, 2025, The Company and Mr. Errez entered into an Advisory Services Agreement (the “Errez Consulting Agreement”), effective as of September 1, 2025, and continuing through February 28, 2026. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Errez Consulting Agreement, Mr. Errez will provide services relating to advising the Company on strategic investor partnerships, investment relationships, exploration of merger and acquisition opportunities, corporate development, and such other revenue-generating advice and consulting as the Company may reasonably request from time to time. In consideration for his consulting services and in recognition of the services the Company has agreed to pay Mr. Errez a cash consulting fee equal to $10,000 per month, payable within five business days after the commencement of each calendar month during the term of the Errez Consulting Agreement. With the prior written consent from the Company, the company is required to reimburse Mr. Errez for preapproved out-of-pocket travel expenses incurred by Mr. Errez on behalf of the Company.
15. Commitments and Contingencies
Purchase Commitments
Aside from the Company’s operating lease commitments, which are disclosed in Note 13,Leases, of this Report, the Company also has the following non-cancellable purchase commitments under services contracts with vendors for software products, as of December 31, 2025:
| Fiscal years: | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2026 | $198 |
| 2027 | 198 |
| 2028 | 16 |
| - | |
| Total | $412 |
Severance Agreements
As previously disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on October 1, 2025, effective October 31, 2025 (the “Termination Date”), Fredi Nisan retired as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. In connection with his reported retirement, the Company and Mr. Nisan entered into a Severance Benefits Offer and General Waiver and Release of Claims agreement (the “Severance Agreement”). Pursuant to the Severance Agreement, Mr. Nisan will receive a cash payment of $350,000, less applicable withholding amounts, payable over a twelve-month period following the Termination Date, and all issued but unvested equity grants held by Mr. Nisan will vest as of the Termination Date. The Severance Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, and covenants.
In addition, on September 25, 2025, the Company and Mr. Nisan entered into an Advisory Services Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”), effective as of November 1, 2025, and continuing through April 30, 2026. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement, Mr. Nisan will provide services relating to advising the Company on strategic investor partnerships, investment relationships, exploration of M&A opportunities, corporate development, and such other revenue-generating advice and consulting as the Company may reasonably request from time to time. In consideration for his consulting services and in recognition of the services, the Company has agreed to pay Mr. Nisan a cash consulting fee equal to $10,000 per month, payable within five business days after the commencement of each calendar month during the term of the Consulting Agreement.
Employment Agreements
As previously disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on September 24, 2025, on September 22, 2025, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Oliva in connection with the continuation of his role as Chief Financial Officer of the Company (the “Employment Agreement”). The employment agreement will be effective upon consummation of the Merger Agreement (see below). Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Mr. Oliva will continue his employment on an “at-will” basis with compensation to be set by the Company’s management team on an annual basis, eligibility for bonuses in accordance with the Company’s applicable bonus programs, and eligibility for other benefits such as participation in any retirement plans and insurance plans. The Company may terminate the Employment Agreement for cause and Mr. Oliva may terminate the Employment Agreement for good reason, both as further described in the Employment Agreement, and both the Company and Mr. Oliva may also terminate without cause subject to fifteen prior days’ notice. Upon termination for cause (by the Company) or without cause (by Mr. Oliva), the Company will pay for any earned but unpaid base salary, bonus, and vested benefits through the date of termination. In addition to the foregoing, in the case of termination without cause (by the Company) or for good reason (by Mr. Oliva), the Company will also pay Mr. Oliva severance in the amount of twelve months salary to be paid in twelve equal instalments, all vested equity awards will be fully vested, and continue to cover Mr. Oliva’s group health plan premium for a period of twelve months. The Employment Agreement contains standard covenants by the Company and Mr. Oliva, including as it relates to confidentiality and indemnification, and defines the duties and responsibilities of Mr. Oliva’s continued employment with the Company.
Merger Agreement with RTB Digital, Inc.
As previously disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on October 2, 2025, on September 28, 2025, the Company, RYVYL Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned direct subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), and RTB Digital, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“RTB”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into RTB (the “Merger”), with RTB surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the corporation surviving the Merger, the “Surviving Corporation”). At the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), among other things, a number of shares of RTB capital stock will be exchanged for shares of common stock equal to an exchange ratio calculated pursuant to the terms set forth in the Merger Agreement, as consideration for the Merger. In addition, the Company will assume a number of securities of RTB, including an outstanding convertible loan note and the interest due thereon, certain unexercised warrants and the RTB equity award plans. Upon the consummation of the Merger, the Company will be renamed “RTB Digital, Inc.” The Company will also pay to its financial advisor a cash fee and issue a number of shares of common stock for its services in connection with the merger transaction, which we estimate will be approximately $1.1 million.
The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants of the Company and RTB, including covenants relating to the conduct of the business of both the Company and RTB from the date of signing the Merger Agreement through the closing, obtaining the requisite approval of the stockholders of the Company and RTB, maintaining listing of the common stock of the Company on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”) and applying for the continued listing of RTB Digital, Inc. after the closing of the Merger, on Nasdaq.
The Merger Agreement provides that the parties will use their respective reasonable best efforts to take all actions reasonably necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and make effective, as promptly as reasonably practicable, the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. The consummation of the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of customary conditions pursuant to the terms set forth in the Merger Agreement. Following the Merger, RTB’s business will be the primary business of the combined companies, but the Company will continue its current operations, thereafter. The Merger is expected to close during the second quarter of 2026. See Note 16,Subsequent Events, of this Report for additional details.
From time-to-time, the Company is involved in legal proceedings. The Company records a liability for those legal proceedings when it determines it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company also discloses when it is reasonably possible that a material loss may be incurred, however, the amount cannot be reasonably estimated. From time to time, the Company may enter into discussions regarding settlement of these matters, and may enter into settlement agreements, if it believes settlement is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.
The following is a summary of our current outstanding litigation. Note that references to GreenBox POS are for historical purposes. GreenBox POS changed its name to RYVYL Inc. on October 13, 2022.
| ● | On December 12, 2022, Jacqueline Dollar (a/k/a Jacqueline Reynolds), former Chief Marketing Officer of the Company, filed a complaint against the Company, Fredi Nisan, and Does 1-20 in San Diego Superior Court. Ms. Dollar is alleging she was undercompensated compared to her male counterparts and retaliated against after raising concerns to management resulting in sex discrimination in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) and failure to prevent discrimination in violation of FEHA. Ms. Dollar is also claiming intentional infliction of emotional distress. Ms. Dollar is seeking an unspecified amount of damages related to, among other things, payment of past and future lost wages, stock issuances, bonuses and benefits, compensatory damages, and general, economic, non-economic, and special damages. On January 21, 2026, Ms. Dollar filed a notice of conditional settlement of entire case with the Court. The parties have since entered into a confidential settlement agreement. |
| ● | As previously disclosed in the Company’s 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2025, as filed on May 20, 2025, since December 2022, the Company has been cooperating with an ongoing investigation by the SEC regarding possible violations of the federal securities laws. Following discussions with the Staff of the SEC, the Company made certain disclosures addressing the concerns regarding the Company’s 2020 Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on December 23, 2020 and subsequent reporting, which are contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2025 under Part I, Note 15, Commitments and Contingencies, and Part I, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Recent Developments, and under the Part II section titled “Legal Proceedings.” We have been informed that the disclosures sufficiently addressed the Staff’s concerns. To resolve the potential charges arising from the SEC’s investigation, the Company has consented, without admitting or denying any wrongdoing, to entry of a judgment permanently restraining and enjoining the Company from violating certain provisions of the federal securities laws. The judgment will not require the Company to pay a monetary penalty and will resolve the SEC’s claims regarding these matters with respect to the Company. |
| ● | On February 1, 2023, a putative class action lawsuit titled Cullen v. RYVYL Inc. fka GreenBox POS, et al., Case No. 3:23-cv-00185-GPC-AGS, was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against several defendants, including the Company and certain of our current and former directors and officers (the “Cullen Defendants”). The complaint was filed on behalf of persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the Company’s publicly traded securities between January 29, 2021 and January 20, 2023. The complaint alleged that the Cullen Defendants violated Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act by making false and/or misleading statements regarding the Company’s financial controls, performance and prospects. On June 30, 2023, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint. On March 1, 2024, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motions to dismiss, which included dismissing all Securities Act claims and narrowing the potential class period. The plaintiff filed a second amended complaint on April 30, 2024, which alleges claims against the Cullen Defendants under Exchange Act Sections 10(b) and 20(a) only and a class period of May 13, 2021 through January 20, 2023. The Company filed its motion to dismiss the second amended complaint on July 1, 2024. On October 21, 2024, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motions to dismiss. The scope of the remaining claims is consistent with the Court’s last motion to dismiss decision dated March 1, 2024. On November 12, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Third Amended Complaint, which asserts the same legal causes of action and proposed class period as the previous complaint. On February 28, 2025, the Parties executed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) that reflects their agreement in principle to settle the claims asserted in this class action. On July 9, 2025, the Parties executed the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (“Stipulation of Settlement”). On July 15, 2025, Plaintiff filed its Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. The Stipulation of Settlement provides for the full resolution and release of all claims against the Cullen Defendants in exchange for $300,000 in cash (“Cash Settlement Amount”), 700,000 freely tradable shares of the Company’s common stock (“Settlement Shares”), and a put option that, together with the Cash Settlement Amount and Settlement Shares, requires that the combined value of the settlement consideration shall be no less than $1,000,000. On August 20, 2025, the Court issued an Order Provisionally Approving Certification of the Proposed Settlement Class and Granting Preliminary Approval of the Class Action Settlement. On December 19, 2025, the Court granted the Motion for Final Approval of the Settlement. |
| ● | On June 22, 2023, a shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against certain of the Company’s current and/or former officers and directors (the “Hertel Defendants”), Christy Hertel, derivatively on behalf of RYVYL Inc., f/k/a GreenBox POS v. Ben Errez et al., Case No. 3:23-CV-01165-GPC-SBC. On August 4, 2023, a second shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against the Hertel Defendants, Marcus Gazaway, derivatively on behalf of RYVYL Inc., f/k/a GreenBox POS v. Ben Errez et al., Case No. 3:23-CV-01425-LAB-BLM. Both derivative complaints generally allege that the Hertel Defendants failed to implement adequate internal controls that would prevent false and misleading financial information from being published by the Company and that controlling shareholders participated in overpayment misconduct resulting in violations of Sections 10(b), 14(a) and 20 of the Exchange Act and breached their fiduciary duties and, purportedly on behalf of the Company. On April 2, 2024, the Court granted the parties’ joint motion for an order consolidating the Hertel and Gazaway cases under the caption In re RYVYL Inc. Derivative Litigation, Lead Case No. 3:23-CV-01165-GPC-SBC (S.D. Cal.). On May 6, 2024, the Court issued an order staying the action until after the final resolution of any motion to dismiss the securities class action detailed above. On May 1, 2024, a third nearly identical shareholder derivative complaint was filed in Clark County, Nevada by plaintiff Christina Brown, derivatively on behalf of RYVYL, Inc., v. Ben Errez et al., Case No. A-24-892382-C. The Complaints seeks damages and contribution from the Hertel Defendants and a direction that the Company and the Hertel Defendants take actions to reform and improve corporate governance and internal procedures to comply with applicable laws. The Hertel Defendants deny all allegations of liability and intend to vigorously defend against all claims. On May 8, 2025, all parties reached an agreement in principle to fully resolve and settle all claims alleged in the lawsuits, and on September 30, 2025 they filed a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement. On November 14, 2025, the Court granted the parties’ Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement. On December 12, 2025, the parties filed a Joint Motion for Final Approval of Settlement, which was set for hearing on January 9, 2026. On January 13, 2026, the Court granted the Motion for Final Approval of the Settlement. |
| ● | On October 1, 2023, the Company filed a demand for arbitration against Sky Financial with the American Arbitration Association in San Diego, California (the “Arbitration”). In the Arbitration, the Company seeks to recover for breach of contract and Sky Financial’s failure to perform its obligations On October 2, 2023, the Company filed a complaint against Sky Financial in San Diego Superior Court asserting the same claims asserted in the Arbitration, solely to toll any applicable statutes of limitations pending the Arbitration and, if necessary, provide jurisdiction for the court to compel arbitration. The action seeks damages, including interest and costs of suit incurred. The parties agreed to proceed in the Arbitration and to implement the steps needed to extend the current stay of the San Diego Superior Court action pending the Arbitration. Subsequently, the parties agreed to stay the Arbitration and attend mediation. A mediation was scheduled but then vacated by stipulation of the parties. The stay of the Arbitration has been lifted. After vigorously prosecuting its claims against Sky and Mr. Haller and vigorously defending against all claims asserted by Sky and Mr. Haller, on September 26, 2025, the parties entered into a confidential settlement agreement. On October 16, 2025, the Company filed with the San Diego Superior Court a Request for Dismissal, dismissing the case with prejudice. |
| ● | On June 25, 2024, J. Drew Byelick, a former Chief Financial Officer of the Company, filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Case No. ‘24CV1096 JLS MSB. Mr. Byelick alleged breach of contract, fraudulent inducement of employment, along with intentional misrepresentation and concealment. The Company moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim and for other violations of the federal rules of civil procedure. The Court granted that motion on December 20, 2024, but permitted Mr. Byelick to file an amended complaint. Mr. Byelick filed his first amended complaint on January 19, 2025, asserting the same core claims. The Company moved to dismiss the first amended complaint for similar reasons as its motion to dismiss the original complaint. The Court granted that motion, in part, on April 18, 2025, ruling that Mr. Byelick was incapable of pleading certain claims (and dismissing those claims) but adequately pled others for purposes of a motion to dismiss only. Mr. Byelick subsequently filed a motion for partial summary judgment, which the Court denied in full as premature. The parties are currently engaged indiscovery. Given the uncertainty of litigation, and the legal standards that must be met for success on the merits, the Company cannot predict the outcome at this time or estimate a reasonably possible loss or range of loss that may result from this action. |
| ● | On July 2, 2025, Plaintiff Kapcharge USA Inc. commenced a lawsuit against Defendants Ryvyl Inc., FFS Data Corporation, CML Management, LLC and Cynthia Lambert in San Diego Superior Court, Case No. 25CU035045C. This lawsuit stems from a dispute between Kapcharge on the one hand and FFS Data Corporation (“FFS”), and CML Management, LLC on the other hand, related to a payment processor agreement between Kapcharge and FFS. Kapcharge alleges causes of action for Conversion, Money Had and Received, Violation of Penal Code § 496, Restitution, Breach of Contract (against FFS, CML, and Lambert), and Unfair Competition in Violation of California Business and Professions Code § 17200 et seq. The Company denies all allegations of liability and intends to vigorously defend against all claims. Kapcharge filed a demurrer on August 28, 2025 related to the causes of action for Conversion and Violation of Penal Code § 496. On April 8, 2026, Kapcharge and Ryvyl filed a stipulation for stay of the proceedings and to continue the demurrer hearing while Ryvyl and Kapcharge explore settlement discussions |
| ● | On July 15, 2025, Plaintiff Rachael Mora filed a complaint against the Company, Fredi Nisan, and Does 1-20 in San Diego Superior Court. Ms. Mora is alleging sex discrimination and sexual favoritism in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), and failure to prevent discrimination in violation of FEHA. Ms. Mora is also claiming retaliation and negligent supervision/negligent retention. Ms. Mora is seeking an unspecified amount of damages related to, among other things, payment of past and future lost wages, stock issuances, bonuses and benefits, compensatory damages, and general, economic, non-economic, and special damages. As the Company cannot predict the outcome of the matter, the probability of an outcome cannot be determined. The Company intends to vigorously defend against all claims. |
| ● | On December 29, 2025, Plaintiff Ellenoff, Grossman & Schole LLP (“EGS”), filed a complaint against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. EGS is alleging breach of contract, account stated, and quantum meriut. The Company denies liability and intends to vigorously defend against all claims. Given the stage of the lawsuit, the uncertainty of litigation, and the legal standards that must be met for success on the merits, the Company cannot predict the outcome at this time or estimate a reasonably possible loss or range of loss that may result from this action. |
| ● | On March 16, 2026, Plaintiff Ideyalabs, LLC (“Ideyalabs”), filed a complaint against the Company and two of its wholly owned subsidiaries in San Diego Superior Court, Case No. 26CU014745C. Ideyalabs alleged breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment. The Company denies liability and intends to vigorously defend against all claims. Given the stage of the lawsuit, the uncertainty of litigation, and the legal standards that must be met for success on the merits, the Company cannot predict the outcome at this time or estimate a reasonably possible loss or range of loss that may result from this action. |
16. Subsequent Events
Merger Agreement with RTB Digital, Inc.
As previously announced, the Company is in the final stages of completing a merger with RTB. On April 1, 2026, the stockholders of the Company approved the merger transaction under the Merger Agreement dated September 28, 2025, pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into RTB (the “Merger Transaction”), with RTB surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Surviving Corporation”). The Company’s initial listing application for the combined company for the Nasdaq Capital Market is pending approval, and the approval is the final condition precedent to consummation of the Merger Transaction.
Compliance with Nasdaq’s Stockholders’ Equity Rule
As of December 31, 2025, the Company’s consolidated stockholders’ equity was $0.7 million, which is below the minimum stockholders’ equity requirement of $2.5 million for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1) (the “Stockholders’ Equity Rule”). Following the closing of the Merger Transaction, the preliminary equity calculation of the Surviving Corporation is anticipated to be greater than $20.0 million, which is above the requirement under the Stockholders’ Equity Rule.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.